sundance 2006 - Zoael
sundance 2006 - Zoael
sundance 2006 - Zoael
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
31derful Flavors<br />
BY MICHAEL SILBERGLEID<br />
HOW OFTEN HAVE YOU<br />
TALKED to an equipment dealer<br />
or rental facility that asked<br />
you what you needed? Probably a lot.<br />
They all want to fill your needs,<br />
whether it be for film-based or electronic-based<br />
production or post.<br />
But when is the last time you were<br />
asked what you do?<br />
What you do is the more important<br />
question.<br />
Here’s an example. “I need a 24p<br />
production package for a micro budget<br />
film.” But what do you do? “I’m a news<br />
photographer.”<br />
News photogs work in a 60i world of<br />
everyday television. While 24p gear<br />
might physically look the same with<br />
similar menus, 24p is a different world.<br />
This guy knows video not digital cinematography<br />
and there is a big difference<br />
in how one shoots and the lenses<br />
one can use).<br />
And why does he want 24p anyway?<br />
Does he think that frame rate<br />
alone will give this project a film look<br />
or was he told that 24p is what he<br />
needs? 24p is just a flavor. One of the<br />
best film outs I have ever seen for a<br />
feature was from 60i video—I would<br />
have sworn the project was shot on<br />
35mm film.<br />
Video has made moviemaking<br />
more affordable. Although, depending<br />
on what you’re shooting and how<br />
you’re shooting, film can be cheaper<br />
than video.<br />
So why shoot video? It’s cheaper on<br />
the front-end (even with seemingly<br />
endless reshoots), so you can get<br />
started with less money.<br />
With video, a major chunk of the<br />
budget will be spent on the back-end<br />
during post. You don’t need full financing<br />
to get started.<br />
That being said, I know a ton of<br />
filmmakers who are still waiting to<br />
cut their masterpieces, even though<br />
they wrapped production months or<br />
years ago. Sadly, some projects never<br />
make it to post.<br />
So you want to shoot video. OK,<br />
what flavor?<br />
If budget dictates the answer, then<br />
it’s probably DV. But how would you<br />
answer this question: “We’ve got some<br />
money in the budget, should we shoot<br />
with HDCAM, DVCPROHD, Viper,<br />
HDCAM SR, XDCAM HD, Infinity...?”<br />
All of these formats are (or will be)<br />
fine for acquisition. They’ll all allow<br />
for on-set visualization of images so<br />
you’ll have a better idea of what you’ll<br />
have to work with in post. So how do<br />
you pick one or two flavors from 31<br />
wonderful flavors?<br />
For some reason, producers and<br />
directors think that this is a front-end<br />
decision.<br />
Here’s what I’ve discovered in life. If<br />
your project has an actual editor<br />
whose only job is to craft the film<br />
together from the work of others, your<br />
answer is with them. Have a post production<br />
supervisor? That person is<br />
now your best friend (another best<br />
friend is the colorist).<br />
Will HDCAM SR’s 4:4:4 make post<br />
easier? Will Viper give you the ability<br />
to get that “look” in post? How much<br />
color correction will you do and will<br />
you have enough color information to<br />
do what you need to do? Keys? Is<br />
DTS Reaches Out To<br />
Independent Filmmakers<br />
BY KRISTIN THOMSON<br />
Long established with major<br />
Hollywood studios as a provider<br />
of high-quality digital surround<br />
sound for film, DTS has expanded its<br />
efforts to reach and educate independent<br />
filmmakers about DTS<br />
Digital Sound as a viable option for<br />
their projects, and to promote the<br />
accessibility and affordability of DTS<br />
Digital Stereo, which provides an<br />
optical/analog sound option for independent<br />
features.<br />
In 1993, Steven Spielberg’s<br />
Jurassic Park introduced the crisp,<br />
clean sound of DTS Digital Sound,<br />
changing forever the way audiences<br />
experience sound in a movie theater.<br />
DTS’s uncompromising digital<br />
process has set the standard of quality<br />
for cinema sound by providing<br />
premier-quality, discrete, multichannel<br />
audio for motion pictures.<br />
Designed to deliver precisely replicated<br />
studio master recordings, the<br />
DTS system stores the digital soundtrack<br />
