23.12.2012 Views

Advanced Practice Nurses: Roles in the Hemodialysis Unit

Advanced Practice Nurses: Roles in the Hemodialysis Unit

Advanced Practice Nurses: Roles in the Hemodialysis Unit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oth as a “midlevel provider.”<br />

Restrictions for APNs range from limit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

prescriptive selection to a specified<br />

formulary, to co-signature requirement<br />

by a physician (MD) for controlled<br />

substances, to no prescriptive<br />

provision (Pearson, 1996). The lack of<br />

a uniform regulatory body for APNs is<br />

recognized as an obstacle to def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical role of APNs, particularly<br />

<strong>in</strong> regards to prescriptive authority<br />

(Chmielewski et al., 1996 ) .<br />

A PN recognition and reimbursement<br />

as a primary care provider<br />

( PCP) are often discussed simultaneo<br />

u s l y. A PCP is one who assumes<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent responsibility for a provided<br />

service and contracts with a<br />

hospital or agency for pay (Be y e r s ,<br />

Gunn, Egg<strong>in</strong>g, & Thomas, 1997). In<br />

contrast, collaborative practice<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves physician oversight and<br />

many states base reimbursement on<br />

<strong>the</strong> type of practices (collaborative vs.<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent). Currently, 13 states<br />

and <strong>the</strong> District of Columbia reimburse<br />

NPs without physician collaboration<br />

(Ventura, 1998). Barriers still<br />

exist for APNs, but substantial<br />

progress has been made over <strong>the</strong> past<br />

25 years.<br />

A PN Historical Pe r s p e c t i ve s<br />

Nearly 25 years ago, both <strong>the</strong> government<br />

and private sector recognized<br />

<strong>the</strong> need for APNs to assist with <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

health care demands. The<br />

Department of Health, Education, and<br />

Welfare established an <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

committee to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

expand<strong>in</strong>g role of nurses <strong>in</strong> health<br />

care. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs gave impetus for<br />

federal fund<strong>in</strong>g of graduate nurs<strong>in</strong>g<br />

programs (Kitzman, 1983). Ad v a n c e d<br />

practice degrees were emphasized <strong>in</strong><br />

ambulatory care sett<strong>in</strong>gs and were limited<br />

to adult, obstetric, and pediatric<br />

primary care. Certified nurse midwives<br />

and certified registered nurse<br />

anes<strong>the</strong>tists were del<strong>in</strong>eated separately<br />

because of <strong>the</strong>ir unique practice.<br />

<strong>Advanced</strong> practice specialization <strong>in</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r cl<strong>in</strong>ical areas emerged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

1990s (Berger et al., 1996 ) .<br />

The need for nephrology APN s<br />

was recognized almost 25 years ago<br />

even though specialized tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was<br />

178<br />

not yet available. Shapiro (1976 )<br />

designed a program to assist dialysis<br />

nurses <strong>in</strong> return<strong>in</strong>g to school for an<br />

advanced practice degree <strong>in</strong> 1976 .<br />

After obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g academic credentials,<br />

additional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g related to <strong>the</strong><br />

unique needs of <strong>the</strong> nephrology<br />

patients was offered. These APN s<br />

were subsequently employed <strong>in</strong> satellite<br />

dialysis units. Ne p h r o l o g i s t s<br />

directly supervised APNs, such that<br />

any prescribed <strong>the</strong>rapy by an APN<br />

required a physician co-signature.<br />

Fiscal analysis demonstrated economic<br />

benefit, s<strong>in</strong>ce each APN assisted <strong>in</strong><br />

manag<strong>in</strong>g 50 chronic dialysis patients<br />

at a cost significantly below that<br />

w h i ch physicians would <strong>in</strong>cur<br />

(Shapiro, 1976).<br />

Today’s cost-conserv<strong>in</strong>g climate of<br />

health care has focused on <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

impact of us<strong>in</strong>g APNs to provide<br />

some services given by MD s<br />

( Berger et al., 1996). The sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

would be largely due to salary differentials,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> APN be<strong>in</strong>g paid less<br />

than <strong>the</strong> MD. Cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs of APN s<br />

has not been limited to salary differentials,<br />

as APNs have been reported<br />

to prescribe less expensive but equally<br />

effective diagnostic or <strong>the</strong>rapeutic<br />

<strong>in</strong>terventions than MDs (Salkever,<br />

Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, Ste<strong>in</strong>wachs, & Katz, 1982 ) .<br />

