23.12.2012 Views

Advanced Practice Nurses: Roles in the Hemodialysis Unit

Advanced Practice Nurses: Roles in the Hemodialysis Unit

Advanced Practice Nurses: Roles in the Hemodialysis Unit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

per month. Patients called NPs first for<br />

m<strong>in</strong>or illnesses because <strong>the</strong> NP was<br />

perceived as more sympa<strong>the</strong>tic and<br />

will<strong>in</strong>g to allot more time to address<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir needs (Bolton, 1998). A Ne w<br />

York dialysis unit recently conducted a<br />

survey to f<strong>in</strong>d out nurses’ perceptions<br />

of an APN colleague. APN availability<br />

and accountability for dialysis orders,<br />

emergency evaluations, and preventive<br />

and health ma<strong>in</strong>tenance were considered<br />

to be <strong>the</strong> most valuable contributions<br />

of APNs. APN availability was<br />

considered to be an improvement<br />

over orders written by <strong>the</strong> nephrologist<br />

that rotated through <strong>the</strong> unit on a<br />

monthly basis (Izzo, 1982 ) .<br />

Debate cont<strong>in</strong>ues over <strong>the</strong> care of<br />

dialysis patients by APNs as compared<br />

to physician assistants (PA). An<br />

editorial by Suki (1999) explored<br />

n e p h r o l o g i s t /PA collaborative practice<br />

issues, but never identified APN s<br />

as a possible alternative. Retention of<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational nephrology fellows and<br />

recruitment of medical school graduates<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> nephrology subspecialty<br />

were considered preferred alternatives<br />

to address<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> shortage of<br />

nephrologists (Suki, 1999). Ach i e v ement<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se proposals is not likely<br />

when <strong>the</strong>re is a lack of evidence for a<br />

change <strong>in</strong> current trends.<br />

Conservative estimates of ESRD<br />

prevalence rates and workforce<br />

requirements still estimate a significant<br />

shortage of nephrologists <strong>in</strong> 10<br />

years (Ad Hoc Committee, 1997 ) .<br />

Numerous authors, however, have<br />

supported <strong>the</strong> utilization of NPs over<br />

PAs <strong>in</strong> collaborative practice agreements<br />

(Beyers et al., 1997; Bolton,<br />

1998; Sox et al., 1994). NPs were recommended<br />

over PAs because NP s<br />

were thought to require less supervision<br />

than PAs (Bolton, 1998; Sox et<br />

al., 1994) and were considered to<br />

have more direct patient care experience<br />

(Ventura, 1998). Watts and<br />

Chmielewski conducted a survey of<br />

nephrology APNs with 45 respondents;<br />

<strong>the</strong> majority possessed over 10<br />

years of nurs<strong>in</strong>g experience (as cited<br />

<strong>in</strong> Chmielewski et al., 1996). To d a y ,<br />

NPs (20.7%) outnumber PAs (8.9%)<br />

<strong>in</strong> collaborative practice with<br />

nephrologists (Anderson et al., 1999 ) .<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> complex nature of<br />

patients with ESRD, cl<strong>in</strong>ical experience<br />

is essential to provid<strong>in</strong>g quality<br />

c a r e .<br />

ESRD patients’ unique <strong>in</strong>terrelated<br />

considerations <strong>in</strong>clude adequacy of<br />

dialysis, management of anemia, electrolyte<br />

disturbances, renal osteodystrophy,<br />

access patency, dietary considerations,<br />

treatment of comorbid conditions,<br />

and rehabilitative <strong>in</strong>itiatives.<br />

Kassirer (1994) noted that NPs were<br />

rated superior to physicians <strong>in</strong> patient<br />

satisfaction and <strong>in</strong> patient compliance<br />

with health promotion and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance,<br />

but ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a lack of support<br />

for APNs as PCPs. Mund<strong>in</strong>ger<br />

( 1994) considered diagnosis and treatment<br />

by NPs and physicians to be simi<br />

l a r. NPs, however, were more likely to<br />

expand treatment to <strong>in</strong>clude patient<br />

education, counsel<strong>in</strong>g, and health<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>in</strong>terventions. The nature<br />

and perpetuity of diseases/impairments<br />

affect<strong>in</strong>g ESRD patients (e.g.,<br />

hypertension, renal osteodystrophy,<br />

anemia, electrolyte imbalances)<br />

require cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>the</strong>rapeutic monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to assure adequate management<br />

