08.01.2013 Views

New waves in Physical Land Resources

New waves in Physical Land Resources

New waves in Physical Land Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>New</strong> <strong>waves</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Workshop for Alumni of the<br />

M.Sc. programmes <strong>in</strong> Soil Science, Eremology and<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Refresher Course supported by the Flemish Interuniversity Council<br />

(VLIR-UOS)<br />

Edited by<br />

Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Langouche & Eric Van Ranst<br />

GHENT UNIVERSITY<br />

3-9 SEPTEMBER 2006


<strong>New</strong> <strong>waves</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Workshop for<br />

Alumni of the M.Sc. programmes <strong>in</strong><br />

Soil Science, Eremology and <strong>Physical</strong><br />

<strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

ISBN 9789076769950<br />

Edited by<br />

Eric Van Ranst & Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Langouche<br />

GHENT UNIVERSITY<br />

3-9 SEPTEMBER 2006


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

PREFACE<br />

OPENING ADDRESS BY PROF. E. VAN RANST, CHAIRMAN STEERING COMMITTEE<br />

PHYSICAL LAND RESOURCES AND PROMOTOR OF THE MASTER PROGRAMME (UGENT)<br />

OPENING ADDRESS BY RECTOR P. VAN CAUWENBERGHE (UGENT)<br />

OPENING ADDRESS BY MS. K. VERBRUGGHEN, DIRECTOR OF VLIR-UNIVERSITY<br />

DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION SECTION<br />

OPENING LECTURES ....................................................................................................................................... 1<br />

SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT IN THE ETHIOPIAN HIGHLANDS............................................ 2<br />

MITIKU HAILE..................................................................................................................................................... 2<br />

NEW CHALLENGES OF SOIL SCIENCE TO FOOD SECURITY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO<br />

CHINA ............................................................................................................................................................. 14<br />

TANG HUAJUN & ZHOU WEI............................................................................................................................. 14<br />

WORKS ON EROSION PROCESSES UNDER WIND-DRIVEN RAIN CONDITIONS IN I.C.E ................ 24<br />

GUNAY ERPUL 1 & DONALD GABRIELS 2 ............................................................................................................ 24<br />

WORKSHOP THEME A – SOIL AND GROUNDWATER POLLUTION AND REMEDIATION.......... 36<br />

SUB-THEME : MANAGING CONTAMINATED SOILS USING PHYTOREMEDIATION................... 37<br />

ERIK MEERS, FILIP M. G. TACK, MARC G. VERLOO ......................................................................................... 37<br />

COMPARISON OF AMENDMENTS USED TO REMEDIATE ACID MINE TAILINGS:<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL AND AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS .................................................................. 39<br />

Kelly A. Senkiw and Tee Boon Goh * ............................................................................................................ 39<br />

STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF TRADE VILLAGE WASTE ON ACCUMULATION OF Cu, Pb, Zn AND<br />

Cd IN AGRICULTURAL SOILS OF PHUNG XA VILLAGE, THACH THANH DISTRICT, HA TAY<br />

PROVINCE.................................................................................................................................................. 49<br />

Nguyen Huu Thanh 1 , Tran Thi Le Ha 1 * , Nguyen Duc Hung 1 , Tran Duc Hai 2 ............................................ 49<br />

METAL CONTAMINATION IN IRRIGATED AGRICULTURAL LAND: CASE STUDY OF NAIROBI<br />

RIVER BASIN, KENYA................................................................................................................................ 60<br />

P.N. Kamande 1* , F.M.G. Tack 2 ................................................................................................................... 60<br />

SUB-THEME : MANAGING GROUNDWATER POLLUTION FROM WASTE DISPOSAL SITES .... 63<br />

KRISTINE WALRAEVENS, MARLEEN COETSIERS, KRISTINE MARTENS, MARC VAN CAMP ............................... 63<br />

CONTAMINATION OF THE MARIMBA RIVER TRIBUTARY, ZIMBABWE, WITH Cu, Pb, Zn AND P BY<br />

INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT AND SEWER LINE DISCHARGE................................................................... 66<br />

Bangira, C * .Wuta, M., Dube, H.M and Chipatiso, L................................................................................... 66<br />

CONTROLLING PHOSPHORUS (P) MOBILITY IN POORLY P SORBING SOILS: DRINKING-WATER<br />

TREATMENT RESIDUALS (WTR) TO THE RESCUE ............................................................................... 75<br />

S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang 1* , G.A. O’Connor 1 and L.W. Jacobs 2 .......................................................................... 75<br />

Effects of WTR on P losses .......................................................................................................................... 84<br />

HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION OF SOIL AND SURFACE WATER BY LEACHATES OF AN OPEN<br />

DUMP OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE: A CASE STUDY OF OBLOGO LANDFILL IN THE GA WEST<br />

DISTRICT OF ACCRA, GHANA................................................................................................................. 87<br />

Abuaku Ebenezer*....................................................................................................................................... 87<br />

CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................................................. 89<br />

WORKSHOP THEME B – INTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT .................................... 92<br />

SUB-THEME : USE OF ISOTOPE TECHNIQUES FOR ................................................................................... 93<br />

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 93<br />

P. BOECKX, K. DENEF, AND O. VAN CLEEMPUT ............................................................................................... 93<br />

ENHANCING THE AGRONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS OF NATURAL PHOSPHATE ROCK WITH<br />

POULTRY MANURE: A WAY FORWARD TO SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION .................... 95<br />

S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang 1 *, M.K. Abekoe 2 , O.O. Oladeji 1 , S.K.A. Danso 2 ......................................................... 95<br />

THE EFFECT OF LIMING AN ACID NITISOL WITH EITHER CALCITE OR DOLOMITE ON<br />

TWO COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) VARIETIES DIFFERING IN ALUMINIUM<br />

TOLERANCE........................................................................................................................................... 108


E .N Mugai 1* , S.G Agong 1 and H. Matsumoto 2 ......................................................................................... 108<br />

EFFECT OF P FERTILISERS AND WEED CONTROL..................................................................... 117<br />

ON THE FATE OF P FERTILISERS APPLIED TO SOILS................................................................ 117<br />

UNDER SECOND-ROTATION PINUS RADIATA............................................................................... 117<br />

A. A. Rivaie 1 , P. Loganathan 2 , and R. W. Tillman 2 ................................................................................... 117<br />

SUB-THEME : ORGANIC FARMING IN THE TROPICS PRESENT SITUATION, POSSIBILITIES<br />

AND CHALLENGES................................................................................................................................... 120<br />

STEFAAN DE NEVE.......................................................................................................................................... 120<br />

LOW INPUT APPROACHES FOR SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT VERIFIED FOR SEMI-<br />

ARID AREAS OF EASTERN UGANDA................................................................................................ 123<br />

Kayuki C.Kaizzi 1 , Byalebeka John 1 , Charles S. Wortmann 2 and Martha Mamo 2 ..................................... 123<br />

AMELIORATION OF ACID SULFATE SOIL INFERTILITY IN MALAYSIA FOR RICE CULTIVATION<br />

................................................................................................................................................................... 133<br />

J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>.......................................................................................................................................... 133<br />

WORKSHOP THEME C – LAND EVALUATION AND LAND DEGRADATION................................. 144<br />

SUB-THEME : LAND EVALUATION FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT & POLICY MAKING ................... 145<br />

A. VERDOODT & E. VAN RANST..................................................................................................................... 145<br />

OIL PALM AND RUBBER PRODUCTION MODEL FOR SUBSTITUING RUBBER WITH OIL<br />

PALM AND EVALUATING TO ESTABLISH OIL PALM INTO NORTHEAST THAILAND.......... 149<br />

S. Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra 1 , E.Van Ranst 2 , H.Verplancke 2 , A. Verdoodt 2 ................................................................ 149<br />

SOIL PROPERTIES AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF UNDISTURBED AND DISTURBED<br />

FORESTS IN MT. MALINDANG, PHILIPPINES ............................................................................... 162<br />

Renato D. Boniao 1* , Rosa Villa B. Estoista 2 , Carmelita G. Hansel 2 , Ron de Goede 4 , .............................. 162<br />

Olga M. Nuneza 3 , Brigida A. Roscom 3 , Sam James 5 , Rhea Amor C. Lumactud 1 , ..................................... 162<br />

Mae Yen O. Poblete 1 and Nonillon Aspe 3 .................................................................................................. 162<br />

SUB-THEME : LAND DEGRADATION : PRESSURES, INDICATORS AND RESPONSES ............... 173<br />

VARIOUS APPROACHES FOR SOIL EROSION RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................... 173<br />

W. CORNELIS, D. GABRIELS, H. VERPLANCKE................................................................................................ 173<br />

INDICATORS AND PARTICIPATORY METHODS FOR MONITORING LAND DEGRADATION. A<br />

CASE STUDY IN THE MIGORI DISTRICT OF KENYA. ................................................................... 175<br />

V<strong>in</strong>cent de Paul Obade 1* , Eva De Clercq 2 ................................................................................................ 175<br />

PROPOSED PLAN OF ACTION FOR RESEARCH ON DESERTIFICATION IN THE SUDAN:... 181<br />

GEZIRA AND SENNAR STATES .......................................................................................................... 181<br />

Kamal Elfadil Fadul and Fawzi Mohamed Salih ...................................................................................... 181<br />

DIAGNOSTIC OF DEGRADATION PROCESSES OF SOILS FROM NORTHERN TOGO (WEST<br />

AFRICA) AS A TOOL FOR SOIL AND WATER MANAGEMENT..................................................... 187<br />

Rosa M Poch*, Josep M Ubalde ............................................................................................................... 187<br />

CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................................................ 195<br />

WORKSHOP THEME D – SOIL SURVEY AND INVENTORY TECHNIQUES.................................... 196<br />

SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL (ATTRIBUTE) MAPPING WITH AN APPLICATION IN<br />

MAPING GROUNDWATER DEPTH....................................................................................................... 197<br />

P.A. FINKE ...................................................................................................................................................... 197<br />

USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM TO MAP<br />

SOIL CHARACTERISTICS FOR LAND EVALUATION........................................................................... 199<br />

P. Wandahwa 1* J. A. Rota 1 , and D. O. Sigunga 2 ....................................................................................... 199<br />

SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN GIS AND REMOTE SENSING WITH EMPHASIS ON HIGH<br />

RESOLUTION IMAGERY AND 3-D PRESENTATION TECHNIQUES ............................................ 208<br />

R. GOOSSENS .................................................................................................................................................. 208<br />

GEOMORPHOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION OF SOME PLAINES AND WADIES ADJACENT TO<br />

GABEL ELBA, SOUTH EAST OF EGYPT................................................................................................ 210<br />

El-Badawi, M. and Abdel-Fattah, A. ......................................................................................................... 210<br />

HIGH RESOLUTION TERRAIN MAPPING AND VISUALIZATION OF CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY<br />

USING LiDAR AND IFSAR DATA............................................................................................................ 225<br />

Sudhir Raj Shrestha 1* , Dr. Scott N. Miller 2 ............................................................................................... 225<br />

SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL SAMPLING AND PROXIMAL SENSING WITH<br />

APPLICATIONS IN PRECISION AGRICULTURE .............................................................................. 226<br />

M. VAN MEIRVENNE, U.W.A. VITHARANA L. COCKX ................................................................................... 226


ESTIMATING SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF SOIL SALINITY USING COKRIGING IN BAHARIYA OASIS,<br />

EGYPT....................................................................................................................................................... 228<br />

Kh. M. Darwish*, M.M. Kotb and R. Ali................................................................................................... 228<br />

SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF DRAINAGE AND PHOSPHATE RETENTION AND THEIR INTER<br />

RELATIONSHIP IN SOILS OF THE SOUTH-WESTERN REGION OF THE NORTH ISLAND, NEW<br />

ZEALAND.................................................................................................................................................. 242<br />

A.Senarath*, A.S.Palmer and R.W.Tillman............................................................................................... 242<br />

CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................... 252<br />

WORKSHOP THEME E – SOIL PROCESSES AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES........................... 254<br />

SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL GENESIS AND MINERALOGY.............................................. 255<br />

VAN RANST E. & MEES F. ..............................................................................................................................255<br />

IMPACT OF ACID DEPOSITION ON CATION LEACHING FROM...................................................... 258<br />

Mt. TALANG AIRFALL ASH..................................................................................................................... 258<br />

Fiantis, D., Nelson 1 , E. Van Ranst 2 and J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong> 3 ......................................................................... 258<br />

STONE LINES AND WEATHERING PROFILES OF FERRALLITIC SOILS IN NORTHEASTERN<br />

ARGENTINA ............................................................................................................................................. 269<br />

Morrás, H. 1* , Moretti, L. 1 , Píccolo, G. 2 , Zech,W. 3 ..................................................................................... 269<br />

PEDOGENESIS ALONG A HILLSLOPE TRAVERSE IN THE UPPER AFRAM BASIN, GHANA.......... 281<br />

T. Adjei-Gyapong, 1 E. Boateng, 1 * C. Dela Dedzoe, 1 W.R. Effland, 2 M.D. Mays 2 and J.K. Seneya 1 ......... 281<br />

INFLUENCE OF TITANOMAGNETITE ON DITHIONITE-CITRATE-BICARBONATE (DCB) AND<br />

OXALATE EXTRACTIONS IN WEATHERED DOLERITE ...................................................................... 283<br />

C. G. Algoe 1* , E. Van Ranst 2 , G. Stoops 3 ................................................................................................ 283<br />

SUB-THEME : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL MICROMORPHOLOGY .......................................................... 291<br />

STOOPS, G., MARCELINO, V., MEES, F............................................................................................................ 291<br />

SPHEROIDAL WEATHERING OF DOLERITE IN SURINAME: EVIDENCE FROM PHYSICAL,<br />

CHEMICAL AND MINERALOGICAL DATA ........................................................................................... 295<br />

C. G. Algoe 1* , E. Van Ranst 2 , G. Stoops 3 ................................................................................................ 295<br />

MICROMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ANDISOLS IN WEST JAVA, INDONESIA ........ 296<br />

Mahfud Arif<strong>in</strong> * , R<strong>in</strong>a Devnita.................................................................................................................... 296<br />

MICROMORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF SOME SOILS IN THE AFRAM PLAINS (GHANA, WEST<br />

AFRICA).................................................................................................................................................... 307<br />

M.D. Mays 1 , W.R. Effland 2 , T. Adjei-Gyapong 3 , C.D. Dedzoe 3 and E. Boateng 4 *................................... 307<br />

CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................... 308<br />

CLOSING ADDRESS BY PROF. E. VAN RANST, CHAIRMAN STEERING COMMITTEE<br />

PHYSICAL LAND RESOURCES AND PROMOTOR OF THE MASTER PROGRAMME (UGENT) 311<br />

AGENDA ........................................................................................................................................................... 314<br />

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS .............................................................................................................................. 318


PREFACE<br />

The 5th Refresher Course for alumni of our Master programmes is organised with the aim to<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t out needs for feedback, co-operation and support for alumni, and present <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

and means to fill gaps and remediate shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs. In addition, the objective is to brief the<br />

alumni on the latest developments <strong>in</strong> the field of Soil Science and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Geology,<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the expertise available at the International Centre for <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>.<br />

While <strong>in</strong> the former editions of the Refresher Course, which took place <strong>in</strong> South-East<br />

Asia, Africa and Lat<strong>in</strong> America, there was a strong accent on transfer of knowledge from the<br />

International Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Centre for Pos-Graduate Soil Scientists (ITC-Ghent), towards alumni,<br />

now an overall exchange of knowledge and <strong>in</strong>formation from alumni to staff and vice versa,<br />

as well as amongst alumni is envisaged. It is the <strong>in</strong>tention to create or improve channels of<br />

communication as an <strong>in</strong>dispensable vehicle for co-operation.<br />

This publication collects all contributions from alumni that were submitted for the<br />

different workshops organised <strong>in</strong> the frame of this Refresher Course. The contributions are<br />

arranged per workshop theme, and <strong>in</strong>troduced by each scientific committee appo<strong>in</strong>ted for each<br />

workshop. Care is taken to add a selection of valuable references perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to each workshop<br />

theme.


Welcome<br />

WELCOME<br />

Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Prof. E. Van Ranst, Chairman Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong><br />

<strong>Resources</strong> and Promotor of the Master Programme (UGent)<br />

Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Rector P. Van Cauwenberghe (UGent)<br />

Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Ms. K. Verbrugghen, Director of VLIR-University Development<br />

Co-operation Section


Welcome<br />

Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Prof. E. Van Ranst, Chairman Steer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Committee <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> and Promotor of the Master<br />

Programme (UGent)<br />

Given at the occasion of the fifth refresher course for alumni of the Master of Science Programmes <strong>in</strong><br />

Soil Science (UGent), Eremology (UGent) and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> (UGent-VUB)<br />

4 September 2006<br />

The Rector of Ghent University,<br />

The Director of the Secretariat for University Development Co-operation of the Flemish<br />

Interuniversity Council,<br />

Esteemed Guests,<br />

Dear Alumni,<br />

Dear Colleagues,<br />

Welcome at our 5 th refresher course for alumni. We are happy to be able to welcome today<br />

about 40 alumni. When we take <strong>in</strong>to account all alumni who reacted to our call for<br />

participation, this number would have been around one hundred (100). However, f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts proved to be a stumbl<strong>in</strong>g stone for many.<br />

The 5 th Refresher Course for Alumni of our Master programmes is organised with the aim to<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t out needs for feedback, co-operation and support for alumni, and to present <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

and means to fill gaps and remediate shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs. In addition, it is the objective to brief the<br />

alumni on the latest developments <strong>in</strong> the field of Soil Science and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Geology,<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the expertise available at the International Centre for <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>.<br />

While <strong>in</strong> the former editions of the Refresher Course, which took place <strong>in</strong> South-East Asia,<br />

Africa and Lat<strong>in</strong> America, there was a strong accent on transfer of knowledge from the<br />

International Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Centre for Post-Graduate Soil Scientists towards the alumni, now an<br />

overall exchange of knowledge and <strong>in</strong>formation from alumni to staff and vice versa, as well<br />

as amongst alumni is aimed at. It is the <strong>in</strong>tention to create or improve channels of<br />

communication as an <strong>in</strong>dispensable vehicle for co-operation.<br />

We, the programme organisers, are proud and honoured that Prof. Van Cauwenberge, the<br />

Rector of Ghent University, which is host<strong>in</strong>g this workshop, has committed himself to address<br />

this meet<strong>in</strong>g at the occasion of the open<strong>in</strong>g. We know that he has a full agenda. In fact, his<br />

secretariat <strong>in</strong>formed us that he has to be <strong>in</strong> Brussels today at eleven (11) ‘o clock, and he will<br />

have to leave us shortly after his open<strong>in</strong>g address.<br />

We are also pleased with the presence of Ms. Verbrugghen, Director of VLIR-University<br />

Development Co-operation Section, and sponsor of this workshop, who k<strong>in</strong>dly accepted to<br />

welcome you here today.


Welcome<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 1997, the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g and scholarships that "the International Course Programme's,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ours, receive from the Belgian Adm<strong>in</strong>istration for Development Co-operation are<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g adm<strong>in</strong>istered through the Flemish Interuniversity Council – or VLIR , and more <strong>in</strong><br />

particular the department University Development Co-operation. VLIR is a familiar name for<br />

all our graduates s<strong>in</strong>ce.<br />

Both dist<strong>in</strong>guished speakers are <strong>in</strong>vited to welcome the audience<br />

Prof. E. Van Ranst


Welcome<br />

Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Rector P. Van Cauwenberghe (UGent)<br />

Given at the occasion of the fifth refresher course for alumni of the Master of Science Programmes <strong>in</strong><br />

Soil Science (UGent), Eremology (UGent) and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> (UGent-VUB)<br />

Dear Alumni,<br />

Dear Colleagues,<br />

Esteemed Guests,<br />

4 September 2006<br />

It is my great pleasure and honour to welcome you at Ghent University. Ghent University has<br />

a long stand<strong>in</strong>g tradition of <strong>in</strong>ternationally oriented education and research. In fact, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational course programme <strong>in</strong> <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>, which has roots back to 1963, is<br />

the very proof of this. And you – its alumni – are the liv<strong>in</strong>g testimony.<br />

Up to this day, Ghent University is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> many <strong>in</strong>ternational projects and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensive contacts with research <strong>in</strong>stitutes and laboratories all over the world. This<br />

university’s concern for the world beyond the national borders manifests itself foremost <strong>in</strong> the<br />

education and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of foreign students.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 1963, up to this day, about 1000 alumni from over 90 countries worldwide graduated<br />

from the Master programmes <strong>in</strong> Soil Science, Eremology and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> at<br />

Ghent University and, s<strong>in</strong>ce 1997, also at the Free University of Brussels. In the present day<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g, I see faces from more than 20 different nations, a number that without any doubt<br />

would have been much higher were it not for budgetary constra<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

While the <strong>in</strong>ternational course programme would not be successful without the day-to-day<br />

dedication of its promoters and staff, the programme is also highly <strong>in</strong>debted to you, the<br />

alumni. You act as scientific ambassadors by dissem<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g your knowledge <strong>in</strong>to your home<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitution and country and as key persons <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g a bridge between your <strong>in</strong>stitution and<br />

Ghent University. Indeed, many of the research projects that have been and are be<strong>in</strong>g carried<br />

out, were set up through co-operation with graduates from this university. All <strong>in</strong>itiatives that<br />

foster communication and network<strong>in</strong>g and which re<strong>in</strong>force ties between the university and its<br />

former students deserve our highest consideration and support.<br />

Yet, when exchang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge care has to be taken to consider the local cultural, social<br />

and material reality. While for a soil scientist, it is as clear as mud that it is important to f<strong>in</strong>d a<br />

common ground, collaboration should consist of support, encouragement, catalysation and<br />

help from the North to f<strong>in</strong>d that little bit extra, while the actual work has to be done <strong>in</strong> and by<br />

the South.<br />

The will has to exist, to have a relevant impact on the local community and to develop a clear<br />

vision of the future.<br />

Soil is a key natural resource which requires better management to support susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

development and to preserve this basic commodity for future generations. There is a need for<br />

well tra<strong>in</strong>ed soil professionals with a sound scientific understand<strong>in</strong>g of soil systems, but who<br />

can also develop policy and provide practical advice and guidance.


Welcome<br />

As soil experts, you are aware of the fact that to get off the ground – you have to know the<br />

ground you walk on, and you have to see what someth<strong>in</strong>g is worth on the ground.<br />

In the course of this day, several speakers will take the word with no other purpose than to<br />

<strong>in</strong>form you about several exist<strong>in</strong>g possibilities to f<strong>in</strong>d support and to establish co-operation,<br />

and this at different levels and scales. In the course of this week, there will be plenty of<br />

occasions to meet and to refresh contacts, both with staff from the International Course<br />

Programme <strong>in</strong> <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> and with your colleagues from the South. I hope that<br />

you will grasp this golden opportunity with both hands.<br />

I s<strong>in</strong>cerely wish to thank here the Flemish Interuniversity Council, and <strong>in</strong> particular the<br />

University Development Cooperation Section, for its f<strong>in</strong>ancial support to the promoters of the<br />

International Course Programme <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> to organise an event like this.<br />

While the course programme provided you with the <strong>in</strong>tellectual luggage, a workshop like this<br />

is <strong>in</strong>tented to prospect channels for carry<strong>in</strong>g that luggage to your targets, yet stay<strong>in</strong>g down to<br />

earth and touch<strong>in</strong>g ground. Above all, the International Centre for <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

aims to act as a two-directional gateway for knowledge exchange.<br />

To conclude, I hope that you will leave no stone unturned and cover a lot of ground the<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g days, so that you come <strong>in</strong> sight of f<strong>in</strong>e land. I th<strong>in</strong>k this is the most I can wish to sons<br />

and daughters of the soil.<br />

Prof. P. Van Cauwenberghe


Welcome<br />

Open<strong>in</strong>g Address by Ms. K. Verbrugghen, Director of VLIR-<br />

University Development Co-operation Section<br />

Given at the occasion of the fifth refresher course for alumni of the Master of Science Programmes <strong>in</strong><br />

Soil Science (UGent), Eremology (UGent) and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> (UGent-VUB)<br />

Dear Alumni,<br />

Dear Colleagues,<br />

Esteemed Guests,<br />

4 September 2006<br />

It is my pleasure to be given the opportunity to say a few words to you.<br />

First of all, I want to congratulate you all, not only for the fact that quite years ago you were<br />

selected as VLIR scholar out of, <strong>in</strong> many cases, hundreds of quality applications, prov<strong>in</strong>g your<br />

quality standard already at that stage, but also for the fact that you all succeeded and obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

a Master degree, and <strong>in</strong>deed returned to your home countries.<br />

Now you have all been called back to Belgium, for a number of reasons. First of all, to update<br />

your scientific knowledge of the field of study, physical land resources, to exchange<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation and experience and specific cases.<br />

This will allow you to be better equipped for your own job back home, but this will also allow<br />

the course organisers <strong>in</strong> Belgium to further improve their tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme. We want to<br />

learn from you, on the basis of your experience, how the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme can be improved<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of quality as well as of development relevance.<br />

Furthermore, <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g your experiences and cases <strong>in</strong>to the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme will allow<br />

also the other students from Belgium or elsewhere to get access to this valuable <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

So this will contribute to the quality and the relevance of the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme, both for the<br />

southern but also the northern students.<br />

But your be<strong>in</strong>g here will also allow you to improve your own network, first of all with the<br />

course organisers <strong>in</strong> Belgium, but also with your colleague graduates. So do talk to one<br />

another. Exchange bus<strong>in</strong>ess cards. Initiate long-last<strong>in</strong>g partnerships across frontiers. Because<br />

academic cooperation consists of both north south but also south south cooperation.<br />

And then f<strong>in</strong>ally you will be given more <strong>in</strong>formation on the opportunities that VLIR is<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

I am proud to be able to announce that this refresher course, organised by Ghent University, is<br />

co-f<strong>in</strong>anced by VLIR. For us, the result of an <strong>in</strong>ternational course is not obta<strong>in</strong>ed by you<br />

gett<strong>in</strong>g your Master degree. No, we want you to go back home, to your home <strong>in</strong>stitution, and<br />

to make the difference there, by apply<strong>in</strong>g the knowledge that you acquired here, by pass<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

the knowledge to colleagues and peers, by tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g others. Only then, the <strong>in</strong>tervention by<br />

VLIR, our fund<strong>in</strong>g, will be a good <strong>in</strong>vestment from the perspective of development<br />

cooperation. Our basel<strong>in</strong>e is : shar<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>ds, chang<strong>in</strong>g lives. It is our common responsibility,<br />

also yours, to jo<strong>in</strong> bra<strong>in</strong>s and forces to help and improve the quality of life <strong>in</strong> the south.


Welcome<br />

This afternoon, my colleague Frank will elaborate more on the wide range of fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

opportunities that VLIR is provid<strong>in</strong>g. Over the last years, we have added quite many new<br />

opportunities, so we will be happy to give you an overview. He will also briefly touch upon<br />

the opportunities offered by other <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> Belgium that are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> development<br />

cooperation. Maybe there is someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> it for you!<br />

But please, remember one th<strong>in</strong>g: VLIR does not directly fund <strong>in</strong>dividuals or organisations <strong>in</strong><br />

the south. We fund cooperation between <strong>in</strong>dividuals and universities or research <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong><br />

the south, and one or more Flemish universities. We want you to occupy and to cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />

occupy a key or strategic position <strong>in</strong> your home country from where you can contribute to the<br />

development of your country, through science, and we want you to l<strong>in</strong>k up with our Flemish<br />

scientists. If those two conditions are fulfilled, we will happily look forward to receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

proposals from your side.<br />

I once aga<strong>in</strong> thank the organisers of this event, and prof. Van Ranst <strong>in</strong> particular, for the time<br />

given to me today, and I wish you all the best. Let’s keep <strong>in</strong> touch!<br />

Ms. K. Verbrugghen


Welcome


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

OPENING LECTURES<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>Land</strong> Management <strong>in</strong> Ethiopian Highlands<br />

Mitiku Haile<br />

<strong>New</strong> Challenges of Soil Science to Food Security with Special<br />

Reference to Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Tang Huajun, Zhou Wei<br />

Works on Erosion Processes under W<strong>in</strong>d-Driven Ra<strong>in</strong> Conditions <strong>in</strong> I.C.E<br />

Gunay Erpul, Donald Gabriels<br />

1


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT IN THE ETHIOPIAN<br />

HIGHLANDS<br />

1.1 Development situation and policy<br />

1.1.1 General<br />

Mitiku Haile<br />

Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Ethiopia is an agrarian country with 85% of the population earn<strong>in</strong>g their livelihoods from<br />

agriculture. It is one of the poorest countries <strong>in</strong> the world with a GDP of US$110 per capita<br />

per annum and 45.5 % of the population is below the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e. The country has suffered<br />

repeated fam<strong>in</strong>es over the last half century, and agriculture has failed to generate capital for<br />

diversify<strong>in</strong>g and transform<strong>in</strong>g the country’s economy. Hence reduc<strong>in</strong>g poverty through<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g rural production and livelihoods is central to the country’s development agenda.<br />

There have been a number of policy <strong>in</strong>itiatives s<strong>in</strong>ce the present government which<br />

came to power <strong>in</strong> 1991 has sought to address these issues. The overall guid<strong>in</strong>g framework<br />

<strong>in</strong>itially developed and still adhered to is ADLI, Agricultural Development Led<br />

Industrialization . This sees <strong>in</strong>creased production <strong>in</strong> the rural areas as critical for generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the materials, market base, surplus labor, export earn<strong>in</strong>gs and capital for <strong>in</strong>dustrialization. In<br />

2002, along with most develop<strong>in</strong>g world countries and <strong>in</strong> response to the identification of<br />

poverty reduction as the key target <strong>in</strong> the millennium development goals, the government<br />

developed its own poverty reduction strategy paper (PRSP) entitled the “Susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

Development and Poverty Reduction Programme” (SDPRP). In 2005 this was superseded by<br />

an updated SDPRP called the “Plan for Accelerated and Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development to End<br />

Poverty” (PASDEP). This provides guidance for the second five years of the PRSP process.<br />

The other guid<strong>in</strong>g document is the Federal Government’s Rural Development Policy and<br />

Strategies launched <strong>in</strong> 2003.<br />

The emphases <strong>in</strong> these three documents respectively are as follows:<br />

SDPRP seeks to:<br />

� support ADLI by generat<strong>in</strong>g a primary surplus to fuel growth <strong>in</strong> other sectors,<br />

� use (option) menu-based extension packages to enhance farmer choice of technologies,<br />

� undertake <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> education to overcome critical capacity constra<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />

� <strong>in</strong>crease from 4m to 6m the households covered by Extension Packages, and<br />

� support agricultural research, water harvest<strong>in</strong>g and small-scale irrigation.<br />

Rural Development Policies <strong>in</strong>cludes:<br />

� crop <strong>in</strong>tensification <strong>in</strong> high ra<strong>in</strong>fall areas,<br />

� livestock improvement and water resource development <strong>in</strong> pastoral areas,<br />

� water harvest<strong>in</strong>g and lands conservation <strong>in</strong> drought-prone areas, and<br />

� livestock improvement through improved breeds and technology.<br />

2


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

PASDEP aims to:<br />

� capture the private <strong>in</strong>itiative of farmers and support a shift to diversification and<br />

commercialization <strong>in</strong> agriculture,<br />

� support pro-poor subsistence farm<strong>in</strong>g where the aim is to <strong>in</strong>crease crop yields for<br />

domestic use and to ensure food security,<br />

� provide <strong>in</strong>tensified extension support at the kebele level to facilitate <strong>in</strong>novation.<br />

In all these policies the need for skilled staff and for <strong>in</strong>novations based on farm-tested<br />

research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are present. It is <strong>in</strong> this way that higher education and research from the<br />

agricultural faculties of universities can contribute to rural development, poverty reduction<br />

and the country’s achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. To this end Faculties<br />

of Agriculture, Junior Colleges and Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Vocational Education Centers are engaged<br />

<strong>in</strong> adress<strong>in</strong>g issues of susta<strong>in</strong>able land management as a basis for <strong>in</strong>creased productivity.<br />

1.1.2 Higher Education's Role <strong>in</strong> Development<br />

Tertiary education plays a key role <strong>in</strong> the economic and social development of any nation.<br />

This is particularly the case <strong>in</strong> today's globaliz<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge-based<br />

economy. No country can expect to successfully <strong>in</strong>tegrate <strong>in</strong>to, and benefit from, the 21st<br />

century economy without a well-educated workforce. The task of <strong>in</strong>tegration is particularly<br />

great for countries like Ethiopia given the low level of education atta<strong>in</strong>ment of the country’s<br />

labor force, and the urgent need for susta<strong>in</strong>ed economic growth <strong>in</strong> order to reduce poverty.<br />

Furthermore, there are few higher education <strong>in</strong>stitutions with the skills, equipment and<br />

mandate to generate new knowledge and to adapt knowledge developed elsewhere to the local<br />

context.<br />

1.1.3 Education Policy<br />

Ethiopia adopted an Education and Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Policy <strong>in</strong> 1994. The policy encompasses general<br />

and specific objectives, as well as implementation strategies that <strong>in</strong>clude formal and nonformal<br />

education, from k<strong>in</strong>dergarten to higher education. Emphasis is placed on the<br />

development of problem-solv<strong>in</strong>g capacities, with a particular focus on the acquisition of both<br />

theoretical and practical knowledge.<br />

The long-term aim is to achieve the goal of universal primary education by the year<br />

2015. The strategy developed to implement the policy calls for susta<strong>in</strong>ed public <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

programme through the mobilization of national and <strong>in</strong>ternational resources. The policy seeks<br />

to develop synergy between education, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, research and development through<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ated participation by relevant organizations.<br />

One outcome of this policy was the formulation of a sector-wide approach. The first<br />

Education Sector Development Programme was launched <strong>in</strong> 1996/1997 and was completed<br />

five years later <strong>in</strong> 2001/2002. The second five year Education Sector Development<br />

Programme became operational <strong>in</strong> 2001/2002, overlapp<strong>in</strong>g slightly with the first one, and was<br />

concluded <strong>in</strong> 2005/2006. The major components of the programmes were to: (1) <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

enrolment; (2) improve leadership and management; (3) ensure quality and relevance; (4)<br />

improve <strong>in</strong>stitutional efficiency; and (5) provide a logistic framework.<br />

For about five decades the country had only two universities (Addis Ababa and<br />

Alemaya). As the primary and secondary education facilities <strong>in</strong>creased, these <strong>in</strong>stitutions were<br />

unable to provide enough opportunities for quality higher education to the grow<strong>in</strong>g numbers<br />

of school leavers. In addition, the tremendous <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the participation rate <strong>in</strong> primary and<br />

secondary education resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased demands for qualified teachers at the various levels.<br />

3


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

To partially meet these grow<strong>in</strong>g demands, the country was obliged to expand the higher<br />

education sector. As a result, the sector witnessed rapid expansion between 1997 and 2001<br />

with the establishment of Bahir Dar, Debub (Awassa), Jimma, and Mekelle universities. This<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved amalgat<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g colleges <strong>in</strong> these towns. Further, to meet the grow<strong>in</strong>g need for<br />

qualified manpower by various sectors of the economy, professional programs were<br />

developed <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, education, eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and health <strong>in</strong> Alemaya, Arba M<strong>in</strong>ch, Dila,<br />

Jimma and Mekelle. The next five years saw the realization of three additional universities,<br />

namely Arba M<strong>in</strong>ch, Gonder and Adama, by upgrad<strong>in</strong>g Arba M<strong>in</strong>ch Institute of Water<br />

Technology, Gonder College of Health Sciences and Nazareth College of Technical Teacher<br />

Education, respectively. This brought the number of public sector universities to n<strong>in</strong>e. At the<br />

present po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time, there are 12 new universities be<strong>in</strong>g established <strong>in</strong> Dessie, Debre Berhan,<br />

Debre Markos, Nekemt, Bale-Robe, Sodo, Dilla, Mizan Teferi/Tepi, Jigjiga, Semera, Dire<br />

Dawa and Axum.<br />

Expansion is not limited to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the number of higher education <strong>in</strong>stitutions, but<br />

also <strong>in</strong>volves enlarg<strong>in</strong>g the number of academic programs they offer and their student <strong>in</strong>take.<br />

This has resulted <strong>in</strong> a tremendous <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the participation rate <strong>in</strong> higher education. With<strong>in</strong><br />

n<strong>in</strong>e years, higher education enrolment <strong>in</strong> regular programs has <strong>in</strong>creased from about 42,100<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1997 to 103,500 <strong>in</strong> 2005 - an <strong>in</strong>crease of 146 percent.<br />

In addition to the expansion <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>stitutions, programmes and student numbers,<br />

higher education is undergo<strong>in</strong>g rapid transformation <strong>in</strong> other respects. Cognizant of the fact<br />

that expansion needs to be supported by improvements <strong>in</strong> the management and operation of<br />

the higher education system, the Government has embarked upon an overall reform<br />

programme. This is part and parcel of the Civil Service Reform Programme the country has<br />

been implement<strong>in</strong>g over the last few years. This requires organizations to become resultorientated,<br />

rather than <strong>in</strong>put-oriented. The most important components of this transformation<br />

for higher education are: improv<strong>in</strong>g leadership, governance and management, and creat<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

enabl<strong>in</strong>g culture to provide appropriate tertiary level education. Relevance of the programmes<br />

to the economic development priorities of the country, as well as efficiency and effectiveness<br />

<strong>in</strong> the delivery of education and the use of scarce resources, are core areas of concern <strong>in</strong> this<br />

transformation.<br />

Experience shows that “massification” at an unprecedented scale can lead to<br />

deterioration <strong>in</strong> quality. Realiz<strong>in</strong>g this, the Government established, <strong>in</strong> 2003, an autonomous<br />

body called the Higher Education Relevance and Quality Assurance Agency to make sure that<br />

appropriate and effective teach<strong>in</strong>g support and learn<strong>in</strong>g opportunities are provided for<br />

students. It is responsible for <strong>in</strong>ternal audit undertaken by the <strong>in</strong>stitutions themselves and<br />

external audits which the Agency itself carries out. The audits assess the <strong>in</strong>stitutions' system<br />

of accountability and <strong>in</strong>ternal review mechanisms to ensure that each <strong>in</strong>stitution's quality<br />

assurance process complies with accepted standards. In addition to this Agency, a Higher<br />

Education Strategy Centre was established <strong>in</strong> 2003 to formulate policies as well as devise<br />

strategic directions for the higher education sector.<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>able land management as a course is provided <strong>in</strong> the universities and other<br />

colleges to enable graduates perceive the processes of land degradation and also design<br />

mitigat<strong>in</strong>g solutions.Cognizant of the fact, the extension packages of the agricultural and<br />

natural resources management sector have been improved to <strong>in</strong>corporate soil and water<br />

conservation practicies not only as a community endeavour but also as a farm management<br />

tool with<strong>in</strong> households.<br />

4


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

2. ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Ethiopia, with a population of 76 million people and annual growth rate of 2.36%, is the<br />

second largest country <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa. It has a surface area of 1.12 million km² and an<br />

average population density of 62 persons per km². The elevation of the country varies from<br />

120 m below sea level at Dalool to 4620 m.a.s.l. at the Ras Dashen Mounta<strong>in</strong>. As a<br />

consequence the country is endowed with diversified agro-ecologies, soil types and<br />

biodiversity.<br />

The country is divided <strong>in</strong>to two major physiographic regions, the highlands and the<br />

lowlands (Table1). This physiographic separation is based on the traditional altitud<strong>in</strong>al<br />

classification of the country ([20]). The lowlands which constitute more than 60% of the land<br />

mass are found <strong>in</strong> areas 1,000 10-14<br />

Kur (very cold or alp<strong>in</strong>e) >3,700 >1,000


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

concentration of around two- thirds livestock herd of the total 78 million population - the<br />

largest <strong>in</strong> Africa. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to [4], the crops grown <strong>in</strong> the country are cereals (70%), pulses<br />

(10%), and perennials (20%). The specific crops <strong>in</strong>clude: tef (Eragrostis tef), maize , wheat,<br />

barley and , sorghum as well as coffee and enset (Enset ventricosum).<br />

The wide ranges of topographic and climatic factors, parent material and land use have<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> extreme variability of soils <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia (Table 2). In different part of the country,<br />

different soil form<strong>in</strong>g factors have taken place. Assessments of the nutrient status of<br />

Ethiopian soils <strong>in</strong>dicate ranges of 0.9 -2.9 g nitrogen (N) and 0.4 -1.10 g phosphorus (P) per<br />

kg of soils ([7]).<br />

Soil type Area (km 2 ) Percent<br />

Acrisol 55,726.5 5.0<br />

Cambisol 124,038 11.1<br />

Chernozems 814 0.07<br />

Rendz<strong>in</strong>as 16,348 1.5<br />

Gleysols 5,273.5 0.47<br />

Phaeozems 32,551 2.9<br />

Lithosol (Leptosols) 163,185 14.7<br />

Fluvisols 88,261.5 7.9<br />

Luvisols 64,063.5 5.8<br />

Nitosols 150,089.5 13.5<br />

Histosols 4,719.5 0.42<br />

Arenosols 9,024 0.81<br />

Regosols 133,596 12.0<br />

Solonetz 495 0.04<br />

Andosols 13,556 1.2<br />

Vertisols 116,785 10.5<br />

Xarosols 53,171 4.8<br />

Yermosols 34,95 3.1<br />

Solonchaks 47,217.5 4.2<br />

Table 2. Distribution of soil types <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia<br />

Ethiopia is endowed with vast water resources with 12 major rivers and 22 natural lakes<br />

([24]). Professional estimates <strong>in</strong>dicate that the country has an annual surface runoff of about<br />

110 billion cubic meters from 12 major dra<strong>in</strong>age bas<strong>in</strong>s ([26]), only 4% of which is used ([5]).<br />

Groundwater resources, the true potential of the country are not clearly known. However, it is<br />

widely reported that Ethiopia possesses a groundwater resource potential of approximately of<br />

2.6 billion cubic meters (m 3 ) ([18]).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to [1], of the country's estimated 112 million ha of land mass, about 66%,<br />

about 22% is under cultivation for production of annual and perennial crops. About 96% of<br />

the current cultivated areas are occupied by small holder subsistence farmers, while<br />

commercial farms cultivate the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ([3]). [26] reported that the total irrigable area from<br />

the 12 major bas<strong>in</strong>s of ca. 3 million ha.[18] estimated the potential irrigable land of ca. 3.7 to<br />

4 million ha. The figure is still subject to change as more reliable data are be<strong>in</strong>g acquired<br />

through accomplishment of all river bas<strong>in</strong>s master plan studies and with the grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technology for water transfer exploitation. Nevertheless. the irrigated areas generate only 3 %<br />

of the total field crop production.<br />

6


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

Despite the country's huge water resources potential, there is high temporal and spatial<br />

variability: most of the rivers <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia are seasonal and about 70% of the runoff potential<br />

takes place dur<strong>in</strong>g the months of June, July and August ([27]). There is uneven spatial<br />

distribution of river bas<strong>in</strong>s that between 80-90% of Ethiopia's water resources is found <strong>in</strong> four<br />

river bas<strong>in</strong>s, namely the Blue Nile, Tekeze, Baro - Akobo, and Gibe – Omo ([18]).<br />

<strong>Land</strong> degradation by erosion is clearly evident throughout 7000 years of history <strong>in</strong> the<br />

world and it is the major cause of poverty <strong>in</strong> rural areas of develop<strong>in</strong>g countries.<br />

Studies of the effect of erosion on early civilization have shown that one of the major<br />

causes of the downfall of many flourish<strong>in</strong>g empires was soil degradation. [2] described soil<br />

degradation as one of the major causes of the downfall of the ancient Axumite K<strong>in</strong>gdom. [10]<br />

also described soil erosion as one of the elements <strong>in</strong> the decl<strong>in</strong>e of civilizations of Lalibela <strong>in</strong><br />

the 14th century and Gondar <strong>in</strong> the 17th century.<br />

Much of the land degradation is found <strong>in</strong> the highlands above 1500m (45% of the total<br />

country's total area) ([4]). These highlands, which are characterized by favorable<br />

environmental conditions, have been settled and cultivated for millennia ([13]). The Ethiopian<br />

highlands constitute one of the most degraded lands <strong>in</strong> Africa, if not <strong>in</strong> the world ([6]). These<br />

highlands are an ancient and conspicuously uplifted part of the earth's surface, which by<br />

virtue of their location have constantly been assailed by normal erosive forces ([4]). Morever,<br />

the highlands have long history of tectonic <strong>in</strong>stability which has split the highland <strong>in</strong>to two<br />

parts. [4] identified six categories of soil degradation <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopian highlands: water<br />

erosion, w<strong>in</strong>d erosion, sal<strong>in</strong>ization /alkalization, and chemical, physical and biological<br />

degradations.<br />

The degradation of resources is caused by heavy pressure from human and livestock<br />

population, coupled with many other physical, socioeconomic and political factors<br />

The most press<strong>in</strong>g forms of resource degradation are the destruction of the natural<br />

vegetation and soil erosion by water. Deforestation has been occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia for<br />

millennia and has accelerated dur<strong>in</strong>g the last century ([15]). Rapid population growth,<br />

extensive forest clear<strong>in</strong>g for cultivation, overgraz<strong>in</strong>g, movement of political centers, and<br />

exploitation of forests for fuel wood and construction materials without replant<strong>in</strong>g reduced<br />

Ethiopia's forest area to 16% <strong>in</strong> the 1950's and to 3.1 % by 1982 ([25]).<br />

The water erosion <strong>in</strong>cludes sheet and rill erosion, gully erosion, tunnel<strong>in</strong>g and land<br />

slides. Sheet and rill erosion is the most important erosion form <strong>in</strong> all zones and altitud<strong>in</strong>al<br />

belts of the Ethiopian highlands ([20]). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the 'Global Assessment of Soil<br />

Degradation' map ([23]), more than 50% of the northern Ethiopan highlands suffer from<br />

extreme loss of top soil due to sheet and rill erosion. On this map, gull<strong>in</strong>g and mass<br />

movements are <strong>in</strong>dicated as another major problem.<br />

Biological degradation <strong>in</strong>duced by man, such as removal of field crop residues and<br />

dung, overgraz<strong>in</strong>g and deforestation, is widespread and severe <strong>in</strong> the highlands. However, the<br />

major force driv<strong>in</strong>g land degradation <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia is nutrient depletion of agricultural soils<br />

aris<strong>in</strong>g from complete removal of crop residues from crop fields, crop production with low<br />

levels of nutrient <strong>in</strong>puts and lack of adequate soil conservation practices. However, this<br />

argument seems to contradict with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of [4]. Although, [7] identified erosion as<br />

particular concern <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopian context as the major cause of land degradation which<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>es food crop production, [20] attribute land degradation to several <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g biophysical<br />

social and political attributes that demand concerted <strong>in</strong>terventions not only<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil fertilitybut also farm management practices that take susta<strong>in</strong>able land<br />

management <strong>in</strong>to concideration.<br />

The physical degradation of soil throughout the highlands is commonly associated with<br />

the biological degradation and water erosion. It could arise from excessive tillage,<br />