Kassirer (1994) disputes this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and suggests that APNs do not order<br />

sophisticated diagnostic tests (e.g.,<br />

magnetic resonance imag<strong>in</strong>g) because<br />

of <strong>the</strong>ir lack of familiarity with <strong>the</strong>se<br />

tests and that this may jeopardize<br />

patient care. Bolton (1998) confirms<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic benefit of APNs <strong>in</strong><br />

nephrology and emphasizes additional<br />

APN qualities <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: subspecialty<br />

expertise, competency, flexibility,<br />

and positive patient reception.<br />

Today, some APNs are able to function<br />

as PCPs and have established<br />

nurse managed cl<strong>in</strong>ics, reimbursed at<br />

<strong>the</strong> same rates as physicians (Ve n t u r a ,<br />

1998 ) .<br />

A PN Me r i t<br />

The proposed shortage of available<br />

nephrologists to care for <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ESRD population is a significant<br />

<strong>in</strong>centive for APN sanction.<br />

Nephrologists have reported spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

38% of <strong>the</strong>ir total ESRD practice time<br />

devoted to primary care (Bender &<br />

Holley, 1996). A recent outcomebased<br />

study that compared NPs to<br />

MDs <strong>in</strong> a ambulatory care sett<strong>in</strong>g concluded<br />

that primary care provided by<br />

NPs was equal to that of MDs. NP s<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> same authority and<br />

responsibilities delegated to <strong>the</strong>ir MD<br />

counterparts, with random patient<br />

assignments (Mund<strong>in</strong>ger et al., 20 0 0 ) .<br />

Most nephrologists spend a significant<br />

proportion of <strong>the</strong>ir time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> care of<br />

non-ESRD patients (Ad Hoc<br />

Committee, 1997). APNs have been<br />

advocated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> management of<br />

patients pre-ESRD as well as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

care of dialysis patients, allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nephrologists to have a more diversified<br />

practice (Bolton, 1998). Bolton<br />

( 1998) described a successful collaborative<br />

practice model utiliz<strong>in</strong>g a NP <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> care of pre-ESRD and ESRD<br />

patients. Collaborative practice<br />

between a MD and APN is comprised<br />

of jo<strong>in</strong>t commitments to patient care<br />

with an <strong>in</strong>tegration of talents and skills<br />

(Chmielewski et al., 1996).<br />

Nephrology APNs <strong>in</strong> a collaborative<br />

practice ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a great deal of autonomy<br />

<strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g primary care with<br />

support from nephrologists for specific<br />

needs (e.g., admitt<strong>in</strong>g privileges) that<br />

<strong>the</strong> APN may not be able to provide<br />

(Ste<strong>in</strong>man, 1999 ) .<br />

The <strong>Unit</strong>ed States Renal Data<br />

System (USRDS) reports an annual<br />

death rate of approximately 25%<br />

(higher than any <strong>in</strong>dustrialized country)<br />

for ESRD. Age and comorbid illnesses<br />

modify <strong>in</strong>dividual mortality<br />

rates (Agodoa, Wolfe, & Port, 1999 ) .<br />

European nephrologists have suggested<br />

that American nephrologists spend<br />

less time with patients and that this<br />

may be a factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> higher mortality<br />

rates (Suki, 1999). With <strong>the</strong> predicted<br />

shortage of nephrologists over <strong>the</strong> next<br />

10 years, nephrologists will have less<br />

time with <strong>in</strong>dividual patients; such<br />

decreased patient contact time could<br />

adversely affect patient mortality.<br />

Bolton (1998) made a comparative<br />

analysis of nephrologists and NPs <strong>in</strong><br />

reference to time spent with patients.<br />

The average pages/calls received by<br />

<strong>the</strong> NP was twice that of nephrologists<br />

NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL April 2000 Vol. 27, No. 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!