21.12.2012 Views

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46 3 Magnetism <strong>of</strong> low dimensional systems<br />

the Dirac equation, and is normally sufficient for treating relativistic effects in <strong>transition</strong>metal<br />

magnets. For a radially symmetric potential, equation (3.53) can be rewritten as:<br />

Hsoc = μB<br />

1 dV (r)<br />

μB 1 dV (r)<br />

σ · (r × p) = (σ · L) =<br />

2mc r dr 2mc r dr<br />

μB<br />

ξ(r)σ · L (3.54)<br />

2mc<br />

where � L is the angular momentum operator. Since the radial derivative <strong>of</strong> the potential in<br />

a crystal will be largest in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> a nucleus, then the major contribution to the spinorbit<br />

interaction will come from this region. For small r the potential will be Coulomb-like<br />

(V = − Z ), therefore the radial expectation value <strong>of</strong> ξ(�r) leads to a material dependent<br />

r<br />

spin-orbit coupling constant ξ, which is proportional to Z2 . The MCA dominates in low<br />

dimensions over the shape anisotropy and the anisotropy depends crucially on the symmetry<br />

<strong>of</strong> the system. In a solid, the symmetry is determined by the crystal field, then the<br />

spin-orbit coupling will introduce orbital moments and magnetocrystalline anisotropy by<br />

coupling the states which do not carry orbital moments such that the combination form<br />

an orbital moment, eg. a dxy + dx2−y2 → m = ±z.<br />

In second-order perturbation theory, the expectation value <strong>of</strong> the orbital moment operator<br />

μBL can be written as:<br />

ml = μB<br />

� � �<br />

�L = μB<br />

i,j<br />

〈ψi|L|ψj〉〈ψj|Hsoc|ψi〉<br />

f(ɛi)[1 − f(ɛj)] (3.55)<br />

ɛi − ɛj<br />

where f is the Fermi function insuring that the wavefunction ψi is occupied and ψj is<br />

unoccupied. In metals, several bands crossing the Fermi level EF . The sum <strong>of</strong> all contributions<br />

from bands near EF determine the orbital moment. Van der Laan[105] showed that<br />

when the majority and minority bands are well separated by the exchange interaction, the<br />

spin-orbit coupling changes the total energy <strong>of</strong> the system in second-order perturbation<br />

theory as:<br />

δE = �<br />

i,j<br />

〈ψi|Hsoc|ψj〉〈ψj|Hsoc|ψi〉<br />

ɛi − ɛj<br />

f(ɛi)[1 − f(ɛj)] ≈− ξ<br />

4πμB<br />

�ms · [m ↓<br />

l<br />

− m↑<br />

l ] (3.56)<br />

where �ms is the direction <strong>of</strong> the spin moment, and m ↓<br />

l (m↓ l ) is the orbital moment vector<br />

for spin-down (up) bands. If the spin-up band is completely filled, then the energy change<br />

δE is proportional to the size <strong>of</strong> the orbital moment and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy<br />

energy. This means that the difference <strong>of</strong> δE for two different magnetization directions<br />

will be proportional to the difference in the orbital moments. This relation between orbital<br />

moment anisotropy and MCA was first derived by Bruno[55].<br />

The spin moment increases in low-dimensional systems because <strong>of</strong> reduced coordination<br />

number (see subsec. 3.1.1). This increase will enable the formation <strong>of</strong> large orbital<br />

moments, as can be seen from most atoms. In figure 3.5 some representative values <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!