New waves in Physical Land Resources
New waves in Physical Land Resources
New waves in Physical Land Resources
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>New</strong> <strong>waves</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Workshop for Alumni of the<br />
M.Sc. programmes <strong>in</strong> Soil Science, Eremology and<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Refresher Course supported by the Flemish Interuniversity Council<br />
(VLIR-UOS)<br />
Edited by<br />
Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Langouche & Eric Van Ranst<br />
GHENT UNIVERSITY<br />
3-9 SEPTEMBER 2006
<strong>New</strong> <strong>waves</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Workshop for<br />
Alumni of the M.Sc. programmes <strong>in</strong><br />
Soil Science, Eremology and <strong>Physical</strong><br />
<strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
ISBN 9789076769950<br />
Edited by<br />
Eric Van Ranst & Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Langouche<br />
GHENT UNIVERSITY<br />
3-9 SEPTEMBER 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
PREFACE<br />
OPENING ADDRESS BY PROF. E. VAN RANST, CHAIRMAN STEERING COMMITTEE<br />
PHYSICAL LAND RESOURCES AND PROMOTOR OF THE MASTER PROGRAMME (UGENT)<br />
OPENING ADDRESS BY RECTOR P. VAN CAUWENBERGHE (UGENT)<br />
OPENING ADDRESS BY MS. K. VERBRUGGHEN, DIRECTOR OF VLIR-UNIVERSITY<br />
DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION SECTION<br />
OPENING LECTURES ....................................................................................................................................... 1<br />
SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT IN THE ETHIOPIAN HIGHLANDS............................................ 2<br />
MITIKU HAILE..................................................................................................................................................... 2<br />
NEW CHALLENGES OF SOIL SCIENCE TO FOOD SECURITY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO<br />
CHINA ............................................................................................................................................................. 14<br />
TANG HUAJUN & ZHOU WEI............................................................................................................................. 14<br />
WORKS ON EROSION PROCESSES UNDER WIND-DRIVEN RAIN CONDITIONS IN I.C.E ................ 24<br />
GUNAY ERPUL 1 & DONALD GABRIELS 2 ............................................................................................................ 24<br />
WORKSHOP THEME A – SOIL AND GROUNDWATER POLLUTION AND REMEDIATION.......... 36<br />
SUB-THEME : MANAGING CONTAMINATED SOILS USING PHYTOREMEDIATION................... 37<br />
ERIK MEERS, FILIP M. G. TACK, MARC G. VERLOO ......................................................................................... 37<br />
COMPARISON OF AMENDMENTS USED TO REMEDIATE ACID MINE TAILINGS:<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL AND AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS .................................................................. 39<br />
Kelly A. Senkiw and Tee Boon Goh * ............................................................................................................ 39<br />
STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF TRADE VILLAGE WASTE ON ACCUMULATION OF Cu, Pb, Zn AND<br />
Cd IN AGRICULTURAL SOILS OF PHUNG XA VILLAGE, THACH THANH DISTRICT, HA TAY<br />
PROVINCE.................................................................................................................................................. 49<br />
Nguyen Huu Thanh 1 , Tran Thi Le Ha 1 * , Nguyen Duc Hung 1 , Tran Duc Hai 2 ............................................ 49<br />
METAL CONTAMINATION IN IRRIGATED AGRICULTURAL LAND: CASE STUDY OF NAIROBI<br />
RIVER BASIN, KENYA................................................................................................................................ 60<br />
P.N. Kamande 1* , F.M.G. Tack 2 ................................................................................................................... 60<br />
SUB-THEME : MANAGING GROUNDWATER POLLUTION FROM WASTE DISPOSAL SITES .... 63<br />
KRISTINE WALRAEVENS, MARLEEN COETSIERS, KRISTINE MARTENS, MARC VAN CAMP ............................... 63<br />
CONTAMINATION OF THE MARIMBA RIVER TRIBUTARY, ZIMBABWE, WITH Cu, Pb, Zn AND P BY<br />
INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT AND SEWER LINE DISCHARGE................................................................... 66<br />
Bangira, C * .Wuta, M., Dube, H.M and Chipatiso, L................................................................................... 66<br />
CONTROLLING PHOSPHORUS (P) MOBILITY IN POORLY P SORBING SOILS: DRINKING-WATER<br />
TREATMENT RESIDUALS (WTR) TO THE RESCUE ............................................................................... 75<br />
S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang 1* , G.A. O’Connor 1 and L.W. Jacobs 2 .......................................................................... 75<br />
Effects of WTR on P losses .......................................................................................................................... 84<br />
HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION OF SOIL AND SURFACE WATER BY LEACHATES OF AN OPEN<br />
DUMP OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE: A CASE STUDY OF OBLOGO LANDFILL IN THE GA WEST<br />
DISTRICT OF ACCRA, GHANA................................................................................................................. 87<br />
Abuaku Ebenezer*....................................................................................................................................... 87<br />
CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................................................. 89<br />
WORKSHOP THEME B – INTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT .................................... 92<br />
SUB-THEME : USE OF ISOTOPE TECHNIQUES FOR ................................................................................... 93<br />
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 93<br />
P. BOECKX, K. DENEF, AND O. VAN CLEEMPUT ............................................................................................... 93<br />
ENHANCING THE AGRONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS OF NATURAL PHOSPHATE ROCK WITH<br />
POULTRY MANURE: A WAY FORWARD TO SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION .................... 95<br />
S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang 1 *, M.K. Abekoe 2 , O.O. Oladeji 1 , S.K.A. Danso 2 ......................................................... 95<br />
THE EFFECT OF LIMING AN ACID NITISOL WITH EITHER CALCITE OR DOLOMITE ON<br />
TWO COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) VARIETIES DIFFERING IN ALUMINIUM<br />
TOLERANCE........................................................................................................................................... 108
E .N Mugai 1* , S.G Agong 1 and H. Matsumoto 2 ......................................................................................... 108<br />
EFFECT OF P FERTILISERS AND WEED CONTROL..................................................................... 117<br />
ON THE FATE OF P FERTILISERS APPLIED TO SOILS................................................................ 117<br />
UNDER SECOND-ROTATION PINUS RADIATA............................................................................... 117<br />
A. A. Rivaie 1 , P. Loganathan 2 , and R. W. Tillman 2 ................................................................................... 117<br />
SUB-THEME : ORGANIC FARMING IN THE TROPICS PRESENT SITUATION, POSSIBILITIES<br />
AND CHALLENGES................................................................................................................................... 120<br />
STEFAAN DE NEVE.......................................................................................................................................... 120<br />
LOW INPUT APPROACHES FOR SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT VERIFIED FOR SEMI-<br />
ARID AREAS OF EASTERN UGANDA................................................................................................ 123<br />
Kayuki C.Kaizzi 1 , Byalebeka John 1 , Charles S. Wortmann 2 and Martha Mamo 2 ..................................... 123<br />
AMELIORATION OF ACID SULFATE SOIL INFERTILITY IN MALAYSIA FOR RICE CULTIVATION<br />
................................................................................................................................................................... 133<br />
J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>.......................................................................................................................................... 133<br />
WORKSHOP THEME C – LAND EVALUATION AND LAND DEGRADATION................................. 144<br />
SUB-THEME : LAND EVALUATION FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT & POLICY MAKING ................... 145<br />
A. VERDOODT & E. VAN RANST..................................................................................................................... 145<br />
OIL PALM AND RUBBER PRODUCTION MODEL FOR SUBSTITUING RUBBER WITH OIL<br />
PALM AND EVALUATING TO ESTABLISH OIL PALM INTO NORTHEAST THAILAND.......... 149<br />
S. Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra 1 , E.Van Ranst 2 , H.Verplancke 2 , A. Verdoodt 2 ................................................................ 149<br />
SOIL PROPERTIES AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF UNDISTURBED AND DISTURBED<br />
FORESTS IN MT. MALINDANG, PHILIPPINES ............................................................................... 162<br />
Renato D. Boniao 1* , Rosa Villa B. Estoista 2 , Carmelita G. Hansel 2 , Ron de Goede 4 , .............................. 162<br />
Olga M. Nuneza 3 , Brigida A. Roscom 3 , Sam James 5 , Rhea Amor C. Lumactud 1 , ..................................... 162<br />
Mae Yen O. Poblete 1 and Nonillon Aspe 3 .................................................................................................. 162<br />
SUB-THEME : LAND DEGRADATION : PRESSURES, INDICATORS AND RESPONSES ............... 173<br />
VARIOUS APPROACHES FOR SOIL EROSION RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................... 173<br />
W. CORNELIS, D. GABRIELS, H. VERPLANCKE................................................................................................ 173<br />
INDICATORS AND PARTICIPATORY METHODS FOR MONITORING LAND DEGRADATION. A<br />
CASE STUDY IN THE MIGORI DISTRICT OF KENYA. ................................................................... 175<br />
V<strong>in</strong>cent de Paul Obade 1* , Eva De Clercq 2 ................................................................................................ 175<br />
PROPOSED PLAN OF ACTION FOR RESEARCH ON DESERTIFICATION IN THE SUDAN:... 181<br />
GEZIRA AND SENNAR STATES .......................................................................................................... 181<br />
Kamal Elfadil Fadul and Fawzi Mohamed Salih ...................................................................................... 181<br />
DIAGNOSTIC OF DEGRADATION PROCESSES OF SOILS FROM NORTHERN TOGO (WEST<br />
AFRICA) AS A TOOL FOR SOIL AND WATER MANAGEMENT..................................................... 187<br />
Rosa M Poch*, Josep M Ubalde ............................................................................................................... 187<br />
CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................................................ 195<br />
WORKSHOP THEME D – SOIL SURVEY AND INVENTORY TECHNIQUES.................................... 196<br />
SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL (ATTRIBUTE) MAPPING WITH AN APPLICATION IN<br />
MAPING GROUNDWATER DEPTH....................................................................................................... 197<br />
P.A. FINKE ...................................................................................................................................................... 197<br />
USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM TO MAP<br />
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS FOR LAND EVALUATION........................................................................... 199<br />
P. Wandahwa 1* J. A. Rota 1 , and D. O. Sigunga 2 ....................................................................................... 199<br />
SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN GIS AND REMOTE SENSING WITH EMPHASIS ON HIGH<br />
RESOLUTION IMAGERY AND 3-D PRESENTATION TECHNIQUES ............................................ 208<br />
R. GOOSSENS .................................................................................................................................................. 208<br />
GEOMORPHOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION OF SOME PLAINES AND WADIES ADJACENT TO<br />
GABEL ELBA, SOUTH EAST OF EGYPT................................................................................................ 210<br />
El-Badawi, M. and Abdel-Fattah, A. ......................................................................................................... 210<br />
HIGH RESOLUTION TERRAIN MAPPING AND VISUALIZATION OF CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY<br />
USING LiDAR AND IFSAR DATA............................................................................................................ 225<br />
Sudhir Raj Shrestha 1* , Dr. Scott N. Miller 2 ............................................................................................... 225<br />
SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL SAMPLING AND PROXIMAL SENSING WITH<br />
APPLICATIONS IN PRECISION AGRICULTURE .............................................................................. 226<br />
M. VAN MEIRVENNE, U.W.A. VITHARANA L. COCKX ................................................................................... 226
ESTIMATING SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF SOIL SALINITY USING COKRIGING IN BAHARIYA OASIS,<br />
EGYPT....................................................................................................................................................... 228<br />
Kh. M. Darwish*, M.M. Kotb and R. Ali................................................................................................... 228<br />
SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF DRAINAGE AND PHOSPHATE RETENTION AND THEIR INTER<br />
RELATIONSHIP IN SOILS OF THE SOUTH-WESTERN REGION OF THE NORTH ISLAND, NEW<br />
ZEALAND.................................................................................................................................................. 242<br />
A.Senarath*, A.S.Palmer and R.W.Tillman............................................................................................... 242<br />
CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................... 252<br />
WORKSHOP THEME E – SOIL PROCESSES AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES........................... 254<br />
SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL GENESIS AND MINERALOGY.............................................. 255<br />
VAN RANST E. & MEES F. ..............................................................................................................................255<br />
IMPACT OF ACID DEPOSITION ON CATION LEACHING FROM...................................................... 258<br />
Mt. TALANG AIRFALL ASH..................................................................................................................... 258<br />
Fiantis, D., Nelson 1 , E. Van Ranst 2 and J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong> 3 ......................................................................... 258<br />
STONE LINES AND WEATHERING PROFILES OF FERRALLITIC SOILS IN NORTHEASTERN<br />
ARGENTINA ............................................................................................................................................. 269<br />
Morrás, H. 1* , Moretti, L. 1 , Píccolo, G. 2 , Zech,W. 3 ..................................................................................... 269<br />
PEDOGENESIS ALONG A HILLSLOPE TRAVERSE IN THE UPPER AFRAM BASIN, GHANA.......... 281<br />
T. Adjei-Gyapong, 1 E. Boateng, 1 * C. Dela Dedzoe, 1 W.R. Effland, 2 M.D. Mays 2 and J.K. Seneya 1 ......... 281<br />
INFLUENCE OF TITANOMAGNETITE ON DITHIONITE-CITRATE-BICARBONATE (DCB) AND<br />
OXALATE EXTRACTIONS IN WEATHERED DOLERITE ...................................................................... 283<br />
C. G. Algoe 1* , E. Van Ranst 2 , G. Stoops 3 ................................................................................................ 283<br />
SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL MICROMORPHOLOGY .......................................................... 291<br />
STOOPS, G., MARCELINO, V., MEES, F............................................................................................................ 291<br />
SPHEROIDAL WEATHERING OF DOLERITE IN SURINAME: EVIDENCE FROM PHYSICAL,<br />
CHEMICAL AND MINERALOGICAL DATA ........................................................................................... 295<br />
C. G. Algoe 1* , E. Van Ranst 2 , G. Stoops 3 ................................................................................................ 295<br />
MICROMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ANDISOLS IN WEST JAVA, INDONESIA ........ 296<br />
Mahfud Arif<strong>in</strong> * , R<strong>in</strong>a Devnita.................................................................................................................... 296<br />
MICROMORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF SOME SOILS IN THE AFRAM PLAINS (GHANA, WEST<br />
AFRICA).................................................................................................................................................... 307<br />
M.D. Mays 1 , W.R. Effland 2 , T. Adjei-Gyapong 3 , C.D. Dedzoe 3 and E. Boateng 4 *................................... 307<br />
CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................... 308<br />
CLOSING ADDRESS BY PROF. E. VAN RANST, CHAIRMAN STEERING COMMITTEE<br />
PHYSICAL LAND RESOURCES AND PROMOTOR OF THE MASTER PROGRAMME (UGENT) 311<br />
AGENDA ........................................................................................................................................................... 314<br />
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS .............................................................................................................................. 318
PREFACE<br />
The 5th Refresher Course for alumni of our Master programmes is organised with the aim to<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t out needs for feedback, co-operation and support for alumni, and present <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
and means to fill gaps and remediate shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs. In addition, the objective is to brief the<br />
alumni on the latest developments <strong>in</strong> the field of Soil Science and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Geology,<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the expertise available at the International Centre for <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>.<br />
While <strong>in</strong> the former editions of the Refresher Course, which took place <strong>in</strong> South-East<br />
Asia, Africa and Lat<strong>in</strong> America, there was a strong accent on transfer of knowledge from the<br />
International Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Centre for Pos-Graduate Soil Scientists (ITC-Ghent), towards alumni,<br />
now an overall exchange of knowledge and <strong>in</strong>formation from alumni to staff and vice versa,<br />
as well as amongst alumni is envisaged. It is the <strong>in</strong>tention to create or improve channels of<br />
communication as an <strong>in</strong>dispensable vehicle for co-operation.<br />
This publication collects all contributions from alumni that were submitted for the<br />
different workshops organised <strong>in</strong> the frame of this Refresher Course. The contributions are<br />
arranged per workshop theme, and <strong>in</strong>troduced by each scientific committee appo<strong>in</strong>ted for each<br />
workshop. Care is taken to add a selection of valuable references perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to each workshop<br />
theme.
Welcome<br />
WELCOME<br />
Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Prof. E. Van Ranst, Chairman Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong><br />
<strong>Resources</strong> and Promotor of the Master Programme (UGent)<br />
Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Rector P. Van Cauwenberghe (UGent)<br />
Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Ms. K. Verbrugghen, Director of VLIR-University Development<br />
Co-operation Section
Welcome<br />
Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Prof. E. Van Ranst, Chairman Steer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Committee <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> and Promotor of the Master<br />
Programme (UGent)<br />
Given at the occasion of the fifth refresher course for alumni of the Master of Science Programmes <strong>in</strong><br />
Soil Science (UGent), Eremology (UGent) and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> (UGent-VUB)<br />
4 September 2006<br />
The Rector of Ghent University,<br />
The Director of the Secretariat for University Development Co-operation of the Flemish<br />
Interuniversity Council,<br />
Esteemed Guests,<br />
Dear Alumni,<br />
Dear Colleagues,<br />
Welcome at our 5 th refresher course for alumni. We are happy to be able to welcome today<br />
about 40 alumni. When we take <strong>in</strong>to account all alumni who reacted to our call for<br />
participation, this number would have been around one hundred (100). However, f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts proved to be a stumbl<strong>in</strong>g stone for many.<br />
The 5 th Refresher Course for Alumni of our Master programmes is organised with the aim to<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t out needs for feedback, co-operation and support for alumni, and to present <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
and means to fill gaps and remediate shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs. In addition, it is the objective to brief the<br />
alumni on the latest developments <strong>in</strong> the field of Soil Science and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Geology,<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the expertise available at the International Centre for <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>.<br />
While <strong>in</strong> the former editions of the Refresher Course, which took place <strong>in</strong> South-East Asia,<br />
Africa and Lat<strong>in</strong> America, there was a strong accent on transfer of knowledge from the<br />
International Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Centre for Post-Graduate Soil Scientists towards the alumni, now an<br />
overall exchange of knowledge and <strong>in</strong>formation from alumni to staff and vice versa, as well<br />
as amongst alumni is aimed at. It is the <strong>in</strong>tention to create or improve channels of<br />
communication as an <strong>in</strong>dispensable vehicle for co-operation.<br />
We, the programme organisers, are proud and honoured that Prof. Van Cauwenberge, the<br />
Rector of Ghent University, which is host<strong>in</strong>g this workshop, has committed himself to address<br />
this meet<strong>in</strong>g at the occasion of the open<strong>in</strong>g. We know that he has a full agenda. In fact, his<br />
secretariat <strong>in</strong>formed us that he has to be <strong>in</strong> Brussels today at eleven (11) ‘o clock, and he will<br />
have to leave us shortly after his open<strong>in</strong>g address.<br />
We are also pleased with the presence of Ms. Verbrugghen, Director of VLIR-University<br />
Development Co-operation Section, and sponsor of this workshop, who k<strong>in</strong>dly accepted to<br />
welcome you here today.
Welcome<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce 1997, the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g and scholarships that "the International Course Programme's,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ours, receive from the Belgian Adm<strong>in</strong>istration for Development Co-operation are<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g adm<strong>in</strong>istered through the Flemish Interuniversity Council – or VLIR , and more <strong>in</strong><br />
particular the department University Development Co-operation. VLIR is a familiar name for<br />
all our graduates s<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />
Both dist<strong>in</strong>guished speakers are <strong>in</strong>vited to welcome the audience<br />
Prof. E. Van Ranst
Welcome<br />
Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Rector P. Van Cauwenberghe (UGent)<br />
Given at the occasion of the fifth refresher course for alumni of the Master of Science Programmes <strong>in</strong><br />
Soil Science (UGent), Eremology (UGent) and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> (UGent-VUB)<br />
Dear Alumni,<br />
Dear Colleagues,<br />
Esteemed Guests,<br />
4 September 2006<br />
It is my great pleasure and honour to welcome you at Ghent University. Ghent University has<br />
a long stand<strong>in</strong>g tradition of <strong>in</strong>ternationally oriented education and research. In fact, the<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational course programme <strong>in</strong> <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>, which has roots back to 1963, is<br />
the very proof of this. And you – its alumni – are the liv<strong>in</strong>g testimony.<br />
Up to this day, Ghent University is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> many <strong>in</strong>ternational projects and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensive contacts with research <strong>in</strong>stitutes and laboratories all over the world. This<br />
university’s concern for the world beyond the national borders manifests itself foremost <strong>in</strong> the<br />
education and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of foreign students.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce 1963, up to this day, about 1000 alumni from over 90 countries worldwide graduated<br />
from the Master programmes <strong>in</strong> Soil Science, Eremology and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> at<br />
Ghent University and, s<strong>in</strong>ce 1997, also at the Free University of Brussels. In the present day<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g, I see faces from more than 20 different nations, a number that without any doubt<br />
would have been much higher were it not for budgetary constra<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
While the <strong>in</strong>ternational course programme would not be successful without the day-to-day<br />
dedication of its promoters and staff, the programme is also highly <strong>in</strong>debted to you, the<br />
alumni. You act as scientific ambassadors by dissem<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g your knowledge <strong>in</strong>to your home<br />
<strong>in</strong>stitution and country and as key persons <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g a bridge between your <strong>in</strong>stitution and<br />
Ghent University. Indeed, many of the research projects that have been and are be<strong>in</strong>g carried<br />
out, were set up through co-operation with graduates from this university. All <strong>in</strong>itiatives that<br />
foster communication and network<strong>in</strong>g and which re<strong>in</strong>force ties between the university and its<br />
former students deserve our highest consideration and support.<br />
Yet, when exchang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge care has to be taken to consider the local cultural, social<br />
and material reality. While for a soil scientist, it is as clear as mud that it is important to f<strong>in</strong>d a<br />
common ground, collaboration should consist of support, encouragement, catalysation and<br />
help from the North to f<strong>in</strong>d that little bit extra, while the actual work has to be done <strong>in</strong> and by<br />
the South.<br />
The will has to exist, to have a relevant impact on the local community and to develop a clear<br />
vision of the future.<br />
Soil is a key natural resource which requires better management to support susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
development and to preserve this basic commodity for future generations. There is a need for<br />
well tra<strong>in</strong>ed soil professionals with a sound scientific understand<strong>in</strong>g of soil systems, but who<br />
can also develop policy and provide practical advice and guidance.
Welcome<br />
As soil experts, you are aware of the fact that to get off the ground – you have to know the<br />
ground you walk on, and you have to see what someth<strong>in</strong>g is worth on the ground.<br />
In the course of this day, several speakers will take the word with no other purpose than to<br />
<strong>in</strong>form you about several exist<strong>in</strong>g possibilities to f<strong>in</strong>d support and to establish co-operation,<br />
and this at different levels and scales. In the course of this week, there will be plenty of<br />
occasions to meet and to refresh contacts, both with staff from the International Course<br />
Programme <strong>in</strong> <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> and with your colleagues from the South. I hope that<br />
you will grasp this golden opportunity with both hands.<br />
I s<strong>in</strong>cerely wish to thank here the Flemish Interuniversity Council, and <strong>in</strong> particular the<br />
University Development Cooperation Section, for its f<strong>in</strong>ancial support to the promoters of the<br />
International Course Programme <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> to organise an event like this.<br />
While the course programme provided you with the <strong>in</strong>tellectual luggage, a workshop like this<br />
is <strong>in</strong>tented to prospect channels for carry<strong>in</strong>g that luggage to your targets, yet stay<strong>in</strong>g down to<br />
earth and touch<strong>in</strong>g ground. Above all, the International Centre for <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
aims to act as a two-directional gateway for knowledge exchange.<br />
To conclude, I hope that you will leave no stone unturned and cover a lot of ground the<br />
com<strong>in</strong>g days, so that you come <strong>in</strong> sight of f<strong>in</strong>e land. I th<strong>in</strong>k this is the most I can wish to sons<br />
and daughters of the soil.<br />
Prof. P. Van Cauwenberghe
Welcome<br />
Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Ms. K. Verbrugghen, Director of VLIR-<br />
University Development Co-operation Section<br />
Given at the occasion of the fifth refresher course for alumni of the Master of Science Programmes <strong>in</strong><br />
Soil Science (UGent), Eremology (UGent) and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> (UGent-VUB)<br />
Dear Alumni,<br />
Dear Colleagues,<br />
Esteemed Guests,<br />
4 September 2006<br />
It is my pleasure to be given the opportunity to say a few words to you.<br />
First of all, I want to congratulate you all, not only for the fact that quite years ago you were<br />
selected as VLIR scholar out of, <strong>in</strong> many cases, hundreds of quality applications, prov<strong>in</strong>g your<br />
quality standard already at that stage, but also for the fact that you all succeeded and obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
a Master degree, and <strong>in</strong>deed returned to your home countries.<br />
Now you have all been called back to Belgium, for a number of reasons. First of all, to update<br />
your scientific knowledge of the field of study, physical land resources, to exchange<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation and experience and specific cases.<br />
This will allow you to be better equipped for your own job back home, but this will also allow<br />
the course organisers <strong>in</strong> Belgium to further improve their tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme. We want to<br />
learn from you, on the basis of your experience, how the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme can be improved<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms of quality as well as of development relevance.<br />
Furthermore, <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g your experiences and cases <strong>in</strong>to the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme will allow<br />
also the other students from Belgium or elsewhere to get access to this valuable <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
So this will contribute to the quality and the relevance of the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme, both for the<br />
southern but also the northern students.<br />
But your be<strong>in</strong>g here will also allow you to improve your own network, first of all with the<br />
course organisers <strong>in</strong> Belgium, but also with your colleague graduates. So do talk to one<br />
another. Exchange bus<strong>in</strong>ess cards. Initiate long-last<strong>in</strong>g partnerships across frontiers. Because<br />
academic cooperation consists of both north south but also south south cooperation.<br />
And then f<strong>in</strong>ally you will be given more <strong>in</strong>formation on the opportunities that VLIR is<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
I am proud to be able to announce that this refresher course, organised by Ghent University, is<br />
co-f<strong>in</strong>anced by VLIR. For us, the result of an <strong>in</strong>ternational course is not obta<strong>in</strong>ed by you<br />
gett<strong>in</strong>g your Master degree. No, we want you to go back home, to your home <strong>in</strong>stitution, and<br />
to make the difference there, by apply<strong>in</strong>g the knowledge that you acquired here, by pass<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
the knowledge to colleagues and peers, by tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g others. Only then, the <strong>in</strong>tervention by<br />
VLIR, our fund<strong>in</strong>g, will be a good <strong>in</strong>vestment from the perspective of development<br />
cooperation. Our basel<strong>in</strong>e is : shar<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>ds, chang<strong>in</strong>g lives. It is our common responsibility,<br />
also yours, to jo<strong>in</strong> bra<strong>in</strong>s and forces to help and improve the quality of life <strong>in</strong> the south.
Welcome<br />
This afternoon, my colleague Frank will elaborate more on the wide range of fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />
opportunities that VLIR is provid<strong>in</strong>g. Over the last years, we have added quite many new<br />
opportunities, so we will be happy to give you an overview. He will also briefly touch upon<br />
the opportunities offered by other <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> Belgium that are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> development<br />
cooperation. Maybe there is someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> it for you!<br />
But please, remember one th<strong>in</strong>g: VLIR does not directly fund <strong>in</strong>dividuals or organisations <strong>in</strong><br />
the south. We fund cooperation between <strong>in</strong>dividuals and universities or research <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong><br />
the south, and one or more Flemish universities. We want you to occupy and to cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />
occupy a key or strategic position <strong>in</strong> your home country from where you can contribute to the<br />
development of your country, through science, and we want you to l<strong>in</strong>k up with our Flemish<br />
scientists. If those two conditions are fulfilled, we will happily look forward to receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
proposals from your side.<br />
I once aga<strong>in</strong> thank the organisers of this event, and prof. Van Ranst <strong>in</strong> particular, for the time<br />
given to me today, and I wish you all the best. Let’s keep <strong>in</strong> touch!<br />
Ms. K. Verbrugghen
Welcome
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
OPENING LECTURES<br />
Susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>Land</strong> Management <strong>in</strong> Ethiopian Highlands<br />
Mitiku Haile<br />
<strong>New</strong> Challenges of Soil Science to Food Security with Special<br />
Reference to Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Tang Huajun, Zhou Wei<br />
Works on Erosion Processes under W<strong>in</strong>d-Driven Ra<strong>in</strong> Conditions <strong>in</strong> I.C.E<br />
Gunay Erpul, Donald Gabriels<br />
1
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT IN THE ETHIOPIAN<br />
HIGHLANDS<br />
1.1 Development situation and policy<br />
1.1.1 General<br />
Mitiku Haile<br />
Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Ethiopia is an agrarian country with 85% of the population earn<strong>in</strong>g their livelihoods from<br />
agriculture. It is one of the poorest countries <strong>in</strong> the world with a GDP of US$110 per capita<br />
per annum and 45.5 % of the population is below the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e. The country has suffered<br />
repeated fam<strong>in</strong>es over the last half century, and agriculture has failed to generate capital for<br />
diversify<strong>in</strong>g and transform<strong>in</strong>g the country’s economy. Hence reduc<strong>in</strong>g poverty through<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g rural production and livelihoods is central to the country’s development agenda.<br />
There have been a number of policy <strong>in</strong>itiatives s<strong>in</strong>ce the present government which<br />
came to power <strong>in</strong> 1991 has sought to address these issues. The overall guid<strong>in</strong>g framework<br />
<strong>in</strong>itially developed and still adhered to is ADLI, Agricultural Development Led<br />
Industrialization . This sees <strong>in</strong>creased production <strong>in</strong> the rural areas as critical for generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the materials, market base, surplus labor, export earn<strong>in</strong>gs and capital for <strong>in</strong>dustrialization. In<br />
2002, along with most develop<strong>in</strong>g world countries and <strong>in</strong> response to the identification of<br />
poverty reduction as the key target <strong>in</strong> the millennium development goals, the government<br />
developed its own poverty reduction strategy paper (PRSP) entitled the “Susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
Development and Poverty Reduction Programme” (SDPRP). In 2005 this was superseded by<br />
an updated SDPRP called the “Plan for Accelerated and Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development to End<br />
Poverty” (PASDEP). This provides guidance for the second five years of the PRSP process.<br />
The other guid<strong>in</strong>g document is the Federal Government’s Rural Development Policy and<br />
Strategies launched <strong>in</strong> 2003.<br />
The emphases <strong>in</strong> these three documents respectively are as follows:<br />
SDPRP seeks to:<br />
� support ADLI by generat<strong>in</strong>g a primary surplus to fuel growth <strong>in</strong> other sectors,<br />
� use (option) menu-based extension packages to enhance farmer choice of technologies,<br />
� undertake <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> education to overcome critical capacity constra<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />
� <strong>in</strong>crease from 4m to 6m the households covered by Extension Packages, and<br />
� support agricultural research, water harvest<strong>in</strong>g and small-scale irrigation.<br />
Rural Development Policies <strong>in</strong>cludes:<br />
� crop <strong>in</strong>tensification <strong>in</strong> high ra<strong>in</strong>fall areas,<br />
� livestock improvement and water resource development <strong>in</strong> pastoral areas,<br />
� water harvest<strong>in</strong>g and lands conservation <strong>in</strong> drought-prone areas, and<br />
� livestock improvement through improved breeds and technology.<br />
2
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
PASDEP aims to:<br />
� capture the private <strong>in</strong>itiative of farmers and support a shift to diversification and<br />
commercialization <strong>in</strong> agriculture,<br />
� support pro-poor subsistence farm<strong>in</strong>g where the aim is to <strong>in</strong>crease crop yields for<br />
domestic use and to ensure food security,<br />
� provide <strong>in</strong>tensified extension support at the kebele level to facilitate <strong>in</strong>novation.<br />
In all these policies the need for skilled staff and for <strong>in</strong>novations based on farm-tested<br />
research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are present. It is <strong>in</strong> this way that higher education and research from the<br />
agricultural faculties of universities can contribute to rural development, poverty reduction<br />
and the country’s achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. To this end Faculties<br />
of Agriculture, Junior Colleges and Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Vocational Education Centers are engaged<br />
<strong>in</strong> adress<strong>in</strong>g issues of susta<strong>in</strong>able land management as a basis for <strong>in</strong>creased productivity.<br />
1.1.2 Higher Education's Role <strong>in</strong> Development<br />
Tertiary education plays a key role <strong>in</strong> the economic and social development of any nation.<br />
This is particularly the case <strong>in</strong> today's globaliz<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge-based<br />
economy. No country can expect to successfully <strong>in</strong>tegrate <strong>in</strong>to, and benefit from, the 21st<br />
century economy without a well-educated workforce. The task of <strong>in</strong>tegration is particularly<br />
great for countries like Ethiopia given the low level of education atta<strong>in</strong>ment of the country’s<br />
labor force, and the urgent need for susta<strong>in</strong>ed economic growth <strong>in</strong> order to reduce poverty.<br />
Furthermore, there are few higher education <strong>in</strong>stitutions with the skills, equipment and<br />
mandate to generate new knowledge and to adapt knowledge developed elsewhere to the local<br />
context.<br />
1.1.3 Education Policy<br />
Ethiopia adopted an Education and Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Policy <strong>in</strong> 1994. The policy encompasses general<br />
and specific objectives, as well as implementation strategies that <strong>in</strong>clude formal and nonformal<br />
education, from k<strong>in</strong>dergarten to higher education. Emphasis is placed on the<br />
development of problem-solv<strong>in</strong>g capacities, with a particular focus on the acquisition of both<br />
theoretical and practical knowledge.<br />
The long-term aim is to achieve the goal of universal primary education by the year<br />
2015. The strategy developed to implement the policy calls for susta<strong>in</strong>ed public <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
programme through the mobilization of national and <strong>in</strong>ternational resources. The policy seeks<br />
to develop synergy between education, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, research and development through<br />
coord<strong>in</strong>ated participation by relevant organizations.<br />
One outcome of this policy was the formulation of a sector-wide approach. The first<br />
Education Sector Development Programme was launched <strong>in</strong> 1996/1997 and was completed<br />
five years later <strong>in</strong> 2001/2002. The second five year Education Sector Development<br />
Programme became operational <strong>in</strong> 2001/2002, overlapp<strong>in</strong>g slightly with the first one, and was<br />
concluded <strong>in</strong> 2005/2006. The major components of the programmes were to: (1) <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
enrolment; (2) improve leadership and management; (3) ensure quality and relevance; (4)<br />
improve <strong>in</strong>stitutional efficiency; and (5) provide a logistic framework.<br />
For about five decades the country had only two universities (Addis Ababa and<br />
Alemaya). As the primary and secondary education facilities <strong>in</strong>creased, these <strong>in</strong>stitutions were<br />
unable to provide enough opportunities for quality higher education to the grow<strong>in</strong>g numbers<br />
of school leavers. In addition, the tremendous <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the participation rate <strong>in</strong> primary and<br />
secondary education resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased demands for qualified teachers at the various levels.<br />
3
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
To partially meet these grow<strong>in</strong>g demands, the country was obliged to expand the higher<br />
education sector. As a result, the sector witnessed rapid expansion between 1997 and 2001<br />
with the establishment of Bahir Dar, Debub (Awassa), Jimma, and Mekelle universities. This<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved amalgat<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g colleges <strong>in</strong> these towns. Further, to meet the grow<strong>in</strong>g need for<br />
qualified manpower by various sectors of the economy, professional programs were<br />
developed <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, education, eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and health <strong>in</strong> Alemaya, Arba M<strong>in</strong>ch, Dila,<br />
Jimma and Mekelle. The next five years saw the realization of three additional universities,<br />
namely Arba M<strong>in</strong>ch, Gonder and Adama, by upgrad<strong>in</strong>g Arba M<strong>in</strong>ch Institute of Water<br />
Technology, Gonder College of Health Sciences and Nazareth College of Technical Teacher<br />
Education, respectively. This brought the number of public sector universities to n<strong>in</strong>e. At the<br />
present po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time, there are 12 new universities be<strong>in</strong>g established <strong>in</strong> Dessie, Debre Berhan,<br />
Debre Markos, Nekemt, Bale-Robe, Sodo, Dilla, Mizan Teferi/Tepi, Jigjiga, Semera, Dire<br />
Dawa and Axum.<br />
Expansion is not limited to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the number of higher education <strong>in</strong>stitutions, but<br />
also <strong>in</strong>volves enlarg<strong>in</strong>g the number of academic programs they offer and their student <strong>in</strong>take.<br />
This has resulted <strong>in</strong> a tremendous <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the participation rate <strong>in</strong> higher education. With<strong>in</strong><br />
n<strong>in</strong>e years, higher education enrolment <strong>in</strong> regular programs has <strong>in</strong>creased from about 42,100<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1997 to 103,500 <strong>in</strong> 2005 - an <strong>in</strong>crease of 146 percent.<br />
In addition to the expansion <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>stitutions, programmes and student numbers,<br />
higher education is undergo<strong>in</strong>g rapid transformation <strong>in</strong> other respects. Cognizant of the fact<br />
that expansion needs to be supported by improvements <strong>in</strong> the management and operation of<br />
the higher education system, the Government has embarked upon an overall reform<br />
programme. This is part and parcel of the Civil Service Reform Programme the country has<br />
been implement<strong>in</strong>g over the last few years. This requires organizations to become resultorientated,<br />
rather than <strong>in</strong>put-oriented. The most important components of this transformation<br />
for higher education are: improv<strong>in</strong>g leadership, governance and management, and creat<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
enabl<strong>in</strong>g culture to provide appropriate tertiary level education. Relevance of the programmes<br />
to the economic development priorities of the country, as well as efficiency and effectiveness<br />
<strong>in</strong> the delivery of education and the use of scarce resources, are core areas of concern <strong>in</strong> this<br />
transformation.<br />
Experience shows that “massification” at an unprecedented scale can lead to<br />
deterioration <strong>in</strong> quality. Realiz<strong>in</strong>g this, the Government established, <strong>in</strong> 2003, an autonomous<br />
body called the Higher Education Relevance and Quality Assurance Agency to make sure that<br />
appropriate and effective teach<strong>in</strong>g support and learn<strong>in</strong>g opportunities are provided for<br />
students. It is responsible for <strong>in</strong>ternal audit undertaken by the <strong>in</strong>stitutions themselves and<br />
external audits which the Agency itself carries out. The audits assess the <strong>in</strong>stitutions' system<br />
of accountability and <strong>in</strong>ternal review mechanisms to ensure that each <strong>in</strong>stitution's quality<br />
assurance process complies with accepted standards. In addition to this Agency, a Higher<br />
Education Strategy Centre was established <strong>in</strong> 2003 to formulate policies as well as devise<br />
strategic directions for the higher education sector.<br />
Susta<strong>in</strong>able land management as a course is provided <strong>in</strong> the universities and other<br />
colleges to enable graduates perceive the processes of land degradation and also design<br />
mitigat<strong>in</strong>g solutions.Cognizant of the fact, the extension packages of the agricultural and<br />
natural resources management sector have been improved to <strong>in</strong>corporate soil and water<br />
conservation practicies not only as a community endeavour but also as a farm management<br />
tool with<strong>in</strong> households.<br />
4
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
2. ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS<br />
Ethiopia, with a population of 76 million people and annual growth rate of 2.36%, is the<br />
second largest country <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa. It has a surface area of 1.12 million km² and an<br />
average population density of 62 persons per km². The elevation of the country varies from<br />
120 m below sea level at Dalool to 4620 m.a.s.l. at the Ras Dashen Mounta<strong>in</strong>. As a<br />
consequence the country is endowed with diversified agro-ecologies, soil types and<br />
biodiversity.<br />
The country is divided <strong>in</strong>to two major physiographic regions, the highlands and the<br />
lowlands (Table1). This physiographic separation is based on the traditional altitud<strong>in</strong>al<br />
classification of the country ([20]). The lowlands which constitute more than 60% of the land<br />
mass are found <strong>in</strong> areas 1,000 10-14<br />
Kur (very cold or alp<strong>in</strong>e) >3,700 >1,000
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
concentration of around two- thirds livestock herd of the total 78 million population - the<br />
largest <strong>in</strong> Africa. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to [4], the crops grown <strong>in</strong> the country are cereals (70%), pulses<br />
(10%), and perennials (20%). The specific crops <strong>in</strong>clude: tef (Eragrostis tef), maize , wheat,<br />
barley and , sorghum as well as coffee and enset (Enset ventricosum).<br />
The wide ranges of topographic and climatic factors, parent material and land use have<br />
resulted <strong>in</strong> extreme variability of soils <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia (Table 2). In different part of the country,<br />
different soil form<strong>in</strong>g factors have taken place. Assessments of the nutrient status of<br />
Ethiopian soils <strong>in</strong>dicate ranges of 0.9 -2.9 g nitrogen (N) and 0.4 -1.10 g phosphorus (P) per<br />
kg of soils ([7]).<br />
Soil type Area (km 2 ) Percent<br />
Acrisol 55,726.5 5.0<br />
Cambisol 124,038 11.1<br />
Chernozems 814 0.07<br />
Rendz<strong>in</strong>as 16,348 1.5<br />
Gleysols 5,273.5 0.47<br />
Phaeozems 32,551 2.9<br />
Lithosol (Leptosols) 163,185 14.7<br />
Fluvisols 88,261.5 7.9<br />
Luvisols 64,063.5 5.8<br />
Nitosols 150,089.5 13.5<br />
Histosols 4,719.5 0.42<br />
Arenosols 9,024 0.81<br />
Regosols 133,596 12.0<br />
Solonetz 495 0.04<br />
Andosols 13,556 1.2<br />
Vertisols 116,785 10.5<br />
Xarosols 53,171 4.8<br />
Yermosols 34,95 3.1<br />
Solonchaks 47,217.5 4.2<br />
Table 2. Distribution of soil types <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia<br />
Ethiopia is endowed with vast water resources with 12 major rivers and 22 natural lakes<br />
([24]). Professional estimates <strong>in</strong>dicate that the country has an annual surface runoff of about<br />
110 billion cubic meters from 12 major dra<strong>in</strong>age bas<strong>in</strong>s ([26]), only 4% of which is used ([5]).<br />
Groundwater resources, the true potential of the country are not clearly known. However, it is<br />
widely reported that Ethiopia possesses a groundwater resource potential of approximately of<br />
2.6 billion cubic meters (m 3 ) ([18]).<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to [1], of the country's estimated 112 million ha of land mass, about 66%,<br />
about 22% is under cultivation for production of annual and perennial crops. About 96% of<br />
the current cultivated areas are occupied by small holder subsistence farmers, while<br />
commercial farms cultivate the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ([3]). [26] reported that the total irrigable area from<br />
the 12 major bas<strong>in</strong>s of ca. 3 million ha.[18] estimated the potential irrigable land of ca. 3.7 to<br />
4 million ha. The figure is still subject to change as more reliable data are be<strong>in</strong>g acquired<br />
through accomplishment of all river bas<strong>in</strong>s master plan studies and with the grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technology for water transfer exploitation. Nevertheless. the irrigated areas generate only 3 %<br />
of the total field crop production.<br />
6
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
Despite the country's huge water resources potential, there is high temporal and spatial<br />
variability: most of the rivers <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia are seasonal and about 70% of the runoff potential<br />
takes place dur<strong>in</strong>g the months of June, July and August ([27]). There is uneven spatial<br />
distribution of river bas<strong>in</strong>s that between 80-90% of Ethiopia's water resources is found <strong>in</strong> four<br />
river bas<strong>in</strong>s, namely the Blue Nile, Tekeze, Baro - Akobo, and Gibe – Omo ([18]).<br />
<strong>Land</strong> degradation by erosion is clearly evident throughout 7000 years of history <strong>in</strong> the<br />
world and it is the major cause of poverty <strong>in</strong> rural areas of develop<strong>in</strong>g countries.<br />
Studies of the effect of erosion on early civilization have shown that one of the major<br />
causes of the downfall of many flourish<strong>in</strong>g empires was soil degradation. [2] described soil<br />
degradation as one of the major causes of the downfall of the ancient Axumite K<strong>in</strong>gdom. [10]<br />
also described soil erosion as one of the elements <strong>in</strong> the decl<strong>in</strong>e of civilizations of Lalibela <strong>in</strong><br />
the 14th century and Gondar <strong>in</strong> the 17th century.<br />
Much of the land degradation is found <strong>in</strong> the highlands above 1500m (45% of the total<br />
country's total area) ([4]). These highlands, which are characterized by favorable<br />
environmental conditions, have been settled and cultivated for millennia ([13]). The Ethiopian<br />
highlands constitute one of the most degraded lands <strong>in</strong> Africa, if not <strong>in</strong> the world ([6]). These<br />
highlands are an ancient and conspicuously uplifted part of the earth's surface, which by<br />
virtue of their location have constantly been assailed by normal erosive forces ([4]). Morever,<br />
the highlands have long history of tectonic <strong>in</strong>stability which has split the highland <strong>in</strong>to two<br />
parts. [4] identified six categories of soil degradation <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopian highlands: water<br />
erosion, w<strong>in</strong>d erosion, sal<strong>in</strong>ization /alkalization, and chemical, physical and biological<br />
degradations.<br />
The degradation of resources is caused by heavy pressure from human and livestock<br />
population, coupled with many other physical, socioeconomic and political factors<br />
The most press<strong>in</strong>g forms of resource degradation are the destruction of the natural<br />
vegetation and soil erosion by water. Deforestation has been occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia for<br />
millennia and has accelerated dur<strong>in</strong>g the last century ([15]). Rapid population growth,<br />
extensive forest clear<strong>in</strong>g for cultivation, overgraz<strong>in</strong>g, movement of political centers, and<br />
exploitation of forests for fuel wood and construction materials without replant<strong>in</strong>g reduced<br />
Ethiopia's forest area to 16% <strong>in</strong> the 1950's and to 3.1 % by 1982 ([25]).<br />
The water erosion <strong>in</strong>cludes sheet and rill erosion, gully erosion, tunnel<strong>in</strong>g and land<br />
slides. Sheet and rill erosion is the most important erosion form <strong>in</strong> all zones and altitud<strong>in</strong>al<br />
belts of the Ethiopian highlands ([20]). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the 'Global Assessment of Soil<br />
Degradation' map ([23]), more than 50% of the northern Ethiopan highlands suffer from<br />
extreme loss of top soil due to sheet and rill erosion. On this map, gull<strong>in</strong>g and mass<br />
movements are <strong>in</strong>dicated as another major problem.<br />
Biological degradation <strong>in</strong>duced by man, such as removal of field crop residues and<br />
dung, overgraz<strong>in</strong>g and deforestation, is widespread and severe <strong>in</strong> the highlands. However, the<br />
major force driv<strong>in</strong>g land degradation <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia is nutrient depletion of agricultural soils<br />
aris<strong>in</strong>g from complete removal of crop residues from crop fields, crop production with low<br />
levels of nutrient <strong>in</strong>puts and lack of adequate soil conservation practices. However, this<br />
argument seems to contradict with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of [4]. Although, [7] identified erosion as<br />
particular concern <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopian context as the major cause of land degradation which<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>es food crop production, [20] attribute land degradation to several <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g biophysical<br />
social and political attributes that demand concerted <strong>in</strong>terventions not only<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil fertilitybut also farm management practices that take susta<strong>in</strong>able land<br />
management <strong>in</strong>to concideration.<br />
The physical degradation of soil throughout the highlands is commonly associated with<br />
the biological degradation and water erosion. It could arise from excessive tillage,<br />
7
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
particularly for tef and livestock trampl<strong>in</strong>g between graz<strong>in</strong>g grounds and water<strong>in</strong>g locations<br />
([4]).<br />
Serious chemical degradation is rarely found <strong>in</strong> actively erod<strong>in</strong>g soils but more common<br />
<strong>in</strong> Nitosols at elevations over 2000 m a.s.l. (southwestern parts of the country). Excessive<br />
removal of plant nutrients can result from cont<strong>in</strong>uous annual crops of cereals, but is not<br />
significant <strong>in</strong> the highlands i.e. partly allows replacement by the arrival of nutrients <strong>in</strong> the<br />
groundwater mov<strong>in</strong>g down the landscape. The argument is that had the replenish<strong>in</strong>g not been<br />
there, the Ethiopian highlands could have been more <strong>in</strong> a severe condition than it is now, after<br />
so many centuries of food production.<br />
Soil at a given site can be formed by three processes: the deposition of sediment by<br />
runoff erosion, the natural weather<strong>in</strong>g of rock beneath the soil and the formation of soil at the<br />
surface by decay<strong>in</strong>g organic and <strong>in</strong>organic m<strong>in</strong>erals caused by both natural processes and by<br />
cropp<strong>in</strong>g. The deposition of sediment <strong>in</strong>volves substantially larger quantities than the<br />
formation of soil at <strong>in</strong> situ. It is estimated that 90% of the total erosion is deposited annually<br />
<strong>in</strong> the lower ly<strong>in</strong>g areas of the Ethiopian highlands ([4]).<br />
Internationally, the issue of <strong>in</strong> situ soil formation rate is controversial among scientists.<br />
However, the common estimates lie between 0.8 and 3 t ha -1 y -1 . It is, however, agreed that<br />
soil formation rate under farm<strong>in</strong>g is faster, and that tillage operations probably <strong>in</strong>crease the<br />
rate of top soil renewal to around 11 t ha -1 y -1 ([4]).<br />
All these rates are considerably lower than the soil formation rates tentatively calculated<br />
for the Ethiopian highlands (from 2 to 22 t ha -1 y -1 ) from the data on temperature, ra<strong>in</strong>fall,<br />
length of grow<strong>in</strong>g period, soil units, soil depth, slope gradient and land cover (FAO) work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
paper 2 (WP2) ([4]). These <strong>in</strong>dicative soil formation rates <strong>in</strong>crease from low levels <strong>in</strong> the<br />
north to high levels <strong>in</strong> the west and southwest and thereafter fall towards the boarder to<br />
Kenya. The patterns reflect ra<strong>in</strong>fall and temperature. In other reports, a soil formation rate of<br />
about 10 t ha -1 y -1 is estimated for the Ethiopian highlands, depend<strong>in</strong>g on slope gradient and<br />
land use type ([21, 8]).<br />
[9] extrapolated soil formation rates for the different agro-climatological zones of<br />
Ethiopia (Table 3). These soil formation rates are mean rates, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account ra<strong>in</strong> and<br />
temperature conditions, however, it did not consider lithology. Over all, the data on soil<br />
formation rates <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia are <strong>in</strong>consistent; on the other hand, those data are used for<br />
comparison with the soil loss rates. It is, however, suggested that those data should not be<br />
applied to the vast areas where the soil mantle results from sediment deposition rather than<br />
from pedogenesis ([8]).<br />
8
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
Agro-Climatogical zone Altitud<strong>in</strong>al limits (m a.s.l.) Soil formation rate<br />
(t ha-1 y-1)<br />
High Wurch(Kur) >3700 2<br />
Wet Wurch 3200 -3700 4<br />
Moist Wurch 3200 -3700 3<br />
Wet Dega 2300-3200 10<br />
Moist Dega 2300 -3200 8<br />
Wet Wo<strong>in</strong>a Dega 1500 – 2300 16<br />
Moist Wo<strong>in</strong>a Dega 1500-2300 12<br />
Dry Wo<strong>in</strong>a Dega 1500 -2300 6<br />
Moist Kolla 500-1500 6<br />
Dry Kolla 500 -1500 3<br />
Berha, Desert
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
The value reported by [22] is lower by a half than the estimate made for the Ethiopian<br />
highlands by [4]. The two studies are not only differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the magnitude of the SSY but also<br />
<strong>in</strong> their approach and assumptions. The [4] approach was based on agro-ecologies and the<br />
contribution of gully erosion and other forms of erosion were ignored. On the other hand, the<br />
[22] approach was catchment - based and seems to over emphasize the contribution of gully<br />
erosion, as it is <strong>in</strong> the same order of magnitude to that of rill erosion. Moreover, [22] predicted<br />
solid sediment loss that took <strong>in</strong>to account the catchment area as the only explanatory variable<br />
for sediment yield prediction, with an r 3 (coefficient of determ<strong>in</strong>ation) of 0.59.<br />
Overall, the <strong>in</strong>formation on sediment budget <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopia highlands is not only<br />
<strong>in</strong>consistent but also <strong>in</strong>adequate to represent all the components of the mass balance equation.<br />
Therefore, further research is needed to understand the sediment budget tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account<br />
representative river bas<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the highlands of Ethiopia.<br />
<strong>Land</strong> cover<br />
Area<br />
(%)<br />
Soil loss<br />
(tha-1y -1 )<br />
Graz<strong>in</strong>g 47 5<br />
Uncultivable 19 5<br />
Crop land 13 42<br />
Wood land/ bush land 8 5<br />
Swampy land 4 0<br />
Former crop land 4 70<br />
Forests 4 1<br />
Perennial crops 2 8<br />
Total for the whole of Ethiopia 100 8<br />
Table 4. Soil loss rates <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia(after [9] and [20])<br />
Erosion impacts can be either on-site or off-site or both. Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, the impacts can be<br />
conceived as positive or negative. [4] has documented that positive and negative impacts are<br />
merely relative terms that ma<strong>in</strong>ly depend on the region of <strong>in</strong>terest. For <strong>in</strong>stance the eroded soil<br />
from the Ethiopian highlands that leaves via the Blue Nile can bee seen as a negative effect<br />
for Ethiopia but, on the other hand , the deposited sediment <strong>in</strong> the Egypt's valley had<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased the fertility status of the <strong>in</strong>-situ soil, which might adversely affect the Aswam dam.<br />
In this study, on-site impacts are related to productivity of farms caused by loss of top soil<br />
(loss of nutrients and organic matter), reduction of soil depth, soil crust<strong>in</strong>g and seal<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
dissection of fields. In less developed countries, on-farm economic impacts of erosion tend to<br />
exceed off-site impacts. This reflects the lower level of downstream <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />
development, less concern about water quality and the heavy dependence of small farmers on<br />
natural levels of soil fertility. [14] also noted that <strong>in</strong> less developed areas the onset of<br />
significant erosion can lead to a pattern of rapid land degradation with decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g yields and<br />
vegetative covers that lead to shortened fallow periods, overgraz<strong>in</strong>g for further erosion and<br />
land degradation.<br />
Soil fertility depletion is develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a major constra<strong>in</strong>t to agricultural production <strong>in</strong><br />
Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Highlands Reclamation Study ([4]) reported that about half of the<br />
Ethiopian highlands (27 million ha) was significantly degraded <strong>in</strong> 1984, out of which 2<br />
million hectares of agricultural land have degraded to the extent that they will not be able to<br />
susta<strong>in</strong> crop production <strong>in</strong> the future. However, little <strong>in</strong>formation exists on the relationship<br />
between erosion, erosion hazard, and its impact on crop productivity and associated costs.<br />
[19] reported that a reduction of barley yield by 25 kg ha -1 for 1 cm of soil loss was observed<br />
10
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
<strong>in</strong> a Humic Andisol <strong>in</strong> the Debre Birhan area of Northen Showa. The same study for the area<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that with the soil loss rate of 66t ha -1 y -1 , the shallow soil with an average depth of 45<br />
cm will be completely eroded <strong>in</strong> about sixty years time while crop production will decrease<br />
by 35% dur<strong>in</strong>g the first twenty years. [11] predicted that most of the cultivated land <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Ethiopian highlands would be entirely stripped of the soil mantel with<strong>in</strong> 150 years, assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
an average soil depth of 60cm. In economic terms, soil erosion, which is based on the data<br />
provided by [4], is estimated to have cost 619 million Ethiopian Birr (ETB) by the year 1990.<br />
[4], however, acknowledged that (1) the cost estimate has uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> that the<br />
relationship between soil loss and yield reduction was not documented and (2) there was<br />
difficulty <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> project<strong>in</strong>g soil loss. An alternative erosion-caused soil fertility<br />
degradation costs analysis can be applied us<strong>in</strong>g a 'replacement cost' approach. The logic<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d this approach is to calculate the loss of nutrients and put a value on it us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
equivalent value cost of commercial fertilizer. Despite the lack of data on erosion related<br />
productivity loss, however, productivity loss rather than replacement cost is the most<br />
theoretically correct way to value resource depletion.<br />
In other studies, the effect of land management and land use conversion was found to<br />
have a significant impact on the spatial variability of soil nutrients. An improvement <strong>in</strong> soil<br />
physical (soil structure, soil depth) and chemical characteristics e.g. N, P and organic matter<br />
(OM) was observed as one is go<strong>in</strong>g from cultivated lands to graz<strong>in</strong>g lands and then to forest<br />
and exclosures. The improved soil characteristics are due to a decreased erosion process along<br />
the same direction. These studies, however, do not to <strong>in</strong>dicate the nutrient status and the<br />
overall nutrient balance of the soils under the different land uses. Nowadays, there is<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest on assessment of nutrient balance at field and regional scale levels. [7]<br />
assessed nutrient balance for N, Pav, and K at regional scale and country level us<strong>in</strong>g two<br />
different soil loss estimates by USLE and LAPSUS (landscape process Model). The values (<strong>in</strong><br />
kg ha -1 y -1 ) reported were: 37.7 and 6.0 for N. 7.8 and 3.0 for Pav; and 28.3 and 4.0 for K, for<br />
USLE and LAPSUS soil loss estimates, respectively. In both cases, soil erosion is found to be<br />
the prime responsible factor for nutrient depletion i.e. accounts for loss of 70%, 80% and 63%<br />
for N, Pav and K, respectively. In their calculation, however, they assume a constant<br />
enrichment ratio (ER) of 1.5 for all nutrients.<br />
[8] studied the N balance <strong>in</strong> Gobo Deguat (with<strong>in</strong> this study region) at farmers' field<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the Nutrient Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Model (NUTMON), and estimated N loss by erosion at 12.6 kg<br />
ha -1 y -1 and the N balance is negative. However, an organic <strong>in</strong>put from purchased manure and<br />
feeds that takes the highest proportion (34.2 kg ha -1 y -1 ) seems exaggerated. Moreover, the<br />
role of erosion <strong>in</strong> nutrient outflow is <strong>in</strong> the fourth place after harvested products (22.9) kg ha -<br />
1 y -1 ), crop residue <strong>in</strong> manure (13.2 kg ha -1 y -1 ), gaseous losses (4.9) kg ha -1 y -1 ), which seems<br />
contradict<strong>in</strong>g with the work by [7] at national and Regional States level.<br />
Nitrogen and phosphorus balances analyzed under five different land uses <strong>in</strong> southern<br />
Ethiopia were either <strong>in</strong> equilibrium or positive <strong>in</strong> most of the farm components which may<br />
seem oppos<strong>in</strong>g to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs by [8] and [7] who found strong negative balances of the<br />
respective nutrients.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>formation on the nutrient balance shows that there are uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> the nutrient<br />
balance calculation which could be associated to lack of measured <strong>in</strong>put and output data and,<br />
therefore, merits further study. Erosion and sedimentation estimates were rough <strong>in</strong> all cases as<br />
both were only estimated but not measured at the site. Therefore, detailed <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the<br />
erosion and sedimentation component is required <strong>in</strong> all scale of nutrient balance studies <strong>in</strong><br />
Ethiopia.<br />
Off-site impacts <strong>in</strong>clude higher turbidity <strong>in</strong> rivers, lakes, reservoirs and sediment<br />
deposition <strong>in</strong> these same environments and flood pla<strong>in</strong>s. Also <strong>in</strong>creased downstream runoff<br />
and flood<strong>in</strong>g as a result of reduction of soil <strong>in</strong>filtration by the on-site impacts. Sediment<br />
11
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
delivery to river channels is probably one of the most problematic off-site consequences of<br />
soil erosion and it is a disturb<strong>in</strong>g problem <strong>in</strong> countries of northern Africa . The <strong>in</strong>puts of the<br />
sediment by erosion process <strong>in</strong>to rivers, reservoirs and ponds results <strong>in</strong> high sediment<br />
deposition rates and frequent dredg<strong>in</strong>g operations.<br />
In Ethiopia, scientific documents on the off-site impacts are very rare. [26] found that<br />
the <strong>in</strong>creased abnormal flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the downstream position of the Baro Akobo river bas<strong>in</strong> is<br />
associated with human <strong>in</strong>terference with<strong>in</strong> the catchment, which is due to absence of proper<br />
land use plann<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>in</strong>creased human activity is due to the <strong>in</strong>creased population after the<br />
1984 resettlement program. These days, the abnormal flood<strong>in</strong>g has become frequent also <strong>in</strong><br />
places of lower Awash and <strong>in</strong> Wabishebele River Valleys which has been displac<strong>in</strong>g many<br />
<strong>in</strong>habitants and damaged the surround<strong>in</strong>g land.<br />
Efforts to rehabilitate the degraded highlands through soil and water conservation were<br />
go<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>in</strong> and promis<strong>in</strong>g results are be<strong>in</strong>g documented. Several hectares of farm lands are<br />
conserved and millions of tree seedl<strong>in</strong>gs have been planted. However a national scheme is not<br />
designed to measure <strong>in</strong> either biophysical and economic terms, the impact of such an effort.<br />
Fragmented and uncoord<strong>in</strong>ated studies are undertaken with no standardized methods and with<br />
no possibilities to formulate a national or regional database. Policy and operational guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />
are required to document the scattered studies with<strong>in</strong> a framework of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
land management <strong>in</strong>to the farm management practices by farmers.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] G. Bikora. "Food security challenges <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia. Unit Nations", African Institute for Economic Development<br />
and Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Dakar, Senegal, (2001).<br />
[2] K.W. Butzer. "Rise and Fall of Axum, Ethiopia: a geological <strong>in</strong>terpretation", American antiquity, 46 (3),<br />
471-495, (1981).<br />
[3] EPA. "National Action Programme to Combat Desertification", Environmental Protection Authority, Addis<br />
Ababa, November 1998, p. 158, (1998).<br />
[4] FAO. "Ethiopian Highlands Reclamation study", vols. 1 and 2. Food and Agricultural Organization of the<br />
United Nations, Rome, Italy, (1986).<br />
[5] FAO. "Small scale irrigation consolidation project preparation report", Food and Agricultural Organizations<br />
of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, (1994).<br />
[6] E. Feoli, Vuerich, L., Zerihun, W. "Evaluation of environmental geomorphological, erosion and socioeconomic<br />
factors", Agriculture, Ecosystems and environment , 91 (1-3), 313-325, (2002).<br />
[7] A. Haileselassie, Priess J., Veldkamp, E., Teketay, D., Lesschen, J.P. "Assessment of soil nutrient depletion<br />
and its spatial variability on stallholder’s mixed farm<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia us<strong>in</strong>g partial versus full nutrient<br />
balances", Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 108, 1-16, (2005).<br />
[8] H. Hengsdijk, Meijer<strong>in</strong>k, G.W., Mosugu, M.E. "Model<strong>in</strong>g the effect of three soil and water conservation<br />
practices <strong>in</strong> Tigray, Ethiopia", Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105, 29-40, (2005).<br />
[9] H. Hurni. "Soil formation rates <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia", Addis Ababa, FAO/M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture. Jo<strong>in</strong>t Project EHRS,<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g paper No. 2, (1983).<br />
[10] H. Hurni. "Options for steep land conservation <strong>in</strong> subsistence agriculture". In: subsistence agricultural<br />
systems. Workshop on soil and water conservation on steep lands, San. Jau, Paurto Rico, Marsh 22-27, p. 14,<br />
(1987).<br />
[11] H. Hurni. "<strong>Land</strong> degradation, fam<strong>in</strong>e and land resource scenarios <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia". In:D. Pimentel (ed.), World<br />
soil erosion and conservation, pp. 27-62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (1993).<br />
[12] IFPRI/CSA. "Atlas of the Ethiopian Rural Economy", International Food Policy Research Institute and<br />
Central Statistics Agency. Addis Ababa (2006).<br />
[13] J. McCann. "People of the plow: an agricultural history of Ethiopia, 1800-1900", University of Wiscons<strong>in</strong><br />
Press, Madison, USA, (1995).<br />
[14] S. McIntyre. "Reservoir sedimentation rates l<strong>in</strong>ked to long term changes <strong>in</strong> agricultural land use", Water<br />
<strong>Resources</strong> Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 29 (3), 487-495, (1993).<br />
[15] J. Moeyersons, Nyssen, J., Poesen, J., Deckers, J., Haile, M. "Age and backfill/overfill stratigraphy of two<br />
tufa dams, Tigray Highlands, Ethiopia: Evidence for Late Pleistocene and Holocene wet conditions",<br />
Palaeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaecology 230, 165-181, (2006).<br />
[16] P.A. Mohr. "The geology of Ethiopia", Univ. College Addis Ababa Press, (1962).<br />
12
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
[17] P.A. Mohr. "The geology of Ethiopia", Addis Ababa: Haileselassie-I University Press, (1971).<br />
[18] MoWR. "Abay River Bas<strong>in</strong> Integrated Development Master Plan Project Phase II". Data collection site<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigation survey and analysis. Section II. Sectorial studies Vol. V Water <strong>Resources</strong> Development. Part I<br />
irrigation and Dra<strong>in</strong>age. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Water <strong>Resources</strong>, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (1998).<br />
[19] T. Mulugeta. "Soil conservation experiments on cultivated land <strong>in</strong> Maybar area, Wollo region, Ethiopia".<br />
SCRP, Research Report 16, (1988).<br />
[20] H. Mitiku, Herweg K., Stillhardt, B. "Susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>Land</strong> Management:<strong>New</strong> Approaches to Soil and Water<br />
Conservation In Ethiopia", Berhanena Selam Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Enterprise. Addis Ababa, p. 304, (2006).<br />
[21] E.J. Mwendera, Saleem Mohammed, M.A. "Hydrologic response to cattle graz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopian<br />
Highlands", Agriculture, Ecosystem, Environment 64, 33-41, (1997).<br />
[22] J. Nyssen, Poesen, J., Moeyersons, J., Deckers, J., Mitiku Haile, <strong>Land</strong>, A. "Human impact on the<br />
environment <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopian and Eritrean highlands-a state of the art", Earth Science Reviews 64 (3-4), 273-<br />
320, (2004a).<br />
[23] L.R. Oldeman, Hakkel<strong>in</strong>g, R.T.A., Sombroek, W.G. "World map of the status of human <strong>in</strong>duced soil<br />
degradation": An explanatory note, 2 nd ed., p 27. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen and Nairobi: ISRIC and UNEP, (1991).<br />
[24] T. Tarekegn. "The role of water harvest<strong>in</strong>g, small, medium and large scale irrigation <strong>in</strong> the overall<br />
agricultural production system and rural development", A paper presented on the first National Water Forum <strong>in</strong><br />
Ethiopia October 23-24, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, (2004).<br />
[25] UNEP (United Nations environment Programme). "Ecology and Environment:What Do We Know About<br />
Desertification", Desertification Control, 3, 2-9, (1983).<br />
[26] M. Woube. "Flood<strong>in</strong>g and susta<strong>in</strong>able land-water management <strong>in</strong> the lower Baro-Akobo river bas<strong>in</strong>,<br />
Ethiopia", Applied geography, 19, 235-511, (1999).<br />
[27] E. Yazew. "Development and management of irrigated lands <strong>in</strong> Tigray". PhD Dissertation, UNESCO-IHE<br />
Institute for Water Education, Ethiopia, p. 284, (2005).<br />
13
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
NEW CHALLENGES OF SOIL SCIENCE TO FOOD SECURITY<br />
WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CHINA<br />
Abstract<br />
Tang Huajun & Zhou Wei<br />
Institute of Agricultural Resource and Regional Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Academy<br />
of Agricultural Sciences, Beij<strong>in</strong>g-100081, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
As the ma<strong>in</strong> productive resource for agriculture, soil is one of the most basal factors consist<strong>in</strong>g of comprehensive<br />
ability for food production, and the base and assurance for food security <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In the situation that arable<br />
land is decreas<strong>in</strong>g drastically, the protection of soil resource has become a major factor affect<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
development of the country. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>vestigations ma<strong>in</strong>ly focused on relationship between amount of arable<br />
land and food demand <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, but lack of systematic analysis on soil resource security associated with food<br />
demand and agricultural product quality. In this paper, based on <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the changes <strong>in</strong> quantity and<br />
quality of soil resource <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, the relationships between soil resource and food quantity security and quality<br />
safety were discussed, and policy options for keystone basic research tasks and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g counter-measures<br />
were also proposed.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a has very abundant soil resource with many k<strong>in</strong>ds of soil types. The total land area is 9.6<br />
million km 2 . Climate types ranges from tropical zone to cold-temperate zone and from humid<br />
region to arid region. There are 14 soil orders, 39 suborders, 138 soil types and 588 subtypes<br />
<strong>in</strong> the whole country (Gong et al., 2005). The area of Cambosols and Aridosols occupies more<br />
than 20% of total soil area, that of Histosols, Ferralosols, Vertosols, Andepts and Spodosols<br />
accounts for 1%, the other <strong>in</strong>cludes Anthrosols, Halosols, Gleyosols, Isohumosols, Ferrosols,<br />
Argosols and Primosols (Table 1). Moreover, the absolute amount of cultivated land,<br />
woodland and grassland ranks number 4, 8 and 3 <strong>in</strong> the world, respectively. The data are<br />
based on 1:12,000,000 soil map, soil classification is from Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Soil Taxonomy.<br />
Soil orders Percent total soil area Soil orders Percent total soil area<br />
(%)<br />
(%)<br />
Histosols 0.22 Isohumosols 8.67<br />
Anthrosols 4.84 Ferrosols 8.89<br />
Ferralosols 0.44 Argosols 7.42<br />
Vertosols 0.30 Cambosols 21.51<br />
Aridosols 23.01 Primosols 9.76<br />
Halosols 3.64 Others 0.04<br />
Gleyosols 1.24<br />
Table 1: Soil resources <strong>in</strong>ventory of different soil orders <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
The amount of arable land per capita <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is very limited. The total arable land area is<br />
about 1.26×10 8 hm 2 , with arable land area per capita of 0.1 hm 2 , less than 40% of the average<br />
<strong>in</strong> the world (Zhao et al., 2006). Figure 1 shows that the amount of arable land resource has<br />
decreased dramatically s<strong>in</strong>ce 1996, and this tendency will be cont<strong>in</strong>ued. The ma<strong>in</strong> factors<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such a decrease of cultivated land <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>dustrial construction, calamity<br />
damage, ecological return<strong>in</strong>g and plant<strong>in</strong>g structure readjustment (Table 2), account<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
14
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
15.68%, 5.73%, 61.43% and 17.16% of the total loss of arable land, respectively. Thus,<br />
ecological return<strong>in</strong>g among various factors dom<strong>in</strong>ates land loss. In addition, the uncultivated<br />
soil resource which can be available to agricultural production <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is about 0.133×10 8<br />
hm 2 , less than 6% of the total arable land area, a serious shortage of farmland resource <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a is com<strong>in</strong>g (Smil, 1995; 1999).<br />
Area of cultivated land (×10 4 hm 2 )<br />
13200<br />
13000<br />
12800<br />
12600<br />
12400<br />
12200<br />
12000<br />
11800<br />
Area of cultivated land<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> production<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Year<br />
Fig 1: Changes of the cultivated land and gra<strong>in</strong> production from 1996 to 2005 <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Year Construction Damage Return<strong>in</strong>g Readjustment Sum ofdecrease<br />
1997 1.930 0.470 1.630 0.590 4.620<br />
1998 1.762 1.595 1.646 0.701 5.704<br />
1999 2.053 1.347 3.946 1.071 8.417<br />
2000 1.633 0.617 7.628 5.782 15.66<br />
2001 1.637 0.306 5.907 1.083 8.933<br />
2002 1.965 0.563 14.26 3.490 20.27<br />
2003 2.610 0.500 22.37 3.310 29.79<br />
2004 2.928 0.633 7.329 2.047 12.94<br />
Sum 16.52 6.032 64.71 18.07 105.3<br />
Average 2.065 0.754 8.089 2.259 13.17<br />
Table 2: Structural analysis of changes <strong>in</strong> cultivated land <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a from 1997 to 2004(×10 4 hm 2 )<br />
The geographic distribution of soil resource, food production and population is uneven <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a (Gong et al., 2005). The southeast region with humid climate and 41.6% of the total<br />
land area, conta<strong>in</strong>s 81% of the population <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, 72.2% of the arable land, 81.5% of the<br />
total gra<strong>in</strong> production of Ch<strong>in</strong>a, but with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly em<strong>in</strong>ent problems such as people-land<br />
confliction and environment deterioration; Northwest region with arid climate and 35.7% of<br />
the total land area, conta<strong>in</strong>s 4%, 8.2% and 4.2%, respectively. Due to restriction of aridity and<br />
cold climate to agricultural production and life of human be<strong>in</strong>g, there is a sharp confliction <strong>in</strong><br />
water and soil, a fragile environment, an undeveloped economy, and a less population and<br />
cultivated land <strong>in</strong> this region; Central region with semi-humid climate and 22.7% of the total<br />
land area, accounts for 15% of the population <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, 19.6% of the cultivated land, 14.8%<br />
of the total gra<strong>in</strong> production <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a (Table 3).<br />
15<br />
5200<br />
5000<br />
4800<br />
4600<br />
4400<br />
4200<br />
4000<br />
3800<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> production ( 10 5 t)
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
Zones Percent total<br />
population<br />
(%)<br />
Percent<br />
total soil<br />
area (%)<br />
16<br />
Percent total<br />
land area (%)<br />
Percent total<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> production<br />
(%)<br />
Total 100 100 100 100<br />
I Humid zones of southeast<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
81.0 41.6 72.2 81.5<br />
1 Cold-temperate zone 0.04 1.2 0.1 0.1<br />
2 Mid-temperate zone 6.96 8.6 16.3 13.7<br />
3 Warm -temperate zone 19.7 5.2 15.7 20.5<br />
4 North subtropical zone 15.7 4.3 11.5 15.2<br />
5 Central subtropical zone 28.7 17.0 22.4 26.1<br />
6 South subtropical zone 8.4 4.3 4.9 4.9<br />
7 Tropical zone 1.6 1.0 1.3 1<br />
II Semi-humid zones of<br />
central Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
15 22.7 19.6 14.8<br />
1 Mid-temperate zone 2.0 6.0 4.2 2.5<br />
2 Warm-temperate zone 9.0 6.2 10.8 7.9<br />
3 Plateau temperate zone 4.0 10.5 4.6 3.9<br />
III Semiarid and arid zones<br />
of northwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
4.0 35.7 8.2 4.2<br />
III 1 Mid-temperate zone 1.1 8.2 2.9 1.5<br />
III 2 Warm-temperate zone 2.22 12.4 4.4 2.2<br />
III 3 Plateau temperate zone 0.49 5.0 0.7 0.5<br />
III 4 Plateau temperate zone 0.08 2.0 0.11 0.0008<br />
III 5 Plateau sub- frigid zone 0.05 5.3 0.06 0.0005<br />
III 6 Plateau frigid zone 0 3.0 0 0<br />
Table 3: Soil regionalization of Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
CHANGES IN QUALITY OF SOIL RESOURCE IN CHINA<br />
Deterioration of soil resource<br />
Soil erosion leads to deterioration of arable land quality, such as reduction <strong>in</strong> the thickness of<br />
soil layer, damage of soil structure and loss of soil nutrients. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to estimation, due to<br />
water loss and soil erosion, annual loss of soil substance, organic matter, N, P and K is about<br />
5.0×10 9 t, 2.7×10 7 t, 5.5×10 6 t, 6.0×10 3 t and 5.0×10 6 t, respectively (Pan,2005).<br />
Soil desertification and sandification occurs seriously. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Station of<br />
Desertification Communique of Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> 2005, the total area suffered from desertification is<br />
2.64×10 6 km 2 until 2004, account<strong>in</strong>g for 27.46% of the total land area; That suffered from<br />
sandification is 1.74×10 6 km 2 , account<strong>in</strong>g for 18.12% of the total land area; The amount of<br />
cultivated land suffered from sandification is 4.63×10 4 km 2 , of which occupies 2.66% of total<br />
sandification land (M<strong>in</strong>istry of Forestry P.R.C, 2005). W<strong>in</strong>d erosion of surface soil with<br />
abundant nutrients results <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e of soil fertility, damage of soil physical structure, decay<br />
of production ability and degeneration of farmland quality.<br />
Arable land productivity is be<strong>in</strong>g degenerated. Among the exist<strong>in</strong>g arable land, highproductive<br />
land accounts for 21.5%, <strong>in</strong>termediate-productive land 37.2%, and low-productive<br />
land 41.2% (Table 4). Soils with the organic matter content of 1% to 2% and lower than 1%<br />
accounts for 38.3% and 26.0%, respectively. The situation of soil nitrogen content is similar
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
to that of organic matter, and soils with total nitrogen content of 0.1 % to 0.075 % and lower<br />
than 0.075% accounts for 21.3% and 33.6%, respectively. As a whole, the total N content is<br />
relatively low. Cultivated land with phosphorous, potassium, sulfur and micronutrients<br />
deficiency accounts for 59%, 30%, 30% and 50%, respectively (Table 5). The soil physical<br />
properties tend to be deteriorated, 40%, 35% and 25% of low-productivity paddy field is<br />
Gleyed soil, illuvial hardened soils and heavy hardened soil, respectively.<br />
High productive land Interm productive land Low productive land<br />
Standard<br />
(t/hm 2 Percent Standard<br />
) distribution (t/hm 2 Percent Standard<br />
) distribution (t/hm 2 Percent<br />
) distribution<br />
Rice >6 21.5%<br />
3~6 37.2% 5 2.5~5 5.2<br />
2.3~5.2<br />
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
2005. The three-year-result of monitor<strong>in</strong>g on agricultural soil quality <strong>in</strong> Zhujiang delta<br />
regions showed that the soils are contam<strong>in</strong>ated by heavy metals such as Hg, Cd and As, and<br />
petroleum. The contam<strong>in</strong>ated area accounts for about 50% of total soil area <strong>in</strong> these regions,<br />
of which light contam<strong>in</strong>ated area is 32%, middle contam<strong>in</strong>ated area is 8%, and heavy<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated area is 10% (Wan et al., 2005).<br />
Central Ch<strong>in</strong>a has a large proportion of low-productivity farmland, <strong>in</strong> which soils are<br />
relatively <strong>in</strong>fertile. In the past 20 years, soil organic matter, N, and P content tended to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease, but the proportion of various nutrients was imbalance, and soil available K was<br />
seriously depleted. The ratio of soil productivity to application rate of chemical fertilizer<br />
tends to decrease with development of <strong>in</strong>tensive cropp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Semiarid region <strong>in</strong> Northwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a is seriously subjected to soil erosion. The land area<br />
with soil erosion <strong>in</strong> Loess Plateau is 1.13×10 7 hm 2 , account<strong>in</strong>g for 24.85% of the total area<br />
with soil erosion <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The land area with sandification <strong>in</strong> the northwesten arid region and<br />
Loess Plateau accounts for 21.06% and 10.70% of the total soil area with sandification <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a, respectively (Li, 2002). In addition, soil nutrients are generally found to be deficient <strong>in</strong><br />
these regions.<br />
In Central Ch<strong>in</strong>a and Southwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a, acid ra<strong>in</strong> is always one of important factors<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> soil acidification and degradation of soil quality. Acid ra<strong>in</strong> not only directly<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence crop adaptability to low soil pH, but also accelerate leach<strong>in</strong>g and loss of soil<br />
nutrients, such as Cu and Zn, which lead to greatly decl<strong>in</strong>e of soil productivity and fertilizer<br />
use efficiency (Zhao, et al., 2002; Galloway, 2001).<br />
SOIL RESOURCE AND FOOD SECURITY IN CHINA<br />
The decrease of cultivated land area <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a greatly affects food production. Total food<br />
production tended to decl<strong>in</strong>e from 1998 to 2003, and began to ascend s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004 (Fig 1). In<br />
order to ensure the country's security of gra<strong>in</strong> supply, it is essential to <strong>in</strong>crease production per<br />
unit area. It is estimated that the food deficit <strong>in</strong> the com<strong>in</strong>g years 2010, 2030 and 2050 would<br />
be expanded to 5,127×10 4 t, 7,359×10 4 t and 1,354×10 4 t (Zhao et al., 2002), respectively.<br />
Difference between the present cultivated land area and the m<strong>in</strong>imum requirement <strong>in</strong> these 3<br />
phases will be over 900×10 4 hm 2 , and the pressure <strong>in</strong>dex of cultivated land will be more than<br />
1.0 (Table 7). Thus, Ch<strong>in</strong>a will have a big challenge <strong>in</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g its grow<strong>in</strong>g population with a<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>ed cultivated land area.<br />
Soil resource and food safety<br />
Due to excessive and improper application of fertilizer and pesticide as well as wastewater<br />
irrigation, poisonous substances <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly accumulated <strong>in</strong> both soils and crops, situation of<br />
food quality safety become more and more serious. It was reported that 10% of gra<strong>in</strong>, 24% of<br />
farm animal products, and 48% of vegetables have quality safety problems <strong>in</strong> some heavy<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated region (Dong & Zhang, 2003). It is worried about that the residual effects of<br />
some low-concentration poisonous substance may last for several decades or even several<br />
generations.<br />
18
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
2010<br />
Year<br />
2030 2050<br />
Population (100 million) 13.76 15.53 15.89<br />
Food demand (10 4 t ) 59177 69907 71338<br />
The m<strong>in</strong>imum requirement of cultivated land 13426.2 12518 11673<br />
(10 4 hm 2 )<br />
The present cultivated land area (10 4 t) 12518.14 11600.33 10749.82<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> production (10 4 t) 53486 61348 69684<br />
Food deficit (10 4 t) -5127 -7359 -1354<br />
The pressure <strong>in</strong>dex of cultivated land * 1.073 1.079 1.086<br />
*The pressure <strong>in</strong>dex of cultivated land = the m<strong>in</strong>imum requirement of cultivated land / present<br />
cultivated land area<br />
Pesticide residue <strong>in</strong> food<br />
Table 7: Estimation of food security and cultivated land change <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Pesticide residue ma<strong>in</strong>ly occurs <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong>s, vegetables and fruits. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>spection<br />
results of 23 cities <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> the third quarter of 2001 issued by Quality Technology<br />
Supervisory Bureau of Ch<strong>in</strong>a, the pesticide residue <strong>in</strong> 47.5% of vegetables exceeded the<br />
maximum permitted value (Dong & Zhang, 2003). Although organochlor<strong>in</strong>e pesticide have<br />
been prohibited for nearly 20 years, it can be detected <strong>in</strong> various crops, which is still a threat<br />
to human health through food cha<strong>in</strong>. Investigations also demonstrated that the benzahex and<br />
DDT <strong>in</strong> tea and fruit could be detected, but the residual level was under standard limit (Fang,<br />
1998). However, it was also found that the level of organochlor<strong>in</strong>e residue <strong>in</strong> 40% of the tea<br />
were over maximum limit value (Hao, 2001).<br />
Heavy metal residue <strong>in</strong> food<br />
Heavy metal residue <strong>in</strong> agricultural products occurs <strong>in</strong> wastewater irrigated soil <strong>in</strong> suburb of<br />
large and middle cities or m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g area. Especially vegetables grown <strong>in</strong> suburb soils are easily<br />
subjected to heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>vestigation on crop quality <strong>in</strong><br />
suburb of 10 prov<strong>in</strong>ce capital cities <strong>in</strong> 2000, heavy metal residue <strong>in</strong> 30% of samples <strong>in</strong> 7 cities<br />
exceeded the limit value. The <strong>in</strong>vestigation of food quality <strong>in</strong> 300, 000 hm 2 <strong>in</strong> basic protected<br />
farmland <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a showed that heavy metal residue <strong>in</strong> 10% of samples was found to be over<br />
the limit value (Dong & Zhang, 2003); Vegetables grown <strong>in</strong> suburb <strong>in</strong> big cities of Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
have been contam<strong>in</strong>ated by heavy metals to some extent, especially Cd, Hg and Pb. The<br />
standard-exceed<strong>in</strong>g rate of Pb <strong>in</strong> vegetables <strong>in</strong> suburb of Xi-an is 48.0%, while that of Cd <strong>in</strong><br />
Nann<strong>in</strong>g is 91%, where the highest level of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> vegetables was found to be 6.2<br />
times more than the limit of sanitation standard(Zhang & Bai, 2001).<br />
Nitrate residue <strong>in</strong> food<br />
Nitrate residue <strong>in</strong> food ma<strong>in</strong>ly arises <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive cultivation regions, especially, nitrate and<br />
nitrite residues <strong>in</strong> vegetables grown <strong>in</strong> greenhouse generally occur. The nitrate content <strong>in</strong> 7<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ds of leafy vegetables <strong>in</strong> Zhuj<strong>in</strong>g delta area are more than 1,200 mg/kg with 100% of<br />
samples beyond the standard limit, and the highest level of nitrate is 5.35 times more than the<br />
limit value (Xie, 2000). In Xi-an, the nitrate residue <strong>in</strong> 32.5% of vegetable samples is over<br />
standard limit, and the highest level is 3.69 times more than the limit value (Wang, 2000).<br />
19
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE UTILIZATION OF SOIL<br />
RESOURCE IN CHINA<br />
Keystone basic research tasks<br />
Keystone basic researches on soil degradation should be carried out with respect to soil<br />
obstacle factors and ma<strong>in</strong> problems <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able utilization of soil resource (Yu, 2001).<br />
The feature of acidity and acidification mechanism <strong>in</strong> the soil of south Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Great attention should be paid to probe the feature of acidity and acidification mechanism <strong>in</strong><br />
the soil of south Ch<strong>in</strong>a with respect to differences <strong>in</strong> soil condition and constitution of acid<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) Fate of H + enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to soil; (2) Changes of Al 3+<br />
forms and chemical equilibrium of solid-liquid <strong>in</strong>terface; (3) Effect of specific absorption of<br />
sulfate on soil acidification; (4) Effects of soil acidification on release of poisonous elements<br />
and leach<strong>in</strong>g loss of nutrient elements; (5) Predication of soil acidification (sensitivity of the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> soils types to acid deposition and its buffer capacity to acidification); (6) Acidification<br />
features <strong>in</strong> weakly acid soil <strong>in</strong> transition zone.<br />
Mechanism of genesis of gleyed soil<br />
The gley<strong>in</strong>g process occurs <strong>in</strong> three types of soils: a swamp soil waterlogged for a long term,<br />
a paddy soil irrigated dur<strong>in</strong>g growth period and bottom-gley soil with a certa<strong>in</strong> height of<br />
groundwater level. Their common feature is that all layer or one layer of soil is saturated with<br />
water, and then reduction occurs to produce poisonous substance. It accounts for 1/5 of the<br />
soils <strong>in</strong> the world and more <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) The relationship<br />
between <strong>in</strong>tensity factors and quantity factors under reduc<strong>in</strong>g condition; (2) Development of<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ation method for dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g organic reduced substance us<strong>in</strong>g chemical and<br />
electrochemical method; (3) Reaction mechanism of organic reductive substance with Fe and<br />
Mn and its dynamics ; (4) Changes of Fe and Mn forms and their effects on plant growth; (5)<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> and chemical equilibrium among H2S—S 2 —FeS and their toxicology to organisms.<br />
Movement characteristic of salts and alkalization mechanism <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e-alkali soil<br />
There is a large scale of sal<strong>in</strong>e soil and alkali soil <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Current researches emphasized on<br />
salt geochemistry, however, little <strong>in</strong>formation is available on mechanisms of physical<br />
chemistry of sal<strong>in</strong>ization and alkalization. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) the effect of<br />
absorption-desorption on the movement of Na, K, Ca and Mg ions <strong>in</strong> soils; (2) the effect of<br />
complexation reaction on mobility of salt ions; (3) Differential movement of chlor<strong>in</strong>e, nitrate,<br />
bicarbonate, and sulfate anions caused by absorption—negative adsorption—desorption<br />
process; (4) The osmotic potential of soil solution and its relationship to equilibrium of<br />
physical chemistry of various ions between solid phase and liquid phases; (5) <strong>Physical</strong><br />
chemistry factors controll<strong>in</strong>g pH of alkali soil.<br />
Transformation of poisonous elements <strong>in</strong> soil and their toxicology to organisms<br />
In the recent year, there have been grow<strong>in</strong>g concerns <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a about <strong>in</strong>organic contam<strong>in</strong>ants<br />
<strong>in</strong> soils, such as Hg, Cd, Cr, Pb, Cu, As, F etc. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) Relative<br />
importance of specific absorption and electrochemcial absorption of heavy metal ions <strong>in</strong><br />
various types of soil; (2) Effect of precipitation, absorption and complexation reaction on<br />
20
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
distribution of heavy metal ions between solid phases and liquid phases; (3) Effect of heavy<br />
metal ions on characteristics of soil surface chemistry;(4) Effect of concomitant cations and<br />
anions on distribution of As and F between solid phase and liquid phase; (5) Forms and<br />
activities of variable valence elements (Cr and As) under different redox conditions.<br />
Migration of poisonous elements and nutrient elements and their effects on groundwater<br />
quality<br />
Nutrient element or poisonous element can affect plant growth through its movement to root<br />
surface. These elements can also <strong>in</strong>fluence the quality of groundwater through a series of<br />
reactions dur<strong>in</strong>g their permeation <strong>in</strong> the soil. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) Effect of<br />
absorption-desorption on migration of ions <strong>in</strong> soils and its mechanism; (2) Relationship<br />
between specific absorption and movement speed of heavy metal ions; (3) Effect of coexist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ions with different charge on the migration of ions; (4) Reaction dynamics of ions <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>terfaces among soil colloid, soil solution and root or microorganism; (5) Relationship<br />
between the absorption of nitrate <strong>in</strong> variable-charge soils and nitrate contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong><br />
groundwater.<br />
The renewal mechanism of soil organic matter<br />
Renewal mechanism of soil organic matter has received great concern due to rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e of<br />
organic matter <strong>in</strong> black soil. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) Changes of components and<br />
characteristics of soil organic matter under different moisture and temperature conditions; (2)<br />
Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g components, m<strong>in</strong>eralization rate and humification coefficient of soil organic<br />
matter and their mechanisms; (3) Equilibrium models for describ<strong>in</strong>g dynamics of soil organic<br />
matter and their equilibrium po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> soils with different fertility; (4) Effect of organic<br />
materials application (straw, green manure and animal manure) on the formation and<br />
characteristics of soil organic matter.<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g counter-measures<br />
Balance fertilization and organic fertilizer application<br />
For a long time, <strong>in</strong>tensive utilization of farmland and imbalance recovery of nutrients has<br />
resulted <strong>in</strong> great decl<strong>in</strong>e of soil fertility and fertilizer use efficiency. Fertilization and nutrient<br />
management need to be improved. Plentiful organic fertilizer resources <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a have not<br />
been fully used yet. It is estimated that 4 billion tons of organic substances was produced <strong>in</strong><br />
agricultural system every year, such as livestock manures, green manures, straws, etc., which<br />
can provide about 53.16 million tons of nutrients, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 21.76 million tons of N, 8.7<br />
millions tons of P2O5 and 22.7 million tons of K2O. However, only 19.28 million tons of<br />
organic substances, or 36% of the total resources, are effectively used. The rema<strong>in</strong>der enters<br />
<strong>in</strong>to environment, and has a risk of contam<strong>in</strong>ation to ecological system. Therefore, it is very<br />
important to improve fertilizer application techniques such as balance fertilization with<br />
rational nutrients ratio, comb<strong>in</strong>ed application of organic and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers, to enhance<br />
soil fertility and ensure food security and food safety <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Amelioration of soil and remediation of contam<strong>in</strong>ated soil<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce various adverse factors such as drought, sandification, sal<strong>in</strong>ization and acidification<br />
exist <strong>in</strong> cultivated lands of Ch<strong>in</strong>a, it was suggested to develop soil amelioration techniques,<br />
21
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g organic matter content of black soil, comprehensively ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g saltalkali<br />
soil, improv<strong>in</strong>g soil structure, neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g acidic soil, and optimiz<strong>in</strong>g management of<br />
fertilizer and water.<br />
With respect to contam<strong>in</strong>ation of pesticide, heavy metals and nitrate, both pollutant<br />
source and pollutant discharge should be controlled simultaneously. Great attention should be<br />
paid to both urban and rural environment protection, especially agricultural non-po<strong>in</strong>t source<br />
pollution. Studies on remediation of contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils, regionally comprehensive<br />
ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g techniques, and develop<strong>in</strong>g patterns for susta<strong>in</strong>able utilization of cultivated land<br />
should be strengthened.<br />
Improvement of ecological environment<br />
High quality of farmland depends on improvement of ecological environment <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a (Tang,<br />
2000). Although a big net of protection forest of farmland had been established <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, it is<br />
not enough to protect all of cultivated land countrywide. The current pivotal works should be<br />
emphasized on remediation of soil sandification <strong>in</strong> semiarid and semi-humid regions,<br />
amelioration of soil secondary sal<strong>in</strong>ization and alkalization, and prevention of soil erosion. In<br />
addition, ecological return<strong>in</strong>g of cultivated land to grassland or forestland is an absolutely<br />
necessary measure <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terleav<strong>in</strong>g zone <strong>in</strong> semiarid regions and <strong>in</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong>ous region of<br />
south Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Exploitation of uncultivated resource<br />
It is an important approach to exploit uncultivated resources for compensat<strong>in</strong>g deficit of<br />
farmland resource and ensur<strong>in</strong>g food security. These approaches <strong>in</strong>clude improve of grassland<br />
to feed animal to <strong>in</strong>crease meat, egg and milk products, utilization of some crops straw to feed<br />
household animals, utilization of water resource to develop aquaculture, and development of<br />
forest and fruit production (Gong et al., 2005).<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Y.H. Dong, T.L. Zhang. "Susta<strong>in</strong>able management of soil resources for food safety" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Soils, 35<br />
(3): 182-186, (2003).<br />
[2] L. Fang. "Assessment on the status of organochlor<strong>in</strong>e pesticide residues <strong>in</strong> tea and surround<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environment" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 27(2): 211-215, (1998).<br />
[3] J.N. Galloway. "Acidification of the world: Nature and anthropogenic" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Water, Air, and Soil<br />
Pollution, 130: 17-24, (2001).<br />
[4] C. George, S. L<strong>in</strong>, P. Samuel. "Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s land resources and land use change: Insights from the 1996 land<br />
survey". <strong>Land</strong> Use Policy, (20):87-107, (2003).<br />
[5] Z.T. Gong, H.Z. Chen, G.L. Zhang, Y.G. Zhao. "Characteristics of soil resources and problems of food<br />
security <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Ecology and Environment. 14(5): 783-788, (2005).<br />
[6] G.M. Hao, H.X. Li, C.J. Zhao. "Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of organochlor<strong>in</strong>e pesticide residues <strong>in</strong> tea" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese).<br />
Food Science, 22(11):73-75, (2001).<br />
[7] F.X. Li. "Degenerative reality and controll<strong>in</strong>g countermeasure of cultivated land <strong>in</strong> west region of Ch<strong>in</strong>a"<br />
(In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 16(1):1-10, (2002).<br />
[8] D.G. Liu, X.C. Zhang, Y. Cui. "Investigation report on the issue of black soil protection" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese).<br />
Journal of Ch<strong>in</strong>a Agricultural <strong>Resources</strong> and Regional Plann<strong>in</strong>g, 25(15):16-18, (2004).<br />
[9] C.Y. Lu, X. Chen, Y. Shi, J. Zheng, Q.L. Zhou. "Study on the change characters of black soil quality <strong>in</strong><br />
Northeast Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies <strong>in</strong> Agriculture. 21(3):182-184,<br />
(2005).<br />
[10] Y.M. Luo, Y. Teng, Q.B. Li, L.H. Wu, Z.G. Li, Q.H. Zhang. "Soil environmental quality and remediation <strong>in</strong><br />
yangtze river delta region I. Composition and pollution of polychlor<strong>in</strong>ated dibenzo-p-diox<strong>in</strong>s and dibenzofurans<br />
(pcdd/fs) <strong>in</strong> a typical farmland" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Acta Pedologica S<strong>in</strong>ica, 42(4):570-576, (2005).<br />
[11] M<strong>in</strong>istry of Forestry P.R.C. "Station of Desertification Communique" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese).<br />
22
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
[12] F. Pan. 2005. Science Times (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese), (2005).<br />
[13] V. Smil. "Who will feed Ch<strong>in</strong>a ?" The Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterly, 143:801-813, (1995).<br />
[14] V. Smil. "Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s agricultural land". The Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterly, 158:414-429, (1999).<br />
[15] H.J. Tang. "Theory and Practice of Susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>Land</strong> Use <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Beij<strong>in</strong>g: Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Agricultural Science and Technology Press, (2000).<br />
[16] H.Y. Wan, S.L.Zhou, Q.G. Zhao. "Spatial variation of content of soil heavy metals <strong>in</strong> metals <strong>in</strong> region with<br />
high economy development of South Jiangsu Prov<strong>in</strong>ce" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Scientia Geographica S<strong>in</strong>ica, 25(3):329-<br />
334, (2005).<br />
[17] L.P. Wang, C.P. Xiang, Y.H. Wang. "Nitrate content and its regulation <strong>in</strong> summer vegetables grown <strong>in</strong><br />
Wuhan region" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 19 (5): 497-499, (2000).<br />
[18] H.S. Xie, Y.L. Wang, P. Cheng, B. Rong, Y.Y. Chen, S.M. Ren. "Nitrate pollution <strong>in</strong> leafy vegetables<br />
grown on Pearl River Delta: Problem and countermeasures" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Guongdong Agricultural Sciences, (5):<br />
26-28, (2000).<br />
[19] T.R. Yu. "Chemical mechanisms for the occurrence of some major problems <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural<br />
development and ecological environment of Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Soils, 33(3): 119 –121, (2001).<br />
[20] Z.G. Yu, X.P. Hu. "Research on the relation of food security and cultivated land’s quantity and quality <strong>in</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Geography and Geo-<strong>in</strong>formation Science, 19(3): 45-49, (2003).<br />
[21] C.L. Zhang, H.Y. Bai. "Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation of soils and vegetables <strong>in</strong> suburb of Nann<strong>in</strong>g"<br />
(In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Journal of Guangxi Agricultural and Biological Science, 20 (3): 186-205, (2001).<br />
[22] S.G. Zhang, J.J. Qiu, H.J. Tang. "Studies on recessive loss of amount of cultivated land <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Science & Technology Review, 24 (2 ):73-74, (2006).<br />
[23] Q.G. Zhao, B.Z. Zhou, H. Yang, S.L. Liu. "Some considerations on safety of arable land resources <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a:<br />
problems and counter-measures" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Soils, 34(6): 293-302, (2002).<br />
[24] Q.G. Zhao, S.L. Zhou, S.H. Wu, K. Ren. "Cultivated land resources and strategies for its susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
utilization and protection <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Acta Pedologica S<strong>in</strong>ica, 43(4):662-672, (2006).<br />
23
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
WORKS ON EROSION PROCESSES UNDER WIND-DRIVEN<br />
RAIN CONDITIONS IN I.C.E<br />
Gunay Erpul 1 & Donald Gabriels 2<br />
1 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science, University of Ankara, 06110 Diskapi – Ankara, Turkey<br />
2 Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, B 9000 Ghent, Belgium.<br />
Abstract<br />
Soil erosion processes under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s are important field of study for understand<strong>in</strong>g the mechanism and<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g prediction models. Clearly, the processes under conditions <strong>in</strong> which w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> act together differ<br />
significantly and conceptually from those under w<strong>in</strong>dless and ra<strong>in</strong>less conditions. In this paper, w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong><br />
erosion research performed <strong>in</strong> I.C.E w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation facility was discussed and reviewed by<br />
analyz<strong>in</strong>g the processes <strong>in</strong> place and methods to measure model parameters as <strong>in</strong>fluenced by horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d<br />
currents. Additionally, concept and mechanism for ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment and transport and sediment transport<br />
by ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow overland flow were given thoroughly.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The <strong>in</strong>stallation of a ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulator <strong>in</strong>side the w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel of I.C.E. (International Center<br />
for Eremology, Ghent, Belgium) enabled to study the comb<strong>in</strong>ed effect of w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> on the<br />
erosion processes [11]. The simulated characteristics of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s were assessed <strong>in</strong><br />
the tunnel [1,3,4]. K<strong>in</strong>etic energy of the simulated ra<strong>in</strong>falls of I.C.E. was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />
splash cup technique [2,4]. Also, a two-dimensional numerical model and a k<strong>in</strong>etic energy<br />
sensor were used to estimate w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drop trajectories [10,23].<br />
After the mass and energy states of the simulated ra<strong>in</strong>falls of I.C.E. were described<br />
under w<strong>in</strong>dless and w<strong>in</strong>d-driven conditions, ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment studies were commenced<br />
[10]. On the other hand, a series of tests conducted to assess the effect of w<strong>in</strong>d velocities on<br />
sand detachment from splash cups [6].<br />
Along with on the ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment process, the comb<strong>in</strong>ed effect of ra<strong>in</strong> and<br />
w<strong>in</strong>d on the ra<strong>in</strong>splash transport process was exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> depth [7] Another paper presented<br />
experimental data on the effects of slope aspect, slope gradient, and horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocity<br />
on the splash-saltation trajectories of soil particles under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> [9].<br />
Total <strong>in</strong>terrill erosion under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> was def<strong>in</strong>ed as a sum of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>splash and sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>-impacted th<strong>in</strong> flow transport, which accounted for<br />
the transport processes occurred before and after runoff onset, respectively [8]. A<br />
quantification of w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions and the effects of w<strong>in</strong>d on both transport<br />
processes aimed to provide an opportunity for an erosion prediction technology to improve<br />
the estimation <strong>in</strong> situations where w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> occurred at the same time. Additionally, an I.<br />
C. E tunnel study under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s was conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of<br />
horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocity and direction on sediment transport by the ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted<br />
shallow flow [5]. W<strong>in</strong>d velocity and direction affected not only energy <strong>in</strong>put of ra<strong>in</strong>s but also<br />
shallow flow hydraulics by chang<strong>in</strong>g roughness <strong>in</strong>duced by ra<strong>in</strong>drop impacts with an angle on<br />
flow and the unidirectional splashes <strong>in</strong> the w<strong>in</strong>d direction. To particularly exam<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
roughness effect of impact<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops with an angle on sediment transport capacity of th<strong>in</strong><br />
flow, KE was divided <strong>in</strong>to its components and the partition<strong>in</strong>g of the KE <strong>in</strong>to two components<br />
provided a better <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the processes for which they <strong>in</strong>dependently played a role [20].<br />
24
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
This paper targets to give a review of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> erosion research performed <strong>in</strong><br />
I.C.E w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation facility. The review conta<strong>in</strong>s analyses of the processes <strong>in</strong><br />
place and methods to measure w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> parameters <strong>in</strong> action. As well, concept and<br />
mechanism for ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment and transport and sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>dropimpacted<br />
shallow overland flow are reviewed by giv<strong>in</strong>g research results.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
A description of the w<strong>in</strong>d-tunnel research facility of International Center for Eremology<br />
(I.C.E.), Ghent University for w<strong>in</strong>d, ra<strong>in</strong>, and jo<strong>in</strong>tly w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> studies is given by<br />
Gabriels et al. (1997) [11] and Cornelis et al. (2004) [1]. Horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d speeds were<br />
measured with a vane-type anemometer and associated record<strong>in</strong>g equipment <strong>in</strong> the center of<br />
the w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel. The reference w<strong>in</strong>d velocities were determ<strong>in</strong>ed up to 2 m and profiles for<br />
these velocities characterized by a logarithmic equation. In our studies, the boundary layer<br />
was mostly set at about 0.30 m, and subsequently, the reference w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocities were<br />
derived from the logarithmic w<strong>in</strong>d profiles by regression, assum<strong>in</strong>g a fixed roughness height<br />
of 0.0001 for a bare and smoothed soil surface.<br />
In studies, the central pipe l<strong>in</strong>e of ra<strong>in</strong>ulator on the ceil<strong>in</strong>g of the I.C.E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel<br />
along the work<strong>in</strong>g area was used, where downward oriented nozzles were <strong>in</strong>stalled at 2 m<br />
high and 1 m <strong>in</strong>tervals. The nozzle employed was an axial-flow, wide angle, full cone type. A<br />
pump<strong>in</strong>g unit supplies water from a tank to the pipe and accord<strong>in</strong>gly to the nozzles. The lower<br />
and upper limits of the operat<strong>in</strong>g pressures were 0.75 and 1.50 bar, respectively. The spatial<br />
distribution of the <strong>in</strong>tensity was measured with ra<strong>in</strong> gauges with 11 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter and 13.5<br />
cm <strong>in</strong> depth. When studies were done on <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed surfaces with different aspects, ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensity was directly determ<strong>in</strong>ed with the same slope degree and aspect as the slop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
experimental set-ups. The drop size distribution was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by an absorbent paper dyed<br />
with 1 M CuSO4. Colored paper was exposed to simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> the tunnel after paper<br />
calibration was performed with drops of known size with known velocities.<br />
The energy of the simulated ra<strong>in</strong>s was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the splash cup technique [2] and<br />
the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor [23]. Also, an analytical calculation was made to approximate the<br />
k<strong>in</strong>etic energy of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s tak<strong>in</strong>g forces that act on a ra<strong>in</strong>drop fall<strong>in</strong>g through a w<strong>in</strong>d<br />
profile <strong>in</strong>to account. The splash cup technique <strong>in</strong>volved exposure of a cup, 8-cm <strong>in</strong> diameter<br />
and 4-cm <strong>in</strong> depth, packed with standard sand of 200 - 300 µm particle size range, to the<br />
simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall. The amount of sand, which splashed out of the cup, was a measure of<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall energy. A calibration study with vertically fall<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops was previously performed<br />
to establish a l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship between the amount of the standard sand splash and the ra<strong>in</strong><br />
energy. Together with splash cups, the read<strong>in</strong>gs of the sensit k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor were taken<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g runs. Similar course of actions followed <strong>in</strong> the splash cup technique was used to<br />
acquire different energy levels. In addition, the two-dimensional analytical model was used to<br />
estimate the KE consider<strong>in</strong>g forces that act on a ra<strong>in</strong>drop fall<strong>in</strong>g through a w<strong>in</strong>d profile. In the<br />
analytical approach assumed was that the reference w<strong>in</strong>d velocity was the x-component of the<br />
ra<strong>in</strong> velocity vector at the nozzle height, and the z-component was the normal term<strong>in</strong>al<br />
velocity <strong>in</strong> still air.<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment by w<strong>in</strong>dless and w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s were evaluated on the soil<br />
surfaces of three loess-derived agricultural soils packed <strong>in</strong>to a 55-cm long and 20-cm wide<br />
pan placed at both w<strong>in</strong>dward and leeward slopes of 7%, 15%, and 20% (Figure 1). Soil<br />
detachment rates were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the amount of the splashed particles trapped at set<br />
distances on a 7-m uniform slope segment. For w<strong>in</strong>dless ra<strong>in</strong>, splashboards were also<br />
25
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
positioned to collect side splash. Calculation of ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rate was based on the<br />
mathematical form of ra<strong>in</strong>splash erosion [19,21,25]:<br />
n<br />
q = ∑ mix<br />
i<br />
(1)<br />
i=<br />
1<br />
where, q (gm -1 m<strong>in</strong> -1 ) is the total ra<strong>in</strong>splash erosion, mi (g) is the mass of a particle, which is<br />
splashed over a distance xi (m) measured along the x-axis. Ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rate was<br />
estimated from the area under the curves of mass with distance by:<br />
1 m i<br />
D = x<br />
At ∫ ∂<br />
(2)<br />
r x i<br />
where, D (gm -2 m<strong>in</strong> -1 ) is the ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rate, A is the surface area of soil pan<br />
2<br />
( 0 . 55m<br />
× 0.<br />
20m<br />
= 0.<br />
110m<br />
) and tr (m<strong>in</strong>) is the time dur<strong>in</strong>g which ra<strong>in</strong>splash process occurred.<br />
Additionally, a ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment study was conducted with cohesionless sand<br />
surfaces. W<strong>in</strong>dless ra<strong>in</strong>s and the ra<strong>in</strong>s driven by horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocities of 6, 10, and 14<br />
ms -1 were applied to the splash cups, 8 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter and 4 cm <strong>in</strong> depth, placed flat to the<br />
base of the tunnel (Figure 2a) [16]. The cups with a removable porous bottom to allow free<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age were filled at a full level with standard graded tertiary dune sand obta<strong>in</strong>ed as a sieve<br />
fraction of 100 – 200 µm (310 gram per cup). After manually compacted by tapp<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />
surface of the sand was smoothed exactly on a level with the rim of the cup. Each run was<br />
performed on a pre-wetted sand surface to prevent sand from lift<strong>in</strong>g off due to the w<strong>in</strong>d. For<br />
each <strong>in</strong>tensity and w<strong>in</strong>d velocity level, there were 30 splash cup measurements (a total of 360<br />
splash cup measurements with 3 <strong>in</strong>tensity and 4 w<strong>in</strong>d velocity levels. Sand detachment rates<br />
were evaluated by the amount of sand splash out of the cup.<br />
26
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
W<strong>in</strong>d<br />
direction<br />
a) Top view<br />
W<strong>in</strong>d<br />
direction<br />
α<br />
Soil pan<br />
b) Side view of w<strong>in</strong>dward setup<br />
W<strong>in</strong>d<br />
direction<br />
α<br />
c) Side view of leeward setup<br />
θ<br />
Sediment traps<br />
7-m uniform slope segment<br />
W<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong><br />
W<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong><br />
27<br />
α: ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation from vertical<br />
θ: slope degree<br />
φ : angle of ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />
cos φ = cos(α - θ)<br />
θ<br />
α: ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation from vertical<br />
θ: slope degree<br />
φ : angle of ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />
cos φ = cos(α + θ)<br />
Figure 1. Experimental set-up with soil pan and sediment traps for ra<strong>in</strong>splash measurements,<br />
arranged on the slopes of w<strong>in</strong>dward and leeward <strong>in</strong> the I. C. E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel.
