Chapter 7 - Dr. Judith Reisman

ing each other, masturbation alone, masturbation in front of a partner, mutual masturbation.…
By helping teens explore the full range of safe sexual behaviors, we may help to
raise a generation of adults that do not equate sex with intercourse, or intercourse with
vaginal orgasm, as the goal of sex. 114
Like Kinsey, nowhere in this “expert advice” does SIECUS mention marriage, or indicate that it
should play a part—much less a central part—in the sexual scheme of things. Nowhere does it
caution that the suggested activities might undermine love and trust, not to mention mental and
physical health. Like Kinsey, SIECUS discourages “intercourse as the goal of sex,” instead offering
youngsters masturbatory activity with erotic entertainment (endorsed in their 1991 Guidelines as
“erotic literature” and art”). In 1992, SIECUS produced a pamphlet, “Talk about Sex,” which urged
children not to reject the sexually exploitive media that surrounds them, but to “use” it as a sexual aid:
When talking to a friend or a possible sex partner, speak clearly.… Movies, music and
TV... often have a message about sexuality and can help possible sexual partners express
their affection and sexual interest.… Use entertainment to help talk about sexuality, TV,
music videos… magazines are a good way to begin to talk about sexuality…. 115
Like Kinsey, the SIECUS Report (1996) urged the use of “sexually explicit visual, printed or online
materials” for schoolchildren in order to “reduce ignorance and confusion” and to help the
children develop “a wholesome concept of sexuality.” The official SIECUS position equates sodomy
with marital sex as “any type of unprotected sexual intercourse (oral, anal or vaginal).”
Few people realize that the great library collection of... the Kinsey Institute... was formed
very specifically with one major field omitted: sex education. This was because it seemed
appropriate, not only to the Institute but to its major funding source, the National
Institute of Mental Health, to leave this area for SIECUS to fill. Thus we applied and
were approved for a highly important grant from the National Institute for Mental Health
that was designed to implement a planned role for SIECUS to become the primary data
base for the area of education [indoctrination] for sexuality.” 116
The SIECUS Sex Education Curriculum Board was also led by Pomeroy, Bell, Calderwood,
Calderone, and McIlvenna—all Kinseyans and all committed to Kinsey’s research findings, deviant
standards and pedophile promotions. What has been the damage of the ideas unleashed by the
documented SIECUS/Playboy partnership? Has SIECUS violated the 1992 Federal False Claims Act,
which provides damages and civil penalties for individuals or persons who knowingly submit a false
or fraudulent claim to the United States government for payment or approval?
Beyond fraud and child endangerment, do such violations rise to the standard of a criminal
conspiracy, as in the Racketeer Influence Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute? Or, at minimum
does the evidence unite the recently estimated $11.5 billion sex syndicate with SIECUS? That
Playboy and other “sexually explicit materials” do encourage illegal juvenile sexual activity and copycat
crimes, including incest and child sex abuse, is documented in my peer-approved US Department
of Juvenile Justice report, obtainable via the US Department of Justice website.
Did Playboy partner with SIECUS in its “initial grant to establish an Office of Research Services”
so that SIECUS would be a stealth invader, serving the sex trade at the expense of America’s children?
The question deserves to be on the Congressional floor.
THE CHILD EXPERIMENTS 179