15.09.2020 Views

Docket #99 page 640, US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals appeal No. 17-2273, the Class certified in Percy v. Brennan, Federal District Court SDNY Case 73-cv-04279, reported at 384 F. Supp 800,

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1974-11-08; Filed Memorandum #41415 motion granted<br />

<strong>Case</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>17</strong>-<strong>22<strong>73</strong></strong>, action Document to be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed 71, 11/22/20<strong>17</strong>, as a 2<strong>17</strong>9151, class action Page87 - <strong>of</strong> 215<br />

<strong>certified</strong> 20<strong>17</strong>-07-24 doc 1<br />

Memorandum ~nd<br />

<strong>the</strong> JunQ 29, lS<strong>73</strong> St<strong>at</strong>e letter.<br />

Ir1 t.}-f':3<br />

quirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ad~<strong>in</strong>istr<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.<br />

and <strong>the</strong> federal defendants <strong>in</strong> this case are accord ly<br />

all<br />

enjo<strong>in</strong>ed from enforc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Erc2:na:l1 lielr:e>:candum or~/ teder·-<br />

ally-assisted construction projecls.<br />

Pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs next argue t~2t<br />

<strong>the</strong> St<strong>at</strong>e letter is<br />

<strong>in</strong>valid because it was not pubJi~hed<br />

as required by Art-<br />

:lcle 4 1<br />

§8, New York Consi:i tution, and New York Exec:·:t.ive<br />

Law §102.<br />

Article 4, §8 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> St<strong>at</strong>0 Constitution<br />

(McK<strong>in</strong>ney 1969) provides:<br />

28.<br />

0669

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!