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
standard sand<br />
Path of ra<strong>in</strong>drop<br />
8cm<br />
(a)<br />
Sand splashes <strong>in</strong><br />
all directions<br />
Figure 2. Splash cups used to evaluate the sand detachment rates (a), radial sand splashes by the<br />
vertical ra<strong>in</strong>drop (b), and unidirectional sand splashes by the <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed ra<strong>in</strong>drop (c).<br />
m<br />
D = (3)<br />
At<br />
where, D is the sand detachment rate (g m -2 s -1 ); m is the mass of soil (g) splashed out of the<br />
cup. The product of At determ<strong>in</strong>es the number of sand particles per unit area per unit time,<br />
which are ra<strong>in</strong>drop-<strong>in</strong>duced and entra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the splash droplets.<br />
Similarly, ra<strong>in</strong>splash transport rates of soils were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the amount of the<br />
splashed particles trapped at set distances on a 7 m uniform slope segment (Figure 1) and<br />
based on Eq. (1) by:<br />
1<br />
= ∫ m dx<br />
At<br />
Qs i<br />
(4)<br />
r<br />
where, Qs is <strong>in</strong> g m -1 m<strong>in</strong> -1 2<br />
, A is the collect<strong>in</strong>g trough area ( 1 . 20m<br />
0.<br />
14m<br />
= 0.<br />
168m<br />
)<br />
28<br />
4cm<br />
porous cloth bottom<br />
Path of ra<strong>in</strong>drop<br />
(b) (c)<br />
α: Ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation from vertical<br />
Unidirectional<br />
sand splashes<br />
× , and tr is<br />
the time (m<strong>in</strong>) dur<strong>in</strong>g which ra<strong>in</strong>splash process occurred. Furthermore, us<strong>in</strong>g the exponential
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
relation between mass of soil particles and distance traveled, the average ra<strong>in</strong>splash trajectory<br />
was derived from the average value of the fitted function:<br />
b<br />
− 1 δx<br />
X = e dx<br />
b a ∫β<br />
(5)<br />
−<br />
a<br />
Eq. (5) gives an approximation of the average value of the mass distribution curves<br />
over the <strong>in</strong>terval a ≤ x ≤ b, where the lower limit a = 0. β and δ are coefficients that depend<br />
upon the physical properties of soil particles.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g each ra<strong>in</strong>fall application and after runoff started sediment and runoff samples<br />
were collected at 5-m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervals at the bottom edge of the pan us<strong>in</strong>g wide-mouth bottles and<br />
were determ<strong>in</strong>ed gravimetrically. Total sediment and runoff values, and the time dur<strong>in</strong>g which<br />
the process occurred were used <strong>in</strong> calculation of sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>-impacted th<strong>in</strong><br />
flow (qs).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Assessment of drop size distribution of simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> the I. C. E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel by the<br />
logistic growth model given as Eq. (6) <strong>in</strong>dicated that a dist<strong>in</strong>ct <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> D50 for all<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g pressures was observed, and values were higher than 1.50 mm [2, 3, 4].<br />
100<br />
N ( d)<br />
= (6)<br />
−βd−γ<br />
1+<br />
e<br />
where, N(d) is the cumulative percentage of a given drop size by volume, d is drop diameter<br />
(mm), and β and γ are parameters of the logistic growth model. Indeed, the effects of w<strong>in</strong>d on<br />
the drop size distribution of the simulated ra<strong>in</strong>s of the tunnel were rather different from its<br />
effects on that of natural ra<strong>in</strong>s. In other terms, its effect on large drop sizes would not be as<br />
great as those on small drops. Large drops are less stable, and w<strong>in</strong>d may cause some of them<br />
to break up <strong>in</strong>to smaller drops. Consequently, dis<strong>in</strong>tegration of large drops depend<strong>in</strong>g on w<strong>in</strong>d<br />
may actually lead to a reduction <strong>in</strong> drop size. However, the w<strong>in</strong>d caused the formation of<br />
larger drops <strong>in</strong> the tunnel s<strong>in</strong>ce collisions between small drops happened more frequently as<br />
result of their greater number per unit volume of air. This accord<strong>in</strong>gly brought about an<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the median drop size.<br />
Assessment of the spatial distribution of the ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>in</strong> I.C.E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel<br />
showed that w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity was determ<strong>in</strong>ed as a function of the angle of ra<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>cidence, which was measured from the normal to the plane of <strong>in</strong>cidence and given by the<br />
cos<strong>in</strong>e law of spherical trigonometry [22]:<br />
( α θ)<br />
= cosα<br />
cosθ<br />
± s<strong>in</strong> αs<strong>in</strong><br />
θcos(<br />
z z )<br />
cos m m<br />
(7)<br />
where, α is the ra<strong>in</strong>drop <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation from vertical, θ is the slope gradient, and zα and zθ are the<br />
azimuth from which ra<strong>in</strong> is fall<strong>in</strong>g and the azimuth towards which the plane of surface is<br />
<strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed, respectively. In the second term of Eq. (7), the positive sign <strong>in</strong>dicates the w<strong>in</strong>dwardfac<strong>in</strong>g<br />
slope and the negative sign corresponds to the leeward-fac<strong>in</strong>g slope, imply<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact deficit with the same values of the slope degree and the ra<strong>in</strong>drop <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>ly, Eq. (7) implied that the w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity varied with the ra<strong>in</strong>drop <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
from vertical and slope degree and aspect.<br />
29<br />
α<br />
θ
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
Splash cup technique, k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor, and analytical solution used to measure<br />
the k<strong>in</strong>etic energies of w<strong>in</strong>dless and w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s led to similar results for w<strong>in</strong>dless ra<strong>in</strong>s;<br />
unfortunately, the methods provided relatively different results for w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s. The<br />
discrepancy among the methods <strong>in</strong>creased as the w<strong>in</strong>d velocity <strong>in</strong>creased (Table 1). The<br />
performance and accuracy of the techniques used were evaluated by consider<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
assumptions. It appeared that splash cup technique underestimated the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy. The<br />
reason for these relatively lesser values was the fact that the calibration study to establish a<br />
relationship between the amount of sand splashed and the ra<strong>in</strong> energy was performed with<br />
vertically fall<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops under w<strong>in</strong>dless conditions. It was apparent that at a given ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />
energy, there was a significant difference between the effectiveness of the vertical ra<strong>in</strong>drops<br />
and the <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed ra<strong>in</strong>drops <strong>in</strong> splash<strong>in</strong>g sand out of the cups.<br />
On the other hand, the analytical solution resulted <strong>in</strong> overestimation of the energy of<br />
w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops. This was because of the assumption that the w<strong>in</strong>d velocity had a xcomponent<br />
of the ra<strong>in</strong>drop velocity at the nozzle height. As anticipated, the ra<strong>in</strong>drop<br />
horizontal velocities could not be atta<strong>in</strong>ed because the horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocities drifted only<br />
a few meters <strong>in</strong> the tunnel. For this reason, the ra<strong>in</strong> energy measured by the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy<br />
sensor was found to be more reliable than those by the splash cup technique and the analytical<br />
solution. Although the calibration of the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor was carried out with vertically<br />
fall<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops, it did not <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong> sand splash, which, we believe, differs significantly<br />
with w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops and directly relied on the amplitude of electrical pulses produced<br />
by the impact of ra<strong>in</strong>drops on the surface of the sensor.<br />
The results of the ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rates from soil surfaces were analyzed for<br />
two cases of ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact parameters, without angle of <strong>in</strong>cidence and with angle of<br />
<strong>in</strong>cidence. Fluxes of k<strong>in</strong>etic energy and momentum were used as ra<strong>in</strong>fall parameters without<br />
angle of <strong>in</strong>cidence:<br />
⎛ 1 2 ⎞<br />
E r = Ξa<br />
⎜ mVR<br />
⎟<br />
(8)<br />
⎝ 2 ⎠<br />
r<br />
a<br />
( mV )<br />
ϕ = Ξ<br />
(9)<br />
where, Ξa is the actual number of ra<strong>in</strong>drops and calculated by ( ∀)<br />
R<br />
I a <strong>in</strong> # m -2 s -1 , Er is<br />
k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux <strong>in</strong> Wm -2 , and ϕr is momentum flux <strong>in</strong> Nm -2 . If ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment was<br />
assumed to be related to the normal component of ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact velocity [ V cos(<br />
α mθ<br />
) ]<br />
[12,13,15,24], fluxes of k<strong>in</strong>etic energy and momentum, and ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact pressure can,<br />
respectively, be calculated by:<br />
E<br />
rn<br />
rn<br />
⎛ 1 2 ⎞ 2<br />
= Ξa<br />
⎜ mVR<br />
⎟cos<br />
( α m θ)<br />
(10)<br />
⎝ 2 ⎠<br />
( mV ) cos(<br />
α m θ)<br />
ϕ =<br />
(11)<br />
Ξa R<br />
2 2 ( ρ V ) cos ( α m θ)<br />
Γ = Ξ<br />
(12)<br />
a<br />
w<br />
R<br />
where, Ern (Wm -2 ) and ϕrn (Nm -2 ) are the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux and momentum flux, which are<br />
related to the normal component of resultant velocity, respectively, Γ (MPa) is the total<br />
2 2 2<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact pressure, and V = V + V with = ∂z<br />
∂t<br />
and = ∂x<br />
∂t<br />
.<br />
R<br />
z<br />
x<br />
30<br />
V z<br />
V x<br />
R
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
u<br />
(m s -1 )<br />
d50<br />
(mm)<br />
KE<br />
(J)<br />
31<br />
VR<br />
(m s -1 )<br />
Splash Cup Technique<br />
0 1.00 1.31E-06 ♣ (3.89E-07) ♦ 2.22 (0.28)<br />
6 1.63 1.04E-05 (3.26E-06) 3.00 (0.47)<br />
10 1.53 2.45E-05 (4.06E-06) 5.09 (0.43)<br />
14 1.54 4.02E-05 (9.02E-06) 6.38 (0.69)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>etic Energy Sensor<br />
0 1.00 5.11E-06 (1.25E-06) 4.38 (0.58)<br />
6 1.63 2.47E-05 (5.99E-06) 4.64 (0.56)<br />
10 1.53 5.51E-05 (8.50E-06) 7.64 (0.60)<br />
14 1.54 1.07E-04 (1.15E-05) 10.48 (0.57)<br />
Analytical Solution<br />
0 1.00 1.73E-05 4.10<br />
6 1.63 6.05E-05 7.31<br />
10 1.53 1.03E-04 10.47<br />
14 1.54 1.95E-04 14.13<br />
KE = f (u)* R 2<br />
KE = 2E-06e 0.2473u 0.9555<br />
KE = 6E-06e 0.2184u 0.9887<br />
KE = 2E-05e 0.1712u 0.9902<br />
VR: resultant ra<strong>in</strong>drop velocity at impact; *this illustrates a functional relationship which exists between the<br />
impact energy and the horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocity obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the correspond<strong>in</strong>g method <strong>in</strong> the form of KE = ae bu<br />
with a and b show<strong>in</strong>g the model parameters; ♣ the E notation means "times 10 to the power"; ♦ standard deviation<br />
is given <strong>in</strong>side the parentheses for the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy and the resultant impact velocity.<br />
Table 1. The k<strong>in</strong>etic energies (J) and the resultant impact velocities (m s -1 ) of w<strong>in</strong>dless and w<strong>in</strong>ddriven<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>s measured by both splash cup technique and k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor and estimated by the<br />
analytical solution.<br />
Statistical analyses between ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rate and the ra<strong>in</strong>fall parameters showed<br />
that Er and ϕr had low correlation coefficients with the detachment rate. This occurred<br />
because they were unable to account for the changes <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>drop trajectory. Even Ia alone led<br />
to a much greater correlation coefficient <strong>in</strong> each case. Very significantly, the <strong>in</strong>troduction of<br />
angle of ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>in</strong>to parameters produced improvements <strong>in</strong> the coefficients, and each<br />
of the parameters, Ern, ϕrn, and Γ, could account for more than 82% of the variation <strong>in</strong> the<br />
detachment rates. This suggested that the angle of ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence accounted for the differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>drop fall trajectory <strong>in</strong> connection with the ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation and slope gradient and<br />
aspect.<br />
On the other hand, the results of sand detachment by w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> showed that the<br />
tangential stress controlled the process rather than compressive stress or the normal<br />
component of resultant velocity. K<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux (Erax) calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the horizontal<br />
component of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops, [VRs<strong>in</strong>α], had a greater correlation coefficient than the<br />
k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux (Eray) calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the normal velocity component, [VRcosα], with the<br />
sand detachment rates from the cups. Correlation coefficients with D were 0.96 and 0.54,<br />
respectively for Erax and Eray at the significance level of P = 0.0001 (Table 2). The reason for<br />
this might be that the vertical compressive stress of a w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drop at impact weakens<br />
as the ra<strong>in</strong>drop deviates from the vertical and the tangential shear stress becomes stronger.<br />
Our experimental study demonstrated that tangential jett<strong>in</strong>g of ra<strong>in</strong>drops ma<strong>in</strong>ly caused the<br />
sand detachment from the splash cups by the w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops. Openly, the soil material<br />
behaved differently from the sand surface, and as w<strong>in</strong>d velocity and angle of ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased, the rate of sand detachment <strong>in</strong>creased even though the rate of soil detachment<br />
decreased. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs also <strong>in</strong>dicated that the strength of the surface, such as <strong>in</strong>terparticle<br />
friction and cohesion, significantly affected the detachment rate and determ<strong>in</strong>ed the
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
differential contribution of the compressive and tangential stress to the process under w<strong>in</strong>ddriven<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>drops.<br />
Eray<br />
Erax<br />
D<br />
Eray<br />
1.00<br />
(0.0000) †<br />
2<br />
* E = E ( cos α)<br />
; ** ( ) α s<strong>in</strong> E E<br />
2<br />
ray<br />
ra<br />
32<br />
Erax<br />
0.53<br />
(0.0001)<br />
1.00<br />
(0.0000)<br />
rax = ra ; † Numbers <strong>in</strong> parantheses are significance levels.<br />
D<br />
0.54<br />
(0.0001)<br />
0.96<br />
(0.0001)<br />
1.00<br />
(0.0000)<br />
Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients between the sand detachment rate, D, (g m -2 s -1 ) and the the<br />
k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux related to both normal component, Eray * , (J m -2 s -1 ) and horizontal component,<br />
Erax ** , (J m -2 s -1 ) of the ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact velocity.<br />
On the other hand, measured ra<strong>in</strong>splash transport rates varied <strong>in</strong> close relationship to the<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact parameter (Θ) and w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity. Therefore, the process was<br />
successfully modeled under the approach that once lifted off by the ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact, the soil<br />
particles entra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>to the splash droplets traveled some distance, which varied directly with<br />
the w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity. The ra<strong>in</strong>drop impacts <strong>in</strong>duced the process that would otherwise be<br />
<strong>in</strong>capable of transport<strong>in</strong>g. At last, the w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>splash process was related to the<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall parameter and the w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity and analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g a log-l<strong>in</strong>ear regression<br />
technique:<br />
Q Θ<br />
s<br />
a1<br />
b1<br />
= k u<br />
(13)<br />
1<br />
*<br />
where, k1 is the relative soil transport parameter for the w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>splash process, u* is<br />
the w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity (ms -1 ), and a1 and b1 are the regression coefficients. Eq. (13)<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporated the dynamic effects of physical ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact and w<strong>in</strong>d action on the process,<br />
therefore, provided a basis for model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terrill ra<strong>in</strong>splash transport under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Additionally, the results of the study to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of slope aspect, slope gradient,<br />
and w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity on the trajectories of the ra<strong>in</strong>drop-<strong>in</strong>duced and w<strong>in</strong>d-driven soil<br />
particles <strong>in</strong>dicated that neither slope aspect nor slope gradient significantly predicted the<br />
splash-saltation trajectory. As a result, we conducted a statistical analysis to fit the average<br />
trajectories of the process <strong>in</strong>to nonl<strong>in</strong>ear regression model of:<br />
_<br />
2 ( u g)<br />
X = C<br />
(14)<br />
1<br />
*<br />
where _<br />
X is <strong>in</strong> m, u* is <strong>in</strong> ms -1 , and g is <strong>in</strong> ms -2 . C1 is a model parameter. These results also<br />
contradicted the previous approach of the splash-saltation transport based on only the slope<br />
aspect and gradient for def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the process.<br />
Along with the substantial effects of the w<strong>in</strong>d on ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact parameter and<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment and transport processes, there were significant w<strong>in</strong>d effects on<br />
sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow flow. This process was modeled based on<br />
<strong>in</strong>terrill erosion mechanics [13,14,17,18,26]:
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
a b c<br />
q s = kE rn q So<br />
(15)<br />
where, k is soil transport parameter for the sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow<br />
flow and , a, b, and c are regression coefficients to which k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux (Ern), unit<br />
discharge (q) and slope (So) are raised, respectively. Flux of ra<strong>in</strong> energy computed by<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the effects of w<strong>in</strong>d on the velocity, frequency, and angle of ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact and<br />
unit discharge and slope adequately described the characteristics of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s and<br />
significantly expla<strong>in</strong>ed the variations <strong>in</strong> sediment delivery rates to the shallow flow transport<br />
(R 2 ≥ 0.91). Analyses of the Pearson correlation coefficients additionally showed that a<br />
significant difference occurred <strong>in</strong> shallow flow hydraulics with different aspects under the<br />
impacts of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops. The reverse / advance particle splashes and the lateral<br />
stress of impact<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops at angle with respect to the shallow flow direction were<br />
concluded to have significant effects on the shallow flow hydraulics under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Further analyses to understand the effects of roughness elements on the sediment transport<br />
capacity of ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow flow were conducted by partition<strong>in</strong>g the resultant<br />
k<strong>in</strong>etic energy <strong>in</strong>to its vertical and horizontal components s<strong>in</strong>ce the magnitude of those<br />
significantly changed with w<strong>in</strong>d velocity, slope aspect and gradient and accord<strong>in</strong>gly their<br />
effects on th<strong>in</strong> flow hydraulics.<br />
KE<br />
KE<br />
x<br />
y<br />
2<br />
= KEs<strong>in</strong><br />
( α ± β)<br />
(16)<br />
2<br />
= KE cos ( α ± β)<br />
(17)<br />
Ω = γqS<br />
(18)<br />
s<br />
0<br />
a b<br />
= kKE xKE<br />
y<br />
c<br />
(19)<br />
q Ω<br />
where, Ω is the stream power as a flow parameter (kg s -3 ).<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
This paper aims to give a review of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> erosion research performed <strong>in</strong> I.C.E<br />
w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation facility giv<strong>in</strong>g the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal discrepancies obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> water<br />
erosion sub-processes when w<strong>in</strong>d came <strong>in</strong>to play dur<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>s. Concepts and mechanisms<br />
were discussed giv<strong>in</strong>g experimental results on the effects of w<strong>in</strong>d on the drop size<br />
distribution, ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity and energy, ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment and transport, and th<strong>in</strong> flow<br />
transport capacity.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Cornelis, W., Erpul, G., D. Gabriels. The I.C.E. W<strong>in</strong>d Tunnel for W<strong>in</strong>d and Water Interaction Research.<br />
W<strong>in</strong>d and Ra<strong>in</strong> Interaction <strong>in</strong> Erosion, Visser, S. and Cornelis, W. (Eds.), Tropical Resource Management<br />
Papers, Chapter 13, p (195 - 224). Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen University and Research Centre (2004).<br />
[2] Ellison, W. D. Soil erosion studies (7 parts). Agr. Eng. 28: 145-146; 197-201; 245-248; 297-300; 349-351;<br />
407-408; 447-450 (1947).<br />
[3] Erpul, G., D. Gabriels, D. Janssens. “Assess<strong>in</strong>g the Drop Size Distribution of Simulated Ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> a W<strong>in</strong>d<br />
Tunnel,” Soil & Tillage Research, 45, 455-463 (1998).<br />
[4] Erpul, G., D. Gabriels, D. Janssens. “Effect of W<strong>in</strong>d on Size and Energy of Small Simulated Ra<strong>in</strong>drops: A<br />
W<strong>in</strong>d Tunnel Study,” Int. Agrophysics, 14, 1-7 (2000).<br />
33
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
[5] Erpul, G., D. Gabriels, L. D. Norton,. “W<strong>in</strong>d effects on sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow<br />
flow”, Earth Surface Processes and <strong>Land</strong>forms, 29: 955-967 (2004).<br />
[6] Erpul, G., D. Gabriels, L. D. Norton. “Sand Detachment by W<strong>in</strong>d-driven Ra<strong>in</strong>drops”. Earth Surface<br />
Processes and <strong>Land</strong>forms, 30: 241-250 (2005).<br />
[7] Erpul, G., L. D. Norton, D. Gabriels. “Ra<strong>in</strong>drop-Induced and W<strong>in</strong>d-Driven Particle Transport,” Catena, 47,<br />
227-243 (2002).<br />
[8] Erpul, G., L. D. Norton, D. Gabriels. “Sediment Transport From Interrill Areas under W<strong>in</strong>d-Driven Ra<strong>in</strong>”,<br />
Journal of Hydrology, 276 (1-4), 184-197 (2003).<br />
[9] Erpul, G., L. D. Norton, D. Gabriels. “Splash – saltation trajectories of soil particles under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>”,<br />
Geomorphology. 59: 31-42 (2004).<br />
[10] Erpul, G., L. D. Norton, D. Gabriels. “The Effect of W<strong>in</strong>d on Ra<strong>in</strong>drop Impact and Ra<strong>in</strong>splash<br />
Detachment”, Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. Vol. 45(6): 51-62 (2003).<br />
[11] Gabriels, D., Cornelis, W., Pollet, I., Van Coillie, T., Quessar, M. The I. C. E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel for w<strong>in</strong>d and<br />
water erosion studies. Soil Technology. 10: 1-8 (1997).<br />
[12] Gilley, J. E. & F<strong>in</strong>kner, S. C. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g soil detachment caused by ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact. Transactions of the<br />
American Society of Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 28, 140-146 (1985).<br />
[13] Gilley, J. E., Woolhiser, D. A. & McWhorter, D. B. Interrill soil erosion. Part I: Development of model<br />
equations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 28, 147-153 and 159 (1985).<br />
[14] Guy, B. T., W. T. Dick<strong>in</strong>son and R. P. Rudra. The roles of ra<strong>in</strong>fall and runoff <strong>in</strong> the sediment transport<br />
capacity of <strong>in</strong>terrill flow. Transactions of the ASAE 30(5): 1378-1386 (1987).<br />
[15] Heymann, F. J. A survey of clues to the relation between erosion rate and impact parameters. In:<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of International Conference on Ra<strong>in</strong> Erosion and Allied Phenomena. Second Ra<strong>in</strong> Erosion<br />
Conference, The Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, England, 2, pp. 683-760 (1967).<br />
[16] Hudson, N. W. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of ra<strong>in</strong>fall mechanics on soil erosion. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Cape Town<br />
(1965).<br />
[17] Julien, P. Y. and D. B. Simons. Sediment transport capacity of overland flow. Transactions of the ASAE 28:<br />
755-762 (1985).<br />
[18] Parsons, A. J., S. G. L. Stromberg and M. Greener. Sediment-transport competence of ra<strong>in</strong>-impacted<br />
<strong>in</strong>terrill overland flow. Earth Surf. Processes and <strong>Land</strong>forms, 23: 365-375 (1998).<br />
[19] Poesen, J. An improved splash transport model. Z. Geomorph. N. F., 29: 193-221. 69-74 (1985).<br />
[20] Samray, H., Erpul, G., Gabriels D. The effect of slope aspect on sediment transport by shallow overland<br />
flow under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>. 18th International Soil Meet<strong>in</strong>g (ISM) on “Soil Susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Life on Earth, Manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Soil and Technology”, May 22 – 26, 2006 Şanlıurfa – Turkey, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, Volume 1: 459 – 464 (2006).<br />
[21] Savat, J. and J. Poesen. Detachment and transportation of loose sediments by ra<strong>in</strong>drop splash. Part I: The<br />
calculation of absolute data on detachability and transportability. Catena 8: 1-18 (1981).<br />
[22] Sellers, W. D. <strong>Physical</strong> Climatology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill. pp. 33-35 (1965).<br />
[23] Sensit. Model V04 K<strong>in</strong>etic Energy of Ra<strong>in</strong> Sensor. Portland, N. D.: Sensit Company (2000).<br />
[24] Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, G. S. Erosion by liquid impact. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York (1976).<br />
[25] Van Heerden, W. M. An analysis of soil transportation by ra<strong>in</strong>drop splash. Trans. ASAE, 10:166-169<br />
(1967).<br />
[26] Zhang, X. C., M. A. Near<strong>in</strong>g, W. P. Miller, L. D. Norton and L. T. West. Model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terrill sediment<br />
delivery. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62: 438-444 (1998).<br />
34
Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />
35
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
WORKSHOP THEME A – SOIL AND GROUNDWATER<br />
POLLUTION AND REMEDIATION<br />
Sub-theme : Manag<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils us<strong>in</strong>g phytoremediation<br />
Erik Meers, Filip M.G. Tack, Marc G. Verloo<br />
Paper/poster : Comparison of amendments used to remediate acid m<strong>in</strong>e<br />
tail<strong>in</strong>gs: Environmental and Agricultural Applications - Kelly A. Senkiw,<br />
Tee Boon Goh<br />
Paper/poster : Study on the effects of trade village waste on accumulation<br />
of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd <strong>in</strong> agricultural soils of Phung Xa Village, Thach<br />
Thanh District, Ha Tay Prov<strong>in</strong>ce - Nguyen Huu Thanh, Tran Thi Le Ha,<br />
Nguyen Duc Hung, Tran Duc Hai<br />
Paper/poster : Metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> irrigated agricultural land : case<br />
study of Nairobi River bas<strong>in</strong>, Kenya – P.N. Kamande, F.M.G. Tack<br />
Sub-theme : Manag<strong>in</strong>g groundwater pollution from waste disposal sites<br />
Krist<strong>in</strong>e Walraevens, Marleen Coetsiers, Krist<strong>in</strong>e Martens, Marc Van Camp<br />
Paper/poster : Contam<strong>in</strong>ation of the Marimba River Tributary, Zimbabwe,<br />
with Cu, Pb, Zn and P by <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent and sewer l<strong>in</strong>e discharge –<br />
Bangira C., Wuta, M. Dube, H.M., Chipatso, L.<br />
Paper/poster : Controll<strong>in</strong>g phosphorus (P) mobility <strong>in</strong> poorly P sorb<strong>in</strong>g<br />
soils : dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g-water treatment residuals (WTR) to the rescue – S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-<br />
Birikorang, G.A. O'Connor, L.W. Jacobs<br />
Paper/poster : Heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation of soil and surface water by leachates<br />
of an open dump of municipal solid waste : a case study of oblogo landfill <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Ga West District of Accra, Ghana – Abuaku Ebenezer<br />
Conclusions<br />
36
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Abstract<br />
Sub-theme : MANAGING CONTAMINATED SOILS USING<br />
PHYTOREMEDIATION<br />
Erik Meers, Filip M. G. Tack, Marc G. Verloo<br />
Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry and Applied Ecochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium<br />
Soil contam<strong>in</strong>ation with heavy metals is a widespread environmental issue, remediation of which is hampered by<br />
excessive economic costs. Phytoremediation is the use of plant based techniques for soil remediation. This<br />
technology can help to solve some of the environmental issues <strong>in</strong>volved, yet only under certa<strong>in</strong> conditions. Some<br />
of the do’s and don’t of phytoremediation applications will be discussed dur<strong>in</strong>g the oral presentation.<br />
SOIL CONTAMINATION<br />
An unfortunate byproduct of <strong>in</strong>dustrialization has been the contam<strong>in</strong>ation of soil and water<br />
resources with heavy metals, metalloids and other harmful substances. Over the last decades,<br />
awareness of the problem has grown considerably, as has the <strong>in</strong>sight that the problem is more<br />
widespread than was <strong>in</strong>itially assumed [1]. Conventional soil remediation techniques fall short<br />
of expectation to tackle the overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g task at hand due to their high cost: eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
techniques cost between €40 - €400 per m3 of soil treated [2]. In Flanders (Belgium, Europe)<br />
average soil remediation costs are estimated at €310 per ton (based on [3]). The estimated<br />
total cost for remediation of historically polluted soils is estimated at 7 billion euro [4]. In<br />
Europe, overall cleanup costs for historic pollution are estimated to run <strong>in</strong>to the 100 billion<br />
euro range [5, 1]. Budget estimates for soil remediation generally exclude the necessity to<br />
remediate light to moderately contam<strong>in</strong>ated sites due to low priority and already high cost<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> clean<strong>in</strong>g the heavily polluted sites.<br />
PHYTOREMEDIATION<br />
Phytoremediation has been proposed as an economic alternative for some of the<br />
environmental issues <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> heavy metal pollution [6, 7]. Phytoextraction is a plant based<br />
technique aimed at remov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>organic contam<strong>in</strong>ants from the soil matrix by plant absorption<br />
and translocation to harvestable plant parts. By subsequently remov<strong>in</strong>g the metal-enriched<br />
biomass from the site, a gradual attenuation of the contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the top soil layer is<br />
achieved.<br />
As a soil remediation technique, it offers the follow<strong>in</strong>g advantages over conventional<br />
remediation techniques: as an <strong>in</strong> situ technique, it is less <strong>in</strong>vasive and more economic than<br />
civil-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g earth mov<strong>in</strong>g techniques. Also, it can be applied over extended surface areas<br />
and targets the “bioavailable” soil fraction of heavy metals, which is the most relevant<br />
fraction from an environmental risk assessment perspective. The most important drawback is<br />
the long required remediation period (years to decades). The sense of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> regards to<br />
system consistency and performance predictability of biological remediation systems can also<br />
be perceived as a drawback. The use of soil amendments to <strong>in</strong>crease accumulation of heavy<br />
metals <strong>in</strong> harvestable plant parts can also <strong>in</strong>crease the risk of leach<strong>in</strong>g. In addition, elevated<br />
37
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
aboveground plant concentrations also run the risk of enter<strong>in</strong>g the foodcha<strong>in</strong> through<br />
herbivory of the phytoextraction crops.<br />
RESEARCH FINDINGS<br />
Phytoextraction research at our laboratory [8] revealed several important f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />
Firstly, phytoextraction as a soil remediation technique can only be applied on lightly<br />
to moderately contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils. This not only for plant tolerance reasons, but also because<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g metal concentrations <strong>in</strong> more heavily polluted soils to levels below legal soil<br />
sanitation criteria would take excessively long periods of time (<strong>in</strong> the order of centuries).<br />
Secondly, phytoextraction is not equally applicable for all heavy metals as plants have<br />
a different aff<strong>in</strong>ity for uptake of the various metals. Particularly for Cd and Zn the technique<br />
appears to be suitable, and to a lesser extent also for Cu.<br />
Thirdly, s<strong>in</strong>ce the technique is slow work<strong>in</strong>g (order of years and decades) it is<br />
considered a vital prerequisite to economically re-valorize the produced biomass for <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
applications. A viable approach is to employ bio-energy crops with aff<strong>in</strong>ity for metal removal.<br />
These energy crops can be converted <strong>in</strong>to electrical and thermal energy. However, the fate of<br />
the accumulated metals <strong>in</strong> the phytoremediation biomass needs to be monitored closely dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the conversion processes. Other <strong>in</strong>dustrial applications can be found <strong>in</strong> the paper <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />
fibre <strong>in</strong>dustry, wood <strong>in</strong>dustry and so on.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the presentation, several field studies will be presented <strong>in</strong> which phytoextraction of<br />
heavy metals is exam<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] C. Ferguson, H. Kasamas. “Risk assessment for contam<strong>in</strong>ated sites <strong>in</strong> Europe”. CARACAS publication.<br />
LQM Press, Nott<strong>in</strong>gham (UK), 223 p. (1999)<br />
[2] S.D. Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham, D.W. Ow. “Promises and prospects of phytoremediation”. Plant Physiology, 110, 715-<br />
719. (1996)<br />
[3] F. De Naeyer. “Soil Remediation Projects: the new guidel<strong>in</strong>es and daily practice”. Studyday TI-KVIV (30/3),<br />
Technological Institute. (Translated from dutch). (2000)<br />
[4] Ecolas. “F<strong>in</strong>ancial cost estimation <strong>in</strong> regards with soil sanitation”. OVAM (Public Waste Agency of<br />
Flanders), Mechelen, Belgium. (Translated from Dutch). (2001)<br />
[5] D.J. Glass. “U.S. and <strong>in</strong>ternational markets for phytoremediation”, 1999-2000. D. Glass Associates Inc.,<br />
Needham (USA), 266 p. (1999)<br />
[6] A.J.M. Baker, R.R. Brooks. “Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements – a review<br />
of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry”. Biorecovery, 1, 81-126. (1989)<br />
[7] A.J.M. Baker, S.P. McGrath, R.D. Reeves, J.A.C. Smith. “A review of the biological resource for possible<br />
exploitation <strong>in</strong> the phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils”. In: Terry, N. & Bañuelos, G.S. (Eds.),<br />
Phytoremediation of Contam<strong>in</strong>ated Soil and Water. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 85-107. (1999)<br />
[8] E. Meers. “Phytoextraction of heavy metals from contam<strong>in</strong>ated dredged sediments”. ISBN 90-5989-053-1,<br />
341 pp., Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. (2005)<br />
38
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
COMPARISON OF AMENDMENTS USED TO REMEDIATE ACID<br />
MINE TAILINGS: ENVIRONMENTAL AND AGRICULTURAL<br />
APPLICATIONS<br />
Abstract<br />
Kelly A. Senkiw and Tee Boon Goh *<br />
Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba, W<strong>in</strong>nipeg, Canada R3T 2N2<br />
In environments with low pH, a large portion of the total copper can exist <strong>in</strong> the labile and potentially toxic<br />
water-soluble form, while the rest is distributed among chemical forms that are less bioavailable. Copper was<br />
sequentially extracted from acid m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>in</strong> order to assess the potential lability and availability of the<br />
metal. Four amendments were applied to the tail<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>cubation study, and sequential extraction was used<br />
to exam<strong>in</strong>e the distribution of copper among six fractions. The control was highly contam<strong>in</strong>ated with copper,<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 564 mg kg -1 of water-soluble copper. The addition of wheat straw (WS) reduced this form to 305 mg<br />
kg -1 . The addition of an alkal<strong>in</strong>e extract of humic substances from leonardite (HS) decreased the free copper to<br />
72 mg kg -1 , while the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of HS+WS reduced it to 30 mg kg -1 . The CaCO3 amendment reduced free<br />
copper to near zero. The amendments <strong>in</strong>creased the pH of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the order of Lime > HS+WS > HS ><br />
WS. Total copper <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs ranged from 1816-2275 mg kg -1 by summation of copper <strong>in</strong> the six fractions.<br />
Total copper by acid digestion was 2257-2360 mg kg -1 . The efficiency of the sequential extraction method<br />
varied from 75 to 96%. Lime was the most effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g the potential availability of copper, followed by<br />
HS+WS, then HS.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Many regions <strong>in</strong> Canada have been m<strong>in</strong>ed for natural resources such as coal and <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
metals. The aboveground storage of m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs exposes previously buried m<strong>in</strong>erals to the<br />
surface environment. Here, accelerated chemical and biological weather<strong>in</strong>g can occur, with<br />
the associated risk of contam<strong>in</strong>ation by heavy metals (Barnhisel et al. 1982, Amacher et al.<br />
1995). The presence of sulphur-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>erals at m<strong>in</strong>e sites is a precursor to the<br />
production of sulphuric acid by the process of oxidation, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a pH as low as 3.5<br />
(Dixon et al. 1982). Heavy metals such as Cu, Ni, Zn, Mn and Fe are often present <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>e<br />
spoils, and their mobility and toxicity may be <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> acidic environments (Barnhisel et<br />
al. 1982). The potentially toxic comb<strong>in</strong>ation of a low pH and dissolution of heavy metals are<br />
hazardous to vegetation and habitats border<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs. Hence the reclamation of m<strong>in</strong>e<br />
spoils or tail<strong>in</strong>gs must <strong>in</strong>volve a neutralization of pH, as well as a reduction of lability,<br />
availability and toxicity of free metal ionic contam<strong>in</strong>ants.<br />
Several m<strong>in</strong>es operated with<strong>in</strong> Manitoba <strong>in</strong> the early twentieth century, <strong>in</strong> the region<br />
that is now Nopim<strong>in</strong>g Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Park. Today, the tail<strong>in</strong>gs of a former gold m<strong>in</strong>e cover an area<br />
of approximately 5400 m 2 and have rema<strong>in</strong>ed virtually barren s<strong>in</strong>ce the m<strong>in</strong>e’s closure, <strong>in</strong><br />
1937, despite several recent attempts at revegetation on site. It is believed that revegetation<br />
has been limited by the acidity and extremely high concentrations of copper and other metals<br />
<strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs (Renault et al. 2000). The acid portion of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs have a pH of 3 to 5, and<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>, on average, 2300 mg kg -1 total copper (by digestion) (Ibrahim and Goh 2004).<br />
Merely know<strong>in</strong>g the total contents of heavy metals (such as copper) <strong>in</strong> a soil provides<br />
limited <strong>in</strong>formation about the potential behaviour and bioavailability of the metals. Soil<br />
texture, pH, organic matter content, and Fe/Mn oxides also <strong>in</strong>fluence the lability and<br />
bioavailability of copper. A heavy metal <strong>in</strong> soil can be associated with many of these soil<br />
components. Sequential extraction techniques have been employed to exam<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
39
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
distribution of metals, such as copper, among soil micronutrient pools (Shuman 1985; Sims<br />
1986; Alva et al. 2000; Kabala and S<strong>in</strong>gh 2001). Shuman (1991) describes six conceptual<br />
micronutrient pools <strong>in</strong> soils: water-soluble; exchangeable; precipitated as carbonate;<br />
associated with Fe, Mn, and Al-oxides; organically-bound; and residual (hereafter referred to<br />
as fractions F1 to F6). The water-soluble and exchangeable forms of metals are considered<br />
readily labile and available to plants, while the other forms can be considered relatively<br />
<strong>in</strong>active or strongly bound (Alva et al. 2000).<br />
Copper is a trace element that is essential to the nutrition of plants and animals. The<br />
average Cu content <strong>in</strong> soils is around 30 ppm with a range from 2-100 ppm (Aubert and P<strong>in</strong>ta<br />
1977) and it is well-documented that excessive bioavailability of copper is toxic. In fact, the<br />
soil-plant cont<strong>in</strong>uum functions as a natural barrier aga<strong>in</strong>st toxicity to animals. Plant growth<br />
(e.g. revegetation of copper-contam<strong>in</strong>ated tail<strong>in</strong>gs) will either be greatly reduced or will cease<br />
before a dangerously toxic amount would be accumulated and transferred to animals via the<br />
food cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Organic matter accounts for many useful functions <strong>in</strong> soils, sediments and natural<br />
waters (Aiken 1985). Studies us<strong>in</strong>g humic substances obta<strong>in</strong>ed from lignite as a soil<br />
conditioner or amendment are rare. Whiteley and Williams (1993) <strong>in</strong>vestigated a metalcontam<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
m<strong>in</strong>e spoil (pH = 5.1) after amendment with three forms of lignite: untreated<br />
lignite; and the <strong>in</strong>soluble and soluble extracts obta<strong>in</strong>ed after an oxidation treatment. The<br />
authors concluded that the lignite treatment may be a valuable reclamation tool, as it<br />
improved the survival of non-tolerant cultivars <strong>in</strong> a Cd-, Pb-, Zn-contam<strong>in</strong>ated m<strong>in</strong>e spoil.<br />
However, the composition of the lignite was not known with certa<strong>in</strong>ty. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong> our laboratory revealed that humic substances constitute most of the organic<br />
matter <strong>in</strong> leonardite, a coal m<strong>in</strong>e overburden material that is rich <strong>in</strong> carbon, but is usually<br />
discarded because it does not burn like coal. It was of <strong>in</strong>terest to <strong>in</strong>vestigate if the humic<br />
substances that can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed follow<strong>in</strong>g alkal<strong>in</strong>e chemical extraction of leonardite was of<br />
benefit <strong>in</strong> the reclamation of copper-contam<strong>in</strong>ated m<strong>in</strong>e spoils.<br />
The objectives of this study were to assess the copper distribution among six def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
fractions, and thereby approximate the lability and the bioavailability of copper, with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs; and, further, to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the potential of alkal<strong>in</strong>e humic substances from<br />
leonardite, lime, and wheat straw amendments to reduce the lability and bioavailability of<br />
copper after <strong>in</strong>cubation for 24 weeks.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Acid m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs were collected from the surface of the Central Manitoba M<strong>in</strong>e site. The<br />
tail<strong>in</strong>gs were then stored at room temperature <strong>in</strong> a covered, five-gallon plastic pail.<br />
The m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs have a sandy loam texture, with 48.5% sand, 47.2% silt, and 4.3%<br />
clay. Their organic matter content is very low (2.1 g kg -1 ), and total copper contents are<br />
extremely high (≥2000 mg kg -1 ) (Renault et al. 2000; Ibrahim and Goh 2004).<br />
The experiment was designed to compare the effects of different organic amendments<br />
on the distribution of copper <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs. Humic substances (HS), fresh wheat straw<br />
(WS), and lime (CaCO3) were mixed with the m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> four comb<strong>in</strong>ations. All<br />
experimental units were 200 g of m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs. For the HS treatment, 14 mL of liquid HS,<br />
(5.62% Organic Carbon), pH = 10.5, was added. The WS, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 65.5% carbon, was<br />
ground by hand and 2.29 g was added to the tail<strong>in</strong>gs. The amounts of HS and WS applied<br />
corresponded to 4.0 and 7.5 g C kg -1 tail<strong>in</strong>gs, respectively. The third treatment was the<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ed addition of HS+WS, at the same rates. The lime was applied at a rate of 4 g CaCO3<br />
40
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
kg -1 tail<strong>in</strong>gs. Nitrogen (N) was added to all samples except the Control at the rate of 50 mg N<br />
kg -1 tail<strong>in</strong>gs. All samples were prepared <strong>in</strong> triplicate and placed <strong>in</strong> 500 mL plastic conta<strong>in</strong>ers<br />
with lids. The samples were <strong>in</strong>cubated at 20°C for 24 weeks and their moisture was<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 60% of the water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity throughout the <strong>in</strong>cubation period.<br />
Fractionation of Copper<br />
Total copper concentration of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs was determ<strong>in</strong>ed follow<strong>in</strong>g digestion of a sample<br />
with aqua regia. In addition, six fractions of copper (labeled F1 to F6) were extracted<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to the procedure of Salbu et al. (1998). After each step, the supernatant was<br />
separated by high-speed centrifugation for 30 m<strong>in</strong> at 10,000 x g. The residue was washed<br />
with 10 mL of deionized water and the wash was comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the supernatant. All<br />
supernatants were refrigerated until analysis for copper content by graphite furnace atomic<br />
absorption spectrophotometry. The sequential extraction was conducted <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
manner:<br />
A two-gram subsample of tail<strong>in</strong>gs and 20 mL of deionized water were comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a<br />
50 mL polycarbonate centrifuge tube and shaken for 1 hour at 20°C. The supernatant<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the water-soluble copper, denoted Fraction 1 (F1), was collected and stored.<br />
The F1 residue (i.e. the soil follow<strong>in</strong>g F1 extraction) was extracted for 2 hours with 20 mL of<br />
1 mol L -1 ammonium acetate, pH 7 to obta<strong>in</strong> the exchangeable copper (F2) from the m<strong>in</strong>e<br />
tail<strong>in</strong>gs. To obta<strong>in</strong> Fraction 3 (F3), the F2 residue was extracted for 2 hours on a shaker with<br />
20 mL of 1 mol L -1 ammonium acetate, pH 5. Fraction 4 (F4), the metal-associated (or<br />
specifically-sorbed) copper, was collected by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the F3 residue with 20 mL of 0.04<br />
mol L -1 NH2OH-HCl solution for 6 h <strong>in</strong> a 60°C water bath. To collect Fraction 5 (F5), the<br />
organically complexed copper, the F4 residue was extracted for 5.5 h <strong>in</strong> an 80°C water bath<br />
with 15 mL of 30% H2O2, pH 2. After cool<strong>in</strong>g, 5 mL of 3.2 mol L -1 ammonium acetate was<br />
added and the sample was shaken for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes. The solution was brought up to 20 mL with<br />
deionized water. F<strong>in</strong>ally, all of the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g copper <strong>in</strong> the sample was extracted <strong>in</strong>to<br />
Fraction 6 (F6). The residue from F5 was allowed to dry for a few m<strong>in</strong>utes. One gram of the<br />
residue was placed <strong>in</strong>to an Erlenmeyer flask and digested with 10 mL of 7 mol L -1 HNO3 on a<br />
hotplate for 6 hours. After dissolution with 1 mL of 2 mol L -1 HNO3, the contents were made<br />
up to 10 mL.<br />
Analysis for Copper Concentration<br />
The copper concentration of all extracts was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by graphite furnace atomic<br />
absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Standard copper solutions were prepared <strong>in</strong> each of the<br />
matrices utilized <strong>in</strong> the sequential extraction procedure.<br />
Data Analysis<br />
The experiment was carried out as completely randomized design (CRD). The copper<br />
fractions (F1-F6), and total copper (by sum of fractions, and by digestion), were randomized<br />
among the treatments (Control, HS, HS+WS, WS, and Lime). Analysis of variance<br />
(ANOVA) was performed us<strong>in</strong>g Statistical Analysis Software (SAS Institute 2000).<br />
41
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Effect of Amendments on pH of the Tail<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The pH measurements (1:1; soil:water) of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs after the <strong>in</strong>cubation period of 24 weeks<br />
are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The pH of the control tail<strong>in</strong>gs was 3.32. As expected, lime was the most<br />
effective treatment, rais<strong>in</strong>g the pH to 5.59. The HS alone augmented the tail<strong>in</strong>gs’ pH to 4.5,<br />
whereas the WS alone <strong>in</strong>creased the pH by a slight 0.6 units compared to the control. In<br />
comparison, the comb<strong>in</strong>ed HS+WS treatment raised the pH to 5.02. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />
HS+WS caused a 50-fold reduction <strong>in</strong> the acidity (i.e. 1.7 pH units), compared to the control.<br />
Despite the fact that all four treatments were able to <strong>in</strong>crease the pH of the m<strong>in</strong>e<br />
tail<strong>in</strong>gs above the <strong>in</strong>itial value of 3.32, the pH still rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the acidic range. This means<br />
that follow<strong>in</strong>g the application of the amendments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g HS at the rate used <strong>in</strong> this<br />
experiment, site rehabilitation by revegetation may still not be possible s<strong>in</strong>ce the availability<br />
of heavy metals is expected to be high <strong>in</strong> acidic environments. Some plants may be able to<br />
tolerate the slightly acidic pH <strong>in</strong> the lime- and HS+WS- amended tail<strong>in</strong>gs, but further<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigation will be necessary to identify these plant species.<br />
Effects of Amendments on the Distribution of Copper<br />
The total copper measured by fractionation <strong>in</strong> the control tail<strong>in</strong>gs was 1816 mg kg -1 (Table 1).<br />
Of this total, 31% or 564 mg kg -1 of Cu was found <strong>in</strong> F1, the water-soluble fraction. This is<br />
an extremely high amount, and is expected to be very toxic to organisms. The organicallycomplexed<br />
fraction (F5) conta<strong>in</strong>s the largest portion of copper <strong>in</strong> the untreated tail<strong>in</strong>gs (34%)<br />
(Table 1 and Fig. 1).<br />
The total copper extracted from the tail<strong>in</strong>gs treated with alkal<strong>in</strong>e HS was 1824 mg kg -1<br />
This was very similar to the amount of total copper obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the control. The watersoluble<br />
copper was drastically reduced from 564 to 72 mg kg -1 (Table 1). The copper was<br />
redistributed <strong>in</strong>to the other fractions, i.e. F2 to F6. The largest <strong>in</strong>crease was observed <strong>in</strong> F5,<br />
which rose to 872 mg kg -1 compared to 618 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> the control, although this difference is<br />
not significant. However, the observed <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> the copper content of the F2 and F3<br />
fractions were significant compared to the control. Furthermore, if fractions F1 (watersoluble)<br />
and F2 (exchangeable) are <strong>in</strong>dicative of the most available fractions of Cu, it is<br />
observed that the HS treatment may greatly reduce the availability of Cu to plants. The size<br />
of the residual copper pool (F6) <strong>in</strong> the HS treated tail<strong>in</strong>gs was the largest of all amendments,<br />
at 23%.<br />
The fractionation procedure extracted almost 2300 mg kg -1 of total copper from the<br />
tail<strong>in</strong>gs treated with HS+WS. The soluble, toxic form of copper was reduced to 1% of the<br />
total copper extracted, or 30 mg kg -1 (Table 1 and Fig. 1). The organically bound copper<br />
comprised 52% of the distribution, and was significantly higher than the F5 of all other<br />
treatments. A total of 11.5 g C was added per kg tail<strong>in</strong>gs, which is the highest of all the<br />
treatments. Because organic matter provides surface sites for adsorption and complexation of<br />
copper, it is expected that <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g additions of carbon residues will correspond<strong>in</strong>gly raise<br />
the copper <strong>in</strong> F5. The HS+WS amendment was very effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g the toxic forms of<br />
copper, while redistribut<strong>in</strong>g the copper to fractions where it is strongly held (F4, F5, F6) and<br />
thus considered to be less bioavailable.<br />
When applied alone, the WS did not reduce the free copper as much as the<br />
amendments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the alkal<strong>in</strong>e HS. The water-soluble copper was reduced from 30% <strong>in</strong><br />
the control, to 15% <strong>in</strong> the WS-treated tail<strong>in</strong>gs (Fig. 1). However, the 305 mg kg -1 of free<br />
copper (Table 1) was still extremely high, and poses a toxicity hazard to organisms. It is<br />
42
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
possible that the low pH of the WS-amended tail<strong>in</strong>gs may have limited microbial activity and<br />
the ability of WS carbon to play a role <strong>in</strong> immobiliz<strong>in</strong>g copper. In contrast, when WS was<br />
added <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with HS, the water-soluble copper was reduced to 30 mg kg -1 . The<br />
slightly higher pH observed <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs that received the HS+WS treatment may have<br />
contributed to the reduction <strong>in</strong> F1, compared to the control. The pH of 5.02 was probably<br />
more favourable for the carbon of the WS to be used by microbes, and thus through<br />
decomposition, the WS may have contributed some active surface sites to which Cu could be<br />
adsorbed or chelated.<br />
A total of 1989 mg kg -1 of copper was extracted from the tail<strong>in</strong>gs treated with Lime.<br />
The water-soluble copper was negligible, at only 7 mg kg -1 . This is a reduction of 80 times<br />
compared to the control. The copper was redistributed to all other fractions, with greatest<br />
ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> F4 and F6. The lime treated tail<strong>in</strong>gs had the largest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> F4 of all the<br />
treatments, at 22% of the total distribution, compared to 11% <strong>in</strong> the control. This provides<br />
evidence that the F4 fraction obta<strong>in</strong>ed by this fractionation scheme extracts some carbonate<br />
bound copper, <strong>in</strong> addition to metal-oxide bound copper.<br />
In this study, an amendment was considered effective based on several observations.<br />
Firstly, if it elevated the pH of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs, then the lability of copper would be reduced (Sims<br />
1986; Alva et al. 2000). The water-soluble copper is the most toxic form, followed by the<br />
adsorbed and exchangeable forms. Thus, if an amendment reduced the copper <strong>in</strong> these<br />
fractions, it was considered beneficial <strong>in</strong> decreas<strong>in</strong>g the potential for mobility and toxicity. A<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease of copper <strong>in</strong> fractions where it is tightly bound or unavailable (i.e. F4,<br />
F5, and F6), was also considered a benefit. There is some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty as to whether the<br />
carbonate-bound fraction (F3) is labile and available. This would depend on the pH, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
Cu sorbed by carbonates may have a transient existence <strong>in</strong> carbonate m<strong>in</strong>erals. In an acidic<br />
environment the Cu may be released upon dissolution of the carbonate. Thus, fraction F3<br />
represents a potentially mobile and available pool among the total copper.<br />
The treatments HS, HS+WS, and Lime, all drastically reduced the F1 fraction of<br />
copper <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs (Table 1). The amount of water-soluble copper <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs amended<br />
with Lime plunged to a nearly negligible amount of 7 mg kg -1 . The treatments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
modified leonardite (HS and HS+WS) were both highly effective compared to the control,<br />
with HS+WS outperform<strong>in</strong>g HS alone (30 and 72 mg kg -1 , respectively).<br />
The amount of free copper <strong>in</strong> soil solution is very important because this form is<br />
readily absorbed by plant roots. In soil solutions with pH < 6.0, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant species of<br />
copper is the divalent cation, Cu 2+ (Harter 1991). As the pH <strong>in</strong>creases, two hydrolysis<br />
reactions occur fairly quickly.<br />
Cu 2+ + H2O � Cu(OH) + + H + log K = -7.70 [1]<br />
Cu(OH) + + H2O � Cu(OH)2 + H + log K = -6.08 [2]<br />
If an amendment was able to <strong>in</strong>crease the pH, the more unavailable chemical forms of copper<br />
such as Cu(OH) + , Cu(OH)2, and even CuO would be formed.<br />
The results show that all treatments caused some of the water-soluble copper to be<br />
redistributed from F1 to F2. However, the copper <strong>in</strong> F2 is still relatively labile, and still poses<br />
a toxicity threat because it may be released <strong>in</strong>to solution via cation exchange, or may be<br />
subject to plant uptake. In a practical sense, it must also be noted that the quantities of copper<br />
held <strong>in</strong> the exchangeable fraction are very small when compared to the total copper <strong>in</strong> the<br />
tail<strong>in</strong>gs. For the Control and WS treatments, where F1 is very large, exchangeable copper<br />
contributes very little to the potentially toxic copper <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs. But, for treatments with<br />
small amounts of Cu <strong>in</strong> F1, namely HS, HS+WS, and Lime, F2 values are approximately<br />
43
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
equal to the amount of water- soluble copper, and thus they contribute more to potential<br />
toxicity or bioavailability.<br />
All treatments significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the amount of copper <strong>in</strong> the carbonate-associated<br />
fraction, F3 (Table 1). Despite the statistical differences between treatments, the relative size<br />
of the F3 fraction only varied from 8.7 to 9.9% <strong>in</strong> all of the amended tail<strong>in</strong>gs (Fig. 1). There<br />
is some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty concern<strong>in</strong>g the classification of F3 as carbonate-bound Cu (Shuman<br />
1991). We doubt that <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>stance, that F3 represents carbonate bound Cu, s<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>in</strong> the<br />
acid pH conditions of the m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs, free calcium carbonate was non-existent.<br />
Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the organically-complexed fraction, F5, reveals several <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
observations. This was the largest pool of copper <strong>in</strong> all treatments, compris<strong>in</strong>g 34 to 52% of<br />
the total copper (Fig. 1). The amount of organically-complexed copper ranged from 618 to<br />
1185 mg kg -1 across all treatments, and the differences were found to be statistically<br />
significant at p < 0.10 (Table 1). As anticipated, the treatment that added the most organic<br />
material to the tail<strong>in</strong>gs, HS+WS, was the most successful at rais<strong>in</strong>g the copper <strong>in</strong> F5.<br />
Copper ions <strong>in</strong> soil solution are often complexed with various <strong>in</strong>organic or organic<br />
ligands. Complexation with organic acids or low molecular weight organic matter may<br />
solubilize copper and render it available for plant uptake or leach<strong>in</strong>g (van der Watt 1991 et al.;<br />
Merritt and Erich 2003). On the other hand, complexation followed by precipitation with<br />
complex humic substances may immobilize the copper (Stevenson 1982).<br />
Effect of Amendments on Potential Lability and Plant Availability of Copper<br />
The water-soluble and exchangeable forms of metals <strong>in</strong> soils are considered to be plantavailable<br />
(Shuman 1991; Alva et al. 2000). The free copper cation or its complexed species<br />
may be adsorbed to the negatively charged colloids with<strong>in</strong> the soil. Attraction due to<br />
electrostatic forces is referred to as non-specific or outer-sphere adsorption. This copper is<br />
exchangeable us<strong>in</strong>g salt solutions because of its relatively weak adsorption onto non-specific<br />
exchange sites (Shuman, 1991). The F3 fraction, considered to be carbonate-bound, is<br />
sometimes <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this estimate, as metals <strong>in</strong> this fraction can become available under<br />
altered environmental conditions (Kabala and S<strong>in</strong>gh 2001). Alternately, copper may form<br />
covalent bonds with an OH - ligand on a soil colloid, such as Fe, Mn, or Al oxides. If the<br />
copper forms two covalent bonds with the exchanger, the copper is strongly reta<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />
soil. This is termed specific adsorption. In this case, the copper is not salt-exchangeable.<br />
The Lability Factor (LF) was employed as an aid <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g the plant-availability of<br />
copper <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs. It is a relative <strong>in</strong>dex to compare metal lability among treatments.<br />
When F1+F2 are the only fractions considered to be labile at the time of fractionation, the<br />
control tail<strong>in</strong>gs have the highest lability, with an LF of 32% (Table 2). The Lability Factors<br />
for the HS and HS+WS treatments are 6.3 and 4%, respectively. The Lime treatment was<br />
more effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g the F1 and F2 fractions of copper, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a low LF of 2.4%.<br />
If fraction F3 is also considered labile, then 37% of the relative distribution of copper<br />
<strong>in</strong> the control tail<strong>in</strong>gs is potentially toxic. Regardless, the result<strong>in</strong>g lability factors, Lability<br />
Factor 2, present the same pattern as described for Lability Factor 1 (Table 2). Hence, the<br />
treatments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the alkal<strong>in</strong>e organic amendment (HS and HS+WS) decreased the<br />
copper LF to less than half of its orig<strong>in</strong>al value, and the Lime is slightly more effective than<br />
the HS+WS.<br />
Caution must be taken when us<strong>in</strong>g a Lability Factor to <strong>in</strong>terpret the potential<br />
movement or availability of metals <strong>in</strong> soil. It is useful as a discussion tool, but the mobility of<br />
copper <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual fractions is only assumed, and not measured. Moreover, the values are <strong>in</strong><br />
percentage of the total Cu and not <strong>in</strong> actual concentration <strong>in</strong> the soil. The copper extracted<br />
44
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
<strong>in</strong>to each fraction, and its lability, will depend upon the <strong>in</strong>dividual soil and the metal<br />
fractionation procedure employed.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The study confirmed that the tail<strong>in</strong>gs from the Central Manitoba M<strong>in</strong>e site are highly<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated with copper, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g approximately 2300 mg Cu kg -1 . The control tail<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>ed 564 mg kg -1 of water-soluble copper, which is readily labile and toxic.<br />
Approximately one-third of the total copper <strong>in</strong> the acid tail<strong>in</strong>gs is considered potentially toxic.<br />
All amendments altered the distribution of copper. The Lime was the most effective at<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g pH, and decreas<strong>in</strong>g soluble copper.<br />
The two treatments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g alkal<strong>in</strong>e, humic substances extracted from leonardite were also<br />
effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g water-soluble copper. The addition of WS with the HS further reduced<br />
the water-soluble fraction. The treatment HS+WS also had the highest amount of copper <strong>in</strong><br />
the organically-complexed fraction.<br />
In conclusion, the alkal<strong>in</strong>e humic substances extract used <strong>in</strong> this research may be a<br />
valuable addition to a reclamation strategy for acid, copper-contam<strong>in</strong>ated m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
This study was supported by a research grant from LUSCAR Ltd. to TBG and the James<br />
Gordon Fletcher Graduate Fellowship <strong>in</strong> Agricultural and Food Sciences to KAS.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Aiken, G.R. 1985. Isolation and concentration techniques for aquatic humic substances. Pages 363-385. <strong>in</strong><br />
Aiken, G.R., McKnight, D.M., Wershaw, R.I. and MacCarthy, P. (Eds). Humus Substances <strong>in</strong> Soil, Sediment<br />
and Water: Geochemistry, Isolation and Characterization. John Wiley, <strong>New</strong> York..<br />
[2] Alva A.K., Huang, B. and Paramasivam, S. 2000. Soil pH affects copper fractionation and phytotoxicity.<br />
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:955-962.<br />
[3] Amacher, M.C., Brown, R.W., Sidle, R.C. and Kotuby-Amacher, J. 1995. Effect of m<strong>in</strong>e waste on element<br />
speciation <strong>in</strong> headwater streams. In: Allen, H., Huang, C.P., Bailey, G.W. and Bowers, A.R. (Eds.). Metal<br />
Speciation and Contam<strong>in</strong>ation of Soil. Lewis Pub. Boca Raton.<br />
[4] Aubert, H. and P<strong>in</strong>ta, M. 1977. Trace Elements <strong>in</strong> Soils. Elsevier, Amsterdam.<br />
[5] Barnhisel, R.I., Powell, J.L., Ak<strong>in</strong>, G.W. and Ebelhar, M.W. 1982. Characteristics and reclamation of “acid<br />
sulfate” m<strong>in</strong>e spoils. Pages 225-232. <strong>in</strong> J.A. Kittrick et al. (Eds.) Acid Sulfate Seather<strong>in</strong>g. SSSA Spec. Publ. 10.<br />
SSSA, Madison, WI.<br />
[6] Dixon, J.B., Hossner, L.R., Senkayi, A.L. and Egashira, K. 1982. M<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of lignite<br />
overburden as they relate to m<strong>in</strong>e spoil reclamation. Pages 169-191. <strong>in</strong> J.A. Kittrick et al. (Eds.). Acid Sulfate<br />
Weather<strong>in</strong>g. SSSA Spec. Publ. 10. SSSA, Madison, WI.<br />
[7] Ibrahim, S.M. and Goh, T.B. 2004. Changes <strong>in</strong> macroaggregation and associated characteristics <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>e<br />
tail<strong>in</strong>gs amended with humic substances. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 35:1905-1922.<br />
[8] Kabala, C. and S<strong>in</strong>gh, B.R. 2001. Fractionation and mobility of copper, lead, and z<strong>in</strong>c <strong>in</strong> soil profiles <strong>in</strong> the<br />
vic<strong>in</strong>ity of a copper smelter. J. Environ. Qual. 30:485-492.<br />
[9] Merritt, K.A. and Erich, M.S. 2003. Influence of organic matter decomposition on soluble carbon and its<br />
copper-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g capacity. J. Environ. Qual. 32:2122-2131.<br />
[10] Renault, S., Sailerova, E., and Fedikow, M.A.F. 2000. Phytoremediation and phytom<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Manitoba:<br />
prelim<strong>in</strong>ary observations from an orientation survey at the Central Manitoba (Au) M<strong>in</strong>esite (NTS 52L13); <strong>in</strong><br />
Report of Activities 2000, Manitoba Industry, Trade and M<strong>in</strong>es, Manitoba Geological Survey, p. 179-188.<br />
[11] Salbu, B., Krekl<strong>in</strong>g T. and Oughton, D.H. 1998. Characterisation of radioactive particles <strong>in</strong> the environment.<br />
Analyst. 123:843-849.<br />
45
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
[12] SAS Institute. 2000. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., U.S.A.<br />
[13] Shuman, L.M. 1985. Fractionation method for soil microelements. Soil Science. 140:11-22.<br />
[14] Shuman, L.M. 1991. Chemical forms of micronutrients <strong>in</strong> soils. Pages 113-144. <strong>in</strong> J.J. Mortvedt et al. (Eds.)<br />
Micronutrients <strong>in</strong> Agriculture. 2 nd ed. SSSA. Madison, WI, U.S.A.<br />
[15] Sims, J.T. 1986. Soil pH effects on the distribution and plant availability of manganese, copper and z<strong>in</strong>c.<br />
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:367-373.<br />
[16] van der Watt, H.v.H., Barnard, R.O., Cronje, I.J., Dekker, J., Croft, G.J.B. and van der Walt, M.M. 1991.<br />
Amelioration of subsoil acidity by application of a coal-derived calcium fulvate to the soil surface. Nature.<br />
350:146-148.<br />
[17] Whiteley, G.M. and Williams, S. 1993. Effects of treatment of metalliferous m<strong>in</strong>e spoil with lignite derived<br />
humic substances on the growth responses of metal tolerant and non metal tolerant cultivars of Agrostis<br />
capillaris L. Soil Technol. 6:163-171.<br />
46
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Treatment z<br />
pH<br />
Control 3.32 564 ± 151 a 16 ± 2.6 c 90 ± 1.1 d 207 ± 13 d 618 ± 199 c 321 ± 73<br />
HS 4.5 72 ± 36 c 44 ± 6.8 b 171 ± 15 c 237 ± 21 cd 872 ± 240 bc 428 ± 38<br />
HS+WS y<br />
Copper <strong>in</strong> each fraction (mg kg<br />
5.02 30 ± 0.8 c 63 ± 8.7 a 217 ± 31 a 334 ± 12 b 1185 ± 30 a 446 ± 11<br />
WS 3.95 305 ± 6.3 b 45 ± 1.9 b 174 ± 3.9 bc 273 ± 6 cd 863 ± 102 bc 341 ± 62<br />
Lime 5.59 7 ± 0.9 c 40 ± 3.8 b 197 ± 1.3 ab 430 ± 33 a 909 ± 179 ab 405 ± 68<br />
-1 )<br />
F 1 F 2<br />
F 3<br />
F 4<br />
F 5 F 6<br />
ANOVA df Pr > F<br />
Trt 4 < .0001** < .0001** < .0001** < .0001** 0.0701* 0.1300<br />
a-d Mean values followed by the same letter (with<strong>in</strong> columns) are not significantly different.<br />
z<br />
Treatments: Control, HS = Humic Substances, WS = Wheat Straw, Lime = CaCO3.<br />
y<br />
For HS+WS, all Cu fractions are means of 2 replications.<br />
* significant at p < 0.10<br />
** significant at p < 0.05<br />
Table 1. pH of tail<strong>in</strong>gs and mean copper content <strong>in</strong> each fraction<br />
47
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Treatment Lability Factor 1 z<br />
Control<br />
HS<br />
HS+WS<br />
WS<br />
Lime<br />
31.92<br />
6.33<br />
4.09<br />
17.50<br />
2.39<br />
48<br />
Lability Factor 2 y<br />
36.88<br />
15.72<br />
13.62<br />
26.21<br />
12.31<br />
z Lability Factor 1 = [(F1 + F2) / (Total Cu by Sum)] x 100<br />
y<br />
Lability Factor 2 = [(F1 + F2 + F3) / (Total Cu by Sum)] x<br />
100<br />
Copper content<br />
(% of Total by Σ F1-F6)<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
0%<br />
Table 2. Copper Lability Factors for each treatment<br />
Control HS HS+WS WS Lime<br />
Treatment<br />
Figure 1. Relative distribution of copper among fractions after 24 weeks.<br />
F 6<br />
F 5<br />
F 4<br />
F 3<br />
F 2<br />
F 1
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF TRADE VILLAGE WASTE ON<br />
ACCUMULATION OF CU, PB, ZN AND CD IN<br />
AGRICULTURAL SOILS OF PHUNG XA VILLAGE, THACH<br />
THANH DISTRICT, HA TAY PROVINCE<br />
Nguyen Huu Thanh 1 , Tran Thi Le Ha 1 * , Nguyen Duc Hung 1 , Tran Duc Hai 2<br />
1 Hanoi Agricultural University, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2 Postgraduate student, Hanoi Agricultural University,<br />
Hanoi, Vietnam<br />
Abstract<br />
Waste materials from V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade village affected greatly the accumulation of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd <strong>in</strong><br />
agricultural soil. Seventeen soil samples were taken for analysis. Soil was polluted locally with Zn and Cd.<br />
The Zn concentrations <strong>in</strong> 2 samples exceeded the standard and were <strong>in</strong> a polluted level. The Cd<br />
concentration of one sample exceeded the standard by 22% with regard<strong>in</strong>g the soil as polluted. Among 17<br />
soil samples, the percentage of samples contam<strong>in</strong>ated with different heavy metals was 100% for Cu, 59%<br />
for Pb, 35% for Cd, and 24% for Zn.<br />
Over 80% of Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> soil was extractable by salt solution or diluted acid. This <strong>in</strong>dicates a great<br />
potential of the soil to cause Pb and Cd toxicity to environment <strong>in</strong> this village. Fe and Mn oxides had the<br />
stronger aff<strong>in</strong>ity to heavy metals than did organic matter and carbonates. The exchangeable form of heavy<br />
metals was <strong>in</strong> the low proportion <strong>in</strong> soil.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Metal recycle trade village (metal ware-mechanical trade village) is one of the typical<br />
features of rural Vietnam <strong>in</strong> general and particularly <strong>in</strong> Ha Tay. These trade villages have<br />
participated greatly <strong>in</strong> the multi-component economy <strong>in</strong> the doi-moi period [3, 4].<br />
Like other trade villages, metal ware-mechanical trade villages are typical with<br />
unprompted development of trade villages without plann<strong>in</strong>g, the low technical level with<br />
simple works and rely<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly on experience, and lack of basic tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Small scale and scattered production all over the area constitute numerous small<br />
waste sources. It is difficult to gather the waste material and to treat it <strong>in</strong> a central facility.<br />
Evaluation the effects of metal ware-mechanical trade villages on the accumulation of<br />
heavy metals <strong>in</strong> agricultural land is to guarantee the susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture.<br />
2.1. Location and sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Phung Xa commune is situated <strong>in</strong> Red River delta (Figure 1) with the area of agricultural<br />
land is 307.1 ha. Residential area and trade village are <strong>in</strong>termixed.<br />
49
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
W<br />
N<br />
S<br />
#<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g diagram<br />
E<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
# #<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
# #<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
# #<br />
#<br />
#<br />
# #<br />
# #<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
# #<br />
#<br />
# #<br />
# #<br />
#<br />
# #<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
#<br />
# household.shp<br />
road.shp<br />
# sampl<strong>in</strong>g_site.shp<br />
commune.shp<br />
aquaculture<br />
cemetry<br />
contruction area<br />
irrigation land<br />
pasture<br />
resident area<br />
rice field<br />
unused water<br />
Figure 1. Sampl<strong>in</strong>g diagram<br />
Seventeen soil samples (Table 1) were sampled at the surface horizon with a depth from<br />
0 to 15 cm and were <strong>in</strong>dicated on the sampl<strong>in</strong>g diagram <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. The nearer to waste<br />
sources, the more densely samples were taken..<br />
Sample<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Location<br />
Dong<br />
Man<br />
Dong<br />
Sau<br />
Distance<br />
to<br />
sources<br />
(m)<br />
Altitude Vegetation<br />
1500 Medium Rice 9<br />
500 Medium Rice 10<br />
3 Ben Hiep 500 High Rice 11<br />
4 Ben Hiep 300 Low Rice 12<br />
5 Cua Lo 100 Medium Rice<br />
6 Ben Hiep 250 Medium Rice<br />
7<br />
8<br />
Dong<br />
Nuong<br />
Dong<br />
Sau<br />
200 Medium Rice<br />
750 Medium Rice<br />
Sample<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
50<br />
Location<br />
Dong<br />
Khoai<br />
Dong<br />
Mo<br />
Dong<br />
Lac<br />
Dong<br />
Lac<br />
Dong<br />
Mo<br />
Cong<br />
D<strong>in</strong>h<br />
Cong<br />
D<strong>in</strong>h<br />
Cong<br />
D<strong>in</strong>h<br />
Cong<br />
D<strong>in</strong>h<br />
Table 1. Ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation on soil samples<br />
Distance<br />
to<br />
sources<br />
(m)<br />
Altitude Vegetation<br />
1250 Medium Rice<br />
1000 Medium Rice<br />
300 Medium Rice<br />
100 Medium Rice<br />
50 Medium Rice<br />
50 Medium Rice<br />
50 Medium Coriander<br />
50 Medium Rice<br />
150 Low<br />
Rice
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
One waste water sample and one domestic waste water sample was taken <strong>in</strong> the trade<br />
village at a distance of 10 m from waste sources to determ<strong>in</strong>e their properties.<br />
2.2. Analytical procedures<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g procedures were used for analyses.<br />
Total Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd were determ<strong>in</strong>ed after digestion the samples by HF,<br />
HNO3, and HClO4 [6].<br />
Fractionation of heavy metals was done by sequential extraction with follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
solutions [5]: 1M MgCl2 (pH=7), 1M CH3COONa (pH=5), 0.3M Na2S2O4 , 0.175M<br />
sodium citrate, 0.025M citric acid, and mixture of 0.02M HNO3, 30%H2O2, 3.2M<br />
CH3COONH4 <strong>in</strong> 30%HNO3.<br />
Concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd <strong>in</strong> the digested solution or extracted solution<br />
were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer ANA182. Cu, Zn, Pb, and<br />
Cd was determ<strong>in</strong>ation at the wave length of 324.8nm; 307.6nm; 283.3nm; 228.8nm<br />
respectively.<br />
3.1. Soil properties<br />
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSION<br />
Soil texture ranged from loamy sand to clay (Table 2). The clay percentage of the surface<br />
horizon was mostly greater than 16%. It related to soil properties, fertility, and heavy<br />
metal absorption ability of soil.<br />
Almost all samples had a pH higher than 5.6 (medium and light acid). The pH<br />
values are <strong>in</strong> harmony with Eutric Fluvisols of the Red River delta with long duration of<br />
cultivation, together with tropical environment. Furthermore, trade village activities<br />
might cause a more or less strong change of pH.<br />
Soil was quite rich <strong>in</strong> organic matter. The total organic carbon concentration (OC)<br />
was <strong>in</strong> a range between 1.47% and 3.15%. Some samples with low altitude or near<br />
residential area had OC greater than 2%.<br />
Cation exchange capacity (CEC) varied from 10.2 to 15.4 cmol+/kg soil and was<br />
<strong>in</strong> the average to high level. In the study of the relationship of pH, OC, and clay content<br />
with CEC, as shown later, a correlation coefficient between CEC and OC was 0.66. The<br />
high OC and CEC are closely related to the existence of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> soils.<br />
51
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Sample<br />
Texture<br />
(FAO-<br />
UNESCO)<br />
pH<br />
OC<br />
(%)<br />
CEC<br />
(meq/100g<br />
soil)<br />
Sample<br />
52<br />
Texture<br />
(FAO-<br />
UNESCO)<br />
pH<br />
OC<br />
(%)<br />
CEC<br />
(meq/100g<br />
soil)<br />
1 Sandy clay 6.18 1.77 10.56 9 Loam 5.32 1.47 10.55<br />
2 Sandy clay 5.78 1.73 11.65 10 Sandy loam 6.08 1.98 10.95<br />
3 Sandy clay 5.21 1.95 10.98 11 Clay loam 6.96 2.91 14.37<br />
4 Sandy clay 6.12 2.80 12.78 12 Sandy clay 5.97 3.15 13.20<br />
5 Sandy clay 6.49 2.03 14.33 13 Sandy loam 4.76 2.52 11.12<br />
6 Clay loam 5.66 1.99 10.16 14 Clay loam 6.31 3.09 15.38<br />
7 Sandy clay 5.97 2.58 12.13 15 Clay loam 6.69 2.25 12.61<br />
8<br />
Loamy<br />
d<br />
6.31 1.73 12.97 16 Clay 4.91 2.73 13.39<br />
17 Clay 5.41 2.56 13.08<br />
Table 2. Some physical and chemical characteristics of soils<br />
3.2. Possible factors <strong>in</strong> the trade village affect<strong>in</strong>g the heavy metal concentration of<br />
soil<br />
3.2.1. Exhausted fumes<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the research of M<strong>in</strong>istry of National Defense <strong>in</strong> 2002, the hang<strong>in</strong>g dust<br />
concentration <strong>in</strong> air ranged from 0.26 to 0.31 mg.m -3 while Vietnam standard TCVN<br />
5937-1995 is 0.3 mg.m -3 . The Pb was detectable <strong>in</strong> air. The SO2 concentration ranged<br />
from 0.01 to 0.61 mg m -3 (Vietnam standard TCVN 5937-1995 is 0.3 mg m -3 ) and the<br />
NOx concentration was <strong>in</strong> a range between 0.004 and 2.12 mg m -3 (Vietnam standard<br />
TCVN 5937-1995 is 0.1 mg m -3 ) [2]. Therefore, the exhausted fumes of V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade<br />
village were regarded hav<strong>in</strong>g no affect to the heavy metal accumulation <strong>in</strong> soil.<br />
3.2.2. Waste water<br />
Waste water from roll<strong>in</strong>g and plat<strong>in</strong>g steel comes to the dra<strong>in</strong>age system. One waste<br />
water sample collected at a site 10 m distant from the dra<strong>in</strong>age system was analyzed.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Item Unit Value<br />
Permissible levels <strong>in</strong> TCVN 5949-1995<br />
A B C<br />
pH 4.2 6 – 9 5.5 - 9 5 – 9<br />
Suspended solids mg/l 725 50 100 200<br />
Cu mg/l 0.178 0.2 1 5<br />
Zn mg/l 7.92 1 2 5<br />
Pb mg/l 0.65 1 2 2<br />
Cd mg/l 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.5<br />
Table 3. Some properties of waste water collected at trade village <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa<br />
Note: Waste water hav<strong>in</strong>g values and concentrations:<br />
o value <strong>in</strong> column A can be discharged to domestic waterways,<br />
o value <strong>in</strong> column B can only be discharged to waterways used for hydro-traffic, aquaculture,<br />
and cultivation.<br />
o ranged from value <strong>in</strong> column B to value <strong>in</strong> column C can only be discharged to def<strong>in</strong>ed places.<br />
o value column C can not be discharged to any environment.<br />
Table 3 showed that the concentrations of Cu, Pb and Cd were lower than or equal to the<br />
permissible level of waste water used for aquaculture and cultivation. However, other<br />
items of pH, suspended solids and Zn concentration were higher than the permissible<br />
level. From the criteria of pH and suspended solids, the waste water was not allowed to<br />
be discharged without treatment. Discharge of such waste water to environment without<br />
treatment affects soil quality badly.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the field observations, waste water was discharged one part to<br />
surround<strong>in</strong>g ponds, lakes and one part directly to agricultural land near the trade village.<br />
Because ponds and lake around V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade village are not connected with irrigation<br />
channels of the commune, the pollution of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> V<strong>in</strong>h village is difficult to take<br />
place <strong>in</strong> samples 1, 2, 8-11. Heavy metal pollution can only occur <strong>in</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g samples<br />
as 3-7, 12, 14-17.<br />
Table 5 showed that the concentrations of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> the above samples<br />
were considerably higher than those of other samples. This proves that waste materials<br />
from trade village raises heavy metal concentrations <strong>in</strong> the soil. The concentrations of Cu,<br />
Pb, Zn and Pb were highest <strong>in</strong> sample 17. Because this sample site is <strong>in</strong> a depression with<br />
stagnant water com<strong>in</strong>g from the village, heavy metals might have accumulated. Similarly,<br />
sample 4 had higher concentrations of heavy metals and was at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level.<br />
This is due to its low altitude compared to samples 3 and 6.<br />
3.2.3. Others<br />
Domestic waste rubbish is collected to a designated place and doesn’t considerably affect<br />
the accumulation of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> soil.<br />
Domestic waste water is discarded directly to dra<strong>in</strong>age channels. The results of<br />
the domestic waste water analysis are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4. Table 4 showed that the<br />
concentrations of Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> the domestic waste water did not exceed the<br />
permissible level of the Vietnam standard. Therefore, the accumulation of Zn, Cu, Pb and<br />
Cd <strong>in</strong> agricultural land is not affected by the domestic waste water more than by the<br />
53
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
waste water from the trade village. However, suspension solid and the NH4 + -N<br />
concentration <strong>in</strong> the waste water were very high and even exceeded the standard C level,<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the domestic waste water is not allowed to be discarded to the<br />
environment.<br />
Item Unit Value<br />
Permissible levels <strong>in</strong> TCVN 5949-1995<br />
A B C<br />
pH 6.98 6 - 9 5.5 - 9 5 – 9<br />
Suspension solid mg/l 409 20 50 100<br />
Cu mg/l 0.01 0.2 1 5<br />
Zn mg/l 0.087 1 2 5<br />
Pb mg/l 0.33 1 2 2<br />
Cd mg/l 0.008 0.01 0.02 0.5<br />
NH4 + -N mg/l 15.36 0.1 1 10<br />
Table 4. Some characteristics of domestic waste water<br />
Furthermore, the accumulation of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> soil can be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by irrigation<br />
water, fertilizer, and agricultural chemicals. Irrigation water of Phung Xa is taken from the<br />
Red River and the Dong Mo River and it can be considered that it does not affect seriously<br />
the heavy metal accumulation <strong>in</strong> soil. As mentioned above, the ma<strong>in</strong> crop <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa is<br />
paddy rice. This crop is planted over 96% of the total area for annual crops. This <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
that the difference <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence of fertilizers and agricultural chemicals between samples<br />
is not great.<br />
3.3. Total concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd <strong>in</strong> soil<br />
Most of soil samples were found to have total concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd below<br />
the permissible level <strong>in</strong> Vietnam standard TCVN 7209-2002.<br />
The analytical results of heavy metal <strong>in</strong> agricultural soils are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 5.<br />
Sample Cu Pb Zn Cd Sample Cu Pb Zn Cd<br />
1 39.68* 10 39.33*<br />
2 43.61* 60.04* 11 43.38* 51.52* 1.45*<br />
3 42.14* 12 47.79* 53.21*<br />
4 47.06* 58.94* 142.49* 1.52* 13 39.05* 50.25* 248.36** 2.44**<br />
5 41.80* 14 42.83* 54.26* 142.00* 1.49*<br />
6 41.66* 15 40.47* 50.33* 157.23* 1.62*<br />
7 41.42* 16 47.08* 57.85* 242.70** 1.52*<br />
8 46.17* 51.39* 17 43.54* 68.24* 155.64* 1.57*<br />
9 39.44*<br />
TCVN 7209-2002 50.00 70.00 200.00 2.00<br />
Note: *, contam<strong>in</strong>ated; **, polluted.<br />
Table 5. Total concentrations of some heavy metals <strong>in</strong> agricultural soils <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa<br />
(unit: mg kg -1 ).<br />
54
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
To evaluate the pollution level <strong>in</strong> heavy metals of soil, the total concentrations of heavy<br />
metals were divided <strong>in</strong>to the follow<strong>in</strong>g three categories:<br />
- No contam<strong>in</strong>ation: heavy metal concentration below 70% of the Vietnam standard.<br />
- Contam<strong>in</strong>ated: heavy metal concentration <strong>in</strong> between 70% and 99% of the<br />
Vietnam standard.<br />
- Polluted: heavy metal concentration over the Vietnam standard.<br />
3.3.1. Cu<br />
Table 5 showed that the total Cu concentrations ranged from 39.05 to 47.79 mg kg -1 and<br />
were lower than the permissible level (50.0 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> TCVN 7209-2002). Although the<br />
total Cu concentrations did not exceed the permissible level, every sample was<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated with Cu (more than 35 mg kg -1 ). Samples 4, 12 and 16, which were taken<br />
from the village border and the waste water receiver from V<strong>in</strong>h village, showed the total<br />
concentration of Cu nearly reach<strong>in</strong>g the permissible level. Other samples taken far from<br />
V<strong>in</strong>h village were less affected by trade village’s activities and had the lower Cu<br />
concentration.<br />
3.3.2. Pb<br />
The total Pb concentrations <strong>in</strong> soil were from 39.66 to 68.24 mg kg -1 and were below the<br />
permissible level (72.0 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> TCVN 7209-2002). However, ten samples (59% of total<br />
samples) were at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level. The total Pb concentration of sample 17 was<br />
noted to be close to the permissible level; this sample was taken from the receiver of<br />
village’s waste water <strong>in</strong> a low altitude. Like Cu, the total Pb concentrations of samples 4,<br />
11, 12, 14- 17, which were taken from the area border<strong>in</strong>g on V<strong>in</strong>h village, were higher than<br />
those of other samples.<br />
3.3.3. Zn<br />
The Zn concentration <strong>in</strong> soil was mostly affected by the waste from the trade village. The<br />
total Zn concentrations of samples 13 and 16 exceeded the Zn permissible level <strong>in</strong> soil<br />
(200.0 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> TCVN 7209-2002). In addition, samples 4, 14, 15 and 17 were <strong>in</strong> the<br />
category of the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level. Production <strong>in</strong>stallations and plat<strong>in</strong>g pools <strong>in</strong> V<strong>in</strong>h<br />
Loc trade village, ma<strong>in</strong>ly z<strong>in</strong>c plat<strong>in</strong>g, probably lead to the local pollution and<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ation of Zn <strong>in</strong> agricultural soil.<br />
3.3.4. Cd<br />
The total Cd concentrations varied from 1.16 to 2.44 mg kg -1 , and sample 13’s Cd<br />
concentration is higher than TCVN 7209-2002. The total Cd concentrations of the<br />
rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g samples were below the Vietnam standard but still <strong>in</strong> the high level. Especially<br />
those of samples 4, 11, 14-17 were at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level. These samples located at<br />
the border on V<strong>in</strong>h village were directly affected from exhausted fumes, dust, and waste<br />
water from the village, lead<strong>in</strong>g to the high total Cd concentration.<br />
55
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
3.3.5. Evaluation the heavy metal pollution <strong>in</strong> agricultural soil<br />
The total Cu concentrations of all samples were at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level (70 to 99% of<br />
TCVN 7209-2002). The total Pb concentrations of samples near V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade village<br />
were at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level. Sample 17 had the total Pb concentration close to the<br />
Vietnam standard. It is worthwhile to pay attention to that agricultural soil <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa<br />
was locally polluted by Zn and Cd. The total Zn concentrations <strong>in</strong> sample 13 and 16<br />
exceeded the permissible level and at the polluted level. The total Cd concentration of<br />
sample 13 exceeded the permissible level by 22% and polluted the soil. Some other<br />
samples around the waste source were <strong>in</strong> the category of the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level.<br />
Sample 13 was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by some production <strong>in</strong>stallations along the road and was the<br />
most polluted one. This sample was at the polluted level <strong>in</strong> the total Zn and Cd concentrations<br />
and at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level <strong>in</strong> the total Cu and Pb concentrations, compared to the Vietnam<br />
standard.<br />
3.4. Fractionation of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> soil<br />
3.4.1. Cu<br />
Analytical results of fractionation of Cu are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 7. The data po<strong>in</strong>ted out that<br />
Cu existed ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the form of bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides and the residual form<br />
which is not extractable with salt solution or diluted acid (Cu <strong>in</strong> crystal network of<br />
primary and secondary m<strong>in</strong>erals or other forms). In average, the Cu concentration <strong>in</strong> the<br />
form bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides was 15.46 mg kg -1 , mak<strong>in</strong>g up 36.18% of total Cu,<br />
and the Cu <strong>in</strong> the residual form was 23.10 mg kg -1 , with occupation of 54.06% of total<br />
Cu.<br />
On the other hand, exchangeable Cu, and Cu bonded to carbonates and to organic<br />
matter were <strong>in</strong> a low concentration. It was as low as 1.08 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> average for the<br />
exchangeable form, 1.74 mg kg -1 for the bond<strong>in</strong>g-to-carbonates form, and 1.35 mg kg -1 for<br />
the bond<strong>in</strong>g-to-organic matter form, mak<strong>in</strong>g up 2.53%, 4.07%, and 3.16% of total Cu,<br />
respectively.<br />
The solubility of Cu decreases <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g order: exchangeable, bond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
carbonate, bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe oxides, bond<strong>in</strong>g to Mn oxides, bond<strong>in</strong>g to organic matter, and<br />
residual forms. In Phung Xa, the concentrations of exchangeable Cu and Cu bonded to<br />
carbonates were low. As a result, it is evaluated that Cu is less toxic to crops and<br />
environment, even when the total Cu concentration is high.<br />
3.4.2. Pb<br />
Analytical results of fractionation of Pb are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 8. It showed that<br />
approximately 50% of total Pb existed <strong>in</strong> the form of bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides. The<br />
average concentration of this form was 25.35 mg kg -1 . The Pb concentration was lowest<br />
<strong>in</strong> the form of bond<strong>in</strong>g to organic matter (average concentration is 4.49 mg kg -1 , mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
up 8.81% of total Pb) and the residual form (average concentration is 4.77 mg kg -1 or<br />
56
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
9.36% of total Pb). The concentrations of exchangeable Pb and Pb bond<strong>in</strong>g to carbonates<br />
were <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>termediate level with averages of 7.57 and 8.78 mg kg -1 , respectively.<br />
Total of the extractable Pb (exchangeable, and bond<strong>in</strong>g to carbonates, Fe and Mn<br />
oxides, and organic matter) was 46.19 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> average (nearly reach<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated level of 49 mgkg -1 ) and made up 90.64% of total Pb. Total of the<br />
extractable Pb concentrations of samples 2, 4, 16 and 17 exceeded 49 mg kg -1 . It means<br />
that the potential Pb toxicity <strong>in</strong> agricultural soil is high, because Pb easily changes to the<br />
available form <strong>in</strong> soil and affects crops, animals, and human be<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
3.4.3. Zn<br />
Analytical results of fractionation of Zn are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 9. Different from Cu, the<br />
concentration of extractable Zn <strong>in</strong>creased from the exchangeable form to the bond<strong>in</strong>g-toorganic<br />
matter form. In this sequence, the concentration of Zn bond<strong>in</strong>g to carbonates was<br />
18.81 mg kg -1 and made up 13.09% of total Zn; exchangeable Zn was 20.10 mg kg -1 or<br />
13.99% of total Zn; Zn bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides was 23.84 mg kg -1 or 16.59% of total<br />
Zn; and Zn bond<strong>in</strong>g to organic matter was 27.16 mg kg -1 or 18.90% of total Zn. The rest of<br />
Zn is kept <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>erals’ crystal structure. The average concentration of this residual form<br />
was 53.79 mg kg -1 or 37.43% of total Zn. Although the proportion of the extractable forms<br />
is not so high, it is necessary to pay a great attention to Zn <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa due to the high Zn<br />
concentration <strong>in</strong> waste sources. When Zn comes <strong>in</strong>to soil, 63% of total Zn will exist <strong>in</strong> the<br />
extractable forms which easily transform <strong>in</strong>to the available form and affect creatures and<br />
environment.<br />
57
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
Figure 2. Fractionation of Cu (mg.kg -1 ) Figure 3. Fractionation of Pb (mg.kg -1 )<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
Figure 3. Fractionation of Zn (mg.kg -1 ) Figure 3. Fractionation of Cd (mg.kg -1 )<br />
Exchange-able<br />
3.4.4. Cd<br />
Bond<strong>in</strong>g to carbonates<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Bond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
Fe & Mn oxides<br />
58<br />
Bond<strong>in</strong>g to organic matter<br />
Cd is a very toxic element <strong>in</strong> soil and can cause toxicity at low concentrations (TCVN<br />
7209-2002 is 2 mg kg -1 ). Analytical results of fractionation of Cd are presented <strong>in</strong> Table<br />
10. It showed that the distribution tendency of Cd <strong>in</strong> soil was similar to that of Pb and<br />
that Cd bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides occupied the highest proportion <strong>in</strong> total Cd. The<br />
average concentration of Cd bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides was 0.41 mg kg -1 or 28.47% of<br />
total Cd.<br />
The problem is that extractable Cd occupies the very high proportion <strong>in</strong> total Cd (1.16 mg<br />
kg -1 or 80.55% of total Cd). Therefore, the risk for Cd toxicity <strong>in</strong> the soil is very high,<br />
because Cd easily changes to the available form from the extractable forms, when<br />
conditions of soil like pH, moisture, and oxidation-reduction potential change naturally or<br />
caused by fertilizer application.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
4.1. Concusions<br />
4. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS<br />
From the study on the effects of the trade village waste on the pollution of agricultural<br />
soil by heavy metals <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa, Thach That, Ha Tay, the follow<strong>in</strong>g conclusions are<br />
drawn:<br />
1. The target soil belonged to Eutric Fluvisols with loamy sand to clay texture, quite high<br />
organic matter concentration, and medium to high CEC.<br />
2. Waste materials from V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade village affected greatly the accumulation of Cu,<br />
Zn, Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> agricultural soil. Soil was polluted locally with Zn and Cd (samples 13<br />
and 16 were polluted with Zn and sample 13 with Cd). Furthermore, the ratio of the<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated to total soil samples was 100% for Cu, 59% for Pb, 35% for Cd, and 24%<br />
for Zn.<br />
3. Over 80% of Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> soil was extractable by salt solution or diluted acid. It made<br />
great potentiality for caus<strong>in</strong>g toxicity to environment.<br />
4. Fe and Mn oxides showed the stronger aff<strong>in</strong>ity to heavy metals than did organic matter<br />
and carbonates. Exchangeable heavy metals were of low proportion (less than 16% of<br />
total heavy metal).<br />
4.2. Proposals<br />
1. The Phung Xa People Committee is requested to research <strong>in</strong>to the closed production<br />
technology, to change mach<strong>in</strong>es to modern ones, and to control and treat waste water<br />
and waste solid. Industrial waste water from <strong>in</strong>dustrial sites or production <strong>in</strong>stallations<br />
must be treated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Vietnam standard before discharge to common<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age canals.<br />
2. Application of lime or phosphate alkali, together with organic fertilizer, to soil <strong>in</strong> order<br />
to transform most of heavy metals <strong>in</strong>to hardly soluble forms.<br />
3. Establishment of the environment management board <strong>in</strong> commune.<br />
4. Rais<strong>in</strong>g of the environment protection awareness by propaganda and education on<br />
environment protection to people.<br />
6. REFERENCES<br />
[1] “Committee of Soil Standard Methods for Analyses and Measurements (ed.)” Soil Standard Methods<br />
for Analyses and Measurements, Hakuyusha, Tokyo (1986).<br />
[2] Hoang M<strong>in</strong>h Dao. “Current Vietnam Environment”. Industrial Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, No. 2, pp. 13, (2004).<br />
[3] “<strong>Land</strong> Use Plann<strong>in</strong>g Program <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa, Thach That, Ha Tay from 2001 to 2010. 2004”.<br />
[4] Le Duc, Le Van Khoa. “Effect of trade villages' activities for handicraft copper recycle <strong>in</strong> Dai Dong<br />
commune, Van Lam district, Hung Yen prov<strong>in</strong>ce to local soil environment”, Soil Science Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, No 14:<br />
48-52, (2001)<br />
[5] Tessier, A., Campbel, P. G. C. and M. Bisson. “Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of<br />
particulate. Analytical Chemistry, No. 51, pp. 844-851, (1979).<br />
[6] Vietnam standard TCVN 5949-1995 for water, (1995).<br />
[7] Vietnam standard TCVN 7209-2002 for soil, (2002).<br />
59
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
METAL CONTAMINATION IN IRRIGATED AGRICULTURAL<br />
LAND: CASE STUDY OF NAIROBI RIVER BASIN, KENYA<br />
P.N. Kamande 1* , F.M.G. Tack 2<br />
1 University of Nairobi, Department of <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> Management and Agricultural Technology,<br />
P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: +254.725.371.498. E-mail: pnkamande2002@yahoo.com,<br />
2 Ghent University, Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry and Applied Ecochemistry, B-9000 Ghent,<br />
Belgium<br />
Poster Extended Abstract<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Kenya has <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> reaction to the <strong>in</strong>creased population and the<br />
concomitant demand for food. River water is used for irrigation. In Nairobi river bas<strong>in</strong>,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustrial effluents and untreated sewage from the Nairobi city council are directly<br />
discharged <strong>in</strong>to the rivers. In spite of this, farmers cont<strong>in</strong>ue to use this water for<br />
irrigation. A recent study by UNEP revealed that Ngong/Moto<strong>in</strong>e River water was<br />
significantly contam<strong>in</strong>ated with Cr, Cd, Cu, Zn, Pb and Ni [1]. The use of this water for<br />
irrigation is likely to cause accumulation of significant amounts of metals <strong>in</strong> agricultural<br />
soils. This may lead to the accumulation of unacceptably high metal concentrations <strong>in</strong><br />
plants grown on these soils. In this study, metal concentrations and contam<strong>in</strong>ation levels<br />
<strong>in</strong> agricultural soils of this area were assessed us<strong>in</strong>g different chemical extraction<br />
procedures.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
This study focussed on the areas irrigated with water from the heavily polluted Ngong<br />
River. Four sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites were selected <strong>in</strong> the farmlands of “Mukuru kwa Njenga”<br />
slums, with<strong>in</strong> a stretch of about 300 m. Sites 1, 2 and 3 were agricultural sites irrigated<br />
with river water while site 4 was a non-irrigated (reference) site. The sites were situated<br />
with<strong>in</strong> 5, 17, 15 and 20 meters from the river, respectively. Sites 1, 2 and 3 were at a<br />
lower and pla<strong>in</strong> position with respect to river. The reference site was selected on an<br />
elevated area that was unlikely to have been flooded by the river; it had similar soil<br />
properties as the test sites and was presumably not predisposed to other sources of<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ation. At each site, soil was sampled from two po<strong>in</strong>ts 10 m apart, at 0-20 cm,<br />
20-40 cm and 40-60 cm depth.<br />
In this study, it was assumed doubtful whether the farmers were aware of the<br />
impend<strong>in</strong>g environmental and health risks <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g polluted river water for grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
crops. To assess their knowledge base about pollution, a brief <strong>in</strong>terview was conducted<br />
on farmers, us<strong>in</strong>g a simple questionnaire with po<strong>in</strong>ted questions.<br />
60
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Different chemical extraction methods were applied to the soils. These <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
aqua regia extraction for pseudo-total analysis, extraction with 0.5 M HCl for extract<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
non lithogenic metal fraction, extractions with EDTA and acetic acid, and extraction with<br />
dilute CaCl2 to determ<strong>in</strong>e a highly soluble fraction [2, 3, 4, 5 and 2 respectively]. Surface<br />
layer samples analysis was triplicated to ascerta<strong>in</strong> the reproducibility of the extraction<br />
procedures used. To check analytical accuracy, certified reference materials for<br />
certification of total contents <strong>in</strong> a calcareous soil (CRM 141) and <strong>in</strong> a light sandy soil<br />
(CRM 142 R) were analyzed.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Most farmers were aware that polluted water affected crop quality. Their awareness and<br />
<strong>in</strong>novativeness was evidenced <strong>in</strong> one case where the farmer tried to purify <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
wastewater by allow<strong>in</strong>g it to percolate through the ground and collect<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> a shallow<br />
well for irrigation. Though the concentration may have been reduced by sorption to soil,<br />
it is not excluded that the water was still contam<strong>in</strong>ated with soluble elements. Farmers<br />
defied their knowledge and used the water due to lack of an alternative source of good<br />
quality water for irrigation.<br />
The pseudo-total metal contents <strong>in</strong> the irrigated sites were at least five times higher<br />
than <strong>in</strong> the non-irrigated site, with sites 1 and 3 lead<strong>in</strong>g. The metal contents (except Ni)<br />
exceeded normal contents found <strong>in</strong> most unpolluted soils <strong>in</strong> the world and were <strong>in</strong> the<br />
order Zn>Cr>Pb>Cu>Ni>Cd. The major contam<strong>in</strong>ants were Zn (300-1000 mg/kg), Cr<br />
(28.5 - 749 mg/kg) and Pb (300 mg/kg). This could possibly be due their extensive use <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>dustries, car garages and <strong>in</strong>formal <strong>in</strong>dustries located near the river. Cd <strong>in</strong> sites 1 and<br />
3 was slightly elevated compared to normal ranges <strong>in</strong> soils worldwide (0.07 – 1.1 mg/kg)<br />
and were <strong>in</strong> the range 0.94 to 1.37 mg/kg.<br />
Significant amount of metals were removed by 0.5 M HCl, suggest<strong>in</strong>g their<br />
association with various more labile fractions <strong>in</strong> the soil. For sites 1 and 3, median HClextractable<br />
contents of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn were between 65 – 80% of the total content.<br />
For the non-irrigated site, this percentage was between 7 and 18%. The extractability of<br />
Ni was between 13 – 27%, and only 3% for the non-irrigated site. Despite elevated total<br />
contents of Cr <strong>in</strong> the irrigated sites, extractability <strong>in</strong> HCl rema<strong>in</strong>ed low <strong>in</strong> the irrigated<br />
soils.<br />
EDTA extracted high contents of Zn (200-700 mg/kg), Pb (35-200 mg/kg) and Cu<br />
(20-85 mg/kg). In contam<strong>in</strong>ated areas, fractions of the total amount for Cd, Cr and Zn<br />
were markedly higher than <strong>in</strong> the reference soil. High EDTA extractable contents <strong>in</strong> the<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated profiles po<strong>in</strong>t to the likelihood that plants grown on these soils would<br />
accumulate metals <strong>in</strong> levels above contents <strong>in</strong> plants grow<strong>in</strong>g on uncontam<strong>in</strong>ated sites.<br />
Except for Zn (200-500 mg/kg) and Ni (3 mg/kg), the metal contents extracted by<br />
0.11 M acetic acid were below the detection limit of ICP-OES <strong>in</strong> some profiles. A high<br />
percentage of Pb (50% of the samples) and Cu (40% of the samples) were also below the<br />
detection limit. Nevertheless, Cd and Cr recorded measurable amounts <strong>in</strong> the test sites but<br />
were below detection <strong>in</strong> the reference site. These results would suggest that the metals are<br />
withheld <strong>in</strong> rather strong complexes, specifically sorbed or occluded <strong>in</strong> solid soil phase.<br />
61
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
The metal content removed with CaCl2 generally fell below the detection limit of<br />
the ICP-OES. However, there were detectable levels of Zn (0.30±0.14 to 10.2±0.39<br />
mg/kg) <strong>in</strong> the surface layers. CaCl2 is a weak extractant, which consists of a neutral salt at<br />
an ionic strength <strong>in</strong> the range of typical soil solutions. Low metal levels would <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
that metals <strong>in</strong> the soil are not highly soluble and hence not immediately available for<br />
uptake by plants.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The farmers were aware of pollution of Ngong River. However, their knowledge was<br />
limited to crop quality and did not encompass the degradation of soil quality and health<br />
hazards related to possible accumulation of heavy metals. With appropriate <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />
farmers may appreciate these hazards<br />
The metal content of the soils revealed that the use of polluted water for irrigation<br />
had significantly contributed to contam<strong>in</strong>ation of the soils with Cr, Cu and Zn. Although<br />
chemical extraction suggested that the mobility of the contam<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>in</strong> these soils is rather<br />
limited, more general surveys and further <strong>in</strong>vestigations of metal uptake by crops are<br />
needed to evaluate the extent of current hazards.<br />
This issue <strong>in</strong>dicates the need for implement<strong>in</strong>g management strategies <strong>in</strong> Kenya to<br />
prevent and abate soil contam<strong>in</strong>ation. To aid <strong>in</strong> the development of reference values,<br />
background concentrations of trace elements <strong>in</strong> Kenyan soils should be established.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] UNEP. Outputs of phase I, Nairobi River Bas<strong>in</strong> Project, (1999).<br />
(URL:http://www.unep.org/roa/Nairobi_River/Webpages/pictures.map7.htm) (24 th July, 2005).<br />
[2] E.Van Ranst, M. Verloo, A. Demeyer, J.M. Pauwels. Manual for the soil chemistry and fertility<br />
laboratory.<br />
Gent University, Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Belgium. Pp. 243, (1999).<br />
[3] R.A. Sutherland. Comparison between non-residual Al, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn released by a<br />
three step sequential extraction procedure and a dilute hydrochloric acid leach for soil and road deposited<br />
sediment. Applied Geochemistry, Volume 17, pp. 353-365, (2002).<br />
[4] G. Rauret, J.F. Lopez-Sanchez, A. Sahuquillo, R. Rubio, C. Davidson, A. Ure, Ph. Quevauviller.<br />
Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new<br />
sediment and soil reference materials. Journal of Environmental Monitor, Volume 1, pp. 57-61, (1999).<br />
[5] Ph. Quevauviller, M. Lachica, E. Barahona, G. Rauret, A. Ure, A. Gomez, H. M<strong>in</strong>tau. Interlaboratory<br />
comparison of EDTA and DPTA procedures prior to certification of extractable trace elements <strong>in</strong><br />
calcareous soils. The Science of The Total Environment, Volume 178, pp. 127-132, (1996a).<br />
62
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Sub-theme : MANAGING GROUNDWATER POLLUTION<br />
FROM WASTE DISPOSAL SITES<br />
Krist<strong>in</strong>e Walraevens, Marleen Coetsiers, Krist<strong>in</strong>e Martens, Marc Van Camp<br />
Laboratory for Applied Geology and Hydrogeology, Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent<br />
University, Ghent, Belgium<br />
INTRODUCTION: THE WASTE PROBLEM<br />
Waste constitutes a problem which <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly demands the attention of scientists,<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eers, policy makers and the general public. This is partly because the volumes of<br />
waste are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g at an alarm<strong>in</strong>g rate (due to population growth, but even more to our<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g life style), and partly because our understand<strong>in</strong>g and appreciation of the hazards<br />
associated with improperly handled wastes are grow<strong>in</strong>g [3].<br />
WASTE MANAGEMENT<br />
In Flanders [8], the strategy to deal with waste consists <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g hierarchy:<br />
1. waste prevention<br />
2. waste reuse<br />
3. waste recycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
4. waste <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />
5. waste disposal <strong>in</strong> controlled dumps.<br />
Dump<strong>in</strong>g has thus become the last resort, only to be appealed to for waste which cannot<br />
be managed at lower steps of this ladder. This is <strong>in</strong> sharp contrast with the past, when the<br />
usual fate of waste was uncontrolled dump<strong>in</strong>g. The former practice has resulted <strong>in</strong> widespread<br />
pollution of soil and groundwater.<br />
Industrial dump sites have often caused major cases of pollution, but mostly<br />
restricted to a select group of chemicals. Yet, municipal household-refuse landfill sites<br />
contribute to pollution of groundwater to a large extent [4], by a wide variety of<br />
chemicals.<br />
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION FROM WASTE DISPOSAL<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>water percolat<strong>in</strong>g through the waste material <strong>in</strong> open dumps dissolves soluble matter<br />
<strong>in</strong> the waste, becom<strong>in</strong>g more concentrated on its way down. This leachate may leave the<br />
dump site and contam<strong>in</strong>ate the surround<strong>in</strong>g soil and groundwater, depend<strong>in</strong>g on different<br />
factors [3]:<br />
- climatic factors (dry versus humid)<br />
- depth to the water table and thickness of the unsaturated zone<br />
63
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
- the characteristics of the rocks: hydraulic conductivity, potential for adsorption or<br />
degradation of contam<strong>in</strong>ants<br />
- type and composition of the waste.<br />
Interaction of the leachate with the solid soil results ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>-situ pollution of the<br />
affected soil, whereas groundwater is a mobile medium, transport<strong>in</strong>g and spread<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ants. Leachate plumes may show lengths of several kilometers [1].<br />
MANAGING GROUNDWATER POLLUTION FROM WASTE<br />
DISPOSAL<br />
Future waste disposal should be managed <strong>in</strong> an appropriate way, prevent<strong>in</strong>g leachate to<br />
be produced and to leave the dump. Current practices implemented to reach this objective<br />
will be discussed.<br />
Exist<strong>in</strong>g cases of groundwater pollution result<strong>in</strong>g from waste disposal must be<br />
handled carefully, <strong>in</strong> order to control the risks and, if possible, restore the area to its<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al state. Different steps are required:<br />
1. characterization of the groundwater reservoir<br />
2. characterization and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the pollution plume; geophysical measurements may<br />
be very helpful [5, 7]<br />
3. simulation of the groundwater pollution [2, 6]<br />
4. conception and simulation of remediation schemes [2, 6]<br />
5. actual remediation<br />
6. monitor<strong>in</strong>g and follow-up.<br />
In very specific cases, the actual remediation step may be replaced by natural attenuation<br />
[4], but then the monitor<strong>in</strong>g and follow-up require double attention.<br />
Case-studies of groundwater pollution from dump sites will be discussed.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] T.H. Christensen, P. Kjeldsen, H.-J. Albrechtsen, G. Heron, P.H. Nielsen, P.L. Bjerg, P.E. Holm.<br />
“Biogeochemistry of landfill leachate plumes.” Appl. Geochem., 16(7-8), pp. 659-718, (2001).<br />
[2] K. Martens, K. Walraevens. “Pollution at a dry clean<strong>in</strong>g site: Modell<strong>in</strong>g of the movement of the<br />
pollution <strong>in</strong> groundwater by VOCl with RBCA Tier 2 Analyzer.” ConSoil 2003, Gent. Eight International<br />
FZK/TNO Conference on Contam<strong>in</strong>ated Soil. Conference Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. Theme B: Identification of Risks,<br />
pp. 1197-1205, (2003).<br />
[3] B.W. Murck, B.J. Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, S.C. Porter. “Environmental Geology”. John Wiley & Sons, <strong>New</strong> York<br />
(ISBN 0-471-30356-9). 535 p., (1996).<br />
[4] B.M. Van Breukelen. “Natural attenuation of landfill leachate: a comb<strong>in</strong>ed biogeochemical process<br />
analysis and microbial ecology approach.” PhD Dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam (ISBN 90-<br />
9016928-8), 140p., (2003).<br />
[5] K. Walraevens, E. Beeuwsaert, W. De Breuck. “Geophysical methods for prospect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
pollution: A case-study.” European Journal of Environmental and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Geophysics, 2, pp. 95-108,<br />
(1997).<br />
[6] K. Walraevens, E. Beeuwsaert, M. Van Camp, W. De Breuck. “Groundwater pollution by <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
waste disposal: geophysical and hydrogeological case-study.” In: MARINOS, P.G., KOUKIS, G.C.,<br />
64
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
TSIAMBAOS, G.C. & STOURNARAS, G.C. (eds.). Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Geology and the Environment. pp. 2243-<br />
2248. Rotterdam: A.A. BALKEMA Publishers (ISBN 90-5410-879-7), (1997).<br />
[7] K. Walraevens, M. Coetsiers, K. Martens. “Large-scale mapp<strong>in</strong>g of soil and groundwater pollution to<br />
quantify pollution spread<strong>in</strong>g.” In: LENS, P., GROTENHUIS, T., MALINA, G. & TABAK, H. (eds.). Soil and<br />
Sediment Remediation. Mechanisms, technologies and applications. pp. 37-48. Integrated Environmental<br />
Technology Series. IWA Publish<strong>in</strong>g, London (ISBN 1-84339-100-7), (2005).<br />
[8] http://www.ovam.be (<strong>in</strong> Dutch)<br />
65
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
CONTAMINATION OF THE MARIMBA RIVER TRIBUTARY,<br />
ZIMBABWE, WITH CU, PB, ZN AND P BY INDUSTRIAL<br />
EFFLUENT AND SEWER LINE DISCHARGE.<br />
Bangira, C * .Wuta, M., Dube, H.M and Chipatiso, L.<br />
* University of Zimbabwe, Department of Soil Science & Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, P.O. Box MP167,<br />
Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe<br />
Tel: +263 4 303211/+263 4 307304 Fax: +263 4 307304<br />
Abstract<br />
Correspondence: Email: cbangira@agric.uz.ac.zw<br />
The rate of <strong>in</strong>dustrialization <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries is often mismatched with the provision of solid and<br />
liquid waste disposal and other requisite <strong>in</strong>frastructural facilities. Consequently, facilities such as sewer<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es and sewage treatment works become overloaded result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> frequent pipe bursts and <strong>in</strong>adequate<br />
sewage treatment. A study was conducted <strong>in</strong> Marimba River tributary to assess the contribution of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent and sewer l<strong>in</strong>e discharge on the total concentration of Cu, Pb, Zn and P <strong>in</strong> sediment and<br />
water. Sediment and water samples were collected at specific po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the tributary dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season.<br />
Heavy metals and P <strong>in</strong> sediments and water were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by spectroscopic and colorimetric methods<br />
respectively. Electrical conductivity and pH were determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g their respective meters. The results<br />
showed elevated levels of Cu and Zn <strong>in</strong> sediments immediately after <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent discharge po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
However, concentrations of Cu, Zn and Pb <strong>in</strong> water were all below 0.5 mgl -1 . The pH ranged from 7.3 - 8.0<br />
and 6.2 – 7.4 <strong>in</strong> water and sediment respectively. Lower concentrations of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> water were<br />
attributed to the low <strong>in</strong>solubility of these metals due to high pH. Significantly higher concentrations of Cu<br />
and Zn <strong>in</strong> sediments immediately after the <strong>in</strong>dustries were due to <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent discharge that was not<br />
adequately pre-treated. Phosphates concentration <strong>in</strong> water exceeded the Standards Association of<br />
Zimbabwe (1999) limit of 0.5mgl -1 . It was concluded that <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent discharge and burst or leak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sewer l<strong>in</strong>es were contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the pollution of Manyame River tributary which feeds <strong>in</strong>to Harare’s ma<strong>in</strong><br />
dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water source.<br />
KEY WORDS: Heavy metals, P, <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent, water, sediment, Marimba River<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In recent years, develop<strong>in</strong>g countries have been experienc<strong>in</strong>g rapid <strong>in</strong>dustrial growth and<br />
urbanisation. Such processes br<strong>in</strong>g with it a plethora of social and economic challenges.<br />
The provision of accommodation to the urban population and the subsequent solid and<br />
liquid waste disposal facilities are probably some of the major problems faced by cities <strong>in</strong><br />
most develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. In Harare, Zimbabwe’s capital city, a phenomenal population<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease from 310 360 people <strong>in</strong> 1961, 658 400 people <strong>in</strong> 1982 to 1 896134 <strong>in</strong> 2002<br />
(CSO, 1982; 2002) occurred follow<strong>in</strong>g the end of the liberation war ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to a<br />
search for employment and partly due to high birth rates. High demand for<br />
accommodation was then created. The Municipality responded to the hous<strong>in</strong>g shortage by<br />
open<strong>in</strong>g up more residential areas adjacent to the exist<strong>in</strong>g ones as <strong>in</strong>-fill type or on<br />
agricultural land. People already allocated houses started extend<strong>in</strong>g them or construct<strong>in</strong>g<br />
66
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
backyard cottages. On one hand small-scale <strong>in</strong>dustrial parks built <strong>in</strong> these areas have their<br />
liquid waste disposed of <strong>in</strong> streams. Although the Municipality sanctioned these<br />
developments, most of them took place illegally. These developments took place without<br />
or with little upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of the sewer reticulation system. Consequently, facilities such as<br />
sewer l<strong>in</strong>es and sewage treatment facilities became overloaded result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> frequent pipe<br />
bursts and <strong>in</strong>adequate sewage and <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent treatment. Old suburbs such as<br />
Mabelreign, Greencroft and Bluffhill that were built <strong>in</strong> the late 1940s and 1950s for<br />
smaller population have been severely affected by the overload<strong>in</strong>g of the sewer system<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>in</strong>creased population and ag<strong>in</strong>g sewer reticulation system. Due to nonprohibitive<br />
f<strong>in</strong>es and the <strong>in</strong>capacity of the Municipality to regularly monitor effluent<br />
discharge <strong>in</strong>to water bodies, most <strong>in</strong>dustries directly discharge their untreated effluent<br />
<strong>in</strong>to streams. This study aimed at assess<strong>in</strong>g the contribution of <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent and<br />
sewer l<strong>in</strong>e discharge on the total concentration of Cu, Pb, Zn and P <strong>in</strong> sediment and water<br />
<strong>in</strong> Marimba River tributary.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
The study area is located about 10 km the north west of Harare City and covers the<br />
Bloom<strong>in</strong>gdale, Bluffhill, Greencroft and Mabelreign residential areas. The Marimba<br />
tributary passes through the medium and low density residential areas of Bloom<strong>in</strong>gdale,<br />
Bluffhill, Cotswold Hills and Mabelreign <strong>in</strong> Harare (Figure 1). In between the tributaries<br />
is an <strong>in</strong>dustrial zone. The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> this zone <strong>in</strong>clude vehicle servic<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
repairs, panel beat<strong>in</strong>g and spray pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, fuel stations, pa<strong>in</strong>t manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, road<br />
construction and weld<strong>in</strong>g. Effluent from these <strong>in</strong>dustries is directly discharged <strong>in</strong>to the<br />
northern sub-tributary. The southern sub-tributary receives ma<strong>in</strong>ly domestic effluent from<br />
the leak<strong>in</strong>g or burst sewer l<strong>in</strong>es and manholes located along the course of the sewer l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Manholes serve as relief ponds <strong>in</strong> case of blockages. Both streams are l<strong>in</strong>ed with Typha<br />
latifolia aquatic plants from the discharge po<strong>in</strong>ts. The tributaries later converge to form<br />
one major stream that dra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to Marimba River that <strong>in</strong> turn dra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to Lake<br />
67
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
LEGEND<br />
Manhole<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g Site<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> Road. ............................................<br />
Built up area. ............................................<br />
Industrial area. .......................................<br />
Angola<br />
Namibia<br />
SOUTHERN AFRICA<br />
Democratic<br />
Republic<br />
of Congo<br />
Zambia<br />
Botsw ana<br />
South Africa<br />
HARARE<br />
Zimbabwe<br />
Tanzania<br />
Mozambique<br />
.................................<br />
...........................<br />
River .....................................................<br />
N<br />
#<br />
68<br />
300 0 300 600 Meters<br />
Marimba<br />
HARARE<br />
Tynwald<br />
500 0 500 1000 Met ers<br />
Figure 1. Location map of the study area.<br />
7<br />
8<br />
Bluff Hill<br />
6<br />
9<br />
5<br />
4<br />
2<br />
3<br />
10<br />
12<br />
11<br />
Marbelreign<br />
Greencroft<br />
Chivero. Lake Chivero is the ma<strong>in</strong> source of dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water for the City of Harare,<br />
Norton and Chitungwiza.<br />
The residential areas of Mabelreign, Greencroft and Bluffhill, from where most of<br />
the sewerage comes from, were constructed <strong>in</strong> the post World War II era between 1949<br />
and early 1970s to accommodate an <strong>in</strong>creased number of immigrants from Europe<br />
(Z<strong>in</strong>yama, 1993). As such, these areas were for the more privileged and relatively small<br />
population (Colquhoun, 1993). Their sizes range from 1000-2000m 2 and were thus<br />
stipulated to have reticulated sewerage system by the urban by-laws.<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Sediment<br />
River sediments were collected from 12 sites us<strong>in</strong>g augers to a depth of 0.1 (refer to<br />
figure 1). Site 1, 11 and 12 were control sites. At each site three composite sediment<br />
samples were taken. One sample was composed of 9 sub-samples randomly selected from<br />
the streambed. The three samples from each site were placed <strong>in</strong> polythene bags and taken<br />
to the laboratory for air-dry<strong>in</strong>g before chemical analyses.<br />
1
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Water<br />
Water samples were collected us<strong>in</strong>g 1 L plastic bottles previously soaked <strong>in</strong> 10% HNO3<br />
to remove any traces of heavy metals. Prior to sampl<strong>in</strong>g the bottles were r<strong>in</strong>sed three<br />
times with de-ionised water and then stream water. Sampl<strong>in</strong>g was done with the bottle<br />
mouth fac<strong>in</strong>g the opposite direction to water flow. A total of three composite water<br />
samples result<strong>in</strong>g from the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of 9 sub-samples were collected from three<br />
randomly selected positions <strong>in</strong> the stream. Immediately after sampl<strong>in</strong>g, the bottles were<br />
tightly closed, put <strong>in</strong> cooler boxes and taken to the laboratory for analyses.<br />
Laboratory Analyses<br />
The electrical conductivity and pH of water samples were determ<strong>in</strong>ed immediately on<br />
arrival to the laboratory us<strong>in</strong>g an Orion pH and electrical conductivity meter respectively.<br />
About 0.5 L of the water samples were then acidified with 5 drops of concentrated nitric<br />
acid, filtered with Whatman No. 42 filter paper and the concentration of Cu, Pb and Zn <strong>in</strong><br />
the filtrate was determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The other 0.5<br />
L water was analysed for P. Total P <strong>in</strong> water was measured colorimetrically [Murphy<br />
and Riley, 1962] after digestion with the aqua-regia. The electrical conductivity was<br />
measured <strong>in</strong> a suspension of 1:5 sediment : water. The pH was measured <strong>in</strong> a 1:5<br />
sediment: 0.01 M CaCl2 suspension. Total heavy metals <strong>in</strong> sediments were extracted with<br />
aqua-regia and then determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g an atomic absorption spectrophotometer.<br />
Water<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Water pH at the sites affected by contam<strong>in</strong>ation was lower than the control sites (sites 1,<br />
11 and 12). Lower pH is attributed to the discharge of domestic and <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the stream. Moreover, there was a marked <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the electrical conductivity of<br />
water at the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sites (sites 4, 5 and 6). Due to high pH of water that precipitates<br />
heavy metals, the concentration of Cu, Pb and Zn <strong>in</strong> water at all the sites were below 0.5<br />
mg l -1 and thus comply with the Standards Association of Zimbabwe [1999] regulations<br />
for wastewater.<br />
The P concentration <strong>in</strong> water (Figure 1) reveals elevated levels of this element<br />
compared to most natural surface water P concentration of 0.005-0.020 mg l -1 P<br />
[Chapman, 1998]. Highest values were also recorded at the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sites. Although the<br />
P concentration at other sites were lower than the recommended value of 0.5mg l -1<br />
[Standards Association of Zimbabwe, 1999] there was a significant difference between<br />
the control sites (sites 1, 11 and 12) with the other sites that were affected by domestic<br />
(sewer l<strong>in</strong>e discharge) and <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent. Downstream Marimba River total P values<br />
between 1.67-5.42 ppm have been recorded <strong>in</strong> water [Hranova and Manjonjo, 2006].<br />
Detergents and soaps, which are commonly used for both domestic and <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
purposes, conta<strong>in</strong> at least one functional group such as sulphate, sulphonate or phosphate<br />
groups [Kirsner and Froelich, 1998] and are therefore likely sources of phosphates <strong>in</strong><br />
69
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
water <strong>in</strong> this study area. High P concentration <strong>in</strong> water may also be contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
growth of aquatic plant, Typha latifolia that starts grow<strong>in</strong>g from areas with burst or<br />
leak<strong>in</strong>g sewer manhole and pipe. Boyd and Hess [1970] found that stand<strong>in</strong>g crops of<br />
Typha latifolia were positively correlated with concentrations of dilute acid soluble P<br />
(1.0-116 ppm) <strong>in</strong> hydrosoils and dissolved P (0.02-0.32 ppm) <strong>in</strong> the waters.<br />
Sediments<br />
P concentration (mg l -1 )<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g site<br />
Figure 2. P concentration <strong>in</strong> water at different sites.<br />
Total P concentration <strong>in</strong> sediments was significantly higher (Figure 3) at sites that<br />
received ma<strong>in</strong>ly domestic effluent from the leak<strong>in</strong>g manhole of sewer l<strong>in</strong>es or burst pipes.<br />
This trend implicates detergents and soaps that are widely used for domestic purposes as<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong> sources of P enrichment <strong>in</strong> the stream. Lower levels of P at site 6 were attributed<br />
to the low sediment accumulation due to the erosive power of the water from all the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries. Earlier studies by Thornton and Nduku [1982] <strong>in</strong> some Zimbabwean lakes<br />
showed non-eutrophic lakes to have sediment P concentration of about 0.3ppm whilst<br />
eutrophic lakes had P concentration greater than 1.0 ppm. The growth of Typha latifolia<br />
<strong>in</strong> sections of the stream that were affected by effluent could therefore be a result of P<br />
enrichment.<br />
The pH of sediments (Table 1) was <strong>in</strong> the slightly alkal<strong>in</strong>e range. A significant<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> electrical conductivity, however, occurred at the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sites and was<br />
attributed to the direct discharge of soluble salts from <strong>in</strong>dustrial chemicals and detergents<br />
that became associated with sediment particles. Heavy metals (Cu and Zn) <strong>in</strong> sediments<br />
showed <strong>in</strong>creased concentration up to 170 mg kg -1 (Figure 3) compared to the control<br />
sites with less than 60 mg kg -1 . Sediments are good nutrient s<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong> rivers. High levels<br />
of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> sediments were attributed to the discharge of effluent <strong>in</strong>to the stream<br />
70
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
by the electrical, weld<strong>in</strong>g, pa<strong>in</strong>t and vehicle services <strong>in</strong>dustries located along this part of<br />
the stream. Industrial effluent and sludge are known to conta<strong>in</strong> heavy metals [Alloway,<br />
1990; McBride, 1995; Nyamangara and Mzezewa, 1999; Zaranyika et al., 1993] The<br />
concentration of the heavy metals <strong>in</strong> sediments <strong>in</strong> a stream that received domestic<br />
effluent was also less than 50mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g no enrichment of heavy metals. Pb<br />
concentration <strong>in</strong> sediments at all the sites was below 70mg kg -1 and there was no<br />
particular trend. The use of heavy metals for domestic use is rather limited hence lower<br />
levels <strong>in</strong> the sediments. No standard values for heavy metals <strong>in</strong> sediments exist <strong>in</strong><br />
Zimbabwe.<br />
P concentration (mg kg -1 )<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g site<br />
Figure 3. Mean total P concentration <strong>in</strong> sediments at different sites.<br />
71
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Conclusion<br />
Metal concentration (mg kg -1 )<br />
200<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g site<br />
72<br />
Cu Pb Zn<br />
Figure 4. Mean heavy metal concentration <strong>in</strong> sediment at different sites.<br />
The direct discharge of <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent <strong>in</strong>to the Marimba tributary contributed to the<br />
enrichment of Cu, P and Zn <strong>in</strong> sediments. Sewer l<strong>in</strong>e leaks and bursts as a result of<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased population and the discharge of <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent are also enrich<strong>in</strong>g the water<br />
and sediments with P and are pollut<strong>in</strong>g Marimba River tributary that feeds <strong>in</strong>to Harare’s<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water source. Higher P levels <strong>in</strong> water and sediments may also have<br />
contributed to the growth of Typha latifolia <strong>in</strong> the tributary. Regular monitor<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent and the upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of the sewer reticulation system are recommended.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
This research was funded by the University of Zimbabwe Research Board fund<br />
(3YSL10/0004) for which the authors are very grateful.<br />
REFERENCE<br />
B.J. Alloway. Heavy Metals <strong>in</strong> Soils. Wiley, <strong>New</strong> York. (1990)<br />
C.E. Boyd and L.W. Hess. Factors Influenc<strong>in</strong>g shoot production and m<strong>in</strong>eral nutrient levels <strong>in</strong> Typha<br />
latifolia. Ecology 51 (2): (1970).<br />
Central Statistics Office. 2002 Census Report. Government of Zimbabwe. (2002)
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
D. Chapman. Water Quality Assessment: A Guide to use of Biota, Sediments and Water <strong>in</strong> Environmental<br />
Monitor<strong>in</strong>g (1998). 2 nd Ed, London. SPON Press<br />
S. Colquhoun. Present problems fac<strong>in</strong>g the harare city council. IN: Z<strong>in</strong>yama, L., Tevera, D. and Cumm<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
S.(eds) 1993. Harare: the growth and problems of the city. University of zimbabwe publishers.<br />
R. Hranova and M. Manjonjo. Sewage sludge disposal on land-impacts on surface water quality (2006). In:<br />
r. Hranova (ed.) Diffuse pollution of water resources: pric<strong>in</strong>ciples and case studies <strong>in</strong> the southern africa<br />
region.p272. Taylor & francis group plc, london.<br />
R.S. Kirsner and C.W. Froelich. Soaps and Detergents: Understand<strong>in</strong>g their composition and effect.<br />
Ostomy Wound Management 44 (4): 393-397. (1998).<br />
M.B. mcbride. Toxic metal accumulation from agricultural use of sludge: are USEPA regulations<br />
protective? Journal of Environmental Quality 24: 5-18. (1995).<br />
J. Murphy and J. P. Riley. A modified s<strong>in</strong>gle solution method for determ<strong>in</strong>ation of phosphate <strong>in</strong> natural<br />
waters. Anal. Chim.Acta 27: 31-36. (1962) Cited <strong>in</strong>: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., and Keeney, D.R.(eds). 1982.<br />
Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Series 9. America<br />
Society of Agronomy, Inc. Madison, USA.<br />
J. Nyamangara and J. Mzezewa . The effect of long-term sludge application on Zn, Cu, Ni and Pb levels<br />
<strong>in</strong> a clay loam soil under pasture grass <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe. Agric. Ecosy. Environ. 73: 199-204 (1999)<br />
Standards Association of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe standard specification for waste water. Zimbabwe<br />
Standard No.558:1999. (1999).<br />
Thornton, J.A. and Nduku, W.K.K. Sediment Chemistry. In: Thornton, J.A. and Nduku, W.K.K. (eds),<br />
Lake Macllwa<strong>in</strong>e-the Eutrophication and Recovery of a Tropical African Man-made Lake. 1982. P59-65,<br />
London: Dr W. Junk Publishers<br />
M.F. Zaranyika, L. Mtetwa, S. Zvomuya, G. Gongoraand and A.S Mathuthu,. The effect of <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
effluent and leachate from landfills on the levels of selected trace heavy metals <strong>in</strong> the waters of upper and<br />
middle Mukuvisi river <strong>in</strong> Harare, Zimbabwe. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiopia 7 (1) :1-10 (1993)<br />
Z<strong>in</strong>yama, L. The evolution of the spatial structure of greater Harare: 1890-1990. (1993). IN: Z<strong>in</strong>yama, L.,<br />
Tevera, D. and Cumm<strong>in</strong>g, S.(Eds) 1993. Harare: the growth and problems of the city. University of<br />
Zimbabwe publishers.<br />
73
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
WATER<br />
Site Number<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
pH 7.9±0.03 7.8±0.03 NS a 7.5±0.01 7.7±0.0 7.7±0.07 7.7±0.08 7.3±0.01 7.6±0.07 7.4±0.02 7.5±0.01 8.0±0.05<br />
Conductivity<br />
(µS cm -1 ) 521±7 542±10 NS 930±74 929±60 887±60 731±27 491.0±22 446±44 507±28 408±25 287±12<br />
Cu (mgl -1 ) 0.1 0.2 NS 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2<br />
Pb (mgl -1 ) 0.2 0.2 NS 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />
Zn (mgl -1 ) 0.1 0.1 NS 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />
SEDIMENT<br />
pH (CaCl2) 6.7±0.02 6.7±0.03 6.8±0.02 7.3±0.01 6.8±0.05 7.0±0.02 6.2±0.03 7.2 ±0.02 7.4 ±0.03 6.7 ±0.02 6.7 ±0.02 6.6±0.02<br />
Conductivity<br />
(µScm -1 ) 451±10 1631±21 2000±51 2116±63 193±15 467±27 375±197 193±7. 1464±34 1630±40 342±9. 320±12<br />
Ns a - Not sampled because stream section dry<br />
Table 1. Mean values (± standard error) of selected parameters for water and sediment <strong>in</strong> Marimba tributary<br />
74
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
CONTROLLING PHOSPHORUS (P) MOBILITY IN POORLY P<br />
SORBING SOILS: DRINKING-WATER TREATMENT<br />
RESIDUALS (WTR) TO THE RESCUE<br />
S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang 1* , G.A. O’Connor 1 and L.W. Jacobs 2<br />
1 Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Ga<strong>in</strong>esville, FL 32611, USA, 2 Department of Crop<br />
Science, Michigan State University, East Lans<strong>in</strong>g, MI 48824, USA<br />
* Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author (E-mail: agy<strong>in</strong>@ufl.edu; Tel.: 1-352-846-5770)<br />
Abstract<br />
Surface runoff of nutrients nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from manured agricultural land can be an important<br />
source of water quality impairment <strong>in</strong> surface waters worldwide. Excessive concentration of soluble P is the<br />
most common source of eutrophication <strong>in</strong> fresh waters. Addition of amendments to reduce P solubility is one of<br />
the most effective <strong>in</strong>-situ technologies for remediat<strong>in</strong>g P contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils. Abundant evidence <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />
dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals (WTR) are effective amendments. However, little <strong>in</strong>formation is available<br />
concern<strong>in</strong>g the longevity of WTR immobilization. A modified isotopic ( 32 P) dilution technique was used to<br />
monitor the lability of P <strong>in</strong> a one-time WTR (114 Mg dry WTR ha -1 ) treated, P-impacted plots <strong>in</strong> two sites <strong>in</strong><br />
Western Michigan (USA) for seven–and-a-half (7.5) years. At the end of the monitor<strong>in</strong>g period, we conducted a<br />
runoff study, us<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation technique on the soils from both sites to assess the long-term<br />
effectiveness of WTR <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g dissolved P <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachate from the soils. Labile P concentrations of<br />
the WTR-amended soil samples were reduced to ≤ 46 % of the soil samples without WTR amendment, 6<br />
months after WTR amendment and the reduction persisted for 7.5 years. Application with WTR reduced the<br />
flow-weighted soluble reactive P concentrations <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachate <strong>in</strong> soils from both sites by ~ 60 % and<br />
dissolved organic P by ~ 45%. Overall, WTR amendment decreased flow-weighted dissolved P concentrations<br />
by ~ 55 %. We concluded that WTR is an effective amendment to control labile P <strong>in</strong> P-impacted soils and that<br />
the WTR immobilized P will rema<strong>in</strong> fixed for a long time. Thus amendment of P-impacted soils with WTR can<br />
help m<strong>in</strong>imize eutrophication <strong>in</strong> fresh surface waters.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Clean water is a crucial resource for dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, irrigation, <strong>in</strong>dustry, transportation, recreation,<br />
fish<strong>in</strong>g, hunt<strong>in</strong>g, support of biodiversity, and sheer esthetic enjoyment. Eutrophication caused<br />
by excessive <strong>in</strong>puts of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) is the most common impairment of<br />
surface waters worldwide. Eutrophication has many negative effects on aquatic ecosystems.<br />
Perhaps the most obvious consequence is the <strong>in</strong>creased growth of algae and aquatic weeds<br />
that <strong>in</strong>terfere with use of the water for fisheries, recreation, <strong>in</strong>dustry, agriculture, and<br />
dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Application of animal manure <strong>in</strong> amounts that exceed agronomic P rates often results <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creased loss of P from agricultural land <strong>in</strong> surface runoff and potential eutrophication of<br />
surface waters [21]. Reversal of eutrophication requires the reduction of P and N <strong>in</strong>puts <strong>in</strong>to<br />
surface waters. Current strategies used to reduce P transport to surface water <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
conservation tillage, crop residue management, cover crops, buffer strips, contour tillage,<br />
runoff water impoundment, and terrac<strong>in</strong>g. These strategies are effective <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
particulate P but not dissolved P <strong>in</strong> runoff [21]. Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals (WTR)<br />
that conta<strong>in</strong> Al or Fe oxides can be beneficially used as a best management practice (BMP) to<br />
protect surface water quality by remov<strong>in</strong>g dissolved P from agricultural runoff water. Thus,<br />
excessive soluble P concentrations can be controlled through the additions of<br />
environmentally-benign and cost-effective P-sorb<strong>in</strong>g amendments, such as WTRs [5].<br />
75
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals are by-products of the dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment<br />
process and are physical mixtures of Al or Fe hydr(oxides) that orig<strong>in</strong>ate from flocculant (Al,<br />
or Fe salts) additions made dur<strong>in</strong>g the dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment [17]. Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water<br />
treatment residuals are usually disposed of <strong>in</strong> landfills, and can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed at m<strong>in</strong>imal or no<br />
cost from dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g-water treatment facilities. Studies have shown that <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g WTRs<br />
<strong>in</strong>to soil reduces excessive soluble P result<strong>in</strong>g from manure application [3]. Similar studies<br />
showed that phosphorus solubility <strong>in</strong> biosolids was reduced by co-application with WTRs [5].<br />
O'Connor et al. [17] showed that P movement from P-enriched soils to freshwater supplies<br />
was reduced when the soils were treated with WTRs. The primary purpose of their study was<br />
to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the ability of three WTRs produced <strong>in</strong> Florida to reduce soluble P levels <strong>in</strong><br />
Florida soils amended with fertilizer, manure, and biosolids-P sources. Gallimore et al. [7]<br />
utilized WTRs as a buffer strip (44.8 Mg WTR ha -1 ) applied to a portion of a pasture treated<br />
with poultry litter. Surface runoff P was reduced by WTR from an average of 15 to 8.1 mg<br />
L -1 . The authors [7] concluded that the most effective surface application of WTR was as a<br />
buffer strip.<br />
Data from various studies suggest that WTRs could be effective amendments to<br />
improve P retention <strong>in</strong> poorly P-sorb<strong>in</strong>g soils. Short-term laboratory, greenhouse, and ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />
simulation studies have demonstrated WTR efficacy <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g soluble P concentrations <strong>in</strong><br />
runoff [3], and leach<strong>in</strong>g [5] from areas amended with animal wastes. The long-term stability<br />
of sorbed P by WTRs has only been qualitatively <strong>in</strong>ferred from lab experiments [12]. Time<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts associated with conduct<strong>in</strong>g long-term field experiments are the major drawbacks<br />
<strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the long-term fate of sorbed P <strong>in</strong> WTR-amended soils, and few researchers have<br />
attempted such studies. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness<br />
of alum WTR (Al-WTR) <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g dissolved P <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachate from field soils with<br />
long histories of poultry manure applications.<br />
Field layout and amendments application<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Two field sites (sites 1 and 2) located <strong>in</strong> Western Michigan were selected <strong>in</strong> 1998 for<br />
evaluation of WTR effects on P extractability <strong>in</strong> soils hav<strong>in</strong>g “very high” soil test P<br />
concentrations. Both soils have a long-term (> 10 yr) history of heavy chicken manure<br />
applications (actual application rates unknown). Soil at site 1 was a Granby f<strong>in</strong>e sandy loam<br />
(sandy, mixed, mesic Typic Endoaquolls) with Bray P1 test levels (265 mg P kg -1 ). Soil at the<br />
second site was Granby loamy sand (sandy, mixed, mesic Typic Endoaquolls) with Bray P1<br />
test values of 655 mg P kg -1 .<br />
A randomized, complete block design was established at each site with four replications<br />
per treatment and a plot size of 14 m x 30 m. The WTR used <strong>in</strong> this study was removed from<br />
lagoon storage, and stockpiled for dry<strong>in</strong>g. The dried Al-WTR was applied (114 dry Mg ha -1 )<br />
to plots us<strong>in</strong>g a Knight ProTw<strong>in</strong> Sl<strong>in</strong>ger, model 8030 V-box spreader, by mak<strong>in</strong>g three passes<br />
on each side of the plot, or three round trips. All plots, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the untreated controls, were<br />
disked (~30 cm) twice follow<strong>in</strong>g WTR application. Additionally, site 1 was chisel-plowed<br />
and field cultivated prior to plant<strong>in</strong>g on May 5, 1998. Site 2 was moldboard plowed before<br />
plant<strong>in</strong>g on May 4, 1998. Subsequently, both sites were rototilled <strong>in</strong> April/May, 2000 prior to<br />
plant<strong>in</strong>g to promote more thorough mix<strong>in</strong>g of WTR. Field corn (Zea mays L.) was planted<br />
each year at both sites. Herbicides and <strong>in</strong>secticides for weed and pest control typically used<br />
by cooperat<strong>in</strong>g farmers were applied at plant<strong>in</strong>g. Fertilizer nitrogen and potash were applied<br />
76
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
as needed. The study cont<strong>in</strong>ued for more than 7 years, but the WTR amendment was applied<br />
only <strong>in</strong> 1998.<br />
Soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Surface soils of control and WTR-amended plots from both of the Michigan field study sites<br />
were first sampled <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 1998 (time zero) by composit<strong>in</strong>g 20 cores (2.54 cm diameter)<br />
from the top 30 cm depth of each plot. Additional soil surface samples were similarly<br />
collected each fall <strong>in</strong> 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 for analyses to<br />
monitor changes <strong>in</strong> labile pools of P follow<strong>in</strong>g the WTR application. At the end of the<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g period (Fall 2005), surface soils of the control and the WTR amended plots from<br />
both sites were sampled (~ 20 kg) from the top 30 cm depth of each plot to undertake the<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation study.<br />
Soil and WTR characterization<br />
Samples were air-dried and passed through a 2 mm sieve before analyses. Particle size<br />
distribution was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the pipette method [2]. The pH was determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a 1:2 WTR<br />
to 0.01 M CaCI2 solution us<strong>in</strong>g a glass electrode [13]. Electrical conductivity (EC) was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a 1:2 WTR to deionized water solution [18]. Soluble reactive P of WTRs was<br />
measured <strong>in</strong> a 0.01 M KCl solution at a 1: 10 solid: solution ratio, after 40 d reaction. Total C<br />
and N were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by combustion at 1010 C us<strong>in</strong>g a Carlo Erba NA-1500 CNS analyzer.<br />
Total recoverable P, Fe, and Al were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by ICP-AES (Perk<strong>in</strong>-Elmer Plasma 3200)<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g digestion accord<strong>in</strong>g to the EPA Method 3050A [23]. Oxalate extractable P, Fe, and<br />
Al were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the ICP after extraction at a 1: 60 solid: solution ratio, follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
procedures of [20]. Oxalate-extractable Fe and Al represents noncrystall<strong>in</strong>e and organically<br />
complexed Fe and Al present <strong>in</strong> the solid [20].<br />
Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of labile pools of P<br />
Two grams of each soil sample was placed <strong>in</strong> centrifuge tubes to which 20 mL of deionized<br />
water was added, giv<strong>in</strong>g a solid-to-solution ratio of 1:10. Two drops of toluene were added to<br />
each suspension and equilibrated for 4 days <strong>in</strong> an end-over-end shaker. The samples were<br />
then spiked with 50 µL of a solution conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 32 P (5 MBq/mL) and returned to the shaker to<br />
equilibrate for 3 days. At the end of the equilibration period, samples were centrifuged at<br />
4200 g for 10 m<strong>in</strong> and filtered through 0.2-µm filters (Sartorius). Activities of radioactive P<br />
<strong>in</strong> the filtrates were assessed us<strong>in</strong>g liquid sc<strong>in</strong>tillation counter (Beckman LS 5801). All<br />
analyses were performed <strong>in</strong> triplicate and <strong>in</strong>cluded blanks. The total activity <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong><br />
each sample was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by analyz<strong>in</strong>g spiked solutions, without soil, <strong>in</strong> parallel with the<br />
soil suspensions as suggested by [10]. The labile pools (E) of P were determ<strong>in</strong>ed as reported<br />
<strong>in</strong> [8].<br />
E = (Csol/C † sol) R * (V/W) -----------------------[1]<br />
where Csol is the concentration of water extractable P <strong>in</strong> solution (µg/mL), C † sol is the activity of radioisotope<br />
rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> solution after equilibration (Bq/mL), R is the total activity of radioisotope added to each sample<br />
(Bq/mL), and V/W is the ratio of solution to sample, which <strong>in</strong> this case was 10 mL/g.<br />
77
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation experiment<br />
The ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation was carried out as prescribed <strong>in</strong> the U.S. National Phosphorus<br />
Research Project <strong>in</strong>door runoff box protocol [16]. However, the design of wooden runoff<br />
boxes (100 cm long, 20 cm wide, and 7.5 cm deep) was modified to quantify leach<strong>in</strong>g of P <strong>in</strong><br />
addition to runoff P by add<strong>in</strong>g a second box under the first <strong>in</strong> a double-decker design. This<br />
design allows collection of runoff and leachate simultaneously. The boxes were packed with<br />
5 cm of soils to a bulk density of 1.4 g cm -3 . Soils collected from the Michigan study sites<br />
(7.5 y after WTR amendment) were pre-wetted to near saturation to control for antecedent<br />
moisture and to promote runoff <strong>in</strong> subsequent ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulations were<br />
conducted three times, at one-day <strong>in</strong>tervals between ra<strong>in</strong>fall events. Boxes were sloped at 3 %<br />
and ra<strong>in</strong>fall was delivered at 7.1 cm hr -1 from a height of 3 m above the boxes. For each<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall event, the 30 m<strong>in</strong> of runoff, and leachate generated dur<strong>in</strong>g the entire ra<strong>in</strong>fall was<br />
collected from each box and the volumes recorded. Subsamples of the runoff were<br />
immediately filtered (0.45 µm) for analysis. A representative well-mixed sample of the<br />
unfiltered runoff (~ 250 mL) was also taken from each replicate for analysis.<br />
Leachate and runoff pH and EC was determ<strong>in</strong>ed on each sample. Soluble reactive P<br />
(SRP) was determ<strong>in</strong>ed on the filtered runoff and the leachate samples colorimetrically [14].<br />
Total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) was measured on the filtered runoff and the leachate<br />
samples after digest<strong>in</strong>g 10 mL of the samples with 0.5 mL 11 N H2S04 and 0.15g of<br />
potassium persulfate <strong>in</strong> an autoclave for 1 hr [4]. Total P <strong>in</strong> the unfiltered runoff sample was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed by digest<strong>in</strong>g 5 mL of the samples with 1 mL of 11 N H2S04 and 0.3g of potassium<br />
persulfate on the digestion block and then diluted by add<strong>in</strong>g 10 ml of water [4]. All digested<br />
samples were analyzed for P colorimetrically [14]. The iron-oxide impregnated paper strip<br />
method [15] was used to estimate bioavailable P <strong>in</strong> runoff waters.<br />
Particulate phosphorus (PP) was calculated by subtract<strong>in</strong>g TDP from the TP of each<br />
sample. Dissolved organic P (DOP) was assumed to be the difference between SRP and TDP.<br />
Flow-weighted P concentrations were determ<strong>in</strong>ed for the runoff and the leachate by summ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the product of the P concentrations and volumes for the three runs (P load) and divid<strong>in</strong>g the P<br />
load by the total volume of the runs. The mass of runoff and leachate P losses (mg) were<br />
calculated as the product of flow-weighted concentrations (mg L -1 ) and the runoff and<br />
leachate volume (L) respectively. Total P losses were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by summ<strong>in</strong>g the masses of<br />
runoff and the leachate P loss.<br />
Statistical analyses<br />
Differences among treatments were statistically analyzed as a factorial experiment with a<br />
randomized complete block design (RCBD), us<strong>in</strong>g the general l<strong>in</strong>ear model (GLM) of the<br />
SAS software [19] The means of the various treatments were separated us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle degree<br />
of freedom orthogonal contrast procedure.<br />
The data collected from the ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation study showed great variation about the<br />
means with coefficient of variation > 60 %. This prompted us to test for normal distribution<br />
of the data us<strong>in</strong>g the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Procedure and the normal probability plots of the<br />
Statistical Analysis System [19]. The P concentration data were not normally distributed, so<br />
typical analysis of variance could not be used. Instead, the NPAR1WAY procedure of the<br />
SAS software with the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The NPARIWAY procedure is a<br />
nonparametric procedure that tests whether the distribution of a variable has the same<br />
location parameter across different groups. The Kruskal-Wallis procedure tests the null<br />
hypothesis that the groups are not different from each other by test<strong>in</strong>g whether the rank sums<br />
78
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
are different based on a Chi-square distribution [9]. This is a powerful and robust test that is<br />
<strong>in</strong>sensitive to variation among data and the presence of outliers [9].<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Chemical properties of the WTR and soils used<br />
The WTR and soils were analyzed for selected chemical properties (Table 1). The pH of<br />
WTR was near neutral (7.4), and may have resulted from pH adjustment with alkal<strong>in</strong>e<br />
materials (i.e., calcium hydroxide) dur<strong>in</strong>g dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment.<br />
WTR Site 1 Site 2<br />
pH 7.4 ± 0.1 6.4 ± 0.2 6.8 ± 0.2<br />
Sand nd †<br />
60 ± 3.0 % 76 ± 4.5 %<br />
Silt nd 28 ± 2.2 % 16 ± 2.0 %<br />
Clay nd 12 ± 1.4 % 8 ± 0.9 %<br />
Total C 34,000 ±<br />
200<br />
nd nd<br />
KCl-P 4.0 ± 0.1 22.1 ± 2.3 58.1 ± 5.1<br />
Bray P1 nd 265 ± 45 655 ± 90<br />
Oxalate P 570 ± 96 790 ± 7.5 970 ± 8.3<br />
Oxalate Al 29700 ±<br />
3603<br />
2400 ± 21.3 710 ± 8.5<br />
Oxalate Fe 2300 ± 310 730 ± 8.3 290 ± 0.8<br />
Total P 800 ± 78 970 ± 47.1 1100 ± 4.3<br />
Total Al 39700 ±<br />
5650<br />
7000 ±<br />
35.2<br />
79<br />
3400 ± 32.5<br />
Total Fe 9200 ± 545 2700 ± 98.3 1800 ± 6.7<br />
† not determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
Table 1: Some characteristics of the WTR and soils used. Values are averages of six replicates ± one<br />
standard deviation. Values are <strong>in</strong> mg kg -1 , except pH values<br />
The EC ranged from 1.21 dS m -1 , well below the 4.0 dS m -1 associated with sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
problems [1]. The KCl-P represented only a small fraction of total P, with a mean value of 4<br />
mg kg -1 . The very low amount of KCl-P <strong>in</strong> the WTR implies that it would be poor not be<br />
source of P <strong>in</strong> soils. Total C value for the WTR was 3.4 %. Total C measured value agreed<br />
with the range C found for Al-WTRs (2.3- to 20.5 %; [3,12]. Total C determ<strong>in</strong>ations may<br />
overestimate organic C content s<strong>in</strong>ce the combustion method (temperature 1010 C) measures<br />
both organic and <strong>in</strong>organic C. The high total C levels found <strong>in</strong> many WTRs may be attributed<br />
to carbonate additions for pH adjustment dur<strong>in</strong>g water treatment or additions of activated
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
carbon, which is used to remove taste and odor from source water. The WTR had C: N ratio<br />
less than 25, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that there was a significant N pool that could be used by plants, if<br />
WTRs were land applied. A C: N ratio of ~25 is commonly used as the value where<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralization and immobilization of an organic amendment are <strong>in</strong> balance. Total P of the<br />
WTR was 800 mg P kg -1 , typical of Al-WTRs (300 to 4000 mg P kg -1 ; [3,12] Total P <strong>in</strong><br />
WTRs comes from the raw water purified <strong>in</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment plants and becomes a<br />
part of the WTR structure. The relatively high total P content of the WTRs is probably due to<br />
concentration <strong>in</strong> the WTR after removal from contam<strong>in</strong>ated raw water dur<strong>in</strong>g treatment. Total<br />
Al was ~ 40 g Al kg -1 , with<strong>in</strong> normal ranges reported by others (15- to 177 g Al kg -1 ; [3,12].<br />
Alum<strong>in</strong>um (hydr)oxides are sorbents for oxyanions such as phosphate, thus the high Al<br />
content of the WTR suggests that they will be major sorbents for P. Oxalate extractable P, Fe,<br />
and Al are usually associated with the amorphous phase of the particles. Oxalate-extractable<br />
Al values were close to total Al (84 % of the total), suggest<strong>in</strong>g an amorphous nature of the<br />
WTR. This is consistent with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of O’Connor et al. [17] that the traditional 200 mM<br />
oxalate-extractable P, Al and Fe concentrations are typically 80-90 % of the respective<br />
WTRs’ total elemental concentrations. Gallimore et al. [17] concluded that the amorphous,<br />
rather than the total, Al content determ<strong>in</strong>es WTR effectiveness <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g runoff-P.<br />
The soil samples collected at both sites of the Michigan field have near neutral pH.<br />
Soils from both sites have very high soil test P (STP) values, but the soil collected from site 2<br />
had greater soil test P. The high STP values reflect the long history of chicken manure<br />
application to the fields. The KCl-P accounted for 3.3 and 4.2 %, respectively, of the total P<br />
contents at site 1 and site 2. The high soluble reactive P concentration at both sites suggests<br />
that the soil can contribute significantly to P loss <strong>in</strong> runoff. The soil from site 1 had greater<br />
total Fe and Al than site 2, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that site 1 had greater potential to sorb excess soil P<br />
than the soil at site 2.<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> labile pools of P with time<br />
The isotopic dilution technique has been used to successfully describe P phytoavailability and<br />
mobility (labile pools of P) <strong>in</strong> soils [8]. Measured labile P levels <strong>in</strong> the control plots did not<br />
change significantly with time <strong>in</strong> the field, and were ~100 and 220 mg P kg -1 for site 1 and 2<br />
(Fig. 1), respectively. Site 2 had significantly greater amounts of labile P, consistent with<br />
greater soil test P levels and coarser texture (Table 1). The high, and nearly constant, labile P<br />
levels <strong>in</strong> the control plots reflect the history of heavy manure applications to these soils, and<br />
portend that soils from both sites could cont<strong>in</strong>uously supply large amounts of soluble P <strong>in</strong><br />
runoff over many years.<br />
80
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
labile P conc. (mg kg-1)<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
t(0) 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />
Year of sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
81<br />
Site1 control<br />
Site 1 WTR<br />
Site 2 control<br />
Site 2 WTR<br />
Figure 1: Changes <strong>in</strong> labile P concentrations with time for the Michigan field samples taken from<br />
both the control and WTR amended plots at site1 and 2<br />
Amendment with the WTR significantly (p = 0.015) reduced labile P concentrations at<br />
both sites (Fig. 1). At site 1, WTR application reduced labile P values from ~ 100 to 50 mg P<br />
kg -1 6 months after WTR application, and labile P levels cont<strong>in</strong>ued to decl<strong>in</strong>e for another 2<br />
years. Time series analysis suggests that an equilibrium labile P level (~ 30 mg P kg -1 ) was<br />
reached around 2.5 years after WTR application. Similar WTR effects were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for site<br />
2. Amendment with WTR significantly (p < 0.001) reduced labile P values with<strong>in</strong> 6 months,<br />
and the reduction cont<strong>in</strong>ued for another 4 years. Time series analysis suggested that an<br />
equilibrium labile P level (~ 75 mg P kg -1 ) was reached around 4.5 years after WTR<br />
application. The greater time (4.5 years) required at site 2 for the equilibration of WTR effect<br />
on labile P probably reflects the greater soil test P level, compared to site 1. Nevertheless,<br />
WTR amendment of either manure-impacted site significantly reduced labile P levels (at all<br />
times) below the higher levels <strong>in</strong> the control soils. The reduction <strong>in</strong> labile P due to WTR<br />
application is expected to reduce P loss and P pollution potential for these soils. Notable also<br />
is the longevity of the WTR effect. There was no evidence of release of WTR-immobilized P<br />
over time as measured by the labile P values. The labile P data demonstrate delayed, but<br />
steady, reduction <strong>in</strong> soluble P with time and ultimate reductions of ~ 65 to 70 % relative to<br />
the control soils.<br />
The reduction of labile pools of P with time from the WTR-amended plots prompted us<br />
to assess the changes <strong>in</strong> Fe and Al concentrations with time. Iron and Al hydroxides,<br />
especially Al forms <strong>in</strong> Al WTR, can be major sorbents for oxyanions <strong>in</strong> soils, such as P.<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> the magnitude of the sorbent pool with time are expected to <strong>in</strong>fluence the P<br />
sorption capacity of the amended soil. For both sites, there was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />
concentration of oxalate (200 mM)-extractable soil Al and Fe concentrations (Fig. 2) <strong>in</strong> the<br />
WTR amended plots, although the concentrations showed great variability over time. The<br />
WTR amended plots of site 2 exhibited a greater <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> oxalate (200 mM)-extractable Al<br />
and Fe concentrations, possibly due to the soil’s lower native Al and Fe concentrations (Table<br />
1). The variability <strong>in</strong> oxalate extractable- Al and Fe, concentrations over time is attributed to<br />
sampl<strong>in</strong>g variability. Variability <strong>in</strong> the sorbent (200 mM oxalate-extractable Fe and Al) pool,<br />
observed with time at both sites (Fig. 25) prompted normaliz<strong>in</strong>g the data by divid<strong>in</strong>g oxalate<br />
(200 mM)-extractable P by the correspond<strong>in</strong>g oxalate Fe and Al concentrations <strong>in</strong> moles.<br />
This normalization yields a term, the P saturation ratio (PSR) [11], similar to the degree of P<br />
saturation (DPS) <strong>in</strong>dex, but omits the α factor (α = 0.3-0.5) <strong>in</strong> the ratio [20]. Small PSR<br />
values (< 0.1) suggest excess P sorption capacity and limited P lability. The PSR values for
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
both sites were calculated and statistically analyzed to evaluate subtle differences between<br />
treatments over time.<br />
Fe+Al conc. (mmol kg -1 )<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
t (0) 1.5 3.5 5.5 7.5<br />
Years after WTR application<br />
Site 2 control<br />
Site 2 WT R<br />
Site 1 control<br />
Site 1 WT R<br />
Figure 2: Changes <strong>in</strong> oxalate extractable Fe+Al<br />
with time from both the control and WTR amended<br />
plots at sites 1 and 2.<br />
82<br />
PSR<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
t (0) 1.5 3.5 5.5 7.5<br />
Years after WTR application<br />
Site 2 control<br />
Site 2 WT R<br />
Site 1 control<br />
Site 1 WT R<br />
Figure 3: Changes <strong>in</strong> P saturation ratios with time<br />
from both the control and WTR amended plots at<br />
sites 1 and 2.<br />
For site 1, PSR values of the WTR-amended plots did not significantly differ at the 95<br />
% confidence level from the control (no WTR) plots (Fig. 3). Similarly, ag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the field had<br />
no significant effect on the PSR values for WTR-amended plots even 7.5 years after WTR<br />
application; the PSR values rema<strong>in</strong>ed low and relatively constant (~ 0.3) throughout the<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g period. For site 2 (Fig. 3), PSR values were at least double those of site 1 for both<br />
control and WTR-amended plots because site 2 had about twice the soil test P and one-half<br />
the total Fe and Al concentrations (Table 1). Control plots of site 2 had relatively high PSR<br />
values (> 1), which suggest that site 2 could contribute significant amounts of P <strong>in</strong> surface<br />
runoff. Amendment with the WTR significantly (p = 0.015) decreased PSR values 6 months<br />
after application and, thereafter, rema<strong>in</strong>ed relatively constant (Fig. 3) at PSR values < 50 %<br />
of the PSR values of the control samples. There was no significant effect of time, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
little potential for time-dependent P release from WTR-amended plots. Low native total soil<br />
Al and Fe concentrations <strong>in</strong> site 2 soil (Table 1) may have contributed to the positive WTR<br />
effect on reduc<strong>in</strong>g P extractability, as expressed by the PSR concept. In contrast, site 1 soil<br />
had relatively high amounts of native total Al and Fe concentrations; thus, the WTR<br />
application rate used was not sufficient to significantly <strong>in</strong>crease total soil Al levels or change<br />
PSR values.<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation study<br />
This study was conducted to confirm WTR effects on WEP and labile P measurements via<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation. Soils used represented samples from one-time WTR-amended fields <strong>in</strong><br />
Western Michigan, 7.5 years after WTR amendment. The masses (mg) of the various forms<br />
of P lost <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachate from soil samples collected from both sites are given <strong>in</strong> Table<br />
2.<br />
Generally, there were significantly greater P losses from the soil samples collected from<br />
site 2 (both the control and the WTR-amended soils), than those collected from site 1 (Table<br />
2). Results are consistent with the greater soil test P values and greater labile P values for soil
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
at site 2 than at site 1. Most of the P loss from both sites occurred through surface runoff,<br />
rather than through leach<strong>in</strong>g (Table 2).<br />
RUNOFF<br />
TREATMENT TDP ‡ SRP †† DOP †‡ PP ‡‡ BAP ‡‡†<br />
Total Runoff<br />
P<br />
CTRL 43.6 ± 31.6 40.6 ± 31.2 3.01 ± 2.2 51.9 ± 43.6 52.4 ± 21.4 95.5 ± 52.1<br />
Site 1 WTR 17.9 ± 8.32 16.0 ± 11.3 1.94 ± 1.37 83.7 ± 77.8 22.5 ± 10.9 102 ± 66.3<br />
CTRL 65.5 ± 47.3 60.6 ± 46.1 4.85 ±2.99 87.4 ±53.6 76.7 ± 41.6 153 ± 101<br />
Site 2 WTR 34.1 ± 26.9 31.3 ± 19.8 2.85 ± 2.04 158 ± 112 39.2 ± 24.7 193 ± 89.6<br />
LEACHATE<br />
Total<br />
TOTAL P LOSS<br />
TREATMENT TDP SRP DOP Leachate P (Runoff + Leachate)<br />
CTRL 29.0 ± 14.9 12.7 ± 9.32 16.3 ± 11.5 29.0 ± 14.9 124 ± 88.9<br />
Site 1 WTR 13.3 ± 8.65 5.82 ± 3.96 7.49 ± 5.48 13.3 ± 8.65 115 ± 79.9<br />
CTRL 44.5 ± 29.5 20.4 ± 16.7 24.1 ± 18.9 44.5 ± 29.5 197 ± 131<br />
Site 2 WTR 18.7 ± 11.2 7.12 ± 5.34 11.6 ± 8.74 18.7 ± 11.2<br />
211 ± 156<br />
†<br />
Numbers are flow-weighted means of 4 replicates <strong>in</strong> 3 ra<strong>in</strong>fall events ± one standard deviation<br />
‡<br />
Total dissolved P<br />
††<br />
Soluble reactive P<br />
†‡<br />
Dissolved organic P<br />
‡‡<br />
Particulate P<br />
‡‡†<br />
Bioavailable P<br />
Table 1: Maases† of the various P forms measured <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachates from both sites of the<br />
Michigan field study. All values are expressed <strong>in</strong> mg.<br />
The total runoff P losses of the samples taken from both sites were dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />
particulate P, and greater particulate P loads came from the WTR-amended plots than the<br />
control plots. The runoff dissolved P at both sites was dom<strong>in</strong>ated by soluble reactive P (SRP),<br />
with dissolved organic P (DOP) occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> small proportions (< 7 % of TDP). Contrary to<br />
the runoff dissolved P, the total dissolved P <strong>in</strong> the leachate had greater absolute values of<br />
DOP than the SRP. An <strong>in</strong>dependent determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the total dissolved P was carried out on<br />
the undigested leachate samples us<strong>in</strong>g ICP-AES. The values obta<strong>in</strong>ed from this <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ation were similar to those obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the digested leachate samples determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
colorimetrically. We, therefore, concluded that particulate P loads <strong>in</strong> the leachate samples<br />
were negligible and were consequently not determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The high particulate P concentrations<br />
observed <strong>in</strong> the runoff from the soil samples, prompted estimation of ‘bioavailable’ P levels<br />
<strong>in</strong> the runoff water, us<strong>in</strong>g the iron-oxide impregnated paper strip method [15]. Sharpley [21]<br />
reported that the transport of BAP <strong>in</strong> agricultural runoff can stimulate freshwater<br />
eutrophication Total bioavailable P (BAP) loss was calculated by summ<strong>in</strong>g the BAP loads<br />
from the runoff and the TDP loads from the leachate. Total dissolved P loads were used to<br />
represent the BAP loads <strong>in</strong> the leachate on the assumption that the dissolved organic P will<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralize and eventually become bioavailable.<br />
As expected, the total BAP loss from the soil samples taken from site 2 were<br />
significantly greater than those taken from site 1 (Table 1), consistent with the higher STP<br />
and labile P values of the site 2 soil. For site 1, the total BAP of the control soils accounted<br />
for > 60 % of the total P loss, whereas total BAP loss from the WTR-amended plots<br />
accounted for ~ 25 % of the total P loss (Table 1). Similar behavior was observed for the<br />
samples taken from site 2, with the total BAP account<strong>in</strong>g for ~ 55 % <strong>in</strong> the control and ~25 %<br />
for the WTR-amended soils (Table 2). The runoff pH and the EC were similar for both the<br />
83
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
WTR-amended and the control plots at the respective sites. Runoff pH and EC values were<br />
similar to those observed for the leachates (data not presented).<br />
Effects of WTR on P losses<br />
There were no significant differences between the flow-weighted total P masses of the WTRamended<br />
plots and the control plots at either site (Table 2). However, the flow-weighted<br />
TDP, SRP and DOP masses were significantly reduced at both sites <strong>in</strong> the presence of WTR.<br />
Conversely, the flow-weighted particulate P masses were significantly greater <strong>in</strong> the WTR<br />
amended plots at both sites than the control plots (Table 2). Possibly, the particles detached<br />
by the ra<strong>in</strong> drops from the WTR-amended plots had greater P enrichment due to the WTR<br />
immobilization than the soil particles detached from the control plots. Furthermore, the<br />
greater particulate P masses may be due to the presence of WTR conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the eroded<br />
particles, which also conta<strong>in</strong>s some P.<br />
For site 1, application of WTR reduced the flow-weighted SRP masses by ~60 % and<br />
DOP by ~35% (Fig. 4). Overall, amendment with Al-WTR decreased flow-weighted<br />
dissolved P mass by ~59 %. Similar results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for site 2. Amendment with Al-<br />
WTR reduced SRP masses by ~53 % and DOP by ~50 % (Fig. 4), result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an overall<br />
reduction of flow-weighted dissolved P by ~52 %. Earlier studies have shown that WTR<br />
amendment <strong>in</strong>creased the content of P-fix<strong>in</strong>g Al and Fe concentrations <strong>in</strong> the soils at both<br />
sites (Fig. 3). The <strong>in</strong>creased P-fix<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the soils resulted <strong>in</strong> the decreased TDP<br />
content. This is consistent with the observation of Elliott et al. [6] that, as the content of Pfix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Al and Fe <strong>in</strong> soils and P sources <strong>in</strong>creases, TDP concentration decreases. The authors<br />
[6] determ<strong>in</strong>ed P levels <strong>in</strong> runoff from soils amended with biosolids and dairy manure, under<br />
simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall and concluded that TDP concentrations <strong>in</strong> runoff can be reduced by add<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Al and Fe salts to P sources that have high concentrations of water soluble P.<br />
Amendment with WTR decreased the total (runoff + leachate) flow-weighted TDP<br />
concentrations from ~ 2.5 mg L -1 to ~ 0.86 mg L -1 at site 1 and from ~ 3.2 mg L -1 to ~ 0.94<br />
mg L -1 at site 2. The reduced values exceed values (0.01-0.05 mg L -1 ) usually associated with<br />
eutrophication of surface waters [23], but are below a solution concentration of 1.0 mg L -1<br />
(3.2 * 10 -5 M) occasionally used as a benchmark. The 1.0 mg L -1 concentration is a common<br />
goal for wastewater discharges to rivers and streams and has been applied to soils on the<br />
premise that the discharge of P from soils to water should be held to the same standard [22].<br />
Greater s<strong>in</strong>gle amendment rates (> 114 Mg ha -1 ), or a multiple (yearly) WTR applications are<br />
likely necessary to reduce TDP concentration to the 0.01-0.05 mg L -1 target concentration<br />
range. The s<strong>in</strong>gle application of 114 Mg ha -1 , however, significantly reduced runoff and<br />
leachate P impacts on water quality.<br />
A large proportion of the total P load loss <strong>in</strong> runoff was particulate P (45-73 % of the<br />
total P losses). Compared to the control plots, greater particulate P losses were found <strong>in</strong> the<br />
WTR-amended plots at both sites (Fig. 4). Despite the greater particulate P loads <strong>in</strong> runoff<br />
from the WTR-amended plots, flow-weighted ‘bioavailable’ P loads <strong>in</strong> runoff were<br />
significantly smaller than those of the control plots (Fig. 32), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that much of the<br />
particulate P was not bioavailable. Thus, even if WTR-P erodes to surface waters, there<br />
should be m<strong>in</strong>imal adverse effects on water quality.<br />
84
percentage od total P mass loss<br />
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
100%<br />
80%<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
0%<br />
Site1<br />
CTRL<br />
Site 1<br />
WTR<br />
Site 2<br />
CTRL<br />
Treatments<br />
Site 2<br />
WTR<br />
Figure 4: Percentages of total P mass loss<br />
represented by the various P forms.<br />
PP<br />
DOP<br />
SRP<br />
85<br />
Mass of bioavailable P (mg)<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Site1 CTRL Site 1 WTR Site 2 CTRL Site 2 WTR<br />
Treatments<br />
Figure 5: Flow-weighted bioavailable P loads <strong>in</strong><br />
runoff from sites 1 and 2.<br />
The study was conducted to assess the longevity of WTR immobilization. Results from this<br />
study also showed that amendment with WTR reduced labile P concentration by ≥ 60 % of<br />
those of the control plots and that 7.5 yr after WTR application, the WTR immobilized P<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable. The data suggest that WTR amendment should reduce P losses from soils,<br />
and do so for a long time. To confirm this, we utilized ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation techniques to<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigate P losses <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachates 7.5 yr after one-time WTR amendment.<br />
Amendment with WTR reduced dissolved P and bioavailable P (BAP) by > 50 % from both<br />
sites, show<strong>in</strong>g that even 7.5 yr after WTR amendment of the sites, the WTR-immobilized P<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>ed non-labile. Thus, there is little fear that WTR-immobilized P will be dissolved <strong>in</strong>to<br />
runoff and leachates to contam<strong>in</strong>ate surface and ground water. The data suggest that WTR<br />
can be relied upon to control P losses <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachates, and that even if WTR-P erodes<br />
to surface waters, the bioavailability of the immobilized P is m<strong>in</strong>imal and will cause no<br />
adverse effects on the water quality.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
This study was funded by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA Project CP-<br />
82963801). We wish to express our appreciation to Drs. Hector Castro, John Thomas and Mr.<br />
Scott R. Br<strong>in</strong>ton (Soil and Water Sci. Dept., Univ. of Florida) for their technical assistance.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] N.C. Brady, R.R. Weil. “The Nature and Properties of soils (13 th ed)”, Prentice Hall, NJ, pp. 430-432,<br />
(2002).<br />
[2] P.R. Day. “Particle fractionation and particle size analysis”, In Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, C.A Black<br />
(Ed), American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI, pp. 545-567, (1965).
