Conflict, Legitimacy and Government Reform: Equitable Allocation of ...
Conflict, Legitimacy and Government Reform: Equitable Allocation of ...
Conflict, Legitimacy and Government Reform: Equitable Allocation of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society
The Supplementary document for the 11 th<br />
academic congress <strong>of</strong> King Prajadhipok’s Insitute<br />
for the year 2009.<br />
“<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society”
KPI Congress XI<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
Copyright © 2009 by King Prajadhipok’s Institute<br />
ISBN: 978-974-449-508-2<br />
KPI 52-67-300.0<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> copies: 400<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong> Reader Wendell Katerenchuk<br />
Saiphone Suthikool<br />
Apinya Dissaman<br />
Natthakarn Sukolratanametee<br />
Support team The College <strong>of</strong> Politics <strong>and</strong> Governance<br />
The Office for Peace <strong>and</strong> Govemance<br />
Publisher: King Prajadhipok’s Institute<br />
47/101 Seminar Center Building, Civil Service Training Institute,<br />
Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000<br />
Tel. 0-2527-7830-9<br />
Fax. 0-2527-7824<br />
http://www.kpi.ac.th<br />
Printer: Charansanitwong Printing<br />
285-292 Moo 4 Petchakasem Road,<br />
Laksong, Bangkae, Bangkok 10160<br />
Tel. 0-2809-2281-3, 0-2809-2285 Fax. 0-2809-2284<br />
All right reserved. No part <strong>of</strong> this publication may be reproduced, stored in a<br />
retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,<br />
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior<br />
permission <strong>of</strong> the publisher.
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
Introduction<br />
The King Prajadhipok’s Institute is set to<br />
organize the 11 th academic congress for<br />
2009 (KPI Congress) entitled “<strong>Conflict</strong>,<br />
<strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong><br />
<strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society”. The<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> the congress is to create a public stage<br />
to present academic works <strong>and</strong> invite thinkers <strong>and</strong><br />
practitioners including interested parties from<br />
local <strong>and</strong> abroad to express views <strong>and</strong> outlooks<br />
<strong>and</strong> exchange experiences over the state systems,<br />
conflicts <strong>and</strong> justice in society. The congress will<br />
also provide recommendations <strong>and</strong> take part in<br />
drafting national policies that fairly allocate<br />
resources for all Thais.<br />
This document is made as a supplementary<br />
document for an academic seminar held by the<br />
King Prajadhipok’s Institute, if the document is<br />
found to be incomplete or carry any mistake; the<br />
institute would like to extend an apology to all<br />
participants. After the seminar is ended, the<br />
institute will provide another document which<br />
includes the results <strong>of</strong> the congress to be<br />
disseminated to concerned agencies <strong>and</strong> general<br />
public.<br />
5
6 KPI Congress XI<br />
CONTENTS<br />
Pages<br />
Introduction 5<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: 11<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
KPI Congress XI Program 21<br />
“<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society”<br />
Exhibition program 21<br />
“<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society”<br />
His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn 31<br />
on the Occasion <strong>of</strong> KPI Congress XI Program<br />
Panel Discussion on<br />
“<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society”<br />
Towards an Acceptable Fair Society 37<br />
Pasuk Phongpaichit<br />
Origin <strong>of</strong> public policies 69<br />
Nithi Eawsriwong<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>s, <strong>Legitimacy</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: 75<br />
The Role <strong>of</strong> Civic Education<br />
Richard A. Nuccio, Ph.D.
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources, Governance <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: 89<br />
Introducing IDG-Net<br />
Kathleen Lauder<br />
Group discussions on<br />
“<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
Group 1: <strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> political legitimacy<br />
Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong>, Rules, Mechanisms, Enforcement <strong>and</strong> Morality 117<br />
Assoc. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Niyom Rathamarit<br />
The Right Parliamentary System for Thail<strong>and</strong> 123<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Nantawat Boraman<strong>and</strong><br />
Performing <strong>Government</strong>al Development Policies with 127<br />
Societal <strong>Conflict</strong> Problems <strong>and</strong> Solutions<br />
Supamit Pitipat<br />
Conceptual Framework on the Implementation <strong>of</strong> Human Rights: 129<br />
A Case Study from Human Rights Violations During<br />
the War against Drugs <strong>of</strong> 2003<br />
Suchart Wongsinnak<br />
Thai <strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Legitimacy</strong> 131<br />
Wira Lertsomporn<br />
A Study on “The Parliament System <strong>and</strong> Suitable 133<br />
Processes for Recruiting senators in Thail<strong>and</strong>”<br />
Dr. Somboon Tosborvorn<br />
Group 2: <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> economic policy for reducing conflicts<br />
<strong>and</strong> promoting political legitimacy<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> ,s <strong>Reform</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Economic <strong>and</strong> Social Development Policy 137<br />
for Social Welfare <strong>and</strong> Legitimization <strong>of</strong> Capitalistic Regimes.<br />
Akarin Wongtiray<strong>and</strong>et<br />
7
8 KPI Congress XI<br />
Group 3: Judicial review <strong>and</strong> judicial activism<br />
Judicial Power <strong>and</strong> Judicial Governance 141<br />
Dr. Udom Rathamarit<br />
Judicial Activism 145<br />
Prasit Piwawattanapanich<br />
Buddhist Approach to Negotiation 147<br />
Chalakorn Thiansongjai<br />
The Roles <strong>of</strong> Monks in Dealing with Local Political <strong>Conflict</strong> 149<br />
Monk-Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Abbot Wat Nong Payom Chumsangsongkram<br />
Group 4: Innovation for political conflict resolution through<br />
Thai local wisdom <strong>and</strong> socio-cultural capital<br />
Innovation for political conflict resolution through 153<br />
Thai local wisdom <strong>and</strong> socio-cultural capital<br />
Chalakorn Thiansongjai<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>s in the Southern Border Provinces: 155<br />
Causes <strong>and</strong> Sustainable Solutions<br />
Group 5: Citizen politics in checking <strong>of</strong> state power for<br />
equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources<br />
Thais have their duties to check the state’s use <strong>of</strong> power. 163<br />
Veera Somkwamkid<br />
Civil Politics: Institutional aspect, after the Promulgation <strong>of</strong> 165<br />
2550 Constitution<br />
Prapas Pintoptaeng<br />
How can we advocate public policy <strong>and</strong> 167<br />
evaluate government performance?<br />
Nattanan Siricharoen
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
Group 6: The strategy <strong>of</strong> public administration system reform<br />
Strategies for improvement <strong>of</strong> the public sector management system 173<br />
Mr. Jadun Aphichartbutra<br />
Bureaucratic <strong>Reform</strong> 175<br />
Dr. Pheeraphon Trthasawit<br />
Group 7: <strong>Reform</strong>ing local government for the achievement <strong>of</strong><br />
fairness in Thai society<br />
<strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> local administrative organization for creation <strong>of</strong> 179<br />
equity Innovation <strong>of</strong> public services <strong>and</strong> network-based operation<br />
Direk Pattamasiriwat<br />
Assuming Local Administrator <strong>and</strong> Council Member Positions 183<br />
Assoc. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trakoon Meechai<br />
From <strong>Conflict</strong> to Innovation: 189<br />
Participatory Budgeting in Suanmon Tambon<br />
Administrative Organization, Khonkaen<br />
Phavinee Chauyprakhong<br />
Biographical Information<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong> Bovornsak Uwanno Ph D 193<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Pasuk Phongpaichit 197<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Nithi Eawsriwong 200<br />
Dr. Porametee Vimolsiri 201<br />
Dr Sompop Chareonkul 204<br />
9
KPI Congress XI<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in<br />
Thai Society<br />
5-7 November 2009<br />
United Nations Conference Center,<br />
Rajdamnoen Avenue, Bangkok
12 KPI Congress XI
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
Principles <strong>and</strong> Rationales<br />
Over the years there have been ongoing<br />
conflicts in Thai society. Political crises<br />
have disrupted the democratic system.<br />
Groups with opposing political views clash, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
with all sides citing civil rights <strong>and</strong> personal<br />
freedoms to legitimize their acts. People disobey<br />
laws they deem unethical, using only their<br />
personal notions as a guide. The result has been<br />
polarization <strong>and</strong> deep rifts among Thai people.<br />
Unrest continues in the southernmost provinces,<br />
causing loss <strong>of</strong> life <strong>and</strong> damage to property. All<br />
over the country, local communities <strong>and</strong> state<br />
agencies battle over allocation <strong>of</strong> natural resources.<br />
All these conflicts have taken a heavy toll on Thai<br />
society, the economy <strong>and</strong> politics, <strong>and</strong> thus have<br />
inevitably affected Thai people’s lives.<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>s that have escalated into violence are<br />
just a tip <strong>of</strong> the iceberg, revealing a larger mass <strong>of</strong><br />
lingering <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>oundly intertwined systemic<br />
problems such as corruption, abuse <strong>of</strong> political<br />
power, misconduct <strong>of</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficials, unfair<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources, unequal access to<br />
education opportunities, elections intimately<br />
linked to the patronage system, militar y<br />
intervention in political crises <strong>and</strong> so forth.<br />
13
14 KPI Congress XI<br />
All these constitute a chain <strong>of</strong> problems that are pr<strong>of</strong>oundly<br />
intertwined with political <strong>and</strong> bureaucratic structures that have brought<br />
about inequities in the society for decades. Most destitute people face a<br />
host <strong>of</strong> problems <strong>and</strong> have only limited channels through which their<br />
plights <strong>and</strong> grievances can be heard <strong>and</strong> remedied.<br />
Various political reform measures prescribed under the 1997<br />
constitution <strong>and</strong> the current constitution have rectified shortcomings in<br />
the channels through which politicians ascend to power <strong>and</strong> improved<br />
the various methods <strong>of</strong> inspecting politicians’ conduct. However, such<br />
measures have not addressed reform <strong>of</strong> government systems. There<br />
should be ways <strong>of</strong> incorporating the general public’s needs <strong>and</strong><br />
resentments (inputs) in decision-making processes in order to formulate<br />
policies (outputs) that will lead to concrete implementation. Also,<br />
evaluation systems <strong>and</strong> management efficiency are needed, so that<br />
reforms will culminate in a fair distribution <strong>of</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> social<br />
harmony (just peace). Since the government system has not been<br />
transformed, numerous conflicts are still embedded in political,<br />
economic, <strong>and</strong> social <strong>and</strong> cultural fabrics, bringing about legitimacy<br />
issues concerning the government’s administration.<br />
<strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> the government system, including political structures<br />
<strong>and</strong> public administration, to ensure fair allocation <strong>of</strong> resources <strong>and</strong><br />
benefits for the people <strong>and</strong> resolve conflicts in society by peaceful means<br />
would supposedly lead to greater legitimacy <strong>of</strong> the government’s<br />
administration in the democratic system <strong>and</strong> thus has become a great<br />
challenge for all Thais. It is imperative that we create a comprehensive<br />
analytical system <strong>and</strong> mobilize resources from all sectors, including<br />
public <strong>and</strong> private sectors, civil society, <strong>and</strong> individuals, to seek models<br />
to help us comprehend the problems <strong>and</strong> develop a suitable structure for<br />
the country’s administration <strong>and</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> social equity <strong>and</strong><br />
harmony.<br />
However, we should agree that a good state administrative structure<br />
alone is not something that can solve every problem within a short<br />
period <strong>of</strong> time. Such an administrative structure must open political<br />
space for different groups <strong>of</strong> people in the society <strong>and</strong> deal with
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
problems by tolerance rather than a resort to authoritarianism. At the<br />
same time, we must not ab<strong>and</strong>on democratic principles, or neglect civil<br />
rights, freedoms <strong>and</strong> the people’s responsibilities. Such a structure must<br />
be built on a foundation <strong>of</strong> good governance principles that promote<br />
accountability, transparency, integrity, rule <strong>of</strong> law <strong>and</strong> equity. To respond<br />
to the needs <strong>of</strong> the people, who truly own sovereign power, political aims<br />
must address resource allocation in society to foster social equity <strong>and</strong><br />
harmony.<br />
Hence, the King Prajadhipok’s Institute, whose key mission is<br />
concerned with democratic development, is organizing KPI Congress XI<br />
for the year 2009 under the theme “<strong>Conflict</strong>s, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society”<br />
as a public forum for sharing learning <strong>and</strong> scrutinizing practical<br />
approaches to foster social equity <strong>and</strong> harmony in every sector <strong>of</strong> the<br />
society, with a government system that would be suitable to the context<br />
<strong>of</strong> Thai society.<br />
Objectives<br />
1. To serve as a public forum for presentation <strong>of</strong> academic papers<br />
concerning reform <strong>of</strong> the government system to facilitate<br />
equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> promote peace <strong>and</strong><br />
harmony in society.<br />
2. To exchange knowledge <strong>and</strong> comparative perspectives about<br />
relevant issues <strong>and</strong> share experiences <strong>of</strong> local <strong>and</strong> foreign<br />
academics <strong>and</strong> interested parties.<br />
3. To provide suggestions <strong>and</strong> collectively formulate a suitable<br />
structure for the government system that would ensure equitable<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> promote peace <strong>and</strong> harmony in<br />
society.<br />
15
16 KPI Congress XI<br />
Expected outcome<br />
1. Administrators, academics, government <strong>of</strong>ficials, nongovernmental<br />
organizations, <strong>and</strong> the general public have<br />
opportunities to review <strong>and</strong> comment on approaches to solve<br />
political problems <strong>and</strong> issues concerning benefits <strong>and</strong> resource<br />
allocation in order to foster equity in administration for every<br />
sector <strong>and</strong> social harmony, which would be beneficial to<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> in the future.<br />
2. Obtain recommendations <strong>and</strong> approaches for structural<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the government system that would facilitate fair<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> promote social harmony in order to<br />
present these measures to Thai society in the near future.<br />
Main activities<br />
There will be three main activities at KPI Congress XI under the<br />
theme<br />
1. Keynote speeches<br />
Keynote speeches present opportunities for local <strong>and</strong> foreign experts<br />
with a breadth <strong>of</strong> experiences <strong>and</strong> knowledge about political <strong>and</strong><br />
administrative structures to share their experiences, insights, <strong>and</strong><br />
perspectives on government system reform to facilitate fair distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> promote social harmony. At this symposium, two<br />
keynote speeches will be arranged:<br />
1.1 Opening keynote speech delivered by a foreign academic<br />
expert in the field <strong>of</strong> government system structures that<br />
facilitate fair distribution <strong>of</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> promote social<br />
harmony;<br />
1.2 Closing keynote speech delivered by a Thai expert on policy<br />
formulation <strong>and</strong> concrete implementation to achieve fair<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> promote social harmony.
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
2. Academic seminar<br />
The academic seminar will serve as a forum for sharing ideas <strong>and</strong><br />
brainstorming among participants on the issue <strong>of</strong> government system<br />
structures that facilitate fair distribution <strong>of</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> promote social<br />
harmony. Participants will include administrators from both public <strong>and</strong><br />
private sectors, academics <strong>and</strong> competent individuals as well as<br />
representatives from the government, independent organizations, public<br />
agencies, local administrative organizations, academic institutions, nongovernmental<br />
organizations, media, civil society organizations, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
general public.<br />
The academic seminar comprises panel discussions <strong>and</strong> group<br />
discussions as follows:<br />
2.1 Panel discussions present opportunities for local <strong>and</strong> foreign<br />
academics <strong>and</strong> experts to share their insights <strong>and</strong> experiences<br />
on the issue <strong>of</strong> government system structures that facilitate<br />
fair distribution <strong>of</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> promote social harmony.<br />
1) Panel discussion with foreign experts who share their<br />
insights <strong>and</strong> experiences on the issue <strong>of</strong> government<br />
system structures that facilitate fair distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
benefits <strong>and</strong> promote social harmony.<br />
2) Panel discussion with Thai academics <strong>and</strong> experts who<br />
share their insights <strong>and</strong> experiences on public policy<br />
issues pertinent to the government system structures in<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
2.2 Group discussions serve as forums for presentation <strong>of</strong><br />
academic articles <strong>and</strong> papers or research findings. The<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> group discussion will be presented under seven<br />
sub-themes, including<br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> political legitimacy<br />
<strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> economic policy for reducing conflicts <strong>and</strong><br />
promoting political legitimacy<br />
17
18 KPI Congress XI<br />
3. Exhibition<br />
Judicial review <strong>and</strong> judicial activism<br />
Innovation for political conflict resolution through<br />
Thai local wisdom <strong>and</strong> socio-cultural capital<br />
Citizen politics in checking <strong>of</strong> state power for equitable<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources<br />
The strategy <strong>of</strong> public administration system reform<br />
<strong>Reform</strong>ing local government for the achievement <strong>of</strong><br />
fairness in Thai society<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> the exhibition is to disseminate information <strong>and</strong><br />
knowledge about fair distribution <strong>of</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> the link<br />
with social equity <strong>and</strong> harmony. The compilation represents research<br />
conducted jointly conducted by King Prajadhipok’s Institute <strong>and</strong> partner<br />
network organizations <strong>and</strong> undertaken by other sectors.<br />
Target groups<br />
1. Members <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives <strong>and</strong> the Senate<br />
2. Executives <strong>and</strong> members <strong>of</strong> political parties<br />
3. National <strong>and</strong> local politicians<br />
4. State <strong>of</strong>ficials as well as <strong>of</strong>ficials or personnel in public agencies,<br />
independent organizations, state enterprises, <strong>and</strong> local<br />
administrative organizations<br />
5. Officials or personnel in international agencies dealing with<br />
promotion <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> democratic governance<br />
6. Academics involved in promotion <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />
democratic government<br />
7. Community development organizations, community leaders,<br />
local leaders, civil society groups or networks
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
8. NGO representatives<br />
9. All branches <strong>of</strong> mass media<br />
10. Secondary school <strong>and</strong> university students<br />
11. Interested persons<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> participants<br />
500 participants<br />
Date <strong>and</strong> venue<br />
5 November 2009 at 13.00-18.00<br />
6 November 2009 at 08.00-17.00<br />
7 November 2009 at 08.00-12.30<br />
United Nations Conference Center, Rajdamnoen Avenue, Bangkok<br />
19
20 KPI Congress XI
KPI Congress XI Program<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in<br />
Thai Society<br />
5-7 November 2009<br />
United Nations Conference Center,<br />
Rajdamnoen Avenue, Bangkok
22 KPI Congress XI
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
KPI Congress XI<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
5-7 November 2009<br />
United Nations Conference Centre, Rajdamnoen Avenue, Bangkok<br />
Thursday November 5, 2009<br />
1300-1430 Registration<br />
1500-1550 His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn<br />
<strong>and</strong> Her Royal Highness Princess Srirasm, Royal<br />
Consort to His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha<br />
Vajiralongkorn preside over opening <strong>of</strong> the Congress<br />
& Exhibition<br />
1550-1600 Video presentation “<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong><br />
<strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in the Thai<br />
Society”<br />
1600-1800 International panel discussion on “<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Resources in the Thai Society”<br />
- Dr. Richard A. Nuccio, Director, Civitas International<br />
Programs at Center for Civic Education (USA)<br />
With the assistance <strong>of</strong> the Embassy <strong>of</strong> the United States <strong>of</strong><br />
America<br />
- Ms. Kathleen Lauder, Senior Associate,<br />
Institute on Governance (Canada)<br />
With the assistance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />
23
24 KPI Congress XI<br />
- Dr. Dieter W. Benecke, Economic Consultant (Germany)<br />
With the assistance <strong>of</strong> Konrad Adenauer Stiftung<br />
- Pr<strong>of</strong>. Park, Chan Wook, Chair, Department <strong>of</strong> Political<br />
Science, Seoul National University (Korea)<br />
Moderator : Dr. Jingjai Hanchanlash, Chairman, 11 th<br />
KPI Congress Organizing Committee<br />
Friday November 6, 2009<br />
0800-0900 Registration<br />
0900-1030 Special keynote address “Towards a fairer Thai society”<br />
By : Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Pasuk Pongpaijit<br />
1030-1100 C<strong>of</strong>fee break<br />
1100-1230 Thai panel discussion “Dynamic allocation <strong>of</strong> resources<br />
<strong>and</strong> conflict management in Thai Society”<br />
- Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Nidhi Eoseewong<br />
- Mr. Salee Ongsomwang<br />
- Dr. Poramethee Vimolsiri<br />
- Dr. Sompop Chareonkul<br />
1230-1330 Lunch<br />
Moderator: Mr. Pat Chungkankul<br />
1330-1700 Group discussions on “<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong><br />
<strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai<br />
Society”<br />
Group 1: <strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> political legitimacy<br />
Group 2: <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> economic policy for reducing<br />
conflicts <strong>and</strong> promoting political legitimacy<br />
Group 3: Judicial review <strong>and</strong> judicial activism
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
Group 4: Innovation for political conflict resolution<br />
through Thai local wisdom <strong>and</strong> socio-<br />
cultural capital<br />
Group 5: Citizen politics in checking <strong>of</strong> the state<br />
power for equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources<br />
Group 6: The strategy <strong>of</strong> public administration<br />
system reform<br />
Group 7: <strong>Reform</strong>ing local government for the<br />
achievement <strong>of</strong> fairness in Thai society<br />
Saturday November 7, 2009<br />
0800-0830 Registration<br />
0830-1030 Presentation <strong>and</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong> group discussion results<br />
(10 minutes each)<br />
Group 1: <strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> political legitimacy<br />
By Dr. Aran Sothib<strong>and</strong>hu, Director <strong>of</strong> the Parliamentary<br />
Academic Support Office, King Prajadhipok’s Institute<br />
Group 2: <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> economic policy for reducing<br />
conflicts <strong>and</strong> promoting political legitimacy<br />
By Assoc. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Chompunuch Kosalakorn Permpoonwiwat<br />
Deputy Dean, Academic <strong>and</strong> International Affiars,<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Economics <strong>and</strong> Public Policy, Srinakharinwirot<br />
University<br />
Group 3: Judicial review <strong>and</strong> judicial activism<br />
By Asst. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Kanongnij Sribuaiam, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Law,<br />
Chulalongkorn University<br />
25
26 KPI Congress XI<br />
Group 4: Innovation for political conflict resolution<br />
through Thai local wisdom <strong>and</strong> socio-cultural capital<br />
By General Ekkachai Srivilas, Director <strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong><br />
Peace <strong>and</strong> Governance, King Prajadhipok’s Institute<br />
Group 5: Citizen politics in checking <strong>of</strong> state power<br />
for equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources<br />
By Dr. Thawilwadee Bureekul, Director, Research <strong>and</strong><br />
Development Office, King Prajadhipok’s Institute<br />
Group 6: The strategy <strong>of</strong> public administration<br />
system reform<br />
By Asst. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pannaros Malakul Na Ayudhaya, Advisor to<br />
the Office <strong>of</strong> Public Sector Development Commission<br />
Group 7: <strong>Reform</strong>ing local government for the<br />
achievement <strong>of</strong> fairness in Thai society<br />
By Asst. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Orathai Kokpol, Director <strong>of</strong> The College<br />
<strong>of</strong> Local <strong>Government</strong> Development, King Prajadhipok’s<br />
Institute<br />
Moderator: Assoc. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Woothisarn Tanchai, Deputy<br />
Secretary General, King Prajadhipok’s Institute<br />
1030-1100 Award presentations for art competitions<br />
1100-1130 KPI Award video presentation <strong>and</strong> 2009 KPI Award<br />
presentation (to local government organizations for<br />
excellence in transparency <strong>and</strong> public participation)<br />
1130-1200 Video presentation: KPI Congress XII<br />
1200-1230 Closing address<br />
By Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Borwornsak Uwanno, Secretary General,<br />
King Prajadhipok’s Institute
Exhibition program<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society
28 KPI Congress XI
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
Exhibition program<br />
KPI Congress XI<br />
Thursday 5 November 2009<br />
1500-1550 His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn<br />
<strong>and</strong> Her Royal Highness Princess Srirasm, Royal<br />
Consort to His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha<br />
Vajiralongkorn preside over the opening <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Congress & Exhibition<br />
Friday November 6, 2009<br />
0900 Registration<br />
0930-1000 Thai musical performance<br />
1000-1015 PRE-QUIZ: Test yourself “Do you like to argue with<br />
your neighbours”<br />
1030-1130 Recommended books that you must read<br />
By Author <strong>and</strong> book Guru’s<br />
1130 Game time<br />
1200 Lunch<br />
1300 Registration<br />
1330-1430 Ramayana Puppet Show from Sai Nam Peung School<br />
1430-1530 The history <strong>of</strong> conflict from the people who had a role in<br />
political conflicts during many era’s<br />
29
30 KPI Congress XI<br />
Saturday November 7, 2009<br />
0900 Registration<br />
0930-1030 Ways <strong>of</strong> collecting news in conflicted area’s<br />
By News broadcaster<br />
Political news editor<br />
Local news broadcaster<br />
1030-1130 Khon Ramayana from Ramkhamhaeng University<br />
1130-1230 University Debate from Rattana Bundit University<br />
1230 Subcommittee Chairman <strong>of</strong> KPI exhibition presents<br />
awards to the winner <strong>of</strong> bag painting contest<br />
Activities: Paint a bag to solve problems <strong>of</strong> conflict (one <strong>and</strong> only in<br />
the world)<br />
Photographs for KPI Congress XI stamps<br />
Predicting behaviors concerning conflict by horoscope
His Royal Highness Crown Prince<br />
Maha Vajiralongkorn<br />
on the Occasion <strong>of</strong> KPI Congress XI Program
32 KPI Congress XI
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society<br />
Schedule<br />
His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn<br />
Accompanied by<br />
Her Royal Highness Princess Srirasm, Royal Consort to His Royal<br />
Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn<br />
Presides Over the Opening Ceremony <strong>of</strong> the 11 th<br />
King Pradjadhipok’s Institute Congress Year 2009<br />
Topic: <strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society”<br />
At the United Nations Conference Centre,<br />
Rajdamnern Nok Avenue, Bangkok<br />
His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, accompanied<br />
by Her Royal Highness Princess Srirasm, Royal Consort to His Royal<br />
Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, proceeds from Sukhothai<br />
Palace to the United Nations Conference Centre, Rajdamnern Nok<br />
Avenue by a royal car<br />
- Arrives at the United Nations Conference Centre<br />
(Royal car parks on the left)<br />
(Playing the Royal anthem)<br />
- Speaker <strong>of</strong> the Parliament (Mr. Chai Chidchob)<br />
(On behalf <strong>of</strong> the president <strong>of</strong> the King Pradjadhipok’s Institute Council)<br />
The Secretary-General <strong>of</strong> the King Pradjadhipok’s Institute<br />
(Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Borwornsak Uwanno)<br />
Board <strong>of</strong> the King Pradjadhipok’s Institute Council<br />
Organizing Committee <strong>of</strong> the King Pradjadhipok’s Institute’s<br />
Academic Conference<br />
Executives <strong>of</strong> the King Pradjadhipok’s Institute awaiting the royal<br />
guests<br />
33
34 KPI Congress XI<br />
Altogether welcome the visit by His Royal Highness Crown Prince<br />
Maha Vajiralongkorn, accompanied by Her Royal Highness Princess<br />
Srirasm, Royal Consort to His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha<br />
Vajiralongkorn<br />
- Proceed to the conference room <strong>of</strong> United Nations Conference Centre<br />
(2 nd Floor, by escalator)<br />
- Proceed to the royal chairs<br />
(Playing royal anthem)<br />
- Be seated in the royal chairs<br />
- The Secretary-General <strong>and</strong> the Deputy Secretary-General <strong>of</strong> the<br />
King Pradjadhipok’s Institute <strong>of</strong>fer the program leaflet <strong>and</strong> books<br />
- Speaker <strong>of</strong> the Parliament gives a brief speech about the background<br />
<strong>and</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> the 11th King Pradjadhipok’s Institute Congress<br />
Year 2009<br />
- His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn delivers the<br />
opening speech for the Academic Conference <strong>of</strong> King Pradjadhipok’s<br />
Institute (Playing royal anthem)<br />
- Proceed out <strong>of</strong> the conference room to the exhibition area on 1st<br />
floor by escalator<br />
- Cut the ribbon for the Exhibition launching ceremony<br />
(Playing Maha Ruek)<br />
- Explore the exhibition<br />
- Sign the book <strong>of</strong> the King Pradjadhipok’s Institute<br />
- Leave the exhibition area towards downstairs by escalator<br />
(Royal car parks on the left)<br />
- Get into royal car<br />
(Playing the royal anthem)<br />
- Depart for Sukhothai Palace<br />
Dress Code The King Pradjadhipok’s Institute or internationally accepted suit
Panel Discussion on<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society
Panel Discussion<br />
Towards an Acceptable Fair Society*<br />
Pasuk Phongpaichit<br />
Honored guests,<br />
It’s my great pleasure to be invited by<br />
King Prajadhipok’s Institute to deliver a<br />
k e y n o t e a d d r e s s a t t h i s a n n u a l<br />
symposium <strong>of</strong> the institute this year. The<br />
topic <strong>of</strong> my speech is entitled “Towards an<br />
Acceptable Fair Society.” I think this topic is<br />
quite appropriate, considering the situations<br />
in our country, <strong>and</strong> it also truly corresponds<br />
to the substance <strong>of</strong> the annual KPI Congress.<br />
I use the English topic instead because I<br />
couldn’t find Thai words that I like. I don’t<br />
want to use wording ‘sue sangkom thi pen<br />
tham (towards a fair society)’ because<br />
* Keynote speech at KPI Congress XI 2009 entitled “<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society,” held at the<br />
United Nations Conference Center, Ratchadamnoen Road, Bangkok during 5-7<br />
November 2009. The author wishes to thank Dr. Methee Krongkaew, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Kowit<br />
Posayanon, Assoc.Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Duangmanee Laowakun <strong>and</strong> Assoc.Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Chairath<br />
Eiamkulawat w h o p rov i d e d u s e f u l s u g g e s t i o n s a s well a s M s . Sa r u e n e e<br />
Archawanunthakun, Dr. Pun Arnun-apibutra <strong>and</strong> Archarn Nuarpear Lekfuengfu who<br />
provided information support.<br />
37
38 KPI Congress XI<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Kraiyut Theeratayakinan, who already passed away, once<br />
told me that the word ‘tham (fair)’ means nature (thammachart) whose<br />
meaning can be interpreted in several ways. I don’t want to use the word<br />
‘sangkom yutitham (fair society)’ because the topic is not about enactment<br />
<strong>of</strong> laws. I don’t want to use the word ‘sue sangkom thaothiam kan (towards<br />
an equitable society)’ because my topic is not intended to make everyone<br />
equal or equitable. I remember when I was a child, we must share things<br />
that we have. We <strong>of</strong>ten asked, “Is it fair to divide it like this?” In fact,<br />
we’re implying, “Is it acceptable?” We need to ask this question to ensure<br />
that everyone agrees that the division is a fair share, so we won’t bicker<br />
over it later. Therefore, the question “Is it fair?” opens an opportunity for<br />
those who disagree to express their opinions. If they still disagree, a new<br />
agreement has to be reached. So, agreement is very important.<br />
An acceptable fair society doesn’t need to be equal in everything but<br />
it must be equitable in terms <strong>of</strong> opportunities, security in life, political<br />
participation <strong>and</strong> the fact that children <strong>and</strong> gr<strong>and</strong>children will have<br />
equally bright futures.<br />
History <strong>of</strong> various societies asserts that these societies could not<br />
develop themselves but they have been borne out <strong>of</strong> the results produced<br />
by the people in such societies. A key factor is there must be a<br />
government system which is responsive to dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> various societal<br />
groups in balanced manners. The mechanisms <strong>of</strong> a modern government<br />
that can satisfy this include fiscal policy, taxation, <strong>and</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> taxes.<br />
Additionally, public utilities <strong>and</strong> social services must be created to satisfy<br />
people’s needs <strong>and</strong> foster the economy. If the government cannot fulfill<br />
these objectives, such society tends to slide towards ever-increasing<br />
inequality. Eventually, the society might develop conflicts between the<br />
“super rich” <strong>and</strong> the “middle class” on one side <strong>and</strong> the “majority poor”<br />
on the other side.….until it becomes a structure-based conflict, waiting<br />
to explode one day (Bavornsak 2009: 6)<br />
Presently, there has been a growing acceptance that the underlying<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> ongoing political conflict we’re facing is inequality in Thai<br />
society.
Panel Discussion<br />
I would like to divide my speech into four parts. The first part<br />
elaborates about inequality in the Thai society. The second part answers<br />
the question why modern-day Thai governments have not tried to<br />
mitigate these inequality. The third part analyzes situations in other<br />
countries that successfully mitigated inequality, so we know how they did<br />
it. I’ll focus on their fiscal policies 1 compared to Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> analyze<br />
what Thail<strong>and</strong> should do. The fourth part is the last part that analyzes<br />
why we should uphold a democratic parliamentary system as a<br />
mechanism that will eventually lead us to an acceptable fair society.<br />
What is the degree <strong>of</strong> inequality<br />
in the Thai society?<br />
Inequality appears in many forms. It may be economic, social,<br />
political <strong>and</strong> cultural status. Even language use <strong>and</strong> treatment may<br />
display inequality. The language we use conveys inequality all the time.<br />
We can look at the use <strong>of</strong> pronouns <strong>and</strong> words that display inequality.<br />
Generally, we tend to take them for granted. My speech today will focus<br />
on economic inequality which we can take the reading from statistical<br />
information to learn how income <strong>and</strong> wealth disparity are among various<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> people in the society. Income inequality indicates how much<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> living differ. If we want to see genuine affluence, we mainly<br />
look at wealth or ownership <strong>of</strong> properties.<br />
Wealth: Recently, TDRI revealed data on property ownership <strong>of</strong><br />
various groups <strong>of</strong> Thai families from the poorest 20% to the richest 20%<br />
as shown in Table 1. These data tell us that the richest families 20% <strong>of</strong><br />
the country collectively possess 69 per cent <strong>of</strong> the properties in the whole<br />
country while the poorest families 20% collectively possess only 1 per<br />
1 There is much more to resource management <strong>of</strong> the country for mitigation <strong>of</strong><br />
inequality than fiscal policies. In particular, there is much more to revenue generation <strong>of</strong><br />
the state sector for public spending than taxation. Aside from that, there are also issues<br />
concerning state enterprise management, l<strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> management <strong>of</strong> other<br />
public properties. Due to limited time, overview <strong>of</strong> taxation policy <strong>and</strong> state expenditure<br />
will be highlighted.<br />
39
40 KPI Congress XI<br />
cent. That means the properties owned by the richest families 20% are<br />
69 times higher than the poorest families. This tells us that wealth highly<br />
concentrates in only 20 per cent <strong>of</strong> the people in the country.<br />
Table 1: Household property by income group in 2006<br />
(1 = Poorest – 5 = Richest)<br />
Group % <strong>of</strong> the entire country<br />
Group 1 1<br />
Group 2 3<br />
Group 3 9<br />
Group 4 18<br />
Group5 69<br />
Source: Kiatpong, Wilatluk <strong>and</strong> Nalin, 2007<br />
The information concerning who has the largest amount <strong>of</strong> deposits<br />
or owns stocks <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s the most which is the most important wealth<br />
indicator also supports the conclusion above.<br />
Bank savings: Statistics compiled by the Bank <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> for the<br />
month <strong>of</strong> June 2009 inform us that 42 per cent <strong>of</strong> bank deposits come<br />
from around 70,000 accounts that have over 10 million baht per<br />
account, accounting for 0.09 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> accounts in<br />
the country. Normally, a person has more than one account. On average,<br />
suppose each person has two accounts. If that’s the case, then it means<br />
42 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total deposit amount in the country belongs to only<br />
35,000 persons (or less than that, if many people have more than two<br />
accounts).<br />
The fact that deposits are concentrated in the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a small<br />
group <strong>of</strong> people implies an extremely high income concentration because<br />
people who have huge deposits have better investment <strong>and</strong> incomegenerating<br />
opportunities than the have-nots.<br />
Stocks in the stock market: A researcher at Thammasat University<br />
is studying stock distribution in the stock market to probe how it is.
