The Changing Role of the Finance Organization in a Multi-Polar World
The Changing Role of the Finance Organization in a Multi-Polar World
The Changing Role of the Finance Organization in a Multi-Polar World
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 6. Mastery scale<br />
<strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong> <strong>Organization</strong> Management<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
<strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong> organization strategy and<br />
structure<br />
Reactive, <strong>in</strong>formative Proactive, aligned with strategy<br />
Workforce management Basic, general skills Deep and specialized skills<br />
Value-centered culture orientation<br />
Enterprise Performance Management<br />
<strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong> governance role Intimate bus<strong>in</strong>ess advisor<br />
Strategy development Less focus on value drivers Deep understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> value drivers<br />
Target sett<strong>in</strong>g No l<strong>in</strong>k to strategy, no dist<strong>in</strong>ction between high<br />
L<strong>in</strong>ked to strategy, full portfolio analyzed for high<br />
return and low return assets<br />
returns<br />
Budget<strong>in</strong>g and forecast<strong>in</strong>g Stand alone; time <strong>in</strong>tensive Integrated; accurate; forward look<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Performance management and Little <strong>in</strong>sight, multiple systems, simple, adhoc<br />
Insight driven; current and future value<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong> and Account<strong>in</strong>g Operations<br />
analysis<br />
management, dynamic, scenario based analysis<br />
Transaction process<strong>in</strong>g Manual process<strong>in</strong>g Outsourced/shared services, workflow management<br />
and self-service capabilities, standard processes<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial/Regulatory report<strong>in</strong>g Non-standardized; 15+ days to close Automated, standardized<br />
Internal controls<br />
Corporate <strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong><br />
Poor control, high risk Optimized, low risk<br />
Capital plann<strong>in</strong>g and management No formal track<strong>in</strong>g, focus on pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss Enterprise-wide capital and <strong>in</strong>vestment plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
focus on value drivers<br />
Treasury Staff function Strategic focus<br />
Tax Tax compliance oriented Intimate bus<strong>in</strong>ess advisor<br />
Investor relations No systemized processes, separate, rudimentary<br />
Reliable data, based on transparent and self-service<br />
Enterprise Risk Management<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial report<strong>in</strong>g<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial risk management No clear risk management goals; limited use<br />
<strong>of</strong> tools<br />
Optimized risk throughout company<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess risk and operational risk Poor understand<strong>in</strong>g; separate risk management Integrated, enterprise-wide risk management<br />
system l<strong>in</strong>ked with strategy and operations<br />
Figure 7. Percentage with advanced capabilities for each f<strong>in</strong>ance capability<br />
Transaction process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Workforce management<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial risk management<br />
Target sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess and operational risk management<br />
Strategy development<br />
Capital plann<strong>in</strong>g and management<br />
Performance management and report<strong>in</strong>g 35%<br />
Value-centered culture orientation 30%<br />
Budget<strong>in</strong>g and forecast<strong>in</strong>g 31%<br />
<strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong> organization strategy and structure 35% 35%<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial/regulatory report<strong>in</strong>g 36%<br />
Treasury 40%<br />
Tax 43% 43%<br />
Internal controls 46%<br />
Investor relations 46%<br />
23%<br />
24%<br />
25%<br />
26%<br />
26%<br />
27%<br />
30%<br />
30%<br />
30%<br />
31%<br />
36%<br />
40%<br />
46%<br />
46%<br />
Accenture High Performance <strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong> Study 2008 | 17