17.11.2021 Views

ST_WS_BOSSteam

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MINIBANK &<br />

MICROBANK<br />

“ BOSS” T EAM:<br />

I O N J O S A N , N AT I O N A L B A N K O F M O L D O VA<br />

I H O R L U B C H U K , N AT I O N A L B A N K O F U K R A I N E<br />

I E VA M I K A L I U N A I T E , B A N K O F L I T H U A N I A


Description<br />

• MINIBANK & MICROBANK are the two smallest banks in the system in terms of:<br />

‣ own assets,<br />

‣ total risk exposure amount,<br />

‣ issued credit.<br />

Mln.<br />

4 500<br />

4 000<br />

3 500<br />

3 000<br />

2 500<br />

2 000<br />

1 500<br />

1 000<br />

500<br />

-<br />

273 221<br />

Own funds<br />

492 451 422<br />

Mln.<br />

18 000<br />

16 000<br />

14 000<br />

12 000<br />

10 000<br />

8 000<br />

6 000<br />

4 000<br />

2 000<br />

-<br />

Total risk exposure amount<br />

748 591 1 005 1 024<br />

16 000<br />

14 000<br />

12 000<br />

10 000<br />

8 000<br />

6 000<br />

4 000<br />

2 000<br />

-<br />

Credit<br />

746 562 865 879


What their likely activities are based on<br />

the risk classification of their assets?<br />

Considering the criteria of the `supervised` category risk,<br />

and the significant decrease of the real estate prices in<br />

the recent crisis, the big part of the banks’ portfolio is<br />

likely consisted of loans secured by real estate<br />

The banks most probably are focused on corporate<br />

lending, as their small size would not efficiently cover<br />

market net to provide households real estate loans, as<br />

well as reduced `profitability space` to compete with low<br />

rates of the big banks.


Capitalization level<br />

Capital adequacy ratio<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

49% 48%<br />

41%<br />

37% 36%<br />

32% 31%<br />

26%<br />

23% 21% 19%<br />

• … but above the system<br />

average, looking at Capital<br />

adequacy ratio<br />

CAR<br />

System


CARs under various scenarios<br />

• The stress test results show that both banks are sufficiently<br />

capitalized and remain resilient to potential shocks under all<br />

scenarios analyzed.<br />

• Under the macro-filter scenario, the CAR would decline:<br />

‣ for MINIBANKfrom 36,47% to 18,99%,<br />

‣ for MICROBANKfrom 37,34% to 29,22%.<br />

• The available capital would be sufficient to meet the capital<br />

requirements (min, CCoB, CCyB, SRB).


Whether the banks are above the<br />

minimum solvency requirement?<br />

• Operating with high capital adequacy rates<br />

(36% and 37%) in simulated scenarios, both<br />

banks would meet the minimum level of<br />

capital requirement (8%) while maintaining<br />

sufficient reserves for supervisory<br />

requirements (Pillar II) and capital buffers


Which macroeconomic factor affect the bank the<br />

most?<br />

MINIBANK MICROBANK<br />

Solvency ratio (baseline) 36.47% 37.34%<br />

Solvency ratio (credit) 30.60% 31.35%<br />

Solvency ratio (macro-all) 30.79% 34.71%<br />

• For MINIBANK and MICROBANK the biggest<br />

influence provides combined scenario.<br />

• However, MICROBANK is more stable to<br />

macro-shocks.<br />

Solvency ratio (macro-crisis) 26.21% 32.01%<br />

Solvency ratio (macro-filter) 18.99% 29.22%


Which macroeconomic factor affect the bank the<br />

most?<br />

Macro-all<br />

(Historical)<br />

MINIBANK<br />

Macro-crisis<br />

(Last crisis)<br />

Macro-filter<br />

(Combined)<br />

Macro-all<br />

(Historical)<br />

MICROBANK<br />

Macro-crisis<br />

(Last crisis)<br />

Macro-filter<br />

(Combined)<br />

Provisioning<br />

(before shock) 72 262 778 72 262 778 72 262 778 47 147 030 47 147 030 47 147 030<br />

