Brown Undergraduate Law Review — Vol. 2 No. 2 (Spring 2021)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF CONTENTS The Failure of the Treatment of Low-level Offenders in the Juvenile Justice System Morgan Awner Targeting Muslims and Civil Liberties Prevention: An Analysis of CVE and TVTP's Infringements on First Amendment Rights Luqmaan Bokhary Standardizing Autonomy: Medical Communication, Liability, and the Doctrine of Informed Consent Liza Edwards-Levin The Legal Precedents for Police Brutality: The Enduring Legacy of the Objective Reasonableness Standard Deepak Gupta The International Space Law Regime in the Modern Era Christopher Kobel Climate Refugees: Protection Gaps in the International Law Sophia Matthews Native Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, and the Epidemic of Sexual Violence against Native Women Deborah Meirowitz Proscribable Thoughts Chris Morillo . . . . . page 7 . . . . . page 21 . . . . . page 32 . . . . . page 46 . . . . . page 57 . . . . . page 66 . . . . . page 75 . . . . . page 91 . . 6
THE FAILURE OF THE TREATMENT OF LOW-LEVEL OFFENDERS IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM Morgan Awner ABSTRACT The juvenile justice system was created to rehabilitate youth, instead of forcing them into the punitive adult criminal justice system. However, there are 48,000 youth under the age of 18 in secure detention facilities around the United States. There is a large overlap between those in the juvenile justice system and youth who experience high rates of trauma. However, a trauma-informed approach alone will not replace the procedural failures of the juvenile justice system that encourages paternalistic intervention and surveillance of youth. By analyzing the juvenile justice system?s origins in post-slavery America through a critical race lens, this paper shows how the juvenile justice system functions exactly as intended: to punish low income youth of color. This historical analysis, as well as an investigation into Supreme Court jurisprudence that fails to extend all due process protections to youth offenders, illustrates a juvenile justice system in desperate need of reform. Brown Undergraduate Law Review 7
Page 1 and 2: Spring 2021 || Vol. 2 || No. 2 b r
Page 3 and 4: BROWN UNDERGRADUATE LAW REVIEW 2021
Page 5: A Letter from the Editors ?current?
Page 9 and 10: The Failure of the Treatment of Low
Page 21 and 22: TARGETING MUSLIMS AND CIVIL LIBERTI
Page 23 and 24: Targeting Muslims and Civil Liberti
Page 33 and 34: Standardizing Autonomy: Medical Com
Page 47 and 48: The Legal Precedents for Police Bru
Page 55 and 56: The Future of the Fourteenth Amendm
Page 57 and 58:
THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE LAW REGIME
Page 59 and 60:
while the latter is not. This does
Page 61 and 62:
Created by an act of the GA in 1959
Page 63 and 64:
shall be responsible for national s
Page 65 and 66:
?accounts for three-quarters of off
Page 67 and 68:
Introduction The concept of environ
Page 69 and 70:
the Convention. The language of the
Page 71 and 72:
Convention. First, the Nansen Initi
Page 73 and 74:
and other particularly vulnerable g
Page 75 and 76:
NATIVE SOVEREIGNTY, JURISDICTION, A
Page 77 and 78:
Native Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, a
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Potential Solutions to Jurisdiction
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
PROSCRIBABLE THOUGHTS: U.S. HATE CR
Page 93 and 94:
Proscribable Thoughts: U.S. Hate Cr
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
101
Page 103 and 104:
Featured Articles The Constitutiona
show all

Brown Undergraduate Law Review — Vol. 2 No. 2 (Spring 2021)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?