7


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

particularly for tef and livestock trampl<strong>in</strong>g between graz<strong>in</strong>g grounds and water<strong>in</strong>g locations<br />

([4]).<br />

Serious chemical degradation is rarely found <strong>in</strong> actively erod<strong>in</strong>g soils but more common<br />

<strong>in</strong> Nitosols at elevations over 2000 m a.s.l. (southwestern parts of the country). Excessive<br />

removal of plant nutrients can result from cont<strong>in</strong>uous annual crops of cereals, but is not<br />

significant <strong>in</strong> the highlands i.e. partly allows replacement by the arrival of nutrients <strong>in</strong> the<br />

groundwater mov<strong>in</strong>g down the landscape. The argument is that had the replenish<strong>in</strong>g not been<br />

there, the Ethiopian highlands could have been more <strong>in</strong> a severe condition than it is now, after<br />

so many centuries of food production.<br />

Soil at a given site can be formed by three processes: the deposition of sediment by<br />

runoff erosion, the natural weather<strong>in</strong>g of rock beneath the soil and the formation of soil at the<br />

surface by decay<strong>in</strong>g organic and <strong>in</strong>organic m<strong>in</strong>erals caused by both natural processes and by<br />

cropp<strong>in</strong>g. The deposition of sediment <strong>in</strong>volves substantially larger quantities than the<br />

formation of soil at <strong>in</strong> situ. It is estimated that 90% of the total erosion is deposited annually<br />

<strong>in</strong> the lower ly<strong>in</strong>g areas of the Ethiopian highlands ([4]).<br />

Internationally, the issue of <strong>in</strong> situ soil formation rate is controversial among scientists.<br />

However, the common estimates lie between 0.8 and 3 t ha -1 y -1 . It is, however, agreed that<br />

soil formation rate under farm<strong>in</strong>g is faster, and that tillage operations probably <strong>in</strong>crease the<br />

rate of top soil renewal to around 11 t ha -1 y -1 ([4]).<br />

All these rates are considerably lower than the soil formation rates tentatively calculated<br />

for the Ethiopian highlands (from 2 to 22 t ha -1 y -1 ) from the data on temperature, ra<strong>in</strong>fall,<br />

length of grow<strong>in</strong>g period, soil units, soil depth, slope gradient and land cover (FAO) work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

paper 2 (WP2) ([4]). These <strong>in</strong>dicative soil formation rates <strong>in</strong>crease from low levels <strong>in</strong> the<br />

north to high levels <strong>in</strong> the west and southwest and thereafter fall towards the boarder to<br />

Kenya. The patterns reflect ra<strong>in</strong>fall and temperature. In other reports, a soil formation rate of<br />

about 10 t ha -1 y -1 is estimated for the Ethiopian highlands, depend<strong>in</strong>g on slope gradient and<br />

land use type ([21, 8]).<br />

[9] extrapolated soil formation rates for the different agro-climatological zones of<br />

Ethiopia (Table 3). These soil formation rates are mean rates, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account ra<strong>in</strong> and<br />

temperature conditions, however, it did not consider lithology. Over all, the data on soil<br />

formation rates <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia are <strong>in</strong>consistent; on the other hand, those data are used for<br />

comparison with the soil loss rates. It is, however, suggested that those data should not be<br />

applied to the vast areas where the soil mantle results from sediment deposition rather than<br />

from pedogenesis ([8]).<br />

8


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

Agro-Climatogical zone Altitud<strong>in</strong>al limits (m a.s.l.) Soil formation rate<br />

(t ha-1 y-1)<br />

High Wurch(Kur) >3700 2<br />

Wet Wurch 3200 -3700 4<br />

Moist Wurch 3200 -3700 3<br />

Wet Dega 2300-3200 10<br />

Moist Dega 2300 -3200 8<br />

Wet Wo<strong>in</strong>a Dega 1500 – 2300 16<br />

Moist Wo<strong>in</strong>a Dega 1500-2300 12<br />

Dry Wo<strong>in</strong>a Dega 1500 -2300 6<br />

Moist Kolla 500-1500 6<br />

Dry Kolla 500 -1500 3<br />

Berha, Desert


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

The value reported by [22] is lower by a half than the estimate made for the Ethiopian<br />

highlands by [4]. The two studies are not only differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the magnitude of the SSY but also<br />

<strong>in</strong> their approach and assumptions. The [4] approach was based on agro-ecologies and the<br />

contribution of gully erosion and other forms of erosion were ignored. On the other hand, the<br />

[22] approach was catchment - based and seems to over emphasize the contribution of gully<br />

erosion, as it is <strong>in</strong> the same order of magnitude to that of rill erosion. Moreover, [22] predicted<br />

solid sediment loss that took <strong>in</strong>to account the catchment area as the only explanatory variable<br />

for sediment yield prediction, with an r 3 (coefficient of determ<strong>in</strong>ation) of 0.59.<br />

Overall, the <strong>in</strong>formation on sediment budget <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopia highlands is not only<br />

<strong>in</strong>consistent but also <strong>in</strong>adequate to represent all the components of the mass balance equation.<br />

Therefore, further research is needed to understand the sediment budget tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account<br />

representative river bas<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the highlands of Ethiopia.<br />

<strong>Land</strong> cover<br />

Area<br />

(%)<br />

Soil loss<br />

(tha-1y -1 )<br />

Graz<strong>in</strong>g 47 5<br />

Uncultivable 19 5<br />

Crop land 13 42<br />

Wood land/ bush land 8 5<br />

Swampy land 4 0<br />

Former crop land 4 70<br />

Forests 4 1<br />

Perennial crops 2 8<br />

Total for the whole of Ethiopia 100 8<br />

Table 4. Soil loss rates <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia(after [9] and [20])<br />

Erosion impacts can be either on-site or off-site or both. Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, the impacts can be<br />

conceived as positive or negative. [4] has documented that positive and negative impacts are<br />

merely relative terms that ma<strong>in</strong>ly depend on the region of <strong>in</strong>terest. For <strong>in</strong>stance the eroded soil<br />

from the Ethiopian highlands that leaves via the Blue Nile can bee seen as a negative effect<br />

for Ethiopia but, on the other hand , the deposited sediment <strong>in</strong> the Egypt's valley had<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased the fertility status of the <strong>in</strong>-situ soil, which might adversely affect the Aswam dam.<br />

In this study, on-site impacts are related to productivity of farms caused by loss of top soil<br />

(loss of nutrients and organic matter), reduction of soil depth, soil crust<strong>in</strong>g and seal<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

dissection of fields. In less developed countries, on-farm economic impacts of erosion tend to<br />

exceed off-site impacts. This reflects the lower level of downstream <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

development, less concern about water quality and the heavy dependence of small farmers on<br />

natural levels of soil fertility. [14] also noted that <strong>in</strong> less developed areas the onset of<br />

significant erosion can lead to a pattern of rapid land degradation with decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g yields and<br />

vegetative covers that lead to shortened fallow periods, overgraz<strong>in</strong>g for further erosion and<br />

land degradation.<br />

Soil fertility depletion is develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a major constra<strong>in</strong>t to agricultural production <strong>in</strong><br />

Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Highlands Reclamation Study ([4]) reported that about half of the<br />

Ethiopian highlands (27 million ha) was significantly degraded <strong>in</strong> 1984, out of which 2<br />

million hectares of agricultural land have degraded to the extent that they will not be able to<br />

susta<strong>in</strong> crop production <strong>in</strong> the future. However, little <strong>in</strong>formation exists on the relationship<br />

between erosion, erosion hazard, and its impact on crop productivity and associated costs.<br />

[19] reported that a reduction of barley yield by 25 kg ha -1 for 1 cm of soil loss was observed<br />

10


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

<strong>in</strong> a Humic Andisol <strong>in</strong> the Debre Birhan area of Northen Showa. The same study for the area<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that with the soil loss rate of 66t ha -1 y -1 , the shallow soil with an average depth of 45<br />

cm will be completely eroded <strong>in</strong> about sixty years time while crop production will decrease<br />

by 35% dur<strong>in</strong>g the first twenty years. [11] predicted that most of the cultivated land <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Ethiopian highlands would be entirely stripped of the soil mantel with<strong>in</strong> 150 years, assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

an average soil depth of 60cm. In economic terms, soil erosion, which is based on the data<br />

provided by [4], is estimated to have cost 619 million Ethiopian Birr (ETB) by the year 1990.<br />

[4], however, acknowledged that (1) the cost estimate has uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> that the<br />

relationship between soil loss and yield reduction was not documented and (2) there was<br />

difficulty <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> project<strong>in</strong>g soil loss. An alternative erosion-caused soil fertility<br />

degradation costs analysis can be applied us<strong>in</strong>g a 'replacement cost' approach. The logic<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d this approach is to calculate the loss of nutrients and put a value on it us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

equivalent value cost of commercial fertilizer. Despite the lack of data on erosion related<br />

productivity loss, however, productivity loss rather than replacement cost is the most<br />

theoretically correct way to value resource depletion.<br />

In other studies, the effect of land management and land use conversion was found to<br />

have a significant impact on the spatial variability of soil nutrients. An improvement <strong>in</strong> soil<br />

physical (soil structure, soil depth) and chemical characteristics e.g. N, P and organic matter<br />

(OM) was observed as one is go<strong>in</strong>g from cultivated lands to graz<strong>in</strong>g lands and then to forest<br />

and exclosures. The improved soil characteristics are due to a decreased erosion process along<br />

the same direction. These studies, however, do not to <strong>in</strong>dicate the nutrient status and the<br />

overall nutrient balance of the soils under the different land uses. Nowadays, there is<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest on assessment of nutrient balance at field and regional scale levels. [7]<br />

assessed nutrient balance for N, Pav, and K at regional scale and country level us<strong>in</strong>g two<br />

different soil loss estimates by USLE and LAPSUS (landscape process Model). The values (<strong>in</strong><br />

kg ha -1 y -1 ) reported were: 37.7 and 6.0 for N. 7.8 and 3.0 for Pav; and 28.3 and 4.0 for K, for<br />

USLE and LAPSUS soil loss estimates, respectively. In both cases, soil erosion is found to be<br />

the prime responsible factor for nutrient depletion i.e. accounts for loss of 70%, 80% and 63%<br />

for N, Pav and K, respectively. In their calculation, however, they assume a constant<br />

enrichment ratio (ER) of 1.5 for all nutrients.<br />

[8] studied the N balance <strong>in</strong> Gobo Deguat (with<strong>in</strong> this study region) at farmers' field<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the Nutrient Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Model (NUTMON), and estimated N loss by erosion at 12.6 kg<br />

ha -1 y -1 and the N balance is negative. However, an organic <strong>in</strong>put from purchased manure and<br />

feeds that takes the highest proportion (34.2 kg ha -1 y -1 ) seems exaggerated. Moreover, the<br />

role of erosion <strong>in</strong> nutrient outflow is <strong>in</strong> the fourth place after harvested products (22.9) kg ha -<br />

1 y -1 ), crop residue <strong>in</strong> manure (13.2 kg ha -1 y -1 ), gaseous losses (4.9) kg ha -1 y -1 ), which seems<br />

contradict<strong>in</strong>g with the work by [7] at national and Regional States level.<br />

Nitrogen and phosphorus balances analyzed under five different land uses <strong>in</strong> southern<br />

Ethiopia were either <strong>in</strong> equilibrium or positive <strong>in</strong> most of the farm components which may<br />

seem oppos<strong>in</strong>g to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs by [8] and [7] who found strong negative balances of the<br />

respective nutrients.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>formation on the nutrient balance shows that there are uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> the nutrient<br />

balance calculation which could be associated to lack of measured <strong>in</strong>put and output data and,<br />

therefore, merits further study. Erosion and sedimentation estimates were rough <strong>in</strong> all cases as<br />

both were only estimated but not measured at the site. Therefore, detailed <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the<br />

erosion and sedimentation component is required <strong>in</strong> all scale of nutrient balance studies <strong>in</strong><br />

Ethiopia.<br />

Off-site impacts <strong>in</strong>clude higher turbidity <strong>in</strong> rivers, lakes, reservoirs and sediment<br />

deposition <strong>in</strong> these same environments and flood pla<strong>in</strong>s. Also <strong>in</strong>creased downstream runoff<br />

and flood<strong>in</strong>g as a result of reduction of soil <strong>in</strong>filtration by the on-site impacts. Sediment<br />

11


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

delivery to river channels is probably one of the most problematic off-site consequences of<br />

soil erosion and it is a disturb<strong>in</strong>g problem <strong>in</strong> countries of northern Africa . The <strong>in</strong>puts of the<br />

sediment by erosion process <strong>in</strong>to rivers, reservoirs and ponds results <strong>in</strong> high sediment<br />

deposition rates and frequent dredg<strong>in</strong>g operations.<br />

In Ethiopia, scientific documents on the off-site impacts are very rare. [26] found that<br />

the <strong>in</strong>creased abnormal flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the downstream position of the Baro Akobo river bas<strong>in</strong> is<br />

associated with human <strong>in</strong>terference with<strong>in</strong> the catchment, which is due to absence of proper<br />

land use plann<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>in</strong>creased human activity is due to the <strong>in</strong>creased population after the<br />

1984 resettlement program. These days, the abnormal flood<strong>in</strong>g has become frequent also <strong>in</strong><br />

places of lower Awash and <strong>in</strong> Wabishebele River Valleys which has been displac<strong>in</strong>g many<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitants and damaged the surround<strong>in</strong>g land.<br />

Efforts to rehabilitate the degraded highlands through soil and water conservation were<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>in</strong> and promis<strong>in</strong>g results are be<strong>in</strong>g documented. Several hectares of farm lands are<br />

conserved and millions of tree seedl<strong>in</strong>gs have been planted. However a national scheme is not<br />

designed to measure <strong>in</strong> either biophysical and economic terms, the impact of such an effort.<br />

Fragmented and uncoord<strong>in</strong>ated studies are undertaken with no standardized methods and with<br />

no possibilities to formulate a national or regional database. Policy and operational guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

are required to document the scattered studies with<strong>in</strong> a framework of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

land management <strong>in</strong>to the farm management practices by farmers.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] G. Bikora. "Food security challenges <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia. Unit Nations", African Institute for Economic Development<br />

and Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Dakar, Senegal, (2001).<br />

[2] K.W. Butzer. "Rise and Fall of Axum, Ethiopia: a geological <strong>in</strong>terpretation", American antiquity, 46 (3),<br />

471-495, (1981).<br />

[3] EPA. "National Action Programme to Combat Desertification", Environmental Protection Authority, Addis<br />

Ababa, November 1998, p. 158, (1998).<br />

[4] FAO. "Ethiopian Highlands Reclamation study", vols. 1 and 2. Food and Agricultural Organization of the<br />

United Nations, Rome, Italy, (1986).<br />

[5] FAO. "Small scale irrigation consolidation project preparation report", Food and Agricultural Organizations<br />

of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, (1994).<br />

[6] E. Feoli, Vuerich, L., Zerihun, W. "Evaluation of environmental geomorphological, erosion and socioeconomic<br />

factors", Agriculture, Ecosystems and environment , 91 (1-3), 313-325, (2002).<br />

[7] A. Haileselassie, Priess J., Veldkamp, E., Teketay, D., Lesschen, J.P. "Assessment of soil nutrient depletion<br />

and its spatial variability on stallholder’s mixed farm<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia us<strong>in</strong>g partial versus full nutrient<br />

balances", Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 108, 1-16, (2005).<br />

[8] H. Hengsdijk, Meijer<strong>in</strong>k, G.W., Mosugu, M.E. "Model<strong>in</strong>g the effect of three soil and water conservation<br />

practices <strong>in</strong> Tigray, Ethiopia", Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105, 29-40, (2005).<br />

[9] H. Hurni. "Soil formation rates <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia", Addis Ababa, FAO/M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture. Jo<strong>in</strong>t Project EHRS,<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g paper No. 2, (1983).<br />

[10] H. Hurni. "Options for steep land conservation <strong>in</strong> subsistence agriculture". In: subsistence agricultural<br />

systems. Workshop on soil and water conservation on steep lands, San. Jau, Paurto Rico, Marsh 22-27, p. 14,<br />

(1987).<br />

[11] H. Hurni. "<strong>Land</strong> degradation, fam<strong>in</strong>e and land resource scenarios <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia". In:D. Pimentel (ed.), World<br />

soil erosion and conservation, pp. 27-62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (1993).<br />

[12] IFPRI/CSA. "Atlas of the Ethiopian Rural Economy", International Food Policy Research Institute and<br />

Central Statistics Agency. Addis Ababa (2006).<br />

[13] J. McCann. "People of the plow: an agricultural history of Ethiopia, 1800-1900", University of Wiscons<strong>in</strong><br />

Press, Madison, USA, (1995).<br />

[14] S. McIntyre. "Reservoir sedimentation rates l<strong>in</strong>ked to long term changes <strong>in</strong> agricultural land use", Water<br />

<strong>Resources</strong> Bullet<strong>in</strong>, 29 (3), 487-495, (1993).<br />

[15] J. Moeyersons, Nyssen, J., Poesen, J., Deckers, J., Haile, M. "Age and backfill/overfill stratigraphy of two<br />

tufa dams, Tigray Highlands, Ethiopia: Evidence for Late Pleistocene and Holocene wet conditions",<br />

Palaeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaecology 230, 165-181, (2006).<br />

[16] P.A. Mohr. "The geology of Ethiopia", Univ. College Addis Ababa Press, (1962).<br />

12


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

[17] P.A. Mohr. "The geology of Ethiopia", Addis Ababa: Haileselassie-I University Press, (1971).<br />

[18] MoWR. "Abay River Bas<strong>in</strong> Integrated Development Master Plan Project Phase II". Data collection site<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation survey and analysis. Section II. Sectorial studies Vol. V Water <strong>Resources</strong> Development. Part I<br />

irrigation and Dra<strong>in</strong>age. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Water <strong>Resources</strong>, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (1998).<br />

[19] T. Mulugeta. "Soil conservation experiments on cultivated land <strong>in</strong> Maybar area, Wollo region, Ethiopia".<br />

SCRP, Research Report 16, (1988).<br />

[20] H. Mitiku, Herweg K., Stillhardt, B. "Susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>Land</strong> Management:<strong>New</strong> Approaches to Soil and Water<br />

Conservation In Ethiopia", Berhanena Selam Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Enterprise. Addis Ababa, p. 304, (2006).<br />

[21] E.J. Mwendera, Saleem Mohammed, M.A. "Hydrologic response to cattle graz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopian<br />

Highlands", Agriculture, Ecosystem, Environment 64, 33-41, (1997).<br />

[22] J. Nyssen, Poesen, J., Moeyersons, J., Deckers, J., Mitiku Haile, <strong>Land</strong>, A. "Human impact on the<br />

environment <strong>in</strong> the Ethiopian and Eritrean highlands-a state of the art", Earth Science Reviews 64 (3-4), 273-<br />

320, (2004a).<br />

[23] L.R. Oldeman, Hakkel<strong>in</strong>g, R.T.A., Sombroek, W.G. "World map of the status of human <strong>in</strong>duced soil<br />

degradation": An explanatory note, 2 nd ed., p 27. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen and Nairobi: ISRIC and UNEP, (1991).<br />

[24] T. Tarekegn. "The role of water harvest<strong>in</strong>g, small, medium and large scale irrigation <strong>in</strong> the overall<br />

agricultural production system and rural development", A paper presented on the first National Water Forum <strong>in</strong><br />

Ethiopia October 23-24, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, (2004).<br />

[25] UNEP (United Nations environment Programme). "Ecology and Environment:What Do We Know About<br />

Desertification", Desertification Control, 3, 2-9, (1983).<br />

[26] M. Woube. "Flood<strong>in</strong>g and susta<strong>in</strong>able land-water management <strong>in</strong> the lower Baro-Akobo river bas<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Ethiopia", Applied geography, 19, 235-511, (1999).<br />

[27] E. Yazew. "Development and management of irrigated lands <strong>in</strong> Tigray". PhD Dissertation, UNESCO-IHE<br />

Institute for Water Education, Ethiopia, p. 284, (2005).<br />

13


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

NEW CHALLENGES OF SOIL SCIENCE TO FOOD SECURITY<br />

WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CHINA<br />

Abstract<br />

Tang Huajun & Zhou Wei<br />

Institute of Agricultural Resource and Regional Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Academy<br />

of Agricultural Sciences, Beij<strong>in</strong>g-100081, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

As the ma<strong>in</strong> productive resource for agriculture, soil is one of the most basal factors consist<strong>in</strong>g of comprehensive<br />

ability for food production, and the base and assurance for food security <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In the situation that arable<br />

land is decreas<strong>in</strong>g drastically, the protection of soil resource has become a major factor affect<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

development of the country. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>vestigations ma<strong>in</strong>ly focused on relationship between amount of arable<br />

land and food demand <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, but lack of systematic analysis on soil resource security associated with food<br />

demand and agricultural product quality. In this paper, based on <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the changes <strong>in</strong> quantity and<br />

quality of soil resource <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, the relationships between soil resource and food quantity security and quality<br />

safety were discussed, and policy options for keystone basic research tasks and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g counter-measures<br />

were also proposed.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a has very abundant soil resource with many k<strong>in</strong>ds of soil types. The total land area is 9.6<br />

million km 2 . Climate types ranges from tropical zone to cold-temperate zone and from humid<br />

region to arid region. There are 14 soil orders, 39 suborders, 138 soil types and 588 subtypes<br />

<strong>in</strong> the whole country (Gong et al., 2005). The area of Cambosols and Aridosols occupies more<br />

than 20% of total soil area, that of Histosols, Ferralosols, Vertosols, Andepts and Spodosols<br />

accounts for 1%, the other <strong>in</strong>cludes Anthrosols, Halosols, Gleyosols, Isohumosols, Ferrosols,<br />

Argosols and Primosols (Table 1). Moreover, the absolute amount of cultivated land,<br />

woodland and grassland ranks number 4, 8 and 3 <strong>in</strong> the world, respectively. The data are<br />

based on 1:12,000,000 soil map, soil classification is from Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Soil Taxonomy.<br />

Soil orders Percent total soil area Soil orders Percent total soil area<br />

(%)<br />

(%)<br />

Histosols 0.22 Isohumosols 8.67<br />

Anthrosols 4.84 Ferrosols 8.89<br />

Ferralosols 0.44 Argosols 7.42<br />

Vertosols 0.30 Cambosols 21.51<br />

Aridosols 23.01 Primosols 9.76<br />

Halosols 3.64 Others 0.04<br />

Gleyosols 1.24<br />

Table 1: Soil resources <strong>in</strong>ventory of different soil orders <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

The amount of arable land per capita <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is very limited. The total arable land area is<br />

about 1.26×10 8 hm 2 , with arable land area per capita of 0.1 hm 2 , less than 40% of the average<br />

<strong>in</strong> the world (Zhao et al., 2006). Figure 1 shows that the amount of arable land resource has<br />

decreased dramatically s<strong>in</strong>ce 1996, and this tendency will be cont<strong>in</strong>ued. The ma<strong>in</strong> factors<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> such a decrease of cultivated land <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>dustrial construction, calamity<br />

damage, ecological return<strong>in</strong>g and plant<strong>in</strong>g structure readjustment (Table 2), account<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

14


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

15.68%, 5.73%, 61.43% and 17.16% of the total loss of arable land, respectively. Thus,<br />

ecological return<strong>in</strong>g among various factors dom<strong>in</strong>ates land loss. In addition, the uncultivated<br />

soil resource which can be available to agricultural production <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a is about 0.133×10 8<br />

hm 2 , less than 6% of the total arable land area, a serious shortage of farmland resource <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a is com<strong>in</strong>g (Smil, 1995; 1999).<br />

Area of cultivated land (×10 4 hm 2 )<br />

13200<br />

13000<br />

12800<br />

12600<br />

12400<br />

12200<br />

12000<br />

11800<br />

Area of cultivated land<br />

Gra<strong>in</strong> production<br />

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Year<br />

Fig 1: Changes of the cultivated land and gra<strong>in</strong> production from 1996 to 2005 <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Year Construction Damage Return<strong>in</strong>g Readjustment Sum ofdecrease<br />

1997 1.930 0.470 1.630 0.590 4.620<br />

1998 1.762 1.595 1.646 0.701 5.704<br />

1999 2.053 1.347 3.946 1.071 8.417<br />

2000 1.633 0.617 7.628 5.782 15.66<br />

2001 1.637 0.306 5.907 1.083 8.933<br />

2002 1.965 0.563 14.26 3.490 20.27<br />

2003 2.610 0.500 22.37 3.310 29.79<br />

2004 2.928 0.633 7.329 2.047 12.94<br />

Sum 16.52 6.032 64.71 18.07 105.3<br />

Average 2.065 0.754 8.089 2.259 13.17<br />

Table 2: Structural analysis of changes <strong>in</strong> cultivated land <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a from 1997 to 2004(×10 4 hm 2 )<br />

The geographic distribution of soil resource, food production and population is uneven <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a (Gong et al., 2005). The southeast region with humid climate and 41.6% of the total<br />

land area, conta<strong>in</strong>s 81% of the population <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, 72.2% of the arable land, 81.5% of the<br />

total gra<strong>in</strong> production of Ch<strong>in</strong>a, but with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly em<strong>in</strong>ent problems such as people-land<br />

confliction and environment deterioration; Northwest region with arid climate and 35.7% of<br />

the total land area, conta<strong>in</strong>s 4%, 8.2% and 4.2%, respectively. Due to restriction of aridity and<br />

cold climate to agricultural production and life of human be<strong>in</strong>g, there is a sharp confliction <strong>in</strong><br />

water and soil, a fragile environment, an undeveloped economy, and a less population and<br />

cultivated land <strong>in</strong> this region; Central region with semi-humid climate and 22.7% of the total<br />

land area, accounts for 15% of the population <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, 19.6% of the cultivated land, 14.8%<br />

of the total gra<strong>in</strong> production <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a (Table 3).<br />

15<br />

5200<br />

5000<br />

4800<br />

4600<br />

4400<br />

4200<br />

4000<br />

3800<br />

Gra<strong>in</strong> production ( 10 5 t)


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

Zones Percent total<br />

population<br />

(%)<br />

Percent<br />

total soil<br />

area (%)<br />

16<br />

Percent total<br />

land area (%)<br />

Percent total<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> production<br />

(%)<br />

Total 100 100 100 100<br />

I Humid zones of southeast<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

81.0 41.6 72.2 81.5<br />

1 Cold-temperate zone 0.04 1.2 0.1 0.1<br />

2 Mid-temperate zone 6.96 8.6 16.3 13.7<br />

3 Warm -temperate zone 19.7 5.2 15.7 20.5<br />

4 North subtropical zone 15.7 4.3 11.5 15.2<br />

5 Central subtropical zone 28.7 17.0 22.4 26.1<br />

6 South subtropical zone 8.4 4.3 4.9 4.9<br />

7 Tropical zone 1.6 1.0 1.3 1<br />

II Semi-humid zones of<br />

central Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

15 22.7 19.6 14.8<br />

1 Mid-temperate zone 2.0 6.0 4.2 2.5<br />

2 Warm-temperate zone 9.0 6.2 10.8 7.9<br />

3 Plateau temperate zone 4.0 10.5 4.6 3.9<br />

III Semiarid and arid zones<br />

of northwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

4.0 35.7 8.2 4.2<br />

III 1 Mid-temperate zone 1.1 8.2 2.9 1.5<br />

III 2 Warm-temperate zone 2.22 12.4 4.4 2.2<br />

III 3 Plateau temperate zone 0.49 5.0 0.7 0.5<br />

III 4 Plateau temperate zone 0.08 2.0 0.11 0.0008<br />

III 5 Plateau sub- frigid zone 0.05 5.3 0.06 0.0005<br />

III 6 Plateau frigid zone 0 3.0 0 0<br />

Table 3: Soil regionalization of Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

CHANGES IN QUALITY OF SOIL RESOURCE IN CHINA<br />

Deterioration of soil resource<br />

Soil erosion leads to deterioration of arable land quality, such as reduction <strong>in</strong> the thickness of<br />

soil layer, damage of soil structure and loss of soil nutrients. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to estimation, due to<br />

water loss and soil erosion, annual loss of soil substance, organic matter, N, P and K is about<br />

5.0×10 9 t, 2.7×10 7 t, 5.5×10 6 t, 6.0×10 3 t and 5.0×10 6 t, respectively (Pan,2005).<br />

Soil desertification and sandification occurs seriously. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Station of<br />

Desertification Communique of Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> 2005, the total area suffered from desertification is<br />

2.64×10 6 km 2 until 2004, account<strong>in</strong>g for 27.46% of the total land area; That suffered from<br />

sandification is 1.74×10 6 km 2 , account<strong>in</strong>g for 18.12% of the total land area; The amount of<br />

cultivated land suffered from sandification is 4.63×10 4 km 2 , of which occupies 2.66% of total<br />

sandification land (M<strong>in</strong>istry of Forestry P.R.C, 2005). W<strong>in</strong>d erosion of surface soil with<br />

abundant nutrients results <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e of soil fertility, damage of soil physical structure, decay<br />

of production ability and degeneration of farmland quality.<br />

Arable land productivity is be<strong>in</strong>g degenerated. Among the exist<strong>in</strong>g arable land, highproductive<br />

land accounts for 21.5%, <strong>in</strong>termediate-productive land 37.2%, and low-productive<br />

land 41.2% (Table 4). Soils with the organic matter content of 1% to 2% and lower than 1%<br />

accounts for 38.3% and 26.0%, respectively. The situation of soil nitrogen content is similar


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

to that of organic matter, and soils with total nitrogen content of 0.1 % to 0.075 % and lower<br />

than 0.075% accounts for 21.3% and 33.6%, respectively. As a whole, the total N content is<br />

relatively low. Cultivated land with phosphorous, potassium, sulfur and micronutrients<br />

deficiency accounts for 59%, 30%, 30% and 50%, respectively (Table 5). The soil physical<br />

properties tend to be deteriorated, 40%, 35% and 25% of low-productivity paddy field is<br />

Gleyed soil, illuvial hardened soils and heavy hardened soil, respectively.<br />

High productive land Interm productive land Low productive land<br />

Standard<br />

(t/hm 2 Percent Standard<br />

) distribution (t/hm 2 Percent Standard<br />

) distribution (t/hm 2 Percent<br />

) distribution<br />

Rice >6 21.5%<br />

3~6 37.2% 5 2.5~5 5.2<br />

2.3~5.2<br />


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

2005. The three-year-result of monitor<strong>in</strong>g on agricultural soil quality <strong>in</strong> Zhujiang delta<br />

regions showed that the soils are contam<strong>in</strong>ated by heavy metals such as Hg, Cd and As, and<br />

petroleum. The contam<strong>in</strong>ated area accounts for about 50% of total soil area <strong>in</strong> these regions,<br />

of which light contam<strong>in</strong>ated area is 32%, middle contam<strong>in</strong>ated area is 8%, and heavy<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated area is 10% (Wan et al., 2005).<br />

Central Ch<strong>in</strong>a has a large proportion of low-productivity farmland, <strong>in</strong> which soils are<br />

relatively <strong>in</strong>fertile. In the past 20 years, soil organic matter, N, and P content tended to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease, but the proportion of various nutrients was imbalance, and soil available K was<br />

seriously depleted. The ratio of soil productivity to application rate of chemical fertilizer<br />

tends to decrease with development of <strong>in</strong>tensive cropp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Semiarid region <strong>in</strong> Northwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a is seriously subjected to soil erosion. The land area<br />

with soil erosion <strong>in</strong> Loess Plateau is 1.13×10 7 hm 2 , account<strong>in</strong>g for 24.85% of the total area<br />

with soil erosion <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The land area with sandification <strong>in</strong> the northwesten arid region and<br />

Loess Plateau accounts for 21.06% and 10.70% of the total soil area with sandification <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a, respectively (Li, 2002). In addition, soil nutrients are generally found to be deficient <strong>in</strong><br />

these regions.<br />

In Central Ch<strong>in</strong>a and Southwest Ch<strong>in</strong>a, acid ra<strong>in</strong> is always one of important factors<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> soil acidification and degradation of soil quality. Acid ra<strong>in</strong> not only directly<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence crop adaptability to low soil pH, but also accelerate leach<strong>in</strong>g and loss of soil<br />

nutrients, such as Cu and Zn, which lead to greatly decl<strong>in</strong>e of soil productivity and fertilizer<br />

use efficiency (Zhao, et al., 2002; Galloway, 2001).<br />

SOIL RESOURCE AND FOOD SECURITY IN CHINA<br />

The decrease of cultivated land area <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a greatly affects food production. Total food<br />

production tended to decl<strong>in</strong>e from 1998 to 2003, and began to ascend s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004 (Fig 1). In<br />

order to ensure the country's security of gra<strong>in</strong> supply, it is essential to <strong>in</strong>crease production per<br />

unit area. It is estimated that the food deficit <strong>in</strong> the com<strong>in</strong>g years 2010, 2030 and 2050 would<br />

be expanded to 5,127×10 4 t, 7,359×10 4 t and 1,354×10 4 t (Zhao et al., 2002), respectively.<br />

Difference between the present cultivated land area and the m<strong>in</strong>imum requirement <strong>in</strong> these 3<br />

phases will be over 900×10 4 hm 2 , and the pressure <strong>in</strong>dex of cultivated land will be more than<br />

1.0 (Table 7). Thus, Ch<strong>in</strong>a will have a big challenge <strong>in</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g its grow<strong>in</strong>g population with a<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed cultivated land area.<br />

Soil resource and food safety<br />

Due to excessive and improper application of fertilizer and pesticide as well as wastewater<br />

irrigation, poisonous substances <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly accumulated <strong>in</strong> both soils and crops, situation of<br />

food quality safety become more and more serious. It was reported that 10% of gra<strong>in</strong>, 24% of<br />

farm animal products, and 48% of vegetables have quality safety problems <strong>in</strong> some heavy<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated region (Dong & Zhang, 2003). It is worried about that the residual effects of<br />

some low-concentration poisonous substance may last for several decades or even several<br />

generations.<br />

18


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

2010<br />

Year<br />

2030 2050<br />

Population (100 million) 13.76 15.53 15.89<br />

Food demand (10 4 t ) 59177 69907 71338<br />

The m<strong>in</strong>imum requirement of cultivated land 13426.2 12518 11673<br />

(10 4 hm 2 )<br />

The present cultivated land area (10 4 t) 12518.14 11600.33 10749.82<br />

Gra<strong>in</strong> production (10 4 t) 53486 61348 69684<br />

Food deficit (10 4 t) -5127 -7359 -1354<br />

The pressure <strong>in</strong>dex of cultivated land * 1.073 1.079 1.086<br />

*The pressure <strong>in</strong>dex of cultivated land = the m<strong>in</strong>imum requirement of cultivated land / present<br />

cultivated land area<br />

Pesticide residue <strong>in</strong> food<br />

Table 7: Estimation of food security and cultivated land change <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Pesticide residue ma<strong>in</strong>ly occurs <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong>s, vegetables and fruits. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>spection<br />

results of 23 cities <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> the third quarter of 2001 issued by Quality Technology<br />

Supervisory Bureau of Ch<strong>in</strong>a, the pesticide residue <strong>in</strong> 47.5% of vegetables exceeded the<br />

maximum permitted value (Dong & Zhang, 2003). Although organochlor<strong>in</strong>e pesticide have<br />

been prohibited for nearly 20 years, it can be detected <strong>in</strong> various crops, which is still a threat<br />

to human health through food cha<strong>in</strong>. Investigations also demonstrated that the benzahex and<br />

DDT <strong>in</strong> tea and fruit could be detected, but the residual level was under standard limit (Fang,<br />

1998). However, it was also found that the level of organochlor<strong>in</strong>e residue <strong>in</strong> 40% of the tea<br />

were over maximum limit value (Hao, 2001).<br />

Heavy metal residue <strong>in</strong> food<br />

Heavy metal residue <strong>in</strong> agricultural products occurs <strong>in</strong> wastewater irrigated soil <strong>in</strong> suburb of<br />

large and middle cities or m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g area. Especially vegetables grown <strong>in</strong> suburb soils are easily<br />

subjected to heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>vestigation on crop quality <strong>in</strong><br />

suburb of 10 prov<strong>in</strong>ce capital cities <strong>in</strong> 2000, heavy metal residue <strong>in</strong> 30% of samples <strong>in</strong> 7 cities<br />

exceeded the limit value. The <strong>in</strong>vestigation of food quality <strong>in</strong> 300, 000 hm 2 <strong>in</strong> basic protected<br />

farmland <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a showed that heavy metal residue <strong>in</strong> 10% of samples was found to be over<br />

the limit value (Dong & Zhang, 2003); Vegetables grown <strong>in</strong> suburb <strong>in</strong> big cities of Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

have been contam<strong>in</strong>ated by heavy metals to some extent, especially Cd, Hg and Pb. The<br />

standard-exceed<strong>in</strong>g rate of Pb <strong>in</strong> vegetables <strong>in</strong> suburb of Xi-an is 48.0%, while that of Cd <strong>in</strong><br />

Nann<strong>in</strong>g is 91%, where the highest level of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> vegetables was found to be 6.2<br />

times more than the limit of sanitation standard(Zhang & Bai, 2001).<br />

Nitrate residue <strong>in</strong> food<br />

Nitrate residue <strong>in</strong> food ma<strong>in</strong>ly arises <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive cultivation regions, especially, nitrate and<br />

nitrite residues <strong>in</strong> vegetables grown <strong>in</strong> greenhouse generally occur. The nitrate content <strong>in</strong> 7<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ds of leafy vegetables <strong>in</strong> Zhuj<strong>in</strong>g delta area are more than 1,200 mg/kg with 100% of<br />

samples beyond the standard limit, and the highest level of nitrate is 5.35 times more than the<br />

limit value (Xie, 2000). In Xi-an, the nitrate residue <strong>in</strong> 32.5% of vegetable samples is over<br />

standard limit, and the highest level is 3.69 times more than the limit value (Wang, 2000).<br />

19


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE UTILIZATION OF SOIL<br />

RESOURCE IN CHINA<br />

Keystone basic research tasks<br />

Keystone basic researches on soil degradation should be carried out with respect to soil<br />

obstacle factors and ma<strong>in</strong> problems <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able utilization of soil resource (Yu, 2001).<br />

The feature of acidity and acidification mechanism <strong>in</strong> the soil of south Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Great attention should be paid to probe the feature of acidity and acidification mechanism <strong>in</strong><br />

the soil of south Ch<strong>in</strong>a with respect to differences <strong>in</strong> soil condition and constitution of acid<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) Fate of H + enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to soil; (2) Changes of Al 3+<br />

forms and chemical equilibrium of solid-liquid <strong>in</strong>terface; (3) Effect of specific absorption of<br />

sulfate on soil acidification; (4) Effects of soil acidification on release of poisonous elements<br />

and leach<strong>in</strong>g loss of nutrient elements; (5) Predication of soil acidification (sensitivity of the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> soils types to acid deposition and its buffer capacity to acidification); (6) Acidification<br />

features <strong>in</strong> weakly acid soil <strong>in</strong> transition zone.<br />

Mechanism of genesis of gleyed soil<br />

The gley<strong>in</strong>g process occurs <strong>in</strong> three types of soils: a swamp soil waterlogged for a long term,<br />

a paddy soil irrigated dur<strong>in</strong>g growth period and bottom-gley soil with a certa<strong>in</strong> height of<br />

groundwater level. Their common feature is that all layer or one layer of soil is saturated with<br />

water, and then reduction occurs to produce poisonous substance. It accounts for 1/5 of the<br />

soils <strong>in</strong> the world and more <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) The relationship<br />

between <strong>in</strong>tensity factors and quantity factors under reduc<strong>in</strong>g condition; (2) Development of<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation method for dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g organic reduced substance us<strong>in</strong>g chemical and<br />

electrochemical method; (3) Reaction mechanism of organic reductive substance with Fe and<br />

Mn and its dynamics ; (4) Changes of Fe and Mn forms and their effects on plant growth; (5)<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> and chemical equilibrium among H2S—S 2 —FeS and their toxicology to organisms.<br />

Movement characteristic of salts and alkalization mechanism <strong>in</strong> sal<strong>in</strong>e-alkali soil<br />

There is a large scale of sal<strong>in</strong>e soil and alkali soil <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Current researches emphasized on<br />

salt geochemistry, however, little <strong>in</strong>formation is available on mechanisms of physical<br />

chemistry of sal<strong>in</strong>ization and alkalization. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) the effect of<br />

absorption-desorption on the movement of Na, K, Ca and Mg ions <strong>in</strong> soils; (2) the effect of<br />

complexation reaction on mobility of salt ions; (3) Differential movement of chlor<strong>in</strong>e, nitrate,<br />

bicarbonate, and sulfate anions caused by absorption—negative adsorption—desorption<br />

process; (4) The osmotic potential of soil solution and its relationship to equilibrium of<br />

physical chemistry of various ions between solid phase and liquid phases; (5) <strong>Physical</strong><br />

chemistry factors controll<strong>in</strong>g pH of alkali soil.<br />

Transformation of poisonous elements <strong>in</strong> soil and their toxicology to organisms<br />

In the recent year, there have been grow<strong>in</strong>g concerns <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a about <strong>in</strong>organic contam<strong>in</strong>ants<br />

<strong>in</strong> soils, such as Hg, Cd, Cr, Pb, Cu, As, F etc. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) Relative<br />

importance of specific absorption and electrochemcial absorption of heavy metal ions <strong>in</strong><br />

various types of soil; (2) Effect of precipitation, absorption and complexation reaction on<br />

20


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

distribution of heavy metal ions between solid phases and liquid phases; (3) Effect of heavy<br />

metal ions on characteristics of soil surface chemistry;(4) Effect of concomitant cations and<br />

anions on distribution of As and F between solid phase and liquid phase; (5) Forms and<br />

activities of variable valence elements (Cr and As) under different redox conditions.<br />

Migration of poisonous elements and nutrient elements and their effects on groundwater<br />

quality<br />

Nutrient element or poisonous element can affect plant growth through its movement to root<br />

surface. These elements can also <strong>in</strong>fluence the quality of groundwater through a series of<br />

reactions dur<strong>in</strong>g their permeation <strong>in</strong> the soil. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) Effect of<br />

absorption-desorption on migration of ions <strong>in</strong> soils and its mechanism; (2) Relationship<br />

between specific absorption and movement speed of heavy metal ions; (3) Effect of coexist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ions with different charge on the migration of ions; (4) Reaction dynamics of ions <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>in</strong>terfaces among soil colloid, soil solution and root or microorganism; (5) Relationship<br />

between the absorption of nitrate <strong>in</strong> variable-charge soils and nitrate contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong><br />

groundwater.<br />

The renewal mechanism of soil organic matter<br />

Renewal mechanism of soil organic matter has received great concern due to rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e of<br />

organic matter <strong>in</strong> black soil. The ma<strong>in</strong> research tasks <strong>in</strong>clude: (1) Changes of components and<br />

characteristics of soil organic matter under different moisture and temperature conditions; (2)<br />

Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g components, m<strong>in</strong>eralization rate and humification coefficient of soil organic<br />

matter and their mechanisms; (3) Equilibrium models for describ<strong>in</strong>g dynamics of soil organic<br />

matter and their equilibrium po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> soils with different fertility; (4) Effect of organic<br />

materials application (straw, green manure and animal manure) on the formation and<br />

characteristics of soil organic matter.<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g counter-measures<br />

Balance fertilization and organic fertilizer application<br />

For a long time, <strong>in</strong>tensive utilization of farmland and imbalance recovery of nutrients has<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> great decl<strong>in</strong>e of soil fertility and fertilizer use efficiency. Fertilization and nutrient<br />

management need to be improved. Plentiful organic fertilizer resources <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a have not<br />

been fully used yet. It is estimated that 4 billion tons of organic substances was produced <strong>in</strong><br />

agricultural system every year, such as livestock manures, green manures, straws, etc., which<br />

can provide about 53.16 million tons of nutrients, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 21.76 million tons of N, 8.7<br />

millions tons of P2O5 and 22.7 million tons of K2O. However, only 19.28 million tons of<br />

organic substances, or 36% of the total resources, are effectively used. The rema<strong>in</strong>der enters<br />

<strong>in</strong>to environment, and has a risk of contam<strong>in</strong>ation to ecological system. Therefore, it is very<br />

important to improve fertilizer application techniques such as balance fertilization with<br />

rational nutrients ratio, comb<strong>in</strong>ed application of organic and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers, to enhance<br />

soil fertility and ensure food security and food safety <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

Amelioration of soil and remediation of contam<strong>in</strong>ated soil<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce various adverse factors such as drought, sandification, sal<strong>in</strong>ization and acidification<br />

exist <strong>in</strong> cultivated lands of Ch<strong>in</strong>a, it was suggested to develop soil amelioration techniques,<br />

21


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g organic matter content of black soil, comprehensively ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g saltalkali<br />

soil, improv<strong>in</strong>g soil structure, neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g acidic soil, and optimiz<strong>in</strong>g management of<br />

fertilizer and water.<br />

With respect to contam<strong>in</strong>ation of pesticide, heavy metals and nitrate, both pollutant<br />

source and pollutant discharge should be controlled simultaneously. Great attention should be<br />

paid to both urban and rural environment protection, especially agricultural non-po<strong>in</strong>t source<br />

pollution. Studies on remediation of contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils, regionally comprehensive<br />

ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g techniques, and develop<strong>in</strong>g patterns for susta<strong>in</strong>able utilization of cultivated land<br />

should be strengthened.<br />

Improvement of ecological environment<br />

High quality of farmland depends on improvement of ecological environment <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a (Tang,<br />

2000). Although a big net of protection forest of farmland had been established <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, it is<br />

not enough to protect all of cultivated land countrywide. The current pivotal works should be<br />

emphasized on remediation of soil sandification <strong>in</strong> semiarid and semi-humid regions,<br />

amelioration of soil secondary sal<strong>in</strong>ization and alkalization, and prevention of soil erosion. In<br />

addition, ecological return<strong>in</strong>g of cultivated land to grassland or forestland is an absolutely<br />

necessary measure <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terleav<strong>in</strong>g zone <strong>in</strong> semiarid regions and <strong>in</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong>ous region of<br />

south Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

Exploitation of uncultivated resource<br />

It is an important approach to exploit uncultivated resources for compensat<strong>in</strong>g deficit of<br />

farmland resource and ensur<strong>in</strong>g food security. These approaches <strong>in</strong>clude improve of grassland<br />

to feed animal to <strong>in</strong>crease meat, egg and milk products, utilization of some crops straw to feed<br />

household animals, utilization of water resource to develop aquaculture, and development of<br />

forest and fruit production (Gong et al., 2005).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Y.H. Dong, T.L. Zhang. "Susta<strong>in</strong>able management of soil resources for food safety" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Soils, 35<br />