Panel Discussion<br />
We’re still waiting for study results. However, there are enough statistics<br />
that can give us a picture that there is a rather high concentration.<br />
During 1995-2004, it was found that 11 families traded positions among<br />
the top-5 families with the highest value <strong>of</strong> shares, including Maleenon,<br />
Shinawatra, Damapong, Jirathiwat, Bencharongkul, Damrongchaitham,<br />
Asavabhokin, Liewphairat, Photharamik, Kannasutra <strong>and</strong> Jaranachit<br />
(Netnapha, 2006: 99-100)<br />
L<strong>and</strong>: L<strong>and</strong> ownership is still the most vital source <strong>of</strong> wealth in the<br />
Thai society. Table 2 illustrates distribution <strong>of</strong> agricultural l<strong>and</strong><br />
ownership by l<strong>and</strong> size in 2006 which reveals a distinct concentration.<br />
The group that doesn’t own any piece <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> makes up almost 20 per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> the total. When combining this group with the group owning 10<br />
rai or less, both groups make up 42 per cent <strong>of</strong> the entire country. Some<br />
people might argue that owing 10 rai is a lot. In fact, if you own 10 rai <strong>of</strong><br />
l<strong>and</strong> in the Northeast <strong>and</strong> the l<strong>and</strong> is located in an arid area or has saline<br />
soil. Ten-rai <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> doesn’t mean anything. This is an important point<br />
because one-third <strong>of</strong> farmers in the country lives in the Northeast <strong>and</strong><br />
faces problems with infertile soil conditions. Thus, 42 per cent <strong>of</strong> farmers<br />
owning 10 rai or less or having no l<strong>and</strong> at all is considered a very high<br />
ratio.<br />
Table 2: Distribution <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong><br />
farmer households in Thail<strong>and</strong> (2006)<br />
L<strong>and</strong> size %<br />
None 18.42<br />
Less than 10 rai 23.94<br />
10-19 rai 24.91<br />
20 rai or over 22.73<br />
Source: Adapted from Duangmanee 2009: 6-6<br />
Another study carried out by an expert in l<strong>and</strong> economics from the<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Development concluded that most l<strong>and</strong>s are in the<br />
h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a marginal number <strong>of</strong> people, that is, 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
41
42 KPI Congress XI<br />
country’s population possesses over 100 rai but the remainder or 90 per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> the population possesses only one rai or less. Around 811,871<br />
Thai families don’t have their own l<strong>and</strong>. Moreover, around 1-1.5 million<br />
farmer households don’t have enough l<strong>and</strong>s to make a living <strong>and</strong> have to<br />
rent l<strong>and</strong>s for their livelihood. (Preecha; 2001; cited in Duangmanee<br />
2009: 6-8)<br />
The above statistics indicate that wealth concentration in our<br />
society lies in the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a marginal number <strong>of</strong> people, which is less<br />
than 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> the country. Moreover, it’s highly likely that these<br />
different types <strong>of</strong> property owners are interlinked, meaning actually they<br />
are the same clans. There is a tendency that people who have a lot <strong>of</strong><br />
deposits also own a large quantity <strong>of</strong> stocks in the stock market <strong>and</strong> a lot<br />
<strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s. Moreover, children <strong>and</strong> gr<strong>and</strong>children <strong>of</strong> these people tend to<br />
relate to each other in some kinds <strong>of</strong> family relationship, as the saying<br />
goes “boat sinks in a swamp, where will the gold go?”<br />
Income distribution: We have plenty <strong>of</strong> data on this. This is<br />
because the National Statistical Office regularly conducts nationwide<br />
surveys on household income <strong>and</strong> expenditure in Thail<strong>and</strong>, which<br />
enables us to divide household groups into various income groups,<br />
ranging from the lowest to the highest, <strong>and</strong> calculate proportions <strong>of</strong><br />
household income <strong>of</strong> different groups in GDP <strong>of</strong> the entire country.
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
0%<br />
Income distribution<br />
Diagram 1<br />
Diagram 1<br />
5th quintile<br />
4th quintile<br />
3rd qunitile<br />
2nd quintile<br />
1st quintile<br />
5<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008<br />
Diagram 1 shows GDP ratio (gross domestic products or GDP) <strong>of</strong><br />
the richest 20% compared to the bottom 20% which is the poorest <strong>and</strong><br />
other groups. The ratios <strong>of</strong> these two groups during 1988-2008 reveal<br />
that the ratio <strong>of</strong> the richest 20% is more than 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> total GDP<br />
while the poorest 20% have only about 4 per cent, which is less than the<br />
ratio <strong>of</strong> 6.05 per cent recorded during 1975-1976.<br />
Diagram 1 shows GDP ratio (gross domestic products or GDP) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
richest 20% compared to the bottom 20% which is the poorest <strong>and</strong> other<br />
groups. The ratios <strong>of</strong> these two groups during 1988-2008 reveal that the ratio<br />
<strong>of</strong> the richest 20% is more than 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> total GDP while the poorest<br />
20% have only about 4 per cent, which is less than the ratio <strong>of</strong> 6.05 per cent<br />
recorded during 1975-1976.<br />
When comparing household income by region against average<br />
household income <strong>of</strong> the entire country, inequality can be observed as well<br />
(see Table 3). The Northeast <strong>and</strong> North, including the South in some years,<br />
tend to have the lowest income. When compared to rural areas, distinct<br />
inequality can be observed as well.<br />
When comparing household income by region against average<br />
household income <strong>of</strong> the entire country, inequality can be observed as<br />
well (see Table 3). The Northeast <strong>and</strong> North, including the South in<br />
some years, tend to have the lowest income. When compared to rural<br />
areas, distinct inequality can be observed as well.<br />
43
44 KPI Congress XI<br />
Table 3: Average household income by region in 1962, 2000, 2007 <strong>of</strong><br />
the entire country = 100<br />
Region 1962 2000 2007<br />
Bangkok 253.7 207.8 187.6<br />
Central 131.1 107.1 105.7<br />
South 120.1 92.1 105.7<br />
North 73.7 71.2 72.7<br />
Northeast 53.5 63.9 69.6<br />
National average 100.0 100.0 100.0<br />
Urban 119.9 150.1<br />
Rural 69.9 76.7<br />
Source: Yukio, Ikemoto, Income Distribution in Thail<strong>and</strong>, Tokyo, Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Developing Economies, 1991; Nuarpear, 2009.<br />
Data in Diagram 1 <strong>and</strong> Table 3 show average household income.<br />
There are also data that reveal personal income disparities in Diagram 2<br />
which reports salaries <strong>and</strong> wages by occupation during 2006-2007.<br />
Again, inequality is evident here.<br />
Regarding income distribution, there are at least four observations.<br />
First, income data <strong>of</strong> the wealthy groups tend to be understated<br />
because data derive from r<strong>and</strong>om sampling. So, there is a tendency that a<br />
small number <strong>of</strong> super rich groups would be left out. (The National<br />
Statistical Office never had access to Shinawatra, Damapong, or<br />
Siriwattanapakdi families among others) Even if these groups could be<br />
reached, respondents would not reveal the whole truth. Aside from that,<br />
collected data would not include various indirect gains, which the rich<br />
tend to have more than the underprivileged, especially from government<br />
spending (such as gains from road construction that transects a piece <strong>of</strong><br />
l<strong>and</strong>, pushing up the l<strong>and</strong> price <strong>and</strong> so forth) or borrowing money for<br />
investment at a special interest rate because they have a better credit<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> so forth.
Bahts<br />
4,000,000<br />
3,500,000<br />
3,000,000<br />
2,500,000<br />
2,000,000<br />
1,500,000<br />
1,000,000<br />
2549<br />
2550<br />
500,000<br />
0<br />
Diagram 2<br />
Diagram 2<br />
Gross Compensation:Thail<strong>and</strong> 2549-2550<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
Occupations<br />
Second, when calculating average income <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the the poorest 20% 20% or or the the<br />
bottom quintile, it was it was found found that that it is it not is not much much different different from from the poverty the<br />
line poverty at 1,443 line at baht 1,443 per baht month per (a month person (a person with income with income below below 1,443 1,443 baht per<br />
month is considered a poor person). This poverty line is calculated by<br />
baht per month is considered a poor person). This poverty line is<br />
converting amount <strong>of</strong> calories that can sustain life <strong>of</strong> a person into amount <strong>of</strong><br />
money calculated needed by to converting buy foods amount to obtain <strong>of</strong> such calories calories, that plus can expenses sustain life <strong>of</strong> clothes, <strong>of</strong> a<br />
dwelling person <strong>and</strong> into medicines amount at <strong>of</strong> a money bare minimum needed level, to buy which foods make to obtain up 60 per such cent<br />
<strong>of</strong> calories, total expenses. plus expenses As this <strong>of</strong> implies, clothes, presently dwelling <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> medicines is less than at a bare 10 per<br />
cent minimum but in fact level, it is which likely make that there up 60 may per be cent at <strong>of</strong> least total another expenses. 10 per As cent this<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
people whose incomes are near this poverty line.<br />
Third, the gap between the richest <strong>and</strong> poorest households in 2007 is<br />
13 times. When comparing to European countries <strong>and</strong> the United States, this<br />
7<br />
45
46 KPI Congress XI<br />
implies, presently <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> is less than 10 per cent but in fact it is<br />
likely that there may be at least another 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> people whose<br />
incomes are near this poverty line.<br />
Third, the gap between the richest <strong>and</strong> poorest households in 2007<br />
is 13 times. When comparing to European countries <strong>and</strong> the United<br />
States, this gap is much lower than that (see Table 4).<br />
Table 4: Comparison <strong>of</strong> income inequality between<br />
the poorest 20% <strong>of</strong> different countries during 1990s-2000s<br />
Country %<br />
Japan 3.4<br />
Norway 3.9<br />
Sweden 4.0<br />
South Korea 4.2<br />
France 5.6<br />
Italy 6.5<br />
United Kingdom 7.2<br />
United States 8.4<br />
China 12.2<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> (2007) 13.0<br />
Venezuela 16.0<br />
Argentina 17.8<br />
Brazil 21.8<br />
Source: Office <strong>of</strong> National Economic <strong>and</strong> Social Development Board, OECD<br />
Fourth, when comparing to neighboring countries, Thail<strong>and</strong> has a<br />
much higher income inequality. Please see Diagram 3 which shows genie<br />
coefficients that indicate levels <strong>of</strong> inequality. The higher the value, the<br />
higher the level <strong>of</strong> inequality. The diagram reveals that the coefficients <strong>of</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> have risen continually <strong>and</strong> are higher than all neighboring<br />
countries while neighboring countries have a declining trend.
0.50<br />
0.40<br />
0.30<br />
Philippines<br />
Indonesia<br />
Malaysia<br />
Diagram 3<br />
Diagram 3<br />
Gini coefficients <strong>of</strong> household income, selected Southeast Asian countries<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005<br />
Why does Thail<strong>and</strong> become<br />
a society with huge inequality?<br />
Source: Adapted from a graph prepared by Hal Hill, ANU<br />
Why does Thail<strong>and</strong> become a society with huge inequality?<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Simon Simon Kuznets Kuznets studied studied a a connection connection between between economic economic<br />
prosperity prosperity <strong>and</strong> income <strong>and</strong> income distribution distribution in the in United the United States, States, Germany Germany <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> United<br />
Kingdom. United It was Kingdom. observed It was that observed when these that when countries these began countries to develop began to during<br />
the early develop days, during income the per early capita days, income perked per up capita <strong>and</strong> income perked inequality up <strong>and</strong> income remained<br />
high. inequality However, when remained further high. development However, when took further place, development income per capita took has<br />
increased place, constantly. income per Up capita to certain has increased points, constantly. inequality Up declined to certain gradually. points, He<br />
explained inequality many declined reasons gradually. attributed He to explained such occurrence. many reasons First, attributed during to early<br />
stages such <strong>of</strong> economic occurrence. development, First, during savings early stages concentrated <strong>of</strong> economic in development,<br />
a small group <strong>of</strong><br />
people savings that could concentrated invest to in generate a small group more income <strong>of</strong> people than that others. could Second, invest to some<br />
economic generate fields more have income higher than productivity others. Second, than others. some economic For instance, fields have industries<br />
grew faster higher productivity than the agricultural than others. sector. For instance, When industrialization industries grew faster progressed than at<br />
an accelerated the agricultural rate, income sector. <strong>of</strong> When workers industrialization in these fields progressed increased at a an<br />
faster<br />
rate compared to other fields, leading to inequality.<br />
Third, in urban areas, income <strong>of</strong> workers in different occupations varies.<br />
Skilled workers can increase their wages above unskilled workers <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />
47<br />
9
48 KPI Congress XI<br />
accelerated rate, income <strong>of</strong> workers in these fields increased at a faster<br />
rate compared to other fields, leading to inequality.<br />
Third, in urban areas, income <strong>of</strong> workers in different occupations<br />
varies. Skilled workers can increase their wages above unskilled workers<br />
<strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> employers who are factory owners increase at an<br />
accelerated rate, thus widening inequality.<br />
Up to a certain point, these inequality would decline gradually due<br />
to several reasons. For instance, when saving concentration dissipates<br />
because other groups have higher income <strong>and</strong> higher saving<br />
opportunities. At the same time, new groups with greater economic<br />
power that become successful dem<strong>and</strong> the government to implement<br />
public policies to mitigate income inequality.<br />
As for Thail<strong>and</strong>, Duangmanee Laowakun applied Kuznets’ method<br />
to calculate income level that might be a turning point that could reduce<br />
income inequality value. It was found that this probable threshold might<br />
be the income per capital <strong>of</strong> 45,215 baht in 1994 (Duagmanee <strong>and</strong><br />
associates, 2009: 3-22) 2 <strong>and</strong> it was found that genie coefficients showed a<br />
declining trend during 1991-1998 but the values perked up again in<br />
2000 <strong>and</strong> 2006. Therefore, such turning point did not really occur.<br />
Why has income distribution inequality in Thail<strong>and</strong> not been<br />
reduced as envisaged in Kuznets’ study?<br />
History tells us that there are two different approaches to mitigate<br />
income inequality. One way is to use taxation <strong>and</strong> money transfer to<br />
create wealth <strong>and</strong> income equality. Another approach is to allow social<br />
forces to exert pressure to mitigate inequality, for example, a labor union<br />
succeeds in negotiating for a higher wage with the employer. In practice,<br />
many countries use both approaches, that is, having both public policy<br />
<strong>and</strong> social pressure.<br />
The countries studied by Kuznets showed a more equitable income<br />
distribution because those in power, that is, governments were pressured<br />
2 Pranee’s study (2002) also adopted Kuznets’ concept. It was found that the turning<br />
point likely occurred in 1993 when annual income per capita was 40,436 baht.
Panel Discussion<br />
to implement numerous public policies (taxation system, public<br />
expenditure <strong>and</strong> revamp <strong>of</strong> several institutions) to prevent exacerbation<br />
<strong>of</strong> income distribution <strong>and</strong> raise equality. In some countries, groups <strong>of</strong><br />
people that wanted to change for the better got a chance to run a<br />
government or governments were forced to change their policies. This<br />
creates something called ‘political will.’ (Wilkinson <strong>and</strong> Pickett, 2009)<br />
In Germany, during late 1900s (the reign <strong>of</strong> King Rama V),<br />
Bismarck adopted a social security system which had been dem<strong>and</strong>ed by<br />
labor unions for a long time. It was one <strong>of</strong> the public policies<br />
implemented to increase support for his government when he desired to<br />
unify Germany.<br />
In United Kingdom, during World War I <strong>and</strong> II, governments<br />
implemented policies to increase equality among different social classes<br />
in order to gain support from the people who had to endure hardships<br />
from the wars. At the end <strong>of</strong> World War II, there was a crucial change,<br />
that is, the Labour Party won elections <strong>and</strong> had opportunities to turn<br />
Engl<strong>and</strong> into a welfare state for quite a long time.<br />
In other developed countries, progressive groups became<br />
governments after a conservative government faced legitimacy crises. For<br />
example, in 1932 after soldiers shot workers embroiled in a dispute with<br />
the employer in Sweden, the Social Democrat won the general election in<br />
that year. This party formed a government <strong>and</strong> turned Sweden into a<br />
welfare state. (Wilkinson <strong>and</strong> Pickett, 2009)<br />
In Asia, presently Japan is an example <strong>of</strong> a highly equitable society.<br />
Even though prior to World War II the country had considerable social<br />
inequality, after World War II there had been numerous institutional<br />
changes in Japan, allowing income <strong>and</strong> property equality to become a<br />
reality. Monumental public policies included l<strong>and</strong> reform, abolishment <strong>of</strong><br />
the feudal era’s class system, abolishment <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong> owner <strong>and</strong> farm<br />
l<strong>and</strong> tenant system, abolishment <strong>of</strong> elite class, reform <strong>of</strong> the political<br />
system that allowed multifarious political parties <strong>and</strong> interest groups to<br />
participate in politics under a democratic parliamentary system. (Ryoshin<br />
et al, 1999: 58) In addition, there is also a property tax system such as<br />
49
50 KPI Congress XI<br />
inheritance tax that aims at mitigating inequality <strong>and</strong> preventing<br />
speculative asset hoarding.<br />
Why were such drastic changes feasible in Japan? One reason was<br />
the earlier ruling class <strong>of</strong> Japan lost in World War II, stripping them <strong>of</strong><br />
their status <strong>and</strong> credibility <strong>and</strong> leaving a room for American consultants<br />
led by General McArthur to successfully implement policies to mitigate<br />
inequality. As a result, labor unions could negotiate with employers.<br />
In my opinion, one interesting point from Japan is generally many<br />
Japanese wanted a more equitable society <strong>and</strong> agreed with American<br />
consultants. Moreover, they could pass on the belief in the value <strong>of</strong><br />
equality until now.<br />
So-called ‘political will’ or the willingness <strong>of</strong> a government to<br />
implement policies to mitigate inequality is very crucial. Policies might<br />
change as time goes by. As observed over the past 10 years, income<br />
distribution in developed countries such as the United States, Engl<strong>and</strong>,<br />
France <strong>and</strong> Italy has turned sour because governments wanted to<br />
implement more liberal economic policies, resulting in reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
social security <strong>and</strong> welfare budgets, but income distribution in countries<br />
that still adopt welfare state policies such as Norway, Sweden <strong>and</strong><br />
Denmark is still in good shape.<br />
In our country, inequality have risen during the early stages <strong>of</strong><br />
economic development, which corresponds to Kuznets’ explanation, that<br />
is, saving concentration lies the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a marginal number <strong>of</strong> people;<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it increases at a faster rate compared to wages; income <strong>of</strong> urbanites<br />
rises faster than rural people <strong>and</strong> so forth. Inequality in Thail<strong>and</strong> have<br />
not subsided but still remained because opportunities which the masses<br />
can earn more are limited, especially those in rural areas. Furthermore,<br />
modern governments <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> have never initiated any mitigation<br />
policies to suppress inequality through fiscal policy <strong>and</strong> other policies like<br />
other countries cited above. In other words, Thail<strong>and</strong> never had a<br />
political will <strong>and</strong> labor unions <strong>and</strong> other social movements (e.g. farmers)<br />
have never been strong enough to pressure governments or become a
government to pursue public policies to mitigate inequality. 3<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
In Thail<strong>and</strong>, groups led by a small number <strong>of</strong> people could usurp<br />
power <strong>and</strong> resist changes. During the past few decades, monopolized<br />
powers were concentrated in the centralized bureaucracy <strong>and</strong> commercial<br />
military systems. (Riggs, 1964; Chai-Anan, 1982; Chambers, 2009)<br />
Even after a parliamentary system was developed, the system has been<br />
controlled by a small number <strong>of</strong> businessmen <strong>and</strong> retired bureaucrats<br />
(both civilian <strong>and</strong> military alike). The military still plays a major role in<br />
Thai politics, can stage a coup to abolish a constitution <strong>and</strong> elected<br />
parliament, <strong>and</strong> impede sustainable democratization. No one in the<br />
power center wants to solve inequality problems. Those who desire to<br />
change this never got a chance to enter the power center. There might be<br />
some discussion about inequality issues in an economic <strong>and</strong> social<br />
development plan like the eighth plan. Later, there would be no<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> any public policy to tackle inequality problems in<br />
earnest, not a single policy. In other words, we still lack a political will.<br />
How can we progress?<br />
I’ll leave political will for the time being <strong>and</strong> turn to review the<br />
mechanisms that can help mitigate income inequality, that is, taxation<br />
system or revenue generated from taxes <strong>and</strong> public expenditure (resource<br />
allocation). Collectively, they are referred to fiscal policy.<br />
A fair society must have a taxation system that is acceptable <strong>and</strong> fair.<br />
However, it doesn’t mean that taxes must be collected from the rich just<br />
to give it to the poor. Since the rich are wealthier, they can pay more,<br />
that is, status-based taxation while gained benefits must not be less than<br />
others. This means the rich must be taxed at an acceptable fair ratio.<br />
3 In Thail<strong>and</strong>, labor unions succeeded in pressuring the government to pass the<br />
social security act that applies to workers in formal sectors in 1988 after 30 years <strong>of</strong><br />
campaigning. However, since the scheme covers only a small portion <strong>of</strong> workers, it has<br />
not contributed much to income distribution.<br />
51
52 KPI Congress XI<br />
A good taxation system must not have a huge impact on incentives,<br />
causing fund transfer or a person’s relocation to other countries where<br />
taxes are lower. The principle should be who needs to pay taxes must do<br />
so according to one’s status. Moreover, those receiving much benefits<br />
from public expenditure should be willing to pay taxes at a greater<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> income, compared to those receiving less benefits. So, we<br />
should pay attention to acceptable, fair allocation <strong>of</strong> tax burden.<br />
(Harberger, 1974: 259) Regarding this issue, a progressive taxation<br />
system (a person with higher income pays a higher percentage <strong>of</strong> income<br />
but taxes should not be too high <strong>and</strong> de-motivate) combined with public<br />
expenditure that benefit everyone should be a primary goal. At the same<br />
time, taxation system should include measures that force those with<br />
excessive wealth to utilize their assets to generate benefits (help increase<br />
productivity <strong>and</strong> employment), not hoarding them for speculation.<br />
Do fiscal policies <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> support the poor?<br />
Taxation system: We must consider both taxation system <strong>and</strong><br />
public expenditure.<br />
Direct <strong>and</strong> indirect taxes are government’s main revenue sources.<br />
Direct taxes are collected from individuals according to income <strong>and</strong> asset<br />
bases, for example, personal income tax, corporate income tax, property<br />
tax <strong>and</strong> inheritance tax (the latter two types are not prominent in our<br />
country). Most indirect taxes are imposed on various products, such as<br />
value-added tax, excise tax, oil tax <strong>and</strong> custom duty, <strong>and</strong> collected when<br />
spending is made on purchase <strong>of</strong> such product.<br />
In Thail<strong>and</strong>, personal income tax is progressive, that is, those with<br />
high income pay a higher tax rate than those with less income; but<br />
corporate income tax is the same rate for everyone.<br />
Indirect taxes are collected from everyone at the same rate, no<br />
matter whether incomes are different or not. In this case, “a poor<br />
household may take a heavier tax burden (compared to income) because<br />
the ratio <strong>of</strong> consumption (C) per income (Y) <strong>of</strong> poor household is higher<br />
than rich household.” (TDRI, 1999: 1, footnote 1) Therefore, the real
Panel Discussion<br />
tax rate <strong>of</strong> an indirect tax is regressive <strong>and</strong> the more government relies on<br />
indirect taxes, the heavier tax burden will be borne by the poor.<br />
Consequently, indirect taxation reduces the poor’s income even more or<br />
increases inequality, implying that the poor subsidizes the rich through<br />
taxation.<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> does not have other direct taxes used in foreign countries<br />
as a supplementary measure to mitigate inequality or even though it has<br />
some but they are underdeveloped. They include property tax,<br />
inheritance tax, capital gain tax <strong>and</strong> interest income tax. Presently, the<br />
withholding tax rate <strong>of</strong> the last one is only 15%, which is rather low<br />
compared to other income taxes.<br />
Table 5: Proportion <strong>of</strong> direct <strong>and</strong> indirect taxes in Engl<strong>and</strong>,<br />
Europe <strong>and</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> in 2000s (%)<br />
Country Direct taxes Indirect taxes Total<br />
Engl<strong>and</strong> 51.6 49.4 100.0<br />
Europe (average) 50.0 50.0 100.0<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> 40.5 59.5 100.0<br />
Source: OECD, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance<br />
Most revenue <strong>of</strong> Thai government comes from indirect taxes (valueadded<br />
tax, excise tax, oil tax, cigarette tax, liquor tax etc.). During late<br />
1980s - late 1990s, the proportion <strong>of</strong> this revenue was as high as 80 per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> total tax revenue but presently this proportion came down to 60<br />
per cent while in developed countries like OECD, the share <strong>of</strong> indirect<br />
taxes is around 50 per cent (Table 5).<br />
As mentioned above, indirect taxes are regressive, that is, the poor<br />
bear a higher tax burden than the rich, thus increasing inequality. Thus,<br />
in Thail<strong>and</strong> our taxation system is rather unfriendly to the poor <strong>and</strong><br />
contributes to exacerbation <strong>of</strong> inequality. Available relevant studies<br />
support this conclusion (Medhi, 1975; Wiboonlak, 1983; Wit, 1977;<br />
TDRI, 2003; Pichit, 1986; Duangmanee <strong>and</strong> associates, 2009; Hyun<br />
Hwa Son, n.d.).<br />
53
54 KPI Congress XI<br />
Even though direct taxes like personal income tax are progressive, in<br />
reality only a small number <strong>of</strong> high income earners pay a high tax rate<br />
<strong>and</strong> since tax evasion is rampant, the government cannot fully collect<br />
personal income tax, rendering the progressive rate ineffectual (Supreeya,<br />
2001; Thanasai, 1994). Even though there are varied tax rates applied to<br />
different income brackets, ranging from 0%, 10%, 20%, 30% <strong>and</strong> 37%,<br />
in reality an average rate is only 5%.<br />
As a result, overall taxation system <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> is regressive rather<br />
than progressive.<br />
The government needs more revenue for production <strong>of</strong> public<br />
goods <strong>and</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> public services in order to effectively mitigate<br />
inequality. Most resources used by the government must come from<br />
duties <strong>and</strong> taxes. In developed countries, a proportion <strong>of</strong> taxes to GDP in<br />
percentage ranges around 40-50% but tax collection <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> is only<br />
17% <strong>of</strong> GDP, which is lower than middle-income countries like<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>, e.g. Venezuela <strong>and</strong> Turkey (see Table 6). Moreover, the<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> personal income tax is very low, that is, only 13 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />
total tax revenue while other countries range from 20 to over 30 per cent.<br />
Table 6: Percentage <strong>of</strong> tax revenue to GDP<br />
<strong>of</strong> various countries in 2007<br />
Country %<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> 17.0<br />
Venezuela 25.0<br />
Japan 27.4<br />
United States 28.0<br />
Turkey 32.5<br />
Russia 36.9<br />
Engl<strong>and</strong> 39.0<br />
Germany 40.6<br />
Sweden 49.7<br />
Source: Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance <strong>and</strong> Heritage Foundation, 2008
Panel Discussion<br />
One problem is that governments <strong>of</strong>ten have tax relief policies.<br />
Most recently, Somchai Wongsawat’s administration waived personal<br />
income tax for those with taxable income below 150,000 baht per year,<br />
thus shrinking a tax base (taxpayers). Another problem is tax collection<br />
issue <strong>and</strong> tax evasion is rampant. Individuals working in the private<br />
sector earning a very high income can hire a legal advisor to help them<br />
pay minimum personal income tax. Many government <strong>and</strong> state<br />
enterprise employees who have withholding tax deductions don’t submit<br />
an income tax return form with full details <strong>of</strong> their incomes. Failure to<br />
submit an income tax return form is considered an <strong>of</strong>fence but this has<br />
been neglected along the way. If any government wants to enforce this, it<br />
will lose popularity. Everyone knows that many government <strong>and</strong> state<br />
enterprise employees earn higher income than their regular wages <strong>and</strong><br />
salaries, as observed from their cars, houses <strong>and</strong> other tangible aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
their st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> living.<br />
In light <strong>of</strong> these problems, the number <strong>of</strong> income taxpayers has<br />
declined constantly from 6.8 million in 2003 to 5.7 million in 2006.<br />
(Songtham Boonyawan <strong>and</strong> Thitima, 2007) In 2008, a total <strong>of</strong> 8.6<br />
million people filed income tax return forms (if husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wife filing<br />
joint tax return forms are counted, the number might be around 12-13<br />
million) In the end, the number <strong>of</strong> people who really pay income tax<br />
might be only around 5 million out <strong>of</strong> 38 million workers in the<br />
country.<br />
As for private companies, the number <strong>of</strong> companies that pay<br />
corporate income tax totals around 301,000 out <strong>of</strong> 546,857 companies<br />
throughout the country. In most cases, this is because the government<br />
gives a tax waiver but there is also tax evasion issue.<br />
In conclusion, studies revealed that the poor bear a greater tax<br />
burden than the rich when considering the proportion relative to<br />
income. This is because Thai government depends on indirect taxes more<br />
than direct taxes, faces problems with a narrow tax base <strong>and</strong> rampant tax<br />
evasion. So, any plan to raise government’s revenue from taxation must<br />
take these issues into consideration. The study on fiscal system <strong>of</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> conducted by Hyun Hwa Son that addressed these issues<br />
55
56 KPI Congress XI<br />
suggested that Thai government must increase the number <strong>of</strong> people who<br />
should pay income tax <strong>and</strong> types <strong>of</strong> direct tax should be exp<strong>and</strong>ed,<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> depending on indirect taxes like in the past. Novel direct taxes<br />
like inheritance tax, property tax <strong>and</strong> capital gain tax must be featured as<br />
a vital component <strong>of</strong> fiscal policy reform. In addition, measures must be<br />
taken to eradicate tax evasion <strong>and</strong> frauds.<br />
Public expenditure <strong>and</strong> income distribution<br />
If we look back in our history, we will find that public expenditure<br />
<strong>of</strong> Thai governments (resource allocation from tax revenue <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country) has changed drastically (see Table 7).<br />
Table 7: Public expenditure <strong>of</strong> Thai government:<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> annual expenditure<br />
Year Military Education<br />
Royal<br />
household<br />
Public<br />
health<br />
Economy<br />
Social<br />
security<br />
1892 26.0 2.0 29.0 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1900 14.0 4.0 22.0 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1910 24.0 2.0 18.0 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1920 27.0 3.0 12.0 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1930 20.0 7.0 8.0 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1935 27.0 11.0 2.0 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1941 36.0 10.0 0.6 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1945 51.0 5.0 0.4 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1950 28.0 11.0 0.6 n.a. n.a. -<br />
1961-65 17.4 28.0* n.a. 25.3 -
Year Military Education<br />
Royal<br />
household<br />
Public<br />
health<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
Economy<br />
Social<br />
security<br />
1975 16.4 30.9* n.a. 25.4 -<br />
1985 16.3 29.8* n.a. 15.8 -<br />
1991 16.0 19.3 n.a. 5.7 23.3 3.1<br />
1995 14.7 14.7 n.a. 6.9 26.5 3.8<br />
1999 9.3 25.1 n.a. 7.3 24.2 4.4<br />
2000 8.9 25.7 n.a. 7.4 22.1 5.4<br />
2005 6.2 21.6 n.a. 7.1 23.7 6.9<br />
2006 6.3 21.7 n.a. 7.4 25.0 7.0<br />
2007 7.3 22.7 9.3 21.2 7.2<br />
2008 8.5 21.9 9.3 19.4 6.9<br />
* Include public health<br />
Source: J.C. Ingram, Economic Change in Thail<strong>and</strong> 1850-1970, Oxford University<br />
Press, 1971, Bank <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Budget Office<br />
A major factor that determines such allocations is power. Over 100<br />
years ago, when governments under absolute monarchy were still in<br />
power, more than one-fourth <strong>of</strong> tax revenue was spent on royal<br />
household. During World War II when military governments were in<br />
power, considerable spending <strong>of</strong> tax revenue was allocated to further<br />
develop the military; in some years the spending exceeded half. Later,<br />
when democracy began to set in, more <strong>and</strong> more tax revenue was spent<br />
on economic <strong>and</strong> social development programs.<br />
57
58 KPI Congress XI<br />
Nevertheless, modern Thai governments still could not prevent<br />
deterioration <strong>of</strong> income inequality. Why?<br />
When comparing to other countries, public expenditure <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
at the level <strong>of</strong> only 18 per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP is still very low. This level is<br />
below 26 per cent <strong>of</strong> developing countries in Asia <strong>and</strong> 36 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />
developed countries. The majority <strong>of</strong> public expenditure goes to wages<br />
<strong>and</strong> salaries <strong>of</strong> government employees which are on an upward trend,<br />
while in developed countries, public spending on subsidies <strong>and</strong> money<br />
transferred to welfare programs is as high as 50 per cent.<br />
Economists said public spending can make income distribution<br />
more equitable (Methee, 1979; TDRI, 1999; Peter Warr, 2003). It was<br />
observed that spending on education is the most efficient, followed by<br />
health care. Other studies also revealed that spending on the agricultural<br />
sector significantly increased income <strong>of</strong> lowest-income groups in the rural<br />
sector.<br />
However, historically such public spending was not enough to<br />
mitigate inequality stemming from other factors <strong>and</strong> the consequence <strong>of</strong><br />
tax burden borne by the poor that has reduced their income in relative<br />
terms.<br />
Such conclusion is substantiated by a research study entitled ‘Fiscal<br />
policies <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Impacts on Poor People’ which was conducted<br />
by Hyun Hwa Son, a South Korean economist. It was found that during<br />
1990s public spending <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> favored the rich <strong>and</strong> provided greater<br />
benefits to urban workers than rural people. State subsidies for electricity,<br />
water, transportation, hospitals <strong>and</strong> education under present schemes<br />
literally benefit well-to-do people more than the underprivileged.<br />
This study did not even take into consideration indirect benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
public spending which tend to fall into the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the rich more than<br />
the poor. Obvious examples are road construction <strong>and</strong> electric train when<br />
l<strong>and</strong> prices along the routes went up. In such case, people who don’t own<br />
l<strong>and</strong> will not receive this benefit.
