21.12.2012 Views

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2 Results <strong>of</strong> Fe monolayer on different hexagonal substrates from non-collinear cal. 87<br />

E Q −E ⎯Γ [meV/Fe]<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0<br />

−10.0<br />

−20.0<br />

−30.0<br />

1 ML Fe/Rh(111)<br />

hcp-Fe-Rh(I)<br />

2Q<br />

fcc-Fe-Rh(I) LDA<br />

3Q 2Q<br />

GGA<br />

−40.0<br />

⎯Γ ⎯Κ ⎯Μ ⎯Γ<br />

Spin spiral vector Q (2π/a)<br />

GGA<br />

LDA<br />

1 ML Fe/Rh(111)<br />

2Q 3Q 2Q<br />

hcp-Fe-Rh(I)<br />

⎯Γ ⎯Κ ⎯Μ ⎯Γ<br />

Spin spiral vector Q (2π/a)<br />

Figure 5.7: Total energy <strong>of</strong> spin spirals for 1 ML Fe/Rh(111). Solid blue circles (green<br />

squares) are the fcc (hcp) Fe-Rh(I) stacking GGA results (left). Solid indigo triangles are<br />

the LDA results with hcp-Fe-Rh(I) stacking (right). The green (indigo) stars are the GGA<br />

(LDA) double- and multi-Q total energies.<br />

equations with three variables. By solving equation (5.15) we get values <strong>of</strong> J1, J2 and<br />

J3 equal to +5.97(+4.18), −2.22 (−1.56), and −3.75 (−2.63) meV/Fe from GGA (LDA)<br />

results. If we use these values and insert them in the phase diagram (Fig. 5.6), we find<br />

out that Fe has indeed a non-collinear spin spiral ground state along Γ-K-M-Γ, using<br />

both GGA and LDA exchange correlation potentials. This agrees well with what we see<br />

in our spin spirals results. In addition to their effect on calculating J3 value accurately,<br />

we know from eq. A-20, that including the higher order terms B1 and K1, in Heisenberg<br />

model, requires us to go beyond the third nearest neighbor and calculate at least J4 for<br />

qualitative results. In this case to calculate the fourth nearest neighbor we need to it to<br />

the whole curve (Fig. 5.7) while to determine B1 and K1 equations (5.8 and 5.14) can be<br />

used. Calculating the double- and multi-Q states will include the higher order interactions<br />

in our calculations, and helps to get more accurate J values, and better prediction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

true ground state.<br />

The 3Q state can be constructed in real space by a superposition <strong>of</strong> three M points<br />

on the hexagonal Brillouin zone (see Fig.5.5). The double-Q structure, along Γ-K-M, is a<br />

collinear <strong>magnetic</strong> structure in real space which can be constructed by a superposition <strong>of</strong><br />

two spiral q-points at Q 3ΓK/4 , i.e. uudd � 3ΓK/4 � in real space (see Fig. 5.5). Because we<br />

calculated the spin spirals using at ferro<strong>magnetic</strong>ally relaxed positions, we performed real<br />

space (collinear) calculations to determine the total energies <strong>of</strong> the multi-Q (double-Q)<br />

states with the same relaxed atomic positions. By that we got the value illustrated by<br />

stars in figure 5.7 using LDA and GGA exchange correlation potentials. If we look at the<br />

calculated double-Q value, we see that it has higher (lower) energy than the corresponded<br />

q-point by about +3 (−30) meV/Fe atom for the Q 3ΓK/4 and Q MΓ/2 points, respectively,<br />

which is surprising since they are expected to gain the same energy due to the including<br />

<strong>of</strong> the higher order terms. The 3Q results show −2.5 (−8) meV/Fe atom energy gain

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!