(3): 182-186, (2003).<br />

[2] L. Fang. "Assessment on the status of organochlor<strong>in</strong>e pesticide residues <strong>in</strong> tea and surround<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environment" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 27(2): 211-215, (1998).<br />

[3] J.N. Galloway. "Acidification of the world: Nature and anthropogenic" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Water, Air, and Soil<br />

Pollution, 130: 17-24, (2001).<br />

[4] C. George, S. L<strong>in</strong>, P. Samuel. "Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s land resources and land use change: Insights from the 1996 land<br />

survey". <strong>Land</strong> Use Policy, (20):87-107, (2003).<br />

[5] Z.T. Gong, H.Z. Chen, G.L. Zhang, Y.G. Zhao. "Characteristics of soil resources and problems of food<br />

security <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Ecology and Environment. 14(5): 783-788, (2005).<br />

[6] G.M. Hao, H.X. Li, C.J. Zhao. "Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of organochlor<strong>in</strong>e pesticide residues <strong>in</strong> tea" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese).<br />

Food Science, 22(11):73-75, (2001).<br />

[7] F.X. Li. "Degenerative reality and controll<strong>in</strong>g countermeasure of cultivated land <strong>in</strong> west region of Ch<strong>in</strong>a"<br />

(In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 16(1):1-10, (2002).<br />

[8] D.G. Liu, X.C. Zhang, Y. Cui. "Investigation report on the issue of black soil protection" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese).<br />

Journal of Ch<strong>in</strong>a Agricultural <strong>Resources</strong> and Regional Plann<strong>in</strong>g, 25(15):16-18, (2004).<br />

[9] C.Y. Lu, X. Chen, Y. Shi, J. Zheng, Q.L. Zhou. "Study on the change characters of black soil quality <strong>in</strong><br />

Northeast Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies <strong>in</strong> Agriculture. 21(3):182-184,<br />

(2005).<br />

[10] Y.M. Luo, Y. Teng, Q.B. Li, L.H. Wu, Z.G. Li, Q.H. Zhang. "Soil environmental quality and remediation <strong>in</strong><br />

yangtze river delta region I. Composition and pollution of polychlor<strong>in</strong>ated dibenzo-p-diox<strong>in</strong>s and dibenzofurans<br />

(pcdd/fs) <strong>in</strong> a typical farmland" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Acta Pedologica S<strong>in</strong>ica, 42(4):570-576, (2005).<br />

[11] M<strong>in</strong>istry of Forestry P.R.C. "Station of Desertification Communique" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese).<br />

22


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

[12] F. Pan. 2005. Science Times (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese), (2005).<br />

[13] V. Smil. "Who will feed Ch<strong>in</strong>a ?" The Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterly, 143:801-813, (1995).<br />

[14] V. Smil. "Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s agricultural land". The Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterly, 158:414-429, (1999).<br />

[15] H.J. Tang. "Theory and Practice of Susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>Land</strong> Use <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Beij<strong>in</strong>g: Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Agricultural Science and Technology Press, (2000).<br />

[16] H.Y. Wan, S.L.Zhou, Q.G. Zhao. "Spatial variation of content of soil heavy metals <strong>in</strong> metals <strong>in</strong> region with<br />

high economy development of South Jiangsu Prov<strong>in</strong>ce" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Scientia Geographica S<strong>in</strong>ica, 25(3):329-<br />

334, (2005).<br />

[17] L.P. Wang, C.P. Xiang, Y.H. Wang. "Nitrate content and its regulation <strong>in</strong> summer vegetables grown <strong>in</strong><br />

Wuhan region" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 19 (5): 497-499, (2000).<br />

[18] H.S. Xie, Y.L. Wang, P. Cheng, B. Rong, Y.Y. Chen, S.M. Ren. "Nitrate pollution <strong>in</strong> leafy vegetables<br />

grown on Pearl River Delta: Problem and countermeasures" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Guongdong Agricultural Sciences, (5):<br />

26-28, (2000).<br />

[19] T.R. Yu. "Chemical mechanisms for the occurrence of some major problems <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural<br />

development and ecological environment of Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Soils, 33(3): 119 –121, (2001).<br />

[20] Z.G. Yu, X.P. Hu. "Research on the relation of food security and cultivated land’s quantity and quality <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Geography and Geo-<strong>in</strong>formation Science, 19(3): 45-49, (2003).<br />

[21] C.L. Zhang, H.Y. Bai. "Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation of soils and vegetables <strong>in</strong> suburb of Nann<strong>in</strong>g"<br />

(In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Journal of Guangxi Agricultural and Biological Science, 20 (3): 186-205, (2001).<br />

[22] S.G. Zhang, J.J. Qiu, H.J. Tang. "Studies on recessive loss of amount of cultivated land <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Science & Technology Review, 24 (2 ):73-74, (2006).<br />

[23] Q.G. Zhao, B.Z. Zhou, H. Yang, S.L. Liu. "Some considerations on safety of arable land resources <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a:<br />

problems and counter-measures" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Soils, 34(6): 293-302, (2002).<br />

[24] Q.G. Zhao, S.L. Zhou, S.H. Wu, K. Ren. "Cultivated land resources and strategies for its susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

utilization and protection <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a" (In Ch<strong>in</strong>ese). Acta Pedologica S<strong>in</strong>ica, 43(4):662-672, (2006).<br />

23


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

WORKS ON EROSION PROCESSES UNDER WIND-DRIVEN<br />

RAIN CONDITIONS IN I.C.E<br />

Gunay Erpul 1 & Donald Gabriels 2<br />

1 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science, University of Ankara, 06110 Diskapi – Ankara, Turkey<br />

2 Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, B 9000 Ghent, Belgium.<br />

Abstract<br />

Soil erosion processes under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s are important field of study for understand<strong>in</strong>g the mechanism and<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g prediction models. Clearly, the processes under conditions <strong>in</strong> which w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> act together differ<br />

significantly and conceptually from those under w<strong>in</strong>dless and ra<strong>in</strong>less conditions. In this paper, w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong><br />

erosion research performed <strong>in</strong> I.C.E w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation facility was discussed and reviewed by<br />

analyz<strong>in</strong>g the processes <strong>in</strong> place and methods to measure model parameters as <strong>in</strong>fluenced by horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d<br />

currents. Additionally, concept and mechanism for ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment and transport and sediment transport<br />

by ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow overland flow were given thoroughly.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The <strong>in</strong>stallation of a ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulator <strong>in</strong>side the w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel of I.C.E. (International Center<br />

for Eremology, Ghent, Belgium) enabled to study the comb<strong>in</strong>ed effect of w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> on the<br />

erosion processes [11]. The simulated characteristics of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s were assessed <strong>in</strong><br />

the tunnel [1,3,4]. K<strong>in</strong>etic energy of the simulated ra<strong>in</strong>falls of I.C.E. was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

splash cup technique [2,4]. Also, a two-dimensional numerical model and a k<strong>in</strong>etic energy<br />

sensor were used to estimate w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drop trajectories [10,23].<br />

After the mass and energy states of the simulated ra<strong>in</strong>falls of I.C.E. were described<br />

under w<strong>in</strong>dless and w<strong>in</strong>d-driven conditions, ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment studies were commenced<br />

[10]. On the other hand, a series of tests conducted to assess the effect of w<strong>in</strong>d velocities on<br />

sand detachment from splash cups [6].<br />

Along with on the ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment process, the comb<strong>in</strong>ed effect of ra<strong>in</strong> and<br />

w<strong>in</strong>d on the ra<strong>in</strong>splash transport process was exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> depth [7] Another paper presented<br />

experimental data on the effects of slope aspect, slope gradient, and horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocity<br />

on the splash-saltation trajectories of soil particles under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> [9].<br />

Total <strong>in</strong>terrill erosion under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> was def<strong>in</strong>ed as a sum of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>splash and sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>-impacted th<strong>in</strong> flow transport, which accounted for<br />

the transport processes occurred before and after runoff onset, respectively [8]. A<br />

quantification of w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions and the effects of w<strong>in</strong>d on both transport<br />

processes aimed to provide an opportunity for an erosion prediction technology to improve<br />

the estimation <strong>in</strong> situations where w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> occurred at the same time. Additionally, an I.<br />

C. E tunnel study under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s was conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of<br />

horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocity and direction on sediment transport by the ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted<br />

shallow flow [5]. W<strong>in</strong>d velocity and direction affected not only energy <strong>in</strong>put of ra<strong>in</strong>s but also<br />

shallow flow hydraulics by chang<strong>in</strong>g roughness <strong>in</strong>duced by ra<strong>in</strong>drop impacts with an angle on<br />

flow and the unidirectional splashes <strong>in</strong> the w<strong>in</strong>d direction. To particularly exam<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

roughness effect of impact<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops with an angle on sediment transport capacity of th<strong>in</strong><br />

flow, KE was divided <strong>in</strong>to its components and the partition<strong>in</strong>g of the KE <strong>in</strong>to two components<br />

provided a better <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the processes for which they <strong>in</strong>dependently played a role [20].<br />

24


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

This paper targets to give a review of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> erosion research performed <strong>in</strong><br />

I.C.E w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation facility. The review conta<strong>in</strong>s analyses of the processes <strong>in</strong><br />

place and methods to measure w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> parameters <strong>in</strong> action. As well, concept and<br />

mechanism for ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment and transport and sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>dropimpacted<br />

shallow overland flow are reviewed by giv<strong>in</strong>g research results.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

A description of the w<strong>in</strong>d-tunnel research facility of International Center for Eremology<br />

(I.C.E.), Ghent University for w<strong>in</strong>d, ra<strong>in</strong>, and jo<strong>in</strong>tly w<strong>in</strong>d and ra<strong>in</strong> studies is given by<br />

Gabriels et al. (1997) [11] and Cornelis et al. (2004) [1]. Horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d speeds were<br />

measured with a vane-type anemometer and associated record<strong>in</strong>g equipment <strong>in</strong> the center of<br />

the w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel. The reference w<strong>in</strong>d velocities were determ<strong>in</strong>ed up to 2 m and profiles for<br />

these velocities characterized by a logarithmic equation. In our studies, the boundary layer<br />

was mostly set at about 0.30 m, and subsequently, the reference w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocities were<br />

derived from the logarithmic w<strong>in</strong>d profiles by regression, assum<strong>in</strong>g a fixed roughness height<br />

of 0.0001 for a bare and smoothed soil surface.<br />

In studies, the central pipe l<strong>in</strong>e of ra<strong>in</strong>ulator on the ceil<strong>in</strong>g of the I.C.E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel<br />

along the work<strong>in</strong>g area was used, where downward oriented nozzles were <strong>in</strong>stalled at 2 m<br />

high and 1 m <strong>in</strong>tervals. The nozzle employed was an axial-flow, wide angle, full cone type. A<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g unit supplies water from a tank to the pipe and accord<strong>in</strong>gly to the nozzles. The lower<br />

and upper limits of the operat<strong>in</strong>g pressures were 0.75 and 1.50 bar, respectively. The spatial<br />

distribution of the <strong>in</strong>tensity was measured with ra<strong>in</strong> gauges with 11 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter and 13.5<br />

cm <strong>in</strong> depth. When studies were done on <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed surfaces with different aspects, ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity was directly determ<strong>in</strong>ed with the same slope degree and aspect as the slop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

experimental set-ups. The drop size distribution was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by an absorbent paper dyed<br />

with 1 M CuSO4. Colored paper was exposed to simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> the tunnel after paper<br />

calibration was performed with drops of known size with known velocities.<br />

The energy of the simulated ra<strong>in</strong>s was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the splash cup technique [2] and<br />

the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor [23]. Also, an analytical calculation was made to approximate the<br />

k<strong>in</strong>etic energy of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s tak<strong>in</strong>g forces that act on a ra<strong>in</strong>drop fall<strong>in</strong>g through a w<strong>in</strong>d<br />

profile <strong>in</strong>to account. The splash cup technique <strong>in</strong>volved exposure of a cup, 8-cm <strong>in</strong> diameter<br />

and 4-cm <strong>in</strong> depth, packed with standard sand of 200 - 300 µm particle size range, to the<br />

simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall. The amount of sand, which splashed out of the cup, was a measure of<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall energy. A calibration study with vertically fall<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops was previously performed<br />

to establish a l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship between the amount of the standard sand splash and the ra<strong>in</strong><br />

energy. Together with splash cups, the read<strong>in</strong>gs of the sensit k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor were taken<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g runs. Similar course of actions followed <strong>in</strong> the splash cup technique was used to<br />

acquire different energy levels. In addition, the two-dimensional analytical model was used to<br />

estimate the KE consider<strong>in</strong>g forces that act on a ra<strong>in</strong>drop fall<strong>in</strong>g through a w<strong>in</strong>d profile. In the<br />

analytical approach assumed was that the reference w<strong>in</strong>d velocity was the x-component of the<br />

ra<strong>in</strong> velocity vector at the nozzle height, and the z-component was the normal term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

velocity <strong>in</strong> still air.<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment by w<strong>in</strong>dless and w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s were evaluated on the soil<br />

surfaces of three loess-derived agricultural soils packed <strong>in</strong>to a 55-cm long and 20-cm wide<br />

pan placed at both w<strong>in</strong>dward and leeward slopes of 7%, 15%, and 20% (Figure 1). Soil<br />

detachment rates were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the amount of the splashed particles trapped at set<br />

distances on a 7-m uniform slope segment. For w<strong>in</strong>dless ra<strong>in</strong>, splashboards were also<br />

25


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

positioned to collect side splash. Calculation of ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rate was based on the<br />

mathematical form of ra<strong>in</strong>splash erosion [19,21,25]:<br />

n<br />

q = ∑ mix<br />

i<br />

(1)<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

where, q (gm -1 m<strong>in</strong> -1 ) is the total ra<strong>in</strong>splash erosion, mi (g) is the mass of a particle, which is<br />

splashed over a distance xi (m) measured along the x-axis. Ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rate was<br />

estimated from the area under the curves of mass with distance by:<br />

1 m i<br />

D = x<br />

At ∫ ∂<br />

(2)<br />

r x i<br />

where, D (gm -2 m<strong>in</strong> -1 ) is the ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rate, A is the surface area of soil pan<br />

2<br />

( 0 . 55m<br />

× 0.<br />

20m<br />

= 0.<br />

110m<br />

) and tr (m<strong>in</strong>) is the time dur<strong>in</strong>g which ra<strong>in</strong>splash process occurred.<br />

Additionally, a ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment study was conducted with cohesionless sand<br />

surfaces. W<strong>in</strong>dless ra<strong>in</strong>s and the ra<strong>in</strong>s driven by horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocities of 6, 10, and 14<br />

ms -1 were applied to the splash cups, 8 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter and 4 cm <strong>in</strong> depth, placed flat to the<br />

base of the tunnel (Figure 2a) [16]. The cups with a removable porous bottom to allow free<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age were filled at a full level with standard graded tertiary dune sand obta<strong>in</strong>ed as a sieve<br />

fraction of 100 – 200 µm (310 gram per cup). After manually compacted by tapp<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />

surface of the sand was smoothed exactly on a level with the rim of the cup. Each run was<br />

performed on a pre-wetted sand surface to prevent sand from lift<strong>in</strong>g off due to the w<strong>in</strong>d. For<br />

each <strong>in</strong>tensity and w<strong>in</strong>d velocity level, there were 30 splash cup measurements (a total of 360<br />

splash cup measurements with 3 <strong>in</strong>tensity and 4 w<strong>in</strong>d velocity levels. Sand detachment rates<br />

were evaluated by the amount of sand splash out of the cup.<br />

26


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

W<strong>in</strong>d<br />

direction<br />

a) Top view<br />

W<strong>in</strong>d<br />

direction<br />

α<br />

Soil pan<br />

b) Side view of w<strong>in</strong>dward setup<br />

W<strong>in</strong>d<br />

direction<br />

α<br />

c) Side view of leeward setup<br />

θ<br />

Sediment traps<br />

7-m uniform slope segment<br />

W<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong><br />

W<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong><br />

27<br />

α: ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation from vertical<br />

θ: slope degree<br />

φ : angle of ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

cos φ = cos(α - θ)<br />

θ<br />

α: ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation from vertical<br />

θ: slope degree<br />

φ : angle of ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

cos φ = cos(α + θ)<br />

Figure 1. Experimental set-up with soil pan and sediment traps for ra<strong>in</strong>splash measurements,<br />

arranged on the slopes of w<strong>in</strong>dward and leeward <strong>in</strong> the I. C. E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel.


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

standard sand<br />

Path of ra<strong>in</strong>drop<br />

8cm<br />

(a)<br />

Sand splashes <strong>in</strong><br />

all directions<br />

Figure 2. Splash cups used to evaluate the sand detachment rates (a), radial sand splashes by the<br />

vertical ra<strong>in</strong>drop (b), and unidirectional sand splashes by the <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed ra<strong>in</strong>drop (c).<br />

m<br />

D = (3)<br />

At<br />

where, D is the sand detachment rate (g m -2 s -1 ); m is the mass of soil (g) splashed out of the<br />

cup. The product of At determ<strong>in</strong>es the number of sand particles per unit area per unit time,<br />

which are ra<strong>in</strong>drop-<strong>in</strong>duced and entra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the splash droplets.<br />

Similarly, ra<strong>in</strong>splash transport rates of soils were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the amount of the<br />

splashed particles trapped at set distances on a 7 m uniform slope segment (Figure 1) and<br />

based on Eq. (1) by:<br />

1<br />

= ∫ m dx<br />

At<br />

Qs i<br />

(4)<br />

r<br />

where, Qs is <strong>in</strong> g m -1 m<strong>in</strong> -1 2<br />

, A is the collect<strong>in</strong>g trough area ( 1 . 20m<br />

0.<br />

14m<br />

= 0.<br />

168m<br />

)<br />

28<br />

4cm<br />

porous cloth bottom<br />

Path of ra<strong>in</strong>drop<br />

(b) (c)<br />

α: Ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation from vertical<br />

Unidirectional<br />

sand splashes<br />

× , and tr is<br />

the time (m<strong>in</strong>) dur<strong>in</strong>g which ra<strong>in</strong>splash process occurred. Furthermore, us<strong>in</strong>g the exponential


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

relation between mass of soil particles and distance traveled, the average ra<strong>in</strong>splash trajectory<br />

was derived from the average value of the fitted function:<br />

b<br />

− 1 δx<br />

X = e dx<br />

b a ∫β<br />

(5)<br />

−<br />

a<br />

Eq. (5) gives an approximation of the average value of the mass distribution curves<br />

over the <strong>in</strong>terval a ≤ x ≤ b, where the lower limit a = 0. β and δ are coefficients that depend<br />

upon the physical properties of soil particles.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g each ra<strong>in</strong>fall application and after runoff started sediment and runoff samples<br />

were collected at 5-m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervals at the bottom edge of the pan us<strong>in</strong>g wide-mouth bottles and<br />

were determ<strong>in</strong>ed gravimetrically. Total sediment and runoff values, and the time dur<strong>in</strong>g which<br />

the process occurred were used <strong>in</strong> calculation of sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>-impacted th<strong>in</strong><br />

flow (qs).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Assessment of drop size distribution of simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> the I. C. E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel by the<br />

logistic growth model given as Eq. (6) <strong>in</strong>dicated that a dist<strong>in</strong>ct <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> D50 for all<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g pressures was observed, and values were higher than 1.50 mm [2, 3, 4].<br />

100<br />

N ( d)<br />

= (6)<br />

−βd−γ<br />

1+<br />

e<br />

where, N(d) is the cumulative percentage of a given drop size by volume, d is drop diameter<br />

(mm), and β and γ are parameters of the logistic growth model. Indeed, the effects of w<strong>in</strong>d on<br />

the drop size distribution of the simulated ra<strong>in</strong>s of the tunnel were rather different from its<br />

effects on that of natural ra<strong>in</strong>s. In other terms, its effect on large drop sizes would not be as<br />

great as those on small drops. Large drops are less stable, and w<strong>in</strong>d may cause some of them<br />

to break up <strong>in</strong>to smaller drops. Consequently, dis<strong>in</strong>tegration of large drops depend<strong>in</strong>g on w<strong>in</strong>d<br />

may actually lead to a reduction <strong>in</strong> drop size. However, the w<strong>in</strong>d caused the formation of<br />

larger drops <strong>in</strong> the tunnel s<strong>in</strong>ce collisions between small drops happened more frequently as<br />

result of their greater number per unit volume of air. This accord<strong>in</strong>gly brought about an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the median drop size.<br />

Assessment of the spatial distribution of the ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>in</strong> I.C.E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel<br />

showed that w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity was determ<strong>in</strong>ed as a function of the angle of ra<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>cidence, which was measured from the normal to the plane of <strong>in</strong>cidence and given by the<br />

cos<strong>in</strong>e law of spherical trigonometry [22]:<br />

( α θ)<br />

= cosα<br />

cosθ<br />

± s<strong>in</strong> αs<strong>in</strong><br />

θcos(<br />

z z )<br />

cos m m<br />

(7)<br />

where, α is the ra<strong>in</strong>drop <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation from vertical, θ is the slope gradient, and zα and zθ are the<br />

azimuth from which ra<strong>in</strong> is fall<strong>in</strong>g and the azimuth towards which the plane of surface is<br />

<strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed, respectively. In the second term of Eq. (7), the positive sign <strong>in</strong>dicates the w<strong>in</strong>dwardfac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

slope and the negative sign corresponds to the leeward-fac<strong>in</strong>g slope, imply<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact deficit with the same values of the slope degree and the ra<strong>in</strong>drop <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>ly, Eq. (7) implied that the w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity varied with the ra<strong>in</strong>drop <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

from vertical and slope degree and aspect.<br />

29<br />

α<br />

θ


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

Splash cup technique, k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor, and analytical solution used to measure<br />

the k<strong>in</strong>etic energies of w<strong>in</strong>dless and w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s led to similar results for w<strong>in</strong>dless ra<strong>in</strong>s;<br />

unfortunately, the methods provided relatively different results for w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s. The<br />

discrepancy among the methods <strong>in</strong>creased as the w<strong>in</strong>d velocity <strong>in</strong>creased (Table 1). The<br />

performance and accuracy of the techniques used were evaluated by consider<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

assumptions. It appeared that splash cup technique underestimated the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy. The<br />

reason for these relatively lesser values was the fact that the calibration study to establish a<br />

relationship between the amount of sand splashed and the ra<strong>in</strong> energy was performed with<br />

vertically fall<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops under w<strong>in</strong>dless conditions. It was apparent that at a given ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />

energy, there was a significant difference between the effectiveness of the vertical ra<strong>in</strong>drops<br />

and the <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed ra<strong>in</strong>drops <strong>in</strong> splash<strong>in</strong>g sand out of the cups.<br />

On the other hand, the analytical solution resulted <strong>in</strong> overestimation of the energy of<br />

w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops. This was because of the assumption that the w<strong>in</strong>d velocity had a xcomponent<br />

of the ra<strong>in</strong>drop velocity at the nozzle height. As anticipated, the ra<strong>in</strong>drop<br />

horizontal velocities could not be atta<strong>in</strong>ed because the horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocities drifted only<br />

a few meters <strong>in</strong> the tunnel. For this reason, the ra<strong>in</strong> energy measured by the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy<br />

sensor was found to be more reliable than those by the splash cup technique and the analytical<br />

solution. Although the calibration of the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor was carried out with vertically<br />

fall<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops, it did not <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong> sand splash, which, we believe, differs significantly<br />

with w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops and directly relied on the amplitude of electrical pulses produced<br />

by the impact of ra<strong>in</strong>drops on the surface of the sensor.<br />

The results of the ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rates from soil surfaces were analyzed for<br />

two cases of ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact parameters, without angle of <strong>in</strong>cidence and with angle of<br />

<strong>in</strong>cidence. Fluxes of k<strong>in</strong>etic energy and momentum were used as ra<strong>in</strong>fall parameters without<br />

angle of <strong>in</strong>cidence:<br />

⎛ 1 2 ⎞<br />

E r = Ξa<br />

⎜ mVR<br />

⎟<br />

(8)<br />

⎝ 2 ⎠<br />

r<br />

a<br />

( mV )<br />

ϕ = Ξ<br />

(9)<br />

where, Ξa is the actual number of ra<strong>in</strong>drops and calculated by ( ∀)<br />

R<br />

I a <strong>in</strong> # m -2 s -1 , Er is<br />

k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux <strong>in</strong> Wm -2 , and ϕr is momentum flux <strong>in</strong> Nm -2 . If ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment was<br />

assumed to be related to the normal component of ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact velocity [ V cos(<br />

α mθ<br />

) ]<br />

[12,13,15,24], fluxes of k<strong>in</strong>etic energy and momentum, and ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact pressure can,<br />

respectively, be calculated by:<br />

E<br />

rn<br />

rn<br />

⎛ 1 2 ⎞ 2<br />

= Ξa<br />

⎜ mVR<br />

⎟cos<br />

( α m θ)<br />

(10)<br />

⎝ 2 ⎠<br />

( mV ) cos(<br />

α m θ)<br />

ϕ =<br />

(11)<br />

Ξa R<br />

2 2 ( ρ V ) cos ( α m θ)<br />

Γ = Ξ<br />

(12)<br />

a<br />

w<br />

R<br />

where, Ern (Wm -2 ) and ϕrn (Nm -2 ) are the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux and momentum flux, which are<br />

related to the normal component of resultant velocity, respectively, Γ (MPa) is the total<br />

2 2 2<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact pressure, and V = V + V with = ∂z<br />

∂t<br />

and = ∂x<br />

∂t<br />

.<br />

R<br />

z<br />

x<br />

30<br />

V z<br />

V x<br />

R


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

u<br />

(m s -1 )<br />

d50<br />

(mm)<br />

KE<br />

(J)<br />

31<br />

VR<br />

(m s -1 )<br />

Splash Cup Technique<br />

0 1.00 1.31E-06 ♣ (3.89E-07) ♦ 2.22 (0.28)<br />

6 1.63 1.04E-05 (3.26E-06) 3.00 (0.47)<br />

10 1.53 2.45E-05 (4.06E-06) 5.09 (0.43)<br />

14 1.54 4.02E-05 (9.02E-06) 6.38 (0.69)<br />

K<strong>in</strong>etic Energy Sensor<br />

0 1.00 5.11E-06 (1.25E-06) 4.38 (0.58)<br />

6 1.63 2.47E-05 (5.99E-06) 4.64 (0.56)<br />

10 1.53 5.51E-05 (8.50E-06) 7.64 (0.60)<br />

14 1.54 1.07E-04 (1.15E-05) 10.48 (0.57)<br />

Analytical Solution<br />

0 1.00 1.73E-05 4.10<br />

6 1.63 6.05E-05 7.31<br />

10 1.53 1.03E-04 10.47<br />

14 1.54 1.95E-04 14.13<br />

KE = f (u)* R 2<br />

KE = 2E-06e 0.2473u 0.9555<br />

KE = 6E-06e 0.2184u 0.9887<br />

KE = 2E-05e 0.1712u 0.9902<br />

VR: resultant ra<strong>in</strong>drop velocity at impact; *this illustrates a functional relationship which exists between the<br />

impact energy and the horizontal w<strong>in</strong>d velocity obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the correspond<strong>in</strong>g method <strong>in</strong> the form of KE = ae bu<br />

with a and b show<strong>in</strong>g the model parameters; ♣ the E notation means "times 10 to the power"; ♦ standard deviation<br />

is given <strong>in</strong>side the parentheses for the k<strong>in</strong>etic energy and the resultant impact velocity.<br />

Table 1. The k<strong>in</strong>etic energies (J) and the resultant impact velocities (m s -1 ) of w<strong>in</strong>dless and w<strong>in</strong>ddriven<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>s measured by both splash cup technique and k<strong>in</strong>etic energy sensor and estimated by the<br />

analytical solution.<br />

Statistical analyses between ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment rate and the ra<strong>in</strong>fall parameters showed<br />

that Er and ϕr had low correlation coefficients with the detachment rate. This occurred<br />

because they were unable to account for the changes <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>drop trajectory. Even Ia alone led<br />

to a much greater correlation coefficient <strong>in</strong> each case. Very significantly, the <strong>in</strong>troduction of<br />

angle of ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>in</strong>to parameters produced improvements <strong>in</strong> the coefficients, and each<br />

of the parameters, Ern, ϕrn, and Γ, could account for more than 82% of the variation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

detachment rates. This suggested that the angle of ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence accounted for the differences<br />

<strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>drop fall trajectory <strong>in</strong> connection with the ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation and slope gradient and<br />

aspect.<br />

On the other hand, the results of sand detachment by w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> showed that the<br />

tangential stress controlled the process rather than compressive stress or the normal<br />

component of resultant velocity. K<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux (Erax) calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the horizontal<br />

component of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops, [VRs<strong>in</strong>α], had a greater correlation coefficient than the<br />

k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux (Eray) calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the normal velocity component, [VRcosα], with the<br />

sand detachment rates from the cups. Correlation coefficients with D were 0.96 and 0.54,<br />

respectively for Erax and Eray at the significance level of P = 0.0001 (Table 2). The reason for<br />

this might be that the vertical compressive stress of a w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drop at impact weakens<br />

as the ra<strong>in</strong>drop deviates from the vertical and the tangential shear stress becomes stronger.<br />

Our experimental study demonstrated that tangential jett<strong>in</strong>g of ra<strong>in</strong>drops ma<strong>in</strong>ly caused the<br />

sand detachment from the splash cups by the w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops. Openly, the soil material<br />

behaved differently from the sand surface, and as w<strong>in</strong>d velocity and angle of ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased, the rate of sand detachment <strong>in</strong>creased even though the rate of soil detachment<br />

decreased. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs also <strong>in</strong>dicated that the strength of the surface, such as <strong>in</strong>terparticle<br />

friction and cohesion, significantly affected the detachment rate and determ<strong>in</strong>ed the


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

differential contribution of the compressive and tangential stress to the process under w<strong>in</strong>ddriven<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>drops.<br />

Eray<br />

Erax<br />

D<br />

Eray<br />

1.00<br />

(0.0000) †<br />

2<br />

* E = E ( cos α)<br />

; ** ( ) α s<strong>in</strong> E E<br />

2<br />

ray<br />

ra<br />

32<br />

Erax<br />

0.53<br />

(0.0001)<br />

1.00<br />

(0.0000)<br />

rax = ra ; † Numbers <strong>in</strong> parantheses are significance levels.<br />

D<br />

0.54<br />

(0.0001)<br />

0.96<br />

(0.0001)<br />

1.00<br />

(0.0000)<br />

Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients between the sand detachment rate, D, (g m -2 s -1 ) and the the<br />

k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux related to both normal component, Eray * , (J m -2 s -1 ) and horizontal component,<br />

Erax ** , (J m -2 s -1 ) of the ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact velocity.<br />

On the other hand, measured ra<strong>in</strong>splash transport rates varied <strong>in</strong> close relationship to the<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact parameter (Θ) and w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity. Therefore, the process was<br />

successfully modeled under the approach that once lifted off by the ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact, the soil<br />

particles entra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>to the splash droplets traveled some distance, which varied directly with<br />

the w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity. The ra<strong>in</strong>drop impacts <strong>in</strong>duced the process that would otherwise be<br />

<strong>in</strong>capable of transport<strong>in</strong>g. At last, the w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>splash process was related to the<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall parameter and the w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity and analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g a log-l<strong>in</strong>ear regression<br />

technique:<br />

Q Θ<br />

s<br />

a1<br />

b1<br />

= k u<br />

(13)<br />

1<br />

*<br />

where, k1 is the relative soil transport parameter for the w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>splash process, u* is<br />

the w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity (ms -1 ), and a1 and b1 are the regression coefficients. Eq. (13)<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporated the dynamic effects of physical ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact and w<strong>in</strong>d action on the process,<br />

therefore, provided a basis for model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terrill ra<strong>in</strong>splash transport under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Additionally, the results of the study to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of slope aspect, slope gradient,<br />

and w<strong>in</strong>d shear velocity on the trajectories of the ra<strong>in</strong>drop-<strong>in</strong>duced and w<strong>in</strong>d-driven soil<br />

particles <strong>in</strong>dicated that neither slope aspect nor slope gradient significantly predicted the<br />

splash-saltation trajectory. As a result, we conducted a statistical analysis to fit the average<br />

trajectories of the process <strong>in</strong>to nonl<strong>in</strong>ear regression model of:<br />

_<br />

2 ( u g)<br />

X = C<br />

(14)<br />

1<br />

*<br />

where _<br />

X is <strong>in</strong> m, u* is <strong>in</strong> ms -1 , and g is <strong>in</strong> ms -2 . C1 is a model parameter. These results also<br />

contradicted the previous approach of the splash-saltation transport based on only the slope<br />

aspect and gradient for def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the process.<br />

Along with the substantial effects of the w<strong>in</strong>d on ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact parameter and<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment and transport processes, there were significant w<strong>in</strong>d effects on<br />

sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow flow. This process was modeled based on<br />

<strong>in</strong>terrill erosion mechanics [13,14,17,18,26]:


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

a b c<br />

q s = kE rn q So<br />

(15)<br />

where, k is soil transport parameter for the sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow<br />

flow and , a, b, and c are regression coefficients to which k<strong>in</strong>etic energy flux (Ern), unit<br />

discharge (q) and slope (So) are raised, respectively. Flux of ra<strong>in</strong> energy computed by<br />

comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the effects of w<strong>in</strong>d on the velocity, frequency, and angle of ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact and<br />

unit discharge and slope adequately described the characteristics of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s and<br />

significantly expla<strong>in</strong>ed the variations <strong>in</strong> sediment delivery rates to the shallow flow transport<br />

(R 2 ≥ 0.91). Analyses of the Pearson correlation coefficients additionally showed that a<br />

significant difference occurred <strong>in</strong> shallow flow hydraulics with different aspects under the<br />

impacts of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>drops. The reverse / advance particle splashes and the lateral<br />

stress of impact<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>drops at angle with respect to the shallow flow direction were<br />

concluded to have significant effects on the shallow flow hydraulics under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Further analyses to understand the effects of roughness elements on the sediment transport<br />

capacity of ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow flow were conducted by partition<strong>in</strong>g the resultant<br />

k<strong>in</strong>etic energy <strong>in</strong>to its vertical and horizontal components s<strong>in</strong>ce the magnitude of those<br />

significantly changed with w<strong>in</strong>d velocity, slope aspect and gradient and accord<strong>in</strong>gly their<br />

effects on th<strong>in</strong> flow hydraulics.<br />

KE<br />

KE<br />

x<br />

y<br />

2<br />

= KEs<strong>in</strong><br />

( α ± β)<br />

(16)<br />

2<br />

= KE cos ( α ± β)<br />

(17)<br />

Ω = γqS<br />

(18)<br />

s<br />

0<br />

a b<br />

= kKE xKE<br />

y<br />

c<br />

(19)<br />

q Ω<br />

where, Ω is the stream power as a flow parameter (kg s -3 ).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

This paper aims to give a review of w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong> erosion research performed <strong>in</strong> I.C.E<br />

w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation facility giv<strong>in</strong>g the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal discrepancies obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> water<br />

erosion sub-processes when w<strong>in</strong>d came <strong>in</strong>to play dur<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>s. Concepts and mechanisms<br />

were discussed giv<strong>in</strong>g experimental results on the effects of w<strong>in</strong>d on the drop size<br />

distribution, ra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity and energy, ra<strong>in</strong>splash detachment and transport, and th<strong>in</strong> flow<br />

transport capacity.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Cornelis, W., Erpul, G., D. Gabriels. The I.C.E. W<strong>in</strong>d Tunnel for W<strong>in</strong>d and Water Interaction Research.<br />

W<strong>in</strong>d and Ra<strong>in</strong> Interaction <strong>in</strong> Erosion, Visser, S. and Cornelis, W. (Eds.), Tropical Resource Management<br />

Papers, Chapter 13, p (195 - 224). Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen University and Research Centre (2004).<br />

[2] Ellison, W. D. Soil erosion studies (7 parts). Agr. Eng. 28: 145-146; 197-201; 245-248; 297-300; 349-351;<br />

407-408; 447-450 (1947).<br />

[3] Erpul, G., D. Gabriels, D. Janssens. “Assess<strong>in</strong>g the Drop Size Distribution of Simulated Ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> a W<strong>in</strong>d<br />

Tunnel,” Soil & Tillage Research, 45, 455-463 (1998).<br />

[4] Erpul, G., D. Gabriels, D. Janssens. “Effect of W<strong>in</strong>d on Size and Energy of Small Simulated Ra<strong>in</strong>drops: A<br />

W<strong>in</strong>d Tunnel Study,” Int. Agrophysics, 14, 1-7 (2000).<br />

33


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

[5] Erpul, G., D. Gabriels, L. D. Norton,. “W<strong>in</strong>d effects on sediment transport by ra<strong>in</strong>drop-impacted shallow<br />

flow”, Earth Surface Processes and <strong>Land</strong>forms, 29: 955-967 (2004).<br />

[6] Erpul, G., D. Gabriels, L. D. Norton. “Sand Detachment by W<strong>in</strong>d-driven Ra<strong>in</strong>drops”. Earth Surface<br />

Processes and <strong>Land</strong>forms, 30: 241-250 (2005).<br />

[7] Erpul, G., L. D. Norton, D. Gabriels. “Ra<strong>in</strong>drop-Induced and W<strong>in</strong>d-Driven Particle Transport,” Catena, 47,<br />

227-243 (2002).<br />

[8] Erpul, G., L. D. Norton, D. Gabriels. “Sediment Transport From Interrill Areas under W<strong>in</strong>d-Driven Ra<strong>in</strong>”,<br />

Journal of Hydrology, 276 (1-4), 184-197 (2003).<br />

[9] Erpul, G., L. D. Norton, D. Gabriels. “Splash – saltation trajectories of soil particles under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>”,<br />

Geomorphology. 59: 31-42 (2004).<br />

[10] Erpul, G., L. D. Norton, D. Gabriels. “The Effect of W<strong>in</strong>d on Ra<strong>in</strong>drop Impact and Ra<strong>in</strong>splash<br />

Detachment”, Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. Vol. 45(6): 51-62 (2003).<br />

[11] Gabriels, D., Cornelis, W., Pollet, I., Van Coillie, T., Quessar, M. The I. C. E. w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel for w<strong>in</strong>d and<br />

water erosion studies. Soil Technology. 10: 1-8 (1997).<br />

[12] Gilley, J. E. & F<strong>in</strong>kner, S. C. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g soil detachment caused by ra<strong>in</strong>drop impact. Transactions of the<br />

American Society of Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 28, 140-146 (1985).<br />

[13] Gilley, J. E., Woolhiser, D. A. & McWhorter, D. B. Interrill soil erosion. Part I: Development of model<br />

equations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 28, 147-153 and 159 (1985).<br />

[14] Guy, B. T., W. T. Dick<strong>in</strong>son and R. P. Rudra. The roles of ra<strong>in</strong>fall and runoff <strong>in</strong> the sediment transport<br />

capacity of <strong>in</strong>terrill flow. Transactions of the ASAE 30(5): 1378-1386 (1987).<br />

[15] Heymann, F. J. A survey of clues to the relation between erosion rate and impact parameters. In:<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of International Conference on Ra<strong>in</strong> Erosion and Allied Phenomena. Second Ra<strong>in</strong> Erosion<br />

Conference, The Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, England, 2, pp. 683-760 (1967).<br />

[16] Hudson, N. W. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of ra<strong>in</strong>fall mechanics on soil erosion. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Cape Town<br />

(1965).<br />

[17] Julien, P. Y. and D. B. Simons. Sediment transport capacity of overland flow. Transactions of the ASAE 28:<br />

755-762 (1985).<br />

[18] Parsons, A. J., S. G. L. Stromberg and M. Greener. Sediment-transport competence of ra<strong>in</strong>-impacted<br />

<strong>in</strong>terrill overland flow. Earth Surf. Processes and <strong>Land</strong>forms, 23: 365-375 (1998).<br />

[19] Poesen, J. An improved splash transport model. Z. Geomorph. N. F., 29: 193-221. 69-74 (1985).<br />

[20] Samray, H., Erpul, G., Gabriels D. The effect of slope aspect on sediment transport by shallow overland<br />

flow under w<strong>in</strong>d-driven ra<strong>in</strong>. 18th International Soil Meet<strong>in</strong>g (ISM) on “Soil Susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Life on Earth, Manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Soil and Technology”, May 22 – 26, 2006 Şanlıurfa – Turkey, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, Volume 1: 459 – 464 (2006).<br />

[21] Savat, J. and J. Poesen. Detachment and transportation of loose sediments by ra<strong>in</strong>drop splash. Part I: The<br />

calculation of absolute data on detachability and transportability. Catena 8: 1-18 (1981).<br />

[22] Sellers, W. D. <strong>Physical</strong> Climatology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill. pp. 33-35 (1965).<br />

[23] Sensit. Model V04 K<strong>in</strong>etic Energy of Ra<strong>in</strong> Sensor. Portland, N. D.: Sensit Company (2000).<br />

[24] Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, G. S. Erosion by liquid impact. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York (1976).<br />

[25] Van Heerden, W. M. An analysis of soil transportation by ra<strong>in</strong>drop splash. Trans. ASAE, 10:166-169<br />

(1967).<br />

[26] Zhang, X. C., M. A. Near<strong>in</strong>g, W. P. Miller, L. D. Norton and L. T. West. Model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terrill sediment<br />

delivery. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62: 438-444 (1998).<br />

34


Open<strong>in</strong>g Lectures<br />

35


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

WORKSHOP THEME A – SOIL AND GROUNDWATER<br />

POLLUTION AND REMEDIATION<br />

Sub-theme : Manag<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils us<strong>in</strong>g phytoremediation<br />

Erik Meers, Filip M.G. Tack, Marc G. Verloo<br />

Paper/poster : Comparison of amendments used to remediate acid m<strong>in</strong>e<br />

tail<strong>in</strong>gs: Environmental and Agricultural Applications - Kelly A. Senkiw,<br />

Tee Boon Goh<br />

Paper/poster : Study on the effects of trade village waste on accumulation<br />

of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd <strong>in</strong> agricultural soils of Phung Xa Village, Thach<br />

Thanh District, Ha Tay Prov<strong>in</strong>ce - Nguyen Huu Thanh, Tran Thi Le Ha,<br />

Nguyen Duc Hung, Tran Duc Hai<br />

Paper/poster : Metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> irrigated agricultural land : case<br />

study of Nairobi River bas<strong>in</strong>, Kenya – P.N. Kamande, F.M.G. Tack<br />

Sub-theme : Manag<strong>in</strong>g groundwater pollution from waste disposal sites<br />

Krist<strong>in</strong>e Walraevens, Marleen Coetsiers, Krist<strong>in</strong>e Martens, Marc Van Camp<br />

Paper/poster : Contam<strong>in</strong>ation of the Marimba River Tributary, Zimbabwe,<br />

with Cu, Pb, Zn and P by <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent and sewer l<strong>in</strong>e discharge –<br />

Bangira C., Wuta, M. Dube, H.M., Chipatso, L.<br />

Paper/poster : Controll<strong>in</strong>g phosphorus (P) mobility <strong>in</strong> poorly P sorb<strong>in</strong>g<br />

soils : dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g-water treatment residuals (WTR) to the rescue – S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-<br />

Birikorang, G.A. O'Connor, L.W. Jacobs<br />

Paper/poster : Heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation of soil and surface water by leachates<br />

of an open dump of municipal solid waste : a case study of oblogo landfill <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Ga West District of Accra, Ghana – Abuaku Ebenezer<br />

Conclusions<br />

36


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Abstract<br />

Sub-theme : MANAGING CONTAMINATED SOILS USING<br />

PHYTOREMEDIATION<br />

Erik Meers, Filip M. G. Tack, Marc G. Verloo<br />

Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry and Applied Ecochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium<br />

Soil contam<strong>in</strong>ation with heavy metals is a widespread environmental issue, remediation of which is hampered by<br />

excessive economic costs. Phytoremediation is the use of plant based techniques for soil remediation. This<br />

technology can help to solve some of the environmental issues <strong>in</strong>volved, yet only under certa<strong>in</strong> conditions. Some<br />

of the do’s and don’t of phytoremediation applications will be discussed dur<strong>in</strong>g the oral presentation.<br />

SOIL CONTAMINATION<br />

An unfortunate byproduct of <strong>in</strong>dustrialization has been the contam<strong>in</strong>ation of soil and water<br />

resources with heavy metals, metalloids and other harmful substances. Over the last decades,<br />

awareness of the problem has grown considerably, as has the <strong>in</strong>sight that the problem is more<br />

widespread than was <strong>in</strong>itially assumed [1]. Conventional soil remediation techniques fall short<br />

of expectation to tackle the overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g task at hand due to their high cost: eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

techniques cost between €40 - €400 per m3 of soil treated [2]. In Flanders (Belgium, Europe)<br />

average soil remediation costs are estimated at €310 per ton (based on [3]). The estimated<br />

total cost for remediation of historically polluted soils is estimated at 7 billion euro [4]. In<br />

Europe, overall cleanup costs for historic pollution are estimated to run <strong>in</strong>to the 100 billion<br />

euro range [5, 1]. Budget estimates for soil remediation generally exclude the necessity to<br />

remediate light to moderately contam<strong>in</strong>ated sites due to low priority and already high cost<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> clean<strong>in</strong>g the heavily polluted sites.<br />

PHYTOREMEDIATION<br />

Phytoremediation has been proposed as an economic alternative for some of the<br />

environmental issues <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> heavy metal pollution [6, 7]. Phytoextraction is a plant based<br />

technique aimed at remov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>organic contam<strong>in</strong>ants from the soil matrix by plant absorption<br />

and translocation to harvestable plant parts. By subsequently remov<strong>in</strong>g the metal-enriched<br />

biomass from the site, a gradual attenuation of the contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the top soil layer is<br />

achieved.<br />

As a soil remediation technique, it offers the follow<strong>in</strong>g advantages over conventional<br />

remediation techniques: as an <strong>in</strong> situ technique, it is less <strong>in</strong>vasive and more economic than<br />

civil-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g earth mov<strong>in</strong>g techniques. Also, it can be applied over extended surface areas<br />

and targets the “bioavailable” soil fraction of heavy metals, which is the most relevant<br />

fraction from an environmental risk assessment perspective. The most important drawback is<br />

the long required remediation period (years to decades). The sense of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> regards to<br />

system consistency and performance predictability of biological remediation systems can also<br />

be perceived as a drawback. The use of soil amendments to <strong>in</strong>crease accumulation of heavy<br />

metals <strong>in</strong> harvestable plant parts can also <strong>in</strong>crease the risk of leach<strong>in</strong>g. In addition, elevated<br />

37


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

aboveground plant concentrations also run the risk of enter<strong>in</strong>g the foodcha<strong>in</strong> through<br />

herbivory of the phytoextraction crops.<br />

RESEARCH FINDINGS<br />

Phytoextraction research at our laboratory [8] revealed several important f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />

