28.08.2020 Views

CCChat-Magazine_Issue-16

WHAT DOESN’T KILL ME

WHAT DOESN’T KILL ME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

harm to the victims and the children it

affects.

So I’m a great believer in having specialist

family courts that deal with domestic

abuse that, not only, understand domestic

abuse but also the connected issues such

as child contact decisions, but also

maintenance payments because, at the

moment, there is not enough joined up

thinking, certainly not around

recognising that witholding child

maintenance is financial abuse as it has

an impact not only on the parent who

should be in receipt of it, but everyone in

that household.

We want to dismantle immunity for

judges and lawyers and mental health

providers who are biased in their

perspective, who come to the table

thinking that survivors make things up,

that women make things up and there’s

no abuse.

All of the different connections around

post separation abuse such as abusers

who claim parental alienation, parents

who are refusing child contact unless it is

on their terms or issues over schooling

and kids clubs , that have a direct impact

on the victim/survivor parent but is often

ignored when it needs to form part of the

greater picture of harms that aggregate

and detrimentally impact a parent’s

ability to parent effectively.

"We want to dismantle immunity for judges and lawyers and mental health

providers who are biased in their perspective, who come to the table

thinking that survivors make things up"

Teri Yuan

So these people should not be working in

these positions and making these

decisions, causing additional harm that

actually ripples through society for

generations and has a huge economic

cost.

M: I think that is a really good idea. I’ve

always thought that there needs to be a

database of judges’ decision making - a

record from which we could, if needed,

identify which judges have a consistently

poor record in this area so the ones that

are identified need to not be hearing these

cases as their decision making is causing

I don’t know what it’s like in the US, by all

accounts it seems to be worse than here in

the UK, but even so, professionals can

have a very entrenched view that they will

not be budged from, so there needs to be

a way of ascertaining a person’s biased

leanings – and not just for someone who

knows which professional to go to, to

obtain a report that is favourable to their

client but there should be an open record

of decision making that shows a track

record of bias, so that people know that

this person is likely to favour a certain

outcome because, despite their stated

neutrality, this is their belief system.

Making The Invisible Visible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!