Docket #99 page 640, US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals appeal No. 17-2273, the Class certified in Percy v. Brennan, Federal District Court SDNY Case 73-cv-04279, reported at 384 F. Supp 800,
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1974-11-08; Filed Memorandum #41415 motion granted<br />
<strong>Case</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>17</strong>-<strong>22<strong>73</strong></strong>, action Document to be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed 71, 11/22/20<strong>17</strong>, as a 2<strong>17</strong>9151, class action Page87 - <strong>of</strong> 215<br />
<strong>certified</strong> 20<strong>17</strong>-07-24 doc 1<br />
Memorandum ~nd<br />
<strong>the</strong> JunQ 29, lS<strong>73</strong> St<strong>at</strong>e letter.<br />
Ir1 t.}-f':3<br />
quirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ad~<strong>in</strong>istr<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.<br />
and <strong>the</strong> federal defendants <strong>in</strong> this case are accord ly<br />
all<br />
enjo<strong>in</strong>ed from enforc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Erc2:na:l1 lielr:e>:candum or~/ teder·-<br />
ally-assisted construction projecls.<br />
Pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs next argue t~2t<br />
<strong>the</strong> St<strong>at</strong>e letter is<br />
<strong>in</strong>valid because it was not pubJi~hed<br />
as required by Art-<br />
:lcle 4 1<br />
§8, New York Consi:i tution, and New York Exec:·:t.ive<br />
Law §102.<br />
Article 4, §8 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> St<strong>at</strong>0 Constitution<br />
(McK<strong>in</strong>ney 1969) provides:<br />
28.<br />
0669