07.01.2013 Views

Native American and Spanish Ancillary Structures - Warren Wilson ...

Native American and Spanish Ancillary Structures - Warren Wilson ...

Native American and Spanish Ancillary Structures - Warren Wilson ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

molds <strong>and</strong> have no identifiable structural pattern. Some<br />

of these posthole-size pits contain <strong>Spanish</strong> artifacts<br />

(See Table 3); postholes 68B <strong>and</strong> 68C contain unfired<br />

daub that indicates their <strong>Spanish</strong> origin. The <strong>Spanish</strong><br />

postholes have blended edges between the posthole<br />

fill <strong>and</strong> surrounding soil matrix. These edges are more<br />

distinct than tree holes but less distinct than Marine<br />

Corps postholes.<br />

There are three postholes with diameters around<br />

three meters, while seven postholes have diameters of<br />

less than 60 cm. One posthole does not have diameter<br />

or depth data recorded. The three postholes with the<br />

largest diameters are outliers <strong>and</strong> are excluded from the<br />

average diameter for <strong>Spanish</strong> postholes at Santa Elena.<br />

The average diameter of the other six postholes is 41.33<br />

cm. The average depth of those same six postholes is<br />

25.5 cm.<br />

Santa Elena postholes have diameters that are<br />

24.597 cm larger than average Berry site postholes <strong>and</strong><br />

are 12.324 cm deeper. Both of these differences fall<br />

outside one st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of the mean, signifying<br />

that Santa Elena postholes are not similar to Berry site<br />

postholes. The square, possibly <strong>Spanish</strong>, postholes<br />

at the Berry site are more comparable to Santa Elena<br />

postholes. Square Berry site postholes are only 9.93 cm<br />

smaller in diameter than Santa Elena postholes, <strong>and</strong> only<br />

1.9 cm shallower. The diameter still falls outside one<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of the mean, but the depth is within<br />

one st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of the mean. This demonstrates<br />

that although possible <strong>Spanish</strong> Berry site postholes are<br />

not similar to Santa Elena non-structural postholes, they<br />

are more similar in size than general Berry site postholes.<br />

Table 3<br />

Santa Elena <strong>Spanish</strong> Postholes<br />

Feature # Shape Diameter<br />

(cm)<br />

Depth<br />

(cm)<br />

Contents<br />

32 Majolica<br />

33 55 44 Earthenware,<br />

olive jar<br />

48 Oval 296 12<br />

49 Circular 27 6 Majolica<br />

52 58 35<br />

68B 26 7<br />

68C Oval 293 26 Olive jar<br />

105 Oval 316 13 Majolica<br />

105A 55 35 Majolica,<br />

olive jar<br />

107 27 26<br />

The Marine Corps postholes—features 53, 92, 93, <strong>and</strong><br />

97 (Table 4)—were all square shaped <strong>and</strong> had a lighter<br />

posthole fill color <strong>and</strong> sharp outlines. The sharp outline<br />

between posthole fill <strong>and</strong> the surrounding soil matrix<br />

indicates that these postholes were dug recently, because<br />

there has not been much soil leeching. These postholes<br />

date to the World War I era when the site was used as a<br />

training facility, bombing range, <strong>and</strong> golf course.<br />

The average diameter of Marine Corps postholes<br />

is 36.5 cm, <strong>and</strong> the depths of the two excavated<br />

postholes are 24 <strong>and</strong> 55 cm. Feature 53 contained<br />

wooden post fragments <strong>and</strong> wire nails, which provide<br />

further evidence for its twentieth-century origin.<br />

Table 4<br />

Santa Elena Marine Corps Postholes<br />

Feature # Shape Diameter<br />

(cm)<br />

Depth (cm) Contents<br />

53 Square 43 55 Wire nails<br />

92 Square 18 24<br />

93 Square 21 Not<br />

Excavated<br />

97 Square 64 Not<br />

Excavated<br />

Berry Site <strong>Structures</strong> 1 <strong>and</strong> 5<br />

At the Berry site, archaeologists find similarities<br />

as well as differences in posthole styles between the<br />

two excavated structures. The two posthole styles are<br />

<strong>Native</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Spanish</strong> postholes. Structure<br />

1 was built of more durable materials <strong>and</strong> of a more<br />

stable architectural design. One of the postholes in this<br />

structure contained an upright post, which was the same<br />

size as the hole it was in (Figure 3). This is evidence of<br />

the native technique of ramming posts into the ground<br />

(Beck et al. 2010).<br />

Structure 5, although a similar size to structure<br />

1, was built of less durable materials <strong>and</strong> in a shallower<br />

basin indicating that it may have been built at a later<br />

time, <strong>and</strong> with less <strong>Native</strong> <strong>American</strong> help. One of<br />

the postholes in this structure had a post mold much<br />

smaller than the posthole <strong>and</strong> had an iron shim wedged<br />

in between the post mold <strong>and</strong> the edge of the posthole<br />

(Figure 3). The larger posthole is evidence that the<br />

hole was dug with shovels before the post was placed<br />

in. Historical documents show that Pardo’s soldiers<br />

had shovels with them at Fort San Juan, whereas<br />

<strong>Native</strong> <strong>American</strong>s would not have used shovels, so this<br />

posthole was probably dug by the <strong>Spanish</strong> soldiers or by<br />

<strong>Native</strong> <strong>American</strong>s with <strong>Spanish</strong> tools (Beck et al. 2010).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!