Firstly, phytoextraction as a soil remediation technique can only be applied on lightly<br />

to moderately contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils. This not only for plant tolerance reasons, but also because<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g metal concentrations <strong>in</strong> more heavily polluted soils to levels below legal soil<br />

sanitation criteria would take excessively long periods of time (<strong>in</strong> the order of centuries).<br />

Secondly, phytoextraction is not equally applicable for all heavy metals as plants have<br />

a different aff<strong>in</strong>ity for uptake of the various metals. Particularly for Cd and Zn the technique<br />

appears to be suitable, and to a lesser extent also for Cu.<br />

Thirdly, s<strong>in</strong>ce the technique is slow work<strong>in</strong>g (order of years and decades) it is<br />

considered a vital prerequisite to economically re-valorize the produced biomass for <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

applications. A viable approach is to employ bio-energy crops with aff<strong>in</strong>ity for metal removal.<br />

These energy crops can be converted <strong>in</strong>to electrical and thermal energy. However, the fate of<br />

the accumulated metals <strong>in</strong> the phytoremediation biomass needs to be monitored closely dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the conversion processes. Other <strong>in</strong>dustrial applications can be found <strong>in</strong> the paper <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

fibre <strong>in</strong>dustry, wood <strong>in</strong>dustry and so on.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the presentation, several field studies will be presented <strong>in</strong> which phytoextraction of<br />

heavy metals is exam<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] C. Ferguson, H. Kasamas. “Risk assessment for contam<strong>in</strong>ated sites <strong>in</strong> Europe”. CARACAS publication.<br />

LQM Press, Nott<strong>in</strong>gham (UK), 223 p. (1999)<br />

[2] S.D. Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham, D.W. Ow. “Promises and prospects of phytoremediation”. Plant Physiology, 110, 715-<br />

719. (1996)<br />

[3] F. De Naeyer. “Soil Remediation Projects: the new guidel<strong>in</strong>es and daily practice”. Studyday TI-KVIV (30/3),<br />

Technological Institute. (Translated from dutch). (2000)<br />

[4] Ecolas. “F<strong>in</strong>ancial cost estimation <strong>in</strong> regards with soil sanitation”. OVAM (Public Waste Agency of<br />

Flanders), Mechelen, Belgium. (Translated from Dutch). (2001)<br />

[5] D.J. Glass. “U.S. and <strong>in</strong>ternational markets for phytoremediation”, 1999-2000. D. Glass Associates Inc.,<br />

Needham (USA), 266 p. (1999)<br />

[6] A.J.M. Baker, R.R. Brooks. “Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements – a review<br />

of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry”. Biorecovery, 1, 81-126. (1989)<br />

[7] A.J.M. Baker, S.P. McGrath, R.D. Reeves, J.A.C. Smith. “A review of the biological resource for possible<br />

exploitation <strong>in</strong> the phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils”. In: Terry, N. & Bañuelos, G.S. (Eds.),<br />

Phytoremediation of Contam<strong>in</strong>ated Soil and Water. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 85-107. (1999)<br />

[8] E. Meers. “Phytoextraction of heavy metals from contam<strong>in</strong>ated dredged sediments”. ISBN 90-5989-053-1,<br />

341 pp., Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. (2005)<br />

38


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

COMPARISON OF AMENDMENTS USED TO REMEDIATE ACID<br />

MINE TAILINGS: ENVIRONMENTAL AND AGRICULTURAL<br />

APPLICATIONS<br />

Abstract<br />

Kelly A. Senkiw and Tee Boon Goh *<br />

Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba, W<strong>in</strong>nipeg, Canada R3T 2N2<br />

In environments with low pH, a large portion of the total copper can exist <strong>in</strong> the labile and potentially toxic<br />

water-soluble form, while the rest is distributed among chemical forms that are less bioavailable. Copper was<br />

sequentially extracted from acid m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>in</strong> order to assess the potential lability and availability of the<br />

metal. Four amendments were applied to the tail<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>cubation study, and sequential extraction was used<br />

to exam<strong>in</strong>e the distribution of copper among six fractions. The control was highly contam<strong>in</strong>ated with copper,<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 564 mg kg -1 of water-soluble copper. The addition of wheat straw (WS) reduced this form to 305 mg<br />

kg -1 . The addition of an alkal<strong>in</strong>e extract of humic substances from leonardite (HS) decreased the free copper to<br />

72 mg kg -1 , while the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of HS+WS reduced it to 30 mg kg -1 . The CaCO3 amendment reduced free<br />

copper to near zero. The amendments <strong>in</strong>creased the pH of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the order of Lime > HS+WS > HS ><br />

WS. Total copper <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs ranged from 1816-2275 mg kg -1 by summation of copper <strong>in</strong> the six fractions.<br />

Total copper by acid digestion was 2257-2360 mg kg -1 . The efficiency of the sequential extraction method<br />

varied from 75 to 96%. Lime was the most effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g the potential availability of copper, followed by<br />

HS+WS, then HS.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Many regions <strong>in</strong> Canada have been m<strong>in</strong>ed for natural resources such as coal and <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

metals. The aboveground storage of m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs exposes previously buried m<strong>in</strong>erals to the<br />

surface environment. Here, accelerated chemical and biological weather<strong>in</strong>g can occur, with<br />

the associated risk of contam<strong>in</strong>ation by heavy metals (Barnhisel et al. 1982, Amacher et al.<br />

1995). The presence of sulphur-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>erals at m<strong>in</strong>e sites is a precursor to the<br />

production of sulphuric acid by the process of oxidation, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a pH as low as 3.5<br />

(Dixon et al. 1982). Heavy metals such as Cu, Ni, Zn, Mn and Fe are often present <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>e<br />

spoils, and their mobility and toxicity may be <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> acidic environments (Barnhisel et<br />

al. 1982). The potentially toxic comb<strong>in</strong>ation of a low pH and dissolution of heavy metals are<br />

hazardous to vegetation and habitats border<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs. Hence the reclamation of m<strong>in</strong>e<br />

spoils or tail<strong>in</strong>gs must <strong>in</strong>volve a neutralization of pH, as well as a reduction of lability,<br />

availability and toxicity of free metal ionic contam<strong>in</strong>ants.<br />

Several m<strong>in</strong>es operated with<strong>in</strong> Manitoba <strong>in</strong> the early twentieth century, <strong>in</strong> the region<br />

that is now Nopim<strong>in</strong>g Prov<strong>in</strong>cial Park. Today, the tail<strong>in</strong>gs of a former gold m<strong>in</strong>e cover an area<br />

of approximately 5400 m 2 and have rema<strong>in</strong>ed virtually barren s<strong>in</strong>ce the m<strong>in</strong>e’s closure, <strong>in</strong><br />

1937, despite several recent attempts at revegetation on site. It is believed that revegetation<br />

has been limited by the acidity and extremely high concentrations of copper and other metals<br />

<strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs (Renault et al. 2000). The acid portion of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs have a pH of 3 to 5, and<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>, on average, 2300 mg kg -1 total copper (by digestion) (Ibrahim and Goh 2004).<br />

Merely know<strong>in</strong>g the total contents of heavy metals (such as copper) <strong>in</strong> a soil provides<br />

limited <strong>in</strong>formation about the potential behaviour and bioavailability of the metals. Soil<br />

texture, pH, organic matter content, and Fe/Mn oxides also <strong>in</strong>fluence the lability and<br />

bioavailability of copper. A heavy metal <strong>in</strong> soil can be associated with many of these soil<br />

components. Sequential extraction techniques have been employed to exam<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

39


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

distribution of metals, such as copper, among soil micronutrient pools (Shuman 1985; Sims<br />

1986; Alva et al. 2000; Kabala and S<strong>in</strong>gh 2001). Shuman (1991) describes six conceptual<br />

micronutrient pools <strong>in</strong> soils: water-soluble; exchangeable; precipitated as carbonate;<br />

associated with Fe, Mn, and Al-oxides; organically-bound; and residual (hereafter referred to<br />

as fractions F1 to F6). The water-soluble and exchangeable forms of metals are considered<br />

readily labile and available to plants, while the other forms can be considered relatively<br />

<strong>in</strong>active or strongly bound (Alva et al. 2000).<br />

Copper is a trace element that is essential to the nutrition of plants and animals. The<br />

average Cu content <strong>in</strong> soils is around 30 ppm with a range from 2-100 ppm (Aubert and P<strong>in</strong>ta<br />

1977) and it is well-documented that excessive bioavailability of copper is toxic. In fact, the<br />

soil-plant cont<strong>in</strong>uum functions as a natural barrier aga<strong>in</strong>st toxicity to animals. Plant growth<br />

(e.g. revegetation of copper-contam<strong>in</strong>ated tail<strong>in</strong>gs) will either be greatly reduced or will cease<br />

before a dangerously toxic amount would be accumulated and transferred to animals via the<br />

food cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Organic matter accounts for many useful functions <strong>in</strong> soils, sediments and natural<br />

waters (Aiken 1985). Studies us<strong>in</strong>g humic substances obta<strong>in</strong>ed from lignite as a soil<br />

conditioner or amendment are rare. Whiteley and Williams (1993) <strong>in</strong>vestigated a metalcontam<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

m<strong>in</strong>e spoil (pH = 5.1) after amendment with three forms of lignite: untreated<br />

lignite; and the <strong>in</strong>soluble and soluble extracts obta<strong>in</strong>ed after an oxidation treatment. The<br />

authors concluded that the lignite treatment may be a valuable reclamation tool, as it<br />

improved the survival of non-tolerant cultivars <strong>in</strong> a Cd-, Pb-, Zn-contam<strong>in</strong>ated m<strong>in</strong>e spoil.<br />

However, the composition of the lignite was not known with certa<strong>in</strong>ty. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong> our laboratory revealed that humic substances constitute most of the organic<br />

matter <strong>in</strong> leonardite, a coal m<strong>in</strong>e overburden material that is rich <strong>in</strong> carbon, but is usually<br />

discarded because it does not burn like coal. It was of <strong>in</strong>terest to <strong>in</strong>vestigate if the humic<br />

substances that can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed follow<strong>in</strong>g alkal<strong>in</strong>e chemical extraction of leonardite was of<br />

benefit <strong>in</strong> the reclamation of copper-contam<strong>in</strong>ated m<strong>in</strong>e spoils.<br />

The objectives of this study were to assess the copper distribution among six def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

fractions, and thereby approximate the lability and the bioavailability of copper, with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs; and, further, to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the potential of alkal<strong>in</strong>e humic substances from<br />

leonardite, lime, and wheat straw amendments to reduce the lability and bioavailability of<br />

copper after <strong>in</strong>cubation for 24 weeks.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Acid m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs were collected from the surface of the Central Manitoba M<strong>in</strong>e site. The<br />

tail<strong>in</strong>gs were then stored at room temperature <strong>in</strong> a covered, five-gallon plastic pail.<br />

The m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs have a sandy loam texture, with 48.5% sand, 47.2% silt, and 4.3%<br />

clay. Their organic matter content is very low (2.1 g kg -1 ), and total copper contents are<br />

extremely high (≥2000 mg kg -1 ) (Renault et al. 2000; Ibrahim and Goh 2004).<br />

The experiment was designed to compare the effects of different organic amendments<br />

on the distribution of copper <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs. Humic substances (HS), fresh wheat straw<br />

(WS), and lime (CaCO3) were mixed with the m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> four comb<strong>in</strong>ations. All<br />

experimental units were 200 g of m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs. For the HS treatment, 14 mL of liquid HS,<br />

(5.62% Organic Carbon), pH = 10.5, was added. The WS, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 65.5% carbon, was<br />

ground by hand and 2.29 g was added to the tail<strong>in</strong>gs. The amounts of HS and WS applied<br />

corresponded to 4.0 and 7.5 g C kg -1 tail<strong>in</strong>gs, respectively. The third treatment was the<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed addition of HS+WS, at the same rates. The lime was applied at a rate of 4 g CaCO3<br />

40


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

kg -1 tail<strong>in</strong>gs. Nitrogen (N) was added to all samples except the Control at the rate of 50 mg N<br />

kg -1 tail<strong>in</strong>gs. All samples were prepared <strong>in</strong> triplicate and placed <strong>in</strong> 500 mL plastic conta<strong>in</strong>ers<br />

with lids. The samples were <strong>in</strong>cubated at 20°C for 24 weeks and their moisture was<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 60% of the water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity throughout the <strong>in</strong>cubation period.<br />

Fractionation of Copper<br />

Total copper concentration of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs was determ<strong>in</strong>ed follow<strong>in</strong>g digestion of a sample<br />

with aqua regia. In addition, six fractions of copper (labeled F1 to F6) were extracted<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the procedure of Salbu et al. (1998). After each step, the supernatant was<br />

separated by high-speed centrifugation for 30 m<strong>in</strong> at 10,000 x g. The residue was washed<br />

with 10 mL of deionized water and the wash was comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the supernatant. All<br />

supernatants were refrigerated until analysis for copper content by graphite furnace atomic<br />

absorption spectrophotometry. The sequential extraction was conducted <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

manner:<br />

A two-gram subsample of tail<strong>in</strong>gs and 20 mL of deionized water were comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a<br />

50 mL polycarbonate centrifuge tube and shaken for 1 hour at 20°C. The supernatant<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the water-soluble copper, denoted Fraction 1 (F1), was collected and stored.<br />

The F1 residue (i.e. the soil follow<strong>in</strong>g F1 extraction) was extracted for 2 hours with 20 mL of<br />

1 mol L -1 ammonium acetate, pH 7 to obta<strong>in</strong> the exchangeable copper (F2) from the m<strong>in</strong>e<br />

tail<strong>in</strong>gs. To obta<strong>in</strong> Fraction 3 (F3), the F2 residue was extracted for 2 hours on a shaker with<br />

20 mL of 1 mol L -1 ammonium acetate, pH 5. Fraction 4 (F4), the metal-associated (or<br />

specifically-sorbed) copper, was collected by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the F3 residue with 20 mL of 0.04<br />

mol L -1 NH2OH-HCl solution for 6 h <strong>in</strong> a 60°C water bath. To collect Fraction 5 (F5), the<br />

organically complexed copper, the F4 residue was extracted for 5.5 h <strong>in</strong> an 80°C water bath<br />

with 15 mL of 30% H2O2, pH 2. After cool<strong>in</strong>g, 5 mL of 3.2 mol L -1 ammonium acetate was<br />

added and the sample was shaken for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes. The solution was brought up to 20 mL with<br />

deionized water. F<strong>in</strong>ally, all of the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g copper <strong>in</strong> the sample was extracted <strong>in</strong>to<br />

Fraction 6 (F6). The residue from F5 was allowed to dry for a few m<strong>in</strong>utes. One gram of the<br />

residue was placed <strong>in</strong>to an Erlenmeyer flask and digested with 10 mL of 7 mol L -1 HNO3 on a<br />

hotplate for 6 hours. After dissolution with 1 mL of 2 mol L -1 HNO3, the contents were made<br />

up to 10 mL.<br />

Analysis for Copper Concentration<br />

The copper concentration of all extracts was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by graphite furnace atomic<br />

absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Standard copper solutions were prepared <strong>in</strong> each of the<br />

matrices utilized <strong>in</strong> the sequential extraction procedure.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

The experiment was carried out as completely randomized design (CRD). The copper<br />

fractions (F1-F6), and total copper (by sum of fractions, and by digestion), were randomized<br />

among the treatments (Control, HS, HS+WS, WS, and Lime). Analysis of variance<br />

(ANOVA) was performed us<strong>in</strong>g Statistical Analysis Software (SAS Institute 2000).<br />

41


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Effect of Amendments on pH of the Tail<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The pH measurements (1:1; soil:water) of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs after the <strong>in</strong>cubation period of 24 weeks<br />

are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The pH of the control tail<strong>in</strong>gs was 3.32. As expected, lime was the most<br />

effective treatment, rais<strong>in</strong>g the pH to 5.59. The HS alone augmented the tail<strong>in</strong>gs’ pH to 4.5,<br />

whereas the WS alone <strong>in</strong>creased the pH by a slight 0.6 units compared to the control. In<br />

comparison, the comb<strong>in</strong>ed HS+WS treatment raised the pH to 5.02. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

HS+WS caused a 50-fold reduction <strong>in</strong> the acidity (i.e. 1.7 pH units), compared to the control.<br />

Despite the fact that all four treatments were able to <strong>in</strong>crease the pH of the m<strong>in</strong>e<br />

tail<strong>in</strong>gs above the <strong>in</strong>itial value of 3.32, the pH still rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the acidic range. This means<br />

that follow<strong>in</strong>g the application of the amendments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g HS at the rate used <strong>in</strong> this<br />

experiment, site rehabilitation by revegetation may still not be possible s<strong>in</strong>ce the availability<br />

of heavy metals is expected to be high <strong>in</strong> acidic environments. Some plants may be able to<br />

tolerate the slightly acidic pH <strong>in</strong> the lime- and HS+WS- amended tail<strong>in</strong>gs, but further<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation will be necessary to identify these plant species.<br />

Effects of Amendments on the Distribution of Copper<br />

The total copper measured by fractionation <strong>in</strong> the control tail<strong>in</strong>gs was 1816 mg kg -1 (Table 1).<br />

Of this total, 31% or 564 mg kg -1 of Cu was found <strong>in</strong> F1, the water-soluble fraction. This is<br />

an extremely high amount, and is expected to be very toxic to organisms. The organicallycomplexed<br />

fraction (F5) conta<strong>in</strong>s the largest portion of copper <strong>in</strong> the untreated tail<strong>in</strong>gs (34%)<br />

(Table 1 and Fig. 1).<br />

The total copper extracted from the tail<strong>in</strong>gs treated with alkal<strong>in</strong>e HS was 1824 mg kg -1<br />

This was very similar to the amount of total copper obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the control. The watersoluble<br />

copper was drastically reduced from 564 to 72 mg kg -1 (Table 1). The copper was<br />

redistributed <strong>in</strong>to the other fractions, i.e. F2 to F6. The largest <strong>in</strong>crease was observed <strong>in</strong> F5,<br />

which rose to 872 mg kg -1 compared to 618 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> the control, although this difference is<br />

not significant. However, the observed <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> the copper content of the F2 and F3<br />

fractions were significant compared to the control. Furthermore, if fractions F1 (watersoluble)<br />

and F2 (exchangeable) are <strong>in</strong>dicative of the most available fractions of Cu, it is<br />

observed that the HS treatment may greatly reduce the availability of Cu to plants. The size<br />

of the residual copper pool (F6) <strong>in</strong> the HS treated tail<strong>in</strong>gs was the largest of all amendments,<br />

at 23%.<br />

The fractionation procedure extracted almost 2300 mg kg -1 of total copper from the<br />

tail<strong>in</strong>gs treated with HS+WS. The soluble, toxic form of copper was reduced to 1% of the<br />

total copper extracted, or 30 mg kg -1 (Table 1 and Fig. 1). The organically bound copper<br />

comprised 52% of the distribution, and was significantly higher than the F5 of all other<br />

treatments. A total of 11.5 g C was added per kg tail<strong>in</strong>gs, which is the highest of all the<br />

treatments. Because organic matter provides surface sites for adsorption and complexation of<br />

copper, it is expected that <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g additions of carbon residues will correspond<strong>in</strong>gly raise<br />

the copper <strong>in</strong> F5. The HS+WS amendment was very effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g the toxic forms of<br />

copper, while redistribut<strong>in</strong>g the copper to fractions where it is strongly held (F4, F5, F6) and<br />

thus considered to be less bioavailable.<br />

When applied alone, the WS did not reduce the free copper as much as the<br />

amendments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the alkal<strong>in</strong>e HS. The water-soluble copper was reduced from 30% <strong>in</strong><br />

the control, to 15% <strong>in</strong> the WS-treated tail<strong>in</strong>gs (Fig. 1). However, the 305 mg kg -1 of free<br />

copper (Table 1) was still extremely high, and poses a toxicity hazard to organisms. It is<br />

42


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

possible that the low pH of the WS-amended tail<strong>in</strong>gs may have limited microbial activity and<br />

the ability of WS carbon to play a role <strong>in</strong> immobiliz<strong>in</strong>g copper. In contrast, when WS was<br />

added <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with HS, the water-soluble copper was reduced to 30 mg kg -1 . The<br />

slightly higher pH observed <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs that received the HS+WS treatment may have<br />

contributed to the reduction <strong>in</strong> F1, compared to the control. The pH of 5.02 was probably<br />

more favourable for the carbon of the WS to be used by microbes, and thus through<br />

decomposition, the WS may have contributed some active surface sites to which Cu could be<br />

adsorbed or chelated.<br />

A total of 1989 mg kg -1 of copper was extracted from the tail<strong>in</strong>gs treated with Lime.<br />

The water-soluble copper was negligible, at only 7 mg kg -1 . This is a reduction of 80 times<br />

compared to the control. The copper was redistributed to all other fractions, with greatest<br />

ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> F4 and F6. The lime treated tail<strong>in</strong>gs had the largest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> F4 of all the<br />

treatments, at 22% of the total distribution, compared to 11% <strong>in</strong> the control. This provides<br />

evidence that the F4 fraction obta<strong>in</strong>ed by this fractionation scheme extracts some carbonate<br />

bound copper, <strong>in</strong> addition to metal-oxide bound copper.<br />

In this study, an amendment was considered effective based on several observations.<br />

Firstly, if it elevated the pH of the tail<strong>in</strong>gs, then the lability of copper would be reduced (Sims<br />

1986; Alva et al. 2000). The water-soluble copper is the most toxic form, followed by the<br />

adsorbed and exchangeable forms. Thus, if an amendment reduced the copper <strong>in</strong> these<br />

fractions, it was considered beneficial <strong>in</strong> decreas<strong>in</strong>g the potential for mobility and toxicity. A<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease of copper <strong>in</strong> fractions where it is tightly bound or unavailable (i.e. F4,<br />

F5, and F6), was also considered a benefit. There is some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty as to whether the<br />

carbonate-bound fraction (F3) is labile and available. This would depend on the pH, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

Cu sorbed by carbonates may have a transient existence <strong>in</strong> carbonate m<strong>in</strong>erals. In an acidic<br />

environment the Cu may be released upon dissolution of the carbonate. Thus, fraction F3<br />

represents a potentially mobile and available pool among the total copper.<br />

The treatments HS, HS+WS, and Lime, all drastically reduced the F1 fraction of<br />

copper <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs (Table 1). The amount of water-soluble copper <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs amended<br />

with Lime plunged to a nearly negligible amount of 7 mg kg -1 . The treatments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

modified leonardite (HS and HS+WS) were both highly effective compared to the control,<br />

with HS+WS outperform<strong>in</strong>g HS alone (30 and 72 mg kg -1 , respectively).<br />

The amount of free copper <strong>in</strong> soil solution is very important because this form is<br />

readily absorbed by plant roots. In soil solutions with pH < 6.0, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant species of<br />

copper is the divalent cation, Cu 2+ (Harter 1991). As the pH <strong>in</strong>creases, two hydrolysis<br />

reactions occur fairly quickly.<br />

Cu 2+ + H2O � Cu(OH) + + H + log K = -7.70 [1]<br />

Cu(OH) + + H2O � Cu(OH)2 + H + log K = -6.08 [2]<br />

If an amendment was able to <strong>in</strong>crease the pH, the more unavailable chemical forms of copper<br />

such as Cu(OH) + , Cu(OH)2, and even CuO would be formed.<br />

The results show that all treatments caused some of the water-soluble copper to be<br />

redistributed from F1 to F2. However, the copper <strong>in</strong> F2 is still relatively labile, and still poses<br />

a toxicity threat because it may be released <strong>in</strong>to solution via cation exchange, or may be<br />

subject to plant uptake. In a practical sense, it must also be noted that the quantities of copper<br />

held <strong>in</strong> the exchangeable fraction are very small when compared to the total copper <strong>in</strong> the<br />

tail<strong>in</strong>gs. For the Control and WS treatments, where F1 is very large, exchangeable copper<br />

contributes very little to the potentially toxic copper <strong>in</strong> the tail<strong>in</strong>gs. But, for treatments with<br />

small amounts of Cu <strong>in</strong> F1, namely HS, HS+WS, and Lime, F2 values are approximately<br />

43


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

equal to the amount of water- soluble copper, and thus they contribute more to potential<br />

toxicity or bioavailability.<br />

All treatments significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the amount of copper <strong>in</strong> the carbonate-associated<br />

fraction, F3 (Table 1). Despite the statistical differences between treatments, the relative size<br />

of the F3 fraction only varied from 8.7 to 9.9% <strong>in</strong> all of the amended tail<strong>in</strong>gs (Fig. 1). There<br />

is some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty concern<strong>in</strong>g the classification of F3 as carbonate-bound Cu (Shuman<br />

1991). We doubt that <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>stance, that F3 represents carbonate bound Cu, s<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

acid pH conditions of the m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs, free calcium carbonate was non-existent.<br />

Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the organically-complexed fraction, F5, reveals several <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

observations. This was the largest pool of copper <strong>in</strong> all treatments, compris<strong>in</strong>g 34 to 52% of<br />

the total copper (Fig. 1). The amount of organically-complexed copper ranged from 618 to<br />

1185 mg kg -1 across all treatments, and the differences were found to be statistically<br />

significant at p < 0.10 (Table 1). As anticipated, the treatment that added the most organic<br />

material to the tail<strong>in</strong>gs, HS+WS, was the most successful at rais<strong>in</strong>g the copper <strong>in</strong> F5.<br />

Copper ions <strong>in</strong> soil solution are often complexed with various <strong>in</strong>organic or organic<br />

ligands. Complexation with organic acids or low molecular weight organic matter may<br />

solubilize copper and render it available for plant uptake or leach<strong>in</strong>g (van der Watt 1991 et al.;<br />

Merritt and Erich 2003). On the other hand, complexation followed by precipitation with<br />

complex humic substances may immobilize the copper (Stevenson 1982).<br />

Effect of Amendments on Potential Lability and Plant Availability of Copper<br />

The water-soluble and exchangeable forms of metals <strong>in</strong> soils are considered to be plantavailable<br />

(Shuman 1991; Alva et al. 2000). The free copper cation or its complexed species<br />

may be adsorbed to the negatively charged colloids with<strong>in</strong> the soil. Attraction due to<br />

electrostatic forces is referred to as non-specific or outer-sphere adsorption. This copper is<br />

exchangeable us<strong>in</strong>g salt solutions because of its relatively weak adsorption onto non-specific<br />

exchange sites (Shuman, 1991). The F3 fraction, considered to be carbonate-bound, is<br />

sometimes <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this estimate, as metals <strong>in</strong> this fraction can become available under<br />

altered environmental conditions (Kabala and S<strong>in</strong>gh 2001). Alternately, copper may form<br />

covalent bonds with an OH - ligand on a soil colloid, such as Fe, Mn, or Al oxides. If the<br />

copper forms two covalent bonds with the exchanger, the copper is strongly reta<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

soil. This is termed specific adsorption. In this case, the copper is not salt-exchangeable.<br />

The Lability Factor (LF) was employed as an aid <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g the plant-availability of<br />

copper <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs. It is a relative <strong>in</strong>dex to compare metal lability among treatments.<br />

When F1+F2 are the only fractions considered to be labile at the time of fractionation, the<br />

control tail<strong>in</strong>gs have the highest lability, with an LF of 32% (Table 2). The Lability Factors<br />

for the HS and HS+WS treatments are 6.3 and 4%, respectively. The Lime treatment was<br />

more effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g the F1 and F2 fractions of copper, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a low LF of 2.4%.<br />

If fraction F3 is also considered labile, then 37% of the relative distribution of copper<br />

<strong>in</strong> the control tail<strong>in</strong>gs is potentially toxic. Regardless, the result<strong>in</strong>g lability factors, Lability<br />

Factor 2, present the same pattern as described for Lability Factor 1 (Table 2). Hence, the<br />

treatments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the alkal<strong>in</strong>e organic amendment (HS and HS+WS) decreased the<br />

copper LF to less than half of its orig<strong>in</strong>al value, and the Lime is slightly more effective than<br />

the HS+WS.<br />

Caution must be taken when us<strong>in</strong>g a Lability Factor to <strong>in</strong>terpret the potential<br />

movement or availability of metals <strong>in</strong> soil. It is useful as a discussion tool, but the mobility of<br />

copper <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual fractions is only assumed, and not measured. Moreover, the values are <strong>in</strong><br />

percentage of the total Cu and not <strong>in</strong> actual concentration <strong>in</strong> the soil. The copper extracted<br />

44


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

<strong>in</strong>to each fraction, and its lability, will depend upon the <strong>in</strong>dividual soil and the metal<br />

fractionation procedure employed.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The study confirmed that the tail<strong>in</strong>gs from the Central Manitoba M<strong>in</strong>e site are highly<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated with copper, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g approximately 2300 mg Cu kg -1 . The control tail<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ed 564 mg kg -1 of water-soluble copper, which is readily labile and toxic.<br />

Approximately one-third of the total copper <strong>in</strong> the acid tail<strong>in</strong>gs is considered potentially toxic.<br />

All amendments altered the distribution of copper. The Lime was the most effective at<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g pH, and decreas<strong>in</strong>g soluble copper.<br />

The two treatments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g alkal<strong>in</strong>e, humic substances extracted from leonardite were also<br />

effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g water-soluble copper. The addition of WS with the HS further reduced<br />

the water-soluble fraction. The treatment HS+WS also had the highest amount of copper <strong>in</strong><br />

the organically-complexed fraction.<br />

In conclusion, the alkal<strong>in</strong>e humic substances extract used <strong>in</strong> this research may be a<br />

valuable addition to a reclamation strategy for acid, copper-contam<strong>in</strong>ated m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This study was supported by a research grant from LUSCAR Ltd. to TBG and the James<br />

Gordon Fletcher Graduate Fellowship <strong>in</strong> Agricultural and Food Sciences to KAS.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Aiken, G.R. 1985. Isolation and concentration techniques for aquatic humic substances. Pages 363-385. <strong>in</strong><br />

Aiken, G.R., McKnight, D.M., Wershaw, R.I. and MacCarthy, P. (Eds). Humus Substances <strong>in</strong> Soil, Sediment<br />

and Water: Geochemistry, Isolation and Characterization. John Wiley, <strong>New</strong> York..<br />

[2] Alva A.K., Huang, B. and Paramasivam, S. 2000. Soil pH affects copper fractionation and phytotoxicity.<br />

Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:955-962.<br />

[3] Amacher, M.C., Brown, R.W., Sidle, R.C. and Kotuby-Amacher, J. 1995. Effect of m<strong>in</strong>e waste on element<br />

speciation <strong>in</strong> headwater streams. In: Allen, H., Huang, C.P., Bailey, G.W. and Bowers, A.R. (Eds.). Metal<br />

Speciation and Contam<strong>in</strong>ation of Soil. Lewis Pub. Boca Raton.<br />

[4] Aubert, H. and P<strong>in</strong>ta, M. 1977. Trace Elements <strong>in</strong> Soils. Elsevier, Amsterdam.<br />

[5] Barnhisel, R.I., Powell, J.L., Ak<strong>in</strong>, G.W. and Ebelhar, M.W. 1982. Characteristics and reclamation of “acid<br />

sulfate” m<strong>in</strong>e spoils. Pages 225-232. <strong>in</strong> J.A. Kittrick et al. (Eds.) Acid Sulfate Seather<strong>in</strong>g. SSSA Spec. Publ. 10.<br />

SSSA, Madison, WI.<br />

[6] Dixon, J.B., Hossner, L.R., Senkayi, A.L. and Egashira, K. 1982. M<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of lignite<br />

overburden as they relate to m<strong>in</strong>e spoil reclamation. Pages 169-191. <strong>in</strong> J.A. Kittrick et al. (Eds.). Acid Sulfate<br />

Weather<strong>in</strong>g. SSSA Spec. Publ. 10. SSSA, Madison, WI.<br />

[7] Ibrahim, S.M. and Goh, T.B. 2004. Changes <strong>in</strong> macroaggregation and associated characteristics <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>e<br />

tail<strong>in</strong>gs amended with humic substances. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 35:1905-1922.<br />

[8] Kabala, C. and S<strong>in</strong>gh, B.R. 2001. Fractionation and mobility of copper, lead, and z<strong>in</strong>c <strong>in</strong> soil profiles <strong>in</strong> the<br />

vic<strong>in</strong>ity of a copper smelter. J. Environ. Qual. 30:485-492.<br />

[9] Merritt, K.A. and Erich, M.S. 2003. Influence of organic matter decomposition on soluble carbon and its<br />

copper-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g capacity. J. Environ. Qual. 32:2122-2131.<br />

[10] Renault, S., Sailerova, E., and Fedikow, M.A.F. 2000. Phytoremediation and phytom<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Manitoba:<br />

prelim<strong>in</strong>ary observations from an orientation survey at the Central Manitoba (Au) M<strong>in</strong>esite (NTS 52L13); <strong>in</strong><br />

Report of Activities 2000, Manitoba Industry, Trade and M<strong>in</strong>es, Manitoba Geological Survey, p. 179-188.<br />

[11] Salbu, B., Krekl<strong>in</strong>g T. and Oughton, D.H. 1998. Characterisation of radioactive particles <strong>in</strong> the environment.<br />

Analyst. 123:843-849.<br />

45


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

[12] SAS Institute. 2000. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., U.S.A.<br />

[13] Shuman, L.M. 1985. Fractionation method for soil microelements. Soil Science. 140:11-22.<br />

[14] Shuman, L.M. 1991. Chemical forms of micronutrients <strong>in</strong> soils. Pages 113-144. <strong>in</strong> J.J. Mortvedt et al. (Eds.)<br />

Micronutrients <strong>in</strong> Agriculture. 2 nd ed. SSSA. Madison, WI, U.S.A.<br />

[15] Sims, J.T. 1986. Soil pH effects on the distribution and plant availability of manganese, copper and z<strong>in</strong>c.<br />

Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:367-373.<br />

[16] van der Watt, H.v.H., Barnard, R.O., Cronje, I.J., Dekker, J., Croft, G.J.B. and van der Walt, M.M. 1991.<br />

Amelioration of subsoil acidity by application of a coal-derived calcium fulvate to the soil surface. Nature.<br />

350:146-148.<br />

[17] Whiteley, G.M. and Williams, S. 1993. Effects of treatment of metalliferous m<strong>in</strong>e spoil with lignite derived<br />

humic substances on the growth responses of metal tolerant and non metal tolerant cultivars of Agrostis<br />

capillaris L. Soil Technol. 6:163-171.<br />

46


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Treatment z<br />

pH<br />

Control 3.32 564 ± 151 a 16 ± 2.6 c 90 ± 1.1 d 207 ± 13 d 618 ± 199 c 321 ± 73<br />

HS 4.5 72 ± 36 c 44 ± 6.8 b 171 ± 15 c 237 ± 21 cd 872 ± 240 bc 428 ± 38<br />

HS+WS y<br />

Copper <strong>in</strong> each fraction (mg kg<br />

5.02 30 ± 0.8 c 63 ± 8.7 a 217 ± 31 a 334 ± 12 b 1185 ± 30 a 446 ± 11<br />

WS 3.95 305 ± 6.3 b 45 ± 1.9 b 174 ± 3.9 bc 273 ± 6 cd 863 ± 102 bc 341 ± 62<br />

Lime 5.59 7 ± 0.9 c 40 ± 3.8 b 197 ± 1.3 ab 430 ± 33 a 909 ± 179 ab 405 ± 68<br />

-1 )<br />

F 1 F 2<br />

F 3<br />

F 4<br />

F 5 F 6<br />

ANOVA df Pr > F<br />

Trt 4 < .0001** < .0001** < .0001** < .0001** 0.0701* 0.1300<br />

a-d Mean values followed by the same letter (with<strong>in</strong> columns) are not significantly different.<br />

z<br />

Treatments: Control, HS = Humic Substances, WS = Wheat Straw, Lime = CaCO3.<br />

y<br />

For HS+WS, all Cu fractions are means of 2 replications.<br />

* significant at p < 0.10<br />

** significant at p < 0.05<br />

Table 1. pH of tail<strong>in</strong>gs and mean copper content <strong>in</strong> each fraction<br />

47


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Treatment Lability Factor 1 z<br />

Control<br />

HS<br />

HS+WS<br />

WS<br />

Lime<br />

31.92<br />

6.33<br />

4.09<br />

17.50<br />

2.39<br />

48<br />

Lability Factor 2 y<br />

36.88<br />

15.72<br />

13.62<br />

26.21<br />

12.31<br />

z Lability Factor 1 = [(F1 + F2) / (Total Cu by Sum)] x 100<br />

y<br />

Lability Factor 2 = [(F1 + F2 + F3) / (Total Cu by Sum)] x<br />

100<br />

Copper content<br />

(% of Total by Σ F1-F6)<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Table 2. Copper Lability Factors for each treatment<br />

Control HS HS+WS WS Lime<br />

Treatment<br />

Figure 1. Relative distribution of copper among fractions after 24 weeks.<br />

F 6<br />

F 5<br />

F 4<br />

F 3<br />

F 2<br />

F 1


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF TRADE VILLAGE WASTE ON<br />

ACCUMULATION OF CU, PB, ZN AND CD IN<br />

AGRICULTURAL SOILS OF PHUNG XA VILLAGE, THACH<br />

THANH DISTRICT, HA TAY PROVINCE<br />

Nguyen Huu Thanh 1 , Tran Thi Le Ha 1 * , Nguyen Duc Hung 1 , Tran Duc Hai 2<br />

1 Hanoi Agricultural University, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2 Postgraduate student, Hanoi Agricultural University,<br />

Hanoi, Vietnam<br />

Abstract<br />

Waste materials from V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade village affected greatly the accumulation of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd <strong>in</strong><br />

agricultural soil. Seventeen soil samples were taken for analysis. Soil was polluted locally with Zn and Cd.<br />

The Zn concentrations <strong>in</strong> 2 samples exceeded the standard and were <strong>in</strong> a polluted level. The Cd<br />

concentration of one sample exceeded the standard by 22% with regard<strong>in</strong>g the soil as polluted. Among 17<br />

soil samples, the percentage of samples contam<strong>in</strong>ated with different heavy metals was 100% for Cu, 59%<br />

for Pb, 35% for Cd, and 24% for Zn.<br />

Over 80% of Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> soil was extractable by salt solution or diluted acid. This <strong>in</strong>dicates a great<br />

potential of the soil to cause Pb and Cd toxicity to environment <strong>in</strong> this village. Fe and Mn oxides had the<br />

stronger aff<strong>in</strong>ity to heavy metals than did organic matter and carbonates. The exchangeable form of heavy<br />

metals was <strong>in</strong> the low proportion <strong>in</strong> soil.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Metal recycle trade village (metal ware-mechanical trade village) is one of the typical<br />

features of rural Vietnam <strong>in</strong> general and particularly <strong>in</strong> Ha Tay. These trade villages have<br />

participated greatly <strong>in</strong> the multi-component economy <strong>in</strong> the doi-moi period [3, 4].<br />

Like other trade villages, metal ware-mechanical trade villages are typical with<br />

unprompted development of trade villages without plann<strong>in</strong>g, the low technical level with<br />

simple works and rely<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly on experience, and lack of basic tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Small scale and scattered production all over the area constitute numerous small<br />

waste sources. It is difficult to gather the waste material and to treat it <strong>in</strong> a central facility.<br />

Evaluation the effects of metal ware-mechanical trade villages on the accumulation of<br />

heavy metals <strong>in</strong> agricultural land is to guarantee the susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture.<br />

2.1. Location and sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Phung Xa commune is situated <strong>in</strong> Red River delta (Figure 1) with the area of agricultural<br />

land is 307.1 ha. Residential area and trade village are <strong>in</strong>termixed.<br />

49


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

W<br />

N<br />

S<br />

#<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g diagram<br />

E<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

# #<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

# #<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

# #<br />

#<br />

#<br />

# #<br />

# #<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

# #<br />

#<br />

# #<br />

# #<br />

#<br />

# #<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

#<br />

# household.shp<br />

road.shp<br />

# sampl<strong>in</strong>g_site.shp<br />

commune.shp<br />

aquaculture<br />

cemetry<br />

contruction area<br />

irrigation land<br />

pasture<br />

resident area<br />

rice field<br />

unused water<br />

Figure 1. Sampl<strong>in</strong>g diagram<br />

Seventeen soil samples (Table 1) were sampled at the surface horizon with a depth from<br />

0 to 15 cm and were <strong>in</strong>dicated on the sampl<strong>in</strong>g diagram <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. The nearer to waste<br />

sources, the more densely samples were taken..<br />

Sample<br />

1<br />

2<br />

Location<br />

Dong<br />

Man<br />

Dong<br />

Sau<br />

Distance<br />

to<br />

sources<br />

(m)<br />

Altitude Vegetation<br />

1500 Medium Rice 9<br />

500 Medium Rice 10<br />

3 Ben Hiep 500 High Rice 11<br />

4 Ben Hiep 300 Low Rice 12<br />

5 Cua Lo 100 Medium Rice<br />

6 Ben Hiep 250 Medium Rice<br />

7<br />

8<br />

Dong<br />

Nuong<br />

Dong<br />

Sau<br />

200 Medium Rice<br />

750 Medium Rice<br />

Sample<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

50<br />

Location<br />

Dong<br />

Khoai<br />

Dong<br />

Mo<br />

Dong<br />

Lac<br />

Dong<br />

Lac<br />

Dong<br />

Mo<br />

Cong<br />

D<strong>in</strong>h<br />

Cong<br />

D<strong>in</strong>h<br />

Cong<br />

D<strong>in</strong>h<br />

Cong<br />

D<strong>in</strong>h<br />

Table 1. Ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation on soil samples<br />

Distance<br />

to<br />

sources<br />

(m)<br />

Altitude Vegetation<br />

1250 Medium Rice<br />

1000 Medium Rice<br />

300 Medium Rice<br />

100 Medium Rice<br />

50 Medium Rice<br />

50 Medium Rice<br />

50 Medium Coriander<br />

50 Medium Rice<br />

150 Low<br />

Rice


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

One waste water sample and one domestic waste water sample was taken <strong>in</strong> the trade<br />

village at a distance of 10 m from waste sources to determ<strong>in</strong>e their properties.<br />

2.2. Analytical procedures<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g procedures were used for analyses.<br />

Total Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd were determ<strong>in</strong>ed after digestion the samples by HF,<br />

HNO3, and HClO4 [6].<br />

Fractionation of heavy metals was done by sequential extraction with follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

solutions [5]: 1M MgCl2 (pH=7), 1M CH3COONa (pH=5), 0.3M Na2S2O4 , 0.175M<br />

sodium citrate, 0.025M citric acid, and mixture of 0.02M HNO3, 30%H2O2, 3.2M<br />

CH3COONH4 <strong>in</strong> 30%HNO3.<br />

Concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd <strong>in</strong> the digested solution or extracted solution<br />

were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer ANA182. Cu, Zn, Pb, and<br />

Cd was determ<strong>in</strong>ation at the wave length of 324.8nm; 307.6nm; 283.3nm; 228.8nm<br />

respectively.<br />

3.1. Soil properties<br />

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSION<br />

Soil texture ranged from loamy sand to clay (Table 2). The clay percentage of the surface<br />

horizon was mostly greater than 16%. It related to soil properties, fertility, and heavy<br />

metal absorption ability of soil.<br />

Almost all samples had a pH higher than 5.6 (medium and light acid). The pH<br />

values are <strong>in</strong> harmony with Eutric Fluvisols of the Red River delta with long duration of<br />

cultivation, together with tropical environment. Furthermore, trade village activities<br />

might cause a more or less strong change of pH.<br />

Soil was quite rich <strong>in</strong> organic matter. The total organic carbon concentration (OC)<br />

was <strong>in</strong> a range between 1.47% and 3.15%. Some samples with low altitude or near<br />

residential area had OC greater than 2%.<br />

Cation exchange capacity (CEC) varied from 10.2 to 15.4 cmol+/kg soil and was<br />

<strong>in</strong> the average to high level. In the study of the relationship of pH, OC, and clay content<br />

with CEC, as shown later, a correlation coefficient between CEC and OC was 0.66. The<br />

high OC and CEC are closely related to the existence of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> soils.<br />

51


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Sample<br />

Texture<br />

(FAO-<br />

UNESCO)<br />

pH<br />

OC<br />

(%)<br />

CEC<br />

(meq/100g<br />

soil)<br />

Sample<br />

52<br />

Texture<br />

(FAO-<br />

UNESCO)<br />

pH<br />

OC<br />

(%)<br />

CEC<br />

(meq/100g<br />

soil)<br />

1 Sandy clay 6.18 1.77 10.56 9 Loam 5.32 1.47 10.55<br />

2 Sandy clay 5.78 1.73 11.65 10 Sandy loam 6.08 1.98 10.95<br />

3 Sandy clay 5.21 1.95 10.98 11 Clay loam 6.96 2.91 14.37<br />

4 Sandy clay 6.12 2.80 12.78 12 Sandy clay 5.97 3.15 13.20<br />

5 Sandy clay 6.49 2.03 14.33 13 Sandy loam 4.76 2.52 11.12<br />

6 Clay loam 5.66 1.99 10.16 14 Clay loam 6.31 3.09 15.38<br />

7 Sandy clay 5.97 2.58 12.13 15 Clay loam 6.69 2.25 12.61<br />

8<br />

Loamy<br />

d<br />

6.31 1.73 12.97 16 Clay 4.91 2.73 13.39<br />

17 Clay 5.41 2.56 13.08<br />

Table 2. Some physical and chemical characteristics of soils<br />

3.2. Possible factors <strong>in</strong> the trade village affect<strong>in</strong>g the heavy metal concentration of<br />

soil<br />

3.2.1. Exhausted fumes<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the research of M<strong>in</strong>istry of National Defense <strong>in</strong> 2002, the hang<strong>in</strong>g dust<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong> air ranged from 0.26 to 0.31 mg.m -3 while Vietnam standard TCVN<br />

5937-1995 is 0.3 mg.m -3 . The Pb was detectable <strong>in</strong> air. The SO2 concentration ranged<br />

from 0.01 to 0.61 mg m -3 (Vietnam standard TCVN 5937-1995 is 0.3 mg m -3 ) and the<br />

NOx concentration was <strong>in</strong> a range between 0.004 and 2.12 mg m -3 (Vietnam standard<br />

TCVN 5937-1995 is 0.1 mg m -3 ) [2]. Therefore, the exhausted fumes of V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade<br />

village were regarded hav<strong>in</strong>g no affect to the heavy metal accumulation <strong>in</strong> soil.<br />

3.2.2. Waste water<br />

Waste water from roll<strong>in</strong>g and plat<strong>in</strong>g steel comes to the dra<strong>in</strong>age system. One waste<br />

water sample collected at a site 10 m distant from the dra<strong>in</strong>age system was analyzed.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Item Unit Value<br />

