05.01.2013 Views

Laboratory evaluation of aging for asphalt-aggregate mixtures

Laboratory evaluation of aging for asphalt-aggregate mixtures

Laboratory evaluation of aging for asphalt-aggregate mixtures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2.2. Ranking <strong>of</strong> SHRP <strong>asphalt</strong>s in terms <strong>of</strong> their resistance to low<br />

temperature cracking<br />

Carbon Number at<br />

Asphalt the Max <strong>of</strong> SFC Peak Ranking<br />

AAA-1 32 Least likely to low temp. crack<br />

AAD-1 32 "<br />

AAK-1 32<br />

AAG 42 Moderate probability to low temp.<br />

crack<br />

AAB 43 "<br />

AAF 48 Most likely to low temp. crack<br />

2.1.3 Fatigue Cracking<br />

Fatigue cracking is typically associated with aged pavement, although it can<br />

occur in relatively new pavements. In relatively new pavement fatigue cracking, to<br />

any extent that it occurs, should be somewhat the opposite <strong>of</strong> rutting. That is,<br />

<strong>asphalt</strong>s that have the smallest amounts <strong>of</strong> SEC II should have the greatest<br />

propensity to crack under stress <strong>of</strong> traffic. The matrix developed by a large SEC I<br />

would be expected to be too rigid. This is highly speculative and the best ranking<br />

available is the reverse order <strong>of</strong> the early rutting list. (Table 2.3)<br />

Problems <strong>of</strong> fatigue cracking in aged <strong>asphalt</strong>s are more likely than fatigue<br />

cracking in unaged binders. Based on Figure 2.2 the rankings were developed <strong>for</strong><br />

3 temperature regimes <strong>for</strong> the 8 core <strong>asphalt</strong>s that are shown in Table 2.3. Each<br />

ranking also has a qualitative descriptor.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!