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
[3] E.A. Dayton, N.T. Basta, C.A Jakober, J.A. Hattey. “Us<strong>in</strong>g treatment residuals to reduce phosphorus <strong>in</strong><br />
agricultural runoff”, Journal of American Water Works Association, 95, pp. 151-158, (2003).<br />
[4] T.C. Daniel, D.H. Pote. “Analyz<strong>in</strong>g for total phosphorus and total dissolved phosphorus <strong>in</strong> water samples”,<br />
In: G.M. Pierzynski (Ed) “Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments residuals and waters”, Southern<br />
Corp. Series Bull. 396. Cooperative Extension Service, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 91-93,<br />
(2000).<br />
[5] H.A. Elliott, G.A. O’Connor, P. Lu, S. Br<strong>in</strong>ton. “Influence of water treatment residuals on phosphorus<br />
solubility and leach<strong>in</strong>g”, Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, pp. 681-689, (2002).<br />
[6] H.A. Elliott, R.C. Brandt, G.A O'Connor. “Runoff phosphorus losses from surface-applied biosolids”,<br />
Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, pp. 1632-1639, (2005).<br />
[7] L.E. Gallimore, N.T. Basta, D.E. Storm, M.E. Payton, R.H. Huhnke, M.D. Smolen. “Water treatment<br />
residual to reduce nutrients <strong>in</strong> surface runoff from agricultural land” Journal Environmental Quality 28, pp.<br />
1474-1478, (1999).<br />
[8] R.E. Hamon, I. Bertrand, M.J. McLaughl<strong>in</strong>. “Use and abuse of isotopic exchange data <strong>in</strong> soil chemistry”,<br />
Australian Journal of Soil Research, 40, pp. 1371-1381, (2002).<br />
[9] M. Hollander, D.A. Wolfe. “Nonparametric statistical methods” 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience Publications,<br />
NY, pp. 787, (1999).<br />
[10] E. Lombi, R.E. Hamon, S.P. McGrath, M.J. McLaughl<strong>in</strong>. “Lability of Cd, Cu, and Zn <strong>in</strong> polluted soils<br />
treated with lime, ber<strong>in</strong>gite, and red mud and identification of a non-labile colloidal fraction of metals us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
isotopic techniques”, Environmental Science and Technology, 37, pp. 979-984, (2003).<br />
[11] R.O. Maguire, J.T. Sims, S.K. Dentel, F.J. Coale, J.T. Mah. “Relationships between biosolids treatment<br />
processes and soil phosphorus availability”, Journal of Environmental Quality, 37, pp. 979-984, (2001).<br />
[12] K.C. Makris, 2004. Long-term stability of sorbed phosphorus by dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals:<br />
mechanisms and implications. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Ga<strong>in</strong>esville, FL, (2002).<br />
[13] E.O. McLean. “Soil pH and Lime Requirement”, In: Methods of Soil Analysis. 2nd Ed., A.L. Page et al.<br />
(Eds.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 687-683, (1982).<br />
[14] J. Murphy, J.P. Riley. “A modified s<strong>in</strong>gle solution method for the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of phosphate <strong>in</strong> natural<br />
waters”, Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, pp. 31-36, (1962).<br />
[15] R.G. Myers, G.M. Pierzynski. “Us<strong>in</strong>g the iron oxide method to estimate biovailable phosphorus <strong>in</strong> runoff”,<br />
In: G.M. Pierzynski (Ed) “Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments residuals and waters”, Southern<br />
Corp. Series Bull. 396. Cooperative Extension Service, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 98-<br />
102, (2000).<br />
[16] National Phosphorus Research Project. National research project for simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall surface runoff<br />
studies [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available at http://www.sera17.ext.vt.edu/Documents/National_P_protocol.pdf (verified May<br />
12 2006). North Carol<strong>in</strong>a State University, Raleigh, (2001).<br />
[17] G.A. O’Connor, H.A Elliott, P. Lu. “Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals phosphorus retention”, Soil<br />
and Crop science Society of Florida Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs 61, pp. 67-73, (2002).<br />
[18] J.D. Rhoades. “Electrical Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids”, In: Methods of soil Analysis 2nd Ed.,<br />
A.L. Page et al. (Eds.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI pp. 365 – 372, (1996).<br />
[19] SAS Institute. “SAS onl<strong>in</strong>e document”, version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, (1999).<br />
[20] O.F. Schoumans. “Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the degree of phosphate saturation <strong>in</strong> non-calcareous soils”, In: G.M.<br />
Pierzynski (Ed) “Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments residuals and waters”, Southern Corp.<br />
Series Bull. 396. Cooperative Extension Service, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 31-34,<br />
(2000).<br />
[21] A.N. Sharpley, S.C. Chapra, R. Wedepohl, J.T. Sims, T.C. Daniel, K.R. Reddy. “Manag<strong>in</strong>g agricultural<br />
phosphorus for protection of surface waters - issues and options”, Journal of Environmental Quality 23, pp. 437-<br />
451 (1994).<br />
[22] J.T. Sims, G.M. Pierzynski. “Chemistry of phosphorus <strong>in</strong> soils”, In. Chemical processes <strong>in</strong> soils, M.A<br />
Tabatabai and D.L Sparks (Eds). SSSA Book Series 8, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI,<br />
(2005).<br />
[23] USEPA. “Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils”, Section A, Part I, Chapter Three – Metallic<br />
analytes. Method 3050, SW-846, test methods for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g solid waste, USEPA, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, (1986).<br />
86
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION OF SOIL AND SURFACE<br />
WATER BY LEACHATES OF AN OPEN DUMP OF MUNICIPAL<br />
SOLID WASTE: A CASE STUDY OF OBLOGO LANDFILL IN<br />
THE GA WEST DISTRICT OF ACCRA, GHANA.<br />
Abuaku Ebenezer*<br />
Department of Soil Science, School of Agriculture, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.<br />
E-mail: ebentje@yahoo.co.uk; Tel.: + 233 244 73 60 51; Fax: + 233 21 85 03 85<br />
Poster Extended Abstract<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management constitutes one of the challeng<strong>in</strong>g environmental<br />
problems fac<strong>in</strong>g many countries <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g world <strong>in</strong> recent times. In Ghana, the<br />
problem is particularly worry<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the big cities like Accra where an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> population<br />
tends to aggravate the situation. Open dump<strong>in</strong>g is the most common method of solid waste<br />
disposal <strong>in</strong> most communities <strong>in</strong> Ghana. However, this presents numerous health and<br />
environmental problems for communities <strong>in</strong> which the landfills are located. Leachate from<br />
the landfill pollutes nearby streams and groundwater and <strong>in</strong> addition the piles act as breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
grounds for rodents and <strong>in</strong>sects which are vectors of human diseases (Rushbrook and Dugh,<br />
1999)<br />
Leachate from these MSW landfills has very high contents of a range of organic and<br />
<strong>in</strong>organic substances <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g heavy metals due to the heterogeneous nature of the waste<br />
stream reach<strong>in</strong>g the landfill. In mixed (unseparated) MSW, there is a diverse range of other<br />
materials, some of which are potentially hazardous. Heavy metals <strong>in</strong> MSW orig<strong>in</strong>ate from a<br />
variety of sources such as batteries, consumer electronics, used motor oils, plastics, <strong>in</strong>k and<br />
glass products, etc. When present <strong>in</strong> ground or surface waters, metals may constitute a<br />
significant hazard for public health and ecosystems.<br />
The site chosen for the study is important because of its proximity to the Densu River<br />
which serves as a source of treated water for Accra, the capital City of Ghana. It is also<br />
located <strong>in</strong> the catchment of one of the country’s most important Ramsar site.<br />
OBJECTIVES<br />
The study is broadly carried out to ascerta<strong>in</strong> the impact of the landfill and its environmental<br />
pollution on the Oblogo community and its environment <strong>in</strong> the Ga West District of Accra,<br />
Ghana. This will <strong>in</strong>volve the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of heavy metals conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the leachates com<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from the landfill and explore the extent to which the leachate has negatively affected the<br />
quality of Densu River and other aquatic life such as fish. The study also aims at assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the levels of soil contam<strong>in</strong>ation due to the landfill and to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the effect of the leachatepolluted<br />
water on the quality of vegetables produced.<br />
87
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
HYPOTHESES<br />
The study is based on the hypotheses that the leachate com<strong>in</strong>g from the landfill conta<strong>in</strong>s high<br />
levels of heavy metals and other contam<strong>in</strong>ants which have affected negatively the quality of<br />
Densu River and that the quality of both the soil and vegetables irrigated with the leachatepolluted<br />
river has also been affected significantly.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The fieldwork <strong>in</strong>volved sampl<strong>in</strong>g of leachates, surface water, soil, fish, and vegetables from<br />
the study site. Measurements which were monitored <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>in</strong>cluded temperature, pH,<br />
and conductivity. Laboratory analyses were also carried out to determ<strong>in</strong>e the presences and/or<br />
levels of heavy metals such as Mercury (Hg), Cadmium (Cd), Copper (Cu), Arsenic (As),<br />
Silver (Ag) etc us<strong>in</strong>g the Nuclear Activation Analysis (NAA) technique. Other physicochemical<br />
parameters analysed <strong>in</strong>cluded the Total Dissolved Solid (TDS), Chemical Oxygen<br />
Demand (COD), and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD). Questionnaires were designed to<br />
ascerta<strong>in</strong> the impact of the landfill on the health and socio-economic life of the Oblogo<br />
community.<br />
EXPECTED OUTCOME<br />
It is envisaged that the study will help establish the critical levels of heavy metal<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>in</strong> the soil and vegetables irrigated with the leachate-polluted river. The<br />
presence and/or critical levels of heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation of the Densu River and other<br />
aquatic life such as fish will be known. The effect of the presence of the landfill on the health<br />
aspects such respiratory diseases, cholera, typhoid etc and the socio-economic life of the<br />
<strong>in</strong>habitants of Oblogo will be ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed. Recommendations will therefore be made to the<br />
appropriate governmental agencies for policy formulation and immediate <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />
88
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
WORKSHOP Theme: Soil and Groundwater Pollution and<br />
Remediation<br />
Convenors: M. Verloo, K. Walraevens, J. Van De Steene, F. Tack<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The workshop consisted of two sub-themes:<br />
- Manag<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils us<strong>in</strong>g phytoremediation<br />
- Manag<strong>in</strong>g groundwater pollution from waste disposal sites<br />
Sub-theme: Manag<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils us<strong>in</strong>g phytoremediation<br />
Soil contam<strong>in</strong>ation is widespread <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>habited areas. Because effective cleanup by pollutant<br />
removal is f<strong>in</strong>ancially prohibitive, there is a need to develop alternative affordable strategies<br />
to manage the contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Phytoremediation may prove a valuable option <strong>in</strong> deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ated land, especially if it can be comb<strong>in</strong>ed with economic uses such as wood<br />
production for bioenergy. Erik Meers <strong>in</strong> his keynote presentation outl<strong>in</strong>ed the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of<br />
phytoremediation and highlighted recent scientific developments.<br />
Acid m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs may benefit from phytoremediation approaches for long term stabilization<br />
of the site. However, plant growth may only be realized on these sites after amelioration of<br />
the physico-chemical parameters us<strong>in</strong>g amendments. Tee Boon Goh (Canada) presented<br />
experiences with various low cost amendments for stabiliz<strong>in</strong>g these sites.<br />
In a next contribution, Tran Thi Le Ha outl<strong>in</strong>ed the issue of contam<strong>in</strong>ation of agricultural land<br />
<strong>in</strong> Vietnam due to various sources of trade village waste.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Exist<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated sites should be managed account<strong>in</strong>g for the contam<strong>in</strong>ation present.<br />
This management should be designed to prevent any significant hazards to ecosystems or to<br />
the food web. Phytoremediation is promis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this context provided it can be comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
with beneficial or economic uses. Appropriate management strategies are extremely site<br />
specific and additionally depend on economical and sociological aspects. Prevention of new<br />
soil pollution should be an utmost priority <strong>in</strong> a country’s policy with respect to soil<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Sub-theme: Manag<strong>in</strong>g groundwater pollution from waste disposal sites<br />
A keynote presentation on this sub-theme was presented by Krist<strong>in</strong>e Walraevens.<br />
Peter Kamande made an oral presentation on metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> irrigated agricultural<br />
land <strong>in</strong> Kenya. River water used for irrigation of fields at the river-side is contam<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />
various pollutants. The study was focus<strong>in</strong>g on heavy metals <strong>in</strong> the soil.<br />
89
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
Abuaku Ebenezer presented both orally and <strong>in</strong> a poster a case study of Oblogo municipal<br />
landfill <strong>in</strong> the Ga West District of Accra, Ghana. This ongo<strong>in</strong>g study is also focus<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Leachates flow overland towards the nearby Densu River, which<br />
is used for food-supply (fish) and irrigation of vegetable fields.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Uncontrolled dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> open dumps is still common practice <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, both<br />
for <strong>in</strong>dustrial and municipal solid waste. Ensu<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ation problems are affect<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
local environment and are threaten<strong>in</strong>g food quality, and ultimately people’s health. Adoption<br />
of proper waste management strategies, and of measures for controll<strong>in</strong>g pollution caused by<br />
the exist<strong>in</strong>g open dumps, are highly needed. These require characterization of the sit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
conditions and of the pollution case.<br />
90
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />
91
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
WORKSHOP THEME B – INTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
Sub-theme : Use of isotope techniques for nutrient management –<br />
Isotope biochemistry<br />
P. Boeckx, K. Denef, O. Van Cleemput<br />
Paper/poster : Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the agronomic effectiveness of natural<br />
phosphate rock with poultry manure : a way forward to susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
crop production – S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang, M.K. Akekoe, O.O. Oladeji,<br />
S.K.A. Danso<br />
Paper/poster : The effect of lim<strong>in</strong>g an acid nitisol with either calcite<br />
or dolomite on two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties<br />
differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance – E.N. Mugai, S.G. Agong, H.<br />
Matsumoto<br />
Paper/poster : Effect of P fertilisers and weed control on the fate of P<br />
fertilizers applied to soils under second-rotation P<strong>in</strong>us radiata – A.A.<br />
Rivaie, P. Loganathan, R.W. Tillman<br />
Sub-theme : Organic farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the tropics present situation,<br />
possibilities and challenges – Current research at the research group of<br />
soil fertility and nutrient management<br />
Stefaan De Neve<br />
Paper/poster : Low <strong>in</strong>put approaches for soil fertility management<br />
verified for semi-arid areas of Eastern Uganda – Kayuki C. Kaizzi,<br />
Byalebeka John, Charles S. Wortmann, Martha Mamo<br />
Paper/poster : Amelioration of acid sulfate soil <strong>in</strong>fertility <strong>in</strong> Malaysia for rice<br />
cultivation – J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong><br />
Conclusions<br />
92
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Sub-theme : USE OF ISOTOPE TECHNIQUES FOR<br />
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT<br />
P. Boeckx, K. Denef, and O. Van Cleemput<br />
1 Laboratory of Applied <strong>Physical</strong> Chemistry (ISOFYS), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<br />
www.isofys.ugent.be, pascal.boeckx@ugent.be, Phone: +32 9 264 60 00<br />
ISOTOPE BIOGEOCHEMISTRY<br />
One of the research l<strong>in</strong>es developed at the ISOFYS laboratory is Isotope<br />
Biogeochemistry. Here<strong>in</strong> we use advanced, state of the art stable isotope techniques to<br />
study processes of C and N cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
two paragraphs we present a summary of our scientific activities and the analytical<br />
equipment related to stable isotope analysis we have available.<br />
A first research l<strong>in</strong>e deals with N cycl<strong>in</strong>g studies. Nitrogen cycl<strong>in</strong>g is studied <strong>in</strong><br />
natural and agricultural ecosystems. In natural ecosystems we use natural abundance<br />
measurements of 15 N <strong>in</strong> soil profiles and leaf material to develop ecosystem <strong>in</strong>dicators for<br />
N-cycl<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. N openness of ecosystems). Next to that we use 15 N isotope dilution<br />
techniques <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with 15 N trac<strong>in</strong>g models to unravel N cycl<strong>in</strong>g processes <strong>in</strong> soil<br />
systems. Both natural abundance techniques and tracer techniques are also applied to<br />
study BNF <strong>in</strong> tropical agriculture. A second research l<strong>in</strong>e deals with the use if 13 C <strong>in</strong><br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation with physical fractionation techniques for soil organic matter. These studies<br />
are carried out on a variety of land use systems, go<strong>in</strong>g from forest soils over grasslands to<br />
no-till systems to study C turnover <strong>in</strong> these systems. A third Isotope Biogeochemistry<br />
research l<strong>in</strong>e deals with the identification of nitrate sources <strong>in</strong> surface water us<strong>in</strong>g stable<br />
isotope signatures and mach<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g techniques. F<strong>in</strong>ally, a fourth axis of expertise we<br />
develop is the use of biomarkers to assess the l<strong>in</strong>k between, on the one hand above<br />
ground biodiversity or land use, and on the other the microbial community structure <strong>in</strong><br />
the soil and the biogeochemical process they carry out.<br />
To perform the above mentioned research l<strong>in</strong>es ISOFYS is equipped with state of<br />
the art advanced mass spectrometry devices. ISOFYS has three Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Flow Isotope<br />
Ratio Mass Spectrometer (CF-IRMS) systems. This equipment is coupled to different<br />
sample preparation units such as an elemental analyzer, a high temperature elemental<br />
analyzer, TOC/TN analyzer, trace gas unit, gas chromatograph (GC) and HPLC. The<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation of three IRMS systems <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous flow with six sample preparation units<br />
enables ISOFYS to analyze 15 N, 13 C and 18 O <strong>in</strong> bulk solid samples; 15 N and 13 C <strong>in</strong> TOC<br />
and TN from liquid samples; 15 N, 13 C and 18 O <strong>in</strong> CO2, CH4, N2O and N2; 15 N, 13 C, 18 O<br />
and D <strong>in</strong> specific compounds that can be separated through; and f<strong>in</strong>ally 13C <strong>in</strong> specific<br />
compounds that can be separated via HPLC.<br />
93
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
SELECTED REFERENCES<br />
[1] P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput. "Methane oxidation <strong>in</strong> a neutral landfill cover soil: <strong>in</strong>fluence of<br />
temperature, moisture content and N-turnover", Journal of Environmental Quality 25: 178-183, (1996).<br />
[2] P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput. "Methane emission from a freshwater wetland <strong>in</strong> Belgium", Soil Science<br />
Society of America Journal 61: 1250-1256, (1997).<br />
[3] Goossens, A. De Visscher, P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput. "Two-year field study on the emission of<br />
N2O from coarse and middle-textured Belgian soils with different land use", Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
Agroecosystems 60: 23-34, (2001).<br />
[4] L. Kravchenko, P. Boeckx, V. Galchenko, O. Van Cleemput. "Short-term and long-term effects of<br />
NH4 + on CH4 and N2O fluxes <strong>in</strong> arable soils", Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34: 669-678, (2002).<br />
[5] H. Vervaet, P. Boeckx, V. Unamuno, O. Van Cleemput, G. Hofman. "Can δ 15 N profiles <strong>in</strong> forest soils<br />
predict NO3 - loss and net N m<strong>in</strong>eralization rates ?", Biology and Fertility of Soils 36: 143-150, (2002).<br />
[6] F. Accoe, P. Boeckx, O.Van Cleemput, G. Hofman, H. Xu, B. Huang, G. Chen. "Characterization of<br />
soil organic matter fractions from grassland and cultivated soils via C content and δ 13 C signature", Rapid<br />
Communications <strong>in</strong> Mass Spectrometry 16: 2157-2164, (2002).<br />
[7] X. Xu, P. Boeckx, L. Zhou, O.Van Cleemput. "Inhibition experiments on nitrous oxide emission from<br />
paddy soils", Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16 (3), DOI. 10.1029/2001GB001397, (2002).<br />
[8] D. Seghers, E.M. Top, D. Reheul, R. Bulcke, P. Boeckx, W. Verstraete, S.D. Siciliano. "Long-term<br />
effects of m<strong>in</strong>eral versus organic fertilizers on activity and structure of the methanotrophic community <strong>in</strong><br />
agricultural soils", Environmental Microbiology 5: 867-877, (2003).<br />
[9] K. Dhondt, P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput, G. Hofman. "Quantify<strong>in</strong>g nitrate retention processes <strong>in</strong> a<br />
riparian buffer zone us<strong>in</strong>g the natural abundance of 15 N <strong>in</strong> NO3 - ", Rapid Communications <strong>in</strong> Mass<br />
Spectrometry 17: 2597-2604, (2003).<br />
[10] F. Accoe, P. Boeckx, J. Busschaert, G. Hofman, O. Van Cleemput. "Gross N transformation rates and<br />
net N m<strong>in</strong>eralisation rates related to C and N content of soil organic matter fractions <strong>in</strong> grassland soils of<br />
different age", Soil Biology & Biochemistry 36: 2075-2087, (2004).<br />
[11] H. Vervaet, P. Boeckx, A.M.C. Boko, O. Van Cleemput, G. Hofman. "Gross and net N transformation<br />
processes <strong>in</strong> a temperate forest soil: the role of NH4 + and NO3 - immobilization", Plant and Soil 264: 349-<br />
357, (2004).<br />
[12] S. De Smet, A. Balcaen, E. Claeys, P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput. "Stable carbon isotope analysis of<br />
different tissues of beef animals <strong>in</strong> relation to their diet". Rapid Communications <strong>in</strong> Mass Spectrometry<br />
18:1227-1232, (2004).<br />
[13] P. Boeckx, L. Paul<strong>in</strong>o, C. Oyarzún, O. Van Cleemput, R. Godoy. "Soil δ 15 N patterns <strong>in</strong> old-growth<br />
forests of southern Chile as <strong>in</strong>tegrator for N cycl<strong>in</strong>g Isotopes", <strong>in</strong> Environmental and Health Studies 41:<br />
249-259, (2005).<br />
[14] D. Huygens, P. Boeckx, R. Godoy, C. Oyarzún, O. Van Cleemput. "Aggregate and soil organic carbon<br />
dynamics <strong>in</strong> south Chilean Andisols", Biogeosciences 2: 159-174, (2005).<br />
[15] K. Dhondt, P. Boeckx, N. Verhoest, O. Hofman, O. Van Cleemput. "Assessment of temporal and<br />
spatial efficiency of three adjacent vegetated riparian buffer zones for groundwater nitrate retention".<br />
Environmental Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Assessment 116: 197-215, (2005)<br />
[16] Y. Kewei, R.D. DeLaune, P. Boeckx. "Direct measurement of denitrification activity <strong>in</strong> a Gulf coast<br />
freshwater marsh receiv<strong>in</strong>g diverted Mississippi water". Chemosphere (accepted), (2006).<br />
94
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
ENHANCING THE AGRONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS OF<br />
NATURAL PHOSPHATE ROCK WITH POULTRY MANURE:<br />
A WAY FORWARD TO SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION<br />
S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang 1 *, M.K. Abekoe 2 , O.O. Oladeji 1 , S.K.A. Danso 2<br />
1 Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Ga<strong>in</strong>esville, FL 32611, USA; 2 Department of<br />
Soil Science, University of Ghana, P. O. Box 125, Legon, Accra, Ghana<br />
* Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author (E-mail: agy<strong>in</strong>@ufl.edu Tel.: 1-352-392-1804 ext. 328)<br />
Abstract<br />
Phosphorus is one of the ma<strong>in</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g nutrients for agricultural production <strong>in</strong> highly weathered soils<br />
worldwide. Addition of P <strong>in</strong>puts is thus required for susta<strong>in</strong>able crop production. However, high cost and<br />
limited access to m<strong>in</strong>eral P fertilizers limit their use by resource-poor farmers <strong>in</strong> West Africa. Direct<br />
application of f<strong>in</strong>ely ground phosphate rock is a promis<strong>in</strong>g alternative but its low solubility hampers its use.<br />
There is therefore the need to look <strong>in</strong>to low cost means of improv<strong>in</strong>g the solubility of natural phosphate<br />
rock to improve their agronomic effectiveness. The objective of this study was to quantitatively estimate<br />
the enhancement effect of poultry manure on P availability applied from low reactive phosphate rock (Togo<br />
phosphate rock) to maize grown on highly weathered soils. We utilized two highly weathered soils from<br />
Ghana and Brazil for this study. In a greenhouse experiment, us<strong>in</strong>g 32 P isotopic tracers, the agronomic<br />
effectiveness of poultry-manure-amended Togo rock phosphate (PR) was compared with partially<br />
acidulated Togo rock phosphate (PAPR) and triple super phosphate (TSP). Four rates of poultry manure: 0,<br />
low (30 mg P kg -1 ), high (60 mg P kg -1 ) and very high (120 mg P kg -1 ) were respectively added to a<br />
constant amendment (60 mg P kg -1 ) of the P sources and applied to each pot of 4 kg soil. A Randomized<br />
Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used for the experiment <strong>in</strong> a greenhouse sett<strong>in</strong>g and Maize (Zea<br />
mays) was used as a test crop. The plants were allowed to grow for 42 days after which the above ground<br />
portion was harvested for analysis. Without poultry manure addition, the agronomic effectiveness,<br />
represented by the relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) and proportion of P derived from fertilizer (%<br />
Pdff) was <strong>in</strong> the order TSP > PAPR > PR = control (P0). In the presence of low rate poultry manure<br />
addition, the agronomic effectiveness followed the order TSP > PAPR = PR > P0. However, at the high and<br />
very high rates of poultry manure addition, no significant differences <strong>in</strong> agronomic effectiveness were<br />
observed among the P sources, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that at this rate of poultry manure addition, PR was equally as<br />
effective as TSP. The study showed that direct application of PR will be a viable option for P replenishment<br />
when comb<strong>in</strong>ed with poultry manure at a 1:1 P ratio. Thus a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of PR and poultry manure can be<br />
a cost-effective means of ensur<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural production <strong>in</strong> P-deficient, highly weathered<br />
tropical soils.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Highly weathered tropical soils are often very <strong>in</strong>fertile and exhibit high acidity, which are<br />
severe constra<strong>in</strong>ts for optimum plant growth and crop yields. A very low P status is the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g factor for susta<strong>in</strong>able crop production, which is exacerbated through the so<br />
called ‘‘soil m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g’’, i.e. cont<strong>in</strong>uous cultivation without addition of P <strong>in</strong>puts [13]. A<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able management of these soils to <strong>in</strong>crease and susta<strong>in</strong> crop yields requires a<br />
proper land use such as long fallows and/or <strong>in</strong>tegrated management of organic and<br />
<strong>in</strong>organic <strong>in</strong>puts [13]. Options for P <strong>in</strong>puts are organic materials and water-soluble<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral P fertilizers like triple superphosphate and diammonium phosphate.<br />
95
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Unfortunately, the use of water-soluble m<strong>in</strong>eral (nearly all imported) P fertilizers by the<br />
resource-poor farmers <strong>in</strong> West Africa is limited by their relatively high cost, and supplies<br />
often unavailable, when needed. Their use has become even more limited due to the<br />
withdrawal of subsidies on agricultural imports by most governments of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ghana. This situation has created a need to consider other alternative<br />
P sources for susta<strong>in</strong>able crop production especially <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries.<br />
Direct application of f<strong>in</strong>ely ground phosphate rock (PR), which is locally available<br />
or imported from neighbour<strong>in</strong>g countries has been suggested as an alternative to the use<br />
of more expensive imported water-soluble P fertilizers for some crops grown <strong>in</strong> tropical<br />
acid soils [10a]. In recent years attention has been focused on the direct use of PRs <strong>in</strong><br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, and a number of trials have been conducted under greenhouse and<br />
field sett<strong>in</strong>gs [1,2,10a,10b,20,21, 29, 30,31]. The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the use of PR is due to<br />
its relatively low cost compared to the processed water-soluble fertilizers, and to its effect<br />
both <strong>in</strong> supply<strong>in</strong>g P and lim<strong>in</strong>g soils <strong>in</strong> the long-term [10a,15]. Utilization of local PR<br />
deposits m<strong>in</strong>imizes importation costs and hence saves on foreign exchange. In addition,<br />
other elements <strong>in</strong> PR, such as Ca, can improve the soil chemical and physical<br />
characteristics and contribute to plant nutrition [10a]. These advantages notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
the low solubility of PRs has discouraged its recommendation for direct use as a source<br />
of P for crops. Most of the P dissolved from PR undergoes immediate adsorption and<br />
immobilization reactions, whereas only a fraction (30–50% of dissolved P from PR)<br />
becomes available for plant uptake [8,21].<br />
A method to improve the effectiveness of PR such as partial acid treatment with<br />
H2SO4 or H3PO4 has been suggested. Chien and Menon [10a] reported that partially<br />
acidified phosphate rocks can be as effective as superphosphate for certa<strong>in</strong> crops and<br />
soils. Although partially acidified phosphate rocks are considerably cheaper than the<br />
imported water-soluble P fertilizer, the cost is still beyond the reach of the resource-poor<br />
small-holder farmers of the develop<strong>in</strong>g world. Another method that has been suggested is<br />
the compaction of PR with water-soluble P fertilizers [11,20,29]. Aga<strong>in</strong>, this process is<br />
slightly expensive to the resource-poor small-holder farmers. One of the cost effective<br />
options to <strong>in</strong>crease PR solubility that has not been fully exploited is to comb<strong>in</strong>e it with<br />
on-farm organic materials such as farmyard manure (FYM) and crop residues, which<br />
farmers, particularly resource-poor smallholders, can access easily. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
hypothetical PR dissolution reaction, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the release of H2PO4 - and Ca 2+<br />
[Ca10(PO4)6F2 + 12H + ⇔ 10Ca 2+ + 6H2PO4 - + 2F - ],<br />
the dissolution of PR can be <strong>in</strong>creased by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the supply of protons (H + ) or by the<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous removal of the dissolved Ca and P from the dissolution zone [5]. Both of<br />
these expected processes have been shown to <strong>in</strong>crease the dissolution of PR when acidic<br />
soil is amended with organic materials [5,18,21, 23,30]. With this amendment, protons<br />
are supplied by organic acids produced dur<strong>in</strong>g compost<strong>in</strong>g and by the oxidation of<br />
ammonium to nitrate <strong>in</strong> the organic material. Thus depend<strong>in</strong>g on the amount and quality<br />
of the material used, it can <strong>in</strong>fluence P availability by stimulat<strong>in</strong>g microbial activity that<br />
can, <strong>in</strong> turn, <strong>in</strong>crease m<strong>in</strong>eralization of soil organic P, produce organic acids that may<br />
help to acidify and dissolve PR, and reduce P sorption [18]. Although organic<br />
amendments cannot usually provide sufficient P for optimum crop productivity because<br />
96
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
of its low P content, it can <strong>in</strong>crease P availability <strong>in</strong> high P-fix<strong>in</strong>g soils [18]. Increases <strong>in</strong><br />
P availability are usually attributed firstly to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> net negative charges on soil<br />
colloids that reduce adsorption of applied P, and secondly to organic anions formed by<br />
decompos<strong>in</strong>g organic manure that can compete with P for the same adsorption sites <strong>in</strong> the<br />
soil [18].<br />
In addition to provid<strong>in</strong>g all the enumerated benefits with regard to organic matter <strong>in</strong><br />
enhanc<strong>in</strong>g P phytoavailability from PR, poultry manure, generally, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g high P<br />
content, which can supply the early P requirement of the crop. By so do<strong>in</strong>g, the plant<br />
would have better root development to deplete P and Ca <strong>in</strong> the dissolution zones of the<br />
PR, and thus enhance further dissolution of the PR. However, quantitative estimation of P<br />
availability from PR <strong>in</strong> soil as enhanced by poultry manure has not been reported.<br />
Because of possible <strong>in</strong>teractions (prim<strong>in</strong>g effect) among poultry manure, PR, and soil P,<br />
use of radioactive 32 P as a tracer is essential to dist<strong>in</strong>guish P availability from soil P, PR,<br />
or poultry manure. The objective of this study was to use 32 P as a tracer to estimate<br />
quantitatively the enhancement effect of poultry manure on P availability applied from a<br />
low-reactivity PR to maize grown on highly weathered tropical soils.<br />
Site and soil description<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Two highly weathered soil types (from Ghana and Brazil) were collected and utilized for<br />
the study. The soil from Ghana was a well-dra<strong>in</strong>ed savanna ochrosol (Ferric Acrisol,<br />
[14]), obta<strong>in</strong>ed from an uncultivated field at the University of Ghana Farm, Legon, near<br />
Accra. The soil was derived from quartzite schist. The sampl<strong>in</strong>g area receives an annual<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall of between 635-1145 mm. The vegetation is ma<strong>in</strong>ly grassland with clusters of<br />
shrubs and grasses which <strong>in</strong>clude Panicum maximum, Andropogon gayallus, Sporobolus<br />
pyramidalis and Cynodon plectoatachus. The soil from Brazil was a clay-textured, typic<br />
Haplustox [27], with natural vegetation. The soil was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Planalt<strong>in</strong>a de Goiás,<br />
State of Goiás, Brazil, an area with<strong>in</strong> the Brazilian central "Cerrado" (15 o 14' S, 47 o 42'<br />
W, altitude 826 m). The soils were collected at the 0-20 cm layer, air-dried, homogenized<br />
and sieved through a 4 mm screen for pot experiments, and 2 mm screen for laboratory<br />
analysis.<br />
Laboratory analysis<br />
Selected physicochemical properties of the soils used are given <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Particle size<br />
distribution analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g the modified Bouyoucos method as described<br />
by Day [12]. Soil pH was measured <strong>in</strong> 1:2 soil: 0.01M CaCl2. Organic carbon was<br />
analysed follow<strong>in</strong>g the Walkley and Black oxidation procedure [4]. Total N was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the Kjeldahl method. Exchangeable basic cations were determ<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
ammonium acetate leachates while exchangeable Al and H were determ<strong>in</strong>ed from KCl<br />
leachates as described by Thomas [28]. The effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC)<br />
was calculated by summ<strong>in</strong>g the above exchangeable cations. Extractable P was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the Bray-1 method and total P content of the soil by digestion with<br />
97
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
concentrated sulphuric acid and hydrogen peroxide [9]. In all cases P concentration was<br />
measured on neutralized extracts by colour development performed by the ammonium<br />
molybdate-ascorbic acid blue method [24].<br />
Selected chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of the PR used are given <strong>in</strong> Table 2.<br />
Total P was determ<strong>in</strong>ed as described <strong>in</strong> AOAC [6]. The fluoride content was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by means of the F - selective electrode as described by Evans et al. [13]. The PR<br />
dissolution <strong>in</strong> neutral ammonium citrate (NAC) and water was carried out as described <strong>in</strong><br />
AOAC (1990) measur<strong>in</strong>g dissolved phosphate by means of the molybdenum blue method<br />
[24]. Calcium carbonate equivalent and pH were determ<strong>in</strong>ed as described <strong>in</strong> ISRIC [17].<br />
The m<strong>in</strong>eral composition of the PR was assessed by X-ray diffraction analysis us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
unoriented mounts and Co-Ka radiation on a Siemens D500 diffractometer equipped with<br />
a graphite crystal monochromator. The CO2-<strong>in</strong>dex, i.e. the ratio of <strong>in</strong>tensities of the C–O<br />
and P–O absorptions, was determ<strong>in</strong>ed from Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the KBr pellet method (0.35 mg PR and 300 mg KBr compressed at 150 MPa <strong>in</strong> an<br />
evacuated die) and a Perk<strong>in</strong>-Elmer FT-IR2000 <strong>in</strong>strument. Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy<br />
(SEM) us<strong>in</strong>g a microprobe technique with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) was used to<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation about arrangement, composition, size, shape and texture of m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />
constituents.<br />
Greenhouse experiment<br />
Soil amendments used<br />
Well decomposed poultry manure was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from University of Ghana Agricultural<br />
Research Station, Nungua, near Accra. It was air-dried and crushed to pass through a 2mm<br />
sieve. The nutrient concentration <strong>in</strong> the poultry manure was as follows: P, 0.59% N,<br />
2.3%; and Ca, 3.1 %. The P sources utilized for the study <strong>in</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>ely ground form (100<br />
mesh) were: Togo phosphate rock (PR), triple superphosphate (TSP) and partially<br />
acidified Togo phosphate rock (PAPR). The PR was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Hahotoe (Togo) and<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>ed 16 % total P with 1.3 % of neutral ammonium citrate-soluble P [2]. The total P<br />
content of the P sources was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by dissolv<strong>in</strong>g each of them <strong>in</strong> concentrated HCl<br />
on a hot sandbath at 80°C and then determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the concentration colorimetrically on<br />
Philips PU 8620 spectrophotometer. The total P contents were: 11.87% for PAPR and<br />
19.4 % for TSP.<br />
Design of the experiment<br />
Sixty (60) mg P kg -1 of the three <strong>in</strong>organic P sources, together with a control [no P<br />
addition (P0)], were utilized for the study. Four application rates of poultry manure were<br />
utilized as follows: no poultry manure (M0), poultry manure to supply 30 mg P (M30), 60<br />
mg P (M60) and 120 mg P (M120) kg -1 of soil calculated on the basis of the total P content<br />
of the poultry manure. Each of the 16 P source x poultry manure application rate<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation was randomly assigned to a pot conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 4 kg of the 2 soil types<br />
respectively. Thus a 3-way mixed factorial experiment with two fixed factors (P source<br />
and Poultry manure rate) and one random factor (soil type) were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to yield a total<br />
of 32 treatments. The pots were arranged n a randomized complete block design (RCBD)<br />
98
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
<strong>in</strong> a greenhouse sett<strong>in</strong>g with 3 replicates for each treatment. The isotopic dilution<br />
technique [32] was then used for the study.<br />
An aliquot conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1850 kBq 32 P pot -1 was added to obta<strong>in</strong> sufficient activity <strong>in</strong><br />
the plant material. To prepare the 32 P-labelled carrier solution, the total activity required<br />
for the experiments was added as 32 P carrier-free to a known volume of KH2PO4 carrier<br />
solution with 10 ppm P. Labell<strong>in</strong>g was done by mix<strong>in</strong>g the soil thoroughly with 10 ml of<br />
the solution conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 32 P phosphate ions. The soils were allowed to equilibrate for 1<br />
week before add<strong>in</strong>g the unlabelled P fertilizers uniformly to the soil. A control [without P<br />
fertilizer and poultry manure addition (P0M0)], where only the 32 P carrier solution was<br />
added was <strong>in</strong>cluded as reference for the isotopic method.<br />
Five maize (Zea mays var. Toxip<strong>in</strong>o) seeds were sown <strong>in</strong> each pot and th<strong>in</strong>ned to<br />
two after emergence. Pots were watered to 70% of the water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the soil.<br />
Nitrogen, K, Ca, Mg and micronutrients were supplied as P-free Hoagland solution to<br />
each pot at every 2-weeks <strong>in</strong>terval. The maize plants were allowed to grow for 42 days<br />
after which the above-ground plant material of each pot was cut <strong>in</strong>to small pieces and the<br />
shoot dry matter yield was recorded after oven dry<strong>in</strong>g at 70 o C to a constant mass. The<br />
plant samples were burned at 450 o C for 5 h <strong>in</strong> a muffle furnace and the ashes were<br />
dissolved <strong>in</strong> 20 ml of 2 M HCl and filtered. Total P content of the filtered solution was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed colorimetrically us<strong>in</strong>g the Murphy and Riley [24] method. The 32 P activity <strong>in</strong><br />
the filtered solution was measured by liquid sc<strong>in</strong>tillation (Beckman LS 5801) count<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
the 32 P, by the Cerenkov Effect. Counts were corrected for isotope decay and count<strong>in</strong>g<br />
efficiency (50%), and expressed <strong>in</strong> Bq. The specific activity (S.A.) of P was then<br />
calculated by consider<strong>in</strong>g the radioactivity per amount of total P content <strong>in</strong> the plant and<br />
expressed <strong>in</strong> Bq mg -1 P [32]. The percentage of plant P derived from the labeled source,<br />
and that derived from the soil alone, were calculated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the 32 P isotopic dilution<br />
method [32]. Similarly, the proportion (%) and amount (mg P pot -1 ) of P <strong>in</strong> the plants<br />
derived from the various P sources, with and without poultry manure treatments was<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed directly or <strong>in</strong>directly us<strong>in</strong>g isotope dilution concepts [32]. Total P uptake from<br />
the <strong>in</strong>dividual P sources alone, and <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with poultry manure was calculated<br />
based on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples followed <strong>in</strong> Chien et al. [11]. The <strong>in</strong>dices of relative agronomic<br />
effectiveness (RAE) were estimated based on the shoot dry weight (DMY), and total P<br />
uptake (Chien et al., 1996) as follows:.<br />
RAE (%) = [(Y1 – Y0) / (Y2 – Y0)] * 100<br />
where<br />
Y1 = yield or P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the P source or its comb<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />
Y2 = yield or P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed from TSP source or its comb<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />
Y0 = yield or P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the control<br />
Statistical analyses<br />
Differences among treatments were statistically analyzed as a factorial experiment with a<br />
randomized complete block design (RCBD), us<strong>in</strong>g the PROC GLM procedure of general<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ear model (GLM) of the SAS software [26]. The means of the various treatments were<br />
separated us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle degree of freedom orthogonal contrast procedure. The<br />
99
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
relationship between P uptake and rate of poultry manure applied for the P sources was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g a logarithmic function as follows:<br />
ln Yi = βo + βi ln χ + εi<br />
where<br />
Yi was the P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed with P source i,<br />
χ was the rate of poultry manure applied,<br />
βi was the slope of the response function of P source i,<br />
βo was the <strong>in</strong>tercept, and<br />
εi was the random error of the fitted model.<br />
The ratio of any two of the regression coefficients (βi), that describes a Relative Crop<br />
Response Index (RCRI) [11,25] was estimated as follows: RCRI = βi/βTSP where βi is the<br />
regression estimate of the tested P source (PR or PAPR) and βTSP is the regression<br />
estimate of the standard fertilizer used (TSP). This ratio represents the marg<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
<strong>in</strong> P uptake, <strong>in</strong> proportion of a P source compared with a standard source, when a unit of<br />
poultry manure is applied.<br />
Properties of the soils<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />
The soil obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Ghana was a sandy clay loam soil and slightly acid <strong>in</strong> reaction<br />
(Table 1). The clay (27.5 %) and sand (51 %) contents were similar to those obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
Acquaye and Oteng [3] for some savanna Ochrosols <strong>in</strong> Ghana. It was characterized by<br />
low organic matter, total nitrogen, available P and exchangeable basic cations. The low<br />
nutrient content of the soil may be due to little nutrient element cycl<strong>in</strong>g through plants <strong>in</strong><br />
soils of the savanna zone.<br />
The soil obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Brazil on the other hand was a clay soil and acid <strong>in</strong><br />
reaction with comparatively high organic matter content (Table 1). Consistent with highly<br />
weathered soils, the soil had very low exchangeable basic cations and low nutrient (N and<br />
P) content.<br />
100
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Ghana Brazil<br />
Soil properties<br />
soil soil<br />
Sand (g kg -1 ) 510 296<br />
Silt (g kg -1 ) 215 324<br />
Clay (g kg -1 ) 275 390<br />
pH 6.1 4.2<br />
Organic carbon (g kg -1 ) 10.6 22.6<br />
Total Nitrogen (%) 0.10 0.32<br />
Total P (mg kg -1 ) 91 103<br />
Bray P-1 (mg kg -1 )<br />
Exchangeable basic cations (cmol (+) kg<br />
7.49 6.98<br />
-1 )<br />
Ca 2.27 1.49<br />
Mg 1.05 1.05<br />
K 0.85 0.16<br />
Na 0.34 0.10<br />
Exchangeable acidity (cmol (+) kg -1 ) 1.45 6.58<br />
Table 1: Some physical and chemical properties of the soils used<br />
Characteristics of the Phosphate Rock<br />
101<br />
pHH2O 7.4<br />
Total P (%) 16.1<br />
Ca (%) 33.2<br />
F (%) 1.6<br />
Ca:P-ratio 2.1<br />
F:P-ratio 0.16<br />
CaCO3 (%) 5.4<br />
Si (%) 5.2<br />
NAC-P † (%) 1.3<br />
WS-P ‡ (%) 0.02<br />
a-cell (nm) 0.938<br />
c-cell (nm) 0.692<br />
Crystal size (nm) 400<br />
CO2-<strong>in</strong>dex 0.29<br />
Table 2: Selected chemical and<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogical the phosphate rock used<br />
† Neutral ammonium citrate-soluble phosphate.<br />
‡ Water-soluble phosphate.<br />
Chemical, m<strong>in</strong>eralogical and reactivity characteristics of the PR used are shown <strong>in</strong> Table<br />
2. The data suggests that PR is a carbonate substituted fluor<strong>in</strong>e deficient francolite. The<br />
low CO2-<strong>in</strong>dex correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a low degree of carbonate substitution is consistent with<br />
the a-cell values, which <strong>in</strong>dicate very low carbonate substitution. Moreover, the high acell<br />
values <strong>in</strong>dicate very low reactivity, which is consistent with the measured low<br />
Neutral ammonium citrate (NAC) solubility. The large crystal size of the PR is also<br />
noteworthy <strong>in</strong> relation to reactivity [10b]. The low reactivity of Togo PR, and hence its<br />
unsuitability for direct application as P fertilizer, has been confirmed <strong>in</strong> numerous<br />
laboratory and greenhouse studies [1,2,21,25].<br />
Effects of the P sources<br />
Despite the variation among the soils used <strong>in</strong> terms of differences <strong>in</strong> texture, pH, organic<br />
carbon content, etc; the effect of poultry manure on PR availability followed similar<br />
trends. Therefore only the data obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the soil of the Savanna zone of Ghana<br />
(Ferric Acrisol) are presented here. This soil was selected for explanation purposes<br />
because it showed the clearest trends.<br />
The shoot dry matter yield (DMY), total P uptake, P derived from the applied P<br />
source (Pdff), obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the applied P sources, without poultry manure addition are<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> Table 3. The relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) values calculated,<br />
based on DMY and total P-uptake from the applied P sources are also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Table<br />
3. Without P addition (P0), DMY and P uptake for the crop were low, consistent with the<br />
low bioavailable P content of the soil. Addition of TSP and PAPR significantly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
DMY and P uptake over the P0 and PR treatments. No significant difference was
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
observed between the PR and P0, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the PR did not release adequate P to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease yield over the P0. Similar results have been previously reported when PR was<br />
utilized <strong>in</strong> some acid to near-neutral soils of the <strong>in</strong>terior savanna and forest zones of<br />
Ghana [1,2,25].<br />
The Pdff, which is estimated by isotope dilution technique, was also used to<br />
evaluate P uptake from the applied P sources. This technique is reported to be the most<br />
sensitive method for P uptake assessment from applied P fertilizers [32]. Similar to the<br />
DMY and P uptake, the percentage Pdff of the P sources followed the order: TSP ><br />
PAPR > PR (Table 3). As expected, the RAE values calculated based on total P uptake<br />
also showed, clearly, highest effectiveness of TSP followed by PAPR. This <strong>in</strong>dex was<br />
found to be a good parameter to compare differences <strong>in</strong> effectiveness between P sources<br />
[11,25]. The RAE calculated based on DMY <strong>in</strong>dicated that PAPR was ~ 55 % as<br />
effective as the water soluble TSP <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g yield of the maize crop while PR was<br />
only ~ 9 % (Table 3). Thus, the untreated PR was far <strong>in</strong>ferior to the TSP and PAPR <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g dry matter yield and P uptake of the crop.<br />
Treatment DMY P uptake Pdff % RAE based on<br />
g pot -1 mg pot -1 % DMY P-uptake<br />
M0P0 3.1 ± 0.7 13.4 ± 2.4 0 0 0<br />
M0PR 3.7 ± 1.1 14.5 ± 2.7 4.3 8.8 5.7<br />
M0PAPR 7.0 ± 1.4 19.5 ± 2.0 35.3 54.6 31.6<br />
M0TSP 10.8 ± 1.8 32.7 ± 4.2 72.6 100 100<br />
M30P0 5.1 ± 0.4 27.6 ± 3.4 0 0 0<br />
M30PR 7.5 ± 1.6 38.7 ±4.6 38.9 40.1 38.7<br />
M30PAPR 7.9 ± 2.1 40.2 ± 5.7 53.2 46.8 43.9<br />
M30TSP 11.2 ± 2.4 56.3 ± 5.3 73.2 100 100<br />
M60P0 7.9 ± 1.3 34.9 ± 4.2 0 0 0<br />
M60PR 11.3 ± 1.8 70.5 ± 8.1 72.7 84.4 85.4<br />
M60PAPR 11.4 ± 2.1 72.7 ± 6.5 70.9 86.3 91.0<br />
M60TSP 12.1 ± 2.4 76.1 ± 7.2 74.4 100 100<br />
M120P0 8.1 ± 1.6 53.4 ± 6.2 0 0 0<br />
M120PR 11.6 ± 1.9 73.1 ± 5.7 74.1 80.4 64.6<br />
M120PAPR 11.7 ± 2.2 74.1 ± 8.2 73.8 83.7 67.9<br />
M120TSP 12.2 ± 2.1 83.9 ± 7.6 75.6 100 100<br />
Table 3: Dry matter yield, P uptake, Pdff and RAE of the maize plant fertilized with the P<br />
sources, with and without manure addition. Values are average of three samples ± one standard<br />
deviation<br />
Effect of poultry manure addition<br />
Mix<strong>in</strong>g the various P sources with poultry manure significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the DMY, P<br />
uptake and Pdff (Table 3) over those applied without poultry manure addition (M0)<br />
(Table 3). In the presence of low rate (M30 = 30 mg P kg -1 ) poultry manure addition, the<br />
DMY of the maize shoot of the PR treated plots <strong>in</strong>creased from 3.8 to 7.5 mg pot -1 , while<br />
the total P uptake <strong>in</strong>creased from 14.5 to 38 mg pot -1 . The percent P derived from the PR<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased by nearly 10-fold (Table 3). Thus <strong>in</strong> the presence of M30, RAE calculated from<br />
102
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
both DMY and P-uptake followed the order TSP > PAPR = PR > P0 (Table 3). At the<br />
high (M60 = 60 mg P kg -1 ) and the very high (M120 = 120 mg P kg -1 ) rates of poultry<br />
manure <strong>in</strong>corporation, about 4-fold <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> DMY of the maize shoot over those of the<br />
PR treatment without poultry manure addition was observed (Table 3). Nearly 5-fold<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> total P uptake over the PR plots without manure addition was also observed.<br />
At these rates of manure application (M60 and M120), no significant differences <strong>in</strong><br />
agronomic effectiveness were observed among the P sources, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that at this rate<br />
of poultry manure addition, PR was equally as effective as TSP (Table 3). The PR mixed<br />
with poultry manure at a ratio of 1:1 <strong>in</strong>creased the Pdff of the maize shoot from ~ 4 to ~<br />
73 % and DMY also <strong>in</strong>creased from ~ 4 to 11.3 g, and gave RAE (calculated from P<br />
uptake) of ~ 84 %, which was similar to that of PAPR-poultry manure treatment and<br />
significantly greater than the PAPR treatment that received no poultry manure<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporation (Table 3). The high Pdff obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the PR-poultry manure mixture<br />
suggested an <strong>in</strong>creased release of P from an otherwise unreactive PR. The DMY and P<br />
uptake by the maize shoot <strong>in</strong> the PR-poultry manure treatment were significantly greater<br />
than those obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the poultry manure applied alone (Table 3). This suggested that P<br />
availability from the PR-poultry manure to the maize crop was derived from the two<br />
materials. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
between the PR and poultry manure.<br />
The calculated values of P uptake us<strong>in</strong>g the isotopic dilution pr<strong>in</strong>ciples [11],<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1, were used to derive the regression coefficients (β) needed to calculate<br />
the relative crop response <strong>in</strong>dex (RCRI) for the various P sources. The estimated<br />
regression coefficients and RCRI for P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the various P sources are<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4. The RCRI represents the marg<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake <strong>in</strong><br />
proportion of a source compared with a standard source (TSP), when a unit of poultry<br />
manure is applied.<br />
Source β1 RCRI (%)<br />
TSP 0.12 100<br />
PAPR 0.21 175<br />
PR 0.37 308<br />
Table 4: Calculated values of the semi-log regression coefficient (β1) and the relative crop<br />
response <strong>in</strong>dex (RCRI) of the P sources as a function of manure addition.<br />
The RCRI vales <strong>in</strong>dicated that the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake as enhanced by poultry manure<br />
was ~ 3 times that of TSP and ~ 2 times that of PAPR (Table 4). The enhanc<strong>in</strong>g effect of<br />
poultry manure on P availability was thus greatest on the PR and that the effect decreased<br />
with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g water-soluble P contents of the P sources. In the case of the TSP and<br />
PAPR, the lower <strong>in</strong>fluence of the poultry manure than the PR-poultry mixture may be<br />
due to the high water soluble P content (50% and 80% respectively for PAPR and TSP),<br />
which, possibly, already had prim<strong>in</strong>g effect of supply<strong>in</strong>g P for early development and<br />
growth of the maize crop [7]. This is consistent with the results of Zaharah and Bah [31]<br />
who reported that green manure (organic matter) generally <strong>in</strong>creased the solubility of less<br />
reactive PRs and depressed that of the more reactive ones. The greater enhancement<br />
effect of the poultry manure on the PR than on the PAPR and TSP may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
two possible mechanisms. Firstly, the release of organic acids such as citric and oxalic<br />
103
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
acids dur<strong>in</strong>g hydrolytic decomposition of the poultry manure may effectively chelate<br />
Ca 2+ ion and lower its activity <strong>in</strong> the solution [15], or the organic acids so produced may<br />
solubilize the PR and render the P available to the maize plant. Secondly, the effect of the<br />
poultry manure may also be due to self-lim<strong>in</strong>g caused by m<strong>in</strong>eralization and subsequent<br />
release of basic cations [23] and/or a release of OH - ions which may raise the pH of the<br />
soil-poultry manure system and facilitate the release of P [18].<br />
To test which one of these processes was responsible for the <strong>in</strong>teraction, the soil<br />
was mixed with PR and poultry manure <strong>in</strong> a ratio of 1:1, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 60% water<br />
hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity and <strong>in</strong>cubated for 6 weeks. A control treatment <strong>in</strong> which the soil was<br />
mixed with PR but without poultry manure was also <strong>in</strong>cluded. At the end of the<br />
<strong>in</strong>cubation period, the pH of the <strong>in</strong>cubated samples was determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The pH dropped<br />
from 6.2 <strong>in</strong> the soil mixed with PR alone (control) to pH 5.1 <strong>in</strong> the soil-poultry manure<br />
mixture. A drop <strong>in</strong> pH suggested a release of organic acids which rules out the possibility<br />
of self-lim<strong>in</strong>g due to the presence of the poultry manure.<br />
We also hypothesized that P conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the poultry manure will supply the early P<br />
requirement of the crop, which will enhance root development of the crop to deplete P<br />
and Ca 2+ <strong>in</strong> the dissolution zone. Such reaction is expected to <strong>in</strong>crease P availability from<br />
the PR. The result of the study shows that poultry manure addition to the soil alone,<br />
enabled the crop to significantly <strong>in</strong>crease P uptake by the crop (Table 3). This<br />
observation supports the hypothesis that P availability from the manure also enhanced the<br />
efficiency of PR <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g P uptake.<br />
Differences between P uptake from the PR applied alone and P uptake from PR<br />
amended with different rates of poultry manure represented a quantitative estimation of<br />
the contribution of the poultry manure to the PR. In spite of the geometric <strong>in</strong>crease of the<br />
P rate of the poultry manure mixed with the PR, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g contribution to P<br />
availability from the PR was rather more of an exponential <strong>in</strong>crease. For example, the<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake from the PR due to the poultry manure was 56 mg pot -l for M60 and<br />
59 mg pot -1 for the MI20 treatment. Thus, doubl<strong>in</strong>g the P rate of the poultry manure mixed<br />
with PR did not result <strong>in</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g contribution to P uptake. This may be attributed<br />
to common Ca 2+ ion s<strong>in</strong>ce, both PR and poultry manure conta<strong>in</strong> some amounts of Ca<br />
which may <strong>in</strong>crease the Ca 2+ ion content <strong>in</strong> the soil solution and prevent dissolution of<br />
the rock phosphate [23]. It is therefore, uneconomical to mix very large amounts of the<br />
poultry manure, with the PR.<br />
The marg<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake (Fig. 2) was calculated as the derivative of the<br />
total P uptake with respect to P application rate of the poultry manure mixed with the PR.<br />
The maximum <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake was observed at M60 (1:1 PR manure ratio), after rate<br />
dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g returns <strong>in</strong> P uptake was observed. The result suggest that the most<br />
economical returns <strong>in</strong> terms of P-uptake and possibly DMY is achieved when unreactive<br />
Togo PR is mixed with poultry manure at 1:1 P ratio.<br />
104
P uptake (log mg pot -1 )<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
TSP: LN Y = 3.7 + 0.12 LN (X) R 2 = 1.0<br />
PAPR: LN Y = 3.2 + 0.21 LN (X) R 2 = 1.0<br />
PR: LN Y = 2.6 + 0.37 LN (X) R 2 = 0.99<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
Manure rate (log mg P kg -1 )<br />
TSP<br />
PAPR<br />
PR<br />
P0<br />
Figure 1: L<strong>in</strong>earized relationship between the manure<br />
application rates and P uptake from the P sources<br />
105<br />
Marg<strong>in</strong>al P uptake (kg soil pot -1 )<br />
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />
1.80<br />
1.60<br />
1.40<br />
1.20<br />
1.00<br />
0.80<br />
0.60<br />
0.40<br />
0.20<br />
0.00<br />
60<br />
0 50 100 150<br />
Manure rate (mg P kg -1 )<br />
Figure 2: Increase <strong>in</strong> P uptake from PR per unit<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> manure added<br />
The 32 P isotope dilution technique was an efficient tool to provide quantitative<br />
measurements of P uptake from the P sources studied for assess<strong>in</strong>g the enhancement<br />
effect of poultry manure on P availability from PR. Unreactive Togo PR was found to be<br />
an <strong>in</strong>effective P source for the 6-week-old maize plants grown on highly weathered acid<br />
to near-neutral soils. Addition of poultry manure to PR enhanced P uptake from the PR<br />
under the experimental conditions. Mix<strong>in</strong>g an unreactive Togo rock phosphate with<br />
poultry manure <strong>in</strong> a 1:1 P ratio and applied to some highly weathered acid to near-neutral<br />
soils was more efficient <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g DMY and P uptake of the maize shoot than us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
PAPR, and comparable to TSP (TSP = M60PR = M60PAPR > PAPR > PR). This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
is of relevance to local agriculture where a low <strong>in</strong>put technology such as mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
unreactive PR with poultry manure can <strong>in</strong>crease crop yield. The cost of mix<strong>in</strong>g poultry<br />
manure with Togo PR is likely to be far lower than partial acidification s<strong>in</strong>ce H3PO4 and<br />
H2SO4 needed for the process are imported and are extra cost to crop production. With<br />
the improvement of the poultry <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> most develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ghana,<br />
disposal of poultry manure will sooner than later become a major environmental issue.<br />
Thus the beneficial use of poultry manure to improve the P status of the cropland will<br />
solve the anticipated disposal problem as well.<br />
Further field trials under a variety of soil, climatic and agronomic management are<br />
needed to test further the hypothesis of the enhancement of P uptake <strong>in</strong> PR-manure<br />
mixture. Also, field-grown plant species may differ widely <strong>in</strong> their abilities to access<br />
poorly available soil phosphorus, thus plant species’ effect is worthy of <strong>in</strong>vestigation.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
This study was funded <strong>in</strong> part by the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Food and Agriculture, Ghana, through<br />
the National Agric. Research Programme (NARP). We wish to express appreciation to<br />
Profs. E. Owusu-Bennoah (CSIR, Ghana) and L.R.F. Alleoni (Univ. de Sao Paulo,<br />
Brazil) for their collaboration, and to Mr. Victor O. Edusei (Soil Sci. Dept., Univ. of<br />
Ghana), and Mr. Jeff Said (Agronomy Dept., Univ. of Florida) for their technical support.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] M.K. Abekoe, S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang “Greenhouse study on enhancement of availability of phosphorus<br />
from Togo rock phosphate us<strong>in</strong>g poultry manure”, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of Soil Science Society of Ghana, 16,<br />
pp.19-26, (1999).<br />
[2] M.K. Abekoe, H. Tiessen. “Fertilizer P transformations and P availability <strong>in</strong> hill slope soils of northern<br />
Ghana”, Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agroecosystems, 52, pp.45-54, (1998).<br />
[3] D.K. Acquaye, J.W. Oteng. “Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the status of phosphorus <strong>in</strong> surface soils of Ghana”,<br />
Ghana journal of Agricultural Science, 5, pp. 221-228, (1972).<br />
[4] L.E. Allison, W.B. Bollen, C.D. Moodie. “Total Carbon”, In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Black CA et al.<br />
(Eds), Agronomy Monograph 9, Madison, WI, Part 2, pp. 1346–1365, (1965).<br />
[5] G.A. Alloush. “Dissolution and effectiveness of phosphate rock <strong>in</strong> acidic soil amended with cattle<br />
manure”, Plant and Soil 251, pp. 37-46 (2003).<br />
[6] AOAC 1990. “Official Methods of Analysis”, 5th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,<br />
VI.<br />
[7] T. B<strong>in</strong>h, C. Fayard. “Small-scale fertilizer production units us<strong>in</strong>g raw and partially solubilized<br />
phosphate”, In: Use of phosphate rock for susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture <strong>in</strong> West Africa, H. Gerner and A.U.<br />
Mokwunye (Eds.), IFDC-Africa V series: Miscellaneous fertilizer studies No II, pp. 181-197, (1995).<br />
[8] N.S. Bolan, R.E. White, M.J. Hedley. “A review of the use of phosphate rocks as fertilizers for direct<br />
application <strong>in</strong> Australia and <strong>New</strong> Zealand”, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 30, pp. 297-<br />
313, (1990).<br />
[9] R.H Bray, L.T. Kurtz. “Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus <strong>in</strong> soils” Soil<br />
Science, 59, pp. 39-45, (1945).<br />
[10a] S.H. Chien, R.G. Menon. “Agronomic evaluation of modified phosphate rock products: IFDC’s<br />
experience”, Fertilizer Research 41, pp. 197- 209, (1995).<br />
[10b] S.H. Chien, R.G. Menon. “Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock for direct<br />
application”, Fertilizer Research 41, pp. 227-234, (1995).<br />
[11] S.H Chien, R.G. Menon, K.S. Bill<strong>in</strong>gham. “Estimation of phosphorus availability to maize and<br />
cowpea from phosphate rock as enhanced by water-soluble phosphorus”, Soil Science Society of America<br />
Journal, 60, pp. 1173-1177, (1996).<br />
[12] P.R. Day. “Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis”, In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Black CA et<br />
al. (Eds), ASA Monography, 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, Part 1, pp. 545–567 (1965).<br />
[13] L. Evans, R.G. Hoyle, J.B. Macaskill. “An accurate and rapid method of analysis of fluor<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />
phosphate rocks”, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Journal of Science, 13 pp. 143-48, (1970).<br />
[14] FAO FAO/UNESCO. “Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend”, World <strong>Resources</strong> Report 60. Rome:<br />
FAO, (1994).<br />
[15] L.L. Hammond, S.H. Chien, A.H. Roy, A.U. Mokwunye. “Agronomic value of unacidulated and<br />
partially acidulated phosphate rocks <strong>in</strong>digenous to the tropics”, Advances <strong>in</strong> Agronomy, 40, pp. 89–140,<br />
(1986).<br />
[16] IFDC. “African Fertilizer Market”, Special Issue on Soil Fertility, Vol. 12, no. 12. IFDC Africa, Lome,<br />
Togo, (1999).<br />
[17] ISRIC. “Procedures for Soil Analysis”, International Soil Reference and Information Centre,<br />
Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, (1995).<br />
106
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
[18] F. Iyamuremye, R.P Dick, J. Graham. “Organic amendments and phosphorus dynamics 1: Phosphorus<br />
chemistry and sorption”, Soil science, 161, pp. 426-453, (1996).<br />
[19] I.A.K. Kanabo, R.J. Gilkes. “The role of soil pH <strong>in</strong> the dissolution of phosphate rock fertilizers”,<br />
Fertilizer Research, 12, pp. 165-179, (1987).<br />
[20] K.A. Kpomblekou, M.A. Tabatabai. “Effect of organic acids on the release of phosphorus from<br />
phosphate rocks”, Soil Science, 158, pp. 442-453, (1994).<br />
[21] K.A. Kpomblekou, S.H. Chien, J. Henao, W.A. Hill. “Greenhouse evaluation of phosphate fertilisers<br />
produced from Togo phosphate rocks”, Communications <strong>in</strong> Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 22, pp. 63-73,<br />
(1991).<br />
[22] M.M Msolla, J.M.R. Semoka, O.K. Borggaard. “Hard M<strong>in</strong>j<strong>in</strong>gu phosphate rock: an alternative P<br />
source for maize production on acid soils <strong>in</strong> Tanzania”, Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agroecosystems, 72, pp. 299-<br />
308, (2005).<br />
[23] S. Mahimairaja, N.S Bolan, M.J. Hediey. “Dissolution of phosphate rock dur<strong>in</strong>g the compost<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
poultry manure: An <strong>in</strong>cubation experiment”, Fertilizer Research, 40, pp. 93-104, (1995).<br />
[24] J. Murphy, J.P. Riley. “A modified s<strong>in</strong>gle solution method for the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of phosphate <strong>in</strong><br />
natural waters”, Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, pp. 31-36, (1962).<br />
[25] E. Owusu-Bennoah, F. Zapata, J.C. Fardeau. “Comparison of greenhouse and P-32 isotopic laboratory<br />
methods for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the agronomic effectiveness of natural and modified rock phosphates <strong>in</strong> some acid<br />
soils of Ghana”, Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agroecosystems 63, pp. 1-12, (2002).<br />
[26] SAS Institute. SAS onl<strong>in</strong>e document Version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, (1999).<br />
[27] Soil Survey Staff. “Keys to Soil Taxonomy”, 8th Edition, United States Department of Agriculture,<br />
Soil Conservation Service, Pocahontas Press, Blacksburg, VI, (1999).<br />
[28] G.W. Thomas. “Exchangeable cations”, In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Page AL, Miller RH & Keeney<br />
SR (Eds), ASA Monography 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, Part 2, pp 159–166, (1982).<br />
[29] F.C.A. Villanueva, T. Muraoka, A.R. Trevizam, V.I. Franz<strong>in</strong>i, A.P. Rocha. “Improv<strong>in</strong>g phosphorus<br />
availability from Patos phosphate rock for Eucalyptus: A study with P-32 radiotracer”, Scientia Agricola<br />
63, pp. 65-69, (2006).<br />
[30] M.W. Waigwa, C.O. Othieno, J.R. Okalebo. “Phosphorus availability as affected by the application of<br />
phosphate rock comb<strong>in</strong>ed with organic materials to acid soils <strong>in</strong> western Kenya”, Experimental Agriculture,<br />
39, pp. 395-407, (2003).<br />
[31] A.R. Zaharah, A.R Bah. “Effect of green manures on P solubilization and P uptake from phosphate<br />
rock”, Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agroecosystems, 48, pp. 247-255 (1997).<br />
[32] F. Zapata, H. Axmann. “ 32 P isotopic techniques for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the agronomic effectiveness of rock<br />
phosphate materials”, Fertilizer Research, 41 pp. 189–195 (1995).<br />
107
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
THE EFFECT OF LIMING AN ACID NITISOL WITH EITHER<br />
CALCITE OR DOLOMITE ON TWO COMMON BEAN<br />
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) VARIETIES DIFFERING IN<br />
ALUMINIUM TOLERANCE<br />
E .N Mugai 1* , S.G Agong 1 and H. Matsumoto 2<br />
1 Horticulture Department, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O Box 62000<br />
Nairobi, Kenya, 3 Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, Chuo Kurashiki 710, Japan<br />
Email: nmugai@yahoo.com or njue@jkuat.ac.ke Tel.+254 -722-337605<br />
Abstract<br />
Two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties, Rosecoco (GLP 2) and French bean (cultivar ‘Amy’),<br />
previously shown to differ <strong>in</strong> Al tolerance were tested for their response to lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or<br />
dolomite <strong>in</strong> potted strongly acid, low fertility humic Nitisol. Dry matter yield, as a response to lim<strong>in</strong>g was<br />
highest at lim<strong>in</strong>g pH 5.6 for both varieties and lime types. However, French bean responded more to lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
than Rosecoco at 102% and 102% (calcite), 129 %and 102 % (dolomite) of control respectively. Higher<br />
calcite lim<strong>in</strong>g (pH 6.8) reduced growth and was attributed to Mg deficiency by competition dur<strong>in</strong>g uptake<br />
of Ca. Differential Al accumulation <strong>in</strong> the two varieties was higher <strong>in</strong> shoots of French bean but lower <strong>in</strong><br />
roots an <strong>in</strong>dication that one of the possible mechanisms of Rosecoco’s Al tolerance is conf<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Al to roots<br />
other than <strong>in</strong> shoots. However, Al uptake decreased <strong>in</strong> roots and shoots of both varieties with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
levels of lim<strong>in</strong>g. Ca <strong>in</strong> the shoots <strong>in</strong>creased with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g lim<strong>in</strong>g levels but was higher <strong>in</strong> calcite than <strong>in</strong><br />
dolomite treatments. Mg contents did not show any significant <strong>in</strong>creases with lim<strong>in</strong>g with calcite but<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased with dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g levels. Rosecoco was more efficient <strong>in</strong> the uptake of Ca and Mg than the<br />
French bean. Therefore, it is concluded that there exists a varietal difference <strong>in</strong> Phaseolus vulgaris response<br />
to soil acidity and associated hazards and is therefore possible to select and breed/<strong>in</strong>troduce Al tolerant<br />
cultivars for the acid soils of Kenya and that although both types of limes can be used to reduce the<br />
hazardous effect of acidity, dolomitic limes have an advantage <strong>in</strong> due to the additional Mg nutrition. It is<br />
therefore recommended that to achieve the highest crop yield on acid Nitisols, only dolomitic limes should<br />
be applied to a pH of around 5.6.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In Kenya, acid soils with a pH of 5.0 or less comprise some or all Nitisols, Acrisols,<br />
Ferralsols, Cambisols and Andisols [3, 16]. These soils are estimated to cover an area of<br />
about 5 million hectares [16]. They are located <strong>in</strong> the Highlands where the climate is<br />
suitable for the <strong>in</strong>tensive cultivation of many crops <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong> source of prote<strong>in</strong><br />
to majority of Kenyans, the common bean. Cont<strong>in</strong>uous cultivation and use of soil<br />
acidify<strong>in</strong>g fertilisers especially those conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ammonium has contributed to further<br />
acidification of these soils.<br />
Although the hazard of soil acidity is obvious, the small-scale farmers have not<br />
adapted the culture of ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g it through lim<strong>in</strong>g, nor is the <strong>in</strong>formation available<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g relevant soil properties and the lim<strong>in</strong>g requirements for a particular crop. In<br />
Kenya, two cheap types of lime are available - calcite (CaCO3) and dolomite<br />
108
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
(CaMg(CO3)2. There are no comparative studies yet done to test the efficacy of the two<br />
lime types <strong>in</strong> the management of specific acid soils of Kenya.<br />
The objectives of this research were to: (i) Characterise the acidity and related<br />
fertility properties of the acid humic Nitisol, (ii) Determ<strong>in</strong>e the optimum lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
requirement by either calcite or dolomite and (iii) Determ<strong>in</strong>e the differential effect of<br />
lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or dolomite on the growth and nutrition aspects of the common<br />
bean.<br />
Soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and analysis<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Soil (0-15cm) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from a humic Nitisol [3,14], <strong>in</strong> the tea-grow<strong>in</strong>g zone (altitude<br />
2150m, Agro-climatic zone I-6) of Gatundu division, Thika District, Kenya. The soil was<br />
air dried, sieved through 2 mm and mixed. A sub-sample of the soil was analysed for pH<br />
(1:2.5 soil/water; 1:2.5 soil/0.01 CaCl2 solution); extractable Al (1N KCl) [2]; available<br />
phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) [8]. P was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by the molybdate blue method and measured by spectrophotometry, K by flame<br />
photometry and Ca and Mg by the atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Organic<br />
carbon was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the wet oxidation method [7]. Cation exchange capacity was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed by ammonium acetate method [2] and effective cation exchange capacity<br />
(ECEC) by sum of cations (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Al) extracted by unbuffered 1N KCl.<br />
The summary results of the soil analysis are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The soil is<br />
strongly acidic. The Al content is high reach<strong>in</strong>g a saturation of about 50%. The high<br />
organic carbon is an <strong>in</strong>dication of a lower rate of humification due to high acidity of the<br />
soil and the cool climate of the area. The chemical soil fertility is low except for K.<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
unit<br />
(FAO)<br />
humic<br />
Nitisol<br />
pH<br />
water<br />
pH<br />
CaCl2<br />
CECac<br />
(cmole<br />
(+)/kg<br />
ECEC<br />
(cmole<br />
(+)/kg<br />
Organic<br />
Carbon %<br />
3.95 3.4 24.8 11.4 1.9 1.<br />
6<br />
Table 1: Selected soil properties of the test soil<br />
Neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g equivalence of limes<br />
109<br />
Available nutrients<br />
(cmole (+)/kg<br />
K Ca Mg P<br />
(ppm<br />
0.6<br />
7<br />
0.2<br />
5<br />
Extractable<br />
Al (cmole<br />
(+) /kg<br />
)<br />
11.0 5.11<br />
The neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g equivalence of both calcite and dolomite as calculated for pure calcium<br />
carbonate was assessed by the method of Jackson [2]. Briefly, 1g of the lime were reacted<br />
with 1N HCl. After dilution, to 100 ml and boil<strong>in</strong>g, the mixture was cooled and backtitrated<br />
with 1N NaOH us<strong>in</strong>g phenol-phthale<strong>in</strong> as <strong>in</strong>dicator and calcium carbonate<br />
equivalence calculated accord<strong>in</strong>gly. Calcite and dolomite were found to have a<br />
neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g equivalence values of 91.6 and 87 respectively.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Estimation of lim<strong>in</strong>g requirements and plant culture<br />
Lim<strong>in</strong>g materials were local merchants. Estimation of lim<strong>in</strong>g requirements was from a<br />
calibration curve of pH aga<strong>in</strong>st lime after <strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g wet soil (1: 2.5 soil: water) with the<br />
vary<strong>in</strong>g amounts of lim<strong>in</strong>g materials (calcite and dolomite) for seven days [1]. Lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
levels were 0, 6.0, 16.0 and 32 and 0, 6.0, 17, and 34 g/4 Kg soil of calcite and dolomite<br />
respectively, to atta<strong>in</strong> pH levels 3.95, 5.1, 5.6 and 6.8. The lim<strong>in</strong>g materials were<br />
thoroughly mixed with the soil before pott<strong>in</strong>g. 1.32 g of diammonium phosphate (DAP)<br />
fertiliser equivalent to 200Kg (DAP) per hectare was mixed with top 5cm potted soil<br />
before plant<strong>in</strong>g. Three uniform 2-leaf seedl<strong>in</strong>gs previously pre-germ<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> sterile sand<br />
were planted per pot. After a week of growth th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g was done to leave one seedl<strong>in</strong>g per<br />
pot. The lim<strong>in</strong>g treatments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the control were replicated three times and<br />
randomly placed on raised bench <strong>in</strong> greenhouse. Distilled water was used for basal<br />
irrigation. After one month the plants were harvested, washed off the soil with runn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
tap water and r<strong>in</strong>sed with distilled water. The plants were then dried for 24 hours at 80 0 C<br />
<strong>in</strong> a blow oven. The dry shoot and root were then weights were then weighed separately.<br />
0.5g of each was then ground <strong>in</strong> a plant mill and ashed <strong>in</strong> a furnace at 550 0 C. The ash<br />
was dissolved <strong>in</strong> 5 ml of 6N HCl, dehydrated, then dissolved aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2 ml of 6N HCl and<br />
diluted to 100ml. Total Al, Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots and were then analysed<br />
by same methods as for the soil.<br />
Plant growth versus lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
RESULTS<br />
Table 2 presents the shoot and root dry weights of the two bean varieties aga<strong>in</strong>st lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
type and levels. The shoot and root dry biomass of the two bean varieties was<br />
significantly improved under lim<strong>in</strong>g irrespective of the lime type. The highest growth <strong>in</strong><br />
both shoots and roots was atta<strong>in</strong>ed at pH 5.6 across the varieties. In the un-limed soil the<br />
French bean variety exhibited a significant suppression of growth as compared with<br />
Rosecoco. Lim<strong>in</strong>g with calcite produced significantly less growth compared to that of<br />
dolomite across the two varieties and at the various levels of lim<strong>in</strong>g. In both types of<br />
lim<strong>in</strong>g, growth <strong>in</strong>crease decl<strong>in</strong>ed for both varieties at pH 6.8 although it was higher <strong>in</strong><br />
French bean than <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco.<br />
The differential variety response to the two types of lime was also assessed by<br />
comput<strong>in</strong>g the relative whole plant growth aga<strong>in</strong>st the un-limed control and expressed as<br />
a percentage (Fig.1). At maximum growth (pH 5.6) the growth response to calcite lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
was similar <strong>in</strong> both varieties (102 %). However, dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g resulted <strong>in</strong>to higher<br />
growth response <strong>in</strong> French bean than <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco. At lim<strong>in</strong>g pH 5.1, 5.6, and 6.8 growth<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> calcite and dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g was 112 %, 129 %, 78 % and 86 %, 119 %, 94 %<br />
respectively.<br />
110
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Uptake of Al<br />
Al contents <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 3. Both varieties accumulated<br />
less Al <strong>in</strong> shoots than <strong>in</strong> roots. French bean concentrated a higher amount of Al <strong>in</strong> shoots<br />
than Rosecoco while Rosecoco accumulated more Al <strong>in</strong> roots. As lim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased, the<br />
content of Al <strong>in</strong> both roots and shoots of both varieties decreased. However the<br />
concentration of Al <strong>in</strong> the roots at calcite lim<strong>in</strong>g of pH 5.1 conta<strong>in</strong>ed the highest levels of<br />
Al, higher than even <strong>in</strong> the control plants. Generally the Al uptake <strong>in</strong> the dolomite-limed<br />
plants conta<strong>in</strong>ed less Al than <strong>in</strong> calcite limed ones <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots <strong>in</strong> both<br />
varieties.<br />
Uptake of Ca and Mg<br />
The contents of Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong> dry shoots and roots <strong>in</strong> both varieties are presented <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 4. Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots of control plants was higher <strong>in</strong><br />
Rosecoco than <strong>in</strong> French bean. The calcite-limed plants had the highest Ca concentration<br />
<strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots at pH 5.6 while dolomite limed plants had their peak at pH 6.8.<br />
The Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots <strong>in</strong> the calcite and dolomite-limed plants<br />
was higher <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco than <strong>in</strong> French bean. Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> shoots of control plants<br />
was also higher <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco than <strong>in</strong> French bean. It <strong>in</strong>creased with lim<strong>in</strong>g with calcite to<br />
reach a peak at pH 5.6. In the dolomite-limed plants, Mg <strong>in</strong>creased with lim<strong>in</strong>g to reach a<br />
peak at pH 6.8. Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> the roots of control plants was higher <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco<br />
than <strong>in</strong> French bean. In calcite limed plants the Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> the roots <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g lim<strong>in</strong>g to reach a peak at pH 6.8 <strong>in</strong> both varieties. Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> the<br />
roots was higher <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco than <strong>in</strong> French bean for both types of limes.<br />
The Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots was higher <strong>in</strong> calcite-limed plants<br />
than <strong>in</strong> dolomite limed ones. Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots of the dolomitelimed<br />
plants was much higher than <strong>in</strong> calcite treatments. The control plants showed clear<br />
deficiency symptoms of Ca deficiency, among others were severe stunted growth;<br />
cr<strong>in</strong>kled, curled leaves and abnormally green first leaves; and some patchy <strong>in</strong>terve<strong>in</strong>al<br />
chlorosis <strong>in</strong> the middle leaves. In the plants limed with calcite to pH 6.8, symptoms of<br />
Mg deficiency ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>terve<strong>in</strong>al chlorosis occurred <strong>in</strong> older leaves, while those treated<br />
at same pH level with dolomite were normal.<br />
111
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Variety and<br />
Lim<strong>in</strong>g level<br />
(pH)<br />
Shoot dry weight<br />
(g)<br />
R 3.95 0.4142 ± .027 c 1<br />
Calcite Dolomite<br />
Root dry weight<br />
(g)<br />
0.1713 ± 0.023 b<br />
1 Means with<strong>in</strong> columns ( plus/m<strong>in</strong>us one standard deviation) with similar letters do not differ<br />
significantly (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test (n = 4)<br />
** , *** Significantly different at p = 0.01 and 0.001 respectively<br />
Table 2: The effect of lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or dolomite on the growth of two Phaseolus<br />
vulgaries varieties, Rosecoco (R) and French bean cv. Amy (F).<br />
Calcite Dolomite<br />
Lim<strong>in</strong>g pH<br />
3.95 5.1 5.6 6.8 3.95 5.1 5.6 6.8<br />
Rosecoco<br />
Shoot 0.45 0.36 0.29 0.24 0.46 0.36 0.18 0.17<br />
Root<br />
French bean<br />
6.1 12.0 8.8 6.6 6.1 6.1 2.9 2.5<br />
Shoot 0.82 0.45 0.3 0.29 0.82 0.29 0.19 0.17<br />
Root 3.9 5.8 5.0 3.6 3.9 3.2 2.95 2.5<br />
Table 3 : Uptake of alum<strong>in</strong>ium (mg/g) <strong>in</strong> dry matter of shoots and roots of Rosecoco and French<br />
bean <strong>in</strong> response to lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or dolomite<br />
112<br />
Shoot dry weight<br />
(g)<br />
Root dry weight<br />
(g)<br />
0.4142 ± 0.027de 0.1713 ± 0.023 c<br />
R 5.1 0.6854 ± 0.043 b 0.2222 ± 0.017 a 0.855 ± 0.021 b 0.2433 ± 0.029 b<br />
R 5.6 0.9011 ± 0.041 a 0.2817 ± 0.0021 a 0.995 ± 0.052 a 0.2967 ± 0.012 a<br />
R 6.8 0.6185 ± 0.14 b 0.2583 ± 0.0164a 0.9133 ± 0.025 b 0.225 ± 0.0071 b<br />
F 3.95 0.1917± 0.016 e<br />
0.0783 ± 0.0153 d 0.1917 ± 0.016 e 0.0783 ± 0.0153 e<br />
F 5.1 0.3733 ± 0.038 c 0.095 ± 0.00 d 0.4325 ± 0.062 e<br />
0.1405 ± 0.0076 d<br />
F 5.6 0.4433 ± 0.034 c 0.1033 ± 0.0153 d 0.4583 ± 0.04 d 0.159 ± 0.025 cd<br />
F 6.8 0.2867± 0.0058 d 0.0783 ± 0.0153 e 0.3925 ± 0.0035 e 0.0875 ± 0.035 e<br />
Significance 2<br />
Lim<strong>in</strong>g *** *** *** ***<br />
Variety *** ** *** ***<br />
Lim<strong>in</strong>g x variety ** *** ** ***
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The humic Nitisol [3] for which the experiment was conducted is strongly acid with very<br />
low nutrient content. Therefore the problem of this acid soil is not only the hazards<br />
associated with acidity like high Al but also quite low levels of P, Ca and Mg. Lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
soil has the primary objective of rais<strong>in</strong>g the pH <strong>in</strong> order to decrease the soluble amounts<br />
of Al, Mn and Fe which not only may cause toxicity to plants but also immobilise P. The<br />
solubility of Mn and Fe is more controlled by soil redox than by pH and therefore <strong>in</strong> well<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils like <strong>in</strong> Kenya Highlands where acid soils dom<strong>in</strong>ate, Al toxicity and soil<br />
<strong>in</strong>fertility are the ma<strong>in</strong> h<strong>in</strong>drance to crop cultivation.<br />
In this study phosphorus and nitrogen were supplied to the plant through<br />
diammonium phosphate fertilizer as is the custom <strong>in</strong> the small-scale cultivation of beans.<br />
The higher growth exhibited <strong>in</strong> limed plants as compared with control plants is an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dication of detoxification of Al and <strong>in</strong>creased Ca, and, Mg and Ca nutrition <strong>in</strong> calcite<br />
and dolomite limed plants respectively. These soils are low <strong>in</strong> both Ca and Mg and<br />
therefore a lim<strong>in</strong>g material like dolomite, which conta<strong>in</strong>s both of the elements, is bound<br />
to <strong>in</strong>crease more the yield of crops than calcite, which conta<strong>in</strong>s only Ca.<br />
The differences <strong>in</strong> acidity tolerance of the two bean varieties fits fairly well with<br />
the results earlier obta<strong>in</strong>ed [12] where root elongation <strong>in</strong> three day - old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />
Rosecoco and French bean was depressed by 38 % and 78 % respectively <strong>in</strong> nutrient<br />
solution conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 5 mM Al. Earlier work [10] showed that Al-sensitive plants respond<br />
more to decreased Al than Al-tolerant ones. The results of this study more or less agree<br />
with this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple (Fig. 1). The reason is that growth stimulation of root growth upon<br />
lim<strong>in</strong>g is more pronounced <strong>in</strong> Al – sensitive plants than Al-tolerant ones. However the<br />
depression of growth upon over-lim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> French bean was greater than <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco.<br />
Under excessive calcite lim<strong>in</strong>g, Rosecoco was probably able to take up more Mg from<br />
the soil because of its more developed root system while under dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g it was<br />
able to take up more elements <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g trace elements, which might have been<br />
unavailable due to immobilization (high pH) or competition by Ca and Mg. The higher<br />
response to lim<strong>in</strong>g with dolomite than with calcite is easily expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the presence of<br />
Mg <strong>in</strong> the former because of the low Mg content <strong>in</strong> the test soil. The higher response to<br />
lim<strong>in</strong>g by French bean was not correlated with either Ca and Mg concentration and this<br />
may probably be Al toxicity was more critical than Ca or Mg nutrition <strong>in</strong> this particular<br />
soil. Barley grown <strong>in</strong> hydroponics had roots with higher contents of Al than <strong>in</strong> shoots [4].<br />
This is <strong>in</strong> conformity with the results <strong>in</strong> this work (Table 3).<br />
In control plants the shoots of Rosecoco conta<strong>in</strong>ed less Al than the Al-sensitive<br />
French bean. Therefore the sensitivity of French bean to Al may be its <strong>in</strong>ability to<br />
exclude Al to roots but also to the tops. There is therefore a need to also study the toxicity<br />
effects of Al <strong>in</strong> tops, which has hitherto been neglected. However roots of Rosecoco<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>ed more Al <strong>in</strong> roots than those of French bean. If tolerance were achieved by Al<br />
immobilization <strong>in</strong> the cell wall, a reduction <strong>in</strong> membrane transport would be balanced by<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of Al <strong>in</strong> the apoplasm [15]. Thus, Al tolerant plants may have more or<br />
less Al as Al-sensitive ones. However this contradicted earlier results [12] where 3 dayold<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of Rosecoco had less Al <strong>in</strong> roots. Probably the accumulation of Al <strong>in</strong> cell<br />
wall through b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to cell walls after apoplasm immobilization <strong>in</strong>creases with age of<br />
113
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
the plants. In this earlier work, Rosecoco’s tolerance was ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to Al<br />
immobilization by citric acid excreted by roots.<br />
The Al concentration <strong>in</strong> both varieties and <strong>in</strong> both types of lim<strong>in</strong>g decl<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />
lim<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong>creased. This is expected because as pH is <strong>in</strong>creased the toxic monomeric<br />
species of Al also decreased. However concentration of Al <strong>in</strong> calcite treatment of pH 5.1<br />
is higher than that <strong>in</strong> controls <strong>in</strong> the roots of all varieties. This may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />
very poor growth <strong>in</strong> the controls, which reduces the uptake of all elements <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Al.<br />
Lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pH<br />
Rosecoco<br />
Shoot<br />
Calcite Dolomite<br />
3.95 5.1 5.6 6.8 3.95 5.1 5.6 6.8<br />
Ca 2.7 16.2 24.2 18.7 2.7 11.8 14.4 18.5<br />
Mg 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.1 4.9 6.0 7.5<br />
Root<br />
Ca 2.2 7.8 17.1 18.5 2.2 7.4 8.8 9.3<br />
Mg 0.9 1.6 2.4 3.3 0.9 5.3 8.5 11.1<br />
French<br />
bean<br />
Shoot<br />
Ca 2.7 18.7 19.3 18.8 2.7 8.8 11.0 15.5<br />
Mg 1.0 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.0 5.1 5.7 6.9<br />
Root<br />
Ca 1.3 4.3 8.7 10.3 1.3 4.0 7.5 8.3<br />
Mg 0.8 1.2 2.5 2.2 0.8 3.0 5.6 5.9<br />
Table 4 : Uptake of Ca and Mg (mg/g) by the dry shoots and roots of Rosecoco (R) and French<br />
bean (F) upon lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or dolomite<br />
The lower concentration of Al <strong>in</strong> dolomite treated plants implies that Mg just like Ca has<br />
Al-toxicity ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g role [9].<br />
114
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Many studies have shown the role played by Ca <strong>in</strong> reduction of Al toxicity <strong>in</strong><br />
plants. Al reduced Ca uptake <strong>in</strong> Al-sensitive wheat cultivars [9] while Al-tolerant Dade<br />
Snap bean cultivar conta<strong>in</strong>ed more Ca <strong>in</strong> its exudate than that of Al-sensitive Romano<br />
cultivar [5]. Higher Ca concentrations <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution decreased Al-tolerance<br />
differences among maize <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es [13]. In this study (Table 4), the Ca <strong>in</strong> shoots<br />
agrees very well with other work [6] where the tolerant Dayton barley cultivar<br />
accumulated more Ca than the Al-sensitive Kearney when Al was added <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient<br />
solution. In this study the Rosecoco plants had a higher Ca concentration than French<br />
bean irrespective of lim<strong>in</strong>g level and type, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g its higher capacity to take Ca due to<br />
its better root development even at acid soil conditions.<br />
The peak Ca uptake was arrived at pH 5.6 <strong>in</strong> calcite limed plants and at pH 6.8 <strong>in</strong><br />
dolomite limed ones. The reason may be that <strong>in</strong> calcite limed plants Mg deficiency<br />
reduces growth so much at pH 6.8 as reduce Ca uptake. The content of Ca <strong>in</strong> shoots of<br />
control plants is less than 1.5% the m<strong>in</strong>imum for optimal growth [7] and this expla<strong>in</strong>s the<br />
Ca deficiency symptoms mentioned earlier.<br />
The Mg concentration <strong>in</strong> shoots was higher <strong>in</strong> the more Al- tolerant Rosecoco than<br />
<strong>in</strong> the French bean <strong>in</strong> both calcite limed probably due to its better-developed root system<br />
even <strong>in</strong> very acid conditions.<br />
The Mg concentration rises with lim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the shoots and roots of calcite limed<br />
plants to reach a peak at lim<strong>in</strong>g pH 5.6; decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at pH 6.8 due to reduced growth<br />
associated with Mg deficiency. In dolomite limed plants, the peak is reached at lim<strong>in</strong>g pH<br />
6.8. This may be due to factors associated with over lim<strong>in</strong>g like trace element deficiency<br />
though no deficiency symptoms were observed.<br />
The content of Mg <strong>in</strong> control plants and <strong>in</strong> all calcite limed plants is less than 0.5%<br />
of dry weight which is necessary for optimal growth [11], thus the cause of the Mg<br />
deficiency symptoms mentioned above.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The study has conclusively shown the beneficial benefits of lim<strong>in</strong>g a low fertility, acid<br />
soil. Dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g gave better growth than calcite and therefore the former should<br />
berecommeded as the type of lim<strong>in</strong>g material for acid soils of the tea zones of Kenya.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the dry weight of the whole plant is well related to Al – tolerance; the<br />
more the response to dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g the more sensitive the bean variety.<br />
Al accumulation <strong>in</strong> the shoots of un-limed plants is a good <strong>in</strong>dicator of acidity<br />
tolerance just like <strong>in</strong> young plants [12] but not so for Al <strong>in</strong> roots which seem to<br />
accumulate more <strong>in</strong> Al tolerant Phaseolus vulgaries. Al accumulation <strong>in</strong> roots of<br />
Phaseolus vulgaries grown <strong>in</strong> soil to near maturity gives contradictory result to that<br />
found <strong>in</strong> young plants and therefore use of Al contents <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g plants <strong>in</strong> soil grown<br />
to near maturity can only be done <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with other techniques. Both Ca and Mg<br />
accumulation can be used to assess Al-tolerance <strong>in</strong> the common bean (Phaseolus<br />
vulgaris) grown <strong>in</strong> soil.<br />
The most ideal lim<strong>in</strong>g pH level for maximum growth is 5.6 <strong>in</strong> this strongly acid soil<br />
irrespective of the lim<strong>in</strong>g material.<br />
115
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
The authors wish to thank the Japanese Co-operation Agency (JICA) for fund<strong>in</strong>g this<br />
study, and also the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology for the<br />
provision of laboratory facilities.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] M. M. Alley, L.W. Zelazny. “Soil acidity: Soil pH and lime needs. In Soil Test<strong>in</strong>g: Sampl<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Correlation, Calibration and Interpretation”, Ed. J.R Brown. pp.65-72. Soil science Society of America,<br />
Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, U.S.A, (1987).<br />
[2] H. D. Chapman, P. F. Platt. Methods of Analysis for Plants, Soils and Waters. Univ. California. 309 p.,<br />
(1961)<br />
[3] FAO - UNESCO. Soil map of the world, Rome, (1988).<br />
[4] C. D. Foy, A.L. Flem<strong>in</strong>g, W.H. Arm<strong>in</strong>ger, “Characterization of differential Al tolerance amongst<br />
varieties of wheat and barley”, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 31, 513 -521, (1967).<br />
[5] C. D. Foy, A. L. Flem<strong>in</strong>g, G. Gerloff. “Differential alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance of soybean varieties”, Agro. J.<br />
64: 815 -18, (1972).<br />
[6] C. D. Foy, A. L. Flem<strong>in</strong>g, J.W. Schwartz. “Opposite and alum<strong>in</strong>ium and manganese tolerance <strong>in</strong> two<br />
wheat varieties”, Agro. J. 65: 123-26, (1973).<br />
[7] A. D. M. Glass. Plant nutrition-An Introduction to Current Concepts, Jones and Bartlet Publishers, <strong>in</strong>c.<br />
234 p. (1989).<br />
[8] G. H<strong>in</strong>ga, F. N. Muchena, C. M. Njihia. <strong>Physical</strong> and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis, NAL-MoA,<br />
Kenya. (1980).<br />
[9] J. W. Huang, J.E. Shaff, D.L. Grunes, L.V. Kochian.. “Alum<strong>in</strong>ium effects on calcium fluxes at the root<br />
apex of alum<strong>in</strong>ium-sensitive wheat cultivars”, Plant Physiol., 98: 230-37, (1992b)<br />
[10] J. F. Ma, S. J. Zheng, X. F. Li, K. Takenda, H. Matsumoto. “A rapid hydroponic screen<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance <strong>in</strong> barley”, Plant and Soil. 191: 133-37, (1997a).<br />
[11] H. Marschner. M<strong>in</strong>eral Nutrition of higher plants, Inst. of plants Nutrition.Univ. Hohenheim,<br />
Germany. 889p., (1986).<br />
[12] E. N. Mugai, S. G Agong, H. Matsumoto. “Alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance mechanisms <strong>in</strong> Phaeolus vulgaris<br />
L.: Citrate synthase activity and TTC reduction are well correlated with citrate secretion”, Soil Sci. Plant<br />
Nutr., 46, 939-950, (2000).<br />
[13] R. D. Rhue, C. O. Grogan. “Screen<strong>in</strong>g corn for alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance”. Agron. J. 69,755 - 760, (1977).<br />
[14] W. G. Sombroek, H. M. H. Braun, B. J. A. van der Pouw. Exploratory Soil map<br />
and Agro-Climatic Zone Map of Kenya. Kenya Soil Survey. MoA. (1980)<br />
[15] G. J. Taylor. “Current views of the alum<strong>in</strong>ium stress response; the physiological basis of tolerance”.<br />
Curr. Top. Plant Biochem. Physiol., 10, 57-93, (1991).<br />
[16] S.M Wokabi. “The distribution, characterization and some management aspects of acid soils of<br />
Kenya”, Paper presented at IBSRAM’S 2 nd Regional Workshop <strong>in</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Development, Lusaka, Zambia.<br />
Kenya Soil Survey, (1987).<br />
116
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
EFFECT OF P FERTILISERS AND WEED CONTROL<br />
ON THE FATE OF P FERTILISERS APPLIED TO SOILS<br />
UNDER SECOND-ROTATION PINUS RADIATA<br />
A. A. Rivaie 1 , P. Loganathan 2 , and R. W. Tillman 2<br />
1 Indonesian Center for Estate Crops R & D, Jl. Tentara Pelajar No.1, Bogor, Indonesia<br />
(ariv<strong>in</strong>rivaie@yahoo.com). Telp/Fax: 62 0251 336194; 2 Soil Science, Massey University, Private Bag<br />
11222, Palmerston North, <strong>New</strong> Zealand (P.Loganathan@massey.ac.nz; R.Tillman@massey.ac.nz)<br />
Poster Extended Abstract<br />
Phosphorus is an important nutrient <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zealand forest plantations as most of the soils<br />
are P deficient or marg<strong>in</strong>ally deficient, and this element has been rout<strong>in</strong>ely applied s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
the 1960’s where appropriate. However, most of the <strong>in</strong>formation available on the P<br />
fertiliser requirements of radiata p<strong>in</strong>e was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from trials on first-rotation forests<br />
that were managed under silvicultural regimes which were quite different from today.<br />
The current silvicultural regimes of P<strong>in</strong>us radiata plantations with wider <strong>in</strong>itial tree<br />
spac<strong>in</strong>gs have created the potential for <strong>in</strong>creased growth of understorey vegetation. A<br />
consequence of this is that the response of P. radiata to P fertiliser is expected to be more<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluenced by the <strong>in</strong>teraction between the P fertiliser, the tree and the understorey<br />
vegetation than was the case <strong>in</strong> the past.<br />
The objectives of this study were to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effect of application of different<br />
rates of two P fertilisers (Triple superphosphate (TSP) and Ben Guerir phosphate rock<br />
(BGPR)) and weed control, and their <strong>in</strong>teractions on P fractions and downward<br />
movement of P, <strong>in</strong> an Allophanic Soil (at the Kaweka forest) and a Pumice Soil (at the<br />
K<strong>in</strong>leith forest) under 4-5-year-old second-rotation P. radiata plantations.<br />
The results showed that P fraction conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the largest percentage of soil P was<br />
the 0.1 M NaOH extractable Po, <strong>in</strong> the surface soils (0-10 cm soil depth) at the two<br />
second-rotation forests. In the Allophanic Soil, NaOH-Po concentration was 196 µg P g -1<br />
soil, which was 41% of the total P, and <strong>in</strong> the Pumice Soil it was 253 µg P g -1 soil which<br />
was 64% of total P. Therefore, the long-term P supply<strong>in</strong>g power of the soil largely<br />
depends on the m<strong>in</strong>eralisation of this organic P.<br />
The NaOH-Pi and the H2SO4-Pi concentrations <strong>in</strong> the soils had <strong>in</strong>creased at both<br />
forests two years after P fertiliser application, whereas, the largest pool of P, NaOH-Po,<br />
and residual-P were unaffected by the P fertiliser application. Changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />
concentration of P fraction as a result of P fertiliser application depend on the P fertiliser<br />
type. When <strong>in</strong>creased rates of TSP were applied, the NaOH-Pi fraction (averaged over<br />
weed and weed-free treatments) <strong>in</strong>creased at a faster rate than the other P fractions and<br />
the rate of <strong>in</strong>crease was more marked at the Kaweka forest (an Allophanic Soil) than at<br />
the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest (a Pumice Soil). This suggested that the proportion of TSP applied to<br />
the soil that was adsorbed to allophane and Fe+Al oxides was more than that converted to<br />
any of the other P fractions. The higher rate of <strong>in</strong>crease of NaOH-Pi concentrations at the<br />
Kaweka forest than at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest is probably due to the higher P fixation capacity<br />
of the Kaweka soil compared to that of the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil.<br />
117
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
When <strong>in</strong>creased rates of BGPR were added, the H2SO4-Pi fraction (averaged over<br />
weed and weed-free treatments) <strong>in</strong>creased at a faster rate compared with the other P<br />
fractions and the rate of <strong>in</strong>crease was also more marked at the Kaweka forest than at the<br />
K<strong>in</strong>leith forest. This is due to the high concentration of undissolved PR (P associated<br />
with Ca) rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the soils, which was extracted by H2SO4. In comparison, the<br />
addition of TSP <strong>in</strong>creased the H2SO4-Pi concentrations only at 100 and 200 kg P ha -1 <strong>in</strong><br />
the Kaweka soil and at 200 kg P ha -1 <strong>in</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil. While, the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> H2SO4-Pi<br />
concentrations result<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> BGPR rates of application is due to an<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> concentration of undissolved PR, the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> H2SO4-Pi with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
TSP rates is due to the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> concentrations of dicalcium phosphate result<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
the conversion of MCP <strong>in</strong> TSP to dicalcium phosphate.<br />
In general, the magnitude of the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> H2SO4-Pi concentrations per unit weight<br />
of BGPR addition at the Kaweka forest was greater than that at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest. This<br />
may be due to the higher rate of dissolution of BGPR <strong>in</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil than <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Kaweka soil, as the former was more acidic than the latter (pH 5.1 and pH 5.7,<br />
respectively). The supply of H + is a driv<strong>in</strong>g force for the dissolution of PR, along with the<br />
removal of the dissolution reaction products Ca 2+ , H2PO4 - and F - from the site of<br />
dissolution.<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>fall at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest dur<strong>in</strong>g the trial period was higher than at the Kaweka<br />
forest (annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall for 2001 at K<strong>in</strong>leith was 1491 mm and at Kaweka was 1285 mm;<br />
for 2002 they were 1702 and 1280 mm, respectively). It is possible that this would have<br />
resulted <strong>in</strong> a higher soil moisture regime at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest to help further the<br />
dissolution of BGPR. But the Kaweka soil had lower exchangeable Ca and res<strong>in</strong>-Pi<br />
concentrations and higher P fix<strong>in</strong>g capacity compared to the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil, therefore,<br />
based on these properties PR dissolution would have been expected to be higher at<br />
Kaweka soil. The fact that the observed dissolution was lower <strong>in</strong> the Kaweka soil<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates that the effect of the higher acidity and moisture content <strong>in</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil<br />
overrides the <strong>in</strong>fluences of P fix<strong>in</strong>g capacity, P concentration and exchangeable Ca <strong>in</strong> the<br />
soils <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g a higher rate of BGPR dissolution <strong>in</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil.<br />
The effect of weeds on plant-available soil P concentration (res<strong>in</strong>-Pi) depends on<br />
the type of weeds and the degree of P deficiency <strong>in</strong> the soil. The deeper root systems of<br />
the weeds (Himalayan honeysuckle, buddleia and some toetoe) at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest<br />
enhanced the plant-available P concentrations <strong>in</strong> soil surface probably by remov<strong>in</strong>g P<br />
from the subsoils and return<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> the form of litter to the soil surface (pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mechanism). At the P-deficient Kaweka forest soils, however, the weeds (bracken fern<br />
and manuka) reduced res<strong>in</strong>-Pi concentration. This suggests that when plant-available P is<br />
very low, the weeds tend to compete with radiata for P.<br />
At both forests, the application of 200 kg P ha -1 as TSP and BGPR <strong>in</strong>creased Bray-<br />
2 P at the 0-10 cm soil depth. At the 10-20 cm soil depth, however, the application of any<br />
of the two P fertilisers at the rate of 200 kg P ha -1 had no effect on Bray-2 P concentration<br />
at the Kaweka forest, while at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest the two P fertilisers <strong>in</strong>creased Bray-2 P<br />
concentration. There was no fertiliser effect on Bray-2 P concentration at the 20-30 cm<br />
soil depth at both sites. This suggested that <strong>in</strong> the Pumice Soil at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest, P<br />
from both TSP and BGPR has leached to the lower depth. In the less porous and higher P<br />
fix<strong>in</strong>g Allophanic Soil at the Kaweka forest it might have been difficult for the fertiliser P<br />
118
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
to have moved to below 10 cm depth. The movement of P <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>leith forest was higher<br />
for TSP than BGPR because of higher solubility of TSP.<br />
119
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Sub-theme : ORGANIC FARMING IN THE TROPICS<br />
PRESENT SITUATION, POSSIBILITIES AND CHALLENGES<br />
Current research at the research group of soil fertility and nutrient management<br />
Stefaan De Neve<br />
Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium<br />
The research group on Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management is part of the department<br />
of Soil Management and Soil Care, which does research on all aspects of applied soil<br />
science, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility, soil organic matter, soil physics, soil erosion and soil<br />
conservation, soil pollution and its remediation, and soil data process<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The research focus <strong>in</strong> the Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management group has<br />
gradually shifted from soil fertility related to maximis<strong>in</strong>g plant production towards<br />
environmental aspects related to fertilization and soil organic matter management. The<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> focus of the department is at present on the cycles of carbon and nitrogen <strong>in</strong> soil,<br />
and is reflected <strong>in</strong> a number of research topics that are briefly outl<strong>in</strong>ed below.<br />
Fundamental research is go<strong>in</strong>g on about soil organic carbon (SOC) along different<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. A first l<strong>in</strong>e is the determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> soil of a passive SOC pool, i.e. a SOC pool that<br />
is by def<strong>in</strong>ition not affected by management but rema<strong>in</strong>s constant <strong>in</strong> size over centuries.<br />
This research uses a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of physical fractionation methods (size and density<br />
fractionation) and chemical fractionation, <strong>in</strong> order to isolate silt and clay associated SOC<br />
and further subdivide this <strong>in</strong> biochemically and non-biochemically resistant SOC. The<br />
fractionations are comb<strong>in</strong>ed with advanced mass spectrometrical analyses.<br />
A second l<strong>in</strong>e is the visualization of physically protected SOC with<strong>in</strong> microaggregates<br />
and the relationship between soil micro-architecture and SOC partition<strong>in</strong>g<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray computed nano tomography. This research should help to improve our<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g of mechanisms of physical protection of SOC, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the improvement<br />
of exist<strong>in</strong>g SOC models.<br />
With regard to nitrogen, a more fundamental l<strong>in</strong>e of research is about the<br />
dynamics of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) <strong>in</strong> forest soils <strong>in</strong> Flanders. Over the last<br />
decades, research on DON has received <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g attention as a possible important loss<br />
mechanism for N and as a biologically active component <strong>in</strong> the N cycle. We are look<strong>in</strong>g<br />
at the importance of DON losses <strong>in</strong> forest soils <strong>in</strong> comparison to overall N leach<strong>in</strong>g<br />
losses, and will try to model DON dynamics <strong>in</strong> these soils, based on laboratory<br />
measurements of the m<strong>in</strong>eralization, sorption and desorption, chemical composition and<br />
transport <strong>in</strong> the vadose zone.<br />
Another research l<strong>in</strong>e is the <strong>in</strong>teraction between exogenous organic matter (EOM)<br />
that is applied to agricultural soil, the soil structure and soil physical properties, and soil<br />
foodweb dynamics, and how this <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong>fluences C and N cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> soil. To this<br />
end, a field experiment was started where different qualities of EOM are applied <strong>in</strong><br />
controlled quantities and where we monitor changes <strong>in</strong> soil physical properties/soil<br />
structure, changes <strong>in</strong> foodweb dynamics (notably microfauna, nematodes and<br />
earthworms) and associated C and N dynamics.<br />
120
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Applied l<strong>in</strong>es of research <strong>in</strong>cluded research on alternative agricultural production<br />
systems such as reduced tillage agriculture/conservation agriculture and organic farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Our research on reduced tillage is focussed on how this type of agriculture <strong>in</strong>fluences soil<br />
structure and soil physical properties, crop yields, and C and N dynamics from soil<br />
organic matter (SOM), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g C storage, C and N m<strong>in</strong>eralization, N2O emissions,<br />
nitrate leach<strong>in</strong>g and overall nitrogen use efficiency. Research is also go<strong>in</strong>g on about the<br />
dynamics of crop residues under reduced tillage agriculture, namely C and N<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralization, NH3 and N2O emission and soil quality parameters <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g enzyme<br />
activities, microbial biomass, earthworms, … The organic farm<strong>in</strong>g systems research <strong>in</strong><br />
our department until now has focussed on nutrient use efficiency compared to<br />
conventional agriculture, with emphasis on nitrate leach<strong>in</strong>g losses and phosphorus<br />
saturation. An important part of the research is focussed on field grown vegetable crops,<br />
because <strong>in</strong> that particular sector many problems of over-fertilization and excessive<br />
nutrient losses are concentrated.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, we are conduct<strong>in</strong>g research on nutrient balances and nutrient efficiencies<br />
of all k<strong>in</strong>ds of organic manures and wastes to provide scientific support for new<br />
legislation concern<strong>in</strong>g nutrient management <strong>in</strong> Flanders and <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Coleman D, Fu SL, Hendrix P & Crossley D. 2002. Soil foodwebs <strong>in</strong> agroecosystems: impacts of<br />
herbivory and tillage management. European Journal of Soil Biology 38, 21-28.<br />
[2] De Neve S., Pannier J. and Hofman G. 1996. Temperature effects on C and N m<strong>in</strong>eralization from<br />
vegetable crop residues. Plant and Soil, 181, 25-30.<br />
[3] Ferris H, Bongers T, de Goede RGM 2001. A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of<br />
the nematode faunal analysis concept. Applied Soil Ecology 18, 13-29.<br />
[4] D’Haene K., Moreels, E., De Neve S., Chaves Daguilar B., Boeckx P., Hofman G., Van Cleemput O.<br />
2003. Soil properties <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the denitrification potential of Flemish agricultural soils. Biology and<br />
Fertility of Soils, 38, 358-366.<br />
[5] Karlen, D.L., Mausbach, M.J., Doran, J.W., Cl<strong>in</strong>e, R.G., Harris, R.F. & Schuman, G.E. (1997). Soil<br />
quality: a concept, def<strong>in</strong>ition and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61, 4-<br />
10.<br />
[6] Lenz R & Eisenbeis G. 2000. Short-term effects of different tillage <strong>in</strong> a susta<strong>in</strong>able farm<strong>in</strong>g system on<br />
nematode community structure. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31, 237-244.<br />
[7] Nunan N, Ritz K, Rivers M, Feeney DS, Young IM 2006. Investigat<strong>in</strong>g microbial micro-habitat<br />
structure us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma 133, 398-407.<br />
[8] Schulten HR & Le<strong>in</strong>weber P (2000) <strong>New</strong> <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to organic-m<strong>in</strong>eral particles: composition,<br />
properties and models of molecular structure. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 399-432.<br />
[9] Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K 2002. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter:<br />
Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil 241, 155-176.<br />
[10] Sleutel S, De Neve S, S<strong>in</strong>gier B, Hofman G 2006. Organic C levels <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensively managed arable soils<br />
- long-term regional trends and characterization of fractions. Soil Use and Management 22, 188-196.<br />
[11] Sleutel S., De Neve S., Hofman G., Boeckx P., Beheydt D., Van Cleemput O., Mestdagh I., Lootens<br />
P., Carlier L., Van Camp N., Verbeeck H., Van De Walle I., Samson R., Lust N. & Lemeur R. 2003.<br />
Carbon stock changes and carbon sequestration potential of Flemish cropland soils. Global Change<br />
Biology, 9, 1193-1203.<br />
[12] Van Den Bossche A., De Neve S. & Hofman G. 2005. Soil phosphorus status of organic farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
Flanders: an overview and a comparison with the conventional situation. Soil Use and Management, 21,<br />
415-421.<br />
[13] Young IM, Crawford JW 2005. Interactions and self-organization <strong>in</strong> the soil-microbe complex. Science<br />
304, 1634-1637.<br />
121
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
[14] Zelles L 1999. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides <strong>in</strong> the characterisation of<br />
microbial communities <strong>in</strong> soil: a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 29, 111-129.<br />
122
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