Panel Discussion<br />
Hyun Hwa Son’s study also suggested that Thai government should<br />
revamp public expenditure to increase equality. For instance, he proposed<br />
that existing subsidies <strong>of</strong> electricity, water <strong>and</strong> transportation should be<br />
abolished. Instead, the government should subsidize parents’ school<br />
expenses, i.e. tuition, books <strong>and</strong> other education-related expenses in<br />
public schools at primary <strong>and</strong> secondary levels. He also urged that health<br />
care <strong>and</strong> education spending be revamped with an aim to improve<br />
equality. In this regard, the free 12-year education policy <strong>of</strong> the present<br />
government is considered to be on the right track, even though it is still<br />
insufficient.<br />
Based on experiences <strong>of</strong> some countries, there is still another way to<br />
spend tax revenue to help improve quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>and</strong> mitigate inequality,<br />
that is, having a universal social security system which is contributed by<br />
both government <strong>and</strong> people. Currently, we use this system for workers<br />
but its coverage is only 25.7% <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> workers or 13.9%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the population. (Kobsak <strong>and</strong> Anan, 2007).<br />
We may discuss about weaknesses <strong>of</strong> public administration in other<br />
dimensions which adversely impacts resource allocation <strong>of</strong> the country,<br />
such as issues concerning corruption <strong>and</strong> justice system <strong>and</strong> so forth.<br />
However, the information shown above obviously tells us that we must<br />
have a sweeping reform, starting from revamping taxation system to<br />
ensure a fairer allocation <strong>of</strong> tax burden <strong>and</strong> revamping public expenditure<br />
to enhance equality.<br />
Now I would like to summarize the approaches that the government<br />
should pursue as follows:<br />
First, there should be more public programs <strong>and</strong> services (public<br />
goods) that every people can gain equal benefits <strong>and</strong> public goods should<br />
be products <strong>and</strong> services that will contribute to mitigation <strong>of</strong> inequality<br />
in respect to health <strong>and</strong> education in particular. To achieve this, the<br />
government must collect more tax revenue. Therefore, a target <strong>of</strong> over 17<br />
per cent <strong>of</strong> GDP should be set to generate more tax revenue in the<br />
future. That means increasing the number <strong>of</strong> people who must pay<br />
income tax, revamping interest rate tax which is still slow, <strong>and</strong> reforming<br />
59
60 KPI Congress XI<br />
the taxation system <strong>and</strong> improving the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the tax collection<br />
system with an aim to mitigate inequality.<br />
Second, the government must avoid a taxation system that will<br />
exacerbate inequality. Accordingly, available information clearly points<br />
out that if tax revenue is to be increased, we must avoid increasing<br />
indirect taxes but add new types <strong>of</strong> direct tax instead. Moreover, we must<br />
ponder about inheritance tax <strong>and</strong> property tax which aim to prevent<br />
people with a lot <strong>of</strong> assets from speculative hoarding. Such measure will<br />
impel people with a lot <strong>of</strong> assets to utilize these assets to boost<br />
productivity <strong>and</strong> create employment or provide opportunities to others<br />
who can utilize these assets as well. In Japan, if people who own a great<br />
deal <strong>of</strong> assets like l<strong>and</strong>s do not make any investment to generate revenue,<br />
they will not be able to keep the l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> have to sell them <strong>of</strong>f within<br />
three generations so as to pay inheritance tax, thus providing<br />
opportunities for further utilization by the people who bought such l<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Third, the government must try to abolish the subsidies that benefit<br />
the rich more than the poor.<br />
The findings <strong>of</strong> Harberger’s study (1974) assert that a fiscal policy<br />
comprising progressive taxes combined with public spending that<br />
benefits everyone can mitigate inequality, judging from declining genie<br />
coefficients as shown in Table 8. This study is applicable to both<br />
developed <strong>and</strong> developing countries.<br />
Table 8: Genie coefficients derived from different fiscal policies<br />
Calculated by Harberger, 1974<br />
Combo policies (both government<br />
revenue <strong>and</strong> spending sides)<br />
Developed<br />
countries<br />
Developing<br />
countries<br />
None 0.402 0.498<br />
Progressive tax + neutral expenditure budget 0.372 0.462<br />
Neutral tax + equitable expenditure budget 0.377 0.456<br />
Progressive tax + equitable expenditure<br />
budget<br />
0.347 0.419
Panel Discussion<br />
As for Thail<strong>and</strong>, the study <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Warr at ANU University in<br />
Australia (Warr 2003) indicates that if Thai government hikes direct tax<br />
revenue by only 10 per cent, then spends collected tax revenue on<br />
production <strong>of</strong> products <strong>and</strong> service provision for the poor (education,<br />
health care, agriculture), the percentage <strong>of</strong> poor people <strong>and</strong> inequality<br />
will drop significantly. This study used data in 2004. It was observed that<br />
the proportion <strong>of</strong> poor people would drop by 3 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population <strong>and</strong> genie coefficient would decline from 0.48 to 0.44.<br />
Furthermore, such policy change also contributes to poverty eradication<br />
<strong>and</strong> more equitable income distribution in the future (Warr, 2003: 43).<br />
As for the increase <strong>of</strong> state revenue from direct taxes such as<br />
personal income tax, direct taxes may not necessarily have to be<br />
progressive in all cases. They may be set at an acceptable flat rate, like not<br />
more than 20 per cent, <strong>and</strong> deductions must be abolished. Then, with<br />
efficient management <strong>of</strong> tax collection, this portion <strong>of</strong> revenue can be<br />
increased. Feasibility studies should be conducted on this.<br />
Politics<br />
In the last part, I would like to come back to talk about political<br />
will.<br />
As mentioned earlier, policies to enhance equality have not<br />
materialized in the past because a lack <strong>of</strong> political will. This means those<br />
who wanted these policies never had a chance to run a government or<br />
never succeeded in pressing governments to change their policies.<br />
Experiences <strong>of</strong> various countries tell us that a political will to implement<br />
policies that enhance equality has the best chance under a democratic<br />
regime where a constitution is the supreme law that guarantees civil<br />
rights <strong>and</strong> liberties.<br />
Nevertheless, there are some people who don’t agree with this<br />
suggestion by saying that democratic system is suitable for Thai society.<br />
Some people even remark that democratic system is not suitable for an<br />
unfair society.<br />
61
62 KPI Congress XI<br />
One common contention is many Thais are still poor <strong>and</strong> not<br />
educated well enough to know what’s right or what’s wrong. Therefore,<br />
they cannot make up their own minds <strong>and</strong> may be misled easily.<br />
However, as time goes by, such thinking is being criticized more <strong>and</strong><br />
more that it is used to justify preservation <strong>of</strong> existing inequality so that<br />
people will accept a government controlled by a few persons that has<br />
supreme power.<br />
Another criticism is the democratic system heeds opinions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
majority <strong>and</strong> will likely end up with mob rule. This issue has been taken<br />
up <strong>and</strong> a solution is there already. Most countries prescribe rules in their<br />
constitutions to prevent the majority from harming the minority <strong>and</strong><br />
adequately protect the minority.<br />
Some people criticize democracy by saying that it provides<br />
opportunities for vote-buying by politicians. Regarding this issue,<br />
experiences <strong>of</strong> developed countries can shed light on this. Once people’s<br />
income rose, 500 or 1,000 baht <strong>of</strong>fered to buy a vote would mean<br />
nothing to them. Eventually, vote-buying will disappear.<br />
Nevertheless, criticism still goes on <strong>and</strong> on, saying in a democratic<br />
system, before important matters are resolved, opinions <strong>of</strong> various groups<br />
must be heeded <strong>and</strong> an agreement must be reached before determining<br />
further action. This process is more time-consuming than under an<br />
authoritarian regime where power is in the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> one person.<br />
Consequently, democracy may deter economic development which<br />
requires quick decisions. Regarding this issue, available studies may not<br />
firmly conclude that democracy is detrimental to economic development<br />
while many countries that have grown dramatically do not have<br />
democracy.<br />
However, it is clearly evident that many countries in the world that<br />
have enjoyed satisfactory economic growth rates <strong>and</strong> stable political<br />
conditions have democratic governments.<br />
Even in our own experiences, Thail<strong>and</strong> enjoyed the fastest economic<br />
growth rate under a democratic regime. During 1986-1996, average
Panel Discussion<br />
GDP growth was 9.5 per cent per annum which was the highest in the<br />
world at that time.<br />
Nevertheless, a reputed scholar who is keen on this found a<br />
conclusion from his study that even if we don’t need a democratic system<br />
to propel economic growth, democracy has its inherent values that other<br />
regimes like communism, authoritarian or military government don’t<br />
have. These values include freedom, equality <strong>and</strong> human rights. Dr.<br />
Bavornsak also agreed on these points when saying “…We must be<br />
democratic to live in the global society with dignity <strong>and</strong> for ourselves<br />
because democracy bestows rights, liberties <strong>and</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> choices on us<br />
while authoritarian doesn’t have ...” (Bavornsak, 2009: 12)<br />
Aside from that, democracy also has another merit. It is an<br />
administrative regime that can resolve conflicts in an industrial society<br />
with the lowest cost. Institutions such as political parties, parliament,<br />
independent bodies, transparent <strong>and</strong> trustworthy justice system, <strong>and</strong> a<br />
constitution that is the supreme law that regulate political rules have<br />
been accepted internationally that they can be used as the most efficient<br />
tools to resolve conflict. We can observe that many countries in the<br />
world, including even India, still uphold democracy.<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> is part <strong>of</strong> the globalized societies. Thus, it cannot avoid<br />
having any connection with democracy <strong>and</strong> must seek to consolidate our<br />
democracy.<br />
There is another criticism on the democratic system that must be<br />
mentioned, that is, corruption by politicians. Corruption is a problem in<br />
every political system. Certainly, switching from democracy to other<br />
regime will not solve corruption problems <strong>and</strong> even switching from<br />
elected MPs to appointed MPs will not solve the problems either. Many<br />
studies, including studies conducted by the research team at<br />
Chulalongkorn University where I am also a member, discovered that<br />
democracy is the best means to mitigate corruption. This is because legal<br />
frameworks <strong>and</strong> institutions can be developed to deal with such<br />
problems, particularly checks <strong>and</strong> balances system <strong>and</strong> reform <strong>of</strong> judicial<br />
processes. Mr. Rakkiat, Mr. Wattana <strong>and</strong> Kamnan Poh who used to be an<br />
63
64 KPI Congress XI<br />
influential person were prosecuted on corruption charges <strong>and</strong> sentenced<br />
to imprisonment under the frameworks <strong>of</strong> the 1997 Constitution.<br />
The outcome <strong>of</strong> political conflicts that culminated in protests<br />
against populist policies <strong>of</strong> Thaksin’s administration <strong>and</strong> opposition<br />
against Pol.Col. Thaksin <strong>and</strong> political parties linked to him has<br />
exacerbated <strong>and</strong> turned into numerous violent protests has convinced a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> middle-class people to renounce the democratic parliamentary<br />
system under one man, one vote principle which applies to election <strong>of</strong><br />
members <strong>of</strong> parliament <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> an increased number <strong>of</strong> appointed<br />
MPs <strong>and</strong> senators. However, this proposal seems to wither away because<br />
more <strong>and</strong> more people oppose this idea. I hope my speech today may<br />
help shed light on this matter.<br />
Once we can agree <strong>and</strong> decide that we should uphold a universal<br />
democratic parliamentary system, we will be able to find ways to make<br />
this system function effectively in Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
However, we must keep two things in mind. First, we cannot<br />
possibly shape up democracy overnight but we have to go through the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> learning by doing <strong>and</strong> apply our cumulative learning from<br />
experiences to improve basic institutions along the way. It may be done<br />
through trial <strong>and</strong> error. That’s alright. Continuity <strong>of</strong> the system is critical<br />
in this respect because it has positive reinforcement on the process <strong>of</strong><br />
learning by doing. Therefore, we must make the best effort to prevent a<br />
military coup.<br />
We must have an acceptable fair society, so we can have a peaceful<br />
society. A political system that consists <strong>of</strong> a parliamentary system <strong>and</strong><br />
constitution that guarantees basic rights <strong>and</strong> liberties <strong>and</strong> sets out rules <strong>of</strong><br />
political gambits will provide us the best opportunities to achieve this<br />
goal.
References<br />
In Thai<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
Kobsak Phutrakoon <strong>and</strong> Anan Serichethapong (2007). “Survival <strong>of</strong><br />
the Social Security System <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>: <strong>Reform</strong> Approaches towards<br />
Sustainability,” Paper presented at the annual symposium <strong>of</strong> the Bank <strong>of</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> in 2007.<br />
Duangmanee Laowakun <strong>and</strong> associates (2009). Research study<br />
entitled “Fiscal Policies <strong>and</strong> Measures to Achieve Income Equality,<br />
presented to the Income Distribution Committee <strong>of</strong> the National<br />
Economic <strong>and</strong> Social Development Board by the Economic Academic<br />
Services Center, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, Thammasat University.<br />
TDRI (Thail<strong>and</strong> Development Research Institute) (2003), “Income<br />
Distribution <strong>and</strong> Poverty: Problems <strong>and</strong> Remedial Measures,” Bangkok.<br />
TDRI (Thail<strong>and</strong> Development Research Institute) (1999).<br />
“<strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Fiscal <strong>and</strong> Tax Burdens <strong>and</strong> Benefits <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> During<br />
1986-1996,” Bangkok.<br />
Kobsak Phutrakoon <strong>and</strong> Anan Serichethapong (2007). “Survival <strong>of</strong><br />
the Social Security System <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>: <strong>Reform</strong> Approaches towards<br />
Sustainability,” Paper presented at the annual symposium <strong>of</strong> the Bank <strong>of</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> in 2007.<br />
Thanasai Fakfaipon (1994). “Current Problems <strong>of</strong> Personal Income<br />
Tax Collection in Thail<strong>and</strong>,” Thesis, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economic Development,<br />
National Institute <strong>of</strong> Development Administration.<br />
Netnapha Wailertsak (2006). “Thai Capital Groups - Business<br />
Families Before <strong>and</strong> After 1997 Crisis,” A research study funded by the<br />
Office <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> Research Fund, Bangkok: Br<strong>and</strong> Age books.<br />
Bavornsak Uwanno (2009). “Roles <strong>of</strong> Media <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Reform</strong>,”<br />
King Prajadhipok’s Institute, Bangkok.<br />
65
66 KPI Congress XI<br />
Pranee Thinnakorn (2002). “Income Distribution Disparity During<br />
the Era <strong>of</strong> Country’s Development 1961-2001,” presented at the 25th<br />
Annual Symposium ‘Five Decades under National Economic <strong>and</strong> Social<br />
Development Plans <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>,’ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, Thammasat<br />
University, 12 June 2002.<br />
Preecha Wathanyu (2001). Support document distributed at the<br />
event ‘L<strong>and</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> by Communities,’ held by the civic action group for<br />
sustainable rectification <strong>of</strong> poverty problems during 17-19 November<br />
2005 at the l<strong>and</strong> reform area <strong>of</strong> Ban Pong community, Moo 2, Mae Fak<br />
sub-district, Sansai district, Chiang Mai.<br />
Pichit Likitkitsomboon (1986). “Taxes <strong>and</strong> Duties <strong>and</strong> Income<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> Thai Households in 1981,” Thammasat Economics<br />
Journal 4(2): 131-157.<br />
Methee Krongkaew (1979). “Impacts <strong>of</strong> Fiscal System on Income<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>,” Research report no. 15, Bangkok. Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics, Thammasat University.<br />
Wit Tantayakun (1977). “Taxes <strong>and</strong> Duties <strong>and</strong> Economic<br />
Inequality,” Bangkok: Personal research, National Defence College <strong>of</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Wiboonlak Ruamrak (1983). “Impacts <strong>of</strong> Fiscal Policy on Income<br />
Distribution in Bangkok Metropolitan During 1972-1976, Graduate<br />
thesis, Kasetsart University.<br />
Supree Somboon (2005). “Tax Structure <strong>and</strong> Income Distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> - Case Study: Personal Income Tax,” Graduate thesis, Faculty<br />
<strong>of</strong> Economic Development, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Development<br />
Administration.<br />
Supreeya Cholaweerawong (1981). “Impacts <strong>of</strong> Personal Income<br />
Tax Collection <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>,” Graduate thesis, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics,<br />
Thammasat University.
In English<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
Chai-Anan Samuudavanija (1982). The Thai Young Turks,<br />
Singapore : ISEAS.<br />
Chambers, Paul (2009). ‘U-Turn to the Past The Resurgence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Military in Contemporary Thail<strong>and</strong>, paper presented at a public forum<br />
on the military in Thai politics, organized by ISIS, Chulalongkorn<br />
University, September 1.<br />
Falkus, Malcolm (1999 a). ‘Income Inequality <strong>and</strong> Uncertain<br />
Democracy in Thail<strong>and</strong>’, in Ryoshin Miami, Kwan S. Kim <strong>and</strong> Malcolm<br />
Falkus (eds.) Growth, Distribution <strong>and</strong> Political Change in Asia <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Wider World, Palgrave, MacMillan, pp.114-142.<br />
Falkus, Malcolm (1999 b). ‘Reflections <strong>and</strong> Retrospect’, in Ryoshim<br />
Miami, Kwan S. Kim <strong>and</strong> Malcolm Falus (eds.) Growth, Distribution<br />
<strong>and</strong> Political Change in Asia <strong>and</strong> the Wider World, Palgrave, MacMilan,<br />
pp. 114-142.<br />
Kuznetss, S. (1955). ‘Economic Growth <strong>and</strong> Income Inequality’,<br />
American Economic Review, 45, 1, March, pp. 1-28.<br />
Medhi Khrongkaew (1975). ‘The Income Distributional Effects <strong>of</strong><br />
Taxes <strong>and</strong> Public Expenditures in Thail<strong>and</strong> : An Intertemporal Study’<br />
(Dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.<br />
Nuar Lekfuangfu (2009). ‘Performance or Power : A Study on<br />
Remunerations <strong>of</strong> Executives <strong>of</strong> SET-Listed Companies in Thail<strong>and</strong>’,<br />
A research proposal for the project ‘Towards <strong>and</strong> More <strong>Equitable</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> : A Study <strong>of</strong> Wealth, Power, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>,’ funded by the TRF,<br />
Chulalongkorn University <strong>and</strong> the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Higher Education,<br />
presented at a workshop to discuss the proposal, at the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics, Chulalongkorn University, May 12, 2009.<br />
Pan Aphinanaphibut (2009). ‘Fiscal reform for Greater Equity’,<br />
A research proposal for the project ‘Towards a More <strong>Equitable</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>:<br />
A Study <strong>of</strong> Wealth, Power, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>,’ funded by the TRF, Chulalongkorn<br />
University <strong>and</strong> the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Higher Education, presented at a workshop<br />
67
68 KPI Congress XI<br />
to discuss the proposal, at the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, Chulalongkorn<br />
University, May 12, 2009.<br />
Pranee Tinakorn (1995). ‘Industrialization Welfare : How Poverty<br />
<strong>and</strong> Income Distribution are Affected’, in Medhi Krongkaew (ed.)<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s Industrialization <strong>and</strong> Its Consequences, London, Macmillan.<br />
Riggs, F.W. (1966). Thail<strong>and</strong> : The Modernization <strong>of</strong> a Democratic<br />
Policy, Honolulu : East-West Centre Press.<br />
Ryoshin Miami, Kwan S. Kim <strong>and</strong> Malcom Falkus, eds. (1999).<br />
Growth, Distribution <strong>and</strong> Political Change in Asia <strong>and</strong> the Wider World,<br />
Palgrave, MacMillan.<br />
Son, Hyun Hwa (n.d.). ‘Is Thail<strong>and</strong>’s Fiscal System Pro-Poor? :<br />
Looking from Income <strong>and</strong> Expenditure Components’, Mimeo. The<br />
World Bank.<br />
Warr, P.G. (2003). ‘Fiscal Policies <strong>and</strong> Poverty Incidence : The Case<br />
<strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>’, Asian Economic Journal, Vol. 17, No. 11.<br />
Warr, P.G. <strong>and</strong> Archanun Kohpaiboon (2007). Distortions to<br />
Agricultural Incentives in a Food Exporting Country : Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Mimeographed.<br />
Wilkinson, Richard <strong>and</strong> Kate Pickett (2009). The Spirit Level :<br />
Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, Allen Lane an<br />
imprint <strong>of</strong> Penguin Books.
Origin <strong>of</strong> Public Policies<br />
Nithi Eawsriwong<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
It’s been said that politicians formulate<br />
policies <strong>and</strong> policy administration is run<br />
by state mechanisms such as government<br />
employees <strong>and</strong> so on.<br />
But where do policies formulated by<br />
politicians come from? Surprisingly, in a<br />
modern democracy, public policies rarely<br />
come from people through elections, except<br />
some immediate problems like “Should the<br />
U.S. pull troops out <strong>of</strong> Iraq?”<br />
Crucial policies that affect the lives <strong>of</strong><br />
most people are not formulated through<br />
elections because platforms <strong>of</strong> various<br />
political parties are not that different, but<br />
people are the ones who formulate or engage<br />
in the formulation <strong>of</strong> public policies through<br />
social movements. Such movements may be<br />
done through media (independent) which<br />
must be rather highly sensitive to opinions <strong>of</strong><br />
audiences or other forms <strong>of</strong> movements.<br />
69
70 KPI Congress XI<br />
A state like Thail<strong>and</strong> that is not opened up to media freedom or<br />
social movements <strong>of</strong> different groups implicitly bars the general public<br />
from getting involved in the formulation <strong>of</strong> public policies.<br />
If that’s the case, where does a public policy in Thail<strong>and</strong> originate<br />
from?<br />
One way is from politicians who hold an administrative position,<br />
especially right after assuming a position <strong>and</strong> before being lobbied by<br />
government departments under his or her comm<strong>and</strong>, technocrats or<br />
capitalist groups <strong>and</strong> businesses.<br />
For example, solving cost <strong>of</strong> living increase problems by using<br />
satang coins which were implemented by other prime ministers in the<br />
past or putting a lid on salary increase <strong>of</strong> government employees (around<br />
five million people) because the news could tempt retailers to hike retail<br />
prices ahead <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
We can’t deny it. Psychology is a factor in the determination <strong>of</strong><br />
product prices. However, there is a factor that is more powerful than<br />
psychology, that is, dem<strong>and</strong>-supply in rudimentary economics. If<br />
dem<strong>and</strong>-supply fails to function or does not fully function, it means free<br />
competition does not exist in the market. Therefore, we must rectify this<br />
to prevent monopoly or circumvention practices (compulsory licensing<br />
(CL) <strong>of</strong> drug products partially undermines monopoly <strong>and</strong><br />
circumvention practices). Otherwise, non-production costs (e.g. different<br />
types <strong>of</strong> rent) will be incurred or costs may arise from production,<br />
distribution or transportation inefficiencies. The state needs to raise<br />
efficiency by providing incentives or putting up obstacles to prevent<br />
inefficient production.<br />
Similarly, the idea to cap cooking gas price by taking subsidy from<br />
the oil fund (or setting aside a separate budget) also points towards the<br />
same direction, that is, trying to rid <strong>of</strong> consumers from the dem<strong>and</strong>supply<br />
rule. Many past lessons have revealed only major <strong>and</strong> minor<br />
failures along the way.
Panel Discussion<br />
Actually, it’s not surprising at all to hear that these policies come<br />
from politicians who just came into the <strong>of</strong>fices. The guy just learned that<br />
he would be installed as a minister <strong>of</strong> a certain ministry no more than a<br />
week before assuming the position. So, what policy will he put out?<br />
When he considers the platforms <strong>of</strong> various parties, there are no concrete<br />
goals that he could play with. That’s why policies during early days in<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice are so pathetic like that. Most policies will be discarded as time<br />
passes, except some politicians who behave absurdly forever like none<br />
other than Mr. Banharn Silapa-archa (perhaps Mr. Samak Sundaravej<br />
too).<br />
However, politicians are just an ordinary Thai person who belongs<br />
to the middle class just like us all. So, they simply adopt some common<br />
senses from the society <strong>and</strong> they struck gold, exclaiming eureka…this is<br />
the policy. Then, this sort <strong>of</strong> policies would be announced upon<br />
assuming ministerial positions. For example, construct a dam (without<br />
having to conduct any study), irrigate water (without having to conduct<br />
any study), pump cash into the system to stimulate spending (without<br />
having to study cash-pumping schemes to ensure that the money flows<br />
right to the real spenders), fight narcotics (without studying other<br />
implications from narcotic suppression, rather than staging a “drug<br />
war”), grow eucalyptus trees, use GMO plants, use nuclear energy <strong>and</strong> so<br />
forth.<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> these policies accord with the interests <strong>of</strong> some groups.<br />
These people have publicized these policies for a long time, so such<br />
policies would be well received by government <strong>of</strong>ficials, technocrats,<br />
media <strong>and</strong>, <strong>of</strong> course, by businesses that would be benefited directly from<br />
the projects.<br />
Moreover, these policies may be rather long-lived because some<br />
social bases support them, sparking debates in the society (not freely <strong>and</strong><br />
impartially). Eventually, some policies got through <strong>and</strong> implemented.<br />
Some policies were put in a drawer, waiting for politicians who will<br />
assume positions in the next administration.<br />
71
72 KPI Congress XI<br />
The second way <strong>of</strong> how public policies in Thail<strong>and</strong> are formed is<br />
through pressure (gently but with stern face) <strong>of</strong> interest groups backed by<br />
capitalist groups <strong>and</strong> businesses, including numerous business<br />
associations, brokers <strong>of</strong> the stock market, stock exchange board, major<br />
stock investors, some university scholars who have some shared interests<br />
with the above groups. Moreover, the stuff considered academic in<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> merely rests on secular views <strong>of</strong> the above groups. So, no matter<br />
whether academics are a hired shooter or not a hired shooter, most <strong>of</strong><br />
them will shoot in the same directions or their shots will be cluttered<br />
together.<br />
This pressure may be considered forceful. Despite the fact that this<br />
pressure may not be based on a comprehensive study, shining “scholar’s<br />
aura” is there. Thus, it has a great influence on media <strong>and</strong> audiences, let<br />
alone financial connection between these groups <strong>and</strong> politicians in every<br />
party. So, this pressure becomes the most vital factor in the formulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> public policies. At the least, if these policies are not opposed by these<br />
groups, they will likely be implemented.<br />
The third way <strong>of</strong> how public policies are formed is through the<br />
monarchy. Due to a special status <strong>of</strong> this institution in the Thai society,<br />
the king’s opinions greatly influence the formulation <strong>of</strong> public policies.<br />
(That’s all I want to write about this because that’s all the courage I have)<br />
The fourth way <strong>of</strong> how public policies are formed is through<br />
middle-class people, who are the most important customers <strong>of</strong> all types<br />
<strong>of</strong> media because <strong>of</strong> high purchasing power that can make the media<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itable. Actually, these people don’t have much shared interests, except<br />
some basic necessities. So, this is the group <strong>of</strong> people that have power to<br />
influence public policies to a certain extent. Since politicians typically<br />
seek popularity among voters, there is a tendency that they will propose<br />
policies to appease middle classes, for example, capping cooking gas<br />
price, taking money from benzene to subsidize diesel prices, reducing bus<br />
fare, building expressway, reducing expressway toll fee, increasing<br />
deductibles for personal income tax <strong>and</strong> so forth.
Panel Discussion<br />
Even though this group <strong>of</strong> people seems powerful, in reality they are<br />
not that powerful after all because it is splintered into numerous small<br />
interest groups. More importantly, interest groups <strong>of</strong> these people have<br />
never been able to form their own organizations in order to actively study<br />
<strong>and</strong> push for policy implementation. Moreover, they have failed to reach<br />
out to the media that <strong>of</strong>fer policy alternatives. (For example, in many<br />
cases, reduction <strong>of</strong> pollution in production can reduce more production<br />
costs as well. So, the middle-class fear being out <strong>of</strong> job more than ruining<br />
their lungs because they never knew that work <strong>and</strong> healthy lung can coexist.)<br />
When the truth unfolds, these people have no power to influence<br />
public policies <strong>and</strong> they can neither develop a policy themselves nor<br />
participate in the formulation with promising results. The only thing<br />
they have left is clamor. If they blared loudly, they would get some<br />
attention but if they just complained quietly, they could vent their<br />
frustration because they could feel relieved after making some noise.<br />
The fifth way <strong>of</strong> how public policies are formed is through what<br />
politicians call “NGOs.” In reality, NGOs today are even more wimpy<br />
(especially when comparing to Jon Ungphakorn who chairs Kor.Por.<br />
Or.Phor.Chor.) because presently NGOs are acting like bureaucrats<br />
working in another department. Their main goal is to keep subsidized<br />
projects running more than anything in the whole world, let alone nasty<br />
fighting among themselves over shares <strong>of</strong> the pie.<br />
As for the group <strong>of</strong> people that actively engage in the formulation <strong>of</strong><br />
public policies, I’d like to call them “activists.” Some people or some<br />
groups may also be NGOs (like Archarn Jon mentioned above). These<br />
people do not have civic “bases” anywhere. Since they do not perform<br />
some sort <strong>of</strong> social welfare works like NGOs, they must create civic<br />
“bases” from the policies that they support by advocating these policies<br />
through the media by networking with activist groups in the civic sector<br />
(which are used to partially contribute to the formulation or<br />
modification <strong>of</strong> public policies supported by them) or directly joining the<br />
civic sector’s movements, provided that such movements correspond to<br />
their public policies.<br />
73
74 KPI Congress XI<br />
No matter whether it is intentional or not, works done by activist<br />
groups bestow “political power” on the people, which are considered a<br />
key to any movement. Sometimes political power may be greater than<br />
the civic sector’s opposition against some projects.<br />
Over the past 10-20 years, as the results have shown, social<br />
movements <strong>of</strong> the civic sector have been more vibrant <strong>and</strong> vigorous.<br />
First, judging from the frequency. Second, activist groups within the civic<br />
sector have created allied networks that are interlinked. Third, the<br />
interests <strong>of</strong> activist groups <strong>of</strong> the civic sector have been extended to other<br />
matters which are not immediate problems they’re facing (such as joining<br />
protests led by the People’s Alliance for Democracy <strong>and</strong> the rival group).<br />
The power <strong>of</strong> the civic sector has grown stronger to the level which<br />
politicians must put up a “challenge” every time whenever they pushed<br />
for adoption <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> their own policies. This demonstrates that<br />
politicians are conscious <strong>of</strong> the civic sector’s power, which in one era,<br />
they could care less about them.<br />
These five factors play some roles in the formulation <strong>of</strong> public<br />
policies, more or less, no matter whether governments came from an<br />
election or were installed by a military coup. All these five factors<br />
combined are still considered a minority <strong>of</strong> Thai population. Therefore,<br />
robustness <strong>of</strong> democratic values is judged by this measure, <strong>and</strong> as long as<br />
spaces for social movements are not wide-opened for the majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
people, this will as far as democratization <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> will go.<br />
Constitution drafters who have to work again in the near future –<br />
whether under a military junta or an elected government – please be<br />
aware.
Panel Discussion<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>s, <strong>Legitimacy</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong><br />
<strong>Reform</strong>: The Role <strong>of</strong> Civic Education<br />
Richard A. Nuccio, Ph.D.<br />
Director Civitas International Programs<br />
The Revolution was not fought to deliver paradise,<br />
but to liberate us from hell.<br />
-Attributed to Joaquin Villalobos,<br />
f o r m e r s e n i o r m i l i t a r y c o m m a n d e r<br />
Farabundo Marti Liberation Front (FMLN),<br />
El Salvador<br />
Introduction<br />
The objectives posed for Thai society by<br />
this KPI conference are important ones,<br />
which have motivated, <strong>and</strong> eluded, human<br />
beings since we began to organize ourselves<br />
into complex political arrangements. Can a<br />
society pursue the objectives <strong>of</strong> equity<br />
through peace <strong>and</strong> harmony? In societies<br />
marked by deep historical, social, <strong>and</strong> ethnic<br />
divisions is there a way to promote social<br />
justice that does not destroy the fabric<br />
holding society together?<br />
Recent Thai history, <strong>and</strong> the “Principle<br />
<strong>and</strong> Rationale” guilding this conference,<br />
75
76 KPI Congress XI<br />
suggest that the experiment in governance being conducted by<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s political leadership is not achieving all that its authors would<br />
hope. The “Rationale” cites, among other disturbing signs in recent<br />
Thai political history, clashes between groups with opposing political<br />
views, unrest, loss <strong>of</strong> life, polarization, <strong>and</strong> battles between different<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> government. The “Rationale” further states that these visible<br />
conflicts cover an even deeper set <strong>of</strong> systemic problems including<br />
corruption, misconduct <strong>of</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficials, unfair allocation <strong>of</strong> resources,<br />
unequal access to educational opportunities, elections influenced by<br />
patronage, <strong>and</strong> military intervention.<br />
If, as is <strong>of</strong>ten said about addictions, the first step toward recovery is<br />
recognizing that one has a problem, the long list <strong>of</strong> problems contained<br />
in this “Rationale” suggests that Thail<strong>and</strong> is ready to undertake the<br />
difficult “Treatment” required to become a full <strong>and</strong> vibrant democracy.<br />
As the recent global financial crisis has reaffirmed, we in the United<br />
States should be very careful about pretending to have lessons to teach<br />
others, whether in economics or politics. Our own failures to address<br />
systemic weaknesses in our financial structures have brought untold<br />
suffering to millions <strong>of</strong> unemployed Americans struggling <strong>and</strong>, in many<br />
cases, loosing their battle to keep their homes <strong>and</strong> families safe. Our<br />
failures because <strong>of</strong> the global influence <strong>of</strong> the U.S. economy have<br />
inflicted life threatening hardship on countless others around the world.<br />
Fortunately, we had a democratic system capable <strong>of</strong> responding<br />
quickly to these failures through the alternation in power <strong>of</strong> an<br />
opposition political party. However, despite the hope that President<br />
Obama has brought to the United States <strong>and</strong>, if the Nobel prize<br />
committee is to be believed, to the rest <strong>of</strong> the world, the jury is still out<br />
on whether we can address the political failures that led to the financial<br />
failures: the corrosive influence <strong>of</strong> money on our political system, the<br />
dominance <strong>of</strong> political decision-making by well-organized lobbies <strong>and</strong><br />
influence peddlers, <strong>and</strong> the undermining <strong>of</strong> the government’s<br />
competence <strong>and</strong> capacity to regulate in the public interest the<br />
functioning <strong>of</strong> the private market economy.
