12.01.2021 Views

The New Urban Normal Urban Sustainability and Resilience Post COVID-19

The COVID19 pandemic has exposed several systemic failures and injustices in the way cities are planned and designed around the world. It has also exposed the failings due to lack of planning in most places in the Global South. Careful, inclusive and participatory spatial planning is thought to greatly strengthen the capacity of societies to withstand systemic shocks, as testified by the New Urban Agenda (2016), the Pact of Amsterdam (2016) and the New Leipzig Charter (2020). Integrated affordable housing, for instance, has come to the top of the agenda once again, now propelled by the realisation that slum dwellers (a staggering 1 billion people around the world) and homeless people are particularly vulnerable to health crises and other societal shocks. The pandemic has been saluted as an opportunity to implement far-reaching transformation of our societies towards sustainability and justice, but little signs of systemic change have actually surfaced. For example, several cities around the world claim they will overhaul public space, take space from private cars, and invest more on green spaces, bicycle paths and quality public mobility. But little has been said about addressing the structural causes of inequality. The champions of the circular economy salute the pandemic as a new dawn for more human-centred capitalism, for the abandonment of exploitation and unfair distribution, and a world where workers can find decent housing, health, work and leisure. But what is actually happening on the ground?

The COVID19 pandemic has exposed several systemic
failures and injustices in the way cities are planned and
designed around the world. It has also exposed the failings
due to lack of planning in most places in the Global South.
Careful, inclusive and participatory spatial planning is
thought to greatly strengthen the capacity of societies to
withstand systemic shocks, as testified by the New Urban
Agenda (2016), the Pact of Amsterdam (2016) and the New
Leipzig Charter (2020). Integrated affordable housing, for
instance, has come to the top of the agenda once again,
now propelled by the realisation that slum dwellers (a
staggering 1 billion people around the world) and homeless
people are particularly vulnerable to health crises and
other societal shocks.
The pandemic has been saluted as an opportunity to
implement far-reaching transformation of our societies
towards sustainability and justice, but little signs of systemic
change have actually surfaced. For example, several cities
around the world claim they will overhaul public space,
take space from private cars, and invest more on green
spaces, bicycle paths and quality public mobility. But little
has been said about addressing the structural causes of
inequality. The champions of the circular economy salute
the pandemic as a new dawn for more human-centred
capitalism, for the abandonment of exploitation and unfair
distribution, and a world where workers can find decent
housing, health, work and leisure. But what is actually
happening on the ground?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62 <strong>The</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Normal</strong><br />

D. Immediate priorities <strong>and</strong> opportunities for<br />

transformation. <strong>The</strong> rallying call is to minimize health<br />

risks <strong>and</strong> maximize livelihood opportunities. All over the<br />

globe there are interesting examples of informal workers<br />

adapting to Covid-<strong>19</strong> realities. For example, street traders<br />

who have developed wash stations <strong>and</strong> trade practising 2<br />

metre social distancing. This shows that solutions exist, but<br />

it does dem<strong>and</strong> a much more creative use of space. During<br />

this relief <strong>and</strong> recovery phase, there are opportunities for<br />

transformation. <strong>The</strong> recognition of informal workers <strong>and</strong><br />

their contributions to city economies <strong>and</strong> societies has<br />

been at the forefront <strong>and</strong> the integration of informal work<br />

into urban plans is imperative. In addition, social protection<br />

needs to be extended to include informal workers. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is a longst<strong>and</strong>ing need to include informal leaders into<br />

urban governance. Informal workers don’t just want to be<br />

meeting local authorities only in times of crisis but should<br />

have regular engagements. On the negative side, there<br />

are threats of reversal of previous gains. <strong>The</strong> permanent<br />

displacement from sites of work through evictions <strong>and</strong><br />

privatization. <strong>The</strong>re is a lot of harassment <strong>and</strong> violence<br />

<strong>and</strong> also deepened discrimination <strong>and</strong> stigmatisation.<br />

E. Innovation <strong>and</strong> informality: Informal workers have come<br />

up with lots of interesting, innovative solutions. So, it’s<br />

important to work alongside them.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!