LOW INPUT APPROACHES FOR SOIL FERTILITY<br />
MANAGEMENT VERIFIED FOR SEMI-ARID AREAS OF<br />
EASTERN UGANDA<br />
Kayuki C.Kaizzi 1 , Byalebeka John 1 , Charles S. Wortmann 2 and Martha Mamo 2<br />
1 Kawanda Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO),<br />
Box 7065 Kampala, Uganda; kckaizzi@hotmail.com, 2 University of Nebraska L<strong>in</strong>coln, IANR, Department<br />
of Agronomy and Horticulture, 154 Keim Hall, L<strong>in</strong>coln, NE 68583-0915; cwortmann@unlnotes.unl.edu<br />
Abstract<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moenich] is an important food crop <strong>in</strong> the semi-arid areas of Sub-<br />
Saharan Africa. Crop yields are generally low and decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g partly due to low soil fertility. In an attempt to<br />
address the problem, 148 on-farm trials were conducted at three sites over three years <strong>in</strong> the drought prone<br />
parts of eastern Uganda. The aim of this research was to evaluate, with farmer participation, alternative<br />
low-<strong>in</strong>put strategies for soil fertility improvement <strong>in</strong> sorghum based cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems. The strategies were:<br />
use of herbaceous legume (Mucuna pruriens) <strong>in</strong> improved fallow; a gra<strong>in</strong> legume (Vigna unguiculata) <strong>in</strong><br />
rotation with sorghum; use of cattle manure; application of low levels of N and P fertilizers. Mucuna<br />
(Mucuna pruriens) on average produced 7 t ha -1 of above ground dry matter conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 160 kg N ha -1<br />
across the three sites. There was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> response to the alternative strategies.<br />
Application of 2.5 t ha -1 of kraal manure and the application of 30 kg N plus 10 kg P ha -1 both <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield by a mean of 1.15 t ha -1 . A comb<strong>in</strong>ation of 2.5 t ha -1 manure with 30 kg N ha -1 <strong>in</strong>creased gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield by 1.40 tha -1 above the farmer practice (1.1 t ha -1 gra<strong>in</strong>). The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yields <strong>in</strong><br />
response to 30 kg N ha -1 alone, to a mucuna fallow, and to a rotation with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) was<br />
1.0, 1.4 and 0.7 t ha -1 , respectively. These alternative strategies were found to be cost-effective <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g sorghum yield <strong>in</strong> the predom<strong>in</strong>antly smallholder agriculture where <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer is not<br />
used. On-farm profitability and food security for sorghum production systems can be improved by use of<br />
<strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers, manure, mucuna fallow, and sorghum-cowpea rotation.<br />
Key words: cowpea, low <strong>in</strong>put, Mucuna pruriens, opportunity cost, resource poor, semi-arid, smallholder<br />
agriculture<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum is an important crop for smallholder farmers <strong>in</strong> the drier areas of sub-<br />
Saharan Africa (SSA) but crop yields are low, and decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some places [10, 22]. Low<br />
<strong>in</strong>herent soil N and P availability are major constra<strong>in</strong>ts [1] that are exacerbated by soil<br />
fertility depletion through nutrient removal <strong>in</strong> harvest and losses with runoff and soil<br />
erosion [21,30]. Many farmers are unable to compensate for these losses, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
negative nutrient balances at the national level for sub-Saharan Africa countries [26] and<br />
at the farm level <strong>in</strong> Eastern and Central Uganda [34]<br />
Nutrient availability can be improved through application of <strong>in</strong>organic or organic<br />
nutrient sources. The profitability of fertilizer use depends on agro-climatic and economic<br />
conditions at local and regional levels [31]. Infra structural and other market<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />
lack of agricultural subsidies, and high opportunity costs on available money makes the use<br />
of <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers very costly <strong>in</strong> SSA, and real costs to farmers are two to six times as<br />
123
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
much as <strong>in</strong> Europe [20]. Resource-poor farmers need large returns on the small <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />
that they can make, often require a 75% return with<strong>in</strong> a six to 12 month period to make an<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment competitive [32]<br />
Use of organic nutrient sources is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by labor availability for collect<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
apply<strong>in</strong>g the materials [19], limited quantities and variation <strong>in</strong> quality [17], and the demand<br />
for crop residues as fuel and fodder [16] Green manure production requires land that could<br />
often be used for food or cash crops [6]. Farmyard manure is available to many smallholder<br />
farmers but generally <strong>in</strong> small quantities [15]. Transfer of plant materials from field<br />
boundary areas, or near-by fallow or graz<strong>in</strong>g areas, often has potential <strong>in</strong> sub-humid areas<br />
but less potential <strong>in</strong> semi-arid areas [14,32].<br />
Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) may contribute much N through better<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegration of legumes <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g systems. Biologically fixed atmospheric nitrogen<br />
contributes to productivity both directly, when the fixed N is harvested <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> of gra<strong>in</strong><br />
or other food for human or animal consumption, or <strong>in</strong>directly by add<strong>in</strong>g N to the soil for<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance or enhancement of soil fertility [8]. Under favorable environmental<br />
conditions, BNF can meet the N requirements of tropical agriculture [6,7,18]. Economic<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts make BNF an attractive N source for resource-poor farmers <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan<br />
Africa [9,28].<br />
Several promis<strong>in</strong>g low <strong>in</strong>put approaches to soil fertility management for sorghum<br />
production <strong>in</strong> the drought-prone areas of eastern Uganda were evaluated to verify and<br />
f<strong>in</strong>e-tune them for the production systems <strong>in</strong> four related studies. The objectives of these<br />
studies were to determ<strong>in</strong>e sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield response to application of <strong>in</strong>organic and<br />
organic N and P sources, mucuna fallow, and cowpea rotation.<br />
Site characteristics<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Farmer-managed trials were conducted at Kadesok and Opwatetta parishes<br />
(approximately 33 45’ E and 1 12’N) <strong>in</strong> the Southern and Eastern Lake Kyoga Bas<strong>in</strong> of<br />
eastern Uganda and Kapol<strong>in</strong> parish <strong>in</strong> the Usuk Sandy Farm-Grasslands (34 0’ E and 1<br />
40’N) [33]. The altitude ranges from 1050 to 1150 m asl. The trials were part of a larger<br />
process of participatory research with these communities that began with participatory<br />
exercises <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g system characterization and diagnosis, identification of potential<br />
solutions to soil fertility problems, and development of research plans. The process lead<br />
to farmer participation <strong>in</strong> the dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of research results to other farmers.<br />
The ra<strong>in</strong>fall at the research sites allows for two cropp<strong>in</strong>g seasons per year with an<br />
annual mean of approximately 1150 mm for Kadesok and Opwatetta and 1000 mm for<br />
Kapol<strong>in</strong>. About 25-30% of the ra<strong>in</strong>fall falls outside the crop seasons and is used by<br />
naturally grow<strong>in</strong>g annual or perennial vegetation and unavailable to the planted crops.<br />
Soil samples for the 0- to 20-cm depth were collected for each trial site, air-dried, ground<br />
to pass through a 2-mm sieve, and analyzed accord<strong>in</strong>g to [6]. Extractable P, K and Ca<br />
were measured <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle ammonium lactate/acetic acid extract buffered at pH 3.8. Soil<br />
pH was measured us<strong>in</strong>g a soil to water ratio of 1:2.5. Soil organic matter was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
124
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Walkley – Black method, modified accord<strong>in</strong>g to [5]. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant soil<br />
types <strong>in</strong> the area are petric pl<strong>in</strong>thosols [3].<br />
Sets of trials<br />
Two sets of trials were conducted. Each farm was a replication to m<strong>in</strong>imize the<br />
probability of Type I error <strong>in</strong> extrapolat<strong>in</strong>g results throughout eastern Uganda. The plot<br />
size was 100 m 2 for all trials.<br />
Trial 1<br />
Use of the herbaceous legume (Mucuna pruriens), <strong>in</strong> improved fallow and cowpea<br />
(Vigna unguiculata) <strong>in</strong> rotation with sorghum were evaluated on 39 farms. The<br />
treatments were: cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum; sorghum follow<strong>in</strong>g cowpea which was produced<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the August to November short ra<strong>in</strong>s; cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum with 30 kg N ha -1<br />
applied to the second sorghum crop; and mucuna fallow dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong>s followed<br />
by sorghum. Sorghum, cowpeas and mucuna were planted <strong>in</strong> the respective plots dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the short ra<strong>in</strong>s. Sorghum was planted <strong>in</strong> all plots dur<strong>in</strong>g the subsequent long ra<strong>in</strong>s period.<br />
No nutrients were applied except for the +N treatment.<br />
Trial 2<br />
Sorghum response to applied <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers and manure was evaluated on 64 farms<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the long ra<strong>in</strong> season. The treatments were: no nutrients applied; 30 kg N ha -1 ; 30<br />
kg N plus 10 kg P ha -1 ; 2.5 t manure ha -1 ; and 30 kg N plus 2.5 t manure ha -1 . The manure<br />
was collected from open pens where farmers kept their cattle and goats at night. Cowpea<br />
was planted on all plots dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous short ra<strong>in</strong>s season.<br />
Crop management practices, application of manure and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers<br />
Manure and P fertilizers were applied at plant<strong>in</strong>g. Nitrogen was applied <strong>in</strong> two splits with<br />
5 kg N ha -1 at plant<strong>in</strong>g and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 25 kg N ha -1 six weeks later. Sorghum (cv.<br />
“Sekedo” and “Epurpur”) was planted at 60 x 20 cm dur<strong>in</strong>g the long ra<strong>in</strong>s of 2004<br />
(season 2004A) and 2005 (2005A). Mucuna was planted at a spac<strong>in</strong>g of 75 x 60 cm and<br />
cowpea at 45 x 20 cm dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong>s of 2003 (2003B) and 2004 (2004B). Inseason<br />
weed control was with hand hoes. Beta-cyfluthr<strong>in</strong> was applied 3 to 4 weeks after<br />
sorghum had germ<strong>in</strong>ated to prevent damage by stem borers and chloropyrifos 5% was<br />
applied for termite control.<br />
Sorghum and cowpea stover were left <strong>in</strong> the field. The mucuna that rema<strong>in</strong>ed after<br />
biomass measurements cont<strong>in</strong>ued to grow until the soil water was depleted. Some of the<br />
mucuna, as well as some of the stover of sorghum and cowpea, was grazed by livestock<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season as livestock generally graze freely <strong>in</strong> the fields after harvest of the<br />
crops. Mucuna seeds rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the field and germ<strong>in</strong>ated dur<strong>in</strong>g the subsequent long<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>s, the volunteer plants were controlled until the second weed<strong>in</strong>g after which emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mucuna was allowed to grow <strong>in</strong> competition with the sorghum crop.<br />
125
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Data collection and analysis<br />
Sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by harvest<strong>in</strong>g the whole plot at maturity. The gra<strong>in</strong><br />
was weighed after air-dry<strong>in</strong>g and thresh<strong>in</strong>g. Sub-samples were collected for moisture<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ation and the gra<strong>in</strong> yield was adjusted to 14% water content.<br />
Mucuna biomass production was determ<strong>in</strong>ed at 22 weeks after plant<strong>in</strong>g by harvest<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
area equivalent to 3 m 2 us<strong>in</strong>g a 1 m 2 quadrant placed randomly at three different places<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a plot. All the materials with<strong>in</strong> the quadrant <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g litter were collected and<br />
weighed. A sub-sample was dried <strong>in</strong> an oven at 70˚C, ground to pass a 0.5 mm sieve and<br />
analyzed for total N, P and K by Kjeldahl digestion with concentrated sulphuric acid [1].<br />
P was determ<strong>in</strong>ed calorimetrically, and K by flame photometry.<br />
Cowpea gra<strong>in</strong> yield was determ<strong>in</strong>ed at physiological maturity by pick<strong>in</strong>g pods only,<br />
a common practice <strong>in</strong> the area. Harvested gra<strong>in</strong> was weighed after air-dry<strong>in</strong>g. Subsamples<br />
were collected for moisture determ<strong>in</strong>ation and the gra<strong>in</strong> yield was adjusted to<br />
14% water content.Analyses of variance were conducted by site and season for all sets of<br />
trials us<strong>in</strong>g Statistix V. 8.0 [25]. Differences were considered significant at the P ≤ 0.05<br />
level.<br />
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS<br />
The profitability of alternative practices was assessed. The analysis for fertilizer use was<br />
based on the follow<strong>in</strong>g assumptions [32]:<br />
1. Opportunity cost, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g risk allowance, was assumed to add 25, 50, and 75%<br />
to the cost of us<strong>in</strong>g fertilizer for the undef<strong>in</strong>ed categories of less poor, poor and very poor<br />
farmers, respectively;<br />
2. Farm gate crop prices were reduced by 10% to cover the cost of harvest<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g, and market<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
3. Fertilizer costs were <strong>in</strong>creased by 10% to cover transport and application costs;<br />
4. Plot yields were assumed to be high relative to yields that small-scale farmers<br />
can achieve at a farm-level and were reduced by 10% <strong>in</strong> the economic analysis.<br />
5. Prices <strong>in</strong> Uganda shill<strong>in</strong>gs (UgSh 1,800/- = US $1) were assumed to be 200/- and<br />
300/- kg -1 for sorghum and cowpea, respectively, at the farm-gate, and 40,000/- for 50-kg<br />
bags of urea and triple super phosphate.<br />
Soil characteristics<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the characterization and diagnosis process, farmers named different soils <strong>in</strong> the<br />
area and described these for their location on the landscape, associated problems, and<br />
soil-specific cop<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms. The major constra<strong>in</strong>ts mentioned by farmers <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
low soil fertility, low water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity for sandy soils, water logg<strong>in</strong>g for clayey<br />
soils, and weeds. Researchers and farmers discussed possible solutions to the problems<br />
and farmers then agreed to participate <strong>in</strong> their evaluation.<br />
126
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Soil texture class for the experimental sites ranged from sandy clay loam to sand<br />
with sand contents of 58 to 92% (Table 1). The pre-dom<strong>in</strong>ant texture classes were sandy<br />
loam and loamy sand, and of low water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity. The soils for most trial sites had<br />
chemical values below the critical low levels estimated for Uganda soils [5]. Soil organic<br />
matter varied widely but was often low. Available P was below the critical level <strong>in</strong> most<br />
fields. Extractable K and Ca levels were low <strong>in</strong> 24 – 33% and 10-16% of the fields,<br />
respectively. Depletion of soil K probably occurred partly due to past harvests of cassava<br />
and sweet potato. The soil test results were typical for the area [23].<br />
Soil property Kadesok Opwatetta Kapol<strong>in</strong> Critical<br />
127<br />
values a<br />
pH1:2.5<br />
6.1 (5.4 – 6.6) 6.0 (5.2 – 7.2) 6.1 (5.3 – 7.5) 5.2<br />
SOM (mg kg -1 ) 28 (19 – 42) 28 (26 – 41) 22 (17 – 35) 30<br />
Extractable P (mg kg -1 )<br />
1.3 (1 – 6) 1.3 (1 – 5) 2.80 (1 – 9) 5.0<br />
Extractable K (cmolc kg -1 ) 5.1 (2 – 10) 6.2 (3 – 10) 5.4 (2 – 10) 0.4<br />
Extractable Ca (cmolc kg -1 ) 41 (8 – 45) 36 (5 – 54) 31 (5 – 68) 0.9<br />
Sand (%) 71 (66 – 88) 76 (58 – 82) 84 (62 – 92) na<br />
Silt (%) 7 (2.6 – 13) 5 (1.3 – 15) 5. (3 - 11) na<br />
Clay (%) 2 (6.5 – 27) 19 (14 – 29) 11 (5 – 29) na<br />
a<br />
Below these values, soils are deficient or poor [5]; na = not applicable.<br />
Table 1: The median values and ranges for soil properties for the on-farm trial field<br />
<strong>in</strong> three communities<br />
Trial 1: Sorghum response to improved fallow and rotation with cowpea<br />
The mean above-ground dry matter production by mucuna across the three sites was 7 t<br />
ha -1 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 160 kg N ha -1 , 14 kg P ha -1 , and 94 kg K ha -1 This agrees with other<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the region where mean dry matter production was 7.3 t ha -1 , conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 180 kg<br />
N ha -1 with 103 kg N ha -1 derived from the atmosphere [11,13]. Farmers usually fallow<br />
their fields or grow cowpeas rather than sorghum dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong> season (season B)<br />
due to the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of the ra<strong>in</strong>s and heavy feed<strong>in</strong>g by birds. The mean cowpea gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong>s was 0.82 t ha -1 , and the mean sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield for the few<br />
farmers who harvested a short-season crop at Opwatetta and Kadesok was 1.05 t ha -1 ;<br />
these short season yields were used <strong>in</strong> the economic analysis.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Treatment Kadesok Opwatetta Kapol<strong>in</strong><br />
2004A 2005A 2004A 2004B 2005A 2004A 2005A<br />
Number of on-farm trials 5 8 5 3 7 6 5<br />
Previous sorghum 1.03 1.76 1.17 1.00 1.39 0.67 0.96<br />
Previous cowpea 1.84 3.19 1.61 2.00 2.17 1.43 1.18<br />
Previous sorghum,<br />
30 kg N ha -1<br />
2.30 3.49 1.65 2.50 2.43 2.05 1.36<br />
Previous mucuna 2.64 3.98 1.76 2.67 3.00 2.81 1.47<br />
LSD0.05 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.56 0.39 0.53 0.15<br />
Table 2 : Sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t ha -1 ) dur<strong>in</strong>g the long ra<strong>in</strong>s of 2004 and 2005 <strong>in</strong> three<br />
communities<br />
All treatments resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield at all sites <strong>in</strong> both years<br />
relative to cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum with no fertilizer applied (Table 2). The overall mean<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield due to the effect of rotation with cowpea as compared to<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum was 0.72 t ha -1 with a range of 0.2 to 1.4 t ha -1 for the means of sites<br />
and years. The effect of apply<strong>in</strong>g 30 kg N ha -1 to sorghum follow<strong>in</strong>g sorghum was an<br />
overall mean <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield of 1.03 tha -1 with a range 0.4 to 1.7 t ha -1 . The<br />
effect of mucuna grown dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous short ra<strong>in</strong> season was an overall mean<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield of 1.43 t ha -1 with a range 0.5 to 2.2 t ha -1 . Thus, <strong>in</strong>organic N<br />
fertilizer, cowpea rotation, and mucuna fallow served as effective N sources for sorghum<br />
at the three sites. The relatively greater <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield due to the<br />
improved fallow with mucuna is <strong>in</strong> agreement with results reported for maize<br />
[3,11,26,28]. The higher mean response for sorghum follow<strong>in</strong>g mucuna as compared to<br />
cowpea is expected as a large amount of fixed N was removed <strong>in</strong> the harvest of cowpea<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> while most mucuna biomass was left <strong>in</strong> the field.<br />
Treatment Gross returns<br />
(,000 UgSh ha -1 )<br />
Previous sorghum 371.2<br />
Previous cowpea 535.7<br />
Previous sorghum, 30 kg N ha -1 488.7 (25) b , 474.3 (50), 460.0 (75)<br />
Previous mucuna c 453.7<br />
b Values <strong>in</strong> parenthesis are opportunity costs<br />
Table 3: The gross returns, exclud<strong>in</strong>g fertilizer costs at 25, 50 & 75% opportunity costs, for<br />
sorghum produced <strong>in</strong> the long ra<strong>in</strong>y season follow<strong>in</strong>g either sorghum, cowpea or mucuna<br />
produced <strong>in</strong> the short ra<strong>in</strong>y season.<br />
The most economical cropp<strong>in</strong>g system was the cowpea-sorghum rotation followed<br />
by cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum with 30 kg N ha -1 fertilizer and the mucuna rotation (Table 3).<br />
Least profitable was the cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum without N. However, production costs were<br />
assumed to be similar for the previous crops while the cost of produc<strong>in</strong>g mucuna was<br />
undoubtedly less than for sorghum and cowpea due to easier plant<strong>in</strong>g, weed control and<br />
no harvest. The value of graz<strong>in</strong>g of the mucuna dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season was not estimated<br />
but was probably greater than the value of graz<strong>in</strong>g sorghum and cowpea stover. Accurate<br />
128
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
estimation of the true costs and benefits would improve the estimated profitability for the<br />
mucuna treatment to the extent that it may be the most profitable practice.<br />
Trial 2: Sorghum response to application of manure and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer<br />
All manure and fertilizer treatments resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield at all sites<br />
<strong>in</strong> all years relative to the control treatment with no nutrients applied (Table 4). The mean<br />
<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield, across sites and years, due to application of 30 kg N ha -<br />
1 and 2.5 t ha -1 manure was 1.3 and 1.2 t ha -1 , respectively. Application of 10 kg P ha -1 <strong>in</strong><br />
addition to the 30 kg N ha -1 resulted <strong>in</strong> a mean additional yield <strong>in</strong>crease of 0.27 t ha -1 with<br />
site-year mean <strong>in</strong>creases rang<strong>in</strong>g from
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Treatment Increase <strong>in</strong><br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Net returns to <strong>in</strong>put use<br />
(,000 UgSh ha -1 ) a<br />
130<br />
Benefit:cost ratio<br />
25% 50% 75% 25% 50% 75%<br />
30 kg N + 10 kg P ha -1 1.27 83.3 58.8 34.3 1.68 1.40 1.20<br />
30 kg N + 2.5 t manure ha -<br />
1 b<br />
1.40 54.4 29.9 5.4 1.32 1.15 1.02<br />
30 kg N ha -1 0.93 78.9 64.6 50.2 2.10 1.75 1.50<br />
2.5 t manure ha -1 1.02 115.2 115.2 115.2 3.30 3.30 3.30<br />
Table 5: Increase <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t ha -1 ) and net returns and benefit:cost ratios for<br />
opportunity costs of money of 25, 50, and 75%, averaged across all location/years<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The results presented <strong>in</strong> Tables 2, 4 and 5 show that sorghum yield is most constra<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
soil N. However, soil tests results show that the availability of P and other nutrients is<br />
often low. Crop yield may therefore be limited by deficiency of one or more of these<br />
nutrients if crop yields are <strong>in</strong>creased due to improved N availability. Application of a<br />
wide range of nutrients and organic matter with manure may contribute to the<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability of the higher yield levels. The nutrient content of the manure on a dry<br />
matter basis was <strong>in</strong> the range 0.7 – 1.8%, 0.1 - 0.2% and 0.8 - 2.4% for N, P and K,<br />
respectively. The manure was from open pens and a large proportion of the manure N<br />
was probably <strong>in</strong> organic rather than ammonium form. Much of the organic N was<br />
probably not m<strong>in</strong>eralized dur<strong>in</strong>g the season and may benefit subsequent crops.<br />
Manure use, however, is a process of transfer of nutrients from one part of the<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g system to another rather than a replacement of nutrients exported <strong>in</strong> marketed<br />
harvest result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a negative farm level nutrient balance <strong>in</strong> the long run. Eventually,<br />
there will be a need to br<strong>in</strong>g nutrients to the farm to susta<strong>in</strong> the higher levels of<br />
productivity and market<strong>in</strong>g of gra<strong>in</strong>. Also, there is <strong>in</strong>sufficient manure to apply 2.5 t ha -1<br />
yr -1 to most of the cropland although manure is currently an under-utilized resource.<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g legumes <strong>in</strong> the rotation apparently improved N availability. The cowpeasorghum<br />
rotation resulted <strong>in</strong> a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield while provid<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
cowpea gra<strong>in</strong> harvest the previous season. Us<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong> season to produce a<br />
mucuna fallow resulted <strong>in</strong> the greatest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield. This is <strong>in</strong> agreement<br />
with the results reported for maize <strong>in</strong> eastern and central Uganda [4,11,12,13].<br />
Furthermore, mucuna itself has some economic value as livestock grazed it dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
dry season when fodder was scarce. Application of N fertilizer resulted <strong>in</strong> a mean<br />
sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield that was <strong>in</strong>termediate relative to the yields follow<strong>in</strong>g the legumes.<br />
The use of N fertilizer means a cash expense to the farmer but allows more choice <strong>in</strong> land<br />
use dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong> season. The results of the economic analysis show that fertilizer<br />
use is profitable for all the farmers but less so for the poorest farmers with the greatest<br />
opportunity cost.<br />
Several of the practices tested were verified as promis<strong>in</strong>g and a strategy is needed<br />
to achieve widespread adoption. Some of these practices had sufficient effect on crop<br />
performance that field demonstrations should be very effective if conducted throughout
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
the semi-arid sorghum production areas of eastern and northern Uganda. Farmer<br />
<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the full research process ensured that the practices are compatible with<br />
their farm<strong>in</strong>g systems. Also, the practices are easily testable by adopt<strong>in</strong>g farmers.<br />
Extension staff work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the target areas need to be enabled to conduct and<br />
effectively use demonstrations to <strong>in</strong>form farmers of the benefits of these practices. The<br />
participat<strong>in</strong>g farmers, who were <strong>in</strong>volved from the characterization and diagnosis<br />
exercises through the implementation of trials and assessment of the results, are a<br />
potential resource for an organized farmer to farmer dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of the <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Inorganic fertilizers, animal manure, N fertilizer comb<strong>in</strong>ed with manure, mucuna fallow<br />
and cowpea rotation enable profitable <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield on the sandy loam and<br />
loamy sand soils of eastern Uganda. Inadequate N availability is the most limit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
nutrient <strong>in</strong> the traditional production systems <strong>in</strong> this area. Application of a small amount<br />
of P <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer or manure, <strong>in</strong> addition to N, is also profitable at three<br />
opportunity costs for money. The cowpea-sorghum rotation is a relatively profitable<br />
cropp<strong>in</strong>g system, especially if fertilizer N or manure is applied to the sorghum crop. The<br />
use of mucuna as a short ra<strong>in</strong> season fallow crop is a promis<strong>in</strong>g source of N and organic<br />
material, as well as dry season fodder, for the resource-poor smallholder farmers of<br />
eastern Uganda. Available manure needs to be used efficiently as it supplies some of all<br />
soil nutrients essential to crop growth, some of which are likely to become more limit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with <strong>in</strong>creased crop yields. Longer-term on-station research is needed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability of these low <strong>in</strong>put approaches to soil fertility management.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
The authors are grateful to the participat<strong>in</strong>g farmers and to Mr. Dennis Odelle, Mr. Bazil<br />
Kadiba, Mr. Patrick Odongo and Mr. William Acoda, the field assistants at the research<br />
sites. The research was made possible by the National Agricultural Research<br />
Organization (NARO), the International Sorghum/Millet Collaborative Research Support<br />
Program (INTSORMIL) and by fund<strong>in</strong>g from the U.S. Agency for International<br />
Development under the terms of Grant No. LAG-G-00-96-900009-00.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] J. M. Anderson, S. J. Ingram Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. CAB Int.<br />
Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, England. 221 p (1993).<br />
[2] M. A. Bekunda, A. Bationo, , H. Ssali. Soil Fertility Management <strong>in</strong> Africa. A review of selected<br />
research trials, pp 63 –79. In: Buresh, R.J., Sanchez, P.A., Calhoun, F. (eds) Replenish<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility <strong>in</strong><br />
Africa. SSSA spec. Publ. 51 SSA, Madison WI (1997).<br />
[3] FAO/ISRIC – ISSS. World Reference Base for Soil <strong>Resources</strong>. World Soil <strong>Resources</strong>. Report No. 84.<br />
Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome (1998).<br />
131
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
[4] M. Fischler, C. S. Wortmann. Green manures maize-bean systems <strong>in</strong> eastern Uganda: Agronomic<br />
performance and farmers’ perceptions. Agrofor. Syst., Volume 47, pp.123-138 (1999).<br />
[5]. H. L. Foster. Rapid rout<strong>in</strong>e soil and plant analysis without automatic equipment. I. Rout<strong>in</strong>e Soil<br />
analysis. E. Afric. Agric. For. J., Volume 37, pp. 160 – 170 (1971).<br />
[6] K.E. Giller, G. Cadisch, C. Ehakuitusm, E. Adams, W. D. Sakala, P.L. Mafongoya. Build<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />
nitrogen capital <strong>in</strong> Africa. In: R. J. Buresh, P. A. Sanchez, F. Calhoun, (eds.), Replenish<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility <strong>in</strong><br />
Africa. p 151-192. SSSA spec. Publ. 51 SSSA, Madison, EI (1997).<br />
[7] K. E. Giller, J. F. McDonagh, G. Cadisch. Can biological nitrogen fixation susta<strong>in</strong> agriculture <strong>in</strong> the<br />
tropics? p 173-191. In: J. K. Syers, D. L. Rimmer (eds.) Soil Science and susta<strong>in</strong>able land management <strong>in</strong><br />
the tropics. CAB Int., Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, England (1994).<br />
[8] K. E. Giller, G. Cadisch Future benefits from biological nitrogen fixation: An ecological approach to<br />
agriculture. Plant and Soil, Volume 174, pp.255-277 (1995).<br />
[9] K. E. Giller, K. J. Wilson. Nitrogen Fixation <strong>in</strong> Tropical Cropp<strong>in</strong>g Systems. CAB International,<br />
Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, 313p, (1991).<br />
[10] IBSRAM. IBSRAM position paper. In: D. J. Greenland, G. D. Bowen, H. Eswaran, R. Rhoades, C.<br />
Valent<strong>in</strong>, (eds). Soil, Water and Nutrient Management Research - A new Agenda. Bangkok, Thailand<br />
(1994).<br />
[11] C. K. Kaizzi. The potential benefit of green manures and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers <strong>in</strong> cereal production on<br />
contrast<strong>in</strong>g soils <strong>in</strong> eastern Uganda. Ecology and Development series No. 4. Cuviller Verlag Göttigen,<br />
German, 102p (2002).<br />
[12] C. K. Kaizzi, H. Ssali, P. L. G. Vlek. Differential use and benefits of Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens)<br />
and N fertilizers <strong>in</strong> maize production <strong>in</strong> contrast<strong>in</strong>g agro-ecological zones of E. Uganda. Agricultural<br />
Systems, Volume 88, pp. 44 – 60 (2006).<br />
[13] C. K. Kaizzi, H. Ssali, P. L. G. Vlek. The potential of Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) and N<br />
fertilizers <strong>in</strong> maize production on contrast<strong>in</strong>g soils and agro-ecological zones of East Uganda. Nutrient<br />
Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agro ecosystems,Volume 68 pp.59-73 (2004).<br />
[14] C. K. Kaizzi, C. S. Wortmann. Plant Materials for Soil Fertility Management <strong>in</strong> Subhumid Tropical<br />
Areas. Agron. J., Volume 93 pp.929-935 (2001).<br />
[15] J. K. Lekasi, J. C. Tanner, S. K. Kimani, P. J. C. Harris. Manag<strong>in</strong>g Manure to Susta<strong>in</strong> Smallholder<br />
Livelihoods <strong>in</strong> the East African Highlands. HDRA Publications, Coventry, UK. 32pp. (2001).<br />
[16] C. A. Palm. Contribution of Agro forestry trees to nutrient requirements of <strong>in</strong>tercropped plants.<br />
Agrofor. Syst., Volume 30, pp.105-124 (1995)[.<br />
[17] C. A. Palm, R. J. K. Myers, S. M. Nandwa. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed use of Organic and <strong>in</strong>organic nutrient sources<br />
for soil fertility ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and replenishment. In: R. J. Buresh, P. A. Sanchez, F. Calhoun, (eds.),<br />
Replenish<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility <strong>in</strong> Africa. pp 193 -217. SSSA spec. Publ. 51 SSSA, Madison, EI (1997).<br />
[18] M. B. Peoples, D. F. Herridge, J. K. Ladha. Biological nitrogen fixation: an efficient source of<br />
nitrogen for susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture? Plant and Soil, Volume 174, pp. 3-28 (1995).<br />
132
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
AMELIORATION OF ACID SULFATE SOIL INFERTILITY IN<br />
MALAYSIA FOR RICE CULTIVATION<br />
J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong><br />
Department of <strong>Land</strong> Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang,<br />
Selangor Malaysia<br />
Abstract<br />
Normally, acid sulfate soils are not suitable for crop production. Unless they are properly ameliorated us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
appropriate technology <strong>in</strong> agronomic practices, the soils are not put to agriculture production. The objective<br />
of this study was to ameliorate an acid sulfate soil <strong>in</strong> Malaysia us<strong>in</strong>g dolomitic limestone (GML) and an<br />
organic-based fertilizer for rice cultivation. The soils at the experimental plots belong to the Nipis-Bakri<br />
Associations (organic soils underla<strong>in</strong> by sulfidic materials with 50 cm depth), which can be classified as<br />
Typic Sulfosaprists. The rice (Oryza sativa) variety used <strong>in</strong> the trial was MR 219. The treatment <strong>in</strong>cluded a<br />
control (T1, no lime), 2 t GML/ha (T2), 4 t GML/ha (T3), 6 t GML/ha (T4), 8 t GML/ha (T5), 4 t GML/ha<br />
+ organic fertilizer (T6) and 4 t GML/ha + fused magnesium phosphate (T7). The result showed that the<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial topsoil pH was low. At the depth of 45-60 cm, the pH values were lower than 3.5. The <strong>in</strong>itial topsoil<br />
exchangeable Ca ranged from 1.17 to 1.68 cmolc/kg soil, lower than the required level for rice of 2<br />
cmolc/kg soil. The <strong>in</strong>itial exchangeable Mg was only 0.50-0.53, but Mg requirement is 1 cmolc/kg soil. The<br />
highest rice yield for the 2 nd season was 7.5 t/ha obta<strong>in</strong>ed by T6. For this treatment, 4 t GML/ha were<br />
applied <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with the organic fertilizer. This yield is comparable to the yield of rice grown on<br />
good soils <strong>in</strong> the granary areas of the west coast of the Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia. The national average for<br />
Malaysia is 3.8 t/ha. It was observed that the yield obta<strong>in</strong>ed by T6 was not significantly different from that<br />
of T3, T4 and T5. This trial showed that apply<strong>in</strong>g 2 t GML/ha (T2) is not enough to ameliorate these soils<br />
for rice cultivation. For the T2, the pH was still low (3.99) and Al was very high (10.22 cmolc/kg soil). For<br />
T7, where 4 t GML/ha were applied <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with fused magnesium phosphate, the yield was not<br />
significantly different from that of T6. It means <strong>in</strong>stead of us<strong>in</strong>g organic fertilizer, farmers <strong>in</strong> that area can<br />
apply lime together with fused magnesium phosphate. The Malaysian government gives farmers <strong>in</strong> the area<br />
this phosphate fertilizer as a subsidy to <strong>in</strong>crease rice production.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The Kemas<strong>in</strong>-Semerak Integrated Agriculture Development Project was launched by the<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture Malaysia <strong>in</strong> 1982. The project area is located <strong>in</strong> the Kelantan<br />
Pla<strong>in</strong>, an east coast state of Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia. The Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong> is <strong>in</strong> the tropical wet<br />
climatic zone, with a mean daily temperature of 32 o C and a mean annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall of<br />
2290-2540 mm [13]. The climate of the area is <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the South Ch<strong>in</strong>a Sea dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the Northeast Monsoon, which is from November to January.<br />
The Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong> consists of a mixture of river<strong>in</strong>e and mar<strong>in</strong>e alluvial soils,<br />
formed as a result of the rise and fall <strong>in</strong> sea level s<strong>in</strong>ce the Quaternary [4]. Peaty materials<br />
sometimes overla<strong>in</strong> by mixed clayey-sandy sediments occasionally with variable amounts<br />
of pyrite are scattered all over the pla<strong>in</strong>, especially along the coastl<strong>in</strong>e. This eventually<br />
gives rise to development of acid sulfate soil conditions, which are harmful to rice.<br />
About 80 % of the people <strong>in</strong> the area <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g activities, particularly<br />
rice production. Unfortunately, some of the soils <strong>in</strong> the rice farms are too acidic for rice<br />
cultivation, hav<strong>in</strong>g a pH value of less than 3.5. They are called acid sulfate soils. Under<br />
this condition, Al and Fe contents <strong>in</strong> the solutions are usually very high. Rice yield for<br />
133
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
these soils is very low (rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1.29 to 3.06 t/ha). Among the agronomic problems<br />
common to acid sulfate soils are toxicity due to the presence of Al, decrease on P<br />
availability, nutrient deficiency, Fe(II) toxicity and plant stress due to the presence of<br />
sulfuric horizon [3].<br />
The activities of Al 3+ <strong>in</strong> the soil solution are controlled by Al(OH)3 (gibbsite), but<br />
only at high pH. Thus, rais<strong>in</strong>g the pH would render the Al <strong>in</strong>active, as gibbsite is <strong>in</strong>ert. Al<br />
<strong>in</strong> soil solution at 1-2 mg/kg can be toxic to rice [5].<br />
With organic material, Fe(II) toxicity may occur due to reduction of Fe(III) under<br />
flooded soil conditions [20]. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Moore and Patrick [9], Fe(II) activities were<br />
seldom equilibrium with iron solid phases <strong>in</strong> acid sulfate soils. Ponnamperuma et al. [15]<br />
reported values of 5000 mg/kg Fe(II) with<strong>in</strong> 2 weeks of flood<strong>in</strong>g. Iron uptake by rice is<br />
correlated with Fe 2+ activities <strong>in</strong> soil solution [9]. Concentration above 500 mg/kg Fe(II)<br />
is considered toxic to rice plants planted on acid sulfate soils [12].<br />
Some areas of acid sulfate soils <strong>in</strong> Malaysia have been reclaimed for rice<br />
cultivation us<strong>in</strong>g ground magnesium limestone (GML). In the acid sulfate soils of the<br />
Muda Agricultural Development Authority (MADA) granary areas <strong>in</strong> Kedah-Perlis<br />
coastal pla<strong>in</strong>s (northwest coast of Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia), for <strong>in</strong>stance, rice yield improved<br />
significantly after apply<strong>in</strong>g 2.5 tonnes of ground magnesium limestone per ha [2]. In<br />
another area called Merbok Scheme (also <strong>in</strong> the Kedah-Perlis coastal pla<strong>in</strong>s), rice yield<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased from 1.4 t/ha (<strong>in</strong> 1974) to 4.5 t/ha (<strong>in</strong> 1990) after yearly application of 2 t<br />
GML/ha [19].<br />
Acid sulfate soils can also be ameliorated by application of organic materials [10].<br />
Application of organic matter <strong>in</strong> Al-toxic soils <strong>in</strong>creases yield by detoxification of Al<br />
through pH <strong>in</strong>crease and complexation of Al by organic matter [7]. The slight <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
soil pH can be due <strong>in</strong> part to release of NH3 dur<strong>in</strong>g decomposition of organic matter as<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g reported for green manure [6].<br />
The objective of this study was to ameliorate an acid sulfate soil us<strong>in</strong>g ground<br />
magnesium limestone and an organic-based fertilizer for rice cultivation.<br />
The soils<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The soils <strong>in</strong> the experimental plots belong to the Nipis-Bakri Associations (organic soils<br />
underla<strong>in</strong> by sulfidic materials with 50 cm depth), which can be classified as Typic<br />
Sulfosaprists. The peaty materials have been degraded as a result of a long history of rice<br />
cultivation. In the soil profile, the sulfuric layer occurs below the depth of 45 cm.<br />
Prior to treatment, soil samples were collected at 15 cm <strong>in</strong>terval to the depth of 75 cm at<br />
selected locations <strong>in</strong> the experimental plots (T1, T3, T5) <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
chemical properties of the soils. Further soil sampl<strong>in</strong>gs were carried out after every rice<br />
harvest for every treatment <strong>in</strong> the trial, but only for the topsoil.<br />
The crop tested<br />
The rice (Oryza sativa) variety used <strong>in</strong> the trial was MR 219. This is the most common<br />
rice variety planted by Malaysian rice growers <strong>in</strong> the Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong>. The past harvest<br />
134
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
showed that this rice variety yields about 2 t/ha us<strong>in</strong>g farmer’s practice, which is below<br />
the national average of 3.8 t/ha.<br />
Experimental<br />
The experiment was laid out <strong>in</strong> the field us<strong>in</strong>g Completely Randomized Design, with five<br />
replications. Each experimental plot size was 3X3 meters. There were altogether seven<br />
treatments. The treatment for the trial <strong>in</strong>cluded a control (no lime, T1); the rest of the<br />
treatments are given <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The amount of organic fertilizer applied was 0.25 t/ha.<br />
Symbol Treatment<br />
T1 Control (0 t GML/ha)<br />
T2 2 t GML + /ha<br />
T3 4 t GML/ha<br />
T4 6 t GML/ha<br />
T5 8 t GML/ha<br />
T6 4 t GML/ha + JITU*<br />
T7 4 t GML/ha + FMP #<br />
+ GML – Ground Magnesium Limestone<br />
* JITU – Sugar cane-based organic fertilizer (0.25 t/ha)<br />
# FMP – Fused Magnesium Phosphate<br />
Table 1: Treatment <strong>in</strong> the field<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> rice season <strong>in</strong> the Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong> is November-April, while the offseason<br />
is May-September. For this trial, two successive crops of rice were planted, dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong> season. Ground magnesium limestone (GML) was applied once <strong>in</strong> mid-October<br />
2002 and the seed<strong>in</strong>g was done two weeks later, just before irrigation water was allowed<br />
to flow <strong>in</strong>to the experimental plots.<br />
Standard fertilizer rates were give to the grow<strong>in</strong>g rice plants <strong>in</strong> the field (90-120<br />
kg N/ha, 12-18 kg P/ha, 90-120 kg K/ha), us<strong>in</strong>g urea, NPK Blue (12:12:17+TE) and NPK<br />
Green (15:15:15+TE) as the sources of the nutrients. This rate was for optimal rice<br />
growth, which was slightly higher than that us<strong>in</strong>g farmer’s practice. The organic fertilizer<br />
used was sugar cane-based compost.<br />
Soil analysis<br />
The soil pH (1:2.5) was determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> water. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g NH4OAc, buffered at pH 7. Exchangeable Ca, Mg, and K <strong>in</strong> the<br />
NH4OAc extract were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).<br />
Exchangeable Al was extracted by I M KCl and determ<strong>in</strong>ed by AAS. The organic carbon<br />
was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the standard Walkley-Black method [21].<br />
135
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Iron <strong>in</strong> the soils was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by double acid method (henceforth referred to as<br />
acid-extractable Fe). It was extracted us<strong>in</strong>g 0.05 M HCl <strong>in</strong> 0.0125 M H2SO4. A five-gram<br />
sample of the soil was mixed with 25 mL of the extract<strong>in</strong>g solution and shaken for 15<br />
m<strong>in</strong>utes. The solution was then filtered through Whatman filter paper number 42 before<br />
determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Fe it conta<strong>in</strong>ed by AAS.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>itial soil chemical properties<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The chemical characteristics by depth of the soils at selected locations of the<br />
experimental plots <strong>in</strong> the trial before treatment are given <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The topsoil pH was<br />
low; the values were even lower at the depth below 50 cm. At the depth of 45-60 cm, the<br />
pH values were lower than 3.5 <strong>in</strong> all the three locations <strong>in</strong> the experimental plot (Table<br />
2). This low pH co<strong>in</strong>cid<strong>in</strong>g with the presence of jarositic mottles <strong>in</strong> the soils at that depth<br />
qualifies them to be classified as acid sulfate soils. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to a study conducted <strong>in</strong><br />
Vietnam, the depth of jarositic layer <strong>in</strong> an acid sulfate soil is not related with rice<br />
productivity [8]<br />
The low pH was consistent with the presence of high exchangeable Al, especially<br />
at depth below 45 cm, which were the sulfuric layers. But <strong>in</strong> the Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong>, the<br />
exchangeable Ca and Mg were very low [18]. Hence, lim<strong>in</strong>g is necessary to supplement<br />
the macronutrients.<br />
It was found that the peaty materials were completely decomposed. The CEC<br />
(data not shown) of less than 20 cmolc/kg soil further proves that the organic had broken<br />
down and completely mixed with m<strong>in</strong>eral sediments. The CEC of normal organic matter<br />
is very high, hav<strong>in</strong>g a value more than 200 cmolc/kg. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the soil taxonomy<br />
[17], these soils can be classified as Typic Sulfosaprists due to the presence of peaty<br />
materials and sulfuric horizon with<strong>in</strong> the depth of 50 cm.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>itial topsoil exchangeable Ca ranged from 1.17 to 1.68 cmolc/kg soil, lower<br />
than the required level for rice of 2 cmolc/kg soil [14]. The <strong>in</strong>itial exchangeable Mg was<br />
only 0.50-0.53, but Mg requirement is 1 cmolc/kg soil [5]. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these researchers<br />
also, Al concentration of 1-2 mg/kg <strong>in</strong> the soil solution would cause toxicity to the<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g rice plants. Potassium contents seemed to be moderately high and thus would be<br />
sufficient for rice growth.<br />
Based on the presence of deficient amounts of the two macronutrients (Ca and<br />
Mg), it is appropriate that the <strong>in</strong>fertility of the soils can <strong>in</strong> part be ameliorated by<br />
application of dolomitic limestone, which conta<strong>in</strong>s both elements.<br />
The effects of treatment on soils<br />
Flood occurred twice <strong>in</strong> late November 2002. It is not possible to estimate how much<br />
damage the flood had caused to the rice production. The soil analyses carried out on the<br />
soil samples after the first rice harvest (sampled <strong>in</strong> April 2003) showed unexpected<br />
results. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> T1, the topsoil pH, exchangeable Al, exchangeable Ca and<br />
136
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
T1 T3 T5<br />
Depth pH Al Ca Mg K O.C pH Al Ca Mg K O.C pH Al Ca Mg K O.C<br />
(cm) air-<br />
fresh --------------(cmolc/kg)-------------- %<br />
air- ------------(cmolc/kg)------------ % air- -----------(cmolc/kg)----------- %<br />
drieddrieddried<br />
1:2.5<br />
1:2.5<br />
1:2.5<br />
1:2.5<br />
0-15 4.1 4.7 4.46 0.36 0.18 1.21 10.4 4.2 3.35 0.27 0.13 0.88 21.5 4.4 2.72 0.46 0.18 2.20 25.6<br />
15-30 4.0 4.5 4.84 0.22 0.14 1.30 - 4.0 4.81 0.36 0.18 0.86 - 3.8 5.94 0.23 0.12 0.41 -<br />
30-45 3.6 4.4 8.29 0.20 0.52 1.81 - 3.7 8.74 0.32 0.47 1.23 - 3.5 8.82 0.16 0.39 1.32 -<br />
45-60 2.9 3.9 12.54 0.08 0.33 0.61 - 3.3 8.76 0.31 0.54 1.09 - 3.1 13.54 0.27 0.65 0.99 -<br />
60-75 2.5 4.1 15.10 0.05 0.15 0.13 - 2.5 32.43 0.07 0.37 0.76 - 2.5 26.73 0.25 0.68 0.75 -<br />
Table 2: Relevant chemical properties of the soil<br />
Treatment<br />
pH<br />
water<br />
1:2.5<br />
Al Ca Mg K<br />
----------------------(cmolc/kg)---------------------- T1 3.95 e 12.75 a 1.58 e 0.48 f 0.41 a<br />
T2 3.99 e 10.22 ab 1.99 de 0.57 e 0.24 bc<br />
T3 4.06 de 9.45 ab 2.22 cd 0.70 d 0.15 d<br />
T4 4.35 b 3.13 c 2.81 b 0.93 b 0.19 bcd<br />
T5 4.52 a 2.37 c 3.74 a 1.10 a 0.17 cd<br />
T6 4.21 bc 8.79 ab 2.57 bc 0.79 c 0.27 b<br />
T7 4.16 cd 7.46 bc 2.47 bc 0.78 cd 0.21 bcd<br />
LSD0.05 0.14 5.15 0.47 0.08 0.08<br />
Table 3: Topsoil pH and exchangeable cations after 2 nd harvest<br />
137
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
exchangeable Mg were 3.95, 5.83, 1.06 and 0.46 cmolc/kg soil, respectively (data not shown).<br />
In the T5, where 8 tonnes/ha of GML were applied, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g values were 4.38, 2.64,<br />
2.86 and 1.21 cmolc/kg soil. Ironically, the respective values for T7 were higher than those of<br />
the T5, where only 4 tonnes/ha of GML were applied. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g values for this<br />
treatment were 4.93, 0.12, 8.60, 3.37 cmolc/kg soil. All these would be seen <strong>in</strong> the response<br />
of the rice plants shown by the yield of rice <strong>in</strong> this trial <strong>in</strong> the 1 st season. However, the effect<br />
of this flood on rice yield was less remarkable <strong>in</strong> the 2 nd season.<br />
The results of the soil analyses for the second season (sampled on May 1, 2004) were<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to expectation. The lowest pH with a value of 3.95 was reported for the control.<br />
The highest pH, be<strong>in</strong>g 4.52, was reported for T5, where the most amount of GML was<br />
applied (Table 3). Consistent with the lowest pH, the control treatment had the highest value<br />
of exchangeable Al, with a value of 12.75 cmolc/kg soil. As a result of the GML application,<br />
soil pH slowly but surely <strong>in</strong>creased, culm<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the T5. In this treatment, the<br />
exchangeable Ca and Mg were the highest <strong>in</strong> the trials, hav<strong>in</strong>g values of 3.74 and 1.10<br />
cmolc/kg soil, respectively. The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> pH was concomitantly followed by the lower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of exchangeable Al <strong>in</strong> the soil, the value of Al be<strong>in</strong>g 2.37 cmolc/kg soil. This was the lowest<br />
value of exchangeable recorded for this trial.<br />
Rice yield <strong>in</strong> the 1 st season<br />
The two floods of November of 2002 had affected the grow<strong>in</strong>g rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. After the<br />
floods, some plots needed to be reseeded (by transplant<strong>in</strong>g). There could also be removal of<br />
the some lim<strong>in</strong>g materials by the runn<strong>in</strong>g water dur<strong>in</strong>g the height of the flood period; each<br />
flood lasted for about a week. The effect of the flood is clearly seen <strong>in</strong> the erratic values of<br />
the rice yield (Table 4). There seemed to be no real difference <strong>in</strong> rice yield between<br />
treatments. Note that the highest yield was seen on T2, where 2 t GML/ha was applied. But<br />
this yield was not significantly different from the control. The result of the trial for the 2 nd<br />
would be presented later.<br />
Treatment<br />
First harvest<br />
April 26, 2003<br />
(t/ha)<br />
138<br />
Second harvest<br />
May 1, 2004<br />
(t/ha)<br />
T1 4.5 ab 5.1 bc<br />
T2 5.0 a 4.5 c<br />
T3 3.5 bc 6.3 abc<br />
T4 4.4 abc 6.6 ab<br />
T5 4.2 abc 7.2 a<br />
T6 3.7 bc 7.5 a<br />
T7 3.1 c 6.8 ab<br />
LSD0.05 1.4 2.0<br />
Table 4: The rice yield at the first and second harvest<br />
Seed<strong>in</strong>g of the 1 st plant<strong>in</strong>g season was done two weeks after lime treatment. This is<br />
considered a long enough time for the lime to react with soil, given the acid soil conditions at<br />
the site. The rice yield for the recommended rate (T6) was 3t/ha; this was lower than that of<br />
the control though it was not significantly different.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Rice yield <strong>in</strong> the 2 nd season<br />
The highest rice yield for the 2 nd season was 7.5 t/ha obta<strong>in</strong>ed by T6 (Table 4). For this<br />
treatment, 4 t GML/ha were applied <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with 0.25 t/ha sugarcane-based organic<br />
fertilizer (JITU). This yield is comparable to the yield of rice grown on good soils <strong>in</strong> the<br />
granary areas of the west coast of the pen<strong>in</strong>sula.<br />
It was observed that the yield obta<strong>in</strong>ed by T6 was not significantly different from that<br />
of the T3, T4 and T5. There was <strong>in</strong>dication that apply<strong>in</strong>g 2 t GML/ha (T2) is not enough to<br />
ameliorate the soil for rice cultivation. As Table 3 shows, for the T2, the pH was still low<br />
(3.99) and Al was very high (10.22 cmolc/kg soil). For T7, where 4 t GML/ha were applied <strong>in</strong><br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation with fused magnesium phosphate, the yield was not significantly different from<br />
that of the T6. It means that <strong>in</strong>stead of us<strong>in</strong>g organic fertilizer, farmers <strong>in</strong> that area can apply<br />
lime together with fused magnesium phosphate.<br />
General discussion<br />
Ca present <strong>in</strong> soils is good <strong>in</strong> itself. Ca is, to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent, able to reduce the toxic effect of<br />
Al [1,16]. This would happen from T3 right to T7 (Table 3). The amelioration of Al toxicity,<br />
should there be any, would be shown by the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> rice yield (Table 4). The presence of<br />
extra Mg could also contribute to alleviation of Al toxicity as had been shown by<br />
Shamshudd<strong>in</strong> et al. [16] for maize.<br />
Alum<strong>in</strong>um is toxic to plant. High exchangeable Al <strong>in</strong> soil is usually associated with<br />
low pH. This is clearly shown by the data given <strong>in</strong> Table 3; the lowest pH co<strong>in</strong>cides with the<br />
highest Al (T5). It shows the opposite <strong>in</strong> T1. As seen <strong>in</strong> Table 1, the <strong>in</strong>itial exchangeable Al<br />
was extremely high <strong>in</strong> some samples, reach<strong>in</strong>g a value of 32.43 cmolc/kg soil <strong>in</strong> the subsoil of<br />
T3. The lowest value was 2.72, <strong>in</strong> the topsoil of T5. In the water <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the<br />
experimental plots, Al would certa<strong>in</strong>ly exceed the critical value for rice production of 1-2<br />
mg/kg. This high Al <strong>in</strong> the solution can be reduced to an accepted level by apply<strong>in</strong>g GML at<br />
an appropriate rate. This study suggested that GML application at 4 t/ha would be<br />
appropriate.<br />
Fe toxicity is one of the most important problems fac<strong>in</strong>g production of rice on acid<br />
sulfate soils. In the abandoned rice fields, the water was reddish <strong>in</strong> color, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
presence of high amounts of soluble iron. In this study, acid-extractable Fe <strong>in</strong> the soils was<br />
slightly above the critical level, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.07 to 0.81 cmolc/kg soil (data not shown).<br />
Critical Fe concentration varies from 0.05 to 5.37 cmolc/kg soil [5] imply<strong>in</strong>g that Fe may not<br />
be the only source of soil toxicity that causes reduction <strong>in</strong> yield.<br />
A major problem of cultivated rice on acid sulfate soils is P-deficiency. This is caused<br />
by high P-fixation capacity of the soil due to the presence of high amounts of Al and/or Fe. P<br />
is unavailable to the rice and will rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> place where it is applied due to its<br />
immobilization. So, once soluble phosphate fertilizer is applied, it will revert to its less or<br />
<strong>in</strong>soluble form. Lack of P <strong>in</strong> the soil can be alleviated by apply<strong>in</strong>g fused magnesium<br />
phosphate (T7).<br />
P-deficiency <strong>in</strong> the soil would cause stunted growth, reduced tiller<strong>in</strong>g and reduction <strong>in</strong><br />
the number of panicles. In the 2 nd season, the available P was about 4 ppm (data not shown),<br />
and there was no significant difference between treatments. But the rice yield did not seem to<br />
be affected significantly by the possible lack of available P <strong>in</strong> the soils, as the yield <strong>in</strong> T6 and<br />
T7 had shown. The required soil available P for rice production is 7-20 ppm [5].<br />
Add<strong>in</strong>g organic fertilizer <strong>in</strong>to a flooded acid sulfate soil would <strong>in</strong>tensify reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
condition, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> release of Fe 2+ , which is toxic to rice plants [20]. Putt<strong>in</strong>g organic<br />
fertilizer at the rate applied <strong>in</strong> the current study did not show any effect on rice yield.<br />
139
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Treatment T6 <strong>in</strong> which GML applied together with organic fertilizer gave the highest rice<br />
yield of 7.5 t/ha <strong>in</strong> 2 nd season (Table 4). On the contrary, high quality organic matter, like<br />
organic fertilizer used <strong>in</strong> the current study, would hasten reduction of Fe that result <strong>in</strong> pH<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease [11].<br />
The lime (GML) used <strong>in</strong> this study was dolomitic limestone [(Ca,Mg) (CO3)2 ].<br />
Add<strong>in</strong>g this lime would <strong>in</strong>crease soil pH accord<strong>in</strong>gly, with concomitant addition of Ca and<br />
Mg <strong>in</strong>to the soil. For 2 nd season of the trial, soil pH <strong>in</strong>creased l<strong>in</strong>early with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
exchangeable Ca (Figure 1A), with R 2 = 0.73. Likewise, pH <strong>in</strong>creased l<strong>in</strong>early with<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g exchangeable Mg (Figure 1B; R 2 = 0.78).<br />
pH<br />
4.80<br />
4.60<br />
4.40<br />
4.20<br />
4.00<br />
3.80<br />
3.60<br />
y = 0.26x + 3.54<br />
R 2 = 0.73<br />
- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />
exchangeable Ca<br />
140<br />
pH<br />
4.80<br />
4.60<br />
4.40<br />
4.20<br />
4.00<br />
3.80<br />
3.60<br />
y = 0.26x + 3.54<br />
R 2 = 0.73<br />
- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />
exchangeable Ca<br />
A B<br />
Figure 1. Relationship between pH and exchangeable Ca (A) and exchangeable Mg (B)<br />
GML ameliorated <strong>in</strong> the soil accord<strong>in</strong>g to the follow<strong>in</strong>g reactions:<br />
(Ca,Mg)(CO3)2 � Ca 2+ + Mg 2+ + CO3 2- (equation 1)<br />
CO3 2- + H2O � HCO3 - + OH - (equation 2)<br />
Al 3+ + 3OH - � Al(OH)3 (equation 3)<br />
The GML dissolved readily on apply<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to the acidic soil, releas<strong>in</strong>g Ca and Mg (equation<br />
1), and these macronutrients could be taken up the grow<strong>in</strong>g rice plants. Subsequently,<br />
hydrolysis of CO3 - (equation 2) would produce hydroxyls that neutralized Al by form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ert<br />
gibbsite (equation 3). Soil pH <strong>in</strong>creased significantly follow<strong>in</strong>g reduction of exchangeable Al<br />
(Figure 2A).
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
pH<br />
4.80<br />
4.60<br />
4.40<br />
4.20<br />
4.00<br />
y = -0.23Ln(x) + 4.59<br />
R 2 3.80<br />
3.60<br />
= 0.59<br />
- 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00<br />
exchangeable Al<br />
141<br />
pH<br />
4.80<br />
4.60<br />
4.40<br />
4.20<br />
4.00<br />
3.80<br />
y = 0.19Ln(x) + 4.36<br />
R 2 = 0.71<br />
3.60<br />
- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />
Ca/Al ratio<br />
A B<br />
Figure 2: Relationship between pH and Al(A) and Ca/Al ratio (B)<br />
Calcium is able to detoxify Al to certa<strong>in</strong> extent [1]. Hence, Ca/Al ratio can be used as<br />
an <strong>in</strong>dex of soil acidity [16]. Unfortunately, there was no correlation between rice and Ca/Al<br />
ratio <strong>in</strong> this study. Neither was there a correlation between relative yield and Ca/Al ratio.<br />
However, there was an excellent correlation between pH and Ca/Al ratio. This is shown by<br />
the equation <strong>in</strong> Figure 2B:<br />
pH = 0.19Ln(x) + 4.36 (R 2 = 0.71)<br />
Figure 3 depicts the relationship between yield and relative yield with either<br />
exchangeable Ca or Mg <strong>in</strong> the acid sulfate soil. The correlation between yield and<br />
exchangeable Ca was poor, with low R 2 value (Figure 3A). The Pearson Correlation<br />
Coefficient was 0.32 with probability of 0.058. Thus, the relationship between the two<br />
parameters was significant at 5 % level. The same is true for the correlation between relative<br />
yield and exchangeable Ca (Figure 3B). As the relationship is poor, it is unable to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the critical exchangeable Ca for rice cultivation on this particular acid sulfate soil. There is<br />
<strong>in</strong>dication that rice yield improves on GML application.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
Yield (t/ha)<br />
Relative Yield (%)<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
A<br />
y = 0.78x + 4.35<br />
-<br />
- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />
exchangeable Ca<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
-<br />
B<br />
y = 7.86x + 43.84<br />
- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />
exchangeable Ca<br />
142<br />
Yield (t/ha)<br />
Relative Yield (%)<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
C<br />
y = 3.44x + 3.65<br />
-<br />
0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20<br />
exchangeable Mg<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
-<br />
D<br />
y = 34.65x + 36.84<br />
0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20<br />
exchangeable Mg<br />
Figure 3. Relationship between rice yield and exchangeable Ca (A), relative yield and exchangeable<br />
Ca (B), yield and exchangeable Mg (C) and relative yield with exchangeable Mg (D) for the second<br />
season. (R 2 < 0.01)<br />
Further <strong>in</strong>dication of the improvement of rice yield due to GML application is shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> Figure 3C and 3D, where yield and relative yield, respectively when exchangeable Mg was<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Ground magnesium limestone and organic fertilizer applied at appropriate rates on acid<br />
sulfate soils can produce rice yield comparable to that of the granary areas of Malaysia. The<br />
result of this study showed that rice yield could be as high as 7.5 t/ha us<strong>in</strong>g current<br />
technology, apply<strong>in</strong>g 4 t GML/ha <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with an organic fertilizer.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />
ACKNOWLEDGENTS<br />
The authors would like to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia and the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Science,<br />
Technology and Innovation Malaysia for f<strong>in</strong>ancial and technical support.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] A.K. Alva, C.J. Asher, D.G. Edwards. The role of calcium <strong>in</strong> alleviat<strong>in</strong>g alum<strong>in</strong>um toxicity. Aust. J. Soil<br />
Res., 37, pp. 375-383, (1986).<br />
[2) X. Arulando, S.P. Kam. Management of acid sulfate soils <strong>in</strong> the Muda Irrigation Scheme, Kedah, Pen<strong>in</strong>sular<br />
Malaysia. In International Institute for <strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Improvement; Dosh, H., Breemenr N., Eds.; Publ.<br />
31, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The Netherlands, pp: 195-212, (1982).<br />
[3] D.L. Dent. Acid Sulfate Soil: A Basel<strong>in</strong>e for Research and Development; International Institute for <strong>Land</strong><br />
Reclamation and Improvement: Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The Netherlands, Publ. 39, (1986).<br />
[4] H.D. Djia. Geomorphology. In Geology of the Malay Pen<strong>in</strong>sula; Gobbet D.S., Hutchison, C.H., Eds.; John<br />
Wiley & Sons, <strong>New</strong> York, pp: 13-24, (1973).<br />
[5] A. Dobermann, T. Fairhurst. Rice: Nutrient Disorders and Nutrient Management; Phosphate Institute of<br />
Canada and International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, The Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, (2000).<br />
[6] P.B. Hoyt, R.C. Turner. Effects of organic materials added to very acid soil on pH, alum<strong>in</strong>um, exchangeable<br />
bases, ammonium, and crop yield. Soil Sci., 119, pp. 227-237, (1975).<br />
[7] N.V. Hue, I. Amien. Alum<strong>in</strong>um detoxification with green manures. Commun. Soil Sci. & Plant Anal., 20,<br />
pp. 1499-1511, (1989).<br />
[8] O. Husson, P.H. Verburg, Mai Thanh Phunh. Special variability of acid sulfate soils <strong>in</strong> the Pla<strong>in</strong> of Reeds,<br />
Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Geoderma, 97, pp.1-19, (2000).<br />
[9] P.A. Moore, W.H. Patrick. Metal availability and uptake by rice <strong>in</strong> acid sulfate soils. In International<br />
Institute for <strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Improvement; Dent, D.L, Mensvoort, M.E.F., Eds.; Publ. 53, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen,<br />
The Netherlands, pp: 205-224, (1993).<br />
[10] S. Muhrizal, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, I. Fauziah, M.H.A. Husni. Alleviation of alum<strong>in</strong>um toxicity <strong>in</strong> acid sulfate<br />
soils <strong>in</strong> Malaysia us<strong>in</strong>g organic materials. Commun. Soil Sci. & Plant Anal., 34, pp. 2999-3017, (2003).<br />
[11] S. Muhrizal, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, I. Fauziah, and M.H.A. Husni. Changes <strong>in</strong> an iron-poor acid sulfate soil upon<br />
submergence. Geoderma, 131, pp. 110-122, (2006).<br />
[12] M.M Nhung, F.N. Ponnamperuma. Effects of calcium carbonate, manganese dioxide, ferric hydroxide and<br />
prolonged flood<strong>in</strong>g and electrochemical changes and growth of rice on a flooded acid sulfate soil. Soil Sci., 102,<br />
pp. 29-41, (1966).<br />
[13] J.B. Ooi. <strong>Land</strong>, People and Economy of Malaya. Longmans; London, (1964).<br />
[14] M. Palhares. Recommendation for fertilizer application for soils via qualitative reason<strong>in</strong>g. J. Agric. Sys.,<br />
67, pp. 21-30, (2000).<br />
[15] F.N.Ponnaperuma, T. Attanandana, G. Beye. Amelioration of three acid sulfate soils for lowland rice. In<br />
International Institute for <strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Improvement; Dosh, H., Ed.; Publ.18, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The<br />
Netherlands, pp: 391-406, (1973).<br />
[16] J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, I. Che Fauziah, H.A.H. Sharifudd<strong>in</strong>. Effects of limestone and gypsum application to a<br />
Malaysian Ultisol on soil solution and yields of maize and groundnut. Plant and Soil, 137, pp. 45-52 (1991).<br />
]17] Soil Survey Staff. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic Soil Classification for Mak<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g Soil Surveys.<br />
USDA, Natural <strong>Resources</strong> Conservation Services, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, (1999).<br />
[18] S.W. Soo,. Semi-detailed Soil Survey of Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong>. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture & Rural Development,<br />
Kuala Lumpur, (1975).<br />
[19] C.C. T<strong>in</strong>g, S. Rohani, W. S. Diemont, B.Y Am<strong>in</strong>udd<strong>in</strong>. The development of an acid sulfate soil <strong>in</strong> former<br />
mangroves <strong>in</strong> Merbok, Kedah, Malaysia. In International Institute for <strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Improvement;<br />
Dent, D.L., Mensvoort, M.E.F., Eds.; Publ. 53, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The Netherlands, pp: 95-101, (1993).<br />
[20] K.T. Tran, T.G. Vo. Effects of mixed organic and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers on rice yield and soil chemistry of<br />
the 8 th crop on heavy acid sulfate soil (Hydraquentic Sulfaquepts) <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. A paper<br />
presented at the 6 th International Symposium on Plant-Soil at Low pH. August 1-5, 2004; Sendai: Japan, (2004).<br />
[21] A.Wakley, I.A. Black. An exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the Degtjrref Method for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g organic matter, and a<br />
proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37, pp. 29-38, (1934).<br />
143
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
WORKSHOP THEME C – LAND EVALUATION AND LAND<br />
DEGRADATION<br />
Sub-theme : <strong>Land</strong> evaluation for susta<strong>in</strong>able land management & policy<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
A. Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst<br />
Paper/poster : Oil palm and rubber production model for substitut<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rubber with oil palm and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g to establish oil palm <strong>in</strong>to Northeast<br />
Thailand – S. Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra, E. Van Ranst, H. Verplancke<br />
Paper/poster : Soil properties and biological diversity of undisturbed and<br />
disturbed forests <strong>in</strong> Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>gdan, Philip<strong>in</strong>es - Renato D. Boniao, Rosa<br />
Villa B. Estoista, Carmelita G. Hansel, Ron de Goede, Olga M. Nuneza,<br />
Brigida A. Roscom, Sam James, Rhea Amor C. Lumactud, Mae Yen O.<br />
Poblete, Nonillon Aspe<br />
Sub-theme : <strong>Land</strong> degradation : pressures, <strong>in</strong>dicators and responses<br />
W. Cornelis, D. Gabriels, H. Verplancke<br />
Paper/poster : Indicators and participatory methods for monitor<strong>in</strong>g land<br />
degradation. A case study <strong>in</strong> the Migori district of Kenya – V<strong>in</strong>cent de<br />
Paul Obade, Eva De Clercq<br />
Paper/poster : Proposed plan of action for research on desertification <strong>in</strong><br />
the Sudan : Gezira and Sennar States – Kamal Elfadil Fadul, Fawzi<br />
Mohamed Salih<br />
Paper/poster : Diagnostic of degradation processes of soils from Northern<br />
Togo (West Africa) as a tool for soil and water management – Rosa M.<br />
Poch, Josep M. Ubalde<br />
Conclusions<br />
144
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Sub-theme : LAND EVALUATION FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND<br />
MANAGEMENT & POLICY MAKING<br />
Overview of the latest research <strong>in</strong> land evaluation at the Laboratory of Soil Science<br />
A. Verdoodt & E. Van Ranst<br />
Laboratory for Soil Science, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<br />
<strong>New</strong> paradigms <strong>in</strong>terpret soil as a habitat for liv<strong>in</strong>g systems, deliver<strong>in</strong>g a wide range of<br />
hugely valuable ecosystem functions such as food security, clean air and water, biodiversity,<br />
and cultural heritage. Soil erosion, contam<strong>in</strong>ation, and organic matter decl<strong>in</strong>e, are only a few<br />
examples of threats that hypothecate soil function<strong>in</strong>g all over the world. Although there is<br />
good agreement on the importance that should be given to susta<strong>in</strong>able land management,<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g about how the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal drivers and configurations of the soil system differ<br />
between ‘land-use-soil-climate’ comb<strong>in</strong>ations is still <strong>in</strong>complete and hampers the<br />
development of scientifically sound land use policies. In response to these new demands, the<br />
research <strong>in</strong> land evaluation conducted at our laboratory focuses on three major aspects :<br />
(1) design of soil/land <strong>in</strong>formation systems provid<strong>in</strong>g georeferenced climate, landscape and<br />
soil data;<br />
(2) design of land evaluation tools for specific land uses, mak<strong>in</strong>g full use of the <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
availability of soil data; and<br />
(3) identification of soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators, basel<strong>in</strong>es and thresholds for monitor<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />
quality and design<strong>in</strong>g soil protection policies.<br />
In the first research aspect, land and soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems, together with the new<br />
techniques of data gather<strong>in</strong>g based on remote sens<strong>in</strong>g, have become <strong>in</strong>dispensable tools for<br />
the presentation and analysis of soil characteristics. Geographic <strong>in</strong>formation science and<br />
relational database software were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to capture the spatial as well as the numerical<br />
and descriptive data gathered dur<strong>in</strong>g the traditional soil surveys organised <strong>in</strong> Rwanda and the<br />
Democratic Republic of Congo. The soil <strong>in</strong>formation system of Rwanda, compris<strong>in</strong>g 43 soil<br />
maps and 43 digital terra<strong>in</strong> models at a scale of 1:50,000, was further extended with climatic<br />
records at monthly and daily temporal resolutions. Additionally, the generation of simplified<br />
soil maps at scale 1:250,000, revealed the diversity <strong>in</strong> land resources at national level. With<br />
the creation of a soil profile database, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1,834 described and analysed soil profiles,<br />
the soil <strong>in</strong>formation system is a powerful tool for agricultural and land use plann<strong>in</strong>g purposes<br />
<strong>in</strong> Rwanda. A similar soil <strong>in</strong>formation system is be<strong>in</strong>g created for the Democratic Republic of<br />
Congo. In addition, the detailed, semi-detailed and reconnaissance soil maps and the<br />
abundant morphological and analytical soil profile data gathered <strong>in</strong> Rwanda, Burundi and the<br />
DR of Congo, enabled us to develop a scientifically sound Great Lakes Area SOTER (Soil<br />
and Terra<strong>in</strong>) Database. SOTER mapp<strong>in</strong>g is similar to physiographic soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g but with<br />
stronger emphasis on the terra<strong>in</strong>-soil relationship. A SOTER unit represents a unique<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation of terra<strong>in</strong> and soil characteristics. The methodology focuses on the identification<br />
of areas of land with a dist<strong>in</strong>ctive pattern of landform, lithology, surface form, slope, parent<br />
material and soil. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the design of the SOTER database of Central Africa, a<br />
physiographic map has been derived after analysis of SRTM satellite data of the region.<br />
Geological maps at different scales were translated <strong>in</strong>to lithological maps. These thematic<br />
maps were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to give the SOTER unit maps at scale 1:1M for Rwanda and Burundi<br />
145
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
and at scale 1:2M for the Democratic Republic of Congo. Much more additional <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
characteris<strong>in</strong>g the non-mappable terra<strong>in</strong> and soil components has been selected, harmonised<br />
and <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong> a large relational database conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a wealth of descriptive and analytical<br />
soil profile data.<br />
The second research aspect comprises the development of (1) a spatially and<br />
temporally explicit multi-scale decision support system that reveals the biophysical <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
affect<strong>in</strong>g land use choices of different stakeholders, and (2) a web-based land evaluation<br />
system to perform agricultural productivity assessments <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. The multiscale<br />
decision support system comprises three different environmental assessment tools,<br />
designed to run with data supplied by traditional soil surveys and organised <strong>in</strong>to a land<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation system. A qualitative land suitability classification procedure is adapted to<br />
translate the large-scale biophysical data, <strong>in</strong>to five suitability classes. At local scale, the<br />
productivity of the soil units is estimated us<strong>in</strong>g a three-level hierarchical crop productivity<br />
estimator. At the smallest spatial and temporal resolution, a daily water balance approach is<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to a crop growth model. The decision support system was applied and validated us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the land <strong>in</strong>formation system of Rwanda. It revealed the biophysical properties affect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
national crop regionalisation, regional crop productivity differences, and local <strong>in</strong>tensification<br />
options. The Web-based land evaluation system (WLES) is designed <strong>in</strong> such a way that the<br />
system operates either as a Web Application or as a Web Service via the Internet.<br />
Implemented on top of the .NET platform, the WLES has a loosely coupled multi-tier<br />
structure which seamlessly <strong>in</strong>tegrates the land evaluation knowledge eng<strong>in</strong>e and the spatial<br />
database. The WLES not only provides productivity assessment service <strong>in</strong> a user-friendly<br />
way to agricultural researchers, eng<strong>in</strong>eers, farm managers, policy makers and planners but<br />
also acts as a build<strong>in</strong>g block of a larger system such as that of land taxation, impact of climate<br />
change on agriculture, population carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity, and so forth.<br />
The third research aspect merely focuses on the assessment of the overall soil<br />
quality, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the capacity of the soil to function susta<strong>in</strong>ably. This encompasses the<br />
identification and selection of scientifically sound soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators to monitor the<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> the soil quality status. These changes are determ<strong>in</strong>ed relative to a basel<strong>in</strong>e value<br />
and are also compared to a threshold value, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a critical soil status limit<strong>in</strong>g or<br />
threaten<strong>in</strong>g the susta<strong>in</strong>able function<strong>in</strong>g of the soil. The ongo<strong>in</strong>g ENVASSO (ENVironmental<br />
ASsessment for SOil monitor<strong>in</strong>g) project reviews and def<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicators that encompass the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> threats to soil degradation <strong>in</strong> Europe. Identification of the soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators for<br />
each threat is based on an extensive literature review with the reports of technical work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
groups with<strong>in</strong> the development of the EU Thematic Strategy on Soil Protection as ma<strong>in</strong><br />
source documents. Selection criteria for each <strong>in</strong>dicator are based on its significance,<br />
analytical soundness, measurability, policy relevance, geographical coverage, availability of<br />
basel<strong>in</strong>es and thresholds and its comprehensibility. Protocols and procedures for data<br />
collection, sampl<strong>in</strong>g, storage, manipulation, <strong>in</strong>terpretation and report<strong>in</strong>g will be developed.<br />
The project will report the current monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators, will identify gaps<br />
<strong>in</strong> the national and European wide monitor<strong>in</strong>g systems and will provide guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the<br />
development of a soil policy. Soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g and identification of sound soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
can also be realised through the <strong>in</strong>corporation of ethnopedological knowledge. In Mexico, a<br />
local soil classification scheme was formalised and compared to the <strong>in</strong>ternational USDA soil<br />
classification system. Both similarities and differences, reveal<strong>in</strong>g complementarities, were<br />
identified. Critical is the evaluation of the topsoil characteristics, as the monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />
topsoil dynamics is fundamental to susta<strong>in</strong>able land management. In a study for susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
land management of mounta<strong>in</strong> karst areas <strong>in</strong> Vietnam, local <strong>in</strong>habitants are also participat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> the generation of soil maps and the identification and classification of local <strong>in</strong>dicators of<br />
soil quality. Laboratory results confirmed the validity of vernacular knowledge for<br />
146
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g and classify<strong>in</strong>g local <strong>in</strong>dicators of soil quality and soil fertility, compared to<br />
scientific standards applied <strong>in</strong> Vietnam and <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational community.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Research papers, Laboratory of Soil Science<br />
[15] N. Barrera-Bassols, J.A. Z<strong>in</strong>ck, E. Van Ranst. Symbolism, knowledge and management of soil and land<br />
resources <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous communities : ethnopedology at global, regional and local scales. Catena 65, pp. 118-<br />
137 (2006).<br />
[16] N. Barrera-Bassols, J.A. Z<strong>in</strong>ck, E. Van Ranst. Local soil classification and comparison of <strong>in</strong>digenous and<br />
technical soil maps <strong>in</strong> a Mesoamerican community us<strong>in</strong>g spatial analysis. Geoderma (<strong>in</strong> press, 2006).<br />
[17] B. M<strong>in</strong>tesenot, H. Verplancke, E. Van Ranst, H. Mitiku. Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g traditional irrigation methods, irrigation<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g and alternate furrows irrigation on Vertisols <strong>in</strong> Northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management<br />
64, pp. 17-27 (2004).<br />
[18] D. P. Shrestha, J. A. Z<strong>in</strong>ck, E. Van Ranst. Modell<strong>in</strong>g land degradation <strong>in</strong> the Nepalese Himalaya. Catena<br />
57, pp. 135-156 (2004).<br />
[19] H. Tang, E. Van Ranst. Is highly <strong>in</strong>tensive agriculture environmentally susta<strong>in</strong>able? A case study from<br />
Fugou county, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Journal of Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agriculture 25 (3), pp. 91-102 (2005).<br />
[20] H. Tang, J. Qiu, E. Van Ranst, C. Li. Estimations of soil organic carbon storage <strong>in</strong> cropland of Ch<strong>in</strong>a based<br />
on DNDC model. Geoderma 134, pp. 200-206 (2006).<br />
[21] E. Van Ranst, F. O. Nachtergaele, A. Verdoodt. Evolution and availability of geographic databases. In :<br />
Innovative techniques <strong>in</strong> soil survey : “Develop<strong>in</strong>g the foundation for a new generation of soil resource<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventories and their utilisation”. H. Eswaran, P. Vijarnsorn, T. Vearasilp, E. Padmanabhan (eds.). <strong>Land</strong><br />
Development Department, Chattuchak, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 223-236 (2004).<br />
[22] Van Vosselen, H. Verplancke, E. Van Ranst. Assess<strong>in</strong>g water consumption of banana : traditional versus<br />
modell<strong>in</strong>g approach. Agricultural Water Management 74, pp. 201-218 (2005).<br />
[23] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst, W. Van Averbeke. Modell<strong>in</strong>g crop production potentials for yield gap analysis<br />
under semi-arid conditions <strong>in</strong> Guquka, South Africa. Soil Use and Management 19, pp. 372-380 (2003).<br />
[24] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst, H. Verplancke. Integration of soil survey data, Geographic Information Science<br />
and land evaluation technology for land use optimisation <strong>in</strong> Rwanda. In : Innovative techniques <strong>in</strong> soil survey :<br />
“Develop<strong>in</strong>g the foundation for a new generation of soil resource <strong>in</strong>ventories and their utilisation”. H. Eswaran,<br />
P. Vijarnsorn, T. Vearasilp, E. Padmanabhan (eds.). <strong>Land</strong> Development Department, Chattuchak, Bangkok,<br />
Thailand, pp. 365-380 (2004).<br />
[25] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst, L. Ye. Daily simulation of potential dry matter production of annual field crops <strong>in</strong><br />
tropical environments. Agronomy Journal 96, pp. 1739-1753 (2004).<br />
[26] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst, L. Ye, H. Verplancke. A daily multi-layered water balance to predict water and<br />
oxygen availability <strong>in</strong> tropical cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems. Soil Use and Management 21, pp. 312-321 (2005).<br />
[27] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst. Environmental assessment tools for multi-scale natural resources <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
systems. A case study of Rwanda. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114, pp. 170-184 (2006).<br />
[28] L. Ye, E. Van Ranst. Population carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity and susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural use of land resources <strong>in</strong><br />
Caoxian County (N. Ch<strong>in</strong>a). Journal of Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agriculture 19 (4), pp. 75-94 (2002).<br />
[29] L. Ye, E. Van Ranst, A. Verdoodt. Design and implementation of a Web-based land evaluation system and<br />
its application to land value tax assessment us<strong>in</strong>g .NET technology. In : Innovative techniques <strong>in</strong> soil survey :<br />
“Develop<strong>in</strong>g the foundation for a new generation of soil resource <strong>in</strong>ventories and their utilisation”. H. Eswaran,<br />
P. Vijarnsorn, T. Vearasilp, E. Padmanabhan (eds.). <strong>Land</strong> Development Department, Chattuchak, Bangkok,<br />
Thailand, pp. 183-196 (2004).<br />
[30] L. Ye, E. Van Ranst. Development of a Web-based land evaluation system and its application to population<br />
carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity assessment us<strong>in</strong>g .NET technology. In : Proc. of the AFITA/WCCA 2004 Jo<strong>in</strong>t Congress on<br />
IT <strong>in</strong> Agriculture. F. Zazueta, S. N<strong>in</strong>omiya, R. Chitradon (eds.). National Science and Technology Development<br />
Agency, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand, pp. 409-414.<br />
[31] J.A. Z<strong>in</strong>ck, J.L. Berroteran, A. Farshad, A. Moameni, S. Wokabi, E. Van Ranst. Approaches to assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture. Journal of Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agriculture 23, pp. 87-109 (2004).<br />
147
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Other <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g papers<br />
[32] S. S. Andrews, D. L. Karlen, C. A. Cambardella. The soil management assessment framework : a<br />
quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, pp. 1945-1962 (2004).<br />
[33] M.A. Arshad, S. Mart<strong>in</strong>. Identify<strong>in</strong>g critical limits for soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong> agro-ecosystems.<br />
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 88, pp. 153-160 (2002).<br />
[34] P. S. B<strong>in</strong>draban, J. J. Stoorvogel, D. M. Jansen, J. Vlam<strong>in</strong>g, J. J. R. Groot. <strong>Land</strong> quality <strong>in</strong>dicators for<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able land management : proposed method for yield gap and soil nutrient balance. Agriculture,<br />
Ecosystems and Environment 81 (2), pp. 103-112 (2000).<br />
[35] M. R. Carter. Soil quality for susta<strong>in</strong>able land management : organic matter and aggregation <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
that ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> soil functions. Agronomy Journal 94, pp. 38-47 (2002).<br />
[36] B. Govaerts, K. D. Sayre, J. Deckers. A m<strong>in</strong>imum data set for soil quality assessment of wheat and maize<br />
cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the highlands of Mexico. Soil and Tillage Research 87, pp. 163-174 (2006).<br />
[37] J. E. Herrick. Soil quality : an <strong>in</strong>dicator of susta<strong>in</strong>able land management? Applied Soil Ecology 15, pp. 75-<br />
83 (2000).<br />
[38] E. M. Hillyer, J. F. McDonagh, A. Verl<strong>in</strong>den. <strong>Land</strong>-use and legumes <strong>in</strong> northern Namibia – The value of a<br />
local classification system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment (<strong>in</strong> press, 2006).<br />
[39] M. Igué, T. Gaiser, K. Stahr. A soil and terra<strong>in</strong> digital database (SOTER) for improved land use plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
Central Ben<strong>in</strong>. European Journal of Agronomy 21, pp. 41-52 (2004).<br />
[40] R. Mermut, H. Eswaran. Some major developments <strong>in</strong> soil science s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid-1960s. Geoderma 100, pp.<br />
403-426 (2001).<br />
[41] E. W. Murage, N. K. Karanja, P. C. Smithson, P.L. Woomer. Diagnostic <strong>in</strong>dicators of soil quality <strong>in</strong><br />
productive and non-productive smallholders’fields of Kenya’s Central Highlands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and<br />
Environment 79, pp. 1-8 (2000).<br />
[42] S. A. Rezaei, R. J. Gilkes, S. S. Andrews, H. Arzani. Soil quality assessment <strong>in</strong> semi-arid rangeland <strong>in</strong> Iran.<br />
Soil Use and Management 21, 402-409 (2005).<br />
[43] R. Ryder. Local soil knowledge and site suitability evaluation <strong>in</strong> the Dom<strong>in</strong>ican Republic. Geoderma 111,<br />
pp. 289-305 (2003).<br />
[44] D. Wu, Q. Yu, C. Lu, H. Hengsdijk. Quantify<strong>in</strong>g production potentials of w<strong>in</strong>ter wheat <strong>in</strong> the North Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Pla<strong>in</strong>. European Journal of Agronomy 24, pp. 226-235 (2006).<br />
148
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
OIL PALM AND RUBBER PRODUCTION MODEL FOR<br />
SUBSTITUING RUBBER WITH OIL PALM AND EVALUATING<br />
TO ESTABLISH OIL PALM INTO NORTHEAST THAILAND<br />
Abstract<br />
S. Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra 1 , E.Van Ranst 2 , H.Verplancke 2 , A. Verdoodt 2<br />
1 Department of Agriculture, Bangkok, Thailand. 2 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.<br />
Oil palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.) is a cash crop that can be exploited all the year round. However, up to now,<br />
oil palm production <strong>in</strong> Thailand has been very low because of some limit<strong>in</strong>g climatic, edaphic, crop-specific and<br />
management parameters. Especially the soil water deficit reported is restrict<strong>in</strong>g oil palm yields. The crop evapotranspiration<br />
<strong>in</strong> an immature state (1-7 years) was about 4.5-5.0 mm.d -1 , while the mature palm need more<br />
amount<strong>in</strong>g to about 5.0-5.5 mm.d -1 . These requirements further <strong>in</strong>crease from 6.5-7.5 mm.d -1 <strong>in</strong> drought period,<br />
depend<strong>in</strong>g on soil texture and soil water content. An area of about 2.012 million rais (0.32 million hectare ) of<br />
oil palm plantation was identified from the LANDSAT 5 TM image data (date <strong>in</strong> 2004) and mapped us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ARCVIEW ver.3.2 a. <strong>Land</strong> evaluation techniques were designed to classify the plantations based on their<br />
production potential. They were grouped <strong>in</strong>to 4 potential production classes: (1) higher than 25 ton.ha -1 .yr -1<br />
(80,708 ha); (2) between 16-25 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 (113,956 ha); (3) between 10-16 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 (125,931 ha) and (4)<br />
lower than 10 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 be<strong>in</strong>g land classified as unsuitable for oil palm (68 ha). Rubber plantation occupy<strong>in</strong>g<br />
about 1.6 million ha <strong>in</strong> East and South Thailand were identified from the same satellite image data. In addition,<br />
the rubber plant<strong>in</strong>g areas were classified by us<strong>in</strong>g the Rubber Production Model. Comparison of the productivity<br />
of both cash crops resulted <strong>in</strong> the identification of areas with a rubber productivity less than 1,500 kg.ha - 1.yr -1<br />
that could be profitably substituted by oil palm, giv<strong>in</strong>g a production exceed<strong>in</strong>g 16 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 . F<strong>in</strong>ally, the oil<br />
palm production model was <strong>in</strong>tegrated with a soil water balance model and applied to evaluate the water-limited<br />
production potential <strong>in</strong> Thabor, Nongkai Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, where the annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall averaged less than 1,500 mm. One<br />
found that oil palm should be planted <strong>in</strong> an area about 20,000 ha and that expected yields are high enough for<br />
sett<strong>in</strong>g-up the bio-diesel project.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Oil palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.) is one of an economic crop <strong>in</strong> the southern part of<br />
Thailand that can be exploited the whole year. However, the production <strong>in</strong> is limited by many<br />
parameters related to climate, soil fertility, oil palm variety and management technology. An<br />
optimized field management is required to cont<strong>in</strong>uously ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>imum bunch<br />
production, as oil palm production will be reduced when it is subjected to water stress<br />
[1,3,6,8,9,11,15]. The optimum average annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall for oil palm is about 2,000 mm with a<br />
monthly distribution of about 120 mm [5,6]. In Malaysia, the water requirement of oil palm<br />
were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g a lysimeter filled with soil of the Munchong Soil Series (Tropeptic<br />
Haplorthoxs). One found that the daily potential evapo-transpiration (ETp) dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
immature stage (1-7 year after plant<strong>in</strong>g (YAP)) is about 4.5-5.0 mm, and <strong>in</strong>creased to 5.0-5.5<br />
mm <strong>in</strong> a mature stage (more than 8 YAP). In the dry season, the daily ETP <strong>in</strong>creased up to<br />
6.5-7.5 mm, while it decreased <strong>in</strong> the ra<strong>in</strong>y season at about 3.0-3.5 mm [4, 12].<br />
The drought period affects the physiological process and stomatal resistance of oil<br />
palm, trigger<strong>in</strong>g the closure of the stomata. Consequently, the leaf temperature <strong>in</strong>creases,<br />
while the rate of photosynthesis was decreased [10]. Upon the decrease <strong>in</strong> photosynthetic<br />
assimilates, the rate of female <strong>in</strong>florescence abortion <strong>in</strong>creases, while the sex ratio decreases,<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g oil palm production [2]. Caliman found that the stomatal resistance of oil palm<br />
decreased when available soil water content. It mean that the stomatal resistant decreased<br />
when the soil moisture content decreased. Further research is required to identify the<br />
149
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
appropriate management techniques for oil palm plantation <strong>in</strong> stress area such as Northeast<br />
Thailand [1].<br />
In Thailand, oil palm plantation are extend<strong>in</strong>g very quickly, with an estimated area of<br />
320,000 that will be exploited at the end of 2006. Some of the new plantation areas face<br />
strong limitations due to low ra<strong>in</strong>fall and high water deficiencies. In these areas, the annual<br />
water deficit is about 208 to 675 mm with<strong>in</strong> a period of 2-6 months [7,16,17]. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
potential production and simulat<strong>in</strong>g soil water balance are important tools for guid<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
farmers <strong>in</strong> their management strategies, oriented to a ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of high yield.<br />
On the other hand, the Thai government policy has been assigned to control the<br />
rubber plantation at about 2 million ha <strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a balanced world demand and<br />
supply, and to stabilize the rubber price. Rubber production area, with a productivity less than<br />
1,500 kg.ha -1 , will therefore be converted to other economic crops such as oil palm.<br />
Materials<br />
This study objectives are;<br />
1. To locate the oil palm plantation and organize this <strong>in</strong>formation to GIS database;<br />
2. To evaluate and map the production potential of oil palm and rubber; and<br />
3. To determ<strong>in</strong>e the area of rubber that should be substituted with oil palm.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Digital Images Data and Image Analysis Module<br />
The Image Analysis is an extension module with<strong>in</strong> ARCVIEW GIS ver. 3.2a. This module is<br />
use to allocate and map the actual extension of rubber plantations and oil palm orchards from<br />
the false color composite image by us<strong>in</strong>g the visualized technique. The false color composite<br />
was formulated from 3 bands (5, 3, 2) of the follow<strong>in</strong>g LANDSAT 5 TM digital data:<br />
1. Path 127 Row 48, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 26 January, 2005.<br />
2. Path 127 Row 49, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 20 April, 2004.<br />
3. Path 127 Row 50, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 7 March, 2004.<br />
4. Path 128 Row 47, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 16 February, 2004.<br />
5. Path 128 Row 48, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 2 February, 2005.<br />
6. Path 128 Row 50, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 6 March, 2005.<br />
Climate Digital Database<br />
Climatic data reported dur<strong>in</strong>g the last twenty years (1986-2005) <strong>in</strong> the nearby meteorological<br />
stations were used to run the land suitability model for oil palm. Required <strong>in</strong>put data were<br />
maps of monthly ra<strong>in</strong>fall, temperature and evaporation.<br />
Soil survey and analytical data<br />
The prov<strong>in</strong>cial soil maps at a scale of 1:50,000 was used as a basal map for soil survey<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Soil sample <strong>in</strong> each depth were brought up by Edelman Auger and determ<strong>in</strong>ed moist soil<br />
color by us<strong>in</strong>g Monsel Soil Color Chart, texture by feel<strong>in</strong>g method, structure and clay coat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
by eye lens, pH with soil pH kit. Then, the soil series was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by compar<strong>in</strong>g the field<br />
characteristics with the typical soil profile characteristics. On the other hand, a composite<br />
150
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
sample of each soil horizon was prepared from 25 sampl<strong>in</strong>g pit and use for phisico-chemical<br />
analysis such as particle size, CEC, available P, %O.C etc. The analytical data of each soil<br />
were stored <strong>in</strong> the database.<br />
Methods<br />
The procedures <strong>in</strong> this study were applied from:<br />
1. The land evaluation technique [18]<br />
2. The yield gap analysis [19]<br />
3. The Rubber Production Model [13,14]<br />
4. The soil water balance [20, 21]<br />
The environmental crop requirements that need to considered to asses the suitability area for<br />
oil palm are related to climate and soil as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />
The steps of work<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 1) started from collect<strong>in</strong>g a climatic and soil data. The<br />
parametric approach , which mentioned <strong>in</strong> land evaluation technique, was used to calculate<br />
the land <strong>in</strong>dex by scor<strong>in</strong>g the parameter with the crop requirement table 1). Field survey<strong>in</strong>g<br />
was done for collect<strong>in</strong>g the field soil data and oil palm yield. Together with the field data and<br />
land <strong>in</strong>dex, the production potential model was classified to 4 classes, named as;<br />
1. L1 or very suitable (<strong>Land</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is higher than 76), the production potential is more<br />
than 25 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 .<br />
2. L2 or suitable (<strong>Land</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is 51-75), the production potential is between 13.1-25<br />
ton.ha -1 .yr -1 .<br />
3. L3 or marg<strong>in</strong>al area (<strong>Land</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is 26-50), the production potential is 9.5-13.0<br />
ton.ha -1 .yr -1 .<br />
4. L4 is not recommended (<strong>Land</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is lower than 25). The production potential is<br />
less than 9.5 ton.ha -1 .y -1 .<br />
The result of the model was projected <strong>in</strong> the map with the GIS work<strong>in</strong>g scheme (Fig.<br />
2).<br />
For rubber, plantations with a potential yield exceed<strong>in</strong>g 1,500 kg dry rubber.0ha -1 .yr -1<br />
were classified as suitable. All others with a lower production potential should be substituted<br />
with oil palm to get a better benefit.<br />
151
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Limitation classes and Indexes<br />
Characteristics<br />
Class<br />
Limitation<br />
S1<br />
0 1<br />
S2<br />
2<br />
S3<br />
3<br />
N<br />
4<br />
Index<br />
Ra<strong>in</strong>fall and Distribution<br />
100 95 85 60 40 25 0<br />
Average annual Ra<strong>in</strong>fall (mm) (p)<br />
2500<br />
3500<br />
2000<br />
3700<br />
1700<br />
4000<br />
1450<br />
5000<br />
1350<br />
5500<br />
1250<br />
6000<br />
600<br />
7000<br />
Drought period (months p20 20 18 16 14 12 10<br />
Annual mean temperature ( °C) >25 25 22 20 18 16 10<br />
Average annual w<strong>in</strong>d speed (m.s -1 )<br />
5<br />
8<br />
4<br />
9<br />
3<br />
10<br />
2<br />
12<br />
1<br />
15<br />
0<br />
20 25<br />
Sunsh<strong>in</strong>e radiation (MJ.m 2 )<br />
13<br />
15<br />
11<br />
16<br />
9<br />
17<br />
8<br />
19<br />
7<br />
21<br />
5<br />
23<br />
3<br />
25<br />
Sunsh<strong>in</strong>e ratio (n/N) >0.75 0.75 0.60 0.45<br />
Topology (%slope)<br />
Wetness (w)<br />
0 4 8 16 30 50 80<br />
Flood Duration<br />
F0<br />
F1 F2<br />
F3<br />
Dra<strong>in</strong>age classes<br />
Mod. Well s. poor Poor&aeric Poor v.poor,<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> Properties (s)<br />
Imp.<br />
but<br />
dra<strong>in</strong><br />
excess.<br />
Soil texture and structure C>60s SiCL, SCL, SiL, SL, fS Ls, Cm,<br />
C60v<br />
s,s,C<br />
C150 150 100 50 25 15 5<br />
CaCO 3 (%) 0 1 5 10 15 20 30<br />
Gypsum (%)<br />
Soil fertility (f)<br />
0 0.5 2 3 5 7 10<br />
Ex. CEC) (cmol (+) kg clay -1 ) >16 16 10 8 6 4 1<br />
pH 1:1 H2O 5.8<br />
6.0<br />
5.5<br />
6.5<br />
4.5<br />
7.0<br />
3.5<br />
7.5<br />
2.5<br />
8.0<br />
2.0<br />
9.0<br />
1.5<br />
O.M (%) >1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1<br />
ECe (dS m -1 ) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
After: [13, 18]<br />
Table 1 (Cont) : Soil characteristics requirement for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g for land suitability for oil palm<br />
152
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Climatic data<br />
- Ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />
- Temperature<br />
- Relative<br />
humidity<br />
Parametric Approach<br />
A1xA2xA3....<br />
An<br />
CI = 2n−<br />
2<br />
10<br />
A = <strong>in</strong>dex of parameters<br />
n = number of parameters<br />
<strong>Land</strong> suitability <strong>in</strong>dex (LI)<br />
CIxSI<br />
LI =<br />
2<br />
10<br />
Soil Characteristics<br />
WaixFaixPSaixPai<br />
SI =<br />
6<br />
10<br />
A = <strong>in</strong>dex of parameters<br />
n = number of parameters<br />
Figure 1 : Work<strong>in</strong>g scheme for <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation for Rubber and Oil Palm<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> data<br />
-Adm<strong>in</strong>istration Boundary<br />
- Climatic Database<br />
- Soil Database<br />
Map of Production Potential<br />
-Rubber<br />
- Oil palm<br />
Production Potential<br />
Y = a + b(LI)<br />
a = <strong>in</strong>tersect<br />
b = Slope<br />
Figure 2 : Work<strong>in</strong>g scheme for GIS<br />
153<br />
Crop Requirement Table<br />
- Climatic characteristics<br />
- Soil characteristics<br />
(Table 1)<br />
Symbols and Suitability Class<br />
CI = Climatic <strong>in</strong>dexes<br />
CI1 = Very suitable, <strong>in</strong>dex >75<br />
CI2 = Suitable, <strong>in</strong>dex 51-75<br />
CI3 = Marg<strong>in</strong>al, <strong>in</strong>dex 25-20<br />
CI4 = Non-suitable, <strong>in</strong>dex
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Production potential model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a pilot area<br />
The Thai government designed a policy that favors the bio-energy to substitute the petroleum<br />
energy. Oil palm is one of the oil crops that will be used to produce bio-diesel (B100). The<br />
target for new oil palm plant<strong>in</strong>gs is about 1 million ha. This means that the government needs<br />
to know which areas are most suitable to establish the new oil palm plantations.<br />
In Northeast Thailand, a pilot project for oil palm cultivation has been set up.<br />
However, this area is characterized by low ra<strong>in</strong>fall, high evaporation rates, and high light<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensities that are serious limitations for oil palm. Therefore, land evaluation models were<br />
designed and applied to analyse the problem. Soil water balances were studied. Based on that<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation, the area of the Tharbor Irrigation Project was selected for the pilot project.<br />
The LANDSAT images were use to analyze land cover type and water system (Fig.<br />
4a). The flood<strong>in</strong>g areas were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by compar<strong>in</strong>g the GIS data with the image data. The<br />
ground control po<strong>in</strong>ts were located with the GPS GARMIN GPS 12 Model. A soil survey<br />
was performed around the area, and the soil texture was mapped. The irrigation canals were<br />
also drawn on the map. Fig 4b shows the spatial distribution of soil texture and the irrigation<br />
system.<br />
The soil water balance, based on Sys et al. [18] Verplancke [20], was then simulated<br />
to calculate the soil water deficit or water needs accord<strong>in</strong>g to soil texture. F<strong>in</strong>ally the<br />
production potential was mapped (Fig. 4C).<br />
Oil palm production potential<br />
RESULTS<br />
The first step of the land evaluation consisted of an analysis of the climatic data (Fig.3 A-E).<br />
The suitability classes of climate (Fig.3 F) show that the highly suitable areas are found <strong>in</strong> the<br />
South and some regions of East Thailand.<br />
Extension of Oil Palm Plantations<br />
The oil palm plantations identified from the LANDSAT images are located <strong>in</strong> the southern<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>ces occupy<strong>in</strong>g an area of 320,138 ha, and <strong>in</strong> the eastern prov<strong>in</strong>ces, occupy<strong>in</strong>g an area<br />
of 1,889 ha.<br />
The maps of the plantations were overlaid with the production potential maps by<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the Geoprocess<strong>in</strong>g Module <strong>in</strong> GIS ARCVIEW 3.2a. Then, the exist<strong>in</strong>g area of oil palm<br />
plantation were classified <strong>in</strong>to the 4 suitability classes (Table 2). The results have been shown<br />
<strong>in</strong>Table 2. About 70.0 ha of oilpalm plantations, almost entirely situated <strong>in</strong> the south were<br />
classified as “not recommendable”. Next, 124,912.2 ha <strong>in</strong> the southern and 1,019.5 ha <strong>in</strong> the<br />
eastern coast, were classified as marg<strong>in</strong>al for oil palm production. The suitable lands occupy<br />
113,086.4 ha <strong>in</strong> South and 869.4 ha <strong>in</strong> East. And f<strong>in</strong>ally, very suitable land was only found <strong>in</strong><br />
the south, with an extension of about 82,071.5 ha.<br />
154
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
A M<strong>in</strong>. Temperature <strong>in</strong>dex B Max. Temperature <strong>in</strong>dex C Mean temperature <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
D Ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>dex E Drought period <strong>in</strong>dex F Climatic <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
Figure 3 : The Result of Climate Classification for Oil Palm by us<strong>in</strong>g Parametric Approach<br />
Production Potential (ton.Ha -1 .year -1 Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Name<br />
25.0 Total<br />
Southern Prov<strong>in</strong>ces 68.8 124,912.2 113,086.4 82,071.5 320,138.7<br />
Chumporn - 22,694.9 33,346.9 2,090.1 58,131.7<br />
Krabi - 45,872.0 38,531.2 59,846.2 144,249.3<br />
Nakorn Srithammarat - 995.5 177.0 9.4 1,181.9<br />
Naratiwat 35.7 19.5 510.1 - 565.3<br />
Pang-nga - 5,450.7 2,522.2 1,759.4 9,732.3<br />
Pattalung 25.8 - - - 25.8<br />
Ranong - 1,696.6 - - 1,696.6<br />
Songkhla - 582.7 3,652.0 - 4,234.7<br />
Satun - 10,145.9 4,176.6 10,719.0 25,041.6<br />
Surat Thani - 34,249.9 27,073.8 3,539.2 64,863.0<br />
Trang - 3,204.3 3,096.8 4,108.2 10,409.1<br />
Yala 7.2 - - - 7.2<br />
East Prov<strong>in</strong>ces 0.2 1,019.5 869.4 - 1,889.0<br />
Chonburi - 424.6 814.7 - 1,239.4<br />
Rayong - 582.4 - - 582.4<br />
Trad 0.2 12.5 54.6 - 65.6<br />
Total Area 70.0 125,931.7 113,955.8 82,071.5 322,028.0<br />
Table 2 : The production potential classification for an exist<strong>in</strong>g oil palm plantation<br />
155
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Area of Rubber Plantation<br />
Analysis of the same LANDSAT images revealed that the total area of rubber is about 1.969<br />
million ha, ma<strong>in</strong>ly located <strong>in</strong> the south for more than 85% (Table 3).<br />
Unit : ha<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Name<br />
Low Production Potential<br />
Low land High land<br />
High Production Total<br />
Southern Prov<strong>in</strong>ces 278,102.6 422,726.2 998,552.0 1,699,381.0<br />
Chumporn 43,490.7 0.0 20,601.9 64,092.6<br />
Krabi 4,865.0 11,689.4 77,253.9 93,808.3<br />
Nakorn Srithammarat 13,415.8 47,092.8 145,306.1 205,814.7<br />
Naratiwat 15,845.9 234.9 140,748.0 156,828.8<br />
Pattani 6,990.7 13,181.3 24,377.4 44,549.4<br />
Pang-nga 32,302.9 39,542.6 30,449.8 102,295.2<br />
Pattalung 17,919.4 16,975.4 47,015.8 81,910.6<br />
Phukhet 216.8 8,559.7 8,817.9 17,594.4<br />
Ranong 457.6 8,819.4 7,793.9 17,070.9<br />
Songkhla 58,736.6 77,858.9 85,462.2 222,057.8<br />
Satun 5,671.7 6,859.5 30,101.1 42,632.3<br />
Surat Thani 31,421.4 29,519.4 219,858.6 280,799.4<br />
Trang 38,497.0 34,684.6 133,339.5 206,521.1<br />
Yala 8,271.2 127,708.5 27,425.8 163,405.4<br />
East Prov<strong>in</strong>ces 45,852.3 23,363.5 140,753.6 209,969.6<br />
Chanthaburi 14,303.0 5,110.2 33,265.1 52,678.4<br />
Chonburi 6,998.9 1,189.8 13,432.6 21,621.3<br />
Chachoengsao 3,591.5 11.4 8,705.8 12,308.6<br />
Rayong 8,941.9 15,624.2 65,098.2 89,664.3<br />
Trad 10,942.2 1,396.6 19,338.7 31,677.6<br />
Prach<strong>in</strong>buri 0.0 0.0 408.2 408.2<br />
Srakaew 1,074.9 31.4 505.0 1,611.2<br />
Total Area 323,954.9 446,089.9 1,139,305.8 1,909,350.6<br />
Establish<strong>in</strong>g oil palm <strong>in</strong> northeast Thailand<br />
Table 3 : An exist<strong>in</strong>g area of rubber plantation<br />
The area of Huimong Irrigation project is about 133,944 ha. An overview of the soils<br />
identified <strong>in</strong> the area has been giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Table 4, summaris<strong>in</strong>g the soil series together with<br />
their national and <strong>in</strong>ternational classification names.<br />
156
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Soil Series USDA-1975 National<br />
Borabu f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Aquic Pl<strong>in</strong>thustults Red-Yellow Podzolic Soils<br />
Korat f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, siliceous, Oxic Paleustults Gray Podzolic Soils<br />
Roiet f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, kaol<strong>in</strong>itic, Aeric Paleaquults Low Humic Grey Soils<br />
Renu f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Pl<strong>in</strong>thic Paleaquults Hydromorphic Gray Podzolic Soils<br />
Sanpaya f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Typic Ustifluevents AlluvialSoils<br />
Siton f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Aeric Tropaquepts Low Humic Grey Soils<br />
Satuk f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, kaol<strong>in</strong>itic, Typic Paleustults Red-Yellow Podzolic Soils<br />
Tatphanom f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Ustic Haplustalfs Non Clacic Brown Soils<br />
War<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, siliceous, OxicPaleustults Red-Yellow Podzolic Soils<br />
Nakornpanom f<strong>in</strong>e clayey, mixed, Aeric Paleaquults Low Humic Grey Soils<br />
Pimai f<strong>in</strong>e clayey, mixed, Vertic Tropaquepts Hydromorphic Alluvial Soils<br />
Phen clayey skeletal, mixed, Typic Pl<strong>in</strong>thaquults Low Humic Grey Soils<br />
Phonpisai clayey skeletal, mixed, Typic Pl<strong>in</strong>thustults Red-Yellow Podzolic Soils<br />
Ratburi f<strong>in</strong>e clayey, mixed, Aeric Tropaquepts Hydromorphic Alluvial Soils<br />
Srisongkham f<strong>in</strong>e clayey, mixed, Vertic Tropaquepts Hydromorphic Alluvial Soils<br />
Table 4 : Soil Taxonomy <strong>in</strong> the Study area<br />
An area of about 30,169 ha has a clayey texture while the sandy soils cover about 96,420 ha.<br />
In sandy soil, the production potential is higher because these areas are located <strong>in</strong> the low<br />
terraces, which are flat and have a high level of ground water. An overview on the spatial<br />
distribution of these results has been shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4, while more detailed data are<br />
provided <strong>in</strong> Table 5.<br />
PPSHHH<br />
5<br />
IWVHHHH IWVHHHH<br />
5<br />
x�����—�—�<br />
€T<br />
8’ 5<br />
€U 8’<br />
5 8’ 8’<br />
€Q u�����—�� €S<br />
€������� 8’ €V<br />
8’<br />
€I<br />
€W<br />
8’<br />
8’ ���� ‚����—���<br />
x—�����<br />
€IH<br />
8’ 8’<br />
8’<br />
€R „�—˜��<br />
€ƒqIH<br />
5€���—<br />
5<br />
5 €��—�<br />
IWUSHHH 5<br />
IWUSHHH<br />
5<br />
5<br />
PQHHHH<br />
5<br />
u������<br />
PQSHHH<br />
IWVSHHH IWVSHHH<br />
f—����<br />
5<br />
5f—��—��<br />
f—���— 5<br />
f—�����<br />
157<br />
5<br />
f—����—�<br />
IWUHHHH IWUHHHH<br />
5x����—�<br />
IWTSHHH IWTSHHH<br />
PPSHHH<br />
PQHHHH<br />
PQSHHH<br />
PRHHHH<br />
PRSHHH<br />
PRHHHH<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
Irrigation l<strong>in</strong>e Huimong Adm<strong>in</strong>istration Boundary<br />
Reservoir Flood<strong>in</strong>g area Sandy soil Clayey soil<br />
20.0 t ha -1 y -1<br />
PRSHHH<br />
PPSHHH<br />
5<br />
IWVHHHH IWVHHHH<br />
5<br />
x�����—�—�<br />
€T<br />
8’ 5<br />
€U 8’<br />
5 8’ 8’<br />
€Q<br />
€S u�����—��<br />
€������� 8’ €V<br />
8’<br />
€I<br />
€W<br />
8’<br />
8’ ���� ‚����—���<br />
x—�����<br />
€IH<br />
8’ 8’<br />
8’<br />
€R „�—˜��<br />
€ƒqIH<br />
5€���—<br />
5<br />
5 €��—�<br />
IWUSHHH 5<br />
IWUSHHH<br />
5<br />
5<br />
PQHHHH<br />
5<br />
u������<br />
PQSHHH<br />
IWVSHHH IWVSHHH<br />
f—����<br />
5<br />
f—����—�<br />
5<br />
5f—��—��<br />
f—���— 5<br />
f—�����<br />
IWUHHHH IWUHHHH<br />
5x����—�<br />
IWTSHHH IWTSHHH<br />
PPSHHH<br />
PQHHHH<br />
PQSHHH<br />
PRHHHH<br />
PRSHHH<br />
Figure 4 : The Result LANDSAT Image, Determ<strong>in</strong>e the Water Body, Irrigation system, and<br />
Production potential <strong>in</strong> the study area<br />
PRHHHH<br />
PRSHHH
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Soil Type Soil series Symbol Production Potential Area<br />
Clayey 30,169<br />
Alluvium complex AC 15.1-20.0 6,256<br />
Nakornpanom Nn 13.0-15.0 7,464<br />
Pimai Pm 15.1-20.0 2,870<br />
Phen Pn 13.0-15.0 4,871<br />
Phonpisai Pp 13.0-15.0 8,490<br />
Ratburi Rb 15.1-20.0 218<br />
Sandy 96,420<br />
Korat Kt >20.0 21,683<br />
Roiet Re 13.0-15.0 33,995<br />
Sanpaya Sa >20.0 10,307<br />
Srisongkham Ss 13.0-15.0 22,875<br />
Sithon St 13.0-15.0 5,490<br />
War<strong>in</strong> Wn >20.0 2,070<br />
Flood<strong>in</strong>g Area 7,355<br />
Total Area 133,944<br />
Table 5 : Area and production potential <strong>in</strong> Huimong Irrigation Project<br />
The soil water balance model runs revealed that the water deficit starts from the first decade<br />
of November <strong>in</strong> sandy soils, while it starts only <strong>in</strong> the second decade <strong>in</strong> clayey soils (Table<br />
6).<br />
Decade P ETc STL-1 ETa STL ST.d ETad Water Deficiency<br />
Jan1 1.52 33.85 2.19 2.2 1.2 3.40 2.19 29.3<br />
Jan2 1.57 35.86 1.21 1.7 0.8 2.47 1.65 30.3<br />
Jan3 1.92 23.29 0.82 1.2 1.2 2.35 1.20 30.4<br />
Feb1 1.67 35.58 1.15 1.7 0.8 2.49 1.65 30.2<br />
Feb2 3.28 37.14 0.84 2.4 1.1 3.46 2.35 29.3<br />
Feb3 5.85 21.93 1.11 2.8 3.0 5.79 2.82 26.9<br />
Mar1 11.72 46.49 2.97 9.4 3.0 12.34 9.36 20.4<br />
Mar2 14.46 48.40 2.98 11.2 3.3 14.56 11.24 18.2<br />
Mar3 16.42 32.36 3.32 10.3 6.1 16.45 10.34 16.3<br />
Apr1 9.03 46.06 6.11 10.1 3.3 13.34 10.08 19.4<br />
Apr2 15.82 44.42 3.26 11.8 4.1 15.92 11.82 16.8<br />
Apr3 28.24 28.74 4.10 15.6 11.1 26.69 15.59 6.0<br />
May1 58.86 39.76 11.10 37.1 21.1 34.31 13.22 0.00<br />
May2 73.10 36.84 21.09 36.8 42.8 42.77 - -<br />
May3 83.54 24.06 42.77 24.1 85.0 85.50 - -<br />
Table 6 : The example of some result of Soil Water Balance calculation<br />
In table 7, the calculation of the water needs of oil palm <strong>in</strong> every soil type show that the<br />
maximum requirements amount to about 438,000 m 3 .ha -1 <strong>in</strong> sandy soils and to 175,000<br />
m 3 .ha -1 <strong>in</strong> clayey soils.<br />
158
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Decade Ra<strong>in</strong>fall ETc S LS SL SCL LC CL C<br />
Jan1 2 36 34 33 30 27 21 13 3<br />
Jan2 2 38 36 35 34 32 28 22 16<br />
Jan3 2 25 22 21 20 19 16 12 6<br />
Feb1 2 37 36 35 34 33 31 28 24<br />
Feb2 3 39 35 35 34 33 32 30 27<br />
Feb3 6 23 16 14 13 12 11 9 7<br />
Mar1 12 49 36 34 32 31 29 28 26<br />
Mar2 14 51 36 33 30 29 27 26 24<br />
Mar3 16 34 15 12 8 6 4 2 0<br />
Apr1 9 48 39 36 33 31 29 27 26<br />
Apr2 16 47 30 27 23 22 19 17 16<br />
Apr3 28 30 - - - - - - -<br />
May1 59 42 - - - - - - -<br />
May2 73 39 - - - - - - -<br />
Oct33 9 20 - - - - - - -<br />
Nov1 6 31 21 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Nov2 2 31 28 17 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Nov3 0 20 19 13 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Dec1 2 32 30 26 14 4 0 0 0<br />
Dec2 2 30 27 25 17 11 1 0 0<br />
Dec3 2 22 19 17 12 7 0 0 0<br />
Total (1000 m 3 ha -1 ) 478 414 334 295 248 215 175<br />
Table 7 : The comparison of soil water balance <strong>in</strong> different texture<br />
PRESENTING AUTHOR<br />
Somjate Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra*, Senior Expert <strong>in</strong> Rubber, Department of Agriculture, M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />
Agriculture and Cooperative, Thailand, is an alumnus of Ghent University <strong>in</strong> 1994. He<br />
studied Master Degree <strong>in</strong> the program of Soil Survey and <strong>Land</strong> Use Plann<strong>in</strong>g. After that, he<br />
got the scholarship from ABOS and He f<strong>in</strong>ished Ph.D. <strong>in</strong> the Tw<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Program between<br />
Ghent University and Universiti Putra Malaysia <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>in</strong> <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Management.<br />
Email address: spratumm<strong>in</strong>@yahoo.com<br />
Prof. Dr. Eric .Van Ranst, Department of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of<br />
Science, Ghent University. He set the standard template for this work and gave an advisory <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Land</strong> Evaluation Technique and the Yield Gap Analysis.<br />
Email address: Eric.VanRanst@UGent.be<br />
Prof. Dr. Hubert .Verplancke, Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Faculty<br />
of Bioscience Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. He set the template study <strong>in</strong> soil water balance and gave an<br />
advisory <strong>in</strong> Soil physics, and calculat<strong>in</strong>g on soil water flux and actual evapo-transpiration<br />
from Soil Water Balance Equations.<br />
Email address: Hubert.Verplancke@UGent.be<br />
Dr. Ann Verdoodt, Department of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of Science,<br />
Ghent University. She works <strong>in</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation Technique and the Yield Gap Analysis.<br />
Email address: ann.verdoodt@UGent.be<br />
SUMMARY<br />
The GIS software such as ARCVIEW ver. 3.2 a and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g technique can be applied<br />
for mapp<strong>in</strong>g on an exist<strong>in</strong>g area of rubber and oil palm. <strong>Land</strong> evaluation technique together<br />
with GIS software could produce a map of production potential of oil palm and rubber. Then,<br />
159
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
the result from <strong>in</strong>tercept<strong>in</strong>g both two maps yielded the map of rubber plantation that should<br />
be substitutes with oil palm base on the crop production. It means that the rubber plantation,<br />
which a production was lower than 950 kg Ha -1 , should be substituted with oil palm that give<br />
the production higher than 16 ton FFB Ha -1 year -1 . At last, the same procedures such as<br />
parametric approach for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the land <strong>in</strong>dex of oil palm, a calculation of soil water<br />
balance were applied to study the area <strong>in</strong> Northeast Thailand. Then the yield gap analyses<br />
[20], especially the calculation of soil water balance, can predict a production of oil palm <strong>in</strong><br />