Panel Discussion<br />
I speak about these matters as a former college pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> political<br />
science, but also as someone with certain government experiences.<br />
I worked for several years as a staff member <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong><br />
Representatives’ Foreign Affairs committee <strong>and</strong> as the senior foreign<br />
policy adviser to a US Senator. I learned, <strong>of</strong>ten to my horror, how the<br />
legislative process really works, in contrast with the neat <strong>and</strong> tidy<br />
textbooks I had studied in graduate school. I saw personally how <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
elected representatives’ decisions are based on no or fragmentary<br />
information <strong>and</strong> the power that unelected staff pr<strong>of</strong>essionals have in<br />
shaping what does or doesn’t get done in Washington. I crossed over to<br />
the “other side” <strong>and</strong> worked for four years as a member <strong>of</strong> the Clinton<br />
Administration at the Department <strong>of</strong> State <strong>and</strong> the White House. I saw<br />
from the perspective <strong>of</strong> the executive branch how comparatively “easy”<br />
it was to pass laws that were never executed <strong>and</strong> how difficult governing<br />
according to principles could be. I saw great political courage, but more<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten striking political weakness when decisions were made to advance<br />
the political ambitions <strong>of</strong> a person or a party at the expense <strong>of</strong> the<br />
national interest.<br />
I reflect on these experiences now from the distant shores <strong>of</strong><br />
California. I <strong>of</strong>ten joke to friends still gripped by “Potomac Fever” that<br />
I have “given up” on adults <strong>and</strong> now work with children in my role as<br />
director <strong>of</strong> international programs at the Center for Civic Education.<br />
Like many factitious comments this one contains a grain <strong>of</strong> truth: young<br />
people are the final hope <strong>of</strong> all societies, including mine, <strong>and</strong> we risk the<br />
future <strong>and</strong> squ<strong>and</strong>er the present if we do not invest in doing the best we<br />
can for them now.<br />
I appear on this podium I am sure not because <strong>of</strong> this background<br />
or the expectation that I will <strong>of</strong>fer some pr<strong>of</strong>ound insights on the<br />
questions posed by the “Rationale.” Rather I suspect it is because I have<br />
the privilege <strong>of</strong> working with KPI in an effort to deliver on the promise<br />
all generations make to their young: to leave our children a world that is<br />
a better place than we found it. This is a very easy thing to say <strong>and</strong> a very<br />
difficult thing to accomplish. But together KPI <strong>and</strong> CCE are doing our<br />
best to fulfill this promise <strong>of</strong> each generation to the next.<br />
77
78 KPI Congress XI<br />
The work we at CCE <strong>and</strong> KPI are doing together does I believe<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer some hope <strong>and</strong> guidance as to how to address the important<br />
questions posed by the “Rationale.” For that reason I would like to tell<br />
you a little more about the mission <strong>of</strong> civic education as we define it at<br />
the Center for Civic Education <strong>and</strong> the worldwide network <strong>of</strong><br />
individuals <strong>and</strong> institutions with which we are privileged to work around<br />
the world. Finally, I will return to work being done by KPI to prepare<br />
young people to contribute to a Thai society that is just <strong>and</strong> democratic.<br />
Civic Education:<br />
The Primary Mission <strong>of</strong> All Education<br />
The education <strong>of</strong> young people to assume their responsibilities as<br />
citizens in a democratic society should be the central mission <strong>of</strong> schools.<br />
For many contemporary educators this assertion may appear debatable<br />
in first part <strong>of</strong> the 21 st century, but it would not have been for most <strong>of</strong><br />
the history <strong>of</strong> the public education system in the United States. The<br />
primary impetus for establishing public schools in the United States was<br />
to educate a diverse American population into a literate <strong>and</strong> informed<br />
citizenry. Our public school system was established in order to make<br />
Americans one people, or as it says on the Great Seal <strong>of</strong> the United States<br />
printed on the back <strong>of</strong> each dollar bill, E Pluribus Unum, Out <strong>of</strong> Many,<br />
One.<br />
In his farewell address, our first President, George Washington,<br />
argued for the creation <strong>of</strong> “institutions for the general diffusion <strong>of</strong><br />
knowledge” <strong>and</strong> made a classic argument for investing in education in a<br />
democratic society. These were his words: “In proportion as the<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential<br />
that public opinion should be enlightened.”<br />
Let me put his words in more contemporary English for the sake <strong>of</strong><br />
translation. Washington was arguing that if the voice <strong>of</strong> the people is to<br />
be given significant weight in government then the people must be<br />
educated to play an enlightened <strong>and</strong> responsible role. The development<br />
<strong>of</strong> the American public school system in the 19 th century was based on
Panel Discussion<br />
this vision that all education had civic purposes <strong>and</strong> that every teacher<br />
was a civics teacher. Evidence <strong>of</strong> the centrality <strong>of</strong> that vision to our<br />
school system is the fact that 40 <strong>of</strong> our 50 state constitutions underline<br />
the importance <strong>of</strong> civic literacy; 13 state constitutions identify the<br />
central purpose <strong>of</strong> their educational system as promoting good<br />
citizenship, democracy, <strong>and</strong> free government. 1<br />
The origin <strong>of</strong> the U.S. public school system in the search for civic<br />
literacy <strong>and</strong> virtue contrasts with the diverse missions our school systems<br />
identify as central today. Those missions include preparing students to be<br />
good economic units in an industrial production process; making<br />
students “happy” <strong>and</strong> “well-rounded;” preparing them to compete<br />
with other nations in science <strong>and</strong> math to ensure our technological <strong>and</strong><br />
military superiority; <strong>and</strong> many others. Instead <strong>of</strong> occupying a central role<br />
in schools, civic education is relegated to the fringes <strong>of</strong> the educational<br />
curriculum, if it is included at all.<br />
On May 16, 2007, the latest National Assessment <strong>of</strong> Educational<br />
Progress (NAEP) Civics Report Card was issued. In the words <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Center for Civic Education’s Executive Director, Charles N. Quigley, the<br />
NAEP study.<br />
…is a confirmation <strong>of</strong> the neglect that many pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> civic education have known about for many years: that the vast<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> our young people are either not taught civics <strong>and</strong> government<br />
at all, or they are taught too little, too late, <strong>and</strong> inadequately. The results<br />
confirm the fact that the past several decades <strong>of</strong> educational policy <strong>and</strong><br />
practice have focused more <strong>and</strong> more on developing the worker at the<br />
expense <strong>of</strong> the citizen. These findings are grounds for concern, <strong>and</strong> they<br />
call for a national response to remedy a serious deficiency in the<br />
education <strong>of</strong> American citizens. 2<br />
1 The Civic Mission <strong>of</strong> the Schools, Carnegie Corporation <strong>of</strong> New York <strong>and</strong> CIRCLE,<br />
The Center for Information <strong>and</strong> Research on Civic Learning <strong>and</strong> Education, 2003.<br />
2 Charles N. Quigley, Executive Director, Center for Civic Education, “Response to<br />
the May 16, 2007, Release <strong>of</strong> the 2006 National Assessment <strong>of</strong> Educational Progress<br />
Civics Report Card” Center for Civic Education, May 16, 2007<br />
79
80 KPI Congress XI<br />
Those <strong>of</strong> us who are advocates for the centrality <strong>of</strong> civic education<br />
in schools believe that there is a relationship between the drift <strong>of</strong> civic<br />
education to the periphery <strong>of</strong> our schools’ curriculum <strong>and</strong> the declining<br />
health <strong>of</strong> our democracy. Unfortunately, there are many signs <strong>of</strong> ill<br />
health in our democratic society. Increasing numbers <strong>of</strong> Americans are<br />
disengaged from civic <strong>and</strong> political institutions such as voluntary<br />
associations, religious congregations, community-based organizations,<br />
<strong>and</strong> political <strong>and</strong> electoral activities such as voting <strong>and</strong> being informed<br />
about public issues. Young people embody these trends <strong>and</strong> are less likely<br />
to vote <strong>and</strong> less interested in political discussion <strong>and</strong> public issues than<br />
either their older counterparts or young people <strong>of</strong> past decades.<br />
As an advocate for civic education I believe that citizenship must be<br />
learned <strong>and</strong> can be taught. For me <strong>and</strong> for the Center for Civic<br />
Education the restoration <strong>of</strong> a vibrant democratic society in the United<br />
States must focus on the school-based education <strong>of</strong> young people in the<br />
skills, knowledge, <strong>and</strong> attitudes that prepare them to be competent <strong>and</strong><br />
responsible citizens. That is a task in which we have been engaged in the<br />
United States for some 40 years. What we have learned during that time<br />
is that the defects <strong>of</strong> traditional civic education, which allowed it to be so<br />
easily driven from prominence in the school curriculum, must be<br />
corrected if we are to restore civic education to its rightful place.<br />
A new model <strong>of</strong> civic education must place the student at the center<br />
<strong>of</strong> the learning process. It must use good curriculum materials that<br />
encourage critical thinking, teamwork, <strong>and</strong> interaction with classmates,<br />
teachers, parents, <strong>and</strong> the community. Teachers must receive high quality<br />
training in the use <strong>of</strong> materials <strong>and</strong> in how to collaborate with students<br />
in their own education.<br />
Descriptions <strong>of</strong> Project Citizen<br />
<strong>and</strong> Foundations <strong>of</strong> Democracy<br />
Project Citizen, one <strong>of</strong> the Center’s signature curriculum materials,<br />
reflects this improved model <strong>of</strong> civic education. It is used in more than<br />
70 countries <strong>and</strong> is the Center’s most widely adapted <strong>and</strong> implemented
Panel Discussion<br />
curriculum. Project Citizen equips students with the knowledge,<br />
attitudes, <strong>and</strong> skills required for competent <strong>and</strong> responsible participation<br />
in the political life <strong>of</strong> their communities. It engages students in a series <strong>of</strong><br />
structured, cooperative learning activities guided by teachers <strong>and</strong> adult<br />
volunteers.<br />
Project Citizen has been recognized as a model community service<br />
program. An independent assessment <strong>of</strong> civic education programs<br />
funded by USAID from 1990 through 2000 found that Project Citizen<br />
had many <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the most effective civic education<br />
programs. “It is highly participatory, it relates to issues that affect the<br />
participants in their daily lives, it produces tangible as well as<br />
intangible results, <strong>and</strong> it is firmly rooted in the community in which<br />
it takes place.” 3 The author also notes that the program provides<br />
students with a variety <strong>of</strong> research <strong>and</strong> communication skills that inform<br />
their participation, teach consensus-building <strong>and</strong> teamwork, <strong>and</strong><br />
enhance their sense <strong>of</strong> efficacy as community members.<br />
Working in teams, students learn to interact with their government<br />
<strong>and</strong> community leaders through a five-step process that entails:<br />
(1) identifying a public policy problem in their community;<br />
(2) gathering <strong>and</strong> evaluating information about the problem;<br />
(3) examining <strong>and</strong> evaluating alternative solutions; (4) selecting <strong>and</strong><br />
developing a public policy proposal to address the problem; <strong>and</strong><br />
(5) developing an action plan to bring their proposed solution to<br />
authorities with the power to implement it.<br />
Project Citizen typically culminates with a simulated public hearing.<br />
Students’ work is displayed in a class portfolio containing a display<br />
section <strong>and</strong> documentation section. Students present their proposals to<br />
panels <strong>of</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> their community, <strong>of</strong>ten including<br />
representatives <strong>of</strong> governmental agencies <strong>and</strong> civil society organizations.<br />
As many as 50% <strong>of</strong> Project Citizen classes worldwide implement their<br />
action plans <strong>and</strong> approximately 20% are implemented by governments.<br />
3 Franca Brilliant, “Civic Education Assessment—Stage II. Civic Education<br />
Programming Since 1990—A Case Study Analysis.” A Report for the U.S. Agency for<br />
International Development by Management Systems International. 2000, p. 38.<br />
81
82 KPI Congress XI<br />
Project Citizen was designed initially to respond to a perceived need<br />
for greater knowledge <strong>of</strong> local government in the United States. It also<br />
reflected a concern that by focusing on national governmental<br />
institutions other curricula ignored the decentralized nature <strong>of</strong> American<br />
society <strong>and</strong> governmental authority. Students needed to underst<strong>and</strong> their<br />
local governments better <strong>and</strong> to develop the skills necessary to interact<br />
with local authorities.<br />
For a program that was developed initially for an American context,<br />
Project Citizen has proven remarkably adaptable to other cultures. It has<br />
been introduced as a curriculum to some 70 countries <strong>and</strong> is being<br />
actively implemented in more than 60 on every inhabited continent.<br />
Although it flourishes in fully democratic societies, it has been adopted<br />
<strong>and</strong> is being used in many “hybrid” societies in which authoritarian<br />
governmental institutions <strong>and</strong> political cultures coexist with<br />
modernizing <strong>and</strong> reformist structures.<br />
Foundations <strong>of</strong> Democracy is a K-12 curricular program based on<br />
concepts fundamental to an underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> politics <strong>and</strong> government,<br />
such as authority, privacy, responsibility, <strong>and</strong> justice. This multidisciplinary<br />
program draws upon such fields as political philosophy,<br />
political science, law, history, literature, <strong>and</strong> environmental studies to<br />
promote underst<strong>and</strong>ing, civic competence <strong>and</strong> responsible democratic<br />
citizenship.<br />
The Authority curriculum helps students (1) distinguish between<br />
authority <strong>and</strong> power, (2) examine different sources <strong>of</strong> authority,<br />
(3) use reasonable criteria for selecting people for positions <strong>of</strong><br />
authority <strong>and</strong> for evaluating rules <strong>and</strong> laws, (4) analyze the<br />
benefits <strong>and</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> authority, <strong>and</strong> (5) evaluate, take, <strong>and</strong> defend<br />
positions on the proper scope <strong>and</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> authority.<br />
The Privacy curriculum helps students (1) underst<strong>and</strong> the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> privacy in a free society, (2) analyze the benefits<br />
<strong>and</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> privacy, <strong>and</strong> (3) evaluate, take, <strong>and</strong> defend positions<br />
on the proper scope <strong>and</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> privacy.
Panel Discussion<br />
The Responsibility curriculum helps students (1) underst<strong>and</strong> the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> responsibility in a free society, (2) analyze the<br />
benefits <strong>and</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> responsibility, (3) evaluate, take, <strong>and</strong> defend<br />
positions on how conflicts among competing responsibilities<br />
should be resolved, <strong>and</strong> (4) evaluate, take, <strong>and</strong> defend positions<br />
on personal responsibility.<br />
The Justice curriculum helps students (1) underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> apply<br />
the basic principles <strong>of</strong> justice set forth in fundamental documents<br />
<strong>of</strong> democratic political <strong>and</strong> legal systems, (2) evaluate, take, <strong>and</strong><br />
defend positions on the fair distribution <strong>of</strong> the benefits <strong>and</strong><br />
burdens <strong>of</strong> society, on fair responses to remedy wrongs <strong>and</strong><br />
injuries, <strong>and</strong> on fair procedures for gathering information <strong>and</strong><br />
making decisions.<br />
A brief review <strong>of</strong> the adoption <strong>of</strong> the Center’s civic education<br />
programs region by region may help to explain why they have become<br />
such powerful tools for change. 4<br />
Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe. The Center’s programs <strong>and</strong> Project<br />
Citizen in particular were promoted internationally by the Clinton<br />
Administration’s foreign policy as a way to respond to the emergence <strong>of</strong><br />
numerous countries into democratic practice after the disintegration <strong>of</strong><br />
the Soviet Union. It fit into the existing school curriculum easily because<br />
countries such as Pol<strong>and</strong>, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, <strong>and</strong><br />
the Baltic states had “gaps” in their curricula that previously were filled<br />
by courses on Marxism-Leninism. Clearly, that subject matter was<br />
irrelevant to newly emerging democracies. Project Citizen served as a<br />
4 It should be noted that the Center for Civic Education does not view adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
Project Citizen or Foundations materials as a substitute for the development <strong>of</strong> a<br />
national curriculum by a country’s educational system. Rather PC <strong>and</strong> Foundations can<br />
help to initiate a reform <strong>of</strong> civic education that could take many years <strong>and</strong> significant<br />
financing to complete. A fuller discussion <strong>of</strong> the strategy pursued by the Center<br />
domestically <strong>and</strong> internationally can be found in a publication available on the Center’s<br />
web site entitled, “Guidelines for Country Coordinators in the Development <strong>of</strong> Plans to<br />
Promote the Sustainability/Institutionalization <strong>of</strong> Comprehensive Civic Education<br />
Programs in a Nation’s Schools,” Center for Civic Education, May 2007.<br />
83
84 KPI Congress XI<br />
rapid response to the need to establish a curriculum based on democratic<br />
values <strong>and</strong> practices.<br />
In many societies, including the United States, civic education is<br />
contaminated by its association with traditional approaches to<br />
citizenship education that emphasize rote learning <strong>of</strong> national symbols<br />
<strong>and</strong> passive acceptance <strong>of</strong> governmental authority. Clearly, this could<br />
have been a problem for courses inserted into a space in the curriculum<br />
previously occupied by a discredited ideology imposed by an occupying<br />
power. However, Project Citizen because <strong>of</strong> its focus on the involvement<br />
<strong>and</strong> creativity <strong>of</strong> students in the learning process met with enthusiastic<br />
response on the part <strong>of</strong> most teachers <strong>and</strong> students. It did not “preach”<br />
democratic values, but rather showed students, teachers, parents, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
broader school <strong>and</strong> community how these values could be practiced to<br />
solve problems <strong>of</strong> significance to the students.<br />
Latin America <strong>and</strong> the Caribbean. The Latin American <strong>and</strong><br />
Caribbean region was another area experiencing a wave <strong>of</strong> democratic<br />
values <strong>and</strong> practices in the 1990s. In this case the region had not been<br />
subjected to an external ideology, but was emerging from years <strong>of</strong><br />
military dictatorship, authoritarian rule, <strong>and</strong> civil war. Although<br />
democracy had long been a part <strong>of</strong> Latin America’s philosophical<br />
tradition <strong>and</strong> its constitutions <strong>and</strong> formal institutions sometimes aped<br />
Anglo Saxon models, practical politics <strong>of</strong>ten departed substantially from<br />
democratic ideals. Deep social <strong>and</strong> economic inequalities, lack <strong>of</strong> literacy<br />
<strong>and</strong> formal schooling, <strong>and</strong> a tradition <strong>of</strong> corruption by pubic figures all<br />
contributed to an extremely weak democratic political culture. Project<br />
Citizen did not find gaps in an existing curriculum that it could readily<br />
fill. Rather its appeal seems to have been due to the need to provide<br />
concrete examples <strong>of</strong> the practical advantages <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />
The Project Citizen curriculum faced problems in Latin America<br />
shared with many other cultures in which the language itself cannot<br />
easily express the concept <strong>of</strong> authoritative decisions taken by public<br />
institutions that affect significant numbers <strong>of</strong> people; what we call<br />
“public policy” in the English language. Neither Spanish, Portuguese,
Panel Discussion<br />
nor French, the most widely used languages in the region, distinguish<br />
between “politics” (the tactics <strong>and</strong> strategy <strong>of</strong> amassing <strong>and</strong> using<br />
power) <strong>and</strong> “public policy” (debating, creating, <strong>and</strong> implementing<br />
decisions that affect the public) <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten require use <strong>of</strong> an English<br />
phrase or an extended definition to explain the concept. The region also<br />
does not have a tradition <strong>of</strong> drawing clear distinctions between the<br />
public <strong>and</strong> private spheres <strong>of</strong> life, another factor making explanation <strong>of</strong><br />
public policy issues difficult. Project Citizen has, however, been able to<br />
overcome these obstacles <strong>and</strong> is used in more than 14 countries<br />
throughout the region.<br />
Middle East <strong>and</strong> North Africa. Civic education in the MENA<br />
region has its origin in a Civic Education conference held at the Dead<br />
Sea, Jordan in 2003 where civic educators from a number <strong>of</strong> Arab<br />
countries pledged their support for a regional network to promote civic<br />
awareness <strong>of</strong> Arab persons <strong>and</strong> their aspirations in such a way that they<br />
will become active citizens who are aware <strong>of</strong> their rights <strong>and</strong><br />
responsibilities <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> others.<br />
From an initial three countries, Egypt, Jordan, <strong>and</strong> occupied<br />
territories <strong>of</strong> the West Bank <strong>and</strong> Gaza, civic education in the Arab world<br />
has grown to include Morocco, Lebanon, Yemen, Tunisia, Algeria,<br />
Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, <strong>and</strong> the UAE.<br />
There are in general terms three levels <strong>of</strong> progress among the Arab<br />
countries. Jordan <strong>and</strong> Morocco have extensive national programs <strong>and</strong><br />
broad support from educational authorities at the regional <strong>and</strong> national<br />
level. Lebanon, Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia, <strong>and</strong> Algeria had had successful<br />
pilots <strong>of</strong> either Project Citizen <strong>and</strong>/or Foundations <strong>of</strong> Democracy <strong>and</strong> are<br />
working to develop national implementation <strong>of</strong> their activities. The<br />
remaining countries have introduced successfully Project Citizen or<br />
Foundations materials into selected schools.<br />
As in other parts <strong>of</strong> the world, the Center’s MENA programs attract<br />
a talented group <strong>of</strong> reformers from backgrounds in journalism <strong>and</strong> civil<br />
society as well as the education field. They share common goals <strong>of</strong><br />
wishing to improve the democratic participation <strong>of</strong> young people in<br />
85
86 KPI Congress XI<br />
their national life. The World Congress brings together civic educators<br />
from around the world who work with Center materials to share best<br />
practices <strong>and</strong> motivate each other to even greater achievements.<br />
Africa. African independence brought with it a wave <strong>of</strong> optimism<br />
<strong>and</strong> experiments in democratic rule that did not <strong>of</strong>ten endure. African<br />
schools usually reflected the repressive patterns <strong>of</strong> behavior practiced in<br />
the wider culture. Literacy levels are low <strong>and</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> basic<br />
government services, including education, weak. Still, the Center’s<br />
programs have found an enthusiastic audience in many African countries<br />
including Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Malawi, Mauritius, <strong>and</strong> others.<br />
Africa is one <strong>of</strong> only two regions that have so far held regional Project<br />
Citizen showcases.<br />
Asia. The wide acceptance <strong>of</strong> Project Citizen throughout some <strong>of</strong><br />
the most populous states <strong>of</strong> Asia provides one answer to the question <strong>of</strong><br />
whether Asian “culture” is not suited to the theory <strong>and</strong> practice <strong>of</strong><br />
“Western” liberal democracy. In only four years Project Citizen has<br />
grown from a limited pilot program to one that is used by nearly a<br />
million students in China <strong>and</strong> India. These two countries present quite<br />
different contexts for the introduction <strong>of</strong> civic education curricula.<br />
China has made a successful transition to a market economy within a<br />
formally Communist political system. Marxism-Leninism remains a<br />
formal part <strong>of</strong> the school curriculum, but is widely seen as anachronistic<br />
<strong>and</strong> irrelevant to the future direction <strong>of</strong> the country. School authorities<br />
at the provincial level, where most educational decisions are made <strong>and</strong><br />
funded in China, are concerned that they may be raising a generation <strong>of</strong><br />
children who reject the formal citizenship <strong>and</strong> value education they<br />
receive, but receive no alternative within the educational system. Project<br />
Citizen, used as an extracurricular subject, does not challenge the existing<br />
civic education structure directly, but <strong>of</strong>fers a modern, engaging, <strong>and</strong><br />
substantive alternative to it. At a recent training <strong>of</strong> teachers for a pilot<br />
Project Citizen program in a province <strong>of</strong> more than 80 million<br />
inhabitants, the number two educational <strong>of</strong>ficial for the province<br />
admonished the teachers to take their training seriously as “what you are<br />
doing today will prepare our students to make the next important
Panel Discussion<br />
transition for China from an authoritarian system to one based on<br />
democracy <strong>and</strong> the respect for human rights.” 5<br />
India, the world’s largest democracy, has no fear <strong>of</strong> vibrant debate<br />
or expressions <strong>of</strong> public opinion. However, the size <strong>of</strong> its enormous<br />
political system <strong>and</strong> wide disparities <strong>of</strong> income <strong>and</strong> opportunity give few<br />
Indian children experience in grassroots democracy. Indian educators<br />
were skeptical initially that the United States had much to <strong>of</strong>fer to India<br />
in the field <strong>of</strong> democracy education. However, when they saw Project<br />
Citizen’s implementation in neighboring countries such as Malaysia they<br />
recognized its potential contribution to Indian students. Project Citizen<br />
has spread there from pilot projects in eleven schools to hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />
schools throughout the country. Most recently, the Jawahar Navodaya<br />
Vidyalaya (JNV) schools, founded by assassinated former Prime<br />
Minister, Rajiv G<strong>and</strong>hi, have adopted it. The JNV schools are free<br />
academies with the mission <strong>of</strong> providing a good quality, modern<br />
education to talented children predominantly from rural areas. Many <strong>of</strong><br />
the children are the first in their families to attend school.<br />
Our work with KPI in Thail<strong>and</strong> aims to increase civic <strong>and</strong> political<br />
participation, <strong>and</strong> to strengthen tolerance <strong>and</strong> respect for human rights<br />
<strong>and</strong> the rule <strong>of</strong> law among young people. We have used the Project<br />
Citizen curriculum I mentioned earlier for several years <strong>and</strong> are just about<br />
to introduce the Foundations curriculum widely in Thai schools.<br />
A program initially focused largely on Bangkok <strong>and</strong> larger cities is now<br />
becoming truly national in scope <strong>and</strong> has held very successful trainings<br />
<strong>and</strong> showcases in the South <strong>and</strong> Deep South. I’m very pleased that I will<br />
have the opportunity to travel Sunday to Songkla for the first time <strong>and</strong><br />
see the great work being done there first h<strong>and</strong>. Tolerance is a core value<br />
<strong>of</strong> the democratic principles <strong>and</strong> practices contained in our materials <strong>and</strong><br />
a special emphasis <strong>of</strong> KPI’s programs in the South <strong>and</strong> Deep South.<br />
We are also encouraged by an insightful decision by Dr. Borwornsak<br />
to include Project Citizen as an integral part <strong>of</strong> the training provided to<br />
5 Recorded by the author at a training session in October 2006. Unfortunately, the<br />
name <strong>and</strong> location <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficial cannot be provided without some risk.<br />
87
88 KPI Congress XI<br />
participants in Political Development Council (PDC) activities. As you<br />
know, the PDC aims to empower the Thai people through the<br />
promotion <strong>of</strong> their participation in decision–making on public policies.<br />
In July <strong>and</strong> August 2009, a total <strong>of</strong> 486 civic leaders representing all 76<br />
provinces <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> participated in a PDC grantee-training program.<br />
These local civic leaders will use the Project Citizen methodology to help<br />
identify public policy problems in their community.<br />
In the relatively short period since the first pilots were begun in<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> some five years ago, thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> students are participating in<br />
Project Citizen <strong>and</strong> soon in Foundations. They are identifying problems in<br />
their communities, challenging their teachers <strong>and</strong> pubic <strong>of</strong>ficials to live<br />
up to their responsibilities, <strong>and</strong> linking in solidarity their activities in the<br />
classroom, with their schools, families, communities, <strong>and</strong> local<br />
governments.<br />
We at the Center have been overwhelmed by the positive response<br />
<strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> to our programs. On behalf <strong>of</strong> the Center <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> our<br />
executive director, Chuck Quigley, thank you for inviting the Center to<br />
work with you. We look forward to a long <strong>and</strong> productive relationship.
Panel Discussion<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources,<br />
Governance <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: Introducing<br />
IDG-Net<br />
Kathleen Lauder<br />
Introduction<br />
This paper defines ‘enhancing equitable<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’ <strong>and</strong><br />
assesses the extent to which it has<br />
been realized both within <strong>and</strong> across countries.<br />
The paper then defines ‘governance’, its actors<br />
<strong>and</strong> principles. It argues that equitable<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources is fundamentally<br />
linked to good governance. The paper then<br />
examines how ‘good governance’ <strong>and</strong> by<br />
association ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’<br />
can be enhanced. It looks at approaches to<br />
enhancing the various actors involved in<br />
good governance <strong>and</strong> the relationships<br />
among those actors. The paper argues that a<br />
compelling approach to strengthening<br />
governance is through partnerships <strong>and</strong><br />
networks. The paper concludes by sharing<br />
information on a new network called<br />
Institutions <strong>of</strong> Democratic Governance<br />
Network (IDG-Net). With support from the<br />
89
90 KPI Congress XI<br />
Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) IDG-Net is being<br />
spearheaded by the Institute On Governance, in partnership with the<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Governance Studies (IGS) in Bangladesh <strong>and</strong> the Centre for<br />
Good Governance (CGG) in India. IDG-Net is put forward as one<br />
model through which good governance, <strong>and</strong> equitable allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
resources, could be enhanced.<br />
Defining <strong>and</strong> Assessing <strong>Equitable</strong><br />
<strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources<br />
In defining ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’ it is helpful to review<br />
the definition <strong>of</strong> equity from the 2006 World Development Report:<br />
Equity means that the resources which are being distributed to the<br />
people are distributed in a way that results in individuals having equal<br />
opportunities to pursue a life <strong>of</strong> their choosing <strong>and</strong> be spared from<br />
extreme deprivation in outcomes. 1<br />
In practical terms, when we talk <strong>of</strong> ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’<br />
we refer to a situation where everyone has equal opportunities to pursue<br />
goals like economic prosperity, educational achievement, <strong>and</strong> political<br />
representation. <strong>Equitable</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> resources also means equitable<br />
access to services <strong>of</strong> the state, including infrastructure, health services <strong>and</strong><br />
other public supports. Opportunity would be granted regardless <strong>of</strong> place<br />
<strong>of</strong> birth, race, gender, class or social st<strong>and</strong>ing. In a Thail<strong>and</strong> in which<br />
resources were allocated equitably there would be virtually no difference<br />
in the opportunity afforded to a girl born to farmers in a hill tribe north<br />
<strong>of</strong> Chaing Mai, than to a boy born in Bangkok to a family <strong>of</strong> large l<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> property owners with strong connections to the power holders.<br />
In reality, income inequalities both within <strong>and</strong> across countries are<br />
severe <strong>and</strong> they are growing. In much <strong>of</strong> the world opportunities for<br />
1 This definition is based on a definition <strong>of</strong> equity used in the “Overview”, World<br />
Development Report 2006 P. 2
Panel Discussion<br />
education, health, wealth, power <strong>and</strong> input into the decision making<br />
process is very much a function <strong>of</strong> where you are born <strong>and</strong> who are your<br />
parents.<br />
In looking at inequalities within countries the case <strong>of</strong> Brazil provides<br />
an illustration which sheds some light on the roots <strong>of</strong> inequality. One<br />
quarter <strong>of</strong> the inequalities in incomes in Brazil in 1996 was found to be<br />
determined by factors completely out <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> the individual: race,<br />
region <strong>of</strong> birth, parental education <strong>and</strong> paternal occupation at birth.<br />
While we do not have a quantifiable measure <strong>of</strong> their impact, we can<br />
argue that gender, family wealth <strong>and</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> primary schools, all<br />
factors out <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> the individual, are also important determinants<br />
<strong>of</strong> power <strong>and</strong> wealth. 2<br />
Compared to inequalities within countries, inequalities across<br />
countries are massive. Cross country differences begin with the<br />
opportunity for life itself: while 7 <strong>of</strong> every 1,000 American babies die in<br />
the first year <strong>of</strong> their lives, 126 <strong>of</strong> every 1,000 Malian babies do. Babies<br />
who survive, not only in Mali but in much <strong>of</strong> Africa <strong>and</strong> in the poorer<br />
countries <strong>of</strong> Asia <strong>and</strong> Latin America, are at much greater nutritional risk<br />
than their counterparts in rich countries. And if they go to school—more<br />
than 400 million adults in developing countries never did—their schools<br />
are substantially worse than those attended by children in Europe, Japan,<br />
or the United States. Given lower school quality, under nutrition, <strong>and</strong><br />
the earnings a child can generate by working instead <strong>of</strong> studying, many<br />
children leave school early. The average person born between 1975 <strong>and</strong><br />
1979 in Sub-Saharan Africa has only 5.4 years <strong>of</strong> schooling. In South<br />
Asia, the figure rises to 6.3 years; in OECD countries, it is 13.4 years.<br />
Opportunities for the consumption <strong>of</strong> private goods differ vastly between<br />
rich <strong>and</strong> poor countries. While the average Nigerian may find it difficult<br />
to afford adequately nutritious meals every day, the average citizen <strong>of</strong><br />
Luxembourg need not worry too much about buying the latest<br />
generation cell phone on the market. 3<br />
2 World Development Report 2006<br />
3 Ibid<br />
91
92 KPI Congress XI<br />
In summary ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’ is about ensuring that<br />
everyone, regardless <strong>of</strong> their place <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>and</strong> their family background,<br />
have equal access to services, equal opportunities to make choices that<br />
will shape their future, <strong>and</strong> equal opportunities to have a say in the<br />
decisions that impact them <strong>and</strong> the world in which they live.<br />
Defining Governance, its Actors <strong>and</strong> Principles<br />
Governance is a broad field <strong>of</strong> study, <strong>and</strong> practitioners <strong>and</strong> theorists<br />
define it differently. There are many definitions <strong>of</strong> governance. We prefer<br />
a definition that speaks <strong>of</strong> governance not only as a destination, but as a<br />
journey. Governance is more than government, more than public<br />
administration, more than a governing model or structure, though <strong>of</strong><br />
course these are important. Governance, <strong>and</strong> in particular good<br />
governance, is also about effective ways <strong>of</strong> continuously engaging various<br />
sectors <strong>of</strong> society. Governance is therefore closely aligned with democracy<br />
<strong>and</strong> the central role that citizens must play in any effective governance<br />
system.<br />
The Institute On Governance defines governance as the process<br />
whereby societies or organizations make their important decisions,<br />
determine who has voice, who is engaged in the process <strong>and</strong> how account<br />
is rendered. 4<br />
Figure 1 illustrates the actors involved in governance <strong>and</strong> the<br />
relationships among those actors. Simply stated, governance actors<br />
include organizations within government 5 , civil society <strong>and</strong> business,<br />
with media forming a link among players in all three sectors. The<br />
diagram depicts these organizations with some overlap among them. It<br />
illustrates that organizations in all sectors exist in a context which is<br />
shaped by citizens <strong>and</strong> their traditions, values <strong>and</strong> cultures.<br />
4 Laura Edgar, Claire Marshall <strong>and</strong> Michael Bassett, “Partnerships: Putting Good<br />
Governance Principles in Practice”, 2006. http://www.iog.ca/publications/<br />
2006_partnerships.pdf<br />
5 <strong>Government</strong> includes the executive branch, the legislature <strong>and</strong> the judiciary.
some overlap among them. It illustrates that organizations in all sectors exist in a context which is sh<br />
by citizens <strong>and</strong> their traditions, values <strong>and</strong> cultures.<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
Figure 1<br />
�������� ��������<br />
Values<br />
�������� ��������<br />
Figure 1<br />
Governance relationships<br />
Civil<br />
Society<br />
������������������������<br />
Traditions<br />
media<br />
<strong>Government</strong><br />
History<br />
Private<br />
Sector<br />
�������� ��������<br />
Cultures<br />
�������� ��������<br />
In principle, the concept <strong>of</strong> governance may be applied to any form<br />
<strong>of</strong> collective action.Governance is about the more strategic aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
steering: the larger decisions about direction <strong>and</strong> roles. That is,<br />
governance is not only about where to go, but also about who should be<br />
capacity. There are four areas or zones where the concept is particularly relevant.<br />
involved in deciding, <strong>and</strong> in what capacity. There are four areas or zones<br />
where the concept is particularly relevant.<br />
In principle, the concept <strong>of</strong> governance may be applied to any form <strong>of</strong> collective action.Governance<br />
about the more strategic aspects <strong>of</strong> steering: the larger decisions about direction <strong>and</strong> roles. That is,<br />
governance is not only about where to go, but also about who should be involved in deciding, <strong>and</strong> in<br />
� Governance in ‘global space’, or global governance, deals with issues outside the purview <strong>of</strong><br />
individual governments4.<br />
� Governance in ‘national in ‘global space’, space’, i.e. within or global a country: governance, this is sometimes deals understood with as the<br />
issues exclusive outside preserve the <strong>of</strong> purview government, <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> individual which there governments.<br />
may be several levels: national, provincial<br />
state, indigenous, urban or local. However, governance is concerned with how other actors, s<br />
as civil society organizations, may play a role in taking decisions on matters <strong>of</strong> public conce<br />
� Organizational governance (governance in ‘organization space’): this comprises the activitie<br />
organizations that are usually accountable to a board <strong>of</strong> directors. Some will be privately ow<br />
<strong>and</strong> operated, e.g. business corporations. Others may be publicly owned, e.g. hospitals, scho<br />
Governance in ‘national space’, i.e. within a country: this is<br />
sometimes understood as the exclusive preserve <strong>of</strong> government, <strong>of</strong><br />
which there may be several levels: national, provincial or state,<br />
government corporations, etc.<br />
indigenous, urban or local. However, governance is concerned<br />
with how other actors, such as civil society organizations, may<br />
play not be a role a formally in taking constituted decisions governing on matters board. <strong>of</strong> public concern<br />
6<br />
� Community governance (governance in ‘community space’): this includes activities<br />
local level where the organizing body may not assume a legal form <strong>and</strong> where there m<br />
Organizational governance (governance in ‘organization space’):<br />
this comprises the activities <strong>of</strong> organizations that are usually<br />
6 st<br />
John Graham, Bruce Amos <strong>and</strong> Tim Plumptre, “Principles for Good Governance in the 21 Century: Policy B<br />
No. 15”, www.iog.ca/publications<br />
accountable to a board <strong>of</strong> directors. Some will be privately owned<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources, Governance <strong>and</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>: Introducing IDG-Net<br />
Institute On Governance<br />
93
94 KPI Congress XI<br />
<strong>and</strong> operated, e.g. business corporations. Others may be publicly<br />
owned, e.g. hospitals, schools, government corporations, etc.<br />
Community governance (governance in ‘community space’): this<br />
includes activities at a local level where the organizing body may<br />
not assume a legal form <strong>and</strong> where there may not be a formally<br />
constituted governing board. 6<br />
Family governance where the traditions, culture <strong>and</strong> values within<br />
the family determine how decisions are made, who has voice <strong>and</strong><br />
how family rights, responsibilities <strong>and</strong> resources are allocated.<br />
Drawing heavily on the work <strong>of</strong> the United Nations Development<br />
Program, the Institute On Governance has identified five principles <strong>of</strong><br />
good governance: legitimacy/voice; direction/strategic vision;<br />
performance; accountability; <strong>and</strong> equity\/fairness. 7 Table 1 describes the<br />
5 principles <strong>and</strong> shows the relationship <strong>of</strong> these principles to the UNDP<br />
principles <strong>of</strong> good governance.<br />
Table 1: Principles <strong>of</strong> Good Governance <strong>and</strong> Their Relationship to<br />
the UNDP Principles<br />
The IOG<br />
The UNDP Principles <strong>and</strong> related UNDP text<br />
Governance Principles<br />
1. <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Voice Participation: All men <strong>and</strong> women should have a<br />
voice in decisionmaking, either directly or through<br />
legitimate intermediate institutions that represent<br />
their intention. Such broad participation is built on<br />
freedom <strong>of</strong> association <strong>and</strong> speech, as well as<br />
capacities to participate constructively.<br />
Consensus Orientation: Good governance mediates<br />
differing interests to reach a broad consensus on<br />
what is in the best interest <strong>of</strong> the group <strong>and</strong>, where<br />
possible, on policies <strong>and</strong> procedures.<br />
6 John Graham, Bruce Amos <strong>and</strong> Tim Plumptre, “Principles for Good Governance<br />
in the 21st Century: Policy Brief No. 15”, www.iog.ca/publications<br />
7 Ibid
The IOG<br />
Governance Principles<br />
Panel Discussion<br />
The UNDP Principles <strong>and</strong> related UNDP text<br />
2. Direction Strategic Vision: Leaders <strong>and</strong> the public have a<br />
b r o a d a n d l o n g - t e r m p e r s p e c t i v e o n g o o d<br />
governance <strong>and</strong> human development, along with a<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> what is needed for such development. There<br />
is also an underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the historical, cultural<br />
<strong>and</strong> social complexities in which that perspective is<br />
grounded.<br />
3. Performance Responsiveness: Institutions <strong>and</strong> processes try to<br />
serve all stakeholders.<br />
Effectiveness <strong>and</strong> efficiency: Processes <strong>and</strong><br />
institutions produce results that meet needs while<br />
making the best use <strong>of</strong> resources.<br />
4. Accountability Accountability: Decision-makers in government,<br />
the private sector <strong>and</strong> civil society organizations are<br />
accountable to the public, as well as to institutional<br />
stakeholders. This accountability differs depending<br />
on the organizations <strong>and</strong> whether the decision is<br />
internal or external.<br />
Transparency: Transparency is built on the free flow<br />
<strong>of</strong> information. Processes, institutions <strong>and</strong><br />
information are directly accessible to those<br />
concerned with them, <strong>and</strong> enough information is<br />
provided to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> monitor them.<br />
5. Equity/fairness Equity: All men <strong>and</strong> women have opportunities to<br />
improve or maintain their well being.<br />
Rule <strong>of</strong> Law: Legal frameworks should be fair <strong>and</strong><br />
enforced impartially, particularly the laws on human<br />
rights.<br />
95
96 KPI Congress XI<br />
Fundamental Linkages between<br />
Good Governance <strong>and</strong> <strong>Equitable</strong><br />
<strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources<br />
Having defined <strong>and</strong> discussed both ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
resources’ <strong>and</strong> ‘good governance’, we can see that the two concepts are<br />
closely linked. Fairness/equity is one <strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong> good<br />
governance. The outcomes <strong>of</strong> both ‘equitable access to resources’ <strong>and</strong><br />
‘good governance’ involve equal access to power <strong>and</strong> ensuring that all<br />
citizens have an opportunity to have a say in decision making. Because<br />
‘equity’ is one <strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong> good governance you can not have<br />
good governance without equity. Because good governance is about the<br />
systems, processes <strong>and</strong> mechanisms that ensure that all people have a say<br />
in decision making, you can not have equity without good governance.<br />
Both ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’ <strong>and</strong> ‘good governance’ is<br />
relevant in different zones. At the global level we have seen that there are<br />
vast difference in equity across countries. Global governance<br />
organizations such as the UN seek to address some <strong>of</strong> those inequalities.<br />
At the national level we have found that there are inequalities. We<br />
suggest that there is a correlation between the 5 principles <strong>of</strong> good<br />
governance (legitimacy/voice; direction/strategic vision; performance;<br />
accountability; <strong>and</strong> equity\/fairness) <strong>and</strong> equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources.<br />
The relationship between the principles <strong>of</strong> good governance <strong>and</strong><br />
equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources is perhaps most stark at the family level,<br />
where families in which principles such as voice/participation,<br />
accountability <strong>and</strong> fairness are upheld we are more likely to see resources<br />
allocated equitably regardless <strong>of</strong> gender <strong>and</strong> age differences, than in<br />
families where these principles are not respected.<br />
An important relationship also exists between equitable allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
resources <strong>and</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> sound government, civil society <strong>and</strong><br />
business organizations. Where there is unequal allocation <strong>of</strong> resources,<br />
there is a tendency for organizations to be developed which perpetuate<br />
inequalities in power, status <strong>and</strong> wealth.
