21.12.2012 Views

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

Ab initio investigations of magnetic properties of ultrathin transition ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

106 6 Co MCA from monolayers to atomic chains<br />

MCA [meV/3d]<br />

|| [ μΒ ]<br />

Δm l = m l −m l<br />

T<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

−0.5<br />

−1<br />

−1.5<br />

0<br />

−0.04<br />

−0.08<br />

1 ML Fe/4d<br />

1 ML Co/4d<br />

Ru Rh Pd<br />

Rh Ru Pd<br />

Fe UML Fe<br />

Co UML Co<br />

2.7 2.71 2.72 2.73 2.74 2.75 2.76<br />

In-plane a 0 [Å]<br />

Figure 6.3: Top: Magneto-crystalline anisotropy (MCA) presented by solid circles (squares)<br />

for 1 ML Co (Fe) on Ru(0001), Rh(111) and Pd(111) (left) compared with UML results<br />

with different lattice constants in (right). Bottom: orbital moments anisotropy (OMA)<br />

presented by open circles (squares) (bottom). Positive MCA means an out <strong>of</strong> plane and<br />

negative MCA means in-plane magneto-crystalline anisotropy. All calculations assuming<br />

FM order.<br />

meV/Co atom, which is similar to the self consistent increase, from 0.12 to 0.25 meV/Co.<br />

This shows the importance <strong>of</strong> relaxations for MCA calculations. Using FT, we also calculated<br />

the Co contribution, by switching <strong>of</strong> the spin-orbit coupling in the Rh atoms. This<br />

gives us an indication about the hybridization and crystal field effect <strong>of</strong> the substrate.<br />

Also, from figure 6.4, we see again the Co MCA increased with relaxing the structure.<br />

We also notice that the crystal field leads the out-<strong>of</strong>-plane MCA already for the unrelaxed<br />

structure, but with increasing relaxation, it becomes even more dominant. The decrease<br />

<strong>of</strong> the absolute value <strong>of</strong> MCA as compared to the UML agrees with the fact that electron<br />

delocalization and crystal field effects compete with the intra-atomic Coulomb interactions,<br />

responsible for Hund’s rules, causing a substantial or total decrease <strong>of</strong> S and quenching <strong>of</strong><br />

L[42].<br />

Because Ir has similar nature like Rh but with large spin orbit coupling parameter,<br />

we also calculated the relaxations and the <strong>magnetic</strong> order and MCA for Co monolayer<br />

on Ir(111). We found that Co/Ir(111) relaxations with respect to the Ir calculated GGA<br />

bulk lattice constant 3.86˚A, are very similar to what was obtained for Co/Rh(111) (see<br />

fig. 6.1). We also found that Co prefers FM ground state by +137 meV/Co on Ir(111)<br />

substrate, with Δd12 = −9.6% and Δd23 =+1.7% relaxations . Also we found that a Co<br />

monolayer has an out-<strong>of</strong>-plane magnetization on the Ir(111) with an anisotropy <strong>of</strong> +0.40<br />

(0.44) meV/Co using force theorem (self consistent). From the self consistent results, we<br />

see that the MCA <strong>of</strong> Co/Rh(111) is about 0.20 meV/Co atom less than for Co/Ir(111).<br />

This difference reflects the strength <strong>of</strong> Ir spin-orbit coupling parameter. If we compare the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!