ST_WS_BOSSteam
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MINIBANK &<br />
MICROBANK<br />
“ BOSS” T EAM:<br />
I O N J O S A N , N AT I O N A L B A N K O F M O L D O VA<br />
I H O R L U B C H U K , N AT I O N A L B A N K O F U K R A I N E<br />
I E VA M I K A L I U N A I T E , B A N K O F L I T H U A N I A
Description<br />
• MINIBANK & MICROBANK are the two smallest banks in the system in terms of:<br />
‣ own assets,<br />
‣ total risk exposure amount,<br />
‣ issued credit.<br />
Mln.<br />
4 500<br />
4 000<br />
3 500<br />
3 000<br />
2 500<br />
2 000<br />
1 500<br />
1 000<br />
500<br />
-<br />
273 221<br />
Own funds<br />
492 451 422<br />
Mln.<br />
18 000<br />
16 000<br />
14 000<br />
12 000<br />
10 000<br />
8 000<br />
6 000<br />
4 000<br />
2 000<br />
-<br />
Total risk exposure amount<br />
748 591 1 005 1 024<br />
16 000<br />
14 000<br />
12 000<br />
10 000<br />
8 000<br />
6 000<br />
4 000<br />
2 000<br />
-<br />
Credit<br />
746 562 865 879
What their likely activities are based on<br />
the risk classification of their assets?<br />
Considering the criteria of the `supervised` category risk,<br />
and the significant decrease of the real estate prices in<br />
the recent crisis, the big part of the banks’ portfolio is<br />
likely consisted of loans secured by real estate<br />
The banks most probably are focused on corporate<br />
lending, as their small size would not efficiently cover<br />
market net to provide households real estate loans, as<br />
well as reduced `profitability space` to compete with low<br />
rates of the big banks.
Capitalization level<br />
Capital adequacy ratio<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
49% 48%<br />
41%<br />
37% 36%<br />
32% 31%<br />
26%<br />
23% 21% 19%<br />
• … but above the system<br />
average, looking at Capital<br />
adequacy ratio<br />
CAR<br />
System
CARs under various scenarios<br />
• The stress test results show that both banks are sufficiently<br />
capitalized and remain resilient to potential shocks under all<br />
scenarios analyzed.<br />
• Under the macro-filter scenario, the CAR would decline:<br />
‣ for MINIBANKfrom 36,47% to 18,99%,<br />
‣ for MICROBANKfrom 37,34% to 29,22%.<br />
• The available capital would be sufficient to meet the capital<br />
requirements (min, CCoB, CCyB, SRB).
Whether the banks are above the<br />
minimum solvency requirement?<br />
• Operating with high capital adequacy rates<br />
(36% and 37%) in simulated scenarios, both<br />
banks would meet the minimum level of<br />
capital requirement (8%) while maintaining<br />
sufficient reserves for supervisory<br />
requirements (Pillar II) and capital buffers
Which macroeconomic factor affect the bank the<br />
most?<br />
MINIBANK MICROBANK<br />
Solvency ratio (baseline) 36.47% 37.34%<br />
Solvency ratio (credit) 30.60% 31.35%<br />
Solvency ratio (macro-all) 30.79% 34.71%<br />
• For MINIBANK and MICROBANK the biggest<br />
influence provides combined scenario.<br />
• However, MICROBANK is more stable to<br />
macro-shocks.<br />
Solvency ratio (macro-crisis) 26.21% 32.01%<br />
Solvency ratio (macro-filter) 18.99% 29.22%
Which macroeconomic factor affect the bank the<br />
most?<br />
Macro-all<br />
(Historical)<br />
MINIBANK<br />
Macro-crisis<br />
(Last crisis)<br />
Macro-filter<br />
(Combined)<br />
Macro-all<br />
(Historical)<br />
MICROBANK<br />
Macro-crisis<br />
(Last crisis)<br />
Macro-filter<br />
(Combined)<br />
Provisioning<br />
(before shock) 72 262 778 72 262 778 72 262 778 47 147 030 47 147 030 47 147 030<br />
INDPROD 7 749 212 63 602 921 63 881 514 5 045 432 23 356 861 23 524 560<br />
