A Review on the Technology Transfer Models ... - EuroJournals
A Review on the Technology Transfer Models ... - EuroJournals
A Review on the Technology Transfer Models ... - EuroJournals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 10, Number 4 (2009)<br />
3. <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Transfer</strong> <strong>Models</strong><br />
3.1. The Appropriability Model<br />
This model, which was developed in 1945-1950s, suggests that good or quality technologies sell<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves (Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor, 1991). The model emphasizes <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> importance of quality of<br />
research, and competitive market pressure in achieving TT and promoting <strong>the</strong> use of research findings<br />
(Devine et al., 1987; Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor, 1991; Tenkasi and Mohrman, 1995). According to this model,<br />
TT process simply occurs when technology has found users or has been discovered by <strong>the</strong> market.<br />
Purposive or deliberate TT mechanism is seen as unnecessary. This model assumes that after <strong>the</strong><br />
researchers develop <strong>the</strong> technology and make technologies available through various forms of<br />
communicati<strong>on</strong>s such as technical reports and professi<strong>on</strong>al journals, <strong>the</strong> users will “automatically show<br />
up at <strong>the</strong> researcher’s door” (Devine et al., 1987).<br />
Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor (1991), in <strong>the</strong>ir three-level TT model, describe <strong>the</strong> first level (technology<br />
development level) as <strong>the</strong> most fundamental level; when technology process can be largely passive<br />
through mediated means such as research reports, journal articles and computer tapes. The underlying<br />
presumpti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> appropriability approach is “viewing TT as <strong>the</strong> result of an automatic process that<br />
began with scientific research and <strong>the</strong>n moved to development, financing, manufacturing and<br />
marketing. [One] need not necessarily be c<strong>on</strong>cerned with linkages in <strong>the</strong> technology commercializati<strong>on</strong><br />
process” (Kozmetsky, 1990). However, previous studies have acknowledged that over <strong>the</strong> years<br />
evidence has shown that quality technologies do not usually sell well <strong>the</strong>mselves (Devine et al., 1987;<br />
Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor, 1991).<br />
3.2. The Disseminati<strong>on</strong> Model<br />
This model, which was popularized by Rogers (1983) and Rogers and Kincaid (1982), is developed in<br />
<strong>the</strong> 1960-1970s (Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor, 1991). This approach suggests <strong>the</strong> importance of technology and<br />
innovati<strong>on</strong> to be diffused or disseminated to <strong>the</strong> potential users by <strong>the</strong> experts (Williams and Gibs<strong>on</strong>,<br />
1990). This model assumes that an expert will transfer specialized knowledge to <strong>the</strong> willing user. The<br />
presumpti<strong>on</strong> underlying this model is that <strong>on</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> linkages are established, <strong>the</strong> new technology will<br />
move from <strong>the</strong> expert to <strong>the</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-expert “like water through a pipe <strong>on</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> channel is opened”<br />
(Williams and Gibs<strong>on</strong>, 1990; Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor, 1991). Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor (1991) describe this model<br />
as <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d level of <strong>the</strong>ir model; <strong>the</strong> technology acceptance level. Based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir model, this level<br />
includes <strong>the</strong> expert’s primary resp<strong>on</strong>sibility to select technology and ensure <strong>the</strong> technology is available<br />
to a receptor that can understand and potentially use <strong>the</strong> technology (Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor, 1991).<br />
However, this model suffers from its <strong>on</strong>e-way communicati<strong>on</strong> (unilateral) characteristic with no<br />
involvement from <strong>the</strong> users (Devine et al., 1987; Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor, 1991).<br />
3.3. The Knowledge Utilizati<strong>on</strong> Model<br />
This model, which was developed in late 1980s (Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor, 1991), has a significant influence<br />
<strong>on</strong> TT literature (Szak<strong>on</strong>yi, 1990; Zacchea, 1992). The approach taken by this model is its emphasis <strong>on</strong><br />
1) <strong>the</strong> important role of interpers<strong>on</strong>al communicati<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> technology developers/researchers<br />
and technology users, and 2) <strong>the</strong> importance of organizati<strong>on</strong>al barriers or facilitators of TT. The<br />
knowledge utilizati<strong>on</strong> approach represents an evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary step which focuses <strong>on</strong> how to organize<br />
knowledge to effective use in <strong>the</strong> technology users setting (Backer, 1991). Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor (1991)<br />
view this model as <strong>the</strong> third level in <strong>the</strong>ir model; technology applicati<strong>on</strong> level. This level is <strong>the</strong> most<br />
involved level of TT where it includes <strong>the</strong> profitable use of <strong>the</strong> technology in <strong>the</strong> market place as well<br />
as o<strong>the</strong>r applicati<strong>on</strong> such as intra-firm processes.<br />
While this approach indicates an appreciati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> complexities of <strong>the</strong> TT, researchers have<br />
argued that <strong>the</strong> model suffers from a linear bias (Dimancescu and Botkin, 1986). The underlying<br />
presumpti<strong>on</strong> of this model is that technology moves “hand-to-hand” to <strong>on</strong>e directi<strong>on</strong>, unilaterally from<br />
<strong>the</strong> experts to <strong>the</strong> users, to become a developed idea and eventually a product (Gibs<strong>on</strong> and Slimor,<br />
552