01.06.2023 Views

Phillip A. Davis, Jr. | Daniel Lanzinger | Matthew Ryan Robinson (Eds.): What Does Theology Do, Actually? (Leseprobe)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40<br />

Anja Block<br />

troduced in local churches for liturgical and personal use in 2016. 3<br />

Moreover,<br />

Luther insisted on bringing central points of doctrine back into focus, which can<br />

be summarized in the so-called four soli: Humankind receives and knows about<br />

God’s benevolence only sola fide, sola gratia, solus Christus and sola scriptura.<br />

The latter constitutes one of the main principles of Lutheran doctrine that has<br />

shaped and continues to shape German Protestantism to this day: sola scriptura ---<br />

only scripture is the source of faith. The great Protestant interest in researching<br />

the biblical texts as a source of faith is thus a natural consequence of the principle<br />

of sola scripture. Although the methods of historical-critical research were<br />

developed in the 18 th and 19 th centuries, their foundation lies in the principle of<br />

sola scriptura. 4<br />

It is not surprising that the knowledge of the texts that comes with translating<br />

them led to further research. Translating a text means to read it very closely<br />

and to be familiar with its expressions and meanings. I cannot dive into the history<br />

of historical-critical exegesis in this chapter, but undeniably, observations<br />

and important remarks about the biblical texts and notes about textual history<br />

were part of the process of the text’s transmission. One thinks, for example, of<br />

the medieval Masoretes who noted variants in the Masorah, or of the Jewish-<br />

Dutch philosopher Baruch de Spinoza who was among the earliest of modern<br />

thinkers to ask who might have been the authors of biblical texts.<br />

Yet, it is no less surprising that birth of what we call historical-critical exegesis<br />

occurred between the Enlightenment and Pietism. Rational thought and a<br />

new-found appreciation for the Bible came together and let scholars ask various<br />

questions. Often, the name of Johann Philipp Gabler (1753---1826) is mentioned<br />

in this context, for he distinguished biblical studies from dogmatics and systematic<br />

theology in his De justo discrimine theologiae biblicae et dogmaticae<br />

regundisque recte utriusque finibus in 1787. 5<br />

Following this notion, scholars<br />

asked manifold historical and literary questions about the Bible. They searched<br />

for answers and came up with theories about the development of the biblical text<br />

and the canon. Scholars researched the form and function of biblical texts, historical<br />

events, and their influence on Israelite theology and emerging Christianity.<br />

They searched for explanations for miracles and used reason as a measure for<br />

biblical stories.<br />

3<br />

Cf. Heinrich Bedford-Strohm, ‘‘Die Lutherbibel und das Reformationsjubiläum,’’ in Die<br />

Revision der Lutherbibel 2017: Hintergründe ---- Kontroversen ---- Entscheidungen, ed. Hannelore<br />

Jahr, Christoph Kähler and Jürgen-Peter Lesch (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft,<br />

2019), 282f.<br />

4<br />

Cf. Hans-Joachim Kraus, Geschichte der historisch-kritischen Erforschung des Alten Testaments,<br />

3rd ed. (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1982), 8.<br />

5<br />

Cf. Johann Philipp Gabler, Oratio de justo discrimine theologiae biblicae et dogmaticae<br />

regundisque recte vtriusque finibus (Altdorf: Monath, 1787).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!