OP_110719
OP_110719
OP_110719
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 | November 7, 2019 | the orland Park Prairie news<br />
<strong>OP</strong>Prairiedaily.com<br />
Orland Park Village Board<br />
Officials back to bickering over pension regulations<br />
Dodge asks<br />
for repeal of<br />
ordinance; mayor<br />
goes on offensive<br />
Jon DePaolis<br />
Freelance Reporter<br />
The Orland Park Village<br />
Board did more than<br />
just revisit an old issue the<br />
evening of Oct. 21; it rehashed<br />
old arguments.<br />
On the agenda for the<br />
Oct. 21 meeting was a<br />
resolution to repeal Resolution<br />
No. 1908, which<br />
eliminated the ability for<br />
trustees and the Village<br />
clerk to participate in the<br />
Illinois Municipal Retirement<br />
Fund as of July 1.<br />
It also eliminated the Village<br />
president from being<br />
able participate in IMRF<br />
as of May 3, 2021.<br />
To Mayor Keith Pekau,<br />
the item — which was<br />
placed under the Officials<br />
portion of the meeting<br />
agenda — was a political<br />
move by Trustee James<br />
Dodge.<br />
“Trustee Dodge, you<br />
announced your run for<br />
mayor almost a year ago in<br />
November 2018,” Pekau<br />
alleged. “This action is<br />
meant to sneak in a provision<br />
to make that position<br />
eligible for a pension for<br />
you. If you want to make<br />
this part of your platform,<br />
run on it. Don’t sneak it<br />
in like the $150,000 pay<br />
increase you voted for in<br />
2016.<br />
“You want to make this<br />
seem like it is about me.<br />
I’ve said it before, and<br />
I’ll say it again: I’m not<br />
taking a pension now or<br />
ever for being mayor of<br />
Orland Park. We’ve lowered<br />
the salary to $40,000<br />
annually and made the<br />
mayor’s position ineligible<br />
for a pension at the<br />
next term.<br />
“If these actions are<br />
reversed and if you are<br />
elected mayor, you stand<br />
to gain $2.9 million in<br />
pension benefits for a<br />
measly $22,400 in contributions<br />
if you are elected.<br />
A vote to rescind this resolution<br />
makes the mayor’s<br />
position pension-eligible<br />
at the next election.”<br />
Pekau said it is a “privilege”<br />
to serve the residents,<br />
“not a right” or a<br />
mechanism “to vote for<br />
policies that serve your<br />
own financial and political<br />
interests.”<br />
“This resolution is about<br />
an elected official trying<br />
to line his own pockets at<br />
the expense of the citizens<br />
of Orland Park,” Pekau<br />
said. “Shame on you.”<br />
Dodge responded by<br />
asking Village Attorney<br />
Dennis Walsh what the<br />
rules were in Robert’s<br />
Rules of Order regarding<br />
Village Board members<br />
openly questioning the<br />
motives of other board<br />
members at a public meeting.<br />
He said the attorney<br />
could get back to him on<br />
that but wondered out<br />
loud if an apology would<br />
be in order from the mayor.<br />
Dodge said his character<br />
was “impugned” and<br />
that the running for mayor<br />
comment was a joke.<br />
“Apparently, that [joke]<br />
is now going to drive policy,”<br />
Dodge said.<br />
But Trustee Michael<br />
Milani also took issue<br />
with the item being placed<br />
on the agenda.<br />
“Here we go once again,<br />
wasting more and more<br />
time on the board floor<br />
about things we don’t<br />
need to worry about,” Milani<br />
said.<br />
Trustee William Healy<br />
agreed, saying he felt revisiting<br />
the pension issue<br />
was “a waste of time.”<br />
After a lengthy discussion,<br />
Dodge made a motion<br />
to amend the item<br />
to also repeal Resolution<br />
1722. Milani asked Walsh<br />
for an explanation of what<br />
the amendment would do<br />
to the ordinance on the<br />
floor.<br />
Walsh said he did not<br />
have Ordinance No. 1722<br />
in front of him.<br />
“So, I don’t know what<br />
the consequences of that<br />
amendment would be as I<br />
sit here,” Walsh said.<br />
Dodge said that because<br />
there were some questions<br />
that would need to be answered<br />
in writing by the<br />
attorneys, he suggested<br />
tabling the item.<br />
But the vote to table<br />
failed 4-3, with Pekau,<br />
Healy, Milani and Trustee<br />
Cynthia Nelson Katsenes<br />
voting against the motion.<br />
During discussion of<br />
the amendment pitched<br />
by Dodge, Trustee Kathleen<br />
Fenton said she had<br />
not had a chance to read<br />
more about what she was<br />
expected to vote on and<br />
therefore wanted to abstain<br />
from the vote on the<br />
amended motion.<br />
“I think it is pretty illinformed<br />
of people to vote<br />
on things they don’t have<br />
in front of [them],” she<br />
said. “That’d be like voting<br />
on a budget, and you<br />
never saw it.”<br />
Trustee Dan Calandriello<br />
also took issue with<br />
voting on the item without<br />
