03.01.2022 Views

Interaction in Choquet inegral model

This paper studies the notion of interaction between criteria in a Choquet integral model.

This paper studies the notion of interaction between criteria in a Choquet integral model.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proposition 2. Let {P, I} be an ordinal preference information on B g such that I = ∅.

Then, {P, I} is representable by a Choquet integral if and only if the binary relation

(P ∪ M) contains no strict cycle.

Proof. Necessity. Suppose that the ordinal preference information {P, I} on B g is

representable by a Choquet integral. So there exists a capacity µ such that {P, I} is

representable by C µ .

If P ∪ M contains a strict cycle, then there exists x 0 , x 1 , . . . , x r on B g such that

x 0 (P ∪ M)x 1 (P ∪ M) . . . (P ∪ M)x r (P ∪ M)x 0 and there exists two elements x i , x i+1 ∈

{x 0 , x 1 , . . . , x r } such that x i P x i+1 . Since {P, I} is representable by C µ , therefore C µ (u(x 0 )) ≥

. . . ≥ C µ (u(x i )) > C µ (u(x i+1 )) ≥ . . . ≥ C µ (u(x 0 )), then C µ (u(x 0 )) > C µ (u(x 0 )), contradiction.

Sufficiency. Assume that (P ∪M) contains no strict cycle, then there exists {B 0 , B 1 , . . . , B m }

a partition of B g , build by using a suitable topological sorting on (P ∪ M) (Gondran and

Minoux, 1995).

We construct a partition {B 0 , B 1 , . . . , B m } as follows:

B 0 = {x ∈ B g : ∀y ∈ B g , not [x(P ∪ M)y]},

B 1 = {x ∈ B g \B 0 : ∀y ∈B g \B 0 , not [x(P ∪ M)y]},

B i = {x ∈ B g \(B 0 ∪ . . . ∪ B i−1 ) : ∀y ∈ B g \(B 0 ∪ . . . ∪ B i−1 ), not [x(P ∪ M)y]}, for all

i = 1, 2, . . . , m.

Let us define the mapping φ : B g −→ P(N), f : P(N) −→ R, µ : 2 N

follows:

φ(a S ) = S { for all S ⊆ N,

0 if l = 0,

f(φ(x)) =

(2n) l if l ∈ {1, 2, . . . , m} for all l ∈ {0, 1, . . . , m}, ∀x ∈ B l,

µ(S) = f S

, where f α S = f(φ(a S )) for all S ⊆ N and α = f N = (2n) m

Let a S , a T ∈ B g such that a S P a T . We show that C µ (u(a S )) > C µ (u(a T )).

−→ [0, 1] as

Since a S , a T ∈ B g and {B 0 , B 1 , . . . , B m } is a partition of B g , then there exists r, q ∈

{0, 1, . . . , m} such that a S ∈ B r , a T ∈ B q . As a S P a T , then r > q, thus C µ (u(a S )) =

µ(S) = f S

α = (2n)r

α .

• If q = 0, then a T ∈ B 0 and a S ∈ B r with r ≥ 1.

As C µ (u(a T )) = C µ (u(a 0 )) = µ(∅) = 0, then C µ (u(a S )) > C µ (u(a T )).

• If q ≥ 1, C µ (u(a T )) = µ(T ) = f T

α = (2n)q , since 1 ≤ q ≤ m − 1.

α

But r > q therefore C µ (u(a S )) = (2n)r > (2n)q = C µ (u(a T )), then C µ (u(a S )) >

α α

C µ (u(a T )).

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!