Permissible levels <strong>in</strong> TCVN 5949-1995<br />

A B C<br />

pH 4.2 6 – 9 5.5 - 9 5 – 9<br />

Suspended solids mg/l 725 50 100 200<br />

Cu mg/l 0.178 0.2 1 5<br />

Zn mg/l 7.92 1 2 5<br />

Pb mg/l 0.65 1 2 2<br />

Cd mg/l 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.5<br />

Table 3. Some properties of waste water collected at trade village <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa<br />

Note: Waste water hav<strong>in</strong>g values and concentrations:<br />

o value <strong>in</strong> column A can be discharged to domestic waterways,<br />

o value <strong>in</strong> column B can only be discharged to waterways used for hydro-traffic, aquaculture,<br />

and cultivation.<br />

o ranged from value <strong>in</strong> column B to value <strong>in</strong> column C can only be discharged to def<strong>in</strong>ed places.<br />

o value column C can not be discharged to any environment.<br />

Table 3 showed that the concentrations of Cu, Pb and Cd were lower than or equal to the<br />

permissible level of waste water used for aquaculture and cultivation. However, other<br />

items of pH, suspended solids and Zn concentration were higher than the permissible<br />

level. From the criteria of pH and suspended solids, the waste water was not allowed to<br />

be discharged without treatment. Discharge of such waste water to environment without<br />

treatment affects soil quality badly.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the field observations, waste water was discharged one part to<br />

surround<strong>in</strong>g ponds, lakes and one part directly to agricultural land near the trade village.<br />

Because ponds and lake around V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade village are not connected with irrigation<br />

channels of the commune, the pollution of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> V<strong>in</strong>h village is difficult to take<br />

place <strong>in</strong> samples 1, 2, 8-11. Heavy metal pollution can only occur <strong>in</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g samples<br />

as 3-7, 12, 14-17.<br />

Table 5 showed that the concentrations of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> the above samples<br />

were considerably higher than those of other samples. This proves that waste materials<br />

from trade village raises heavy metal concentrations <strong>in</strong> the soil. The concentrations of Cu,<br />

Pb, Zn and Pb were highest <strong>in</strong> sample 17. Because this sample site is <strong>in</strong> a depression with<br />

stagnant water com<strong>in</strong>g from the village, heavy metals might have accumulated. Similarly,<br />

sample 4 had higher concentrations of heavy metals and was at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level.<br />

This is due to its low altitude compared to samples 3 and 6.<br />

3.2.3. Others<br />

Domestic waste rubbish is collected to a designated place and doesn’t considerably affect<br />

the accumulation of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> soil.<br />

Domestic waste water is discarded directly to dra<strong>in</strong>age channels. The results of<br />

the domestic waste water analysis are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4. Table 4 showed that the<br />

concentrations of Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> the domestic waste water did not exceed the<br />

permissible level of the Vietnam standard. Therefore, the accumulation of Zn, Cu, Pb and<br />

Cd <strong>in</strong> agricultural land is not affected by the domestic waste water more than by the<br />

53


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

waste water from the trade village. However, suspension solid and the NH4 + -N<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong> the waste water were very high and even exceeded the standard C level,<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the domestic waste water is not allowed to be discarded to the<br />

environment.<br />

Item Unit Value<br />

Permissible levels <strong>in</strong> TCVN 5949-1995<br />

A B C<br />

pH 6.98 6 - 9 5.5 - 9 5 – 9<br />

Suspension solid mg/l 409 20 50 100<br />

Cu mg/l 0.01 0.2 1 5<br />

Zn mg/l 0.087 1 2 5<br />

Pb mg/l 0.33 1 2 2<br />

Cd mg/l 0.008 0.01 0.02 0.5<br />

NH4 + -N mg/l 15.36 0.1 1 10<br />

Table 4. Some characteristics of domestic waste water<br />

Furthermore, the accumulation of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> soil can be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by irrigation<br />

water, fertilizer, and agricultural chemicals. Irrigation water of Phung Xa is taken from the<br />

Red River and the Dong Mo River and it can be considered that it does not affect seriously<br />

the heavy metal accumulation <strong>in</strong> soil. As mentioned above, the ma<strong>in</strong> crop <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa is<br />

paddy rice. This crop is planted over 96% of the total area for annual crops. This <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />

that the difference <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence of fertilizers and agricultural chemicals between samples<br />

is not great.<br />

3.3. Total concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd <strong>in</strong> soil<br />

Most of soil samples were found to have total concentrations of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd below<br />

the permissible level <strong>in</strong> Vietnam standard TCVN 7209-2002.<br />

The analytical results of heavy metal <strong>in</strong> agricultural soils are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 5.<br />

Sample Cu Pb Zn Cd Sample Cu Pb Zn Cd<br />

1 39.68* 10 39.33*<br />

2 43.61* 60.04* 11 43.38* 51.52* 1.45*<br />

3 42.14* 12 47.79* 53.21*<br />

4 47.06* 58.94* 142.49* 1.52* 13 39.05* 50.25* 248.36** 2.44**<br />

5 41.80* 14 42.83* 54.26* 142.00* 1.49*<br />

6 41.66* 15 40.47* 50.33* 157.23* 1.62*<br />

7 41.42* 16 47.08* 57.85* 242.70** 1.52*<br />

8 46.17* 51.39* 17 43.54* 68.24* 155.64* 1.57*<br />

9 39.44*<br />

TCVN 7209-2002 50.00 70.00 200.00 2.00<br />

Note: *, contam<strong>in</strong>ated; **, polluted.<br />

Table 5. Total concentrations of some heavy metals <strong>in</strong> agricultural soils <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa<br />

(unit: mg kg -1 ).<br />

54


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

To evaluate the pollution level <strong>in</strong> heavy metals of soil, the total concentrations of heavy<br />

metals were divided <strong>in</strong>to the follow<strong>in</strong>g three categories:<br />

- No contam<strong>in</strong>ation: heavy metal concentration below 70% of the Vietnam standard.<br />

- Contam<strong>in</strong>ated: heavy metal concentration <strong>in</strong> between 70% and 99% of the<br />

Vietnam standard.<br />

- Polluted: heavy metal concentration over the Vietnam standard.<br />

3.3.1. Cu<br />

Table 5 showed that the total Cu concentrations ranged from 39.05 to 47.79 mg kg -1 and<br />

were lower than the permissible level (50.0 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> TCVN 7209-2002). Although the<br />

total Cu concentrations did not exceed the permissible level, every sample was<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated with Cu (more than 35 mg kg -1 ). Samples 4, 12 and 16, which were taken<br />

from the village border and the waste water receiver from V<strong>in</strong>h village, showed the total<br />

concentration of Cu nearly reach<strong>in</strong>g the permissible level. Other samples taken far from<br />

V<strong>in</strong>h village were less affected by trade village’s activities and had the lower Cu<br />

concentration.<br />

3.3.2. Pb<br />

The total Pb concentrations <strong>in</strong> soil were from 39.66 to 68.24 mg kg -1 and were below the<br />

permissible level (72.0 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> TCVN 7209-2002). However, ten samples (59% of total<br />

samples) were at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level. The total Pb concentration of sample 17 was<br />

noted to be close to the permissible level; this sample was taken from the receiver of<br />

village’s waste water <strong>in</strong> a low altitude. Like Cu, the total Pb concentrations of samples 4,<br />

11, 12, 14- 17, which were taken from the area border<strong>in</strong>g on V<strong>in</strong>h village, were higher than<br />

those of other samples.<br />

3.3.3. Zn<br />

The Zn concentration <strong>in</strong> soil was mostly affected by the waste from the trade village. The<br />

total Zn concentrations of samples 13 and 16 exceeded the Zn permissible level <strong>in</strong> soil<br />

(200.0 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> TCVN 7209-2002). In addition, samples 4, 14, 15 and 17 were <strong>in</strong> the<br />

category of the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level. Production <strong>in</strong>stallations and plat<strong>in</strong>g pools <strong>in</strong> V<strong>in</strong>h<br />

Loc trade village, ma<strong>in</strong>ly z<strong>in</strong>c plat<strong>in</strong>g, probably lead to the local pollution and<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation of Zn <strong>in</strong> agricultural soil.<br />

3.3.4. Cd<br />

The total Cd concentrations varied from 1.16 to 2.44 mg kg -1 , and sample 13’s Cd<br />

concentration is higher than TCVN 7209-2002. The total Cd concentrations of the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g samples were below the Vietnam standard but still <strong>in</strong> the high level. Especially<br />

those of samples 4, 11, 14-17 were at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level. These samples located at<br />

the border on V<strong>in</strong>h village were directly affected from exhausted fumes, dust, and waste<br />

water from the village, lead<strong>in</strong>g to the high total Cd concentration.<br />

55


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

3.3.5. Evaluation the heavy metal pollution <strong>in</strong> agricultural soil<br />

The total Cu concentrations of all samples were at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level (70 to 99% of<br />

TCVN 7209-2002). The total Pb concentrations of samples near V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade village<br />

were at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level. Sample 17 had the total Pb concentration close to the<br />

Vietnam standard. It is worthwhile to pay attention to that agricultural soil <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa<br />

was locally polluted by Zn and Cd. The total Zn concentrations <strong>in</strong> sample 13 and 16<br />

exceeded the permissible level and at the polluted level. The total Cd concentration of<br />

sample 13 exceeded the permissible level by 22% and polluted the soil. Some other<br />

samples around the waste source were <strong>in</strong> the category of the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level.<br />

Sample 13 was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by some production <strong>in</strong>stallations along the road and was the<br />

most polluted one. This sample was at the polluted level <strong>in</strong> the total Zn and Cd concentrations<br />

and at the contam<strong>in</strong>ated level <strong>in</strong> the total Cu and Pb concentrations, compared to the Vietnam<br />

standard.<br />

3.4. Fractionation of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> soil<br />

3.4.1. Cu<br />

Analytical results of fractionation of Cu are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 7. The data po<strong>in</strong>ted out that<br />

Cu existed ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the form of bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides and the residual form<br />

which is not extractable with salt solution or diluted acid (Cu <strong>in</strong> crystal network of<br />

primary and secondary m<strong>in</strong>erals or other forms). In average, the Cu concentration <strong>in</strong> the<br />

form bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides was 15.46 mg kg -1 , mak<strong>in</strong>g up 36.18% of total Cu,<br />

and the Cu <strong>in</strong> the residual form was 23.10 mg kg -1 , with occupation of 54.06% of total<br />

Cu.<br />

On the other hand, exchangeable Cu, and Cu bonded to carbonates and to organic<br />

matter were <strong>in</strong> a low concentration. It was as low as 1.08 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> average for the<br />

exchangeable form, 1.74 mg kg -1 for the bond<strong>in</strong>g-to-carbonates form, and 1.35 mg kg -1 for<br />

the bond<strong>in</strong>g-to-organic matter form, mak<strong>in</strong>g up 2.53%, 4.07%, and 3.16% of total Cu,<br />

respectively.<br />

The solubility of Cu decreases <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g order: exchangeable, bond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

carbonate, bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe oxides, bond<strong>in</strong>g to Mn oxides, bond<strong>in</strong>g to organic matter, and<br />

residual forms. In Phung Xa, the concentrations of exchangeable Cu and Cu bonded to<br />

carbonates were low. As a result, it is evaluated that Cu is less toxic to crops and<br />

environment, even when the total Cu concentration is high.<br />

3.4.2. Pb<br />

Analytical results of fractionation of Pb are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 8. It showed that<br />

approximately 50% of total Pb existed <strong>in</strong> the form of bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides. The<br />

average concentration of this form was 25.35 mg kg -1 . The Pb concentration was lowest<br />

<strong>in</strong> the form of bond<strong>in</strong>g to organic matter (average concentration is 4.49 mg kg -1 , mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

up 8.81% of total Pb) and the residual form (average concentration is 4.77 mg kg -1 or<br />

56


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

9.36% of total Pb). The concentrations of exchangeable Pb and Pb bond<strong>in</strong>g to carbonates<br />

were <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>termediate level with averages of 7.57 and 8.78 mg kg -1 , respectively.<br />

Total of the extractable Pb (exchangeable, and bond<strong>in</strong>g to carbonates, Fe and Mn<br />

oxides, and organic matter) was 46.19 mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong> average (nearly reach<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated level of 49 mgkg -1 ) and made up 90.64% of total Pb. Total of the<br />

extractable Pb concentrations of samples 2, 4, 16 and 17 exceeded 49 mg kg -1 . It means<br />

that the potential Pb toxicity <strong>in</strong> agricultural soil is high, because Pb easily changes to the<br />

available form <strong>in</strong> soil and affects crops, animals, and human be<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3.4.3. Zn<br />

Analytical results of fractionation of Zn are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 9. Different from Cu, the<br />

concentration of extractable Zn <strong>in</strong>creased from the exchangeable form to the bond<strong>in</strong>g-toorganic<br />

matter form. In this sequence, the concentration of Zn bond<strong>in</strong>g to carbonates was<br />

18.81 mg kg -1 and made up 13.09% of total Zn; exchangeable Zn was 20.10 mg kg -1 or<br />

13.99% of total Zn; Zn bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides was 23.84 mg kg -1 or 16.59% of total<br />

Zn; and Zn bond<strong>in</strong>g to organic matter was 27.16 mg kg -1 or 18.90% of total Zn. The rest of<br />

Zn is kept <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>erals’ crystal structure. The average concentration of this residual form<br />

was 53.79 mg kg -1 or 37.43% of total Zn. Although the proportion of the extractable forms<br />

is not so high, it is necessary to pay a great attention to Zn <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa due to the high Zn<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong> waste sources. When Zn comes <strong>in</strong>to soil, 63% of total Zn will exist <strong>in</strong> the<br />

extractable forms which easily transform <strong>in</strong>to the available form and affect creatures and<br />

environment.<br />

57


20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

Figure 2. Fractionation of Cu (mg.kg -1 ) Figure 3. Fractionation of Pb (mg.kg -1 )<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

Figure 3. Fractionation of Zn (mg.kg -1 ) Figure 3. Fractionation of Cd (mg.kg -1 )<br />

Exchange-able<br />

3.4.4. Cd<br />

Bond<strong>in</strong>g to carbonates<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Bond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Fe & Mn oxides<br />

58<br />

Bond<strong>in</strong>g to organic matter<br />

Cd is a very toxic element <strong>in</strong> soil and can cause toxicity at low concentrations (TCVN<br />

7209-2002 is 2 mg kg -1 ). Analytical results of fractionation of Cd are presented <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

10. It showed that the distribution tendency of Cd <strong>in</strong> soil was similar to that of Pb and<br />

that Cd bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides occupied the highest proportion <strong>in</strong> total Cd. The<br />

average concentration of Cd bond<strong>in</strong>g to Fe and Mn oxides was 0.41 mg kg -1 or 28.47% of<br />

total Cd.<br />

The problem is that extractable Cd occupies the very high proportion <strong>in</strong> total Cd (1.16 mg<br />

kg -1 or 80.55% of total Cd). Therefore, the risk for Cd toxicity <strong>in</strong> the soil is very high,<br />

because Cd easily changes to the available form from the extractable forms, when<br />

conditions of soil like pH, moisture, and oxidation-reduction potential change naturally or<br />

caused by fertilizer application.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

4.1. Concusions<br />

4. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS<br />

From the study on the effects of the trade village waste on the pollution of agricultural<br />

soil by heavy metals <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa, Thach That, Ha Tay, the follow<strong>in</strong>g conclusions are<br />

drawn:<br />

1. The target soil belonged to Eutric Fluvisols with loamy sand to clay texture, quite high<br />

organic matter concentration, and medium to high CEC.<br />

2. Waste materials from V<strong>in</strong>h Loc trade village affected greatly the accumulation of Cu,<br />

Zn, Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> agricultural soil. Soil was polluted locally with Zn and Cd (samples 13<br />

and 16 were polluted with Zn and sample 13 with Cd). Furthermore, the ratio of the<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated to total soil samples was 100% for Cu, 59% for Pb, 35% for Cd, and 24%<br />

for Zn.<br />

3. Over 80% of Pb and Cd <strong>in</strong> soil was extractable by salt solution or diluted acid. It made<br />

great potentiality for caus<strong>in</strong>g toxicity to environment.<br />

4. Fe and Mn oxides showed the stronger aff<strong>in</strong>ity to heavy metals than did organic matter<br />

and carbonates. Exchangeable heavy metals were of low proportion (less than 16% of<br />

total heavy metal).<br />

4.2. Proposals<br />

1. The Phung Xa People Committee is requested to research <strong>in</strong>to the closed production<br />

technology, to change mach<strong>in</strong>es to modern ones, and to control and treat waste water<br />

and waste solid. Industrial waste water from <strong>in</strong>dustrial sites or production <strong>in</strong>stallations<br />

must be treated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Vietnam standard before discharge to common<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age canals.<br />

2. Application of lime or phosphate alkali, together with organic fertilizer, to soil <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to transform most of heavy metals <strong>in</strong>to hardly soluble forms.<br />

3. Establishment of the environment management board <strong>in</strong> commune.<br />

4. Rais<strong>in</strong>g of the environment protection awareness by propaganda and education on<br />

environment protection to people.<br />

6. REFERENCES<br />

[1] “Committee of Soil Standard Methods for Analyses and Measurements (ed.)” Soil Standard Methods<br />

for Analyses and Measurements, Hakuyusha, Tokyo (1986).<br />

[2] Hoang M<strong>in</strong>h Dao. “Current Vietnam Environment”. Industrial Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, No. 2, pp. 13, (2004).<br />

[3] “<strong>Land</strong> Use Plann<strong>in</strong>g Program <strong>in</strong> Phung Xa, Thach That, Ha Tay from 2001 to 2010. 2004”.<br />

[4] Le Duc, Le Van Khoa. “Effect of trade villages' activities for handicraft copper recycle <strong>in</strong> Dai Dong<br />

commune, Van Lam district, Hung Yen prov<strong>in</strong>ce to local soil environment”, Soil Science Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, No 14:<br />

48-52, (2001)<br />

[5] Tessier, A., Campbel, P. G. C. and M. Bisson. “Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of<br />

particulate. Analytical Chemistry, No. 51, pp. 844-851, (1979).<br />

[6] Vietnam standard TCVN 5949-1995 for water, (1995).<br />

[7] Vietnam standard TCVN 7209-2002 for soil, (2002).<br />

59


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

METAL CONTAMINATION IN IRRIGATED AGRICULTURAL<br />

LAND: CASE STUDY OF NAIROBI RIVER BASIN, KENYA<br />

P.N. Kamande 1* , F.M.G. Tack 2<br />

1 University of Nairobi, Department of <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> Management and Agricultural Technology,<br />

P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: +254.725.371.498. E-mail: pnkamande2002@yahoo.com,<br />

2 Ghent University, Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry and Applied Ecochemistry, B-9000 Ghent,<br />

Belgium<br />

Poster Extended Abstract<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Kenya has <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> reaction to the <strong>in</strong>creased population and the<br />

concomitant demand for food. River water is used for irrigation. In Nairobi river bas<strong>in</strong>,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial effluents and untreated sewage from the Nairobi city council are directly<br />

discharged <strong>in</strong>to the rivers. In spite of this, farmers cont<strong>in</strong>ue to use this water for<br />

irrigation. A recent study by UNEP revealed that Ngong/Moto<strong>in</strong>e River water was<br />

significantly contam<strong>in</strong>ated with Cr, Cd, Cu, Zn, Pb and Ni [1]. The use of this water for<br />

irrigation is likely to cause accumulation of significant amounts of metals <strong>in</strong> agricultural<br />

soils. This may lead to the accumulation of unacceptably high metal concentrations <strong>in</strong><br />

plants grown on these soils. In this study, metal concentrations and contam<strong>in</strong>ation levels<br />

<strong>in</strong> agricultural soils of this area were assessed us<strong>in</strong>g different chemical extraction<br />

procedures.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

This study focussed on the areas irrigated with water from the heavily polluted Ngong<br />

River. Four sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites were selected <strong>in</strong> the farmlands of “Mukuru kwa Njenga”<br />

slums, with<strong>in</strong> a stretch of about 300 m. Sites 1, 2 and 3 were agricultural sites irrigated<br />

with river water while site 4 was a non-irrigated (reference) site. The sites were situated<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 5, 17, 15 and 20 meters from the river, respectively. Sites 1, 2 and 3 were at a<br />

lower and pla<strong>in</strong> position with respect to river. The reference site was selected on an<br />

elevated area that was unlikely to have been flooded by the river; it had similar soil<br />

properties as the test sites and was presumably not predisposed to other sources of<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation. At each site, soil was sampled from two po<strong>in</strong>ts 10 m apart, at 0-20 cm,<br />

20-40 cm and 40-60 cm depth.<br />

In this study, it was assumed doubtful whether the farmers were aware of the<br />

impend<strong>in</strong>g environmental and health risks <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g polluted river water for grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crops. To assess their knowledge base about pollution, a brief <strong>in</strong>terview was conducted<br />

on farmers, us<strong>in</strong>g a simple questionnaire with po<strong>in</strong>ted questions.<br />

60


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Different chemical extraction methods were applied to the soils. These <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

aqua regia extraction for pseudo-total analysis, extraction with 0.5 M HCl for extract<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

non lithogenic metal fraction, extractions with EDTA and acetic acid, and extraction with<br />

dilute CaCl2 to determ<strong>in</strong>e a highly soluble fraction [2, 3, 4, 5 and 2 respectively]. Surface<br />

layer samples analysis was triplicated to ascerta<strong>in</strong> the reproducibility of the extraction<br />

procedures used. To check analytical accuracy, certified reference materials for<br />

certification of total contents <strong>in</strong> a calcareous soil (CRM 141) and <strong>in</strong> a light sandy soil<br />

(CRM 142 R) were analyzed.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Most farmers were aware that polluted water affected crop quality. Their awareness and<br />

<strong>in</strong>novativeness was evidenced <strong>in</strong> one case where the farmer tried to purify <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

wastewater by allow<strong>in</strong>g it to percolate through the ground and collect<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> a shallow<br />

well for irrigation. Though the concentration may have been reduced by sorption to soil,<br />

it is not excluded that the water was still contam<strong>in</strong>ated with soluble elements. Farmers<br />

defied their knowledge and used the water due to lack of an alternative source of good<br />

quality water for irrigation.<br />

The pseudo-total metal contents <strong>in</strong> the irrigated sites were at least five times higher<br />

than <strong>in</strong> the non-irrigated site, with sites 1 and 3 lead<strong>in</strong>g. The metal contents (except Ni)<br />

exceeded normal contents found <strong>in</strong> most unpolluted soils <strong>in</strong> the world and were <strong>in</strong> the<br />

order Zn>Cr>Pb>Cu>Ni>Cd. The major contam<strong>in</strong>ants were Zn (300-1000 mg/kg), Cr<br />

(28.5 - 749 mg/kg) and Pb (300 mg/kg). This could possibly be due their extensive use <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>in</strong>dustries, car garages and <strong>in</strong>formal <strong>in</strong>dustries located near the river. Cd <strong>in</strong> sites 1 and<br />

3 was slightly elevated compared to normal ranges <strong>in</strong> soils worldwide (0.07 – 1.1 mg/kg)<br />

and were <strong>in</strong> the range 0.94 to 1.37 mg/kg.<br />

Significant amount of metals were removed by 0.5 M HCl, suggest<strong>in</strong>g their<br />

association with various more labile fractions <strong>in</strong> the soil. For sites 1 and 3, median HClextractable<br />

contents of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn were between 65 – 80% of the total content.<br />

For the non-irrigated site, this percentage was between 7 and 18%. The extractability of<br />

Ni was between 13 – 27%, and only 3% for the non-irrigated site. Despite elevated total<br />

contents of Cr <strong>in</strong> the irrigated sites, extractability <strong>in</strong> HCl rema<strong>in</strong>ed low <strong>in</strong> the irrigated<br />

soils.<br />

EDTA extracted high contents of Zn (200-700 mg/kg), Pb (35-200 mg/kg) and Cu<br />

(20-85 mg/kg). In contam<strong>in</strong>ated areas, fractions of the total amount for Cd, Cr and Zn<br />

were markedly higher than <strong>in</strong> the reference soil. High EDTA extractable contents <strong>in</strong> the<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated profiles po<strong>in</strong>t to the likelihood that plants grown on these soils would<br />

accumulate metals <strong>in</strong> levels above contents <strong>in</strong> plants grow<strong>in</strong>g on uncontam<strong>in</strong>ated sites.<br />

Except for Zn (200-500 mg/kg) and Ni (3 mg/kg), the metal contents extracted by<br />

0.11 M acetic acid were below the detection limit of ICP-OES <strong>in</strong> some profiles. A high<br />

percentage of Pb (50% of the samples) and Cu (40% of the samples) were also below the<br />

detection limit. Nevertheless, Cd and Cr recorded measurable amounts <strong>in</strong> the test sites but<br />

were below detection <strong>in</strong> the reference site. These results would suggest that the metals are<br />

withheld <strong>in</strong> rather strong complexes, specifically sorbed or occluded <strong>in</strong> solid soil phase.<br />

61


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

The metal content removed with CaCl2 generally fell below the detection limit of<br />

the ICP-OES. However, there were detectable levels of Zn (0.30±0.14 to 10.2±0.39<br />

mg/kg) <strong>in</strong> the surface layers. CaCl2 is a weak extractant, which consists of a neutral salt at<br />

an ionic strength <strong>in</strong> the range of typical soil solutions. Low metal levels would <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

that metals <strong>in</strong> the soil are not highly soluble and hence not immediately available for<br />

uptake by plants.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The farmers were aware of pollution of Ngong River. However, their knowledge was<br />

limited to crop quality and did not encompass the degradation of soil quality and health<br />

hazards related to possible accumulation of heavy metals. With appropriate <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

farmers may appreciate these hazards<br />

The metal content of the soils revealed that the use of polluted water for irrigation<br />

had significantly contributed to contam<strong>in</strong>ation of the soils with Cr, Cu and Zn. Although<br />

chemical extraction suggested that the mobility of the contam<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>in</strong> these soils is rather<br />

limited, more general surveys and further <strong>in</strong>vestigations of metal uptake by crops are<br />

needed to evaluate the extent of current hazards.<br />

This issue <strong>in</strong>dicates the need for implement<strong>in</strong>g management strategies <strong>in</strong> Kenya to<br />

prevent and abate soil contam<strong>in</strong>ation. To aid <strong>in</strong> the development of reference values,<br />

background concentrations of trace elements <strong>in</strong> Kenyan soils should be established.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] UNEP. Outputs of phase I, Nairobi River Bas<strong>in</strong> Project, (1999).<br />

(URL:http://www.unep.org/roa/Nairobi_River/Webpages/pictures.map7.htm) (24 th July, 2005).<br />

[2] E.Van Ranst, M. Verloo, A. Demeyer, J.M. Pauwels. Manual for the soil chemistry and fertility<br />

laboratory.<br />

Gent University, Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Belgium. Pp. 243, (1999).<br />

[3] R.A. Sutherland. Comparison between non-residual Al, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn released by a<br />

three step sequential extraction procedure and a dilute hydrochloric acid leach for soil and road deposited<br />

sediment. Applied Geochemistry, Volume 17, pp. 353-365, (2002).<br />

[4] G. Rauret, J.F. Lopez-Sanchez, A. Sahuquillo, R. Rubio, C. Davidson, A. Ure, Ph. Quevauviller.<br />

Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new<br />

sediment and soil reference materials. Journal of Environmental Monitor, Volume 1, pp. 57-61, (1999).<br />

[5] Ph. Quevauviller, M. Lachica, E. Barahona, G. Rauret, A. Ure, A. Gomez, H. M<strong>in</strong>tau. Interlaboratory<br />

comparison of EDTA and DPTA procedures prior to certification of extractable trace elements <strong>in</strong><br />

calcareous soils. The Science of The Total Environment, Volume 178, pp. 127-132, (1996a).<br />

62


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Sub-theme : MANAGING GROUNDWATER POLLUTION<br />

FROM WASTE DISPOSAL SITES<br />

Krist<strong>in</strong>e Walraevens, Marleen Coetsiers, Krist<strong>in</strong>e Martens, Marc Van Camp<br />

Laboratory for Applied Geology and Hydrogeology, Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent<br />

University, Ghent, Belgium<br />

INTRODUCTION: THE WASTE PROBLEM<br />

Waste constitutes a problem which <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly demands the attention of scientists,<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers, policy makers and the general public. This is partly because the volumes of<br />

waste are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g at an alarm<strong>in</strong>g rate (due to population growth, but even more to our<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g life style), and partly because our understand<strong>in</strong>g and appreciation of the hazards<br />

associated with improperly handled wastes are grow<strong>in</strong>g [3].<br />

WASTE MANAGEMENT<br />

In Flanders [8], the strategy to deal with waste consists <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g hierarchy:<br />

1. waste prevention<br />

2. waste reuse<br />

3. waste recycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

4. waste <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />

5. waste disposal <strong>in</strong> controlled dumps.<br />

Dump<strong>in</strong>g has thus become the last resort, only to be appealed to for waste which cannot<br />

be managed at lower steps of this ladder. This is <strong>in</strong> sharp contrast with the past, when the<br />

usual fate of waste was uncontrolled dump<strong>in</strong>g. The former practice has resulted <strong>in</strong> widespread<br />

pollution of soil and groundwater.<br />

Industrial dump sites have often caused major cases of pollution, but mostly<br />

restricted to a select group of chemicals. Yet, municipal household-refuse landfill sites<br />

contribute to pollution of groundwater to a large extent [4], by a wide variety of<br />

chemicals.<br />

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION FROM WASTE DISPOSAL<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>water percolat<strong>in</strong>g through the waste material <strong>in</strong> open dumps dissolves soluble matter<br />

<strong>in</strong> the waste, becom<strong>in</strong>g more concentrated on its way down. This leachate may leave the<br />

dump site and contam<strong>in</strong>ate the surround<strong>in</strong>g soil and groundwater, depend<strong>in</strong>g on different<br />

factors [3]:<br />

- climatic factors (dry versus humid)<br />

- depth to the water table and thickness of the unsaturated zone<br />

63


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

- the characteristics of the rocks: hydraulic conductivity, potential for adsorption or<br />

degradation of contam<strong>in</strong>ants<br />

- type and composition of the waste.<br />

Interaction of the leachate with the solid soil results ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>-situ pollution of the<br />

affected soil, whereas groundwater is a mobile medium, transport<strong>in</strong>g and spread<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ants. Leachate plumes may show lengths of several kilometers [1].<br />

MANAGING GROUNDWATER POLLUTION FROM WASTE<br />

DISPOSAL<br />

Future waste disposal should be managed <strong>in</strong> an appropriate way, prevent<strong>in</strong>g leachate to<br />

be produced and to leave the dump. Current practices implemented to reach this objective<br />

will be discussed.<br />

Exist<strong>in</strong>g cases of groundwater pollution result<strong>in</strong>g from waste disposal must be<br />

handled carefully, <strong>in</strong> order to control the risks and, if possible, restore the area to its<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al state. Different steps are required:<br />

1. characterization of the groundwater reservoir<br />

2. characterization and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the pollution plume; geophysical measurements may<br />

be very helpful [5, 7]<br />

3. simulation of the groundwater pollution [2, 6]<br />

4. conception and simulation of remediation schemes [2, 6]<br />

5. actual remediation<br />

6. monitor<strong>in</strong>g and follow-up.<br />

In very specific cases, the actual remediation step may be replaced by natural attenuation<br />

[4], but then the monitor<strong>in</strong>g and follow-up require double attention.<br />

Case-studies of groundwater pollution from dump sites will be discussed.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] T.H. Christensen, P. Kjeldsen, H.-J. Albrechtsen, G. Heron, P.H. Nielsen, P.L. Bjerg, P.E. Holm.<br />

“Biogeochemistry of landfill leachate plumes.” Appl. Geochem., 16(7-8), pp. 659-718, (2001).<br />

[2] K. Martens, K. Walraevens. “Pollution at a dry clean<strong>in</strong>g site: Modell<strong>in</strong>g of the movement of the<br />

pollution <strong>in</strong> groundwater by VOCl with RBCA Tier 2 Analyzer.” ConSoil 2003, Gent. Eight International<br />

FZK/TNO Conference on Contam<strong>in</strong>ated Soil. Conference Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. Theme B: Identification of Risks,<br />

pp. 1197-1205, (2003).<br />

[3] B.W. Murck, B.J. Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, S.C. Porter. “Environmental Geology”. John Wiley & Sons, <strong>New</strong> York<br />

(ISBN 0-471-30356-9). 535 p., (1996).<br />

[4] B.M. Van Breukelen. “Natural attenuation of landfill leachate: a comb<strong>in</strong>ed biogeochemical process<br />

analysis and microbial ecology approach.” PhD Dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam (ISBN 90-<br />

9016928-8), 140p., (2003).<br />

[5] K. Walraevens, E. Beeuwsaert, W. De Breuck. “Geophysical methods for prospect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

pollution: A case-study.” European Journal of Environmental and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Geophysics, 2, pp. 95-108,<br />

(1997).<br />

[6] K. Walraevens, E. Beeuwsaert, M. Van Camp, W. De Breuck. “Groundwater pollution by <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

waste disposal: geophysical and hydrogeological case-study.” In: MARINOS, P.G., KOUKIS, G.C.,<br />

64


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

TSIAMBAOS, G.C. & STOURNARAS, G.C. (eds.). Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Geology and the Environment. pp. 2243-<br />

2248. Rotterdam: A.A. BALKEMA Publishers (ISBN 90-5410-879-7), (1997).<br />

[7] K. Walraevens, M. Coetsiers, K. Martens. “Large-scale mapp<strong>in</strong>g of soil and groundwater pollution to<br />

quantify pollution spread<strong>in</strong>g.” In: LENS, P., GROTENHUIS, T., MALINA, G. & TABAK, H. (eds.). Soil and<br />

Sediment Remediation. Mechanisms, technologies and applications. pp. 37-48. Integrated Environmental<br />

Technology Series. IWA Publish<strong>in</strong>g, London (ISBN 1-84339-100-7), (2005).<br />

[8] http://www.ovam.be (<strong>in</strong> Dutch)<br />

65


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

CONTAMINATION OF THE MARIMBA RIVER TRIBUTARY,<br />

ZIMBABWE, WITH CU, PB, ZN AND P BY INDUSTRIAL<br />

EFFLUENT AND SEWER LINE DISCHARGE.<br />

Bangira, C * .Wuta, M., Dube, H.M and Chipatiso, L.<br />

* University of Zimbabwe, Department of Soil Science & Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, P.O. Box MP167,<br />

Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe<br />

Tel: +263 4 303211/+263 4 307304 Fax: +263 4 307304<br />

Abstract<br />

Correspondence: Email: cbangira@agric.uz.ac.zw<br />

The rate of <strong>in</strong>dustrialization <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries is often mismatched with the provision of solid and<br />

liquid waste disposal and other requisite <strong>in</strong>frastructural facilities. Consequently, facilities such as sewer<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es and sewage treatment works become overloaded result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> frequent pipe bursts and <strong>in</strong>adequate<br />

sewage treatment. A study was conducted <strong>in</strong> Marimba River tributary to assess the contribution of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent and sewer l<strong>in</strong>e discharge on the total concentration of Cu, Pb, Zn and P <strong>in</strong> sediment and<br />

water. Sediment and water samples were collected at specific po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the tributary dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season.<br />

Heavy metals and P <strong>in</strong> sediments and water were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by spectroscopic and colorimetric methods<br />

respectively. Electrical conductivity and pH were determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g their respective meters. The results<br />

showed elevated levels of Cu and Zn <strong>in</strong> sediments immediately after <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent discharge po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

However, concentrations of Cu, Zn and Pb <strong>in</strong> water were all below 0.5 mgl -1 . The pH ranged from 7.3 - 8.0<br />

and 6.2 – 7.4 <strong>in</strong> water and sediment respectively. Lower concentrations of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> water were<br />

attributed to the low <strong>in</strong>solubility of these metals due to high pH. Significantly higher concentrations of Cu<br />

and Zn <strong>in</strong> sediments immediately after the <strong>in</strong>dustries were due to <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent discharge that was not<br />

adequately pre-treated. Phosphates concentration <strong>in</strong> water exceeded the Standards Association of<br />

Zimbabwe (1999) limit of 0.5mgl -1 . It was concluded that <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent discharge and burst or leak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sewer l<strong>in</strong>es were contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the pollution of Manyame River tributary which feeds <strong>in</strong>to Harare’s ma<strong>in</strong><br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water source.<br />

KEY WORDS: Heavy metals, P, <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent, water, sediment, Marimba River<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In recent years, develop<strong>in</strong>g countries have been experienc<strong>in</strong>g rapid <strong>in</strong>dustrial growth and<br />

urbanisation. Such processes br<strong>in</strong>g with it a plethora of social and economic challenges.<br />

The provision of accommodation to the urban population and the subsequent solid and<br />

liquid waste disposal facilities are probably some of the major problems faced by cities <strong>in</strong><br />

most develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. In Harare, Zimbabwe’s capital city, a phenomenal population<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease from 310 360 people <strong>in</strong> 1961, 658 400 people <strong>in</strong> 1982 to 1 896134 <strong>in</strong> 2002<br />

(CSO, 1982; 2002) occurred follow<strong>in</strong>g the end of the liberation war ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to a<br />

search for employment and partly due to high birth rates. High demand for<br />

accommodation was then created. The Municipality responded to the hous<strong>in</strong>g shortage by<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g up more residential areas adjacent to the exist<strong>in</strong>g ones as <strong>in</strong>-fill type or on<br />

agricultural land. People already allocated houses started extend<strong>in</strong>g them or construct<strong>in</strong>g<br />

66


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

backyard cottages. On one hand small-scale <strong>in</strong>dustrial parks built <strong>in</strong> these areas have their<br />

liquid waste disposed of <strong>in</strong> streams. Although the Municipality sanctioned these<br />

developments, most of them took place illegally. These developments took place without<br />

or with little upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of the sewer reticulation system. Consequently, facilities such as<br />

sewer l<strong>in</strong>es and sewage treatment facilities became overloaded result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> frequent pipe<br />

bursts and <strong>in</strong>adequate sewage and <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent treatment. Old suburbs such as<br />

Mabelreign, Greencroft and Bluffhill that were built <strong>in</strong> the late 1940s and 1950s for<br />

smaller population have been severely affected by the overload<strong>in</strong>g of the sewer system<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>in</strong>creased population and ag<strong>in</strong>g sewer reticulation system. Due to nonprohibitive<br />

f<strong>in</strong>es and the <strong>in</strong>capacity of the Municipality to regularly monitor effluent<br />

discharge <strong>in</strong>to water bodies, most <strong>in</strong>dustries directly discharge their untreated effluent<br />

<strong>in</strong>to streams. This study aimed at assess<strong>in</strong>g the contribution of <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent and<br />

sewer l<strong>in</strong>e discharge on the total concentration of Cu, Pb, Zn and P <strong>in</strong> sediment and water<br />

<strong>in</strong> Marimba River tributary.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The study area is located about 10 km the north west of Harare City and covers the<br />

Bloom<strong>in</strong>gdale, Bluffhill, Greencroft and Mabelreign residential areas. The Marimba<br />

tributary passes through the medium and low density residential areas of Bloom<strong>in</strong>gdale,<br />

Bluffhill, Cotswold Hills and Mabelreign <strong>in</strong> Harare (Figure 1). In between the tributaries<br />

is an <strong>in</strong>dustrial zone. The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> this zone <strong>in</strong>clude vehicle servic<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

repairs, panel beat<strong>in</strong>g and spray pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, fuel stations, pa<strong>in</strong>t manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, road<br />

construction and weld<strong>in</strong>g. Effluent from these <strong>in</strong>dustries is directly discharged <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

northern sub-tributary. The southern sub-tributary receives ma<strong>in</strong>ly domestic effluent from<br />

the leak<strong>in</strong>g or burst sewer l<strong>in</strong>es and manholes located along the course of the sewer l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Manholes serve as relief ponds <strong>in</strong> case of blockages. Both streams are l<strong>in</strong>ed with Typha<br />

latifolia aquatic plants from the discharge po<strong>in</strong>ts. The tributaries later converge to form<br />

one major stream that dra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to Marimba River that <strong>in</strong> turn dra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>to Lake<br />

67


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

LEGEND<br />

Manhole<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g Site<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> Road. ............................................<br />

Built up area. ............................................<br />

Industrial area. .......................................<br />

Angola<br />

Namibia<br />

SOUTHERN AFRICA<br />

Democratic<br />

Republic<br />

of Congo<br />

Zambia<br />

Botsw ana<br />

South Africa<br />

HARARE<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

Tanzania<br />

Mozambique<br />

.................................<br />

...........................<br />

River .....................................................<br />

N<br />

#<br />

68<br />

300 0 300 600 Meters<br />

Marimba<br />

HARARE<br />

Tynwald<br />

500 0 500 1000 Met ers<br />

Figure 1. Location map of the study area.<br />

7<br />

8<br />

Bluff Hill<br />

6<br />

9<br />

5<br />

4<br />

2<br />

3<br />

10<br />

12<br />

11<br />

Marbelreign<br />

Greencroft<br />

Chivero. Lake Chivero is the ma<strong>in</strong> source of dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water for the City of Harare,<br />

Norton and Chitungwiza.<br />

The residential areas of Mabelreign, Greencroft and Bluffhill, from where most of<br />

the sewerage comes from, were constructed <strong>in</strong> the post World War II era between 1949<br />

and early 1970s to accommodate an <strong>in</strong>creased number of immigrants from Europe<br />

(Z<strong>in</strong>yama, 1993). As such, these areas were for the more privileged and relatively small<br />

population (Colquhoun, 1993). Their sizes range from 1000-2000m 2 and were thus<br />

stipulated to have reticulated sewerage system by the urban by-laws.<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Sediment<br />

River sediments were collected from 12 sites us<strong>in</strong>g augers to a depth of 0.1 (refer to<br />

figure 1). Site 1, 11 and 12 were control sites. At each site three composite sediment<br />

samples were taken. One sample was composed of 9 sub-samples randomly selected from<br />

the streambed. The three samples from each site were placed <strong>in</strong> polythene bags and taken<br />

to the laboratory for air-dry<strong>in</strong>g before chemical analyses.<br />

1


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Water<br />

Water samples were collected us<strong>in</strong>g 1 L plastic bottles previously soaked <strong>in</strong> 10% HNO3<br />

to remove any traces of heavy metals. Prior to sampl<strong>in</strong>g the bottles were r<strong>in</strong>sed three<br />

times with de-ionised water and then stream water. Sampl<strong>in</strong>g was done with the bottle<br />

mouth fac<strong>in</strong>g the opposite direction to water flow. A total of three composite water<br />

samples result<strong>in</strong>g from the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of 9 sub-samples were collected from three<br />

randomly selected positions <strong>in</strong> the stream. Immediately after sampl<strong>in</strong>g, the bottles were<br />

tightly closed, put <strong>in</strong> cooler boxes and taken to the laboratory for analyses.<br />

Laboratory Analyses<br />

The electrical conductivity and pH of water samples were determ<strong>in</strong>ed immediately on<br />

arrival to the laboratory us<strong>in</strong>g an Orion pH and electrical conductivity meter respectively.<br />

About 0.5 L of the water samples were then acidified with 5 drops of concentrated nitric<br />

acid, filtered with Whatman No. 42 filter paper and the concentration of Cu, Pb and Zn <strong>in</strong><br />

the filtrate was determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The other 0.5<br />

L water was analysed for P. Total P <strong>in</strong> water was measured colorimetrically [Murphy<br />

and Riley, 1962] after digestion with the aqua-regia. The electrical conductivity was<br />

measured <strong>in</strong> a suspension of 1:5 sediment : water. The pH was measured <strong>in</strong> a 1:5<br />

sediment: 0.01 M CaCl2 suspension. Total heavy metals <strong>in</strong> sediments were extracted with<br />

aqua-regia and then determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g an atomic absorption spectrophotometer.<br />

Water<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Water pH at the sites affected by contam<strong>in</strong>ation was lower than the control sites (sites 1,<br />

11 and 12). Lower pH is attributed to the discharge of domestic and <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the stream. Moreover, there was a marked <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the electrical conductivity of<br />

water at the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sites (sites 4, 5 and 6). Due to high pH of water that precipitates<br />

heavy metals, the concentration of Cu, Pb and Zn <strong>in</strong> water at all the sites were below 0.5<br />

mg l -1 and thus comply with the Standards Association of Zimbabwe [1999] regulations<br />

for wastewater.<br />

The P concentration <strong>in</strong> water (Figure 1) reveals elevated levels of this element<br />

compared to most natural surface water P concentration of 0.005-0.020 mg l -1 P<br />

[Chapman, 1998]. Highest values were also recorded at the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sites. Although the<br />

P concentration at other sites were lower than the recommended value of 0.5mg l -1<br />

[Standards Association of Zimbabwe, 1999] there was a significant difference between<br />

the control sites (sites 1, 11 and 12) with the other sites that were affected by domestic<br />

(sewer l<strong>in</strong>e discharge) and <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent. Downstream Marimba River total P values<br />

between 1.67-5.42 ppm have been recorded <strong>in</strong> water [Hranova and Manjonjo, 2006].<br />

Detergents and soaps, which are commonly used for both domestic and <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

purposes, conta<strong>in</strong> at least one functional group such as sulphate, sulphonate or phosphate<br />

groups [Kirsner and Froelich, 1998] and are therefore likely sources of phosphates <strong>in</strong><br />

69


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

water <strong>in</strong> this study area. High P concentration <strong>in</strong> water may also be contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

growth of aquatic plant, Typha latifolia that starts grow<strong>in</strong>g from areas with burst or<br />

leak<strong>in</strong>g sewer manhole and pipe. Boyd and Hess [1970] found that stand<strong>in</strong>g crops of<br />

Typha latifolia were positively correlated with concentrations of dilute acid soluble P<br />

(1.0-116 ppm) <strong>in</strong> hydrosoils and dissolved P (0.02-0.32 ppm) <strong>in</strong> the waters.<br />

Sediments<br />

P concentration (mg l -1 )<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g site<br />

Figure 2. P concentration <strong>in</strong> water at different sites.<br />

Total P concentration <strong>in</strong> sediments was significantly higher (Figure 3) at sites that<br />

received ma<strong>in</strong>ly domestic effluent from the leak<strong>in</strong>g manhole of sewer l<strong>in</strong>es or burst pipes.<br />

This trend implicates detergents and soaps that are widely used for domestic purposes as<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> sources of P enrichment <strong>in</strong> the stream. Lower levels of P at site 6 were attributed<br />

to the low sediment accumulation due to the erosive power of the water from all the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries. Earlier studies by Thornton and Nduku [1982] <strong>in</strong> some Zimbabwean lakes<br />

showed non-eutrophic lakes to have sediment P concentration of about 0.3ppm whilst<br />

eutrophic lakes had P concentration greater than 1.0 ppm. The growth of Typha latifolia<br />

