Stay up-to-date on news and events from our Young Advocates' Standing Committee (YASC) with Keeping Tabs.

Stay up-to-date on news and events from our Young Advocates' Standing Committee (YASC) with Keeping Tabs.


You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.


The Advocates’ Society<br />

WINTER <strong>2023</strong>

What the TWEET is this?<br />

When you see this icon, throughout the publication,<br />

click on it to see what members are tweeting about.<br />


The Advocates’ Society is proud to announce a<br />

new online mentoring program exclusively for TAS members.<br />

A key goal of this new mentoring program is to create a simple way for our Junior Members to<br />

feel more connected to their professional community and obtain some career advice from more<br />

experienced members of the bar. This program model is convenient, efficient and effective:<br />

√<br />

√<br />

√<br />

No long-term commitments.<br />

No extensive questionnaires or matching.<br />

No heavy agendas, minute taking or long-term planning.<br />

NEW TAS<br />


PORTAL<br />

Just simple connection and conversation for junior lawyers to get some tips and connect with<br />

someone new.<br />

04<br />

07<br />

11<br />

16<br />

18<br />

20<br />

Chair Chat<br />

Claudia Cappuccitti, Dyer Brown LLP<br />

Trial Advocacy For Junior Litigators<br />

Flora Yu, Waddell Phillips<br />

The Law of Trolling: Publication Bans in<br />

Regulatory Proceedings<br />

Evan Rankin, Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP<br />

Fit to practice: Four tips for keeping in shape,<br />

even when busy<br />

Byron Taylor-Conboy, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP<br />

The Litigator’s Guide to Transfer Pricing Trials<br />

Nicole Lynx, Deloitte Legal Canada LLP<br />

Interview with Sarah Strathopolous<br />

Aly Haji, Lax O’Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP<br />

More information is available on<br />

the TAS mentoring<br />

website page.<br />

Mentee registration for TAS Junior Members<br />

is now open! Click here!<br />

****At this time, the program is only available in English but we are working with Mentorship Rocket to build a bilingual (English and French) site for later in <strong>2023</strong>.<br />

Editor: Khrystina McMillan, Ontario Securities Commission | kmcmillan@osc.gov.on.ca<br />

Deputy Editor: Sania Chaudhry, Forte Workplace Law | sania@fortelaw.ca<br />

<strong>Keeping</strong> <strong>Tabs</strong> Editorial Team: Eric Blay, Pallett Valo LLP, Nina Butz, Bennett Jones LLP, Michael Ding, WeirFoulds LLP, Aly Haji, Lax O’Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP, and Sean<br />

Petrou, McCarthy Tétrault LLP<br />

The Young Advocates’ Standing Committee (“YASC”) is a standing committee of The Advocates’ Society with a mandate to be a voice for young advocates (advocates<br />

who are ten years of call or fewer) within the Society and within the profession. We do this through networking/mentoring events, by publishing articles by and<br />

for young advocates, and by raising issues of concern to young advocates as we work with the Society’s Board of Directors. The opinions expressed by individual<br />

authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the policies of The Advocates’ Society.<br />

2 3


Chair Chat<br />

Claudia Cappuccitti, Dyer Brown LLP<br />

Traditionally the start of the new year is a<br />

time for reflection and self-improvement.<br />

In this edition of <strong>Keeping</strong> <strong>Tabs</strong> we have<br />

some inspiration to kick-start your year.<br />

Flora Yu provides her top trial advocacy<br />

tips for junior litigators. We have an interview<br />

with the ever-inspiring Sarah Strathopolous,<br />

winner of the inaugural Patrick D.<br />

Schmidt Future of Family Law Award. Byron<br />

Taylor-Conboy has unlocked the secret to<br />

finding both more time in the day and the<br />

energy to get everything done. Evan Rankin<br />

walks us through publication bans in regulatory<br />

proceedings. Finally, Nicole Lynx<br />

gives us a run-down of the TAS event, The<br />

Litigator’s Guide to Transfer Pricing Trials.<br />

If, after making it though this edition of<br />

<strong>Keeping</strong> <strong>Tabs</strong>, you’re hungry for more inspiration<br />

