31.08.2019 Views

September 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Insurance: Project Policies<br />

THE PROBLEM WITH PROJECT<br />

POLICIES: ARE YOU COVERED?<br />

By Ian Hollingworth, Technical Claims and Relationship Manager, ECIC.<br />

The High Court’s decision last year that a<br />

roofing firm that caused a fire at a high<br />

school in London was not protected by a<br />

project policy has raised some serious questions<br />

over the worth of these types of insurance<br />

policies.<br />

Traditionally, employers on larger construction<br />

projects take out a project policy to cover damage<br />

to the existing structure and possibly the contract<br />

works being undertaken by the sub-contractors<br />

appointed to work on site.<br />

The contractual chain<br />

A project policy would usually provide protection<br />

to named contractors and sometimes all<br />

contractors in the contractual chain, in the event<br />

of a fire or some other damage caused by<br />

contract workers on site.<br />

The project policy insurer would simply cover the<br />

loss rather than each sub-contractor going to<br />

their own insurers to recover the cost of their own<br />

damaged contract works. This means lengthy and<br />

costly litigation between sub-contractors can be<br />

avoided and ensures the property and works are<br />

adequately covered, preventing any delays in the<br />

completion of the construction.<br />

However, in Haberdashers’ Aske’s Federation<br />

Trust Ltd v Lakehouse Contracts Ltd and others<br />

[2018] EWHC 558 (TCC), the High Court found<br />

roofing firm CPR wasn’t protected by the project<br />

policy because the terms of the sub-contract<br />

required that they should maintain their own<br />

insurance.<br />

That’s not unusual in itself. Usually a<br />

construction contract would contain an insuring<br />

clause requiring the individual sub-contractor to<br />

take out insurance to cover their own contract<br />

works along with Employers Liability and Public<br />

Liability. This is even if there is a<br />

project policy in place.<br />

The key difference with this case<br />

was that the project policy<br />

insurer dealt with the property<br />

loss, but then sought to recover<br />

their outlay from the contractor that<br />

caused the loss.<br />

“It’s essential,<br />

therefore, that<br />

contractors are aware<br />

that a project policy<br />

may no longer provide<br />

the catchall cover they<br />

have previously relied<br />

on”<br />

This was very unusual as a project policy is<br />

usually taken out in joint names – the<br />

policyholder and all sub-contractors. As such the<br />

project policy insurer could not seek a recovery as<br />

essentially all sub-contractors would be<br />

considered a policyholder and covered under the<br />

policy.<br />

Not named at commencement<br />

The Court allowed the project insurer to recover<br />

the loss from the sub-contractor on the basis of<br />

two key facts: the main contract had required the<br />

sub-contractor to take out their own insurance;<br />

and the sub-contractor was not named at the<br />

commencement of the construction project and<br />

therefore not factored into the cover by the project<br />

policy insurer when the policy was taken out.<br />

The contractor in this case was due to appeal the<br />

High Court’s decision in early <strong>2019</strong> but instead<br />

Left: Ian Hollingworth, Technical Claims and<br />

Relationship Manager, ECIC.<br />

settled out of court, prior to the<br />

appeal hearing.<br />

This ruling has really called into<br />

question the effectiveness of project<br />

insurance. Roofing contractors and subcontractors<br />

may no longer rely upon a project<br />

insurer to pick up a loss in the event of damage<br />

they have caused.<br />

It’s essential, therefore, that contractors are<br />

aware that a project policy may no longer provide<br />

the catchall cover they have previously relied on<br />

and should try to take proactive steps to seek<br />

confirmation of any cover available under a<br />

project policy at the pre-commencement stage.<br />

Working with their insurance brokers, roofing<br />

contractors would be well-advised to take a fresh<br />

look at their cover to ensure they are adequately<br />

insured for their potential liabilities. In most<br />

cases they may need their own Contractors All<br />

Risks insurance in addition to public liability<br />

insurance to ensure they have the right levels of<br />

cover in place before starting work on a major<br />

contract.<br />

Contractors All Risks insurance provides cover for<br />

physical loss or damage to contract works during<br />

the course of construction and will often be<br />

offered with a range of extensions to provide more<br />

bespoke cover. Public liability insurance provides<br />

cover in the event of damage or personal injury to<br />

third parties.<br />

Contact ECIC:<br />

0330 221 0250<br />

www.ecic.co.uk/<br />

24 TC SEPTEMBER <strong>2019</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!