24.04.2020 Views

Deep Work Rules for focused success in a distracted world ( PDFDrive.com )

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This study, it turns out, is one of many that validate attention restoration theory

(ART), which claims that spending time in nature can improve your ability to

concentrate. This theory, which was first proposed in the 1980s by the University of

Michigan psychologists Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan (the latter of which coauthored

the 2008 study discussed here, along with Marc Berman and John Jonides),

is based on the concept of attention fatigue. To concentrate requires what ART calls

directed attention. This resource is finite: If you exhaust it, you’ll struggle to

concentrate. (For our purposes, we can think of this resource as the same thing as

Baumeister’s limited willpower reserves we discussed in the introduction to this

rule. * ) The 2008 study argues that walking on busy city streets requires you to use

directed attention, as you must navigate complicated tasks like figuring out when to

cross a street to not get run over, or when to maneuver around the slow group of

tourists blocking the sidewalk. After just fifty minutes of this focused navigation, the

subject’s store of directed attention was low.

Walking through nature, by contrast, exposes you to what lead author Marc Berman

calls “inherently fascinating stimuli,” using sunsets as an example. These stimuli

“invoke attention modestly, allowing focused-attention mechanisms a chance to

replenish.” Put another way, when walking through nature, you’re freed from having to

direct your attention, as there are few challenges to navigate (like crowded street

crossings), and experience enough interesting stimuli to keep your mind sufficiently

occupied to avoid the need to actively aim your attention. This state allows your

directed attention resources time to replenish. After fifty minutes of such

replenishment, the subjects enjoyed a boost in their concentration.

(You might, of course, argue that perhaps being outside watching a sunset puts

people in a good mood, and being in a good mood is what really helps performance on

these tasks. But in a sadistic twist, the researchers debunked that hypothesis by

repeating the experiment in the harsh Ann Arbor winter. Walking outside in brutal cold

conditions didn’t put the subjects in a good mood, but they still ended up doing better

on concentration tasks.)

What’s important to our purpose is observing that the implications of ART expand

beyond the benefits of nature. The core mechanism of this theory is the idea that you

can restore your ability to direct your attention if you give this activity a rest. Walking

in nature provides such a mental respite, but so, too, can any number of relaxing

activities so long as they provide similar “inherently fascinating stimuli” and freedom

from directed concentration. Having a casual conversation with a friend, listening to

music while making dinner, playing a game with your kids, going for a run—the types

of activities that will fill your time in the evening if you enforce a work shutdown—

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!