and self-improvement, please<br />

consider applying for a spot on the Young<br />

Advocates’ Standing Committee (YASC).<br />

YASC is the voice of young advocates within<br />

The Advocates’ Society and in the profession<br />

at large. We are a community dedicated<br />

to providing young advocates with a<br />

platform and opportunities for mentoring,<br />

networking, and skills-improvement. We<br />

are committed to improving diversity and<br />

equity within profession, across the country.<br />

YASC is also, simply, a lot of fun. Applications<br />

open late January at advocates.ca<br />

to those within their first ten years of practice.<br />

Please do not hesitate to reach out to<br />

me at cc@dyerbrownlaw.com for more information.<br />

You can also continue you journey to<br />

self-improvement by contributing to an<br />

upcoming edition of <strong>Keeping</strong> <strong>Tabs</strong>. Please<br />

email our editor, Khrystina McMillan, at<br />

kmcmillan@osc.gov.on.ca for more details.<br />

If you’re looking to get involved, you<br />

can join our Volunteer Roster by reaching<br />

out to Katrina Crocker at katrina.crocker@<br />

queensu.ca.<br />

Be sure to check your inboxes or follow<br />

The Advocates’ Society on Twitter, LinkedIn,<br />

and Facebook for the latest on our events<br />

and initiatives.<br />



Key YASC contact: Nina Butz, 416-777-5521, butzn@bennettjones.com<br />

4<br />



Trial Advocacy for Junior<br />

Litigators<br />

Flora Yu, Waddell Phillips<br />

Despite being in my first year of call, I have<br />

had the opportunity to act as second chair in<br />

three major civil trials. Trials are a “final exam”<br />

of sorts, testing nearly every major lesson in<br />

advocacy learned in law school and our day-today<br />

practice as litigators. In this article I would<br />

like to share some of the insights I have gained<br />

through trial and error (mind the pun) on how<br />

to support your team through this gruelling<br />

process, and come out as a better litigator.<br />

Plan, but not too far in advance<br />

Time is a precious commodity in civil trials. Planning<br />

in advance helps ease the pressure, but trials<br />

are unpredictable: preparing too much and<br />

too far in advance may result in otherwise excellent<br />

work becoming obsolete and the client<br />

being billed unnecessarily. This is why it is important<br />

to work backwards from a big-picture<br />

timeline with direction from senior lawyers who<br />

can fill you in on the overall trial strategy, the<br />

core arguments on which to focus your efforts,<br />

and the areas that will most likely be subject to<br />

significant change.<br />

With that guidance from senior counsel, you<br />

should prepare an outline of closing submissions<br />

in advance. A helpful outline should contain<br />

the legal arguments and excerpts of the<br />

documentary evidence on which you are most<br />

likely to rely, with clearly demarcated spaces<br />

where you require more research or evidentiary<br />

support. It is important to identify gaps in<br />

your case early and communicate them to senior<br />

lawyers, as these gaps may impact their<br />

strategy at trial.<br />

You should also brush up on key evidentiary<br />

issues that may come up at trial including<br />

hearsay, other anticipated objections (and responses<br />

to anticipated objections), impeaching<br />

witnesses, expert qualifications, and business<br />

records. Investing in the latest edition of Sopinka’s<br />

Law of Evidence in Canada (or other similar<br />

resource) will yield guaranteed returns at trial.<br />

6 7

Discovery will come back to haunt<br />

(or reward) you<br />

Procedural mistakes and sharp practice at<br />

the discovery stage can resurface at trial<br />

resulting in real consequences to your client’s<br />

case. Improper questions, as well as<br />

incomplete answers and productions, can<br />

result in sanctions by the court such as adverse<br />

costs, an inability to tender favourable<br />

evidence, or the striking out of pleadings.<br />

It is important both as advocates and<br />

officers of the court to take our responsibilities<br />

seriously, and ensure fulsome, proper<br />

examinations and documentary production<br />

in advance of trial.<br />

Carve out your role and take ownership<br />

