07.01.2013 Views

''Don't Ask me, I'm Just a Girl'': Feminism, Female Identity, and The ...

''Don't Ask me, I'm Just a Girl'': Feminism, Female Identity, and The ...

''Don't Ask me, I'm Just a Girl'': Feminism, Female Identity, and The ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Don’t <strong>Ask</strong> <strong>me</strong>, I’m <strong>Just</strong> a Girl 297<br />

collection,’’ shouts ‘‘But she’s got a new hat!’’ <strong>and</strong> that’s all it takes<br />

for the crowd to surge forward, claim their Malibu Stacy dolls, <strong>and</strong><br />

ignore Lisa Lionheart. Lisa sighs <strong>and</strong> sadly concludes, ‘‘I guess you<br />

just can’t beat big business. <strong>The</strong>re’s no room for the little guy.’’ But<br />

just as soon as the words are out of her mouth she hears her own voice<br />

saying ‘‘Trust in yourself <strong>and</strong> you can achieve anything!’’ <strong>and</strong> she turns<br />

to see one little girl st<strong>and</strong>ing before the Lisa Lionheart display, smiling<br />

at the doll. Proudly, Lisa then says ‘‘You know, if we get through to just<br />

that one little girl, it’ll all be worth it.’’ Not content to let liberal<br />

pieties go uncontested, the writers have Lovell quietly say ‘‘Yes, particularly<br />

if that little girl happens to pay $46,000 for that doll.’’<br />

‘‘What?’’ Lisa asks. ‘‘Oh, nothing,’’ Lovell replies. ‘‘Kudos to you, Lisa.<br />

Kudos.’’<br />

Conclusion<br />

How are we to read such an ending? On the one h<strong>and</strong>, this episode is<br />

offering its viewers an image of youthful idealism, can-do individualism,<br />

<strong>and</strong> grass-roots activism in the service of contesting prevailing<br />

ideologies <strong>and</strong> providing alternative ones, an image in accord with the<br />

progressive politics of <strong>The</strong> Simpsons. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, in acknowledging<br />

capitalism <strong>and</strong> the reality of a profit-oriented consu<strong>me</strong>r marketplace,<br />

the episode is also offering a rather pessimistic view of the<br />

ability of individuals (or even small coalitions of individuals) to truly<br />

effect social change. In this regard, the politics of the episode is marked<br />

by an ambiguity that seems to <strong>me</strong> in perfect keeping with the ti<strong>me</strong>s in<br />

which it appeared. <strong>The</strong> 1990s itself was an era of great ambiguity,<br />

epitomized perhaps in the year-long public debate over whether or not<br />

we should care about the private sexual activities of the President of the<br />

United States. More to the point here, the creators of <strong>The</strong> Simpsons seem<br />

to have mixed feelings regarding feminism <strong>and</strong> female identity in the<br />

contemporary age. Ironically enough, considering the largely egalitarian<br />

climate in which <strong>The</strong> Simpsons is both set <strong>and</strong> produced, the show<br />

seems to be, in the words of Lori L<strong>and</strong>ay, ‘‘at a crossroads of reactionary<br />

<strong>and</strong> liberated definitions of femininity’’ (192). So<strong>me</strong> of this can assuredly<br />

be attributed to the fact that <strong>The</strong> Simpsons is, after all, a<br />

mass <strong>me</strong>dia product, produced for <strong>and</strong> marketed to the largest demographic<br />

possible, <strong>and</strong> that, as such, it needs to cater to prevailing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!