<strong>in</strong> sections of the stream that were affected by effluent could therefore be a result of P<br />

enrichment.<br />

The pH of sediments (Table 1) was <strong>in</strong> the slightly alkal<strong>in</strong>e range. A significant<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> electrical conductivity, however, occurred at the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sites and was<br />

attributed to the direct discharge of soluble salts from <strong>in</strong>dustrial chemicals and detergents<br />

that became associated with sediment particles. Heavy metals (Cu and Zn) <strong>in</strong> sediments<br />

showed <strong>in</strong>creased concentration up to 170 mg kg -1 (Figure 3) compared to the control<br />

sites with less than 60 mg kg -1 . Sediments are good nutrient s<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong> rivers. High levels<br />

of heavy metals <strong>in</strong> sediments were attributed to the discharge of effluent <strong>in</strong>to the stream<br />

70


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

by the electrical, weld<strong>in</strong>g, pa<strong>in</strong>t and vehicle services <strong>in</strong>dustries located along this part of<br />

the stream. Industrial effluent and sludge are known to conta<strong>in</strong> heavy metals [Alloway,<br />

1990; McBride, 1995; Nyamangara and Mzezewa, 1999; Zaranyika et al., 1993] The<br />

concentration of the heavy metals <strong>in</strong> sediments <strong>in</strong> a stream that received domestic<br />

effluent was also less than 50mg kg -1 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g no enrichment of heavy metals. Pb<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong> sediments at all the sites was below 70mg kg -1 and there was no<br />

particular trend. The use of heavy metals for domestic use is rather limited hence lower<br />

levels <strong>in</strong> the sediments. No standard values for heavy metals <strong>in</strong> sediments exist <strong>in</strong><br />

Zimbabwe.<br />

P concentration (mg kg -1 )<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g site<br />

Figure 3. Mean total P concentration <strong>in</strong> sediments at different sites.<br />

71


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Conclusion<br />

Metal concentration (mg kg -1 )<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g site<br />

72<br />

Cu Pb Zn<br />

Figure 4. Mean heavy metal concentration <strong>in</strong> sediment at different sites.<br />

The direct discharge of <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent <strong>in</strong>to the Marimba tributary contributed to the<br />

enrichment of Cu, P and Zn <strong>in</strong> sediments. Sewer l<strong>in</strong>e leaks and bursts as a result of<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased population and the discharge of <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent are also enrich<strong>in</strong>g the water<br />

and sediments with P and are pollut<strong>in</strong>g Marimba River tributary that feeds <strong>in</strong>to Harare’s<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water source. Higher P levels <strong>in</strong> water and sediments may also have<br />

contributed to the growth of Typha latifolia <strong>in</strong> the tributary. Regular monitor<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial effluent and the upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of the sewer reticulation system are recommended.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This research was funded by the University of Zimbabwe Research Board fund<br />

(3YSL10/0004) for which the authors are very grateful.<br />

REFERENCE<br />

B.J. Alloway. Heavy Metals <strong>in</strong> Soils. Wiley, <strong>New</strong> York. (1990)<br />

C.E. Boyd and L.W. Hess. Factors Influenc<strong>in</strong>g shoot production and m<strong>in</strong>eral nutrient levels <strong>in</strong> Typha<br />

latifolia. Ecology 51 (2): (1970).<br />

Central Statistics Office. 2002 Census Report. Government of Zimbabwe. (2002)


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

D. Chapman. Water Quality Assessment: A Guide to use of Biota, Sediments and Water <strong>in</strong> Environmental<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g (1998). 2 nd Ed, London. SPON Press<br />

S. Colquhoun. Present problems fac<strong>in</strong>g the harare city council. IN: Z<strong>in</strong>yama, L., Tevera, D. and Cumm<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

S.(eds) 1993. Harare: the growth and problems of the city. University of zimbabwe publishers.<br />

R. Hranova and M. Manjonjo. Sewage sludge disposal on land-impacts on surface water quality (2006). In:<br />

r. Hranova (ed.) Diffuse pollution of water resources: pric<strong>in</strong>ciples and case studies <strong>in</strong> the southern africa<br />

region.p272. Taylor & francis group plc, london.<br />

R.S. Kirsner and C.W. Froelich. Soaps and Detergents: Understand<strong>in</strong>g their composition and effect.<br />

Ostomy Wound Management 44 (4): 393-397. (1998).<br />

M.B. mcbride. Toxic metal accumulation from agricultural use of sludge: are USEPA regulations<br />

protective? Journal of Environmental Quality 24: 5-18. (1995).<br />

J. Murphy and J. P. Riley. A modified s<strong>in</strong>gle solution method for determ<strong>in</strong>ation of phosphate <strong>in</strong> natural<br />

waters. Anal. Chim.Acta 27: 31-36. (1962) Cited <strong>in</strong>: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., and Keeney, D.R.(eds). 1982.<br />

Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Series 9. America<br />

Society of Agronomy, Inc. Madison, USA.<br />

J. Nyamangara and J. Mzezewa . The effect of long-term sludge application on Zn, Cu, Ni and Pb levels<br />

<strong>in</strong> a clay loam soil under pasture grass <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe. Agric. Ecosy. Environ. 73: 199-204 (1999)<br />

Standards Association of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe standard specification for waste water. Zimbabwe<br />

Standard No.558:1999. (1999).<br />

Thornton, J.A. and Nduku, W.K.K. Sediment Chemistry. In: Thornton, J.A. and Nduku, W.K.K. (eds),<br />

Lake Macllwa<strong>in</strong>e-the Eutrophication and Recovery of a Tropical African Man-made Lake. 1982. P59-65,<br />

London: Dr W. Junk Publishers<br />

M.F. Zaranyika, L. Mtetwa, S. Zvomuya, G. Gongoraand and A.S Mathuthu,. The effect of <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

effluent and leachate from landfills on the levels of selected trace heavy metals <strong>in</strong> the waters of upper and<br />

middle Mukuvisi river <strong>in</strong> Harare, Zimbabwe. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiopia 7 (1) :1-10 (1993)<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>yama, L. The evolution of the spatial structure of greater Harare: 1890-1990. (1993). IN: Z<strong>in</strong>yama, L.,<br />

Tevera, D. and Cumm<strong>in</strong>g, S.(Eds) 1993. Harare: the growth and problems of the city. University of<br />

Zimbabwe publishers.<br />

73


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

WATER<br />

Site Number<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

pH 7.9±0.03 7.8±0.03 NS a 7.5±0.01 7.7±0.0 7.7±0.07 7.7±0.08 7.3±0.01 7.6±0.07 7.4±0.02 7.5±0.01 8.0±0.05<br />

Conductivity<br />

(µS cm -1 ) 521±7 542±10 NS 930±74 929±60 887±60 731±27 491.0±22 446±44 507±28 408±25 287±12<br />

Cu (mgl -1 ) 0.1 0.2 NS 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2<br />

Pb (mgl -1 ) 0.2 0.2 NS 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

Zn (mgl -1 ) 0.1 0.1 NS 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

SEDIMENT<br />

pH (CaCl2) 6.7±0.02 6.7±0.03 6.8±0.02 7.3±0.01 6.8±0.05 7.0±0.02 6.2±0.03 7.2 ±0.02 7.4 ±0.03 6.7 ±0.02 6.7 ±0.02 6.6±0.02<br />

Conductivity<br />

(µScm -1 ) 451±10 1631±21 2000±51 2116±63 193±15 467±27 375±197 193±7. 1464±34 1630±40 342±9. 320±12<br />

Ns a - Not sampled because stream section dry<br />

Table 1. Mean values (± standard error) of selected parameters for water and sediment <strong>in</strong> Marimba tributary<br />

74


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

CONTROLLING PHOSPHORUS (P) MOBILITY IN POORLY P<br />

SORBING SOILS: DRINKING-WATER TREATMENT<br />

RESIDUALS (WTR) TO THE RESCUE<br />

S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang 1* , G.A. O’Connor 1 and L.W. Jacobs 2<br />

1 Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Ga<strong>in</strong>esville, FL 32611, USA, 2 Department of Crop<br />

Science, Michigan State University, East Lans<strong>in</strong>g, MI 48824, USA<br />

* Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author (E-mail: agy<strong>in</strong>@ufl.edu; Tel.: 1-352-846-5770)<br />

Abstract<br />

Surface runoff of nutrients nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from manured agricultural land can be an important<br />

source of water quality impairment <strong>in</strong> surface waters worldwide. Excessive concentration of soluble P is the<br />

most common source of eutrophication <strong>in</strong> fresh waters. Addition of amendments to reduce P solubility is one of<br />

the most effective <strong>in</strong>-situ technologies for remediat<strong>in</strong>g P contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils. Abundant evidence <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals (WTR) are effective amendments. However, little <strong>in</strong>formation is available<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g the longevity of WTR immobilization. A modified isotopic ( 32 P) dilution technique was used to<br />

monitor the lability of P <strong>in</strong> a one-time WTR (114 Mg dry WTR ha -1 ) treated, P-impacted plots <strong>in</strong> two sites <strong>in</strong><br />

Western Michigan (USA) for seven–and-a-half (7.5) years. At the end of the monitor<strong>in</strong>g period, we conducted a<br />

runoff study, us<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation technique on the soils from both sites to assess the long-term<br />

effectiveness of WTR <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g dissolved P <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachate from the soils. Labile P concentrations of<br />

the WTR-amended soil samples were reduced to ≤ 46 % of the soil samples without WTR amendment, 6<br />

months after WTR amendment and the reduction persisted for 7.5 years. Application with WTR reduced the<br />

flow-weighted soluble reactive P concentrations <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachate <strong>in</strong> soils from both sites by ~ 60 % and<br />

dissolved organic P by ~ 45%. Overall, WTR amendment decreased flow-weighted dissolved P concentrations<br />

by ~ 55 %. We concluded that WTR is an effective amendment to control labile P <strong>in</strong> P-impacted soils and that<br />

the WTR immobilized P will rema<strong>in</strong> fixed for a long time. Thus amendment of P-impacted soils with WTR can<br />

help m<strong>in</strong>imize eutrophication <strong>in</strong> fresh surface waters.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Clean water is a crucial resource for dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, irrigation, <strong>in</strong>dustry, transportation, recreation,<br />

fish<strong>in</strong>g, hunt<strong>in</strong>g, support of biodiversity, and sheer esthetic enjoyment. Eutrophication caused<br />

by excessive <strong>in</strong>puts of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) is the most common impairment of<br />

surface waters worldwide. Eutrophication has many negative effects on aquatic ecosystems.<br />

Perhaps the most obvious consequence is the <strong>in</strong>creased growth of algae and aquatic weeds<br />

that <strong>in</strong>terfere with use of the water for fisheries, recreation, <strong>in</strong>dustry, agriculture, and<br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Application of animal manure <strong>in</strong> amounts that exceed agronomic P rates often results <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creased loss of P from agricultural land <strong>in</strong> surface runoff and potential eutrophication of<br />

surface waters [21]. Reversal of eutrophication requires the reduction of P and N <strong>in</strong>puts <strong>in</strong>to<br />

surface waters. Current strategies used to reduce P transport to surface water <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

conservation tillage, crop residue management, cover crops, buffer strips, contour tillage,<br />

runoff water impoundment, and terrac<strong>in</strong>g. These strategies are effective <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

particulate P but not dissolved P <strong>in</strong> runoff [21]. Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals (WTR)<br />

that conta<strong>in</strong> Al or Fe oxides can be beneficially used as a best management practice (BMP) to<br />

protect surface water quality by remov<strong>in</strong>g dissolved P from agricultural runoff water. Thus,<br />

excessive soluble P concentrations can be controlled through the additions of<br />

environmentally-benign and cost-effective P-sorb<strong>in</strong>g amendments, such as WTRs [5].<br />

75


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals are by-products of the dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment<br />

process and are physical mixtures of Al or Fe hydr(oxides) that orig<strong>in</strong>ate from flocculant (Al,<br />

or Fe salts) additions made dur<strong>in</strong>g the dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment [17]. Dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water<br />

treatment residuals are usually disposed of <strong>in</strong> landfills, and can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed at m<strong>in</strong>imal or no<br />

cost from dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g-water treatment facilities. Studies have shown that <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g WTRs<br />

<strong>in</strong>to soil reduces excessive soluble P result<strong>in</strong>g from manure application [3]. Similar studies<br />

showed that phosphorus solubility <strong>in</strong> biosolids was reduced by co-application with WTRs [5].<br />

O'Connor et al. [17] showed that P movement from P-enriched soils to freshwater supplies<br />

was reduced when the soils were treated with WTRs. The primary purpose of their study was<br />

to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the ability of three WTRs produced <strong>in</strong> Florida to reduce soluble P levels <strong>in</strong><br />

Florida soils amended with fertilizer, manure, and biosolids-P sources. Gallimore et al. [7]<br />

utilized WTRs as a buffer strip (44.8 Mg WTR ha -1 ) applied to a portion of a pasture treated<br />

with poultry litter. Surface runoff P was reduced by WTR from an average of 15 to 8.1 mg<br />

L -1 . The authors [7] concluded that the most effective surface application of WTR was as a<br />

buffer strip.<br />

Data from various studies suggest that WTRs could be effective amendments to<br />

improve P retention <strong>in</strong> poorly P-sorb<strong>in</strong>g soils. Short-term laboratory, greenhouse, and ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />

simulation studies have demonstrated WTR efficacy <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g soluble P concentrations <strong>in</strong><br />

runoff [3], and leach<strong>in</strong>g [5] from areas amended with animal wastes. The long-term stability<br />

of sorbed P by WTRs has only been qualitatively <strong>in</strong>ferred from lab experiments [12]. Time<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts associated with conduct<strong>in</strong>g long-term field experiments are the major drawbacks<br />

<strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the long-term fate of sorbed P <strong>in</strong> WTR-amended soils, and few researchers have<br />

attempted such studies. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness<br />

of alum WTR (Al-WTR) <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g dissolved P <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachate from field soils with<br />

long histories of poultry manure applications.<br />

Field layout and amendments application<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Two field sites (sites 1 and 2) located <strong>in</strong> Western Michigan were selected <strong>in</strong> 1998 for<br />

evaluation of WTR effects on P extractability <strong>in</strong> soils hav<strong>in</strong>g “very high” soil test P<br />

concentrations. Both soils have a long-term (> 10 yr) history of heavy chicken manure<br />

applications (actual application rates unknown). Soil at site 1 was a Granby f<strong>in</strong>e sandy loam<br />

(sandy, mixed, mesic Typic Endoaquolls) with Bray P1 test levels (265 mg P kg -1 ). Soil at the<br />

second site was Granby loamy sand (sandy, mixed, mesic Typic Endoaquolls) with Bray P1<br />

test values of 655 mg P kg -1 .<br />

A randomized, complete block design was established at each site with four replications<br />

per treatment and a plot size of 14 m x 30 m. The WTR used <strong>in</strong> this study was removed from<br />

lagoon storage, and stockpiled for dry<strong>in</strong>g. The dried Al-WTR was applied (114 dry Mg ha -1 )<br />

to plots us<strong>in</strong>g a Knight ProTw<strong>in</strong> Sl<strong>in</strong>ger, model 8030 V-box spreader, by mak<strong>in</strong>g three passes<br />

on each side of the plot, or three round trips. All plots, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the untreated controls, were<br />

disked (~30 cm) twice follow<strong>in</strong>g WTR application. Additionally, site 1 was chisel-plowed<br />

and field cultivated prior to plant<strong>in</strong>g on May 5, 1998. Site 2 was moldboard plowed before<br />

plant<strong>in</strong>g on May 4, 1998. Subsequently, both sites were rototilled <strong>in</strong> April/May, 2000 prior to<br />

plant<strong>in</strong>g to promote more thorough mix<strong>in</strong>g of WTR. Field corn (Zea mays L.) was planted<br />

each year at both sites. Herbicides and <strong>in</strong>secticides for weed and pest control typically used<br />

by cooperat<strong>in</strong>g farmers were applied at plant<strong>in</strong>g. Fertilizer nitrogen and potash were applied<br />

76


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

as needed. The study cont<strong>in</strong>ued for more than 7 years, but the WTR amendment was applied<br />

only <strong>in</strong> 1998.<br />

Soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Surface soils of control and WTR-amended plots from both of the Michigan field study sites<br />

were first sampled <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 1998 (time zero) by composit<strong>in</strong>g 20 cores (2.54 cm diameter)<br />

from the top 30 cm depth of each plot. Additional soil surface samples were similarly<br />

collected each fall <strong>in</strong> 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 for analyses to<br />

monitor changes <strong>in</strong> labile pools of P follow<strong>in</strong>g the WTR application. At the end of the<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g period (Fall 2005), surface soils of the control and the WTR amended plots from<br />

both sites were sampled (~ 20 kg) from the top 30 cm depth of each plot to undertake the<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation study.<br />

Soil and WTR characterization<br />

Samples were air-dried and passed through a 2 mm sieve before analyses. Particle size<br />

distribution was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the pipette method [2]. The pH was determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a 1:2 WTR<br />

to 0.01 M CaCI2 solution us<strong>in</strong>g a glass electrode [13]. Electrical conductivity (EC) was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a 1:2 WTR to deionized water solution [18]. Soluble reactive P of WTRs was<br />

measured <strong>in</strong> a 0.01 M KCl solution at a 1: 10 solid: solution ratio, after 40 d reaction. Total C<br />

and N were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by combustion at 1010 C us<strong>in</strong>g a Carlo Erba NA-1500 CNS analyzer.<br />

Total recoverable P, Fe, and Al were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by ICP-AES (Perk<strong>in</strong>-Elmer Plasma 3200)<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g digestion accord<strong>in</strong>g to the EPA Method 3050A [23]. Oxalate extractable P, Fe, and<br />

Al were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the ICP after extraction at a 1: 60 solid: solution ratio, follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

procedures of [20]. Oxalate-extractable Fe and Al represents noncrystall<strong>in</strong>e and organically<br />

complexed Fe and Al present <strong>in</strong> the solid [20].<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of labile pools of P<br />

Two grams of each soil sample was placed <strong>in</strong> centrifuge tubes to which 20 mL of deionized<br />

water was added, giv<strong>in</strong>g a solid-to-solution ratio of 1:10. Two drops of toluene were added to<br />

each suspension and equilibrated for 4 days <strong>in</strong> an end-over-end shaker. The samples were<br />

then spiked with 50 µL of a solution conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 32 P (5 MBq/mL) and returned to the shaker to<br />

equilibrate for 3 days. At the end of the equilibration period, samples were centrifuged at<br />

4200 g for 10 m<strong>in</strong> and filtered through 0.2-µm filters (Sartorius). Activities of radioactive P<br />

<strong>in</strong> the filtrates were assessed us<strong>in</strong>g liquid sc<strong>in</strong>tillation counter (Beckman LS 5801). All<br />

analyses were performed <strong>in</strong> triplicate and <strong>in</strong>cluded blanks. The total activity <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong><br />

each sample was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by analyz<strong>in</strong>g spiked solutions, without soil, <strong>in</strong> parallel with the<br />

soil suspensions as suggested by [10]. The labile pools (E) of P were determ<strong>in</strong>ed as reported<br />

<strong>in</strong> [8].<br />

E = (Csol/C † sol) R * (V/W) -----------------------[1]<br />

where Csol is the concentration of water extractable P <strong>in</strong> solution (µg/mL), C † sol is the activity of radioisotope<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> solution after equilibration (Bq/mL), R is the total activity of radioisotope added to each sample<br />

(Bq/mL), and V/W is the ratio of solution to sample, which <strong>in</strong> this case was 10 mL/g.<br />

77


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation experiment<br />

The ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation was carried out as prescribed <strong>in</strong> the U.S. National Phosphorus<br />

Research Project <strong>in</strong>door runoff box protocol [16]. However, the design of wooden runoff<br />

boxes (100 cm long, 20 cm wide, and 7.5 cm deep) was modified to quantify leach<strong>in</strong>g of P <strong>in</strong><br />

addition to runoff P by add<strong>in</strong>g a second box under the first <strong>in</strong> a double-decker design. This<br />

design allows collection of runoff and leachate simultaneously. The boxes were packed with<br />

5 cm of soils to a bulk density of 1.4 g cm -3 . Soils collected from the Michigan study sites<br />

(7.5 y after WTR amendment) were pre-wetted to near saturation to control for antecedent<br />

moisture and to promote runoff <strong>in</strong> subsequent ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulations were<br />

conducted three times, at one-day <strong>in</strong>tervals between ra<strong>in</strong>fall events. Boxes were sloped at 3 %<br />

and ra<strong>in</strong>fall was delivered at 7.1 cm hr -1 from a height of 3 m above the boxes. For each<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall event, the 30 m<strong>in</strong> of runoff, and leachate generated dur<strong>in</strong>g the entire ra<strong>in</strong>fall was<br />

collected from each box and the volumes recorded. Subsamples of the runoff were<br />

immediately filtered (0.45 µm) for analysis. A representative well-mixed sample of the<br />

unfiltered runoff (~ 250 mL) was also taken from each replicate for analysis.<br />

Leachate and runoff pH and EC was determ<strong>in</strong>ed on each sample. Soluble reactive P<br />

(SRP) was determ<strong>in</strong>ed on the filtered runoff and the leachate samples colorimetrically [14].<br />

Total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) was measured on the filtered runoff and the leachate<br />

samples after digest<strong>in</strong>g 10 mL of the samples with 0.5 mL 11 N H2S04 and 0.15g of<br />

potassium persulfate <strong>in</strong> an autoclave for 1 hr [4]. Total P <strong>in</strong> the unfiltered runoff sample was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by digest<strong>in</strong>g 5 mL of the samples with 1 mL of 11 N H2S04 and 0.3g of potassium<br />

persulfate on the digestion block and then diluted by add<strong>in</strong>g 10 ml of water [4]. All digested<br />

samples were analyzed for P colorimetrically [14]. The iron-oxide impregnated paper strip<br />

method [15] was used to estimate bioavailable P <strong>in</strong> runoff waters.<br />

Particulate phosphorus (PP) was calculated by subtract<strong>in</strong>g TDP from the TP of each<br />

sample. Dissolved organic P (DOP) was assumed to be the difference between SRP and TDP.<br />

Flow-weighted P concentrations were determ<strong>in</strong>ed for the runoff and the leachate by summ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the product of the P concentrations and volumes for the three runs (P load) and divid<strong>in</strong>g the P<br />

load by the total volume of the runs. The mass of runoff and leachate P losses (mg) were<br />

calculated as the product of flow-weighted concentrations (mg L -1 ) and the runoff and<br />

leachate volume (L) respectively. Total P losses were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by summ<strong>in</strong>g the masses of<br />

runoff and the leachate P loss.<br />

Statistical analyses<br />

Differences among treatments were statistically analyzed as a factorial experiment with a<br />

randomized complete block design (RCBD), us<strong>in</strong>g the general l<strong>in</strong>ear model (GLM) of the<br />

SAS software [19] The means of the various treatments were separated us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle degree<br />

of freedom orthogonal contrast procedure.<br />

The data collected from the ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation study showed great variation about the<br />

means with coefficient of variation > 60 %. This prompted us to test for normal distribution<br />

of the data us<strong>in</strong>g the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Procedure and the normal probability plots of the<br />

Statistical Analysis System [19]. The P concentration data were not normally distributed, so<br />

typical analysis of variance could not be used. Instead, the NPAR1WAY procedure of the<br />

SAS software with the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The NPARIWAY procedure is a<br />

nonparametric procedure that tests whether the distribution of a variable has the same<br />

location parameter across different groups. The Kruskal-Wallis procedure tests the null<br />

hypothesis that the groups are not different from each other by test<strong>in</strong>g whether the rank sums<br />

78


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

are different based on a Chi-square distribution [9]. This is a powerful and robust test that is<br />

<strong>in</strong>sensitive to variation among data and the presence of outliers [9].<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Chemical properties of the WTR and soils used<br />

The WTR and soils were analyzed for selected chemical properties (Table 1). The pH of<br />

WTR was near neutral (7.4), and may have resulted from pH adjustment with alkal<strong>in</strong>e<br />

materials (i.e., calcium hydroxide) dur<strong>in</strong>g dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment.<br />

WTR Site 1 Site 2<br />

pH 7.4 ± 0.1 6.4 ± 0.2 6.8 ± 0.2<br />

Sand nd †<br />

60 ± 3.0 % 76 ± 4.5 %<br />

Silt nd 28 ± 2.2 % 16 ± 2.0 %<br />

Clay nd 12 ± 1.4 % 8 ± 0.9 %<br />

Total C 34,000 ±<br />

200<br />

nd nd<br />

KCl-P 4.0 ± 0.1 22.1 ± 2.3 58.1 ± 5.1<br />

Bray P1 nd 265 ± 45 655 ± 90<br />

Oxalate P 570 ± 96 790 ± 7.5 970 ± 8.3<br />

Oxalate Al 29700 ±<br />

3603<br />

2400 ± 21.3 710 ± 8.5<br />

Oxalate Fe 2300 ± 310 730 ± 8.3 290 ± 0.8<br />

Total P 800 ± 78 970 ± 47.1 1100 ± 4.3<br />

Total Al 39700 ±<br />

5650<br />

7000 ±<br />

35.2<br />

79<br />

3400 ± 32.5<br />

Total Fe 9200 ± 545 2700 ± 98.3 1800 ± 6.7<br />

† not determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

Table 1: Some characteristics of the WTR and soils used. Values are averages of six replicates ± one<br />

standard deviation. Values are <strong>in</strong> mg kg -1 , except pH values<br />

The EC ranged from 1.21 dS m -1 , well below the 4.0 dS m -1 associated with sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

problems [1]. The KCl-P represented only a small fraction of total P, with a mean value of 4<br />

mg kg -1 . The very low amount of KCl-P <strong>in</strong> the WTR implies that it would be poor not be<br />

source of P <strong>in</strong> soils. Total C value for the WTR was 3.4 %. Total C measured value agreed<br />

with the range C found for Al-WTRs (2.3- to 20.5 %; [3,12]. Total C determ<strong>in</strong>ations may<br />

overestimate organic C content s<strong>in</strong>ce the combustion method (temperature 1010 C) measures<br />

both organic and <strong>in</strong>organic C. The high total C levels found <strong>in</strong> many WTRs may be attributed<br />

to carbonate additions for pH adjustment dur<strong>in</strong>g water treatment or additions of activated


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

carbon, which is used to remove taste and odor from source water. The WTR had C: N ratio<br />

less than 25, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that there was a significant N pool that could be used by plants, if<br />

WTRs were land applied. A C: N ratio of ~25 is commonly used as the value where<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralization and immobilization of an organic amendment are <strong>in</strong> balance. Total P of the<br />

WTR was 800 mg P kg -1 , typical of Al-WTRs (300 to 4000 mg P kg -1 ; [3,12] Total P <strong>in</strong><br />

WTRs comes from the raw water purified <strong>in</strong> dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment plants and becomes a<br />

part of the WTR structure. The relatively high total P content of the WTRs is probably due to<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong> the WTR after removal from contam<strong>in</strong>ated raw water dur<strong>in</strong>g treatment. Total<br />

Al was ~ 40 g Al kg -1 , with<strong>in</strong> normal ranges reported by others (15- to 177 g Al kg -1 ; [3,12].<br />

Alum<strong>in</strong>um (hydr)oxides are sorbents for oxyanions such as phosphate, thus the high Al<br />

content of the WTR suggests that they will be major sorbents for P. Oxalate extractable P, Fe,<br />

and Al are usually associated with the amorphous phase of the particles. Oxalate-extractable<br />

Al values were close to total Al (84 % of the total), suggest<strong>in</strong>g an amorphous nature of the<br />

WTR. This is consistent with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of O’Connor et al. [17] that the traditional 200 mM<br />

oxalate-extractable P, Al and Fe concentrations are typically 80-90 % of the respective<br />

WTRs’ total elemental concentrations. Gallimore et al. [17] concluded that the amorphous,<br />

rather than the total, Al content determ<strong>in</strong>es WTR effectiveness <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g runoff-P.<br />

The soil samples collected at both sites of the Michigan field have near neutral pH.<br />

Soils from both sites have very high soil test P (STP) values, but the soil collected from site 2<br />

had greater soil test P. The high STP values reflect the long history of chicken manure<br />

application to the fields. The KCl-P accounted for 3.3 and 4.2 %, respectively, of the total P<br />

contents at site 1 and site 2. The high soluble reactive P concentration at both sites suggests<br />

that the soil can contribute significantly to P loss <strong>in</strong> runoff. The soil from site 1 had greater<br />

total Fe and Al than site 2, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that site 1 had greater potential to sorb excess soil P<br />

than the soil at site 2.<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> labile pools of P with time<br />

The isotopic dilution technique has been used to successfully describe P phytoavailability and<br />

mobility (labile pools of P) <strong>in</strong> soils [8]. Measured labile P levels <strong>in</strong> the control plots did not<br />

change significantly with time <strong>in</strong> the field, and were ~100 and 220 mg P kg -1 for site 1 and 2<br />

(Fig. 1), respectively. Site 2 had significantly greater amounts of labile P, consistent with<br />

greater soil test P levels and coarser texture (Table 1). The high, and nearly constant, labile P<br />

levels <strong>in</strong> the control plots reflect the history of heavy manure applications to these soils, and<br />

portend that soils from both sites could cont<strong>in</strong>uously supply large amounts of soluble P <strong>in</strong><br />

runoff over many years.<br />

80


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

labile P conc. (mg kg-1)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

t(0) 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Year of sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

81<br />

Site1 control<br />

Site 1 WTR<br />

Site 2 control<br />

Site 2 WTR<br />

Figure 1: Changes <strong>in</strong> labile P concentrations with time for the Michigan field samples taken from<br />

both the control and WTR amended plots at site1 and 2<br />

Amendment with the WTR significantly (p = 0.015) reduced labile P concentrations at<br />

both sites (Fig. 1). At site 1, WTR application reduced labile P values from ~ 100 to 50 mg P<br />

kg -1 6 months after WTR application, and labile P levels cont<strong>in</strong>ued to decl<strong>in</strong>e for another 2<br />

years. Time series analysis suggests that an equilibrium labile P level (~ 30 mg P kg -1 ) was<br />

reached around 2.5 years after WTR application. Similar WTR effects were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for site<br />

2. Amendment with WTR significantly (p < 0.001) reduced labile P values with<strong>in</strong> 6 months,<br />

and the reduction cont<strong>in</strong>ued for another 4 years. Time series analysis suggested that an<br />

equilibrium labile P level (~ 75 mg P kg -1 ) was reached around 4.5 years after WTR<br />

application. The greater time (4.5 years) required at site 2 for the equilibration of WTR effect<br />

on labile P probably reflects the greater soil test P level, compared to site 1. Nevertheless,<br />

WTR amendment of either manure-impacted site significantly reduced labile P levels (at all<br />

times) below the higher levels <strong>in</strong> the control soils. The reduction <strong>in</strong> labile P due to WTR<br />

application is expected to reduce P loss and P pollution potential for these soils. Notable also<br />

is the longevity of the WTR effect. There was no evidence of release of WTR-immobilized P<br />

over time as measured by the labile P values. The labile P data demonstrate delayed, but<br />

steady, reduction <strong>in</strong> soluble P with time and ultimate reductions of ~ 65 to 70 % relative to<br />

the control soils.<br />

The reduction of labile pools of P with time from the WTR-amended plots prompted us<br />

to assess the changes <strong>in</strong> Fe and Al concentrations with time. Iron and Al hydroxides,<br />

especially Al forms <strong>in</strong> Al WTR, can be major sorbents for oxyanions <strong>in</strong> soils, such as P.<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> the magnitude of the sorbent pool with time are expected to <strong>in</strong>fluence the P<br />

sorption capacity of the amended soil. For both sites, there was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

concentration of oxalate (200 mM)-extractable soil Al and Fe concentrations (Fig. 2) <strong>in</strong> the<br />

WTR amended plots, although the concentrations showed great variability over time. The<br />

WTR amended plots of site 2 exhibited a greater <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> oxalate (200 mM)-extractable Al<br />

and Fe concentrations, possibly due to the soil’s lower native Al and Fe concentrations (Table<br />

1). The variability <strong>in</strong> oxalate extractable- Al and Fe, concentrations over time is attributed to<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g variability. Variability <strong>in</strong> the sorbent (200 mM oxalate-extractable Fe and Al) pool,<br />

observed with time at both sites (Fig. 25) prompted normaliz<strong>in</strong>g the data by divid<strong>in</strong>g oxalate<br />

(200 mM)-extractable P by the correspond<strong>in</strong>g oxalate Fe and Al concentrations <strong>in</strong> moles.<br />

This normalization yields a term, the P saturation ratio (PSR) [11], similar to the degree of P<br />

saturation (DPS) <strong>in</strong>dex, but omits the α factor (α = 0.3-0.5) <strong>in</strong> the ratio [20]. Small PSR<br />

values (< 0.1) suggest excess P sorption capacity and limited P lability. The PSR values for


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

both sites were calculated and statistically analyzed to evaluate subtle differences between<br />

treatments over time.<br />

Fe+Al conc. (mmol kg -1 )<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

t (0) 1.5 3.5 5.5 7.5<br />

Years after WTR application<br />

Site 2 control<br />

Site 2 WT R<br />

Site 1 control<br />

Site 1 WT R<br />

Figure 2: Changes <strong>in</strong> oxalate extractable Fe+Al<br />

with time from both the control and WTR amended<br />

plots at sites 1 and 2.<br />

82<br />

PSR<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

t (0) 1.5 3.5 5.5 7.5<br />

Years after WTR application<br />

Site 2 control<br />

Site 2 WT R<br />

Site 1 control<br />

Site 1 WT R<br />

Figure 3: Changes <strong>in</strong> P saturation ratios with time<br />

from both the control and WTR amended plots at<br />

sites 1 and 2.<br />

For site 1, PSR values of the WTR-amended plots did not significantly differ at the 95<br />

% confidence level from the control (no WTR) plots (Fig. 3). Similarly, ag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the field had<br />

no significant effect on the PSR values for WTR-amended plots even 7.5 years after WTR<br />

application; the PSR values rema<strong>in</strong>ed low and relatively constant (~ 0.3) throughout the<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g period. For site 2 (Fig. 3), PSR values were at least double those of site 1 for both<br />

control and WTR-amended plots because site 2 had about twice the soil test P and one-half<br />

the total Fe and Al concentrations (Table 1). Control plots of site 2 had relatively high PSR<br />

values (> 1), which suggest that site 2 could contribute significant amounts of P <strong>in</strong> surface<br />

runoff. Amendment with the WTR significantly (p = 0.015) decreased PSR values 6 months<br />

after application and, thereafter, rema<strong>in</strong>ed relatively constant (Fig. 3) at PSR values < 50 %<br />

of the PSR values of the control samples. There was no significant effect of time, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

little potential for time-dependent P release from WTR-amended plots. Low native total soil<br />

Al and Fe concentrations <strong>in</strong> site 2 soil (Table 1) may have contributed to the positive WTR<br />

effect on reduc<strong>in</strong>g P extractability, as expressed by the PSR concept. In contrast, site 1 soil<br />

had relatively high amounts of native total Al and Fe concentrations; thus, the WTR<br />

application rate used was not sufficient to significantly <strong>in</strong>crease total soil Al levels or change<br />

PSR values.<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation study<br />

This study was conducted to confirm WTR effects on WEP and labile P measurements via<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation. Soils used represented samples from one-time WTR-amended fields <strong>in</strong><br />

Western Michigan, 7.5 years after WTR amendment. The masses (mg) of the various forms<br />

of P lost <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachate from soil samples collected from both sites are given <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

2.<br />

Generally, there were significantly greater P losses from the soil samples collected from<br />

site 2 (both the control and the WTR-amended soils), than those collected from site 1 (Table<br />

2). Results are consistent with the greater soil test P values and greater labile P values for soil


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

at site 2 than at site 1. Most of the P loss from both sites occurred through surface runoff,<br />

rather than through leach<strong>in</strong>g (Table 2).<br />

RUNOFF<br />

TREATMENT TDP ‡ SRP †† DOP †‡ PP ‡‡ BAP ‡‡†<br />

Total Runoff<br />

P<br />

CTRL 43.6 ± 31.6 40.6 ± 31.2 3.01 ± 2.2 51.9 ± 43.6 52.4 ± 21.4 95.5 ± 52.1<br />

Site 1 WTR 17.9 ± 8.32 16.0 ± 11.3 1.94 ± 1.37 83.7 ± 77.8 22.5 ± 10.9 102 ± 66.3<br />

CTRL 65.5 ± 47.3 60.6 ± 46.1 4.85 ±2.99 87.4 ±53.6 76.7 ± 41.6 153 ± 101<br />

Site 2 WTR 34.1 ± 26.9 31.3 ± 19.8 2.85 ± 2.04 158 ± 112 39.2 ± 24.7 193 ± 89.6<br />

LEACHATE<br />

Total<br />

TOTAL P LOSS<br />

TREATMENT TDP SRP DOP Leachate P (Runoff + Leachate)<br />

CTRL 29.0 ± 14.9 12.7 ± 9.32 16.3 ± 11.5 29.0 ± 14.9 124 ± 88.9<br />

Site 1 WTR 13.3 ± 8.65 5.82 ± 3.96 7.49 ± 5.48 13.3 ± 8.65 115 ± 79.9<br />

CTRL 44.5 ± 29.5 20.4 ± 16.7 24.1 ± 18.9 44.5 ± 29.5 197 ± 131<br />

Site 2 WTR 18.7 ± 11.2 7.12 ± 5.34 11.6 ± 8.74 18.7 ± 11.2<br />

211 ± 156<br />

†<br />

Numbers are flow-weighted means of 4 replicates <strong>in</strong> 3 ra<strong>in</strong>fall events ± one standard deviation<br />

‡<br />

Total dissolved P<br />

††<br />

Soluble reactive P<br />

†‡<br />

Dissolved organic P<br />

‡‡<br />

Particulate P<br />

‡‡†<br />

Bioavailable P<br />

Table 1: Maases† of the various P forms measured <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachates from both sites of the<br />

Michigan field study. All values are expressed <strong>in</strong> mg.<br />

The total runoff P losses of the samples taken from both sites were dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />

particulate P, and greater particulate P loads came from the WTR-amended plots than the<br />

control plots. The runoff dissolved P at both sites was dom<strong>in</strong>ated by soluble reactive P (SRP),<br />

with dissolved organic P (DOP) occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> small proportions (< 7 % of TDP). Contrary to<br />

the runoff dissolved P, the total dissolved P <strong>in</strong> the leachate had greater absolute values of<br />

DOP than the SRP. An <strong>in</strong>dependent determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the total dissolved P was carried out on<br />

the undigested leachate samples us<strong>in</strong>g ICP-AES. The values obta<strong>in</strong>ed from this <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation were similar to those obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the digested leachate samples determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

colorimetrically. We, therefore, concluded that particulate P loads <strong>in</strong> the leachate samples<br />

were negligible and were consequently not determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The high particulate P concentrations<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> the runoff from the soil samples, prompted estimation of ‘bioavailable’ P levels<br />

<strong>in</strong> the runoff water, us<strong>in</strong>g the iron-oxide impregnated paper strip method [15]. Sharpley [21]<br />

reported that the transport of BAP <strong>in</strong> agricultural runoff can stimulate freshwater<br />

eutrophication Total bioavailable P (BAP) loss was calculated by summ<strong>in</strong>g the BAP loads<br />

from the runoff and the TDP loads from the leachate. Total dissolved P loads were used to<br />

represent the BAP loads <strong>in</strong> the leachate on the assumption that the dissolved organic P will<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralize and eventually become bioavailable.<br />

As expected, the total BAP loss from the soil samples taken from site 2 were<br />

significantly greater than those taken from site 1 (Table 1), consistent with the higher STP<br />

and labile P values of the site 2 soil. For site 1, the total BAP of the control soils accounted<br />

for > 60 % of the total P loss, whereas total BAP loss from the WTR-amended plots<br />

accounted for ~ 25 % of the total P loss (Table 1). Similar behavior was observed for the<br />

samples taken from site 2, with the total BAP account<strong>in</strong>g for ~ 55 % <strong>in</strong> the control and ~25 %<br />

for the WTR-amended soils (Table 2). The runoff pH and the EC were similar for both the<br />

83


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

WTR-amended and the control plots at the respective sites. Runoff pH and EC values were<br />

similar to those observed for the leachates (data not presented).<br />

Effects of WTR on P losses<br />

There were no significant differences between the flow-weighted total P masses of the WTRamended<br />

plots and the control plots at either site (Table 2). However, the flow-weighted<br />

TDP, SRP and DOP masses were significantly reduced at both sites <strong>in</strong> the presence of WTR.<br />

Conversely, the flow-weighted particulate P masses were significantly greater <strong>in</strong> the WTR<br />

amended plots at both sites than the control plots (Table 2). Possibly, the particles detached<br />

by the ra<strong>in</strong> drops from the WTR-amended plots had greater P enrichment due to the WTR<br />

immobilization than the soil particles detached from the control plots. Furthermore, the<br />

greater particulate P masses may be due to the presence of WTR conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the eroded<br />

particles, which also conta<strong>in</strong>s some P.<br />

For site 1, application of WTR reduced the flow-weighted SRP masses by ~60 % and<br />

DOP by ~35% (Fig. 4). Overall, amendment with Al-WTR decreased flow-weighted<br />

dissolved P mass by ~59 %. Similar results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for site 2. Amendment with Al-<br />

WTR reduced SRP masses by ~53 % and DOP by ~50 % (Fig. 4), result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an overall<br />

reduction of flow-weighted dissolved P by ~52 %. Earlier studies have shown that WTR<br />

amendment <strong>in</strong>creased the content of P-fix<strong>in</strong>g Al and Fe concentrations <strong>in</strong> the soils at both<br />

sites (Fig. 3). The <strong>in</strong>creased P-fix<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the soils resulted <strong>in</strong> the decreased TDP<br />

content. This is consistent with the observation of Elliott et al. [6] that, as the content of Pfix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Al and Fe <strong>in</strong> soils and P sources <strong>in</strong>creases, TDP concentration decreases. The authors<br />

[6] determ<strong>in</strong>ed P levels <strong>in</strong> runoff from soils amended with biosolids and dairy manure, under<br />

simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall and concluded that TDP concentrations <strong>in</strong> runoff can be reduced by add<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Al and Fe salts to P sources that have high concentrations of water soluble P.<br />

Amendment with WTR decreased the total (runoff + leachate) flow-weighted TDP<br />

concentrations from ~ 2.5 mg L -1 to ~ 0.86 mg L -1 at site 1 and from ~ 3.2 mg L -1 to ~ 0.94<br />

mg L -1 at site 2. The reduced values exceed values (0.01-0.05 mg L -1 ) usually associated with<br />

eutrophication of surface waters [23], but are below a solution concentration of 1.0 mg L -1<br />

(3.2 * 10 -5 M) occasionally used as a benchmark. The 1.0 mg L -1 concentration is a common<br />

goal for wastewater discharges to rivers and streams and has been applied to soils on the<br />

premise that the discharge of P from soils to water should be held to the same standard [22].<br />

Greater s<strong>in</strong>gle amendment rates (> 114 Mg ha -1 ), or a multiple (yearly) WTR applications are<br />

likely necessary to reduce TDP concentration to the 0.01-0.05 mg L -1 target concentration<br />

range. The s<strong>in</strong>gle application of 114 Mg ha -1 , however, significantly reduced runoff and<br />

leachate P impacts on water quality.<br />

A large proportion of the total P load loss <strong>in</strong> runoff was particulate P (45-73 % of the<br />

total P losses). Compared to the control plots, greater particulate P losses were found <strong>in</strong> the<br />

WTR-amended plots at both sites (Fig. 4). Despite the greater particulate P loads <strong>in</strong> runoff<br />

from the WTR-amended plots, flow-weighted ‘bioavailable’ P loads <strong>in</strong> runoff were<br />

significantly smaller than those of the control plots (Fig. 32), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that much of the<br />

particulate P was not bioavailable. Thus, even if WTR-P erodes to surface waters, there<br />

should be m<strong>in</strong>imal adverse effects on water quality.<br />

84


percentage od total P mass loss<br />

Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Site1<br />

CTRL<br />

Site 1<br />

WTR<br />

Site 2<br />

CTRL<br />

Treatments<br />

Site 2<br />

WTR<br />

Figure 4: Percentages of total P mass loss<br />

represented by the various P forms.<br />

PP<br />

DOP<br />

SRP<br />

85<br />

Mass of bioavailable P (mg)<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Site1 CTRL Site 1 WTR Site 2 CTRL Site 2 WTR<br />

Treatments<br />

Figure 5: Flow-weighted bioavailable P loads <strong>in</strong><br />

runoff from sites 1 and 2.<br />

The study was conducted to assess the longevity of WTR immobilization. Results from this<br />

study also showed that amendment with WTR reduced labile P concentration by ≥ 60 % of<br />

those of the control plots and that 7.5 yr after WTR application, the WTR immobilized P<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable. The data suggest that WTR amendment should reduce P losses from soils,<br />

and do so for a long time. To confirm this, we utilized ra<strong>in</strong>fall simulation techniques to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigate P losses <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachates 7.5 yr after one-time WTR amendment.<br />

Amendment with WTR reduced dissolved P and bioavailable P (BAP) by > 50 % from both<br />

sites, show<strong>in</strong>g that even 7.5 yr after WTR amendment of the sites, the WTR-immobilized P<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed non-labile. Thus, there is little fear that WTR-immobilized P will be dissolved <strong>in</strong>to<br />

runoff and leachates to contam<strong>in</strong>ate surface and ground water. The data suggest that WTR<br />

can be relied upon to control P losses <strong>in</strong> runoff and leachates, and that even if WTR-P erodes<br />

to surface waters, the bioavailability of the immobilized P is m<strong>in</strong>imal and will cause no<br />

adverse effects on the water quality.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This study was funded by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA Project CP-<br />

82963801). We wish to express our appreciation to Drs. Hector Castro, John Thomas and Mr.<br />

Scott R. Br<strong>in</strong>ton (Soil and Water Sci. Dept., Univ. of Florida) for their technical assistance.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] N.C. Brady, R.R. Weil. “The Nature and Properties of soils (13 th ed)”, Prentice Hall, NJ, pp. 430-432,<br />

(2002).<br />

[2] P.R. Day. “Particle fractionation and particle size analysis”, In Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, C.A Black<br />

(Ed), American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI, pp. 545-567, (1965).