Being second chair can be a valuable opportunity<br />

to establish yourself as the trusted<br />

“right hand” to the senior counsel on<br />

your team and venture outside your comfort<br />

zone to develop new skills. As a junior<br />

litigator, you are in an ideal position to proactively<br />

coordinate with your colleagues<br />

to ensure that there is no duplication of<br />

work or confusion of responsibilities. The<br />

time required for essential tasks such as<br />

inserting footnotes, swearing affidavits, or<br />

uploading documents to Caselines is often<br />

underestimated. Exercising leadership by<br />

managing these details may be one of the<br />

best ways in which you can contribute to<br />

the team and prevent last-minute disasters.<br />

Aside from providing timely high-quality<br />

work product, you may also be able to<br />

carve out smaller, discrete aspects of the<br />

case over which you can take ownership.<br />

For example, you can become an “expert”<br />

in key legal issues of the case and prepare<br />

case summaries or bench briefs (see below)<br />

for quick reference when the need arises.<br />

There may be an opportunity for you to argue<br />

a motion or prepare and/or examine<br />

a witness. It is a good practice to express<br />

your interest well in advance and schedule<br />

time for senior counsel to supervise and review<br />

your work.<br />

Set up a system for in-trial<br />

communication<br />

Prior to trial, you will need to coordinate<br />

with your teammates to find a minimally<br />

intrusive system for conveying real-time information.<br />

For example, imagine that you<br />

notice a mistake that needs prompt correction<br />

as another member of your team is<br />

making submissions to court, or you have<br />

a case or document that is helpful to the<br />

point being made. Whether it is a tug on<br />

the robe, post-its, emails, or messaging<br />

platforms, you should devise a system that<br />

will quickly get the message across with<br />

minimal disturbance.<br />

Brief the bench<br />

I credit my mentor, John Kingman Phillips,<br />

for introducing me to the concept of “bench<br />

briefs” – minimalistic memos on a discrete<br />

issue. These documents are designed to be<br />

digested in seconds and can be submitted to<br />

court in a moment’s notice. Because bench<br />

briefs lay out discrete issues in an intuitive,<br />

user-friendly way, they can be indispensable<br />

tools for counsel and court alike.<br />

No rest for the wicked<br />

It probably comes as no surprise that trials<br />

are fast-paced, labour-intensive, and highly<br />

unpredictable. There never seems to be<br />

enough time to accomplish all the tasks to<br />

the exacting standards that we set for ourselves.<br />

A few times I have had to turn in a<br />

factum, on unfamiliar topics that must be<br />

served within 24 hours.<br />

Despite all the positive developments<br />

in our industry when it comes to mental<br />

health and self-care and the best efforts<br />

of our colleagues to share our burdens,<br />

trials are still undeniably taxing. Even if<br />

you manage to find downtime, you may<br />

not be able to summon the mental or<br />

emotional energy to be a good partner,<br />

parent, child, sibling, or friend. It is important<br />

to give your loved ones a headsup<br />

prior to entering this tough period and<br />

to give yourself lots of grace for not accomplishing<br />

everything to a standard of<br />

perfection. It may be tempting to forego<br />

sleep, nutrition, and exercise in favour of<br />

short-term productivity. However, your<br />

physical health is vital to your ability to<br />

undergo a long trial. Try to find opportunities<br />

to recharge and reward yourself<br />

whenever you can.<br />

Ed: Looking for more tips on being second chair? The Advocates’ Society’s Second Chair not Second Fiddle program is<br />

available on-demand here.<br />

8 9


The Law of Trolling:<br />

Publication Bans in<br />

Regulatory Proceedings<br />

Evan Rankin, 1 Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP<br />

Where regulatory personnel and potential witnesses might face aggressive online trolling as a result<br />

of their involvement in an investigation, can a publication ban be obtained over their names?<br />

