Chapter 7 - Dr. Judith Reisman

But the acceptance of infant and childhood sexuality is
powerfully entrenched in sexology circles. The "given" factor
can be clearly seen in statements from Mary Calderone
(past president and co-founder, with Lester Kirkendall, of
SIECUS). Speaking before the 1980 annual meeting of the
Association of Planned Parenthood Physicians, Dr.
Calderone reportedly explained that providing today's society
"very broadly and deeply with awareness of the vital
importance of infant and childhood sexuality" is now the
primary goal of SIECUS. 38 In 1983, Calderone wrote of
the child's sexual capacities that,
With knowledge to the contrary, Indiana University
consistently presented Kinsey as working under
their safe and respectable auspices.
[these should] be developed-in the same way as the child's inborn human capacity to talk
or to walk, and that [the parents'] role should relate only to teaching the child the appropriateness
of privacy, place, and person-in a word socialization 39
Or, in a typical Christian set education resource, "Children are Sexual Beings, Too."
It may be surprising to realize that our children are sexual beings from birth. For instance,
a parent changing a male infant's diaper may accidentally stimulate the child and be
shocked to realize the child is having an erection. Similarly, researchers tell us that baby girls
have vaginal lubrication regularly. In fact, a little girl being bounced on her parent's knee
may feel pleasant sensations and bgin to make natural pelvic thrust movements. 40
Which "researchers tell us" these things about children? Who is Buth's source? Only those
trained by "sexologists" "tell us" about "child sexuality." The author first read the above dogma,
eroticizing a baby girl's "vaginal lubrication" and a baby boy's erection in a 1977 pro-pedophile essay.
But, all mucosal exit/entry organs; ears, mouth, vagina, anus, (even eyes) "have lubrication regularly,"
while the reflexive nervous and vascular reactions of the penis, "erectile tissue," respond to many
biological stimuli; urinary build-up, friction, infections, (or fear), all wholly unconnected to libido.
Clearly, Buth relies upon Freud's discredited child sexuality theories but, like Kinsey, Buth guts Freud's
latency period.
Yes, children can be sexually abused and prematurely disturbed and aroused, by fear-sex stimuli
like pornography as well as genital trauma due to antibiotics, medication or yeast infections and
(more likely) pinworms. Even Webster states that ejaculation is required for the male "orgasm" and
that eliminates babies, prepubertal children, from this category. Would God so mock His people so
as to, or nature, the animal world, make little children "sexual" when an early libido could cripple the
child's development?
“SCIENTIFICALLY TRAINED OBSERVERS”
So, Kinsey was not merely an “interviewer” as his supporters would have us believe. He and his team
had long conducted laboratory experiments on human sexual response. Kinsey acknowledged that
they had “unpublished gynecologic data that have been made available for the present project... some
special data on the... detailed anatomy... involved in sexual response... physiologic experiments on
the sexual activities of... the human animal.” 41 The experiments occurred both in the field and at
Indiana University, where perverts of all sorts kept detailed records of their child molestations and
THE CHILD EXPERIMENTS 149