05.11.2019 Views

OP_110719

OP_110719

OP_110719

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 | November 7, 2019 | the orland Park Prairie news<br />

<strong>OP</strong>Prairiedaily.com<br />

Orland Park Village Board<br />

Officials back to bickering over pension regulations<br />

Dodge asks<br />

for repeal of<br />

ordinance; mayor<br />

goes on offensive<br />

Jon DePaolis<br />

Freelance Reporter<br />

The Orland Park Village<br />

Board did more than<br />

just revisit an old issue the<br />

evening of Oct. 21; it rehashed<br />

old arguments.<br />

On the agenda for the<br />

Oct. 21 meeting was a<br />

resolution to repeal Resolution<br />

No. 1908, which<br />

eliminated the ability for<br />

trustees and the Village<br />

clerk to participate in the<br />

Illinois Municipal Retirement<br />

Fund as of July 1.<br />

It also eliminated the Village<br />

president from being<br />

able participate in IMRF<br />

as of May 3, 2021.<br />

To Mayor Keith Pekau,<br />

the item — which was<br />

placed under the Officials<br />

portion of the meeting<br />

agenda — was a political<br />

move by Trustee James<br />

Dodge.<br />

“Trustee Dodge, you<br />

announced your run for<br />

mayor almost a year ago in<br />

November 2018,” Pekau<br />

alleged. “This action is<br />

meant to sneak in a provision<br />

to make that position<br />

eligible for a pension for<br />

you. If you want to make<br />

this part of your platform,<br />

run on it. Don’t sneak it<br />

in like the $150,000 pay<br />

increase you voted for in<br />

2016.<br />

“You want to make this<br />

seem like it is about me.<br />

I’ve said it before, and<br />

I’ll say it again: I’m not<br />

taking a pension now or<br />

ever for being mayor of<br />

Orland Park. We’ve lowered<br />

the salary to $40,000<br />

annually and made the<br />

mayor’s position ineligible<br />

for a pension at the<br />

next term.<br />

“If these actions are<br />

reversed and if you are<br />

elected mayor, you stand<br />

to gain $2.9 million in<br />

pension benefits for a<br />

measly $22,400 in contributions<br />

if you are elected.<br />

A vote to rescind this resolution<br />

makes the mayor’s<br />

position pension-eligible<br />

at the next election.”<br />

Pekau said it is a “privilege”<br />

to serve the residents,<br />

“not a right” or a<br />

mechanism “to vote for<br />

policies that serve your<br />

own financial and political<br />

interests.”<br />

“This resolution is about<br />

an elected official trying<br />

to line his own pockets at<br />

the expense of the citizens<br />

of Orland Park,” Pekau<br />

said. “Shame on you.”<br />

Dodge responded by<br />

asking Village Attorney<br />

Dennis Walsh what the<br />

rules were in Robert’s<br />

Rules of Order regarding<br />

Village Board members<br />

openly questioning the<br />

motives of other board<br />

members at a public meeting.<br />

He said the attorney<br />

could get back to him on<br />

that but wondered out<br />

loud if an apology would<br />

be in order from the mayor.<br />

Dodge said his character<br />

was “impugned” and<br />

that the running for mayor<br />

comment was a joke.<br />

“Apparently, that [joke]<br />

is now going to drive policy,”<br />

Dodge said.<br />

But Trustee Michael<br />

Milani also took issue<br />

with the item being placed<br />

on the agenda.<br />

“Here we go once again,<br />

wasting more and more<br />

time on the board floor<br />

about things we don’t<br />

need to worry about,” Milani<br />

said.<br />

Trustee William Healy<br />

agreed, saying he felt revisiting<br />

the pension issue<br />

was “a waste of time.”<br />

After a lengthy discussion,<br />

Dodge made a motion<br />

to amend the item<br />

to also repeal Resolution<br />

1722. Milani asked Walsh<br />

for an explanation of what<br />

the amendment would do<br />

to the ordinance on the<br />

floor.<br />

Walsh said he did not<br />

have Ordinance No. 1722<br />

in front of him.<br />

“So, I don’t know what<br />

the consequences of that<br />

amendment would be as I<br />

sit here,” Walsh said.<br />

Dodge said that because<br />

there were some questions<br />

that would need to be answered<br />

in writing by the<br />

attorneys, he suggested<br />

tabling the item.<br />

But the vote to table<br />

failed 4-3, with Pekau,<br />

Healy, Milani and Trustee<br />

Cynthia Nelson Katsenes<br />

voting against the motion.<br />

During discussion of<br />

the amendment pitched<br />

by Dodge, Trustee Kathleen<br />

Fenton said she had<br />

not had a chance to read<br />

more about what she was<br />

expected to vote on and<br />

therefore wanted to abstain<br />

from the vote on the<br />

amended motion.<br />

“I think it is pretty illinformed<br />

of people to vote<br />

on things they don’t have<br />

in front of [them],” she<br />

said. “That’d be like voting<br />

on a budget, and you<br />

never saw it.”<br />

Trustee Dan Calandriello<br />

also took issue with<br />

voting on the item without<br />

having enough time to research<br />