According to a recent decision by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice the answer is that witnesses’<br />

identities may be protected, but not those of “public officials.”<br />

Background<br />

In College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario v O’Connor, Ontario’s regulator of physicians<br />

sought publication bans over the name of a Medical Officer of Health (“Dr X”) who had reported<br />

concerns about another physician to the College, the names of two other physicians who had provided<br />

information to the College (the “Potential Witnesses”), as well as the names of the College’s<br />

investigators (the “Investigators”). The motion occurred in the context of several applications for<br />

statutory injunctions which were heard together.<br />

The request was prompted in part by a concern that if the names of these individuals became<br />

public, they would be subjected to intense online harassment. This concern was not baseless. The<br />

physician being investigated, Dr. Phillips, maintained a substantial Twitter following and had earlier<br />

disclosed the names of the Potential Witnesses in a tweet. Several Twitter users began tagging<br />

the Potential Witnesses in Tweets featuring statements such as “You’re complicit in Nuremberg<br />

code violations. The trials will come for you. I will make sure of it” and “Murderer.”<br />

The Decision<br />

Publication bans are only granted in Canada if: (1) court openness poses a serious risk to an important<br />

public interest; (2) the order sought is necessary to prevent this serious risk to the iden-<br />

10 11

tified interest because reasonably alternative<br />

measures will not prevent this risk; and, (3) as<br />

a matter of proportionality, the benefits of the<br />

order outweigh its negative effects. 2<br />

With respect to Dr. X and the Potential Witnesses,<br />

the College argued the important public interests<br />

at stake were (i) encouraging the reporting<br />

of misconduct, (ii) fostering witness candour,<br />

and (iii) ensuring the integrity of the College’s<br />

investigation. With respect to its Investigators,<br />

the College argued that the important public<br />

interest at stake was ensuring the efficiency of<br />

the College’s enforcement function.<br />

With respect to the Potential Witnesses, Justice<br />

Morgan accepted that there is a public interest<br />

in encouraging the identification and reporting<br />

of misconduct. He held that fostering<br />

witness candour was also an important public<br />

interest which could justify a limitation on court<br />

openness, and noted that “[p]atients and physicians<br />

alike require some assurance that they<br />

can register complaints and report to the [College]<br />

without public exposure.” 3 Of significance,<br />

Justice Morgan noted that “even the spectre<br />

of harassment” could have a chilling effect on<br />

witness candour. 4 The “spectre of harassment”<br />

language suggests that a publication ban may be available where online harassment has not yet<br />

occurred, but is reasonably anticipated.<br />

However, insofar as Dr. X and the Investigators were concerned, the examples of Twitter trolling<br />

provided by the College did not fit the bill because Dr. X and the College’s investigators were<br />

public officials who “must bear a higher level of public accountability in carrying out their duties.” 5<br />

Weighed against this interest, the trolling in evidence should be dismissed as mere name calling: 6<br />

“The social media name calling identified by the Applicant is excessive<br />

and insulting, but it is not fear-inducing. Without some perspective<br />

on such hyperbole, “the inflation of language…detracts from<br />

precise consideration of what is involved here”: […] If being called a<br />

“Nazi” on Twitter could actually paralyze regulatory officials in the<br />

course of their duties, one can only imagine what it would do to a<br />

Prime Minister or provincial Premier who are targeted non-stop. In<br />

the current social media-dominated world, all of government would<br />

have to operate in secret in order to avoid such language.”<br />

12 13

Using a publication ban to shield the identities of Dr. X and the Investigators was too great a cost to free<br />

expression because anonymizing their names prevented public scrutiny of their performance. 7<br />

Takeaways<br />

It appears that the identities of witnesses in regulatory proceedings can now be made subject to publication<br />

bans where online trolling and harassment is occurring, and perhaps even where it is just reasonably<br />

anticipated. Though the O’Connor decision appears to be the first time that an Ontario Court<br />

has found that “encouraging the reporting of misconduct” and “fostering witness candour” justified imposing<br />

a publication ban in the context of a regulatory proceeding, 8 the Divisional Court has recently<br />

accepted Justice Morgan’s approach in another case involving the College. 9<br />

