15.09.2020 Views

Docket #99 page 640, US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals appeal No. 17-2273, the Class certified in Percy v. Brennan, Federal District Court SDNY Case 73-cv-04279, reported at 384 F. Supp 800,

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1974-11-08; Filed Memorandum #41415 motion granted<br />

<strong>Case</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>17</strong>-<strong>22<strong>73</strong></strong>, action Document to be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed 71, 11/22/20<strong>17</strong>, as a 2<strong>17</strong>9151, class action Page71 - <strong>of</strong> 215<br />

<strong>certified</strong> 20<strong>17</strong>-07-24 doc 1<br />

1527 (2d Cir. October 11, 1974)<br />

v. Doard <strong>of</strong> Educ<strong>at</strong>ion, 3<strong>73</strong> U.S. 6G8 (1963). As <strong>the</strong> Eisen<br />

<strong>in</strong>adequ<strong>at</strong>e ... or where it is certa<strong>in</strong>ly or probably<br />

r~~2d z~t 569.,<br />

futile." 421/ The case <strong>at</strong> hand supports this position<br />

dict<strong>at</strong>ed an adverse outcome.<br />

Here <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istr<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

rerneCt;{ (locs not e\ren exi~:;t: as t.r) tl1e sut~j::~c:·t: n1a.tte.1:· <strong>in</strong><br />

lack stand<strong>in</strong>g to seek relief for <strong>the</strong> class <strong>the</strong>y represent<br />

because <strong>the</strong> claim <strong>of</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion alleged here is not<br />

properly directed aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>m, but ia<strong>the</strong>r is, or should<br />

be, lodged aga<strong>in</strong>st th

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!