07.01.2013 Views

Dietzfelbinger M. Primality testing in polynomial time ... - tiera.ru

Dietzfelbinger M. Primality testing in polynomial time ... - tiera.ru

Dietzfelbinger M. Primality testing in polynomial time ... - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

102 7. More Algebra: Polynomials and Fields<br />

f p = ad · (X p ) d + ···+ a1 · X p + a0 = f(X p ).<br />

For the more general exponent p k we use <strong>in</strong>duction. For k = 0, there is<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>gtoprove,s<strong>in</strong>cef = f(X). The case k = 1 has just been treated. Now<br />

assume k ≥ 2, and calculate <strong>in</strong> Zp[X], by us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>duction hypothesis and<br />

the case k =1:<br />

f pk<br />

=<br />

�<br />

f pk−1� p<br />

=(f(X pk−1<br />

)) p = f((X p ) pk−1<br />

)=f(X pk<br />

),<br />

as desired. ⊓⊔<br />

7.2 Division with Rema<strong>in</strong>der and Divisibility for<br />

Polynomials<br />

Let R be a r<strong>in</strong>g. Even if R is a field, the r<strong>in</strong>g R[X] is never a field: for every<br />

f =(a0,a1,...)wehaveX · f =(0,a0,a1,...) �= (1, 0, 0,...) = 1, and hence<br />

X does not have a multiplicative <strong>in</strong>verse <strong>in</strong> R[X]. We will soon see how to<br />

use <strong>polynomial</strong>s to const<strong>ru</strong>ct fields. However, for many <strong>polynomial</strong>s we may<br />

carry out a division with rema<strong>in</strong>der, just as for <strong>in</strong>tegers.<br />

Proposition 7.2.1 (Polynomial Division with Rema<strong>in</strong>der). Let R be<br />

ar<strong>in</strong>g,andleth ∈ R[X] be a monic <strong>polynomial</strong> (or a nonzero <strong>polynomial</strong><br />

whose lead<strong>in</strong>g coefficient is a unit <strong>in</strong> R). Then for each f ∈ R[X] there are<br />

unique <strong>polynomial</strong>s q, r ∈ R[X] with f = h · q + r and deg(r) < deg(h).<br />

Proof. “Existence”: First assume that h is monic, and write h =(a0,...,ad)<br />

with ad = 1. We prove the existence of the quotient-rema<strong>in</strong>der representation<br />

f = h · q + r by <strong>in</strong>duction on d ′ =deg(f). If d ′

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!