SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AFFAIRS - Parliament
SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AFFAIRS - Parliament
SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AFFAIRS - Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Professor Gavin McCrone—Oral evidence (QQ 117–187)<br />
themselves partially as Scots, really, and who knows what might happen there. I always think<br />
that the status of Faroe in relation to Denmark is something that could be of interest to<br />
Shetland. The Faroe Islands are a dependency of Denmark rather than an integral part of<br />
Denmark, which means they are not in the European Union but can trade freely in the<br />
European Union, and they get a lot of advantage from that because of their fishing industry.<br />
Q120 The Chairman: On public pension assets and liabilities, how do you feel that<br />
should be dealt with?<br />
Professor McCrone: I do not really know, but a lot of the public pensions, of course, are<br />
not funded; they are simply paid out of revenue. So I suppose that that would be the practice<br />
that would be adopted, for instance, for civil service pensions. I do not know what would<br />
happen with teachers, but it would be a very difficult split for the ones that are actually<br />
funded, I suppose. As for defence, I think that is a nightmare.<br />
The Chairman: Yes. We will obviously be taking other evidence on defence.<br />
Professor McCrone: Yes.<br />
Q121 The Chairman: Are there any important items that you think should not be<br />
divided?<br />
Professor McCrone: I do not really think so. If Scotland becomes independent, then a lot of<br />
consequences follow from that, and it then becomes much more difficult to see various<br />
things being shared. Things like foreign embassies and so on, I suppose, might be at least<br />
partially shared, but I do not see any financial flow being shared.<br />
Q122 Lord Lawson of Blaby: On the last point, it is very difficult to see how you could<br />
share a foreign embassy if the two countries had different foreign policies, which might be<br />
the case.<br />
Professor McCrone: It might easily be the case. But on the other hand, it is quite common<br />
for the embassy of one country to act on behalf of another one, so I suppose that is how it<br />
would be done.<br />
Q123 Lord Lawson of Blaby: I want to come back to the Shetlands, because you drew<br />
our attention, very properly, to the importance of that. Presumably the Shetland islanders<br />
would effectively have a choice as to whether they wished to remain part of the United<br />
Kingdom or wished to be part of an independent Scotland. As you said, they would have a<br />
very strong bargaining position because they would see which of those two courses would<br />
give them a more attractive deal all round. Have you any inkling—because you say you know<br />
the Shetland Islands well—of which way that might go, and indeed how long this process<br />
would take? It seems to me that even if the Scots do vote for independence, there are a lot<br />
of important issues that are going to have to be decided, where there is no clear<br />
international law that governs how they are decided. They have to be decided by<br />
negotiation, and this negotiation and discussion could take a very long time, could it not?<br />
Professor McCrone: Yes, indeed, it certainly could, and there are a lot of things to be<br />
sorted out. As for Shetland, incidentally the Shetlanders call it Shetland not “the Shetlands”.<br />
They are quite sensitive about that point.<br />
Lord Lawson of Blaby: I understand sometimes they call it Zetland.<br />
Professor McCrone: That is in the past, yes. I have no inkling what would happen. It has<br />
never been suggested to me from any of my contacts in Shetland that they would want to<br />
208