Northeast Thailand for establish<strong>in</strong>g oil palm <strong>in</strong> this area that will have a production higher<br />
than 16 ton FFB Ha -1 year -1 .<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Dr. Somchai Baimuang, Senior Expert,<br />
Department of Meteorology, who has consistently contributed <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g essential<br />
metrological data available. He also help me to convert each climate data to a digital map.<br />
Special thanks go to Department of <strong>Land</strong> Development, furthered contributed <strong>in</strong><br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g me all the digital LANDSAT TM 5, and help me to tra<strong>in</strong> my colleague for<br />
analyz<strong>in</strong>g a digital map of land use.<br />
Special thanks their respective <strong>in</strong>stitutions, the Chachoengsao Rubber Research<br />
Centre, Surat Thani Rubber Research Centre and Surat Thani Oil Palm Research Centre, for<br />
the generous support staff services dur<strong>in</strong>g the field survey <strong>in</strong> their responsibility area.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Caliman, J.P., 1992. Oil Palm and water deficit production adapted cropp<strong>in</strong>g techniques. Oleag<strong>in</strong>eux;<br />
47(5):205-216.<br />
[2] Corley, R.H.V. 1976. Inflorescence abortion and sex differentiation. In Oil Palm Research (ed. R.H.V.<br />
Corley, J.J. Hardon and B.J. Wood). Amsterdam Elsevier. pp. 37-54.<br />
[3] Corley, R.H.V. and T.K. Hong. 1982. Irrigation of oil palm <strong>in</strong> Malaysia. In The Oil Palm <strong>in</strong> Agriculture <strong>in</strong><br />
Eighties. E. Pushparajah and P.S.Chew (eds.) vol.2. pp. 343-356.<br />
[4] Cornaire, B.,C. Daniel, Y. Zuily-Fodil and E. Lamade. 1994. Oil palm performance under water stress.<br />
Background to the problem, first results and research approaches. Oleag<strong>in</strong>eux; 49(1):1-12.<br />
[5] Foong, S.F. 1991. Potential evapo-transpiration potential yield and leach<strong>in</strong>g losses of oil palm. PORIM Intl.<br />
Palm Oil Conf-Agriculture. p.105-118.<br />
[6] Foong, S.F. 1999. Impact of moisture on potential evapo-transpiration, growth and yield of oil palm. 1999<br />
PORIM Int. Palm Oil Congress. PORIM p.64-86.<br />
[7] Guha, M.M. 1986. Agro-climatic and soil factors <strong>in</strong> land use plann<strong>in</strong>g for oilpalm development <strong>in</strong> Thailand.<br />
Consultant Report to UNDP/FAO/THA/84/007. project.<br />
[8] Hartley, C.W.S. 1977. The Oil Palm. 2 nd Longmans , London. 706 pp.<br />
[9] Hartley, C.W.S. 1988. The Oil Palm. 2 nd Longmans, London. 706pp.<br />
[10]Hong, T.K. and R.H.V. Corley. 1976. Leaf temperature and photosynthesis of atropical C3 plant,<br />
Elaeisgu<strong>in</strong>eensis. MARDIRes. Bull.4 (1):16-20.<br />
[11]Kee, K.K. and P.S. Chew. 1991. Oil palm response to nitrogen and drip irrigation <strong>in</strong> a wet monsoonal<br />
climate <strong>in</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia. PORIM Int. Palm Oil Conf-Agriculture. pp. 321-339.<br />
[12]Ochs, R. and C. Daniel. 1976. Research on techniques adapted to dry regions. In Oil Palm Research (ed.<br />
R.H.V. Corley, J.J. Hardon and B.J. Wood) Amsterdam Elsevier. pp. 315-330.<br />
[13]Paramathan, S. 2003. <strong>Land</strong> Selection for Oil Palm. In Oil Palm: Management for Large and Susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
Yield (ed. Fairhurst, T. And Härdter, R. Potash&Phosphate Institute of Canada. pp:27-57.<br />
[14]Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra, S., Van Ranst, E., Verplancke, H., Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, J., Theeravatanasuk, K., and Kesawapituk<br />
P. 2002. Quantify<strong>in</strong>g Parameters for the Maximum Rubber Production Potential Model <strong>in</strong> East Thailand.<br />
The 17 th World Congress of Soil Science. 14-21 Septemper, Sirigit National Concerence Cemtre. Bangkok.<br />
160
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
[15]Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra, S., Verplancke, H., Van Ranst, E., Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, J., Zauyah, S., Yew, F.K. 2000. Maximum<br />
Production Potential Model for Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Land</strong> Suitability for Rubber <strong>in</strong> THAILAND. The International<br />
Symposium on Suitable <strong>Land</strong> management, 8-10 August 2000. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.<br />
[16]Prioux, J.,J. C. Jacquemard, H. de Franqueville and J.P. Caliman. 1992. Oil palm irrigation. Initial results<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed by PHCI (IvoryCoast). Oleag<strong>in</strong>eux. 47(8-9):497-509.<br />
[17]Sarakhun, N., S<strong>in</strong>thurahut, S. and Dansakoonphon, S. 1998.Analytical for Oil Palm Plantation <strong>in</strong> South<br />
Thailand. Department of Agriculture, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture and Cooporation. Thailand. 266 pp. (Thai<br />
Version)<br />
[18]Sys, C., Van Ranst, E. and Debaveye, J. and Beernaert, F. 1993. <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation Part I: Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong> <strong>Land</strong><br />
Evaluation and Crop Production Calculations. Agricultural Publication No. 7. General Adm<strong>in</strong>istration for<br />
Development Cooperation. Brussel. Belgium. 274 pp.<br />
[19]Vanranst, E. 1998. Estimation of Rubber Yields Us<strong>in</strong>g Readily Available Climatic Data and Soil<br />
Characteristics. University of Gent, Laboratory of Soil Science. Gent Belgium. pp 6.<br />
[20]Verdoodt, A. and Van Ranst, E. 2003. A Two Level Crop Growth Model for Annual Crop. Ghent<br />
University. Belgium. 258 pp.<br />
[21]Verplancke H. 1998. Applied Soil Physics. Department of Soil Management and Soil Care-Division Soil<br />
Physics. Faculty of Agriculture and Applied Biological Sciences. University of Gent. Gent, Belgium. 450<br />
pp.<br />
161
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
SOIL PROPERTIES AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF<br />
UNDISTURBED AND DISTURBED FORESTS IN MT.<br />
MALINDANG, PHILIPPINES<br />
Renato D. Boniao 1* , Rosa Villa B. Estoista 2 , Carmelita G. Hansel 2 , Ron de Goede 4 ,<br />
Olga M. Nuneza 3 , Brigida A. Roscom 3 , Sam James 5 , Rhea Amor C. Lumactud 1 ,<br />
Mae Yen O. Poblete 1 and Nonillon Aspe 3<br />
1 M<strong>in</strong>danao State University at Naawan, Naawan, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, 2 M<strong>in</strong>danao State University-Marawi, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
3 M<strong>in</strong>danao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, 4 Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen University,<br />
The Netherlands, 5 Kansas University, USA.<br />
Abstract<br />
Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang, a natural park <strong>in</strong> the southern Philipp<strong>in</strong>es faces serious problems of<br />
biodiversity loss and soil degradation. Scarce <strong>in</strong>formation on the drastic effects of forest<br />
cover loss and any form of disturbance keeps the forest denudation and soil loss unabated.<br />
Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the soil physicochemical and biological<br />
properties, and the change of such properties with disturbance <strong>in</strong> Mt Mal<strong>in</strong>dang. Undisturbed<br />
and disturbed forests and agro- and grassland ecosystems of the range, located at altitudes<br />
above and below the 1000 m asl contourl<strong>in</strong>e, were sampled. Results showed that <strong>in</strong> forest<br />
areas where human <strong>in</strong>trusion was less, highest amount of O.M. (20.2%), highest CEC (43 to<br />
57 cmolc kg -1 soil) and lowest bulk density (0.4 Mg m -3 ) were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. The soil was<br />
relatively fertile. There were also more earthworm species (at least four) <strong>in</strong> contrast to only<br />
one species (Pontoscolex corethrurus) <strong>in</strong> agricultural land and grassland. Activities of liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
organisms (soil respiration rate) <strong>in</strong> grassland were significantly lower than those of natural<br />
ecosystems. Root hair plant-feed<strong>in</strong>g nematodes are abundant <strong>in</strong> all sites except <strong>in</strong> arable corn<br />
and grassland below 1000 m asl where semi-endoparasitic species associated with crops<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ate. Thus, <strong>in</strong> any human-<strong>in</strong>duced forest disturbance, it is not only the forest cover that<br />
is lost, but the soil as well. Earthworms and nematodes species composition and a number of<br />
bio-physicochemical soil properties served well as <strong>in</strong>dicators of this disturbance.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Soil is an essential part of the biosphere and is vital for the cont<strong>in</strong>ued existence of life on<br />
Earth. It is a crucial component of terrestrial ecosystems and a determ<strong>in</strong>ant of their capacity<br />
to produce goods and services. Unfortunately, despite the role they played <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g our<br />
natural ecosystems, the soil and the soil communities and the vital functions they perform are<br />
still poorly understood. Lack of knowledge on the <strong>in</strong>credible complexity of soils and the<br />
organisms that made them their home is probably the s<strong>in</strong>gular reason that there is a seem<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ued disregard of this vital component of the natural ecosystems. Such a disregard is<br />
true <strong>in</strong> the Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang range ecosystems, the research site.<br />
Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang range is one of the ecologically valuable areas <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>danao and is an<br />
important biodiversity refuge. Yet, the whole range with its varied ecosystems from the<br />
mossy forest (its highest po<strong>in</strong>t) down to the coastal areas is, <strong>in</strong> fact, ecologically threatened.<br />
The pressures come from many fronts: subsistence farmers liv<strong>in</strong>g and encroach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>side the<br />
Park [5] and farm<strong>in</strong>g on steep slopes; logg<strong>in</strong>g, either commercial or at small scale, denud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the formerly thickly forested lands; and political and economic power holders, and other<br />
162
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
<strong>in</strong>terested groups (military or <strong>in</strong>surgent) [11] with<strong>in</strong> the range who would probably risk a<br />
fortune just to claim a stake on the land. All these pressures led to soil degradation, followed<br />
by loss of biodiversity, and the repercussion goes beyond local boundaries. Among people<br />
dependent on such resources, soil degradation is simply understood as depletion or loss of a<br />
natural productive resource. Biodiversity and its key function <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the stability of<br />
(soil) ecosystems are hardly understood [11].<br />
Studies, therefore, on soil properties and their relationship to soil biodiversity are expected to<br />
address the <strong>in</strong>adequacy of <strong>in</strong>formation for conservation needs and for truly susta<strong>in</strong>able land<br />
use plans that ultimately protect Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang and its natural ecosystems.<br />
Objectives<br />
Given the need to save Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang Natural Park from the <strong>in</strong>evitable degradation, the<br />
study was, therefore, conducted to assess the soil physicochemical and biological properties<br />
of the range, and to study the changes of such properties with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g ecosystem<br />
disturbance.<br />
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE<br />
Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang is located <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Misamis Occidental, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. It is a<br />
watershed and a catchment area. In 1971 it officially proclaimed as a National Park and<br />
Watershed Reserve through Republic Act 6266. In August 2002, through proclamation No.<br />
228, the range was proclaimed as Natural Park, which made it, at the same time, a protected<br />
area. With 78 rivers emerg<strong>in</strong>g from the mounta<strong>in</strong>'s rugged volcanic landscape [11] and with<br />
about 15 major catchment bas<strong>in</strong>s [5], the range is undeniably the lifeblood of the neighbor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Misamis Occidental, Zamboanga del Norte, and Zamboanga del Sur. DENR [5]<br />
noted that the range or particularly the park is an important biodiversity refuge. Diverse<br />
endemic faunal and floral species are found <strong>in</strong> the old-growth and mossy forests, several<br />
more other species have yet to be identified or discovered. Still others may already be<br />
threatened or endangered and some may no longer exist.<br />
The park occupies a total land area of 53,262 hectares, consist<strong>in</strong>g of 24,511 hectares<br />
forest land, 13,320 hectares shrub lands of open and denuded land and 14,297.25 hectares<br />
open and cultivated land. The soils are mostly undifferentiated except <strong>in</strong> the buffer zones and<br />
down to the lowlands.<br />
The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forest cover, approximately 23,000 ha, has been decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fast<br />
especially over the last decade, due to some logg<strong>in</strong>g and timber poach<strong>in</strong>g activities.<br />
Eventually, the lush forest is converted to agricultural land and human settlements. Such<br />
demand for the biological resources has, of course, resulted <strong>in</strong> high rates of biodiversity loss<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang as one of the “hotspots” <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es need<strong>in</strong>g high priority for<br />
protection and conservation [8].<br />
Earthworms, one of the groups of organisms studied, are considered as ecosystem<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eers. Sensitive to low soil moisture and soil management practices such as soil tillage,<br />
application of organic matter, pesticides and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer, the earthworm population<br />
density tends to <strong>in</strong>crease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g organic matter <strong>in</strong>puts and decrease with soil<br />
disturbance, e.g., tillage [3].<br />
Another group of organisms is the Nematodes. They are microscopic, unsegmented,<br />
threadlike worms that can be found <strong>in</strong> soils and sediments of all terrestrial and aquatic<br />
ecosystems. Nematodes, both free-liv<strong>in</strong>g and plant-parasitic, possess several attributes that<br />
make them useful ecological <strong>in</strong>dicators [6].<br />
163
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Participatory approach<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Series of consultation with the local communities, from the local government units and l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
agencies down to the barangay levels, were conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g the preparation of the proposed<br />
study and their participation and commitment to the study and to the eventual conservation<br />
and protection of the Park, was enlisted. Incorporated <strong>in</strong> some of these meet<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />
capacity-build<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs, particularly on field sampl<strong>in</strong>g, which resulted <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
number of ‘local researchers’. They also became an important source of <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the<br />
selection of sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites.<br />
Sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites and soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Sixteen (16) sites (Fig.1) with<strong>in</strong> the Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang Protected Area, spread over 8 barangays<br />
<strong>in</strong> 4 municipalities, were selected for the study. These sites were grouped accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
elevation (above and below 1000 m asl) and <strong>in</strong>to four different ecosystems based on the<br />
degree of disturbance (Table 1).<br />
In each site at least three plots of 20 x 20 meters were established with<strong>in</strong> which<br />
composite soil samples were collected for chemical and physical analyses. A sub-sample of<br />
about 700 g was separated for nematode extraction. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil (for<br />
chemical/physical analyses) was air-dried and stored at room temperature. On the same plots,<br />
3 replicates of an undisturbed sample at 0-10 cm and at 20-30 cm depths, us<strong>in</strong>g a core<br />
sampler with known volume were collected for bulk density. Pits were dug, described and<br />
sampled for soil classification. The rout<strong>in</strong>e physicochemical analyses all follow the standard<br />
accepted laboratory procedures<br />
Earthworm sampl<strong>in</strong>g and identification<br />
With<strong>in</strong> each 20 x 20m plot, 10 subplots measur<strong>in</strong>g 50 cm x 50 cm and 30 cm deep were dug.<br />
The soil block was put on a plastic sheet and all earthworms present were collected by hand.<br />
The earthworms were killed <strong>in</strong> a 70-90% ethanol and stored <strong>in</strong> 10% formaldehyde and the<br />
total number and species composition were counted and identified by plot. Species new to<br />
science were stored for further taxonomic description.<br />
Soil respiration determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
In a randomly selected spots of each field plot, soil respiration was measured us<strong>in</strong>g the closed<br />
chamber–Draeger Tube-syr<strong>in</strong>ge method described by Park<strong>in</strong> and Doran [10]. Each<br />
measurement was replicated twice.<br />
Nematode analyses<br />
Nematodes were extracted from a 100 g fresh weight soil sample stored at 4 o C, us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Oostenbr<strong>in</strong>k elutriator technique [9]. Total numbers of nematodes were counted and then<br />
stored <strong>in</strong> 4% formaldehyde until identification. Nematodes were identified to family and<br />
genus level. Next, they were assigned to trophic groups accord<strong>in</strong>g to Yeates et al. [15].<br />
164
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Figure 1. Location of Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang Protected Area and the sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites with<strong>in</strong> four municipalities<br />
165
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Elevation Ecosystems<br />
Undisturbed<br />
(Primary)<br />
> 1000<br />
masl<br />
< 1000<br />
masl<br />
forest<br />
Mt.<br />
Gu<strong>in</strong>lajan<br />
(6)*<br />
North Peak<br />
(6)<br />
Disturbed Forest<br />
Small-scale timber extraction:<br />
a. Mt. Ulo sa Dapitan (6)<br />
b. Mt. Capole (6)<br />
c. Old Liboron (3)<br />
Logged-over- Pongol (3)<br />
Secondary Growth<br />
Forest - North Peak (1)<br />
Small-scale timber extraction:<br />
Mialen (3)<br />
Logged-over: Peniel (3)<br />
Agroforestry: Mamalad (3)<br />
166<br />
Agroecosystem<br />
1 st arable:<br />
a. Lake Gandawan/<br />
Cabbage (3)<br />
2 nd Arable:<br />
a. Lake Gandawan-<br />
Agro (3)<br />
b. Gandawan - Agro (3)<br />
Coco<br />
a. Mialen (3)<br />
Corn<br />
a. Bunga (3)<br />
b. Mamalad (3)<br />
Grassland<br />
Lake Dum<strong>in</strong>agat<br />
(1)<br />
b. Gandawan<br />
(2)<br />
a. Peniel (3)<br />
Table 1. Sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites at different ecosystems <strong>in</strong> Mt. *Mal<strong>in</strong>dang. Numbers <strong>in</strong> parenthesis are the<br />
total no. of sampl<strong>in</strong>g plots of the site specified<br />
Soil morphology and classification<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang soils were relatively young. Two soil orders, Inceptisols and Entisols<br />
were reported (Descriptions of 9 profiles not shown). The studied soils, except one Profile<br />
(Brgy. Peniel), may have andic properties as shown by the bulk density values (Table 2) and<br />
the nature of the parent material. Such soils have good physical properties and essentially are<br />
fertile when first cleared for cultivation. However, they deteriorate fast with cont<strong>in</strong>ued use<br />
over time, particularly because these soils were concentrated mostly on slop<strong>in</strong>g areas.<br />
Physico-chemical Properties<br />
Primary data on the chemical and physical properties of the soils were given <strong>in</strong> Tables 2 and<br />
3. It was shown that <strong>in</strong> a number of parameters, i.e. pH, available phosphorus (P), total<br />
nitrogen (N), exchangeable potassium (K) and texture, most of the ecosystems studied were<br />
similar, and if there were any seem<strong>in</strong>g dissimilarities, these were not statistically significant.<br />
There were, however, soil properties that reflected a higher soil quality <strong>in</strong> the<br />
undisturbed ecosystem than <strong>in</strong> the disturbed ecosystems, such as percent organic matter<br />
(%O.M.), CEC, and bulk density (Db).<br />
Organic matter (% O.M.)<br />
The organic matter contents ranged from 8.5 to 20.2 % (Table 2). These values were<br />
relatively higher than an ideal soil was supposed to conta<strong>in</strong> [1] and very much higher than<br />
most of the soils across the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es [2]. Comparison of the samples <strong>in</strong>dicated that the<br />
undisturbed (primary) forests were richer <strong>in</strong> O.M. than the other ecosystems studied.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
ECOSYSTEMS<br />
BD<br />
Mg m -3<br />
OM<br />
%<br />
pH<br />
1:1 H2O<br />
167<br />
Avail P<br />
ppm<br />
Total<br />
N %<br />
Exch K<br />
cmolc/kg<br />
soil<br />
CEC<br />
cmolc/kg<br />
soil<br />
Undisturbed Forest 0.4 a* 20.2 c 4.9 a 2.1 0.5 b 0.2 57.0 c<br />
Disturbed Forest 0.7 b 15.0 b 5.4 b 1.4 0.5 ab 0.5 40.1 b<br />
Agroecosystem 0.9 bc 10.3 ab 5.2 ab 1.3 0.4 ab 0.5 27.5 a<br />
Grassland 1.1 c 8.5 a 5.3 ab 1.0 0.3 a 0.3 23.6 a<br />
Table 2. Soil chemical properties of the different ecosystems. *Means with same letter are not<br />
significantly different at 5% level (Duncan) us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS<br />
Among disturbed ecosystems, the amount of O.M. went down with their degree or state of<br />
disturbance. Comparison by land use types (Table 3), reflect<strong>in</strong>g vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees of<br />
disturbance, confirmed that more O.M. is lost as disturbance progresses <strong>in</strong>to grassland<br />
(Peniel). Not even reforestation, as was the case of plantation forest <strong>in</strong> Peniel (6.6 %), can<br />
raise O.M. content approximately as high as the North Peak level (24.9 %), the undisturbed<br />
ecosystem. The consequential loss or decl<strong>in</strong>e of the natural levels of soil organic matter<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g cultivation is well established <strong>in</strong> literature. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Syers and Craswell [12]<br />
soils under agriculture <strong>in</strong>evitably show a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> organic matter because (1) tillage and<br />
other agricultural practices <strong>in</strong>crease the soil organic matter decomposition rate by mix<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
surface soil and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the number and <strong>in</strong>tensity of wett<strong>in</strong>g and dry<strong>in</strong>g cycles; and (2) the<br />
<strong>in</strong>puts of plant C are generally less <strong>in</strong> a disturbed or cultivated system than <strong>in</strong> natural<br />
environment. The reduction <strong>in</strong> return of organic residues to the soil is as much as ten-fold [7].<br />
<strong>Land</strong> Use Types<br />
OM<br />
(%)<br />
pH<br />
(1:1<br />
H2O)<br />
Total<br />
N%<br />
Avail P<br />
ppm<br />
Exch K<br />
cmolc/kg soil<br />
CEC<br />
cmolc/kg<br />
soil<br />
Small scale timber<br />
extraction 16.0 cd* 5.5 bc<br />
0.51 abc 1.6 ab 0.54 ab 43.16 d<br />
Logged-over 11.98 abcd 4.9 ab 0.45 abc 0.8 a 0.18 a 30.96 bcd<br />
Agroforestry 4.9 a 4.6 a 0.2 a<br />
0.5 a 0.20 a 20.48 ab<br />
First arable 14.8 bcd 5.4 bc 0.69 c<br />
1.9 ab 0.73 b 43.15 d<br />
Last arable 14.3 bcd 5.4 bc 0.57 bc<br />
2.6 b 0.28 a 29.77 ab<br />
Coco 10.6 abc 5.7 c 0.35 ab<br />
0.5 a 1.16 c 34.87 bc<br />
Corn 6.6 ab 4.8 ab 0.19 a<br />
0.5 a 0.30 a 17.14 a<br />
Grassland 8.5 abc 5.3 bc 0.29 a<br />
1.0 ab 0.38 a 23.58 abc<br />
Table 3. Soil chemical properties at different land use types. *Means with same letter are not<br />
significantly different at 5% level (Duncan) us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS<br />
Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC)<br />
The CEC values of the ecosystems regardless of elevation were given <strong>in</strong> Table 2. These<br />
values were all above the adequate level (20 cmolc kg -1 soil) for plant growth set by the<br />
BSWM [4]. The undisturbed forest was observed to have the highest CEC value (57.0 cmolc<br />
kg -1 soil). Grassland, on the other hand, had the lowest CEC (23.6 cmolc kg -1 soil), followed<br />
by the agricultural and the disturbed forest ecosystems. The CEC difference between<br />
undisturbed and disturbed forest was quite significant and both had CECs significantly higher<br />
than those of the agricultural and grassland ecosystems. Obviously, CEC decreases with<br />
ecosystem disturbance.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Incidentally, ecosystems with high CECs were the ecosystems with high O.M contents.<br />
Figure 2 shows the trend and the relationship hav<strong>in</strong>g a high R 2 value (R 2 =0.998). CEC<br />
com<strong>in</strong>g from humus (O.M.) seemed to play a prom<strong>in</strong>ent role. Thus, the importance of organic<br />
matter to the cation exchange capacity of the soils was once aga<strong>in</strong> demonstrated above. The<br />
organic matter content is <strong>in</strong> equilibrium with climate, vegetation and other environmental<br />
conditions. It depletes rapidly if this equilibrium is disturbed by <strong>in</strong>appropriate management<br />
practices [13]. It is, therefore, a must that the management of these soils is oriented <strong>in</strong><br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sufficient amounts of organic matter.<br />
CEC (cmolc/kg soil)<br />
Bulk Density (Db)<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
168<br />
y = 2.8461x - 0.8821<br />
R 2 = 0.9987<br />
0<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25<br />
% OM<br />
Figure 2. Relationship between OM and CEC of the different ecosystems<br />
The bulk densities of the studied soils <strong>in</strong> each ecosystem were presented <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The<br />
values were unusually low for m<strong>in</strong>eral soils, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.4 to 1.1 at 0-20 cm depth or 0.43<br />
– 1.03 Mg m -3 at 20-30 cm (not shown). However, aga<strong>in</strong>st the backdrop of high O.M. content<br />
of most soils, these Db values seemed plausible. M<strong>in</strong>eral particle densities (Dp) usually range<br />
from 2.5 to 2.8 Mg m -3 , while organic particles are usually less than 1.0 Mg m -3 . Thus, where<br />
O.M. was observed to be comparatively high, bulk density was also relatively low.<br />
Undisturbed forest, significantly had the lowest Db value. This was also the ecosystem with<br />
the highest O.M. Soils <strong>in</strong> the disturbed ecosystems, grassland and agro ecosystems <strong>in</strong><br />
particular, on the other hand, which may have lost much of their O.M. from human activities<br />
as presented earlier, had much higher bulk densities.<br />
Biological components<br />
Soil Respiration<br />
Soil respiration values were given <strong>in</strong> Table 4, all of which were less than the range of 40-72<br />
CO2-C ha -1 d -1 based on the soil respiration class rat<strong>in</strong>gs of Words End Research [14]. Tillage,<br />
which was known to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more oxygen to the soil and expose organic matter to<br />
organisms, had obviously contributed to the <strong>in</strong>crease of CO2 evolution from the soil.<br />
Comparatively, although the difference was not statistically significant, the undisturbed<br />
ecosystem had lower respiration rate than that of the disturbed or agro-ecosystem. The<br />
grassland ecosystem seemed to be an exception. It had the lowest respiration value among
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
ecosystems when, <strong>in</strong> fact, it was the most disturbed albeit quite recently. The reason, maybe,<br />
was the amount of organic matter available for decomposition. Grassland <strong>in</strong>cidentally (Tables<br />
2, 3) had the lowest O.M.<br />
As <strong>in</strong>dicator of biological activity, soil respiration is usually regarded as a positive<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicator of soil quality. A higher respiration rate results <strong>in</strong> more nutrients released from<br />
organic matter and improved soil structure, among others. In this perspective, the agroecosystem<br />
would have the highest quality soil. High respiration, however, does not always<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate good soil quality. It is understood that biological activity is also a direct reflection of<br />
the degradation of organic C compounds <strong>in</strong> soil [10]. It <strong>in</strong>dicates loss of carbon from the soil<br />
system. Viewed from this perspective, the agro-ecosystem <strong>in</strong> this study must have reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
less organic matter than the forest ecosystems. Indeed, based on the amount of organic matter<br />
present <strong>in</strong> these ecosystems (Table 2) the observation was true. All, except grassland, had<br />
high O.M. contents and the undisturbed ecosystem had more compared to other ecosystems.<br />
Earthworms<br />
Pontoscolex corethrurus, an exotic species <strong>in</strong>troduced from Brazil, was the earthworm type<br />
that <strong>in</strong>habited grassland and agro-ecosystems. It was the only species found <strong>in</strong> those<br />
ecosystems. In other ecosystems, varied species, possibly some would be new to science,<br />
were found. The undisturbed mossy forest had a notably higher number of species per unit<br />
area than the disturbed forest. Forest ecosystems, disturbed or not, had much more diverse<br />
species of worms than grasslands and agro-ecosystems (Table 4). In terms of the number of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals, however, the latter two gave the greater numbers at both elevations (below or<br />
above 1000 masl). The species presence, however, was limited to one, P. corethrurus. It was<br />
well to note that, <strong>in</strong> forests, particularly the undisturbed ecosystems, where bigger and more<br />
colorful species were found, organic matter and surface litters were abundant. This may<br />
expla<strong>in</strong> why the latter species of earthworms were mostly present.<br />
Type of<br />
ecosystem<br />
Earthworm<br />
(Ind. per 2.5 m 2 at<br />
0.30 m depth)<br />
Earthworm<br />
(No. of sp per<br />
2.5m 2 at 0.30 m<br />
depth)<br />
169<br />
Nematode<br />
(No. of Ind. per<br />
100 g soil)<br />
Soil respiration<br />
(CO2 -C kg ha -1 d -<br />
1 )<br />
Primary forest 9.5 a* 3.8 b 583.3 a 41.34 b<br />
Disturbed forest 74.6 ab 3.4 b 921.7 a 41.49 b<br />
Agroeco 113.8 b 1.0 a 910.7 a<br />
43.16 b<br />
Grassland 111.0 b 1.0 a 805.0 a 21.59 a<br />
Table 4. Soil nematode and earthworm abundance and soil respiration <strong>in</strong> different ecosystems.<br />
*Means with same letter are not significantly different at 5% level (Duncan) us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS.<br />
Nematodes<br />
Table 4 showed that the number of <strong>in</strong>dividual nematodes per 100 g soil was not<br />
significantly different among ecosystems and was rather low compared with soils <strong>in</strong> the<br />
temperate regions. But when grouped accord<strong>in</strong>g to feed<strong>in</strong>g habits, plant-feeders came out<br />
most abundant <strong>in</strong> all sites studied. And among this group, root-hair feeders dom<strong>in</strong>ate except<br />
<strong>in</strong> arable corn and grassland below 1000 m asl. In the grassland ecosystem, it was the semiendoparasitic<br />
group which was abundant <strong>in</strong> both elevation classes, while the ectoparasitic<br />
plant-feed<strong>in</strong>g nematodes were most abundant <strong>in</strong> forest ecosystems at more than 1000 m asl.<br />
When the relative abundance of nematodes were subjected to pr<strong>in</strong>cipal component analyses
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
(PCA) with some environmental parameters as passive variables, the result showed that the<br />
forest ecosystems, located <strong>in</strong> the upper part of the ord<strong>in</strong>ation plot (Fig. 3) and characterized<br />
by low bulk density, and high organic matter and CEC, have relatively high abundance of<br />
nematodes.<br />
Figure 3. PCA of nematodes show<strong>in</strong>g the position of the10 sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites (o) and some soil physical<br />
and chemical properties.<br />
Further ord<strong>in</strong>ation analyses (redundancy analysis, RDA) on the 10 sites with nematode data<br />
showed that 58% of the variation <strong>in</strong> the nematode population can be described by the<br />
environmental variables. In fact, all variables together can expla<strong>in</strong> 84% of the variation<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the nematode dataset (Table 5).<br />
Axes 1 2 3 4 Total<br />
variance<br />
Eigenvalues 0.305 0.185 0.112 0.072 1.000<br />
Species-environment correlations 0.993 0.997 0.959 0.929<br />
Cumulative percentage variance<br />
of species data 30.5 49.0 60.2 67.4<br />
of species-environment relation 36.4 58.4 71.7 80.3<br />
Sum of all eigenvalues 1.000<br />
Sum of all canonical eigenvalues 0.840<br />
Table 5. Results of a RDA on the 10 sites with nematode data. Total-N was not <strong>in</strong>cluded because data<br />
were miss<strong>in</strong>g for two sites; CEC and bulk density were excluded from the analyses because of strong<br />
autocorrelation with other parameters.<br />
PRESENTING AUTHOR<br />
*Renato D. Boniao, M<strong>in</strong>danao State University-Naawan, Naawan, Misamis Oriental,<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. E-mail: rdboniao@msu-naawan.net or natsupm@yahoo.com .<br />
170
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The soil characteristics, both physical and chemical properties, all po<strong>in</strong>ted out that they are at<br />
their optimum or best levels <strong>in</strong> ecosystems where human activities occurrence is almost<br />
absent or none at all. These ecosystems kept the organic matter values high, pH levels<br />
acceptable and reta<strong>in</strong>ed relatively good amounts of N or P <strong>in</strong> the soils. These are also the<br />
ecosystems that have loamy textural classes and low bulk densities, <strong>in</strong>dicative of good<br />
structural aggregation, presumably because of, but for one, the high amount of O.M. In<br />
contrast, forests converted <strong>in</strong>to agricultural lands and later abandoned <strong>in</strong>to grasslands have<br />
much poorer soil properties. As shown, a good quality of the soil is <strong>in</strong> part ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrity of the forest cover, and forest or soil disturbance <strong>in</strong> any form without mitigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
measures, can ultimately compromise soil quality. As is the case <strong>in</strong> Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang, <strong>in</strong> time,<br />
grassland or waste land areas <strong>in</strong>crease while forestlands decrease correspond<strong>in</strong>gly.<br />
The best way to break the cycle of abandon<strong>in</strong>g old farms and open<strong>in</strong>g new ones is to<br />
select areas on which, by necessity and social consideration, a certa<strong>in</strong> degree of susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />
cultivation is allowable.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />
We wish to thank The Netherlands M<strong>in</strong>istry of Development (DGIS) for the research<br />
grant through SEAMEO-SEARCA for the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e-Netherlands Biodiversity Research<br />
for Development <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>danao: Focus on Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang (BRP)<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Brady, N.C and R. R. Weil. 1999. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 12 th Ed. Prentice Hall International,<br />
Inc.<br />
[2] Badayos, R. B. 1996. Soils and Agriculture <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. Sem<strong>in</strong>ar paper presented at Tsukuba, Ibaraki,<br />
Japan, October 1996<br />
[3] Blair, J.M., P.J. Bohlen and D.W. Freckman. 1996. Soil Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Quality. In: J.W.<br />
Doran & A.J. Jones (Eds.) Methods for Assess<strong>in</strong>g Soil Quality. SSSA special publication number 49, Madison,<br />
Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA: 273-287.<br />
[4] CARE-BSWM. 2002. Soil and <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> Evaluation. Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang National Park Buffer Zone,<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Misamis Occidental Vol. 1, The Bio-physical <strong>Resources</strong>. BSWM and CARE Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
[5] DENR, 1999. Management Strategy for Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang. DENR, National Integrated Protected Areas<br />
Program. p. 22.<br />
[6] Freckman, D.W. 1988. Bacterivorous nematodes and organic –matter decomposition. Agriculture,<br />
Ecosystems and Environment 24:195-217.<br />
[7] Goh, K.M. 1980. Dynamics and Stability of Organic Matter. In: B.K. Theng, (ed), Soils with Variable<br />
Charge. <strong>New</strong> Zealand Society of Soil Science. pp 373-393.<br />
[8] Ong, P.S., L.E. Afuang, and R.G. Rose-Amball (eds). 2002. Philipp<strong>in</strong>e Bidiversity Conservation Priorities:<br />
A Second Iteration of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan. Department of Environment and<br />
Natural <strong>Resources</strong>-Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau, Conservation International Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, Biodiversity<br />
conservation program. UPCIDS and FPE, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
[9] Oostenbr<strong>in</strong>k, M. 1960. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g Nematode Populations by Some Selected Methods. In: Sasser J.N. &<br />
W.R. Jenk<strong>in</strong>s (Eds.) Nematology. Chapel Hill, Univ. N. Carol<strong>in</strong>a Press: 85-102.<br />
[10] Park<strong>in</strong>, T.B. & J.W. Doran. 1996. Field and Laboratory Tests of Soil Respiration. In: J.W. Doran & A.J.<br />
Jones (Eds.) Methods for assess<strong>in</strong>g soil quality. SSSA special publication number 49, Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>,<br />
USA: 231-246.<br />
[11] SEAMEO-SEARCA. 2002. Biodiversity Research Programme for Development <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>danao: Focus on Mt<br />
Mal<strong>in</strong>dang. SEAMEO-SEARCA, College, Los Banos, Laguna, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
171
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
[12] Syers, J.K. and E.T. Craswell. 1995. Role of Soil Organic Matter <strong>in</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agricultural Systems. In:<br />
R.D.B. Lefroy, G.J. Blair and E.T. Craswell (Eds.) Soil Organic Matter Management for Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agriculture<br />
A workshop held <strong>in</strong> Ubon, Thailand, 24-26 August 1994. ACIAR, Canberra.<br />
[13] Van Wambeke, A. 1992. Soils of the Tropics, Properties and Appraisal. McGraw-Hill, Inc. <strong>New</strong> York.<br />
343p.<br />
[14] Woods End Research. 1997. Guide to Solvita Test<strong>in</strong>g and Manag<strong>in</strong>g your Soil. Woods End Research<br />
Laboratory, Inc., Mt., ME.<br />
[15] Yeates G.W., T. Bongers, R.G.M. de Goede, D.W. Freckman & S.S. Georgieva, 1993. Feed<strong>in</strong>g Habits <strong>in</strong><br />
Soil Nematode Families and Genera – An Outl<strong>in</strong>e for Soil Ecologists. J. Nematology 25: 315-331.<br />
172
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Sub-theme : LAND DEGRADATION : PRESSURES, INDICATORS<br />
AND RESPONSES<br />
Various approaches for soil erosion risk assessment<br />
W. Cornelis, D. Gabriels, H. Verplancke<br />
Soil Physics and Soil Erosion Unit, Department Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Gent,<br />
Belgium<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to GLASOD (Global Assessment of Degradation), erosion by water and w<strong>in</strong>d is,<br />
on a global scale, considered as the major cause of soil degradation. The detrimental effects<br />
of soil erosion are particularly manifest <strong>in</strong> many tropical rural areas, where farmers are highly<br />
dependent on the <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic land properties and are lack<strong>in</strong>g the means to improve the quality of<br />
their soils. There is, therefore, an urgent need for policy <strong>in</strong>terventions to arrest soil<br />
degradation, and erosion <strong>in</strong> particular, and rehabilitate degraded areas. Erosion risk<br />
assessment methods offer a vital tool <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g of such <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />
The early erosion models such as the widely adopted USLE (Universal Soil Loss<br />
Equation) or WEQ (W<strong>in</strong>d Erosion eQuation) consisted of relatively simple response<br />
functions that were calibrated to fit a limited number of (regional) observations. Despite our<br />
progress <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g soil erosion over the past years and the result<strong>in</strong>g attempts to<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduce physically-based determ<strong>in</strong>istic models of vary<strong>in</strong>g level of sophistication (e.g.<br />
WEPP, EUROSEM, WEPS), those ‘good old’ empirical models, though now improved and<br />
often <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to a Geographical Information System, are still very popular and most<br />
widely used. This was one of the outcomes of the International Symposium on ’25 Years of<br />
Assessment of Erosion’ held <strong>in</strong> September 2003 at Ghent University. The empirical models<br />
have generally a much simpler structure, require less <strong>in</strong>put parameters and show often similar<br />
performance <strong>in</strong> terms of prediction accuracy than determ<strong>in</strong>istic models when consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />
yearly averages. Reduc<strong>in</strong>g model complexity will generally lead to a m<strong>in</strong>imization of the<br />
error propagation of erosion models, a topic that should be given much more attention than it<br />
has now <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />
Besides the model-based and strictly quantitative approach, more attention has been<br />
given <strong>in</strong> recent years to expert-based methods. These methods use qualitative (categorical) or<br />
quantitative (numerical) data, or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of both, be it <strong>in</strong> a parametric or nonparametric<br />
way. An example of a parametric approach is factorial scor<strong>in</strong>g. In this approach,<br />
scores are given to various <strong>in</strong>dicators of soil erosion and then multiplied giv<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
score that represents erosion risk. Non-parametric methods can be based on regression<br />
techniques such as e.g. kernel density regression or a classification tree. They have the<br />
advantage that they do not require any assumption about the functional relationships between<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent (e.g. erosion factor/<strong>in</strong>dicator) and dependent variables (e.g. erosion risk). This,<br />
however, also implies that the result<strong>in</strong>g regression is shaped accord<strong>in</strong>g to the data only, and<br />
not accord<strong>in</strong>g to theoretical functions. Expert-based methods <strong>in</strong> general are further rather<br />
subjective as they depend on judgment of erosion <strong>in</strong>dicators which can vary substantially<br />
among experts. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g these short-com<strong>in</strong>gs, expert-based methods have shown to<br />
be promis<strong>in</strong>g. They are very attractive <strong>in</strong> those tropical rural areas where numerical data are<br />
scarce, but where categorical data such as erosion <strong>in</strong>dicators can be relatively easily collected<br />
by scientists, extensionists or farmers. Integration of the broader scientific knowledge and<br />
experience of scientists and extensionists with the ‘grass-rooted’ local knowledge can<br />
become a key factor for successful <strong>in</strong>terventions, and can stimulate the participation of local<br />
farmers <strong>in</strong> conservation practices to arrest and combat land degradation.<br />
173
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
We f<strong>in</strong>ally believe that techniques enabl<strong>in</strong>g to identify computer models on the basis<br />
of expert knowledge of the process of soil erosion, such as e.g. fuzzy methods, should be<br />
further explored <strong>in</strong> the context of erosion risk assessment. Fuzzy-based model<strong>in</strong>g can also<br />
been applied to improve the empirical or determ<strong>in</strong>istic model-based methods.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[45] W.M. Cornelis, D. Gabriels (eds). “25 Years of Assessment of Erosion”. Catena Special Issue, 64, pp.139-<br />
364, (2005).<br />
[46] M. Grimm, R. Jones L. Montanarella. Soil Erosion Risk <strong>in</strong> Europe. European Soil Bureau. Institute for<br />
Environment & Susta<strong>in</strong>ability. JRC Ispra. 40 p. (2002).<br />
[47] V. Jetten, A. de Roo, D. Favis-Mortlock. “Evaluation of field-scale and catchment-scale soil erosion<br />
models”. Catena, 37, pp. 521-541, (1999).<br />
[48] G. Metternicht, S. Gonzalez. “FUERO: foundations of a fuzzy exploratory model for soil erosion hazard<br />
prediction”. Environmental Modell<strong>in</strong>g & Software, 20, pp. 715-728, (2005).<br />
[49] B.G.J.S. Sonneveld, M.Q. Keyzer, P.J. Albersen. “A non-parametric analysis of qualitative and quantitative<br />
data for erosion model<strong>in</strong>g: a case study for Ethiopia”. In: D.E. Stoot, R.H. Mohtar and G.C. Ste<strong>in</strong>hardt (eds.).<br />
Susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Global Farm. Selected papers from the 10 th International Soil Conservation Organization<br />
Meet<strong>in</strong>g, May 24-29, 1999, Purdue University and USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory. pp.<br />
979-993. (2001).<br />
[50] L.T. Tran, M.A. Ridgley, M.A. Near<strong>in</strong>g, L. Duckste<strong>in</strong>, R. Sutherland. “Us<strong>in</strong>g fuzzy logic-based model<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to improve the performance of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation”. In: D.E. Stoot, R.H. Mohtar and G.C.<br />
Ste<strong>in</strong>hardt (eds.). Susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Global Farm. Selected papers from the 10 th International Soil Conservation<br />
Organization Meet<strong>in</strong>g, May 24-29, 1999, Purdue University and USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research<br />
Laboratory. pp. 979-993. (2001).<br />
[51] G. Verstraeten, J. Poesen, J. de Vente, X. Kon<strong>in</strong>ckx. “Sediment yield variability <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>: a quantitative and<br />
semiqualitative analysis us<strong>in</strong>g reservoir sedimentation rates”. Geomorphology, 50, pp. 327-348, (2003).<br />
[52] O. Vigiak, B.O. Okoba, G. Sterk, L. Stroosnijder. “Water erosion assessment us<strong>in</strong>g farmers’ <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong><br />
the West Usambara Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, Tanzania”. Catena, 64, pp. 307-320, (2005).<br />
174
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
INDICATORS AND PARTICIPATORY METHODS FOR<br />
MONITORING LAND DEGRADATION. A CASE STUDY IN THE<br />
MIGORI DISTRICT OF KENYA.<br />
Abstract<br />
V<strong>in</strong>cent de Paul Obade 1* , Eva De Clercq 2<br />
1* United States International University, Nairobi, Kenya, 2 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.<br />
"Knowledge is power" is a common term <strong>in</strong> development research. The two sides of the same co<strong>in</strong>, "shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
knowledge" and "power shar<strong>in</strong>g", however, lie at the root of problems like desertification and drought.<br />
Traditionally, farmers have used local knowledge to understand weather and climate patterns <strong>in</strong> order to make<br />
decisions about plant<strong>in</strong>g and harvest<strong>in</strong>g. This knowledge, which has been passed on from previous generations,<br />
is adapted to local conditions and has been ga<strong>in</strong>ed through many decades of experience. The potential of<br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g "grassroots (local) <strong>in</strong>dicators" offers possibilities to design new and more accurate<br />
approaches to <strong>in</strong>dicators selection, plann<strong>in</strong>g and monitor<strong>in</strong>g processes for development. This approach would<br />
also facilitate local control over the generation and use of knowledge. This paper gives an overview of localgrassroots<br />
and scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators of land degradation, which could be useful <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation oriented<br />
towards reduc<strong>in</strong>g poverty and combat<strong>in</strong>g desertification <strong>in</strong> Kenya. The study area is Migori district <strong>in</strong> Nyanza<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>habited mostly by the Luo community of Kenya.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Unpredictable ra<strong>in</strong>s and long periods without ra<strong>in</strong>s may result <strong>in</strong> crop failure and drought.<br />
Local people, <strong>in</strong> response to cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g poverty develop approaches to cope with unfavorable<br />
environmental conditions. These cop<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms can <strong>in</strong>clude career change, migrations,<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensive agriculture etc. To counter drought, the Luo are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly apply<strong>in</strong>g irrigation <strong>in</strong><br />
addition to us<strong>in</strong>g fertilizers and pesticides whenever possible to plant crops like vegetables,<br />
maize, and sugarcane. Furthermore, the lake region has had a rapid population growth, with a<br />
13% growth rate [10]. It is not uncommon for the Luo people to have large families of 3-4<br />
wives and 15-20 children <strong>in</strong> total. The comb<strong>in</strong>ations of all these factors are at the orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />
land degradation <strong>in</strong> Migori, Kenya.<br />
Desertification is "land degradation <strong>in</strong> arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid areas result<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from various factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g climatic variations and human activities [8]." Degradation of<br />
soil, decreas<strong>in</strong>g water resources and changes <strong>in</strong> the climate are the three ma<strong>in</strong> obstacles to<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural development <strong>in</strong> Kenya [2, 6, and 7]. The current debate on<br />
desertification has tended to focus on alarm<strong>in</strong>g data and trends <strong>in</strong> climatology and ecological<br />
change, to the neglect of the <strong>in</strong>fluence of and impact on, social conditions [5].<br />
Participatory methods give outsiders a chance to learn how the local people live, what<br />
signs or signals they look for, and how they susta<strong>in</strong> their everyday lives. Before the advent of<br />
modern scientific methods, the local communities <strong>in</strong> Kenya must have realized that some<br />
animals, birds, <strong>in</strong>sects and plants had the capacity to monitor and detect the changes <strong>in</strong><br />
climatic conditions. However, research on these techniques cont<strong>in</strong>ues most commonly to be<br />
an isolated process. The question then is: if local people's knowledge is to be used for<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g natural resources, how can it be used and how useful and accurate is it for<br />
decision-makers, planners or implementers?<br />
175
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Objectives<br />
The objectives of this study are:<br />
1. Outl<strong>in</strong>e and briefly compare various <strong>in</strong>dicators (scientific and grassroots-traditional) and<br />
the participatory methodologies for monitor<strong>in</strong>g climate, land degradation and land cover<br />
changes and<br />
2. Identify <strong>in</strong>dicators perceived by rural communities as affect<strong>in</strong>g their Food Security (FS)<br />
and the changes (or <strong>in</strong>dicators of change) <strong>in</strong> the environment that are used by local<br />
communities to monitor the environmental resources and make decisions about the<br />
adequacy of their future food supply.<br />
INDICATORS<br />
Different approaches to understand<strong>in</strong>g land degradation suggest differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />
Scientists' explanations of degradation are derived from conclusions based on scientific data<br />
sets [2, 3 and 7]. Local perceptions-"grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators”, on the contrary, are mostly<br />
derived from the experience ga<strong>in</strong>ed by the local people from the observable changes on the<br />
environment over time. This article outl<strong>in</strong>es the factors considered when develop<strong>in</strong>g scientific<br />
and grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />
Scientific Indicators<br />
Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the extent of land degradation can be achieved through the use of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicators, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g [7 and 9]: topography, soil depth, dra<strong>in</strong>age, nutrient retention,<br />
vegetation, traffic, level of alum<strong>in</strong>ium toxicity and soil acidity, vertic properties, soil erosion<br />
potential, flood risk, calcium carbonate, soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity etc. Table 1 shows the types of <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
and specific factors considered <strong>in</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g land degradation [9, 11, and 12].<br />
Among the problems fac<strong>in</strong>g the development of scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators of land degradation <strong>in</strong><br />
Kenya are: the lack of coord<strong>in</strong>ated data systems between the various stakeholders, poor<br />
methodologies and <strong>in</strong>accuracies <strong>in</strong> data collection and analysis. As an example one can<br />
mention the heavy reliance on questionnaires to assess socio-economic conditions, or the<br />
conflicts <strong>in</strong> legislation, standards and specifications as given <strong>in</strong> the “Registration of Titles<br />
Act” (RTA) of 1919 (Cap. 281), the “Survey Act” of 1923 (Cap.299), and the “Registered<br />
<strong>Land</strong>s Act” (RLA) of 1963 (Cap 300) that are used for survey and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of land etc. In<br />
addition, scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators have the weakness of the giv<strong>in</strong>g less importance to the effects<br />
of plant diseases that are soil borne (or perceived to be), as well as pests that live <strong>in</strong> the soil or<br />
crop residue.<br />
176
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
<strong>Physical</strong><br />
Biological<br />
Type and subtype of <strong>in</strong>dicator Factors<br />
Socioeconomic<br />
Climatic a. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />
b. Temperature<br />
c. Ra<strong>in</strong> erosion potential (calculated)<br />
d. Sunlight duration<br />
e. Potential evapotranspiration — PET (calculated)<br />
Soils a. Texture<br />
b. Fertility (organic matter)<br />
c. Structure<br />
d. Permeability<br />
e. Erosion potential (calculated)<br />
f. Alkal<strong>in</strong>ization/Sal<strong>in</strong>ization<br />
Topography a. Slope<br />
Vegetation a. Canopy cover of herbaceous and woody plants (%)<br />
b. Plant composition and desirable or key species<br />
c. Potential herbaceous production (calculated)<br />
Animals a. Animal population estimates and distribution<br />
b. Herd composition<br />
c. Herbaceous consumption (calculated)<br />
<strong>Land</strong> and water use a. <strong>Land</strong> use<br />
b. Water availability and requirements<br />
Settlement patterns a. Settlements and <strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />
Human biological<br />
parameters<br />
a. Population structure and growth rate<br />
b. Measures of nutritional status and Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
Social process parameters a. Conflicts and Migration<br />
Table 1: shows the scientific parameters considered <strong>in</strong> land degradation [9, 11 and 12].<br />
Grassroots Indicators<br />
Traditional knowledge is generally def<strong>in</strong>ed as the “knowledge of the people of a<br />
particular area based on their <strong>in</strong>teractions and experiences with<strong>in</strong> that area, their traditions<br />
and economic systems”. There has been an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous knowledge <strong>in</strong> the<br />
science of climatology and agriculture [2]. Local climate can be predicted and <strong>in</strong>terpreted by<br />
locally observed variables and experiences; us<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ations of plant, animal, <strong>in</strong>sects and<br />
astronomical <strong>in</strong>dicators. Table 2 shows grassroots (local) <strong>in</strong>dicators of the people of Migori<br />
district. In design<strong>in</strong>g grassroots’ <strong>in</strong>dicators, one could ask the elders to expla<strong>in</strong> how they<br />
predict com<strong>in</strong>g events, ra<strong>in</strong>s, etc. What is it that they look for? What enables them to see<br />
trends? Future possibilities can also be probed by ask<strong>in</strong>g questions such as: What happens if<br />
noth<strong>in</strong>g is done? Or if someth<strong>in</strong>g is done? The impact of this technique is that most of the<br />
outsiders and local community end up with some understand<strong>in</strong>g of their land resources, forest<br />
resources, village boundaries etc.<br />
177
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Issue Indicators Indicator Mean<strong>in</strong>g Expected action by community<br />
Start of<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Drought<br />
Soil types<br />
and changes<br />
Flower<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
shad<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
various<br />
species of<br />
plants<br />
When the Kayongo plant flowers, long ra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
are about to start. The onyiego plant shades<br />
its leaves and produces fresh buds just<br />
before the ra<strong>in</strong>. (March and April). The<br />
modhno plant produces fruit <strong>in</strong> September<br />
and turns reddish just before the short ra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
<strong>in</strong> October-December.<br />
Bird behaviour The osogo (weaver) birds make noises<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uously dur<strong>in</strong>g the day and night,<br />
Magungu, Ang’etho and Agak fly across the<br />
sky<br />
Insect<br />
behaviour<br />
Animal and<br />
human<br />
behaviour<br />
Stars,<br />
Lighten<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and<br />
Thunderstorms<br />
Plant and<br />
animal<br />
behaviour<br />
Stars<br />
Ong’<strong>in</strong>o, Onyoso and Ngwen <strong>in</strong>sects (ants<br />
/termites) jump up and down imitat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
way the women plant with a kwer (farm<br />
implement), Grasshoppers chirp<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />
Cows and goats jump about excitedly.<br />
Elders and ra<strong>in</strong>-makers (nganyi) determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the com<strong>in</strong>g of ra<strong>in</strong>s for example by<br />
appearance of ayila-plant and gwer-gwer<br />
birds. Frogs croak.<br />
Appearance of yugni mammon (the sisters)<br />
female constellation of stars <strong>in</strong>dicate wet<br />
season. Ra<strong>in</strong>s beg<strong>in</strong><br />
Flower<strong>in</strong>g of Otho tree, which usually never<br />
buds. Mab<strong>in</strong>ju, ochok, and ali plant flowers<br />
before any other plant. Strong easterly<br />
w<strong>in</strong>ds (Komadhi) marks dry spell. Ober and<br />
Saye plants shed off their leaves <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
drought. Deterioration of the health and<br />
productivity of crops.<br />
Appearance of numerous <strong>in</strong>sects which<br />
destroy crops. Absence of frogs. Snakes and<br />
other reptiles beg<strong>in</strong> stray<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to peoples<br />
houses search<strong>in</strong>g for food.<br />
Appearance of yugni-machwo (orion).-male<br />
constellation of stars <strong>in</strong>dicate dry season<br />
Fertile soils Soil red, heavy and sticky. Insects such as<br />
ants around anthills, earthworms, snakes<br />
and rats found here<br />
Infertile soils Formerly heavy, sticky soil becomes loose<br />
and coarse. Weeds such as akech, mab<strong>in</strong>ju,<br />
kayongo grow<br />
178<br />
Advanced stages of land preparation and<br />
manure application. Decisions and<br />
consultations with<strong>in</strong> households on what to<br />
plant and where to plant<br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>ue land preparation. Preparation of<br />
seeds<br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>ue land preparation.<br />
Farmers take risk <strong>in</strong> Plant<strong>in</strong>g suitable crops.<br />
Farmers Plant and Cultivate suitable crops.<br />
Start stor<strong>in</strong>g food. Migrate to empty<br />
government lands (lop serikal) or employ<br />
herdsmen, send them with cattle to these<br />
lands, and check on them frequently;<br />
(however, those who settle on these lands<br />
reta<strong>in</strong> previous homes)<br />
Unthatched rooftops for cattle feed. Sell cattle<br />
and farms to buy food<br />
Men migrate to seek employment elsewhere to<br />
feed families. Women engage more <strong>in</strong> fish<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess and feed on osuga, awayo, apoth,<br />
odielo etc Group formations <strong>in</strong>crease, k<strong>in</strong>ship<br />
affiliations and friendships are strengthened,<br />
as people grapple with problem of survival.<br />
Some men run away, leav<strong>in</strong>g wives and<br />
children beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />
In kitchen gardens where debris and other<br />
rubbish are thrown away daily, Maize, beans<br />
and other legumes planted. Sorghum, pigeon<br />
peas, cowpeas, sweet potatoes and cassava<br />
planted.<br />
Manure is added as soil nutrient, crop rotation,<br />
grow drought resistant crops<br />
Table 2: Grassroots Indicators of land degradation for Migori district, Kenya.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
The weakness of the migori-luo grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators is that they are subjective <strong>in</strong> that<br />
they do not consider the effect of population change, landslides, soil erosion, texture,<br />
landform type and organic matter content. Furthermore, the appearance of ra<strong>in</strong>s is at times<br />
believed to be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by ra<strong>in</strong>-makers, lead<strong>in</strong>g to further uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty on the reliability of<br />
the luo <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />
HISTORICAL TRENDS<br />
Historical profiles and time trends are useful <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g important events or key<br />
changes between years. As such, they also help to focus on the future <strong>in</strong> terms of land use,<br />
climate change, soil erosion, population, tree cover and common property resources etc [1].<br />
PARTICIPATORY MAPPING<br />
Maps are important for communicat<strong>in</strong>g land use changes especially where monitor<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
evaluation are required. The people of the local community can do mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the landuse/change<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce they know most about the area under study. Maps are valuable for explor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
land-use patterns, changes <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g practices, constra<strong>in</strong>ts, depletion trends of forest cover,<br />
land deterioration, water, and crops [9]. The key <strong>in</strong>formants <strong>in</strong> this process will be the<br />
elderly, both men and women. The maps can be drawn on paper or on the ground i.e. “onground”<br />
digitiz<strong>in</strong>g whereby maps are sketched on the ground by people of various age<br />
groups. Secondary data and records can also be brought <strong>in</strong> for comparative <strong>in</strong>formation. As<br />
postulated by [4], satellite imagery and Global Position<strong>in</strong>g Systems (GPS) can also be used to<br />
validate the data.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
In order to improve land management and climate forecast<strong>in</strong>g, the gap between the<br />
local and scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators needs to be assessed and bridged for the benefit of the rural<br />
communities who form the largest percentage of the population <strong>in</strong> Kenya. Neither the<br />
scientist nor the local-farmer views consider all factors responsible for land degradation.<br />
There is need for further <strong>in</strong>vestigations on grassroots and scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators, to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the most useful soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators oriented towards susta<strong>in</strong>able land management. In<br />
addition, it is important to select <strong>in</strong>dicators that are easy and <strong>in</strong>expensive to measure or<br />
monitor. Identification of grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators is a complicated process, and there is a need<br />
for more exam<strong>in</strong>ation and documentation of this <strong>in</strong>formation. Most communities <strong>in</strong> Kenya<br />
have their own "grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators" based on knowledge and practical experience ga<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
over time. The <strong>in</strong>dicators differ by area accord<strong>in</strong>g to environmental conditions and people's<br />
activities. However, the real challenge will be to evolve hybrid <strong>in</strong>dicator systems br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />
together the different relevant traditional and scientific, historical and actual perspectives and<br />
knowledge systems.<br />
179
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
I wish to thank Dr-ir. Wim Cornelis and Dr. Ann Verdoodt of Ghent University <strong>in</strong> Belgium,<br />
Katsuji Nakamura and Professor Bob Kio Manuel both of the United States International<br />
University-Africa for their critical comments and contributions towards improv<strong>in</strong>g this<br />
article. I am also grateful to Professors Hubert Verplancke and Eric Van Ranst of Ghent<br />
University, Belgium for their advice.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Anthony, G.Y., Xia, L. Urban Growth management <strong>in</strong> the Pearl river delta: an <strong>in</strong>tegrated remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and GIS approach, ITC Journal 1996-1, pp. 77-86, 1996.<br />
[2] Copp<strong>in</strong>, N.J., Richards, I.G. Use of Vegetation <strong>in</strong> Civil Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. CIRIA/ Butterworths, London, 1990.<br />
[3] De jong, S.M., Paracch<strong>in</strong>i, M.L., Bertolo, F., Folv<strong>in</strong>g, S., Megier, J., De Roo, A.P.J. Regional Assessment of<br />
Soil Erosion us<strong>in</strong>g the distributed model SEMMED and remotely sensed data. Catena 37, 291-308, 1999.<br />
[4] Dymond, J.R., Bẻgue, A., Loseen, D. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Land</strong> at Regional and National Scales and the role of<br />
remote sens<strong>in</strong>g, ITC Journal 2001-2, pp. 162-175, 2001.<br />
[5] Evers, Y.D. Deal<strong>in</strong>g with risk and uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> Africa's dry lands: The social dimensions of desertification.<br />
International Institute of Environment and Development, Issue Paper No. 48, London, UK, 1994.<br />
[6] GoK (Government of Kenya). Royal Netherlands Government and United Nations Environment Programme.<br />
National <strong>Land</strong> Degradation and Mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Kenya. United Nations Office, Nairobi, 1997<br />
[7] Morgan, R.P.C. A Simple approach to soil loss prediction: a revised Morgan-Morgan-F<strong>in</strong>ley model. Catena<br />
44, 305-322, 2001.<br />
[8] UNEP. The United Nations Environmental Programme’s (UNEP) Millennium Report on the Environment.<br />
Global Environment Outlook 2000. Nairobi: UNEP, 1999.<br />
[9] Van Ranst, E., Verplancke, H. <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation. Lecture notes. Laboratory of Soil Science, Faculty of<br />
Science, Ghent University, Belgium, 2003.<br />
[10] http://www.cbs.go.ke/census1999.html, Accessed onl<strong>in</strong>e 12 th November 2005.<br />
[11] http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-30796-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html, Accessed onl<strong>in</strong>e 6 th July, 2006.<br />
[12] http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/lada/emailconf.stm, Accessed onl<strong>in</strong>e 6 th July, 2006.<br />
180
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Abstract<br />
PROPOSED PLAN OF ACTION FOR RESEARCH ON<br />
DESERTIFICATION IN THE SUDAN:<br />
GEZIRA AND SENNAR STATES<br />
Kamal Elfadil Fadul and Fawzi Mohamed Salih<br />
<strong>Land</strong> and Waterr Research Center, AgriculturalResearch Corporation, Wad Medani. Sudan<br />
The proposed plan of action for research on desertification <strong>in</strong> both Gezira and Sennar states <strong>in</strong>cludes an overall<br />
review of the previous and present activities <strong>in</strong>novated along his aspect. Both protective and preventive<br />
measures are required to combat desertification. Proper management of the cultivated lands, controlled use of<br />
the natural forests and rangelands, improvement of the standards of liv<strong>in</strong>g for the <strong>in</strong>habitants and the level of<br />
awareness perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to the problem are all factors of impact on the desertification <strong>in</strong> both states. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />
the proposed plan addresses two experimental sites, one <strong>in</strong> the natural vegetation zone and the other <strong>in</strong> the<br />
irrigated area. The former site <strong>in</strong>volves the cultivation of environmentally adapted plant species, where as the<br />
latter site caters for the management practices of the crops grown <strong>in</strong> the cultivated lands. Such a research<br />
program needs a multidispl<strong>in</strong>ary effort of the specialties concerned together with the provision of fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />
estimated to implementation and follow up.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Desertification as a land degradational process is encountered <strong>in</strong> Sudan at vary<strong>in</strong>g levels of<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensity. It is mostly active <strong>in</strong> the northern and western regions. Nevertheless, Gezira and<br />
Sennar states, as parts of the central region, are susceptible to this phenomenon <strong>in</strong> the near<br />
future, especially <strong>in</strong> the northwestern parts of both states. The western part of Gezira state lies<br />
at he fr<strong>in</strong>ges of the degradated area of the northern and western regions, whereas the northwestern<br />
part of Sennar state borders the tongues of the lighter-textured soils of Managil ridge.<br />
To illustrate the danger of sand encroachment as a sign of desertification of the northwest<br />
part of Gezira state, an area of 34 km2 of alluvial clay pla<strong>in</strong> has been <strong>in</strong>vaded and covered by<br />
sands from the surround<strong>in</strong>g sand dunes (Fig1).<br />
However there is hardly any effective research done to monitor or combat the<br />
approach<strong>in</strong>g danger of desertification. The only effort implemented <strong>in</strong> this respect was the<br />
‘Green belt’ of Eucalyptus species grown north of Gezira state and more Mesquit trees east of<br />
the White Nile at Hashaba area. Previously “Forest” plots existed with<strong>in</strong> the Gezira irrigated<br />
scheme; also reclamation trials have been carried out <strong>in</strong> north Gezira salt-affected part<br />
(Mustafa,H.F., 1998).<br />
A plan of action has to be drawn for Gezira and Sennar states follow<strong>in</strong>g an overall<br />
study of the problem of desertification. Such mode of scientific <strong>in</strong>vestigation can be justified<br />
by threaten<strong>in</strong>g of the sand creep from the two border<strong>in</strong>g directions towards the northern and<br />
western regions. The <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly expected hazard of desertification <strong>in</strong>cludes even the<br />
irrigated tracts of lands, save the bare and seasonally ra<strong>in</strong>fed fields, where proper<br />
management of cultivated crops is envisaged. However this effort requires the collaboration<br />
of research units, universities, local government and land users as guided and supervised by<br />
the Desertification and Desert Cultivation Studies Institute <strong>in</strong> Khartoum University.<br />
181
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
11 .438250<br />
9 .438250<br />
7 .438250<br />
5 .438250<br />
3 .438250<br />
1 .438250<br />
-0 .561750<br />
0 .589750<br />
The legend<br />
desertification<br />
NAME<br />
Gezira Scheme<br />
Sand dune 1975<br />
Sand dune 1985<br />
Sand duue 1949<br />
0 .589750<br />
1 .589750<br />
1 .589750<br />
white Nile<br />
2 .589750<br />
2 .589750<br />
3 .589750<br />
M onitor<strong>in</strong>g of Sand Dune M ovement at North-West Gezira <strong>Land</strong>sat image for (1985,1975,1949)<br />
3 .589750<br />
4 .589750<br />
4 .589750<br />
182<br />
5 .589750<br />
Scale 1:400,000 ´<br />
Fig. 1 : Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of Sand Dune Movement at North-West Gezira <strong>Land</strong>sat image for (1985, 1975,<br />
1949)<br />
5 .589750<br />
6 .589750<br />
6 .589750<br />
7 .589750<br />
7 .589750<br />
8 .589750<br />
8 .589750<br />
11 .438250<br />
9 .438250<br />
7 .438250<br />
5 .438250<br />
3 .438250<br />
1 .438250<br />
-0 .561750
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Objectives<br />
PLAN OF WORK<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> objective of this proposed plan of action is to promote the process of combat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
desertification through feasible preventive and protective measures, where a comprehensive<br />
technological program will be established for the development and management of the agro<br />
forestry. Specific objectives for Gezira and Sennar states endorse the control measures of<br />
sand movement along their northwestern fr<strong>in</strong>ges by shelterbelts of environmentally adapted<br />
tree and grass species, the recommended management practices of the cultivated tracts and<br />
the reclamation of Gezira and low-fertility parts of northwest Sennar. Basic data for both<br />
states is to be acquired.<br />
Strategy<br />
This plan aims at the preservation of the natural ecosystem of Gezira and Sennar states<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the future projection of the grow<strong>in</strong>g population and the dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g returns of the<br />
environmental <strong>in</strong>puts (Purnell,M.F. and Venema,J.H., 1976).<br />
Priority research themes<br />
These themes may <strong>in</strong>volve the improvement of degraded cultivated lands (both irrigated and<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fed) and the conservation of the susceptible erodable lands (either by water, w<strong>in</strong>d or<br />
mismanagement). Although all parts of the two states are at stake, still the northwestern parts<br />
of the Gezira and Sennar states represent priority research areas due to their proximity to the<br />
<strong>in</strong>vad<strong>in</strong>g desert. In addition to these experimental sites, other susceptible parts to<br />
desertification could be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the overall plan i.e. Abu Guta, Butana, Tahamid, Rahad,<br />
Guneid, North-West Sennar and Kenana schemes.<br />
Research plan<br />
To set an actual plan of action fulfill<strong>in</strong>g the objectives of combat<strong>in</strong>g desertification <strong>in</strong> Gezira<br />
and Sennar states, a number of steps have to be considered:<br />
- Collection of data, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g maps of location, hydrology, vegetation, soils and land use.<br />
Also all relevant literature of research and control efforts is to be compiled as well.<br />
- Formation of a specialized cadre to review the prevail<strong>in</strong>g biophysical socio-economic and<br />
political conditions related to the two states.<br />
- Conduct<strong>in</strong>g a comparative study between the past and present situation of the forementioned<br />
aspects so as to evaluate the magnitude of the problem.<br />
- Selection of two experimental sites (e.g. north-west of the two states) for plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environmentally adapted species.<br />
- Follow-up of results of the experimental sites prior to the evaluation of the effects of<br />
control measures applied aga<strong>in</strong>st the hazard.<br />
- Monitor<strong>in</strong>g the trend of desertification through time by <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation system will<br />
be of high need (us<strong>in</strong>g landsat images and/or maps of similar landuse and crop yield<br />
potentials)(Imad,A.A., etal, 2000).<br />
- Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of all other aspects of land degradation (e.g. erosion sal<strong>in</strong>ization, pollution,<br />
etc.) for their potential impact on land utilization productivity both <strong>in</strong> irrigated and ra<strong>in</strong>fed<br />
areas i.e. by measur<strong>in</strong>g environmental stability <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />
183
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
- Undertak<strong>in</strong>g a feasibility study prior to the implementation of the research plan for<br />
provision of necessary funds. Thus a scheduled plan of action is proposed for each state.<br />
- Inclusion of land dune stabilization as <strong>in</strong>tegral activity of the overall research program<br />
(Table1).<br />
Activities Area feddans<br />
1<br />
1.1<br />
1.2<br />
2<br />
2.1<br />
3<br />
3.1<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
Two plant<strong>in</strong>g (Irrigated & Ra<strong>in</strong>fed)<br />
Front rows (Laot, Kitir, Turfa, Tundub)<br />
Back rows (Eucalyptus, Seyal, Sidir, Sunut)<br />
Ranges:<br />
Grass-seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Dune stabilization<br />
Mesquite and/or Petro-chemicals<br />
Extension services (T.V, Radio, Leaflets, Sem<strong>in</strong>ars, etc)<br />
Alternative energy sources<br />
Ohers (Experimentation, Scholarships, Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, etc)<br />
184<br />
200,000<br />
200,000<br />
400,000<br />
200,000<br />
Table 1. A scheduled plan of action for each proposed research site <strong>in</strong> Gezira and Sennar states.<br />
PROPOSED RESEARCH PROGRAM<br />
This program aims at establish<strong>in</strong>g comprehensive technologies for the management and<br />
development of agroforestry.<br />
Natural vegetation zones<br />
Acacia seyal (Talh) belt<br />
This belt lies between 400 to 800 mm isohyets. Experimental sites are selected and reserved<br />
<strong>in</strong> agricultural schemes to:<br />
1. Study and monitor flower<strong>in</strong>g and seed<strong>in</strong>g of Acacia trees.<br />
2. Specify the critical moisture content necessary for growth (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g water conservational<br />
measures).<br />
3. Specify methods, rate and tim<strong>in</strong>g of plant<strong>in</strong>g seeds and young trees.<br />
4. Specify lateral position of tillers and the suitable time for cutt<strong>in</strong>g and activat<strong>in</strong>g the trees<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g natural or agronomic biofactors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g heir growth).<br />
5. Specify research site (size 625m 2 ) for data collection, i.e.:<br />
a) Survey of land use resources, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g type and density of vegetation (Van der kevie,W.,<br />
1976).<br />
b) Compar<strong>in</strong>g local sites with similar <strong>in</strong>ternational sites (IUFRO).<br />
c) Correlat<strong>in</strong>g product versus factors of production (climate, etc).<br />
d) Experiment<strong>in</strong>g on agronomic production factors.<br />
Acacia mellifera (Kitir) belt<br />
This belt is north of the Talh belt with less than 400 mm isohyets. Experimental sites are<br />
selected and reserved <strong>in</strong> agricultural schemes to:
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
1. Study and monitor flower<strong>in</strong>g and seed<strong>in</strong>g of Acacia trees.<br />
2. Specify the critical moisture content necessary for growth (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g water conservational<br />
measures).<br />
3. Specify methods, rate and time of plant<strong>in</strong>g seeds and young trees.<br />
4. Specify lateral position of tillers and the suitable time for cutt<strong>in</strong>g and activat<strong>in</strong>g the trees<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g natural or agronomic biofactors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g their growth).<br />
5. Specify research site (size 625 cm 2 ) for data collection, i.e.:<br />
a) Survey of land use resource, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g type and density of vegetation (Van der kevie,W.,<br />
1976).<br />
b) Compar<strong>in</strong>g local sites similar <strong>in</strong>ternational sites (IUFRO).<br />
c) Correlat<strong>in</strong>g product versus factors of production (climate, etc.).<br />
d) Experiment<strong>in</strong>g on agronomic production factors.<br />
Acacia nilotica (Sunut) belt<br />
This belt lies on both banks of Blue Nile, where, death of old trees due to silt<strong>in</strong>g-up <strong>in</strong> lowly<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sites and difficulty of regenerat<strong>in</strong>g new trees occur. The foreseen activities aim at<br />
1. Study<strong>in</strong>g the factors affect<strong>in</strong>g silt<strong>in</strong>g up.<br />
2. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the amount of yearly silt<strong>in</strong>g up.<br />
3. Study<strong>in</strong>g the characteristics of soil deposits.<br />
4. Study<strong>in</strong>g the effect of silt<strong>in</strong>g up on establishment of tree roots.<br />
Irrigation zones<br />
Eucalyptus plantation<br />
The foreseen activities <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
1. Genetic improvement of eucalyptus species.<br />
2. Agronomic studies related to productivity.<br />
3. Ecological and silvicultural studies as related to productivity.<br />
Shelterbelts for agricultural schemes<br />
A shelterbelt model will be made for each scheme.<br />
Irrigation canals shelterbelts<br />
The foreseen activities <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
1. Selection of suitable species.<br />
2. Study of suitable technologies to grow these species.<br />
Other relevant <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />
1. The mismanagement of the agricultural schemes (both ra<strong>in</strong>fed or irrigated) leads to<br />
deterioration of the cultivated lands as reflected by less productivity due to poor<br />
physiochemical properties of the soils. Such tracts of land may be deserted and hence become<br />
susceptible to desertification especially after their natural flora has been removed. Also some<br />
185
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
of these traces may undergo sal<strong>in</strong>ization and/or sodication (e.g. north Gezira, which requires<br />
reclamation to improve its productivity).<br />
2. Water harvest<strong>in</strong>g is an important practice <strong>in</strong> arid areas where the ra<strong>in</strong>water is collected<br />
and stored for use dur<strong>in</strong>g the critical time. Both climate and soils have an effective role <strong>in</strong> the<br />
system of water harvest<strong>in</strong>g (Amer,N.M., 1993). The role of climate is through precipitation<br />
and evapotranspiration (Farah,S.M., etal, 1996). Effective soil factors <strong>in</strong>clude texture, depth,<br />
<strong>in</strong>filtration rate, water availability, slope and sal<strong>in</strong>ity. The study of all these factors (climate<br />
and soil) will help <strong>in</strong> the establishment of pasture and forages thus reduc<strong>in</strong>g the hazard of<br />
desertification by vegetation cover and stabiliz<strong>in</strong>g the bare land surface.<br />
3. Some tree species are capable of N-fixation. Such trees may be identified so as to observe<br />
how much of this nutrient is added to the soil per grow<strong>in</strong>g season.<br />
4. Seed propagation and breed<strong>in</strong>g of selected tree species may be <strong>in</strong>corporated dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
research program.<br />
5. A socio-economic study of all the research program localities may be developed as<br />
related to the welfare of the people.<br />
Nevertheless, the implementation of this research plan of action is a multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary project<br />
<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g almost all the sectors of the society i.e. government, research centers, universities,<br />
specialized organizations and the users.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] N.M. Amer(1993). "Water harvest<strong>in</strong>g for supplementary irrigation. Regional Sem<strong>in</strong>ar on Cereal Production",<br />
Damascus, Syria, (1993).<br />
[2] S.M. Farah, I.A. Ali, S. Inanaga. "The role of climate and cultural practices on land degradation and<br />
desertification with reference to ra<strong>in</strong>-fed agriculture <strong>in</strong> Sudan". Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Fifth Int. Conference on<br />
Desert Development. Taxas Tch. University, USA, (1996).<br />
[3] A.A. Imad, M.F. Hassan, A.S. Ahmed. "Importance of <strong>in</strong>formation system for progress of research <strong>in</strong>to<br />
desertification and susta<strong>in</strong>able development of the natural resources", LWRC, ARC, Medani, Sudan, (2000).<br />
[4] H.F. Mustafa. "Forestry Research Program Dur<strong>in</strong>g (1998-2000)". Forestry Research Centre, ARC, Sudan,<br />
(1998).<br />
[5] M.F. Purnell, J.H. Venema. "Agricultural Potential Regions of Sudan". UNDP project work<strong>in</strong>g paper. Soil<br />
Survey Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, Medani, Sudan, (1976).<br />
[6] W. Van der Kevie. "Climatic Zones <strong>in</strong> the Sudan". Bullet<strong>in</strong> No. 27, SSA. Wad Medani, Sudan, (1973).<br />
186
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
DIAGNOSTIC OF DEGRADATION PROCESSES OF SOILS<br />
FROM NORTHERN TOGO (WEST AFRICA) AS A TOOL FOR<br />
SOIL AND WATER MANAGEMENT<br />
Abstract<br />
Rosa M Poch*, Josep M Ubalde<br />
Department of Environment and Soil Sciences, Universitat de Lleida, Catalonia, Spa<strong>in</strong><br />
In order to carry out a conservation project <strong>in</strong> Northern Togo, a survey was conducted to identify soil and water<br />
degradation processes. The model area occupies 100 ha and is representative of the Savannah Region of<br />
northern Togo (West Africa). This area belongs to the Centre de Formation Rurale de Tami, where several<br />
problems due to sheet and gully erosion, overgraz<strong>in</strong>g, waterlogg<strong>in</strong>g and trafficability were identified. Parent<br />
materials are Precambrian granites and gneisses with granodioritic composition. The soil moisture and<br />
temperature regime are ustic and isohyperthermic respectively (SSS 1999). The vegetation type is a woody<br />
savannah, with a marked agricultural <strong>in</strong>fluence. A soil survey of the model area at a scale 1:5000 (1 observation<br />
/ 10 ha) showed several mapp<strong>in</strong>g units classified as Geric Pl<strong>in</strong>thosol, Orthipl<strong>in</strong>thic and Arenic Acrisol, Arenic<br />
Gleysol, Stagnic, Endoeutric Pl<strong>in</strong>thosol (agricultural soils) and Pachic and Gleyic Phaeozem (natural soil) (FAO<br />
1998). <strong>Physical</strong>, hydrological, chemical and micromorphological analyses showed that the ma<strong>in</strong> problems<br />
related to the agricultural soils were waterlogg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> microdepressions due to saturated flow dur<strong>in</strong>g the wet<br />
season, shallowness due to sheet erosion, soil acidity, lack of nutrients and organic matter, and low water<br />
hold<strong>in</strong>g capacities. On the contrary, undisturbed forest soils show very favourable physical and chemical<br />
properties for root development. The results were used to design soil and water conservation works as dra<strong>in</strong>age<br />
ditches, zonation of crops and recommendation of management practices for each unit, as well as to assess the<br />
potential of the soils of the region to improve their quality with appropriate management. The practices are<br />
recommended not only to improve agricultural production, but also as mechanisms to use soils as carbon s<strong>in</strong>ks<br />
<strong>in</strong> the frame of global climatic change policies.<br />
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES<br />
Degradation of soils due to human activity, ma<strong>in</strong>ly as soil erosion, is one of the factors<br />
affect<strong>in</strong>g the future land use of the Savannah region <strong>in</strong> West Africa. In this region, an<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease of the population (locally exceed<strong>in</strong>g 300 <strong>in</strong>habitants km -2 ) and a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the<br />
agricultural yield has already been recorded [1].<br />
The recovery or ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the soil quality requires a diagnostic of the degradation<br />
processes, and establish<strong>in</strong>g a hierarchy of the soils to manage and the measures to apply <strong>in</strong><br />
order to optimize the economical and human resources. The objectives of this research were<br />
to carry out the diagnosis of degradation processes through gather<strong>in</strong>g of soil morphological<br />
and analytical <strong>in</strong>formation that are easy to collect, and to assess the type and severity of soil<br />
degradation and recover<strong>in</strong>g possibilities.<br />
The physical environment<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
This work was carried out <strong>in</strong> a model area of 100 ha located <strong>in</strong> the Savannah Region of<br />
northern Togo (West Africa). This area belongs to the Centre de Formation Rurale de Tami,<br />
187
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
where peasants of the region are tra<strong>in</strong>ed on agriculture and husbandry dur<strong>in</strong>g two years. This<br />
centre is located 20 km east from Dapaong, the capital of the region.<br />
The climatic data was taken from a series of 19 years from the meteorological station of<br />
Dapaong. The climate is sudano-gu<strong>in</strong>ean, characterized by a dry season from October to<br />
April and a ra<strong>in</strong>y season from May to end of September. Dur<strong>in</strong>g January and February a<br />
strong dusty w<strong>in</strong>d from the NE (harmattan) re<strong>in</strong>forces the dryness of the season. Annual<br />
precipitation is 1001 mm, with a maximum <strong>in</strong> August (266 mm) and a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong> January<br />
(0 mm). Interannual variability is high: with<strong>in</strong> the studied series, annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall ranges from<br />
649 to 1370 mm. The maximum precipitation values <strong>in</strong> 24 h are 62, 86 and 107 mm for<br />
recurrence periods of 2, 10 and 100 years. Mean annual temperature is 28.1ºC, rang<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
25.2 ºC (August) to 31.8 ºC (May). The difference between the average of the maxima (33.6<br />
ºC) and the average of the m<strong>in</strong>ima (22.5 ºC) is higher than the annual variation of the monthly<br />
mean, characteristic of a iso-temperature regime. Potential evapotranspiration accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
Thornthwaite is 2057 mm, with a maximum <strong>in</strong> April (280.8 mm) and a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong> August<br />
(106.7 mm). The soil moisture and temperature regime are ustic and isohyperthermic<br />
respectively [8].<br />
Geologically the region belongs to the sedimentary or epimetamorphic cover formations<br />
from the Voltaian. The study area is found on the birrimian (Precambrian) basement<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g on granites and gneiss with granodioritic composition. The rock presents abundant<br />
large plagioclase crystals slightly oriented. Locally, quartz and pegmatite ve<strong>in</strong>s are found [2].<br />
The savannah region is characterised by a roll<strong>in</strong>g landscape consist<strong>in</strong>g of sequences of<br />
platforms, valleys and slopes without precise limits but with a great relevance <strong>in</strong> soil form<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and soil erosion processes. These units are found <strong>in</strong> the model area, at altitudes from 250 to<br />
270 m asl.<br />
The vegetation type is a woody savannah, with a marked agricultural <strong>in</strong>fluence. The<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant species are Parkia biglobosa and Butyrospermum parkii as trees and Acacia<br />
sieberiana as bush. Riparian and ruderal vegetation are also present. A small remnant of dry<br />
sudanian forest vegetation consist<strong>in</strong>g of Anogeissus leiocarpus, Butyrospermum parkii,<br />
Bauh<strong>in</strong>ia thonn<strong>in</strong>gii and Ziziphus mauritiaca as ma<strong>in</strong> species has been preserved as ‘sacred<br />
forest’ (fôret sacrée). The ma<strong>in</strong> land uses of the region are represented <strong>in</strong> the study area: 60%<br />
of the area is devoted to ra<strong>in</strong>fed crops, ma<strong>in</strong>ly for self consumption (peanuts, soja, corn,<br />
sorghum, millet, rice) but also cash crops as cotton, occupy<strong>in</strong>g 8% of the area. The rest are<br />
pastures (30%), forest or abandoned cropland. The crop yields are low due to low fertility of<br />
the soils and a lack of fertilisation: 1850 kg ha -1 for corn and 1500 kg ha -1 for rice.<br />
Methods<br />
The soils of the model area were surveyed at a scale 1:5000 (1 observation/10 ha). Profile<br />
description was carried out <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> geomorphological and vegetation units previously<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ed. Chemical and physico-chemical characterisation was done <strong>in</strong> some of the profiles<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to Porta et al. [5].<br />
Tests of <strong>in</strong>filtration by a double-r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>filtrometer and permeability by the <strong>in</strong>verse<br />
Auger-hole method were performed <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> soil units of the study area.<br />
Three of the profiles were sampled for the micromorphological study. Ten th<strong>in</strong> sections<br />
were made accord<strong>in</strong>g to Guilloré [4] and described follow<strong>in</strong>g the guidel<strong>in</strong>es of Stoops [6].<br />
188
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
The soils: formation and characteristics<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The soils are developed either on saprolites of igneous rocks, on coarse colluvia of sands and<br />
petropl<strong>in</strong>thite gravels. Table 1 presents the ma<strong>in</strong> soils related with the geomorphological unit,<br />
the landuse/vegetation and the parent material. They classify as Ultisols, Vertisols and<br />
Mollisols, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the degree of stability and lack of soil erosion. The morphology and<br />
micromorphology of the representative soils are found <strong>in</strong> Table 2 and 3. The soil formation<br />
processes on the saprolite is fully displayed <strong>in</strong> Profile 9, who has the most complete sequence<br />
of horizons. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to this sequence, the alteration of the saprolite consists <strong>in</strong> the<br />
weather<strong>in</strong>g of the plagioclases to kaol<strong>in</strong>ite or 2:1 clays, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the dra<strong>in</strong>age class of<br />
the soils. Profile 9 and 7 correspond to a vertic horizon, with frequent slickensides and<br />
striated b-fabrics. The clay has later been dispersed and illuviated, as it is shown by the<br />
microlam<strong>in</strong>ated clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> these horizons and <strong>in</strong> the saprolite itself. Formation of<br />
pl<strong>in</strong>thic horizons would proceed from the more sandy horizons, with Fe-oxides accumulation,<br />
either absolute accumulation by direct release from m<strong>in</strong>eral weather<strong>in</strong>g, or residual<br />
accumulation after clay illuviation. This accumulation is strong enough for an <strong>in</strong>cipient<br />
cementation <strong>in</strong> the walls of Profile 9, and is generalized <strong>in</strong> the platform soils of the region.<br />
Position<br />
Tentative classification<br />
<strong>Land</strong>use / Parent material Modal<br />
FAO 1998 [3] SSS 1999 [8] vegetation<br />
profile<br />
Platforms Geric Haplic Pl<strong>in</strong>thustult cotton, corn, Saprolite of syenites and 1,3<br />
Pl<strong>in</strong>thosol<br />
peanuts gneiss<br />
Slopes Upslope Orthipl<strong>in</strong>thic Pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />
soja, corn, Saprolite of syenites and 8<br />
Acrisol or Kanhaplustult peanuts, gneiss<br />
Lixisol<br />
cotton,<br />
Footslope Arenic Acrisol Arenic<br />
millet, Colluvium of quartzitic sands 4<br />
or Lixisol Kanhaplustult sorghum, with petropl<strong>in</strong>thitic gravels<br />
Eroded slope Hypereutric Chromic Haplustert pastures Saprolite of syenites and 7<br />
Vertisol<br />
gneiss<br />
Valley Strong Arenic Gleysol Aquic<br />
Pastures, Colluvium of quartzitic sands 6<br />
bottoms accumulation<br />
Quartzipsamment rice with petropl<strong>in</strong>thitic gravels<br />
Pachic Pachic Vermustoll Sacred Saprolite of syenites and 5<br />
Phaeozem<br />
forest gneiss<br />
Slight Stagnic, Oxyaquic Argiustoll Pastures, Saprolite of gneiss and sandy 9,2<br />
accumulation Endoeutric (<strong>in</strong>c. Oxyaquic rice colluvium on top<br />
Pl<strong>in</strong>thosol (<strong>in</strong>c. Haplustoll)<br />
Gleyic<br />
Phaeozem)<br />
Table 1 : Classification, geomorphology and landuse of the soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g units <strong>in</strong> the study area<br />
The evolution from this model produces different soil patterns depend<strong>in</strong>g on the local<br />
conditions:<br />
- Soils on stable positions, not disturbed nor cultivated, under a dense vegetation cover<br />
(Profile 5) undergo an <strong>in</strong>tense OM accumulation. The relatively high base content of the<br />
saprolite allows even the formation and accumulation of calcite coat<strong>in</strong>gs and nodules, caused<br />
by root and microbial activity.<br />
- Soils with different degrees of erosion lack this organic-rich top horizon and have sandy<br />
surface horizons <strong>in</strong>stead, sometimes overly<strong>in</strong>g the pl<strong>in</strong>thic horizon (profiles 1,3). In the most<br />
severe cases, a slight acidification of the topsoil is proceed<strong>in</strong>g (Profile 1).<br />
- Redoximorphic features are generalized <strong>in</strong> the soils of the area, as Fe oxi-hydroxide<br />
accumulation as concentric nodules, hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs around pores and impregnative nodules,<br />
either orthic or anorthic. The high permeability of surface horizons <strong>in</strong> contrast to the<br />
189
Profile<br />
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
impervious vertic or pl<strong>in</strong>thic horizons allows for subsurface saturated flow to occur, which is<br />
also the cause of erosion of the surface sands which are accumulated on the slopes (Profile 6)<br />
and <strong>in</strong> the valley bottoms (Profile 2)<br />
Horizon<br />
s<br />
1 Ap<br />
Bt1<br />
Bts2<br />
Bts3<br />
2 Apg1<br />
Ag2<br />
Bs<br />
2C<br />
3C<br />
3 Ap1<br />
Ap2<br />
Bw<br />
2Bts<br />
4 Ap1<br />
Ap2<br />
Ap3<br />
Bw<br />
Bts1<br />
Bts2<br />
5 Oa<br />
Oi<br />
A1<br />
Bw1<br />
Bw2<br />
Bwg3<br />
6 Ap<br />
Bg1<br />
Bg2<br />
Bs3<br />
7 Ap<br />
2Apg2<br />
2Bssg<br />
2Bt<br />
8 Ap<br />
Bw1<br />
Bt1<br />
Bt2<br />
9 Apg<br />
Bg1<br />
Bst2<br />
Bsm3<br />
Bssg4<br />
C<br />
Depth (cm) Colour<br />
(moist)<br />
0-20<br />
20-33<br />
33-55<br />
55->60<br />
0-10<br />
10-25<br />
25-63<br />
63-100<br />
>100<br />
0-10<br />
10-19/25<br />
19/25-40<br />
40->70<br />
0-10<br />
10-20<br />
20-26/43<br />
26/43-50<br />
50-68<br />
68->90<br />
-5 - -3<br />
-3-0<br />
0-16/19<br />
16/19-43<br />
43-75/85<br />
75/85->90<br />
0-15/21<br />
15/21-37<br />
37-65<br />
65->80<br />
0-2<br />
2-17<br />
17-35<br />
35->55<br />
0-18<br />
18-33<br />
33-53<br />
53->70<br />
0-20<br />
20-28<br />
28-60<br />
60-73<br />
73-150<br />
>150<br />
7.5YR4/4<br />
10YR6/3<br />
7.5YR5/6<br />
10R4/6<br />
10YR3/3<br />
10YR3/3<br />
10YR4/6<br />
7.5YR4/6<br />
-<br />
5YR2/3<br />
5YR2/3<br />
7.5YR4/6<br />
5YR3/6<br />
5YR4/6<br />
5YR4/8<br />
5YR3/6<br />
5YR3/6<br />
5YR4/6<br />
5YR4/6<br />
-<br />
7.5YR1.7/1<br />
7.5YR2/1<br />
10YR3/2<br />
10YR2/3<br />
10YR4/3<br />
10YR3/3<br />
10YR4/6<br />
10YR5/6<br />
10YR5/6<br />
10YR4/6<br />
2.5Y4/6<br />
2.5Y6/4<br />
2.5Y6/5<br />
7.5YR4/6<br />
7.5YR4/6<br />
7.5YR4/6<br />
10YR5/6<br />
10YR3/3<br />
10YR4/6<br />
10YR6/6<br />
10YR5/6<br />
2.5Y6/6<br />
2.5Y7/2<br />
Structure<br />
(primary,<br />
secondary)<br />
vw-sab-c<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
m-sab-m<br />
w-sab-m<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
vw-c-m<br />
vw-sab-c<br />
-<br />
-<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
vw-c-m,w-sab-m<br />
w-sab-c<br />
m-sab-m<br />
s-sab-m<br />
vw-sab-f<br />
vw-sab-m<br />
w-sab-m<br />
-<br />
abs<br />
m-sab-m<br />
s-sab-m<br />
-<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
w-sab-m<br />
vw-sab-m<br />
vw-sab-f<br />
abs<br />
vs-sab-f, m-p-c<br />
parent material<br />
Texture Coarse<br />
fragments<br />
LS<br />
SL<br />
SCL<br />
SCL<br />
LS<br />
LS<br />
CS<br />
CS<br />
-<br />
LS<br />
CL<br />
CS<br />
-<br />
mS<br />
mS<br />
mS<br />
mS<br />
CS<br />
CS<br />
-<br />
-<br />
CS<br />
CS<br />
CS<br />
CS<br />
LS<br />
SL<br />
CS<br />
CS<br />
S<br />
C<br />
C<br />
SC<br />
mS<br />
LS<br />
SC<br />
C<br />
S<br />
S<br />
LS<br />
–<br />
C<br />
-<br />
16-35% gr<br />
>70%gr<br />
>70%<br />
>70%<br />
abs<br />
fr-gr<br />
vfr-gr<br />
vfr-gr<br />
>70%<br />
fr-gr<br />
vfr-gr<br />
ab-gr<br />
ab-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
-<br />
-<br />
vf-gr<br />
vf-gr<br />
vf-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
abs<br />
f-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
>70% gr<br />
ab-gr<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
f-gr<br />
v-gr<br />
vf-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
fr-gr<br />
fr-gr<br />
fr-gr<br />
vfr-gr<br />
f-gr<br />
ab<br />
190<br />
Consiste<br />
nce<br />
l-vf<br />
c-fm<br />
vc<br />
vc<br />
vc-fm<br />
vc-fm<br />
c-vf<br />
s<br />
c<br />
l-s<br />
c-f<br />
c<br />
vc<br />
l<br />
c<br />
s<br />
s<br />
s<br />
l<br />
-<br />
-<br />
l-vf<br />
c-vf<br />
c-f<br />
c-fm<br />
l-vf<br />
l<br />
c-f<br />
vc<br />
l<br />
vc<br />
vc<br />
vc<br />
l<br />
c<br />
c<br />
vc<br />
l<br />
c<br />
c<br />
vc<br />
vc<br />
vc<br />
Roots Mottles Accumulations/surfaces Diagnosti<br />
c horizon<br />
[3]<br />
f<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
f<br />
f<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
f<br />
f<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
f<br />
f<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
-<br />
-<br />
ab<br />
ab<br />
ab<br />
fr<br />
f<br />
f<br />
vf<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
f<br />
f<br />
abs<br />
f<br />
f<br />
vf<br />
abs<br />
f<br />
f<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
fr-ox<br />
fr-ox<br />
ab-ox<br />
abs<br />
-<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
f-red<br />
-<br />
-<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
ab-red<br />
abs<br />
fr-ox<br />
ab-ox<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
fr-ox<br />
fr-ox<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
fr-ox<br />
fr-ox<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
fr-ox<br />
abs<br />
Abs<br />
silt cutans<br />
silt cutans, soft iron<br />
concretions<br />
silt cutans, soft iron matrix<br />
Abs<br />
abs<br />
iron coat<strong>in</strong>gs on coarse<br />
fragments<br />
abs<br />
Abs<br />
Abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
iron impregnations on soil<br />
mass<br />
Abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
few clay cutans<br />
few clay cutans<br />
-<br />
-<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
pressure faces<br />
abs<br />
few skeletans on root channels<br />
few skeletans on root channels<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
frequent slickensides<br />
frequent silt coat<strong>in</strong>gs on sands<br />
abs<br />
Fe-Mn nodules, soft<br />
id, silt coat<strong>in</strong>gs, vertical cracks<br />
Fe-Mn nodules<br />
abs<br />
abs<br />
few clay cutans, Fe-Mn<br />
nodules<br />
weak Fe cementation<br />
abundant slickensides<br />
few silt coat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
structure: s: strong, m: moderate, w: weak; sab: subangular blocky, g: granular; f: f<strong>in</strong>e, m: medium, c: coarse, vc: very coarse, abundance: abs:<br />
absent, c: common, fr: frequent, vfr: very frequent, ab: abundant, coarse fragments: gr: gravels, consistence: l: loose, vf: very friable, f: friable, fm:<br />
firm, s: soft, c: compact: vc: very compact, size f: f<strong>in</strong>e, c: coarse, vc: very coarse, roots: f: few, fr: frequent, ab: abundant, mottles: abs: absent, f: few,<br />
fr: frequent, ox: oxidation, red: reduction<br />
Table 2 : Field description of the modal profiles<br />
ochric<br />
argic<br />
pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />
pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />
mollic<br />
mollic<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
ochric<br />
ochric<br />
-<br />
pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />
ochric<br />
ochric<br />
-<br />
-<br />
argic<br />
argic<br />
-<br />
-<br />
mollic<br />
mollic<br />
mollic<br />
-<br />
ochric<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
ochric<br />
ochric<br />
vertic<br />
-<br />
ochric<br />
-<br />
argic<br />
argic<br />
mollic<br />
-<br />
argic<br />
pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />
vertic<br />
-
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Microstructure and porosity Micromass Pedofeatures<br />
PROFILE 1 Bt1 25-35 cm<br />
Apedal, vughy, 30%, vughs,<br />
vesicles, biopores, planar.<br />
Bts2, 30-40 cm<br />
Pedal, subangular blocky, very<br />
coarse sand size. 25%, planar<br />
voids and vughs<br />
Bts3, 60-73 cm<br />
Apedal, vughy, 20%, vughs<br />
and planar voids<br />
PROFILE 5 A1, 0-15 cm<br />
Pedal, granular, coarse sand<br />
size, well developed. 40%,<br />
compound pack<strong>in</strong>g pores,<br />
biopores, accomodated planar<br />
voids<br />
Bw1, 20-30 cm<br />
Pedal; Primary: subangular<br />
blocky, 1 cm, well developed;<br />
Secondary: channel. 30%,<br />
planar pores, biopores.<br />
Bw1, 30-43 cm<br />
Pedal. Primary: subangular<br />
blocky, 3 cm, well developed;<br />
Secondary: channel. 35%,<br />
planar voids, biopores.<br />
Bw2, 50-60 cm<br />
Pedal, Primary: subangular<br />
blocky, 4 cm, moderately<br />
developed; Secondary:<br />
channel. 30%, planar voids and<br />
biopores<br />
PROFILE 9 Ap, 0-13 cm<br />
Apedal, vughy. 20%,<br />
vesicules, biopores<br />
Bst2, 33-43 cm<br />
Pedal. Primary: subangular<br />
blocky (3-4 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter),<br />
weakly developed; Secondary:<br />
vughy; 30%, planar voids,<br />
vesicles<br />
Bts2, 43-60 cm<br />
Pedal. Primary: subangular<br />
blocky (1-2 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter),<br />
moderately developed;<br />
Secondary: channel. 30%,<br />
planar voids, channels, vughs<br />
and vesicles.<br />
Bssg4, 80-85 cm<br />
Apedal, channel. 20%, vughs<br />
and vesicles<br />
Bssg4, 140-155 cm<br />
Pedal, subangular blocky, 1 cm<br />
<strong>in</strong> diameter, moderately<br />
developed, 20%, planar voids,<br />
vughs, biopores.<br />
Brownish mixture of clay and<br />
silt, mosaic and nodulostriated<br />
b-fabric<br />
fe-oxides.<br />
Intra-aggregate impregations of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, halo, very coarse sand size.<br />
Few silt and clay <strong>in</strong>tercalations around some vughs, moderately oriented, lam<strong>in</strong>ated, mottled.<br />
Few clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs, around fissure walls, limpid, microlam<strong>in</strong>ated, medium sand size, sta<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />
Nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, very coarse sand and gravel size, rounded, concentric, with<br />
<strong>in</strong>clusions of runiquartz, anorthic, with higher quartz content than the groundmass.<br />
Id before Nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, very coarse sand and gravel size, rounded, concentric, with<br />
<strong>in</strong>clusions of runiquartz, anorthic, with higher quartz content than the groundmass.<br />
General impregnation of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, with different degrees of <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />
Clay <strong>in</strong>tercalations along walls of planar voids, probably kaol<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
Id before Clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs around pores, occupy<strong>in</strong>g 30% of the soil.<br />
Nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, very coarse sand and gravel size, rounded, concentric, with<br />
<strong>in</strong>clusions of runiquartz, anorthic, with higher quartz content than the groundmass.<br />
Orthic nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, aggregate, diffuse, halo, <strong>in</strong>tra-aggregate.<br />
Dark brown mixture of silt, clay<br />
and organic pigment, mosaic<br />
striated b-fabric<br />
Light brown mixture of silt, and<br />
clay, mottled; mosaic-, cross-<br />
and nodulostriated b-fabric<br />
Yellowish brown mixture of<br />
clay and silt, grano- and<br />
porostriated b-fabric<br />
Yellowish brown mixture of<br />
clay and silt, mosaic-<br />
granostriated and slightly cross<br />
striated b-fabric<br />
Brownish mixture of clay, silt<br />
and organic pigment,<br />
undifferenciated b-fabric,<br />
locally mosaic striated.<br />
Yellowish brow mixture of clay<br />
and silt, mottled, mosaic<br />
striated b-fabric, locally<br />
nodulostriated<br />
Passage features as <strong>in</strong>filled channels<br />
Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of acicular CaCO3 crystals <strong>in</strong> some biopores, apparently associated to organic rema<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Rounded nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides.<br />
Few micritic nodules of CaCO3, medium sand size.<br />
Concentric nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, very coarse sand and gravels, granostriated.<br />
Few diffuse nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnated, orthic, coarse and very coarse sand size.<br />
Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of acicular and microsparitic CaCO3 <strong>in</strong> some pores<br />
Passage features as <strong>in</strong>filled channels<br />
Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of acicular and microsparitic CaCO3 <strong>in</strong> some pores<br />
Kaol<strong>in</strong>ite coat<strong>in</strong>gs around a planar void and around anorthic nodules<br />
Nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnated, orthic (diffuse) and anorthic, very coarse sand size.<br />
Impregnations of Fe oxi-hydroxides <strong>in</strong>tra-aggregate, very coarse sand size<br />
Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of acicular CaCO3 <strong>in</strong> biopores, crystals 0.3 mm long and 0.1 mm thick.<br />
Impregnative hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs of microsparite <strong>in</strong> biopores, 0.25 to 0.5 mm <strong>in</strong> diameter<br />
Rounded nodules of microsparite, medium sand.<br />
Microsparite and needles of CaCO3 dispersed <strong>in</strong> the groundmass.<br />
Coat<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs of mottled clay, microlam<strong>in</strong>ated, colours of 1st and 2nd order, around<br />
channels, 0.1 to 0.25 mm thick.<br />
Frequent hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnative, around channels<br />
Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, medium sand, orthic and anorthic<br />
Frequent <strong>in</strong>tercalations of limpid clay, microlam<strong>in</strong>ated, 1st order colours, up ot 2 mm thick.<br />
Clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> channels, < 0.25 mm thick<br />
Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, with quartz <strong>in</strong>clusions, sharp boundary.<br />
Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnative, diffuse boundary.<br />
Impregnative Fe hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs along channels.<br />
Id before Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, with quartz <strong>in</strong>clusions, sharp boundary, very coarse sand,<br />
granostriated, porous.<br />
Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnative, diffuse boundary.<br />
Impregnative Fe hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs along channels<br />
Clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>tercalations, limpid, microlam<strong>in</strong>ated, kaol<strong>in</strong>itic,
Profi<br />
le<br />
1 Ap<br />
Bt1<br />
Bts2<br />
Bts3<br />
2 Apg1<br />
Ag2<br />
Bs<br />
2C<br />
3C<br />
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Degradation processes<br />
Soil erosion is one of the ma<strong>in</strong> problems, ma<strong>in</strong>ly as splash and sheet erosion. The most<br />
affected soils are those on the platforms and slopes. Soil erosion also occurs by concentrated<br />
runoff, as rills and gullies. Retreats of 2 m of the gully heads have been observed after a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle storm event.<br />
The erosion is due to <strong>in</strong>tense ra<strong>in</strong>falls dur<strong>in</strong>g the wet season, low structural stability,<br />
crops with low coverage and fields with an excessive length with low runoff control. In the<br />
case of the gullies, saturation flow <strong>in</strong> the sand colluvia runs along the slopes over the more<br />
clayey horizons and concentrates at the gully head. The low cohesion of the saturated sands at<br />
this po<strong>in</strong>t is the responsible of the collapse and retreat of the gully heads.<br />
Regard<strong>in</strong>g the chemical and physical fertility (Table 4), the ma<strong>in</strong> problems are the low<br />
OM contents (600<br />
>600<br />
-<br />
86<br />
3 18<br />
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Modal profile Infiltration<br />
capacity (mm h -1 Bulk density of the<br />
) surface horizon (kg m -3 Permeability class Available water<br />
)<br />
capacity AWC (mm)<br />
1<br />
100<br />
1708<br />
-<br />
40<br />
3<br />
250<br />
1770<br />
-<br />
2<br />
75<br />
1418<br />
-<br />
48<br />
9<br />
60<br />
1480<br />
Moderate<br />
100<br />
6<br />
50<br />
1440<br />
Slow<br />
88<br />
5 100 1195 Moderate 200<br />
7 60<br />
1369<br />
Moderate<br />
110<br />
70<br />
1306<br />
-<br />
8<br />
170<br />
1612<br />
Moderate<br />
94<br />
4<br />
320<br />
1670<br />
-<br />
50<br />
50<br />
1560<br />
-<br />
Table 5 : Hydrological properties of the modal profiles<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The results show a very strong <strong>in</strong>fluence of human activity <strong>in</strong> soil formation and distribution.<br />
Erosion, either geological or human-driven (deforestation, fires) has acted <strong>in</strong> all soils except<br />
the undisturbed one under a permanent forest (Profile 5). Its properties show as well a high<br />
potential quality of the soils of the region, both regard<strong>in</strong>g agricultural yields and also as<br />
carbon s<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> the frame of global change policies.<br />
The fertility of the most degraded soils cannot be improved significantly unless large<br />
<strong>in</strong>puts of organic matter and strict conservation management practices are applied, which are<br />
not possible given the availability of organic residues and the socio-economical<br />
characteristics of the region [9]. Instead, the application of good management practices that<br />
can be adapted to the conventional agricultural systems <strong>in</strong> the moderately degraded soils -as<br />
the ultisols-, would optimize the resources, keep<strong>in</strong>g or improv<strong>in</strong>g soil quality and lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
higher yields.<br />
In this sense, the management recommendations have been the control of surface runoff<br />
by a new outl<strong>in</strong>e of the fields and a network of contour dra<strong>in</strong>age ditches, the control of gully<br />
erosion by permeable stone dams, and the management of organic matter: compost<strong>in</strong>g, crop<br />
residue management and bush fences. A new land use redistribution made from soil quality<br />
and soil erosion maps was also proposed [9].<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
We acknowledge the <strong>in</strong>conditional help, willigness and enthusiasm of Felipe García (CTFC),<br />
and the fund<strong>in</strong>g of Diputació de Lleida, Proide and Centre de Cooperació Internacional -<br />
Universitat de Lleida.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] P. Brabant, S. Darracq, K Egue, V. Simonneaux. “Togo. État de degradation des terres resultant des activités<br />
huma<strong>in</strong>es. Notice explicative de la carte des <strong>in</strong>dices de degradation”, Éditions de l’ORSTOM, Paris, 57 pp.<br />
(1996)<br />
193
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
[2] J. Collart, I. Ouassane, J.P. Sylva<strong>in</strong>. “Notice explicative de la carte géologique à 1/200 000. Feuille<br />
Dapaong, 1e Édition” Mémoire n. 2. République Togolaise, M<strong>in</strong>istère de l’Équipement, des M<strong>in</strong>es et des Postes<br />
et Télécommunications, DG M<strong>in</strong>es, Géologie et du Bureau National des Recherches M<strong>in</strong>ières. (1985)<br />
[3] FAO. "World reference base for soil resources (WRB)", World Soil <strong>Resources</strong> Report No. 84 , FAO/<br />
ISSS/AISS/IBG/ISRIC, Rome, (1998).<br />
[4] P. Guilloré. “Méthode de fabrication mécanique et en série de lames m<strong>in</strong>ces”. CNRS and INA-Paris-<br />
Grignon. Dep. Sols. Thiverval.Grignon. 22p. (1980)<br />
[5] J. Porta, M. López-Acevedo, R. Rodríguez. “Laboratori d’Edafologia”. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.<br />
193 pp. (1993)<br />
[6] G. Stoops. “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for analysis and description of soil and regolith th<strong>in</strong> sections”, Soil Science Society<br />
of America, Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>. 184 pp. (2003)<br />
[7] R.M. Rochette. “Le Sahel en lutte contre la desertification: leçons d’expériences”. Weikersheim, Margraf.<br />
592 pp (1989).<br />
[8] SSS-Soil Survey Staff. "Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Classification for Mak<strong>in</strong>g and Interpret<strong>in</strong>g Soil<br />
Surveys ", USDA, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton. (1999).<br />
[9] J.M. Ubalde, R.M. Poch. “Projet de conservation des sols et des eaux dans la zone soudano-gu<strong>in</strong>éene au<br />
Centre de Formation Rurale de Tami (Togo)”, Bullet<strong>in</strong> du reséau erosion 20, pp 485-495, (2000)<br />
194
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
WORKSHOP Theme: <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />
Convenors: A.; Verdoodt, W. Cornelis, E. Van Ranst, H. Verplancke, D. Gabriëls<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
This workshop focussed on two themes: «<strong>Land</strong> Evaluation» and «<strong>Land</strong> Degradation». The<br />
objectives were (1) to give an overview of the latest developments <strong>in</strong> both discipl<strong>in</strong>es, (2) to<br />
review the current activities of our alumni with<strong>in</strong> these fields of expertise and (3) to hold a<br />
round table discussion on the issues raised, on new research questions and chang<strong>in</strong>g needs.<br />
Although both themes were addressed separately, strik<strong>in</strong>g similarities and crosscutt<strong>in</strong>g issues<br />
could be identified throughout the workshop. Both sciences evolved from experimental<br />
modell<strong>in</strong>g, over process-based modell<strong>in</strong>g, towards more participatory approaches, mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
full use of the local knowledge on land suitability and risks for land degradation. Recent<br />
research topics <strong>in</strong> both discipl<strong>in</strong>es focus on identify<strong>in</strong>g soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators. The research<br />
topics presented by the 3 alumni illustrated these developments very well. Dr. Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra<br />
explored the possibilities for oil palm production <strong>in</strong> Thailand us<strong>in</strong>g land suitability<br />
classification and crop modell<strong>in</strong>g techniques. Dr. Boniao on the other hand, identified bio<strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
of soil degradation follow<strong>in</strong>g forest to agricultural land conversion <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; a presentation touch<strong>in</strong>g both land evaluation and land degradation issues. And<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ally, with<strong>in</strong> the «<strong>Land</strong> Degradation» theme, Dr. Poch illustrated how one combats soil<br />
degradation <strong>in</strong> Togo mak<strong>in</strong>g use of soil quality maps and local capacity build<strong>in</strong>g. Each<br />
presentation was followed by a short discussion with the alumni attend<strong>in</strong>g the workshop. The<br />
most important overall conclusion of the workshop was that current methodologies <strong>in</strong> both<br />
discipl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>tegrate – us<strong>in</strong>g a sound scientific approach - traditional models build<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
expert knowledge with more recent process-based models and strongly valuable grass-roots<br />
knowledge.<br />
195
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
WORKSHOP THEME D – SOIL SURVEY AND INVENTORY<br />
TECHNIQUES<br />
Sub-theme : Developments <strong>in</strong> soil (attribute) mapp<strong>in</strong>g with a application <strong>in</strong><br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g groundwater depth<br />
P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke<br />
Paper/poster : Us<strong>in</strong>g geographic <strong>in</strong>formation systems and global<br />
position<strong>in</strong>g system to map soil characteristics for land evaluation – P.<br />
Wandahwa, J.A. Rota, D.O. Sigunga<br />
Sub-theme : Developments <strong>in</strong> GIS and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g with emphasis on<br />
high resolution imagery and 3-D presentation techniques<br />
R. Goossens<br />
Paper/poster : Geomorphology and classification of some pla<strong>in</strong>es and<br />
wadies adjacent to Gabel Elba, South East of Egypt – El-Badawi, M.,<br />
Abdel-Fattah, A.<br />
Paper/poster : High resolution terra<strong>in</strong> mapp<strong>in</strong>g and visualization of<br />
channel morphology us<strong>in</strong>g Lidar and Ifsar data – Sudhir Raj Shrestha, Dr.<br />
Scott N. Miller<br />
Sub-theme : Developments <strong>in</strong> soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and proximal sens<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
applications <strong>in</strong> precision agriculture<br />
M. Van Meirvenne, U.W.A. Vitharana, L. Cockx<br />
Paper/poster : Estimat<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cokrig<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Bahariya Oasis, Egypt – Kh. M. Darwish, M.M. Kotb, R. Ali<br />
Paper/poster : Spatial variability of dra<strong>in</strong>age and phosphate retention and<br />
their <strong>in</strong>ter relationship <strong>in</strong> soils of the South-Western region of the North<br />
Island, <strong>New</strong> Zealand – A. Senarath, A.S. Palmer, R.W. Tillman<br />
Conclusions<br />
196
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Abstract<br />
Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques :<br />
Modern soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques have been developed to meet requests for the updat<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems and to make primary soil <strong>in</strong>ventories <strong>in</strong> less accessible areas easier. The<br />
