18.12.2012 Views

Microscopic Modelling of Correlated Low-dimensional Systems

Microscopic Modelling of Correlated Low-dimensional Systems

Microscopic Modelling of Correlated Low-dimensional Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2: Method 13<br />

In magnetic systems or, in general, in systems where open electronic shells are involved,<br />

better approximations to the exchange-correlation functional can be obtained by introducing<br />

the two spins densities, ρ↑(r) and ρ↓(r), such that ρ(r) = ρ↑(r) + ρ↓(r), and (ζ(r) =<br />

ρ↑(r) − ρ↓(r))/ρ(r) is the magnetization density. The non-interacting kinetic energy splits<br />

trivially into spin-up and a spin-down contributions, and the external and Hartree potentials<br />

depend on the fully density ρ(r), but the approximate exchange-correlation functional will<br />

depend on both spin densities independently, Exc = Exc[ρ↑(r), ρ↓(r)]. The density, given<br />

by Eq. (2.16) contains a double summation, over the spin states and over the number <strong>of</strong><br />

electrons in each spin state. These latter have to be determined according to the single-<br />

particle eigenvalues, by asking for the lowest N = N↑ + N↓ to be occupied.<br />

The equivalent <strong>of</strong> the LDA in spin-polarized systems is the local spin density approximation<br />

(LSDA), which basically consists <strong>of</strong> replacing the exchange-correlation energy density with<br />

a spin-polarized expression:<br />

E LSDA<br />

�<br />

xc [ρ↑(r), ρ↓(r)] =<br />

[ρ↑(r) + ρ↓(r)]ɛ h xc[ρ↑(r), ρ↓(r)]dr (2.18)<br />

obtained for instance, by interpolating between the fully-polarized and fully-unpolarized<br />

exchange-correlation energy densities using an appropriate expression that depends on ζ(r).<br />

To extend the local density approximation to systems with more significant non-<br />

homogeneous densities, several techniques have been proposed. The most successful one<br />

is the generalized gradient approximation (GGA), where the real Exc[ρ(r)] is expressed as a<br />

functional <strong>of</strong> the density ρ(r) and its gradient ∇ρ(r):<br />

where Fxc is a correction.<br />

�<br />

Exc[ρ] =<br />

�<br />

ρ(r)ɛxc(ρ(r)) dr +<br />

Fxc[ρ, |∇ρ|] dr (2.19)<br />

The GGA formalism gives a better description <strong>of</strong> inhomogeneous systems, like transition<br />

metals, and it significantly improves the binding and atomic energies, it improves bond<br />

lengths, angles, predicting good results also in the cases where LDA fails. It improves ener-<br />

getics, geometries and dynamical properties <strong>of</strong> water, ice and water clusters. GGA accounts<br />

specifically for density gradients that are neglected in pure LDA. For the GGA calculations<br />

performed in this work, the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerh<strong>of</strong> (PBE96) [93] parameterization for<br />

the exchange-correlation functional was used. This functional improves the description <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrogen-bonded systems.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!