On the other hand, even severe online trolling directed at regulatory participants – including accusations<br />

of Nazism – may be insufficient to warrant a publication ban if those individuals are “public officials”,<br />

a term which will need to be fleshed out in future cases.<br />

Notes<br />

1. Evan Rankin together with his colleague Peter Wardle served as counsel to the College in this case.<br />

2. Sherman Estate v Donovan, 2021 SCC 25 at para 38.<br />

3. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario v O’Connor, 2022 ONSC 195 at para 59 [O’Connor].<br />

4. O’Connor at para 60.<br />

5. O’Connor at para 62.<br />

6. O’Connor at paras 71-72.<br />

7. O’Connor at para 62.<br />

8. Although the Divisional Court has previously been willing to entertain “fostering witness candour” as a “theoretical” important public interest in Turner<br />

v Death Investigation Council, 2021 ONSC 6625 (Div Ct) at para 56.<br />

9. Kilian v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2022 ONSC 5931 (Div Ct) at para 94.<br />

14 15


Fit to practice: Four tips for<br />

keeping in shape, even<br />

when busy<br />

Byron Taylor-Conboy, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP<br />

We get it, physical exercise is important. But finding time and energy for it<br />

can be a real challenge, especially for us young advocates. Here are four<br />

concrete steps you can take right now to become more physically active:<br />

Focus on small gains<br />

Some exercise is better than no exercise.<br />

Remember this when you’re tempted to skip<br />

the gym or that yoga class because you don’t<br />

have a full hour for it. Instead, try going to<br />

the gym for 30 minutes or going for a brisk<br />

walk around the office—you’d be surprised<br />

how beneficial that little bit of exercise can<br />

be.<br />

Early bird gets the worm<br />

Yes, it’s cold, it’s dark, the bed is warm. But<br />

for most of us the early morning is the only<br />

time when life and work won’t get in the way.<br />

If you’re serious about carving out time for<br />

taking care of your body—at least 2.5 hours<br />

of moderate-to-strenuous activity a week,<br />

say the experts—consider moving up your<br />

alarm.<br />

Develop your routine<br />

It’s one thing to get 2.5 hours of exercise<br />

one week; it’s another thing to get it week<br />

after week. What you need is a routine that<br />

aligns with your practice and lifestyle. Try<br />

experimenting to find what works best. I<br />

love running at lunch or after work, but I find<br />

it hard to do so consistently on weekdays.<br />

And while I’m not exactly thrilled about my<br />

morning routine, it works—and that’s what<br />

counts.<br />

Create microhabits<br />

According to the Harvard Business Review,<br />

one of the keys to forging a new habit is to<br />

develop “microhabits,” which are incremental<br />

adjustments that get you closer to your<br />

goals. These microhabits have worked for<br />

me:<br />

1. Setting out my running gear at bedtime<br />

the night before a morning run;<br />

2. Programming my smart speakers to command<br />

me to go to bed earlier; and<br />

3. Making friends with the regulars at the<br />

gym.<br />

Kick off <strong>2023</strong> with YOU being your priority.<br />

Share your tips for fitting fitness into your<br />

week @Advocates_Soc using #TASLawTips<br />

16 17


The Litigator’s Guide to<br />

Transfer Pricing Trials<br />

Nicole Lynx, Deloitte Legal Canada LLP<br />

On November 17, 2022, the TAS TAX Litigation<br />

Practice Group held a vibrant session<br />

devoted to the intricacies of transfer pricing<br />

litigation. “The Litigator’s Guide to Transfer<br />

Pricing Trials” featured speakers from both<br />

private practice and the bench who discussed<br />

the nuances of conducting transfer<br />

pricing trials as well as tips for effective advocacy.<br />

The session was moderated by Marie-Claude<br />

Marcil of EY Law LLP.<br />

The first portion of the session focused<br />

on top tips for litigators conducting transfer<br />

pricing trials and Osler’s Amanda Heale provided<br />

a helpful recap of the transfer pricing<br />

rules and their operation.<br />

The dispute resolution process for resolving<br />

transfer pricing matters can be confusing<br />

as there are multiple resolution options<br />

that are available which have competing<br />

timelines. A taxpayer can opt for relief under<br />

an applicable tax treaty, utilize the traditional<br />

domestic appeals and tax litigation<br />

processes or both. However, if a practitioner<br />

