26.03.2021 Views

Credit Management issue April 2021

The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals

The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PANEL BASHERS<br />

Performance Indicators<br />

Karen Savage and Paula Swain answer<br />

this month's question.<br />

How should<br />

I assess the<br />

effectiveness<br />

of a third-party<br />

collection<br />

agency or<br />

lawyer?<br />

Panellist<br />

Karen Savage FCICM<br />

PERHAPS the best way of<br />

answering this question is<br />

to look at our own model<br />

and the lessons that can be<br />

learned from it in terms of<br />

how ‘effective’ a third-party<br />

can and should be.<br />

We have a panel of six DCAs and three<br />

law firms. Managing their performance<br />

requires a robust Supplier Assurance<br />

Framework. The Assurance Framework<br />

seeks oversight and assurance over<br />

each servicer firms’ general governance<br />

and control framework, adherence to<br />

regulatory requirements, customer<br />

treatment and evidence of satisfactory<br />

recruitment, training and competency<br />

frameworks. Ongoing Quality Assurance<br />

checking are also conducted on a regular<br />

basis.<br />

Azzurro Associates has an independent<br />

second line Risk & Compliance Team. The<br />

Head of Risk & Compliance is responsible<br />

for the compliance monitoring plan,<br />

complaints handling and the monthly<br />

QA framework over our suppliers. Each<br />

customer-facing supplier goes through a<br />

Due Diligence process, an annual review<br />

of policies and a monthly oversight<br />

process. The monthly oversight includes<br />

anything up to 50 customer telephone<br />

calls and file reviews per supplier. These<br />

are marked against industry best practice,<br />

regulatory requirements and our own suite<br />

of policies. (Once lockdown restrictions<br />

in the UK have been lifted, the Risk &<br />

Compliance Team will recommence visits<br />

to each supplier to conduct a full audit.)<br />

Over the last 12 months, weekly virtual<br />

meetings with suppliers have been ‘the<br />

norm’, to discuss and assess collections<br />

performance, accounts that are on ‘hold’<br />

as a result of COVID, and or agreed strategy<br />

as regards litigation and use of the courts.<br />

Both the FCA and the CSA provided regular<br />

updates on generic operational <strong>issue</strong>s and<br />

best practice, which were also used as a<br />

benchmark for third-party performance.<br />

What we looked for (and still look for) in<br />

particular includes:<br />

• The ability to provide timely, accurate<br />

reporting in line with our monthly<br />

reporting requirements. All transactions<br />

(whether cash or non-cash) should be<br />

coded correctly enabling straightforward<br />

balance reconciliation. Periodic audit of<br />

the data transmission should highlight few<br />

if any errors.<br />

• A review of a sample of accounts placed<br />

with the servicer should indicate multiple<br />

attempts to contact the customer through<br />

the various channels available to the<br />

servicer (phone, letter, email, SMS etc).<br />

Further contact with the customer should<br />

reflect the preferred communication<br />

channel agreed with that customer.<br />

• The servicer should proactively suggest<br />

changes in strategy based on information<br />

gleaned by the Contact Centre. The<br />

recommendations should highlight the<br />

cost/benefit of such a strategy change.<br />

• The servicer should, where possible,<br />

enable the customer to use self-serve<br />

processes to manage their debt position.<br />

Such online tools should offer a suite of<br />

payment plan and settlement options,<br />

ensuring all forbearance tools and<br />

affordability guidelines are adhered to.<br />

• Running a benchmark strategy<br />

introduces an element of competition<br />

to the servicing strategy between two or<br />

more service providers. The key criteria<br />

to ensure an effective benchmark process<br />

are:<br />

The debt placed is randomly allocated –<br />

with a check of credit quality characteristics<br />

to ensure no pool is substantially different;<br />

The timeframe of measurement<br />

must discourage an acceleration of the<br />

collection process by the Servicers, and<br />

thus create artificial unsustainable results;<br />

The benchmark pools must be of<br />

sufficient size to support consistent efforts<br />

by the servicers;<br />

One should consider a hybrid activity<br />

and contingent commission rate model,<br />

to ensure each servicer is appropriately<br />

compensated for their efforts, thus<br />

ensuring a level playing field.<br />

Close oversight during the Pandemic<br />

– and beyond – should ensure collection<br />

volumes remain stable, whatever the<br />

challenge!<br />

KAREN SAVAGE FCICM<br />

Chief Operating Officer and Solicitor at Azzurro Associates.<br />

Advancing the credit profession / www.cicm.com / <strong>April</strong> <strong>2021</strong> / PAGE 32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!