having enough time to research<br />
the issue fully. He<br />
asked if it was possible<br />
to just withdraw the item<br />
from the floor, because<br />
there were too many questions<br />
about it.<br />
“I can’t make an educated<br />
vote either way on<br />
this,” he said.<br />
Walsh said that because<br />
the motion to table the<br />
item failed, it needed to<br />
be voted on by the board<br />
members.<br />
Calandriello and Fenton<br />
both initially voted to<br />
abstain; however, Milani<br />
asked for a point of order.<br />
Milani stated that he<br />
thought the trustees had to<br />
vote on the issue. It was<br />
determined that unless<br />
the board members had a<br />
conflict of interest — or if<br />
the majority of the Village<br />
Board voted to allow the<br />
abstention — they would<br />
need to vote for or against<br />
the amendment.<br />
The vote to allow abstentions<br />
failed 3-3, with<br />
Dodge, Milani and Katsenes<br />
voting against allowing<br />
them.<br />
The vote on the amendment<br />
ultimately failed<br />
5-1, with Dodge being the<br />
only one to vote in favor<br />
of the amendment. During<br />
the vote, Fenton abstained,<br />
citing conflict of<br />
interest regarding her being<br />
a trustee and voting on<br />
trustee pension eligibility.<br />
Calandriello voted against<br />
the amendment but said<br />
his vote came “under duress.”<br />
Finally, the vote on the<br />
original motion to repeal<br />
Resolution 1908 failed<br />
5-2, with Dodge and Fenton<br />
casting the votes in favor<br />
of the repeal.<br />
The discussion continues<br />
During his comments<br />
to the rest of the Village<br />
Board at the end of the<br />
meeting, Dodge continued<br />
the conversation on<br />
pensions. In particular, he<br />
called out the mayor’s allegation<br />
that Dodge could<br />
earn up to $2.9 million in<br />
pension benefits.<br />
“I think someone used<br />
the number $2.9 million<br />
in pension, [and] I will<br />
call IMRF tomorrow and<br />
make sure they do a calculation,<br />
and I will bring<br />
it back to this full board,”<br />
Dodge said. “I think there<br />
will be an apology due,<br />
not the least of which is<br />
that I just think the math<br />
is wrong — including<br />
probably not accounting<br />
for the seven years<br />
that I served up here for<br />
free. I didn’t take a paycheck<br />
from the Village of<br />
Orland Park, so by definition,<br />
there’s no pension<br />
credit.”<br />
Dodge also said he<br />
would anxiously await the<br />
legal opinion from Klein,<br />
Thorpe and Jenkins on a<br />
few things, such as the language<br />
in Robert’s Rules of<br />
Order on not attacking the<br />
motives of another board<br />
member’s vote, and on the<br />
intersection of all of the<br />
Village’s ordinances regarding<br />
IMRF.<br />
Dodge said he would<br />
apologize if he was<br />
wrong, but he stated that<br />
because the current ordinance<br />
eliminates pension<br />
eligibility in May<br />
2021, the opportunity<br />
still exists that the Village<br />
Board members can<br />
vote to allow pension eligibility<br />
immediately after<br />
the April 2021 election.<br />
This would mean, in his<br />
eyes, that the mayor could<br />
be eligible for pension<br />
credit from his first term,<br />
a second term if re-elected<br />
and buy into military<br />
credit.<br />
“There is no opt-out<br />
provision under Illinois<br />
law,” Dodge said. “You<br />
are pension-eligible. A<br />
piece of paper and a signature<br />
would make you,<br />
on my math, a pension<br />
worth $1 million.”<br />
During her comments,<br />
Katsenes asked, “With<br />
all this talk of pensions,<br />
where was the concern a<br />
few years back?”<br />
Milani also revisited the<br />
topic.<br />
“How foolish would<br />
it be for us to sit up here<br />
[after running] on a platform<br />
saying we’re going<br />
to eliminate pensions and<br />
then a year later or two<br />
years later turn around<br />
and change our mind and<br />
make the mayor eligible<br />
for a pension or turn<br />
around and make ourselves<br />
eligible?” he said.<br />
Reached by phone Oct.<br />
23, Dodge confirmed<br />
that he was the one to<br />
place the IMRF item on<br />
the agenda.<br />
“That majority said<br />
they wanted to end public<br />
officials’ participation in<br />
pensions going forward,”<br />
Dodge said. “They did the<br />
exact opposite by allowing<br />
[the mayor] to stay<br />
pension-eligible. That’s<br />
the central policy question.<br />
That’s why I put it<br />
on the table.”<br />
Seritage granted specialuse<br />
permit<br />
In a 6-1 vote, the Village<br />
Board approved a<br />
special use permit for Seritage<br />
Growth Properties to<br />
allow for a 24-hour fitness<br />
facility to occupy part<br />
of the Sears redevelopment<br />
property at Orland<br />
Square. Trustee Kathleen<br />
Fenton voted against it.