- Page 1 and 2: An Abstract of the Thesis of Daniel
- Page 3 and 4: Master of Science thesis of Daniel
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction
- Page 7 and 8: Table of Contents (Continued) 6.2 R
- Page 9 and 10: List of Tables Table 2.1. Ranking o
- Page 11 and 12: Appendix D Appendix F Figure D.1. F
- Page 13 and 14: Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Ap
- Page 15 and 16: 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this rep
- Page 17: any given set of physical propertie
- Page 21 and 22: Viscous flow implies that the elast
- Page 23 and 24: 2.1.4 Aging Aging of asphalt is a c
- Page 25 and 26: x a) -0 c ..... 0) c .ii) .ct 70- 6
- Page 27 and 28: Table 2.4. Ranks of moisture damage
- Page 29 and 30: 2) Laboratory Flexural Beam Fatigue
- Page 31 and 32: Table 2.7. Ranking of asphalts in l
- Page 33 and 34: Table 2.10. Ranking of SHRP tank as
- Page 35 and 36: 2.3 Auburn University A003B The fol
- Page 37 and 38: Aagi . The aging of asphalt in a ro
- Page 39 and 40: is termed net adsorption. The net a
- Page 41 and 42: 1.8 (mg/g) 1.6 AAD-1 AAK-1 I AAM-1
- Page 43 and 44: 3.3 Aging Methods 3.3.1 No Aging Th
- Page 45 and 46: Table 3.3. Materials used Aggregate
- Page 47 and 48: procedure. A thorough explanation o
- Page 49 and 50: 4.1.3 Adjustment of Modulus Data To
- Page 51 and 52: Table 4.1 (continued). Modulus data
- Page 53 and 54: Table 4.2 (continued). Modulus data
- Page 55 and 56: Table 4.3 (continued). Modulus data
- Page 57 and 58: Table 4.4 (continued). Modulus data
- Page 59 and 60: AGGREGATE - RC AGGREGATE - RH LOW P
- Page 61 and 62: MODULUS RATIO 5 4 3 2 1 AGGREGATE -
- Page 63 and 64: 5.1 Statistical Analysis 5.0 Analys
- Page 65 and 66: 5.2.1 Comparison of Mix Aging by Sh
- Page 67 and 68: Table 5.1. Short-term rankings by a
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 5.3. Long-term aging by low p
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 5.5. Long-term oven aging at
- Page 73 and 74:
5.5.1 Short-Term Aging Table 5.8 sh
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 5.8. Comparison of rankings f
- Page 77 and 78:
5.6 General Discussion The differen
- Page 79 and 80:
6.1 Conclusions 6.0 Conclusions and
- Page 81 and 82:
References ASTM (1987). Standard Te
- Page 83 and 84:
Waller, R. A., and D. B. Duncan (19
- Page 85 and 86:
A.1 Scope Appendix A Short-Term Agi
- Page 87 and 88:
A.6 Apparatus 6.1 Aging Test System
- Page 89 and 90:
11.1.3 Aggregate Type and Gradation
- Page 91 and 92:
T 164 Method for Quantitative Extra
- Page 93 and 94:
6.1.2 Specimen End Platens as shown
- Page 95 and 96:
sufficient bead of silicone around
- Page 97 and 98:
12.1.8 Compacted Specimen Density -
- Page 99 and 100:
T 201 Method for Kinematic Viscosit
- Page 101 and 102:
C.8 Sampling 8.1 Field asphalt conc
- Page 103 and 104:
11.1.11 Long-Term Aging Duration in
- Page 105 and 106:
AGGREGATE -RC MODUWS (161) 1.600 u1
- Page 107 and 108:
AGGREGATE - RC MODUW 8 (kW) 1,600 1
- Page 109 and 110:
MODULUS (kb) 1,800 U"TED 81r 1,400
- Page 111 and 112:
AGGREGATE - RC MODULUS (ks 1.600 1.
- Page 113 and 114:
Appendix E Tensile Strength Test Re
- Page 115 and 116:
Table E.1. Tensile strength test re
- Page 117 and 118:
STRESS STRAIN TIME ..011- PHASE SHI
- Page 119 and 120:
Lead to Signal Conditioner Yoke Lea
- Page 121 and 122:
F.4. Phase shift curves are unique
- Page 123 and 124:
1E Co a) Co al 0) 0 (1) (2) (3) (4)
- Page 125 and 126:
B > g k 70,::r2.1:!:.1 ::,1.11::ir
- Page 127 and 128:
Table F.3. Complex modulus (ksi) da
- Page 129 and 130:
N V 0 2 5,000 2,000 Asphalt MD-1 ig
- Page 131 and 132:
5,000 MASTER STIFFNESS CURVE 2,000
- Page 133 and 134:
-cr) O 'II O a) 0. 0) 5,000 MASTER
- Page 135 and 136:
1e15 1e4 COMPLEX MODULUS LOSS TANGE
- Page 137:
The mixes become stiffer in the low