the issue fully. He<br />

asked if it was possible<br />

to just withdraw the item<br />

from the floor, because<br />

there were too many questions<br />

about it.<br />

“I can’t make an educated<br />

vote either way on<br />

this,” he said.<br />

Walsh said that because<br />

the motion to table the<br />

item failed, it needed to<br />

be voted on by the board<br />

members.<br />

Calandriello and Fenton<br />

both initially voted to<br />

abstain; however, Milani<br />

asked for a point of order.<br />

Milani stated that he<br />

thought the trustees had to<br />

vote on the issue. It was<br />

determined that unless<br />

the board members had a<br />

conflict of interest — or if<br />

the majority of the Village<br />

Board voted to allow the<br />

abstention — they would<br />

need to vote for or against<br />

the amendment.<br />

The vote to allow abstentions<br />

failed 3-3, with<br />

Dodge, Milani and Katsenes<br />

voting against allowing<br />

them.<br />

The vote on the amendment<br />

ultimately failed<br />

5-1, with Dodge being the<br />

only one to vote in favor<br />

of the amendment. During<br />

the vote, Fenton abstained,<br />

citing conflict of<br />

interest regarding her being<br />

a trustee and voting on<br />

trustee pension eligibility.<br />

Calandriello voted against<br />

the amendment but said<br />

his vote came “under duress.”<br />

Finally, the vote on the<br />

original motion to repeal<br />

Resolution 1908 failed<br />

5-2, with Dodge and Fenton<br />

casting the votes in favor<br />

of the repeal.<br />

The discussion continues<br />

During his comments<br />

to the rest of the Village<br />

Board at the end of the<br />

meeting, Dodge continued<br />

the conversation on<br />

pensions. In particular, he<br />

called out the mayor’s allegation<br />

that Dodge could<br />

earn up to $2.9 million in<br />

pension benefits.<br />

“I think someone used<br />

the number $2.9 million<br />

in pension, [and] I will<br />

call IMRF tomorrow and<br />

make sure they do a calculation,<br />

and I will bring<br />

it back to this full board,”<br />

Dodge said. “I think there<br />

will be an apology due,<br />

not the least of which is<br />

that I just think the math<br />

is wrong — including<br />

probably not accounting<br />

for the seven years<br />

that I served up here for<br />

free. I didn’t take a paycheck<br />

from the Village of<br />

Orland Park, so by definition,<br />

there’s no pension<br />

credit.”<br />

Dodge also said he<br />

would anxiously await the<br />

legal opinion from Klein,<br />

Thorpe and Jenkins on a<br />

few things, such as the language<br />

in Robert’s Rules of<br />

Order on not attacking the<br />

motives of another board<br />

member’s vote, and on the<br />

intersection of all of the<br />

Village’s ordinances regarding<br />

IMRF.<br />

Dodge said he would<br />

apologize if he was<br />

wrong, but he stated that<br />

because the current ordinance<br />

eliminates pension<br />

eligibility in May<br />

2021, the opportunity<br />

still exists that the Village<br />

Board members can<br />

vote to allow pension eligibility<br />

immediately after<br />

the April 2021 election.<br />

This would mean, in his<br />

eyes, that the mayor could<br />

be eligible for pension<br />

credit from his first term,<br />

a second term if re-elected<br />

and buy into military<br />

credit.<br />

“There is no opt-out<br />

provision under Illinois<br />

law,” Dodge said. “You<br />

are pension-eligible. A<br />

piece of paper and a signature<br />

would make you,<br />

on my math, a pension<br />

worth $1 million.”<br />

During her comments,<br />

Katsenes asked, “With<br />

all this talk of pensions,<br />

where was the concern a<br />

few years back?”<br />

Milani also revisited the<br />

topic.<br />

“How foolish would<br />

it be for us to sit up here<br />

[after running] on a platform<br />

saying we’re going<br />

to eliminate pensions and<br />

then a year later or two<br />

years later turn around<br />

and change our mind and<br />

make the mayor eligible<br />

for a pension or turn<br />

around and make ourselves<br />

eligible?” he said.<br />

Reached by phone Oct.<br />

23, Dodge confirmed<br />

that he was the one to<br />

place the IMRF item on<br />

the agenda.<br />

“That majority said<br />

they wanted to end public<br />

officials’ participation in<br />

pensions going forward,”<br />

Dodge said. “They did the<br />

exact opposite by allowing<br />

[the mayor] to stay<br />

pension-eligible. That’s<br />

the central policy question.<br />

That’s why I put it<br />

on the table.”<br />

Seritage granted specialuse<br />

permit<br />

In a 6-1 vote, the Village<br />

Board approved a<br />

special use permit for Seritage<br />

Growth Properties to<br />

allow for a 24-hour fitness<br />

facility to occupy part<br />

of the Sears redevelopment<br />

property at Orland<br />

Square. Trustee Kathleen<br />

Fenton voted against it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!