23.12.2012 Views

Program of the 2001 International Worm Meeting - Sternberg Lab ...

Program of the 2001 International Worm Meeting - Sternberg Lab ...

Program of the 2001 International Worm Meeting - Sternberg Lab ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1003<br />

1003. The Roles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> par Genes in<br />

Intracellular Motility Before <strong>the</strong> First<br />

Asymmetric Cell Division in C.<br />

elegans<br />

Rebecca J Cheeks, Bob Goldstein<br />

University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina-Chapel Hill,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Chapel Hill, NC<br />

27599-3280<br />

Generation <strong>of</strong> cell diversity during development<br />

is accomplished ei<strong>the</strong>r via cell-cell signaling or<br />

asymmetric cell division. In asymmetric cell<br />

division, two distinct daughter cells are born.<br />

Between fertilization and <strong>the</strong> first cell division<br />

in <strong>the</strong> C. elegans zygote, central and cortical<br />

cytoplasmic flows are observed. The timing <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se flows coincides with <strong>the</strong> asymmetric<br />

localization <strong>of</strong> P granules, RNAs, proteins and<br />

cytoskeletal elements.<br />

To begin to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

genes required for asymmetric cell division play<br />

a role in polarized intracellular motility, we<br />

asked whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> par genes (1) are required for<br />

cytoplasmic flows. Using DIC microscopy, we<br />

filmed embryos with mutations in <strong>the</strong> par genes<br />

and analyzed rates and duration <strong>of</strong> flows as well<br />

as distances traveled along <strong>the</strong> axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

embryo, and compared <strong>the</strong>m to wild-type. We<br />

found that strong loss-<strong>of</strong>-function mutations in<br />

par-2, -3, -4, and -6 prevent cytoplasmic flows,<br />

whereas par-1 mutant embryos (b274, it51, it60)<br />

have flows comparable to wild-type. Kemphues<br />

and colleagues (1) have placed <strong>the</strong> par genes<br />

into a pathway by analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir protein<br />

distributions in various genetic backgrounds.<br />

Our results reveal that, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong><br />

par-1, <strong>the</strong> par pathway is required to produce<br />

polarized cytoplasmic flows.<br />

P granules are normally redistributed to <strong>the</strong><br />

posterior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> embryo before <strong>the</strong> first cell<br />

division. Hird et al. (2) found that P granules<br />

redistribute primarily by moving to <strong>the</strong> posterior<br />

at <strong>the</strong> same time as flows occur, and at a similar<br />

rate, suggesting that P granules might be moved<br />

by bulk flows <strong>of</strong> cytoplasm. We have filmed<br />

fluorescent P granules and cytoplasmic flows in<br />

<strong>the</strong> same embryos, and created overlays <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

films. Consistent with <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that P<br />

granules move by bulk flows <strong>of</strong> cytoplasm, we<br />

have found that P granules move perfectly<br />

coincident with <strong>the</strong> flows <strong>of</strong> yolk granules (n= 6<br />

1003<br />

embryos; 30/30 P granules in <strong>the</strong> central<br />

cytoplasm, 20/20 P granules in <strong>the</strong> cortical<br />

cytoplasm). This result suggests that <strong>the</strong><br />

mislocalized P granule phenotype in par-2, -3,<br />

-4, and -6 may be a result <strong>of</strong> failure to produce<br />

cytoplasmic flows. We are currently testing<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r P granules fail to move in <strong>the</strong>se mutants<br />

by filming mutant embryos similarly.<br />

par-1 mutants have cytoplasmic flows<br />

comparable to wild-type embryos but <strong>the</strong> P<br />

granules do not become asymmetrically<br />

localized (1). These results, along with <strong>the</strong><br />

posterior cortical localization <strong>of</strong> PAR-1 (3),<br />

suggest to us at least two hypo<strong>the</strong>ses for <strong>the</strong> role<br />

<strong>of</strong> PAR-1 in localization <strong>of</strong> P granules. First,<br />

PAR-1 might be part <strong>of</strong> a complex that anchors<br />

P granules in place once <strong>the</strong>y reach <strong>the</strong> posterior<br />

cortex, preventing fur<strong>the</strong>r movement along <strong>the</strong><br />

cortex, even as cortical flows continue. This<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis appears unlikely, since our<br />

preliminary evidence from wild-type embryos<br />

suggests that no such anchor exists: P granules<br />

in <strong>the</strong> cortical cytoplasm stop moving when<br />

cortical flows stop, and not before (3/3 embryos,<br />

9/9 P granules). Second, PAR-1 might be<br />

required to prevent degradation <strong>of</strong> P granules,<br />

acting as a "safe haven" for P granules that<br />

reach <strong>the</strong> posterior cortex. Consistent with this,<br />

Hird et al. found that P granules in wild-type<br />

embryos that do not reach <strong>the</strong> posterior<br />

disappear, suggesting that a P granule degrading<br />

or disassembling activity is present in <strong>the</strong><br />

anterior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> embryo (2), and Guo and<br />

Kemphues (3) have noted that P granules are<br />

missing in 2-cell par-1 mutant embryos.<br />

Experiments testing <strong>the</strong> safe haven hypo<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

are currently underway.<br />

1. Rose & Kemphues (1998) Annu Rev Genet<br />

32:521-45 2. Hird et al (1996) Development<br />

122:1303-12 3. Guo and Kemphues (1995) Cell<br />

81:611-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!