11.12.2020 Views

Maricho November Edition

Bridging the information gap in the agricultural sector value chain

Bridging the information gap in the agricultural sector value chain

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

35

sales, a single bull can go for as much as US$20 000, which

is an abnormal price for ordinary farmers.

These are some of the critical issues to be considered

before rolling out large scale crossbreeding programmes.

Ideally, such programmes should creatively combine

environmental adaptation with productivity. Through their

own experiments, African pastoralists and livestock farmers

are always continuously doing field trial and error research

with remarkable results.

Farmer experiments and studies demonstrate that mixing of

breeds is not inherently detrimental. Crossbreeding certainly

has the potential to improve food security and livelihoods in

the African continent when applied in a strategic manner.

Breed complementarity versus breed purity

Knowledge about livestock breeds should be shared widely

so that more farmers can understand the art and benefits

of crossbreeding in ways that take advantage of breed

complementarity rather than being always obsessed with

maintaining breed purity.

In fact, the majority of livestock farmers, indigenous breeders

and pastoralists are less concerned with purity unlike ‘purist’

livestock scientists who unfortunately do not understand the

limited utility of ‘purity’. The livestock scientific community

sometimes forgets that investigating the history of livestock

development in Africa would not be possible if farmers and

pastoralists were not conserving their breeds for decades.

Sustainability is more important than yield

It is not just about pure breeds and hybrids. African

communities are tired of crop and livestock programmes

that promote hybrids with a narrow focus on increasing yield

and household income at the expense of the environment.

In a rapidly changing climate, farmers are incurring

downstream costs on the local ecosystem due to introduced

chemicals that erode topsoil, pollute groundwater, and

decrease biodiversity.

In turn, these environmental costs result in economic and

health costs for the larger population that far outweigh

measured benefits in targeted farmer households. In some

countries, this is in leading to resource-induced conflict

between people and wildlife.

Charles Dhewa is CEO of Knowledge Transfer Africa.

He can be reached on 0772 137 717, Email Charles@

knowledgetransafrica.com

MARICHO

A resource for Agribusiness

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!