(Daugirdas, 1994 ) .<br />

The Department of Veterans<br />

Affairs issued a policy promot<strong>in</strong>g<br />

employment of APNs because it was<br />

felt that APNs could effectively manage<br />

up to 80% of patient care requirements<br />

(Ventura, 1998). Experienced<br />

A PNs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hemodialysis unit should<br />

be able to successfully address <strong>the</strong><br />

majority of patient care issues, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir practice may best be conveyed <strong>in</strong><br />

collaboration with one or more<br />

nephrologists. A major barrier to<br />

nephrologists acceptance of APNs is<br />

related to quality of care concerns<br />

( Beyers et al., 1997). Lack of clarity <strong>in</strong><br />

def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g APN roles has led to concerns<br />

among both nurses and physicians<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g competency (Chmielewski<br />

et al., 1996). The American Nu r s e s ’<br />

Association has def<strong>in</strong>ed a graduate<br />

level degree as a requirement for identification<br />

of APNs (American Nu r s e s ’<br />

Association, 1996).<br />

A PN <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Hemodialysis</strong> Un i t<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g section will address<br />

roles of APNs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> care of<br />

hemodialysis patients, emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

utilization of a collaborative team<br />

a p p r o a ch which <strong>in</strong>cludes, nephrologist,<br />

dietician, social worker, psych o lo<br />

g i s t / p s y chiatrist, vascular access surgeon,<br />

<strong>in</strong>terventional radiologist, dialysis<br />

nurse, and APN .<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g effective communication<br />

among all members of <strong>the</strong> team<br />

is essential to quality care, and <strong>the</strong><br />

A PN must assume a pivotal role. It is<br />

difficult to separate APN roles (cl<strong>in</strong>ician,<br />

educator, consultant, counselor,<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrator, and research e r )<br />

because of <strong>the</strong>ir overlapp<strong>in</strong>g nature.<br />

Some APNs function as adm<strong>in</strong>istrators<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>rs practice as case managers,<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g 24-hour accountability<br />

for patients <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> caseload (Berger et<br />

al., 1996). This article will explore <strong>the</strong><br />

A PN as a cl<strong>in</strong>ician, educator, consultant,<br />

and research e r. A scenario will<br />

be given for each role to illustrate<br />

A PN <strong>in</strong>volvement and emphasize <strong>the</strong><br />

need for a collaborative practice.<br />

Cl i n i c i a n<br />

Nephrology APNs <strong>in</strong>stitute treatment<br />

options for a variety of patient<br />

problems and <strong>in</strong>itiate preventive<br />

measures to avert development of<br />

complications. <strong>Hemodialysis</strong> patients<br />

are subject to unique problems not<br />

often observed with o<strong>the</strong>r chronic illnesses.<br />

Hematological, nutritional,<br />

endocr<strong>in</strong>e, musculoskeletal, and<br />

immune response abnormalities are<br />

just a few of <strong>the</strong> universal problems<br />

associated with chronic dialysis <strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

(Daugirdas, 1994). There is a predom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />

of cardiovascular disease<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ESRD population, such that<br />

chronic renal failure has been<br />

described as a vasculopathic state<br />

(Luke, 1998). Cardiovascular disease<br />

has been identified as <strong>the</strong> cause of up<br />

to 50% of deaths <strong>in</strong> ESRD (Ritz &<br />

Querfeld, 1986), with cardiac arrests,<br />

acute myocardial <strong>in</strong>farction, and cardiac<br />

arrhythmia account<strong>in</strong>g for one<br />

third of all ESRD deaths (Luke,<br />

1998). Hypertension and diabetes<br />

mellitus account for <strong>the</strong> cause of<br />

approximately two thirds of ESRD<br />

cases. Because of <strong>the</strong> magnitude of<br />

<strong>the</strong> problem of cardiovascular disease,<br />

nephrology practice must <strong>in</strong>cor-<br />

NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL April 2000 Vol. 27, No. 2 179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!