is not aware of how these different<br />

regimes operate, certain deadlines may be<br />

missed. Daniel Sandler of EY Law LLP delved<br />

into the different dispute resolution processes,<br />

clarifying the different options that<br />

are available to taxpayers as well as their<br />

pros and cons.<br />

Of particular interest was a group discussion<br />

on timely issues such as litigation<br />

of hybrid debt matters, the benefits of case<br />

management and whether there should be<br />

mandatory mediation in transfer pricing appeals.<br />

Expert witnesses often play a significant<br />

role in transfer pricing litigation. When<br />

choosing an expert witness, it is particularly<br />

important to properly vet potential candidates<br />

in order to ensure that they have<br />

relevant credentials and experience, strong<br />

communication skills and an appropriate<br />

demeanor.<br />

BLG’s Laurie Goldbach engaged in a lively<br />

discussion with the Honourable former<br />

Justice D’auray regarding the role of expert<br />

witnesses in consideration of the Tax Court<br />

Rules, and in practice, as well as the effectiveness<br />

of expert witnesses in the context<br />

of transfer pricing appeals. Of note was the<br />

commentary regarding best practices for<br />

managing expert witnesses and the degree<br />

of assistance that counsel can provide in<br />

drafting expert reports and witness preparation.<br />

The second portion of the session featured<br />

another special guest, the Honorable<br />

Justice Boyle. During a convivial fireside<br />

chat with Olivier Fournier of Deloitte Legal<br />

LLP, J. Boyle provided his thoughts on topics<br />

such as the role of counsel in designing<br />

questions to ask experts, the use of expert<br />

evidence to encourage out of court resolution<br />

and principled bases for settlement in<br />

transfer pricing cases.<br />

Get Involved!<br />

Interested in getting more involved with TAS?<br />

Applications are now being accepted for<br />

our Young Advocates’ Standing Committee<br />

(YASC).<br />

The Young Advocates’ Standing Committee<br />

seeks engaged, hard-working volunteers to<br />

promote the interests of young advocates<br />

(within their first ten years of practice) by<br />

planning and implementing mentoring/<br />

networking programs, administering YASC’s<br />

publication (<strong>Keeping</strong> <strong>Tabs</strong>) and participating<br />

in the work of The Advocates’ Society.<br />

The Society welcomes applications to YASC<br />

from Society members who are in their first<br />

ten years of practice. Successful applicants<br />

will serve a two-year term starting June <strong>2023</strong>.<br />

Parental leave will be accommodated.<br />

Deadline to apply: March 3, <strong>2023</strong>.<br />

APPLY FOR YASC <strong>2023</strong>/24 TERM<br />


Questions? Please contact Chris Hunter at<br />

ckhunter@torys.com<br />

18 19


Sarah Strathopolous, Recipient<br />

of the Patrick D. Schmidt<br />

Future of Family Law Award<br />

Q. How did your practice in family law begin, and how has it evolved?<br />

A. I began my family law practice in a boutique family law firm that focused on intense litigation. I was<br />

immersed in my practice, working very long hours. The experience I gained was immeasurable. As<br />

my practice has evolved, I am also now able to act as a parenting coordinator, mediator, or arbitrator<br />

to help families resolve disputes in a cost-effective and thoughtful way. This has provided a nice balance<br />

with the continued litigation side of my practice.<br />

Compiled by Aly Haji, Lax O’Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP<br />

20<br />

Sarah Strathopolous is a Partner at Epstein Cole LLP, where she practises in all areas of family law. Sarah<br />

was the inaugural recipient of The Advocates’ Society’s Patrick D. Schmidt Future of Family Law Award<br />

in 2022. This award honours the legacy of Patrick D. Schmidt and promotes excellence in the profession<br />

by supporting junior lawyers in their first ten years of practice who have chosen to dedicate their practice<br />

to family law, and have demonstrated excellence advocacy, civility and giving back to the profession<br />

through teaching and/or mentoring.<br />

Q. What drew you to family law?<br />

A. As cliché as it sounds, like many young lawyers coming out of law school, I was drawn to family law as<br />

a way of making an observable impact in clients’ lives. And, frankly, family law files are just so interesting.<br />

