11.08.2021 Views

Brown Undergraduate Law Review — Vol. 2 No. 2 (Spring 2021)

We are proud to present the Spring 2021 issue of the Brown Undergraduate Law Review. We hope that the works contained herein offer insight and inspiration to all who read them.

We are proud to present the Spring 2021 issue of the Brown Undergraduate Law Review. We hope that the works contained herein offer insight and inspiration to all who read them.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Targeting Muslims and Civil Liberties Prevention:<br />

An Analysis of the Countering Violent Extremism Program?s First Amendment Violations<br />

Introduction<br />

CVE seeks to prevent the proliferation of extremist<br />

ideologies; though previous programs have shared this<br />

American Muslims have borne the brunt of measures taken<br />

aim, CVE was the first to do so as an explicit part of its<br />

by federal, state, and local governments and law<br />

strategy. All of these approaches taken in the name of<br />

enforcement agencies aimed at preserving and advancing<br />

national security in the post-9/11 era are unconstitutional,<br />

national security in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. The<br />

as evidenced by both their strategic frameworks and their<br />

passage of the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001 was an<br />

effects on Muslim communities.<br />

inflection point in increasing securitization. Granting law<br />

enforcement agencies the authorization to enhance their This article will elucidate the deficiencies in the<br />

surveillance capabilities became the impetus for constitutionality of the CVE program. The first section<br />

ever-expanding counterterror programs.<br />

provides a brief history of the CVE, including an outline of<br />

the three pilot programs in Boston, Los Angeles, and<br />

These programs included divisions for research into the<br />

Minneapolis, and characterizes the prominent<br />

causes of terrorism itself. The prevailing theories on terror<br />

radicalization theories underpinning CVE programs,<br />

advanced by research analysts at the FBI and NYPD<br />

highlighting the central premise: an assumed causal<br />

identified adherence to Salafism or ?jihadi? interpretations<br />

relationship between adherence to Islam and participation<br />

of Islam as the primary precursors to extremist violence.<br />

in violent extremism. The second section, in reviewing<br />

These radicalization theories, coupled with new capacities<br />

three relevant Supreme Court cases, addresses the<br />

as a result of expanded security apparatuses, led to<br />

unconstitutionality of the CVE program based on its<br />

unprecedented intelligence gathering programs, both overt<br />

violation of freedom of speech under the First<br />

and covert. The National Security Entry-Exit Registration<br />

Amendment. The third section analyzes whether the<br />

System required male non-citizens entering the United<br />

targeting of entire Muslim communities by the CVE<br />

States from Muslim-majority countries to register with<br />

programs can meet the strict scrutiny standard for<br />

their local Immigration and Customs Enforcement office in<br />

burdening freedom of religion, a right protected by the<br />

an effort to track ?potential terrorists.? The NYPD Muslim<br />

First Amendment. The fourth section considers whether<br />

Surveillance Program recruited and supervised thousands<br />

the CVE program, motivated by blatant anti-Muslim<br />

of informants engaged in ?warrantless, blanket<br />

animus, violates the prohibition against the establishment<br />

surveillance of Muslim communities? in New York City,<br />

Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and parts of Connecticut. 1 of an official religion set forth in the First Amendment.<br />

This<br />

The article concludes that the CVE program is<br />

information gathering on supposed ?centers of terrorism?<br />

unconstitutional in all three regards? infringing on<br />

furthered de facto criminalization and created an air of<br />

freedom of speech, burdening the free exercise of religion,<br />

suspicion toward Muslim communities.<br />

and discriminating against American Muslims on the basis<br />

It is in the context of enhanced surveillance and<br />

of religion.<br />

counterterrorism efforts in the post-9/11 era that the<br />

Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Task Force arose. It<br />

can be distinguished from previous programs by two main<br />

characteristics. First, instead of unilateral action on the part<br />

of government and law enforcement, CVE seeks to work<br />

with community partners to combat extremism. Second,<br />

Countering Violent Extremism Task Force<br />

The Countering Violent Extremism Task Force is a<br />

program, housed in the Department of Justice and the<br />

Department of Homeland Security, that was unveiled by<br />

the Obama administration in August 2011 with the purpose<br />

1. Asad Dandia, ?Bloomberg?s NYPD Spied On Me For Being Muslim. He Has Never Apologized,? Washington Post, February 20, 2020.<br />

<strong>Brown</strong> <strong>Undergraduate</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!