CPI 9 137 732 13 281 010 22 418 742 3 725 827 5 372 443 9 098 270<br />
EXPORTS 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
IMPORTS -581 153 12 683 488 12 894 117 1 837 567 8 870 881 8 997 669<br />
FX 44 672 045 -2 002 161 44 974 294 13 117 603 -2 744 972 14 978 351<br />
REALE<strong>ST</strong>P 167 179 16 333 730 17 250 967 -112 669 10 955 657 11 294 486<br />
Other 296 412 92 895 0 263 003 571 894 0<br />
Provisioning (after<br />
macro shock) 133 704 205 176 254 662 233 682 412 71 023 794 93 529 794 115 040 366<br />
• Both banks have the<br />
same “champions”:<br />
FX in historical scenario<br />
INDPROD for last crisis<br />
and combined scenarios<br />
Additional<br />
provisioning 61 441 427 103 991 884 161 419 634 23 876 763 46 382 763 67 893 336
Which bank characteristics influence the stresstest<br />
results in each of the analyzed scenarios?<br />
Credit scenario<br />
Under the credit scenario, banks with lending as<br />
their core business are the most affected.<br />
Banks<br />
Credit to total exposure<br />
amount ratio<br />
Decline in CAR<br />
RURALBANK 99.9 7.0<br />
MINIBANK 99.7 5.9<br />
SECONDBANK 97.0 6.4<br />
FOREIGNBANK 96.0 6.6<br />
MICROBANK 95.0 6.0<br />
INVE<strong>ST</strong>BANK 91.8 4.6<br />
PEOPLESBANK 91.1 5.5<br />
BIGBANK 90.0 6.2<br />
MARKETBANK 86.0 3.7<br />
ELITEBANK 85.8 4.3<br />
SAFEBANK 73.6 3.1<br />
Macro-crisis scenario<br />
Under the macro-crisis scenario, banks with a<br />
larger share of NPLs are the most affected.<br />
Banks NPL to credit ratio Decline in CAR<br />
INVE<strong>ST</strong>BANK 19.3 25.2<br />
MARKETBANK 15.6 15.1<br />
FOREIGNBANK 12.2 9.6<br />
MINIBANK 10.7 10.3<br />
SECONDBANK 9.4 5.9<br />
MICROBANK 8.6 5.3<br />
PEOPLESBANK 6.6 6.8<br />
SAFEBANK 5.2 2.2<br />
BIGBANK 5.0 6.0<br />
ELITEBANK 3.7 3.6<br />
RURALBANK 3.3 3.0
What the bank can do to remediate eventual<br />
non-conformity with solvency requirements?<br />
‣ After the simulated shocks, MINIBANK and MICROBANK are well higher<br />
the minimum capital requirement and the buffers requirements<br />
However<br />
‣ considering their (potential) high portfolio concentration,<br />
‣… the supervisory buffers should cover their specific risks and cover<br />
potential losses.
What other stress testing exercises and/or<br />
macroeconomic factors should be considered?<br />
Other stress testing exercises:<br />
• Market risks<br />
• Operational risks<br />
• Climate risks<br />
Other macro factors to consider:<br />
• Agricultural production<br />
• PPI<br />
• Debt ratios<br />
• Unemployment<br />
• Disposable incomes<br />
• Consumption
Specific questions:<br />
Both banks have roughly the same CAR, however, the <strong>ST</strong> scenarios produce very different<br />
effects on them. Why??<br />
Macro-ALL<br />
• MINIBANK's portfolio has a higher proportion of non-performing<br />
loans. It is therefore more vulnerable than MACROBANK in the<br />
event of an adverse macroeconomic scenario.<br />
Macro-Crisis<br />
• These results are explained by the different structure of the credit<br />
portfolio. MINIBANK is more significantly affected due to the higher<br />
shares of the „Substandard” and „Compromised” risk category,<br />
which are the most impacted in all 3 scenarios in terms increase in<br />
provisions<br />
Macro-Filter
To sum up<br />
• Both banks are well capitalized: MINIBANK has a capital ratio of 36.47% and MICROBANK a<br />
capital ratio of 37.34%<br />
• The stress test results show that both banks remain resilient to potential shocks and meet<br />
the capital requirements under all scenarios analyzed.