Birmingham H ip Resurfacing v ersus C onserv e Plus M etal-on-M ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Heisel, C., J. A. Kleinhans, et al. (2008). “Ten different h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing systems: biomechanical analysis of design and material Copyright Dr. Koen De Smet 20 properties.” Int Orthop 4: 4. Hing, C. B., D. L. Back, et al. (2007). “The results of primary <strong>Birmingham</strong> h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacings at a mean of five years: AN INDE- PENDENT PROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF THE FIRST 230 HIPS.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89(11): 1431-8. Hing, C. B., D. A. Young, et al. (2007). “Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the h<strong>ip</strong>: A RADIOLOGICAL STUDY.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89-B(8): 1019-24. Isaac, G. H., T. Siebel, et al. (2006). “Development rationale for an articular surface replacement: a science-based evolution.” Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 220(2): 253-68. Kohan, L., R. Appleyard, et al. (2008). Effect of <strong>Resurfacing</strong> Component Acetabular Version Angle on Ion Level Changes - A finite Element Study. 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA. Lachiewicz, P. F. (2007). “M<strong>etal</strong>-on-M<strong>etal</strong> H<strong>ip</strong> <strong>Resurfacing</strong>: A Skeptic’s View.” Clin Orthop Relat Res 465(465): 117-121. Lavigne, M., J. Girard , et al. (2007). Range of Motion After Total H<strong>ip</strong> <strong>Resurfacing</strong> and Total H<strong>ip</strong> Arthroplasty: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Study. Canadian Orthopedic Association meeting, Halifax. Little, J. P., F. Taddei, et al. (2007). “Changes in femur stress after h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing arthroplasty: Response to physiological loads.” Clin Biomech 24: 24. Loughead, J. M., D. Chesney, et al. (2005). “Comparison of offset in <strong>Birmingham</strong> h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing and hybrid total h<strong>ip</strong> arthroplasty.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87(2): 163-6. Marker, D. R., T. M. Seyler, et al. (2007). “Femoral neck fractures after m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> total h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing: a prospective cohort study.” J Arthroplasty. 22(7 Suppl 3): 66-71. McMahon, S. J., D. Young, et al. (2006). “Vascularity of the femoral head after <strong>Birmingham</strong> h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing. A technetium Tc 99m bone scan/single photon emission computed tomography study.” J Arthroplasty. 21(4): 514-21. McMinn, D. J. W. (2003). “Development of m<strong>etal</strong>/m<strong>etal</strong> h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing.” HIP International 13 1(SUPPL. 2). Mont, M. A., T. M. Seyler, et al. (2007). “Effect of Changing Indications and Techniques on Total H<strong>ip</strong> <strong>Resurfacing</strong>.” Clin Orthop Relat Res 20: 20. Morlock, M., N. Bishop, et al. (2008). Failure Patterns and Wear of H<strong>ip</strong> Surface Replacements are Different for Early and Late Failures. 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA. Myers, G. J., D. Morgan, et al. (2007). “Does surgical approach influence component positioning with <strong>Birmingham</strong> H<strong>ip</strong> Resur- facing?” Int Orthop 30: 30. Pandit, H., S. Glyn-Jones et al. (2008). “Pseudotumours associated with m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacings.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90(7): 847-51. Pollard, T. C., R. P. Baker, et al. (2006). “Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the h<strong>ip</strong>: A five- to seven- year comparison of hybrid total h<strong>ip</strong> arthroplasty and m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> resurfacing.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88(5): 592- 600. Rieker, C. B., R. Schon, et al. (2005). “Influence of the clearance on in-vitro tribology of large diameter m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> articulations pertaining to resurfacing h<strong>ip</strong> implants.” Orthop Clin North Am 36(2): 135-42.
Schmalzried, T. P., M. Silva, et al. (2005). “Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing.” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 441: 200-4. Shimmin, A. J. and D. Back (2005). “Femoral neck fractures following <strong>Birmingham</strong> h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing: A NATIONAL REVIEW OF 50 CASES.” J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(4): 463-4. Copyright Dr. Koen De Smet Shimmin, A. J., J. Bare, et al. (2005). “Complications associated with h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing arthroplasty.” Orthop Clin North Am 36(2): 187-93, ix. Sk<strong>ip</strong>or, Campbell, Patterson (2002). “Serum and urine m<strong>etal</strong> levels in patients with m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> surface arthroplasty.” J. Mater Sci Med. 13:1227. Siebel, T., S. Maubach, et al. (2006). “Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR® h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing implantations.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 220(2): 345-353. Spencer, R. F. (2006). “Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the h<strong>ip</strong>.” The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 88(6): 838. Steffen, R., K. O’Rourke, et al. (2007). “The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89(10): 1293-8. Steffen, R. T., S. R. Smith, et al. (2005). “The effect of h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head.” J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(11): 1468-74. Treacy, R. B., C. W. McBryde, et al. (2005). “<strong>Birmingham</strong> h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87(2): 167-70. Vendittoli, P. A., M. Lavigne, et al. (2006). “A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total h<strong>ip</strong> replacement.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88(8): 997-1002. Vendittoli, P.-A., M. Lavigne, et al. (2006). “A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> total h<strong>ip</strong> arthroplasty and m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> total h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old.” H<strong>ip</strong> International 16(SUPPL. 4): 73-81. Vendittoli, P. A., S. Mottard, et al. (2007). “Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> surface replacement of the h<strong>ip</strong>.” J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89(4): 441-8. Walter, L. R., E. Marel, et al. (2008). “Distribution of Chromium and Cobalt Ions in Various Blood Fractions After <strong>Resurfacing</strong> H<strong>ip</strong> Arthroplasty.” J Arthroplasty 18: 18. Witzleb, W. C., U. Hanisch, et al. (2007). “Neo-capsule tissue reactions in m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> h<strong>ip</strong> arthroplasty.” Acta Orthop. 78(2): 211-20. Witzleb, W. C., J. Ziegler, et al. (2006). “Exposure to chromium, cobalt and molybdenum from m<strong>etal</strong>-on-m<strong>etal</strong> total h<strong>ip</strong> replacement and h<strong>ip</strong> resurfacing arthroplasty.” Acta Orthop. 77(5): 697-705. 21
Page 1: Copyright Dr. Koen De Smet
Page 4 and 5: Introduction I have been performing
Page 6 and 7: 4a The puzzling fact that the manuf
Page 8 and 9: Metal Ion Measurem
Page 10 and 11: Coverage Angle The alpha angle or c
Page 12 and 13: Unlike some other socket designs in
Page 14 and 15: Instrumentation Having many years o
Page 16 and 17: Copyright Dr. Koen De Smet 14 Table
Page 18 and 19: For example, Back and Shimmin in Me
Page 20 and 21: BIBLIOGRAPHY Amstutz, H. C., S. T.
Page 24 and 25: Headlines and article titles Copyri
Page 26 and 27: Copyright Dr. Koen De Smet Acknowle
Page 28: Copyright Dr. Koen De Smet

Birmingham H ip Resurfacing v ersus C onserv e Plus M etal-on-M ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?