INDPROD 7 749 212 63 602 921 63 881 514 5 045 432 23 356 861 23 524 560<br />

CPI 9 137 732 13 281 010 22 418 742 3 725 827 5 372 443 9 098 270<br />

EXPORTS 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

IMPORTS -581 153 12 683 488 12 894 117 1 837 567 8 870 881 8 997 669<br />

FX 44 672 045 -2 002 161 44 974 294 13 117 603 -2 744 972 14 978 351<br />

REALE<strong>ST</strong>P 167 179 16 333 730 17 250 967 -112 669 10 955 657 11 294 486<br />

Other 296 412 92 895 0 263 003 571 894 0<br />

Provisioning (after<br />

macro shock) 133 704 205 176 254 662 233 682 412 71 023 794 93 529 794 115 040 366<br />

• Both banks have the<br />

same “champions”:<br />

FX in historical scenario<br />

INDPROD for last crisis<br />

and combined scenarios<br />

Additional<br />

provisioning 61 441 427 103 991 884 161 419 634 23 876 763 46 382 763 67 893 336


Which bank characteristics influence the stresstest<br />

results in each of the analyzed scenarios?<br />

Credit scenario<br />

Under the credit scenario, banks with lending as<br />

their core business are the most affected.<br />

Banks<br />

Credit to total exposure<br />

amount ratio<br />

Decline in CAR<br />

RURALBANK 99.9 7.0<br />

MINIBANK 99.7 5.9<br />

SECONDBANK 97.0 6.4<br />

FOREIGNBANK 96.0 6.6<br />

MICROBANK 95.0 6.0<br />

INVE<strong>ST</strong>BANK 91.8 4.6<br />

PEOPLESBANK 91.1 5.5<br />

BIGBANK 90.0 6.2<br />

MARKETBANK 86.0 3.7<br />

ELITEBANK 85.8 4.3<br />

SAFEBANK 73.6 3.1<br />

Macro-crisis scenario<br />

Under the macro-crisis scenario, banks with a<br />

larger share of NPLs are the most affected.<br />

Banks NPL to credit ratio Decline in CAR<br />

INVE<strong>ST</strong>BANK 19.3 25.2<br />

MARKETBANK 15.6 15.1<br />

FOREIGNBANK 12.2 9.6<br />

MINIBANK 10.7 10.3<br />

SECONDBANK 9.4 5.9<br />

MICROBANK 8.6 5.3<br />

PEOPLESBANK 6.6 6.8<br />

SAFEBANK 5.2 2.2<br />

BIGBANK 5.0 6.0<br />

ELITEBANK 3.7 3.6<br />

RURALBANK 3.3 3.0


What the bank can do to remediate eventual<br />

non-conformity with solvency requirements?<br />

‣ After the simulated shocks, MINIBANK and MICROBANK are well higher<br />

the minimum capital requirement and the buffers requirements<br />

However<br />

‣ considering their (potential) high portfolio concentration,<br />

‣… the supervisory buffers should cover their specific risks and cover<br />

potential losses.


What other stress testing exercises and/or<br />

macroeconomic factors should be considered?<br />

Other stress testing exercises:<br />

• Market risks<br />

• Operational risks<br />

• Climate risks<br />

Other macro factors to consider:<br />

• Agricultural production<br />

• PPI<br />

• Debt ratios<br />

• Unemployment<br />

• Disposable incomes<br />

• Consumption


Specific questions:<br />

Both banks have roughly the same CAR, however, the <strong>ST</strong> scenarios produce very different<br />

effects on them. Why??<br />

Macro-ALL<br />

• MINIBANK's portfolio has a higher proportion of non-performing<br />

loans. It is therefore more vulnerable than MACROBANK in the<br />

event of an adverse macroeconomic scenario.<br />

Macro-Crisis<br />

• These results are explained by the different structure of the credit<br />

portfolio. MINIBANK is more significantly affected due to the higher<br />

shares of the „Substandard” and „Compromised” risk category,<br />

which are the most impacted in all 3 scenarios in terms increase in<br />

provisions<br />

Macro-Filter


To sum up<br />

• Both banks are well capitalized: MINIBANK has a capital ratio of 36.47% and MICROBANK a<br />

capital ratio of 37.34%<br />

• The stress test results show that both banks remain resilient to potential shocks and meet<br />

the capital requirements under all scenarios analyzed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!