methods have <strong>in</strong> common that that a soil expectation map is produced by statistical <strong>in</strong>ference methods that<br />
replace part (not all!) of the field work. Another property is that an assessment of the quality of the soil<br />
expectation map is produced as well. The latter property is very useful for cost-quality optimization.<br />
Applications of these new methods are given <strong>in</strong> the fields of soil map updat<strong>in</strong>g and soil <strong>in</strong>ventories for precision<br />
agriculture. S<strong>in</strong>ce digital elevation models play an important role <strong>in</strong> these new mapp<strong>in</strong>g methods, new<br />
developments concern<strong>in</strong>g the acquisition, availability and presentation of elevation data are summarized.<br />
Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL (ATTRIBUTE) MAPPING<br />
WITH AN APPLICATION IN MAPING GROUNDWATER DEPTH<br />
P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke<br />
Lab. of Soil Science, Dept. of Geology & Soil Science, Krijgslaan 281, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium,<br />
Many years of soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g has resulted <strong>in</strong> a wide variety of soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems.<br />
Differences between and also <strong>in</strong>side countries are found, when the scale, the mapped objects<br />
and the soil parameters conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> different soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems (SIS) are evaluated<br />
with quality parameters such as completeness, currency and semantic quality.<br />
The completeness of a soil database is the degree to which the necessary data are<br />
present. Insufficient completeness can be of geographical nature (<strong>in</strong>complete coverage with<br />
data, <strong>in</strong>sufficient data density) and of thematic nature (<strong>in</strong>sufficiently sampled soil<br />
parameters). This <strong>in</strong>sufficiency comb<strong>in</strong>ed with an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g variety of applications of soil<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation has <strong>in</strong>voked new soil sampl<strong>in</strong>gs to upgrade SIS even <strong>in</strong> areas where the soil<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g had long been done [1,7].<br />
The currency of a soil database is the degree to which the soil map or the data <strong>in</strong> the SIS<br />
are still up-to-date. Thematic soil <strong>in</strong>formation that has been reported to loose currency with<strong>in</strong><br />
decades after the primary soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g are water table depths [3] and carbon contents [5], and<br />
as a consequence updat<strong>in</strong>g programs have been implemented [4].<br />
The need to improve the quality of SIS has stimulated the development of new soil<br />
sampl<strong>in</strong>g and soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g methods. In general, methods were needed that (1) reduce field<br />
work, (2) employ exist<strong>in</strong>g observational data as well as knowledge about soil formation and<br />
soil landscape relations. When used for primary soil (attribute) mapp<strong>in</strong>g, additionally these<br />
methods should (3) employ exist<strong>in</strong>g soil maps with partial coverage and (4) work <strong>in</strong> areas<br />
with scarce soil data. In [6] an overview is given of modern so-called "digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g"<br />
methods that meet these requirements. These methods have <strong>in</strong> common, that they produce a<br />
soil expectation map (like <strong>in</strong> the old reconnaissance survey, but now directly at the target map<br />
scale and map extent), that they use statistical <strong>in</strong>ference methods to replace part of field work,<br />
and that they <strong>in</strong> many cases can implicitly assess the quality of the soil expectation map. The<br />
latter property is very useful for cost-quality optimization.<br />
One recent example of digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g was the re-mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the water tables <strong>in</strong><br />
the Netherlands [4]. A high reduction of the field work relative to the traditional mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
approach was achieved by us<strong>in</strong>g a highly detailed DEM and exist<strong>in</strong>g thematic maps to<br />
formalize soil (water)-landscape relations us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of stratified multiple<br />
regression and krig<strong>in</strong>g to obta<strong>in</strong> maps of various aspects of water table dynamics. All<br />
197
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g maps are associated with maps of the quality (prediction error), which allows for<br />
targeted future improvement.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[53] C.L. Arnold, Jr., D.L. Civco, M.P. Prisloe, J.D. Hurd, J.W. Stocker. "Remote-sens<strong>in</strong>g-enhanced outreach<br />
education as a decision support system for local land-use officials", Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote<br />
Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (10), 1251-1260, (2000).<br />
[54] J. Bak, J. Jensen, M.M. Larsen, G. Pritzl, J. Scott-Fordsmand. A heavy metal monitor<strong>in</strong>g-program <strong>in</strong><br />
Denmark. The Science of the Total Environment 207: 179-186., (1997).<br />
[55] J.S. Bethel, J.S., J.Ch. McGlone, E.M. Mikhail. "Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry", John Wiley &<br />
Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, 477p, (2001).<br />
[56] D.L. Corw<strong>in</strong>., S.M. Lesch. “Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity<br />
I. Survey protocols”. Computers and Electronics <strong>in</strong> Agriculture, 46, pp. 103-133, (2005).<br />
[57] D. Devriendt, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, Y. Cornet, R. Goossens. "Accuracy assessment of an IKONOS derived DSM over<br />
urban and suburban area", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 2005 workshop EARSeL Special Interest Group “3D Remote<br />
Sens<strong>in</strong>g” - use of the third dimension for remote sens<strong>in</strong>g purposes.<br />
[58] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. Dewulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />
regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data – geometric aspects", High Resolution Mapp<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
Space (2003).<br />
[59] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. De Wulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />
regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data - geometrical aspects", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 24th<br />
EARSeL symposium : <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, /May 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 421-<br />
428, (2005).<br />
[60] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke. Updat<strong>in</strong>g groundwater table class maps 1:50,000 by statistical methods: an analysis of quality<br />
versus cost. Geoderma 97: 329-350, (2000).<br />
[61] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke, D.J. Brus, M.F.P. Bierkens, T. Hoogland, M. Knotters, F. de Vries. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g ground water<br />
dynamics us<strong>in</strong>g multiple sources of exhaustive high resolution data. Geoderma 123: 23-39, (2004).<br />
[62] K. Jacobsen. "Analysis of Digital Elevation Models based on space <strong>in</strong>formation", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for<br />
European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 439-451, (2005).<br />
[63] K. Jacobsen. "Orthoimages and DEMs by QuickBird and IKONOS", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Transition,<br />
Rotterdam, Millpress, 273-279, (2003).<br />
[64] P.J. Kuikman, W.J.M. de Groot, R.F.A. Hendriks, J. Verhagen, F. de Vries. Stocks of C <strong>in</strong> soils and<br />
emissions of CO2 from agricultural soils <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, Alterra-report 561. 41 pp.<br />
(http://www2.alterra.wur.nl/Webdocs/PDFFiles/Alterrarapporten/AlterraRapport561.pdf ), (2003).<br />
[65] A.B. McBratney, M.L. Mendonca Santos, B. M<strong>in</strong>asny. “On digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g” Geoderma, 117, pp. 3–<br />
52, (2003).<br />
[66] S.P. McGrath, P. Loveland. The Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. Blackie Academic and<br />
Professional, Glasgow, (1992).<br />
[67] K. Taillieu, R. Goossens, D. Devriendt, A. Dewulf, S. Van Coillie, T. Willems. "Generation of DEMs and<br />
orthoimages based on non-stereoscopical IKONOS images", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 453-460, (2005).<br />
[68] T. Vandevoorde, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, F. Canters, W. De Genst, N. Stephenne, E. Wolff. "Extraction of land use /<br />
land cover - related <strong>in</strong>formation from very high resolution data <strong>in</strong> urban and suburban areas", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
Transition, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 237-245, (2003).<br />
[69] G. Zhou, R. Li. "Accuracy evaluation of ground po<strong>in</strong>ts from IKONOS high-resolution satellite imagery",<br />
Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (9), 1103-1112, (2000).<br />
198
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL<br />
POSITIONING SYSTEM TO MAP SOIL CHARACTERISTICS<br />
FOR LAND EVALUATION<br />
P. Wandahwa 1* J. A. Rota 1 , and D. O. Sigunga 2<br />
1 Egerton University, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, P. O. Box 536 Njoro, Kenya.<br />
2 Maseno University, Department of Horticulture, P. O. Private Bag, Maseno, Kenya<br />
*Present<strong>in</strong>g author: Tel: +254-733 26 94 60; Fax +254-51 62527; E-mail: wandahwa2002@yahoo.com<br />
Abstract<br />
<strong>Land</strong> evaluation is traditionally based on conventional soil survey <strong>in</strong>formation i.e. the plan-view maps and<br />
written descriptions <strong>in</strong> soil reports. The maps consist of soil units that are characterized by a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
representative soil profile pit on which suitability evaluations are based. The soil unit has s<strong>in</strong>gle values for all<br />
soil characteristics analyzed for the profile and the same spatial boundary for these characteristics. These<br />
implies that soil variability encountered <strong>in</strong> the process of soil survey is not captured on the result<strong>in</strong>g soil maps<br />
and reports, yet analysis of these maps shows that there can be considerable variability <strong>in</strong> soil properties with<strong>in</strong><br />
soil units with consequent variability <strong>in</strong> land assessment results. In this study, cont<strong>in</strong>uous surface maps of<br />
organic carbon, soil pH, base saturation and soil depth hav<strong>in</strong>g a value at every location are generated from<br />
randomly sampled po<strong>in</strong>ts us<strong>in</strong>g geographic <strong>in</strong>formation systems and global position<strong>in</strong>g system. The maps are<br />
classified on the basis of suitability levels of a test crop, overlaid and the f<strong>in</strong>al evaluation results compared with<br />
those obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g soil units. The results show that a better distribution of suitability <strong>in</strong> accordance with the<br />
random sample po<strong>in</strong>ts is obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g these maps than soil units derived from conventional soil survey.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The data used for land evaluation have traditionally been derived from conventional soil<br />
survey maps and reports that range <strong>in</strong> degree of details from small to large scales. The basic<br />
premise <strong>in</strong> soil survey is that soils are predictable along landscape positions. Reliability of the<br />
predictions is a function of the soil scientists’ abilities to consistently <strong>in</strong>terpret and predict the<br />
relationship between soils and landscape. The soil scientist does not physically probe every<br />
acre <strong>in</strong> the survey area, or use random sampl<strong>in</strong>g techniques that allow each member of the<br />
soil population equal probability of be<strong>in</strong>g sampled [12].<br />
The maps produced dur<strong>in</strong>g soil survey are therefore characterized by a modal soil<br />
profile pit represent<strong>in</strong>g a soil unit on which suitability evaluations are based [13]. The soil<br />
units can be simple map units def<strong>in</strong>ed as del<strong>in</strong>eations conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a very low percentage of<br />
dissimilar soils and conform<strong>in</strong>g to the def<strong>in</strong>ition of a s<strong>in</strong>gle soil type or compound map units<br />
referr<strong>in</strong>g to del<strong>in</strong>eations with a higher percentage of dissimilar soils [19, 25]. Purity standards<br />
placed on soil map units are therefore a reflection of the expected (<strong>in</strong>terpretative) use of the<br />
maps and to a degree have misrepresented the true map unit composition. Focus on the soil<br />
map unit that has undoubtedly served well for the purposes of soil classification, does not<br />
however produce the best soil database for other applications, thereby weaken<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>in</strong>k<br />
between soil data and process models [14] and hence land evaluation for land use plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
An alternative procedure <strong>in</strong> soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g is to focus on po<strong>in</strong>t observations that allow<br />
each member of the soil population equal probability of be<strong>in</strong>g sampled and derive cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
surface <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristic or s<strong>in</strong>gle factor maps through <strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques. The<br />
procedure can be used to <strong>in</strong>ventory only soil characteristics required <strong>in</strong> land evaluation<br />
thereby reduc<strong>in</strong>g the time and costs normally <strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> conventional soil surveys. The<br />
199
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
boundaries of <strong>in</strong>dividual factor maps are <strong>in</strong>dependent of one another and a function of<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques found <strong>in</strong> Geographic Information Systems (GIS) [27]; therefore free<br />
from the subjective <strong>in</strong>terpretative abilities of soil scientists.<br />
Po<strong>in</strong>ts for <strong>in</strong>terpolation must be geographically referenced us<strong>in</strong>g a Global Position<strong>in</strong>g<br />
System (GPS) as a prerequisite for management of the spatial <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> Geographic<br />
Information System. The purpose of this study was to generate <strong>in</strong>dividual soil characteristic<br />
maps from randomly sampled po<strong>in</strong>ts us<strong>in</strong>g GIS and GPS and explore their potential for land<br />
evaluation. Further <strong>in</strong>formation on the application of GIS to soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g and research can be<br />
found <strong>in</strong> publications by Burgess and Webster [4, 5]; Webster and Burgess [28]; Wild<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
Drees [31]; Trangmar et al. [26]; Webster [30] and Webster and Oliver [29] that represent<br />
some of the most acknowledged contributions on the subject.<br />
The Study Area<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The study was conducted <strong>in</strong> Kakamega District, western Kenya dur<strong>in</strong>g the month of April<br />
2001. The District lies between latitudes 0°15' and 1° N and longitudes 34°20' and 35° E <strong>in</strong><br />
the western part of Kenya. It covers approximately 1,486 km 2 . The altitude ranges from 1,250<br />
m above sea level (asl) <strong>in</strong> the southwest to 2,000 m asl <strong>in</strong> the east. Two dist<strong>in</strong>ct physiographic<br />
units evident are the southern hilly belt, and the slightly undulat<strong>in</strong>g penepla<strong>in</strong>, stretch<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
the north to the central and eastern parts. A prom<strong>in</strong>ent feature on the eastern border is the<br />
Nandi escarpment whose ma<strong>in</strong> scarp rises from a general elevation of 1,700 to 2,000 m asl<br />
with<strong>in</strong> one kilometer.<br />
Annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> the District varies between 1,000 and 2,400 mm per annum and is<br />
received as heavy afternoon showers with occasional thunderstorms. About 500 to 1,100 mm<br />
is received dur<strong>in</strong>g the first ra<strong>in</strong>s (March through June) and 450 to 850 mm dur<strong>in</strong>g the second<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>s (August through November). M<strong>in</strong>imum, maximum and mean temperatures range from<br />
11to16, 24 to 31 and 17 to 23 °C, respectively [11].<br />
In this study, soybean was used as a test crop to explore the potential of the<br />
methodology for land evaluation. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the first ra<strong>in</strong>s, 78% of the land is very suitable for<br />
soybean cultivation because of adequate temperatures and ra<strong>in</strong>fall. Moderate and marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />
land is 20.6% and 1.4% due to mean temperature of the grow<strong>in</strong>g cycle below 20 and 18°C<br />
respectively. The low temperatures are associated with the high altitude of the Nandi<br />
escarpment. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the second ra<strong>in</strong>s, 9.4% of the land is very suitable while moderate and<br />
marg<strong>in</strong>al land is 90.5% and 0.1%, respectively. Farmers should therefore be encouraged to<br />
utilize the long ra<strong>in</strong>s season to <strong>in</strong>corporate soybean <strong>in</strong> their cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems [18].<br />
Soils and <strong>Land</strong>scape Data<br />
Figure 1 shows the soil map of the study area. The map was prepared by the Fertilizer Use<br />
Recommendation Project [11] us<strong>in</strong>g background <strong>in</strong>formation from the Reconnaissance Soil<br />
Map of the Lake Bas<strong>in</strong> Development Authority at scale 1: 250,000 [2] and the Exploratory<br />
Soil Map of Kenya at scale 1: 1,000,000 [20]. The soil units are physiographic and<br />
descriptive <strong>in</strong> nature without any soil characteristic data.<br />
200
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Soil characteristic<br />
Fig. 1: Map show<strong>in</strong>g soil units and sample po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the study area<br />
Suitability class and values<br />
High Moderate Marg<strong>in</strong>al Unsuitable<br />
Slope (%) 0-8 8-16 16-30 > 30<br />
Soil depth (cm) > 75 75-50 50-20 < 20<br />
Base saturation (%) > 35 35-20 < 20<br />
pH water 5.6-7.5 5.5-5.4 5.4-5.2<br />
7.5-7.8 7.8-8.2<br />
Organic carbon (%) > 1.2 1.2-0.8 < 0.8<br />
201<br />
< 5.2<br />
> 8.2<br />
Table 1: Soil and landscape requirements for soybean cultivation <strong>in</strong> Kakamega District (adapted from<br />
Sys et al., [23]<br />
Soil characteristic data were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from samples collected at 0 to 30 cm and 30 to 60 cm<br />
depths for 76 randomly selected sites shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1. The sites were geographically<br />
referenced us<strong>in</strong>g a portable Global Position<strong>in</strong>g System (GPS). Soil depth was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
augur<strong>in</strong>g to 100 cm or impervious layer. Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and flood<strong>in</strong>g conditions were recorded
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
at the sites. The collected soil samples were air-dried and the content of organic carbon<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to Okalebo et al. [15], cation exchange capacity (CEC) and basic<br />
cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na) as described <strong>in</strong> Sparks [21], and soil reaction (pH) accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
Anderson and Ingram [1]. Base saturation was determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the sum of basic cations and<br />
cation exchange capacity. The values from the two depths sampled were averaged to provide<br />
the f<strong>in</strong>al value for evaluation [24].<br />
Soil unit<br />
code 1<br />
Unit names [10]<br />
No. of<br />
Sample<br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
202<br />
OC 2<br />
%<br />
Soil<br />
Depth<br />
(cm)<br />
Soil<br />
pH<br />
BS 3<br />
%<br />
Area<br />
(ha)<br />
Slope<br />
(%)<br />
UhB3 Cambisol and Ferralsols 2 1.35 100 5.5 18 1434 5-16<br />
UhB5 Rhodic Ferralsols 1 2.95 100 5.7 41 2435 5-16<br />
UhD1 Orthic Acrisols 15 1.91 93 5.5 27 19991 5-16<br />
UhD2 Nito-rhodic Ferralsols 1 1.15 100 5.8 34 135 5-16<br />
UhDC Acrisols and Ferralsols 2 1.53 90 5.4 20 15225 5-16<br />
UhG2 Ferralo-humic Acrisols 4 1.24 51 5.9 27 5797 5-16<br />
UhG5 Humic Acrisols 6 1.74 74 5.6 38 5787 5-16<br />
UhI2 Luvic Phaeozems 5 2.36 100 5.7 35 6829 5-16<br />
UhV1 Dystro-mollic Nitisols 2 1.91 100 5.8 24 1845 5-16<br />
UmD2 Orthic Ferralsols 1 2.42 100 5.6 46 728 2-8<br />
UmD3 Rhodic Ferralsols 4 2.07 100 5.7 42 3011 2-8<br />
UmF1 Cambisols and Phaeozems 1 2.14 100 6.6 71 1042 2-8<br />
UmG2 Ferralo-orthic Acrisols 1 2.14 100 6.6 71 2246 2-8<br />
UmG3 Chromic Acrisols 13 1.63 97 6.3 54 17532 2-8<br />
UmG5 Humic Acrisols 16 1.14 82 5.8 30 28017 2-8<br />
UmG7 Rankers and Cambisols 8 1.18 66 5.6 67 9870 2-8<br />
UmU2 Ferralsols and Cambisols 1 2.14 100 6.6 71 920 2-8<br />
UlG3 Acrisols and Lithosols 1 1.92 55 6.1 21 1779 2-8<br />
UlGC1 Acrisols and Cambisols 4 1.11 63 6.1 26 7548 2-8<br />
UlX1 Rhodic Ferralsols 1 1.18 100 6.4 20 2878 2-8<br />
BXC2 Gleysols, planosols etc 1 - - - - 201 0-5<br />
FUC Ferralsols, Acrisols etc 1 - - - - 1334 2-16<br />
HGC Regosols, Rankers, etc 1 - - - - 456 16-30<br />
HU1 Humic Cambisols 1 - - - - 648 16-30<br />
MU2 Lithosols and Regosols - - - - - 2660 >30<br />
VXC Gleysols, Vertisols etc - - - - - 8232 -<br />
1<br />
The first soil unit letter represents physiographic position as follows: M: mounta<strong>in</strong>s and major scarps; H: hills<br />
and m<strong>in</strong>or scarps; F: footslopes; Uh: upland (upper middle level); Um: uplands (lower middle level); Ul:<br />
uplands (lower level); B: bottomlands; V: valleys.<br />
2<br />
Organic carbon.<br />
3<br />
Base saturation.<br />
Table 2: Soil units shown <strong>in</strong> Fig.1, number of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts per unit and their characteristics<br />
Data Analysis<br />
Data analysis comprised use of PC Arc / Info [16] followed by IDRISI32 [9] Geographic<br />
Information Systems. The soil map and sample po<strong>in</strong>ts were digitized along side other<br />
physical features <strong>in</strong> the study area us<strong>in</strong>g PC Arc / Info. Vector files for these features were<br />
created and exported as UNGEN files to IDRISI32. The files were imported and stored <strong>in</strong><br />
IDRISI32 as digital maps for further analysis. Sample po<strong>in</strong>ts were given numbers to identify<br />
them and the vector digital map converted to a raster digital map. For each soil characteristic<br />
(organic carbon, soil pH, base saturation and soil depth), a data file was prepared us<strong>in</strong>g the 76
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t identifiers and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g characteristic value. The values files were then<br />
assigned to the digital map hav<strong>in</strong>g the 76 po<strong>in</strong>t identifiers and surface analysis done to<br />
produce <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristic maps <strong>in</strong> a three step procedure.<br />
First, the maps were analyzed for spatial dependence <strong>in</strong> the spatial dependence modeler<br />
and semivariograms created. Models were then fitted to the semivariograms <strong>in</strong> the model-<br />
fitt<strong>in</strong>g module. F<strong>in</strong>ally, these models were used to produce cont<strong>in</strong>uous surfaces of the<br />
characteristics us<strong>in</strong>g the ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g method. Ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g is one of several optimal<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques useful <strong>in</strong> mapp<strong>in</strong>g soil resources [3]. The technique utilizes<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation about the spatial autocorrelation <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of each sample po<strong>in</strong>t to provide<br />
optimal <strong>in</strong>terpolation between the <strong>in</strong>dividual po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong>to cont<strong>in</strong>uous surfaces [22].<br />
The cont<strong>in</strong>uous surfaces of the kriged maps were smoothed and reclassified based on<br />
suitability class values shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1 for soybean, a test crop. To evaluate the landscape,<br />
soil units <strong>in</strong> Figure 1 were assigned their respective slope values shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2 and<br />
reclassified accord<strong>in</strong>g to suitability slope classes of soybean shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The classified<br />
soil characteristic maps and the landscape map were overlaid to obta<strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al soils and<br />
landscape suitability map for soybean cultivation based on the most limit<strong>in</strong>g factor. This map<br />
was then overlaid with maps represent<strong>in</strong>g other physical features such as escarpments,<br />
forests, valleys, roads and towns and the land areas represent<strong>in</strong>g these features and different<br />
suitability levels for soybean cultivation determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
Evaluation based on soil units was done by averag<strong>in</strong>g values of soil characteristics<br />
from a number of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts with<strong>in</strong> the soil units to obta<strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle value for the soil unit<br />
as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The total number of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts for all the soil units was more than 76<br />
because some fell on boundaries of two soil units and were therefore used for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g both<br />
units. The soil unit value was compared with the requirements for soybean cultivation shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table 1 and a suitability level assigned to the soil unit. The resultant map was also overlaid<br />
with maps represent<strong>in</strong>g other physical features and land areas represent<strong>in</strong>g these features and<br />
different suitability levels for soybean cultivation determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Random sampl<strong>in</strong>g of soil at po<strong>in</strong>ts geographically referenced us<strong>in</strong>g a GPS followed by<br />
krig<strong>in</strong>g of soil characteristic values <strong>in</strong> GIS resulted <strong>in</strong> spatial maps that can be classified for<br />
land evaluation. Classification of these maps <strong>in</strong>to suitability levels for soybean cultivation<br />
revealed a better distribution of soil characteristics for organic carbon, soil depth and soil pH<br />
but not base saturation as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. The distribution shown by base saturation could<br />
be an <strong>in</strong>dication that krig<strong>in</strong>g may not be the best statistical tool to use <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g spatial<br />
maps of this characteristic. On the other hand, it could be an <strong>in</strong>dication of a strong <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
of soil management practices on base saturation as opposed to the other characteristics.<br />
Despite the poor distribution exhibited for base saturation, a general <strong>in</strong>dication of soil<br />
characteristics across the district is directly observed and users of this <strong>in</strong>formation do not<br />
have to glean written descriptions <strong>in</strong> a separate location as <strong>in</strong> the case of conventional soil<br />
survey maps [8].<br />
A close look at the characteristic maps reveals that soils <strong>in</strong> the district are generally<br />
shallow and poor <strong>in</strong> fertility. Forty two percent of the district has soil pH equal to or less than<br />
5.5, while 54% has organic carbon equal to or less than 1.2%. Sixty two percent of the district<br />
has base saturation equal to or less than 35%, while 59% has soil depth equal to or less than<br />
0.75 m. The maps can be used to identify areas with soil problems that require to be<br />
addressed.<br />
203
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Organic carbon Soil depth<br />
pH Base saturation<br />
Suitability level<br />
Fig. 2: Maps show<strong>in</strong>g soil characteristics and their level of suitability to soybean cultivation<br />
204
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Table 3 shows results of the f<strong>in</strong>al evaluation based on soil characteristic maps and the<br />
soil unit map. In the study area, 17.6% of the district is accounted for by valleys, escarpments<br />
and forests. Evaluation based on soil characteristic maps reveal that very suitable soil is<br />
found <strong>in</strong> 3.5% of the district, while moderate and marg<strong>in</strong>al soil is found <strong>in</strong> 38.5% and 38.6%<br />
of the district, respectively. Unsuitable soil ow<strong>in</strong>g to low soil pH is found <strong>in</strong> 1.8% of the<br />
district. On the basis of soil units, highly suitable, moderate and marg<strong>in</strong>al soil is found <strong>in</strong><br />
5.8%, 72.7% and 3.9% of the district, respectively. There is no unsuitable land when soil<br />
units are used for evaluation yet sample po<strong>in</strong>t data shows sites that are classified as unsuitable<br />
due to low soil pH values.<br />
Soil characteristic maps Soil units<br />
Suitability level Area (ha) (%) Area (ha) (%)<br />
High 5131 3.5 8,609 5.8<br />
Moderate 57,266 38.5 108,024 72.7<br />
Marg<strong>in</strong>al 57,341 38.6 5,830 3.9<br />
Unsuitable 2,725 1.8 0 0<br />
Valleys 8,232 5.5 8,232 5.5<br />
Escarpment 2,660 1.8 2,660 1.8<br />
Forests 15,225 10.3 15,225 10.3<br />
Total 148580 100 148,580 100<br />
Table 3: <strong>Land</strong> evaluation for soybean cultivation based upon soil characteristic and soil unit maps of<br />
Kakamega District<br />
When soil characteristic maps are used for evaluation of soil suitability, the amount of<br />
land del<strong>in</strong>eated as hav<strong>in</strong>g moderate soil (38.5%) is similar to that <strong>in</strong>dicated as hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
marg<strong>in</strong>al soil (38.6%) to soybean cultivation. However, on the basis of soil units, the amount<br />
of land del<strong>in</strong>eated as hav<strong>in</strong>g moderate soil (72.7%) is by far more than that del<strong>in</strong>eated as<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>al soil (3.9%) to soybean cultivation. The reason is that large tracts of land are<br />
del<strong>in</strong>eated under s<strong>in</strong>gle soil units and evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g one value obta<strong>in</strong>ed by averag<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
number of sample po<strong>in</strong>t values as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2. This is the same way representative soil<br />
profiles from conventional soil survey maps are used to evaluate soil units.<br />
By randomly sampl<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts geo-referenced us<strong>in</strong>g a GPS and utiliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpolation<br />
techniques <strong>in</strong> GIS, it was possible to create cont<strong>in</strong>uous surface maps for <strong>in</strong>dividual soil<br />
characteristics and use them to produce soil evaluation maps for soybean production <strong>in</strong> the<br />
study area. Interpolation techniques have been used to create factor maps for evaluation of<br />
suitable areas for crops even when detailed soil survey <strong>in</strong>formation was available [6, 7]. This<br />
is an <strong>in</strong>dication that the procedures provide more <strong>in</strong>formation than is otherwise captured <strong>in</strong><br />
conventional soil survey maps and reports.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The present study successfully demonstrates the potential of us<strong>in</strong>g a GPS and GIS for land<br />
evaluation. Random soil characteristic data however respond differently when subjected to<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques dur<strong>in</strong>g the development of soil characteristic maps. There is need for<br />
further research on the type of <strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques suitable for mapp<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />
characteristics. Soil characteristic maps show spatial variations of these characteristics and<br />
are therefore useful <strong>in</strong> locat<strong>in</strong>g soil related problems. Soil variability not captured <strong>in</strong><br />
205
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
conventional soil survey maps is captured <strong>in</strong> soil characteristic maps developed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques. The maps can be used for spatial model<strong>in</strong>g of soil processes.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
The authors acknowledge the f<strong>in</strong>ancial support for this study provided by the African Career<br />
Award (ACA) program of the Rockefeller Foundation.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] J.M. Anderson, J.S.I. Ingram. “Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods”. C. A. B.<br />
International, Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, U.K., pp. 221, (1993).<br />
[2] W. Andriesse, B.J.A. van der Pouw. “Reconnaissance soil map of the Lake Bas<strong>in</strong> Development authority<br />
area, West Kenya, scale 1:250,000”. Netherlands Soil Survey Institute (STIBOKA) <strong>in</strong> cooperation with Kenya<br />
Soil Survey, Nairobi, (1985).<br />
[3] A. Bekele, R.G. Downer, M.C. Wolcott, W.H. Hudnall, S.H. Moore. “Comparative evaluation of spatial<br />
prediction methods <strong>in</strong> a field experiment for mapp<strong>in</strong>g soil potassium”. Soil Science 168 (1), pp. 15-28, (2003).<br />
[4] T.M. Burgess, R. Webster. “Optimal <strong>in</strong>terpolation and isarithmic mapp<strong>in</strong>g of soil properties I. The<br />
semivariogram and punctual krig<strong>in</strong>g”. J. Soil Sci. 31, pp. 315-332, (1980).<br />
[5] T.M. Burgess, R. Webster. “Optimal <strong>in</strong>terpolation and isarithmic mapp<strong>in</strong>g of soil properties II. Block<br />
krig<strong>in</strong>g”. J. Soil Sci. 31, pp. 333-341, (1980).<br />
[6] A. Ceballos-Silva, J. Lopez-Blanco. “Del<strong>in</strong>eation of suitable areas for crops us<strong>in</strong>g a Multi-Criteria<br />
Evaluation approach and land use/cover mapp<strong>in</strong>g: a case study <strong>in</strong> Central Mexico”. Agricultural Systems 77, pp.<br />
117-136, (2003).<br />
[7] A. Ceballos-Silva, J. Lopez-Blanco. “Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g biophysical variables to identify suitable areas for oat <strong>in</strong><br />
Central Mexico: a multi-criteria and GIS approach. Agriculture”, Ecosystems and Environment 95, pp. 371-377,<br />
(2003).<br />
[8] A.W. Douglas, P.J. Schoeneberger, H.E. LaGarry. “Soil surveys: A w<strong>in</strong>dow to the subsurface”. Geoderma<br />
126, pp. 167-180, (2005).<br />
[9] J.R. Eastman. “IDRISI Release 32”. Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA,<br />
(2000).<br />
[10] FAO. “Soil map of the world. 1: 5,000,000, volume 1 legend”. FAO/UNESCO, pp. 59, (1974).<br />
[11] FURP. “Fertilizer use recommendation project: Kakamega District”. Vol. 7, KARI, Nairobi, Kenya, (1987).<br />
[12] S.L. Hartung, S.A. Sche<strong>in</strong>ost, R.J. Ahrens. “Scientific methodology of the National Cooperative Soil<br />
Survey”. In: Spatial variability of soils and landforms, M.J. Mausbach, L.P. Wild<strong>in</strong>g (eds). SSSA Special<br />
Publication Number 28. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA, pp. 39-48, (1991).<br />
[13] D.N. Kimaro, B.M. Msanya, G.G. Kimbi, M. Kilasara, J.A. Deckers, E.P. Kileo, S.B. Mwango.<br />
“Computer-captured expert knowledge for land evaluation of mounta<strong>in</strong>ous areas: A case study of Uluguru<br />
Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, Morogoro, Tanzania”. UNISWA Research Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology 6 (2), pp.<br />
120-127, (2003).<br />
[14] D. Lammers, M.G. Johnson. “Soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g concepts for environmental assessment”. In: Spatial variability<br />
of soils and landforms, M. J. Mausbach, P.L. Wild<strong>in</strong>g (eds). SSSA Special Publication Number 28. Soil Science<br />
Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA, pp. 149-160, (1991).<br />
[15] J.R. Okalebo, K.W. Gathua , P.L. Woomer. “Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
manual”. Soil Science Society of East Africa, Nairobi, pp. 128, (2002).<br />
[16] PC Arc / Info. “Users guide version 6.1”. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Inc.,<br />
Redlands, CA, USA, (1992).<br />
[18] J.A. Rota, P. Wandahwa, D.O. Sigunga. “<strong>Land</strong> evaluation for soybean (Glyc<strong>in</strong>e max L. Merrill) production<br />
based on krig<strong>in</strong>g soil and climate parameters for the Kakamega District, Kenya”. Journal of Agronomy, 5(1), pp.<br />
142-150, (2006).<br />
[19] W. Siderius. “Standards for soil surveys <strong>in</strong> Kenya”. National Agricultural Laboratories, Nairobi pp. 13,<br />
(1980).<br />
206
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
[20] W.G. Sombroek, H.M.H. Braun, B.J.A. van der Pauw. “Exploratory Soil Map and Agro-climatic Zone Map<br />
of Kenya, scale 1: 1,000,000”. Exploratory Soil Survey Report No. E1, Kenya Soil Survey, Nairobi, pp. 56,<br />
(1982).<br />
[21] D.L. Sparks. “Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3: Chemical Methods”. SSSA Book Series, 5. SSSA and<br />
ASA, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, U.S.A, pp. 1390, (1996).<br />
[22] A. Ste<strong>in</strong>, C. Ettema. “An overview of spatial sampl<strong>in</strong>g procedures and experimental design of spatial<br />
studies for ecosystem comparisons”. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 94, pp. 31- 47, (2003).<br />
[23] C. Sys, E van Ranst, J. Debaveye, F. Beernaert. “<strong>Land</strong> Evaluation part III: Crop requirements”.<br />
Agricultural publication No. 7. GADC, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 197, (1993).<br />
[24] C. Sys, E. van Ranst, J. Debaveye. “<strong>Land</strong> Evaluation part II: Methods <strong>in</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation. Agricultural<br />
publication No. 7. GADC, Brussels, Belgium pp: 274, (1991).<br />
[25] N.H. Taylor, I.J. Pohlen. “Soil survey method: a <strong>New</strong> Zealand handbook for the field study of soils”. <strong>New</strong><br />
Zealand Soil Bureau Bullet<strong>in</strong> 25, DSIR, Well<strong>in</strong>gton, (1970).<br />
[26] B.B. Trangmar, R.S. Yost, G. Uehara. “Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties”.<br />
Adv. Agron. 38, pp. 45-94, (1985).<br />
[27] D.R. Upchurch, W.J. Edmonds. “Statistical procedures for specific objectives”. In: Spatial variability of<br />
soils and landforms, M.J. Mausbach, L.P. Wild<strong>in</strong>g (eds). SSSA Special Publication Number 28. Soil Science<br />
Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA, pp. 49-71, (1991).<br />
[28] R. Webster, T.M. Burgess. “Optimal <strong>in</strong>terpolation and isarithmic mapp<strong>in</strong>g of soil properties III. Chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />
drift and universal krig<strong>in</strong>g”. J. Soil Sci. 31, pp. 505-525, (1980).<br />
[29] R. Webster, M. Oliver. “Statistical methods <strong>in</strong> soil and land resource survey”. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford,<br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, (1990).<br />
[30] R. Webster, “Quantitative spatial analysis of soil <strong>in</strong> the field”. In B. A. Steward (ed.), Advances <strong>in</strong> soil<br />
science 3. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger – Verlag, <strong>New</strong> York, pp. 1-70, (1985).<br />
[31] L.P. Wild<strong>in</strong>g, L.R. Drees. “Spatial variability and pedology”. In: L.P. Wild<strong>in</strong>g et al. (ed.). Pedogenesis and<br />
soil taxonomy I. Concepts and <strong>in</strong>teractions. Elsevier, <strong>New</strong> York, pp. 83-116, (1983).<br />
207
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN GIS AND REMOTE<br />
SENSING WITH EMPHASIS ON HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGERY<br />
AND 3-D PRESENTATION TECHNIQUES<br />
R. Goossens<br />
Dept. of Geography, Krijgslaan 281, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the year 2000 Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g is undergo<strong>in</strong>g a drastic change, offer<strong>in</strong>g much more<br />
possibilities than the decades before. These changes can be summarised as follow:<br />
- Very High Resolution imagery (VHR),<br />
- Stereo vision at different resolutions,<br />
- Digital photogrammetry,<br />
- Super to hyper spectral imagery.<br />
The VHR images are recorded ma<strong>in</strong>ly with the satellites IKONOS and Quick Bird.<br />
Both satellites are comparable concern<strong>in</strong>g the spectral characteristics, they are record<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
blue, green red and near <strong>in</strong>fra red light, allow<strong>in</strong>g image analysis <strong>in</strong> the visual as well as the<br />
<strong>in</strong>fra red light. True as well as false colour composites can be created, and image<br />
classification can be performed based upon 4 spectral bands. The ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics of<br />
these sensors are their ground resolution; IKONOS has a ground resolution of 4 meters <strong>in</strong> the<br />
multi spectral mode (XS) and 1 meter <strong>in</strong> the panchromatic (P) mode while Quick Bird has<br />
2.44 meter <strong>in</strong> the XS mode and 0.61 meter <strong>in</strong> the P-mode.<br />
Also other sensors provide stereo imagery at medium resolution. The ASTER sensor is<br />
an excellent tool for the creation of DEM, ortho-photo maps and contour maps. Where <strong>in</strong> the<br />
past topographical <strong>in</strong>formation at an appropriate scale was a problem, this problem can easily<br />
overcome with the ASTER sensor <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with GPS technology.<br />
Both new types of sensors came available on the moment that also photogrammetry<br />
became digital. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of both events makes it now possible that topographical<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation is easy to be created. With a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 6 ground control po<strong>in</strong>ts, areas of 60 by<br />
60 km can easily be mapped <strong>in</strong> an automated way. In the frame of soil survey, <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
slope and aspect is crucial. It will be discussed how DEM are generated <strong>in</strong> an automated way.<br />
An other trend <strong>in</strong> remote sens<strong>in</strong>g is the shift from multi-spectral imagery towards super-<br />
and hyper-spectral imagery. The Aster sensor has 16 bands available <strong>in</strong> the visual, near<br />
<strong>in</strong>frared, short wave <strong>in</strong>frared and the thermal range. This allows a more detailed mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
the soil material. A Belgian satellite, called Chris-Proba, is taken super spectral images with<br />
32 bands, with the possibility of stereo view<strong>in</strong>g. This satellite and sensor summarize the<br />
possibilities of future remote sens<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Also more and more imagery is com<strong>in</strong>g available free of charge or at m<strong>in</strong>imum cost.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the sem<strong>in</strong>ar all possibilities of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g imagery will be discussed and listed.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[70] C.L. Arnold, Jr., D.L. Civco, M.P. Prisloe, J.D. Hurd, J.W. Stocker. "Remote-sens<strong>in</strong>g-enhanced outreach<br />
education as a decision support system for local land-use officials", Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote<br />
Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (10), 1251-1260, (2000).<br />
[71] J. Bak, J. Jensen, M.M. Larsen, G. Pritzl, J. Scott-Fordsmand. A heavy metal monitor<strong>in</strong>g-program <strong>in</strong><br />
Denmark. The Science of the Total Environment 207: 179-186., (1997).<br />
208
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
[72] J.S. Bethel, J.S., J.Ch. McGlone, E.M. Mikhail. "Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry", John Wiley &<br />
Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, 477p, (2001).<br />
[73] D.L. Corw<strong>in</strong>., S.M. Lesch. “Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity<br />
I. Survey protocols”. Computers and Electronics <strong>in</strong> Agriculture, 46, pp. 103-133, (2005).<br />
[74] D. Devriendt, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, Y. Cornet, R. Goossens. "Accuracy assessment of an IKONOS derived DSM over<br />
urban and suburban area", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 2005 workshop EARSeL Special Interest Group “3D Remote<br />
Sens<strong>in</strong>g” - use of the third dimension for remote sens<strong>in</strong>g purposes.<br />
[75] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. Dewulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />
regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data – geometric aspects", High Resolution Mapp<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
Space (2003).<br />
[76] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. De Wulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />
regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data - geometrical aspects", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 24th<br />
EARSeL symposium : <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, /May 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 421-<br />
428, (2005).<br />
[77] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke. Updat<strong>in</strong>g groundwater table class maps 1:50,000 by statistical methods: an analysis of quality<br />
versus cost. Geoderma 97: 329-350, (2000).<br />
[78] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke, D.J. Brus, M.F.P. Bierkens, T. Hoogland, M. Knotters, F. de Vries. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g ground water<br />
dynamics us<strong>in</strong>g multiple sources of exhaustive high resolution data. Geoderma 123: 23-39, (2004).<br />
[79] K. Jacobsen. "Analysis of Digital Elevation Models based on space <strong>in</strong>formation", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for<br />
European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 439-451, (2005).<br />
[80] K. Jacobsen. "Orthoimages and DEMs by QuickBird and IKONOS", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Transition,<br />
Rotterdam, Millpress, 273-279, (2003).<br />
[81] P.J. Kuikman, W.J.M. de Groot, R.F.A. Hendriks, J. Verhagen, F. de Vries. Stocks of C <strong>in</strong> soils and<br />
emissions of CO2 from agricultural soils <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, Alterra-report 561. 41 pp.<br />
(http://www2.alterra.wur.nl/Webdocs/PDFFiles/Alterrarapporten/AlterraRapport561.pdf ), (2003).<br />
[82] A.B. McBratney, M.L. Mendonca Santos, B. M<strong>in</strong>asny. “On digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g” Geoderma, 117, pp. 3–<br />
52, (2003).<br />
[83] S.P. McGrath, P. Loveland. The Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. Blackie Academic and<br />
Professional, Glasgow, (1992).<br />
[84] K. Taillieu, R. Goossens, D. Devriendt, A. Dewulf, S. Van Coillie, T. Willems. "Generation of DEMs and<br />
orthoimages based on non-stereoscopical IKONOS images", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 453-460, (2005).<br />
[85] T. Vandevoorde, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, F. Canters, W. De Genst, N. Stephenne, E. Wolff. "Extraction of land use /<br />
land cover - related <strong>in</strong>formation from very high resolution data <strong>in</strong> urban and suburban areas", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
Transition, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 237-245, (2003).<br />
[86] G. Zhou, R. Li. "Accuracy evaluation of ground po<strong>in</strong>ts from IKONOS high-resolution satellite imagery",<br />
Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (9), 1103-1112, (2000).<br />
209
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
GEOMORPHOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION OF SOME<br />
PLAINES AND WADIES ADJACENT TO GABEL ELBA, SOUTH<br />
EAST OF EGYPT.<br />
Abstract<br />
El-Badawi, M. and Abdel-Fattah, A.<br />
National Research Center, Soil dept., Cairo, Egypt.<br />
The area under <strong>in</strong>vestigation is located <strong>in</strong> the southern eastern part of Egypt (Gabel Elba). It is considered as a<br />
promis<strong>in</strong>g part for the urban extension by establish<strong>in</strong>g new communities due to the abundance of the natural<br />
resources.<br />
The current work used the remote sens<strong>in</strong>g tools for prepar<strong>in</strong>g a geomorphological and soil maps based on the<br />
del<strong>in</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g of the photomorphic units (PMU`s) accord<strong>in</strong>g to the visual perception (visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation). The<br />
image classification is based upon the photomorphic elements, which can be easily dist<strong>in</strong>guished. Their values<br />
are comb<strong>in</strong>ed to def<strong>in</strong>e the PMU`s. Ten photomorphic units were recognized namely, Delta pla<strong>in</strong>, Alluvial pla<strong>in</strong>,<br />
Wadi, Sand dunes, Beach, Sabkhas, Costal pla<strong>in</strong>, Pla<strong>in</strong> with rock out crop, Denuded hill and Mounta<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy (1998), the data showed that the soils belong to Entisolos and Aridisolos<br />
orders. These orders could be classified <strong>in</strong>to six sub great groups: namely, Typic Torrifluvents, Typic<br />
Quartzpssaments, Typic Torripssaments, Typic Haplosalids, Typic Petrocalcids and Typic salorthids.<br />
The study has produced geomorphological and soil maps of scale 1:100000 based on remote sens<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>Land</strong>sat<br />
TM) accomplished with the field observation and laboratory analysis.<br />
Key words: soils, south east Egypt, remote sens<strong>in</strong>g, visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation, soil taxonomy.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The total area of Egypt is about one million square kilometers. It consists of about 94% desert<br />
and 6% as a traditional agricultural land of the Nile delta and valley. Therefor, there is a<br />
severe pressure and demand dictated by the grow<strong>in</strong>g population on this limited area of<br />
agricultural land.<br />
Rehabilitat<strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>g the south eastern part of Egypt are among the major<br />
aims of the government. Hence, this study may be regarded as a base for a better<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g of the soil characteristics and soil classification of these areas.<br />
The current work has been performed by apply<strong>in</strong>g a false color composite landast TM<br />
image as suitable tools to def<strong>in</strong>e the ma<strong>in</strong> soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g units by the recognition of the<br />
geomorphological units and the field observation. Eventually, the geomorphological<br />
characteristics and the soil classification of the different features adjacent to Gabel Elba<br />
would be performed.<br />
PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES<br />
The area under <strong>in</strong>vestigation occupies the extreme south eastern part of Egypt. It is bounded<br />
by 36°00` and 36°30` east and 22°30` and 22°00` north fig(1).<br />
It has torric and hyperthermic moisture and temperature regimes. The mean annual<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall is 6.5 mm, ma<strong>in</strong>ly fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter and the mean maximum temperature is 29.71 °C<br />
210
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> summer. The area is exposed to north – eastern and south - western w<strong>in</strong>ds with a<br />
mean velocity of about >21 Knots.<br />
Egyptian Geological Survey and M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Authority Staff (1981)[6], Egyptian General<br />
Petroleum Cooperation Staff (1987) [5], Said (1990) [15] and El-Rakaiby et al. (1996) [13]<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that the surface of (Halaib-Shalat<strong>in</strong>) region is occupied by about fourteen rock<br />
formations belong to Precambrian, Cretaceous, Miocene and Quaternary ages<br />
Abu Al-Ezz, (1987) [13], Hammad (1994) [7], Desert research center (1994) [4] stated that<br />
two ma<strong>in</strong> geomorphic units are recognized;<br />
a) Basement ridges which occupy most of the surface area around 13000Km 2 ; (78% of the<br />
total area). It is formed by fractured hard igneous and metamorphic rocks, hav<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
elevation rang<strong>in</strong>g between 1000-1900 m a.s.l. the ridges are considered as the ma<strong>in</strong> watershed<br />
area. The surface is severely dissected by many wadis tributaries.<br />
b) The coastal pla<strong>in</strong>s represent a cont<strong>in</strong>uous strip of low lands bordered from north to south<br />
by the Red Sea, at altitude rarely exceed<strong>in</strong>g 100 m a.s.l. The width varies greatly (5-30 Km)<br />
and the largest width is found at Di`ib`s delta Fig (1). It occupies an area of about 3700 Km2,<br />
represents about 22% of the total area. It <strong>in</strong>cludes different landforms, namely; sabkha,<br />
alluvial fans, and shallow wadis mostly perpendicular to the coast.<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g methods have been used:<br />
1- Visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />
Fig 1: location of the study area<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
<strong>Land</strong>sat TM image acquired on path 72 and row 44/45 <strong>in</strong> 19-7-1995 was used. The<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpretation was done on a false color composite of bands 2, 4 and 7 at scale 1:100000 fig<br />
(2). The major landforms were identified by the physiognomic analysis, Bennema and<br />
Gelens, (1969) [10] .<br />
The landast image was carefully analyzed to demonstrate easily the dist<strong>in</strong>guishable<br />
physiographic features and land cover. Among the image characteristics, the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
elements have been used; shape, size, color tone, texture and pattern recognition.<br />
The image <strong>in</strong>terpretation was based on the follow<strong>in</strong>g criteria; soil surface, slope relief,<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age patterns, vegetation etc. V<strong>in</strong>k, (1963) [1] .<br />
211
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Geological map at scale 1:500000 and topographic map at scale 1:100000 were used to guide<br />
the image <strong>in</strong>terpretation.<br />
2- Field work and laboratory studies<br />
The field work was undertaken to verify the established soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g units, which were<br />
represented by ten soil profiles fig (3). A detailed morphological description was performed<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to the guide l<strong>in</strong>es FAO (1970) [8] ,Table (3). Thirty soil samples were collected and<br />
subjected to the follow<strong>in</strong>g analysis:<br />
1- Particle size distribution was carried out by dry siev<strong>in</strong>g as described by Black (1985) [2] .<br />
2- Calcium Carbonate by the Coll<strong>in</strong>`s Calcimeter methods (Piper, 1950) [3] .<br />
3- Soluble salts <strong>in</strong> the saturated soil extract, soil reaction <strong>in</strong> the soil paste, cation exchange<br />
capacity and gypsum percentage were determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the standard methods by<br />
Richards (1964) [11] .<br />
4- Organic matter was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the method of Walkely and Black (Jackson, 1973) [12] .<br />
5- Soil classification was carried out accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy (1998) [16] .<br />
1. Visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The best color comb<strong>in</strong>ation for the recognition of soil and water bodies has been the<br />
enhanced FCC of bands, 2 (visible green) as blue, 4 (NIR) as green and 7 (MIR) as red. The<br />
FCC was projected on a transparent screen at scale of 1:100 000 for image <strong>in</strong>terpretation.<br />
Based on the <strong>in</strong>terpretation elements and the knowledge drawn from other sources (i.e.<br />
geological map, topographical map and the field work); eleven photomorphic units could be<br />
del<strong>in</strong>eated and discussed. fig (2) and table (1)<br />
Image characteristics<br />
Group Geomorphic unit<br />
color texture pattern<br />
Nature of<br />
the pattern<br />
1 Water Very dark blue F No X<br />
2 Delta pla<strong>in</strong> Mixed colors F to M P Y<br />
3 Alluvial pla<strong>in</strong> Light to dark G F P X<br />
4 Wadi W - Grey F to M L X<br />
5 Sand dunes W / Y M to F L X<br />
6 Beach Y (W) F No X<br />
7 Sabkhas<br />
Light to dark<br />
B(W)<br />
F to M P Y<br />
8 Costal pla<strong>in</strong> Very pale G F to M No Y<br />
9<br />
Pla<strong>in</strong> with rock out<br />
Mixed colors F to M No Y<br />
crop<br />
10 Denuded hill Dark G M to C Pol to P Y<br />
11 Mounta<strong>in</strong> Light to dark G C pol X<br />
Table 1: Image characteristics of the mapped pmu`s<br />
212
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Group 1<br />
This PMU was the easiest unit to be <strong>in</strong>terpreted, s<strong>in</strong>ce it shows nearly the same color of water<br />
bodies. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant and the only color of the PMU is very dark blue. The unit has a f<strong>in</strong>e<br />
homogenous texture and no pattern has been detected.<br />
The color characteristics of the PMU is co<strong>in</strong>cid<strong>in</strong>g with the water bodies i.e. the red sea<br />
and the water logged area.<br />
Group (2):<br />
This PMU appears <strong>in</strong> various color (light green, p<strong>in</strong>ky and dark green color) and refers to the<br />
out-wash of the mounta<strong>in</strong>, f<strong>in</strong>e to coarse <strong>in</strong> texture. S<strong>in</strong>ce the coarse materials precipitate first<br />
and the f<strong>in</strong>e materials come at the end of the precipitation, the unit takes a delta shape.<br />
Group (3):<br />
This PMU refers to the alluvial pla<strong>in</strong>s, founded <strong>in</strong> the out-wash area and hav<strong>in</strong>g a very f<strong>in</strong>e<br />
materials.<br />
Group (4):<br />
This PMU refers to the wadies hav<strong>in</strong>g many dra<strong>in</strong>age patterns.<br />
Group (5):<br />
This PMU exists <strong>in</strong> the north west of the study area, it displays as an accumulation area of<br />
w<strong>in</strong>d blown sand <strong>in</strong> longitud<strong>in</strong>al shape. The desert pavement and the gravelly corridors<br />
between the dunes appear <strong>in</strong> a pale p<strong>in</strong>k and greenish color.<br />
Group (6):<br />
The yellowish and the whitish colors <strong>in</strong>dicate a high reflection through out the wavelength<br />
range of the spectral bands; referr<strong>in</strong>g to the landscape features of f<strong>in</strong>e homogenous texture<br />
and the smoothness of the surface. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the color characteristics and the patterns; this<br />
PMU has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as beach.<br />
Group (7):<br />
This PMU has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as sabkhas and could be divided <strong>in</strong>to wet and dry. The blue<br />
color refers to the presence of water,<br />
Group (8):<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to image <strong>in</strong>terpretation and the field observation, the PMU has been referred to the<br />
costal pla<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Group (9):<br />
This PMU has mixed colors of light green, pale yellow and pale green with <strong>in</strong>clusion of<br />
white. It is covered by gravelly and stony materials transported by water stream. The PMU<br />
has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as pla<strong>in</strong> with rock out crop.<br />
213
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Group (10):<br />
The distribution of this unit <strong>in</strong>side the macro PMU, is homogenous. In few cases a relation<br />
was found with the hydrographic network. It refers to the strongly exposed rock out crop and<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpreted as denuded hill.<br />
Group (11):<br />
This PMU refers to Mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
2. Field trip<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the differences <strong>in</strong> the photomorphic unit (prelim<strong>in</strong>ary classification) the sample<br />
areas were chosen and ten soil profiles have been described and sampled, Fig (3).<br />
3. F<strong>in</strong>al classification map<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>al del<strong>in</strong>eation of the geomorphic units was based on the image characteristics and the<br />
field observation. Fig (2), table (2) Each geomorphic unit was described as follow<strong>in</strong>g:-<br />
1. Sabkhas<br />
The total area of this unit is about 8.6 Km2 (2064 feddan) and represented by profile 4. The<br />
soil surface slopes towards the sea. The soils are orig<strong>in</strong>ated from alluvial deposits mixed with<br />
mar<strong>in</strong>e deposits. The surface is covered with shells, some low hummocks and few scattered<br />
vegetation ma<strong>in</strong>ly from halophytes.<br />
The profile depth is varied from shallow to deep as far from the sea. The f<strong>in</strong>e texture is<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ated while the gravel content is varied from layer to another; it is 17.2% at the surface<br />
layer and 9.1 % <strong>in</strong> the lower one, as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> table (4).<br />
- The sal<strong>in</strong>ity is very high and <strong>in</strong>creased by depth. Table (5)<br />
- The soil pH was 7.5 which are due to the <strong>in</strong>crease of sal<strong>in</strong>ity.<br />
- The soil has low percentage of CaCO3 content.<br />
- The color is varied from yellow (10yr 7/6 dry) to (very pale brown 7/4dry) and from<br />
yellowish brown (10yr 5/6 moist) to yellowish brown (10 yr 5/4 moist). Table (3)<br />
- Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy 1998 the soils Typic Salorthids.<br />
2. Alluvial pla<strong>in</strong><br />
The total area of this unit is 662.3 Km 2 (158952 fedden) and geographically could be divided<br />
<strong>in</strong>to two parts from north to south as follows:<br />
a) From 22°30`N to Abu Ramad (22°20`N)<br />
b) From 22°20`N to Halaib (22°15`N)<br />
a) From 22°30`N to Abu Ramad (22°20`N)<br />
The total area of this unit is 245.7 Km2 (58968 fedden). It is represented by two profiles<br />
(profile 1 and profile 2) and characterized as follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
- the surface is almost flat, covered by desert pavement <strong>in</strong> some places.<br />
214
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
- In the upper layer the soil texture is commonly f<strong>in</strong>e sand, while <strong>in</strong> the subsurface it is<br />
commonly very gravelly coarse sand.<br />
- The soil surface is covered by some scattered young trees and some natural vegetation.<br />
- Generally the EC value of profile 1 is lower than 4 dS/m, while <strong>in</strong> profile 2 it is higher<br />
than 8 dS/m.<br />
- The mean CaCO3 content <strong>in</strong> profile 1 is lower than 2 %, and 4.5 %.<strong>in</strong> profile 2.<br />
- The soil taxonomy accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy 1998 is Typic Torrifluvents.<br />
215
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
<strong>Land</strong>scape<br />
Pla<strong>in</strong>, P<br />
Mounta<strong>in</strong>,<br />
M<br />
Relief<br />
Flat to gently<br />
undulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
P1<br />
Almost flat<br />
to Hilly<br />
P2<br />
Almost flat<br />
to<br />
Hilly<br />
P2<br />
Undulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to hilly<br />
P3<br />
Hill or Mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
M1<br />
Lithology<br />
Alluvial<br />
Deposit<br />
P11<br />
Aeolian<br />
deposit<br />
P21<br />
Mar<strong>in</strong>e deposit<br />
P22<br />
Colluvial<br />
deposit<br />
P31<br />
Rock<br />
M11<br />
<strong>Land</strong>form<br />
Delta pla<strong>in</strong><br />
Alluvial pla<strong>in</strong><br />
Wadi<br />
Sand dunes<br />
Beach<br />
Sabkhas<br />
Costal pla<strong>in</strong><br />
Pla<strong>in</strong> with Rock<br />
outcrop<br />
P311<br />
Denuded hill<br />
M111<br />
Mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
M112<br />
216<br />
Phase<br />
This soil covers most of the costal region and could be identified easily <strong>in</strong> the satellite image and<br />
classified as Typic Torrifluvents<br />
Flat, surface covered by desert pavement, vary<strong>in</strong>g texture from f<strong>in</strong>e sand to gravelly coarse sand, common<br />
to many calcium carbonate and salt contents, classified as Typic Torrifluvents, Typic Haplosalids, and<br />
Typic Petrocalcids<br />
Alluvial, sandy texture, covered by silty crust (<strong>in</strong> some areas). This soil could be classified as Typic<br />
Torrifluvents<br />
Undeveloped soils consist of sand accumulation of different altitudes, barchanoid and longitud<strong>in</strong>al form<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong> dune types and could be classified as Typic Quartzpssaments<br />
Flat to undulat<strong>in</strong>g surface, some vegetation cover, loose, few to many calcium carbonate and salt<br />
contents. It could be classified as Typic Torripssaments<br />
Flat to undulat<strong>in</strong>g surface, sandy and strongly sal<strong>in</strong>e soils, shallow depth, highly sal<strong>in</strong>e gypsiferous orig<strong>in</strong>,<br />
motels of iron and manganese oxide also exist. The soil could be classified as Typic salorthids<br />
Coarse sandy soils <strong>in</strong>clude gravels, less vegetation covers, medium calcium carbonate and salt content.<br />
Could be classified as Typic Torrifluvents<br />
The soil surface is covered by stones <strong>in</strong> different size mixed with sand and gravels, shallow depth, could<br />
be classified as Typic quartzpssament<br />
Area covered with big rocks and stones of different size<br />
rocks<br />
Table 2: The f<strong>in</strong>al legend of the classified image, z<strong>in</strong>k, (1988) [9]<br />
Map.<br />
units<br />
P111<br />
P112<br />
P113<br />
P211<br />
P221<br />
P222<br />
P224<br />
P311<br />
M111<br />
M112<br />
Feddan<br />
(4200m 2 )<br />
320<br />
158952<br />
5832<br />
400<br />
1360<br />
2064<br />
3120<br />
49248<br />
49248<br />
189660
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Fig 2: Map of photomorphic units<br />
Fig 3: Location of the soil profile<br />
217
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
b) The alluvial pla<strong>in</strong> from 22°20` N to 22°15`N<br />
This area is very narrow pla<strong>in</strong> and has very small wadies namely; wadi Ashmahi, wadi Udar,<br />
wadi Ediab and wadi Cermatai. The total area is about 225 Km2 (54000 fedden) and is<br />
represented by profile 6, 9 and 10.<br />
The soil profiles are characterized as follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
- The topography is almost flat; some small sandy hills could be noticed <strong>in</strong> some places due<br />
to the w<strong>in</strong>d activity.<br />
- The texture is varied from f<strong>in</strong>e to very gravely coarse sand.<br />
- Most of the soil profiles have a mean EC value over 8 dS/m, while <strong>in</strong> profile 6 it is very<br />
obvious <strong>in</strong> the sublayer. The variations of the EC values are <strong>in</strong> relation to the distance<br />
from the sea.<br />
- The CaCO3 content of most profiles is lower 4 %. It is over 8% <strong>in</strong> profile 10 and reach<strong>in</strong>g<br />
45% <strong>in</strong> profile9.<br />
- Generally, the pH values are varied between 7 and 8.2. A reversible relationship between<br />
pH and EC values are obvious as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> profile 6 where the pH value is 8.1 and the<br />
EC value was 0.2 dS/m <strong>in</strong> the upper layer. While, <strong>in</strong> the lower layer the pH value was 7.4<br />
and the EC value was 11.2. This contradiction refers to the lowness of the buffer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
capacity of the sandy soils and the dom<strong>in</strong>ant of NaCl salt.<br />
- The soil taxonomy of this unit accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy 1998 is Typic<br />
Torrifluvents except for profile 9 is Typic Haplosalids and profile 10 is Typic<br />
Petrocalcides.<br />
3. Wadies<br />
This unit occupies a total area of about 24.3 Km (5832 feddens) could be divided <strong>in</strong>to two<br />
sub unit namely; ma<strong>in</strong> wadi and tributaries. It is represented by profiles no. (Profile 3, 5, 7<br />
and profile 8)<br />
- The soil surface is flat to undulat<strong>in</strong>g covered by gravels varied <strong>in</strong> size from small to<br />
coarse gravel and few scattered natural vegetation.<br />
- Geomorphologicaly the wadi could be divided <strong>in</strong>to three sub units namely; wadi bottom<br />
which is normally affected by water erosion, flood pla<strong>in</strong> and wadi terraces.<br />
- The EC mean value is lower 2 dS/m <strong>in</strong> profile 3, and 8.6 dS/m <strong>in</strong> profile 5 (wadi Oshipa),<br />
while <strong>in</strong> profile 7 (wadi Udar) and profile 8 (wadi Ediab) it reaches 18.6.<br />
- 50% of the pH values of the studied soil profiles are vary<strong>in</strong>g between 7 and 7.5, the rest<br />
are 7.6 to 8.2.<br />
- Most of the CaCO3 values of the profile are very low except for profile 7 and profile 12,<br />
it reaches to more than 8%<br />
- The soil texture is varied from f<strong>in</strong>e sand to very gravelly f<strong>in</strong>e sand and from coarse sand<br />
to gravelly coarse sand.<br />
- The soil classification accord<strong>in</strong>g to USDA soil taxonomy 1998 is Typic Torrifluvents.<br />
Table (3)<br />
4. Delta pla<strong>in</strong><br />
The total area of this unit is 320 fedden. This soils covers most of the costal region and can be<br />
identified <strong>in</strong> the satellite images. The soil can be classified as Typic Torrifluvents.<br />
218
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Pro<br />
f.<br />
no.<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
Locations<br />
Lg.: 22ُ 29`<br />
26.8" N<br />
Lt: 36ُ 5`<br />
12.6" E<br />
Lg. 22ُ 28`<br />
36.3" N<br />
Lt:36ُ 8` 00"<br />
E<br />
Lg. 22ُ 28`<br />
36.3"N<br />
Lt:36ُ 4`<br />
44.2" E<br />
Long. 22ُ 25`<br />
00' N<br />
Lat:36ُ 5`<br />
12.6" E<br />
Map.<br />
units<br />
vegetat<br />
ion<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>a<br />
ge<br />
P112 few well<br />
P112 common well<br />
P113 few well<br />
P216 few well<br />
Parent<br />
material<br />
Alluvial<br />
deposit<br />
Alluvial<br />
deposit<br />
Alluvial<br />
deposit<br />
Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
deposits<br />
classification<br />
Typic<br />
Torrifluvents<br />
Typic<br />
Haplosalids<br />
Typic<br />
Torrifluvents<br />
Typic<br />
Aquisalids<br />
219<br />
Depth<br />
Cm.<br />
0-15<br />
15-50<br />
50-100<br />
0-15<br />
15-35<br />
35-70<br />
0-25<br />
25-40<br />
40-60<br />
60-100<br />
0-15<br />
15-45<br />
45-100<br />
color<br />
dry moist<br />
10 YR<br />
7/3<br />
10 YR<br />
6/6<br />
10 YR<br />
7/3<br />
10YR 7/4<br />
10 YR<br />
7/8<br />
10 YR<br />
7/8<br />
10 YR<br />
7/2<br />
10 YR<br />
7/4<br />
10 YR<br />
7/6<br />
10 YR<br />
7/6<br />
10 YR<br />
7/6<br />
10 YR<br />
7/4<br />
10 YR<br />
7/4<br />
5/4<br />
5/6<br />
5/4<br />
6/3<br />
5/4<br />
6/4<br />
5/3<br />
5/3<br />
6/6<br />
6/8<br />
5/6<br />
5/6<br />
5/4<br />
text<br />
ure<br />
FS<br />
FS<br />
GCS<br />
GFS<br />
VGCS<br />
GCS<br />
GFS<br />
GFS<br />
CS<br />
GCS<br />
FS<br />
FS<br />
FS<br />
Struct<br />
ure<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
consis<br />
tence<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
effe<br />
rves<br />
cenc<br />
e<br />
s<br />
s<br />
st<br />
s<br />
v<br />
s<br />
vs<br />
st<br />
s<br />
s<br />
vs<br />
st<br />
st<br />
bounda<br />
ry<br />
d<br />
d<br />
-<br />
c<br />
cw<br />
cw<br />
d<br />
d<br />
d<br />
-<br />
cs<br />
cs<br />
-
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
Lg. 22ُ 23`<br />
36.32" N<br />
Lt:36ُ 19`<br />
31.6" E<br />
Lg. 22ُ22`00' N<br />
Lt:36ُ 25`00"E<br />
Long. 22ُ 20`<br />
00" N<br />
Lat:36ُ 25`<br />
42.6" E<br />
Long. 22ُ<br />
18`31.6" N<br />
Lat: 36ُ 25`<br />
25.3" E<br />
Lg. 22ُ 18` 00"<br />
N<br />
Lt:36ُ 26`<br />
23.7" E<br />
P112 few well<br />
P112 few well<br />
P113 few well<br />
P113 few well<br />
P311 common well<br />
10 Lg. 22ُ 18` 00" P112 Few well<br />
Alluvial<br />
deposits<br />
Alluvial<br />
deposits<br />
Alluvial<br />
deposits<br />
Alluvial<br />
deposits<br />
Colluvial<br />
deposits<br />
Typic<br />
Torrifluvents<br />
Typic<br />
Torrifluvents<br />
Typic<br />
Torrifluvents<br />
Typic<br />
Torrifluvents<br />
Typic<br />
Haplocalcids<br />
Alluvial Typic<br />
220<br />
0-15<br />
15-30<br />
30-100<br />
0-30<br />
30-60<br />
60-150<br />
0-25<br />
25-55<br />
55-100<br />
0-25<br />
25-80<br />
80-100<br />
0-25<br />
25-70<br />
0-15<br />
10 YR<br />
7/8<br />
10 YR<br />
7/4<br />
10 YR<br />
7/6<br />
10 YR<br />
7/3<br />
10 YR<br />
7/4<br />
10 YR<br />
7/4<br />
7.5 R<br />
6/6<br />
7.5 YR<br />
6/6<br />
7.5 YR<br />
7/6<br />
10 YR<br />
6/4<br />
10 YR<br />
6/6<br />
10 YR<br />
6/4<br />
10 YR<br />
7/6<br />
10 YR<br />
7/4<br />
10 YR<br />
6/6<br />
6/4<br />
5/6<br />
5/4<br />
5/6<br />
5/4<br />
5 YR 4/6<br />
7.5 YR<br />
4/4<br />
7.5 YR<br />
5/8<br />
5/4<br />
6/8<br />
5/4<br />
5/4<br />
6/3<br />
GFS<br />
GFS<br />
GCS<br />
GFS<br />
GCS<br />
GCS<br />
VGFS<br />
GCS<br />
VGCS<br />
FS<br />
GFS<br />
FS<br />
FS<br />
GFS<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
st<br />
s<br />
s<br />
s<br />
vs<br />
st<br />
st<br />
s<br />
vs<br />
st<br />
st<br />
st<br />
v<br />
v<br />
cs<br />
cs<br />
-<br />
d<br />
cs<br />
-<br />
d<br />
cs<br />
-<br />
d<br />
cs<br />
-<br />
d<br />
cs<br />
5/6 GFS Sg dL v c
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
N<br />
Lt:36ُ 24`<br />
39.5" E<br />
deposits petrocalcids 15-30<br />
Where: -Texture: FS= f<strong>in</strong>e sand, GFS= gravelly f<strong>in</strong>e sand, VGFS= very gravelly f<strong>in</strong>e Sand, GCS= gravelly coarse sand, VGCS= very gravelly<br />
coarse sand<br />
-Structure: Sg= s<strong>in</strong>gle gra<strong>in</strong> -Consistence: d=dry, L=loose - Boundary: c=clear, d= diffuse, s=smooth<br />
- effervescence with HCl: vs= very slight, s= slight, st= strong, v= violent<br />
221<br />
30-100<br />
7/4<br />
10 YR<br />
5/3<br />
10 YR<br />
7/2<br />
4/4<br />
7.5 YR<br />
4/4<br />
Table 3: Morphological description and classification of the studied soil profiles<br />
GFS<br />
VGFS<br />
Sg<br />
Sg<br />
dL<br />
dL<br />
v<br />
v<br />
d<br />
-
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
5. Beach<br />
The area of this unit is 1360 fedden. Almost flat to undulat<strong>in</strong>g, some vegetation cover, loose,<br />
few to many calcium carbonate and salt content could be classified as Typic Torripssament<br />
6. Sand dunes<br />
The total area of this unit is 400 fedden. Undeveloped soils consist of sand accumulation of<br />
different altitudes, barchanoid and longitud<strong>in</strong>al forms area the ma<strong>in</strong> dune type. Could be<br />
classified as Typic Quartzpssaments.<br />
7. Coastal pla<strong>in</strong><br />
The total area of this unit is 3120 fedden. the soil surface is slop<strong>in</strong>g towards the sea and the<br />
soil orig<strong>in</strong>ated from alluvial deposit mixed with mar<strong>in</strong>e deposit. Coarse sandy soils, <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
gravels, less vegetation covers, medium calcium carbonate and salt content, the surface<br />
covered with shells. It could be classified as Typic Torrifluvents.<br />
Profile<br />
nr.<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
Soil depth<br />
(cm)<br />
0-15<br />
15-50<br />
50-100<br />
0-15<br />
15-35<br />
35-70<br />
0-25<br />
25-40<br />
40-60<br />
60-100<br />
0-10<br />
10-45<br />
45-100<br />
0-15<br />
15-30<br />
30-100<br />
0-30<br />
30-60<br />
60-150<br />
0-25<br />
25-55<br />
55-100<br />
0-25<br />
25-80<br />
80-100<br />
0-20<br />
20-70<br />
0-15<br />
15-30<br />
Gravel<br />
>2mm<br />
%<br />
2.5<br />
3.4<br />
23.7<br />
35.7<br />
54.0<br />
47.1<br />
38.5<br />
40.4<br />
17.4<br />
50.0<br />
17.2<br />
3.1<br />
9.1<br />
38.8<br />
46.5<br />
42.9<br />
37.4<br />
31.4<br />
68.2<br />
54.9<br />
27.9<br />
34.1<br />
17.7<br />
42.3<br />
--<br />
14.7<br />
12.9<br />
42.4<br />
36.0<br />
2-1<br />
VCS<br />
9.5<br />
9.1<br />
29.8<br />
5.0<br />
29.0<br />
32.0<br />
9.1<br />
8.8<br />
30.1<br />
31.2<br />
7.9<br />
10.6<br />
10.1<br />
10.0<br />
8.1<br />
22.3<br />
6.4<br />
31.1<br />
20.1<br />
6.6<br />
27.0<br />
28.1<br />
7.9<br />
7.7<br />
8.6<br />
10.4<br />
12.9<br />
10.9<br />
10.7<br />
Percentage of separate particles (mm)<br />
1-0.5<br />
CS<br />
10.5<br />
10.1<br />
10.9<br />
12.0<br />
18.8<br />
17.3<br />
12.5<br />
12.3<br />
17.9<br />
16.3<br />
10.4<br />
9.8<br />
9.1<br />
7.7<br />
9.8<br />
20.9<br />
11.3<br />
18.7<br />
21.2<br />
8.1<br />
13.3<br />
12.1<br />
11.5<br />
13.4<br />
12.5<br />
10.4<br />
9.7<br />
11.9<br />
9.3<br />
0.5-<br />
0.25<br />
MS<br />
17.3<br />
19.2<br />
29.7<br />
18.1<br />
31.9<br />
27.4<br />
18.1<br />
17.7<br />
32.7<br />
28.5<br />
19.4<br />
12.2<br />
20.1<br />
21.7<br />
22.8<br />
30.0<br />
20.3<br />
23.8<br />
23.0<br />
19.6<br />
30.1<br />
30.2<br />
16.9<br />
16.3<br />
17.4<br />
16.0<br />
17.9<br />
16.5<br />
17.6<br />
222<br />
0.25-0.1<br />
FS<br />
43.8<br />
50.2<br />
18.5<br />
46.0<br />
14.4<br />
16.2<br />
44.4<br />
46.0<br />
12.4<br />
11.4<br />
50.0<br />
52.2<br />
46.5<br />
49.0<br />
44.5<br />
20.3<br />
43.3<br />
17.9<br />
27.9<br />
56.9<br />
23.8<br />
23.3<br />
41.5<br />
44.7<br />
43.6<br />
41.6<br />
41.4<br />
40.9<br />
40.3<br />
0.1-0.05<br />
VFS<br />
12.5<br />
8.4<br />
7.0<br />
10.9<br />
2.8<br />
5.4<br />
9.9<br />
9.0<br />
2.9<br />
4.0<br />
9.9<br />
11.1<br />
10.1<br />
8.8<br />
11.9<br />
5.0<br />
13.4<br />
4.8<br />
4.9<br />
4.9<br />
2.8<br />
3.2<br />
16.2<br />
13.3<br />
13.4<br />
13.2<br />
13.6<br />
13.7<br />
14.4<br />
Table 4: Gra<strong>in</strong> size distribution<br />
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
223<br />
Soluble cations me/L Soluble anion me/L<br />
Profil<br />
e nr.<br />
Depth <strong>in</strong>,<br />
Cm<br />
S.P.<br />
EC<br />
ds/m<br />
pH CaCO3 %<br />
OM<br />
% Na + K + Ca ++ Mg ++<br />
HCO3<br />
-<br />
Cl - CO3 -- SO4 ++<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
0-15<br />
15-50<br />
50-100<br />
0-15<br />
15-35<br />
35-70<br />
0-25<br />
25-40<br />
40-60<br />
60-100<br />
0-10<br />
10-45<br />
45-100<br />
0-15<br />
15-30<br />
30-100<br />
0-30<br />
30-60<br />
60-150<br />
0-25<br />
25-55<br />
55-100<br />
0-25<br />
25-80<br />
80-100<br />
0-20<br />
20-70<br />
0-15<br />
15-30<br />
30-70<br />
21.8<br />
19.1<br />
20<br />
23.1<br />
22<br />
19<br />
18<br />
18<br />
20<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
21<br />
21<br />
22<br />
22<br />
21<br />
18<br />
21<br />
19<br />
21<br />
22<br />
19<br />
22<br />
21<br />
22<br />
20<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
0.8<br />
0.36<br />
0.41<br />
11.45<br />
25.4<br />
16.4<br />
1.43<br />
0.5<br />
0.69<br />
3.58<br />
20.6<br />
26.9<br />
23.6<br />
1.92<br />
1<br />
5.4<br />
0.92<br />
2.9<br />
11.2<br />
14.53<br />
11.6<br />
4.99<br />
5.4<br />
8.9<br />
14.9<br />
23.9<br />
6.8<br />
12.1<br />
2.9<br />
5.9<br />
7.8<br />
7.9<br />
7.9<br />
8.2<br />
7.2<br />
7.2<br />
7.9<br />
8.2<br />
8<br />
7.9<br />
7.5<br />
7.6<br />
7.9<br />
8<br />
7.9<br />
8.2<br />
8.1<br />
8<br />
7.4<br />
7.6<br />
7.8<br />
7.8<br />
7.9<br />
8<br />
7.8<br />
8<br />
8<br />
8<br />
7.7<br />
8.2<br />
0.1<br />
1.3<br />
2<br />
1.6<br />
1.3<br />
3.6<br />
0.76<br />
4.9<br />
2.09<br />
0.83<br />
6.4<br />
5.4<br />
14.2<br />
8.1<br />
4.5<br />
9.8<br />
2.1<br />
1.8<br />
7.1<br />
1.05<br />
0.09<br />
1.6<br />
9<br />
10.1<br />
3.93<br />
45<br />
12.8<br />
40.9<br />
28.5<br />
19.8<br />
0.36<br />
0.23<br />
0.29<br />
0.5<br />
0.23<br />
0.21<br />
0.01<br />
0.07<br />
0.07<br />
0.06<br />
0.04<br />
0.02<br />
0.01<br />
0.5<br />
0.02<br />
0.02<br />
0.2<br />
0.02<br />
0.01<br />
0.53<br />
0.02<br />
0.02<br />
0.2<br />
0.28<br />
0.14<br />
0.04<br />
0.01<br />
0.06<br />
0.01<br />
0.01<br />
0.8<br />
0.78<br />
0.7<br />
69.8<br />
163.9<br />
15.6<br />
0.14<br />
2.7<br />
0.19<br />
0.47<br />
34.4<br />
5.56<br />
15.5<br />
3.56<br />
6<br />
42.9<br />
0.12<br />
0.27<br />
.96<br />
54.35<br />
54.4<br />
0.53<br />
43<br />
60<br />
18.9<br />
210<br />
46<br />
0.24<br />
18<br />
46<br />
0.12<br />
0.1<br />
0.05<br />
3<br />
0.55<br />
0.4<br />
0.01<br />
0.4<br />
0.01<br />
0.02<br />
0.09<br />
0.17<br />
0.09<br />
0.06<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
0.01<br />
0.02<br />
0.05<br />
0.82<br />
1.7<br />
0.05<br />
1<br />
0.6<br />
0.16<br />
0.5<br />
2.2<br />
0.01<br />
0.6<br />
0.3<br />
1.05<br />
0.65<br />
0.54<br />
29.9<br />
41.51<br />
19.71<br />
0.14<br />
1<br />
0.08<br />
0.23<br />
6.93<br />
7.53<br />
9.61<br />
0.74<br />
2.7<br />
12.6<br />
0.02<br />
0.03<br />
0.2<br />
50.52<br />
46<br />
0.27<br />
11.4<br />
21.8<br />
4.29<br />
52.1<br />
24.2<br />
0.03<br />
7.4<br />
12.5<br />
0.22<br />
0.21<br />
0.1<br />
15.6<br />
36.9<br />
11.3<br />
0.05<br />
0.6<br />
0.12<br />
0.14<br />
6.38<br />
2.97<br />
5.8<br />
0.46<br />
1.1<br />
6.1<br />
0.0`4<br />
0.1<br />
0.78<br />
21.5<br />
5.6<br />
0.69<br />
7.8<br />
12.8<br />
3.57<br />
23.9<br />
7.6<br />
0.05<br />
5.4<br />
7.5<br />
0.52<br />
0.6<br />
0.61<br />
5.4<br />
4.1<br />
3.6<br />
0.17<br />
0.9<br />
0.15<br />
0.15<br />
0.72<br />
0.76<br />
0.45<br />
0.08<br />
0.9<br />
4.6<br />
0.04<br />
0.03<br />
0.42<br />
4.08<br />
4.29<br />
0.17<br />
5.3<br />
11.6<br />
0.39<br />
17.6<br />
9.3<br />
0.12<br />
3.8<br />
6.3<br />
1.01<br />
0.5<br />
0.5<br />
81.3<br />
200.1<br />
29.9<br />
0.12<br />
2.6<br />
0.16<br />
0.24<br />
10.2<br />
2.22<br />
2.05<br />
2.29<br />
5.3<br />
41.3<br />
0.14<br />
0.37<br />
0.96<br />
82.93<br />
72<br />
0.72<br />
47.5<br />
67.5<br />
15.03<br />
245<br />
50<br />
0.16<br />
23.5<br />
45.7<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.5<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.4<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
0.064<br />
0.62<br />
0.31<br />
31.4<br />
40.3<br />
13.5<br />
0.05<br />
0.7<br />
0.1<br />
0.77<br />
36.92<br />
13.25<br />
9.86<br />
2.25<br />
3.5<br />
16.1<br />
0.01<br />
0.02<br />
0.6<br />
40.19<br />
41.41<br />
0.65<br />
10.4<br />
15.7<br />
11.5<br />
23.9<br />
20.7<br />
0.05<br />
4.1<br />
14.3<br />
Table 5: Analysis of soil paste extract
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
8. Pla<strong>in</strong> with rock outcrop<br />
The soil surface is covered by stones <strong>in</strong> different size mixed with sand and gravels, shallow<br />
depth and it could be classified as Typic quartzpssament<br />
9. Denuded hills<br />
The total area of this unit is 49248 fedden. Area covered with big rocks and stones of<br />
different size<br />
10. Mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
The total area of this unit is 189660 fedden. Rocks.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] A.P.A., V<strong>in</strong>k "Aerial photographs and soil sciences". UNESCO report, Paris, (1963).<br />
[2] C. A., Black; D.D., Evans; L.E., Ensm<strong>in</strong>ger; J.L, White and F.E., Clark."Methods of soil analysis". Medison:<br />
American Society of Agronomy. IAC., Medison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA., (1985)<br />
[3] C. S., Piper "soil and plant analysis". Inter science Publishers, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, PP.59-75, (1950).<br />
[4] Desert Research Center (1994). Reconnaissance studies for natural and human resources <strong>in</strong> El-Shalate<strong>in</strong>-<br />
Halaib. Supervis<strong>in</strong>g committee on Technical studies and natural resources of El-Shalate<strong>in</strong>-Halaib region, D.R.C.<br />
Mataria, Cairo, Egypt (<strong>in</strong> Arabic).<br />
[5] Egyptian General Petroleum Cooperation Staff "Geological map of Egypt scale 1:500000". The Egyptian<br />
General Petroleum Cooperation, Cairo, Egypt, (1987).<br />
[6] Egyptian Geological Survey and M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Authority Staff "Geological map of Egypt, Scale 1:2000000".<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>in</strong>dustry and m<strong>in</strong>eral resources, Cairo, Egypt, (1981).<br />
[7] F. A., Hammad "Water situation <strong>in</strong> El-Shalatien- Halaib region susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture potentiality".<br />
International Egyptian center of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt. Report (<strong>in</strong> Arabic). (1994).<br />
[8] F.A.O. staff "Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for soil profile description". F.A.O. soil Bullet<strong>in</strong> 6, F.A.O, (1966).<br />
[9] J. A., Z<strong>in</strong>k "Geomorphology and soils", <strong>in</strong>ternal publ., I.T.C. Enschede, (1988).<br />
[10] J., Bennema and M. F., Gelons "Aerial photo <strong>in</strong>terpretation for soil survey". Lecture note, I.T.C. courses<br />
photo-<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong> soil survey I.T.C., Enschede, The Netherlands, (1969).<br />
[11] L. A., Richards "Diagnosis and improvement of sal<strong>in</strong>e and alkali soils". U. S. Dep. Of Agric. Hand Book,<br />
No. 60, pp. 102, (1954).<br />
[12] M. L., Jackson (1973). Soil chemical Analysis. Inter. Sci. pub. Inc., N.Y.<br />
[13] M. S., Abu Al-Ezz "<strong>Land</strong> form of Egypt'. Jojn Wiley and sons., Inc., <strong>New</strong> York. (1987).<br />
[14] M., El-Rakaiby; T., Ramadan; A., Morsy and M., Ashmawe "Geological and geomorphological studies of<br />
Halaib and Shalatien region and its relation to surface and subsurface water". NARSS, Cairo, Egypt, (1996).<br />
[15] R., Said (1990). "The geology of Egypt". A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfield (1990).<br />
[16] USDA (1998) "key to soil taxonomy". SCC, SMSS Technical Monograph 19, USDA, USA., (1987).<br />
224
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
HIGH RESOLUTION TERRAIN MAPPING AND<br />
VISUALIZATION OF CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY USING LIDAR<br />
AND IFSAR DATA<br />
Sudhir Raj Shrestha 1* , Dr. Scott N. Miller 2<br />
1 Graduate Research Assistant, University of Wyom<strong>in</strong>g, Department of Renewable <strong>Resources</strong>, Laramie, WY<br />
82071, USA, Email: sudhir@uwyo.edu, Phone: 1-307-766-5305, Fax: 1-307-766-6403, 2 Professor<br />
Poster Extended Abstract<br />
Channel morphology characteristics play crucial roles <strong>in</strong> the understand<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />
of the geomorphic and hydrologic characteristics of an area. Conventional techniques for<br />
determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g channel width, depth and cross-section area is time consum<strong>in</strong>g and most of the<br />
time may not represent the spatial variability with<strong>in</strong> the watershed. This poster presents an<br />
overview of the methods for extract<strong>in</strong>g average channel morphology characteristics on a<br />
channel reach basis from a high resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of 1m and 2.5m<br />
respectively build from Light Detection and Rang<strong>in</strong>g (LiDAR) and Interferometric Aperture<br />
Radar (IFSAR) for 150 km 2 USDA-ARS Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed <strong>in</strong> Arizona.<br />
LiDAR is an active remote sens<strong>in</strong>g technology used on a satellite or airborne platform.<br />
By the use of laser light for reflection, high precision k<strong>in</strong>ematic DGPS (differential global<br />
position<strong>in</strong>g systems) for position <strong>in</strong>formation, and an IMU (<strong>in</strong>tertial measur<strong>in</strong>g unit, also<br />
know as <strong>in</strong>ertial navigation system, INS) for altitude calculations, this system can collect high<br />
density, highly accurate topographic and bathymetric data. Digital products delivered to the<br />
end user <strong>in</strong>clude a grid or irregular network of XYZ data po<strong>in</strong>ts with maximum vertical<br />
accuracy on the order of 15 cm and horizontal spac<strong>in</strong>g on the order of 1m, but under some<br />
circumstances as f<strong>in</strong>e as 30-60 cm. This technology holds the promise of produc<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>e<br />
resolution digital elevation model (DEM) for use <strong>in</strong> soil survey, subaqueous soil survey, and<br />
other related pedologic and geomorphological work.<br />
IFSAR is an active remote sens<strong>in</strong>g technology used on satellite or aircrafts. It<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>es complex images recorded by antennas at different locations or at different times. It<br />
is an alternative to conventional stereo photographic techniques for generat<strong>in</strong>g high<br />
resolution topographic maps.<br />
The primary objective of this project was to evaluate the accuracy of the LiDAR and<br />
IFSAR data <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g channel morphology and build an <strong>in</strong>put for Predictive Soil<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g (PSM) project. An approach was developed <strong>in</strong> a geographic <strong>in</strong>formation system<br />
(GIS) to extract cross-section profiles on a stream system derived from the topographic<br />
models. Simultaneous to the acquisition of LIDAR data a field campaign was undertaken by<br />
to evaluate the accuracy of the LiDAR DEM; a total station was used to evaluate cross<br />
sections at 22 sites with<strong>in</strong> the study area. Manual <strong>in</strong>terpretation was required to identify the<br />
bank location from the profiles extracted from the GIS, after which average channel<br />
morphologic properties of width, depth and cross-section area were determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
Results from both the LiDAR and IFSAR data were highly correlated with field<br />
observations, although the LiDAR data performed significantly better <strong>in</strong> terms of the ability<br />
to determ<strong>in</strong>e channel depth. These results illustrate the benefits of us<strong>in</strong>g high resolution data<br />
<strong>in</strong> hydrologic and geomorphic study, and show promise towards the development of a fully<br />
automated system for extract<strong>in</strong>g channel morphology from surface terra<strong>in</strong> models which can<br />
be used as one of the proxies of soil form<strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>in</strong> PSM.<br />
225
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL SAMPLING AND<br />
PROXIMAL SENSING WITH APPLICATIONS IN PRECISION<br />
AGRICULTURE<br />
M. van Meirvenne, U.W.A. Vitharana L. Cockx<br />
2 Research unit Soil Spatial Inventory Techniques, Dept. of Soil Management & Soil Care, Coupure 653, Ghent<br />
University, Gent, Belgium<br />
Detailed soil spatial <strong>in</strong>formation has become <strong>in</strong>dispensable for a variety of agronomic and<br />
environmental applications. Precision agriculture is one of the applications which refers to a<br />
crop management concept that allows for variable management practices with<strong>in</strong> a field<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to soil or site conditions. The economic and environmental benefits of precision<br />
agriculture have stimulated the research <strong>in</strong>terest and farmer adoption level <strong>in</strong> developed<br />
countries. Moreover, there are evidences for the potential applications of precision agriculture<br />
technology <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries with proper adjustments. Intensive soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
analysis is not a realistic alternative to explore the detailed soil spatial variation due to cost<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts. The advances <strong>in</strong> soil sens<strong>in</strong>g technology, global position<strong>in</strong>g systems (GPS) and<br />
spatial prediction techniques make it possible to acquire accurate high resolution soil<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> a cost effective manner. The user friendly geographical <strong>in</strong>formation systems<br />
have provided tremendous opportunities to analyze, display and <strong>in</strong>ventory soil <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
Consequently, new digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g techniques are aimed to produce soil <strong>in</strong>ventories with<br />
5 m resolution [6].<br />
Proximal soil sens<strong>in</strong>g is widely accepted as a suitable ancillary <strong>in</strong>formation source for<br />
detailed soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Currently, different types of proximal soil sensor techniques are<br />
available. These <strong>in</strong>clude electromagnetic <strong>in</strong>duction (EMI), magnetics, soil resistivity,<br />
spectrometry, ion selective field effect transistors, aerial digital photography and ground<br />
penetrat<strong>in</strong>g radar. In addition, comb<strong>in</strong>es mounted with crop yield sensors became<br />
commercially available <strong>in</strong> the last decade. These sensors are capable to reflect the spatial<br />
variability of different crop and soil properties, e.g. the EMI based EM38 sensor<br />
measurements reflect soil textural variation. Proximal sensors are coupled to a GPS receiver<br />
and a data logger to obta<strong>in</strong> large numbers of on-the-go georeferenced measurements. The<br />
spatial variation observed with sensor <strong>in</strong>formation can be used to design a targeted field soil<br />
sampl<strong>in</strong>g scheme consist<strong>in</strong>g of a limited number of samples [2]. The relationships identified<br />
between the proximal sensor <strong>in</strong>formation and soil properties are used to predict soil variation<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g appropriate prediction technique. The prediction approaches <strong>in</strong>clude techniques such as<br />
geostatistical methods, different forms of regression, neural networks and Bayesian<br />
maximum entropy. The cluster<strong>in</strong>g procedures like fuzzy k-means algorithm facilitate to<br />
identify with<strong>in</strong>-field zones characterized with a unique comb<strong>in</strong>ation of soil properties to<br />
manage crops at a with<strong>in</strong>-field scale.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[87] C.L. Arnold, Jr., D.L. Civco, M.P. Prisloe, J.D. Hurd, J.W. Stocker. "Remote-sens<strong>in</strong>g-enhanced outreach<br />
education as a decision support system for local land-use officials", Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote<br />
Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (10), 1251-1260, (2000).<br />
[88] J. Bak, J. Jensen, M.M. Larsen, G. Pritzl, J. Scott-Fordsmand. A heavy metal monitor<strong>in</strong>g-program <strong>in</strong><br />
Denmark. The Science of the Total Environment 207: 179-186., (1997).<br />
[89] J.S. Bethel, J.S., J.Ch. McGlone, E.M. Mikhail. "Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry", John Wiley &<br />
Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, 477p, (2001).<br />
226
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
[90] D.L. Corw<strong>in</strong>., S.M. Lesch. “Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity<br />
I. Survey protocols”. Computers and Electronics <strong>in</strong> Agriculture, 46, pp. 103-133, (2005).<br />
[91] D. Devriendt, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, Y. Cornet, R. Goossens. "Accuracy assessment of an IKONOS derived DSM over<br />
urban and suburban area", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 2005 workshop EARSeL Special Interest Group “3D Remote<br />
Sens<strong>in</strong>g” - use of the third dimension for remote sens<strong>in</strong>g purposes.<br />
[92] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. Dewulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />
regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data – geometric aspects", High Resolution Mapp<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
Space (2003).<br />
[93] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. De Wulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />
regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data - geometrical aspects", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 24th<br />
EARSeL symposium : <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, /May 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 421-<br />
428, (2005).<br />
[94] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke. Updat<strong>in</strong>g groundwater table class maps 1:50,000 by statistical methods: an analysis of quality<br />
versus cost. Geoderma 97: 329-350, (2000).<br />
[95] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke, D.J. Brus, M.F.P. Bierkens, T. Hoogland, M. Knotters, F. de Vries. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g ground water<br />
dynamics us<strong>in</strong>g multiple sources of exhaustive high resolution data. Geoderma 123: 23-39, (2004).<br />
[96] K. Jacobsen. "Analysis of Digital Elevation Models based on space <strong>in</strong>formation", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for<br />
European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 439-451, (2005).<br />
[97] K. Jacobsen. "Orthoimages and DEMs by QuickBird and IKONOS", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Transition,<br />
Rotterdam, Millpress, 273-279, (2003).<br />
[98] P.J. Kuikman, W.J.M. de Groot, R.F.A. Hendriks, J. Verhagen, F. de Vries. Stocks of C <strong>in</strong> soils and<br />
emissions of CO2 from agricultural soils <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, Alterra-report 561. 41 pp.<br />
(http://www2.alterra.wur.nl/Webdocs/PDFFiles/Alterrarapporten/AlterraRapport561.pdf ), (2003).<br />
[99] A.B. McBratney, M.L. Mendonca Santos, B. M<strong>in</strong>asny. “On digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g” Geoderma, 117, pp. 3–<br />
52, (2003).<br />
[100] S.P. McGrath, P. Loveland. The Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. Blackie Academic and<br />
Professional, Glasgow, (1992).<br />
[101] K. Taillieu, R. Goossens, D. Devriendt, A. Dewulf, S. Van Coillie, T. Willems. "Generation of DEMs<br />
and orthoimages based on non-stereoscopical IKONOS images", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 453-460, (2005).<br />
[102] T. Vandevoorde, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, F. Canters, W. De Genst, N. Stephenne, E. Wolff. "Extraction of land use /<br />
land cover - related <strong>in</strong>formation from very high resolution data <strong>in</strong> urban and suburban areas", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
Transition, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 237-245, (2003).<br />
[103] G. Zhou, R. Li. "Accuracy evaluation of ground po<strong>in</strong>ts from IKONOS high-resolution satellite<br />
imagery", Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (9), 1103-1112, (2000).<br />
227
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
ESTIMATING SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF SOIL SALINITY<br />
USING COKRIGING IN BAHARIYA OASIS, EGYPT<br />
Abstract<br />
Kh. M. Darwish*, M.M. Kotb and R. Ali<br />
Soils & Water Use Dept., National Research Centre (NRC), Cairo, Egypt.<br />
* kdarwish@hotmail.com<br />
The mapp<strong>in</strong>g of sal<strong>in</strong>e soils is the first task before any reclamation effort can be conducted.<br />
Soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity is determ<strong>in</strong>ed, traditionally, by soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and laboratory analysis. Recently, it<br />
became possible to complement these hard data with soft secondary data made available<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g field sensors like electrode probes or satellite images. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability of<br />
soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity is an important issue <strong>in</strong> precision agriculture.<br />
In this study, geostatistical method of cokrig<strong>in</strong>g, were applied to estimate and identify the<br />
spatial variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity with ECe measurements <strong>in</strong> 200 km 2 agricultural fields <strong>in</strong> the<br />
north and south Bahariya oasis. In cokrig<strong>in</strong>g, more densely sampled secondary data from the<br />
ETM satellite image source were <strong>in</strong>corporated to improve the estimation of the electrical<br />
conductivity (ECe). The estimated spatial distributions of ECe us<strong>in</strong>g the geostatistical<br />
methods with various reduced data sets were compared with the extensive sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
measurements <strong>in</strong> the large field. The results suggest that sampl<strong>in</strong>g cost can be dramatically<br />
reduced and estimation can be significantly improved us<strong>in</strong>g cokrig<strong>in</strong>g. Compared with the<br />
krig<strong>in</strong>g results us<strong>in</strong>g only primary data set of ECe, cokrig<strong>in</strong>g with reduced data sets of ECe<br />
improves the estimations greatly by reduc<strong>in</strong>g mean squared error and krig<strong>in</strong>g variance up to<br />
70% and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g correlation of estimates and measurements about 25%. Relative<br />
improvements <strong>in</strong> map accuracy were highest (25% to 38%) <strong>in</strong> regression colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g<br />
approach, which also performed better than ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g method that utilized only one<br />
ancillary variable. The relative ga<strong>in</strong> from <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g remote sens<strong>in</strong>g secondary<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>creased with decreas<strong>in</strong>g sampl<strong>in</strong>g density. The results of these models allow to<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolate and classify sal<strong>in</strong>ity on a more realistic and cont<strong>in</strong>uous scale.<br />
Keywords: soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity - spatial variability - cokrig<strong>in</strong>g algorithm – colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Introduction<br />
Soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity limits food production <strong>in</strong> many countries of the world. There are ma<strong>in</strong>ly two<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ds of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity: naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g dryland sal<strong>in</strong>ity and human-<strong>in</strong>duced sal<strong>in</strong>ity caused<br />
by the low quality of water. In both cases the development of plants and soil organisms are<br />
limited lead<strong>in</strong>g to low yields. In Bahariya oasis, where more than 10% of the land is affected<br />
by salt, groundwater and <strong>in</strong>adequate dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions are the major causes of sal<strong>in</strong>ization.<br />
Generally, the classical soil survey methods of field sampl<strong>in</strong>g, laboratory analysis and<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolation of these field data for mapp<strong>in</strong>g, especially <strong>in</strong> large areas is relatively expensive<br />
and time consum<strong>in</strong>g. Remote sensed data might be a useful tool to overcome these<br />
problems. Dwivedi (1992) used <strong>Land</strong>sat MSS and TM data for more detailed mapp<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the salt affected soils <strong>in</strong> the frame of the reconnaissance soil map of India.<br />
Also, De Dapper and Goossens (1996) <strong>in</strong>dicated the development of GIS and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for monitor<strong>in</strong>g and predication of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> the Desert-Delta fr<strong>in</strong>ges of Egypt.<br />
Conventionally (Soil and Plant Analysis Council, 1992) soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
laboratory analysis (electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste extract ECe). This<br />
228
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
procedure is expensive and time-consum<strong>in</strong>g, and provides an <strong>in</strong>complete view of the extent<br />
of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity. An alternative to laboratory analysis is to assess soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> the field by<br />
determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the apparent electrical conductivity (ECa). This can be done us<strong>in</strong>g sensors such<br />
as the four-electrode probes (Rhoades and van Schilfgaarde, 1976) or by electromagnetic<br />
<strong>in</strong>duction <strong>in</strong>struments (McNeil, 1980). This procedure is cheaper and less time-consum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and enabl<strong>in</strong>g a more <strong>in</strong>tensive survey of the study area. Creat<strong>in</strong>g maps typically <strong>in</strong>volves<br />
sampl<strong>in</strong>g, measur<strong>in</strong>g the variable of <strong>in</strong>terest, and estimat<strong>in</strong>g values at unsampled locations<br />
through some form of <strong>in</strong>terpolation, pla<strong>in</strong> regression, data aggregation, or other prediction<br />
techniques (McBratney et al., 2003).<br />
Geostatistics offers a collection of determ<strong>in</strong>istic and statistical tools aimed at<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g and model<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability. Hybrid geostatistical procedures that account<br />
for environmental correlation have become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly popular <strong>in</strong> recent years because they<br />
allow utiliz<strong>in</strong>g secondary <strong>in</strong>formation that is often available at f<strong>in</strong>er spatial resolution than the<br />
sampled values of a primary target variable. If the correlation between primary and secondary<br />
variables is significant, hybrid techniques generally result <strong>in</strong> more accurate local predictions<br />
than ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g or other univariate predictors (Goovaerts, 1999; McBratney et al., 2000;<br />
Odeh et al., 1994; Triantafilis et al., 2001).<br />
Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is the extension of krig<strong>in</strong>g to more than one variable. It is most likely to be<br />
beneficial where the primary variable (the one be estimated) is under sampled with respect to<br />
the secondary variable(s) that are assumed to be correlated with the primary variable. In some<br />
applications there are only a few measurements of the attribute of <strong>in</strong>terest; the resultant<br />
predicated maps have poor resolution and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty may be very large.<br />
In such situation it is critical to account for secondary, <strong>in</strong>direct <strong>in</strong>formation that may be more<br />
densely sampled (Goovaerts, 1997).<br />
In this way, colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is as reduced form of full cokrig<strong>in</strong>g. It requires only<br />
knowledge of the semivariogram of the primary variable and the cross-variogram between the<br />
primary and secondary variable (Curran & Atk<strong>in</strong>son, 1997). Furthermore, the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />
geostatistics and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g techniques has been used before to study and assess the<br />
magnitude and extent of spatial variability <strong>in</strong> soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity (Lesch et al., 1995; Christakos &<br />
Li, 1998.; Darwish, 1998).<br />
This study aims to map soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> the northern and southern part of Bahariya oasis<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g geostatistical techniques, <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g a limited data set of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity measurements<br />
(ECe) as a primary variable with ETM satellite image as a secondary data source. The result<br />
of this methodology will be qualified us<strong>in</strong>g the cross validation method.<br />
Material and methods<br />
Study site description<br />
Bahariya depression is located nearly <strong>in</strong> the middle of the Western desert of Egypt and<br />
compris<strong>in</strong>g a total area of approximately 2250 km 2 (Fig.1). The area falls under the arid<br />
condition as the total ra<strong>in</strong>fall is (3-6) mm/year. Spr<strong>in</strong>gs and wells are the ma<strong>in</strong> two<br />
groundwater resources for irrigation and civic purposes (Salem, 1987). In Bahariya, it is<br />
found that the ma<strong>in</strong> unsuitability criteria elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g more extend of cultivation areas is the<br />
excess of salts. In this research, two study areas were selected. One is <strong>in</strong> the north of Bahariya<br />
cover<strong>in</strong>g an area of about 118.3km 2 and the second is cover<strong>in</strong>g partly the southern part of it<br />
with an area of 77.5km 2 (Fig.2).<br />
229
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Data description<br />
Based on the pre-field and <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed, 45 soil profiles and 71 soil augers were<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> different locations. Fig. 3a and 3b show the location of the observation sites<br />
where soil samples were taken. Four transects <strong>in</strong> area1 and two <strong>in</strong> the southern one. Electrical<br />
conductivity soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity measurements (ECe) dS/cm were determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the soil water<br />
extract out of the saturated soil paste. Total of six sample areas were selected and distributed<br />
over the study areas with a fixed wide of 1km for each. The exact locations of the soil<br />
profiles and auger po<strong>in</strong>ts were precisely def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the field by us<strong>in</strong>g the DGPS, and plotted<br />
on the maps.<br />
Figure 1 & 2. Location and the study areas <strong>in</strong> N and S Baharyia.<br />
Figure 3a. Location of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> study area-1 (North).<br />
230
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Figure 3b. Location of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> study area-2 (South).Fig. 4a and 4b show the frequency<br />
distribution of ECe (dS/cm) values <strong>in</strong> study areas-1 and 2 respectively. The first one exhibit abnormal<br />
distribution, while the second is normally distributed, which does not deemed Ln transformation.<br />
Although the Ln transformation ECe semivariogram can give a better fitt<strong>in</strong>g, but the problem of back<br />
transformation through the estimation procedure is limit<strong>in</strong>g its usability.<br />
Frequency<br />
9,0<br />
6,8<br />
4,5<br />
2,3<br />
0,0<br />
0,96 59,97 118,99 178,00<br />
231<br />
"ECe"<br />
Figure 4a. Frequent distribution of ECe values <strong>in</strong> study area-1.<br />
Frequency<br />
Method of geostatistical analysis<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
0,86 44,57 88,29 132,00<br />
"ECe"<br />
Figure 4b. Frequent distribution of ECe values <strong>in</strong> study area-2<br />
The variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity represent<strong>in</strong>g horizontal distribution of salts <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
model was mapped. The study shows that it is possible to map soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity variability us<strong>in</strong>g
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
an appropriate <strong>in</strong>terpolation technique. The part of the study, as reported here, <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
reconstruct<strong>in</strong>g the spatial variability of sal<strong>in</strong>ity; and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the accuracy to predict<br />
electrical conductivity measurements.<br />
Geostatistical methods can be used to measure and model the spatial correlation of soil<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>ity measurements as a primary variable and the satellite image as a secondary data<br />
variable. The models of spatial correlation are then used along with Krig<strong>in</strong>g and the new<br />
geostatistical technique of Collocated Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g to develop large scale maps show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
spatial pattern of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity status <strong>in</strong> the selected study area.<br />
Colocated Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g<br />
As mentioned before, Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is the extension of Krig<strong>in</strong>g to more than one variable.<br />
Colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is as reduced form of full cokrig<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Consider<strong>in</strong>g Z (the primary variable) = 1 and Y (The secondary variable) = 2<br />
Then, colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g with Markov-type approximation of attribute Z at location X<br />
is given by:<br />
Z*cok (u) = n i=1∑ λ1i (u) Z (ui) + λ2 (u) [Y (u) + mz - my] (1)<br />
Where:<br />
Z*cok (u): cokrig<strong>in</strong>g estimator of Z(u)<br />
λ1i (u): cokrig<strong>in</strong>g weight associated to neighbor<strong>in</strong>g datum Z(u) for estimation at location u.<br />
λ2 (u): cokrig<strong>in</strong>g weight associated to collocated secondary datum Y(u).<br />
mz: mean of the primary variable (ECe measurements).<br />
my: Mean of the secondary variable (Satellite data).<br />
In this study, colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g was applied to map soil ECe values, from available<br />
ECe data as primary data and ETM Satellite image as densely sampled secondary data<br />
source. When the collocated secondary variable Y (u) is known everywhere and varies<br />
smoothly across the study area (e.g., satellite data & surface reflectance) there is little loss <strong>in</strong><br />
reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the cokrig<strong>in</strong>g system, provided that it is available at each location u be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
estimated (Xu et al., 1992; Goovaerts, 1998b). This is clear the case <strong>in</strong> remote sens<strong>in</strong>g where<br />
the secondary variable is provided by remotely sensed imagery data, which often completely<br />
covers the area of <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />
Selection of the imagery<br />
Two smaller w<strong>in</strong>dows of a complete <strong>Land</strong>sat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) satellite<br />
image of Bahariya Oasis dated <strong>in</strong> 21-04-2002 were chosen to be used <strong>in</strong> this study (Fig.2).<br />
The False Color Composite (FCC) of these image w<strong>in</strong>dows is cover<strong>in</strong>g area-1 as shown <strong>in</strong><br />
Fig. 3a and area-2 <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3b. The first image w<strong>in</strong>dow is with<strong>in</strong> the Northern part of Bahariya<br />
depression, which is cover<strong>in</strong>g most of the villages located there. The second one is cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />
partly the southern part of Bahariya.<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g geo-morphological features are covered by image one from north to<br />
south:<br />
1- Maysera Plateau, escarpment and plateau footslope.<br />
2- Mandisha Hill, hilland and footslope.<br />
3- Penepla<strong>in</strong> sand sheet and rock out crop.<br />
4- Pla<strong>in</strong> sand sheet, sand flat and playa.<br />
On the other hand, the follow<strong>in</strong>g geo-morphological features can be recognized <strong>in</strong> image two:<br />
1 Pla<strong>in</strong> sand sheet, sand flat, playa and isolated conical hills.<br />
232
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
2 Plateau footslope and escarpment.<br />
Exploratory data analysis<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Some statistics about the hard data (ECe) for areas-1 &-2 are reported <strong>in</strong> Table 1. It was<br />
noted the presence of a strong spatial variability. For example <strong>in</strong> areas 1 & 2, there is a big<br />
difference between the extreme values (m<strong>in</strong>imum and maximum). In addition, to improve<br />
estimation accuracy, the correlation between the primary and secondary variables should be<br />
as high as possible. Therefore, the Pearson correlation coefficient was applied on the ECe<br />
values that were available and the colocated reflectance measurements provided by the eight<br />
spectral bands of the ETM image. It is found, that the highest correlation (r≅0.3) of the ETM<br />
bands with the EC observations is signed for the ETM low ga<strong>in</strong> band 6 (Fig. 5). At study<br />
areas 1 and 2, the relationship between EC and surface reflectance REF was probably masked<br />
by the sand sheet and flat layer on the soil surface, which had accumulated as a result of<br />
geological history and greatly affected surface reflectance shown <strong>in</strong> the satellite image, but<br />
not ma<strong>in</strong>ly EC. The oldest rocks exposed with<strong>in</strong> Bahariya depression are sandstone, siltstone<br />
and clay of Cenomanian age that cover the floor of the depression and crop out along the base<br />
of the escarpment (Parsons, 1962).<br />
In this way, the secondary variable could be determ<strong>in</strong>ed for every pixel covered by the image.<br />
Items Mean Standard Deviation Sample variance M<strong>in</strong>. Max.<br />
Area 1 (N) 37.27 46.51 2163.06 0.96 178.0<br />
Area 2 (S) 51.26 39.41 1552.79 0.86 132.0<br />
Correlation Coefficient<br />
Table 1. Statistical summary of ECe (dS/cm) data.<br />
0.3<br />
0.25<br />
0.2<br />
0.15<br />
0.1<br />
0.05<br />
0<br />
-0.05<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />
ETM spectral bands<br />
Figure 5. The Correlation Coefficient statistical analysis among primary and secondary variables.<br />
(All correlations were significant at P < 0.001 level).<br />
On the other hand, the frequent distribution of the colocated reflectance measurements<br />
of ETM low ga<strong>in</strong> band 6 for area 1 and 2 is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 6a & 6b.<br />
233
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Frequency<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
NonTransformed<br />
0<br />
148.0 169.0 190.0 211.0<br />
ETM LG band 6<br />
Figure 6a. Frequent distribution of ETM low<br />
ga<strong>in</strong> band 6 for area-1.<br />
234<br />
Frequency<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
NonTransformed<br />
0<br />
161.0 177.0 193.0 209.0<br />
ETM LG band 6<br />
Figure 6b. Frequent distribution of ETM low<br />
ga<strong>in</strong> band 6 for area-2.<br />
The reflectance values of ETM LG band 6 were standardized to zero mean and unit variance<br />
for each study area and re-comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>to one dataset of standardized the field surface<br />
reflectance (REF) for whole study area. The confirmed Regression Coefficient of (ETM LG<br />
band 6) with the EC observations for study areas 1 and 2 is <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g relatively higher<br />
correlation for area-1 than area-2 (Fig. 7a & 7b).<br />
Primary ("EC")<br />
178.00<br />
133.74<br />
89.48<br />
45.22<br />
0.96<br />
148.00 169.00 190.00 211.00<br />
Covariate ("ETM LG 6")<br />
Regression coefficient = 0.9 (SE = 0.6, r2 =0.065, y <strong>in</strong>tercept = -126.705, n = 31)<br />
Figure 7a. The Regression Coefficient among<br />
variables (Z & Y) <strong>in</strong> area-1<br />
Structure analysis<br />
Primary (EC)<br />
132.00<br />
99.22<br />
66.43<br />
33.65<br />
0.86<br />
161.0 177.0 193.0 209.0<br />
Covariate (ETM LG band 6)<br />
Regression coefficient = 0,6 (SE = 0,8, r2 =0,047, y <strong>in</strong>tercept = -72,154, n = 14<br />
Figure 7b. The Regression Coefficient among<br />
variables (Z & Y) <strong>in</strong> area-2.<br />
It is necessary to analyze the spatial variability of the data above by semivariance function.<br />
Fig. 8a and 8b illustrate the semivariance value of primary variable (ECe) of study areas 1 &<br />
2. The sill of EC <strong>in</strong> areas 1 & 2 are 2620.0m and 1845.0m and their correlation lag range<br />
3710.0m and 1120.0m respectively
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Semivariance<br />
5805<br />
4353<br />
2902<br />
1451<br />
0<br />
0.0 2596.0 5192.0 7788.0<br />
Separation Distance (h) m<br />
Figure 8a. Isotropic variogram (spherical model)<br />
of ECe (dS/cm) <strong>in</strong> area-1.<br />
235<br />
Semivariance<br />
3482<br />
2611<br />
1741<br />
870<br />
0<br />
0.0 2257.7 4515.3 6773.0<br />
Separation Distance (h) m<br />
Figure 8b. Isotropic variogram (spherical model)<br />
of ECe (dS/cm) <strong>in</strong> area-2.<br />
The variogram shows a relative nugget effect of 11.7% for study area-1 and 10.0% for area-2,<br />
which cloud be calculated through this ratio [(C /(C + C)) x 100] between nugget variance<br />
0 0<br />
and sill. The nugget effect looks more significant <strong>in</strong> study area-2 than area-1, which causes<br />
by random factors.<br />
On the other hand, as Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is a multivariate extension of krig<strong>in</strong>g, when the<br />
secondary variable is known everywhere and varies smoothly across the study area (e.g.,<br />
colocated reflectance measurements provided by ETM low ga<strong>in</strong> band 6) there is little loss <strong>in</strong><br />
reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the cokrig<strong>in</strong>g system. The secondary variable provides <strong>in</strong>formation only about<br />
the primary trend at location u.<br />
In order to apply a colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g method a cross-semivariance analysis must be<br />
performed prior to cokrig<strong>in</strong>g, where CZY(ui - u) is the cross covariance between primary and<br />
secondary variables at locations ui and u, respectively. Aga<strong>in</strong>, the common practice consists<br />
of estimat<strong>in</strong>g and model<strong>in</strong>g the (cross) semivariogram, then retriev<strong>in</strong>g the (cross) covariance.<br />
Fig. 9a and 9b show the experimental semivariogram of the secondary variable ETM LG<br />
band6 and cross semivariogram with the primary one (ECe po<strong>in</strong>t observations) for study<br />
area-1, computed as:<br />
(2)
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Semivariance<br />
394.7<br />
263.1<br />
131.6<br />
"ETM LG 6": Isotropic Variogram<br />
0.0<br />
0.0 2596.0 5192.0 7788.0<br />
Separation Distance (h) m<br />
Figure 9a. The semivariogram of secondary<br />
variable for study area-1<br />
236<br />
Semivariance<br />
"EC" x "ETM LG 6": Isotropic Cross Variogram<br />
2163.<br />
1431.<br />
698.<br />
-34.<br />
0.0 2596.0 5192.0 7788.0<br />
Separation Distance (h) m<br />
Figure 9b. The cross-variogram of primary and<br />
secondary variables for area-1.<br />
The sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed based on the semivariograms. In Fig. 9a & 9b, an<br />
exponential model of isotropic variogram was fitted for the secondary variable (ETM LG 6)<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g an iterative procedure developed by Goulard (1989). The cross-variogram between the<br />
primary and secondary data sets is modeled (here a small nugget effect 11.6m and a spherical<br />
model with sill 232.2m and range 3400.0m), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the <strong>in</strong>tensive sampl<strong>in</strong>g scheme<br />
used resolved most of the spatial variation<br />
Nevertheless, Fig. 10a & 10b illustrate the experimental semivariograms of the<br />
secondary variable (ETM LG 6) and the cross-variogram <strong>in</strong> study area-2. At area-2, the<br />
isotropic varigram of (ETM LG 6) shows a spherical model with a sill of 164.7m and a fitted<br />
range of 1150.0m, which probably reflected gradual differences <strong>in</strong> EC due to elevation. The<br />
cross-variogram between the primary and secondary data sets <strong>in</strong> area-2 modeled l<strong>in</strong>early with<br />
sill of 0.1m and range of 0.75m. Although <strong>in</strong> study area-2, EC was less significantly<br />
correlated with the secondary variable compare with area-1, only a small portion of the<br />
variation <strong>in</strong> EC can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by variation <strong>in</strong> elevation.<br />
Generally, cross-variograms largely confirmed the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the simple correlation analysis,<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g (i) more spatial correlation between EC and ETM LG 6 at area-1, and (ii) decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
spatial correlation between EC and ETM LG 6 at area-2 (Fig. 10b). This proves the existence<br />
of correlation between spatial variability of the soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity data, which belongs to nugget<br />
effect.<br />
Semivariance<br />
450.0<br />
300.0<br />
150.0<br />
"ETM LG 6" Isotropic Variogram<br />
0.0<br />
0.0 2257.7 4515.3 6773.0<br />
Separation Distance (h) m<br />
Figure 10a. The semivariogram of secondary<br />
variable for study area-2.<br />
Semivariance<br />
"EC" x "ETM LG 6" : Isotropic Cross Variogram<br />
1552.79<br />
851.66<br />
150.52<br />
-550.61<br />
-1251.75<br />
0.00 2257.67 4515.33 6773.00<br />
Separation Distance (h) m<br />
Figure 10b. The cross-variogram of primary and<br />
secondary variables for area-2.
