28.08.2020 Views

CCChat-Magazine_Issue-16

WHAT DOESN’T KILL ME

WHAT DOESN’T KILL ME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T: I’ve been attending since 2008. I was

first informed by Nancy Erickson, who

has now become a friend. She is a

domestic violence adviser to attorneys

and she was an adviser in my case. She

informed me that there was not just this

conference but there was this battered

women and protective mothers

movement and that there were going to

be survivors, advocates and practitioners

in that space, where I could learn from.

I’ve been going almost every year because

it is the only place where I can, in one

space, access information around what is

happening in the law and what people are

working on to make changes in policy and

to include my voice in that process.

M: I think that even if the intention isn’t

there, it happens by default

T: Yes, reproductive justice is one of the

ways they are doing so and I think this is

just one form of reproductive justice that

is being denied.

M: Could you expand on that?

T: Sure. My definition of reproductive

justice is having the access and freedom

to the healthcare you need, to make

decisions around whether and if and

when you want to become pregnant.

Sexual coercion is something that

happens a lot in intimate partner violence

relationships and to the extent that you

may want to have a child but you don’t

want to parent with your abuser, that’s a

restriction on reproductive justice and

also on the freedoms of both the victims,

survivor and the children because they

are not able to live a life free from power

and control and coercive control.

M: So what made you decide to attend the

conference?

I subscribe to Evan Stark’s definition of

coercive control as a gendered liberty

crime and the idea is that under

patriarchy men use coercive control as a

tactic to maintain their male privilege and

supremacy and engage in tactics that

limit the freedoms of their victims, mainly

women, from exercising agency, so

agency over their bodies, over their daily

lives, over whether or not they can have

joy in the world and certainly one of the

ways they do so is through their children.

I want to add that, for you and I and those

of us in the community who subscribe to

this definition that there is a global

pandemic against violence against

women. It shows up mainly in femicide

but there are a whole host of other ways

in which sexism, exploitation, oppression

and violence show up in our lives and

coercive control is a way to capture all of

the different tactics that de-centre the

physical aspects of the harm and

centralise the liberty – human rights –

aspects, to the point where physical harm

and threats of physical harm are not even

needed.

Victims of coercive control engage in selfpolicing

or self-surveillance tactics

because of the fear or the threat of, not

necessarily physical harm, but other

forms of restrictions on their lives and so

Making The Invisible Visible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!