Panel Discussion<br />
Unequal power leads to the formation <strong>of</strong> institutions that<br />
perpetuate inequalities in power, status <strong>and</strong> wealth – <strong>and</strong> that typically<br />
are also bad for the investment, innovation <strong>and</strong> risk taking that<br />
underpin long term growth. 8<br />
Some Directions for Enhancing<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources<br />
This section will suggest some options for enhancing equitable<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources by strengthening government, strengthening those<br />
organizations which hold government accountable <strong>and</strong> enhancing<br />
partnerships <strong>and</strong> networks.<br />
1. Enhancing Performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Government</strong><br />
Some approaches to enhancing performance <strong>of</strong> government which<br />
have enhanced governance <strong>and</strong> equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources are<br />
outlined below.<br />
Developing Electronic Procurement Systems to Reduce<br />
Corruption: In many parts <strong>of</strong> the world, especially in East Asia<br />
<strong>and</strong> Latin America, e-procurement has proved to be an effective<br />
means <strong>of</strong> curbing corruption, as well as easing the purchasing<br />
woes <strong>of</strong> state agencies. For example, in the Philippines benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
e-procurement included: competitive purchase price; wider<br />
‘market’ participation; faster transactions; direct communication<br />
with suppliers; reduced administrative cost; real time<br />
information, <strong>and</strong> enhanced accountability. 9<br />
8 World Development Report 2006, “Overview”, pp 8-9. Chapter 6 <strong>of</strong> the World<br />
Development Report 2006 elaborates on the impact <strong>of</strong> inequality on the shaping <strong>of</strong><br />
economic <strong>and</strong> political institutions <strong>and</strong> the way these institutions affect development.<br />
9 Pacoy, Emilia P. “Tracking Anti-Corruption Initiatives: Perceptions <strong>and</strong> Initiatives<br />
in the Philippines”, JOAAG, Vol. 3. No. 1, p. 61, http://joaag.com/uploads/6_Pacoy-<br />
Final.pdf.<br />
97
98 KPI Congress XI<br />
Creating a merit based civil service to prevent nepotism <strong>and</strong><br />
enhance performance: For example, in Singapore the<br />
government has consciously followed a stringent policy to<br />
cultivate <strong>and</strong> nurture the civil service, to ensure that it has the<br />
best talents to drive the country forward. Factors that have<br />
contributed to this amazing story include: the government<br />
follows a businesslike approach within the civil service,<br />
continuously analyzing the service delivery needs <strong>of</strong> the country<br />
<strong>and</strong> the emerging global trends, reforming the civil service<br />
according to such needs <strong>and</strong> trends, <strong>and</strong> utilizing the knowledge<br />
available from the vast business <strong>and</strong> educational sector <strong>and</strong><br />
industries that are present in the country; the government has<br />
continuously played a very active role in identifying, nurturing<br />
<strong>and</strong> grooming promising young talents for civil service leadership<br />
positions, including providing scholarships for local <strong>and</strong> foreign<br />
universities, <strong>and</strong> continuing development programmes; public<br />
servants in Singapore receive very competitive salaries, rivaling<br />
even the private sector; in addition to providing a relatively high<br />
salary structure for the civil service, the government has exhibited<br />
strong political will to combat corruption. 10<br />
Enhancing service quality to put citizens first – citizen’s<br />
charters: In the UK the Charter programme was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
clearest articulations <strong>of</strong> the need to focus on the experience <strong>of</strong><br />
public service users, <strong>and</strong> for services to be responsive to the<br />
people using them. It also popularised the ideas that performance<br />
should be measured <strong>and</strong> measurements made public, <strong>and</strong> that<br />
information about services should be readily available in plain<br />
language. The Public Service Committee concluded in its 1997<br />
report that The Citizens’ Charter had made “a valuable<br />
contribution to improving public ser vices”. It led to<br />
10 Robert, Bern<strong>and</strong>o. The Role <strong>of</strong> Incentives in Civil Service <strong>Reform</strong>: the Singapore<br />
Story, http://regionalcentrebangkok.undp.or.th/practices/capacitydevelopment/<br />
documents Evidence_from_the_field_series_Singapore_Civil_Service_<strong>Reform</strong>_through_<br />
Incentives_-_formated.pdf.
Panel Discussion<br />
improvements in the delivery, culture <strong>and</strong> responsiveness <strong>of</strong> many<br />
services. 11 Citizens’ charters have been broadly adopted, especially<br />
in commonwealth countries.<br />
Legislating, promoting <strong>and</strong> enforcing right to information<br />
acts: The passage <strong>of</strong> the 2005 Right to Information Act in India<br />
is a step in this direction. As its preamble notes, the act seeks “to<br />
promote transparency <strong>and</strong> accountability in the working <strong>of</strong> every<br />
public authority.” It was enacted in the belief that “an informed<br />
citizenry <strong>and</strong> transparency <strong>of</strong> information” is vital in any<br />
democracy “to hold governments <strong>and</strong> their instrumentalities<br />
accountable to the governed.” Its enactment holds out the serious<br />
hope that social movements can now access information necessary<br />
to promote social <strong>and</strong> administrative justice. The hope is<br />
sustained by the experience <strong>of</strong> social movements with the right to<br />
information act legislated in the Indian state <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan in<br />
2000. The Rajasthan Right to Information Act has, among other<br />
things, been used by NGOs to check corruption in rural works.<br />
Well-known activists Aruna Roy <strong>and</strong> Nikhil Dey refer to two<br />
such incidents:<br />
- In 1998 . . . the Sarpanches [local <strong>of</strong>ficials] <strong>of</strong> Kukarkhada<br />
(Rajsam<strong>and</strong> district), Rawatmala <strong>and</strong> Surajpura (Ajmer<br />
district) apologized for committing fraud <strong>and</strong> publicly<br />
returned money after being confronted with incontrovertible<br />
public evidence at a public hearing.<br />
- In 2001, in Janawad panchayat (Raj sam<strong>and</strong> district) the<br />
information <strong>of</strong> public works expenditure painted on a<br />
panchayat wall led to the people to mobilize <strong>and</strong> protest<br />
exposing fraud <strong>and</strong> ghost works amounting to Rs.70 lakh, at<br />
a public hearing. This was later substantiated by a special<br />
11 House <strong>of</strong> Commons – Public Administration Select Committee. “From Citizen’s<br />
Charter to Public Service Guarantees: Entitlement to Public Services”, July 15, 2008,<br />
p. 9, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmpubadm/411/<br />
411.pdf.<br />
99
100 KPI Congress XI<br />
government investigation leading to a number <strong>of</strong><br />
institutionalized measures <strong>of</strong> transparency <strong>and</strong> accountability.<br />
L<strong>and</strong>mark events like these, facilitated by people’s use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
right to information, have had a pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact in the<br />
whole State. Slowly but surely, corruption in public works has<br />
been curtailed. 12<br />
Requiring civil servants to declare assets: In the past few years,<br />
the Bulgarian government has instituted a requirement <strong>of</strong> judges<br />
to file a declaration <strong>of</strong> assets. Judges must now report their<br />
property <strong>and</strong> income on an annual basis beginning with their<br />
appointment <strong>and</strong> ending upon their departure. Filing a<br />
declaration <strong>of</strong> assets may deter the acquisition <strong>of</strong> improper<br />
income while serving on the bench. It will clearly force judges to<br />
declare their home <strong>and</strong> major personal possessions, such as an<br />
automobile. The Supreme Judicial Council’s Anti-Corruption<br />
Committee has authority, along with the National Audit Office,<br />
to verify information about the existence <strong>of</strong> serious differences<br />
between the judges’ declared assets <strong>and</strong> acquired assets. 13<br />
2. Enhancing Performance <strong>of</strong> those Organizations which<br />
Hold <strong>Government</strong> Accountable<br />
A strong, vibrant <strong>and</strong> organized civil society can be critical to<br />
enhancing equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. Civil society organizations<br />
hold the potential to both strengthen <strong>and</strong> challenge the capacity <strong>of</strong><br />
governments to pursue equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. Some specific<br />
approaches include the following:<br />
Social accountability processes such as citizen report cards:<br />
For example, the Public Affairs Centre in Bangalore leads a<br />
process where citizens rate various pubic services over time. The<br />
12 CHIMNI, B.S. “Co-option <strong>and</strong> Resistance: Two Faces <strong>of</strong> Global Administrative<br />
Law”, International Law <strong>and</strong> Politics, Vol. 37, no 399, October 2006, p. 810, http://<br />
www.iilj.org/GAL/documents/CO-OPTIONANDRESISTANCETWOFACESOF.pdf<br />
13 American Bar Association, Judicial <strong>Reform</strong> Index for Bulgaria Volume II, April<br />
2004, p. 31.
Panel Discussion<br />
Centre publishes the results <strong>of</strong> those ratings <strong>and</strong> compares the<br />
ratings <strong>of</strong> different government services. Research has<br />
demonstrated that the quality <strong>of</strong> services for all citizens improved<br />
dramatically between 1998 to 2004. 14<br />
Budget monitoring <strong>and</strong> tracking: Citizens can ensure that<br />
budget allocation for education services is allocated equitably <strong>and</strong><br />
effectively by tracking the budget against performance objectives.<br />
In Ug<strong>and</strong>a there was great difficulty in getting the education<br />
budget to the targeted districts until 2004, when the government<br />
published the budget in the newspaper. After the publication,<br />
there was a marked improvement in ensuring the resources were<br />
allocated more equitably.<br />
Participatory budgeting: This is a process which engages citizens<br />
at the community level in defining their own priorities <strong>and</strong><br />
providing input on how a portion <strong>of</strong> the budget should be<br />
allocated to meet those priorities. One <strong>of</strong> Latin America’s first<br />
participatory budgeting processes was done in Porto Alegre,<br />
Brazil in 1989 <strong>and</strong> the process has spread throughout Brazil <strong>and</strong><br />
Latin America <strong>and</strong> into Europe, Asia, Africa <strong>and</strong> North America.<br />
Participatory budgeting is believed to have led to direct<br />
improvements in facilities in Porto Alegre, Brazil. For example,<br />
sewer <strong>and</strong> water connections increased from 75% <strong>of</strong> households<br />
in 1988 to 98% in 1997. The number <strong>of</strong> schools quadrupled<br />
since 1986. Also, Porto Alegre’s health <strong>and</strong> education budget<br />
increased from 13% (1985) to almost 40% (1996), <strong>and</strong> the share<br />
<strong>of</strong> the participatory budget in the total budget increased from<br />
17% (1992) to 21% (1999). 15<br />
Engaging citizens in consultative processes to develop policies<br />
<strong>and</strong> laws: Thail<strong>and</strong> launched a comprehensive community<br />
consultation process to get input from citizens across the country<br />
14 Public Affairs Centre, Banglalore.<br />
15 http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/<br />
14657_Partic-Budg-Brazil-web.pdf<br />
101
102 KPI Congress XI<br />
on the drafting <strong>of</strong> its new constitution.<br />
Enhancing the role <strong>of</strong> media to act as watchdogs <strong>and</strong> to<br />
enhance citizen’s voice: The BBC World Service Trust uses radio<br />
talk shows, mass media <strong>and</strong> radio drama, for example, to reduce<br />
practices <strong>of</strong> sex selection in India, to raise awareness <strong>and</strong> stimulate<br />
debate on social issues in Burma <strong>and</strong> to show popular support<br />
among Burundians for a Truth <strong>and</strong> Reconciliation Commission.<br />
Engaging civil society in the development <strong>of</strong> poverty<br />
reduction strategies. This process has been widely used in<br />
various countries including Canada to enhance equitable<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources by engaging civil society in defining<br />
development priorities <strong>and</strong> the best strategies for reducing<br />
poverty.<br />
3. Enhancing Partnerships <strong>and</strong> Networks<br />
Partnerships <strong>and</strong> networks can be powerful forces through which to<br />
enhance equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. A relative low cost, low tech<br />
approach to capacity building, organizations which form coalitions can<br />
be particularly effective as they support players involved to align<br />
resources, knowledge <strong>and</strong> practical tools to address a specific issue <strong>of</strong><br />
common concern. While there are scores <strong>of</strong> these, this section outlines<br />
the power <strong>of</strong> partnerships <strong>and</strong> networking for 5 such entities. Further<br />
details <strong>of</strong> these entities, based from their web-sites, is provided in<br />
Appendix B.<br />
Transparency International: Now in its second decade, <strong>and</strong> with<br />
chapters in 90 countries around the world, TI has served to align <strong>and</strong><br />
focus people from all walks <strong>of</strong> life around a common goal <strong>of</strong> combating<br />
corruption. Through the TI network, best practices <strong>and</strong> success stories<br />
are shared, champions are created <strong>and</strong> sustained, tools for fighting<br />
corruption are developed, tested <strong>and</strong> adopted. As a relatively low tech,<br />
low cost initiative, the accomplishments <strong>of</strong> TI are impressive. It has<br />
helped to put corruption on the global agenda. It has played a vital role<br />
in anti-corruption conventions <strong>and</strong> has raised st<strong>and</strong>ards in public life.
Panel Discussion<br />
Philippine Procurement Watch Inc.: Philippines Procurement<br />
Watch Inc. aligns <strong>and</strong> galvanizes the efforts <strong>of</strong> multiple stakeholders to<br />
monitor the procurement <strong>of</strong> local government units. By working<br />
together, government, media <strong>and</strong> civil society players are able to<br />
accomplish more than they could accomplish working independently.<br />
“Procurement reform requires technical competence found in a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> people in <strong>and</strong> out <strong>of</strong> government. It is vital that they can<br />
complement each other’s unique contributions. People in government<br />
should know when the expertise required is beyond them. People out <strong>of</strong><br />
government should appreciate the fact that there are many well-meaning<br />
people in government. A network <strong>of</strong> like-minded individuals is priceless.<br />
The partnering process therefore is essentially a helping relationship as<br />
opposed to an adversarial relationship. <strong>Reform</strong>ers have to continuously<br />
build bridges instead <strong>of</strong> emphasizing differences that separate.” 16<br />
CIVICUS: CIVICUS is an international alliance <strong>of</strong> members <strong>and</strong><br />
partners which constitute an influential network <strong>of</strong> organisations at the<br />
local, national, regional <strong>and</strong> international levels, <strong>and</strong> span the spectrum<br />
<strong>of</strong> civil society including: civil society networks <strong>and</strong> organisations; trade<br />
unions; faith-based networks; pr<strong>of</strong>essional associations; NGO capacity<br />
development organisations; philanthropic foundations <strong>and</strong> other funding<br />
bodies; businesses; <strong>and</strong> social responsibility programmes. Through its<br />
newsletters, World Assemblies <strong>and</strong> special projects CIVICUS has been a<br />
powerful force through which to increase underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> visibility <strong>of</strong><br />
the civil society sector <strong>and</strong> the legal principles necessary for the sector’s<br />
empowerment <strong>and</strong> to enhance the sector’s resource base.<br />
Affiliated Network <strong>of</strong> Social Accountability (ANSA): The ANSA<br />
model creates <strong>and</strong> supports regional networks <strong>of</strong> practitioners, both<br />
governmental <strong>and</strong> nongovernmental, in the field <strong>of</strong> social accountability.<br />
While the networks are relatively new 17 they promise to be an important<br />
16 Maria Kristina Villanueva Pimentel, Procurement Watch, inc.: The Role <strong>of</strong> Civil<br />
Society in Public Procurement <strong>Reform</strong>s in the Philippines, taken from http://<br />
www.ippa.ws/IPPC1/BOOK/Chapter_3.pdf<br />
17 With support from the World Bank Institute, ANSA Africa was created in 2007,<br />
ANSA East Asia Pacific was created in 2008 <strong>and</strong> ANSA South Asia is in its start-up<br />
phase.<br />
103
104 KPI Congress XI<br />
tool through which the growing knowledge <strong>of</strong> social accountability can<br />
be shared <strong>and</strong> applied to enhance policies <strong>and</strong> programs. For example<br />
ANSA East Asia Pacific has used social networking technology to link<br />
individuals <strong>and</strong> groups with a common interest in social accountability<br />
action. Through their youth program young people in East Asia Pacific<br />
are learning to analyse, speak out on <strong>and</strong> impact issues that concern them<br />
in their communities.<br />
World Movement for Democracy: The World Movement for<br />
Democracy, initiated in 1999, is a global network <strong>of</strong> democrats,<br />
including activists, practitioners, academics, policy makers, <strong>and</strong> funders,<br />
who have come together to cooperate in the promotion <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />
Through regular newsletters, annual meetings <strong>and</strong> numerous projects the<br />
movement provides support, encouragement <strong>and</strong> practical resources to<br />
enhance democracy.<br />
Introducing IDG-Net <strong>and</strong> Inviting Partnership<br />
This section talks about how the IOG seeks to help to enhance<br />
governance <strong>and</strong> equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. It shares a model <strong>of</strong><br />
partnership <strong>and</strong> networking which has been spearheaded by the IOG,<br />
called Institutions <strong>of</strong> Democratic Governance Network (IDG-Net).<br />
1. How IDG-Net Works<br />
A growing number <strong>of</strong> institutions in developing countries have been<br />
created to support the move towards more effective <strong>and</strong> sustainable<br />
democracy. The Institutes <strong>of</strong> Democratic Governance Network (IDG-<br />
Net) was created in response to the belief that these entities can benefit<br />
from sharing knowledge, experience <strong>and</strong> resources. IDG-Net was<br />
formed, with support from the Canadian International Development<br />
Agency (CIDA) to share <strong>and</strong> promote knowledge, resources <strong>and</strong><br />
experience. Founding members include the Institute <strong>of</strong> Governance<br />
Studies (Bangladesh), the Centre for Good Governance (India) <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Institute On Governance (Canada). Since its inception in November,<br />
2008 the network has grown to include 25 members located in South<br />
Asia, South-east Asia, Africa <strong>and</strong> Latin America.
Panel Discussion<br />
We believe that IDG-Net can be an important tool to promote<br />
equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources for several reasons. First, its members are<br />
organizations which are uniquely positioned in their countries, working<br />
with both government <strong>and</strong> civil society <strong>and</strong> enjoying legitimacy with<br />
players in both domains. As such they are ideally positioned to shape<br />
governance in their countries. Second, the members are engaged in a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> approaches, from training to research to consultancies, all <strong>of</strong><br />
which contribute to enhance democratic governance, create space for<br />
citizens to have their say <strong>and</strong> thus enhance equitable allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
resources. Third, the network enhances the effectiveness <strong>and</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
its members by providing opportunities for them to share experience,<br />
knowledge <strong>and</strong> resources with like organizations in their countries,<br />
regions <strong>and</strong> at a global level, in the conduct <strong>of</strong> practical joint outcome<br />
oriented initiatives. Organizations eligible for membership in the<br />
network:<br />
seek to strengthen democracy<br />
are engaged in at least two <strong>of</strong> the following: research, training,<br />
technical assistance<br />
regularly involve both government <strong>and</strong> civil society organizations<br />
in their activities<br />
seek to enhance one or more elements <strong>of</strong> governance <strong>and</strong><br />
democratic development, ranging from accountable public<br />
institutions, to human rights, rule <strong>of</strong> law <strong>and</strong> open <strong>and</strong><br />
accountable political systems<br />
We share our knowledge <strong>and</strong> experience through:<br />
focused <strong>and</strong> well designed forums, workshops <strong>and</strong> conferences on<br />
specific topics<br />
attachments where members <strong>of</strong> staff from one participating<br />
institute spend time at another institute<br />
sharing <strong>and</strong> pooling <strong>of</strong> resources among members on a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
governance initiatives, projects <strong>and</strong> competitive bids<br />
105
106 KPI Congress XI<br />
a web-site linked to related web-sites<br />
planning <strong>and</strong> management meetings which use technology<br />
creatively through video conferencing, Skype, telephone,<br />
electronic bulletin board <strong>and</strong> email communication, supplemented<br />
by limited face to face meetings<br />
Phase 1, the start-up phase, <strong>of</strong> the network was guided by a<br />
Steering Committee, comprising heads <strong>of</strong> the three founding partners.<br />
An Advisory Group has been created to support the network in its startup<br />
phase.<br />
Joint activities (two ‘Leadership <strong>and</strong> Governance’ courses) have been<br />
planned by the network for this start-up phase. The first will take place<br />
in Dhaka from November 9 – 12 for 24 senior Bangladesh civil servants.<br />
The second will be held in Hyderabad from November 16 – 19 for 30<br />
medium to large city managers in India. These courses have been<br />
developed jointly by the IOG, IGS <strong>and</strong> CGG, drawing on the<br />
knowledge, skills, resources <strong>and</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> the three organizations.<br />
Other members <strong>of</strong> IDG-Net have been invited to audit the course with a<br />
view to adapting it for participants in their own countries.<br />
The plans for phase II <strong>of</strong> the network, over the next two years, are<br />
to establish Steering Committees in three continents: Asia, Africa <strong>and</strong><br />
Latin America. These committees will plan joint activities to be<br />
undertaken through the network in each continent. It is anticipated that<br />
phase III <strong>of</strong> the network will involve bringing the three continents<br />
together to undertake joint initiatives both within <strong>and</strong> across continents.<br />
2. Areas <strong>of</strong> Focus for IDG-NET<br />
Areas <strong>of</strong> focus which have been chosen for IDG-Net, <strong>and</strong> the way in<br />
which they are expected to enhance governance <strong>and</strong> equitable allocation<br />
<strong>of</strong> resources, are described below.<br />
a) Leadership Training<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> IDG-Net have ‘training’ as one <strong>of</strong> their<br />
core programming activities. Leaders from business, government <strong>and</strong>
Panel Discussion<br />
civil society are critical in the process <strong>of</strong> enhancing democratic<br />
governance. IDG-Net members can design <strong>and</strong> deliver leadership<br />
training more effectively by working together.<br />
IDG-Net members will be invited to collaborate on the design<br />
<strong>and</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> ‘leadership <strong>and</strong> governance’ training programs for leaders<br />
from government, business <strong>and</strong> civil society. Participants may be 24<br />
leaders from government, business <strong>and</strong>/or civil society. The leadership<br />
programs are likely to be approximately 3.5 days in length <strong>and</strong> draw on a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> approximately 60% local <strong>and</strong> 40% international faculty.<br />
Organizations collaborating on these programs will document<br />
<strong>and</strong> share lessons learned through the process so that all participating<br />
organizations, with their faculty <strong>and</strong> administrative staff, will have<br />
enhanced capacity to design <strong>and</strong> deliver leadership <strong>and</strong> governance<br />
programs. They will also have the benefit <strong>of</strong> training materials which can<br />
readily be adapted <strong>and</strong> tailored for different contexts.<br />
These courses are believed to be a powerful tool to enhance<br />
equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources as they are designed to provide leaders<br />
with the knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attitudes which they will need to<br />
effectively engage multiple stakeholders in decision making for more<br />
accountable, equitable <strong>and</strong> effective development <strong>of</strong> policy <strong>and</strong> delivery<br />
<strong>of</strong> services. The courses are designed to inspire <strong>and</strong> motivate leaders from<br />
government, civil society <strong>and</strong> business to work together to achieve these<br />
ends.<br />
b) Citizen <strong>and</strong> Governance Awards Programs<br />
Youth are key to developing <strong>and</strong> sustaining democratic values <strong>and</strong><br />
practices. IDG-Net will unite interested organizations in a process<br />
through which they can work together to empower youth as agents <strong>of</strong><br />
change in governance through youth awards programs.<br />
IDG-Net members will be invited to participate. The IDG-Net<br />
member may either implement the initiative by itself, or it may identify<br />
another local organization with which to partner for this initiative.<br />
107
108 KPI Congress XI<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> local partners might include church youth groups,<br />
schools, youth centred organizations such as Girl Guides <strong>and</strong> Boy Scouts<br />
or youth centred development organizations such as Save the Children or<br />
World Vision.<br />
Each participating IDG-Net member will start by identifying<br />
approximately 10 youth groups in 10 different communities.<br />
A community will typically involve a population <strong>of</strong> about 10,000 – 20,000<br />
people. It may be a village, a cluster <strong>of</strong> villages or a neighbourhood in<br />
a big city.<br />
Each youth group will identify 2 youth leaders to attend a 3 day<br />
national training program. The national training will develop leadership<br />
skills, teach about democratic governance <strong>and</strong> introduce <strong>and</strong> plan the<br />
governance awards initiative. Trained youth leaders will return to their<br />
communities to mobilize other youth to identify <strong>and</strong> address an issue in<br />
their community.<br />
They will approach this by engaging multiple stakeholders in the<br />
community, <strong>and</strong> practicing principles <strong>of</strong> good governance including<br />
accountability, participation, fairness, transparency <strong>and</strong> strategic vision.<br />
They will develop a proposal for their initiative. The local partner will<br />
review the proposals <strong>and</strong> provide modest funding for those proposals<br />
which appear to be viable. The youth, working with the community, will<br />
have approximately 6 months to implement the initiative. They will then<br />
report on the initiative through various different formats including<br />
written reports, videos, <strong>and</strong> comics. Examples <strong>of</strong> youth led initiatives<br />
which might be undertaken within the time <strong>and</strong> budget constraints<br />
include the following: mobilizing the community to improve community<br />
cleanliness; advocating for policies which will reduce absenteeism <strong>of</strong><br />
teachers through the production <strong>of</strong> dramas in their communities; <strong>and</strong><br />
reducing HIV/AIDS by creating clubs in their schools which raise<br />
awareness about HIV/AIDS. 18<br />
18 These examples are actual projects which had been led by youth in a ‘governance<br />
awards programme’ for youth which was piloted in Indonesia <strong>and</strong> the Philippines in<br />
2006.
