03.01.2013 Views

sudoku - Historical RFA

sudoku - Historical RFA

sudoku - Historical RFA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Guard remained on Prestol to protect the Officers and those of the crew who were<br />

still working.<br />

On 19 November 1920 Captain Cecil Pilcher Royal Navy convened a Naval Court under<br />

the provisions of Section 430 Merchant Shipping Act 1894 onboard HMS Dauntless.<br />

Captain Pilsher nominated and appointed to be members of the Court: -<br />

Cecil Horace Pilcher, Esquire, Captain, Royal Navy<br />

B H Fry, Esquire, His Britannic Majesties Consul at Danzig<br />

John Henderson, Master of <strong>RFA</strong> Burma<br />

All the defendants contested the charges that they had: -<br />

1. Quit the ship without leave<br />

2. Combined to disobey the lawful command of the Master of <strong>RFA</strong> Prestol<br />

both on or about 15 November 1920<br />

The prosecution called the Master, the Chief Officer, the Third Officer and the Chief<br />

Engineer Officer<br />

The defendants, as well as giving evidence on their own behalf also called the Bosun, the<br />

Second Cook, the Donkeyman, a Greaser, Lieutenant B Sim Royal Navy the Officer<br />

commanding the Guard, Acting Lieutenant William A D Twysden Royal Navy and also<br />

finally Leading Seaman Hume of HMS Woolston – the fleet postman, who had arrived<br />

onboard on the 15 November just as things were becoming rather heated. His evidence<br />

provided little support for the defendants as he reported he had heard the threats to shoot<br />

the Chief Engineer Officer and that at least one of the defendants was under the influence<br />

of alcohol at 0915hrs<br />

Able Seaman McFarlane while denying the charges corrected the Fleet Postman as he<br />

advised the Court two of the defendants were drunk, not one.<br />

At the end of the evidence the Court adjudged that all of the defendants were guilty of<br />

quitting the ship without leave and all the defendants were guilty of disobeying the lawful<br />

command of the Master with the exception of Ordinary Seaman J Bain who was found<br />

not guilty of that offence.<br />

The Court sentenced the men to:-<br />

Stoker C Curd – that he forfeit one month and two days pay and to<br />

be imprisoned for twelve weeks<br />

Stoker John Duthie – that he forfeit twenty three days pay and be<br />

imprisoned for eight weeks<br />

Stoker P Cullin - Stoker J Newlands - Able Seaman W F Ibitson -<br />

Able Seaman D J McFarlane - Able Seaman A Cameron - Able<br />

Published by James R. Smith, <strong>RFA</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> Society - © 2011 <strong>RFA</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> Society

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!