06.04.2020 Views

Q1 2020 Texas CEO Magazine

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a startup should raise and how they

should describe that to investors.

The basic formula

For startups seeking growth, the figure

below summarizes the first major steps for

deciding how much to raise. As you can

see, the amount of money raised affords

the startup a combination of time and

resources. And with time and resources,

they can accomplish things (outcomes).

The basic concept is simple. And since

we are trying to solve for the right

amount of funding to raise, let’s analyze

the other variables a little further.

Time and resources

When I say time, I actually mean an

amount of time the money will last, or

what is often referred to as runway.

The amount of runway needed varies

widely for each venture but usually

gets longer with subsequent rounds of

funding and later stages of evolution.

The most obvious type of resource is

the one every founder obsesses about,

additional headcount—regardless of

whether they are part-time or full-time.

“If we only had two more developers, we

would be in great shape.” In the same

category as headcount are contractors,

consultants, and various service

professionals like lawyers and accountants.

What many early-stage startups don’t

think about are things like increased

spending for marketing programs,

specialty tools, and software systems.

These are usually important resources that

are also needed to advance the business.

For startups, time and resources are in

competition with each other. In other

words, a startup could use all of the new

funding to gain time, but that means

not adding headcount to the team,

not adding more contractors, and not

spending more on programs, tools, and

the like. Instead, they could use all of

the new funding to aggressively dial

up headcount and spending, but that

means they’ll almost immediately have

to raise more money. Part of the trick

is dialing in the optimal combination of

extra time and extra resources in order

to achieve the desired outcomes.

Figuring out the best combination involves

creating a financial forecast model that

allows experimenting with various

assumptions and alternatives. For a preseed

or seed round of funding, the startup

will have lots of assumptions that have

no support from prior results. Because

of this, the investors will really want to

understand any information or insights the

startup has to support their assumptions.

Later, the prior track record will serve

as a basis for many of the projections.

Outcomes

Outcomes are discretely identifiable results

the startup hopes to achieve with their

newly raised funds. How about acquiring a

certain number of new customers to reach

the next meaningful revenue milestone,

or significantly reducing your average cost

to acquire a new customer? How about

securing a strategic partnership that will

provide significant leverage, or getting final

approval on a patent filing? What about

launching a new product or entering a new

market? These are outcomes that reduce

the investor’s risk or increase their upside

potential when the startup eventually exits.

The best way to understand the formula

is the way it is diagramed above, left to

right. But the best way to actually go

about the exercise of figuring out how

much money to raise is to work backward,

starting with the desired outcomes. It is

those future outcomes that the investors

want the company to achieve and,

therefore, the things they want to fund.

Once the desired future outcomes are

determined, the startup simply needs

to use their financial forecast model to

determine the best combination of time

and resources needed to generate the

outcomes. With this, they can determine

how much funding is needed for that

combination of time and resources.

Feature

There are pretty dramatic differences

in the outcomes Silicon Valley investors

expect and the outcomes investors in most

other places in the country expect. A set

of projected outcomes that are exciting

to an investor in Memphis, Tennessee,

or Denver, Colorado, could easily seem

way too safe and conservative to a Silicon

Valley investor. There is much more of

a swing-for-the-fences, build-a-unicorn,

global-world-domination mentality in

Silicon Valley, and fundraising startups

should understand this philosophical

difference in risk tolerance as they go

about setting their desired outcomes.

Time for the first

check and balance

Why not just raise enough money to last

a long time, like three or four years?

Well, ignoring whether the startup could

be successful raising that much, the

answer relates to the valuation they’re

able to negotiate with investors.

Let’s assume $10 million would fund a

particular venture for four years. The

question is, What sort of valuation can

the company earn at the time they raise

that money? As you can see in the figure

below, today’s valuation is mostly based

on the state of the business today. If

investors will only agree to a $5 million

valuation, for example, the company

will experience significant dilution and

immediately give control to the investors

due to the amount of equity they will get.

The amount of money raised compared

to the valuation they’re able to negotiate

provides a check and balance.

Because of this, the process of figuring

out how much money to raise is often

iterative. First, an uncontested look into

the crystal ball allows the startup to figure

TexasCEOMagazine.com

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!