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

[3] E.A. Dayton, N.T. Basta, C.A Jakober, J.A. Hattey. “Us<strong>in</strong>g treatment residuals to reduce phosphorus <strong>in</strong><br />

agricultural runoff”, Journal of American Water Works Association, 95, pp. 151-158, (2003).<br />

[4] T.C. Daniel, D.H. Pote. “Analyz<strong>in</strong>g for total phosphorus and total dissolved phosphorus <strong>in</strong> water samples”,<br />

In: G.M. Pierzynski (Ed) “Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments residuals and waters”, Southern<br />

Corp. Series Bull. 396. Cooperative Extension Service, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 91-93,<br />

(2000).<br />

[5] H.A. Elliott, G.A. O’Connor, P. Lu, S. Br<strong>in</strong>ton. “Influence of water treatment residuals on phosphorus<br />

solubility and leach<strong>in</strong>g”, Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, pp. 681-689, (2002).<br />

[6] H.A. Elliott, R.C. Brandt, G.A O'Connor. “Runoff phosphorus losses from surface-applied biosolids”,<br />

Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, pp. 1632-1639, (2005).<br />

[7] L.E. Gallimore, N.T. Basta, D.E. Storm, M.E. Payton, R.H. Huhnke, M.D. Smolen. “Water treatment<br />

residual to reduce nutrients <strong>in</strong> surface runoff from agricultural land” Journal Environmental Quality 28, pp.<br />

1474-1478, (1999).<br />

[8] R.E. Hamon, I. Bertrand, M.J. McLaughl<strong>in</strong>. “Use and abuse of isotopic exchange data <strong>in</strong> soil chemistry”,<br />

Australian Journal of Soil Research, 40, pp. 1371-1381, (2002).<br />

[9] M. Hollander, D.A. Wolfe. “Nonparametric statistical methods” 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience Publications,<br />

NY, pp. 787, (1999).<br />

[10] E. Lombi, R.E. Hamon, S.P. McGrath, M.J. McLaughl<strong>in</strong>. “Lability of Cd, Cu, and Zn <strong>in</strong> polluted soils<br />

treated with lime, ber<strong>in</strong>gite, and red mud and identification of a non-labile colloidal fraction of metals us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

isotopic techniques”, Environmental Science and Technology, 37, pp. 979-984, (2003).<br />

[11] R.O. Maguire, J.T. Sims, S.K. Dentel, F.J. Coale, J.T. Mah. “Relationships between biosolids treatment<br />

processes and soil phosphorus availability”, Journal of Environmental Quality, 37, pp. 979-984, (2001).<br />

[12] K.C. Makris, 2004. Long-term stability of sorbed phosphorus by dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals:<br />

mechanisms and implications. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Ga<strong>in</strong>esville, FL, (2002).<br />

[13] E.O. McLean. “Soil pH and Lime Requirement”, In: Methods of Soil Analysis. 2nd Ed., A.L. Page et al.<br />

(Eds.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 687-683, (1982).<br />

[14] J. Murphy, J.P. Riley. “A modified s<strong>in</strong>gle solution method for the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of phosphate <strong>in</strong> natural<br />

waters”, Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, pp. 31-36, (1962).<br />

[15] R.G. Myers, G.M. Pierzynski. “Us<strong>in</strong>g the iron oxide method to estimate biovailable phosphorus <strong>in</strong> runoff”,<br />

In: G.M. Pierzynski (Ed) “Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments residuals and waters”, Southern<br />

Corp. Series Bull. 396. Cooperative Extension Service, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 98-<br />

102, (2000).<br />

[16] National Phosphorus Research Project. National research project for simulated ra<strong>in</strong>fall surface runoff<br />

studies [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available at http://www.sera17.ext.vt.edu/Documents/National_P_protocol.pdf (verified May<br />

12 2006). North Carol<strong>in</strong>a State University, Raleigh, (2001).<br />

[17] G.A. O’Connor, H.A Elliott, P. Lu. “Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g water treatment residuals phosphorus retention”, Soil<br />

and Crop science Society of Florida Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs 61, pp. 67-73, (2002).<br />

[18] J.D. Rhoades. “Electrical Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids”, In: Methods of soil Analysis 2nd Ed.,<br />

A.L. Page et al. (Eds.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI pp. 365 – 372, (1996).<br />

[19] SAS Institute. “SAS onl<strong>in</strong>e document”, version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, (1999).<br />

[20] O.F. Schoumans. “Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the degree of phosphate saturation <strong>in</strong> non-calcareous soils”, In: G.M.<br />

Pierzynski (Ed) “Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments residuals and waters”, Southern Corp.<br />

Series Bull. 396. Cooperative Extension Service, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 31-34,<br />

(2000).<br />

[21] A.N. Sharpley, S.C. Chapra, R. Wedepohl, J.T. Sims, T.C. Daniel, K.R. Reddy. “Manag<strong>in</strong>g agricultural<br />

phosphorus for protection of surface waters - issues and options”, Journal of Environmental Quality 23, pp. 437-<br />

451 (1994).<br />

[22] J.T. Sims, G.M. Pierzynski. “Chemistry of phosphorus <strong>in</strong> soils”, In. Chemical processes <strong>in</strong> soils, M.A<br />

Tabatabai and D.L Sparks (Eds). SSSA Book Series 8, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI,<br />

(2005).<br />

[23] USEPA. “Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils”, Section A, Part I, Chapter Three – Metallic<br />

analytes. Method 3050, SW-846, test methods for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g solid waste, USEPA, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, (1986).<br />

86


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION OF SOIL AND SURFACE<br />

WATER BY LEACHATES OF AN OPEN DUMP OF MUNICIPAL<br />

SOLID WASTE: A CASE STUDY OF OBLOGO LANDFILL IN<br />

THE GA WEST DISTRICT OF ACCRA, GHANA.<br />

Abuaku Ebenezer*<br />

Department of Soil Science, School of Agriculture, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.<br />

E-mail: ebentje@yahoo.co.uk; Tel.: + 233 244 73 60 51; Fax: + 233 21 85 03 85<br />

Poster Extended Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management constitutes one of the challeng<strong>in</strong>g environmental<br />

problems fac<strong>in</strong>g many countries <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g world <strong>in</strong> recent times. In Ghana, the<br />

problem is particularly worry<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the big cities like Accra where an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> population<br />

tends to aggravate the situation. Open dump<strong>in</strong>g is the most common method of solid waste<br />

disposal <strong>in</strong> most communities <strong>in</strong> Ghana. However, this presents numerous health and<br />

environmental problems for communities <strong>in</strong> which the landfills are located. Leachate from<br />

the landfill pollutes nearby streams and groundwater and <strong>in</strong> addition the piles act as breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

grounds for rodents and <strong>in</strong>sects which are vectors of human diseases (Rushbrook and Dugh,<br />

1999)<br />

Leachate from these MSW landfills has very high contents of a range of organic and<br />

<strong>in</strong>organic substances <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g heavy metals due to the heterogeneous nature of the waste<br />

stream reach<strong>in</strong>g the landfill. In mixed (unseparated) MSW, there is a diverse range of other<br />

materials, some of which are potentially hazardous. Heavy metals <strong>in</strong> MSW orig<strong>in</strong>ate from a<br />

variety of sources such as batteries, consumer electronics, used motor oils, plastics, <strong>in</strong>k and<br />

glass products, etc. When present <strong>in</strong> ground or surface waters, metals may constitute a<br />

significant hazard for public health and ecosystems.<br />

The site chosen for the study is important because of its proximity to the Densu River<br />

which serves as a source of treated water for Accra, the capital City of Ghana. It is also<br />

located <strong>in</strong> the catchment of one of the country’s most important Ramsar site.<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

The study is broadly carried out to ascerta<strong>in</strong> the impact of the landfill and its environmental<br />

pollution on the Oblogo community and its environment <strong>in</strong> the Ga West District of Accra,<br />

Ghana. This will <strong>in</strong>volve the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of heavy metals conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the leachates com<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from the landfill and explore the extent to which the leachate has negatively affected the<br />

quality of Densu River and other aquatic life such as fish. The study also aims at assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the levels of soil contam<strong>in</strong>ation due to the landfill and to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the effect of the leachatepolluted<br />

water on the quality of vegetables produced.<br />

87


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

HYPOTHESES<br />

The study is based on the hypotheses that the leachate com<strong>in</strong>g from the landfill conta<strong>in</strong>s high<br />

levels of heavy metals and other contam<strong>in</strong>ants which have affected negatively the quality of<br />

Densu River and that the quality of both the soil and vegetables irrigated with the leachatepolluted<br />

river has also been affected significantly.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The fieldwork <strong>in</strong>volved sampl<strong>in</strong>g of leachates, surface water, soil, fish, and vegetables from<br />

the study site. Measurements which were monitored <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>in</strong>cluded temperature, pH,<br />

and conductivity. Laboratory analyses were also carried out to determ<strong>in</strong>e the presences and/or<br />

levels of heavy metals such as Mercury (Hg), Cadmium (Cd), Copper (Cu), Arsenic (As),<br />

Silver (Ag) etc us<strong>in</strong>g the Nuclear Activation Analysis (NAA) technique. Other physicochemical<br />

parameters analysed <strong>in</strong>cluded the Total Dissolved Solid (TDS), Chemical Oxygen<br />

Demand (COD), and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD). Questionnaires were designed to<br />

ascerta<strong>in</strong> the impact of the landfill on the health and socio-economic life of the Oblogo<br />

community.<br />

EXPECTED OUTCOME<br />

It is envisaged that the study will help establish the critical levels of heavy metal<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>in</strong> the soil and vegetables irrigated with the leachate-polluted river. The<br />

presence and/or critical levels of heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation of the Densu River and other<br />

aquatic life such as fish will be known. The effect of the presence of the landfill on the health<br />

aspects such respiratory diseases, cholera, typhoid etc and the socio-economic life of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitants of Oblogo will be ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed. Recommendations will therefore be made to the<br />

appropriate governmental agencies for policy formulation and immediate <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />

88


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

WORKSHOP Theme: Soil and Groundwater Pollution and<br />

Remediation<br />

Convenors: M. Verloo, K. Walraevens, J. Van De Steene, F. Tack<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The workshop consisted of two sub-themes:<br />

- Manag<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils us<strong>in</strong>g phytoremediation<br />

- Manag<strong>in</strong>g groundwater pollution from waste disposal sites<br />

Sub-theme: Manag<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated soils us<strong>in</strong>g phytoremediation<br />

Soil contam<strong>in</strong>ation is widespread <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>habited areas. Because effective cleanup by pollutant<br />

removal is f<strong>in</strong>ancially prohibitive, there is a need to develop alternative affordable strategies<br />

to manage the contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Phytoremediation may prove a valuable option <strong>in</strong> deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated land, especially if it can be comb<strong>in</strong>ed with economic uses such as wood<br />

production for bioenergy. Erik Meers <strong>in</strong> his keynote presentation outl<strong>in</strong>ed the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of<br />

phytoremediation and highlighted recent scientific developments.<br />

Acid m<strong>in</strong>e tail<strong>in</strong>gs may benefit from phytoremediation approaches for long term stabilization<br />

of the site. However, plant growth may only be realized on these sites after amelioration of<br />

the physico-chemical parameters us<strong>in</strong>g amendments. Tee Boon Goh (Canada) presented<br />

experiences with various low cost amendments for stabiliz<strong>in</strong>g these sites.<br />

In a next contribution, Tran Thi Le Ha outl<strong>in</strong>ed the issue of contam<strong>in</strong>ation of agricultural land<br />

<strong>in</strong> Vietnam due to various sources of trade village waste.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Exist<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated sites should be managed account<strong>in</strong>g for the contam<strong>in</strong>ation present.<br />

This management should be designed to prevent any significant hazards to ecosystems or to<br />

the food web. Phytoremediation is promis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this context provided it can be comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with beneficial or economic uses. Appropriate management strategies are extremely site<br />

specific and additionally depend on economical and sociological aspects. Prevention of new<br />

soil pollution should be an utmost priority <strong>in</strong> a country’s policy with respect to soil<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

Sub-theme: Manag<strong>in</strong>g groundwater pollution from waste disposal sites<br />

A keynote presentation on this sub-theme was presented by Krist<strong>in</strong>e Walraevens.<br />

Peter Kamande made an oral presentation on metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> irrigated agricultural<br />

land <strong>in</strong> Kenya. River water used for irrigation of fields at the river-side is contam<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />

various pollutants. The study was focus<strong>in</strong>g on heavy metals <strong>in</strong> the soil.<br />

89


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

Abuaku Ebenezer presented both orally and <strong>in</strong> a poster a case study of Oblogo municipal<br />

landfill <strong>in</strong> the Ga West District of Accra, Ghana. This ongo<strong>in</strong>g study is also focus<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

heavy metal contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Leachates flow overland towards the nearby Densu River, which<br />

is used for food-supply (fish) and irrigation of vegetable fields.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Uncontrolled dump<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> open dumps is still common practice <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, both<br />

for <strong>in</strong>dustrial and municipal solid waste. Ensu<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ation problems are affect<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

local environment and are threaten<strong>in</strong>g food quality, and ultimately people’s health. Adoption<br />

of proper waste management strategies, and of measures for controll<strong>in</strong>g pollution caused by<br />

the exist<strong>in</strong>g open dumps, are highly needed. These require characterization of the sit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conditions and of the pollution case.<br />

90


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme A – Soil and groundwater pollution and remediation<br />

91


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

WORKSHOP THEME B – INTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

Sub-theme : Use of isotope techniques for nutrient management –<br />

Isotope biochemistry<br />

P. Boeckx, K. Denef, O. Van Cleemput<br />

Paper/poster : Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the agronomic effectiveness of natural<br />

phosphate rock with poultry manure : a way forward to susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

crop production – S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang, M.K. Akekoe, O.O. Oladeji,<br />

S.K.A. Danso<br />

Paper/poster : The effect of lim<strong>in</strong>g an acid nitisol with either calcite<br />

or dolomite on two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties<br />

differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance – E.N. Mugai, S.G. Agong, H.<br />

Matsumoto<br />

Paper/poster : Effect of P fertilisers and weed control on the fate of P<br />

fertilizers applied to soils under second-rotation P<strong>in</strong>us radiata – A.A.<br />

Rivaie, P. Loganathan, R.W. Tillman<br />

Sub-theme : Organic farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the tropics present situation,<br />

possibilities and challenges – Current research at the research group of<br />

soil fertility and nutrient management<br />

Stefaan De Neve<br />

Paper/poster : Low <strong>in</strong>put approaches for soil fertility management<br />

verified for semi-arid areas of Eastern Uganda – Kayuki C. Kaizzi,<br />

Byalebeka John, Charles S. Wortmann, Martha Mamo<br />

Paper/poster : Amelioration of acid sulfate soil <strong>in</strong>fertility <strong>in</strong> Malaysia for rice<br />

cultivation – J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong><br />

Conclusions<br />

92


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Sub-theme : USE OF ISOTOPE TECHNIQUES FOR<br />

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT<br />

P. Boeckx, K. Denef, and O. Van Cleemput<br />

1 Laboratory of Applied <strong>Physical</strong> Chemistry (ISOFYS), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<br />

www.isofys.ugent.be, pascal.boeckx@ugent.be, Phone: +32 9 264 60 00<br />

ISOTOPE BIOGEOCHEMISTRY<br />

One of the research l<strong>in</strong>es developed at the ISOFYS laboratory is Isotope<br />

Biogeochemistry. Here<strong>in</strong> we use advanced, state of the art stable isotope techniques to<br />

study processes of C and N cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

two paragraphs we present a summary of our scientific activities and the analytical<br />

equipment related to stable isotope analysis we have available.<br />

A first research l<strong>in</strong>e deals with N cycl<strong>in</strong>g studies. Nitrogen cycl<strong>in</strong>g is studied <strong>in</strong><br />

natural and agricultural ecosystems. In natural ecosystems we use natural abundance<br />

measurements of 15 N <strong>in</strong> soil profiles and leaf material to develop ecosystem <strong>in</strong>dicators for<br />

N-cycl<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. N openness of ecosystems). Next to that we use 15 N isotope dilution<br />

techniques <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with 15 N trac<strong>in</strong>g models to unravel N cycl<strong>in</strong>g processes <strong>in</strong> soil<br />

systems. Both natural abundance techniques and tracer techniques are also applied to<br />

study BNF <strong>in</strong> tropical agriculture. A second research l<strong>in</strong>e deals with the use if 13 C <strong>in</strong><br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation with physical fractionation techniques for soil organic matter. These studies<br />

are carried out on a variety of land use systems, go<strong>in</strong>g from forest soils over grasslands to<br />

no-till systems to study C turnover <strong>in</strong> these systems. A third Isotope Biogeochemistry<br />

research l<strong>in</strong>e deals with the identification of nitrate sources <strong>in</strong> surface water us<strong>in</strong>g stable<br />

isotope signatures and mach<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g techniques. F<strong>in</strong>ally, a fourth axis of expertise we<br />

develop is the use of biomarkers to assess the l<strong>in</strong>k between, on the one hand above<br />

ground biodiversity or land use, and on the other the microbial community structure <strong>in</strong><br />

the soil and the biogeochemical process they carry out.<br />

To perform the above mentioned research l<strong>in</strong>es ISOFYS is equipped with state of<br />

the art advanced mass spectrometry devices. ISOFYS has three Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Flow Isotope<br />

Ratio Mass Spectrometer (CF-IRMS) systems. This equipment is coupled to different<br />

sample preparation units such as an elemental analyzer, a high temperature elemental<br />

analyzer, TOC/TN analyzer, trace gas unit, gas chromatograph (GC) and HPLC. The<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of three IRMS systems <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous flow with six sample preparation units<br />

enables ISOFYS to analyze 15 N, 13 C and 18 O <strong>in</strong> bulk solid samples; 15 N and 13 C <strong>in</strong> TOC<br />

and TN from liquid samples; 15 N, 13 C and 18 O <strong>in</strong> CO2, CH4, N2O and N2; 15 N, 13 C, 18 O<br />

and D <strong>in</strong> specific compounds that can be separated through; and f<strong>in</strong>ally 13C <strong>in</strong> specific<br />

compounds that can be separated via HPLC.<br />

93


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

SELECTED REFERENCES<br />

[1] P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput. "Methane oxidation <strong>in</strong> a neutral landfill cover soil: <strong>in</strong>fluence of<br />

temperature, moisture content and N-turnover", Journal of Environmental Quality 25: 178-183, (1996).<br />

[2] P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput. "Methane emission from a freshwater wetland <strong>in</strong> Belgium", Soil Science<br />

Society of America Journal 61: 1250-1256, (1997).<br />

[3] Goossens, A. De Visscher, P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput. "Two-year field study on the emission of<br />

N2O from coarse and middle-textured Belgian soils with different land use", Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Agroecosystems 60: 23-34, (2001).<br />

[4] L. Kravchenko, P. Boeckx, V. Galchenko, O. Van Cleemput. "Short-term and long-term effects of<br />

NH4 + on CH4 and N2O fluxes <strong>in</strong> arable soils", Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34: 669-678, (2002).<br />

[5] H. Vervaet, P. Boeckx, V. Unamuno, O. Van Cleemput, G. Hofman. "Can δ 15 N profiles <strong>in</strong> forest soils<br />

predict NO3 - loss and net N m<strong>in</strong>eralization rates ?", Biology and Fertility of Soils 36: 143-150, (2002).<br />

[6] F. Accoe, P. Boeckx, O.Van Cleemput, G. Hofman, H. Xu, B. Huang, G. Chen. "Characterization of<br />

soil organic matter fractions from grassland and cultivated soils via C content and δ 13 C signature", Rapid<br />

Communications <strong>in</strong> Mass Spectrometry 16: 2157-2164, (2002).<br />

[7] X. Xu, P. Boeckx, L. Zhou, O.Van Cleemput. "Inhibition experiments on nitrous oxide emission from<br />

paddy soils", Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16 (3), DOI. 10.1029/2001GB001397, (2002).<br />

[8] D. Seghers, E.M. Top, D. Reheul, R. Bulcke, P. Boeckx, W. Verstraete, S.D. Siciliano. "Long-term<br />

effects of m<strong>in</strong>eral versus organic fertilizers on activity and structure of the methanotrophic community <strong>in</strong><br />

agricultural soils", Environmental Microbiology 5: 867-877, (2003).<br />

[9] K. Dhondt, P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput, G. Hofman. "Quantify<strong>in</strong>g nitrate retention processes <strong>in</strong> a<br />

riparian buffer zone us<strong>in</strong>g the natural abundance of 15 N <strong>in</strong> NO3 - ", Rapid Communications <strong>in</strong> Mass<br />

Spectrometry 17: 2597-2604, (2003).<br />

[10] F. Accoe, P. Boeckx, J. Busschaert, G. Hofman, O. Van Cleemput. "Gross N transformation rates and<br />

net N m<strong>in</strong>eralisation rates related to C and N content of soil organic matter fractions <strong>in</strong> grassland soils of<br />

different age", Soil Biology & Biochemistry 36: 2075-2087, (2004).<br />

[11] H. Vervaet, P. Boeckx, A.M.C. Boko, O. Van Cleemput, G. Hofman. "Gross and net N transformation<br />

processes <strong>in</strong> a temperate forest soil: the role of NH4 + and NO3 - immobilization", Plant and Soil 264: 349-<br />

357, (2004).<br />

[12] S. De Smet, A. Balcaen, E. Claeys, P. Boeckx, O. Van Cleemput. "Stable carbon isotope analysis of<br />

different tissues of beef animals <strong>in</strong> relation to their diet". Rapid Communications <strong>in</strong> Mass Spectrometry<br />

18:1227-1232, (2004).<br />

[13] P. Boeckx, L. Paul<strong>in</strong>o, C. Oyarzún, O. Van Cleemput, R. Godoy. "Soil δ 15 N patterns <strong>in</strong> old-growth<br />

forests of southern Chile as <strong>in</strong>tegrator for N cycl<strong>in</strong>g Isotopes", <strong>in</strong> Environmental and Health Studies 41:<br />

249-259, (2005).<br />

[14] D. Huygens, P. Boeckx, R. Godoy, C. Oyarzún, O. Van Cleemput. "Aggregate and soil organic carbon<br />

dynamics <strong>in</strong> south Chilean Andisols", Biogeosciences 2: 159-174, (2005).<br />

[15] K. Dhondt, P. Boeckx, N. Verhoest, O. Hofman, O. Van Cleemput. "Assessment of temporal and<br />

spatial efficiency of three adjacent vegetated riparian buffer zones for groundwater nitrate retention".<br />

Environmental Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Assessment 116: 197-215, (2005)<br />

[16] Y. Kewei, R.D. DeLaune, P. Boeckx. "Direct measurement of denitrification activity <strong>in</strong> a Gulf coast<br />

freshwater marsh receiv<strong>in</strong>g diverted Mississippi water". Chemosphere (accepted), (2006).<br />

94


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

ENHANCING THE AGRONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS OF<br />

NATURAL PHOSPHATE ROCK WITH POULTRY MANURE:<br />

A WAY FORWARD TO SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION<br />

S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang 1 *, M.K. Abekoe 2 , O.O. Oladeji 1 , S.K.A. Danso 2<br />

1 Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Ga<strong>in</strong>esville, FL 32611, USA; 2 Department of<br />

Soil Science, University of Ghana, P. O. Box 125, Legon, Accra, Ghana<br />

* Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author (E-mail: agy<strong>in</strong>@ufl.edu Tel.: 1-352-392-1804 ext. 328)<br />

Abstract<br />

Phosphorus is one of the ma<strong>in</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g nutrients for agricultural production <strong>in</strong> highly weathered soils<br />

worldwide. Addition of P <strong>in</strong>puts is thus required for susta<strong>in</strong>able crop production. However, high cost and<br />

limited access to m<strong>in</strong>eral P fertilizers limit their use by resource-poor farmers <strong>in</strong> West Africa. Direct<br />

application of f<strong>in</strong>ely ground phosphate rock is a promis<strong>in</strong>g alternative but its low solubility hampers its use.<br />

There is therefore the need to look <strong>in</strong>to low cost means of improv<strong>in</strong>g the solubility of natural phosphate<br />

rock to improve their agronomic effectiveness. The objective of this study was to quantitatively estimate<br />

the enhancement effect of poultry manure on P availability applied from low reactive phosphate rock (Togo<br />

phosphate rock) to maize grown on highly weathered soils. We utilized two highly weathered soils from<br />

Ghana and Brazil for this study. In a greenhouse experiment, us<strong>in</strong>g 32 P isotopic tracers, the agronomic<br />

effectiveness of poultry-manure-amended Togo rock phosphate (PR) was compared with partially<br />

acidulated Togo rock phosphate (PAPR) and triple super phosphate (TSP). Four rates of poultry manure: 0,<br />

low (30 mg P kg -1 ), high (60 mg P kg -1 ) and very high (120 mg P kg -1 ) were respectively added to a<br />

constant amendment (60 mg P kg -1 ) of the P sources and applied to each pot of 4 kg soil. A Randomized<br />

Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used for the experiment <strong>in</strong> a greenhouse sett<strong>in</strong>g and Maize (Zea<br />

mays) was used as a test crop. The plants were allowed to grow for 42 days after which the above ground<br />

portion was harvested for analysis. Without poultry manure addition, the agronomic effectiveness,<br />

represented by the relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) and proportion of P derived from fertilizer (%<br />

Pdff) was <strong>in</strong> the order TSP > PAPR > PR = control (P0). In the presence of low rate poultry manure<br />

addition, the agronomic effectiveness followed the order TSP > PAPR = PR > P0. However, at the high and<br />

very high rates of poultry manure addition, no significant differences <strong>in</strong> agronomic effectiveness were<br />

observed among the P sources, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that at this rate of poultry manure addition, PR was equally as<br />

effective as TSP. The study showed that direct application of PR will be a viable option for P replenishment<br />

when comb<strong>in</strong>ed with poultry manure at a 1:1 P ratio. Thus a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of PR and poultry manure can be<br />

a cost-effective means of ensur<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural production <strong>in</strong> P-deficient, highly weathered<br />

tropical soils.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Highly weathered tropical soils are often very <strong>in</strong>fertile and exhibit high acidity, which are<br />

severe constra<strong>in</strong>ts for optimum plant growth and crop yields. A very low P status is the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g factor for susta<strong>in</strong>able crop production, which is exacerbated through the so<br />

called ‘‘soil m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g’’, i.e. cont<strong>in</strong>uous cultivation without addition of P <strong>in</strong>puts [13]. A<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able management of these soils to <strong>in</strong>crease and susta<strong>in</strong> crop yields requires a<br />

proper land use such as long fallows and/or <strong>in</strong>tegrated management of organic and<br />

<strong>in</strong>organic <strong>in</strong>puts [13]. Options for P <strong>in</strong>puts are organic materials and water-soluble<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral P fertilizers like triple superphosphate and diammonium phosphate.<br />

95


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Unfortunately, the use of water-soluble m<strong>in</strong>eral (nearly all imported) P fertilizers by the<br />

resource-poor farmers <strong>in</strong> West Africa is limited by their relatively high cost, and supplies<br />

often unavailable, when needed. Their use has become even more limited due to the<br />

withdrawal of subsidies on agricultural imports by most governments of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ghana. This situation has created a need to consider other alternative<br />

P sources for susta<strong>in</strong>able crop production especially <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries.<br />

Direct application of f<strong>in</strong>ely ground phosphate rock (PR), which is locally available<br />

or imported from neighbour<strong>in</strong>g countries has been suggested as an alternative to the use<br />

of more expensive imported water-soluble P fertilizers for some crops grown <strong>in</strong> tropical<br />

acid soils [10a]. In recent years attention has been focused on the direct use of PRs <strong>in</strong><br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, and a number of trials have been conducted under greenhouse and<br />

field sett<strong>in</strong>gs [1,2,10a,10b,20,21, 29, 30,31]. The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the use of PR is due to<br />

its relatively low cost compared to the processed water-soluble fertilizers, and to its effect<br />

both <strong>in</strong> supply<strong>in</strong>g P and lim<strong>in</strong>g soils <strong>in</strong> the long-term [10a,15]. Utilization of local PR<br />

deposits m<strong>in</strong>imizes importation costs and hence saves on foreign exchange. In addition,<br />

other elements <strong>in</strong> PR, such as Ca, can improve the soil chemical and physical<br />

characteristics and contribute to plant nutrition [10a]. These advantages notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

the low solubility of PRs has discouraged its recommendation for direct use as a source<br />

of P for crops. Most of the P dissolved from PR undergoes immediate adsorption and<br />

immobilization reactions, whereas only a fraction (30–50% of dissolved P from PR)<br />

becomes available for plant uptake [8,21].<br />

A method to improve the effectiveness of PR such as partial acid treatment with<br />

H2SO4 or H3PO4 has been suggested. Chien and Menon [10a] reported that partially<br />

acidified phosphate rocks can be as effective as superphosphate for certa<strong>in</strong> crops and<br />

soils. Although partially acidified phosphate rocks are considerably cheaper than the<br />

imported water-soluble P fertilizer, the cost is still beyond the reach of the resource-poor<br />

small-holder farmers of the develop<strong>in</strong>g world. Another method that has been suggested is<br />

the compaction of PR with water-soluble P fertilizers [11,20,29]. Aga<strong>in</strong>, this process is<br />

slightly expensive to the resource-poor small-holder farmers. One of the cost effective<br />

options to <strong>in</strong>crease PR solubility that has not been fully exploited is to comb<strong>in</strong>e it with<br />

on-farm organic materials such as farmyard manure (FYM) and crop residues, which<br />

farmers, particularly resource-poor smallholders, can access easily. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

hypothetical PR dissolution reaction, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the release of H2PO4 - and Ca 2+<br />

[Ca10(PO4)6F2 + 12H + ⇔ 10Ca 2+ + 6H2PO4 - + 2F - ],<br />

the dissolution of PR can be <strong>in</strong>creased by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the supply of protons (H + ) or by the<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous removal of the dissolved Ca and P from the dissolution zone [5]. Both of<br />

these expected processes have been shown to <strong>in</strong>crease the dissolution of PR when acidic<br />

soil is amended with organic materials [5,18,21, 23,30]. With this amendment, protons<br />

are supplied by organic acids produced dur<strong>in</strong>g compost<strong>in</strong>g and by the oxidation of<br />

ammonium to nitrate <strong>in</strong> the organic material. Thus depend<strong>in</strong>g on the amount and quality<br />

of the material used, it can <strong>in</strong>fluence P availability by stimulat<strong>in</strong>g microbial activity that<br />

can, <strong>in</strong> turn, <strong>in</strong>crease m<strong>in</strong>eralization of soil organic P, produce organic acids that may<br />

help to acidify and dissolve PR, and reduce P sorption [18]. Although organic<br />

amendments cannot usually provide sufficient P for optimum crop productivity because<br />

96


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

of its low P content, it can <strong>in</strong>crease P availability <strong>in</strong> high P-fix<strong>in</strong>g soils [18]. Increases <strong>in</strong><br />

P availability are usually attributed firstly to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> net negative charges on soil<br />

colloids that reduce adsorption of applied P, and secondly to organic anions formed by<br />

decompos<strong>in</strong>g organic manure that can compete with P for the same adsorption sites <strong>in</strong> the<br />

soil [18].<br />

In addition to provid<strong>in</strong>g all the enumerated benefits with regard to organic matter <strong>in</strong><br />

enhanc<strong>in</strong>g P phytoavailability from PR, poultry manure, generally, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g high P<br />

content, which can supply the early P requirement of the crop. By so do<strong>in</strong>g, the plant<br />

would have better root development to deplete P and Ca <strong>in</strong> the dissolution zones of the<br />

PR, and thus enhance further dissolution of the PR. However, quantitative estimation of P<br />

availability from PR <strong>in</strong> soil as enhanced by poultry manure has not been reported.<br />

Because of possible <strong>in</strong>teractions (prim<strong>in</strong>g effect) among poultry manure, PR, and soil P,<br />

use of radioactive 32 P as a tracer is essential to dist<strong>in</strong>guish P availability from soil P, PR,<br />

or poultry manure. The objective of this study was to use 32 P as a tracer to estimate<br />

quantitatively the enhancement effect of poultry manure on P availability applied from a<br />

low-reactivity PR to maize grown on highly weathered tropical soils.<br />

Site and soil description<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Two highly weathered soil types (from Ghana and Brazil) were collected and utilized for<br />

the study. The soil from Ghana was a well-dra<strong>in</strong>ed savanna ochrosol (Ferric Acrisol,<br />

[14]), obta<strong>in</strong>ed from an uncultivated field at the University of Ghana Farm, Legon, near<br />

Accra. The soil was derived from quartzite schist. The sampl<strong>in</strong>g area receives an annual<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall of between 635-1145 mm. The vegetation is ma<strong>in</strong>ly grassland with clusters of<br />

shrubs and grasses which <strong>in</strong>clude Panicum maximum, Andropogon gayallus, Sporobolus<br />

pyramidalis and Cynodon plectoatachus. The soil from Brazil was a clay-textured, typic<br />

Haplustox [27], with natural vegetation. The soil was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Planalt<strong>in</strong>a de Goiás,<br />

State of Goiás, Brazil, an area with<strong>in</strong> the Brazilian central "Cerrado" (15 o 14' S, 47 o 42'<br />

W, altitude 826 m). The soils were collected at the 0-20 cm layer, air-dried, homogenized<br />

and sieved through a 4 mm screen for pot experiments, and 2 mm screen for laboratory<br />

analysis.<br />

Laboratory analysis<br />

Selected physicochemical properties of the soils used are given <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Particle size<br />

distribution analysis was performed us<strong>in</strong>g the modified Bouyoucos method as described<br />

by Day [12]. Soil pH was measured <strong>in</strong> 1:2 soil: 0.01M CaCl2. Organic carbon was<br />

analysed follow<strong>in</strong>g the Walkley and Black oxidation procedure [4]. Total N was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the Kjeldahl method. Exchangeable basic cations were determ<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

ammonium acetate leachates while exchangeable Al and H were determ<strong>in</strong>ed from KCl<br />

leachates as described by Thomas [28]. The effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC)<br />

was calculated by summ<strong>in</strong>g the above exchangeable cations. Extractable P was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the Bray-1 method and total P content of the soil by digestion with<br />

97


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

concentrated sulphuric acid and hydrogen peroxide [9]. In all cases P concentration was<br />

measured on neutralized extracts by colour development performed by the ammonium<br />

molybdate-ascorbic acid blue method [24].<br />

Selected chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of the PR used are given <strong>in</strong> Table 2.<br />

Total P was determ<strong>in</strong>ed as described <strong>in</strong> AOAC [6]. The fluoride content was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by means of the F - selective electrode as described by Evans et al. [13]. The PR<br />

dissolution <strong>in</strong> neutral ammonium citrate (NAC) and water was carried out as described <strong>in</strong><br />

AOAC (1990) measur<strong>in</strong>g dissolved phosphate by means of the molybdenum blue method<br />

[24]. Calcium carbonate equivalent and pH were determ<strong>in</strong>ed as described <strong>in</strong> ISRIC [17].<br />

The m<strong>in</strong>eral composition of the PR was assessed by X-ray diffraction analysis us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

unoriented mounts and Co-Ka radiation on a Siemens D500 diffractometer equipped with<br />

a graphite crystal monochromator. The CO2-<strong>in</strong>dex, i.e. the ratio of <strong>in</strong>tensities of the C–O<br />

and P–O absorptions, was determ<strong>in</strong>ed from Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the KBr pellet method (0.35 mg PR and 300 mg KBr compressed at 150 MPa <strong>in</strong> an<br />

evacuated die) and a Perk<strong>in</strong>-Elmer FT-IR2000 <strong>in</strong>strument. Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy<br />

(SEM) us<strong>in</strong>g a microprobe technique with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) was used to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation about arrangement, composition, size, shape and texture of m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

constituents.<br />

Greenhouse experiment<br />

Soil amendments used<br />

Well decomposed poultry manure was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from University of Ghana Agricultural<br />

Research Station, Nungua, near Accra. It was air-dried and crushed to pass through a 2mm<br />

sieve. The nutrient concentration <strong>in</strong> the poultry manure was as follows: P, 0.59% N,<br />

2.3%; and Ca, 3.1 %. The P sources utilized for the study <strong>in</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>ely ground form (100<br />

mesh) were: Togo phosphate rock (PR), triple superphosphate (TSP) and partially<br />

acidified Togo phosphate rock (PAPR). The PR was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Hahotoe (Togo) and<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ed 16 % total P with 1.3 % of neutral ammonium citrate-soluble P [2]. The total P<br />

content of the P sources was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by dissolv<strong>in</strong>g each of them <strong>in</strong> concentrated HCl<br />

on a hot sandbath at 80°C and then determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the concentration colorimetrically on<br />

Philips PU 8620 spectrophotometer. The total P contents were: 11.87% for PAPR and<br />

19.4 % for TSP.<br />

Design of the experiment<br />

Sixty (60) mg P kg -1 of the three <strong>in</strong>organic P sources, together with a control [no P<br />

addition (P0)], were utilized for the study. Four application rates of poultry manure were<br />

utilized as follows: no poultry manure (M0), poultry manure to supply 30 mg P (M30), 60<br />

mg P (M60) and 120 mg P (M120) kg -1 of soil calculated on the basis of the total P content<br />

of the poultry manure. Each of the 16 P source x poultry manure application rate<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation was randomly assigned to a pot conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 4 kg of the 2 soil types<br />

respectively. Thus a 3-way mixed factorial experiment with two fixed factors (P source<br />

and Poultry manure rate) and one random factor (soil type) were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to yield a total<br />

of 32 treatments. The pots were arranged n a randomized complete block design (RCBD)<br />

98


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

<strong>in</strong> a greenhouse sett<strong>in</strong>g with 3 replicates for each treatment. The isotopic dilution<br />

technique [32] was then used for the study.<br />

An aliquot conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1850 kBq 32 P pot -1 was added to obta<strong>in</strong> sufficient activity <strong>in</strong><br />

the plant material. To prepare the 32 P-labelled carrier solution, the total activity required<br />

for the experiments was added as 32 P carrier-free to a known volume of KH2PO4 carrier<br />

solution with 10 ppm P. Labell<strong>in</strong>g was done by mix<strong>in</strong>g the soil thoroughly with 10 ml of<br />

the solution conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 32 P phosphate ions. The soils were allowed to equilibrate for 1<br />

week before add<strong>in</strong>g the unlabelled P fertilizers uniformly to the soil. A control [without P<br />

fertilizer and poultry manure addition (P0M0)], where only the 32 P carrier solution was<br />

added was <strong>in</strong>cluded as reference for the isotopic method.<br />

Five maize (Zea mays var. Toxip<strong>in</strong>o) seeds were sown <strong>in</strong> each pot and th<strong>in</strong>ned to<br />

two after emergence. Pots were watered to 70% of the water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the soil.<br />

Nitrogen, K, Ca, Mg and micronutrients were supplied as P-free Hoagland solution to<br />

each pot at every 2-weeks <strong>in</strong>terval. The maize plants were allowed to grow for 42 days<br />

after which the above-ground plant material of each pot was cut <strong>in</strong>to small pieces and the<br />

shoot dry matter yield was recorded after oven dry<strong>in</strong>g at 70 o C to a constant mass. The<br />

plant samples were burned at 450 o C for 5 h <strong>in</strong> a muffle furnace and the ashes were<br />

dissolved <strong>in</strong> 20 ml of 2 M HCl and filtered. Total P content of the filtered solution was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed colorimetrically us<strong>in</strong>g the Murphy and Riley [24] method. The 32 P activity <strong>in</strong><br />

the filtered solution was measured by liquid sc<strong>in</strong>tillation (Beckman LS 5801) count<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the 32 P, by the Cerenkov Effect. Counts were corrected for isotope decay and count<strong>in</strong>g<br />

efficiency (50%), and expressed <strong>in</strong> Bq. The specific activity (S.A.) of P was then<br />

calculated by consider<strong>in</strong>g the radioactivity per amount of total P content <strong>in</strong> the plant and<br />

expressed <strong>in</strong> Bq mg -1 P [32]. The percentage of plant P derived from the labeled source,<br />

and that derived from the soil alone, were calculated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the 32 P isotopic dilution<br />

method [32]. Similarly, the proportion (%) and amount (mg P pot -1 ) of P <strong>in</strong> the plants<br />

derived from the various P sources, with and without poultry manure treatments was<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed directly or <strong>in</strong>directly us<strong>in</strong>g isotope dilution concepts [32]. Total P uptake from<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dividual P sources alone, and <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with poultry manure was calculated<br />

based on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples followed <strong>in</strong> Chien et al. [11]. The <strong>in</strong>dices of relative agronomic<br />

effectiveness (RAE) were estimated based on the shoot dry weight (DMY), and total P<br />

uptake (Chien et al., 1996) as follows:.<br />

RAE (%) = [(Y1 – Y0) / (Y2 – Y0)] * 100<br />

where<br />

Y1 = yield or P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the P source or its comb<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />

Y2 = yield or P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed from TSP source or its comb<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />

Y0 = yield or P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the control<br />

Statistical analyses<br />

Differences among treatments were statistically analyzed as a factorial experiment with a<br />

randomized complete block design (RCBD), us<strong>in</strong>g the PROC GLM procedure of general<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear model (GLM) of the SAS software [26]. The means of the various treatments were<br />

separated us<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle degree of freedom orthogonal contrast procedure. The<br />

99


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

relationship between P uptake and rate of poultry manure applied for the P sources was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g a logarithmic function as follows:<br />

ln Yi = βo + βi ln χ + εi<br />

where<br />

Yi was the P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed with P source i,<br />

χ was the rate of poultry manure applied,<br />

βi was the slope of the response function of P source i,<br />

βo was the <strong>in</strong>tercept, and<br />

εi was the random error of the fitted model.<br />

The ratio of any two of the regression coefficients (βi), that describes a Relative Crop<br />

Response Index (RCRI) [11,25] was estimated as follows: RCRI = βi/βTSP where βi is the<br />

regression estimate of the tested P source (PR or PAPR) and βTSP is the regression<br />

estimate of the standard fertilizer used (TSP). This ratio represents the marg<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> P uptake, <strong>in</strong> proportion of a P source compared with a standard source, when a unit of<br />

poultry manure is applied.<br />

Properties of the soils<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />

The soil obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Ghana was a sandy clay loam soil and slightly acid <strong>in</strong> reaction<br />

(Table 1). The clay (27.5 %) and sand (51 %) contents were similar to those obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

Acquaye and Oteng [3] for some savanna Ochrosols <strong>in</strong> Ghana. It was characterized by<br />

low organic matter, total nitrogen, available P and exchangeable basic cations. The low<br />

nutrient content of the soil may be due to little nutrient element cycl<strong>in</strong>g through plants <strong>in</strong><br />

soils of the savanna zone.<br />

The soil obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Brazil on the other hand was a clay soil and acid <strong>in</strong><br />

reaction with comparatively high organic matter content (Table 1). Consistent with highly<br />

weathered soils, the soil had very low exchangeable basic cations and low nutrient (N and<br />

P) content.<br />

100


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Ghana Brazil<br />

Soil properties<br />

soil soil<br />

Sand (g kg -1 ) 510 296<br />

Silt (g kg -1 ) 215 324<br />

Clay (g kg -1 ) 275 390<br />

pH 6.1 4.2<br />

Organic carbon (g kg -1 ) 10.6 22.6<br />

Total Nitrogen (%) 0.10 0.32<br />

Total P (mg kg -1 ) 91 103<br />

Bray P-1 (mg kg -1 )<br />

Exchangeable basic cations (cmol (+) kg<br />

7.49 6.98<br />

-1 )<br />

Ca 2.27 1.49<br />

Mg 1.05 1.05<br />

K 0.85 0.16<br />

Na 0.34 0.10<br />

Exchangeable acidity (cmol (+) kg -1 ) 1.45 6.58<br />

Table 1: Some physical and chemical properties of the soils used<br />

Characteristics of the Phosphate Rock<br />

101<br />

pHH2O 7.4<br />

Total P (%) 16.1<br />

Ca (%) 33.2<br />

F (%) 1.6<br />

Ca:P-ratio 2.1<br />

F:P-ratio 0.16<br />

CaCO3 (%) 5.4<br />

Si (%) 5.2<br />

NAC-P † (%) 1.3<br />

WS-P ‡ (%) 0.02<br />

a-cell (nm) 0.938<br />

c-cell (nm) 0.692<br />

Crystal size (nm) 400<br />

CO2-<strong>in</strong>dex 0.29<br />

Table 2: Selected chemical and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogical the phosphate rock used<br />

† Neutral ammonium citrate-soluble phosphate.<br />

‡ Water-soluble phosphate.<br />

Chemical, m<strong>in</strong>eralogical and reactivity characteristics of the PR used are shown <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

2. The data suggests that PR is a carbonate substituted fluor<strong>in</strong>e deficient francolite. The<br />

low CO2-<strong>in</strong>dex correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a low degree of carbonate substitution is consistent with<br />

the a-cell values, which <strong>in</strong>dicate very low carbonate substitution. Moreover, the high acell<br />

values <strong>in</strong>dicate very low reactivity, which is consistent with the measured low<br />

Neutral ammonium citrate (NAC) solubility. The large crystal size of the PR is also<br />

noteworthy <strong>in</strong> relation to reactivity [10b]. The low reactivity of Togo PR, and hence its<br />

unsuitability for direct application as P fertilizer, has been confirmed <strong>in</strong> numerous<br />

laboratory and greenhouse studies [1,2,21,25].<br />

Effects of the P sources<br />

Despite the variation among the soils used <strong>in</strong> terms of differences <strong>in</strong> texture, pH, organic<br />

carbon content, etc; the effect of poultry manure on PR availability followed similar<br />

trends. Therefore only the data obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the soil of the Savanna zone of Ghana<br />

(Ferric Acrisol) are presented here. This soil was selected for explanation purposes<br />

because it showed the clearest trends.<br />

The shoot dry matter yield (DMY), total P uptake, P derived from the applied P<br />

source (Pdff), obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the applied P sources, without poultry manure addition are<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Table 3. The relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) values calculated,<br />

based on DMY and total P-uptake from the applied P sources are also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

3. Without P addition (P0), DMY and P uptake for the crop were low, consistent with the<br />

low bioavailable P content of the soil. Addition of TSP and PAPR significantly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

DMY and P uptake over the P0 and PR treatments. No significant difference was


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

observed between the PR and P0, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the PR did not release adequate P to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease yield over the P0. Similar results have been previously reported when PR was<br />

utilized <strong>in</strong> some acid to near-neutral soils of the <strong>in</strong>terior savanna and forest zones of<br />

Ghana [1,2,25].<br />

The Pdff, which is estimated by isotope dilution technique, was also used to<br />

evaluate P uptake from the applied P sources. This technique is reported to be the most<br />

sensitive method for P uptake assessment from applied P fertilizers [32]. Similar to the<br />

DMY and P uptake, the percentage Pdff of the P sources followed the order: TSP ><br />

PAPR > PR (Table 3). As expected, the RAE values calculated based on total P uptake<br />

also showed, clearly, highest effectiveness of TSP followed by PAPR. This <strong>in</strong>dex was<br />

found to be a good parameter to compare differences <strong>in</strong> effectiveness between P sources<br />

[11,25]. The RAE calculated based on DMY <strong>in</strong>dicated that PAPR was ~ 55 % as<br />

effective as the water soluble TSP <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g yield of the maize crop while PR was<br />

only ~ 9 % (Table 3). Thus, the untreated PR was far <strong>in</strong>ferior to the TSP and PAPR <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g dry matter yield and P uptake of the crop.<br />

