05.01.2013 Views

Health Council of the Netherlands Reports 2003 - Gezondheidsraad

Health Council of the Netherlands Reports 2003 - Gezondheidsraad

Health Council of the Netherlands Reports 2003 - Gezondheidsraad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

category <strong>of</strong> services will have various elements that require careful discussion<br />

and evaluation. Examples are: <strong>the</strong> need to differentiate between <strong>the</strong> concepts <strong>of</strong><br />

health and disease, and <strong>the</strong> multidimensional nature <strong>of</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> disease and its<br />

reduction (effectiveness). O<strong>the</strong>r considerations <strong>of</strong> a societal, legal or ethical<br />

nature also need to be included in <strong>the</strong> evaluation. Decision-making can only<br />

partly be based on scientific principles, since societal views also have a role to<br />

play. This is illustrated by <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> where one should place a threshold in<br />

relation to burden <strong>of</strong> disease. Moreover, at what point do <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> a service<br />

become unacceptably high compared with its benefits? According to <strong>the</strong><br />

Committee, <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se limit values or thresholds is a task for<br />

government, which <strong>the</strong>n requests <strong>the</strong> administrators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national assessment<br />

framework to assess services in <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se limit values for burden <strong>of</strong><br />

disease or efficiency. The Committee recommends that a national assessment<br />

framework should be established, taking advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiences that have<br />

now been ga<strong>the</strong>red in <strong>the</strong> UK with <strong>the</strong> National Institute for Clinical Excellence<br />

(NICE).<br />

Research recommendations<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r research is needed before <strong>the</strong> basic package can be formulated entirely in<br />

<strong>the</strong> manner that has been proposed above.<br />

First <strong>of</strong> all, <strong>the</strong> criteria for solidarity and compulsory insurance will need to<br />

be even more clearly operationalized in relation to a number <strong>of</strong> points.<br />

Second, more research is required in cases where data on individual disease<br />

burden or cost-effectiveness are ei<strong>the</strong>r missing or incomplete. This is particularly<br />

important in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> services that are associated with a large total disease<br />

burden and a correspondingly great demand for care among <strong>the</strong> population,<br />

whereas cost-effectiveness is still insufficient or else unknown.<br />

Third, <strong>the</strong>re is a need for research that contributes to effective decisionmaking<br />

on rationing issues.<br />

Finally, fur<strong>the</strong>r research is needed into means <strong>of</strong> promoting efficient practices<br />

among caregivers.<br />

24 <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands; <strong>Reports</strong> <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!