Every case is different. Every day is different.<br />

Q. As a family lawyer, what challenges do you face in your practice and how do you manage them?<br />

A. Three main challenges come to mind: For me, perhaps the most challenging aspect of practicing<br />

family law has been working on files where I represent the spouse that is acting badly. However,<br />

I have come to realize that, in these cases, I can make just as much of a positive impact –<br />

and perhaps more – by working with my client to minimize, or even prevent, this type of conduct<br />

from continuing.<br />

Second, family law is one of the areas of law most impacted by emotions. I have found that<br />

keeping advocacy focused on long-term goals, not getting bogged down with irrelevant drama or<br />

positioning, and carefully crafting arguments in a way that does not immediately set off defensive-<br />


ness from the opposing side, greatly help to de-escalate the emotion.<br />

Finally, family law files are not just about one incident or one transaction: they involve all aspects<br />

of a family’s life and are ever-evolving as children age, market conditions vary, etc. This<br />

makes family law interesting, but it also requires an immense amount of organization and planning<br />

to ensure that advocacy strategies are constantly being reassessed and updated.<br />

Q. What can young advocates do to help improve access to justice?<br />

A. I believe it is important for young advocates to devote even a small amount of their time towards<br />

access to justice initiatives – whether that is pro bono work, or “low-bono” work, volunteering at legal<br />

clinics, etc. I, myself, volunteer with the Family Justice Center and Luke’s Place, and that experience<br />

has highlighted how much of a need there is for these programs. Even a few hours a month can have<br />

a profound impact.<br />

Q. What role has mentorship played in your career?<br />

A. I have been incredibly fortunate to have worked under, and been mentored by, some of the<br />

best practitioners in this area, who were willing to devote the time to helping me grow professionally<br />

and personally including Alfred Mamo, Harold Niman, Philip Epstein, Ken Cole and many<br />

others. I have also found mentorship through opposing counsel on certain files. Patrick Schmidt<br />

was one of these mentors and I had the great fortune of being challenged by him and being able<br />

to learn from him on files. I am extremely humbled to be the inaugural recipient of the “Patrick D.<br />

Schmidt Future of Family Law Award” and I view it as a responsibility to practice law in a manner<br />

that carry on even a small part of the tremendous contributions Pat made to our profession.<br />

Q. What advocacy tips do you have for young advocates?<br />

A. The difference between a good lawyer and a great lawyer is preparation and practice. Hard<br />

work pays off, and your knowledge will be your greatest source of confidence and persuasion.<br />

You need to be confident in your advocacy before you can gain other people’s confidence in you.<br />

Q. What do you feel are the most important traits of a good mentor to a young advocate?<br />

A. I think there are two important traits: First, mentors should go beyond helping their mentees succeed.<br />

They should also encourage their mentees to pay it forward by helping to develop the next generation<br />

of young advocates to ensure the profession continues to flourish long-term.<br />

Second, experience and knowledge of not only substantive law, but also legal processes and advocacy<br />

techniques. This is important because practicing law requires not just ability to quickly assess<br />

challenges and to develop and adapt strategies to address them.<br />

Q. What have been some memorable high and low points of your career? What learnings<br />

did you take from these experiences and how have they led you to this milestone?<br />

A. My most memorable high point was reading the decision following my first contested motion, where<br />

a controlling husband was attempting to use the justice system to continue his control. The decision<br />

had a profound impact on the wife and the children and was my first experience with how rewarding<br />

this job can be.<br />

The most memorable low point happened early in my practice. I returned from my honeymoon to an<br />

arbitration that was not properly prepared. The stress of feeling unprepared was significant, as was the<br />

intensity of preparing an entire arbitration in a short time period. This experience, however, made me<br />

acutely aware of the need to be prepared; to prepare early and to prepare more than might be necessary.<br />

This is a lesson I have not forgotten and has served me well.<br />

22 23


Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!