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Colocated Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g of EC po<strong>in</strong>t observations with ETM as secondary data source<br />
The colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpolated maps cover study areas 1 and 2 is shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 11a &<br />
12a. The ord<strong>in</strong>ary cokrig<strong>in</strong>g algorithm was applied to <strong>in</strong>terpolate the EC data us<strong>in</strong>g GS +<br />
program.<br />
As a result of us<strong>in</strong>g search neighborhood area as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> the cross-variograms of<br />
area-1 and area-2, quite lots of areas were closed to the primary observation po<strong>in</strong>ts and this<br />
give high effect of the secondary data. Closer to primary observation po<strong>in</strong>ts this effect is<br />
more screened by the available primary data and this significantly improved the accuracy of<br />
colocated EC maps.<br />
However, the visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation of the EC colocated map of area-1 <strong>in</strong> relation to the<br />
DEM (digital Elevation Model) grid image of each area give a good impression that the<br />
estimation of sal<strong>in</strong>ity values is logical, taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration the location from the salt<br />
effected soils (playa), the relatively lower elevation units (depressions) and the position <strong>in</strong><br />
landscape <strong>in</strong> the oasis (Fig. 11b).<br />
"m north"<br />
3142286<br />
3138434<br />
3134583<br />
35679444 35687159<br />
"m east"<br />
35694874<br />
Figure 11a. Interpolate-colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g map of EC (dS/cm) of the study area-1 (North of<br />
Bahariya).<br />
On the other hand, the relatively high ECe (dS/cm) values that are pronounced and<br />
presented as connected counter l<strong>in</strong>es are express<strong>in</strong>g the areas where low elevation and much<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>ity features are available. This is clear presented for area-2 <strong>in</strong> Fig. 12b. This quite<br />
validat<strong>in</strong>g the estimated <strong>in</strong>terpolated cokriged maps obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Obviously, there is a visually<br />
better resolution of spatial detail <strong>in</strong> the EC colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpolated maps.<br />
237<br />
"EC"<br />
> 164<br />
> 151<br />
> 139<br />
> 126<br />
> 114<br />
> 102<br />
> 89<br />
> 77<br />
> 64<br />
> 52<br />
> 39<br />
> 27<br />
> 15<br />
> 2<br />
> -10
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
3142000<br />
3140000<br />
3138000<br />
3136000<br />
"m north"<br />
35680000 35684000 35688000 35692000<br />
3103869<br />
3100634<br />
Playa<br />
238<br />
Playa<br />
Depression<br />
Figure 11b. The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) map of area-1.<br />
3097399<br />
35657997 35663986<br />
"m east"<br />
35669976<br />
"EC south area"<br />
Figure 12a. Interpolate-colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g map of EC (dS/cm) of the study area-2 (South of<br />
Bahariya).<br />
3102000<br />
3100000<br />
3098000<br />
35658000 35661000 35664000 35667000<br />
Playa<br />
Figure 12b. The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) map of area-2<br />
142<br />
138<br />
134<br />
130<br />
126<br />
122<br />
118<br />
114<br />
110<br />
106<br />
102<br />
98<br />
94<br />
144<br />
140<br />
136<br />
132<br />
128<br />
124<br />
120<br />
116<br />
112<br />
108<br />
104<br />
100<br />
96<br />
92<br />
> 119<br />
> 110<br />
> 102<br />
> 93<br />
> 85<br />
> 77<br />
> 68<br />
> 60<br />
> 51<br />
> 43<br />
> 34<br />
> 26<br />
> 18<br />
> 9<br />
> 1
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Perform cross validation analysis<br />
To assess the accuracy of the colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g estimated maps, there is a cross validation<br />
analysis for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g effective parameters for cokrig<strong>in</strong>g. In cross-validation analysis a graph<br />
can be constructed of the estimated vs. actual values for each sample location <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong>.<br />
The cross validation analysis of study areas 1 and 2 are presented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 13a & 13b. Each<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t on the graph represents a location <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>put data set for which an actual and estimated<br />
value are available.<br />
Actual "EC"<br />
178.00<br />
133.74<br />
89.48<br />
45.22<br />
0.96<br />
0.96 59.97 118.99 178.00<br />
Estimated "EC"<br />
Regression coefficient = 0.321 (SE = 0.363 , r2 =0.026,<br />
y <strong>in</strong>tercept = 26.72, SE Prediction = 45.893)<br />
Figure 13a. Cross Validation (CoKrig<strong>in</strong>g) of<br />
study area-1.<br />
239<br />
Actual<br />
132.00<br />
99.22<br />
66.43<br />
33.65<br />
0.86<br />
0.86 44.57 88.29 132.00<br />
Estimated<br />
Regression coefficient = -0.455 (SE = 0.390 , r2 =0.102,<br />
y <strong>in</strong>tercept = 75.99, SE Prediction = 37.344)<br />
Figure 13b. Cross Validation (CoKrig<strong>in</strong>g) of<br />
study area-2.<br />
The regression coefficient, which is describ<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>in</strong>ear regression equation is for<br />
(area-1) = 0.3 and for (area-2) = -0.4. The standard error of the regression coefficient (SE =<br />
0.36, 0.39 for area-1 & 2 respectively). The r 2 value is the proportion of variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by the best-fit l<strong>in</strong>e (<strong>in</strong> case of (area-1) = 2.6% and 10.2% for (area-2)); and the y-<strong>in</strong>tercept of<br />
the best-fit l<strong>in</strong>e is also provided. The SE Prediction term is def<strong>in</strong>ed as SD x (1 - r 2 )0.5, where<br />
SD = standard deviation of the actual data (45.9 and 37.3 for areas-1 & 2 respectively).<br />
Generally, the method of colokated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g significantly improved the accuracy of<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolated cokriged EC maps, as shown by a reasonable acceptable regression coefficient<br />
values <strong>in</strong> both study areas. For cokriged EC, patterns <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpolated EC maps closely<br />
resembled those of the DEM maps, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that this method is also more vulnerable to<br />
potential artifacts <strong>in</strong> ancillary variables. In study areas 1 & 2, both the primary variate (ECe<br />
measurements) and secondary one (surface reflectance derived from ETM satellite image)<br />
contributed significantly to predict<strong>in</strong>g the local means of ECe.<br />
However, it is clear that the spatial variability of area-2 is comparatively less than that<br />
<strong>in</strong> area-1. The ma<strong>in</strong> reason for this weakness of spatial variability <strong>in</strong> area-2 could be referred<br />
to the lack of EC sampl<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts available and still to the high <strong>in</strong>fluence of the ECe (dS/cm)<br />
extreme values on neighbor<strong>in</strong>g locations.<br />
Although two sites were used <strong>in</strong> our study, the range <strong>in</strong> soil types and terra<strong>in</strong> conditions<br />
was limited. Clearly, more work needs to be done, to develop a flexible, more generic<br />
framework for soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity mapp<strong>in</strong>g at different scales and <strong>in</strong> different environments. Of<br />
particular <strong>in</strong>terest is what secondary data source (e.g. surface reflectance derived from<br />
satellite images) are most suitable for EC mapp<strong>in</strong>g across larger regions, for which detailed<br />
on-the-go mapp<strong>in</strong>g of EC or similar properties is not feasible. Our study <strong>in</strong>dicates great<br />
potential for reduc<strong>in</strong>g sampl<strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>in</strong> digital soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity mapp<strong>in</strong>g when a cokrig<strong>in</strong>g<br />
approach is used. However, the reduction of sample size tested here (Fig. 13a & 13b) was<br />
somewhat arbitrary. Better procedures are needed for optimiz<strong>in</strong>g sampl<strong>in</strong>g with regard to
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
cover<strong>in</strong>g the variation <strong>in</strong> primary and secondary variables <strong>in</strong> both feature and geographic<br />
spaces, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g situations where little prior <strong>in</strong>formation about the target variable is<br />
available.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The spatial distribution maps drawn based on cokrig<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpolation method expla<strong>in</strong> clearly<br />
the spatial variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> north and south study areas of Bahariya oasis.<br />
Geostatistical method of colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g that utilized spatially correlated secondary<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>creased the quality of maps of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity (ECe measurements) as compared to<br />
ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g method. Apparent EC cokriged with surface reflectance derived from<br />
satellite images performed best <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g map accuracy. In this method, relative<br />
improvements <strong>in</strong> map accuracy over ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g method ranged from 19% to 38% at the<br />
two study areas and there was little loss of accuracy when sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity was reduced by<br />
half as shown <strong>in</strong> area-2. The ETM LG band 6 secondary data source is considered valuable<br />
one for detailed mapp<strong>in</strong>g of EC at the field scale, whereas the relative value of terra<strong>in</strong><br />
attributes varied geographically.<br />
Indeed, there are different orig<strong>in</strong>al factors have <strong>in</strong>fluenced the f<strong>in</strong>al output of the<br />
cokrig<strong>in</strong>g logarithm technique. Those factors can be related to the issues of sampl<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />
spatial distribution of the soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity measurements <strong>in</strong> the space, the total number of the<br />
observation po<strong>in</strong>ts and the variability of the ECe data set obta<strong>in</strong>ed. In addition, most<br />
secondary <strong>in</strong>formation (i.e. satellite image data) conta<strong>in</strong>s uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties that may mask<br />
relationships with EC values, or other soil properties of <strong>in</strong>terest. Furthermore, rely<strong>in</strong>g on a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle secondary attribute is risky because (i) the variable chosen may not be related to the<br />
primary variable of <strong>in</strong>terest and (ii) field artifacts or errors <strong>in</strong> the secondary <strong>in</strong>formation could<br />
cause significant errors <strong>in</strong> the EC prediction.<br />
Improv<strong>in</strong>g those factors especially <strong>in</strong> the south study area-2, would play an important<br />
role for receiv<strong>in</strong>g more accurate results out of this <strong>in</strong>terpolation method.<br />
At the end of the whole procedure, it is still manage successfully to use the obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpolated EC sal<strong>in</strong>ity maps. To reduce uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, we recommend us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />
measured, multivariate secondary <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />
approach.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[104] A.B. McBratney, I.O.A. Odeh, T.F.A. Bishop, M.S. Dunbar and T.M. Shatar. "An overview of<br />
pedometric techniques for use <strong>in</strong> soil survey". Geoderma 97, 293– 327, (2000).<br />
[105] A.B. McBratney, M. L. Mendonca Santos and B. M<strong>in</strong>asny. "On digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g". Geoderma 117,<br />
3– 52, (2003).<br />
[106] G. Christakos, X. Li. "Bayesian maximum entropy analysis and mapp<strong>in</strong>g: a farewell to krig<strong>in</strong>g<br />
estimators". Mathematical Geology 30, 435–462, (1998).<br />
[107] I.O.A Odeh, A.B McBratney and D.J. Chittleborough. "Spatial prediction of soil properties from<br />
landform attributes derived from a digital elevation model". Geoderma 63, 197–214, (1994).<br />
[108] J. D. McNeil. "Electromagnetic Terra<strong>in</strong> Conductivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers:<br />
Technical Note TN-6". GEONICS Limited, Ontario, Canada (15 pp.), (1980).<br />
[109] J.D. Rhoades and J. Van Schilfgaarde. "An electrical conductivity probe for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity".<br />
Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 647– 651, (1976).<br />
[110] J. Triantafilis, A.I. Huckel and I.O.A Odeh. "Comparison of statistical prediction methods for<br />
estimat<strong>in</strong>g field-scale clay content us<strong>in</strong>g different comb<strong>in</strong>ations of ancillary variables". Soil Sci. 166, 415–427,<br />
(2001).<br />
240
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
[111] Kh. M. Darwish. "Integrat<strong>in</strong>g soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity data with satellite image us<strong>in</strong>g geostatistics". M.Sc. Thesis,<br />
Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium, (1998).<br />
[112] M. De Dapper, R. Goossens. "Model<strong>in</strong>g and monitor<strong>in</strong>g of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity and water logg<strong>in</strong>g hazards <strong>in</strong><br />
the Desert-Delta fr<strong>in</strong>ges of Egypt based on Geomorphology", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g and GIS, (1996).<br />
[113] M. Goulard. "Inference <strong>in</strong> a coregionalization model". In: M. Armstrong, Ed. Geostatistics, Kluwer,<br />
Dordrecht, pp. 397-408, (1989).<br />
[114] M. Z. Salem. "Pedological characteristics of Bahariya Oasis soils". Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. of Agric. A<strong>in</strong><br />
Shams, Univ., Egypt, (1987).<br />
[115] P. Goovaerts. "Geostatistics for Natural <strong>Resources</strong> Evaluation", Oxford University Press, London,<br />
(1997).<br />
[116] P. Goovaerts. "Ord<strong>in</strong>ary cokrig<strong>in</strong>g revisited", Math. Geol., 30(1), pp. 21-42, (1998b).<br />
[117] P. Goovaerts. "Geostatistics <strong>in</strong> soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives". Geoderma 89, 1 –45,<br />
(1999).<br />
[118] P.M. Atk<strong>in</strong>son and P.J. Curran. “Choos<strong>in</strong>g an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigations”. Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 63, 1345-1351, (1997).<br />
[119] R. M. Parsons. "Bahariya and Farafra areas (<strong>New</strong> Valley Project, Western Desert of Egypt)", F<strong>in</strong>al<br />
Report. Egyptian General Desert Development Organization, U.A.R, (1962).<br />
[120] R. S. Dwivedi. "Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and the study of the effect of image scale on del<strong>in</strong>eation of salt affected<br />
soils <strong>in</strong> the Indo-Gangentic pla<strong>in</strong>s". Intern. Journal of Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 13: 1527-1536, (1992).<br />
[121] S. M. Lesch, D. J. Strauss and J. D. Rhoades. "Spatial predication of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity us<strong>in</strong>g electromagnetic<br />
<strong>in</strong>duction techniques. 1. Statistical predication models: A comparison of multiple l<strong>in</strong>ear regression and<br />
cokrig<strong>in</strong>g". Water Resour. Res. 31, 373-386, (1995). Soil and Plant Analysis Council. "Handbook on Reference<br />
Methods for Soil Analysis". Georgia University Station, Athens, Georgia, (1992).<br />
[122] W. Xu, T.T. Tran, R.M. Srivastava and A.G. Journel. "Integrat<strong>in</strong>g seismic data <strong>in</strong> reservoir model<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
the collocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g alternative", Society of Petroleum Eng<strong>in</strong>eers, paper no. 24,742, (1992).<br />
241
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF DRAINAGE AND PHOSPHATE<br />
RETENTION AND THEIR INTER RELATIONSHIP IN SOILS OF<br />
THE SOUTH-WESTERN REGION OF THE NORTH ISLAND,<br />
NEW ZEALAND<br />
A.Senarath*, A.S.Palmer and R.W.Tillman<br />
Soil & Earth Sciences, Institute of Natural <strong>Resources</strong>, Massey University, Palmerston North, <strong>New</strong> Zealand<br />
Abstract<br />
Spatial variability of dra<strong>in</strong>age, phosphate retention and their <strong>in</strong>ter-relationship was<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> soils developed from mixed quartzo-feldspathic and tephric parent material on<br />
river terraces <strong>in</strong> the south western region of the North Island . A series of dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps<br />
at 1:25,000, 1:10,000 and 1:5000 scales were produced for selected w<strong>in</strong>dow areas. The<br />
optimal soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale for captur<strong>in</strong>g soil dra<strong>in</strong>age variability and the usefulness of the<br />
soil maps for identify<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability of phosphate-retention was <strong>in</strong>vestigated. Soil<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age varies from well dra<strong>in</strong>ed through moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed to imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
and poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> a paddock scale (2-3 ha). In this study, soil dra<strong>in</strong>age had no<br />
topographic control which makes soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g extremely difficult. The reason for the short<br />
distance variability <strong>in</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>age is attributed to slight textural variations of the orig<strong>in</strong>al alluvial<br />
parent material. This gives rise to the formation of different soil structures, which <strong>in</strong> turn<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluences the hydraulic conductivity of the soil and results <strong>in</strong> variable dra<strong>in</strong>age properties<br />
which <strong>in</strong>fluence the clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy. There is a close relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age, Pretention<br />
and clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy. Well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have high P-retention and the clay fraction<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>s 12-13% allophane. Poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have low P-retention and the clay fraction<br />
has no allophane and conta<strong>in</strong>s ma<strong>in</strong>ly kandite. The relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and Pretention<br />
can be used to identify different P-retention areas on soil maps. In addition,<br />
1:10,000 is the most suitable soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale for practical farm plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Region.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
A detailed soil survey carried out at 1:25,000 scale <strong>in</strong> an area cover<strong>in</strong>g 2000 ha of terraced<br />
land near Kiwitea village <strong>in</strong> south western region of the North Island reveals that the soil<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age varies over the landscape at paddock scale (2-3 ha.) hav<strong>in</strong>g no topographic control<br />
[15]. Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age dictates suitability for cropp<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>tensive graz<strong>in</strong>g and sensitivity of<br />
land to a number of management practices so, soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps will be helpful <strong>in</strong> land<br />
use plann<strong>in</strong>g and management practices. Furthermore previous studies have shown that<br />
phosphate retention (P-retention) is related to soil dra<strong>in</strong>age; and <strong>in</strong> particular Parfitt et all[10]<br />
have shown that soil dra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>in</strong>fluences clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy and hence P-retention. Phosphate<br />
retention is an important soil attribute determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the amount of P needed to be applied for<br />
plant production. Soil maps are therefore valuable tools. Small scale exist<strong>in</strong>g soil maps<br />
published for the area at 1:250,000 [9] and at 1:63,360 [8] are clearly <strong>in</strong>capable of show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age variability on soil maps [15].<br />
The aim of this study is to <strong>in</strong>vestigate variability of soil dra<strong>in</strong>age status over the<br />
landscape, the best scale to map soil dra<strong>in</strong>age classes to aid land management decisions,<br />
242
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
ability of soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps to predict P-retention values and the reasons for short<br />
distance soil dra<strong>in</strong>age variability <strong>in</strong> the region..<br />
OVER VIEW OF THE STUDY AREA<br />
The study area, 2000 ha <strong>in</strong> extent, is located near Kiwitea village <strong>in</strong> the northern Manawatu<br />
district which is situated towards the south-western part of the North Island. The landform of<br />
the area is characterized by suites of river terraces at different elevations. Three major<br />
terraces can be identified with<strong>in</strong> the area; the river flats (180 m above msl) covered with<br />
recent alluvium (1000-2000 years BP) hav<strong>in</strong>g flat to gently slop<strong>in</strong>g topography, the<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate terrace (200-240 m above msl) covered with a mixture of old alluvium,<br />
colluvium, loess and tephra (
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
core sampler and were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to form a composite sample to determ<strong>in</strong>e P-retention. This<br />
is the methodology used <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zealand as part of a fertiliser recommendation for pastures.<br />
P-retention of soils was determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the method given by Saunders [13]<br />
and the results are expressed as percentage values. Eight quality control samples with known<br />
P-retention values were <strong>in</strong>corporated with<strong>in</strong> each 100-sample batch to monitor the possible<br />
variations that might arise among different batches. The same P-retention solution and<br />
vanado-molybdate solutions were used throughout the analysis of the samples for a fair<br />
comparison of results.<br />
Preparation of maps<br />
Dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps were generated by the “Surfer” programme (version 5.0) based on the<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t dra<strong>in</strong>age class data. The dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps (Figure 3A, 3B and 3C) are contour maps<br />
generated by the “Surfer” programme based on the po<strong>in</strong>t dra<strong>in</strong>age data. The programme<br />
generates values between the po<strong>in</strong>ts automatically by krig<strong>in</strong>g [14]. To generate maps,<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age classes were given numerical values of 100, 90, 60 and 30 for well dra<strong>in</strong>ed,<br />
moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed and poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed dra<strong>in</strong>age classes<br />
respectively [6]. When generat<strong>in</strong>g the contour pattern, the programme always generates a<br />
sequential dra<strong>in</strong>age pattern accord<strong>in</strong>g to this order. That is if a well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soil was found by<br />
auger<strong>in</strong>g to occur adjacent to a poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soil, the programme automatically <strong>in</strong>terpolates<br />
moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed and imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soil units between the two.A series of soil<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps were produced at 1:25,000 (observations on a 250 m grid), 1:10,000<br />
(observations on a 100 m grid) and 1:5000 (observations on a 50 m grid) scales<br />
Bulk density<br />
Bulk density measurements were made on core samples (with known volume) taken from<br />
each soil horizon. Soil samples were oven dried at 105° C until the weight became constant.<br />
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat)<br />
Saturated hydraulic conductivity measurements were made for undisturbed soil samples taken<br />
from each soil horizon, us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tact cores (150 mm height and 74 mm diameter) accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
the method of Klute [5].<br />
M<strong>in</strong>eralogical analysis<br />
M<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of soil samples were determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to methods described by<br />
Whitton and Churchman [18]. Allophane present <strong>in</strong> soils was determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
method of Parfitt [11] and Parfitt and Wilson [12]. Acid-oxalate extractable Si was<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the method of Blakemore et.al..[1].<br />
Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age variability<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The 1:250,000 scale soil map [9], of the study area portrays the 2000 m by 300 m w<strong>in</strong>dow<br />
area as well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Kawhatau silt loam (Table 1). A subsequent land resource map at<br />
1:63,360 scale [8] shows the area to be well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Kiwitea loam. Senarath [15] has<br />
244
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed why neither series name is appropriate for the soils on the Intermediate terrace, and<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduced new series. When the authors mapped the area at 1:25,000 scale it appears to<br />
encompass three different soil dra<strong>in</strong>age classes (Figure 1a); well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Coulter silt loam,<br />
moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Horoeka silt loam and imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Barrow silt loam (Figure<br />
Figure: 1a Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class map for the 2000 m by 300 m w<strong>in</strong>dow area (60 ha) when mapped at<br />
1:25,000 scale.<br />
Figure: 1b Grid sampl<strong>in</strong>g design (50 m by 50 m) with<strong>in</strong> blocks A, B and C established with<strong>in</strong> the 2000<br />
m by 300 m large w<strong>in</strong>dow area on imperfect, moderately well and well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soil units respectively<br />
mapped at 1:25,000 scale.<br />
Figure: 1c .Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps for the 300m by 250m w<strong>in</strong>dow (7.5 ha) areas when mapped at<br />
1:10,000 scale.<br />
Figure: 1d Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps for the 300 m by 250m blocks (7.5 ha) when mapped at 1:5,000<br />
scale.<br />
245
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Soil type <strong>New</strong> Zealand Classification<br />
USDA Soil Taxonomy<br />
[4]<br />
[16]<br />
Kawhatau silt loam Acidic Allophanic Brown Soil Andic Eutrudepts<br />
Kiwitea loam Typic Orthic Melanic Soil Eutrudepts<br />
Coulter silt loam Typic Orthic Allophanic Soil Dystrudepts<br />
Horoeka silt loam Typic Orthic Melanic Soil Andic Eutrudepts<br />
Barrow silt loam Mottled Immature Pallic Soil Aqualfs<br />
Table 1:Classification of soil types accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>New</strong> Zealand soil classification system and the<br />
USDA Soil Taxonomy.<br />
1a). When selected w<strong>in</strong>dow areas (blocks A, B and C) are mapped at 1:10,000 scale it<br />
becomes apparent that the relatively simple soil dra<strong>in</strong>age pattern represented <strong>in</strong> the 1:25,000<br />
scale map (Figure 1a) is much more complex (Figure 1cA, 1cB, and 1cC). Instead of a<br />
gradation of dra<strong>in</strong>age status from well dra<strong>in</strong>ed to imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils (Figure 1a), there<br />
is a mixture of well, moderately well and imperfectly or poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils present <strong>in</strong> each<br />
block with<strong>in</strong> close proximity. At least three different soil dra<strong>in</strong>age classes are identified <strong>in</strong><br />
each of the 300 m by 250 m blocks when mapped at 1:10,000 scale. Each of these blocks<br />
comprises only one soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class when mapped at 1:25,000 scale.<br />
When blocks A, B and C are mapped at 1:5000 scale, no new dra<strong>in</strong>age classes are found<br />
<strong>in</strong> any areas except for block B (Figure 1d B), but the dra<strong>in</strong>age class boundaries could be<br />
shown more accurately and it is apparent that the distribution of dra<strong>in</strong>age classes is more<br />
complex even than that revealed at 1:10,000 scale (Figure, 1d A, 1d B and 1d C). It is evident<br />
that when ground observation <strong>in</strong>tensity is <strong>in</strong>creased a more and more variable soil dra<strong>in</strong>age<br />
pattern can be observed.<br />
Soil-landscape relationship<br />
The problem associated with mapp<strong>in</strong>g of dra<strong>in</strong>age classes (soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>in</strong> this area is that it<br />
is difficult to establish an obvious relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and the topography of<br />
the land [15]. The land is essentially flat to gently undulat<strong>in</strong>g, with a gentle tilt to the west.<br />
There are some <strong>in</strong>stances where soils <strong>in</strong> local depressions, areas close to water bodies or<br />
streams are imperfectly or poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed, but that cannot be accepted as a general rule for<br />
the entire area.<br />
Phosphate retention (P-retention)<br />
The relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and P-retention was <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> detail us<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>in</strong>formation collected from blocks A, B and C on a 50 m <strong>in</strong>terval grid (Figure 1b).<br />
The comparison between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and the P-retention at each observation po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
that 100% of the poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils <strong>in</strong> the study area have low P-retention, whereas 100%<br />
of the well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have high P-retention. P-retention <strong>in</strong> imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils ranges<br />
from low through medium to high, but 69% of the observations have medium P-retention.<br />
Twenty two percent show high values and only 8% show low values. A majority of the<br />
moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have high P-retention (85%), whereas only 15% of the<br />
observations have medium P-retention values (Table 2).<br />
246
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Dra<strong>in</strong>age class<br />
Blocks A+B+C<br />
Total number of observations<br />
247<br />
Blocks A+B+C<br />
Percentage number of observations<br />
LP-ret MP-ret HP-ret LP-ret MP-ret HP-ret<br />
0 - 30% 31 – 60% 61 – 100% 0 -30% 31 – 60% 61 – 100%<br />
Poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed 9 0 0 100 0 0<br />
Imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed 4 34 11 82 69.4 22.4<br />
Moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed 0 5 29 0 14.7 85.3<br />
Well dra<strong>in</strong>ed 0 0 34 0 0 100<br />
Table 2:The relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age classes and P-retention classes.<br />
LP-ret = low P-retention; MP-ret = medium P-retention; HP-ret = high P-retention.<br />
From these observations it is evident that poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have low P-retention,<br />
imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have medium P-retention and moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed and well<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have high P-retention. Therefore, the variability <strong>in</strong> P-retention with<strong>in</strong> paddocks<br />
can be attributed to the variability of soil dra<strong>in</strong>age. The relationship has been suspected but<br />
never before demonstrated for <strong>New</strong> Zealand soils.<br />
Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age, phosphate retention and clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy<br />
The sand fractions of both the well dra<strong>in</strong>ed and imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils on the <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
terrace conta<strong>in</strong> volcanic glass (Table 3). But the clay fraction of the well-dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>s allophane whereas the clay fraction of the imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils conta<strong>in</strong>s no<br />
allophane. The P-retention also varies accord<strong>in</strong>gly (Table 3).<br />
Soil Type<br />
Sand fraction Clay fraction<br />
Quartz Feldspar Volcanic.glassKandite<br />
Allophane P-<br />
% % %<br />
% % Ret.%<br />
Coulter silt Well dra<strong>in</strong>ed 41 32 13<br />
loam<br />
16 10 86<br />
Barrow silt Imperfectly 54 29 8<br />
loam dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
31 0 50<br />
Table 3.The relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age, P-retention and clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy of the topsoil of two<br />
of the soils (Senarath, 2003).<br />
As mentioned <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>troduction, Parfitt et al. [10] showed that clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy is<br />
related to soil dra<strong>in</strong>age. It is well known <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zealand that topsoils dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />
allophane have high P-retention while those dom<strong>in</strong>ated by kandite have low P-retention.<br />
These results show that the average P-retention of the topsoil is also <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age of the whole profile.<br />
Soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale and variability of P-retention<br />
The P-retention values of the topsoil samples collected from the study area range from 15%<br />
to 86% [15]. These values <strong>in</strong>dicate that there is considerable variability <strong>in</strong> P-retention with<strong>in</strong><br />
the soils, rang<strong>in</strong>g from low to high [13]. When the area is mapped at 1:25,000 scale, the<br />
ranges of P-retention with<strong>in</strong> the imperfectly, moderately well and well dra<strong>in</strong>ed map units, are<br />
15-72%, 23-86% and 34-86% respectively (Table 4). These figures show that the variability
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
with<strong>in</strong> each map unit at this scale has not reduced significantly compared to the total range of<br />
P-retention (15 – 86%).<br />
Map unit<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale 1:25,000<br />
Phosphate Retention<br />
Range Mean STD CV%<br />
Ohakea silt loam (PD) No mapp<strong>in</strong>g unit at 1:25,000 scale<br />
Barrow silt loam (ImD) 15 - 72 44.1 14.4 32.6<br />
Horoeka silt loam (MWD) 23 - 86 65.1 14.2 21.8<br />
Coulter silt loam (WD) 34 - 86 71 12.4 17.4<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale 1:10,000<br />
Ohakea silt loam 22 - 44 28 6.7 23.9<br />
Barrow silt loam 15 - 73 46.2 13.5 29.2<br />
Horoeka silt loam 23 - 86 64.8 13.8 21.2<br />
Coulter silt loam 54 - 86 75.9 6.1 8<br />
Mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale 1:5,000<br />
Ohakea silt loam 16 - 52 27.5 8.3 22.3<br />
Barrow silt loam 15 - 78 48.5 14 28.8<br />
Horoeka silt loam 32 - 85 67.9 10.4 15.3<br />
Coulter silt loam 54 - 86 76.7 5.9 7.6<br />
Table 4:The variability of P-retention with<strong>in</strong> the soil map units when mapped at three different scales.<br />
(Senarath, 2003).<br />
STD = standard deviation; CV% = coefficient of variation; PD = poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed; ImD = imperfectly<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>ed; MWD = moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed; WD = well dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
When the mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale is <strong>in</strong>creased from 1:25,000 to 1:10,000 a new poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
map unit (Ohakea silt loam) with less variable P-retention values (22 – 44%) is added to the<br />
soil map (Table 4). The range of P-retention values <strong>in</strong> the Barrow (15 – 73%) and Horoeka<br />
(23 – 86%) map units changed only slightly. However, there is a considerable change of<br />
range <strong>in</strong> P-retention with<strong>in</strong> the Coulter map unit (from 34 – 86% to 54 – 86%). The coefficient<br />
of variation (CV) <strong>in</strong>dicates that Barrow and Horoeka map units mapped at 1:10,000<br />
scale are slightly less variable compared to that of 1:25,000 scale. CV of P-retention slightly<br />
reduced <strong>in</strong> Barrow (from 32.6 to 29.2%) and Horoeka (from 21.8 to 21.2%) silt loams<br />
whereas CV considerably reduced <strong>in</strong> Coulter silt loams (from 17.4% to 8%) (Table 4).<br />
When the mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale <strong>in</strong>creased from 1:10,000 to 1:5,000, the variability of Pretention<br />
very slightly decreased <strong>in</strong> Ohakea , Barrow, Horoeka and Coulter silt loam map<br />
units (Table 4).<br />
Therefore map units at all scales have a considerable range <strong>in</strong> P-retention, but their<br />
mean P-retention values <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> an orderly manner with improv<strong>in</strong>g dra<strong>in</strong>age.<br />
Soil maps at 1:25,000 scale are of little use <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g different areas of P-retention<br />
<strong>in</strong> the field. Dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps at 1:10,000 scale can be used to identify low and high Pretention<br />
areas successfully, but always some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty exists with<strong>in</strong> moderately well and<br />
imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed areas. Although 1:5000 scale maps are more precise and less variable,<br />
there is no advantage <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong>stead of 1:10,000 maps when the added cost of<br />
produc<strong>in</strong>g the maps at the larger scale is taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />
248
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Genesis of soil dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions<br />
Soil texture is a property that is <strong>in</strong>itially <strong>in</strong>herited from its parent material, so variations <strong>in</strong><br />
soil texture are presumed to reflect variations <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial deposition overpr<strong>in</strong>ted by changes due<br />
to weather<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The slight textural variations <strong>in</strong> the parent material probably effected slight variations<br />
<strong>in</strong> soil structural development. In the soils of the study area, silt loam soil textures are<br />
associated with nutty structure while silty clay loam; clay loam or clay soil textures are<br />
associated with blocky structures (Table 5 and 6).<br />
Horizon Depth (cm) Field -texture Structure Macro-<br />
Porosity (%)<br />
249<br />
Ksat<br />
(mm hr –1 )<br />
Ap 0-20 silt loam moderate f<strong>in</strong>e to medium nutty 6 to 7 8<br />
Bw1 20-65 silt loam moderate f<strong>in</strong>e to medium nutty 11 8<br />
Bw2 65-95 silt loam moderate f<strong>in</strong>e to medium nutty<br />
and moderate medium blocky<br />
2Ab 95-125 clay loam moderate medium to coarse<br />
blocky<br />
8 4.3<br />
5 4.6<br />
Table 5:The physical properties of a representative profile of well dra<strong>in</strong>ed Coulter silt loam related to<br />
water movement <strong>in</strong> soil (Senarath, 2003).<br />
Horizon Field-texture Structure Macro- Ksat<br />
depth (cm)<br />
porosity (%) (mm hr –1 )<br />
Ap 0-21 silt loam Strong f<strong>in</strong>e to medium nutty 4 to 8 6.4 to 14<br />
Bg1 21-34 silty clay loam strong very f<strong>in</strong>e, f<strong>in</strong>e and medium<br />
nutty and moderate medium blocky<br />
Bg2 34-65 f<strong>in</strong>e sandy clay loam strong medium to coarse<br />
nutty<br />
Bg3 65-82 clay loam moderate medium to coarse<br />
blocky<br />
12 0.9<br />
9 7.6<br />
3 0.8<br />
Table 6:The physical properties of a representative profile of imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed Barrow silt loam<br />
related to water movement <strong>in</strong> soil (Senarath, 2003).<br />
It is hypothesised that the differences <strong>in</strong> soil structure largely caused the differences <strong>in</strong><br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age status. The hydraulic conductivity of a soil is directly related to its porosity, more<br />
importantly the macro porosity. The shape and the size of the soil structural units has a<br />
noticeable affect on the space between them [2,3] Blocky structure is more closely fitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
than nutty structure hence water can move more readily along structural faces of soils hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
nutty structure.<br />
Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) values <strong>in</strong> the Bg1 and Bg3 horizons (0.9 and<br />
0.8 mm/hr) are very slow <strong>in</strong> the imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed Barrow soils (Table 6). This impedes<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>in</strong> the whole profile. K sat values for the other two horizons are approximately same<br />
as that of the Coulter soil (Table 5). Ksat values range from moderately slow to very slow <strong>in</strong><br />
soils hav<strong>in</strong>g blocky structures [3] Although macro porosity is more or less similar to that of<br />
Coulter soils (Table 5), they may not be <strong>in</strong>terconnected with<strong>in</strong> soil aggregates, because
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
blocky structure is rather compact compared to nutty structure [3]. Therefore, water moves<br />
very slowly with<strong>in</strong> Barrow soils, creat<strong>in</strong>g imperfect dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions.<br />
The soil textures of Coulter soils are silt loam and the structures are nutty. The<br />
structural units are not closely packed as expla<strong>in</strong>ed above. Therefore, water can move<br />
through soils more rapidly and hence soils are well dra<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
From these observations it is possible that the dra<strong>in</strong>age variability of soils with<strong>in</strong> short<br />
distances on the <strong>in</strong>termediate terrace may be associated with the slight textural variations of<br />
the orig<strong>in</strong>al alluvial parent materials from which the soils are formed, and the result<strong>in</strong>g<br />
development of contrast<strong>in</strong>g soil structure. These subtle changes <strong>in</strong> texture have been<br />
subsequently masked by weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g clay formation and changes <strong>in</strong> clay<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogy.<br />
Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions <strong>in</strong>fluence clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Parfitt et al. [10]<br />
weather<strong>in</strong>g of rhyolitic tephra is controlled by Si <strong>in</strong> soil solution. When Si concentration <strong>in</strong><br />
the soil solution is low (possibly < 10 µg cm -3 ), due to leach<strong>in</strong>g, allophane is formed from<br />
volcanic glass whereas if Si concentration is high (possibly >10 µg cm -3 ), <strong>in</strong> the soil solution<br />
due to impeded dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions, halloysite is formed. The presence of allophane <strong>in</strong> the<br />
clay fraction of Coulter silt loam can be attributed to weather<strong>in</strong>g of volcanic glass under welldra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
conditions. Under well-dra<strong>in</strong>ed conditions Si is leached from the profile and<br />
allophane forms. Imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed Barrow silt loam conta<strong>in</strong>s no allophane <strong>in</strong> the clay<br />
fraction due to Si not be<strong>in</strong>g leached from the profile, and kandite m<strong>in</strong>erals (kaol<strong>in</strong>ite +<br />
halloysite) form <strong>in</strong>stead.<br />
The variability <strong>in</strong> P-retention with<strong>in</strong> a paddock should have a significant <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />
the amount of phosphate fertilizer applied by farmers. If fertilised at a rate suited to the low<br />
P-retention soil, then the high P-retention soils <strong>in</strong> the paddock will be deficient <strong>in</strong> P and will<br />
have suboptimal productivity. If land is fertilised accord<strong>in</strong>g to the high P-retention soil, then<br />
surplus P will be applied to the low P-retention soil which is uneconomic and may <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
the rate of loss of P to waterways. Thus it is clear from both an economic and an<br />
environmental po<strong>in</strong>t of view that soils with<strong>in</strong> different P-retention classes should be treated<br />
differently. Therefore, identification of low, medium and high P-retention areas <strong>in</strong> the<br />
landscape and manag<strong>in</strong>g them accord<strong>in</strong>gly is important. Variable rate of application of<br />
phosphate fertiliser through precision agriculture is an obvious solution, if the areas of low,<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediate and high P-retention <strong>in</strong> a paddock can be identified. This is most cheaply and<br />
efficiently achieved by soil survey recognis<strong>in</strong>g dra<strong>in</strong>age classes.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
• Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age properties <strong>in</strong> the study area vary from well dra<strong>in</strong>ed through moderately well<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>ed to imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed and poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>in</strong> the paddock scale.<br />
• The poor relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and the topography of the landscape poses<br />
difficulties for conventional soil survey.<br />
• There is a strong relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age, phosphate retention and clay<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogy <strong>in</strong> soils developed from tephra mixed parent materials. Well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils<br />
have high P-retention and the clay fraction conta<strong>in</strong>s allophane whereas poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
soils have low P-retention and the clay fraction conta<strong>in</strong>s no allophane but ma<strong>in</strong>ly kandite.<br />
• The positive relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and P-retention can be used to identify<br />
different P-retention areas on soil maps.<br />
• 1:10,000 is the optimal soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale for practical farm plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this area.<br />
250
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
• Short distance dra<strong>in</strong>age variability has a relationship to the textural variations of the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al alluvial parent material which gives rise to the formation of different soil<br />
structures and different pathways of weather<strong>in</strong>g. This <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>in</strong>fluences the hydraulic<br />
conductivity of the soil and results <strong>in</strong> variable dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions and different Pretention<br />
values.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] L.C.Blakemore, P.L.Searle, B.K.Daly. Methods for chemical analysis of soils, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau<br />
Scientific Report no.80, .<strong>New</strong> Zealand Society of Soil Science, Lower Hutt, <strong>New</strong> Zealand, (1987).<br />
[2] E.Griffiths, T.H.Webb, J.P.C.Watt, P.L.S<strong>in</strong>gleton. “Development of soil morphological descriptors to<br />
improve field estimation of hydraulic conductivity”, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 37, PP. 971-982,<br />
(1999).<br />
[3] E.Griffiths. Interpretation of soil morphology for assess<strong>in</strong>g moisture movement and storage, <strong>New</strong> Zealand<br />
Soil Bureau Scientific Report, 74, (1985).<br />
[4] A.E.Hewitt. <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Classification, DSIR, <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> Scientific Report No.19,(1992).<br />
[5] A.Klute. Methods of soil analysis part 1, American Society of Agronomy Inc., Soil Science Society of<br />
America, Inc., PP. 694-696, (1986).<br />
[6] J.D.G Milne, B.Clayden, P.L.S<strong>in</strong>gleton, A.D.Wilson. Soil Description Handbook, L<strong>in</strong>coln, Canterbury,<br />
<strong>New</strong> Zealand, (1995).<br />
[7] <strong>New</strong> Zealand Meteorological Service. Summaries of climatological observations to 1980, <strong>New</strong> Zealand<br />
Meteorological Service Miscellaneous Publication 177, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport, (1983).<br />
[8] <strong>New</strong> Zealand <strong>Land</strong> Resource Inventory Work sheet, Feild<strong>in</strong>g N.144. The National Water and Soil<br />
Conservation Organization, Water and Soil Division, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Works and Development, (1979).<br />
[9] <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau General survey of the soils of North Island, <strong>New</strong> Zealand, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil<br />
Bureau Bullet<strong>in</strong> 5, (1954).<br />
[10] R.L.Parfitt, M.Saigusa, D.N.Eden. “Soil development processes <strong>in</strong> an Aqualf-Ochrept sequence from loess<br />
with admixtures of tephra”, <strong>New</strong> Zealand .Journal of Soil Science, 35, PP. 625-640,.(1984).<br />
[11] R.L.Parfitt. Towards understand<strong>in</strong>g soil m<strong>in</strong>eralogy III, Notes on allophane. <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau<br />
Laboratory Report CM 10, (1986).<br />
[12] R.L.Parfitt, A.D.Wilson. Estimation of allophane and halloysite <strong>in</strong> three sequences of volcanic soils, <strong>New</strong><br />
Zealand, Catena Supplement 7, PP. 1-8, (1985).<br />
[13] W.M.H.Saunders. “Phosphate retention by <strong>New</strong> Zealand soils and its relationship to free sesquioxides,<br />
organic matter and other soil properties”, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, PP. 30-57, (1965).<br />
[14] A.Senarath, G.Arnold, A.S.Palmer, R.W.Tillman, M.P.Tuohy. Use of geostatistics <strong>in</strong> soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
precision agricultural management, In precision tools for improv<strong>in</strong>g land management (Eds LD Currie and P<br />
Loganathan).Occasional report No.14.Fertiliser and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston<br />
North, PP. 161-171, (2001).<br />
[15] A.Senarath. Soil spatial variability <strong>in</strong> northern Manawatu, <strong>New</strong> Zealand, Unpublished PhD thesis, Massey<br />
University, Palmerston North, <strong>New</strong> Zealand, (2003).<br />
[16] Soil Survey Staff Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Mak<strong>in</strong>g and Interpret<strong>in</strong>g Soil<br />
Surveys., United State Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook Number 436, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton D.C.,<br />
(1999).<br />
[17] N.H.Taylor, I.Pohlen. Classification of <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soils, In Soils of <strong>New</strong> Zealand, Part 1 (Ed Jean Luke)<br />
PP. 15-46, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau Bullet<strong>in</strong>. 26(1), (1968).<br />
[18] J.S.Whitton, G.J.Churchman. Standard methods for m<strong>in</strong>eral analysis of soil survey samples for<br />
characterization and classification <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zealand, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific Report 79, (1987).<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
The authors are grateful to the technical staff of the Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre,<br />
Massey University, Palmerston North particularly Ian Furkert, Bob Toes, James Hanly and<br />
Lance Currie for help <strong>in</strong> the field and laboratory experiments and farmers of the Kiwitea<br />
study area for their co-operation dur<strong>in</strong>g the soil survey and field experiments.<br />
251
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
WORKSHOP Theme: Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
Convenors: P. F<strong>in</strong>ke, M. Van Meirvenne, R. Goossens<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
This workshop focused on current and develop<strong>in</strong>g techniques for soil and terra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory to<br />
meet requests for the construction, updat<strong>in</strong>g and upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems. The<br />
papers were grouped <strong>in</strong>to three perspectives:<br />
1. Soil (attribute) mapp<strong>in</strong>g at regional and national scales<br />
The keynote by F<strong>in</strong>ke addressed the quantitative soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g methods co<strong>in</strong>ed as digital soil<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g methods. Based on the overview it was concluded that these methods have a great<br />
potential for mapp<strong>in</strong>g soil types and soil attributes <strong>in</strong> scarcely visited areas if ancillary data<br />
like DTM and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g images are available. As these methods give an <strong>in</strong>dication of<br />
the precision of their output, they allow for a motivated choice on the position<strong>in</strong>g of future<br />
field work. Because of their complexity, applucation of these methods require an expert. It<br />
was stressed that the result<strong>in</strong>g maps and data bases are as reliable as the (amount and quality)<br />
of the data used as <strong>in</strong>put.<br />
The paper by Wandahwa et al. treated the issue of how to obta<strong>in</strong> soil characteristics for land<br />
evaluation <strong>in</strong> a case study from Kenyia. A comparison was made between the approaches<br />
“calculate first, <strong>in</strong>terpolate later” and its opposite. It was found that soil characteristics<br />
respond differently when subjected to <strong>in</strong>terpolation. Conclusion was, that a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />
landscape and soil characteristic maps derived from <strong>in</strong>terpolation gave better distribution of<br />
suitability classes than the approach based directly on soil units. The study successfully<br />
demonstrates the potential of us<strong>in</strong>g GPS and GIS for land evaluation.<br />
2. Gis and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The keynote by Goossens highlighted a number of important developments <strong>in</strong> remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for data users worldwide. It was concluded that <strong>in</strong> the near future, 3-D visualisation of remote<br />
sens<strong>in</strong>g images will become accessible s<strong>in</strong>ce data and techniques are available and costs are<br />
low (e.g. the Corona images at $18 / 14*188 km). Another trend is that ground resolutions are<br />
becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly f<strong>in</strong>er (± 1.2-1.8 m to near the physical threshold of 30 cm). Thirdly,<br />
the emergence of hyperspectral imagery (from the Chris-Proba satellite) was mentioned.<br />
The paper by El-Badawi on mapp<strong>in</strong>g soils <strong>in</strong> southeastern Egypt <strong>in</strong> difficult field<br />
circumstances demonstrated that aerial photo <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with remote<br />
sens<strong>in</strong>g is a powerful method to make a physiographic soil map.<br />
252
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
3. Soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g at field scale<br />
The keynote by Van Meivenne addressed some developments <strong>in</strong> soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and proximal<br />
sens<strong>in</strong>g with applications <strong>in</strong> precision agriculture. The measurement precision of position (by<br />
GPS) and crop yield has greatly improved over recent years, is operational and commercially<br />
available. One bottleneck is the characterization of the with<strong>in</strong> field variability of crop<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g variables, especially soil. Usage of soil sensors based on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of<br />
electromagnetic <strong>in</strong>duction (EMI) offers a promis<strong>in</strong>g alternative to detailed soil map<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensive sampl<strong>in</strong>g schemes. In the context of precision agriculture, it was concluded, that the<br />
with<strong>in</strong>-field soil variability is often underestimated, especially of deeper soil horizons. There<br />
is a potential for improved crop management with a reduced environmental pressure.<br />
253
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
WORKSHOP THEME E – SOIL PROCESSES AND ANALYTICAL<br />
TECHNIQUES<br />
Sub-theme : Development <strong>in</strong> soil genesis and m<strong>in</strong>eralogy<br />
Van Ranst E., Mees F.<br />
Paper/poster : Impact of acid deposition on cation leach<strong>in</strong>g from Mt. Talang<br />
airfall ash – D. Fiantis, Nelson, E. Van Ranst, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong><br />
Paper/poster : Stone l<strong>in</strong>es and weather<strong>in</strong>g profiles of ferrallitic soils <strong>in</strong><br />
Northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a – Morrás H., Moretti L., Piccolo G., Zech, W.<br />
Paper/poster : Pedogenesis along a hillslope traverse <strong>in</strong> the upper Afram<br />
bas<strong>in</strong>, Ghana – T. Adjei-Gyapong, E. Boateng, C. Dela Dedzoe, W.R.<br />
Effland, M.D. Mays, J.K. Seneya<br />
Paper/poster : Influence of titanomagnetite on dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate<br />
(DCB) and oxalate extractions <strong>in</strong> weathered dolerite – C.G. Algoe, E. Van<br />
Ranst, G. Stoops<br />
Sub-theme : Developments <strong>in</strong> soil micromorphology<br />
G. Stoops, V. Marcel<strong>in</strong>o, F. Mees<br />
Paper/poster : Spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g of dolerite <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame : evidence from<br />
physical, chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical data – C.G. Algoe, E. Van Ranst, G.<br />
Stoops<br />
Paper/poster : Micromorphological characteristics of andisols <strong>in</strong> West Java,<br />
Indonesia – Mahfud Arif<strong>in</strong>, R<strong>in</strong>a Devnita<br />
Paper/poster : Micromorphological features of some soils <strong>in</strong> the Afram<br />
pla<strong>in</strong>s (Ghana, West Africa) – M.D. Mays, W.R. Effland, T. Adjei-Gyapong,<br />
C.D. Dedzoe, E. Boateng<br />
Conclusions<br />
254
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL GENESIS AND<br />
MINERALOGY<br />
Overview of latest research <strong>in</strong> soil genesis and soil m<strong>in</strong>eralogy conducted at the<br />
Department of Geology and Soil Science<br />
Van Ranst E. & Mees F.<br />
Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<br />
The research related to m<strong>in</strong>eral weather<strong>in</strong>g/formation and soil processes is concentrated with<strong>in</strong><br />
three big research programs that are still go<strong>in</strong>g on:<br />
(1) Interaction between atmospheric deposition, soil acidification, and m<strong>in</strong>eral weather<strong>in</strong>g, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
soil solution analyses, laboratory and field experiments;<br />
(2) M<strong>in</strong>eralogy and chemistry of variable charge soils to determ<strong>in</strong>e their constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />
management options; and<br />
(3) Formation of authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> atmospheric conditions, studied by means of an analysis<br />
of regional variations.<br />
In the first research programme a fortnightly monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the chemical composition of the<br />
bulk precipitation, throughfall, humus water and soil water at three depths <strong>in</strong> 6 forest ecosystems<br />
<strong>in</strong> Flanders (N-Belgium) is carried out from 1993 onwards. The selected forest plots, with soils<br />
rang<strong>in</strong>g from sand to silt of Pleistocene orig<strong>in</strong>, belong to the forest condition monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programme that started <strong>in</strong> Flanders <strong>in</strong> 1987, as part of the ‘International Co-operative<br />
Programme (ICP) on the Assessment and Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of Air Pollution Effects on Forests’ under<br />
the Convention of Long-range transboundary Air pollution (UN/ECE) and the European Scheme<br />
on the Protection of Forests aga<strong>in</strong>st Atmospheric Pollution. Based on chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical<br />
analyses a methodology to assess the total acid-neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g capacity (ANC) of forest soils has<br />
been developed and applied on the forest floor and the m<strong>in</strong>eral topsoil <strong>in</strong> the 6 forest ecosystems.<br />
As the total ANC is clearly related to the soil texture class, the exist<strong>in</strong>g soil maps are ideal<br />
documents to assess the sensitivity of the soils for acidic pollution. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the average acid<br />
loads on the plots a danger for further alum<strong>in</strong>ization of the organic complexes would be real.<br />
Although s<strong>in</strong>ce these analyses did not consider the neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g effect occurr<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g turn-over<br />
of organic matter, the actual outlook is probably less dramatic. The chemical analyses of the<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g programme proved that previous and present weather<strong>in</strong>g is predom<strong>in</strong>antly due to<br />
synthesis of HNO3 out of organic rema<strong>in</strong>s and subsequent reaction with silicates with release of<br />
Al 3+ and acidity. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of the synthesis of HNO3 on the nutrient replenishment <strong>in</strong> these<br />
forest soils has been studied as well. The weather<strong>in</strong>g of soil m<strong>in</strong>erals was studied further <strong>in</strong> detail<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g different approaches(batch-, column and field experiments). The laboratory experiments,<br />
performed under different conditions (acid type and strength, temperature, solid:liquid ratio, etc.)<br />
served to better understand the ability and mechanisms of different m<strong>in</strong>erals (hectorite, biotite,<br />
vermiculite, etc.) to neutralize acidity. The field experiments, based on the test m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />
technique, were set up under the hypothesis that a residence of the m<strong>in</strong>erals (trioctahedral<br />
vermiculite and glauconite) <strong>in</strong> the soil dur<strong>in</strong>g 4 years, would result <strong>in</strong> the extraction of quantiable<br />
amounts of structural elements, render<strong>in</strong>g it possible to deduct the <strong>in</strong> situ weather<strong>in</strong>g rates. The<br />
255
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
test-m<strong>in</strong>eral(vermiculite) technique was used to dist<strong>in</strong>guish simple acidolysis from acidocomplexolysis<br />
<strong>in</strong> a Podzol profile.<br />
In the second research programme a great deal of time and effort is spent to study the<br />
chemical behaviour of variable charge m<strong>in</strong>erals and soils, ma<strong>in</strong>ly highly weathered soils (Oxisols<br />
and Ultisols) of the tropics and volcanic ash soils (Andisols), to elucidate different aspects of<br />
their behaviour. Variable charge soils (VCS) are heterogenous charge systems. The coexistence<br />
and <strong>in</strong>teractions of soil particles and colloids with net opposite surface charges confer a quite<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g, and much more complex pattern with respect to soil physical and chemical behaviour<br />
compared to homogeneously charged soil systems of temperate regions. Different methods<br />
(NH4OAc, Charge F<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t, Compulsive Exchange) to determ<strong>in</strong>e the electrochemical<br />
properties, <strong>in</strong> particular ion exchange capacities, have been tested to assess variation <strong>in</strong><br />
exchange capacity with respect to the composition of the colloid fraction. The application of Casilicate<br />
slags and calc-alkal<strong>in</strong>e pyroclastic materials has been used to <strong>in</strong>crease the cation<br />
exchange capacity (CEC) of highly weathered VCS. Research us<strong>in</strong>g other natural amendments<br />
on sandy soils is go<strong>in</strong>g on at moment. Special emphasis is given to the study of Andisols on<br />
volcanic ash, ma<strong>in</strong>ly from the Indonesian islands, Java and Sumatra. The physico-chemical and<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of ash soils along the Sunda arc were characterized <strong>in</strong> order to assess<br />
the <strong>in</strong>fluence of the change of parent material on differ<strong>in</strong>g soil characteristics and on surface<br />
reactivity with emphasis on short-range-order m<strong>in</strong>eral constituents and active Al and Fe<br />
compounds on fluoride and phosphate sorption. This study provided a scientific basis for (1)<br />
localiz<strong>in</strong>g the soils which are less likely to be deficient <strong>in</strong> Ca and Mg under yearly application of<br />
acidify<strong>in</strong>g nitrogenous fertilizers and (2) propos<strong>in</strong>g separate regions <strong>in</strong> terms of P-fertilizer<br />
strategy for susta<strong>in</strong>able crop production.<br />
The aim of the third research programme is to contribute to a fundamental understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of the factors and mechanisms that control the formation of authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals at earth-surface<br />
conditions. Specific objectives are (i) an evaluation of the conditions of formation of authigenic<br />
m<strong>in</strong>erals for <strong>in</strong>dividual lake bas<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> selected study areas, and (ii) the creation of a regional<br />
synthesis for each study area, relat<strong>in</strong>g variations <strong>in</strong> the nature and mode of occurrence of<br />
authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals to regional patterns and factors. One of both regions selected for this research<br />
project is a zone with temporary and dry salt lakes <strong>in</strong> a karst area of the Ebro Bas<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> northern<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> (Los Monegros), with e.g. abundant gypsum, magnesite, halite and Mg-bear<strong>in</strong>g sulfates.<br />
The second study area is a region with dry lake bas<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the southwestern Kalahari, Namibia,<br />
which conta<strong>in</strong> smectite, sepiolite, dolomite, thenardite and various other authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> two<br />
previously studied bas<strong>in</strong>s. The lakes <strong>in</strong> both regions represent a series of ma<strong>in</strong>ly groundwater-fed<br />
flow-through bas<strong>in</strong>s. Both study areas conta<strong>in</strong> a group of about 20 isolated lake bas<strong>in</strong>s,<br />
characterised by (i) the presence of authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals belong<strong>in</strong>g to different m<strong>in</strong>eral groups, (ii)<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral associations between the bas<strong>in</strong>s, and (iii) important variations with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual bas<strong>in</strong>s, which represent a set of characterstics that renders the study areas ideally suited<br />
for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the conditions of authigenic m<strong>in</strong>eral formation. These conditions will <strong>in</strong>itially be<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>ed for each <strong>in</strong>dividual lake bas<strong>in</strong>s, consider<strong>in</strong>g various modes of m<strong>in</strong>eral formation<br />
(synsedimentary vs pedogenic, direct precipitation vs transformation) and the processes and factors<br />
that control m<strong>in</strong>eral distribution patterns (e.g. lateral and vertical groundwater movement, flood<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
groundwater composition, groundmass characteristics, porosity, lithological discont<strong>in</strong>uities).<br />
Subsequently, a regional synthesis for each study area will be made, allow<strong>in</strong>g the development of a<br />
model for authigenic m<strong>in</strong>eral formation, <strong>in</strong> relation to the evolution of groundwater composition<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the region, modified by local factors. Samples were collected <strong>in</strong> both study areas <strong>in</strong> the<br />
256
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
course of 2005. Analysis of the available samples is <strong>in</strong> progress, us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray diffraction methods,<br />
th<strong>in</strong> section observations and chemical analyses.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[123] D. Fiantis, E. Van Ranst, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, I. Fauziah, S. Zauyah. "Effect of calcium silicate and<br />
superphosphate application on surface charge properties of volcanic soils from west Sumatra, Indonesia". Comm.<br />
Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 33: 1887-1900, (2002).<br />
[124] P. Kanyankogote, E. Van Ranst, A. Verdoodt, G. Baert. "Effet de la lave trachybasaltique broyée sur les<br />
propriétés chimiques de sols de climat tropical humide", Etude et Gestion des Sols, 12(4):301-311, (2005).<br />
[125] O.T. Mandir<strong>in</strong>gana, P.N.S. Mnkeni, Z. Mkile, W. Van Averbeke, E. Van Ranst, H. Verplancke.<br />
"M<strong>in</strong>eralogy and fertility status of selected soils of the Eastern Cape Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, South Africa". Comm. In : Soil<br />
Science and Plant Analysis, 36:2431-2446, (2005).<br />
[126] F. Mees. “Salt m<strong>in</strong>eral distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> soils of the Otjomongwa pan, Namibia”. Catena, 54:425-<br />
437, (2003).<br />
[127] F. Mees, M. De Dapper. “Vertical variations <strong>in</strong> bassanite distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> near-surface sediments,<br />
southern Egypt”. Sedimentary Geology, 181:225-229, (2005).<br />
[128] F. Mees, A. S<strong>in</strong>ger. “Surface crusts on soils/sediments of the southern Aral Sea bas<strong>in</strong>, Uzbekistan”.<br />
Geoderma, <strong>in</strong> press.<br />
[129] F. Mees, G. Stoops, E. Van Ranst, R. Paepe, E. Van Overloop. "The nature of zeolite occurrences <strong>in</strong><br />
deposits of the Olduvai Bas<strong>in</strong>, northern Tanzania", Clays and Clay M<strong>in</strong>erals, 53(6) : 659-673, (2005).<br />
[130] J. Neirynck, E. Van Ranst, P. Roskams, N. Lust. "Impact of decreas<strong>in</strong>g throughfall depositions on soil<br />
solution chemistry at coniferous monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites <strong>in</strong> northern Belgium", Forest Ecology & Management, 160:127-<br />
142, (2002).<br />
[131] N.P. Qafoku, E. Van Ranst, A.Noble, G. Baert. "M<strong>in</strong>eralogy and chemistry of variable charge soils. In :<br />
The Encyclopedia of Soil Science (Ed. : R. Lal), M. Dekker, Inc. (ISBN:0-8247-0846-6)", Onl<strong>in</strong>e Published:1-8,<br />
(2003).<br />
[132] N.P. Qafoku, E. Van Ranst, A.Noble, G. Baert. "Variable charge soils : their m<strong>in</strong>eralogy, chemistry and<br />
management", Advances <strong>in</strong> Agronomy, 84:159-215, (2004).<br />
[133] G. Stoops, E.Van Ranst, K. Verbeek. "Pedology of soils with<strong>in</strong> the spray zone of the Victoria Falls<br />
(Zimbabwe)", Catena, 46:63-83, (2001).<br />
[134] E. Van Ranst, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck. "Evaluation of ferrolysis <strong>in</strong> soil formation", European Journal of Soil<br />
Science, 53:513-519, (2002).<br />
[135] E. Van Ranst, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck. "Synthesis of HNO3 out of organic matter and its <strong>in</strong>fluence on weather<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />
: Soil Science : Confront<strong>in</strong>g <strong>New</strong> Realities <strong>in</strong> the 21 st Century", Transactions 17 e World Congress of Soil Science<br />
(CD-Rom), Bangkok, Thailand : 285, 1-10, (2002).<br />
[136] E. Van Ranst, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck, K. Van Rompaey. "Synthesis of HNO3 from organic matter and its <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
on nutrient replenishment <strong>in</strong> forest soils", Environmental Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Assessment, 98:409-420, (2004).<br />
[137] Van Ranst, E., De Con<strong>in</strong>ck, F., Roskams, P., V<strong>in</strong>devogel, N. "Acid-neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g capacity of forest floor and<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral topsoil <strong>in</strong> Flemish forests (North Belgium)", Forest Ecology and Management, 166:45-53, (2002).<br />
[138] E. Van Ranst, S.R. Utami, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>. "Andisols on volcanic ash from Java Island, Indonesia :<br />
Physico-chemical properties and classification", Soil Science, 167:68-79, (2002).<br />
[139] E. Van Ranst, S.R. Utami, J. Vanderdeelen, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>. "Surface reactivity of Andisols on volcanic<br />
ash along the Sunda arc cross<strong>in</strong>g Java Island, Indonesia", Geoderma, 123:193-203, (2004).<br />
[140] K. Van Rompaey, E. Van Ranst, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck, N. V<strong>in</strong>devogel. "Dissolution characteristics of hectorite <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>organic acids". Applied Clay Science, 21 : 241-256, (2002).<br />
[141] K. Van Rompaey, E. Van Ranst, A. Verdoodt, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck, 2006. Use of the test-m<strong>in</strong>eral technique to<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guish simple acidolysis from acido-complexolysis <strong>in</strong> a Podzol profile. Geoderma (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />
257
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
IMPACT OF ACID DEPOSITION ON CATION LEACHING FROM<br />
MT. TALANG AIRFALL ASH<br />
Fiantis, D., Nelson 1 , E. Van Ranst 2 and J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong> 3<br />
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture University of Andala, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, Padang<br />
25163, Indonesia; 1 Department of Crop Estate, Polytechnic of Agriculture University of Andalas, Kampus Politani<br />
Tanjung Pati, 50 Kota, Sumbar, Indonesia; 2 Department of Geology and Soil Science, Laboratory of Soil Science,<br />
Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S1, B- 9000 Gent, Belgium; 3 Department of <strong>Land</strong> Management, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400 Selangor, Malaysia<br />
Abstract<br />
An evaluation of the response of airfall ash from Mt. Talang on acid deposition and weather<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rates was studied by us<strong>in</strong>g a controlled laboratory leach<strong>in</strong>g experiment. Airfall ash from Mt.<br />
Talang was collected a few days after it was blown up by a phreatic eruption at the upper NE<br />
side of the volcano. The ash samples were leached with de-ionized water and nitric acid 0.05 M<br />
(pH 2) for seven weeks. Solutions leachates were collected after 2 and 48 hours, and after 7, 14,<br />
21, 28, 35 and 42 days for chemical analyses. Measured cations were Ca and Fe. Two sets of<br />
sample conta<strong>in</strong>ers were constructed, namely (1) successive <strong>in</strong>cubation and (2) separated<br />
<strong>in</strong>cubation. The successive <strong>in</strong>cubation set up consisted of the addition of new solutions to the<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>ers after each collection of leachate to simulate the leach<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong> the field. The<br />
conta<strong>in</strong>ers for separate <strong>in</strong>cubation were set up accord<strong>in</strong>g to the respective time and discharge<br />
afterward.<br />
Acidic <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong>creased iron leach<strong>in</strong>g; Fe was <strong>in</strong>creased by 1.75-folds <strong>in</strong> successive <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />
and 47 times <strong>in</strong> separated <strong>in</strong>cubation, while Ca was elevated 1.5 times <strong>in</strong> successive mode and 4folds<br />
<strong>in</strong> separate set. The Fe release was <strong>in</strong>creased sharply after 3 weeks and started to level off<br />
after 6 weeks. Meanwhile, Ca was released sharply after 1 week and started to level off after 2<br />
weeks. In total, 0.08 to 0.13 % of iron was released after addition of de-ionized water <strong>in</strong><br />
successive mode and 0.05 – 0.08% <strong>in</strong> separate mode. Treat<strong>in</strong>g the airfall ash with nitric acid<br />
yielded more Fe, <strong>in</strong> the range of 0.34 – 0.37% and 1.41 to 2.42 %, <strong>in</strong> successive and separate<br />
modes respectively. Addition of de-ionized water resulted <strong>in</strong> higher concentration of Ca <strong>in</strong><br />
contrast to addition of nitric acid. The value of Ca between 2.54 to 6.64 % was obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
reconstructed field condition and between 6.04 – 6.84 % <strong>in</strong> separated sets. The total<br />
concentration of calcium after apply<strong>in</strong>g nitric acid was between 2.06 – 3.03 %, and 5.10 – 5.91<br />
%.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Ow<strong>in</strong>g to its position <strong>in</strong> the mid-western part of the Barisan Mounta<strong>in</strong> Range of Sumatra, to its<br />
shape and size and to its activity, Mt. Talang is one of the most important and active volcano <strong>in</strong><br />
Sumatra. Mt. Talang is a strato volcano, formed of lava flows alternat<strong>in</strong>g with pyroclastic<br />
materials, emitted from various eruptive cases over the centuries. Summit elevation of Mt.<br />
Talang reaches 2896 m above sea level and located at 100° 40' 41.9304" E and 0° 58' 40.8072" S<br />
258
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
and the distance from the city of Padang to Talang is about 35 km. (Figure 1). Historical<br />
eruptions from Talang volcano have occurred many times from flank vents and most of the<br />
eruptions are moderate <strong>in</strong> size. On April 12 th , 2005 an explosion was heard 25 km from Talang<br />
and grayish ash was emitted to the sky. Ash fell to the south and eastern-northern slope of Mt.<br />
Talang.<br />
Volcanic ash, the smallest tephra fragments, is highly disruptive to economic activity<br />
because it covers just about everyth<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>filtrates most open<strong>in</strong>gs, and is highly abrasive. On the<br />
other hand, from these ashes of devastation arise some of the most productive soils <strong>in</strong> the world<br />
with the capacity to susta<strong>in</strong> high human population densities.<br />
Figure 1. Satellite image of Mt. Talang and surround<strong>in</strong>g area<br />
Airfall volcanic ash has f<strong>in</strong>e particle size, vesicular nature with high surface area, high<br />
porosity and permeability enhance weather<strong>in</strong>g rates [4]. Rapid weather<strong>in</strong>g of the ash liberated<br />
cations through surface exchange with aqueous hydrogen ions [13]. Volcanic ash is believed to<br />
release elements faster than other primary or secondary crystall<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>erals [11]. The primary<br />
proton donors <strong>in</strong> the weather<strong>in</strong>g of airfall ash are both acidic aerosols, carbonic and organic acids<br />
[3]. Proton donors or acids affect weather<strong>in</strong>g by provid<strong>in</strong>g H + which may attack rocks or<br />
m<strong>in</strong>erals [12] The acidic aerosols, such as sulfuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl),<br />
fluoric acid (HF) and nitric acid (HNO3), which come from eruption plume dur<strong>in</strong>g the eruption<br />
while the carbonic and organic acids derived from biota [3].<br />
Both m<strong>in</strong>eral and organic acids play an important role <strong>in</strong> soil environments and provided<br />
evidence that weather<strong>in</strong>g of rocks and m<strong>in</strong>erals are facilitated by these acids through<br />
259
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
organometallic complex formation or through metal chelation process [9]. Furthermore, [7]<br />
found out that the ratio between anion or cation released over protons-added from organic acids<br />
are greater than those from m<strong>in</strong>eral acids. The ability of organic acids to complex metals is more<br />
important than the strength of m<strong>in</strong>eral acids that have lower dissociation constant (pK1). M<strong>in</strong>eral<br />
acids are considered as strong noncomplex form<strong>in</strong>g acids [12].<br />
Solutions leached from the tephra layer <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>in</strong>congruent dissolution result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
formation of a cation-depleted, silica-rich leached layer on glass and m<strong>in</strong>eral surfaces [4] As<br />
reported by [1] the <strong>in</strong>itial lechates from the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens composed primarily<br />
of base cations (Ca 2+ > Na + >> Mg 2+ > K + ) and strong acid anions (SO4 2- >> Cl - > F - >> NO 3- ).<br />
The rate of alum<strong>in</strong>um release from colored volcanic glass <strong>in</strong> order of 10 -12 mol g -1 s -1 at pH 4.00.<br />
Colored volcanic glass release cations 1.5 times greater than non-colored glass, reflect<strong>in</strong>g its<br />
lower stability [11]. As weather<strong>in</strong>g progresses, dissolution rates are controlled by surface<br />
dissolution with concurrent diffusion of cations through the leached layer near the glass surface.<br />
A shift from <strong>in</strong>congruent to congruent dissolution presumably occurs when the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />
diffusion length equals the rate of retreat of the solution-solid <strong>in</strong>terface [14].<br />
The primary objective of this study was to provide a direct measurement of acid<br />
dissolution from unweathered airfall ash deposits <strong>in</strong> a warm, humid climate regime. The<br />
questions addressed <strong>in</strong> this research concern<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial stages of volcanic ash weather<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: (1) what are the <strong>in</strong>itial cations releases from fresh volcanic ash; (2) does the volcanic<br />
ash dissolve stoichiometrically or <strong>in</strong>congruently?<br />
To answer these questions fresh airfall ash of Mt. Talang were subjected <strong>in</strong>to laboratory<br />
dissolution experiment for 7 weeks with nitric acid, which is considered as strong m<strong>in</strong>eral acid,<br />
de-ionized water as weak noncomplex acid and acetic acid of the organic acid. Lechates from ash<br />
deposits were collected weekly for chemical analysis and are used to calculate elemental fluxes<br />
and weather<strong>in</strong>g rates of airfall ash.<br />
2.1. Study area<br />
2. MATERALS AND METHODS<br />
Mt. Talang is considered as type-A volcano and has been <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous eruption for decades<br />
either from flank vent, radial fissures or summit of volcano. The area affected by volcanic<br />
activity covers at about 42103.6 ha and mostly from Quaternary age. The recent eruption of<br />
April 12, 2005, blew away airfall ash tephra over portions of Solok District of West Sumatra,<br />
Indonesia. The maximum thickness of ash was 5 cm <strong>in</strong> the upper NE slope of Mt. Talang and<br />
the m<strong>in</strong>imum thickness of 1 mm blanketed the area <strong>in</strong> the foot slope.<br />
2.2. Collection and Analysis of Ash Lechates<br />
Airfall ash was collected from the affected areas of tea-plantation shortly after the April 12 th<br />
2005 eruption. The ash was collected prior to any ra<strong>in</strong>fall and sealed <strong>in</strong> watertight conta<strong>in</strong>ers<br />
until it was used for m<strong>in</strong>eralogical and chemical analysis as well as applied it for the dissolution<br />
experiments. The airfall ash fractions were analyzed <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> mounts with a polariz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
microscope. Elemental analyses of airfall ash were done by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry<br />
after ignition at 1100 0 C.<br />
260
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
The dissolution experiment was carried out as follows. One gram of airfall ash was<br />
placed <strong>in</strong> each 250 ml plastic conta<strong>in</strong>er with a stopper, and 200 ml of de-ionized water and nitric<br />
acid 0.05 M (pH 2) for seven weeks at room temperature. Mix<strong>in</strong>g of the solution was made by<br />
shak<strong>in</strong>g the conta<strong>in</strong>ers once a day for 60 m<strong>in</strong>utes dur<strong>in</strong>g the dissolution. The solution was<br />
separated after 1 hour, 24 hours, and after 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days. Chemical analysis of<br />
lechates were conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e the pH, cations (Ca and Fe) were measured by AAS.<br />
Two sets of sample conta<strong>in</strong>ers were constructed, namely (1) successive <strong>in</strong>cubation and<br />
(2) separated <strong>in</strong>cubation. The successive <strong>in</strong>cubation set up consisted of the addition of new<br />
solutions to the conta<strong>in</strong>ers after each collection of lechates to simulate the leach<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong><br />
the field. The conta<strong>in</strong>ers for separate <strong>in</strong>cubation was set up accord<strong>in</strong>g to the respective time and<br />
discharge afterward. All values represent the mean of duplicate analyses.<br />
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
3.1. M<strong>in</strong>eralogical Characteristics of Mt. Talang Airfall Ash<br />
The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of the ash consisted of noncrystall<strong>in</strong>e and crystall<strong>in</strong>e<br />
components. The noncrystall<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>eral is volcanic glass (30%) and the rest are crystall<strong>in</strong>e<br />
m<strong>in</strong>erals. The glassy materials of volcanic glass appear optically isotropic under crossed<br />
polarizer microscope and usually present as clusters of small particles with vesicular<br />
morphology. Volcanic glass, as it was believed [2], is the most weatherable components as a<br />
result of its amorphous nature <strong>in</strong> volcanic deposits. Weather<strong>in</strong>g of volcanic glass can be<br />
described <strong>in</strong> term of a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of parabolic and l<strong>in</strong>ear k<strong>in</strong>etics, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the hydration of<br />
glass and the formation of secondary clay m<strong>in</strong>erals. Furthermore they stated that the<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of volcanic ash varies widely as a function of particle-size and that<br />
volcanic glass <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> relative proportion to plagioclase as the particle size decreases.<br />
The crystall<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong>clude andes<strong>in</strong>e (1%), quartz ( 32 mm). As it is, the<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of volcanic ash varies accord<strong>in</strong>g to rock types. Ash of rhyolite, dacite<br />
or andesite composition is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by noncolored volcanic glass with lesser amounts of<br />
plagioclase, pyroxenes, and ferromagnesian m<strong>in</strong>erals. On the other hand, volcanic ash hav<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
composition of basalt and basaltic andesite composition is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by colored volcanic glass<br />
accompanied by plagioclase, oliv<strong>in</strong>e, pyroxenes and ferromagnesian m<strong>in</strong>erals [2].<br />
261
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
3.2. Elemental Composition of Mt. Talang Airfall Ash<br />
Air fall ash, as a parent material of soils, controls soil formation more than any other parent<br />
materials. The behavior of chemical elements <strong>in</strong> airfall ash can be <strong>in</strong>ferred by compar<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
total elemental analysis. The elemental composition of the airfall ash is depicted <strong>in</strong> Tables 1.<br />
Each element is expressed <strong>in</strong> oxide percentage on the basis of an oven-dried weight (105 0 C).<br />
Based on the silica content of 54%, the airfall ash of Mt. Talang can be considered as basalticandesitic<br />
type. A classification of volcanic ash was proposed by [10] <strong>in</strong>to five groups based on<br />
the silica (SiO2) content: rhyolite (100-70%); dacite (70-62%); andesite (62-58%); basaltic<br />
andesitic (58-53.5%) and basalt (53.5-45%). The result of this study is different with the report<br />
of [5] that volcanic ash of Mt. Marapi, located 140 km north of Mt. Talang, are considered as<br />
andesitic type s<strong>in</strong>ce the silica contents was higher 15%. Japanese soil scientists stated that silica<br />
content of volcanic ash from Japan <strong>in</strong> the range of 48 – 73% and exists strong correlation<br />
between silica content and most of chemical elements except for K [15]. Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />
also reported for volcanic ash orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>New</strong> Zealand [8]. SiO2 is regarded as one of the<br />
immobile element found <strong>in</strong> tephra as well as Al2O3 and Fe2O3 [2].<br />
Element<br />
Composition (%)<br />
Fresh Oxalate-treated<br />
SiO2 54.37 64.36<br />
Al2O3 18.33 15.00<br />
Fe2O3 4.82 5.95<br />
CaO 4.19 4.25<br />
MgO 1.33 1.42<br />
K2O 1.15 1.49<br />
Na2O 0.61 0.67<br />
LOI 4.2 4.88<br />
Table 1: Contents of major elements <strong>in</strong> fresh and oxalate-treated<br />
airfall ash of Mt. Talang<br />
The molar ratio between SiO2/Al2O3 is 6.14 <strong>in</strong> fresh volcanic ash and decrease <strong>in</strong>to 4.29<br />
<strong>in</strong> oxalate-treated ash of Mt. Talang. The down shift value of the molar ratio is assumed to be<br />
largely due to presence of the amorphous and noncrystall<strong>in</strong>e components of volcanic materials.<br />
This is <strong>in</strong> accordance with the report else where <strong>in</strong> Japan [15]. Meanwhile the SiO2, Al2O3 and<br />
Fe2O3 are orig<strong>in</strong>ated from both volcanic glass and plagioclase while Fe2O3 can be found also <strong>in</strong><br />
mafic m<strong>in</strong>erals [10].<br />
The alkal<strong>in</strong>e earth elements (CaO and MgO) found <strong>in</strong> the studied ash are higher then the<br />
alkal<strong>in</strong>e elements (K2O and Na2O). The higher contents of CaO and MgO because the samples<br />
are very new and is not subjected to any weather<strong>in</strong>g process yet. These data are <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with<br />
those obta<strong>in</strong>ed by [10] that CaO and Na2O are orig<strong>in</strong>ated from volcanic glass and plagioclase,<br />
MgO is from mafic m<strong>in</strong>eral and K2O ma<strong>in</strong>ly occurs <strong>in</strong> volcanic glass. They added that<br />
proportion of CaO, Na2O and MgO were decreased as weather<strong>in</strong>gs proceed contrary to K2O<br />
content. Both CaO and Na2O have high solubility and easily lost by leach<strong>in</strong>g. The mobility<br />
sequence found <strong>in</strong> volcanic ash parent materials are <strong>in</strong> order: CaO, Na2O >SiO2 >MgO > Al2O3,<br />
Fe2O3, K2O [7, 10, 2].<br />
262
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Removal of the amorphous constituents by us<strong>in</strong>g oxalate <strong>in</strong>creased the concentration of<br />
all elements except for the alum<strong>in</strong>um oxide concentration, which is down from 18% to 15%.<br />
Although SiO2 concentration is exceed<strong>in</strong>g the requirement for basaltic andesitic, it is our belief<br />
that treated the samples with chemical solutions does not necessary change the rock type of the<br />
airfall ash from basaltic andesitic <strong>in</strong>to dacitic. The ammonium oxalate acid dissolution is<br />
<strong>in</strong>tended to remove the amorphous fraction that is coat<strong>in</strong>g some of the crystall<strong>in</strong>e particles.<br />
Unfortunately, we do not have any value of dissolved cations from the lechates to be reported<br />
and compared with the concentration of cations from ash-residue or solid components after<br />
ignition to 1100 0 C.<br />
3.3. Dissolution Rate of Calcium<br />
The solubility of solid-phase of calcium upon leach<strong>in</strong>g with different acids <strong>in</strong> successive and<br />
separate mode <strong>in</strong>cubation is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2 and 3. Different results obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the two<br />
mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation. Ca obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the successive mode, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the leach<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong><br />
the field, are lower than the separated <strong>in</strong>cubation mode. Comparable results were also reported<br />
by [3] maximum solute concentrations <strong>in</strong> solutions dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from tephra layer dur<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>y<br />
season dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial weather<strong>in</strong>g study (12 months) and there was a dist<strong>in</strong>ct decrease <strong>in</strong> the<br />
annual concentrations of several solutes such as calcium, sodium, silicon and bicarbonate after 4<br />
years of study.<br />
Location<br />
Bukit Sileh<br />
1.300 m a.s.l<br />
Aie Batumbuk<br />
1.100 m a.s.l<br />
Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates (g/kg)<br />
Treatments<br />
After 2 h After 24 hAfter 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w After 6 w<br />
H2O 13.83 18.82 102.47 57.40 13.18 31.89 15.56 0.39<br />
Acetic acid 19.72 20.48 229.17 85.46 28.49 25.09 39.86 0.52<br />
HNO2 17.38 13.35 161.99 30.19 4.68 15.73 16.25 0.27<br />
NH4 OACe 14.02 14.78 339.71 161.14 60.80 23.38 65.56 0.61<br />
H2O 18.05 20.08 451.96 92.26 31.04 31.04 19.72 0.34<br />
Acetic acid 20.41 19.02 503.83 296.34 45.49 18.28 32.22 1.06<br />
HNO2 20.27 19.02 192.60 46.34 6.38 2.98 14.86 0.31<br />
NH4 OACe 19.04 21.01 416.24 304.00 86.31 26.79 32.92 0.76<br />
Table 2: Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates as a function of residence time and type of acids <strong>in</strong> successive<br />
mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />
263
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Location<br />
Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates (g/kg)<br />
Treatments<br />
After 2 h After 24 hAfter 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w After 6 w<br />
Bukit Sileh<br />
H2O Acetic acid<br />
13.83<br />
19.72<br />
18.82<br />
20.48<br />
158.59<br />
130.53<br />
117.77<br />
122.02<br />
105.02<br />
99.06<br />
96.51<br />
109.27<br />
90.56<br />
88.47<br />
3.24<br />
2.36<br />
1.300 m a.s.l<br />
HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />
17.38<br />
14.02<br />
13.35<br />
14.78<br />
117.77<br />
140.73<br />
94.81<br />
123.72<br />
105.87<br />
67.60<br />
81.21<br />
102.47<br />
78.06<br />
105.83<br />
2.02<br />
3.60<br />
Aie Batumbuk<br />
1.100 m a.s.l<br />
H 2O 18.05 20.08 144.13 141.58 109.27 138.18 109.31 2.92<br />
Acetic acid 20.41 19.02 157.74 134.78 126.28 123.72 107.22 2.77<br />
HNO 2 20.27 19.02 120.32 108.42 107.57 111.82 100.97 2.53<br />
NH 4 OACe 19.04 21.01 149.23 139.88 80.36 168.79 138.47 4.48<br />
Table 3: Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates as a function of residence time and type of acids <strong>in</strong> separate<br />
mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />
Compar<strong>in</strong>g the source of proton donors used to age the airfall ash of Mt. Talang, acetic<br />
acid released cations more than deionized water, nitric acid and sulfuric acid as well as<br />
ammonium acetate. Acetic acid is one of the organic acids, nitric acid is considered as strong<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral acid, deionized water is a weak acid while ammonium acetate is an alkal<strong>in</strong>e solution<br />
with pH value of 7. Organic acids, as expla<strong>in</strong>ed by [12], are capable of dissolv<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
complex<strong>in</strong>g the cations from the surface layer of colloid or clay particles. Deionized water as a<br />
weak acid, is a source of protons <strong>in</strong> soil. It can be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> hydrolytic reactions lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
partial dissolution (<strong>in</strong>congruent) and total dissolution (congruent) of m<strong>in</strong>erals as time progresses.<br />
Furthermore, they discussed that strong acid, like nitric acid with a pKa of -1, capable of<br />
lower<strong>in</strong>g the pH and to dissolve cations congruently, leav<strong>in</strong>g no residue <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>eral surfaces.<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> leachates chemistry of progressive weathered of ash dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cubation are<br />
illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 and Figure 3. As <strong>in</strong>dicated, the amount of Ca <strong>in</strong> leachates <strong>in</strong>creases with<br />
time, especially after 24 hours of contact time between the ash and the proton donor of each<br />
respective solution and started to level off after 5 weeks. Similar trend was also observed by<br />
[14] both <strong>in</strong> field and laboratory experiments of the Mt. St. Helens ash fall. They expla<strong>in</strong>ed that<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g of the cations (ca and Mg) from field study reflect<strong>in</strong>g retention of the cations <strong>in</strong> the<br />
soils after 2 years. Meanwhile higher amount of cations <strong>in</strong> lechates obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the leach<strong>in</strong>g<br />
experiments as surface layer of the ash become cations-depleted. The same author presumed that<br />
rapid weather<strong>in</strong>g of the ash liberated cations through surface exchange with aqueous hydrogen<br />
ions.<br />
264
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Ca dissolution (%)<br />
8.000<br />
7.000<br />
6.000<br />
5.000<br />
4.000<br />
3.000<br />
2.000<br />
1.000<br />
0.000<br />
Bukit Sileh (Successive <strong>in</strong>cubation mode)<br />
After 2 h After 24 h After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w<br />
265<br />
Times<br />
H2O H Acetat HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />
Figure 2: Concentration of Ca after leached with different acids for 5 weeks<br />
Ca Dissolution (%)<br />
7.000<br />
6.000<br />
5.000<br />
4.000<br />
3.000<br />
2.000<br />
1.000<br />
0.000<br />
Bukit Sileh (separate <strong>in</strong>cubation mode)<br />
After 2 h After 24 h After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w<br />
Times<br />
H2O H Acetat HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />
Figure 3: Concentration of Ca after leached with different acids for 5 weeks<br />
3.4. Dissolution Rate of Iron<br />
The solubility of solid-phase of iron upon leach<strong>in</strong>g with different acids <strong>in</strong> successive<br />
mode <strong>in</strong>cubation is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4 and Figure 4, whereas the result of the separated mode<br />
<strong>in</strong>cubation is displayed <strong>in</strong> Table 5 and Figure 5. Fe concentrations are much lower compared to<br />
concentration of Ca. Aqueous concentration of iron is low because of the low solubility of the<br />
iron dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial period of weather<strong>in</strong>g. As expla<strong>in</strong>ed by [3] that Fe display low solubility<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the first two years of experiments and <strong>in</strong>crease slightly dur<strong>in</strong>g the last two stages of their<br />
study. The dissolution of iron by soluble organic acids <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g complexation process for quite<br />
long period of time [12].
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Location Treatments<br />
After 2 h After 24 h<br />
Fe concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates (g/kg)<br />
After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w After 6 w<br />
Bukit Sileh<br />
H2O Acetic acid<br />
0.45<br />
1.91<br />
0.97<br />
2.08<br />
0.01<br />
1.66<br />
2.00<br />
3.57<br />
8.27<br />
2.29<br />
0.43<br />
1.74<br />
0.24<br />
2.18<br />
0.15<br />
1.30<br />
1.300 m a.s.l<br />
HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />
5.35<br />
0.05<br />
6.25<br />
0.06<br />
2.46<br />
0.26<br />
6.27<br />
0.42<br />
3.56<br />
0.50<br />
4.15<br />
0.43<br />
4.48<br />
0.52<br />
1.89<br />
0.39<br />
Aie Batumbuk<br />
1.100 m a.s.l<br />
H2O 0.09 0.13 0.01 2.22 4.44 0.14 0.94 0.37<br />
Acetic acid 1.93 1.49 1.41 4.54 2.36 2.20 2.33 1.38<br />
HNO2 5.10 6.13 1.66 6.76 4.24 5.72 5.12 2.75<br />
NH4 OACe 0.00 0.05 0.30 0.45 0.16 0.40 1.15 0.37<br />
Table 4: Fe concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates as a function of residence time and type of acids <strong>in</strong> successive<br />
mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />
Location<br />
Bukit Sileh<br />
1.300 m a.s.l<br />
Aie Batumbuk<br />
1.100 m a.s.l<br />
Treatments<br />
After 2 h After 24 h<br />
Fe concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates (g/kg)<br />
After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w After 6 w<br />
H2O 0.45 0.97 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.00<br />
Acetic acid 1.91 2.08 0.72 0.72 7.93 10.09 10.81 0.29<br />
HNO2 5.35 6.25 58.36 7.20 48.27 54.76 61.96 0.29<br />
NH4 OACe 0.05 0.06 2.88 4.32 4.32 3.60 8.65 0.24<br />
H2O 0.09 0.13 0.72 2.88 2.16 0.72 0.72 0.11<br />
Acetic acid 1.93 1.49 2.88 6.48 6.48 4.32 7.93 0.26<br />
HNO2 5.10 6.13 3.60 17.29 36.02 36.02 36.74 0.17<br />
NH4 OACe 0.00 0.05 0.72 4.32 0.72 0.72 5.76 0.09<br />
Table 5: Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates as a function of residence time and type of acids <strong>in</strong> separate<br />
mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />
Fe dissolution (%)<br />
0.400<br />
0.350<br />
0.300<br />
0.250<br />
0.200<br />
0.150<br />
0.100<br />
0.050<br />
0.000<br />
Aie Batumbuk (successive <strong>in</strong>cubation mode)<br />
After 2 h After 24 h After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w<br />
266<br />
Times<br />
H2O H Acetat HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />
Figure 4: Concentration of Fe after leached with different acids for 5 weeks
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Fe dissolution (%)<br />
0.800<br />
0.600<br />
0.400<br />
0.200<br />
0.000<br />
Aie Batumbuk (Separate <strong>in</strong>cubation mode)<br />
After 2 h After 24<br />
h<br />
After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w<br />
267<br />
Times<br />
H2O H Acetat HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />
Figure 4: Concentration of Fe after leached with different acids for 5 weeks<br />
4. CONCLUSIONS<br />
The preced<strong>in</strong>g data and discussion <strong>in</strong>dicate that the recent airfall ash of Mt. Talang considered as<br />
basaltic andesitic rock type with higher amount of volcanic glass and plagioclase. Other primary<br />
m<strong>in</strong>erals exists are hypersthene, augite, hornblende, opaque or ferromagnesian m<strong>in</strong>erals. The<br />
elemental composition of the ash reaches the value of 55% for silica, with lesser amount of<br />
calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium oxides. The calcium concentration detected <strong>in</strong> the<br />
leachates <strong>in</strong>creased sharply up to 4 weeks and started to level off after 5 weeks. Among the<br />
proton donors, acetic acid is capable to dissolve more cations from air fall ash compared to other<br />
source proton donors such as deionized water, nitric acid and ammonium acetate. Concentration<br />
of Ca is higher thru the experimental study compared to Fe concentration.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
This work is supported by Directorate of Higher Education Department of National Education of<br />
Republic of Indonesia under Fundamental Research Grant no: 005/SP3/PP/DP2M/II/2006,<br />
granted to the first author. Total elemental analyses with XRF Spectrophotometer were<br />
performed at the Laboratory of Research and Development of PT. Semen Padang, Indonesia.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[142] Dahlgren, R. A. and F. C. Ugol<strong>in</strong>i. Effects of Tephra Addition on Soil Processes <strong>in</strong> Spodosols <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Cascade Range, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, U.S.A. Geoderma, 45:331-355. (1989).<br />
[143] Dahlgren, R., S. Shoji and M. Nanzyo. M<strong>in</strong>eralogical characteristics of volcanic ash soils. In: S. Shoji, M.<br />
Nanzyo and R. Dahlgren (eds.). Volcanic Ash Soil-genesis, properties, and utilization. Developments <strong>in</strong> Soil<br />
Science 21, Elsevier, Amsterdam. 101-144. (1993).