Panel Discussion<br />
The youth initiatives will then be assessed by a jury <strong>of</strong> judges <strong>and</strong><br />
the best initiatives will be showcased through media, brochures <strong>and</strong><br />
videos <strong>and</strong> an award ceremony.<br />
This program is expected to enhance equitable allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
resources as it promises to develop a cadre <strong>of</strong> youth with values,<br />
awareness <strong>and</strong> practical tools to promote equity <strong>and</strong> fairness in their<br />
communities. As this generation matures it is hoped that they will<br />
continue to champion these values in their communities, their nations<br />
<strong>and</strong> internationally.<br />
c) Research to Enhance Governance Assessment Tools<br />
Most IDG-Net members are involved in implementing some<br />
form <strong>of</strong> governance assessments in their countries. Often these<br />
assessments are undertaken using international indicators such as those<br />
developed by the World Bank. Many IDG-Net members find these<br />
indicators are not appropriate for their unique cultures <strong>and</strong> settings.<br />
However, the process <strong>of</strong> developing unique indicators is challenging.<br />
IDG-Net members will collaborate in a process to design more<br />
contextualized indicators, to incorporate them in their governance<br />
assessments, review the validity <strong>of</strong> the indicators, <strong>and</strong> adapt the most<br />
suitable indicators into their on-going governance assessment process.<br />
IDG-Net will bring together interested researchers for an initial<br />
meeting to share <strong>and</strong> discuss indicators <strong>and</strong> to develop new indicators.<br />
Researchers would meet again after they have tested their new indicators<br />
<strong>and</strong> assessed their validity <strong>and</strong> relevance.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> this process would be documented <strong>and</strong><br />
disseminated so that all institutions involved in governance assessments<br />
can benefit from the lessons learned.<br />
This research is expected to contribute to enhancing equitable<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources as it will aim to improve the way in which<br />
participating institutions measure equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. It is<br />
expected to result in the identification <strong>of</strong> indicators for equity <strong>and</strong><br />
109
110 KPI Congress XI<br />
fairness which reflect the unique social, cultural <strong>and</strong> political contexts <strong>of</strong><br />
the countries involved in the research.<br />
3. Moving IDG-Net Forward<br />
Although IDG-Net is young, its members, sitting at the interface<br />
between government, civil society, business <strong>and</strong> the media are well<br />
positioned to play a key role in enhancing equitable allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
resources. It is believed that the areas which have been chosen for joint<br />
initiatives over the coming years <strong>of</strong>fer powerful levers to raise awareness,<br />
change attitudes <strong>and</strong> impact on policies <strong>and</strong> programs to enhance<br />
governance <strong>and</strong> equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. The challenge will be to<br />
maintain momentum, stay focused <strong>and</strong> manage the growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />
network effectively over the coming years.<br />
Conclusion<br />
This paper has <strong>of</strong>fered a definition <strong>of</strong> ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong><br />
resources’ <strong>and</strong> assesses it both within <strong>and</strong> across countries. It defines<br />
governance <strong>and</strong> describes governance actors <strong>and</strong> principles. It has argued<br />
that ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’ <strong>and</strong> ‘good governance’ are<br />
intricately linked. The paper draws on international experience in<br />
strengthening governance to identify opportunities to enhance ‘equitable<br />
allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’. It reviews experience in capacity building in three<br />
areas: government, organizations holding government accountable <strong>and</strong><br />
partnerships <strong>and</strong> networks. The paper argues for the vital role which can<br />
be played in enhancing governance <strong>and</strong> ‘equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources’<br />
through partnerships <strong>and</strong> networks. Finally the paper shares the work <strong>of</strong><br />
Canada’s Institute on Governance, <strong>and</strong> its partners in South Asia, in<br />
spearheading the creation <strong>of</strong> a network <strong>of</strong> institutes <strong>of</strong> democratic<br />
governance.<br />
In conclusion, it is hoped that through the KPI Congress XI, <strong>and</strong> in<br />
particular, through this paper, practitioners <strong>and</strong> organizations wishing to<br />
enhance equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources will do so in partnership <strong>and</strong><br />
through networks which will harness <strong>and</strong> galvanize efforts to achieve
Panel Discussion<br />
common objectives. By working together we can raise awareness about<br />
equitable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources, <strong>and</strong> develop <strong>and</strong> implement strategies<br />
to enhance it at a global level.<br />
Appendix A:<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> Partnershipss <strong>and</strong> Networks as a Tool for<br />
Enhancing Governance <strong>and</strong> <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Resources<br />
Transparency International: Transparency International (TI), the<br />
global civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption,<br />
brings people together in a powerful worldwide coalition to end the<br />
devastating impact <strong>of</strong> corruption on men, women <strong>and</strong> children around<br />
the world. TI’s mission is to create change towards a world free <strong>of</strong><br />
corruption.<br />
Transparency International is a global network including more than<br />
90 locally established national chapters <strong>and</strong> chapters-in-formation. These<br />
bodies fight corruption in the national arena in a number <strong>of</strong> ways. They<br />
bring together relevant players from government, civil society, business<br />
<strong>and</strong> the media to promote transparency in elections, in public<br />
administration, in procurement <strong>and</strong> in business. TI’s global network <strong>of</strong><br />
chapters <strong>and</strong> contacts also use advocacy campaigns to lobby governments<br />
to implement anticorruption reforms.<br />
TI has the skills, tools, experience, expertise <strong>and</strong> broad participation<br />
to fight corruption on the ground, as well as through global <strong>and</strong> regional<br />
initiatives.<br />
Now in its second decade, Transparency International is maturing,<br />
intensifying <strong>and</strong> diversifying its fight against corruption. 19<br />
Philippine Procurement Watch: Philippines Procurement Watch<br />
Inc monitors the procurement <strong>of</strong> local government units based on the<br />
19 Taken from http://www.transparency.org/about_us<br />
111
112 KPI Congress XI<br />
implementing rules <strong>and</strong> regulations <strong>of</strong> the government procurement<br />
reform act. It involves a host <strong>of</strong> organizations <strong>and</strong> groups from virtually<br />
every sector to work together on this cause. From civil society it has<br />
harnessed the energy <strong>of</strong> over 20 groups involved in a Transparency <strong>and</strong><br />
Accountability Network. It has drawn in youth through the Walang Ku-<br />
Corrupt Movement (Youth). It involves a church group called CBCP.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the main stakeholders in the coalition is the Philippine<br />
Contractors Association. (private sector – main stakeholder). Finally local<br />
chambers <strong>of</strong> commerce provide important inputs <strong>and</strong> resources. 20<br />
CIVICUS: CIVICUS is an international alliance dedicated to<br />
strengthening citizen action <strong>and</strong> civil society throughout the world. It is<br />
an international alliance <strong>of</strong> members <strong>and</strong> partners which constitute an<br />
influential network <strong>of</strong> organisations at the local, national, regional <strong>and</strong><br />
international levels, <strong>and</strong> span the spectrum <strong>of</strong> civil society including: civil<br />
society networks <strong>and</strong> organisations; trade unions; faith-based networks;<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional associations; NGO capacity development organisations;<br />
philanthropic foundations <strong>and</strong> other funding bodies; businesses; <strong>and</strong><br />
social responsibility programmes. CIVICUS has worked for over a<br />
decade to strengthen citizen action <strong>and</strong> civil society throughout the<br />
world, especially in areas where participatory democracy <strong>and</strong> citizens’<br />
freedom <strong>of</strong> association are threatened. CIVICUS seeks to amplify the<br />
voices <strong>and</strong> opinions <strong>of</strong> ordinary people <strong>and</strong> it gives expression to the<br />
enormous creative energy <strong>of</strong> the burgeoning sector <strong>of</strong> civil society. 21<br />
Affiliated Network for Social Accountability (ANSA): Affiliated<br />
Networks for Social Accountability (ANSA) bridge the gap between the<br />
growing body <strong>of</strong> knowledge in the field <strong>of</strong> social accountability <strong>and</strong> the<br />
current capacity <strong>of</strong> practitioners, civil society, <strong>and</strong> government to<br />
effectively apply the concept to policy <strong>and</strong> program design. The ANSA<br />
model creates <strong>and</strong> supports regional networks <strong>of</strong> practitioners—both<br />
governmental <strong>and</strong> nongovernmental—in the field <strong>of</strong> social<br />
accountability.<br />
20 Taken from a presentation made by Sanjay Pradhan, Vice President, World Bank<br />
Institute at a conference held in Frankfurt, October 2, 2009<br />
21 Taken from http://www.civicus.org/who-we-are
Panel Discussion<br />
Beginning with the creation <strong>of</strong> ANSA-Africa in 2006, the ANSA<br />
network has grown to include ANSA-East Asia/Pacific <strong>and</strong> ANSA-South<br />
Asia, along with a Global Partnership Fund housed in ANSA-SA to<br />
promote cross-regional collaboration <strong>and</strong> foster the development <strong>of</strong><br />
ANSAs in additional regions. While their work is varied, the ANSAs are<br />
linked by their common goal <strong>of</strong> equipping civil society <strong>and</strong> ordinary<br />
citizens with the skills necessary to play a more active role in bringing<br />
about more accountable governance. The ANSA networks work in a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> ways, specifically to:<br />
• Build capacity through training <strong>and</strong> skills building on social<br />
accountability<br />
• Provide a knowledge platform for dissemination <strong>of</strong> best-practices<br />
• Facilitate networking <strong>and</strong> regional exchanges among practitioners<br />
to strengthen capacity<br />
• Provide technical assistance <strong>and</strong> grants to practitioners engaged in<br />
dem<strong>and</strong>-side governance initiatives<br />
• Conduct <strong>and</strong> disseminate research on social accountability 22<br />
World Movement for Democracy: The World Movement for<br />
Democracy is a global network <strong>of</strong> democrats, including activists,<br />
practitioners, academics, policy makers, <strong>and</strong> funders, who have come<br />
together to cooperate in the promotion <strong>of</strong> democracy.<br />
The Washington, D.C.-based National Endowment for Democracy<br />
(NED) initiated this nongovernmental effort with a global Assembly in<br />
New Delhi, India, in February 1999 to strengthen democracy where it is<br />
weak, to reform <strong>and</strong> invigorate democracy even where it is longst<strong>and</strong>ing,<br />
<strong>and</strong> to bolster pro-democracy groups in countries that have not yet<br />
entered into a process <strong>of</strong> democratic transition.<br />
22 Taken from the ANSA brochure<br />
113
114 KPI Congress XI<br />
The World Movement is led by a distinguished international<br />
Steering Committee <strong>and</strong> the National Endowment for Democracy serves<br />
as its Secretariat.<br />
The World Movement <strong>of</strong>fers new ways to give practical help to<br />
democrats who are struggling to open closed societies, challenge<br />
dictatorships, democratize semi-authoritarian systems, consolidate<br />
emerging democracies, <strong>and</strong> strengthen established democracies. The<br />
World Movement has the potential to do so in several ways:<br />
All those who are engaged in the advancement <strong>of</strong> democracy<br />
worldwide are welcome to participate in the World Movement for<br />
Democracy. 23<br />
23 Taken from http://www.wmd.org/about/information.html
Group<br />
1<br />
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong>
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong>, Rules, Mechanisms,<br />
Enforcement <strong>and</strong> Morality<br />
Assoc. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Niyom Rathamarit<br />
Thammasat University<br />
The fight for power among political<br />
groups based on rules that are not<br />
accepted by some or accepted by all<br />
but disobeyed or broken by some or all<br />
groups causes the defeated groups to refuse to<br />
recognize their opponents’ victories, which<br />
leads to protests, arguments, <strong>and</strong> attempts to<br />
topple the opponents’ power using extra-legal<br />
measures, such as public protest, blocking <strong>of</strong><br />
roads, seizure <strong>of</strong> airports <strong>and</strong> government<br />
buildings. This is happening in Thai society.<br />
This article attempts to search for ways <strong>and</strong><br />
means to solve the problem so that the<br />
country will be peaceful <strong>and</strong> the government,<br />
including various social groups, will be able<br />
to carry on their assigned tasks in a normal<br />
fashion.<br />
In a big society with a large population<br />
<strong>and</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essions, ethnicities,<br />
languages, cultures, ideologies, economic<br />
statuses, politics <strong>and</strong> interests, it is <strong>of</strong> utmost<br />
necessity that fundamental rules be accepted<br />
117
118 KPI Congress XI<br />
by all groups <strong>and</strong> that a mechanism to monitor <strong>and</strong> enforce the rules in<br />
accordance with the purpose <strong>of</strong> the law be agreed upon.<br />
For Thai society, the fundamental rule agreed upon by all sectors in<br />
the political, economic <strong>and</strong> social system is liberal <strong>and</strong> democratic.<br />
Nonetheless, there are some disagreements over subsidiary issues, such as<br />
political party-control, the representative election system, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
authority <strong>and</strong> duties <strong>of</strong> independent organization, in particular the<br />
Election Commission.<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> the political system in the past focused on<br />
building up the strength <strong>of</strong> political parties. Thail<strong>and</strong>’s 1974 constitution<br />
<strong>and</strong> the following ones state that MP c<strong>and</strong>idates <strong>and</strong> MPs must be<br />
members <strong>of</strong> parties (they cannot run as independents) <strong>and</strong> that the<br />
House <strong>of</strong> Representatives has the authority to establish <strong>and</strong> impeach the<br />
government.<br />
However, Thail<strong>and</strong>’s experience shows that the aim <strong>of</strong> using political<br />
parties as the main mechanism in developing democracy <strong>and</strong> improving<br />
government efficiency has failed. Thai politics is still unstable <strong>and</strong><br />
inefficient, with groups that are not in power acting disloyally. There are<br />
also occasional political disturbances <strong>and</strong> violence, for example, the<br />
“Right kills Left” incident on 6th October 1976, the “Young Turk”<br />
coup attempt on 1st April 1981 <strong>and</strong> the “Black May” event <strong>of</strong> 1992.<br />
The popular democratic movement forced the post-“Black May”<br />
1992 government to reform the whole political system. The coalition<br />
government led by Chart Thai Party that came to power in 1995<br />
launched a political reform campaign that led to the abrogation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
1991 constitution <strong>and</strong> the adoption <strong>of</strong> a new constitution in 1997.<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s 1997 constitution aimed to build up the strength <strong>of</strong><br />
political parties in the democratic system <strong>and</strong> make the political system<br />
transparent, so that it would become an institution that is accountable<br />
<strong>and</strong> trustworthy to every Thai. The 1997 constitution used various<br />
measures to achieve its goal. Political parties were strengthened by<br />
creating a system that favored large political parties, putting small<br />
political parties at a disadvantage <strong>and</strong> preventing MPs from switching
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
parties. The position <strong>of</strong> prime minister was strengthened. The role <strong>and</strong><br />
power <strong>of</strong> the legislature was diminished. Various independent monitoring<br />
organizations were established; the Election Commission was to filter<br />
those allowed to enter politics <strong>and</strong> the National Anti-Corruption<br />
Commission was to guarantee <strong>and</strong> verify politicians’ transparency in<br />
exercising state power. State decentralization <strong>and</strong> people’s political<br />
participation in such matters as law-making, petitions for political<br />
impeachment, public referendums on important issues <strong>and</strong> before<br />
starting <strong>of</strong> new mega-projects affecting the environment <strong>and</strong> people’s<br />
lifestyles were promoted<br />
Despite the aim <strong>of</strong> the new constitution to strengthen Thail<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
democratic system, Thai society was unfortunate. A billionaire politician<br />
who was good at playing political games used money, populist policies,<br />
<strong>and</strong> marketing strategies to centralize <strong>and</strong> monopolize power. Within<br />
three or four years this led to the end <strong>of</strong> the political rule established by<br />
the 1997 constitutional framework, which hoped to make the Thai<br />
democracy strong, efficient in responding to the people’s needs <strong>and</strong> wellbalanced<br />
among different branches <strong>of</strong> power.<br />
At the moment, there is an attempt to solve the problem caused by<br />
the structure <strong>and</strong> process <strong>of</strong> the governing institution by changing the<br />
House <strong>of</strong> Representatives’ election system <strong>and</strong> the determination <strong>of</strong><br />
Senate membership. The attempt also includes providing severe<br />
punishment for politicians <strong>and</strong> political parties involved in vote-buying,<br />
<strong>and</strong> revising processes <strong>of</strong> selecting members <strong>of</strong> independent agencies.<br />
However, it seems that the more attempts made to solve the problem, the<br />
more controversial the issue becomes.<br />
Political demonstrations against the government have broken out<br />
very <strong>of</strong>ten since the adoption <strong>of</strong> 2007 constitution. The coup<br />
government led by General Surayuth Julanond faced protests <strong>of</strong> the<br />
National United Front <strong>of</strong> Democracy Against Dictatorship—UDD (the<br />
Red Shirts supporting Thaksin). After the People Power Party (the<br />
successor <strong>of</strong> the Thai Rak Thai Party dissolved by Justices <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Constitutional Court on 30 May 2007) won the general election on 23<br />
December 2007, it became the leading party <strong>of</strong> the two coalition<br />
119
120 KPI Congress XI<br />
governments that followed: the first government was led by Mr. Samak<br />
Sundaravej—a self-proclaimed Thaksin nominee, <strong>and</strong> the second was led<br />
by Mr. Somchai Wongsawat—Thaksin’s brother-in-law. The People’s<br />
Alliance for Democracy—PAD (the Yellow Shirts protesting against<br />
Thaksin) demonstrated against the two governments continuously,<br />
causing the government serious troubles For example, the protesters<br />
seized <strong>Government</strong> House, blocked the area around Makawan Bridge on<br />
Ratchadamnoen Road <strong>and</strong> seized the airport. Somchai’s government was<br />
ousted after the Constitution Court found People Power Party guilty in<br />
the Mr. Yongyuth Tiyapairat’s vote-buying case, disb<strong>and</strong>ed the party <strong>and</strong><br />
stripped its executive members’, including PM Somchai, <strong>of</strong> electoral<br />
rights on 2 December 2008. The anti-government protest ended on<br />
4 December 2008.<br />
Since the Democrat Party formed a coalition government under<br />
Mr. Abhisit Vejachiva as prime minister, the UDD has been acting in the<br />
same way as the PAD did against the People Power Party’s government.<br />
It undertakes regular anti-government protests in Bangkok <strong>and</strong> the<br />
provinces, <strong>and</strong> its actions have included closing the road at Victory<br />
Monument, forcing the closure <strong>of</strong> the ASEAN + 6 Summit at Pattaya<br />
<strong>and</strong> blocking roads in the Din-Dang area during the 2009 Songkran<br />
festival.<br />
This ongoing civil disobedience is destructive for the future <strong>of</strong> Thai<br />
democracy. How can Thai society return to a normal situation in which<br />
every group accepts the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> the government? It might be said<br />
that the old ways <strong>of</strong> using political parties as the intermediary between<br />
the people <strong>and</strong> the government, representative elections, the<br />
decentralization <strong>of</strong> governing power to local administrations, the<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> powers <strong>and</strong> the check <strong>and</strong> balance system are still the main<br />
mechanisms necessary for building the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> the government.<br />
These mechanisms, however, do not act as the genuine representatives <strong>of</strong><br />
the people’s interest but are used as the politicians’ tools to seek power<br />
<strong>and</strong> pursue personal interests. The election system cannot perform its<br />
duty in screening for good <strong>and</strong> smart persons to run the political system<br />
efficiently but rather allows vote-buying to be widespread <strong>and</strong> gives way
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
politicians who abuse their <strong>of</strong>ficial positions pursuing personal interest.<br />
The mechanism to monitor the use <strong>of</strong> state power cannot function fully<br />
due to work overload <strong>and</strong> time-consuming investigation procedures. The<br />
decentralization to local administrations is not firmly settled <strong>and</strong> cannot<br />
be the framework for local citizens to participate in the process <strong>of</strong> solving<br />
their communities’ problems.<br />
In conclusion, it takes quite a long time to solve social disunity<br />
caused by the fact that the politicians use the people tools to negotiate<br />
with the government. Institutions, especially organizations monitoring<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> state authority, the new instruments designed to promote<br />
transparency <strong>and</strong> government creditability, must work in unity <strong>and</strong> aim<br />
for the achievement <strong>of</strong> their duties rather than their personal interests.<br />
People must not abuse their positions to increase personal influence,<br />
power <strong>and</strong> private interest.<br />
The monitoring organizations prominent in the process to build<br />
government legitimacy <strong>and</strong> credibility are the Election Commission, the<br />
National Anti-Corruption Commission, the Constitution Court, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Supreme Court. If these organizations perform their duties thoroughly,<br />
the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the government legitimacy will be restored.<br />
It should be noted that the government legitimacy is not just about<br />
law, tradition <strong>and</strong> charisma (supranational power) as stated by Max<br />
Weber, the German social sociologist. It is also about the morality <strong>and</strong><br />
ethics <strong>of</strong> the politicians <strong>and</strong> governors. As the ancient philosophers<br />
stated, society is in crisis because leaders ab<strong>and</strong>oned morality, only<br />
pursuing their personal interests <strong>and</strong> forgetting about the public interest.<br />
121
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
The Right Parliamentary System for<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Nantawat Boraman<strong>and</strong><br />
Th i s a r t i c l e a i m s t o p r o p o s e a<br />
parliamentary system that is right for<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>. The article is divided in<br />
three sections as described below.<br />
1. The proposal for the membership<br />
<strong>and</strong> the selection <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong><br />
Representatives.<br />
(1) The House <strong>of</strong> Representatives should<br />
c o m p r i s e 5 0 0 m e m b e r s ; 1 0 0<br />
members are to be elected nationwide<br />
o n a p a r t y - l i s t b a s i s w i t h n o<br />
minimum proportion stipulation as<br />
included in the 1997 constitution<br />
<strong>and</strong> 400 members are to be elected<br />
on a single-member constituency<br />
basis.<br />
(2) The vote-counting method should be<br />
changed back to that used under the<br />
1997 constitution, which is a single<br />
vote-counting location for each<br />
constituency.<br />
123
124 KPI Congress XI<br />
(3) Prohibition on some forms <strong>of</strong> election campaigning should be<br />
cancelled to reduce vote-canvassers’ influence.<br />
(4) The rule regarding c<strong>and</strong>idate partisanship should be cancelled to<br />
prevent “authoritarianism <strong>of</strong> political party executives” but the<br />
political party system should still be supported.<br />
2. The proposal for the membership <strong>and</strong> the selection <strong>of</strong><br />
the Senate.<br />
The Senate should comprise 120 members to be selected through<br />
the two-layer selection process described below.<br />
The first-layer <strong>of</strong> selection is to choose 600 persons as c<strong>and</strong>idates<br />
to the Senate by means <strong>of</strong> selection from among representatives <strong>of</strong><br />
various organizations, based on regulations <strong>and</strong> methods stated in the<br />
organic law on Senate selection:<br />
1) 75 representatives <strong>of</strong> local administrative authorities<br />
2) 75 representatives <strong>of</strong> civil servant, military <strong>and</strong> police associations<br />
3) 15 representatives <strong>of</strong> state-funded enterprise labor unions <strong>and</strong><br />
public organizations<br />
4) 100 representatives from specialized career councils, such as<br />
doctors, lawyers, engineers <strong>and</strong> accountants<br />
5) 80 representatives <strong>of</strong> the institutions <strong>of</strong> the manufacturing/<br />
production sector, including the Thai Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce,<br />
the Federation <strong>of</strong> Thai Industries, the Thai Bankers Association<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Agriculture Cooperative Federation <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>, Ltd.<br />
6) 25 representatives <strong>of</strong> labor unions<br />
7) 230 representatives <strong>of</strong> NGOs.<br />
The second-layer <strong>of</strong> selection is to have “the Senate Selection<br />
Committee” select 120 out <strong>of</strong> the 600 c<strong>and</strong>idates from the first-layered<br />
selection maintaining the prescribed proportions <strong>of</strong> members for each<br />
represented group, based on regulations <strong>and</strong> methods stated in the
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
organic law on Senate selection. “The Senate Selection Committee” is<br />
composed <strong>of</strong><br />
1) the Speaker <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives.<br />
2) the leader <strong>of</strong> the opposition in the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives.<br />
3) the prime minister.<br />
4) the head <strong>of</strong> the Constitution Court.<br />
5) the head <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court.<br />
6) the head <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Administrative Court.<br />
7) the chairman <strong>of</strong> the Election Commission.<br />
8) the chairman <strong>of</strong> the Ombudsmen.<br />
9) the chairman <strong>of</strong> the National Anti-Corruption Commission.<br />
10) the chairman <strong>of</strong> the State Audit Commission.<br />
11) the chairman <strong>of</strong> the National Human Rights Commission.<br />
12) the chairman <strong>of</strong> the National Economic <strong>and</strong> Social Advisory<br />
Council.<br />
13) the Attorney General.<br />
3. The proposal for creating the right relationship between<br />
the Parliament <strong>and</strong> the Cabinet:<br />
(1) Members <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives should no longer be<br />
forced to be partisans.<br />
(2) A rule that allows a minority in the Parliament to call for a noconfidence<br />
debate against the prime minister, as stated in the<br />
2007 constitution, enables the minorities to present their<br />
information <strong>and</strong> criticize the government’s performance before<br />
the public, thus enhancing people’s political learning.<br />
(3) Legislative <strong>and</strong> executive powers should be separated by<br />
prohibiting MPs from serving as ministers. In order to create<br />
125
126 KPI Congress XI<br />
government stability <strong>and</strong> efficiency, ministers must work in<br />
accordance with the Cabinet’s guidelines under the comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
the prime minister. This, especially in the case <strong>of</strong> a coalition<br />
government, will reduce the coalition parties’ negotiation power<br />
with the prime minister because if the prime minister decides to<br />
reshuffle the Cabinet or fire any minister, that particular minister<br />
cannot return to his seat in Parliament as in the past.
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
Performing <strong>Government</strong>al<br />
Development Policies with Societal<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong> Problems <strong>and</strong> Solutions 1<br />
Supamit Pitipat 2<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Political Science, Chulalongkorn University<br />
During the past two or three decades,<br />
the problems causing resistance to<br />
the exercise <strong>of</strong> governmental power<br />
in Thai society has most frequently raised the<br />
question <strong>of</strong> government legitimacy. One <strong>of</strong><br />
the problems has been caused by policies<br />
aimed at national development in connection<br />
to the government’s use <strong>of</strong> power to manage<br />
1 Presented in the work <strong>of</strong> the academic 11th conference <strong>of</strong> the King Prajadhipok’s<br />
Insitute in 2009 on the topic <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Conflict</strong>, <strong>Legitimacy</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>:<br />
<strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources in Thai Society”, 5-7 November 2009 at the UN<br />
Meeting Center, Outer Ratchadamnern Rd., Bangkok.<br />
2 This article was modified from a research report by the writer as a part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
research project: “Research Project on Changing the 10 th National Plan for Economic<br />
<strong>and</strong> Social Development with regard to natural resources, the environment <strong>and</strong><br />
biological diversity into Practice by Forming the Cooperative Processes <strong>of</strong> partnerships<br />
for development in performing according to the 10th National Plan for Economical <strong>and</strong><br />
Social Plans Development as presented to the National Economical <strong>and</strong> Social Advisory<br />
Council in September <strong>of</strong> 2008. The author would like to thank Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Dr. Wira Somboon, the project leader, the team <strong>of</strong> research assistants <strong>and</strong> all primary<br />
research committees that participated in this project with particular thanks to Assistant<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Kaewkam Kraisorapong <strong>and</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr. Nareumon Tapjumpon. Any<br />
errors appearing herein are the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the author.<br />
127
128 KPI Congress XI<br />
local resources <strong>and</strong> communities in response to <strong>and</strong> compliance with the<br />
policies <strong>and</strong> “national” plans for economic development until sharp rifts<br />
<strong>of</strong> conflict have occurred between local citizens, governmental <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />
<strong>and</strong> the private business sector seeking for investment aimed at<br />
“development” in numerous areas with impact on changes in lifestyle, the<br />
environment, ecology <strong>and</strong> human health conditions in various areas<br />
across the nation.<br />
To all appearances, the governmental sector, which specifies the<br />
directions <strong>and</strong> plans for national development, also realizes the issues <strong>of</strong><br />
conflicts <strong>and</strong> injustice in society leading to illegitimacy, including<br />
environmental funds created by imbalance in developmental policies, <strong>and</strong><br />
also seeks solutions these issues. It is evident that attempted solutions<br />
were reflected in Economic <strong>and</strong> Social Development Plan, Version 10<br />
(2007-2011). This developmental plan sets forth primary strategies for<br />
an area <strong>of</strong> development as strategies <strong>of</strong> development based on biological<br />
diversity <strong>and</strong> stability in terms <strong>of</strong> resources <strong>and</strong> the environment.<br />
The report, however, contains the main recommendation that<br />
analysis that conscientiousness <strong>of</strong> the issues <strong>and</strong> specifications <strong>of</strong><br />
measures to find a solution to those issues are considered necessary basic<br />
terms that are insufficient to guarantee that these problems will<br />
eventually disappear. Successful problem-solving continues to depend on<br />
whether or not various measures aimed at problem-solving were<br />
appropriate <strong>and</strong> sufficient measures, <strong>and</strong> how many attempts were made<br />
at taking action in concurrence with those measures. Moreover,<br />
evaluations for changing plans in practice must consider the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
the plans themselves, which are to return <strong>and</strong> evaluate the concepts <strong>and</strong><br />
developmental guidelines in terms <strong>of</strong> direction, what basic assumptions<br />
<strong>of</strong> development the plan was based upon, how relevant the methods <strong>of</strong><br />
cognition <strong>and</strong> practice guidelines were toward the existing national<br />
problems <strong>and</strong> areas in various regions in order in helping to ensure that<br />
the plan was put to practice effectively toward reducing or eliminating<br />
the issue <strong>of</strong> social conflict <strong>and</strong> problems <strong>of</strong> injustice which are the base<br />
roots <strong>of</strong> the problem <strong>of</strong> governmental illegitimacy.
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
Conceptual Framework on the Implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Human Rights: A Case Study from Human<br />
Rights Violations During the War against Drugs<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2003<br />
Suchart Wongsinnak 1<br />
Today’s challenges on governmental<br />
power by claiming human rights is<br />
visible throughout the world as<br />
democratic states bind themselves to<br />
international human rights principles. At the<br />
very least, democratic states do not accept<br />
br<strong>and</strong>ing by global society as violators <strong>of</strong><br />
human rights. For this reason, human rights<br />
are one type <strong>of</strong> criteria used to evaluate the<br />
government’s use power to ensure compliance<br />
with moral <strong>and</strong> legal principles. Driving<br />
human rights for the aforementioned goal is<br />
not only a matter <strong>of</strong> state, which once was<br />
the center <strong>of</strong> law enforcement. On the<br />
contrary, human right activists become<br />
individuals with key roles in taking human<br />
1 Ph.D. in Criminology, Law <strong>and</strong> Society, University <strong>of</strong> Florida. He is currently a<br />
litigation <strong>of</strong>ficer attached to the Administrative Court Officer.<br />
129
130 KPI Congress XI<br />
rights to the local operational level (vernacularization). One important<br />
question, both in theory <strong>and</strong> practice, is “What do human right<br />
activists need to do for the human rights concept to be enforced in<br />
society?”<br />
This research was conducted with the objective <strong>of</strong> studying the roles<br />
<strong>and</strong> attitudes <strong>of</strong> human rights advocates regarding human rights<br />
violations during the war against drugs <strong>of</strong> 2003 when over 2,500 people<br />
were murdered within a short period <strong>of</strong> three months from February to<br />
April <strong>of</strong> 2003. <strong>Government</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>and</strong> the media have <strong>of</strong>ten associated<br />
these murders with drugs <strong>and</strong> the term “extrajudicial killing” has been<br />
invented to explain the occurrence. It is known that, drug traders killed<br />
each other so the government <strong>of</strong>ficials wouldn’t trace smaller drug dealer<br />
to the larger dealers. Extrajudicial killing also meant cutting <strong>of</strong>f the<br />
examination process associated with all <strong>of</strong> the murders during that time<br />
from the <strong>of</strong>ficial judicial system, i.e. not one single case involving<br />
individuals performing “extrajudicial killing” was to be tried. In the<br />
same way, the sympathy or suspicions <strong>of</strong> Thai society toward these<br />
murders were also extrajudicial. The society put up with <strong>and</strong> accepted<br />
the necessity <strong>of</strong> using violence to solve drug problems. The results <strong>of</strong> this<br />
extrajudicial killing left the victims’ family members to face the fate on<br />
their own. Thai society virtually had no shared pain <strong>and</strong> envisioned no<br />
threat in the use <strong>of</strong> violence supported by the government.<br />
In addition to the National Human Rights Committee, some<br />
human rights activists also try to become a voice in protection <strong>of</strong> human<br />
rights. The significance <strong>of</strong> this research is to search for a conceptual<br />
framework <strong>and</strong> see how human right activists apply the law <strong>and</strong> the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> international human rights on a local level.
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
Thai <strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
Wira Lertsomporn<br />
Abstract<br />
According to a study conducted on<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s political data only for the<br />
years 2 0 0 8 a n d 2 0 0 9 , t h e t e r m<br />
“political legitimacy” has been found to be<br />
used in two main instances: one is when the<br />
term is used to explain to the society that one<br />
has a legitimacy <strong>and</strong> another is when the<br />
term is used to explain that a certain<br />
individual or organization lacks political<br />
legitimacy.<br />
In addition to this data, if the writer<br />
conducts research back to the year <strong>of</strong> 1932<br />
when changes in Thai government occurred,<br />
the writer believes that the use <strong>of</strong> the term<br />
“political legitimacy” must have existed at a<br />
certain level, more or less depending upon<br />
the political conditions during that certain<br />
period. In pursuing this line <strong>of</strong> thought, the<br />
research has come up with a number if issues:<br />
“What is political legitimacy?” “What are the<br />
indicators?” “Who is likely to use the term?<br />
(in Thai politics)”, “Should the term<br />
“political legitimacy” be used only with<br />
131
132 KPI Congress XI<br />
governments as it has always been used?” <strong>and</strong> “What recommendations<br />
should there be to promote the body <strong>of</strong> knowledge on “political<br />
legitimacy” to Thai people in a creative way that agrees with a national<br />
democratic government under constitutional monarchy <strong>and</strong> to help push<br />
Thai politics into a better direction. With these issues in mind, the<br />
writer conducted a literature review on various literature <strong>and</strong> researches<br />
to find answers for the aforementioned issues.<br />
The writer proposes a new perspective on political legitimacy in that<br />
it should broadly cover every sector <strong>and</strong> every part <strong>of</strong> the term “politics”.<br />
“Political legitimacy” should not be the term used only to stimulate<br />
creative political conscience with governments, but should also be used<br />
with the opposition, senators, judicial organizations, statutory free<br />
organizations, media, private development organizations, academic<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>and</strong> society as individuals <strong>and</strong> other sectors raise the level <strong>of</strong><br />
“Thai political development” so political legitimacy genuinely occurs in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> content <strong>and</strong> process which will eventually lead to desired<br />
political stability.<br />
Finally, the writer recommends that there be a process for<br />
promoting the body <strong>of</strong> knowledge on “political legitimacy” <strong>and</strong> other<br />
important bodies <strong>of</strong> knowledge such as overall bodies <strong>of</strong> knowledge on<br />
“politics” <strong>and</strong> on “democracy” to the public, who can be divided into 2<br />
major groups: 1. The youth studying from kindergarten to high school<br />
<strong>and</strong> those who are studying at the college level as well, <strong>and</strong> 2. The general<br />
public who has already left educational facilities since adolescence,<br />
middle age <strong>and</strong> senior adulthood.<br />
The writer believes that a clear <strong>and</strong> tangible method that can<br />
effectively create the aforementioned processes in the two sectors <strong>of</strong><br />
people is the creation <strong>of</strong> a curriculum <strong>of</strong> at least three years’ duration <strong>and</strong><br />
the process must not be thought by memorization, but it utilize “child<br />
centers”, “citizen dialogue” <strong>and</strong> “facilitators” as core processes because<br />
these bodies <strong>of</strong> knowledge are not about memorization, but they are<br />
about asking questions <strong>and</strong> collectively finding the answers wherein the<br />
facilitator is the one who gradually takes the two sectors <strong>of</strong> public toward<br />
the goal in order for the knowledge, realization, responsibility <strong>and</strong><br />
conscience <strong>of</strong> citizenship to occur genuinely.
<strong>Government</strong> <strong>and</strong> Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
A Study on “The Parliament System <strong>and</strong> Suitable<br />
Processes for Recruiting senators in Thail<strong>and</strong>”<br />
Dr. Somboon Tosborvorn<br />
Objective: To study the parliament<br />
system <strong>and</strong> suitable processes for<br />
recruiting senators in Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Methodology: This research explored<br />
the parliament system (Unicameralism <strong>and</strong><br />
Bicameralism) <strong>and</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Senate or upper houses <strong>of</strong> 170 countries in a<br />
comparative objective study. The research<br />
also studied a conceptual framework on<br />
sovereignty, conceptual framework <strong>of</strong><br />
Country State, <strong>and</strong> problems <strong>and</strong> barriers in<br />
the past regarding the issue <strong>of</strong> the parliament<br />
<strong>and</strong> the process for recruiting senators in<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Findings: Unicameralism is mostly<br />
employed in small countries (86.66%), new<br />
countries (68.00%) (except for large new<br />
countries or countries with clear racial<br />
d i f f e r e n c e s ) a n d c o u n t r i e s r u l e d b y<br />
dictatorship (100%), as well as countries in<br />
Central America <strong>and</strong> Africa (60%), Mid <strong>and</strong><br />
l a r g e - s i z e d c o u n t r i e s w i t h s t a b l e<br />
133
134 KPI Congress XI<br />
administrative systems, high levels <strong>of</strong> education, high-income economics<br />
<strong>and</strong> absolute monarchy systems (4 in 5 countries).<br />
Consideration <strong>of</strong> the Thai setting shows the following: l<strong>and</strong> area<br />
ranking 49 th in the world, a population ranking 20th in the world, a<br />
population literacy rate <strong>of</strong> 92.4%, but a secondary education enrollment<br />
rate at 64% <strong>and</strong> an average learning rate <strong>of</strong> 56.6%. Although<br />
information accessibility rates low in Thail<strong>and</strong>, Thail<strong>and</strong>’s GDP ranks<br />
34th whereas the GDP per capita (Nominal) ranks 92 <strong>and</strong> the Human<br />
Development Index Ranks 78th. In addition, buying votes for sale<br />
during elections are difficult to deny, so Unicameralism is not suitable for<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> in the near future <strong>and</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> should continue to use<br />
Bicameralism.<br />
With regard to the process <strong>of</strong> recruiting senators, the researchers<br />
believe that the same process should be used for all senate members in<br />
order to gain quality senators with knowledge <strong>and</strong> ability as suitable for<br />
respective senatorial roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities. Thus, in order to form a<br />
link with the people, the researchers hold the belief that the same for all<br />
senators <strong>and</strong> the suitable process is found in the first steps <strong>of</strong> the<br />
searching process as set forth in the Constitution <strong>of</strong> 2007. Furthermore,<br />
one process that allowed the people be the final selectors involved<br />
holding nationwide elections should be used, <strong>and</strong> the Recruitment<br />
Committee should be improved to avoid overlapping benefits between<br />
the senators <strong>and</strong> the Recruitment Committee.
Group<br />
2<br />
<strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic Policy for<br />
Reducing <strong>Conflict</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Promoting<br />
Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong>
<strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic Policy for Reducing <strong>Conflict</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Promoting Political <strong>Legitimacy</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s <strong>Reform</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />
<strong>and</strong> Social Development Policy for<br />
Social Welfare <strong>and</strong> Legitimization <strong>of</strong><br />
Capitalistic Regimes.<br />
Akarin Wongtiray<strong>and</strong>et<br />
National Economic <strong>and</strong> Social Advisory Council<br />
Abstract<br />
This article was written for the purpose<br />
<strong>of</strong> analysis to show the connection<br />
between capitalism <strong>and</strong> the country’s<br />
economic <strong>and</strong> social development as well as<br />
the impact <strong>of</strong> development according to the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> capitalism <strong>and</strong> the improvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> mechanisms so capitalism will gain greater<br />
justice for its existence. This context analysis<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>and</strong> overall economic<br />
problems, analysis <strong>and</strong> actual economic<br />
problems e.g. free trade, agriculture, tourism,<br />
etc, <strong>and</strong> the analysis <strong>and</strong> social problem <strong>and</strong><br />
problems <strong>of</strong> life quality such as income<br />
distribution, education, community, etc. <strong>and</strong><br />
analysis <strong>and</strong> problems with natural resources<br />
<strong>and</strong> the environment. For the evaluation, a<br />
preparation has been conducted on an<br />
economic <strong>and</strong> social reform proposal<br />
137
138 KPI Congress XI<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> overall economic, actual economic reform, social <strong>and</strong> life<br />
quality reform, social welfare reform <strong>and</strong> national development strategy<br />
reform.
Group<br />
3<br />
Judicial Review<br />
<strong>and</strong> Judicial Activism
Judicial Review <strong>and</strong> Judicial Activism<br />
Judicial Power <strong>and</strong> Judicial Governance<br />
Dr. Udom Rathamarit<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Law, Thammasat University<br />
Since Thail<strong>and</strong> changed its governing<br />
system to democracy, among the<br />
organizations empowered to exercise<br />
state’s sovereignty, like the legislature <strong>and</strong> the<br />
executive, only the judiciary or court has<br />
been continuously trusted by Thai society.<br />
Furthermore, the judiciary has its own<br />
tradition <strong>of</strong> exercising power under Royal<br />
endorsement <strong>of</strong> His Majesty, the revered<br />
King. Naturally, courts will adhere to justice<br />
<strong>and</strong> rationality within the law’s framework in<br />
judging the cases without prejudice for all<br />
who come to seek justice.<br />
In the situation <strong>of</strong> the continuous<br />
change in Thai society, like social change,<br />
economic change <strong>and</strong> political change, the<br />
judge or tulakar is an ordinary human being,<br />
who sometimes feels love, greed, anger or<br />
confusion. To make judges adhere to justice<br />
without any deviation, there must be a<br />
process to build public awareness <strong>of</strong> honesty<br />
<strong>and</strong> virtue; this learning process has to be<br />
141
142 KPI Congress XI<br />
enhanced by a continual process <strong>of</strong> learning correct academic principles.<br />
It also requires creation <strong>of</strong> guidelines to protect judicial independence<br />
founded on belief in the principle <strong>of</strong> separation <strong>of</strong> powers, so judges do<br />
not fall under the influence <strong>of</strong> politics or unjust powers. There must be a<br />
guarantee that courts adhere to neutrality <strong>and</strong> judge without prejudice.<br />
Article 201 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom Thail<strong>and</strong> stipulates that<br />
a judge must take an oath before His Majesty the King, swearing he “will<br />
be loyal to the His Majesty King <strong>and</strong> will faithfully perform my duties in<br />
the name <strong>of</strong> the King without any partiality in the interest <strong>of</strong> justice, <strong>of</strong><br />
the people <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the public order <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom. I will also uphold<br />
<strong>and</strong> observe the democratic regime <strong>of</strong> government with the King as Head<br />
<strong>of</strong> State, the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the law in<br />
every respect.”<br />
Political freedoms stipulated in the 1997 <strong>and</strong> 20007 constitutions<br />
have increasingly created a conflict among political groups <strong>and</strong> pressure<br />
groups. The judicial institution must enter to judge the behaviors <strong>of</strong><br />
these individuals or groups <strong>of</strong> the people in politics all the time. Due to<br />
the different characteristics in Thai society, in which a judicial culture has<br />
not yet been firmly rooted, influential people in society have been<br />
allowed to intervene in the process <strong>of</strong> using state power in order to justify<br />
their own actions. Furthermore, there is a limited underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> new<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> law, particularly public law, under which various relations<br />
have been set up <strong>and</strong> many mechanisms have established concerning the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> power in the work systems <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fices in various organizations.<br />
These are very different from what they were in the past. Therefore,<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s judicial institutions like the Constitution Court, the Courts <strong>of</strong><br />
Justice, <strong>and</strong> the Administrative Court must work under the challenging<br />
situation <strong>of</strong> facing constant public criticism, particularly when dealing<br />
with cases concerning political interest that have huge effects in politics,<br />
such as cases concerning removing political <strong>of</strong>fice-holders from their<br />
positions, dissolving, political parties, disqualifying election c<strong>and</strong>idates,<br />
or confiscating assets when courts find the defendant to possess unusual<br />
wealth. All these cases bring criticism <strong>of</strong> verdicts from all sides.
