04.04.2021 Views

YSM Issue 93.4 Full Magazine

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OINT

CLIMATE CHANGE IS WORSE

THAN YOU THOUGHT

BY CHARLOTTE LEAKEY

IMAGE COURTESY OF PIXABAY

Bramble Cay melomys are the chubbiest brown mice you’ve

never heard of. They lived on a small island on the northern

tip of the Great Barrier Reef until they met their unfortunate

demise in the early 2000s. Scientists worldwide grieved the

extinction of these elusive critters, both for the ecosystems they

left behind and for the dire situation that their extinction brings

to light. “Significantly, this probably represents the first recorded

mammalian extinction due to anthropogenic climate change,” a

2016 Queensland Government report postulated. As modern-day

anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change progresses, other

fauna of the Earth are also projected to suffer immensely. Alas, if

climate-driven extinctions of ancestral human species thousands

of years ago give any indicators about the present, the situation

might be even worse than we thought.

Pasquale Raia’s group at the University of Naples Federico

II studied the fossil records of five extinct human species, such

as Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis, in addition to our

own, to see how they reacted to natural changes in climate. The

researchers looked at climatic niches, the conditions in which a

species can survive and thrive. By studying fossil records with

a climate emulator, a computational tool that supplies highresolution

temperature and rainfall data, the researchers estimated

the climatic niches during the time period and in the regions in

which each human species lived. After distributing each species’s

fossil record into respective consecutive time bins—a statistical

technique for discretizing large sets of data—they compared

the niche of each bin to the fully realized climatic niche that the

species encompassed throughout its evolution.

Right before their extinction, in the last time bin, three human

species lost a significant proportion of their climatic niche. These

results were consistent across different fossil records and with controls

for various confounding factors, such as species interbreeding and

competition with Homo sapiens. “If you consider the entire history

of a species as a sphere, we thought that the diameter of the sphere of

each bin would be a constant proportion of the entire sphere because

humans are so good at modifying their climatic conditions,” Raia said.

“[Instead], in the last bin, that sphere became very tiny.” Additional

statistical analysis further confirmed that climate change in particular

caused the shrinkage of the bin sphere, accelerating the extinctions.

What does this mean for us, the last prevailing Homo species,

as we face a climate crisis today? There’s good(ish) and bad news.

www.yalescientific.org

The good: “I do not feel that we as humans really risk going extinct

because of future climate change,” Raia said. Though we face drastic

damages to our lifestyle, as a species, we have the ability to create

technology that can let us at least survive just about anything that

climate change has to throw at us. Floods, droughts, drowning

cities, tropical storms, or even ice ages would be devastating, but

they would not be at a scale to completely wipe out the human

race, unlike the fate of the hapless hominids of the past.

The bad news concerns other life on Earth. “[The Homo species]

were endowed with a lot of skills that were quite unnatural, quite

rare. They were able to master fire, produce clothes and spears,

and move over very large distances,” Raia said. “Despite this,

climate change that was not as fast and not as extreme as the

current climate change was enough to wipe them extinct.” This

is very concerning: given this result, it is difficult to envision how

the fauna of the Earth, which are far less technologically advanced

than any Homo species, could possibly survive anthropogenic

climate change—especially considering that it is occurring at a

rate orders of magnitude more quickly than past events.

Exactly how vulnerable are our precious fauna? The

preliminary results look grim. “They have not enough space,

the populations are too small, too isolated, too fragmented,”

Raia said. And humans have been frustratingly slow to help.

“We are doing almost nothing—we are thinking a lot, studying

a lot, trying to do a lot of things,” Raia said. “I think probably a

teenager from Sweden is doing more than politicians have done

in the past twenty years or so.” If these patterns continue, we are

looking towards a disaster, both for the fauna of our planet and

for the modern lifestyle we hold onto. ■

Gynther, I., Waller, N. & Leung, L.K.-P (2016). Confirmation of

the extinction of the Bramble Cay melomys Melomys rubicola

on Bramble Cay, Torres Strait: results and conclusions from a

comprehensive survey in August–September 2014. Unpublished

report to the Department of Environment and Heritage

Protection, Queensland Government, Brisbane.

Raia, P., Mondanaro, A., Melchionna, M., Febbraro, M. D., Diniz-

Filho, J. A., Rangel, T. F., . . . Rook, L. (2020). Past Extinctions

of Homo Species Coincided with Increased Vulnerability

to Climatic Change. One Earth, 3(4), 480-490. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.007

December 2020 Yale Scientific Magazine 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!