Report on the 3rd Pilling Round Trial of IWTO Pilling Working Group ...
Report on the 3rd Pilling Round Trial of IWTO Pilling Working Group ...
Report on the 3rd Pilling Round Trial of IWTO Pilling Working Group ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
95% C<strong>on</strong>fidence Interval<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 3 rd <strong>Pilling</strong> <strong>Round</strong> <strong>Trial</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWTO</strong><br />
<strong>Pilling</strong> <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Group</strong> DTM<br />
� Relati<strong>on</strong>ship between C<strong>on</strong>fidence Limit<br />
and <strong>Pilling</strong> Grade from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Round</strong> <strong>Trial</strong><br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
Combined Ratings<br />
y = -0.5126x2 + 2.6812x - 1.4438<br />
R2 0.5<br />
0<br />
= 0.5075<br />
1 1.5 2 2.5 3<br />
Mean Rating<br />
3.5 4 4.5 5<br />
Figure 1. Relati<strong>on</strong>ship between<br />
C<strong>on</strong>fidence Limit and <strong>Pilling</strong><br />
Grades in 2006/07 <strong>Round</strong> <strong>Trial</strong><br />
95% C<strong>on</strong>fidence Limits<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
y = -0.2727x 2 + 1.5487x - 0.8475<br />
R 2 = 0.7154<br />
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5<br />
Mean <strong>Pilling</strong> Grade<br />
Figure 2. Relati<strong>on</strong>ship between<br />
C<strong>on</strong>fidence Limit and <strong>Pilling</strong><br />
Grades in 2009/10 <strong>Round</strong> <strong>Trial</strong>