Judicial Review <strong>and</strong> Judicial Activism<br />
“Judicial Governance” is a criticism leveled by people who believe<br />
that justice <strong>of</strong>ficials act inappropriately or beyond their legitimate legal<br />
authority when checking the exercise <strong>of</strong> power by the executive or the<br />
legislature. It is strong criticism <strong>of</strong> the judicial institution that should be<br />
considered by all parties concerned. In particular, every judicial<br />
organization should strictly check its own performance, like accelerating<br />
the expansion <strong>of</strong> new legal knowledge <strong>and</strong> sticking to procedure when<br />
judging cases in order to make all parties involved trust that the court has<br />
always attached great importance to bringing justice without<br />
discrimination or prejudice towards any individual or case. More<br />
importantly, performance must be checked <strong>and</strong> transparent to confirm<br />
that judges perform their duties by taking into consideration their<br />
responsibility to the society <strong>and</strong> parties concerned. The exercise <strong>of</strong><br />
judicial power to judge a case must be based on facts <strong>and</strong> the application<br />
<strong>of</strong> law, which comes from a rational judging process with completely no<br />
prejudice toward any parties.<br />
143
Judicial Activism<br />
Judicial Review <strong>and</strong> Judicial Activism<br />
Prasit Piwawattanapanich<br />
Lecturer at the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Law, Thammasat University<br />
The idea <strong>of</strong> judicial activism was first<br />
developed in the United States <strong>of</strong><br />
America. Academics still debate the<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> judicial activism because<br />
different scholars interpret the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />
the term differently. Notably, the early study<br />
<strong>of</strong> judicial activism was <strong>of</strong> interest to<br />
American political scientists who wanted to<br />
evaluate whether judges’ deliberation<br />
processes were free from political influence<br />
(in general meaning). Political scientists use<br />
the behavioural or structural approaches to<br />
achieve a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the court<br />
system by considering judge recruitment<br />
processes <strong>and</strong> career paths, as well power<br />
relationships concerning the courts,<br />
particularly in the American federalist<br />
system.<br />
Additionally, the idea <strong>of</strong> judicial<br />
activism was created at the same time as the<br />
145
146 KPI Congress XI<br />
idea <strong>of</strong> judicial restraint, which means courts should not rule on cases<br />
that are matters <strong>of</strong> executive policy, or political. Therefore, the idea <strong>of</strong><br />
judicial activism <strong>and</strong> the idea <strong>of</strong> judicial restraint are opposite sides <strong>of</strong><br />
the same coin. Interestingly, only judicial activism is mentioned in Thai<br />
society, without any comment about judicial restraint.<br />
Although, the definition <strong>of</strong> judicial activism is still debated among<br />
scholars, it is generally accepted that the high court (which may refer to<br />
a high court or Constitution Court) interprets the law under the<br />
constitution in order to protect the rights <strong>and</strong> freedoms <strong>of</strong> people. The<br />
role <strong>of</strong> controlling <strong>and</strong> examining the lawfulness <strong>of</strong> the law under the<br />
constitution, or any action, in this sense is called judicial review.<br />
However, judicial activism does not intend to go too far in using the<br />
court system to resolve political conflicts.
Judicial Review <strong>and</strong> Judicial Activism<br />
Buddhist Approach to Negotiation<br />
Chalakorn Thiansongjai<br />
Graduate College Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalay University<br />
The proposal <strong>of</strong> a Buddhist approach<br />
to negotiation in h<strong>and</strong>ling political<br />
conflicts is a proposal employing<br />
Buddhist concepts, i.e. what is considered<br />
Thai wisdom, as a method to apply in<br />
h<strong>and</strong>ling conflicts. This proposal consists <strong>of</strong><br />
the causal factors prompting the conflict,<br />
Buddhist methods <strong>of</strong> negotiation <strong>and</strong> the<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> a case study where Buddha served<br />
as moderator for a negotiation.<br />
In studying the cause or the roots <strong>of</strong><br />
disagreement, Buddhism focuses on the<br />
internal factors that cause the disagreement.<br />
This can be explained from the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />
the 2 groups <strong>of</strong> demeritorious acts i.e. the<br />
three roots <strong>of</strong> evil, namely, greed, rage <strong>and</strong><br />
delusion, <strong>and</strong> hindrances i.e. lust, conceit<br />
<strong>and</strong> pride.<br />
Pride is considered the core <strong>of</strong> conflict<br />
situated at the deepest level because it is<br />
147
148 KPI Congress XI<br />
adherence to idealism. Furthermore, if that pride consists <strong>of</strong><br />
demeritorious acts prompting false views, it will eventually lead to<br />
conflict <strong>and</strong> violence. Thus, according to Buddhism, the concept that is<br />
the basis <strong>of</strong> conflict management is “how to create correct views”. The<br />
creation <strong>of</strong> factors for the occurrence <strong>of</strong> correct views relies upon the<br />
balance <strong>of</strong> external factors (outside influences, news, teachings <strong>of</strong> others,<br />
outside motivators, etc.) <strong>and</strong> internal factors (correct thinking).<br />
With the aforementioned concept, it can be concluded that the<br />
heart <strong>of</strong> Buddhist serenity in moderating is to enter the moderation as a<br />
third party or as a mediator. The moderator will act as an external factor<br />
or outside influence who will serve as a comrade in the negotiations as<br />
well as an educator who imparts accurate knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
with various actions considered the keys to making the parties to the<br />
dispute have correct thinking, which is the internal factor leading to<br />
correct views or a correct thoughts for seeking peace agreements<br />
satisfactory to both parties derived from self. For the operating strategy,<br />
it is from the analysis <strong>of</strong> the case study where Buddha served as a<br />
moderator who used such methods <strong>of</strong> moderating as encountering,<br />
persuasion, avoidance, advocacy <strong>and</strong> participation.
Judicial Review <strong>and</strong> Judicial Activism<br />
The Roles <strong>of</strong> Monks in Dealing with<br />
Local Political <strong>Conflict</strong><br />
Monk-Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Abbot<br />
Wat Nong Payom Chumsangsongkram<br />
Bangrakam<br />
Phitsanulok<br />
Phramahaboonlert Chuaithani*<br />
Master Wiroon Siriphan,<br />
Miss Yuwathida Chomchoey<br />
Miss Sudarat Ruttanapong,<br />
Miss Oraphan Poolsin**<br />
* Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.<br />
This study focuses on the exploration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the roles <strong>of</strong> monks in dealing with<br />
local political conflict <strong>and</strong> was<br />
conducted with the objective <strong>of</strong> seeking<br />
wisdom <strong>of</strong> the monks involved in h<strong>and</strong>ling<br />
conflict, <strong>and</strong> to explore the use <strong>of</strong> this<br />
educational zone as a zone for creating<br />
unified politics. From the study <strong>of</strong> the role<br />
<strong>of</strong> Phrakhru Wiboon Sitthitham or <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
called by the people, “Master Toom”, in<br />
h<strong>and</strong>ling local political conflict, it was found<br />
that the Master played a role in creating<br />
** All graduate students majoring in <strong>Conflict</strong> Management at Naresuan University<br />
149
150 KPI Congress XI<br />
political unification <strong>and</strong> was able to reduce violence at the election level,<br />
while being able to create activities in recruiting election applicants <strong>and</strong><br />
resolving conflicts among local election campaigners for each side by<br />
using Wat Nong Payom as a facility for organizing the activities.<br />
The Phrakhru Wiboon Sitthitham defines the meaning <strong>of</strong> conflict<br />
by connecting the villagers’ well-being or life quality. <strong>Conflict</strong> means the<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> good life quality both in terms <strong>of</strong> income, education, family life,<br />
etc. In order to reduce the level <strong>of</strong> discord in the community, including<br />
political conflicts, the villagers must be provided with good life quality.<br />
The Master, therefore, initiated projects to improve the villagers’ quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> life. Among these projects was the Asset Saving Oath Project, which<br />
was an important mechanism in helping to raise the level <strong>of</strong> life quality<br />
among the villagers while reducing local <strong>and</strong> political conflict.<br />
The ethic for the villagers’ improved quality <strong>of</strong> life connected to the<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> conflict used by the master was oath-taking, which was the<br />
fundamental ideology <strong>of</strong> the Asset Savings Oath Group with additional<br />
ethics: 1. The members’ ethics for self improvement, i.e. diligence,<br />
honesty, unity <strong>and</strong> regulations <strong>and</strong> 2. A group <strong>of</strong> ethics that must be<br />
exercised, namely, endurance, thriftiness, <strong>and</strong> patience. The results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the aforementioned ethics were: 1. Love <strong>and</strong> sharing,<br />
2.Sacrifice for the greater good, 3. Empathy, 4. Responsibility for group<br />
<strong>and</strong> community, 5.Compassion <strong>and</strong> 6.Trust.<br />
The instrument Phrakhru Wiboon Sitthitham employed in<br />
h<strong>and</strong>ling conflict consisted <strong>of</strong> 1. Ground rules; 2. The concept <strong>of</strong><br />
identifying the community needs; 3. The process <strong>of</strong> people’s<br />
participation; 4. Apology, <strong>and</strong> forgiveness; 5. Dialogue 6. Moderating<br />
<strong>and</strong> 7. Peaceful communication.
Group<br />
4<br />
Innovation for Political <strong>Conflict</strong><br />
Resolution Through Thai Local<br />
Wisdom <strong>and</strong> Socio-cultural Capital
Innovation for Political <strong>Conflict</strong> Resolution Through Thai Local Wisdom <strong>and</strong> Socio-cultural Capital<br />
Innovation for political conflict<br />
resolution through Thai local wisdom<br />
<strong>and</strong> socio-cultural capital<br />
Chalakorn Thiansongjai<br />
Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalay University<br />
Abstract<br />
The proposal <strong>of</strong> a Buddhist approach<br />
to negotiation in h<strong>and</strong>ling political<br />
conflicts is a proposal employing<br />
Buddhist concepts, i.e. what is considered<br />
Thai wisdom, as a method to apply in<br />
h<strong>and</strong>ling conflicts. This proposal consists <strong>of</strong><br />
the causal factors prompting the conflict,<br />
Buddhist methods <strong>of</strong> negotiation <strong>and</strong> the<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> a case study where Buddha served<br />
as moderator for a negotiation.<br />
In studying the cause or the roots <strong>of</strong><br />
disagreement, Buddhism focuses on the<br />
internal factors that cause the disagreement.<br />
This can be explained from the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />
the 2 groups <strong>of</strong> demeritorious acts i.e. the<br />
three roots <strong>of</strong> evil, namely, greed, rage <strong>and</strong><br />
delusion, <strong>and</strong> hindrances i.e. lust, conceit<br />
<strong>and</strong> pride.<br />
153
154 KPI Congress XI<br />
Pride is considered the core <strong>of</strong> conflict situated at the deepest level<br />
because it is adherence to idealism. Furthermore, if that pride consists <strong>of</strong><br />
demeritorious acts prompting false views, it will eventually lead to<br />
conflict <strong>and</strong> violence. Thus, according to Buddhism, the concept that is<br />
the basis <strong>of</strong> conflict management is “how to create correct views”. The<br />
creation <strong>of</strong> factors for the occurrence <strong>of</strong> correct views relies upon the<br />
balance <strong>of</strong> external factors (outside influences, news, teachings <strong>of</strong> others,<br />
outside motivators, etc.) <strong>and</strong> internal factors (correct thinking).<br />
With the aforementioned concept, it can be concluded that the<br />
heart <strong>of</strong> Buddhist serenity in moderating is to enter the moderation as a<br />
third party or as a mediator. The moderator will act as an external factor<br />
or outside influence who will serve as a comrade in the negotiations as<br />
well as an educator who imparts accurate knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
with various actions considered the keys to making the parties to the<br />
dispute have correct thinking, which is the internal factor leading to<br />
correct views or a correct thoughts for seeking peace agreements<br />
satisfactory to both parties derived from self. For the operating strategy,<br />
it is from the analysis <strong>of</strong> the case study where Buddha served as a<br />
moderator who used such methods <strong>of</strong> moderating as encountering,<br />
persuasion, avoidance, advocacy <strong>and</strong> participation.
Innovation for Political <strong>Conflict</strong> Resolution Through Thai Local Wisdom <strong>and</strong> Socio-cultural Capital 155<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong>s in the Southern Border<br />
Provinces: Causes <strong>and</strong> Sustainable<br />
Solutions<br />
Perspectives <strong>of</strong> Class 1 students <strong>of</strong> an advanced certificate program<br />
“Creating a Peaceful Society”<br />
Office for Peace <strong>and</strong> Governance, King Prajadhipok’s Institute<br />
Core problem:<br />
The core problem <strong>of</strong> the unrest in<br />
southern border provinces is a<br />
struggle that cites the ideology <strong>of</strong><br />
separatist movements in Patani, led by BRN-<br />
Coordinate <strong>and</strong> PULO which are core<br />
groups, combined with anti-state elements<br />
that want to strike back at some public<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials for actions that made them feel as if<br />
they are not being treated fairly. In this<br />
instance, most people are being victimized<br />
amidst an air <strong>of</strong> distrust between the state<br />
<strong>and</strong> people as well as between people <strong>and</strong><br />
people themselves.<br />
Root causes <strong>of</strong> the problem:<br />
The violence that has been occurring in<br />
the areas is just a symptom <strong>of</strong> political<br />
conflicts that are interlinked with cultural<br />
contexts, <strong>of</strong> which the root causes include:
156 KPI Congress XI<br />
1) Perception <strong>of</strong> unfair treatment towards local people has been<br />
induced by past discriminatory actions <strong>and</strong> attitudes <strong>of</strong> some<br />
government <strong>of</strong>ficials who did not accept the identity <strong>of</strong> local<br />
people wholeheartedly. This resulted from misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong><br />
suspicion that different identity would pose a threat to peace <strong>and</strong><br />
security <strong>of</strong> the Thai society.<br />
2) Distrust among various groups <strong>of</strong> people inside <strong>and</strong> outside the<br />
areas.<br />
3) Memories <strong>of</strong> past anguish inflicted by the actions <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong><br />
Siam upon the once-flourishing Patani state.<br />
4) Administrative structure with respect to legal, political <strong>and</strong><br />
economic policies as well as social <strong>and</strong> cultural policies, <strong>of</strong> which<br />
some components do not conform to the identity <strong>and</strong> lifestyles <strong>of</strong><br />
local people <strong>and</strong> are not opened to direct participation by the<br />
people at a level that can create a sense <strong>of</strong> ownership genuinely<br />
<strong>and</strong> equitably.<br />
All these have made Malayu-Patani people, especially those who<br />
have resorted to violence, feel that they could not become a part <strong>of</strong> Thai<br />
society with dignity <strong>and</strong> merits. The people in all sectors who are<br />
involved in problem solving must recognize the core problem <strong>and</strong> these<br />
root causes <strong>and</strong> focus their attention on these issues, otherwise they<br />
cannot formulate proper remedial approaches.<br />
Key questions crucial to problem solving<br />
Rectification measures <strong>of</strong> the state sector should take into<br />
consideration two key questions which are linked with the aforesaid root<br />
causes as follows:<br />
1) How local people <strong>and</strong> adversary groups can engage in political<br />
participation for rectification <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> relevant<br />
activities or policies that are truly concerned with their livelihood<br />
through administrative structure <strong>and</strong> policies that are impartial<br />
<strong>and</strong> conform to the identity <strong>of</strong> local people as well as strengthen
Innovation for Political <strong>Conflict</strong> Resolution Through Thai Local Wisdom <strong>and</strong> Socio-cultural Capital 157<br />
local communities <strong>and</strong> prepare them for the participation with a<br />
feeling <strong>of</strong> equality <strong>and</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> expression.<br />
2) How a feeling <strong>of</strong> distrust will be eliminated quickly so that<br />
government <strong>of</strong>ficials, people in the mainstream society <strong>and</strong><br />
southern border provinces will adequately underst<strong>and</strong>, accept <strong>and</strong><br />
recognize the values <strong>of</strong> diverse cultures <strong>and</strong> the identity <strong>of</strong> local<br />
people to a degree that they are no longer suspicious that such<br />
diversity would pose a threat to peace <strong>and</strong> serenity Instead, such<br />
diversity should turn into a positive force in the Thai society, thus<br />
creating public confidence <strong>and</strong> faith in the government, especially<br />
on the issue <strong>of</strong> equality.<br />
Directional framework for rectification <strong>of</strong> the problem:<br />
Solutions to the problem must be under the framework <strong>of</strong> peaceful<br />
means, whereby politics truly takes the lead, not the military. Peaceful<br />
means do not reject military intervention but the military must be<br />
deployed to support law enforcement efforts <strong>and</strong> must abide by the rule<br />
<strong>of</strong> law in order to control the spreading <strong>of</strong> violence. In addition, the<br />
military must support <strong>and</strong> fulfill only the goals <strong>of</strong> political works. Aside<br />
from using political works to develop quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> local people, the<br />
state still need to use proactive political works to deal with the groups<br />
with opposing viewpoints in local societies, thus enabling them to accept<br />
each other to a level that they can live side by side with dignity <strong>and</strong><br />
equality.<br />
Recommendations for proactive political works<br />
The following nine recommendations pertain to the use <strong>of</strong> proactive<br />
political works to quell the unrest in southern border provinces for good<br />
based on the principles <strong>of</strong> creating trust – creating equality – opening<br />
spaces/spaces for participation – listening – creating underst<strong>and</strong>ing –<br />
conforming to identity.<br />
1) Organize a peace talk with adversary groups through a systematic<br />
process which follows suitable procedures, thus creating trust for<br />
in-depth discussion <strong>and</strong> collectively seeking peaceful <strong>and</strong>
158 KPI Congress XI<br />
sustainable solutions to address the problem at root causes <strong>and</strong><br />
putting an end to the losses on both sides. However, it must be<br />
stressed that such dialogue is not a negotiation but the focus will<br />
be on creating mutual underst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />
2) Build capacity <strong>and</strong> enhance readiness <strong>of</strong> local communities <strong>and</strong><br />
civil societies, enabling the people to have an equal access to the<br />
state’s justice process <strong>and</strong> public welfare <strong>and</strong> opening spaces for<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> peaceful means <strong>and</strong> initiation <strong>of</strong> activities that can<br />
contribute to quelling <strong>of</strong> the unrest <strong>and</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> a sustainable<br />
peace based on broad-based participation <strong>of</strong> local people. This<br />
recommendation is based on the idea that local problems must be<br />
solved by local people.<br />
3) Jointly create a peace network for the southern border (PeaceNet)<br />
that puts emphasis on participation by various sectors to<br />
exchange learning <strong>and</strong> information <strong>and</strong> share experiences about<br />
solutions to different problems <strong>and</strong> collective use <strong>of</strong> peaceful<br />
means as well as support in terms <strong>of</strong> body <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />
resources <strong>and</strong> work morale, thus energizing collective efforts to<br />
solve problems.<br />
4) Push forward the establishment <strong>of</strong> the truth <strong>and</strong> reconciliation<br />
commission to perform as a mechanism to create justice <strong>and</strong> trust<br />
in the areas. The commission consists <strong>of</strong> representatives from all<br />
relevant sectors that will collectively seek <strong>and</strong> reveal the facts<br />
about violent situations <strong>and</strong> rumors in the areas. Its aim is to<br />
uncover factual information <strong>and</strong> promote correct underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
among all sectors, thus leading to justice <strong>and</strong> mutual trust in the<br />
areas.<br />
5) Formulate social communication strategies to enhance<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing about the situation <strong>and</strong> the facts in the areas <strong>and</strong><br />
to signal peaceful co-existence between the people in a larger<br />
society <strong>and</strong> the people in the locality as Thai citizens on the basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> diversity <strong>of</strong> multi-cultural societies.
Innovation for Political <strong>Conflict</strong> Resolution Through Thai Local Wisdom <strong>and</strong> Socio-cultural Capital 159<br />
6) Study <strong>and</strong> develop appropriate <strong>and</strong> feasible administrative<br />
management by putting the accent on participation <strong>and</strong><br />
conformity to the local identity <strong>and</strong> culture under the framework<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
7) Promote implementation <strong>of</strong> a feasibility study on the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> Islamic law courts pertaining to family <strong>and</strong><br />
inheritance laws within the structure <strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Judiciary <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
8) Urge the state to adopt Malayu language as another working<br />
language in southern border provinces in conjunction with Thai<br />
language.<br />
9) Encourage examination <strong>of</strong> the enforcement <strong>of</strong> special laws <strong>of</strong><br />
relevant authorities to ensure that the enforcement abides by the<br />
rule <strong>of</strong> law <strong>and</strong> is not discriminatory. In addition, regular<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> impacts on the people should be conducted.
160 KPI Congress XI<br />
Recommendation 1-6 are key recommendations proposed by the<br />
students. Recommendation 1 is deemed sending a signal that peaceful<br />
means will be adopted as a main approach to end the violence.<br />
Recommendation 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 are process-oriented suggestions concerning<br />
setting up <strong>of</strong> a dialogue forum that links with the foundation for the<br />
opening <strong>of</strong> a space for broad-based public participation.<br />
Recommendation 4 is a mechanism to create justice <strong>and</strong> trust in the<br />
areas. Recommendation 5 is communication to create underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
with the mainstream society, ensuring that the society realizes the<br />
benefits <strong>of</strong> peaceful means <strong>and</strong> forms an attitude that recognizes the<br />
merits <strong>of</strong> peaceful co-existence within a multi-cultural society.<br />
Recommendation 6 proposes an adaptation <strong>of</strong> an administrative<br />
structure to conform to the local identity <strong>and</strong> culture under the<br />
constitutional framework <strong>and</strong> to encourage public participation.<br />
Recommendation 7-9 are secondary ones that favor providing support<br />
to concerned parties so that they can pursue the matters more vigorously<br />
on ongoing basis to win the heart <strong>and</strong> mind <strong>of</strong> Malayu Patani people<br />
<strong>and</strong> make them feel that the state <strong>and</strong> mainstream society accept,<br />
respect <strong>and</strong> recognize values <strong>of</strong> their identity genuinely <strong>and</strong><br />
wholeheartedly. Consequently, they can live their lives with dignity <strong>and</strong><br />
without making them feel alienated, <strong>and</strong> they can take pride in being<br />
a Thai citizen with Malay race who lives in the Thai society which is<br />
diverse <strong>and</strong> equitable.
Innovation for Political <strong>Conflict</strong> Resolution Through Thai Local Wisdom <strong>and</strong> Socio-cultural Capital<br />
Group<br />
5<br />
Citizen Politics in Checking <strong>of</strong> the 5<br />
State Power for <strong>Equitable</strong><br />
<strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources
Citizen Politics in Checking <strong>of</strong> the State Power for <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources<br />
Thais have their duties to check<br />
the state’s use <strong>of</strong> power.<br />
Veera Somkwamkid<br />
secretary-general <strong>of</strong> the People’s Network against Corruption<br />
Abstract<br />
According to a study conducted on<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s political data only for the<br />
years 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2009, the term<br />
“political legitimacy” has been found to be<br />
used in two main instances: one is when the<br />
term is used to explain to the society that one<br />
has a legitimacy <strong>and</strong> another is when the<br />
term is used to explain that a certain<br />
individual or organization lacks political<br />
legitimacy.<br />
In addition to this data, if the writer<br />
conducts research back to the year <strong>of</strong> 1932<br />
when changes in Thai government occurred,<br />
the writer believes that the use <strong>of</strong> the term<br />
“political legitimacy” must have existed at a<br />
certain level, more or less depending upon<br />
the political conditions during that certain<br />
period. In pursuing this line <strong>of</strong> thought, the<br />
research has come up with a number if issues:<br />
“What is political legitimacy?” “What are the<br />
indicators?” “Who is likely to use the term?<br />
(in Thai politics)”, “Should the term<br />
“political legitimacy” be used only with<br />
163
164 KPI Congress XI<br />
governments as it has always been used?” <strong>and</strong> “What recommendations<br />
should there be to promote the body <strong>of</strong> knowledge on “political<br />
legitimacy” to Thai people in a creative way that agrees with a national<br />
democratic government under constitutional monarchy <strong>and</strong> to help push<br />
Thai politics into a better direction. With these issues in mind, the<br />
writer conducted a literature review on various literature <strong>and</strong> researches<br />
to find answers for the aforementioned issues.<br />
The writer proposes a new perspective on political legitimacy in that<br />
it should broadly cover every sector <strong>and</strong> every part <strong>of</strong> the term “politics”.<br />
“Political legitimacy” should not be the term used only to stimulate<br />
creative political conscience with governments, but should also be used<br />
with the opposition, senators, judicial organizations, statutory free<br />
organizations, media, private development organizations, academic<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>and</strong> society as individuals <strong>and</strong> other sectors raise the level <strong>of</strong><br />
“Thai political development” so political legitimacy genuinely occurs in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> content <strong>and</strong> process which will eventually lead to desired<br />
political stability.<br />
Finally, the writer recommends that there be a process for<br />
promoting the body <strong>of</strong> knowledge on “political legitimacy” <strong>and</strong> other<br />
important bodies <strong>of</strong> knowledge such as overall bodies <strong>of</strong> knowledge on<br />
“politics” <strong>and</strong> on “democracy” to the public, who can be divided into 2<br />
major groups: 1. The youth studying from kindergarten to high school<br />
<strong>and</strong> those who are studying at the college level as well, <strong>and</strong> 2. The general<br />
public who has already left educational facilities since adolescence,<br />
middle age <strong>and</strong> senior adulthood.<br />
The author believes that a clear <strong>and</strong> tangible method that can<br />
effectively create the aforementioned processes in the two sectors <strong>of</strong><br />
people is the creation <strong>of</strong> a curriculum <strong>of</strong> at least three years’ duration <strong>and</strong><br />
the process must not be thought by memorization, but it utilize “child<br />
centers”, “citizen dialogue” <strong>and</strong> “facilitators” as core processes because<br />
these bodies <strong>of</strong> knowledge are not about memorization, but they are<br />
about asking questions <strong>and</strong> collectively finding the answers wherein the<br />
facilitator is the one who gradually takes the two sectors <strong>of</strong> public toward<br />
the goal in order for the knowledge, realization, responsibility <strong>and</strong><br />
conscience <strong>of</strong> citizenship to occur genuinely.
Citizen Politics in Checking <strong>of</strong> the State Power for <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources<br />
Civil Politics: Institutional aspect, after<br />
the Promulgation <strong>of</strong> 2550 Constitution<br />
Prapas Pintoptaeng<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this article is to follow<br />
up <strong>and</strong> assess the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
p r o m u l g a t i o n o f t h e 2 0 0 7<br />
constitution in terms <strong>of</strong> civil politics. What<br />
progress has been made, <strong>and</strong> are there<br />
enough established institutions, mechanisms,<br />
processes, <strong>and</strong> space for civil politics to<br />
enable it to successfully push for issuing<br />
public policy <strong>and</strong> monitor performance <strong>of</strong><br />
the state.<br />
During the last two or three decades,<br />
the problem <strong>of</strong> inadequate representative<br />
democracy in Thai society has brought about<br />
an expansion <strong>and</strong> enhancement <strong>of</strong> civil<br />
politics under the slogan “decrease the state’s<br />
power, increase the power <strong>of</strong> the people”.<br />
This is an essential aim <strong>of</strong> both the 1997 <strong>and</strong><br />
t h e 2 0 0 7 c o n s t i t u t i o n s . T h e 2 0 0 7<br />
c o n s t i t u t i o n d e s i g n e d m e a s u r e s f o r<br />
institutionalization <strong>of</strong> civil politics in many<br />
provisions <strong>and</strong> articles. For example,<br />
c o n c e r n i n g t h e p r o c e s s o f p e o p l e ’s<br />
p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n p u b l i c p o l i c y, t h e<br />
constitution establishes a mechanism to<br />
165
166 KPI Congress XI<br />
create a public participation process at both national level <strong>and</strong> local level.<br />
Expansion <strong>of</strong> direct democracy is to create direct participation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
people in politics such as providing for people’s initiatives in the<br />
legislation, the right to recall high level administrators <strong>and</strong> the right to<br />
have a referendum, etc.<br />
Apart from that, at least two important laws have been issued to<br />
enhance <strong>and</strong> support civil politics: the Council for Political Development<br />
Act 2008 <strong>and</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Community Organizations Act 2007.<br />
More than two years after the promulgation <strong>of</strong> 2007 constitution, it<br />
has been found that different pressure groups in the Thai society have<br />
pushed for civil politics in the context <strong>of</strong> social <strong>and</strong> political conflicts.<br />
The creation <strong>and</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> civil politics, in terms <strong>of</strong> institutionalization,<br />
expressed in principle <strong>and</strong> objective in the constitution seems to<br />
be beyond the imagination <strong>of</strong> social <strong>and</strong> political pressure groups<br />
including the main political institutions like Parliament <strong>and</strong> the<br />
government. For example, ancillary laws that were to be issued within<br />
one or two years in accordance with the constitution’s provisions have<br />
not been passed, <strong>and</strong> there has been very little progress. Besides, some<br />
principles, such as existence <strong>of</strong> an independent environmental<br />
organization, etc., have deviated from the constitution’s objective. Both<br />
<strong>of</strong> these ancillary laws to enhance civil politics still are unable to move<br />
effectively.<br />
Institutionalization <strong>and</strong> mechanisms <strong>of</strong> civil politics are instead only<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest as political tools for each side to pursue their own short term<br />
political aims. There is evidently no intention to instill civil politics in<br />
society in order to provide a space for people to effectively push for the<br />
public policy <strong>and</strong> monitor the performance <strong>of</strong> state both at national <strong>and</strong><br />
local level, which are essential to create civil politics <strong>and</strong> prolong<br />
democracy.
Citizen Politics in Checking <strong>of</strong> the State Power for <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources<br />
How can we advocate public policy<br />
<strong>and</strong> evaluate government<br />
performance?<br />
Nattanan Siricharoen<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Communication Arts, Chalermprakiet University<br />
Abstract<br />
Pu b l i c “ c o n t e n t e d n e s s ” - A n<br />
important factor that brings about the<br />
people’s well being is the government’s<br />
“public policy” because public policy is<br />
virtually the master plan leading to the use <strong>of</strong><br />
i n s t r u m e n t s , t o o l s , e q u i p m e n t a n d<br />
operational budgets in response to the<br />
people’s actual dem<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
This article, therefore, was written to<br />
publish <strong>and</strong> present methods for pushing<br />
public policies for greater clarity <strong>and</strong><br />
tangibility with closer resemblance to reality<br />
in addition to becoming a proposal for<br />
evaluating government performance in order<br />
t o a c h i e v e m a x i m u m c a u t i o n a n d<br />
effectiveness. The main objectives lie in<br />
creating perception <strong>and</strong> building conscience<br />
for honesty, responsibility <strong>and</strong> shame from<br />
sinful acts for both local <strong>and</strong> national<br />
167
168 KPI Congress XI<br />
politicians’ as well as government employees, both in the central <strong>and</strong><br />
local sectors so they perform their jobs conscientiously with good intent<br />
free <strong>of</strong> corruption which will be a key driving force toward leading the<br />
nation <strong>and</strong> its citizens to civilization <strong>and</strong> well-being.<br />
The concepts <strong>and</strong> presentation <strong>of</strong> views broadcast through the roles<br />
<strong>of</strong> “NGOs” <strong>and</strong> “civil society” can be considered the representatives <strong>of</strong><br />
the people <strong>of</strong> the whole nation because we have to accept that the growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> social movement, civil society <strong>and</strong> NGOs have continually <strong>and</strong><br />
quickly adjusted <strong>and</strong> developed the work <strong>of</strong> new organizations under the<br />
political climate <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> which are highly contradictory <strong>and</strong><br />
susceptible to change while the complexity <strong>of</strong> the rapidly changing<br />
political structures at national <strong>and</strong> local levels. In addition, the 2007<br />
Constitution also provides opportunities for participation over a broad<br />
spectrum.<br />
The term “public policy” refers to the government’s performance,<br />
decision-making <strong>and</strong> resource allocation for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>and</strong><br />
must be accepted as valuable <strong>and</strong> beneficial to all parties involved: 1.<br />
The government as policy maker, 2. <strong>Government</strong> employees as important<br />
mechanisms for policy compliance <strong>and</strong> 3. The people, whose needs will<br />
be responded to which bears an important impact on their lives. Both<br />
government employees <strong>and</strong> politicians must not forget that “The people’s<br />
voice is the voice <strong>of</strong> heaven”.<br />
As for the role <strong>of</strong> policy advocacy, the writer agrees with the key<br />
concept on another issue, i.e. the concept <strong>of</strong> “social welfare”, which is the<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> the labor class’s fight against capitalists following the<br />
industrial revolution in 19th century, not by the government or capitalist<br />
h<strong>and</strong>-outs. Social welfare is a social system equally guaranteed to the<br />
government to all citizen in terms <strong>of</strong> basic needs for good quality <strong>of</strong> life,<br />
which is not just a matter <strong>of</strong> social welfare, but a matter <strong>of</strong> “social<br />
democracy” for managing the welfare state as stated by the saying<br />
“…from mother’s womb to the funeral pyre”.<br />
In this day <strong>and</strong> age, it has become evident that social context which<br />
is a “social current” coming from civil society <strong>and</strong> NGOs, as well as
Citizen Politics in Checking <strong>of</strong> the State Power for <strong>Equitable</strong> <strong>Allocation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Resources<br />
media, are considered a social network which is virtually the only factor<br />
prompting the government’s willingness to change public policy at a<br />
certain satisfactory level.<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> government performance may be divided into 4 parts:<br />
1. The government, who must check itself; 2. Private businesses who<br />
must perform various legal activities with the government; 3. Social<br />
sectors or civil society/NGOs who can broadly exercise statutory rights in<br />
performing the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the government <strong>and</strong> 4. The media who<br />
must always monitor <strong>and</strong> sniff for the unwanted odors <strong>of</strong> corruption to<br />
make public so society will have awareness <strong>and</strong> opposition to these<br />
people, so corrupt government <strong>of</strong>ficials will be ashamed a they consider<br />
themselves <strong>and</strong> eventually leave the government system.<br />
“Policy Advocacy” <strong>and</strong> “evaluating government performance” by<br />
both “NGOs” <strong>and</strong> “civil society” must be conducted with scientific <strong>and</strong><br />
social knowledge <strong>and</strong> with a positive goal toward every group <strong>of</strong> people<br />
<strong>and</strong> with sufficient supporting academic data for the government’s<br />
decision making.<br />
If we can act as stated herein, Thai people, Thai society <strong>and</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> will be able to reduce resources <strong>and</strong> budget spending to a great<br />
extent <strong>and</strong> the live <strong>of</strong> Thai people will be improved as never before in the<br />
history <strong>of</strong> our country.<br />
169
Group<br />
6<br />
The Strategy <strong>of</strong> Public<br />
Administration System <strong>Reform</strong>
The Strategy <strong>of</strong> Public Administration System <strong>Reform</strong><br />
Strategies for improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
the public sector management system<br />
Mr. Jadun Aphichartbutra<br />
Inspector General for Ministry <strong>of</strong> Interior<br />
The public sector system in Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
has been in existence for a very long<br />
t i m e a n d h a s b e e n d e v e l o p i n g<br />
continually until present. The components <strong>of</strong><br />
the public sector is divided into<br />
1. <strong>Government</strong> sector<br />
2. State enterprises<br />
3. <strong>Government</strong> organizations<br />
3. Public organizations<br />
4. Constitutionally m<strong>and</strong>ated independent<br />
bodies<br />
5. Parliament<br />
Therefore, revamp <strong>of</strong> the public sector<br />
management system must encompass all<br />
sectors mentioned above in order to develop<br />
<strong>and</strong> move public administration in the same<br />
direction because the key aspect <strong>of</strong> the improvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the public sector management<br />
system is “focusing on efficient operations<br />
173
174 KPI Congress XI<br />
with integrity, transparency <strong>and</strong> accountability <strong>and</strong> encouraging<br />
private entities <strong>and</strong> the general public to participate.” Based on this<br />
key principle, it can be concluded that no matter how the public sector<br />
will evolve, one must take into consideration the good governance<br />
principles under the Royal Decree on Good Governance Guideline <strong>and</strong><br />
Practices B.E. 2546 (2003) which stipulates that the administration shall<br />
achieve the goals by ensuring public well-being, efficacy <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />
missions, efficiency <strong>and</strong> economy <strong>of</strong> the state’s missions, <strong>and</strong> elimination<br />
<strong>of</strong> too lengthy procedures. The tasks <strong>of</strong> the government sector must be<br />
improved so that they are done in timely manner <strong>and</strong> people’s needs are<br />
served <strong>and</strong> satisfied. In addition, performance <strong>of</strong> the government sector<br />
must be evaluated on regular basis.<br />
At present, since there have been numerous changes, including<br />
economic, political, social, technological <strong>and</strong> cultural aspects as well as<br />
relevant laws, hence public sector management strategies should be<br />
revamped to conform to changing situations. Under present<br />
circumstances, a key point that must be stressed is transparency <strong>of</strong> public<br />
sector management that can be examined <strong>and</strong> demonstrated in tangible<br />
manners. The oversight <strong>of</strong> public sector management requires public<br />
participation in various steps, starting from policy formulation <strong>and</strong><br />
implementation to post-audit <strong>and</strong> monitoring after a policy has been<br />
implemented. If people are involved from the beginning, the public<br />
sector’s conducts will genuinely satisfy public needs <strong>and</strong> operations will<br />
be performed transparently without any irregularities. As a result, our<br />
nation will further progress with concerted efforts <strong>of</strong> the public sector<br />
<strong>and</strong> civil sector.
