You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
What was quickly learned by <strong>NATA</strong> and others<br />
was that it was too late; the laws were passed and<br />
the regulations written. Of course that would not<br />
be the end of this story. <strong>NATA</strong> worked alongside the<br />
Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and<br />
hundreds of flight training business owners, flight<br />
instructors, and individual pilots in an effort to allow<br />
those that know this industry the best to have<br />
input on the laws and rules that affect them.<br />
With the August 1 compliance deadline quickly<br />
approaching it became clear that the laws could not<br />
be changed in time. The flight training industry was<br />
too diverse for a long-term solution to be identified,<br />
debated, and passed in just a couple of months.<br />
Rather, <strong>NATA</strong> and others in the industry began to<br />
pursue a delay in compliance with the new laws<br />
that would allow time for all stakeholders to participate<br />
in an effort to find a solution that would<br />
both protect students from predatory flight training<br />
providers and allow this industry to continue.<br />
An All-Out Effort in Sacramento<br />
As each day of summer passed, the<br />
compliance deadline drew closer.<br />
<strong>NATA</strong> and AOPA lobbyists worked in<br />
the state capitol convincing legislators<br />
that a delay was necessary to prevent<br />
the destruction of our industry. Pilots,<br />
flight instructors, and business owners<br />
spoke to their representatives about<br />
the value that flight training and aviation<br />
bring to the state. The compliance<br />
deadline came and went, and just before<br />
the close of the legislative session in<br />
late August, Assembly Bill 1889 was<br />
passed by the legislature. In this bill was<br />
language that would have provided the<br />
much-needed delay for the flight training<br />
industry. However, other portions of<br />
the bill made it impossible for the governor<br />
to sign, and AB 1889 was vetoed.<br />
The legislature did not go home; they<br />
had yet to pass a state budget and would<br />
remain in Sacramento until they had<br />
done so. <strong>NATA</strong> and AOPA continued to<br />
work quietly behind the scenes looking<br />
for a solution. On October 8, Senate Bill<br />
856, a budget trailer bill, was passed by<br />
both houses of the legislature. SB 856<br />
contained a 12-month delay in compliance<br />
for the flight training industry<br />
beginning in July of 2010.<br />
Aviation Business Journal | 4th Aviation Business Journal | 4 Quarter 2010<br />
th Quarter 2010<br />
On October 19, SB 856 was signed into law by<br />
Gov. Schwarzenegger. Chapter two of this story now<br />
begins, as the industry and the legislature will have<br />
to find a long-term solution to this issue. In the<br />
battle to secure a delay, many legislators learned<br />
more than they ever knew about the flight training<br />
effort. This educational effort will continue. The<br />
final solution must recognize the vast diversity of<br />
the flight training industry while also understanding<br />
that there are individuals out there, that given<br />
the opportunity, would take advantage of others.<br />
General aviation has a storied history in this<br />
country. It is a story that contains many obstacles<br />
and challenges. <strong>NATA</strong> is certain that this issue will<br />
become another in a long list of obstacles overcome<br />
and challenges met by our industry. We are proud<br />
to have the opportunity to work alongside the many<br />
passionate business owners, pilots, and students<br />
who worked on this issue. Together, we believe our<br />
efforts will prove successful.<br />
13