26.08.2020 Views

Pittwater Life September 2020 Issue

OUR BEACHES ART PRIZE WINNERS. MUSO PAUL CHRISTIE: FROM ‘PARTY BOY’ TO ROCK ’N’ ROLL STORYTELLER. COVID CASUALTY: IS THE ENVIRONMENT. COPING WITH INCREASED WASTE? LOCAL PRINCIPAL SIGNS OFF / COUNCIL NEWS /SEEN... HEARD... ABSURD...

OUR BEACHES ART PRIZE WINNERS. MUSO PAUL CHRISTIE: FROM ‘PARTY BOY’ TO ROCK ’N’ ROLL STORYTELLER. COVID CASUALTY: IS THE ENVIRONMENT. COPING WITH INCREASED WASTE? LOCAL PRINCIPAL SIGNS OFF / COUNCIL NEWS /SEEN... HEARD... ABSURD...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inaction bewilders Mayor<br />

News<br />

Northern Beaches Mayor Michael<br />

Regan has expressed confusion<br />

and disappointment at Council<br />

staff’s inability to carry out a unanimous<br />

resolution to wind back unauthorised<br />

works and encroachment on public land<br />

at Shore Brace Reserve Avalon.<br />

It follows the lodgment of a subject<br />

modification by the owners of 173-175<br />

Riverview Road, seeking to permit them<br />

to retain their contentious letterbox<br />

structure built on the unformed public<br />

road reserve between Riverview Road<br />

and <strong>Pittwater</strong>.<br />

In October 2019 Council voted to wind<br />

back much of the encroachment – with<br />

the large sandstone letterbox a key element.<br />

In lead-up investigation, a Council<br />

staff report noted: “... the size and design<br />

gives the perception that the land behind<br />

the letterbox and retaining wall are private,<br />

rather than public road reserve.”<br />

After its wind-back vote was carried,<br />

Mayor Regan told <strong>Pittwater</strong> <strong>Life</strong>: “Council<br />

needs to draw a line in the sand... we<br />

need to send a message to the courts that<br />

we will not tolerate this.”<br />

Nearly 11 months on, a bewildered<br />

Mayor Regan has asked Council CEO Ray<br />

Brownlee for an update.<br />

In a written reply to a concerned local<br />

resident, Mayor Regan said: “I have asked<br />

the CEO for an explanation on why/how<br />

we have accepted a modification of this<br />

DA if what you say is accurate... the CEO<br />

will brief Councillors and I will ensure<br />

you will be responded to.<br />

“For the life of me, I cannot understand<br />

that if we have said no once, then<br />

passed a Council Resolution to similar<br />

effect that was in effect purported to<br />

address the issues in good faith and was<br />

POINT OF CONTENTION: The letterbox structure.<br />

agreed to, then if they choose to renege,<br />

why not go straight to court...<br />

“I will await advice from the staff. My<br />

limited planning knowledge tells me that<br />

we have to accept an application by law,<br />

however… I have a slightly different view<br />

on this given the circumstances.”<br />

Meanwhile the owner of 173-175<br />

Riverview Road has distributed letters to<br />

neighbours claiming he and his wife are<br />

the victims of a “deceptive and misleading<br />

campaign” aimed at preventing them<br />

from completing construction of their<br />

home.<br />

Owner Gary Johnston wrote: “Some<br />

people believe that we have made an<br />

‘outrageous attempt’ at privatising public<br />

property, which includes the construction<br />

of a letterbox embedded in a wall.”<br />

He admitted the letterbox was “in fact<br />

just on land that is part of the Shore<br />

Brace” – but added Council had powers<br />

to allow “minor incursions” to be<br />

overlooked.<br />

Mr Johnston claimed the previous<br />

owners of 173-175 Riverview Road<br />

had an entrance and letterbox which<br />

encroached even more than his new<br />

structure – which he said was approved<br />

by Council at the time.<br />

“Considering the precedent set when<br />

the Cordoni’s owned the property, this<br />

would seem an appropriate action.<br />

“These works have never had any<br />

intention to privatise public land.”<br />

On behalf of concerned locals, resident<br />

Peter L’Green has opposed the encroachment<br />

for years, with Mr L’Green addressing<br />

Council before last October’s<br />

wind-back resolution. With no action in<br />

the intervening months, he has sought<br />

further local support to force Council to<br />

make good on its determination.<br />

In his letter to neighbours Mr Johnston<br />

wrote: “Peter... L’Green [has] asked you to<br />

contact Council and other public officials<br />

to ‘enforce their resolution’. These same<br />

officials at the time were largely not<br />

aware of the history and realities of the<br />

situation.<br />

“Could it be that [when L’Green says]<br />

‘NBC has since done nothing’ [it has]<br />

anything to do with their [Council’s] now<br />

greater knowledge?”<br />

“You of course are perfectly free to<br />

support the efforts to meaninglessly<br />

relocate the entrance and letterbox.”<br />

Mr L’Green told <strong>Pittwater</strong> <strong>Life</strong> Mr Johnston’s<br />

letter was “fake news”.<br />

“If the offending structures and works<br />

on the reserve were approved two years<br />

ago, why was such critical information<br />

and proof not tabled in the run-up to, or<br />

at, the October Council meeting and during<br />

the 10 months since?<br />

“And why make application for a Modification<br />

now to the DA if the structures<br />

were approved by Council as part of the<br />

original DA years ago?” – Nigel Wall<br />

10 SEPTEMBER <strong>2020</strong><br />

The Local Voice Since 1991

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!