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
[144] Dahlgren, R. A., F. C. Ugol<strong>in</strong>i and W. H. Casey. Field weather<strong>in</strong>g rates of Mt. St. Helens tephra.<br />
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 63, 587-598. (1999).<br />
[145] Dahlgren, R. A., M. Saigusa and F. C. Ugol<strong>in</strong>i. The Nature, Properties and Management of Volcanic<br />
Soils. Advances <strong>in</strong> Agronomy, Academic Press. Vol. 82:113-182. (2004).<br />
[146] Fiantis, D. Colloid-Surface Characteristics and Amelioration Problems of some volcanic soils <strong>in</strong> West<br />
Sumatra, Indonesia. Ph. D. Thesis. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. 315 p. (2000).<br />
[147] Kpomblekou-A, K. and M. A. Tabatabai. Effect of Organic Acids on Release of Phosphorus from<br />
Phosphate Rocks. Soil Sci. Vol 156, No.6:442-453. (1994).<br />
[148] Kurashima, K., S. Shoji and I. Yamada. Mobilities and related factors of chemical elements <strong>in</strong> the toposoils<br />
of Andosols <strong>in</strong> Tohoku, Japan: 1. Mobility sequence of major chemical elements. Soil Sci. 132:300-307. (1981).<br />
[149] Lowe, D. J. Controls on the rates of weather<strong>in</strong>g and clay m<strong>in</strong>eral genesis <strong>in</strong> airfall tephras: a review and<br />
<strong>New</strong> Zealand case study. In: S. M. Colman and D. P. Dethier (eds.), Rates of Chemical Weather<strong>in</strong>g of Rocks and<br />
M<strong>in</strong>erals. Academic Press, Inc. Orlando. 265-330 pp. (1986).<br />
[150] Robert, M. and J. Berthel<strong>in</strong>. Role of Biological and Biochemical factors <strong>in</strong> Soil M<strong>in</strong>eral Weather<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />
Interactions of Soil M<strong>in</strong>erals with Natural Organics and Microbes. P. M. Huang and M. Schnitzer (eds). Soil Sci.<br />
Soc. Am. Spec. Publ. 17. Madison, WI, pp.453-495. (1986).<br />
[151] Shoji, S., I. Yamada and K. Kurashima. Mobilities and related factors of chemical elements <strong>in</strong> the toposoils<br />
of Andosols <strong>in</strong> Tohoku, Japan: 2. Chemical. and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical compositions of size fractions and factors<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the mobilities of major chemical elements. Soil Sci. 132:331-346. (1981).<br />
[152] Shoji, S., M. Nanzyo and R. A. Dahlgren. Volcanic Ash Soils – Genesis, Properties and Utilization.<br />
Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 288 p. (1993).<br />
[153] Ugol<strong>in</strong>i, F. C. and R. S. Sletten. The Role of Proton Donors <strong>in</strong> Pedogenesis as Revealed by Soil Solution<br />
Studies. Soil Sci. Vol. 151, No. 1:61-75. (1991).<br />
[154] White, A. F. Surface chemistry and dissolution k<strong>in</strong>etics of glassy rocks at 25°C. Geochim. Cosmochim.<br />
Acta. 47, 805-815. (1983).<br />
[155] White, A. F., L. V. Benson and A. Yee. Chemical Weather<strong>in</strong>g of the May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helen Ash<br />
Fall and the Effect on the Iron Creek Watershed, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton. In “Rates of Chemical Weather<strong>in</strong>g of Rocks and<br />
M<strong>in</strong>erals”. Colman, S. M. and D. P. Deither (Eds.). pp.351-375. Academic Press, Orlando. (1986).<br />
[156] Yamada, I., S. Shoji, S. Kobayashi and J. Masui. Chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical studies of volcanic ashes.<br />
II. Relationship between rock types and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of volcanic ashes. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 24:75-89.<br />
(1975).<br />
268
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
STONE LINES AND WEATHERING PROFILES OF FERRALLITIC<br />
SOILS IN NORTHEASTERN ARGENTINA<br />
Morrás, H. 1* , Moretti, L. 1 , Píccolo, G. 2 , Zech,W. 3<br />
1INTA-CIRN, Instituto de Suelos, 1712 Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argent<strong>in</strong>a, 2 INTA-EEA Cerro Azul, 3313 Cerro<br />
Azul, Misiones, Argent<strong>in</strong>a, 3 Institute of Soil Science, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany<br />
Abstract<br />
A ferrallitic pedological mantle with Ultisols and a lower proportion of Oxisols, is found <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of<br />
Misiones, <strong>in</strong> northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a. This ferrallitic material usually has a depth of 3 to 7 m above the weathered<br />
basalt, and frequently a “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”, many times ly<strong>in</strong>g on a th<strong>in</strong> structured layer, appears <strong>in</strong> its lower part, close to<br />
the limit with the saprolite.<br />
The autochthonous or allochthonous orig<strong>in</strong> of materials compos<strong>in</strong>g this type of profile, frequent <strong>in</strong> tropical and<br />
subtropical environments, is controversially discussed <strong>in</strong> the literature. Referr<strong>in</strong>g specifically to the area of Misiones<br />
and to neighbour<strong>in</strong>g regions <strong>in</strong> Brazil and Paraguay, Iriondo and Kröhl<strong>in</strong>g [5] postulated that the material that covers<br />
the basaltic rock and <strong>in</strong> which the red soils have developed is an eolian sediment (a “tropical loess”) of upper<br />
Pleistocene age, deflated from the alluvial pla<strong>in</strong>s of the Paraná and Uruguay rivers.<br />
The work we have carried out <strong>in</strong> this region, allows us to dist<strong>in</strong>guish two basic types of “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”: the first one is<br />
a “nodular l<strong>in</strong>e”, more typical for the southern part of Misiones, composed by goethitic nodules of gravel size, and<br />
appear<strong>in</strong>g to derive from differential weather<strong>in</strong>g of more resistant basaltic layers. The second one is a “siliceous”<br />
layer of quarzitic nature, characteriz<strong>in</strong>g profiles <strong>in</strong> central Misiones: these silica concentrations <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>stances are<br />
<strong>in</strong> situ relicts of former quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the basalt, and <strong>in</strong> other cases the “l<strong>in</strong>e” may be def<strong>in</strong>ed as a “silcrete”; a<br />
secondary accumulation of quartz on relictic quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s seems to happen <strong>in</strong> other cases. Concern<strong>in</strong>g the blocky<br />
structured subsurface levels below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”, the results lead to conclude that they are not paleosols, and that<br />
they can not be considered as an evidence of paleosurfaces.<br />
Consequently, accord<strong>in</strong>g to our field observations and to our laboratory results (clay and sand m<strong>in</strong>eralogy, magnetic<br />
susceptibility, geochemical data, granulometry, micromorphology and stable carbon isotope analysis), we consider<br />
that the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” as well as the surface ferrallitic soil materials <strong>in</strong> Misiones have an autochthonous orig<strong>in</strong>,<br />
deriv<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong> situ weather<strong>in</strong>g of basaltic rock.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
A ferrallitic pedological mantle with Ultisols and a lower proportion of Oxisols, covers most part<br />
of the landscape <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Misiones, <strong>in</strong> northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a. This ferrallitic material<br />
usually has a depth of 3 to 7 m above the weathered basalt, and frequently a “stone l<strong>in</strong>e’, many<br />
times ly<strong>in</strong>g on a th<strong>in</strong> structured layer, appears <strong>in</strong> its lower part, close to the limit with the<br />
saprolite.<br />
The nomenclature of different layers and the autochthonous or allochthonous orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />
materials compos<strong>in</strong>g this type of complex profile, frequent <strong>in</strong> tropical and subtropical<br />
environments, is a controversial matter that has deserved numerous <strong>in</strong>terpretations and proposals<br />
[19, 20]. The presence of the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” suggests the existence of an unconformity and this<br />
feature has been generally considered to be of sedimentological rather than of pedological orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Thus, most part of diverse hypotheses proposed considers processes of generation, movement<br />
and accumulation of pebbles, though differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of their genesis and that of the<br />
overly<strong>in</strong>g material.<br />
269
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Segalen [19] the different <strong>in</strong>terpretations currently admitted concern<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> of the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” can be grouped <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way: 1) processes of pediplanation<br />
related to climatic changes, produc<strong>in</strong>g the erosion of laterites and quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s followed by the<br />
transport of their fragments; 2) colluvial processes <strong>in</strong> steep slopes, produc<strong>in</strong>g the erosion and<br />
transport of hardened horizons and ve<strong>in</strong>s; 3) autochthony or <strong>in</strong> situ s<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of hardened laterites<br />
previously fragmented by chemical weather<strong>in</strong>g. The activity of the soil fauna has also been<br />
proposed to be responsible for the downward movement of the pebbles with<strong>in</strong> the profiles, and<br />
for cover<strong>in</strong>g them with f<strong>in</strong>e textured materials.<br />
For the orig<strong>in</strong> of surface material above the stone l<strong>in</strong>es different <strong>in</strong>terpretations have also<br />
been suggested. A two stages process made up by a first one of deflation and exposure of pebbles<br />
and a second one of cover<strong>in</strong>g due to a later sedimentation is among the older explanations; this<br />
would be eventually possible at certa<strong>in</strong> localities but it is considered unacceptable as a general<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpretation [3, 19, 20]. At present, two explanations of general application about the orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />
the f<strong>in</strong>e textured surface materials are a colluvial deposition and an upward vertical transport of<br />
f<strong>in</strong>e material by termites from the saprolite [19, 20]. Segalen [19] also mentions that several<br />
authors have presented <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the simultaneous effect of different processes <strong>in</strong><br />
the development of these soil profiles. Recently, Johnson [7, 8] proposed a general explanation<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g different theories and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of geomorphology, pedology and hydrology that he<br />
named “the dynamic denudation theory”, and <strong>in</strong> which the dynamic processes and conditions are<br />
driven by gravity, water and biotic agents.<br />
With regard to Misiones <strong>in</strong> Argent<strong>in</strong>a, the red soils were traditionally considered to be the<br />
result of <strong>in</strong> situ weather<strong>in</strong>g of the tholeiitic basalt of the Serra Geral Formation [18]. On the<br />
contrary, Iriondo and Kröhl<strong>in</strong>g [5] referr<strong>in</strong>g to Misiones as well as to neighbour<strong>in</strong>g regions <strong>in</strong><br />
Brazil and Paraguay, postulated that the material cover<strong>in</strong>g the basaltic rock and <strong>in</strong> which the red<br />
soils have developed is an eolian sediment of upper Pleistocene age, deflated from the alluvial<br />
pla<strong>in</strong>s of the Paraná and the Uruguay rivers. The authors consider this surface material to be a<br />
“tropical loess” and have formally named it “Oberá Formation”, identify<strong>in</strong>g an “Upper member”<br />
and a “Lower member” separated by the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”. Besides some analytical data, the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
arguments are the presence of a “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” described as platy-gravel sized silica and, less<br />
frequently, the presence of a buried soil (classified as Ultisol) represented by a moderately<br />
structured B horizon below the ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ and therefore regarded as an evidence of a<br />
paleosurface.<br />
Similarly, Lichte y Behl<strong>in</strong>g [10] referr<strong>in</strong>g to the Quaternary landscape evolution <strong>in</strong><br />
southeastern Brazil, also consider that the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” have developed on a now fossil surface<br />
that was subsequently covered by an eolian sediment. For these authors the quartz pebbles derive<br />
from quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Precambrian crystall<strong>in</strong>e rocks, which were distributed by heavy<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>s along the slopes, and later on covered by f<strong>in</strong>e eolian sediments deriv<strong>in</strong>g at least partly from<br />
the lateritic cover of the Sudamericana pla<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Consequently, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the diversity of hypotheses concern<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong> of this<br />
type of ferrallitic soils with “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”, and due to the role they play with respect to the<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpretation of landscape evolution, we focus s<strong>in</strong>ce some years on this phenomena <strong>in</strong> Misiones<br />
[13, 14, 15, 16]. In the follow<strong>in</strong>g our results will be summarized.<br />
270
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
The Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Misiones is located <strong>in</strong> northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a, around 28º S and 54º W (Fig. 1).<br />
The climate is subtropical humid without dry season; the mean annual temperature is around<br />
20°C and the mean annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>creases from 1750 mm <strong>in</strong> the south to 1950 mm <strong>in</strong> the north.<br />
The present vegetation is a subtropical forest, except a narrow strip along the southern border<br />
with a savanna type vegetation.<br />
The field work for the study of ferrallitic soils was for the most part done on exposed<br />
profiles along the ma<strong>in</strong> roads <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The sites observed and described up to the present<br />
are more than sixty, and several of the profiles <strong>in</strong> different sectors of the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce have been<br />
selected and sampled for detailed studies. Some soil profiles <strong>in</strong> concave topographic positions<br />
have also been sampled and analyzed. The samples were characterized by conventional analysis;<br />
<strong>in</strong> addition clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy (DRX and TEM), sand m<strong>in</strong>eralogy (optical microscopy and SEM),<br />
magnetic m<strong>in</strong>eralogy (magnetic susceptibility), micromorphology, geochemistry (macro- and<br />
micro-elements), and stable carbon isotopes analysis were taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration.<br />
Figure 1: Map of the Misiones Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, and location of some of the surveyed sites.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Consider<strong>in</strong>g that the genesis of ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>es¨ and associated ¨structured horizons¨ is unclear, we<br />
have focused our study on these features. The work we have carried out <strong>in</strong> this region, allowed<br />
us to dist<strong>in</strong>guish several morphological types of ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>es¨, from which two basic<br />
compositional types were identified.<br />
271
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
a) The ¨nodular l<strong>in</strong>es¨<br />
The first type of “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” we named “nodular l<strong>in</strong>e” (Fig. 5-A), typical for the southern part<br />
but also observed <strong>in</strong> other sectors of Misiones, is composed by ferrug<strong>in</strong>ous nodules of gravel<br />
size, usually with a mean size of around 15 mm. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to their m<strong>in</strong>eralogy and morphology<br />
three groups were dist<strong>in</strong>guished: the first one consists of hematitic nodules, dark red <strong>in</strong> colour<br />
and bright, and be<strong>in</strong>g the smallest <strong>in</strong> size; the second group is composed by goethitic nodules,<br />
reddish yellow <strong>in</strong> colour, opaque, and the bigger <strong>in</strong> size; the third group is composed by nodules<br />
of <strong>in</strong>termediate aspect and composition. The hematitic nodules occur <strong>in</strong> low proportion along the<br />
profile, as well above as below of the ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ with a slight maximum at that level; the<br />
goethitic nodules are <strong>in</strong> a high proportion with<strong>in</strong> the ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ and appear only <strong>in</strong> this layer,<br />
while the <strong>in</strong>termediate nodules are <strong>in</strong> low proportion above and below the ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
there a sharp quantitative <strong>in</strong>crement though the <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> size is progressive (Fig. 2).<br />
Though the nodules are more abundant at a particular level thus def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨, the<br />
fact that those ¨iron gravels¨ are not restricted to that level, together with their verticals variation<br />
<strong>in</strong> quantity, size and composition, suggest that they are not the result of a sedimentary process of<br />
accumulation. Secondly, the goethitic nature of gravels appear<strong>in</strong>g exclusively at the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”<br />
level, would not be compatible with their residence at a surface under an arid climate.<br />
Moreover, transitional vertical or horizontal steps of rock weather<strong>in</strong>g observed <strong>in</strong> several<br />
profiles have furnished the evidence of the <strong>in</strong> situ formation of this type of “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”: thus for<br />
example, it was observed the transition from homogeneous saprolite bodies to levels with an<br />
<strong>in</strong>cipient <strong>in</strong>dividualisation of soft rounded and more yellowish nodules, <strong>in</strong> turn pass<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
rounded hardened fragments <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>dividualised and sparsed, giv<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ally rise to a k<strong>in</strong>d<br />
of relictic ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ (Figs. 5-C, 5-E, 5-F). Microscopic analysis of the nodules form<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
“stone l<strong>in</strong>e” shows an <strong>in</strong>ternal porphyric texture with weathered phenocrysts, partially filled with<br />
goethitic iron, thus reveal<strong>in</strong>g its relationship with the basaltic rock.<br />
b) The ¨siliceous l<strong>in</strong>es¨<br />
The second type of ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨, ma<strong>in</strong>ly observed <strong>in</strong> the central part of the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, is a<br />
“siliceous” level of quartzitic nature (Fig. 5-B). In this type of ¨l<strong>in</strong>e¨ the silica appears as<br />
horizontal levels of variable thickness, from a few millimeters (<strong>in</strong> this case usually fractured and<br />
with the appearance of lam<strong>in</strong>ar fragments) up to 30 cm or more.<br />
In some <strong>in</strong>stances these silica concentrations are clearly <strong>in</strong> situ relicts of former quartz<br />
ve<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the basalt. Lateral as well as vertical transitions from weathered basalt levels <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s to pedogenized red materials <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g quartz ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ have been observed (Figs. 5-E,<br />
5-F). In some cases these siliceous levels <strong>in</strong>to the pedogenized material seem to result from a<br />
secondary crystallisation of quartz, thus develop<strong>in</strong>g as ¨silcretes¨. Besides, <strong>in</strong> several <strong>in</strong>stances, a<br />
secondary crystallisation of quartz seems to happen on relictic quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s; the upper face of<br />
these levels shows an irregular morphology that could be the result of dissolution as well as<br />
crystallization of silica.<br />
In every case it is clear that the siliceous levels are basically massive and cont<strong>in</strong>uous, i.e.<br />
they are not constituted by pebbles or fragments that were submitted to transport. Some<br />
fragmentation of thick siliceous ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ observed <strong>in</strong> some cases on vertical walls is the artificial<br />
result of the excavation, which is not observed when the ¨levels¨ are carefully exposed remov<strong>in</strong>g<br />
272
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
the cover<strong>in</strong>g material. Th<strong>in</strong> ve<strong>in</strong>s may be naturally fragmented, but the fragments appear<br />
perfectly accommodated as the pieces of a floor (Fig. 5-D), this be<strong>in</strong>g the result of <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
movements and eventually from processes of dissolution, dur<strong>in</strong>g the processes of rock<br />
weather<strong>in</strong>g and soil formation.<br />
273
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
In these profiles, the ferrug<strong>in</strong>ous nodules are scarce and its vertical distribution is different to<br />
the profiles with ¨nodular l<strong>in</strong>es¨. In some cases levels show<strong>in</strong>g a relatively higher<br />
concentration of iron nodules, dark red and hematitic, and appear<strong>in</strong>g regularly with depth,<br />
co<strong>in</strong>cides with a higher concentration of quartz gravels (Fig. 3). The last may be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as<br />
fragments of presently dissolved th<strong>in</strong> relictic quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s; it may be hypothesized that those<br />
former ve<strong>in</strong>s have slow<strong>in</strong>g down the process of lixiviation thus contribut<strong>in</strong>g to an<br />
accumulation of iron and promot<strong>in</strong>g the development of iron nodules.<br />
c) The ¨structured horizons¨<br />
Concern<strong>in</strong>g the blocky structured subsurface levels below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” (Figs. 5-A, 5-F),<br />
field and analytical results lead to the conclusion that they are not buried paleosols and that<br />
they can not be considered as an evidence of paleosurfaces. Two processes may be<br />
responsible for the formation of these structured layers: 1) The first one is similar to the<br />
“stone l<strong>in</strong>e” development described above, to which sometimes they are associated: <strong>in</strong> this<br />
case a lateral sequence of weather<strong>in</strong>g, from the weathered rock to a structured and f<strong>in</strong>e<br />
textured material, can be observed (Figs. 5-E, 5-F). 2) In a second one, nodular or siliceous<br />
layers derived from the above mentioned processes, may exert a “protection” effect on the<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>e textured materials aga<strong>in</strong>st the weather<strong>in</strong>g front, thus allow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
development or conservation of structural blocky units. As a consequence, places are found <strong>in</strong><br />
which a well def<strong>in</strong>ed “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” covers a cont<strong>in</strong>uous structured horizon, as well as places<br />
where short discont<strong>in</strong>uous ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ or even isolated gravels preserve structured micro-horizons,<br />
surrounded by a differently organized material.<br />
Besides the profiles show<strong>in</strong>g one of the above mentioned two types of ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>es¨,<br />
other situations have been also observed: profiles with several superimposed ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ of the<br />
same type; profiles with different types of ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ superimposed at different depths; ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨<br />
with dark and bright gravels of lam<strong>in</strong>ar morphology; profiles without ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨; ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>es¨<br />
appear<strong>in</strong>g above, below as well as <strong>in</strong>side of structured layers, thus do not hav<strong>in</strong>g a fixed<br />
positional relation with structured horizons, and “l<strong>in</strong>es” ly<strong>in</strong>g directly on or with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
saprolite. It is also to be mentioned that besides the horizontal facies, many times “stone<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es” and structured layers show sub-horizontal directions and bifurcations or branch<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
(Fig. 5-A). ¨L<strong>in</strong>es¨ with an undulated morphology, sometimes described as ¨funnel-like¨ [20],<br />
are also common.<br />
d) Clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy.<br />
The XR-diffractometry of the clay fraction from different profiles, those hav<strong>in</strong>g a nodular<br />
“stone l<strong>in</strong>e” as well as those with a siliceous l<strong>in</strong>e, shows a similar composition and gradual<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogical variation from the saprolite up to the soil surface (Fig. 4). The more abundant<br />
components of the fraction are kaol<strong>in</strong>itic m<strong>in</strong>erals, i.e ma<strong>in</strong>ly kaol<strong>in</strong>ite and some halloysite,<br />
the last evidenced clearly by TEM; the content of these phyllosilicates decrease progressively<br />
from the saprolite up to the surface. At the same time, a cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>crease of chloritic<br />
m<strong>in</strong>erals is observed from the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” up to the surface, where they comprise around the<br />
15% of the clay fraction. These last m<strong>in</strong>erals known under different names, v.g. pseudochlorites,<br />
alum<strong>in</strong>ous chlorite, alum<strong>in</strong>ous vermiculites, develop <strong>in</strong> pedogenic environments.<br />
This m<strong>in</strong>eralogical vertical variation suggests that these profiles are the result of <strong>in</strong> situ<br />
weather<strong>in</strong>g of the basalt rock. Besides, it can be observed that the m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition<br />
of structured levels below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”, which have been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as paleosols, have a<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition similar to that of the saprolite and thus differ<strong>in</strong>g from that of the<br />
upper B soil horizons.<br />
274
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
e) Sand m<strong>in</strong>eralogy and quartz exoscopy<br />
The sand fraction of the ferrallitic soils <strong>in</strong> Misiones is almost exclusively composed by quartz<br />
and magnetite, the first be<strong>in</strong>g more abundant <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>er fractions while the second is more<br />
abundant <strong>in</strong> the coarser ones. Variable proportions of pseudosand gra<strong>in</strong>s and small iron<br />
nodules are also observed by microscopy. Other stable m<strong>in</strong>erals as ilmenite, anatase and rutile<br />
have been detected by XRD [2, 12]. The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of sands is thus typical<br />
for highly weathered materials.<br />
On the other hand, the morphological study of quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s by optical microscopy and<br />
by SEM, record<strong>in</strong>g their general morphology and the features on their surfaces, provides<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation about their history, i.e. processes of transport and chemical environment that have<br />
affected the materials where the gra<strong>in</strong>s are <strong>in</strong>cluded [4, 9].<br />
Microscopic analysis of the sand fraction from soils of Misiones reveals that a<br />
considerable part of quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s have experienced a high degree of weather<strong>in</strong>g, characterised<br />
by deep and <strong>in</strong>terconnected pits of dissolution (Fig. 5-G). On the other hand, many of the<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>s are clearly the result of secondary crystallisation of quartz. This secondary quartz can<br />
be observed as <strong>in</strong>dividualized s<strong>in</strong>gle gra<strong>in</strong>s, or as a secondary crystallisation on the surface of<br />
other quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s act<strong>in</strong>g as a nucleus or template for silica deposition (Fig. 5-G). Some of<br />
the gra<strong>in</strong>s appear rounded under optical microscopy, but under the SEM these gra<strong>in</strong>s show<br />
sharp and well developed crystal faces (Fig. 5-H). Besides, these gra<strong>in</strong>s show on their surface<br />
typical marks of dissolution with an <strong>in</strong>verted trigonal symmetry [12]<br />
The exoscopy performed on sand gra<strong>in</strong>s from different horizons of ferrallitic soils from<br />
Misiones, do not show evidences of eolian transport. On the contrary clear traces of quartz<br />
crystallisation and of chemical dissolution appear. Very <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g are those gra<strong>in</strong>s show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
both processes, a first one of quartz crystallisation, with silica supposedly ma<strong>in</strong>ly com<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from more weatherable m<strong>in</strong>erals, followed by the dissolution of that secondary quartz (Fig. 5-<br />
275
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
H). Thus, morphology and surface textures of quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s are consistent with a <strong>in</strong> situ<br />
development of these ferrallitic soils.<br />
f) Magnetic susceptibility<br />
Magnetic susceptibility was measured <strong>in</strong> the field and <strong>in</strong> the laboratory, <strong>in</strong> this case at high<br />
and low frequency. Results obta<strong>in</strong>ed show high values, fitt<strong>in</strong>g the concept of “magnetic” soils,<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g progressively from the saprolite up to the soil surface. The difference between high<br />
and low MS –the frequency dependent MS– is low <strong>in</strong> the saprolite, shows a rapid <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
from the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” to lower B horizons, and then keeps similar differences up to the surface<br />
(Figs. 2, 3).<br />
The gradual <strong>in</strong>crease of MS from the saprolite towards the surface can be related to a<br />
gradual <strong>in</strong>crement <strong>in</strong> the magnetite content, a highly resistant m<strong>in</strong>eral found <strong>in</strong> the basalt rock<br />
[2]. In turn, the high value of the frequency dependent MS above the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”, is an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dication of the existence of superparamagnetic magnetite, which is of pedogenic orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Thus, both results suggest that these soil profiles are developed through <strong>in</strong> situ ferrallitic<br />
processes of weather<strong>in</strong>g from the basalt. Besides, data from the structured horizons below the<br />
stone l<strong>in</strong>e differ from the soil horizons above it, thus be<strong>in</strong>g an additional <strong>in</strong>dication that they<br />
are not paleosols.<br />
g) Granulometry<br />
The granulometric data show a gradual <strong>in</strong>crease of clay and silt fractions from the surface to<br />
the middle part of the B horizons, and then a progressive decrease towards the base of the<br />
saprolite (Figs. 2, 3). The maximum of f<strong>in</strong>e materials observed <strong>in</strong> the B horizon would be the<br />
result of a twofold process, <strong>in</strong> a one hand the result of the process of illuviation typical for<br />
Ultisols, and <strong>in</strong> the other hand a process of argilogenesis due to rock weather<strong>in</strong>g and soil<br />
development. Particularly, the progressive <strong>in</strong>crease of f<strong>in</strong>e fractions from the saprolite<br />
towards the middle part of B horizons suggests that the materials are <strong>in</strong> situ. Besides, the<br />
content of f<strong>in</strong>e fractions <strong>in</strong> the structured horizons below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” are quite different<br />
from the B horizons, and do not seem to correspond to a paleo Ultisol as has been proposed.<br />
h) Geochemistry<br />
Total amounts of selected chemical elements and their ratios generally show cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
transitions from the saprolite up to the soil surface, evidenc<strong>in</strong>g the weather<strong>in</strong>g process and the<br />
neoformation of m<strong>in</strong>erals that have occurred <strong>in</strong> these soils. Total content of silica <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
rapidly above the saprolite, due to the neoformation of clay m<strong>in</strong>erals as well as quartz<br />
crystallisation. The Si/Al ratio <strong>in</strong>creases progressively towards the surface, runn<strong>in</strong>g parallel<br />
with the <strong>in</strong>crease of chloritic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> the same direction (Fig. 3). A stable element as Zr<br />
<strong>in</strong>creases progressively towards the surface, which would reflect the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity of<br />
weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the same direction. Weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dices such as the one of Parker and<br />
homogeneity <strong>in</strong>dices such as Ti/Zr do not show discordances (Fig. 3). But the same elements<br />
and certa<strong>in</strong> ratios shift significantly below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”. These results <strong>in</strong>dicate that the<br />
reddish materials and the “structured horizons” below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” do not correspond to a<br />
paleosol and to a lower member of a sedimentary formation as has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted [5], but to<br />
slightly pedogenized transitional levels between the saprolite and the B horizons of the soils.<br />
276
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
i) Stable Carbon Isotopes<br />
The stable carbon isotope composition of plants differs accord<strong>in</strong>g to their photosynthetic<br />
pathway (C3, C4, and CAM). δ 13 C values of C3 plants like trees and almost all the plants <strong>in</strong><br />
temperate and cold regions, range from approximately –32‰ to –20‰ PDB, with a mean of –<br />
27‰. In contrast δ 13 C values of C4 plants, adapted to conditions of higher hydric stress, range<br />
from –17‰ to –9‰, with a mean of –13‰ [11, 17]. Isotopic fractionation depends not only<br />
on the type of vegetation but also on the plant environment, the CO2 atmospheric<br />
concentration, the temperature and on the humidity level. Dur<strong>in</strong>g litter decomposition and<br />
humification the isotopic signal of plants is transferred <strong>in</strong>to the soil organic matter (SOM).<br />
Thus, the analysis of carbon isotopic composition of SOM may allow to deduce <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
about the environments and climatic conditions under which plants have grown <strong>in</strong> former<br />
times.<br />
Results obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Misiones [16] show that surface soil horizons (0-50 cm) have δ 13 C<br />
values around –25‰ <strong>in</strong> accordance with the present humid climate and a C3 vegetation cover.<br />
At around one meter depth the isotopic signature shows a significant enrichment <strong>in</strong> δ 13 C of up<br />
to –15‰ (Figs. 2, 3).This result <strong>in</strong>dicates that the SOM has derived from a vegetation<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ated by C4 plants developed under conditions of hydric stress <strong>in</strong> a savanna<br />
environment. Such conditions have probably existed <strong>in</strong> Misiones dur<strong>in</strong>g the Last Glacial<br />
Maximum and the first half of the Holocene, as it is reported by several authors <strong>in</strong> southern<br />
Brazil [6, 17].<br />
In the lower part of the profiles, the measurement of δ 13 C gives <strong>in</strong>termediate values<br />
(around -21‰) that are more difficult to be expla<strong>in</strong>ed. Anyway, and <strong>in</strong> accordance with the<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpretations made for similar situations, it is considered that these δ 13 C values result from a<br />
vegetation dom<strong>in</strong>ated by C3 plants <strong>in</strong> an open forest and under <strong>in</strong>termediate climatic<br />
conditions. Consequently, <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” there are no evidences of arid to<br />
semiarid environmental conditions suitable for a denudation, accumulation of gravels on a<br />
paleosurface, and a later eolian sedimentation several meters thick dur<strong>in</strong>g the LGM as has<br />
been proposed by Iriondo and Kröhl<strong>in</strong>g [5].<br />
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to our field and laboratory results, it is possible to attribute an autochthonous<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> to the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the red soils of Misiones.<br />
In the case of the “nodular l<strong>in</strong>es”, the rounded goethitic gravels seem to derive from a<br />
differential weather<strong>in</strong>g of relatively more resistant basaltic layers. Transitional situations<br />
between the weathered basalt and the well def<strong>in</strong>ed “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” clearly show the orig<strong>in</strong> and<br />
the process of <strong>in</strong>dividualisation and accumulation of s<strong>in</strong>gle nodules. Besides, the ferrug<strong>in</strong>ous<br />
nodules are not restricted to the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”. The hematitic ones as well as those with a<br />
partial cover<strong>in</strong>g of hematite at their surfaces, both appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g proportion with<br />
depth down to the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”, may also be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as relictic fragments of the basaltic<br />
saprolite, i.e. formed similarly to the ones <strong>in</strong> the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” but that has been progressively<br />
weathered, sparsed and covered by hematite as the result of soil development.<br />
In the case of the “siliceous l<strong>in</strong>es” several evidences <strong>in</strong>dicate that they are also<br />
autochthonous, and derived from pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> the basalt. Here also<br />
transitional situations between the weathered basalt <strong>in</strong>truded by quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s, and silica<br />
accumulations <strong>in</strong>to pedogenized materials have been observed. Besides it has clearly appeared<br />
that platy siliceous gravels are not transported and that they result from <strong>in</strong> situ fragmentation<br />
of quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s. Some additional complexity <strong>in</strong> the evolution and morphology of these<br />
277
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
“siliceous l<strong>in</strong>es” is given by the frequently evident secondary accumulation of quartz on the<br />
relictic ve<strong>in</strong>s, which <strong>in</strong> cases make difficult to dist<strong>in</strong>guish relictic features from newly formed<br />
levels that would better fit with the concept of “silcretes”.<br />
Concern<strong>in</strong>g the “structured horizons” below the “stonel<strong>in</strong>es”, field and analytical data<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate that they are not paleosols. Though the process of structuration is not so clear, it also<br />
seems to be associated to the existence of the relatively more resistant layers with<strong>in</strong> the basalt.<br />
In the case of profiles with “nodular l<strong>in</strong>es”, it seems that dur<strong>in</strong>g the process of nodules<br />
development, the material <strong>in</strong> between and immediately below gets a polyhedric structure. In<br />
this process of aggregates development, the “l<strong>in</strong>es” seem to play as a sort of “protection”<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st the weather<strong>in</strong>g front. This “protective” effect would be the orig<strong>in</strong> of structuration <strong>in</strong><br />
the case of “siliceous l<strong>in</strong>es”. Several field evidences seem to support these <strong>in</strong>terpretations: <strong>in</strong><br />
many cases the “structured horizons” conserve many morphological features from the<br />
saprolite. In the cases where the “nodular” or “siliceous” l<strong>in</strong>es have subhorizontal directions<br />
or when they bifurcate, “structured horizons” follow the orientation of those gravelly “l<strong>in</strong>es”.<br />
Moreover, <strong>in</strong> the cases where the horizontal gravelly “l<strong>in</strong>es” are <strong>in</strong>terrupted, a feature that<br />
may be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as the result of weather<strong>in</strong>g proceed<strong>in</strong>g through pockets <strong>in</strong>to the parent<br />
rock, the “structured horizons” also disappear.<br />
Thus, both types of gravelly ”l<strong>in</strong>es” identified <strong>in</strong> the ferrallitic soils of Misiones as well<br />
as the “structured horizons” are consider<strong>in</strong>g to be <strong>in</strong> situ relictic features deriv<strong>in</strong>g from the<br />
ferrallitic weather<strong>in</strong>g of two types of basaltic flows appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the area. The soils show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
both types of “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” superposed with<strong>in</strong> the same profile, the “nodular” one above the<br />
“siliceous” one -as was consistently observed up to the moment- <strong>in</strong> agreement with the usual<br />
ly<strong>in</strong>g of both types of basalt layers at the surface, are additional evidences of its<br />
autochthonous orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
The authors thank the ¨Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación Científica y<br />
Técnica¨ –ANPCyT- of Argent<strong>in</strong>a, for support<strong>in</strong>g a great part of this research through the<br />
Project PICT 07-08879.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] H. Behl<strong>in</strong>g, M, Lichte, A., Miklós. Evidence of a forest free landscape under dry and cold climate conditions<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the Last Glacial Maximun <strong>in</strong> the Botocatu region (Sao Paulo State), Southeastern Brazil. Quaternary of<br />
South America and Antartic Pen<strong>in</strong>sula, 11, 99-110, (1998).<br />
[2] H. Causevic, H. Morrás, A. Mijovilovich, C. Saragovi. Evidences of the stability of magnetite on a soil from<br />
Northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a by Mössbauer spectroscopy and magnetization measurementes. Physica B: Physics of<br />
Condensed Matter, 354 (1-4): 373-376, (2004)<br />
[3] Y. Chatel<strong>in</strong>, Influence des conceptions géomorphologiques et paléoclimatiques sur l´<strong>in</strong>terpretation de la<br />
genèse et la classification des sols ferrallitiques d´Afrique Centrale et Australe. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Pédol.,<br />
V(3): 243-255, (1967)<br />
[4] H. Eswaran, G. Stoops. Surface textures of quartz <strong>in</strong> tropical soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal.<br />
43(2):420-424, (1979).<br />
[5] M. Iriondo, D. Kröhl<strong>in</strong>g. The tropical loess. Proc. 30 th International Geological Congress, (An Zhisheng et<br />
al., Eds.), Vol. 21, p. 61-77, (1997).<br />
[6] T. Desjard<strong>in</strong>s, F. Andreux, B. Volkoff., C. Cerri, Distribution de l’ isotope 13 C dans des sols ferrallitiques du<br />
Brésil. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Pédol., XXVI (4): 343-348, (1991).<br />
[7] D. Johnson. Dynamic denudation evolution of tropical, subtropical and temperate landscapes with three<br />
tiered soils: toward a general theory of landscape evolution. Quaternary International, 17: 67-78, (1993).<br />
278
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
[8] D. Johnson, J. Domier, D.N. Johnson. Animat<strong>in</strong>g the biodynamics of soil thickness us<strong>in</strong>g process vector<br />
analysis: a dynamic denudation approach to soil formation. Geomorphology, 67, 23-46, (2005).<br />
[9] L. Le Ribault. L´exoscopie des quartz. Masson, Paris, 150 p, (1977)<br />
[10] M. Lichte, H. Behl<strong>in</strong>g, Dry and cold climatic conditions <strong>in</strong> the formation of the present landscape <strong>in</strong><br />
Southeastern Brazil. Z. Geomorph. N.F., 43(3):341-358, (1999).<br />
[11] A. Mariotti. Le carbone 13 en abondance naturelle, traceur de la dynamique de la matière organique des sols<br />
et de l’évolution des paléoenvironments cont<strong>in</strong>entaux. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Pédol., XXVI (4): 299-313, (1991).<br />
[12] A. Mijovilovich, H. Morrás, C. Saragovi, G. Santana, J. Fabris. Magnetic fraction of an Ultisol from<br />
Misiones, Argent<strong>in</strong>a. Hyperf<strong>in</strong>e Interactions, C, 3: 332-335, (1998)<br />
[13] H. Morrás, L. Moretti, G. Píccolo, W. Zech. Algunas observaciones sobre la composición y el origen del<br />
material edafizado y las líneas de piedra sobreyacentes a los basaltos de Misiones. Actas X Reunión Argent<strong>in</strong>a de<br />
Sedimentología, San Luis, pp. 106-108, (2004)<br />
[14] H. Morrás, L. Moretti, G. Píccolo, W. Zech. <strong>New</strong> hypotheses and results about the orig<strong>in</strong> of stonel<strong>in</strong>es and<br />
subsurface structured horizons <strong>in</strong> ferrallitic soils of Misiones, Argent<strong>in</strong>a. 2 nd Assembly of the European<br />
Geosciences Union, Vienna, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 7, 05522, (2005).<br />
[15] H. Morrás, L. Moretti, B. Glaser, G. Píccolo, W. Zech. Eolian transport vs. <strong>in</strong> situ weather<strong>in</strong>g: evidences for<br />
support<strong>in</strong>g an autochthonous orig<strong>in</strong> of ferrallitic soil parent materials <strong>in</strong> subtropical norhteastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
Abstracts, INQUA International Workshop, Lower Latitudes Loess - Dust transport. Past and Present,<br />
Lanzarote, Canary Islands, (2006)<br />
[16] H. Morrás, L. Moretti, B. Glaser, G. Píccolo, C. Hatté, W. Zech. Paleoenvironments <strong>in</strong> the subtropical<br />
northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a as deduced from stable Carbon isotopes composition of ferrallitic soils. V South<br />
American Symposium on Isotope Geology. Punta del Este, Uruguay, pp. 267-271, (2006)<br />
[17] L. Pessenda, S. Gouveia, R. Aravena, R. Boulet, E. Valencia. Holocene fire and vegetation changes <strong>in</strong><br />
southeastern Brazil as deduced from fossil charcoal and soil carbon isotopes. Quaternary International, 114, 35–<br />
43, (2004).<br />
[18] G. Sanesi. I souli di Misiones. Academia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, 343 p., (1965).<br />
[19] P. Ségalen. Les sols ferrallitiques et leur répartition géographique. Orstom Éditions, Paris, Tome 1, 198 p.,<br />
(1994).<br />
[20] G. Stoops. Le profil d´alteration au Bas-Congo (K<strong>in</strong>shasa). Sa description et sa genèse. Pédologie, XVII (1):<br />
60-105, (1967).<br />
279
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Figure 5. A: soil profile with a ¨nodular l<strong>in</strong>e¨ (profile M0 <strong>in</strong> the locality of Leandro N. Alem); see the<br />
complex morphology of the ¨l<strong>in</strong>e¨. B: a profile with a ¨siliceous l<strong>in</strong>e¨ (M10, <strong>in</strong> the locality of<br />
Aristóbulo del Valle). C: goethitic nodules develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the saprolite, and giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to a ¨nodular<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e¨. D: vertical view of a ¨siliceous l<strong>in</strong>e¨ deriv<strong>in</strong>g from a quartz ve<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>to the basalt; E: at left, two<br />
superposed weathered basalt layers; the lower layer <strong>in</strong>cludes quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s; at right, the same profile <strong>in</strong><br />
a more advanced step of weather<strong>in</strong>g. F: the same sequence of basalt layers showed <strong>in</strong> figure E,<br />
already pedogenized; remark the superposition of a ¨nodular l<strong>in</strong>e¨ above a ¨siliceous l<strong>in</strong>e¨, each one<br />
with its own ¨structured horizon¨ G: sand fraction from a Bt horizon, composed by magnetite, quartz<br />
and pseudosands (optical microscopy); remark the presence of very weathered quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s together<br />
with secondary quartz. H: a gra<strong>in</strong> of secondary quartz from the sand fraction; remark the dissolution<br />
pits.<br />
280
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
PEDOGENESIS ALONG A HILLSLOPE TRAVERSE IN THE<br />
UPPER AFRAM BASIN, GHANA<br />
T. Adjei-Gyapong, 1 E. Boateng, 1 * C. Dela Dedzoe, 1 W.R. Effland, 2 M.D. Mays 2 and J.K.<br />
Seneya 1<br />
Poster Extended Abstract<br />
1 Ghana Soil Research Institute and 2 USDA/NRCS Soil Survey Division<br />
E-mail: soilri@ncs.com.gh, Tel: 23321778226, Fax: 23321778219<br />
In March 2004, six pedons were sampled dur<strong>in</strong>g a collaborative Ghana-U.S. <strong>in</strong>ter-laboratory<br />
soil characterization project. This poster presents results from three pedons located along a<br />
hillslope traverse. The objectives of this research are: (1) to compare the morphology of the<br />
soils; (2) to exam<strong>in</strong>e the chemical, physical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of each soil; and<br />
(3) to understand the genesis and variation of soil properties along the hillslope.<br />
Three locations were selected to represent soil variation along a hillslope traverse with<br />
consistent parent materials, climate, and native vegetation. Standard soil characterization<br />
analyses were conducted at the USDA/NRCS National Soil Survey Laboratory <strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>coln,<br />
NE (Soil Survey Staff, 1996),and the Soil Research Institute , Ghana. Analytical results for<br />
particle size distribution, pH, clay and sand m<strong>in</strong>eralogy, and citrate-dithionite extractable<br />
“free” Fe are discussed. Th<strong>in</strong> sections were prepared from oriented clods<br />
The soils are developed over relatively similar parent materials (f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed Voltaian<br />
sandstones) and <strong>in</strong> similar macro-climates. Occurr<strong>in</strong>g at the forest-savannah transition, they<br />
display contrast<strong>in</strong>g morphological properties, which affect their soil classification, land use<br />
and management. The Techiman series (Typic Rhodustalfs) on the summit to shoulder is well<br />
to excessively dra<strong>in</strong>ed, moderately deep (80-100 cm), grayish brown, loamy f<strong>in</strong>e sand with<br />
many (35%) ironstone concretions and nodules over a reddish brown, dom<strong>in</strong>antly ironstoneconcretionary<br />
(65%) sandy clay loam subsoil. On the l<strong>in</strong>ear (middle) back slopes, the<br />
Amant<strong>in</strong> series (Typic Kandiustalfs) is moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, very deep (> 190 cm),<br />
grayish brown, loamy f<strong>in</strong>e sand over yellowish brown sandy clay loam free of coarse<br />
fragments. The Denteso series (Oxyaquic Dystrudept) on the foot (lower) slope is poorly<br />
dra<strong>in</strong>ed, grayish brown, loamy f<strong>in</strong>e sand over structureless, s<strong>in</strong>gle-gra<strong>in</strong>ed p<strong>in</strong>kish gray sand.<br />
Iron concretions and ironpans occur with<strong>in</strong>, and <strong>in</strong> some cases beneath, the soils<br />
studied along the hillslope <strong>in</strong> the Upper Afram Bas<strong>in</strong>. The genesis of ironpans <strong>in</strong>volves cycles<br />
of Fe mobilization, redistribution and concentration with<strong>in</strong> the landscape. The higher Fe<br />
content results from element release through m<strong>in</strong>eral weather<strong>in</strong>g from overly<strong>in</strong>g horizons and<br />
neighbor<strong>in</strong>g upslope soils.<br />
Further research is planned with an evaluation of terra<strong>in</strong> data on elevation, slope<br />
classes, slope aspect and other derivatives for the Afram Bas<strong>in</strong> study area.<br />
Current environmental conditions (elevation, slope classes, aspect) with<strong>in</strong> the Afram<br />
Bas<strong>in</strong> study area are displayed with derivatives from a 200 ft resolution digital elevation<br />
model (DEM).<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[157] S.V. Adu, J. A. Mensah-Ansah. "Soils of the Afram Bas<strong>in</strong>, Ashantiand Eastern Regions, Ghana",<br />
CSIR-Soil Research Institute, Memoir No. 12. Kwadaso-Kumasi, Ghana. 90pp., (1995).<br />
281
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
[158] T.W. Awadzi, R.D. Asiamah. "Soil Survey of Ghana", Soil Survey Horizon. 43 (2): 44-52, (2002).<br />
[159] E. Boateng, TR. E. Chidley, D. J. Savory, J. Elgy. "Soil Information System Development and <strong>Land</strong><br />
Suitability Mapp<strong>in</strong>g at the Ghana Soil Research Institute", Poster Presentation at 16 th World Congress of Soil<br />
Science, Montpellier, France. August 20-26, (1998).<br />
[160] Soil Survey Staff. "Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual". USDA/NRCS Soil Survey<br />
Investigations Report No. 42, January, (1996).<br />
282
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
INFLUENCE OF TITANOMAGNETITE ON DITHIONITE-<br />
CITRATE-BICARBONATE (DCB) AND OXALATE<br />
EXTRACTIONS IN WEATHERED DOLERITE<br />
C. G. Algoe 1* , E. Van Ranst 2 , G. Stoops 3<br />
1* Anton de Kom Universiteit van Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Faculteit der Technologische Wetenschappen, POB 9212,<br />
Paramaribo, Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Tel: +597 465558 ext. 413, Fax: +597 495005, Email: c.algoe@uvs.edu<br />
2 Laboratorium voor Bodemkunde, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Gent, Belgium<br />
3 Laboratorium voor M<strong>in</strong>eralogie, Petrologie en Micropedologie, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, S8 B-9000<br />
Gent, Belgium<br />
Abstract<br />
Four dolerite boulders were collected <strong>in</strong> weathered profiles <strong>in</strong> the Precambrian Guiana Shield<br />
occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame. These spheroidally weathered boulders were sub-sampled <strong>in</strong> the<br />
laboratory to obta<strong>in</strong> shells of different weather<strong>in</strong>g grades, which were analysed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical techniques. The high amount of ammonium-oxalate extractable<br />
iron as compared to the dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB) extractable iron and the presence<br />
of titanomagnetite <strong>in</strong> the fresh rock questions the <strong>in</strong>fluence of (titano)magnetite on either type<br />
of extraction technique. Highly magnetic fractions were separated from the fresh rock and<br />
studied us<strong>in</strong>g microprobe analyses, oxalate and DCB extractions. Oxalate and DCB<br />
extractions were also carried out on th<strong>in</strong> sections. The results confirm the <strong>in</strong>fluence of<br />
titanomagnetite on the extractable iron content.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Two techniques are most commonly used to extract pedogenic iron from soil and regolith<br />
samples: the ammonium-oxalate method (Ox) and the dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB)<br />
method. The oxalate extraction is presumed to remove X-ray amorphous and organic bound<br />
iron oxides, whereas the dithionite extraction is supposed to remove <strong>in</strong> addition the f<strong>in</strong>ely<br />
crystall<strong>in</strong>e iron oxides [9, 10, 21]. The amount of iron released by the dithionite extraction<br />
should therefore be equal to or greater than the amount of iron released by the oxalate<br />
extraction method [21].<br />
In order to study the spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g of dolerite, four boulders were collected <strong>in</strong><br />
a weathered profile with<strong>in</strong> the Precambrian Guiana Shield occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame. These<br />
boulders were sub-sampled <strong>in</strong> the laboratory, to obta<strong>in</strong> shells of vary<strong>in</strong>g weather<strong>in</strong>g grade,<br />
which were analyzed with various chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical techniques, among which the<br />
oxalate and DCB extractions. The amount of iron extracted by the ammonium-oxalate method<br />
was unexpectedly higher than the amount of Fe extracted by the DCB method carried out on<br />
fresh rock (Table 1). One of the possible explanations for this result could be the presence of<br />
magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> the samples, <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the extraction methods. This study aims at<br />
determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>fluence of magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals on the ammonium oxalate extractable and<br />
DCB extractable iron. Analyses are made on bulk samples as well as th<strong>in</strong> sections of the fresh<br />
rock.<br />
A number of studies have been dedicated to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the <strong>in</strong>fluence of magnetite on<br />
both the dithionite and oxalate extraction methods. The results are sometimes however a bit<br />
contradictory. It has been demonstrated that oxalate extraction dissolves magnetite and that<br />
283
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
dithionite extraction does not attack primary magnetite [10] but does attack hematite <strong>in</strong> or on<br />
the magnetic gra<strong>in</strong>s [19, 20, 21]. Other studies however reveal that the presence of magnetite<br />
or maghemite does <strong>in</strong>fluence the DCB extraction method [4, 5, 6, 7, 8].<br />
DCB extraction depends on the extraction temperature, as well as on the concentration<br />
of the magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals [18]. Athough some dist<strong>in</strong>ction between f<strong>in</strong>e gra<strong>in</strong>ed maghemite and<br />
magnetite could be made the DCB extraction treatment alone was proven not to be suitable<br />
for dist<strong>in</strong>ction between f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed magnetic iron oxides [18].<br />
It was stated [18] that the results of reported DCB extraction studies varied<br />
considerably. In some cases the DCB method was reported to dissolve only the pedogenic<br />
maghemite [5, 16, 17] while <strong>in</strong> other cases the f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed magnetite was dissolved as well<br />
[8]. The results of different studies were found difficult to compare, because the extraction<br />
procedure of each study was not always clearly specified. Factors such as amount of sample,<br />
type of sample, amount of dithionite and extraction temperature varied with each study.<br />
The reductive dissolution of iron oxides is a k<strong>in</strong>etic process and factors such as pH,<br />
crystall<strong>in</strong>ity and temperature have a major effect on the dissolution rate [11, 13, 22].<br />
Therefore, results of extraction studies with differences <strong>in</strong> extraction procedures do not<br />
necessarily reflect the same dissolution behaviour. The sample type (natural or synthetic) also<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>es the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed by DCB extraction.<br />
Chemical extractants, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g acid ammonium oxalate and DCB, have also been<br />
used for study<strong>in</strong>g the spatial distribution of iron and other oxides <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections of<br />
undisturbed soil [1, 2, 3], prov<strong>in</strong>g the usefulness for these techniques for extractions carried<br />
out on th<strong>in</strong> sections.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The material selected for this study consisted of dolerite samples obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Central-North area of Sur<strong>in</strong>ame <strong>in</strong> a village called Berg en Dal (Figure 1). The dolerite<br />
boulders show<strong>in</strong>g spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g patterns were collected <strong>in</strong> the field and shells were<br />
sub-sampled <strong>in</strong> the laboratory. For this study samples of the unweathered dolerite were<br />
selected for analyses. Ammonium-oxalate extractions and DCB extractions were carried out<br />
on bulk samples, their highly magnetic fraction, and on th<strong>in</strong> sections. The highly magnetic<br />
fraction was separated from the bulk sample by pass<strong>in</strong>g a hand magnet over the sample at a<br />
distance of 1 cm. The highly magnetic fraction was studied us<strong>in</strong>g microprobe analyses,<br />
ammonium-oxalate extractions, DCB extractions, and X-Ray analyses. The extracts were<br />
measured us<strong>in</strong>g atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS).<br />
The ammonium oxalate extraction is based on solubilisation of the amorphous<br />
sesquioxides after reduction reactions with ammonium oxalate <strong>in</strong> the dark. The method<br />
followed was retested by Schwertmann [14, 15] who found out that <strong>in</strong> the darkness the<br />
ammonium-oxalate extraction only dissolved X-ray amorphous oxides [9]. Fe, Al, Si and Mn<br />
are measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). A 0.2M ammonium oxalate<br />
solution and a 0.2M oxalic acid solution were prepared and mixed to obta<strong>in</strong> an ammonium<br />
oxalate-and oxalic acid mixture with pH = 3. The sample (250 mg) was weighed <strong>in</strong> a plastic<br />
centrifuge tube to which 50 ml ammonium oxalate mixture was added. This mixture was<br />
stirred <strong>in</strong> the dark for 4 hours and centrifuged dur<strong>in</strong>g 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes at 2000 rpm. The supernatant<br />
clear solution was decanted to a volumetric flask of 50 ml and the volume was made up with<br />
the oxalate mixture. This solution was used for the measurement of Fe, Al, Si and Mn. The<br />
same procedure was followed for extraction of th<strong>in</strong> sections, vary<strong>in</strong>g the extraction time from<br />
4 to 6, and f<strong>in</strong>ally 12 hours [1, 2, 3].<br />
284
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Figure 1: Location of the study area Berg en Dal <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame (Modified after [12])<br />
285
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g the DCB extractions, amorphous coat<strong>in</strong>gs and crystals of free iron oxides and<br />
other sesquioxides are removed us<strong>in</strong>g sodiumdithionite as reduc<strong>in</strong>g agent. The removal of free<br />
iron oxides aids <strong>in</strong> dispersion of the silicate proportion [11]. The DCB extractions were<br />
carried out follow<strong>in</strong>g the procedure outl<strong>in</strong>ed by Mehra and Jackson [11]. The concentration of<br />
Fe, Al, Si and Mn are determ<strong>in</strong>ed from a solution <strong>in</strong> which the solubilized cations are kept <strong>in</strong><br />
solution by complexation with Na citrate. A Na citrate bicarbonate buffer is added to the<br />
sample, which is placed <strong>in</strong> a waterbath, for 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes after which sodium dithionite powder<br />
(0.75 gram) is added, while stirr<strong>in</strong>g and the solution is aga<strong>in</strong> left for 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes. After<br />
cool<strong>in</strong>g, the mixture is centrifuged at 3000 rpm, decanted, washed, aga<strong>in</strong> centrifuged and<br />
decanted. The collected extraction solution is used for determ<strong>in</strong>ation of Fe, Al, Si and Mn<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g AAS. The same procedure was followed for DCB extraction on th<strong>in</strong> sections. In some<br />
cases multiple DCB extractions were carried out on the same th<strong>in</strong> section. The total values for<br />
Fe, Al, Si and Mn were measured for the fresh rock us<strong>in</strong>g AAS.<br />
The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of the opaque m<strong>in</strong>erals was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by wavelength<br />
dispersive spectrometry (WDS) microprobe analyses on uncovered th<strong>in</strong> sections and Energy<br />
dispersive spectrometry (EDS) microprobe analyses on magnetic gra<strong>in</strong>s, as well as X-Ray<br />
Diffraction analyses on the highly magnetic fraction. The XRD patterns were collected with a<br />
Phillips X’PERT system with a PW 3710 based diffractometer (Laboratory of Soil Science,<br />
Ghent University), equipped with a Cu tube anode, a secondary graphite beam<br />
monochromator, a proportional xenon-filled detector, and a 35-position multiple sample<br />
changer. The <strong>in</strong>cident beam was automatically collimated. The irradiated length was 12 mm.<br />
The secondary beam side comprised a 0.1 mm receiv<strong>in</strong>g slit, a soller slit, and a 1° anti-scatter<br />
slit. The tube was operated at 40 kV and 30 mA, and the XRD data were collected <strong>in</strong> a θ/2θ<br />
geometry from 3° 2θ onwards, with a step of 0.02° 2-theta and a count time of 1 second per<br />
step. The highly magnetic samples were analysed us<strong>in</strong>g unoriented powder samples (3° to 60°<br />
2θ) that were placed on a glass plate us<strong>in</strong>g collodium solution.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
M<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition - Microprobe analyses<br />
In order to determ<strong>in</strong>e the composition of the opaque m<strong>in</strong>erals, 12 WDS microprobe analyses<br />
were carried out <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections. All analysed gra<strong>in</strong>s are Fe-Ti oxides. Three analyses gave<br />
Fe/Ti ratios equal to 1, po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to an ilmenite composition (FeTiO3). For the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
analyses, the Fe/Ti ratio was close to 2, which is compatible with an ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el composition<br />
(Fe2TiO4). Investigation of the opaque gra<strong>in</strong>s at a magnification of 400 times shows the<br />
<strong>in</strong>tergrowth of ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el <strong>in</strong> a mass of ilmenite. EDS microprobe analyses of the highly<br />
magnetic fraction give similar results, and po<strong>in</strong>t to an ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el composition.<br />
M<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition – X-Ray Diffraction<br />
The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of the highly magnetic fraction was determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray<br />
diffraction. The X-Ray diffraction pattern obta<strong>in</strong>ed is presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. The peaks<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate the presence of sp<strong>in</strong>el, magnetite and/or (titanian) maghemite. The peaks do not<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate the presence of ilmenite.<br />
286
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Oxalate and DCB extraction on samples<br />
Table 1 shows the results of the extractions carried out on the samples. The higher amounts of<br />
oxalate extractable iron <strong>in</strong> the bulk samples as apposed to the amounts of DCB extractable<br />
iron are clear. The same can be stated for Al2O3. In order to <strong>in</strong>fer whether the difference can<br />
be attributed to the presence of magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> the fresh rock, the analyses were<br />
repeated on magnetic fractions.<br />
Intensity<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
0.483 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />
0.374 Mgt<br />
0.336 Mgt<br />
0.322 u<br />
0.318 u<br />
0.296 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />
0.275 Ilm/Mgt<br />
0.252 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />
15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60<br />
287<br />
0.242 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />
2θ<br />
0.223 Mgt<br />
0.214 u<br />
0.209 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />
Figure 2: XRD Diffraction pattern for highly magnetic samples , Sp: Sp<strong>in</strong>el, Mt: Magnetite, Mgt:<br />
maghemite, U: Unidentified<br />
DB1-C: Bulk Sample DB1-C: highly magnetic sample<br />
Wt %<br />
Fe2O3DCB 1.73 4.64<br />
Fe2O3OX 3.91 12.42<br />
Fe2O3-total 15.60 -<br />
Al2O3DCB 0.18 0.14<br />
Al2O3OX 0.52 0.31<br />
Al2O3-total 12.80 -<br />
MnO2DCB 0.01 0.01<br />
MnO2OX 0.01 0.02<br />
MnO2-total 0.23 -<br />
SiO2DCB 0.90 0.32<br />
SiO2Ox 0.49 0.27<br />
SiO2-total 48.90 -<br />
Table 1: Total oxide values, ammonium-oxalate and DCB extractable oxides <strong>in</strong> bulk and magnetic<br />
samples<br />
0.187 u<br />
0.172 Sp/Mt<br />
0.161 Sp/Mgt
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Figure 3: Image of untreated section (A), ammonium-oxalate treated section (B) and DCB treated<br />
section (C)<br />
The results <strong>in</strong>dicate that the oxalate extractable Fe and to some extend Al are much higher<br />
than the DCB extractable ones.<br />
Oxalate and DCB extractions on th<strong>in</strong> sections<br />
After treatment of the th<strong>in</strong> sections digital photographs were taken <strong>in</strong> order to visually detect<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>erals present. Figure 3 gives three photomicrographs of the fresh rock, one<br />
before treatment (A), one after 4 hours of oxalate treatment (B) and one after DCB treatment<br />
(C), each taken <strong>in</strong> pla<strong>in</strong> polarised light.<br />
The fresh rock is composed of predom<strong>in</strong>antly lathshaped plagioclases which are<br />
colourless and bright <strong>in</strong> the pictures. The second most abundant are the pyroxenes, which are<br />
also colourless but have higher relief as compared to the plagioclases. The treatments were<br />
focused on the black opaque gra<strong>in</strong>s of either ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el or ilmenite composition.<br />
After the ammonium-oxalate treatment the th<strong>in</strong> section appears brighter. The opaque<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>s show no visible changes. There is however the appearance of a black spot (outl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
with an ellipse) that was not present <strong>in</strong> the untreated sample. After DCB treatment the section<br />
is far less bright, the black spot is no longer present and no changes have been noticed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
opaque gra<strong>in</strong>s. The DCB and oxalate extractions on th<strong>in</strong> sections of fresh rock material did<br />
not show any sign of m<strong>in</strong>eral dissolution. For this reason the oxalate extraction period was<br />
extended to 6, 8 and 12 hours, however still without signs of apparent dissolution.<br />
CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION<br />
This study demonstrates that the amount of oxalate extractable Fe was much greater than the<br />
DCB extractable Fe. These differences are even more pronounced <strong>in</strong> the magnetic fraction<br />
288
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence from the magnetic fraction. The XRD pattern of the magnetic fraction<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t to the presence of magnetite, sp<strong>in</strong>el or maghemite. The percentage of the magnetic<br />
fraction was however not determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The data presented does suggest attack of the magnetic<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral (ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el) by the oxalate solution. The higher values for DCB extractable iron<br />
measured <strong>in</strong> the magnetic fraction, also po<strong>in</strong>t to attack of the magnetic gra<strong>in</strong>s by the DCB<br />
extraction technique. This means that Fe values obta<strong>in</strong>ed from samples conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a magnetic<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral (magnetite or ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el) can be overestimated. The XRD pattern of the magnetic<br />
fraction did not po<strong>in</strong>t to the presence of ilmenite, and consequently the <strong>in</strong>fluence of ilmenite<br />
was not <strong>in</strong>vestigated. Although this is apparent <strong>in</strong> the chemical data the extractions on the th<strong>in</strong><br />
sections do not reveal attack or dissolution of the opaque (and possibly magnetic) m<strong>in</strong>eral. A<br />
possible dissolution of the opaque gra<strong>in</strong>s should be confirmed by study<strong>in</strong>g the th<strong>in</strong> sections<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy and microprobe analyses before and after treatment. This<br />
would also <strong>in</strong>vestigate the <strong>in</strong>fluence of ilmenite on the extraction techniques.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] J.M. Arocena, G. De Geyter, C. <strong>Land</strong>uyt and U. Schwertmann. “Dissolution of soil iron oxides with<br />
ammoniumoxalate: comparison between bulk samples and th<strong>in</strong> sections”. Pedologie, 29, pp. 275-297, (1989)<br />
[2] J.M. Arocena, G. De Geyter, C. <strong>Land</strong>uyt and G. Stoops. “A Study on the Distribution and Extraction of Iron<br />
and Manganese <strong>in</strong> soil th<strong>in</strong> sections”. In: Douglas L.A (ed.). Soil Micromorphology: A Basic and Applied<br />
Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 621-626, (1990)<br />
[3] P. Bullock, P.J. Loveland and C.P. Murphy. “A technique for selective solution of iron oxides <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections<br />
of soil”. Journal of Soil Science, 26: 247-248, (1975).<br />
[4] P. F<strong>in</strong>e, and M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger. “Pedogenic factors affect<strong>in</strong>g magnetic susceptibility of northern California soils”,<br />
Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53, pp. 1119-1127, (1989).<br />
[5] P. F<strong>in</strong>e, M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger, R. La Ven, K.L. Verosub and R.J. Southard. “Role of pedogenesis <strong>in</strong> distribution of<br />
magnetic susceptibility <strong>in</strong> two California chronosequences”, Geoderma, 44, pp. 287-306, (1989).<br />
[6] P. F<strong>in</strong>e,. M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger and K.L. Verosub. “Use of magnetic susceptibility measurement <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />
uniformity <strong>in</strong> chronosequence studies”, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56, pp. 1195-1199, (1992).<br />
[7] P. F<strong>in</strong>e, M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger, K.L. Verosub and J. TenPas. “<strong>New</strong> evidence for the orig<strong>in</strong> of ferrimagnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong><br />
loess from Ch<strong>in</strong>a”, Soil Science Society of America Journa, 57, pp. 1537-1542, (1993).<br />
[8] C.P. Hunt, M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger, G. Kletetschka, J. TenPas and K.L. Verosub. “Effect of citrate–bicarbonate–<br />
dithionite treatment on f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed magnetite and maghemite”, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 130, pp.<br />
87–94, (1995).<br />
[9] J.A. McKeague, and J. H. Day. “Dithionite and oxalate extractable Fe and Al as aids <strong>in</strong> differentiat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
various classes of soils”, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 46, pp. 13-22, (1966).<br />
[10] J.A. McKeague, J.E. Brydon and N.M. Miles. “Differentiation of forms of extractable iron and alum<strong>in</strong>ium<br />
<strong>in</strong> soils”, Soil Science Society of America Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 35, pp. 33-38, (1971).<br />
[11] O.P. Mehra, and M.L. Jackson. “Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite–citrate system<br />
buffered with sodium bicarbonate”, Clays and Clay M<strong>in</strong>erals., 7, pp. 317–327, (1960).<br />
[12] Narena-Celos. Sur<strong>in</strong>ame kaarten collectie, 1p., (2004).<br />
[13] D. Postma. “The reactivity of iron oxides <strong>in</strong> sediments: a k<strong>in</strong>etic approach” Geochimica Cosmochimica<br />
Acta, 57, pp. 5027–5034, (1993).<br />
[14] U. Schwertmann. “Differenzierung der Eisenoxide des Bodens durch photochemische Extraktion mit saurer<br />
Ammoniumoxalat-Lösung”. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Düng., Bodenkunde, 105, pp. 194-202, (1964).<br />
[15] U. Schwertmann. “Use of oxalate for Fe extraction from soils”. Canadian Journal of Soil Science., 53: pp.<br />
244-246, (1973)<br />
[16] M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger and P. F<strong>in</strong>e. “Pedogenic factors affect<strong>in</strong>g magnetic susceptibility of Northern California soils”,<br />
Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53, pp. 1119–1127, (1989).<br />
[17] M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger, L.H. Bowen, K.L. Verosub, P. F<strong>in</strong>e and J. TenPas. “Mössbauer spectroscopic evidence for<br />
citrate–bicarbonate–dithionite extraction of maghemite from soils”, Clays and Clay M<strong>in</strong>erals, 43, pp. 1-7,<br />
(1995).<br />
[18] I.H.M. van Oorschot, and M.J.Dekkers. “Dissolution behaviour of f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed magnetite and maghemite <strong>in</strong><br />
the citrate–bicarbonate–dithionite extraction method”, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 167, pp. 283–295,<br />
(1999).<br />
289
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
[19] I.H.M. van Oorschot and Mark J. Dekkers. “Selective dissolution of magnetic iron oxides <strong>in</strong> the acid–<br />
ammonium oxalate/ferrous iron extraction method—I. Synthetic samples, Geophysical Journal International,<br />
145, pp. 740–748, (2001).<br />
[20] I.H.M. van Oorschot, M. J. Dekkers and P. Havlicek,. Selective dissolution of magnetic iron oxides with the<br />
acid-ammonium-oxalate/ferrous-iron extraction technique—II. Natural loess and palaeosol samples .<br />
Geophyisical Journal International, 149, pp. 106–117, (2002).<br />
[21] A.L. Walker. “The effects of magnetite on oxalate and dithionite extractable iron”, Soil Science Society of<br />
America Journal, 47, pp. 1022-1026, (1983).<br />
[22] B. Z<strong>in</strong>der, G. Furrer and W. Stumm. “The coord<strong>in</strong>ation chemistry of weather<strong>in</strong>g, II. Dissolution of Fe(III)<br />
oxides”, Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, 50, pp. 1861–1869, (1986).<br />
290
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL MICROMORPHOLOGY<br />
Abstract<br />
Stoops, G., Marcel<strong>in</strong>o, V., Mees, F.<br />
Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<br />
This contribution br<strong>in</strong>gs an overview of latest research <strong>in</strong> soil micromorphology conducted at<br />
the Department of Geology and Soil Science of the Ghent University, and a short <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />
to two important current themes <strong>in</strong> this field.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Although soil microscopy has been totally excluded from the new curriculum of “<strong>Physical</strong><br />
<strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>” studies <strong>in</strong> Ghent, research <strong>in</strong> this field is still be<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued.<br />
Apart from applications of micromorphological techniques to soil genesis and<br />
development [1-23] and to archaeology (the latter especially by Prof. R. Langohr and coworkers),<br />
attention has also been paid to the development and/or critical evaluation of special<br />
methodologies such as image analysis and X-ray-tomography, and observation and<br />
description techniques. A book on genetic <strong>in</strong>terpretation of micromorphological data is <strong>in</strong><br />
progress (Stoops et al.).<br />
APPLICATIONS IN SOIL GENESIS AND DEVELOPMENT<br />
Amongst the applications <strong>in</strong> soil genesis and development the follow<strong>in</strong>g will be summarised:<br />
1° circumgranalar bassanite formation around quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> a natural gypsum crust.<br />
Heat<strong>in</strong>g experiments suggest that differences <strong>in</strong> heat capacity between the components can<br />
expla<strong>in</strong> the observed patterns, but <strong>in</strong> the natural crust they were found to be related to the<br />
availability of space around the enclosed detrital m<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s. Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of the studied type,<br />
or derived relict features, are potential palaeosurface <strong>in</strong>dicators [9].<br />
2° zeolite neoformation <strong>in</strong> the Olduvai (Tanzania) stratigraphic sequence of lacustr<strong>in</strong>e and<br />
fluvial sediments, related to the <strong>in</strong>teraction of volcanic material with sal<strong>in</strong>e alkal<strong>in</strong>e lake water<br />
or groundwater [10]. The conditions formation of the various zeolite m<strong>in</strong>erals were<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated (analcime, chabazite, phillipsite, erionite, cl<strong>in</strong>optilolite), based on their mode of<br />
occurrence, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g their relationship with other pedogenic materials.<br />
3° differentiation of pedogenic and geogenic calcite <strong>in</strong> soils from Iran, us<strong>in</strong>g UV and blue<br />
light fluorescence techniques comb<strong>in</strong>ed with cathodolum<strong>in</strong>escence [7].<br />
4° impact of land use (forest, afforested pasture and crop land) and seasonal freez<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />
(micro)morphological properties of silty Norwegian soils [20]: platy and lenticular<br />
microstructures due to frost are present <strong>in</strong> the upper part of all soils studied but occur at<br />
shallowest depth (35 cm) under forest than <strong>in</strong> the other soils (50 cm); planar voids associated<br />
with these structures are not or partially accommodat<strong>in</strong>g, mean<strong>in</strong>g that when the soil is wet<br />
they do not completely close and water can still move parallel to the soil surface. Dusty clay<br />
coat<strong>in</strong>gs (agricutans) and <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs and compound layered <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs are observed immediately<br />
below the plough layer <strong>in</strong> the cropland but not at the same depth <strong>in</strong> the other soils. They thus<br />
reflect the <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>ternal soil erosion associated with cultivation.<br />
291
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
5° soil evolution on volcanic ash <strong>in</strong> Europe [19, 22]: as a first step coat<strong>in</strong>gs of f<strong>in</strong>e material<br />
develop around the coarse particles (chitonic c/f related distribution pattern), or form hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
<strong>in</strong> the case of pumice; with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g amount of f<strong>in</strong>e material an enaulic c/f r.d.p. is<br />
formed, that gradually grades <strong>in</strong>to a f<strong>in</strong>e granular microstructure. The latter is preserved as an<br />
<strong>in</strong>trapedal microstructure <strong>in</strong> the more clayey Bw horizons where a (sub)angular blocky<br />
microstructure prevails. In the case of Icelandic soils a lenticular microstructure developed,<br />
related to freeze-thaw cycles [21] and a microstratification, often with organic layers, is<br />
throughout preserved, po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to the quasi absence of biological activity, <strong>in</strong> contrast to what<br />
happens <strong>in</strong> temperate and tropical areas [1]. The transformation of volcanic glass to<br />
alteromorphs of allophane, with a palagonite like appearance, is discussed [2]. Throughout the<br />
profiles an undifferentiated b-fabric is noticed <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>e mass of the European soils on<br />
volcanic ash. Alteration products of volcanic ash <strong>in</strong> Mexico give rise to specific opal<strong>in</strong>e<br />
features [3, 4].<br />
6° research on micromorphological concepts and term<strong>in</strong>ology lead to the publication of a new<br />
manual [19], <strong>in</strong> order to replace the standard work of Bullock et al. (1985) out of pr<strong>in</strong>t s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
many years.<br />
IMAGE ANALYSIS<br />
Presently, low-cost software-based image analysis systems make automated analysis of soil<br />
pore space and other features very attractive. Large amounts of data on feature characteristics<br />
can be easily generated. Although it is currently possible to use 3D image analysis associated<br />
with non-destructive tools such as X-ray CT to observe and quantify soil porosity, 2D image<br />
analysis procedures are still commonly applied because of their lower cost and easier<br />
accessibility. With the aim of <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g whether different sorts of images analysed with<br />
different methods produce comparable results, three widely used sample preparation and<br />
image acquisition procedures and three 2D-image analysis methods with different levels of<br />
manual <strong>in</strong>tervention were compared. The quality of the image, determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the image<br />
acquisition and sample preparation method used, affects average porosity measurements<br />
significantly: fluorescent images compared with BSE-images clearly underestimate porosity.<br />
On the other hand, different <strong>in</strong>terventions and methods used to <strong>in</strong>crease image quality and to<br />
segment images also affect porosity measurements significantly. Moreover, <strong>in</strong> the particular<br />
case of manual threshold<strong>in</strong>g, porosity values obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the same observer are more<br />
reproducible than those from different observers. These results stress the need for<br />
standardization of image analysis protocols and warn of the dangers of compar<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />
porosity measurements performed on different types of images.<br />
X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY<br />
X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) is a non-destructive imag<strong>in</strong>g technique that provides<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation about the <strong>in</strong>ternal structure of objects. X-ray CT images are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
record<strong>in</strong>g radiographs for successive positions dur<strong>in</strong>g step-wise rotation of a sample relative<br />
to an X-ray source and a detector. These radiographs are then used to create images show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
variations <strong>in</strong> X-ray attenuation values, determ<strong>in</strong>ed by density and element composition, for<br />
cross-sections perpendicular to the axis of rotation. One of the advantages of X-ray CT is the<br />
292
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
possibility of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a large number of parallel cross-sections, which can be used for 3D<br />
imag<strong>in</strong>g and analysis.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce its development as a medical technique, X-ray CT has been applied <strong>in</strong> various<br />
other fields of research, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g earth sciences and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. [28]). In soil science, it<br />
has ma<strong>in</strong>ly been used for the study of pore characteristics. Aspects of soil porosity that have<br />
been <strong>in</strong>vestigated with X-ray CT <strong>in</strong>clude the effects of faunal activity (e.g. [24]), soil<br />
compaction (e.g. [27]), erosion control measures (e.g. [31]), and tillage practices (e.g. [30]).<br />
Examples of other applications are the study of root development (e.g. [26]), water movement<br />
(e.g. [25]), and soil surface morphology (e.g. [25]).<br />
Ghent University has X-ray CT facilities for material research, operated by the<br />
Department of Geology and Soil Science and the Department of Subatomic and Radiation<br />
Physics. The available scanners can handle a wide range of sample types, for studies<br />
requir<strong>in</strong>g CT images with specific requirements regard<strong>in</strong>g spatial resolution and material<br />
contrasts.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Most important micromorphological contributions from the Department of Geology and Soil<br />
Science over the last five years<br />
[1] Fauzi, A.I., Stoops, G. Influence of Krakatau ash fall on pedogenesis <strong>in</strong> West Java. Example of a<br />
toposequence <strong>in</strong> the Honje Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, Ujung Kulon Pen<strong>in</strong>sula, Catena, 56, 45-66, (2004).<br />
[2] Gérard, M., Caqu<strong>in</strong>eau, S., P<strong>in</strong>heiro, J., G. Stoops. Weather<strong>in</strong>g and allophane neoformation <strong>in</strong> soils on<br />
volcanic ash from the Azores, Europ. J. Soil Sci.(<strong>in</strong> press).<br />
[3] Gutierrez Castorena, M.d.C., Stoops, G., Ortiz Solorio, C.A., Lopez Avila, G. Amorphous silica materials <strong>in</strong><br />
soils and sediments of the Ex-Lago de Texcoco, Mexico. An explanation of its subsidence, Catena, 60, 205-226,<br />
(2005).<br />
[4] Gutierrez Castorena, M.d.C., Stoops, G., Ortiz Solorio, C.A., Sanchez-Guzman, P. Micromorphology of<br />
opal<strong>in</strong>e features <strong>in</strong> soils on the sediments of the Ex-Lago de Texcoco, Mexico, Geoderma, 132, 89-104, (2005).<br />
[5] Heidari, A., Mahmoodi, Sh., Stoops, G., Mees, F. Micromorphological characteristics of Vertisols <strong>in</strong> Iran,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g non-smectitic soils, Arid <strong>Land</strong> Research and Management, 19, 29-46, (2005).<br />
[6] Khormali, F., Abtahi, A., Mahmoodi, S., Stoops, G. Argillic horizon development <strong>in</strong> calcareous soils of arid<br />
and semi-arid regions of southern Iran, Catena, 53, 273-301, (2003).<br />
[7] Khormali, F., Abtahi, A., Stoops, G.. Micromorphology of calcitic features <strong>in</strong> highly calcareous soils of Fars<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, Southern Iran, Geoderma, 132, 31-46, (2006).<br />
[8] Marcel<strong>in</strong>o V., Cnudde V., Vansteelandt S., Carò F.. An evaluation of 2D-image analysis techniques for<br />
measur<strong>in</strong>g soil microporosity, European Journal of Soil Science (<strong>in</strong> press). (2006).<br />
[9] Mees, F., Stoops, G. Circumgranular bassanite <strong>in</strong> a gypsum crust from eastern Algeria - a potential<br />
palaeosurface <strong>in</strong>dicator, Sedimentology, 50, 1139-1145, (2003).<br />
[10] Mees, F., Stoops, G., Van Ranst, E., Paepe, R., Van Overloop, E. The nature of zeolite occurrences <strong>in</strong><br />
deposits of the Olduvai Bas<strong>in</strong>, northern Tanzania, Clays and Clay M<strong>in</strong>erals, 53,659-673,. (2005).<br />
[11] Mees, F., De Dapper, M. Vertical variations <strong>in</strong> bassanite distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> near-surface sediments,<br />
southern Egypt, Sedimentary Geology, 181, 225-229, (2005).<br />
[12] Mees, F. Salt m<strong>in</strong>eral distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> soils of the Otjomongwa pan, Namibia, Catena, 54, 425-437,<br />
(2003).<br />
[13] Mees, F., S<strong>in</strong>ger, A. Surface crusts on soils/sediments of the southern Aral Sea bas<strong>in</strong>, Uzbekistan,<br />
Geoderma, (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />
[14] Mulyanto, B., Stoops, G.. M<strong>in</strong>eral neoformation <strong>in</strong> pore spaces dur<strong>in</strong>g alteration and weather<strong>in</strong>g of andesitic<br />
rocks <strong>in</strong> humid tropical Indonesia, Catena, 54, 385-392, (2003).<br />
[15] Oleschko, K., Parrot, J-F., Ronquillo, G., Shoba, S., Stoops,, G. Marcel<strong>in</strong>o, V. Weather<strong>in</strong>g: towards a fractal<br />
quantify<strong>in</strong>g,. Mathematical Geology,. 51: 607-627, (2004).<br />
[16] Stoops, G., Van Ranst, E., Verbeek, K. Pedology of soils with<strong>in</strong> the spray zone of the Victoria Falls<br />
(Zimbabwe), Catena, 46, 63-83, (2001).<br />
[17] Stoops, G.,. Achievements <strong>in</strong> micromorphology,. Catena, 54, 317-319, (2003).<br />
293
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
[18] Stoops, G. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the Analysis and Description of Soil and Regolith Th<strong>in</strong> Sections. SSSA. Madison,<br />
WI., 184pp + CD. ISBN 0-89118-842-8, (2003).<br />
[19] Stoops, G., Gérard, M., Micromorphology. In: Arnalds, O., Bartoli, F., Buurman, P., Garcia-Rodeja, E.,<br />
Oskarsson, H., Stoops, G. (eds), Soils of Volcanic Regions of Europe, (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />
[20] Stoops, G., D. Dedecker. Microscopy on undisturbed sediments as a help <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g dredg<strong>in</strong>g operations.<br />
A case study from Thailand. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs International Conference Pnom Penh, KAOW. (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />
[21] Stoops, G., Gérard, M., Arnalds, O. A micromorphological study of andosol genesis <strong>in</strong> Iceland, Geoderma,<br />
(accepted).<br />
[22] Stoops.G. Micromorphology of soils on volcanic ash <strong>in</strong> Europe. A review and synthesis. Europ. J.Soil<br />
Science, (accepted).<br />
[23] Sveistrup T. E., Haraldsen T.K., Langohr R., Marcel<strong>in</strong>o V., Kværner J.. <strong>Land</strong> use impact on seasonally<br />
frozen silty soils <strong>in</strong> South Eastern Norway, Soil and Tillage Research, 81: 39-56, (2005).<br />
Cited papers – X-ray tomography<br />
[161] Bastardie, F., Capowiez, Y., Cluzeau, D. 3D characterisation of earthworm burrow systems <strong>in</strong> natural<br />
soil cores collected from a 12-year-old pasture. Applied Soil Ecology 30, 34-46, (2005).<br />
[162] Fohrer, N., Berkenhagen, J., Hecker, J.M., Rudolph, A. Chang<strong>in</strong>g soil and surface conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall - S<strong>in</strong>gle ra<strong>in</strong>storm/subsequent ra<strong>in</strong>storms, Catena, 37, 355-375, (1999).<br />
[163] Gregory, P.J., Hutchison, D.J., Read, D.B., Jenneson, P.M., Gilboy, W.B., Morton, E.J. Non-<strong>in</strong>vasive<br />
imag<strong>in</strong>g of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography, Plant and Soil, 255, 351-359, (2003).<br />
[164] Langmaack, M., Schrader, S. & Rapp-Bernhardt, U., Kotzke, K. Soil structure rehabilitation of arable<br />
soil degraded by compaction, Geoderma, 105, 141-152, (2002).<br />
[165] Mees, F., Swennen, R., Van Geet, M., Jacobs, P. (eds). Applications of X-ray Computed Tomography<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Geosciences. Geological Society Special Publication 215, 328 pp. Geological Society Publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
House, Bath, United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. (2003).<br />
[166] Mooney, S.J. Three-dimensional visualization and quantification of soil macroporosity and water flow<br />
patterns us<strong>in</strong>g computed tomography, Soil Use and Management, 18, 142-151, (2002).<br />
[167] Pedrotti, A., Pauletto, E.A., Crestana, S., Holanda, F.S.R., Cruv<strong>in</strong>el, P.E., Vaz, C.M.P. Evaluation of<br />
bulk density of Albaqualf soil under different tillage systems us<strong>in</strong>g the volumetric r<strong>in</strong>g and computerized<br />
tomography methods, Soil & Tillage Research, 80, 115-123, (2005).<br />
[168] Rachman, A., Anderson, S.H., Gantzer, C.J., Computed-tomographic measurement of soil<br />
macroporosity parameters as affected by stiff-stemmed grass hedges, Soil Science Society of America<br />
Journa, 69, 1609-1616, (2005).<br />
Some new publications on micromorphology<br />
[169] Eswaran, H., Drees, R. Soil under the Microscope: Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g Soil <strong>in</strong> Another Dimension. CD. Soil<br />
Micromorphology Committee of the Soil Science Society of America.<br />
[170] FitzPatrick, E.A., Soil Microscopy and Micromorphology. CD. Interactive Soil Science, 76 Burns Road,<br />
Aberdeen, AB15 4NS, UK, (2006)<br />
[171] Kapur, S., Mermut, A., Stoops, G., (Eds.), Special Issue of Geoderma (papers presented dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
International Work<strong>in</strong>g Meet<strong>in</strong>g on Soil Micromorphology, 2004, Adana, Turkey) (<strong>in</strong> preparation<br />
[172] Stoops, G. (Ed.), Achievements <strong>in</strong> Micromorphology. Special Issue of Catena, Vol. 54, Issue , pp 317-<br />
678 (papers presented dur<strong>in</strong>g the International Work<strong>in</strong>g Meet<strong>in</strong>g on Soil Micromorphology, 2001, Gent,<br />
Belgium) (2003)<br />
294
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
SPHEROIDAL WEATHERING OF DOLERITE IN SURINAME:<br />
EVIDENCE FROM PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND<br />
MINERALOGICAL DATA<br />
C. G. Algoe 1* , E. Van Ranst 2 , G. Stoops 3<br />
1* Anton de Kom Universiteit van Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Faculteit der Technologische Wetenschappen, POB 9212,<br />
Paramaribo, Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Tel: +597 465558 ext. 413, Fax: +597 495005, Email: c.algoe@uvs.edu<br />
2 Laboratorium voor Bodemkunde, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Gent, Belgium<br />
3 Laboratorium voor M<strong>in</strong>eralogie, Petrologie en Micropedologie, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, S8 B-9000<br />
Gent, Belgium<br />
Poster Extended Abstract<br />
Sur<strong>in</strong>ame consists geologically for about 80 % of a Precambrian basement, the Guiana shield.<br />
At numerous places this shield is <strong>in</strong>tersected by Permo-Triassic NS strik<strong>in</strong>g dolerite dike<br />
suites. In the regolith they appear as spheroidally weathered boulders with an “onion-sk<strong>in</strong>”<br />
fabric.<br />
Four weathered boulders were collected <strong>in</strong> profiles near the locality Berg en Dal and<br />
shells of different weather<strong>in</strong>g grades sub-sampled <strong>in</strong> the laboratory. These shell-samples were<br />
analysed us<strong>in</strong>g physical, chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical methods <strong>in</strong> order to characterize the<br />
spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g process and the result<strong>in</strong>g weather<strong>in</strong>g products. The chemical analyses<br />
comprise total elemental contents, oxalate and dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extractions,<br />
cation exchange capacities and pH values. The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical data is obta<strong>in</strong>ed from th<strong>in</strong><br />
section studies, WDS microprobe analyses, X ray diffraction data, and scann<strong>in</strong>g electron<br />
microscopy.<br />
The bulk densities show a vast decrease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g weather<strong>in</strong>g grade. The total<br />
elemental data show a progressive and complete loss of the alkal<strong>in</strong>e and earth alkal<strong>in</strong>e<br />
elements <strong>in</strong> course of the weather<strong>in</strong>g process. These data also allow the calculation of a<br />
number of weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dices, used to def<strong>in</strong>e the behaviour of elements dur<strong>in</strong>g the weather<strong>in</strong>g<br />
process. The total elemental data and bulk densities are used to calculate the isovolumetric<br />
weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the boulders. Special attention is given to the behaviour of both free and<br />
amorphous Fe as revealed from the oxalate and dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extractions.<br />
The unweathered parent material consists predom<strong>in</strong>antly of lath-shaped plagioclases<br />
(andesite and labradorite), pyroxenes (augite and pigeonite), chlorites, opaque m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />
(ilmenite and titanomagnetite), granophyric <strong>in</strong>tergrowths of quartz, feldspars, apatite and<br />
ilmenite. In addition amphiboles and apatite occur <strong>in</strong> small amounts. All m<strong>in</strong>eral data of the<br />
weathered samples po<strong>in</strong>t to an end system with residual weather<strong>in</strong>g products consist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly of clay m<strong>in</strong>erals (kaol<strong>in</strong>ite and chlorite) and Fe- and Al-hydroxides (goethite and<br />
gibbsite). Weather<strong>in</strong>g of m<strong>in</strong>erals takes place abruptly, and although the orig<strong>in</strong>al m<strong>in</strong>erals are<br />
completely altered, their alteromorphs can still be recognised <strong>in</strong> the th<strong>in</strong> sections upto the<br />
latest weather<strong>in</strong>g stages.<br />
The isovolumetric condition of spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g and the mobility of Al and Ti <strong>in</strong><br />
the weather<strong>in</strong>g system are discussed as well as the <strong>in</strong> situ character of the boulders based on<br />
the sharp contrasts <strong>in</strong> data between weathered dolerite samples and the residual soil. Another<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t of discussion is the <strong>in</strong>fluence of magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals on the oxalate and DCB extractable<br />
components.<br />
295
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
MICROMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ANDISOLS<br />
IN WEST JAVA, INDONESIA<br />
Abstract<br />
Mahfud Arif<strong>in</strong> * , R<strong>in</strong>a Devnita<br />
Dept. of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia<br />
mahfud_arif<strong>in</strong>s@yahoo.com<br />
Tel. ++62-22/779.63.16 Fax. ++62-22/779.63.16; ++62-22/779.72.00<br />
Micromorphological characteristics have been studied for six pedons of Andisols developed<br />
<strong>in</strong> volcanic materials <strong>in</strong> West java, Indonesia. The pedons represent deposits of different<br />
volcanoes (Mt.Tangkuban Perahu A and C, Mt. Patuha, Mt. Kendeng, Mt. Papandayan, Mt.<br />
Guntur), with different ages (Pleistocene, Holocene) and different types of volcanism<br />
(andesitic, basaltic), <strong>in</strong> three agroclimatic zones (A, B1, B2). Undisturbed soil samples for<br />
th<strong>in</strong> section preparation were taken from every identifiable horizon (49 samples <strong>in</strong> total).<br />
Observations were made with a magnify<strong>in</strong>g lens, b<strong>in</strong>ocular stereomicroscope, polarization<br />
microscope, and scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope. The results demonstrate that the study of<br />
micromorphological characteristics is very useful to identify pedogenetic processes <strong>in</strong><br />
Andisols.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Soil micromorphology is a method to study undisturbed soil samples us<strong>in</strong>g microscopic and<br />
submicroscopic techniques to identify soil components and establish their spatial, temporal,<br />
genetic and functional relationships [3, 13].<br />
Historically, micromorphological <strong>in</strong>vestigations have ma<strong>in</strong>ly been used for soil<br />
genesis studies, but they also have wider applications, e.g. <strong>in</strong> soil physics, biology and<br />
chemistry [3]. Two basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of micropedology are the use of undisturbed (oriented)<br />
samples and the concept of functional research whereby all observations are directed towards<br />
reach<strong>in</strong>g as an understand<strong>in</strong>g of the function of soil components and the relationship between<br />
one another.<br />
Micropedology covers all microscopic analyses of undisturbed soil samples [14],<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the study of soil th<strong>in</strong> sections, microchemical and microphysical methods, and<br />
submicroscopic techniques. The most advanced analysis is the study of the entire soil fabric<br />
(soil micromorphology) and its quantitative aspects (soil micromorphometry).<br />
Many soil micromorphology studies have been conducted and published, especially on<br />
Ultisols, Oxisols, Spodosols and Paleosols [3]. However, research on Andisols is still rare,<br />
especially <strong>in</strong> Indonesia. Therefore, there is only a few <strong>in</strong>formation concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
micromorphological features of Andisols <strong>in</strong> Indonesia, particularly the Andisols develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on different parent materials and <strong>in</strong> different agroclimatic zones.<br />
For this study, research has been done on the micromorphological characteristics of<br />
Andisols <strong>in</strong> six pedons <strong>in</strong> the tea plantation area of West Java, Indonesia. The studied soils<br />
represent six different volcanic eruptions, ages, and parent materials, <strong>in</strong> three agroclimatic<br />
zones [11].<br />
296
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Pedon CTR-A2 (Acrudoxic Durudan) represents eruption C (middle Holocene) of Mt.<br />
Tangkuban Perahu (Ciater District, andesitic, agroclimatic zone A), and pedon CTR-B4<br />
(Acrudoxic Thaptic Hydrudand) represents eruption A (early Holocene) of Mt. Tangkuban<br />
Perahu (Ciater District, andesitic, agroclimatic zone A), both located <strong>in</strong> Subang Regency.<br />
Pedon SNR-A2 (Acrudoxic Hydrudand) at Mt. Kendeng (S<strong>in</strong>umbra District, Pleistocene,<br />
andesitic, agroclimatic zone B1), pedon SNR-B5 (Lithic Hapludand) at Mt. Patuha (S<strong>in</strong>umbra<br />
District, Holocene, basaltic, B1), pedon SDP-A3 (Typic Hapludand) at Mt. Guntur Cs (Sedep<br />
District, Pleistocene, basaltic, agroclimatic zone B2), and pedon SDP-B5 (Hydric Thaptic<br />
Hapludand) at Mt. Papandayan (Sedep District, Holocene, basaltic, agroclimatic zone B2) are<br />
all located <strong>in</strong> Bandung Regency.<br />
Undisturbed soil samples for the preparation of soil th<strong>in</strong> sections were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for<br />
every identifiable horizon <strong>in</strong> all profiles. The total number of samples was 49.<br />
Preparation of the soil th<strong>in</strong> sections <strong>in</strong>volved harden<strong>in</strong>g of the samples by impregnation.<br />
Observations of the undisturbed samples were made with the naked eye, a magnifier lens,<br />
b<strong>in</strong>ocular stereomicroscope, polarization microscope and scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope. The<br />
term<strong>in</strong>ology and concepts of the Handbook for Soil Th<strong>in</strong> Section Description [3] were used,<br />
with a few modifications.<br />
Micromass Colour<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The colour of the micromass as observed <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections partly depends on thickness, light<br />
source properties and magnification.<br />
In this study, only small variations <strong>in</strong> colour were observed. Horizon A/Bw has a<br />
brown to dark brown colour. Horizon BC generally has a lighter colour compared to the other<br />
genetic horizons. Surface horizons and buried A horizons have the darkest colour. In<br />
general, the horizons of pedons CTR-A2, SNR-A2, SNR-B5 and SDP-A3 have a brown<br />
colour, except pedon SDP-A3, which was lighter. Pedon CTR-B4 and SDP-B5 have a dark<br />
brown colour.<br />
The micromass colour <strong>in</strong> the th<strong>in</strong> sections was generally more brownish than the field soil<br />
capacity colour. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall, age and parent material appear to have no significant effect on<br />
micromass colour. However, <strong>in</strong> Ciater District pedon CTR-A2 generally has a lighter colour<br />
than CTR-B4, <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>umbra District pedon SNR-A2 has a lighter colour than SNR-B5, and <strong>in</strong><br />
Sedep District SDP-A3 is lighter than SDP-B5. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the older parent<br />
materials have a lighter colour than the younger parent materials.<br />
Microstructure<br />
Microstructure refers to the shape, size and arrangement of soil aggregates and pores,<br />
generally observed at rather low magnification.<br />
Pedality<br />
The complete results of observation of the microstructure are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Some<br />
examples of soil microstructure features are presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. The microstructure of the<br />
Andisols ranges from granular to massive. The surface horizon generally has crumb and<br />
297
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
granular microstructures (Fig. 1.a and 1.b), whereas the subsurface horizon has a blocky to<br />
subangular blocky microstructure.<br />
The surface horizons (Ap) of soils developed <strong>in</strong> areas with high ra<strong>in</strong>fall (e.g. Ciater)<br />
have a more strongly developed pedality (and darker colour) than those developed <strong>in</strong><br />
relatively drier areas (S<strong>in</strong>umbra and Sedep), which generally also have a lighter colour and<br />
tend to show rounded and subangular peds. This suggests a relationship between organic<br />
matter content and pedality. Besides, the granular peds <strong>in</strong> the Ap horizon of soils develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on older parent materials are generally larger and have a denser groundmass than the younger<br />
soils. Chemical analysis <strong>in</strong>dicates that the Ap horizon has a high organic carbon content and<br />
also conta<strong>in</strong> Al- and Fe-bear<strong>in</strong>g organic complexes. Those materials are predicted to play a<br />
role <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g a stable granular microstructure.<br />
In all horizons, the size of the peds shows a rather wide range (0.02-11.00 mm). The degree<br />
of accommodation ranges from well accommodated to unaccommodated, and is generally<br />
partly accommodated (Fig. 1.f).<br />
Types of voids<br />
In surface horizons, compound pack<strong>in</strong>g voids are observed (Fig. 1.a and 1.b). The voids are<br />
equant to elongate, <strong>in</strong>terconnected, occurr<strong>in</strong>g between granular, crumb and angular blocky<br />
peds, which are unaccommodated. Other void types that are recognized are planar voids,<br />
chambers and vughs (Fig. 1.a, 1.b, 1.f)<br />
Subsurface horizons, which show crumb, granular or angular blocky microstructures,<br />
with or without pores, generally have planar voids, or planar voids with compound pack<strong>in</strong>g<br />
voids (Fig. 1.f). In a subsurface horizon (A’’, Bw) developed on old parent material (e.g.<br />
pedon SNR-A2 and SDP-A3), planar voids, vughs, channels, chambers and vesicles are<br />
recognized.<br />
a<br />
c<br />
b<br />
d<br />
298
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
e<br />
g<br />
Figure 1. Photomicrograph of th<strong>in</strong> section with plane polarized light. Hor. Ap, CTR-A2 (a); Hor. Ap,<br />
SNR-B5 (b); Hor B’wb, SDP-A3 (c); Hor. 2Ab SNR-A2 (d); Hor. 3Ab, CTR-A2 (e); Hor. Ap, SNR-A2<br />
(f); Hor. A’b2, SDP-A3 (g); Hor. Bw SDP-A3 (h)<br />
f<br />
h<br />
Planar voids <strong>in</strong> the surface horizon (Ap) generally developed along roots residues or<br />
microfauna rema<strong>in</strong>s. In the subsurface horizon, planar void ma<strong>in</strong>ly formed by development<br />
of cracks <strong>in</strong> dense groundmass material.<br />
Abundance of voids<br />
The abundance of voids <strong>in</strong> the th<strong>in</strong> sections was determ<strong>in</strong>ed, expressed as percentage of the<br />
total area of the th<strong>in</strong> section [5]. The results show that surface horizons have a higher<br />
porosity than the subsurface horizons. Hence, the percentage of voids decreases with depth.<br />
This can be clearly seen <strong>in</strong> old pedons such as SNR-A2 and SDP-A3. This was predicted<br />
referr<strong>in</strong>g to processes of <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>g of voids by illuvial material derived from the groundmass by<br />
299
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
percolation of water, gravity, and biological activity, tak<strong>in</strong>g place dur<strong>in</strong>g a long period.<br />
Therefore several pores have been closed by material derived from upper horizons.<br />
Related Distribution Patterns<br />
Horizons <strong>in</strong> Andisols have porphyric and enaulic c/f related distribution patterns, i.e. they are<br />
composed of coarse material embedded <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>er material (porphyric) or they have a skeleton<br />
of larger fabric units with aggregates of f<strong>in</strong>e material <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terstitial spaces (enaulic) [1,8].<br />
In the latter, the aggregates do not completely fill the <strong>in</strong>terstitial spaces, and the larger units<br />
support each other.<br />
Surface horizon generally have enaulic c/f related distribution patterns (Fig. 1.a and<br />
1.b), especially <strong>in</strong> Andisols developed on young parent materials. Andisols developed from<br />
old parent material have porphyric c/f related distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> their surface horizon.<br />
The granular or crumb structure <strong>in</strong> the surface horizon could be related to high biological<br />
activity (e.g. termites, ants), and the <strong>in</strong>tensive growth of roots. The allophane content <strong>in</strong> the<br />
surface horizon is generally lower than <strong>in</strong> subsurface horizons due to the strong accumulation<br />
of organic matter <strong>in</strong> the surface horizon, prevent<strong>in</strong>g the formation of allophanes because of<br />
the formation of Al-humus complexes [9].<br />
The subsurface horizons have porphyric c/f related distribution patterns. These<br />
horizons have a high total density, with porous and non porous parts. Pores <strong>in</strong> the porous parts<br />
can be filled with material derived from upper horizons. With time, they can develop <strong>in</strong>to<br />
non-porous materials <strong>in</strong> this way.<br />
Pedons SNR-A2 and SDP-A3 have porphyric c/f related distribution patterns (Fig. 1.c<br />
and 1.d). Both pedons represents the older parent materials. The partly short range-order<br />
m<strong>in</strong>erals have been weathered to crystall<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>erals like halloysite, metahalloysite and<br />
gibbsite. The change <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral composition was predicted to be accompanied by a change <strong>in</strong><br />
c/f related distribution pattern from enaulic to porphyric.<br />
The subsurface horizons of pedon CTR-B4 still have enaulic c/f related distribution<br />
patterns, although the age of this pedon is older than that of CTR-A2, which shows porphyric<br />
c/f related distribution patterns. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the accumulation process <strong>in</strong> the subsurface<br />
horizons (pedon CTR-A2) was <strong>in</strong>tensive due to the presence of impervious layers that prevent<br />
transportation of material to the lower horizons.<br />
Pedon/ Depth Shape Size Pedality Acc. Proportion<br />
Hor. (cm)<br />
(mm)<br />
(%)<br />
Pedon CTR-A2<br />
Ap 0-17 gr 0.042-0.2 s no 80<br />
ab 0.4-4.0 w pr 20<br />
Bw 17-31 gr 0.04-0.4 m-w no 45<br />
sab 0.4-1.6 w pr 55<br />
BC 31-43 ab-sab 1.6-2,8 w pr 30<br />
gr 0.4-0.8 w no 30<br />
gr 0.04-0.12 w no 40<br />
2Ab 43-60 gr < 0.08 w-m pr 20<br />
gr 0.4-0.8 w-m pr 40<br />
gr 1.6-2.4 w no 40<br />
2Bw 60-70 cr-gr 0.04-0.2 m-s pr 40<br />
ab 0.08-4.4 m-s pr 60<br />
2BC 70-94 mv - - - 90<br />
ab - m no 10<br />
300
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
3Ab 94-110 sab 0.4-0.8 m pr 40<br />
cr 0.04-1.2 w no 60<br />
3Bw 110-128 ab 4.8 s-m pr 80<br />
gr 0.08-0.4 s-m no 20<br />
Pedon CTR-B4<br />
Ap 0-15 gr 0.04-0.2 m no 60<br />
gr 0.2-0.4 m no 20<br />
gr 0.4-3.2 m no 20<br />
Bw 15-30 cr 0.04-11.0 m no 70<br />
ab 2.0-5.0 m no 30<br />
BC 30-38 mv - - - 100<br />
2Ab 38-52 cr 0.02-0.04 m no 80<br />
ab 0.4-1.0 m pr 20<br />
2BCb1 52-65 gr 0.02-0.2 m no 60<br />
ab 0.7-2.0 m pr 40<br />
2BCb2 65-90 ab 5.0 m pr 100<br />
2A’b1 90-105 ab 0.04-0.4 m pr 50<br />
ab 1.0-7.0 m pr 50<br />
2A’b2 105-120 ab 1.0-8.0 m pr 85<br />
gr 0.04-0.8 m no 15<br />
Pedon SNR-A2<br />
Ap 0-10 gr 2.0-3.0 m no 100<br />
Bw1 10-23 ab 2.0-5.0 s no 50<br />
sab 5.0-5.9 s no 50<br />
Bw2 23-40 ab 3.0-5.0 s gd 100<br />
Bw3 40-54 sab 1.0-10.0 s pr 70<br />
BC 54-73 sab 5.0-10.0 m pr 70<br />
2Ab 73-84 ab,sab 5.0-7.0 m pr 80<br />
2BCb 84-98 ab 2.0-7.0 m pr 100<br />
2A’b -120/130 ab 2.0-3.0 m pr 80<br />
2BC’b -142/148 sab,ab 1.0-2.5 m pr 100<br />
Pedon SNR-B5<br />
Ap 0-10 ab,sab 0.04-4.0 m pr 70;30<br />
Bw 10-19 ab,gr 0.04-3.6 m pr 70;30<br />
A’b 19-44 ab,gr 0.2-1.2 m pr 70;30<br />
Bcb 44-60 ab,sab 0.5-5.0 m pr<br />
Pedon SDP-A3<br />
Ap 0-14 ab 1.0-5.0 m pr 100<br />
A2 14-24 ab,gr 1.0-4.0 m no 50:50<br />
Bw 24-35 ab 0.05-5.0 m pr 60<br />
gr 0.12-0.24 m pr 40<br />
A’b1 35-46 ab 1.0-10.0 m gd 100<br />
A’b2 46-65 ab 0.1-5.0 m pr 100<br />
B’wb 65-81 ab 0.4-10.0 m gd 100<br />
A”b 81-95 ab 1.0-5.0 m pr 100<br />
B”wb 95-105 ab 0.4-2.8 m pr 100<br />
BCb 105-130 ab,mv - w pr<br />
Pedon SDP-B5<br />
301
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Ap 0-11 sab 1.0-8.0 m pr 100<br />
Bw 11-30 gr,sab - m pr 25:75<br />
A’b 30-45 sab,gr - m pr 70:30<br />
B’wb 45-54 sab 0.2-2.4 m pr 70<br />
gr 0.08-2.4 m pr 30<br />
A”b1 54-72 sab - s pr 100<br />
A”b2 72-94 sab 0.2-1.0 m pr 70<br />
gr 0.02-0.04 m pr 30<br />
B”wb 94-115 sab 7.0-8.0 m pr 100<br />
BCb 115-135 sab 0.4-4.00 m pr 100<br />
A”’b 135-152 sab 0.4-2.4 s pr 100<br />
Table 1. Shape and size of aggregates, degree of pedality and accommodation of the studied profiles.<br />
ab; angular blocky;sab subangular blocky; gr granular; cr crumb; mv massive; w weak; m medium; s<br />
strong; pr part; gd good; no non<br />
Pedofeatures and weather<strong>in</strong>g features<br />
The types of pedofeatures that have been recognized are textural, amorphous and<br />
cryptocrystall<strong>in</strong>e, fabric and excrement pedofeatures [3,4]. Weather<strong>in</strong>g of primary m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>s is also considered <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Table 2 gives a detailed overview of the<br />
pedofeatures observed <strong>in</strong> every studied horizon.<br />
The features most commonly found <strong>in</strong> Andisols are the weather<strong>in</strong>g of primary m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />
and the illuviation and accumulation of material derived from upper horizons, as found by<br />
Goenadi and Tan [6, 7]. Illuvial material can be material derived from the groundmass, or<br />
f<strong>in</strong>e organic material mixed with silt to very f<strong>in</strong>e sand (Fig. 1.c and 1.d). In addition, humic<br />
substances quite often penetrate the groundmass. These pedofeatures are generally found <strong>in</strong><br />
the site with young parent material and high ra<strong>in</strong>fall (Ciater), or <strong>in</strong> the horizon directly<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g the buried A horizon (thaptic) (Fig. 1.e).<br />
The other features generally found were the strong alteration of primary m<strong>in</strong>eral, e.g.<br />
m<strong>in</strong>erals susceptible to physical and chemical weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> A, B, and BC horizons. <strong>Physical</strong><br />
weather<strong>in</strong>g can be <strong>in</strong> the form of fragmentation. Chemical weather<strong>in</strong>g can be recognized by<br />
the change of form or colour of the m<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
M<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> pedons orig<strong>in</strong>ated from old parent material generally have anhedral shapes<br />
(and low c/f2µ ratios), whereas gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> younger pedons usually have subhedral to euhedral<br />
shape (and higher c/f2µ ratios). Iron nodules are found <strong>in</strong> old pedon like SDP-A3 <strong>in</strong> Sedep<br />
(Fig. 1.g). The nodules were formed by residual accumulation of iron compounds, related to<br />
weather<strong>in</strong>g of primary m<strong>in</strong>erals. Gibbsite coat<strong>in</strong>gs (Fig. 2.a) are found <strong>in</strong> Acrudoxic<br />
Hapludand.<br />
Weak <strong>in</strong>dications for clay illuviation are only recognized for the B’wb horizon <strong>in</strong><br />
pedon SDP-A3, orig<strong>in</strong>ated from old parent material, and <strong>in</strong> horizon 2BCb of pedon SNR-A2<br />
(Fig. 2.b). These horizons do not fulfill the prerequisite of an argillic horizon <strong>in</strong> Soil<br />
Taxonomy [12] due to the small total volume of illuvial clay (< 1 %) and the low degree of<br />
orientation with<strong>in</strong> the clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs. Maeda et al [10] also reported a few coat<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />
Andisols. Mohr et al [11] proposed that Andisols often <strong>in</strong>clude a horizon with clay<br />
accumulation.<br />
302
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
Pedon/horizon Pedofeatures and weather<strong>in</strong>g features (and plant rema<strong>in</strong>s)<br />
CTR-A2<br />
Ap Partly weathered primary m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />
Bw Voids of root residue filled by granular groundmass material [??]<br />
Fragment of altered root, coloured brown-black at the edge<br />
BC Planar voids filled by isotropic clay mixed with very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
2 Ab Fragment of yellowish weathered rock<br />
2Bw -<br />
2BC Plagioclase covered by opaque material<br />
3Ab Planar void filled by a mixture of clay and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
3Bw Planar voids filled by clay<br />
Root residue, with black soil material at the edge<br />
CTR-B4<br />
Ap Voids of root residue, brownish, 20 %<br />
Bw Voids of root residue, 15 %<br />
BC Planar voids filled by a mixture of clay and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
Brownish red organic fragments, 10 %<br />
2Ab -<br />
2BCb1 Voids of root residue and organic fragments, 10 %<br />
2BCb2 Planar void filled by granular clay aggregates and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
Fragment of reddish weathered rocks with volcanic glass<br />
2A’b1 Tuff with volcanic glass and yellowish brown clay m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />
2A’b2 Voids filled by very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
2B’wb Voids filled by very f<strong>in</strong>e sand and groundmass material<br />
SNR-A2<br />
Ap Voids of tea plant’s root residue, reddish brown wall<br />
Bw1 Voids filled by gibbsite<br />
Bw2 Partly altered root fragments<br />
Bw3 -<br />
BC Voids of rounded root residue filled by granular groundmass material<br />
2Ab Planar void filled by clay and gibbsite<br />
2BCb Planar void filled by clay<br />
Root fragments, 7 % [or phytoliths ??] non crystall<strong>in</strong>e !!<br />
2A”B Void of weathered m<strong>in</strong>eral residue<br />
Planar void filled by clay and gibbsite<br />
2BC’b Planar voids and vughs filled by granular groundmass material<br />
SNR-B5<br />
Ap Opaque root fragments<br />
Bw Opaque root fragments<br />
A’b Opaque root fragments<br />
BC’b Voids of root residue, partly filled with groundmass material<br />
Typic nodules<br />
SDP-A3<br />
Ap Opaque and reddish brown root fragments<br />
Voids of root residue, partly filled with granular groundmass material<br />
A2 Typic and nucleic nodules<br />
Root fragments [or phytoliths ??] non crystall<strong>in</strong>e !!<br />
Bw Typic and nucleic nodules<br />
303
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
BC Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
A’b1 Hypocoat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the planar voids<br />
Typic nodules<br />
Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
A’b2 Typic nodules<br />
Voids of root residue, reddish brown wall, partly coated by groundmass<br />
material<br />
B’wb Typic nodules<br />
Voids of root residue (Chamber), filled with groundmass material<br />
Typic hypocoat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> planar voids<br />
Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
A”b Planar voids coated by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand (Typic)<br />
[type ?]<br />
B”wb Typic coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> planar voids<br />
Planar voids filled by groundmass material<br />
BC”b Coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> planar voids (Typic)<br />
Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
Typic nodules<br />
SDP-B5<br />
Ap Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
Bw -<br />
A’b Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
Voids of weathered root residue, rounded, reddish brown wall<br />
B’wb Planar voids and compound pack<strong>in</strong>g voids filled by groundmass<br />
material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
A”b1 Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />
A”b2 -<br />
B”wb Chamber filled by micropeds<br />
BCb -<br />
A”’b Planar voids and vesicles!! filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e<br />
sand [vesicles ?]<br />
Table 2. Pedofeatures of every identifiable horizon <strong>in</strong> the studied soils.<br />
304
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
A<br />
C<br />
e<br />
b<br />
d<br />
Fig.2 . Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope images (a and e) and th<strong>in</strong> section photographs. Gibbsite<br />
coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hor. 2BCb, SNR-A2 (a); clay coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hor. B’wb-SDP-A3, XPL (b); coat<strong>in</strong>gs of organic<br />
material <strong>in</strong> hor. B’wb, SDP-A3, PPL (c); pores with <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hor. 2BCb, SNR-A2, XPL (d); clay<br />
coat<strong>in</strong>g on sand gra<strong>in</strong>s, hor. Bw, SNR-B5 (e)<br />
305
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
(1) Pedofeatures observed <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections are very useful to reveal pedogenetic processes.<br />
The pedon developed after the eruption of Mt. Guntur has clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs and nodules. The<br />
pedon developed at Mt. Kendeng has gibbsite coat<strong>in</strong>gs, and pedons developed at Mt.<br />
Papandayan and Mt. Tangkuban Perahu (eruption A and C) had coat<strong>in</strong>gs of organic material.<br />
(2) Micromorphological characteristics of Andisols developed from old parent material<br />
were different from those of soils developed from young parent material. The former have<br />
porphyric c/f related distribution patterns, low c/f2µ ratios, poor sort<strong>in</strong>g, common <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />
coat<strong>in</strong>gs of voids, a few clay and gibbsite coat<strong>in</strong>gs, anhedral primary m<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s, planar<br />
voids, a blocky to angular blocky microstructure, well-developed pedality and good<br />
accommodation. The soils on young parent materials have enaulic c/f related distribution<br />
patterns, high c/f2µ ratios, poor sort<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs composed of groundmass material, silt and<br />
organic material, subhedral to euhedral primary m<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s, a granular microstructure, a<br />
crumb to blocky microstructure with medium pedality, partly accommodated peds and<br />
compound pack<strong>in</strong>g voids.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] Brewer, R. “Fabric and M<strong>in</strong>eral Analysis Soils”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, (1964).<br />
[2] Brewer, R. “Fabric and M<strong>in</strong>eral Analysis Soils”, Robert E. Krieger Publ. Co., <strong>New</strong> York, (1976).<br />
[3] Bullock, P. L., Federoff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G. and T. Turs<strong>in</strong>a, “Handbook for Soil Th<strong>in</strong> Section<br />
Description”, Wa<strong>in</strong>e Research Publ, 152 p (1985).<br />
[4] Bullock, P. L. “The Role of Micromorphology <strong>in</strong> the Study of Quaternary Soil Process. Soil and Quaternary<br />
<strong>Land</strong>scape Evolution”, J. Boardman (ed), John Wiley & Sons Lt, (1985).<br />
[5] FitzPatrick, E. A. “Micromorphology of Soils”, Chapman and Hall, London, (1984).<br />
[6] Goenadi, D. H. and Tan, K. H. “M<strong>in</strong>eralogy and micromorphology of soils from volcanic tuffs <strong>in</strong> the humid<br />
tropics”, SSSAJR, 53(6):1907-1911 (1989).<br />
[7] Goenadi, D. H. and Tan, K. H. “Relationship of soil fabric and particle-size distribution <strong>in</strong> Davidson soil”,<br />
Soil Sci. 147:264-269 (1989).<br />
[8] Goenadi, D.H and Tan, K. H. “Micromorphology and x-ray microanalysis of an Ultisols <strong>in</strong> the tropic”, Indon.<br />
J. Trop. Agric, 1:12-16 (1989).<br />
[9] Maeda, T., H. Takenaka and B.P Warkent<strong>in</strong>. “<strong>Physical</strong> properties of allophane soils”, Advances Agronomy,<br />
29:229-264 (1977).<br />
[10] Mohr, E.J.C., F.A van Baren and I. van Schuylenborg. ”Tropical Soils, A Comprehensive Study of Their<br />
Genesis”, The Hague-Paris-Djakarta, (1972).<br />
[11] Oldeman, L. R. “An Agroclimatic Map of Java Central Research”, Institute of Agricultur, Bogor, (1975).<br />
[12] Soil Survey Staff. “Keys to Soil Taxonomy, SMSS, Technical Monograph No.19, Fifth Edition”,<br />
Pocahontas Press. Inc, Blacksburg. Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, (1992).<br />
[13] Stoops, G and A. Jongerius. “Proposal for micromorphological classification <strong>in</strong> soil materials, I. A<br />
classification of the related distribution of coarse and f<strong>in</strong>e particles”, Geoderma, 13: 189-200 (1975).<br />
[14] Stoops, G and H. Eswaran. “Soil Micromorphology”, Van Nostrand Re<strong>in</strong>hold, <strong>New</strong> York (1986).<br />
306
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
MICROMORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF SOME SOILS IN THE<br />
AFRAM PLAINS (GHANA, WEST AFRICA)<br />
M.D. Mays 1 , W.R. Effland 2 , T. Adjei-Gyapong 3 , C.D. Dedzoe 3 and E. Boateng 4 *<br />
1 National Soil Survey Centre, USDA-NRCS, L<strong>in</strong>coln NE; 2 USDA-NRCS, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C.;<br />
3 CSIR-SRI, Kumasi (Ghana); 4 CSIR/SRI, Accra (Ghana)<br />
E-mail: soilri@ncs.com.gh, Tel: 233-21-778226, Fax: 233-21-778219<br />
Poster Extended Abstract<br />
An eight-member sampl<strong>in</strong>g team from Ghana’s Council for Scientific and Industrial Research<br />
(CSIR) / Soil Research Institute (SRI) and from the USDA-National <strong>Resources</strong> Conservation<br />
Service (NRCS) sampled soils <strong>in</strong> the Upper Afram Bas<strong>in</strong> as part of a co-operative project that<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded provid<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> modern soil survey methodologies.<br />
The field portion of the project <strong>in</strong>cluded sampl<strong>in</strong>g six soil pedons that represent a<br />
variety of soil types for complete analyses. These soils are developed <strong>in</strong> Paleozoic f<strong>in</strong>e- and<br />
coarse-gra<strong>in</strong>ed Voltaian sandstone and shale. The objective is to relate clay and optical<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogy f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs to micromorphological properties of the studied soils. As <strong>in</strong> many<br />
tropical soils, they did not reflect strong pedofeatures, except for clay illuviation, which may<br />
be masked <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections by illuvial iron and manganese that coats peds and gra<strong>in</strong>s. The<br />
illuvial iron/ferri-argillans mask the cation exchange capacity of the soil and other clay<br />
expressions such as x-ray diffractions. It also fixes phosphorous and produces the red colour<br />
exhibited <strong>in</strong> these soils.<br />
X-ray diffraction analysis showed that quartz is the dom<strong>in</strong>ant m<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>in</strong> the clay<br />
fraction. Faunal activity, e.g. by termites and earthworms, and vegetation differences are<br />
important soil developmental factors observed <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections. Also, iron and clay illuviation<br />
was dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> soils on mature landscapes. Quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections <strong>in</strong> these soils are<br />
highly weathered with rounded edges and striated marks <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong>s surfaces. These features<br />
are evidence of the long and cont<strong>in</strong>uous weather<strong>in</strong>g that has taken place <strong>in</strong> these soils or<br />
parent materials over time. Remnants of termite and worm activity <strong>in</strong>clude vermiform features<br />
composed of kaol<strong>in</strong>itic clays that have been <strong>in</strong>gested and are plastered along the walls of<br />
channel. The soils <strong>in</strong> this study record a large variation <strong>in</strong> animal activities. There was a larger<br />
variety of activities <strong>in</strong> the surface layer of forested areas than <strong>in</strong> cultivated fields. However,<br />
termites were active <strong>in</strong> both forested and cultivated areas.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[173] S.V. Adu, J. A. Mensah-Ansah. "Soils of the Afram Bas<strong>in</strong>, Ashantiand Eastern Regions, Ghana",<br />
CSIR-Soil Research Institute, Memoir No. 12. Kwadaso-Kumasi, Ghana. 90pp, (1995).<br />
[174] D.A. Bates. Geology. P51-61. In J. Brian Wills (ed). "Agriculture and land use <strong>in</strong> Ghana", Oxford<br />
University Press, London, (1962).<br />
[175] R. Brewer. "Fabric and M<strong>in</strong>eral Analysis of Soils", John Wiley & Sons, Inc. <strong>New</strong> York. 304pp., (1964).<br />
[176] E.A. FitzPatrick. "Soil Microscopy and Micromorphology", John Wiley & Sons, Inc. <strong>New</strong> York.<br />
304pp., (1993).<br />
[177] Soil Survey Staff. "Keys to Soil Taxnomy", N<strong>in</strong>th Edition. United States Department of Agriculture<br />
and Natural <strong>Resources</strong> Conservation Service. 332pp., (2003).<br />
[178] G. Stoops. "Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Analysis and Description of Soil and Regolith Th<strong>in</strong> Sections", Soil Science<br />
Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI, 184pp, (2003).<br />
307
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
WORKSHOP Theme: Soil Processes and analytical techniques<br />
Convenors: E. Van Ranst, G. Stoops, F. Mees, V. Marcel<strong>in</strong>o<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
About 15 participants attended the session for this workshop theme. They were ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
alumni of the former “Soil Science” and “Soil Science and Eremology” programmes, <strong>in</strong><br />
which more attention was given to the understand<strong>in</strong>g of soil genesis and dynamics (e.g. us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogical and micromorphological methods) compared to the curriculum of the present<br />
“<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>” programme. A majority of the participants is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />
at university level, which implies that the total impact of the session will be important, due to<br />
the multiplication effect of deal<strong>in</strong>g with teach<strong>in</strong>g staff.<br />
The first part of the session was concentrated ma<strong>in</strong>ly on soil m<strong>in</strong>eralogy. E. Van Ranst<br />
(UGent), chair<strong>in</strong>g that part, illustrated the importance of physico-chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical<br />
studies of the clay fraction for understand<strong>in</strong>g soil dynamics, followed by a presentation of an<br />
ongo<strong>in</strong>g research project about authigenic m<strong>in</strong>eral formation (F. Mees, UGent). Lectures by<br />
Fiantis et al. and Morras et al. illustrated the use of various techniques for the m<strong>in</strong>eralogical<br />
study of soils.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the coffee break, attention was focussed on the presentation of posters by<br />
participants of this workshop theme session.<br />
The second part started with an <strong>in</strong>troduction by G. Stoops (UGent), describ<strong>in</strong>g recent<br />
advances <strong>in</strong> soil micromorphology and the present research <strong>in</strong> this field with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
Department, followed by more detailed discussions on the problem of compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
micromorphometric data obta<strong>in</strong>ed by different techniques (V. Marcel<strong>in</strong>o, UGent) and on the<br />
application of X-ray tomography <strong>in</strong> soil micromorphology (F. Mees, UGent). Two alumni<br />
presented papers on their current research <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame and Indonesia, us<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralogical and micromorphological techniques to disentangle complex pedogenic<br />
processes.<br />
All presentations, dur<strong>in</strong>g both parts of the session, were followed by a discussion with<br />
the audience.<br />
308
Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
309
Clos<strong>in</strong>g Word<br />
CLOSING WORD<br />
Clos<strong>in</strong>g Address by Prof. E. Van Ranst, Chairman Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong><br />
<strong>Resources</strong> and Promotor of the Master Programme (UGent)<br />
310
Clos<strong>in</strong>g Word<br />
Clos<strong>in</strong>g Address by Prof. E. Van Ranst, Chairman Steer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Committee <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> and Promotor of the Master<br />
Programme (UGent)<br />
Given at the occasion of the fifth refresher course for alumni of the Master of Science Programmes <strong>in</strong><br />
Soil Science (UGent), Eremology (UGent) and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> (UGent-VUB)<br />
Dear Alumni,<br />
Dear Colleagues,<br />
Esteemed Guests,<br />
9 September 2006<br />
On behalf of the Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee and the Staff of our programme <strong>in</strong> PLR, I first want to<br />
congratulate all of you, alumni and staff who attended this 5 th refresher course, for your<br />
contributions and active participation <strong>in</strong> the discussions. I am proud to be able to announce<br />
that this refresher course was attended by 40 alumni com<strong>in</strong>g from 22 countries spread over<br />
different cont<strong>in</strong>ents. As I said already dur<strong>in</strong>g my open<strong>in</strong>g speech, our major objective was to<br />
come to an overall exchange of knowledge and <strong>in</strong>formation from alumni to staff and vice<br />
versa, as well as amongst alumni. I hope we have succeeded <strong>in</strong> this objective? I hope that all<br />
of you enjoyed the sessions, that you could establish cooperative l<strong>in</strong>kages, upgrade your<br />
knowledge with the latest developments <strong>in</strong> the field of soil science and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g geology,<br />
and that you were able to collect valuable <strong>in</strong>formation about the wide range of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
fund<strong>in</strong>g opportunities provided by VLIR or offered by other <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> Belgium that are<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> development cooperation.<br />
I th<strong>in</strong>k that the <strong>in</strong>formation session we had on Monday afternoon on possibilities for cooperation,<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial support, project plann<strong>in</strong>g, etc.. with presentations of VLIR, BTC, the<br />
Department of Research Affairs from the Ghent University and the Department for<br />
Development Cooperation of the Free University of Brussels was very <strong>in</strong>formative to<br />
strengthen your academic cooperation <strong>in</strong> the near future or to help younger colleagues or<br />
scientists of your <strong>in</strong>stitute <strong>in</strong> their further tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or career development.<br />
The flash presentations proved to be an ideal communication tool, <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g us to explore the<br />
differences and similarities <strong>in</strong> the problems you, the alumni, face while develop<strong>in</strong>g your<br />
scientific career. It stressed the importance of fund<strong>in</strong>g – through projects with professors from<br />
Ghent University and the Free university of Brussels - but it also highlighted opportunities for<br />
co-operation among the alumni themselves.<br />
The most important limitation experienced by the majority of the speakers is the lack of funds<br />
and consequently, there’s a high necessity for cooperation with other <strong>in</strong>stitutes through<br />
projects. The funds raised as such are necessary to buy basic equipment for laboratories or<br />
field experiments, or to buy data such as climatic records or satellite imagery. The<br />
collaboration with European universities also opens opportunities for knowledge exchange,<br />
through guest lectures or short tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs. The <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong> current lead<strong>in</strong>g research topics is<br />
broadened as the alumni get access to e-papers.<br />
311
Clos<strong>in</strong>g Word<br />
However, a project starts with writ<strong>in</strong>g a well-prepared project proposal, and this <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
proposal writ<strong>in</strong>g is not as evident as it seems if there’s no access to basic computer<br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure, <strong>in</strong>ternet services or e-subscriptions to journals that allow the alumni to keep<br />
pace with the latest developments <strong>in</strong> their field of expertise.<br />
Once the project f<strong>in</strong>ishes, often, there are no funds anymore that can be used to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>,<br />
repair or order spare parts of the laboratory equipment acquired. This opened the discussion<br />
with respect to the frequent demand of alumni for more sophisticated <strong>in</strong>struments. In reality,<br />
they more urgently need good basic <strong>in</strong>frastructure that is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed correctly. This<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance not only requires funds, but also a good management with cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
supervision.<br />
All speakers are also will<strong>in</strong>g to exchange MSc and PhD students. These foreign students br<strong>in</strong>g<br />
along with them their knowledge of tools, theories, and new advances <strong>in</strong> soil science. On the<br />
other hand, several alumni highlighted the lack of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> soil science shown by the local<br />
students. Often, these students don’t choose for soil science because they don’t have any idea<br />
of the potential future jobs. They also need to be conv<strong>in</strong>ced of the persist<strong>in</strong>g (or even<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g) importance of soil science <strong>in</strong> our modern communities.<br />
Upon the demand for more « upgraded » local staff, the problem of bra<strong>in</strong>-dra<strong>in</strong> is raised,<br />
faced by many develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. However, there are also positive, encourag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
statements. Fac<strong>in</strong>g all the problems, mak<strong>in</strong>g it difficult (at might take several years) to get a<br />
project proposal launched, some of the speakers already successfully got <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> national<br />
and <strong>in</strong>ternational projects. Cooperation among the alumni of different universities or research<br />
<strong>in</strong>stitutes with<strong>in</strong> a country or with<strong>in</strong> neighbour<strong>in</strong>g countries, is often a way of gett<strong>in</strong>g access<br />
to papers, to data, or to specific laboratory <strong>in</strong>struments.<br />
Also our newsletter “PEDON” can play a major role <strong>in</strong> all this, as I mentioned already <strong>in</strong> the<br />
editorial of Pedon nr. 16 (2005). I wish to rem<strong>in</strong>d everyone of you that Pedon is not meant as<br />
a one-way channel of <strong>in</strong>formation from our centre towards alumni. Pedon also makes room<br />
for your contributions, reactions, call for research partners, important events <strong>in</strong> your research<br />
groups, as well as activities and projects organised <strong>in</strong> the frame of the soil science – and<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g geology – community <strong>in</strong> your country and, perhaps, by associations of alumni.<br />
In 1992, a local Alumni Association was set up <strong>in</strong> Malaysia. We have about 70 alumni from<br />
Malaysia, and they were one of the most prom<strong>in</strong>ent countries represented here dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
seventies and eighties. At present, other nationalities surface <strong>in</strong> our <strong>in</strong>ternational student<br />
community. Ethiopia is certa<strong>in</strong>ly tak<strong>in</strong>g the lead. In 1996, an association of Ethiopian alumni<br />
from Belgian universities was founded. Although this association groups alumni from<br />
different programs <strong>in</strong> Belgium, it does provide a channel through which our alumni can meet<br />
and (we hope) keep contact. Associations like these can facilitate network<strong>in</strong>g and set up of<br />
research activities with<strong>in</strong> and across borders.<br />
Please send us <strong>in</strong>formation to be published <strong>in</strong> PEDON!<br />
312
Clos<strong>in</strong>g Word<br />
Before end<strong>in</strong>g this speech, I once aga<strong>in</strong> would like to thank the VLIR for co-f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g this<br />
event; the Ghent University for host<strong>in</strong>g this workshop, and especially the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative staff<br />
of the secretariat of the PLR for the hard work done over the past weeks mak<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
organization of this refresher course possible.<br />
Thanks, let’s keep <strong>in</strong> touch, and have a safe journey back home.<br />
313<br />
Prof. E. Van Ranst
Agenda<br />
Workshop for Alumni of the M.Sc. programmes <strong>in</strong> Soil Science, Eremology<br />
and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Sunday September 3, 2006 :<br />
NEW WAVES IN PHYSICAL LAND RESOURCES<br />
3-9 September 2006<br />
AGENDA<br />
04.00–06.00 pm : Registration and reception of participants, Faculty of Bioscience<br />
Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, 9000 Gent (FBE, UGent), Bldg. E<br />
Monday September 4, 2006 :<br />
Place: Faculty of Bioscience Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, 9000 Gent (FBE, UGent),<br />
Bldg. E, room E009<br />
09.00-09.30 am : Registration<br />
09.30-10.00 am : Welcome of the participants by<br />
. course promoter(s)<br />
. Rector UGent<br />
. Director VLIR-UOS (K. Verbrugghen)<br />
10.00-11.30 am : Open<strong>in</strong>g lectures by alumni<br />
. Prof. Dr. Mitiku Haile, Rector, Mekelle University College,<br />
Ethiopia<br />
. Prof. Dr. Tang Hua-Jun, Director General, National Institute of<br />
Agricultural <strong>Resources</strong> and Regional Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Academy<br />
of Agricultural Science (CAAS), Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
. Prof. Dr. Erpul Gunay, Ankara University, Turkey<br />
11.30-02.00 pm : Reception - Lunch<br />
02.00-05.30 pm : Informative session on possibilities for co-operation, f<strong>in</strong>ancial support,<br />
project plann<strong>in</strong>g etc.<br />
. UGent, Dept. Research Affairs (Dr. D. De Craemer)<br />
. VUB, Dept. Devt. Cooperation (J. Couder)<br />
. BTC (C. Michiels)<br />
. VLIR (F. Vermeulen)<br />
. DGOS (D. Molderez, A. Van Malderghem)<br />
314
Agenda<br />
Tuesday September 5, 2006 :<br />
Place: FBE (UGent), Bldg. E, room E009<br />
09.00–11.00 am : Flash presentations by alumni on background, current work, needs,<br />
demands for co-operation<br />
11.00–11.30 am : Break<br />
11.30-12.30 am : Discussion<br />
02.00–04.00 pm : Flash presentations by alumni on background, current work, needs,<br />
demands for co-operation (cont’d)<br />
04.00-04.30 pm : Break<br />
04.30-05.30 pm : Discussion<br />
6.00 pm : reception at the town hall and guided city walk<br />
Wednesday September 6, 2006 :<br />
Full day excursion:<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g time and meet<strong>in</strong>g place:<br />
7.30 am: Monasterium Poortackere, Oude Houtlei 56, 9000 Gent<br />
8.00 am: <strong>in</strong> front of the entrance hall of the build<strong>in</strong>g S8, De Sterre, Krijgslaan 281, 9000<br />
Gent<br />
Expected time of return: It is expected to leave from Brussels around 4.00 pm.<br />
Morn<strong>in</strong>g : Visit to the labs of ICP staff at the VUB (Brussels)<br />
Afternoon : Visit to the Royal Museum of Central Africa, Tervuren, dept.<br />
Teledetection<br />
Thursday September 7, 2006 :<br />
Visit to the labs of ICP-staff (UGent):<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g time: 15 m<strong>in</strong>utes before start of each tour (08.45 am and 01.45 pm respectively)<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g place: entrance hall of the build<strong>in</strong>g concerned (S8, Sterre and Bldg. B, FBE<br />
respectively)<br />
Note: a bus will pick up participants at the Monasterium at 8.30 am, with dest<strong>in</strong>ation the<br />
Sterre. A bus will take the participants at 12.00 am to the FBE for lunch and cont<strong>in</strong>uation of<br />
the visit there.<br />
315
Agenda<br />
place time nr. lab/dept.<br />
De Sterre, S8 09.00 – 12.00<br />
am<br />
(3 groups)<br />
FBE, bldg B 02.00 – 05.30<br />
pm<br />
(4 groups)<br />
FBE, bldg A By appo<strong>in</strong>tment 8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
Friday September 8, 2006 :<br />
Place: FBE (UGent), Bldg. E<br />
09.00 – 12.30<br />
am<br />
break: 10.30-11.00 am<br />
02.00 – 05.30<br />
pm<br />
break: 03.30-04.00 pm<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
Lab. Soil Science<br />
Lab. Applied Geology & Hydrogeology<br />
Center for Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Lab. Applied <strong>Physical</strong> Chemistry<br />
Lab. Analytical Chemistry & Applied Ecochemistry<br />
Lab. Soil Physics<br />
Lab. Soil Fertility & Data Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Lab. Hydrology & Water Management<br />
Dept. Applied Ecologie & Environmental Biology<br />
Dept. Applied Mathematics, Biometry & Process<br />
Regulation<br />
: Parallel theme-workshops based on papers and posters:<br />
� Theme A : Soil and groundwater pollution and<br />
remediation<br />
� Theme C : <strong>Land</strong> evaluation and land degradation<br />
: Parallel theme-workshops based on papers and posters :<br />
� Theme B : Integrated soil fertility management<br />
� Theme D : Soil survey and soil <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />
� Theme E : Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />
7.30 pm : Workshop D<strong>in</strong>ner at Monasterium Poortackere, Oude Houtlei 56<br />
Saturday September 9, 2006 :<br />
Place: FBE (UGent), Bldg. E, room E010<br />
09.00 - 10.00<br />
am<br />
10.00 – 10.30<br />
am<br />
10.30 – 11.30<br />
am<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
Time for mak<strong>in</strong>g reports of the workshops<br />
Coffee break<br />
Report<strong>in</strong>g on theme workshops, conclusions<br />
11.30 am : Clos<strong>in</strong>g of the meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
316<br />
Room<br />
E010<br />
E009<br />
Room<br />
E009<br />
E010<br />
E015
Agenda<br />
317
List of Participants<br />
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS<br />
Dr. Héctor Morrás<br />
Instituto Nacional de Tecnolgia Agropecuaria (INTA), Centro de Investigación de Recursos<br />
Naturales (CIRn) - Instituto de Suelos<br />
Las Cabañas y Los Reseros, 1712 Castelar, Argent<strong>in</strong>a<br />
tel.: 54-1146211448 fax: 54-114811688 e-mail: hmorras@cirn.<strong>in</strong>ta.gov.ar<br />
Promotion: 1972, Soil Science<br />
Ms. Kather<strong>in</strong>e Verbeek<br />
Goed<strong>in</strong>genstraat 20, 9051 Afsnee, Belgium<br />
tel.: 0473/522513 fax: e-mail: kverbeek@skynet.be<br />
Promotion: 1982, Soil Science<br />
Prof. Boon Goh Tee<br />
University of Manitoba, Dept. Of Soil Science<br />
R3T 2NZ W<strong>in</strong>nipeg, Canada<br />
tel.: 204-4746046 fax: 204-4747642 e-mail: gohtb@ms.umanitoba.ca<br />
Promotion: 1978, Soil Science<br />
Dr. Youqi Chen<br />
National Institute of Natural <strong>Resources</strong> and Soil Science, CAAS,<br />
12 Zhong Guan Cun South Avenue, 100081 Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
tel.: 0086-10-68919638 fax: 0086-10-68976016<br />
e-mail: <br />
Promotion:<br />
Dr. J<strong>in</strong> Ke<br />
Soil and Fertilizers Institute,<br />
Baishiqiao 30, 100081 Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
tel.: 0086-10-68918672 fax: e-mail: ke-j<strong>in</strong>@hotmail.com<br />
Promotion: 2002? <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Prof. Dr. Tang Huajun<br />
National Institute of Natural <strong>Resources</strong> and Soil Science, CAAS,<br />
12 Zhong Guan South Ave., 100081 Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
tel.: 86-10-68919638 fax: 86-10-68976016<br />
e-mail: <br />
Promotion: 1993, Soil Science<br />
Prof. Dr., Dean Luhembwe Ngongo<br />
University of Lubumbashi,<br />
825 Lubumbashi, D.R. Congo<br />
tel.: 243-997027140 fax: e-mail: ngongoluhembwe@unilu.ac.cd<br />
Promotion: 1986, Soil Science<br />
318
List of Participants<br />
Prof. Jorge Valarezo<br />
Universidad Nacional de Loja-Ecuador,<br />
Ciudad Universitaria, La Argelia, 1101 Loja, Ecuador<br />
tel.: 593-72546671 fax: 593-72545054 e-mail: jivg1@yahoo.es<br />
Promotion: 1977, Soil Science<br />
Ing. M.Sc. Carlos Valarezo<br />
Universidad Nacional de Loja-Ecuador,<br />
Ciudad Universitaria "Guillermo Falconi" - La Argelia, 1101 Loja, Ecuador<br />
tel.: 93-72545054 fax: 593-72584802 e-mail: cvalarezo@softhome.net<br />
Promotion: 1978, Soil Science<br />
Dr. Ahmed Taalab<br />
National Research Centre,<br />
Tahrrer St., 12622 Dokki, Cairo, Egypt<br />
tel.: 123991830 fax: 2023371362 e-mail: astaalab@hotmail.com<br />
Promotion:<br />
Prof. Dr. Mohamed El-Badawi<br />
National Research Centre, Soil Dept.<br />
El-Bohouse St., 123 Dokki, Cairo, Egypt<br />
tel.: 20123707177 fax: 20123370931 e-mail: badawi2712@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1986, Ph.D. Soil Science<br />
Dr. Ageeb Gamil Waheeb<br />
National Research Centre,<br />
Al Bohos St., 12622 Dokki, Cairo, Egypt<br />
tel.: 202-0106833629 fax: 202-3370931 e-mail: gamilageeb@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1994, Soil Science<br />
Prof. Dr., President Mitiku Haile<br />
Mekelle University,<br />
P.O. Box 231, 231 Mekelle, Ethiopia<br />
tel.: 251-344402264 fax: 251-344409304 e-mail: gualmitiku@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1987, Soil Science<br />
Drs. Meklit Tariku<br />
Ugent, Dept. Soil Mant. & Soil Care<br />
Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, B 9000 Gent, Belgium<br />
tel.: fax: e-mail: Meklit.TarikuChernet@UGent.be<br />
Promotion: 2004, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Mr. Enoch Boateng<br />
CSIR-Soil Research Institute,<br />
P.O. Box 1132, Accra, Ghana<br />
tel.: 233-244732410 fax: 233-21778219 e-mail: soilri@ncs.com.gh<br />
Promotion: 1990, Soil Science<br />
319
List of Participants<br />
Mr. Ebenezer Abuaku<br />
University of Cape Coast, Dept. of Soil Science, School of Agriculture<br />
23342 Cape Coast, Ghana<br />
tel.: 233-244736051 fax: 233-21-774313 e-mail: ebentje@yahoo.co.uk<br />
Promotion: 2002, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Prof. Dr. Arif<strong>in</strong> Mahfud<br />
Padjadjaran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Soil Science<br />
Jl. Raya Sumedang km 21 Jat<strong>in</strong>angor, 46000 Bandung, Indonesia<br />
tel.: 062-22-7797200 fax: 062-22-7796316 e-mail: mahfud_arif<strong>in</strong>s@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion:<br />
ir. M.Sc. R<strong>in</strong>a Devnita<br />
Padjadjaran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Soil Science<br />
Jl. Raya Sumedang km 21 Jat<strong>in</strong>angor, 46000 Bandung, Indonesia<br />
tel.: 062-22-7797200 fax: e-mail: r<strong>in</strong>abursi@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1993, Soil Science<br />
Dr. Dian Fiantis<br />
University of Andalas, Dept. Of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture<br />
Kampus Unand Limau Manis, 25163 Padang, Indonesia<br />
tel.: 62-75128136 fax: 62-75172702 e-mail: dianfiantis@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1995, Soil Science<br />
Dr. A. Ariv<strong>in</strong> Rivaie<br />
Indonesian Centre for Estate Crops Research & Development,<br />
Jl. Tentara Pelajar n° 1, 16111 Bogor, Indonesia<br />
tel.: 62-251313083 fax: 62-251336194 e-mail: ariv<strong>in</strong>rivaie@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1998, Soil Science and Eremology<br />
Dr. Mugai Njue<br />
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Horticulture Department<br />
P.O. Box 62000, Nairobi, Kenya<br />
tel.: 722-337605 fax: e-mail: nmugai@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1982, Soil Science<br />
Dr. Philip Wandahwa<br />
Egerton University, Dept. Of Soil Science<br />
P.O. Box 536, Njoro, Kenya<br />
tel.: 254-733269460 fax: 254-5162527 e-mail: wandahwa2002@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1992, Soil Science<br />
Mr. Peter Njoroge Kamande<br />
University of Nairobi,<br />
P.O. Box 29053, Nairobi, Kenya<br />
tel.: 254-726378491 fax: e-mail: pnkamande2002@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 2005, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
320
List of Participants<br />
Prof. B<strong>in</strong> Jusop Shamshudd<strong>in</strong><br />
Universiti Putra Malaysia, Department of <strong>Land</strong> Management, Faculty of Agriculture<br />
43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia<br />
tel.: 603-89466985 fax: 603-89434419 e-mail: samsud<strong>in</strong>@agri.upm.edu.my<br />
Promotion: 1981, Soil Science<br />
Dr. Abdul Razzaq<br />
University of Agriculture, Dept. of Soil Science<br />
Faisalabad, Pakistan<br />
tel.: fax: e-mail:<br />
Promotion: 1969, Soil Science<br />
Dr. Renato Boniao<br />
MSU-NAAWAN,<br />
Naawan, Misamis Oriental, 9023 Naawan, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />
tel.: H/P # 063 63 9164958669 fax: e-mail: natsupm@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1996, Soil Science<br />
Prof. Rosa Poch<br />
Universitat de Lleida, Departament de Medi Ambient i Ciències del Sòl<br />
Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spa<strong>in</strong><br />
tel.: 34973702621 fax: 34973702613 e-mail: rosa.poch@macs.udl.es<br />
Promotion: 1989, Soil Science<br />
Drs. Udayakantha Vitharana<br />
Ugent, Dept. Soil Mant. & Soil Care<br />
Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium<br />
tel.: fax: e-mail: U.Vitharana@UGent.be<br />
Promotion: 2004, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
M.Sc. Chandra G. Algoe<br />
Anton de Kom Universiteit van Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Faculteit der Technologische Wetenschappen<br />
Universiteitscomplex, Leysweg, POB 9212, Paramaribo, Sur<strong>in</strong>ame<br />
tel.: 465558 ext. 413 fax: 495005 e-mail: c.algoe@uvs.edu<br />
Promotion: 1999, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Dr. Somjate Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra<br />
Department of Agriculture,<br />
Chatuchak, 10900 Bangkok, Thailand<br />
tel.: 66-2-5790574 fax: 66-2-9405472 e-mail: spratumm<strong>in</strong>@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 1996, Soil Science<br />
Dr. Gunay Erpul<br />
Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture, Soil Science Department<br />
06110 Ankara, Turkey<br />
tel.: 90-312/5961796 fax: 90-312/5171917 e-mail: Gunay.Erpul@agri.anakara.edu.tr<br />
Promotion: 1996, Eremology<br />
321
List of Participants<br />
Dr. Hasan Öztürk<br />
Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Soil Science<br />
06110 Diskapi, Ankara, Turkey<br />
tel.: 90-312-5961757 fax: 90-312-3178465 e-mail: hozturk@agri.ankara.edu.tr<br />
Promotion: 1997, Eremology<br />
Dr. Crammer Kayuki Kaizzi<br />
Kawanda Agricultural Research Institute (KARI),<br />
P.O. Box 7065, Kampala, Uganda<br />
tel.: 256-41567649696 fax: 256-41567649 e-mail: kckaizzi@hotmail.com<br />
Promotion: 1994, Soil Science<br />
M.Sc. Tran Thi Le Ha<br />
Hanoi Agricultural University, Faculty of <strong>Land</strong> and Environment, Department of Soil Science<br />
22A Duong S., Trau Quy, Gia Lam, 10700 Hanoi, Vietnam<br />
tel.: 84-912554602 fax: 84-48276554 e-mail: faithanoi@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 2000, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Mr. Dai Trung Nguyen<br />
Research Institute of Geology and M<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>Resources</strong>, Soil and <strong>Land</strong>use Dvision<br />
Nguyen Trai Road, km 9 + 200 Chien Thang Street, Thanh Xuan, 0084 Hanoi, Vietnam<br />
tel.: 84-4/8543107 fax: 84-4/8542125 e-mail: trung_nd@yahoo.com<br />
Promotion: 2001, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Sr. Lecturer, Director Khoa Le Van<br />
Can Tho University,<br />
3/2 Street, N<strong>in</strong>h Kieu District, Cantho City, Vietnam<br />
tel.: 84-71-832971 fax: 84-71-838474 e-mail: LVKhoa@ctu.edu.vn<br />
Promotion: 2002, Ph.D.<br />
322