25.02.2021 Views

CIOPORA Chronicle 2015

2015 CIOPORA annual magazine on Intellectual Property protection for plant innovations. The edition issue was produced in cooperation with FloraCulture International. Read in the 2015 issue: - From the President: The world is changing - Should PBR influence the minimum distances between varieties? - U.S. plant patent protection & public use - Is border detention in the Netherlands an effective enforcement tool for breeders? - From Secretary General: Securing another piece of the puzzle - Gen Y consumers: flower purchasing behavior and social media - The superlative of miniature: a brand new small world and more...

2015 CIOPORA annual magazine on Intellectual Property protection for plant innovations. The edition issue was produced in cooperation with FloraCulture International.

Read in the 2015 issue:
- From the President: The world is changing
- Should PBR influence the minimum distances between varieties?
- U.S. plant patent protection & public use
- Is border detention in the Netherlands an effective enforcement tool for breeders?
- From Secretary General: Securing another piece of the puzzle
- Gen Y consumers: flower purchasing behavior and social media
- The superlative of miniature: a brand new small world
and more...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sharing provisions of UPOV’91.

Namely: the “breeders´ exemption”

which allows unrestricted access to

protected varieties for the purpose

of breeding other, new varieties;

the “researchers’ exemption”,

which provides unrestricted access

to protected varieties for experimentation

and scientific investigation;

and finally, the “private/noncommercial

exemption” which

permits the propagation of protected

varieties by home gardeners,

hobbyists, subsistence farmers, etc.

Canada has also elected to include

the optional “farmers’ privilege” in

the suite of amendments, explicitly

permitting farmers to continue

saving, conditioning (clean, treat,

etc.), and storing seeds of protected

plant varieties for replanting on

their own land.

Public consultations

The Government of Canada has a

strong tradition of consulting with

the impacted stakeholder community

before making changes to

the Intellectual Property framework

for protecting new plant

varieties. In fact, Canada’s original

decision to enact a PBR law, based

on UPOV’78, was the result of

strong support from farmers and

plant breeders alike. In 2004/05

the PBR Office conducted national

consultations on the possible adoption

of UPOV’91. The outcome

of these consultations was that

impacted stakeholders were in

favor of improving our Intellectual

Property framework. Since tabling

of Bill C-18, the Agricultural

Growth Act, in Parliament on

December 7 th , 2013, I had the personal

pleasure of conducting over

35 individual consultations with

various organizations representing

the agriculture, horticulture, and

ornamental sectors. These more

recent consultations reconfirmed

what we had observed almost a

decade earlier, that the stakeholder

community, both domestically and

internationally, strongly supported

Canada’s move towards ratifying

the UPOV’91 standard.

Endorsement of

the industry

In fact, a coalition of Canadian

farmer and value

chain organizations called

“Partners in Innovation”

(www.partnersininnovation.ca)

formed specifically to encourage

and support the federal government

in adopting UPOV’91. This organization

is comprised of a diverse

group of over 20 organizations,

representing producers of grains,

oilseeds, pulse crops, fruit crops,

potatoes, and flowers, encompassing

the vast majority of Canadian

agriculture and horticulture.

Overseas, organizations such as

the International Community of

Breeders of Asexually Reproduced

Ornamental and Fruit Varieties

(CIOPORA), the International Seed

Federation (ISF), and the International

Association of Horticulture

Producers (AIPH), have also

been strong and vocal proponents

Mum varieties

protected under

Canadian Plant

Breeders´ Rights.

Some plants

are reproduced

vegetatively

from plant

cuttings or

budwood. This

includes many

ornamental

plants, such

as roses and

spirea, and

most fruit, such

as apples and

strawberries.

of UPOV’91 amendments to

Canada’s PBR Act.

Beneficiaries

By amending its legislation,

Canada has listened and

responded to the needs of its

stakeholders and fulfilled a commitment

made in 1992 when

we became a signatory to the

UPOV’91 Convention. Updating

Canada’s PBR Act will stimulate

innovation in domestic plant

breeding and encourage foreign

breeders to release their varieties

into our marketplace. In fact,

the ink is barely dry on the law

and we have already witnessed

increased investments and new

partnerships form between Canadian

seed companies and foreign

breeders. In the end, Canadian

farmers and growers will be the

beneficiaries of these changes.

Securing access to a greater diversity

of high yielding and diseaseresistant

varieties will help

Canadian farmers meet market

demands and remain competitive

internationally. We are pleased

to have reached this important

milestone, and look forward to

continued collaboration with the

stakeholder community to fully

realize the advantages of moving

to UPOV’91. |||

About the author

Anthony Parker is Commissioner of the Canadian

Plant Breeders' Rights Office (PBRO) which is part

of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).

CFIA administers the Plant Breeders' Rights

Act (1990) and Regulations which provide legal

protection to new plant varieties.

CIOPORA Chronicle June 2015 | www.FloraCulture.eu 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!