06.01.2013 Views

e-Research: A Journal of Undergraduate Work - Chapman University

e-Research: A Journal of Undergraduate Work - Chapman University

e-Research: A Journal of Undergraduate Work - Chapman University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Cyr, M. Weitzman<br />

Western Blotting<br />

10-well and 12-well 4-12% Bis-Tris Acetate gels with MOPS running buffer to run 18 ul samples <strong>of</strong> 30 ug samples<br />

and 60 ug samples respectively and full range rainbow recombinant protein marker. 1:5 loading dye prepared with<br />

LDS sample buffer (4X) and IM DTT (20X). Gels ran at 150 V for 1.5 hours. Transfers ran at 30 V for 2 hours in 20X<br />

NUPAGE transfer buffer, methanol, H2O, NUPAGE antioxidant. Membranes soaked in 5% milk with 100 ul NaN3<br />

after transfer in 4 degree C cold room. Membranes washed with 1X PBST. Membranes soaked with mouse ICP0,<br />

mouse GAPDH, or mouse Flag primary antibodies then horse-radish peroxidase-conjugated mouse secondary<br />

antibodies in 5% milk. Equal volumes <strong>of</strong> Western Lightening Plus-ECL oxidizing reagent and enhanced luminal<br />

reagent distributed over membranes for film development.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Cloning<br />

Cloning the two separate constructs <strong>of</strong> RNF168 was carried out as described in the methods section. Correct<br />

constructs <strong>of</strong> the clones were identified by restriction digest analysis and computer-based DNA sequencing. The<br />

verified clones <strong>of</strong> F1 and F2 were purified and used in transfection experiments in the HeLa cells. As seen in figure<br />

2, the F1 construct (~850bp) contained the RING finger motif and MIU1, and the F2 construct (~1Kbp) contained<br />

MIU2.<br />

Figure 2: Schematic images <strong>of</strong> F1 and F2 constructs <strong>of</strong> RNF168 cloned and transfected +/- ICP0.<br />

F2 is degraded by ICP0 expression<br />

ICP0 expression degrades several cellular substrates, but this study focused on RNF168 degradation specifically.<br />

Degradations <strong>of</strong> the fragments from the separated RNF168 were compared to each other and to the full-length<br />

RNF168. The lysates <strong>of</strong> ICP0 co-transfections in HeLa cells were analyzed by a western blot for F2. F2 fragment<br />

degradation is evident with ICP0 expression as seen in Figure 3. The F2 fragment is not degraded with pcDNA3.1<br />

vector alone in the absence <strong>of</strong> ICP0. F2 is sized at approximately 50kDa.<br />

F1 may be degraded by ICP0 expression less efficiently<br />

The western blot in Figure 3 indicates moderate degradation <strong>of</strong> F1 by ICP0 expression. Two separate lysates <strong>of</strong> F1<br />

(F1-12 and F1-15) were analyzed on the western blot to express F1 in duplicate due to uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

the sequences <strong>of</strong> the clones. F1 degradation appears to be less efficient in comparison to F2 degradation. Both F1-<br />

12 and F1-15 fragments suggest no degradation in the presence <strong>of</strong> pcDNA3.1 vector alone. F1 is sized at<br />

approximately 38kDa.<br />

42 e-<strong>Research</strong>, Vol 2, No 2 (2011)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!