Bureaucratic <strong>Reform</strong><br />
Dr. Pheeraphon Trithasanit<br />
The Strategy <strong>of</strong> Public Administration System <strong>Reform</strong><br />
This article focuses on bureaucratic<br />
reform <strong>of</strong> the regional administration<br />
system. It studies two periods <strong>of</strong><br />
development <strong>of</strong> the provincial administration<br />
system, namely, the initial period <strong>of</strong> holistic<br />
integrated provincial administration (2003 -<br />
2008) <strong>and</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> reviewing <strong>and</strong><br />
evaluating holistic integrated provincial<br />
administration (2008 - present). The article<br />
analyses the strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses <strong>of</strong> each<br />
period <strong>and</strong> comments on ways <strong>and</strong> means to<br />
improve the system for the future. The paper<br />
examines the following: the provincial<br />
development planning system based on<br />
people’s needs; the integration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
provincial development plan <strong>and</strong> the ministry<br />
authorities’ planning <strong>and</strong> development system;<br />
the system that allows the public, civil<br />
society, the private sector, governmental<br />
agencies <strong>and</strong> political actors to participate in<br />
planning <strong>and</strong> consulting programs; the<br />
governor recruitment system; <strong>and</strong> the<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> the governor’s performance in<br />
175
176 KPI Congress XI<br />
order to bring justice, promote morality according to His Majesty the<br />
King’s direction, achieve the desired outcome <strong>of</strong> serving the people, <strong>and</strong><br />
build a provincial administration that is genuinely reliable for the people.
Group<br />
7<br />
<strong>Reform</strong>ing Local <strong>Government</strong> for<br />
the Achievement <strong>of</strong> Fairness in<br />
Thai Society
<strong>Reform</strong>ing Local <strong>Government</strong> for the Achievement <strong>of</strong> Fairness in Thai Society<br />
<strong>Reform</strong> <strong>of</strong> local administrative<br />
organization for creation <strong>of</strong> equity<br />
Innovation <strong>of</strong> public services <strong>and</strong><br />
network-based operation<br />
Direk Pattamasiriwat<br />
De c e n t r a l i z a t i o n t o l o c a l<br />
administrative organizations (LAO)<br />
has been advocated <strong>and</strong> pushed<br />
forward for over a decade after the enactment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 1997 Constitution. Consequently,<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> Thai people has dramatically<br />
improved from the provision <strong>of</strong> local public<br />
services, especially in the area <strong>of</strong> basic<br />
infrastructure that is considered basic needs<br />
<strong>of</strong> the people (according to Maslow’s<br />
concept). However, there are many levels <strong>of</strong><br />
public needs. Most likely, public services that<br />
constitute a higher level <strong>of</strong> public needs are<br />
services that promote quality <strong>of</strong> life which<br />
encompass a) Educational services at all levels<br />
b) Health care <strong>and</strong> treatment services as well<br />
as health promotion, disease prevention <strong>and</strong><br />
behavioral modification to mitigate health<br />
risks c) Provision <strong>of</strong> social welfare services d)<br />
Pr o v i s i o n o f s e r v i c e s p e r t a i n i n g t o<br />
environment <strong>and</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong> violation <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental rights, which are current<br />
problems <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten reported as news in the<br />
179
180 KPI Congress XI<br />
media. In the provision <strong>of</strong> these services, LAO still have minor roles, does<br />
not engage in service provision or is still at an early stage <strong>of</strong> development.<br />
Thus, service provision will be a challenging task <strong>of</strong> LAOs in the future.<br />
This article has the following assumptions.<br />
First, there is a possibility that there will be new developments <strong>of</strong><br />
local administrative organization in Thail<strong>and</strong> with respect to creation <strong>of</strong><br />
equity in the society. To this end, equity must be clearly defined <strong>and</strong><br />
what the people are lacking must be identified by considering readiness<br />
<strong>of</strong> LAO’s financial <strong>and</strong> fiscal resources. It is anticipated that these new<br />
developments will progress gradually, that is, creating “innovation” <strong>of</strong> the<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life services in leading local organizations. After<br />
these services have been proven popular among the general public, they<br />
would be replicated in other LAOs. However, “massive changes” may<br />
occur, provided that the government lends its support.<br />
Second, regarding the reform <strong>of</strong> local public services to mitigate<br />
partiality, LAOs do not have to undertake such reform alone. Support<br />
from the government or collaboration with other sectors such as the<br />
business sector that desires to demonstrate its corporate social<br />
responsibility (CSR) as well as inter-disciplinary approaches will ensure<br />
the success <strong>of</strong> this project, rather than acting alone.<br />
Third, conditions <strong>of</strong> the success <strong>of</strong> new public services with respect<br />
to education-health-welfare <strong>and</strong> so forth rest on new knowledge,<br />
requiring that LAO <strong>of</strong>ficers need to adjust themselves. This is because<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> the people is a sensitive topic <strong>and</strong> such problems are<br />
individualistic. Therefore, remedial approaches must be suitable for each<br />
individual <strong>and</strong> solutions should not be one size fits all.<br />
The content <strong>of</strong> this article consists <strong>of</strong> five parts. Part 2 discusses<br />
about equity-related principles <strong>and</strong> theories <strong>and</strong> their application to the<br />
contexts <strong>of</strong> Thai locality, starting from a review <strong>of</strong> numerous examples <strong>of</strong><br />
“inequity.” For instance<br />
a) Children/teenagers in a poor family lacking opportunities to<br />
attain a higher level <strong>of</strong> education (vocational level or higher
<strong>Reform</strong>ing Local <strong>Government</strong> for the Achievement <strong>of</strong> Fairness in Thai Society<br />
education) must work to earn money at a very young age. They<br />
work hard but receive a low wage.<br />
b) Health care services - Even though there are over 9,000 public<br />
health centers spreading across the country but service quality is<br />
not uniform. Moreover, one must accept that in many cases,<br />
budget allocation to operating units <strong>of</strong> Thai authorities, is done<br />
in such as way due to familiarity. So the method may not<br />
conform to the principle <strong>of</strong> equity. 1<br />
c) Most people in this country lack welfare. Only one-third <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country, that is, government employees <strong>and</strong> workers in the social<br />
security system receive their rights <strong>and</strong> welfare <strong>and</strong> other benefits,<br />
while two-thirds <strong>of</strong> Thai people, that is, farmers, laborers <strong>and</strong><br />
small business owners lack many welfares. Regarding these<br />
problems, LAOs are in the position to help upgrade service<br />
quality <strong>and</strong> “close the gap.”<br />
Part 3 explores the progress <strong>of</strong> health-oriented public policy, that is,<br />
sub-district health fund which is a new tool used for behavioral<br />
modification that contributes to people’s health. This scheme accords<br />
with the principles <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>and</strong> public participation. This is<br />
done by reviewing results <strong>of</strong> an evaluative study conducted by the<br />
Economics Academic Service Center <strong>and</strong> records <strong>of</strong> the initiatives in each<br />
locality. It is worth noting that sub-district health funds began to operate<br />
in 2006. Initially there were 888 funds. After its operation has run for<br />
only a few years, the number <strong>of</strong> the funds has exp<strong>and</strong>ed to more than<br />
3,000 locations. This is a phenomenon that reflects the dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />
LAOs with respect to health care services.<br />
Part 4 presents an analysis <strong>of</strong> future policies by creating a<br />
hypothetical scenario where property tax will be levied (to reduce income<br />
inequality) <strong>and</strong> the revenue will be used to support poor people <strong>and</strong><br />
1 For example, subsidy per capita <strong>of</strong> municipality <strong>and</strong> sub-district administrative<br />
organization (SAO) <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> adheres to accustomed or customary practices in the<br />
past without any curiosity whether such method conforms to the principle <strong>of</strong> equity on<br />
horizontal or vertical axis or not.<br />
181
182 KPI Congress XI<br />
informal workers in a form <strong>of</strong> money transfer <strong>and</strong> contributions into<br />
truth saving funds in order to provide incentives for creation <strong>of</strong> a social<br />
security fund for informal workers. In addition, quantitative analysis is<br />
shown to assert that there is a real possibility.
<strong>Reform</strong>ing Local <strong>Government</strong> for the Achievement <strong>of</strong> Fairness in Thai Society<br />
Assuming Local Administrator <strong>and</strong><br />
Council Member Positions<br />
Assoc. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trakoon Meechai<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Political Sciences, Chulalongkorn University<br />
Abstract<br />
The objectives <strong>of</strong> the research project<br />
e n t i t l e d “ A s s u m i n g L o c a l<br />
A d m i n i s t r a t o r a n d C o u n c i l<br />
Member Positions” are to analyze current<br />
c o n f l i c t s i n l o c a l p o l i t i c s a n d l o c a l<br />
communities, sub-districts <strong>and</strong> villages<br />
between local administrative organizations<br />
(local administrator <strong>and</strong> local council) <strong>and</strong><br />
supervisory authorities <strong>and</strong> other civil<br />
societies; to explore approaches for local<br />
politics’ structural reform which focus on the<br />
issues concerning local administrators <strong>and</strong><br />
local councils assuming political power; <strong>and</strong><br />
to strengthen local communities. This study<br />
underscores the issues concerning restructuring<br />
<strong>of</strong> the local administrative system that allows<br />
all sectors <strong>of</strong> local communities to take part in<br />
governance <strong>and</strong> local administration <strong>and</strong> the<br />
issues around reform approaches <strong>of</strong> the<br />
electoral system <strong>of</strong> local administrators <strong>and</strong><br />
councils. Consequently, the system will be<br />
183
184 KPI Congress XI<br />
opened up for a greater proportional representation <strong>of</strong> civil society<br />
groups working as local administrators <strong>and</strong> in local councils.<br />
Research findings:<br />
1. Assuming local administrator’s position under the stipulation that<br />
local administrators must be directly elected by the people bestows<br />
strength <strong>and</strong> stability upon local administration <strong>and</strong> uplifts political<br />
leadership <strong>of</strong> local administrators. However, in local government’s<br />
executive boards, a very small proportion <strong>of</strong> women’s representation in<br />
the position <strong>of</strong> vice president appointed by local administrators is<br />
observed.<br />
2. Local administrative organization is a system <strong>of</strong> separation <strong>of</strong><br />
powers between local government <strong>and</strong> local council but the local<br />
administrative organization law does not prescribe a checks <strong>and</strong> balances<br />
mechanism for local council. Consequently, local councils have been<br />
weakened <strong>and</strong> could not perform oversight functions to examine local<br />
government’s exercise <strong>of</strong> power.<br />
3. Regarding local council’s functions, the only principal role <strong>of</strong><br />
local council is to enact expenditure budget ordinance <strong>of</strong> local<br />
administrative organization. It is observed that there are very few<br />
enactments <strong>of</strong> other local ordinances to control <strong>and</strong> regulate the<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> public services <strong>of</strong> local administrative organization.<br />
4. Even though local government has more dominant administrative<br />
roles over local council but local government’s exercise <strong>of</strong> power in the<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> public services is restricted under the frameworks prescribed<br />
by central authorities. The central authorities require that the<br />
administration <strong>of</strong> local government be scrutinized under a participation<br />
process engaged by other organizations within local administrative<br />
organization’s territory as follows:<br />
4.1 The development process <strong>of</strong> annual expenditure budget<br />
ordinance <strong>of</strong> local administrative organization requires<br />
formulation <strong>of</strong> a local development plan that has passed<br />
through development processes <strong>of</strong> development plans at
<strong>Reform</strong>ing Local <strong>Government</strong> for the Achievement <strong>of</strong> Fairness in Thai Society<br />
village <strong>and</strong> community levels.<br />
4.2 Strong local organization councils established under the Local<br />
Organization Council Act B.E. 2550 (2007) at village level<br />
up to provincial level within a local administrative organization’s<br />
territory play a collective role in formulation <strong>of</strong> development<br />
<strong>and</strong> operational approaches <strong>of</strong> local administrative<br />
organization. In some areas, local administrators <strong>and</strong> local<br />
council members are selected without any competition so as<br />
to prevent political conflicts in sub-districts <strong>and</strong> villages.<br />
4.3 The Department <strong>of</strong> Local Administration, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Interior, has expedited revitalization <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />
village committees pursuant to the Local Administrative<br />
Schemes Act (Issue 11) B.E. 2511 (1968), the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Interior’s regulations, <strong>and</strong> the cabinet’s resolutions,<br />
particularly pertaining to its roles as a principal organization<br />
instrumental in consolidation <strong>of</strong> village plan/community<br />
plan. The components <strong>of</strong> a newly established village<br />
committee include village head, deputy village head, local<br />
council member who is a village resident, group leaders or<br />
representatives <strong>of</strong> activity groups in the village (e.g. SML,<br />
OTOP, village fund, public health volunteers, community<br />
shops, organizations set up under the community organization<br />
council law, farmer housewife group, saving for<br />
production group <strong>and</strong> women development volunteer group,<br />
etc.) If community committees are developed successfully,<br />
villages will become a strong “village institution” <strong>and</strong> will<br />
effect the administration <strong>of</strong> local administrative organizations<br />
(particularly sub-district administrative organizations <strong>and</strong><br />
sub-district municipalities that have been upgraded from a<br />
sub-district administrative organization)<br />
4.4 People in villages <strong>and</strong> communities (particularly sub-district<br />
administrative organization <strong>and</strong> sub-district municipality)<br />
give less importance to local council member compared to<br />
local administrator, sub-district head, village head or<br />
185
186 KPI Congress XI<br />
community organization leader. When people in villages or<br />
communities face any problem <strong>and</strong> a local administrative<br />
organization is responsible for solving that problem, they will<br />
file grievances directly to a local administrator or sub-district<br />
head or village head rather than a local council member. In<br />
some cases, local administrators resort to “village community”<br />
meeting in the course <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> village plan/<br />
community plan or during the occasion that they can directly<br />
listen to public opinions about implementation <strong>of</strong> public<br />
policies.<br />
5. The stipulation <strong>of</strong> a similar structure for all forms <strong>of</strong> local<br />
administrative organization, that is, local administrators <strong>and</strong> council<br />
members are chosen by a direct election. Based on political,<br />
administrative <strong>and</strong> social fabrics as well as political culture where local<br />
administrative organization is not the only local government organization<br />
that can exercise administrative power in the provision <strong>of</strong> public services<br />
within a local administrative organization’s territory. However, other<br />
organizations also play their roles in the exercise <strong>of</strong> power, that is, central<br />
authorities, regional authorities, local administrators (sub-district head<br />
<strong>and</strong> village head), civil society organizations (committee organization<br />
council <strong>and</strong> various activity groups). Moreover, decision-making format<br />
<strong>of</strong> public policies <strong>of</strong> most local administrative organizations is not a<br />
majority rule in a local council (representative democracy) <strong>and</strong> the<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> directly elected local council alone is not representative <strong>of</strong><br />
diverse groups in a locality. Meanwhile, the administrative branch’s<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> numerous matters requires deliberative democracy<br />
approach to deal with various groups in order to prevent conflicts with<br />
political groups, governance groups <strong>and</strong> social groups within a local<br />
administrative organization’s territory.<br />
Policy recommendations<br />
1. Amend Section 284 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom <strong>of</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> B.E. 2550 (2007) in respect to the issues concerning the<br />
selection process <strong>of</strong> local council members. The recommendation is there<br />
should be various forms <strong>of</strong> local council, that is, (1) local council
<strong>Reform</strong>ing Local <strong>Government</strong> for the Achievement <strong>of</strong> Fairness in Thai Society<br />
members are chosen by direct election (2) half <strong>of</strong> local council members<br />
are chosen by direct election <strong>and</strong> another half are represented by the civil<br />
society sector; <strong>and</strong> (3) local council members are represented by the civil<br />
society sector. The choice <strong>of</strong> a selection process <strong>of</strong> local council members<br />
should be resolved in accordance with people’s intents.<br />
2. Amend the electoral law <strong>of</strong> local administrators <strong>and</strong> council<br />
members by raising the issue concerning the selection process <strong>of</strong> civil<br />
society representatives who become local council members. The<br />
recommendation is there should be a selection process <strong>of</strong> civil society<br />
representatives at community/village level. At the level <strong>of</strong> municipality<br />
community (that does not have a village committee), a community<br />
committee screens <strong>and</strong> selects c<strong>and</strong>idates. At village level (within a<br />
territory <strong>of</strong> municipality <strong>and</strong> sub-district administrative organization), a<br />
village committee selects c<strong>and</strong>idates. Qualified c<strong>and</strong>idates must not hold<br />
any position <strong>of</strong> sub-district head, village head or deputy village head.<br />
3. In the case <strong>of</strong> community in a municipality area, there should be<br />
a law that sanctions the status <strong>of</strong> community committee in a<br />
municipality area, setting it free from the municipality <strong>and</strong> granting it<br />
the status <strong>of</strong> a juristic person (similar to a law regulating the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> a juristic person <strong>of</strong> a real estate project). Village<br />
committee should also attain the status <strong>of</strong> a juristic person.<br />
4. Amend the local administrative organization law in respect to<br />
relationship between local government <strong>and</strong> local council. Local council<br />
should be bestowed greater power so that it can control <strong>and</strong> examine<br />
local government’s operation. In case there are conflicts between local<br />
government <strong>and</strong> local council <strong>and</strong> both sides cannot reach a compromise,<br />
conflict issues should be resolved by a public referendum.<br />
5. The decentralization committee submits a proposal to the<br />
government suggesting more enactment power <strong>of</strong> local ordinances be<br />
devolved to local administrative organizations. Moreover, capacitybuilding<br />
<strong>of</strong> local council <strong>and</strong> local council members should be<br />
undertaken along with awareness-raising among general public to ensure<br />
that people underst<strong>and</strong> about local council’s roles, power <strong>and</strong> duties.<br />
187
188 KPI Congress XI<br />
6. Amend the local administrative organization law that prescribes<br />
drafting <strong>of</strong> expenditure budget ordinance <strong>and</strong> local ordinances <strong>and</strong> any<br />
administrative actions <strong>of</strong> local administrative organization that affects<br />
public interests in a locality or any group <strong>of</strong> people. It is suggested that<br />
local administrative organization should have “consultation” process that<br />
deals with the civil society sector (community committee, village<br />
committee) in affected community/village beforeh<strong>and</strong>.<br />
7. Amend the direct election scheme <strong>of</strong> local administrators by<br />
stipulating that local executive board (president <strong>and</strong> vice president) be<br />
chosen by an election. In addition, women should be represented in a<br />
local executive board in the position <strong>of</strong> vice president <strong>and</strong> half <strong>of</strong> board<br />
members should be women.
<strong>Reform</strong>ing Local <strong>Government</strong> for the Achievement <strong>of</strong> Fairness in Thai Society<br />
From <strong>Conflict</strong> to Innovation:<br />
Participatory Budgeting in Suanmon Tambon<br />
Administrative Organization, Khonkaen<br />
Phavinee Chanyprakhang<br />
Abstract<br />
<strong>Conflict</strong> is not necessarily negative.<br />
S o m e t i m e s i t i s a s t i m u l u s o f<br />
innovation, for new, creative ideas,<br />
procedures or approaches to mitigate <strong>and</strong><br />
s o l v e p r o b l e m s . S u a n m o n Ta m b o n<br />
Administrative Organization’s participatory<br />
b u d g e t i n g c a n b e a g o o d e x a m p l e o f<br />
changing conflict into innovation. This paper<br />
explores how Suanmon TAO managed to<br />
discard an old, conflicting, pork-barreling<br />
budget allocation approach <strong>and</strong> set up<br />
participatory budgeting in which citizens<br />
deliberate <strong>and</strong> negotiate over the distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> public financial resources. Suanmon<br />
TAO’s participatory budgeting not only<br />
reduces heated conflict, but also improves<br />
performance <strong>and</strong> responsiveness to citizens’<br />
needs.<br />
189
Biographical Information
Current Positions<br />
Biographical Information<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Bovornsak Uwanno Ph D<br />
Secretary-General, King Prajadhipok’s Institute<br />
Chief Executive Officer, Princess Maha Chakri<br />
Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre (SAC)<br />
Chairman, Audit Committee for the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Justice<br />
State Councilor<br />
Education Background<br />
Member, Law Commission, Office <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> State<br />
<strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
Honorar y Member, Office <strong>of</strong> the Public Sector<br />
Development Commission<br />
Member, National Health Systems <strong>Reform</strong> Committee<br />
Member, Chulalongkorn University Council<br />
Member, Board <strong>of</strong> Directors, Thai Asset Management<br />
Corporation<br />
Ph.D in Public Law (With High Honors), University <strong>of</strong><br />
Paris 10, France<br />
Master <strong>of</strong> Advanced Studies in Administrative Law,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Paris 2, France<br />
Studies in Public Law (With Honors),<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Paris 10, France<br />
Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Laws (First Class Honor), Chulalongkorn<br />
University<br />
193
194 KPI Congress XI<br />
Others Certified Thai Barrister, Institute <strong>of</strong> Legal Education <strong>of</strong><br />
the Thai Bar<br />
Work Experiences<br />
National Defence College Class 4111<br />
Cabinet Secretary-General<br />
Dean, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Law, Chulalongkorn University<br />
Policy Adviser to then Prime Minister General Chatichai<br />
Choonhavan<br />
Deputy Secretary-General to the Prime Minister (Political<br />
Affairs)<br />
Senator<br />
Former Member, Constitution Drafting Assembly<br />
Advisor, Senate St<strong>and</strong>ing Committee on Interior<br />
Administration<br />
Advisor, St<strong>and</strong>ing Committee on Justice <strong>and</strong> Human<br />
Rights, Thai Parliament<br />
Chairman, Advisory Board to the Senate St<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
Committee on Environment<br />
Chairman, Advisory Board on Legal Affairs to President<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Senate<br />
Member, Commission on the Bureaucratic <strong>and</strong> Public<br />
Administration <strong>Reform</strong><br />
Member, Committee to decide on Information Disclosure<br />
on Social Sector, Public Administration <strong>and</strong> Law<br />
Enforcement<br />
Chairman, Advisory Board to then Deputy Transport<br />
Minister Pinij Jarusombat
Academic Works<br />
Biographical Information<br />
Member, Sub-Committee scrutinising Amendments <strong>of</strong><br />
the National Constitution’s Section 211<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Public Law, Volume III: Origin <strong>and</strong><br />
Juristic Methods. Bangkok: Nititham Publishing House,<br />
1995. 423 pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Public Law, Volume II: The<br />
Separation <strong>of</strong> Public Law <strong>and</strong> Private Law <strong>and</strong> History <strong>of</strong><br />
Public Law in Thail<strong>and</strong>. Bangkok: Nititham Publishing<br />
House, 1994. 334 pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, The system to control the<br />
administrative power in United Kingdom). Bangkok:<br />
Nititham Publishing House, 1994. 192 pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Law <strong>and</strong> Alternatives for Thai<br />
society. Bangkok: Nititham Publishing House, 1994. 467<br />
pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Public Law, Volume I: Development<br />
<strong>of</strong> Philosophies <strong>and</strong> Features <strong>of</strong> Public Law in Various<br />
Ages. Bangkok: Nititham Publishing House, 1994. 467<br />
pages.<br />
B o v o r n s a k U w a n n o a n d W i s s a n u K r e a - n g a m ,<br />
Explanatory Book <strong>of</strong> the Interim Constitution B.E.2520<br />
(1977), First Edition. Bangkok: Nam Aksorn Publishing<br />
House, 1977. 195 pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Lecture on Constitution <strong>of</strong> Courts<br />
<strong>of</strong> Justice, 713335. 1977. 92 pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Lecture on Introduction to Law,<br />
1977. 60 pages.<br />
195
196 KPI Congress XI<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno <strong>and</strong> Wissanu Krea-ngam, The Status<br />
<strong>of</strong> the King according to the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>), Chulalongkorn Law Journal. No.<br />
3 (May – August 1977), Page148-183<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Civil <strong>and</strong> Commercial Code <strong>of</strong> Law,<br />
Book 6 on Heritage Law. Bangkok: Nititham Publishing<br />
House, 1994, 701 pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Khemchai Chutiwongse, <strong>and</strong><br />
Thitipan Chuerboonchai. H<strong>and</strong>book on Negotiation for<br />
Thai-Foreign Joint Investment Contracts, Bangkok: The<br />
Board <strong>of</strong> Investment <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>, Chulalongkorn<br />
University Academic Service Center, Law Development<br />
a n d R e s e a r c h C e n t r e a t t h e F a c u l t y o f L a w,<br />
Chulalongkorn University, 1992. 239 pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno, Text on Thai <strong>and</strong> Foreign legal<br />
systems Unit 2: Romano-Germanic Law Family.<br />
Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University’s School <strong>of</strong><br />
Law. Bangkok: Victory Power Point Corp Ltd, 1985.<br />
Page 57- 140 (83 pages). Paper for practice on Thai <strong>and</strong><br />
foreign legal systems Unit 2. Page 18-28. 10 pages.<br />
Bovornsak Uwanno <strong>and</strong> Khemchai Chutiwongse, Lecture<br />
on Contracts. Bangkok: Copy duplicated <strong>and</strong> bonded by<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Law, Chulalongkorn University. 1977. 360<br />
pages.
Current positions:<br />
Education<br />
Academic Works:<br />
Biographical Information<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Pasuk Phongpaichit<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics,<br />
Chulalongkorn University<br />
Director, Political Economy Centre,<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, Chulalongkorn University.<br />
Director, the Research Subcommittee <strong>of</strong> the National<br />
Counter Corruption Commission<br />
Member <strong>of</strong> International Advisory Board <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Program on Latin American <strong>and</strong> the Asia Pacific Rim,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> California at San Diego (UCSD), USA.<br />
Ph.D Economics, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, U.K.<br />
M.A. Economics, Monash University, Australia<br />
B.A. Economics (Hons), Monash University, Australia<br />
Corruption <strong>and</strong> Democracy in Thail<strong>and</strong> Pasuk<br />
Phongpaichit <strong>and</strong> Sungsidh Piriyarangsan, Political<br />
Economy Centre, Chulalongkorn University, 1994<br />
The Thai political economy in the Bangkok era Pasuk<br />
Phongpaichit <strong>and</strong> Chris Beker, Silkworm Books 1996<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s Illegal Economy <strong>and</strong> Public Policy Pasuk<br />
Phongpaichit, Nualnoi Treerat, Sungsidh Piriyarangsan,<br />
Political Economy Centre, Chulalongkorn University,<br />
1998<br />
197
198 KPI Congress XI<br />
Corruption in the Thai bureaucratic system Pasuk<br />
Phongpaichit, Nualnoi Treerat, Sungsidh Piriyarangsan<br />
presented to the National Counter Corruption<br />
Commission<br />
Illegal lottery, Brothels, Gambling dens, Illegal drug <strong>and</strong><br />
Illegal Economy <strong>and</strong> Public Policy Pasuk Phongpaichit,<br />
Nualnoi Treerat, Sungsidh Piriyarangsan, Silkworm<br />
Books, 2000<br />
“Ban Lom Rat” published in “Withi Sungkom Thai” on<br />
the occasion <strong>of</strong> a century, Pridi Phanomyong, Editor<br />
Santisuk Soponsiri, 2001<br />
Illegal gambling Industry in Thail<strong>and</strong>, the United<br />
Kingdom, the United States, Australia, <strong>and</strong> Malaysia.<br />
Pasuk Phongpaichit, Nualnoi Treerat, Sungsidh<br />
Piriyarangsan <strong>and</strong> Kanoksak Kaewthep The Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
Research Fund’s Senior Research Scholar, 1997<br />
Lifestyle, the Fighting Methods, the Contemporary<br />
People Movement, the Thail<strong>and</strong> Research Fund <strong>and</strong><br />
Silkworm Books, 2002. Pasuk Phongpaichit <strong>and</strong> The<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong> Research Fund’s Senior Research Scholar, 2002<br />
Form Peasant Grils to Bangkok Masseuses, (Geneva :<br />
ILO, 1980), Japanese <strong>and</strong> English language<br />
Employment, Income <strong>and</strong> Mobilisation <strong>of</strong> Local<br />
Resources in Three Thai Villages, (Bangkok : ILO –<br />
ARTEP , 1982).<br />
Socio – Economic Survey <strong>of</strong> Low – Income Returnees<br />
<strong>and</strong> Thais in Trat, With Samart Chiasakul, Somphob<br />
Manarangsan <strong>and</strong> others, a Report prepared for the<br />
Operation Center for Displaced Persons in Thail<strong>and</strong>,<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Interior, with support From Norwegian<br />
Church Aid. (Bangkok, 1985).
Biographical Information<br />
The Social Indicators in Thail<strong>and</strong>: The 1980’s. (Bangkok:<br />
NESDB, 1987).<br />
The New Wave <strong>of</strong> Japanese Investment in ASEAN:<br />
Determinants <strong>and</strong> Prospects, (Singapore: Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Southeast Asian Studies, 1990). English <strong>and</strong> Japanese<br />
language<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>: Economy <strong>and</strong> Politics , with Chris Baker.<br />
(Oxford University Press, 1995)<br />
Corruption <strong>and</strong> Democracy in Thail<strong>and</strong>, with Sungsidh<br />
Piriyarangsan. (Chiangmai:Silkworm Books, 1996)<br />
Guns, Girls, Gambling, Ganja: Thail<strong>and</strong>’s Illegal<br />
Economy <strong>and</strong> Public Policy, with Sungsibh Piriyarangsan<br />
<strong>and</strong> Nualnoi Teerat. (Chiangmai: Silkworm Books,<br />
1997).<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>’s Boom!, with Chris Baker. (Chiangmai:<br />
Silkworm Books, 1996).<br />
T h a i l a n d ’s B o o m a n d Bust, w i t h C h r i s Baker.<br />
(Chiangmai: Silkworm Books, 1997)<br />
199
200 KPI Congress XI<br />
Positions:<br />
Education<br />
Academic works:<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Nithi Eawsriwong<br />
Chief, Department <strong>of</strong> History, Chiang Mai University’s<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> Humanities (retired in 2000)<br />
Ph.D: University <strong>of</strong> Michigan<br />
M.A (History): Chulalongkorn University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Arts<br />
B.A (History): Chulalongkorn University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Arts.<br />
Research works on cultural history such as The History <strong>of</strong><br />
Rattanakosin in the Royal Chronicles <strong>of</strong> Ayutthaya,<br />
(1978), the Thai Politics during the reign <strong>of</strong> King Narai<br />
(1979), Sunthorn Phu, the Great Poet (1981), the Thai<br />
Politics during the Reign <strong>of</strong> King Taksin (1986)<br />
Won the Sriburapha Award in 2002<br />
Won the Fukuoka award in 1999<br />
Wrote articles such as The Thoughts <strong>and</strong> Views <strong>of</strong> Nithi,<br />
The Community Forests, Confusion <strong>and</strong> Attitude, the<br />
Poor in Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
Wrote books such as “Think as Buddhists”, “Think<br />
within their Frames <strong>of</strong> Mind Featuring Culture <strong>and</strong> a<br />
Way <strong>of</strong> Thinking”, “The Thai Society Footnote in the Eye<br />
<strong>of</strong> Analysts”, “Pens <strong>and</strong> Sails”<br />
Translation works such as “Buddhism, Essence <strong>and</strong><br />
Development” written by Edward Conze, “The Germans<br />
in History” by Hubertus zu Loewenstein <strong>and</strong> “The First<br />
Stages <strong>of</strong> Islam”
Positions<br />
Education<br />
Work Experience:<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> Overall Planning Division<br />
Biographical Information<br />
Dr. Porametee Vimolsiri<br />
Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Economics in Quantitative Analysis in<br />
Economics, Chulalongkorn University, 1981-1984<br />
Master <strong>of</strong> International Affairs in International<br />
Economics, Columbia University, New York, USA, 1985-<br />
1986<br />
Ph.D. <strong>of</strong> Economics in Money <strong>and</strong> Public Finance<br />
Economics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, 1989-<br />
1994<br />
Plan <strong>and</strong> Policy Analyst Level 4, Overall Planning<br />
Division, Office <strong>of</strong> the National Economic <strong>and</strong> Social<br />
Development Board (NESDB), 1987-1993<br />
Plan <strong>and</strong> Policy Analyst Level 5, Economic Analysis <strong>and</strong><br />
Projection Division,1994<br />
Plan <strong>and</strong> Policy Analyst Level 6, Economic Analysis <strong>and</strong><br />
Projection Division, 1995<br />
Acting Head <strong>of</strong> Planning Technique Unit, Economic<br />
Analysis <strong>and</strong> Projection Division, 1996<br />
Head <strong>of</strong> Planning Technique Unit, Economic Analysis<br />
<strong>and</strong> Projection Division, 1997<br />
201
202 KPI Congress XI<br />
Other Positions<br />
Member, National Debt Policy Committee<br />
(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance)<br />
Member, Working Group for Money-Loaning to<br />
Compensate Trade Deficit (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance)<br />
Member, Working Group to Study the <strong>Government</strong>’s<br />
Revenue Collection (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance)<br />
Member, Working Group to Set Macroeconomic Policy<br />
Framework in the Country Development (Office <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Prime Minister’s Advisory Council)<br />
Member, Secretary Section, The 5th Cabinet Agenda<br />
Screening Committee (Prime Minister’s Office)<br />
Member, Working Group to Formulate <strong>and</strong> Supervise the<br />
Plan Execution <strong>of</strong> Power Decentralization to Local<br />
Administrative Organizations <strong>and</strong> Action Plan (Secretariat<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Prime Minister)<br />
Advisor, Working Group for Project on Agricultural<br />
Statistics <strong>and</strong> Information (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture <strong>and</strong><br />
Cooperatives)<br />
Research-supervising Committee Member <strong>and</strong> Manager,<br />
Project Sponsored by Asian Development Bank for the<br />
Strategy Formulation for Medium Term Development<br />
(NESDB)<br />
Research-supervising Committee Member, Policy<br />
Research Project on Macroeconomics for the Ninth<br />
National Economic <strong>and</strong> Social Development Plan’s<br />
Macroeconomic Policy Formulation (NESDB)<br />
M e m b e r, C o o r d i n a t i n g C o m m i t t e e f o r t h e<br />
“Strengthening <strong>of</strong> Macroeconomic Statistics (SOME)“<br />
project (NESDB)
Biographical Information<br />
Member, Working Group to Produce Price Index <strong>and</strong><br />
Value for Import <strong>and</strong> Export Goods (NESDB)<br />
Special Lecturer, Master <strong>of</strong> Science (Economics) Evening<br />
Program, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, Kasetsart University<br />
Lecturer, Graduate School, Kasetsart University<br />
203
204 KPI Congress XI<br />
Current position<br />
Education<br />
Work Experiences<br />
Dr Sompop Chareonkul<br />
Executive Vice President <strong>of</strong> Loxley Public Company<br />
Limited <strong>and</strong><br />
Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Executive Board, Asia Security<br />
Management Co., Ltd.<br />
Commerce (1 st Class Honours), Chulalongkorn University<br />
MBA. (Marketing), University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison,<br />
USA<br />
M.S. (Business Administration), University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin<br />
- Madison, USA<br />
Ph.D. (Business Administration), University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin<br />
- Madison, USA<br />
National Defense College (4212)<br />
Honorary Advisor, S<strong>of</strong>tware Industry Promotion Agency<br />
(Public Organization) (SIPA),<br />
Advisor to Deputy Commerce Minister<br />
Chief Executive Officer, Progress Information Company<br />
Limited<br />
Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Executive Board, Law Enforcement<br />
Technology Solutions Co., Ltd.,<br />
Executive Director, Oriental Post Company Limited<br />
Director, Loxley Trading Company Limited
Biographical Information<br />
Director, the Civil Service Sub-Commission on Ethics<br />
Promotion for Public Sector Transparency<br />
Director, the High-Ranking Position Classification<br />
Committee, the Secretariat <strong>of</strong> the Cabinet<br />
Chairman (Entertainment) the National Defence College<br />
Association<br />
Di rector, So c i e t e C o m m e rciale L a o C o m p a n y<br />
LimitedTeam Foundation<br />
Advisor, Chulalongkorn University’s Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Commerce <strong>and</strong> Accountancy, Department <strong>of</strong> Marketing<br />
Radio host <strong>of</strong> the programe “Business Connection” on<br />
FM 96.5 station<br />
Columnist “Anupop” Daily News’s page 8<br />
205