on a CD-ROM, affording a data<br />
capacity, reliability, and quality that<br />
cannot be matched by digital systems<br />
which store the soundtrack<br />
directly on the motion picture film.<br />
The soundtrack is then synchronized<br />
with the film via a proprietary timecode<br />
that is unique to the DTS system,<br />
and results in playback that is<br />
unaffected by film print deterioration<br />
or degradation—the soundtrack<br />
is perfect whether played for the<br />
first time or the thousandth.<br />
The DTS commitment to quality<br />
and performance begins in post-production<br />
when a film soundtrack is<br />
mixed in DTS Digital Sound. In addition<br />
to providing digital mixing and<br />
recording equipment worldwide, DTS<br />
provides a studio engineer / consultant<br />
to assist with equipment set-up.<br />
The consultant is also present at the<br />
print mastering session to assure correct<br />
monitoring levels, and to ensure<br />
the film mixers hear an accurate representation<br />
of DTS playback.<br />
Additionally, DTS offers a variety of<br />
rates and plans to meet the needs of<br />
independent filmmakers.<br />
Because the DTS soundtrack is on a<br />
93<br />
CD-ROM, as opposed to the actual<br />
film, last minute changes can be made<br />
up to a few days before release without<br />
incurring the high cost of remaking<br />
film prints. Another advantage of having<br />
a soundtrack separate from the<br />
film is that additional film prints need<br />
not be made to accommodate foreign<br />
languages or subtitles.<br />
“DTS is committed to understanding<br />
an artist’s vision, and to providing<br />
the creative tools to unlock the power<br />
and emotion of their story,” said Don<br />
Bird, Senior Vice President, Cinema<br />
Division at DTS. “We offer the flexibility<br />
and accessibility to meet the needs<br />
of any filmmaker.<br />
“We want filmmakers working in<br />
every format—be it 16mm, 35mm, or<br />
70mm—to call upon DTS to meet all of<br />
their multi-channel sound needs,” Don<br />
continued. “We’re especially excited<br />
about the work we’re doing with 16mm<br />
films—we’re able to deliver a digital<br />
soundtrack in up to six discrete channels<br />
of stereo, which is a great<br />
improvement over the mono sound<br />
that has historically confined 16mm.<br />
The Video Guru Explains It All<br />
your project for the big screen or the<br />
little screen?<br />
So many filmmakers who use video<br />
think the only difference between a<br />
DV-based image and the other formats<br />
is just a better picture. The real<br />
difference is what you have to work<br />
with in post... where the money is<br />
really spent.<br />
What’s your favorite flavor? More<br />
importantly, why? If your answer is<br />
format-based and not project based, it<br />
may be time to try some other flavors.<br />
Michael Silbergleid is the technical<br />
editor for Film Festival Reporter.<br />
He is also the editor of Television<br />
Broadcast magazine and The Video<br />
Guru website<br />
(www.TheVideoGuru.com) and coeditor<br />
of The Guide To Digital<br />
Television.<br />
The Video Guru is a trademark<br />
of The SilverKnight Group,<br />
Incorporated.<br />
DTS also provides a 4:1 compression<br />
rate, versus the 12:1 compression rate<br />
of other film soundtracks.”<br />
Alaskan filmmaker Sean Morris is<br />
one director who knows the value of<br />
DTS for 16mm film. According to<br />
Sean, “New advances in film stocks<br />
have hugely improved the quality of<br />
the 16mm film image, but the medium’s<br />
limitation has always been its<br />
poor sound quality. DTS has fixed<br />
this problem with an amazing and<br />
innovative advance that allows us<br />
independent filmmakers to have the<br />
exact same sound quality in our<br />
16mm films that multi-million dollar<br />
features have in theirs.” Morris’ film<br />
Kusah Hakwaan won several<br />
Festival awards after being encoded<br />
in DTS Digital Stereo.<br />
DTS is continuing to work closely<br />
with independent filmmakers to<br />
license material for future projects. In<br />
<strong>2006</strong>, the company has several new<br />
projects that showcase independent<br />
talent in the U.S., and is actively copromoting<br />
the independent filmmakers<br />
that they are supporting.