24.05.2019 Views

Ohio PHC Contractor Volume 2019 Issue 2

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LEGALLY SPEAKING<br />

AFFORDABLE CARE ACT<br />

UNDER ATTACK – YET AGAIN!<br />

The Trump Administration has just gone on the record<br />

stating that the entire Affordable Care Act should<br />

be struck down in a pending court case destined for<br />

appeal – Texas v. United States. On December 14,<br />

2018, a Federal District Judge ruled that because<br />

Congress eliminated the penalty on individuals not having ACA<br />

compliant healthcare coverage (the “individual mandate”), the<br />

ACA “can no longer be sustained as a constitutional exercise<br />

of Congress’ tax powers.” In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that<br />

the individual mandate was constitutional because of Congress’<br />

power to tax. But, when the fine for not having insurance was<br />

eliminated, there was no taxing basis to uphold the law.<br />

BECAUSE HEALTHCARE IS<br />

SUCH A VOLATILE ISSUE AND<br />

CONGRESS IS SO DIVIDED ON<br />

THE TOPIC, IT IS DOUBTFUL<br />

THAT A LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION<br />

WILL BE FOUND BEFORE THE<br />

2020 ELECTIONS.<br />

healthcare coverage to at<br />

least 95 percent of full-time<br />

employees and properly report<br />

offers of coverage as elements<br />

Bob Dunlevey - Taft Law<br />

of compliance. For the 10<br />

million individuals with expanded ACA Medicaid and the 11<br />

plus million utilizing the ACA exchanges, coverage will go on<br />

for now.<br />

Those most familiar with the legal arguments advanced in<br />

court by the coalition of 20 states believe that the decision will<br />

be struck down by the Court of Appeals even though it is a very<br />

conservative court. If this be true, the Trump Administration’s<br />

appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court may not be accepted. But, if<br />

the Court of Appeals somehow upholds the trial judge’s position<br />

that the ACA is unconstitutional, the case will surely be heard<br />

by the Supreme Court.<br />

Because healthcare is such a volatile issue and Congress is so<br />

divided on the topic, it is doubtful that a legislative solution<br />

will be found before the 2020 elections. Watch for more<br />

developments in the months to come, but don’t count on the<br />

ACA being cast aside for now.<br />

For further information, contact Bob Dunlevey, Board Certified<br />

Specialist in Labor and Employment Law, at Taft/Law (937) 641-<br />

1743 or email rdunlevey@taftlaw.com.<br />

The Department of Justice<br />

has just formally announced<br />

that it supports the position of<br />

the District Judge finding the<br />

entire ACA unconstitutional<br />

because if part of the ACA fails<br />

then the rest of it should be<br />

ruled invalid as well.<br />

iStockphoto.com/designer491<br />

The case is destined for the<br />

Federal Fifth Circuit Court of<br />

Appeals in New Orleans and<br />

may see as a final destination<br />

the U.S. Supreme Court. These<br />

proceedings may take more<br />

time than is left in President<br />

Trump’s current term. In the<br />

meantime, ObamaCare remains<br />

in effect and both individuals<br />

and employers need to comply.<br />

Employers still have to offer<br />

8 OHIO <strong>PHC</strong> CONTRACTOR • VOLUME <strong>2019</strong>, ISSUE 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!