30.04.2019 Views

May 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Business Talk<br />

PROS & CONS OF RECRUITMENT<br />

We take a look at the issues and protocols when recruiting individuals with criminal<br />

convictions.<br />

Arecent study, conducted for the Scottish<br />

Centre for Crime and Justice, found that 11<br />

million people in the UK have a criminal<br />

record and that 75% of employers admit to<br />

rejecting a job applicant once a criminal<br />

conviction is disclosed.<br />

With this in mind, what is the law surrounding<br />

employees with criminal records, and what can<br />

employers do to ensure they are asking the right<br />

questions at the right time?<br />

The law<br />

According to Mark Stevens, a Senior Associate at<br />

VWV, it’s important to note that an employer can<br />

obtain information on a person’s criminal record:<br />

“They can do so in one of two ways – either by<br />

asking the candidate or employee directly, or by<br />

requesting an official criminal record check by the<br />

Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS).”<br />

The treatment of individuals with criminal records<br />

is set out in the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act<br />

1974 (ROA 1974). This Act provides a system for<br />

the records of people with convictions to be<br />

cleared.<br />

Subject to certain exemptions, a person whose<br />

conviction is spent is entitled to hold themselves<br />

out as a having a clean record – only ‘unspent’<br />

convictions need to be disclosed. However, even<br />

with unspent convictions it is worth bearing in<br />

mind an applicant may not disclose this<br />

information.<br />

Stevens advises that if an individual has a spent<br />

conviction and they choose not to disclose it<br />

“A person whose<br />

conviction is spent is<br />

entitled to hold<br />

themselves out as a<br />

having a clean record”<br />

when questioned, subject to certain exemptions,<br />

“they cannot be subjected to any liability or<br />

prejudice for their failure to disclose, and this<br />

would include an employer not hiring them.<br />

Failure to disclose a spent conviction is not a<br />

lawful ground for dismissal.” An employee<br />

dismissed on these grounds may bring a claim for<br />

unfair dismissal.<br />

The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974<br />

(Exceptions) Order 1975 identifies that in certain<br />

cases spent convictions should be disclosed. The<br />

Order sets out certain occupations, offices and<br />

professions where the disclosure of spent<br />

convictions can be required:<br />

• Professions such as medicine, lawyers,<br />

accountants, vets, chemist and opticians;<br />

• Those employed to uphold the law, including<br />

judges and prison officers;<br />

• Certain regulated occupations, including the<br />

financial services;<br />

• Those who work with children and vulnerable<br />

adults; and<br />

• Those whose work could pose a risk to national<br />

security.<br />

If an applicant fails to disclose a spent conviction<br />

in these circumstances, an employer will have a<br />

valid reason for withholding or withdrawing an<br />

offer of employment or dismissal.<br />

Disclosure and Barring Service<br />

As mentioned earlier, an alternative to asking an<br />

employee about their past is for an employer to<br />

obtain information on an individual’s criminal<br />

record via a DBS check which will include all<br />

spent and unspent convictions, and avoids the<br />

need to rely solely on an individual’s voluntary<br />

disclosure.<br />

22 TC MAY <strong>2019</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!