26.12.2012 Views

Program of the 2004 East Coast Worm Meeting - Caenorhabditis ...

Program of the 2004 East Coast Worm Meeting - Caenorhabditis ...

Program of the 2004 East Coast Worm Meeting - Caenorhabditis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

33. A New Phylogeny Reveals Frequent Loss <strong>of</strong> Introns During Nematode Evolution<br />

Ronald E Ellis 1 , Soochin Cho 2<br />

1Department <strong>of</strong> Molecular Biology, UMDNJ - SOM, Stratford, NJ 08084<br />

2Department <strong>of</strong> EEB, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109<br />

Since introns were discovered 26 years ago, people have wondered how changes in<br />

intron/exon structure occur, and what role <strong>the</strong>se changes play in evolution. To answer <strong>the</strong>se<br />

questions, we have begun studying gene structure in nematodes related to C. elegans. As a first<br />

step, we cloned a set <strong>of</strong> five genes from six different <strong>Caenorhabditis</strong> species, and used <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

amino acid sequences to construct a detailed phylogeny <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus. Our results show that C.<br />

briggsae and C. remanei are sister species, and imply that mating systems have changed<br />

frequently during recent nematode evolution.<br />

Using this phylogeny, and <strong>the</strong> species C. sp. PS1010 as an outgroup, we were able to<br />

determine which changes in intron/exon structure were caused by <strong>the</strong> deletion <strong>of</strong> ancestral<br />

introns, and which were caused by <strong>the</strong> insertion <strong>of</strong> new introns. Our results show that nematode<br />

introns are lost at a very high rate during evolution, almost 400-fold higher than in mammals.<br />

These losses do not occur randomly, but instead favor some introns and do not affect o<strong>the</strong>rs. By<br />

contrast, intron gains are far less common than losses in <strong>the</strong>se genes.<br />

For years, people have focused on recombination between a gene and a cDNA copy <strong>of</strong> its<br />

transcript as <strong>the</strong> primary cause <strong>of</strong> intron loss. However, we found that adjacent introns were not<br />

likely to be lost toge<strong>the</strong>r, as one might expect from this model, which implies that o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

mechanisms are also important. Based on sequence data, we suggest that both simple deletions<br />

and mutations at splice donor sites might play a significant role in causing <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> introns<br />

during evolution. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species has small introns, much like those in C.<br />

elegans. The small size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se introns should increase <strong>the</strong> rate at which each type <strong>of</strong> loss<br />

occurs, and could account for <strong>the</strong> dramatic difference in loss rate between nematodes and<br />

mammals.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wealth <strong>of</strong> genomic data that will be generated for <strong>the</strong>se species, we should<br />

soon be able to expand our studies and determine <strong>the</strong> relative importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se mechanisms<br />

during evolution.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!