Treatment DMY P uptake Pdff % RAE based on<br />

g pot -1 mg pot -1 % DMY P-uptake<br />

M0P0 3.1 ± 0.7 13.4 ± 2.4 0 0 0<br />

M0PR 3.7 ± 1.1 14.5 ± 2.7 4.3 8.8 5.7<br />

M0PAPR 7.0 ± 1.4 19.5 ± 2.0 35.3 54.6 31.6<br />

M0TSP 10.8 ± 1.8 32.7 ± 4.2 72.6 100 100<br />

M30P0 5.1 ± 0.4 27.6 ± 3.4 0 0 0<br />

M30PR 7.5 ± 1.6 38.7 ±4.6 38.9 40.1 38.7<br />

M30PAPR 7.9 ± 2.1 40.2 ± 5.7 53.2 46.8 43.9<br />

M30TSP 11.2 ± 2.4 56.3 ± 5.3 73.2 100 100<br />

M60P0 7.9 ± 1.3 34.9 ± 4.2 0 0 0<br />

M60PR 11.3 ± 1.8 70.5 ± 8.1 72.7 84.4 85.4<br />

M60PAPR 11.4 ± 2.1 72.7 ± 6.5 70.9 86.3 91.0<br />

M60TSP 12.1 ± 2.4 76.1 ± 7.2 74.4 100 100<br />

M120P0 8.1 ± 1.6 53.4 ± 6.2 0 0 0<br />

M120PR 11.6 ± 1.9 73.1 ± 5.7 74.1 80.4 64.6<br />

M120PAPR 11.7 ± 2.2 74.1 ± 8.2 73.8 83.7 67.9<br />

M120TSP 12.2 ± 2.1 83.9 ± 7.6 75.6 100 100<br />

Table 3: Dry matter yield, P uptake, Pdff and RAE of the maize plant fertilized with the P<br />

sources, with and without manure addition. Values are average of three samples ± one standard<br />

deviation<br />

Effect of poultry manure addition<br />

Mix<strong>in</strong>g the various P sources with poultry manure significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the DMY, P<br />

uptake and Pdff (Table 3) over those applied without poultry manure addition (M0)<br />

(Table 3). In the presence of low rate (M30 = 30 mg P kg -1 ) poultry manure addition, the<br />

DMY of the maize shoot of the PR treated plots <strong>in</strong>creased from 3.8 to 7.5 mg pot -1 , while<br />

the total P uptake <strong>in</strong>creased from 14.5 to 38 mg pot -1 . The percent P derived from the PR<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased by nearly 10-fold (Table 3). Thus <strong>in</strong> the presence of M30, RAE calculated from<br />

102


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

both DMY and P-uptake followed the order TSP > PAPR = PR > P0 (Table 3). At the<br />

high (M60 = 60 mg P kg -1 ) and the very high (M120 = 120 mg P kg -1 ) rates of poultry<br />

manure <strong>in</strong>corporation, about 4-fold <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> DMY of the maize shoot over those of the<br />

PR treatment without poultry manure addition was observed (Table 3). Nearly 5-fold<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> total P uptake over the PR plots without manure addition was also observed.<br />

At these rates of manure application (M60 and M120), no significant differences <strong>in</strong><br />

agronomic effectiveness were observed among the P sources, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that at this rate<br />

of poultry manure addition, PR was equally as effective as TSP (Table 3). The PR mixed<br />

with poultry manure at a ratio of 1:1 <strong>in</strong>creased the Pdff of the maize shoot from ~ 4 to ~<br />

73 % and DMY also <strong>in</strong>creased from ~ 4 to 11.3 g, and gave RAE (calculated from P<br />

uptake) of ~ 84 %, which was similar to that of PAPR-poultry manure treatment and<br />

significantly greater than the PAPR treatment that received no poultry manure<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporation (Table 3). The high Pdff obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the PR-poultry manure mixture<br />

suggested an <strong>in</strong>creased release of P from an otherwise unreactive PR. The DMY and P<br />

uptake by the maize shoot <strong>in</strong> the PR-poultry manure treatment were significantly greater<br />

than those obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the poultry manure applied alone (Table 3). This suggested that P<br />

availability from the PR-poultry manure to the maize crop was derived from the two<br />

materials. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

between the PR and poultry manure.<br />

The calculated values of P uptake us<strong>in</strong>g the isotopic dilution pr<strong>in</strong>ciples [11],<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1, were used to derive the regression coefficients (β) needed to calculate<br />

the relative crop response <strong>in</strong>dex (RCRI) for the various P sources. The estimated<br />

regression coefficients and RCRI for P uptake obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the various P sources are<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4. The RCRI represents the marg<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake <strong>in</strong><br />

proportion of a source compared with a standard source (TSP), when a unit of poultry<br />

manure is applied.<br />

Source β1 RCRI (%)<br />

TSP 0.12 100<br />

PAPR 0.21 175<br />

PR 0.37 308<br />

Table 4: Calculated values of the semi-log regression coefficient (β1) and the relative crop<br />

response <strong>in</strong>dex (RCRI) of the P sources as a function of manure addition.<br />

The RCRI vales <strong>in</strong>dicated that the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake as enhanced by poultry manure<br />

was ~ 3 times that of TSP and ~ 2 times that of PAPR (Table 4). The enhanc<strong>in</strong>g effect of<br />

poultry manure on P availability was thus greatest on the PR and that the effect decreased<br />

with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g water-soluble P contents of the P sources. In the case of the TSP and<br />

PAPR, the lower <strong>in</strong>fluence of the poultry manure than the PR-poultry mixture may be<br />

due to the high water soluble P content (50% and 80% respectively for PAPR and TSP),<br />

which, possibly, already had prim<strong>in</strong>g effect of supply<strong>in</strong>g P for early development and<br />

growth of the maize crop [7]. This is consistent with the results of Zaharah and Bah [31]<br />

who reported that green manure (organic matter) generally <strong>in</strong>creased the solubility of less<br />

reactive PRs and depressed that of the more reactive ones. The greater enhancement<br />

effect of the poultry manure on the PR than on the PAPR and TSP may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

two possible mechanisms. Firstly, the release of organic acids such as citric and oxalic<br />

103


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

acids dur<strong>in</strong>g hydrolytic decomposition of the poultry manure may effectively chelate<br />

Ca 2+ ion and lower its activity <strong>in</strong> the solution [15], or the organic acids so produced may<br />

solubilize the PR and render the P available to the maize plant. Secondly, the effect of the<br />

poultry manure may also be due to self-lim<strong>in</strong>g caused by m<strong>in</strong>eralization and subsequent<br />

release of basic cations [23] and/or a release of OH - ions which may raise the pH of the<br />

soil-poultry manure system and facilitate the release of P [18].<br />

To test which one of these processes was responsible for the <strong>in</strong>teraction, the soil<br />

was mixed with PR and poultry manure <strong>in</strong> a ratio of 1:1, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 60% water<br />

hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity and <strong>in</strong>cubated for 6 weeks. A control treatment <strong>in</strong> which the soil was<br />

mixed with PR but without poultry manure was also <strong>in</strong>cluded. At the end of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>cubation period, the pH of the <strong>in</strong>cubated samples was determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The pH dropped<br />

from 6.2 <strong>in</strong> the soil mixed with PR alone (control) to pH 5.1 <strong>in</strong> the soil-poultry manure<br />

mixture. A drop <strong>in</strong> pH suggested a release of organic acids which rules out the possibility<br />

of self-lim<strong>in</strong>g due to the presence of the poultry manure.<br />

We also hypothesized that P conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the poultry manure will supply the early P<br />

requirement of the crop, which will enhance root development of the crop to deplete P<br />

and Ca 2+ <strong>in</strong> the dissolution zone. Such reaction is expected to <strong>in</strong>crease P availability from<br />

the PR. The result of the study shows that poultry manure addition to the soil alone,<br />

enabled the crop to significantly <strong>in</strong>crease P uptake by the crop (Table 3). This<br />

observation supports the hypothesis that P availability from the manure also enhanced the<br />

efficiency of PR <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g P uptake.<br />

Differences between P uptake from the PR applied alone and P uptake from PR<br />

amended with different rates of poultry manure represented a quantitative estimation of<br />

the contribution of the poultry manure to the PR. In spite of the geometric <strong>in</strong>crease of the<br />

P rate of the poultry manure mixed with the PR, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g contribution to P<br />

availability from the PR was rather more of an exponential <strong>in</strong>crease. For example, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake from the PR due to the poultry manure was 56 mg pot -l for M60 and<br />

59 mg pot -1 for the MI20 treatment. Thus, doubl<strong>in</strong>g the P rate of the poultry manure mixed<br />

with PR did not result <strong>in</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g contribution to P uptake. This may be attributed<br />

to common Ca 2+ ion s<strong>in</strong>ce, both PR and poultry manure conta<strong>in</strong> some amounts of Ca<br />

which may <strong>in</strong>crease the Ca 2+ ion content <strong>in</strong> the soil solution and prevent dissolution of<br />

the rock phosphate [23]. It is therefore, uneconomical to mix very large amounts of the<br />

poultry manure, with the PR.<br />

The marg<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake (Fig. 2) was calculated as the derivative of the<br />

total P uptake with respect to P application rate of the poultry manure mixed with the PR.<br />

The maximum <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> P uptake was observed at M60 (1:1 PR manure ratio), after rate<br />

dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g returns <strong>in</strong> P uptake was observed. The result suggest that the most<br />

economical returns <strong>in</strong> terms of P-uptake and possibly DMY is achieved when unreactive<br />

Togo PR is mixed with poultry manure at 1:1 P ratio.<br />

104


P uptake (log mg pot -1 )<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

TSP: LN Y = 3.7 + 0.12 LN (X) R 2 = 1.0<br />

PAPR: LN Y = 3.2 + 0.21 LN (X) R 2 = 1.0<br />

PR: LN Y = 2.6 + 0.37 LN (X) R 2 = 0.99<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Manure rate (log mg P kg -1 )<br />

TSP<br />

PAPR<br />

PR<br />

P0<br />

Figure 1: L<strong>in</strong>earized relationship between the manure<br />

application rates and P uptake from the P sources<br />

105<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>al P uptake (kg soil pot -1 )<br />

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

1.80<br />

1.60<br />

1.40<br />

1.20<br />

1.00<br />

0.80<br />

0.60<br />

0.40<br />

0.20<br />

0.00<br />

60<br />

0 50 100 150<br />

Manure rate (mg P kg -1 )<br />

Figure 2: Increase <strong>in</strong> P uptake from PR per unit<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> manure added<br />

The 32 P isotope dilution technique was an efficient tool to provide quantitative<br />

measurements of P uptake from the P sources studied for assess<strong>in</strong>g the enhancement<br />

effect of poultry manure on P availability from PR. Unreactive Togo PR was found to be<br />

an <strong>in</strong>effective P source for the 6-week-old maize plants grown on highly weathered acid<br />

to near-neutral soils. Addition of poultry manure to PR enhanced P uptake from the PR<br />

under the experimental conditions. Mix<strong>in</strong>g an unreactive Togo rock phosphate with<br />

poultry manure <strong>in</strong> a 1:1 P ratio and applied to some highly weathered acid to near-neutral<br />

soils was more efficient <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g DMY and P uptake of the maize shoot than us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

PAPR, and comparable to TSP (TSP = M60PR = M60PAPR > PAPR > PR). This f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is of relevance to local agriculture where a low <strong>in</strong>put technology such as mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

unreactive PR with poultry manure can <strong>in</strong>crease crop yield. The cost of mix<strong>in</strong>g poultry<br />

manure with Togo PR is likely to be far lower than partial acidification s<strong>in</strong>ce H3PO4 and<br />

H2SO4 needed for the process are imported and are extra cost to crop production. With<br />

the improvement of the poultry <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> most develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ghana,<br />

disposal of poultry manure will sooner than later become a major environmental issue.<br />

Thus the beneficial use of poultry manure to improve the P status of the cropland will<br />

solve the anticipated disposal problem as well.<br />

Further field trials under a variety of soil, climatic and agronomic management are<br />

needed to test further the hypothesis of the enhancement of P uptake <strong>in</strong> PR-manure<br />

mixture. Also, field-grown plant species may differ widely <strong>in</strong> their abilities to access<br />

poorly available soil phosphorus, thus plant species’ effect is worthy of <strong>in</strong>vestigation.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

This study was funded <strong>in</strong> part by the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Food and Agriculture, Ghana, through<br />

the National Agric. Research Programme (NARP). We wish to express appreciation to<br />

Profs. E. Owusu-Bennoah (CSIR, Ghana) and L.R.F. Alleoni (Univ. de Sao Paulo,<br />

Brazil) for their collaboration, and to Mr. Victor O. Edusei (Soil Sci. Dept., Univ. of<br />

Ghana), and Mr. Jeff Said (Agronomy Dept., Univ. of Florida) for their technical support.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] M.K. Abekoe, S. Agy<strong>in</strong>-Birikorang “Greenhouse study on enhancement of availability of phosphorus<br />

from Togo rock phosphate us<strong>in</strong>g poultry manure”, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of Soil Science Society of Ghana, 16,<br />

pp.19-26, (1999).<br />

[2] M.K. Abekoe, H. Tiessen. “Fertilizer P transformations and P availability <strong>in</strong> hill slope soils of northern<br />

Ghana”, Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agroecosystems, 52, pp.45-54, (1998).<br />

[3] D.K. Acquaye, J.W. Oteng. “Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the status of phosphorus <strong>in</strong> surface soils of Ghana”,<br />

Ghana journal of Agricultural Science, 5, pp. 221-228, (1972).<br />

[4] L.E. Allison, W.B. Bollen, C.D. Moodie. “Total Carbon”, In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Black CA et al.<br />

(Eds), Agronomy Monograph 9, Madison, WI, Part 2, pp. 1346–1365, (1965).<br />

[5] G.A. Alloush. “Dissolution and effectiveness of phosphate rock <strong>in</strong> acidic soil amended with cattle<br />

manure”, Plant and Soil 251, pp. 37-46 (2003).<br />

[6] AOAC 1990. “Official Methods of Analysis”, 5th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,<br />

VI.<br />

[7] T. B<strong>in</strong>h, C. Fayard. “Small-scale fertilizer production units us<strong>in</strong>g raw and partially solubilized<br />

phosphate”, In: Use of phosphate rock for susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture <strong>in</strong> West Africa, H. Gerner and A.U.<br />

Mokwunye (Eds.), IFDC-Africa V series: Miscellaneous fertilizer studies No II, pp. 181-197, (1995).<br />

[8] N.S. Bolan, R.E. White, M.J. Hedley. “A review of the use of phosphate rocks as fertilizers for direct<br />

application <strong>in</strong> Australia and <strong>New</strong> Zealand”, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 30, pp. 297-<br />

313, (1990).<br />

[9] R.H Bray, L.T. Kurtz. “Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus <strong>in</strong> soils” Soil<br />

Science, 59, pp. 39-45, (1945).<br />

[10a] S.H. Chien, R.G. Menon. “Agronomic evaluation of modified phosphate rock products: IFDC’s<br />

experience”, Fertilizer Research 41, pp. 197- 209, (1995).<br />

[10b] S.H. Chien, R.G. Menon. “Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock for direct<br />

application”, Fertilizer Research 41, pp. 227-234, (1995).<br />

[11] S.H Chien, R.G. Menon, K.S. Bill<strong>in</strong>gham. “Estimation of phosphorus availability to maize and<br />

cowpea from phosphate rock as enhanced by water-soluble phosphorus”, Soil Science Society of America<br />

Journal, 60, pp. 1173-1177, (1996).<br />

[12] P.R. Day. “Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis”, In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Black CA et<br />

al. (Eds), ASA Monography, 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, Part 1, pp. 545–567 (1965).<br />

[13] L. Evans, R.G. Hoyle, J.B. Macaskill. “An accurate and rapid method of analysis of fluor<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />

phosphate rocks”, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Journal of Science, 13 pp. 143-48, (1970).<br />

[14] FAO FAO/UNESCO. “Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend”, World <strong>Resources</strong> Report 60. Rome:<br />

FAO, (1994).<br />

[15] L.L. Hammond, S.H. Chien, A.H. Roy, A.U. Mokwunye. “Agronomic value of unacidulated and<br />

partially acidulated phosphate rocks <strong>in</strong>digenous to the tropics”, Advances <strong>in</strong> Agronomy, 40, pp. 89–140,<br />

(1986).<br />

[16] IFDC. “African Fertilizer Market”, Special Issue on Soil Fertility, Vol. 12, no. 12. IFDC Africa, Lome,<br />

Togo, (1999).<br />

[17] ISRIC. “Procedures for Soil Analysis”, International Soil Reference and Information Centre,<br />

Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, (1995).<br />

106


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

[18] F. Iyamuremye, R.P Dick, J. Graham. “Organic amendments and phosphorus dynamics 1: Phosphorus<br />

chemistry and sorption”, Soil science, 161, pp. 426-453, (1996).<br />

[19] I.A.K. Kanabo, R.J. Gilkes. “The role of soil pH <strong>in</strong> the dissolution of phosphate rock fertilizers”,<br />

Fertilizer Research, 12, pp. 165-179, (1987).<br />

[20] K.A. Kpomblekou, M.A. Tabatabai. “Effect of organic acids on the release of phosphorus from<br />

phosphate rocks”, Soil Science, 158, pp. 442-453, (1994).<br />

[21] K.A. Kpomblekou, S.H. Chien, J. Henao, W.A. Hill. “Greenhouse evaluation of phosphate fertilisers<br />

produced from Togo phosphate rocks”, Communications <strong>in</strong> Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 22, pp. 63-73,<br />

(1991).<br />

[22] M.M Msolla, J.M.R. Semoka, O.K. Borggaard. “Hard M<strong>in</strong>j<strong>in</strong>gu phosphate rock: an alternative P<br />

source for maize production on acid soils <strong>in</strong> Tanzania”, Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agroecosystems, 72, pp. 299-<br />

308, (2005).<br />

[23] S. Mahimairaja, N.S Bolan, M.J. Hediey. “Dissolution of phosphate rock dur<strong>in</strong>g the compost<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

poultry manure: An <strong>in</strong>cubation experiment”, Fertilizer Research, 40, pp. 93-104, (1995).<br />

[24] J. Murphy, J.P. Riley. “A modified s<strong>in</strong>gle solution method for the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of phosphate <strong>in</strong><br />

natural waters”, Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, pp. 31-36, (1962).<br />

[25] E. Owusu-Bennoah, F. Zapata, J.C. Fardeau. “Comparison of greenhouse and P-32 isotopic laboratory<br />

methods for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the agronomic effectiveness of natural and modified rock phosphates <strong>in</strong> some acid<br />

soils of Ghana”, Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agroecosystems 63, pp. 1-12, (2002).<br />

[26] SAS Institute. SAS onl<strong>in</strong>e document Version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, (1999).<br />

[27] Soil Survey Staff. “Keys to Soil Taxonomy”, 8th Edition, United States Department of Agriculture,<br />

Soil Conservation Service, Pocahontas Press, Blacksburg, VI, (1999).<br />

[28] G.W. Thomas. “Exchangeable cations”, In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Page AL, Miller RH & Keeney<br />

SR (Eds), ASA Monography 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, Part 2, pp 159–166, (1982).<br />

[29] F.C.A. Villanueva, T. Muraoka, A.R. Trevizam, V.I. Franz<strong>in</strong>i, A.P. Rocha. “Improv<strong>in</strong>g phosphorus<br />

availability from Patos phosphate rock for Eucalyptus: A study with P-32 radiotracer”, Scientia Agricola<br />

63, pp. 65-69, (2006).<br />

[30] M.W. Waigwa, C.O. Othieno, J.R. Okalebo. “Phosphorus availability as affected by the application of<br />

phosphate rock comb<strong>in</strong>ed with organic materials to acid soils <strong>in</strong> western Kenya”, Experimental Agriculture,<br />

39, pp. 395-407, (2003).<br />

[31] A.R. Zaharah, A.R Bah. “Effect of green manures on P solubilization and P uptake from phosphate<br />

rock”, Nutrient Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agroecosystems, 48, pp. 247-255 (1997).<br />

[32] F. Zapata, H. Axmann. “ 32 P isotopic techniques for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the agronomic effectiveness of rock<br />

phosphate materials”, Fertilizer Research, 41 pp. 189–195 (1995).<br />

107


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

THE EFFECT OF LIMING AN ACID NITISOL WITH EITHER<br />

CALCITE OR DOLOMITE ON TWO COMMON BEAN<br />

(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) VARIETIES DIFFERING IN<br />

ALUMINIUM TOLERANCE<br />

E .N Mugai 1* , S.G Agong 1 and H. Matsumoto 2<br />

1 Horticulture Department, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O Box 62000<br />

Nairobi, Kenya, 3 Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, Chuo Kurashiki 710, Japan<br />

Email: nmugai@yahoo.com or njue@jkuat.ac.ke Tel.+254 -722-337605<br />

Abstract<br />

Two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties, Rosecoco (GLP 2) and French bean (cultivar ‘Amy’),<br />

previously shown to differ <strong>in</strong> Al tolerance were tested for their response to lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or<br />

dolomite <strong>in</strong> potted strongly acid, low fertility humic Nitisol. Dry matter yield, as a response to lim<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

highest at lim<strong>in</strong>g pH 5.6 for both varieties and lime types. However, French bean responded more to lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

than Rosecoco at 102% and 102% (calcite), 129 %and 102 % (dolomite) of control respectively. Higher<br />

calcite lim<strong>in</strong>g (pH 6.8) reduced growth and was attributed to Mg deficiency by competition dur<strong>in</strong>g uptake<br />

of Ca. Differential Al accumulation <strong>in</strong> the two varieties was higher <strong>in</strong> shoots of French bean but lower <strong>in</strong><br />

roots an <strong>in</strong>dication that one of the possible mechanisms of Rosecoco’s Al tolerance is conf<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Al to roots<br />

other than <strong>in</strong> shoots. However, Al uptake decreased <strong>in</strong> roots and shoots of both varieties with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

levels of lim<strong>in</strong>g. Ca <strong>in</strong> the shoots <strong>in</strong>creased with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g lim<strong>in</strong>g levels but was higher <strong>in</strong> calcite than <strong>in</strong><br />

dolomite treatments. Mg contents did not show any significant <strong>in</strong>creases with lim<strong>in</strong>g with calcite but<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased with dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g levels. Rosecoco was more efficient <strong>in</strong> the uptake of Ca and Mg than the<br />

French bean. Therefore, it is concluded that there exists a varietal difference <strong>in</strong> Phaseolus vulgaris response<br />

to soil acidity and associated hazards and is therefore possible to select and breed/<strong>in</strong>troduce Al tolerant<br />

cultivars for the acid soils of Kenya and that although both types of limes can be used to reduce the<br />

hazardous effect of acidity, dolomitic limes have an advantage <strong>in</strong> due to the additional Mg nutrition. It is<br />

therefore recommended that to achieve the highest crop yield on acid Nitisols, only dolomitic limes should<br />

be applied to a pH of around 5.6.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In Kenya, acid soils with a pH of 5.0 or less comprise some or all Nitisols, Acrisols,<br />

Ferralsols, Cambisols and Andisols [3, 16]. These soils are estimated to cover an area of<br />

about 5 million hectares [16]. They are located <strong>in</strong> the Highlands where the climate is<br />

suitable for the <strong>in</strong>tensive cultivation of many crops <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong> source of prote<strong>in</strong><br />

to majority of Kenyans, the common bean. Cont<strong>in</strong>uous cultivation and use of soil<br />

acidify<strong>in</strong>g fertilisers especially those conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ammonium has contributed to further<br />

acidification of these soils.<br />

Although the hazard of soil acidity is obvious, the small-scale farmers have not<br />

adapted the culture of ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g it through lim<strong>in</strong>g, nor is the <strong>in</strong>formation available<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g relevant soil properties and the lim<strong>in</strong>g requirements for a particular crop. In<br />

Kenya, two cheap types of lime are available - calcite (CaCO3) and dolomite<br />

108


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

(CaMg(CO3)2. There are no comparative studies yet done to test the efficacy of the two<br />

lime types <strong>in</strong> the management of specific acid soils of Kenya.<br />

The objectives of this research were to: (i) Characterise the acidity and related<br />

fertility properties of the acid humic Nitisol, (ii) Determ<strong>in</strong>e the optimum lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

requirement by either calcite or dolomite and (iii) Determ<strong>in</strong>e the differential effect of<br />

lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or dolomite on the growth and nutrition aspects of the common<br />

bean.<br />

Soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and analysis<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Soil (0-15cm) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from a humic Nitisol [3,14], <strong>in</strong> the tea-grow<strong>in</strong>g zone (altitude<br />

2150m, Agro-climatic zone I-6) of Gatundu division, Thika District, Kenya. The soil was<br />

air dried, sieved through 2 mm and mixed. A sub-sample of the soil was analysed for pH<br />

(1:2.5 soil/water; 1:2.5 soil/0.01 CaCl2 solution); extractable Al (1N KCl) [2]; available<br />

phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) [8]. P was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by the molybdate blue method and measured by spectrophotometry, K by flame<br />

photometry and Ca and Mg by the atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Organic<br />

carbon was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the wet oxidation method [7]. Cation exchange capacity was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by ammonium acetate method [2] and effective cation exchange capacity<br />

(ECEC) by sum of cations (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Al) extracted by unbuffered 1N KCl.<br />

The summary results of the soil analysis are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The soil is<br />

strongly acidic. The Al content is high reach<strong>in</strong>g a saturation of about 50%. The high<br />

organic carbon is an <strong>in</strong>dication of a lower rate of humification due to high acidity of the<br />

soil and the cool climate of the area. The chemical soil fertility is low except for K.<br />

Mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

unit<br />

(FAO)<br />

humic<br />

Nitisol<br />

pH<br />

water<br />

pH<br />

CaCl2<br />

CECac<br />

(cmole<br />

(+)/kg<br />

ECEC<br />

(cmole<br />

(+)/kg<br />

Organic<br />

Carbon %<br />

3.95 3.4 24.8 11.4 1.9 1.<br />

6<br />

Table 1: Selected soil properties of the test soil<br />

Neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g equivalence of limes<br />

109<br />

Available nutrients<br />

(cmole (+)/kg<br />

K Ca Mg P<br />

(ppm<br />

0.6<br />

7<br />

0.2<br />

5<br />

Extractable<br />

Al (cmole<br />

(+) /kg<br />

)<br />

11.0 5.11<br />

The neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g equivalence of both calcite and dolomite as calculated for pure calcium<br />

carbonate was assessed by the method of Jackson [2]. Briefly, 1g of the lime were reacted<br />

with 1N HCl. After dilution, to 100 ml and boil<strong>in</strong>g, the mixture was cooled and backtitrated<br />

with 1N NaOH us<strong>in</strong>g phenol-phthale<strong>in</strong> as <strong>in</strong>dicator and calcium carbonate<br />

equivalence calculated accord<strong>in</strong>gly. Calcite and dolomite were found to have a<br />

neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g equivalence values of 91.6 and 87 respectively.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Estimation of lim<strong>in</strong>g requirements and plant culture<br />

Lim<strong>in</strong>g materials were local merchants. Estimation of lim<strong>in</strong>g requirements was from a<br />

calibration curve of pH aga<strong>in</strong>st lime after <strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g wet soil (1: 2.5 soil: water) with the<br />

vary<strong>in</strong>g amounts of lim<strong>in</strong>g materials (calcite and dolomite) for seven days [1]. Lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

levels were 0, 6.0, 16.0 and 32 and 0, 6.0, 17, and 34 g/4 Kg soil of calcite and dolomite<br />

respectively, to atta<strong>in</strong> pH levels 3.95, 5.1, 5.6 and 6.8. The lim<strong>in</strong>g materials were<br />

thoroughly mixed with the soil before pott<strong>in</strong>g. 1.32 g of diammonium phosphate (DAP)<br />

fertiliser equivalent to 200Kg (DAP) per hectare was mixed with top 5cm potted soil<br />

before plant<strong>in</strong>g. Three uniform 2-leaf seedl<strong>in</strong>gs previously pre-germ<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> sterile sand<br />

were planted per pot. After a week of growth th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g was done to leave one seedl<strong>in</strong>g per<br />

pot. The lim<strong>in</strong>g treatments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the control were replicated three times and<br />

randomly placed on raised bench <strong>in</strong> greenhouse. Distilled water was used for basal<br />

irrigation. After one month the plants were harvested, washed off the soil with runn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tap water and r<strong>in</strong>sed with distilled water. The plants were then dried for 24 hours at 80 0 C<br />

<strong>in</strong> a blow oven. The dry shoot and root were then weights were then weighed separately.<br />

0.5g of each was then ground <strong>in</strong> a plant mill and ashed <strong>in</strong> a furnace at 550 0 C. The ash<br />

was dissolved <strong>in</strong> 5 ml of 6N HCl, dehydrated, then dissolved aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2 ml of 6N HCl and<br />

diluted to 100ml. Total Al, Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots and were then analysed<br />

by same methods as for the soil.<br />

Plant growth versus lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

RESULTS<br />

Table 2 presents the shoot and root dry weights of the two bean varieties aga<strong>in</strong>st lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

type and levels. The shoot and root dry biomass of the two bean varieties was<br />

significantly improved under lim<strong>in</strong>g irrespective of the lime type. The highest growth <strong>in</strong><br />

both shoots and roots was atta<strong>in</strong>ed at pH 5.6 across the varieties. In the un-limed soil the<br />

French bean variety exhibited a significant suppression of growth as compared with<br />

Rosecoco. Lim<strong>in</strong>g with calcite produced significantly less growth compared to that of<br />

dolomite across the two varieties and at the various levels of lim<strong>in</strong>g. In both types of<br />

lim<strong>in</strong>g, growth <strong>in</strong>crease decl<strong>in</strong>ed for both varieties at pH 6.8 although it was higher <strong>in</strong><br />

French bean than <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco.<br />

The differential variety response to the two types of lime was also assessed by<br />

comput<strong>in</strong>g the relative whole plant growth aga<strong>in</strong>st the un-limed control and expressed as<br />

a percentage (Fig.1). At maximum growth (pH 5.6) the growth response to calcite lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was similar <strong>in</strong> both varieties (102 %). However, dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g resulted <strong>in</strong>to higher<br />

growth response <strong>in</strong> French bean than <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco. At lim<strong>in</strong>g pH 5.1, 5.6, and 6.8 growth<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> calcite and dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g was 112 %, 129 %, 78 % and 86 %, 119 %, 94 %<br />

respectively.<br />

110


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Uptake of Al<br />

Al contents <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 3. Both varieties accumulated<br />

less Al <strong>in</strong> shoots than <strong>in</strong> roots. French bean concentrated a higher amount of Al <strong>in</strong> shoots<br />

than Rosecoco while Rosecoco accumulated more Al <strong>in</strong> roots. As lim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased, the<br />

content of Al <strong>in</strong> both roots and shoots of both varieties decreased. However the<br />

concentration of Al <strong>in</strong> the roots at calcite lim<strong>in</strong>g of pH 5.1 conta<strong>in</strong>ed the highest levels of<br />

Al, higher than even <strong>in</strong> the control plants. Generally the Al uptake <strong>in</strong> the dolomite-limed<br />

plants conta<strong>in</strong>ed less Al than <strong>in</strong> calcite limed ones <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots <strong>in</strong> both<br />

varieties.<br />

Uptake of Ca and Mg<br />

The contents of Ca and Mg <strong>in</strong> dry shoots and roots <strong>in</strong> both varieties are presented <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 4. Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots of control plants was higher <strong>in</strong><br />

Rosecoco than <strong>in</strong> French bean. The calcite-limed plants had the highest Ca concentration<br />

<strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots at pH 5.6 while dolomite limed plants had their peak at pH 6.8.<br />

The Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots <strong>in</strong> the calcite and dolomite-limed plants<br />

was higher <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco than <strong>in</strong> French bean. Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> shoots of control plants<br />

was also higher <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco than <strong>in</strong> French bean. It <strong>in</strong>creased with lim<strong>in</strong>g with calcite to<br />

reach a peak at pH 5.6. In the dolomite-limed plants, Mg <strong>in</strong>creased with lim<strong>in</strong>g to reach a<br />

peak at pH 6.8. Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> the roots of control plants was higher <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco<br />

than <strong>in</strong> French bean. In calcite limed plants the Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> the roots <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g lim<strong>in</strong>g to reach a peak at pH 6.8 <strong>in</strong> both varieties. Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

roots was higher <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco than <strong>in</strong> French bean for both types of limes.<br />

The Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots was higher <strong>in</strong> calcite-limed plants<br />

than <strong>in</strong> dolomite limed ones. Mg accumulation <strong>in</strong> both shoots and roots of the dolomitelimed<br />

plants was much higher than <strong>in</strong> calcite treatments. The control plants showed clear<br />

deficiency symptoms of Ca deficiency, among others were severe stunted growth;<br />

cr<strong>in</strong>kled, curled leaves and abnormally green first leaves; and some patchy <strong>in</strong>terve<strong>in</strong>al<br />

chlorosis <strong>in</strong> the middle leaves. In the plants limed with calcite to pH 6.8, symptoms of<br />

Mg deficiency ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>terve<strong>in</strong>al chlorosis occurred <strong>in</strong> older leaves, while those treated<br />

at same pH level with dolomite were normal.<br />

111


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Variety and<br />

Lim<strong>in</strong>g level<br />

(pH)<br />

Shoot dry weight<br />

(g)<br />

R 3.95 0.4142 ± .027 c 1<br />

Calcite Dolomite<br />

Root dry weight<br />

(g)<br />

0.1713 ± 0.023 b<br />

1 Means with<strong>in</strong> columns ( plus/m<strong>in</strong>us one standard deviation) with similar letters do not differ<br />

significantly (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test (n = 4)<br />

** , *** Significantly different at p = 0.01 and 0.001 respectively<br />

Table 2: The effect of lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or dolomite on the growth of two Phaseolus<br />

vulgaries varieties, Rosecoco (R) and French bean cv. Amy (F).<br />

Calcite Dolomite<br />

Lim<strong>in</strong>g pH<br />

3.95 5.1 5.6 6.8 3.95 5.1 5.6 6.8<br />

Rosecoco<br />

Shoot 0.45 0.36 0.29 0.24 0.46 0.36 0.18 0.17<br />

Root<br />

French bean<br />

6.1 12.0 8.8 6.6 6.1 6.1 2.9 2.5<br />

Shoot 0.82 0.45 0.3 0.29 0.82 0.29 0.19 0.17<br />

Root 3.9 5.8 5.0 3.6 3.9 3.2 2.95 2.5<br />

Table 3 : Uptake of alum<strong>in</strong>ium (mg/g) <strong>in</strong> dry matter of shoots and roots of Rosecoco and French<br />

bean <strong>in</strong> response to lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or dolomite<br />

112<br />

Shoot dry weight<br />

(g)<br />

Root dry weight<br />

(g)<br />

0.4142 ± 0.027de 0.1713 ± 0.023 c<br />

R 5.1 0.6854 ± 0.043 b 0.2222 ± 0.017 a 0.855 ± 0.021 b 0.2433 ± 0.029 b<br />

R 5.6 0.9011 ± 0.041 a 0.2817 ± 0.0021 a 0.995 ± 0.052 a 0.2967 ± 0.012 a<br />

R 6.8 0.6185 ± 0.14 b 0.2583 ± 0.0164a 0.9133 ± 0.025 b 0.225 ± 0.0071 b<br />

F 3.95 0.1917± 0.016 e<br />

0.0783 ± 0.0153 d 0.1917 ± 0.016 e 0.0783 ± 0.0153 e<br />

F 5.1 0.3733 ± 0.038 c 0.095 ± 0.00 d 0.4325 ± 0.062 e<br />

0.1405 ± 0.0076 d<br />

F 5.6 0.4433 ± 0.034 c 0.1033 ± 0.0153 d 0.4583 ± 0.04 d 0.159 ± 0.025 cd<br />

F 6.8 0.2867± 0.0058 d 0.0783 ± 0.0153 e 0.3925 ± 0.0035 e 0.0875 ± 0.035 e<br />

Significance 2<br />

Lim<strong>in</strong>g *** *** *** ***<br />

Variety *** ** *** ***<br />

Lim<strong>in</strong>g x variety ** *** ** ***


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The humic Nitisol [3] for which the experiment was conducted is strongly acid with very<br />

low nutrient content. Therefore the problem of this acid soil is not only the hazards<br />

associated with acidity like high Al but also quite low levels of P, Ca and Mg. Lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

soil has the primary objective of rais<strong>in</strong>g the pH <strong>in</strong> order to decrease the soluble amounts<br />

of Al, Mn and Fe which not only may cause toxicity to plants but also immobilise P. The<br />

solubility of Mn and Fe is more controlled by soil redox than by pH and therefore <strong>in</strong> well<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils like <strong>in</strong> Kenya Highlands where acid soils dom<strong>in</strong>ate, Al toxicity and soil<br />

<strong>in</strong>fertility are the ma<strong>in</strong> h<strong>in</strong>drance to crop cultivation.<br />

In this study phosphorus and nitrogen were supplied to the plant through<br />

diammonium phosphate fertilizer as is the custom <strong>in</strong> the small-scale cultivation of beans.<br />

The higher growth exhibited <strong>in</strong> limed plants as compared with control plants is an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dication of detoxification of Al and <strong>in</strong>creased Ca, and, Mg and Ca nutrition <strong>in</strong> calcite<br />

and dolomite limed plants respectively. These soils are low <strong>in</strong> both Ca and Mg and<br />

therefore a lim<strong>in</strong>g material like dolomite, which conta<strong>in</strong>s both of the elements, is bound<br />

to <strong>in</strong>crease more the yield of crops than calcite, which conta<strong>in</strong>s only Ca.<br />

The differences <strong>in</strong> acidity tolerance of the two bean varieties fits fairly well with<br />

the results earlier obta<strong>in</strong>ed [12] where root elongation <strong>in</strong> three day - old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />

Rosecoco and French bean was depressed by 38 % and 78 % respectively <strong>in</strong> nutrient<br />

solution conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 5 mM Al. Earlier work [10] showed that Al-sensitive plants respond<br />

more to decreased Al than Al-tolerant ones. The results of this study more or less agree<br />

with this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple (Fig. 1). The reason is that growth stimulation of root growth upon<br />

lim<strong>in</strong>g is more pronounced <strong>in</strong> Al – sensitive plants than Al-tolerant ones. However the<br />

depression of growth upon over-lim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> French bean was greater than <strong>in</strong> Rosecoco.<br />

Under excessive calcite lim<strong>in</strong>g, Rosecoco was probably able to take up more Mg from<br />

the soil because of its more developed root system while under dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g it was<br />

able to take up more elements <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g trace elements, which might have been<br />

unavailable due to immobilization (high pH) or competition by Ca and Mg. The higher<br />

response to lim<strong>in</strong>g with dolomite than with calcite is easily expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the presence of<br />

Mg <strong>in</strong> the former because of the low Mg content <strong>in</strong> the test soil. The higher response to<br />

lim<strong>in</strong>g by French bean was not correlated with either Ca and Mg concentration and this<br />

may probably be Al toxicity was more critical than Ca or Mg nutrition <strong>in</strong> this particular<br />

soil. Barley grown <strong>in</strong> hydroponics had roots with higher contents of Al than <strong>in</strong> shoots [4].<br />

This is <strong>in</strong> conformity with the results <strong>in</strong> this work (Table 3).<br />

In control plants the shoots of Rosecoco conta<strong>in</strong>ed less Al than the Al-sensitive<br />

French bean. Therefore the sensitivity of French bean to Al may be its <strong>in</strong>ability to<br />

exclude Al to roots but also to the tops. There is therefore a need to also study the toxicity<br />

effects of Al <strong>in</strong> tops, which has hitherto been neglected. However roots of Rosecoco<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ed more Al <strong>in</strong> roots than those of French bean. If tolerance were achieved by Al<br />

immobilization <strong>in</strong> the cell wall, a reduction <strong>in</strong> membrane transport would be balanced by<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of Al <strong>in</strong> the apoplasm [15]. Thus, Al tolerant plants may have more or<br />

less Al as Al-sensitive ones. However this contradicted earlier results [12] where 3 dayold<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs of Rosecoco had less Al <strong>in</strong> roots. Probably the accumulation of Al <strong>in</strong> cell<br />

wall through b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to cell walls after apoplasm immobilization <strong>in</strong>creases with age of<br />

113


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

the plants. In this earlier work, Rosecoco’s tolerance was ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to Al<br />

immobilization by citric acid excreted by roots.<br />

The Al concentration <strong>in</strong> both varieties and <strong>in</strong> both types of lim<strong>in</strong>g decl<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />

lim<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong>creased. This is expected because as pH is <strong>in</strong>creased the toxic monomeric<br />

species of Al also decreased. However concentration of Al <strong>in</strong> calcite treatment of pH 5.1<br />

is higher than that <strong>in</strong> controls <strong>in</strong> the roots of all varieties. This may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

very poor growth <strong>in</strong> the controls, which reduces the uptake of all elements <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Al.<br />

Lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pH<br />

Rosecoco<br />

Shoot<br />

Calcite Dolomite<br />

3.95 5.1 5.6 6.8 3.95 5.1 5.6 6.8<br />

Ca 2.7 16.2 24.2 18.7 2.7 11.8 14.4 18.5<br />

Mg 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.1 4.9 6.0 7.5<br />

Root<br />

Ca 2.2 7.8 17.1 18.5 2.2 7.4 8.8 9.3<br />

Mg 0.9 1.6 2.4 3.3 0.9 5.3 8.5 11.1<br />

French<br />

bean<br />

Shoot<br />

Ca 2.7 18.7 19.3 18.8 2.7 8.8 11.0 15.5<br />

Mg 1.0 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.0 5.1 5.7 6.9<br />

Root<br />

Ca 1.3 4.3 8.7 10.3 1.3 4.0 7.5 8.3<br />

Mg 0.8 1.2 2.5 2.2 0.8 3.0 5.6 5.9<br />

Table 4 : Uptake of Ca and Mg (mg/g) by the dry shoots and roots of Rosecoco (R) and French<br />

bean (F) upon lim<strong>in</strong>g with either calcite or dolomite<br />

The lower concentration of Al <strong>in</strong> dolomite treated plants implies that Mg just like Ca has<br />

Al-toxicity ameliorat<strong>in</strong>g role [9].<br />

114


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Many studies have shown the role played by Ca <strong>in</strong> reduction of Al toxicity <strong>in</strong><br />

plants. Al reduced Ca uptake <strong>in</strong> Al-sensitive wheat cultivars [9] while Al-tolerant Dade<br />

Snap bean cultivar conta<strong>in</strong>ed more Ca <strong>in</strong> its exudate than that of Al-sensitive Romano<br />

cultivar [5]. Higher Ca concentrations <strong>in</strong> nutrient solution decreased Al-tolerance<br />

differences among maize <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es [13]. In this study (Table 4), the Ca <strong>in</strong> shoots<br />

agrees very well with other work [6] where the tolerant Dayton barley cultivar<br />

accumulated more Ca than the Al-sensitive Kearney when Al was added <strong>in</strong>to the nutrient<br />

solution. In this study the Rosecoco plants had a higher Ca concentration than French<br />

bean irrespective of lim<strong>in</strong>g level and type, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g its higher capacity to take Ca due to<br />

its better root development even at acid soil conditions.<br />

The peak Ca uptake was arrived at pH 5.6 <strong>in</strong> calcite limed plants and at pH 6.8 <strong>in</strong><br />

dolomite limed ones. The reason may be that <strong>in</strong> calcite limed plants Mg deficiency<br />

reduces growth so much at pH 6.8 as reduce Ca uptake. The content of Ca <strong>in</strong> shoots of<br />

control plants is less than 1.5% the m<strong>in</strong>imum for optimal growth [7] and this expla<strong>in</strong>s the<br />

Ca deficiency symptoms mentioned earlier.<br />

The Mg concentration <strong>in</strong> shoots was higher <strong>in</strong> the more Al- tolerant Rosecoco than<br />

<strong>in</strong> the French bean <strong>in</strong> both calcite limed probably due to its better-developed root system<br />

even <strong>in</strong> very acid conditions.<br />

The Mg concentration rises with lim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the shoots and roots of calcite limed<br />

plants to reach a peak at lim<strong>in</strong>g pH 5.6; decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at pH 6.8 due to reduced growth<br />

associated with Mg deficiency. In dolomite limed plants, the peak is reached at lim<strong>in</strong>g pH<br />

6.8. This may be due to factors associated with over lim<strong>in</strong>g like trace element deficiency<br />

though no deficiency symptoms were observed.<br />

The content of Mg <strong>in</strong> control plants and <strong>in</strong> all calcite limed plants is less than 0.5%<br />

of dry weight which is necessary for optimal growth [11], thus the cause of the Mg<br />

deficiency symptoms mentioned above.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The study has conclusively shown the beneficial benefits of lim<strong>in</strong>g a low fertility, acid<br />

soil. Dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g gave better growth than calcite and therefore the former should<br />

berecommeded as the type of lim<strong>in</strong>g material for acid soils of the tea zones of Kenya.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the dry weight of the whole plant is well related to Al – tolerance; the<br />

more the response to dolomite lim<strong>in</strong>g the more sensitive the bean variety.<br />

Al accumulation <strong>in</strong> the shoots of un-limed plants is a good <strong>in</strong>dicator of acidity<br />

tolerance just like <strong>in</strong> young plants [12] but not so for Al <strong>in</strong> roots which seem to<br />

accumulate more <strong>in</strong> Al tolerant Phaseolus vulgaries. Al accumulation <strong>in</strong> roots of<br />

Phaseolus vulgaries grown <strong>in</strong> soil to near maturity gives contradictory result to that<br />

found <strong>in</strong> young plants and therefore use of Al contents <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g plants <strong>in</strong> soil grown<br />

to near maturity can only be done <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with other techniques. Both Ca and Mg<br />

accumulation can be used to assess Al-tolerance <strong>in</strong> the common bean (Phaseolus<br />

vulgaris) grown <strong>in</strong> soil.<br />

The most ideal lim<strong>in</strong>g pH level for maximum growth is 5.6 <strong>in</strong> this strongly acid soil<br />

irrespective of the lim<strong>in</strong>g material.<br />

115


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors wish to thank the Japanese Co-operation Agency (JICA) for fund<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

study, and also the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology for the<br />

provision of laboratory facilities.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] M. M. Alley, L.W. Zelazny. “Soil acidity: Soil pH and lime needs. In Soil Test<strong>in</strong>g: Sampl<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Correlation, Calibration and Interpretation”, Ed. J.R Brown. pp.65-72. Soil science Society of America,<br />

Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, U.S.A, (1987).<br />

[2] H. D. Chapman, P. F. Platt. Methods of Analysis for Plants, Soils and Waters. Univ. California. 309 p.,<br />

(1961)<br />

[3] FAO - UNESCO. Soil map of the world, Rome, (1988).<br />

[4] C. D. Foy, A.L. Flem<strong>in</strong>g, W.H. Arm<strong>in</strong>ger, “Characterization of differential Al tolerance amongst<br />

varieties of wheat and barley”, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 31, 513 -521, (1967).<br />

[5] C. D. Foy, A. L. Flem<strong>in</strong>g, G. Gerloff. “Differential alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance of soybean varieties”, Agro. J.<br />

64: 815 -18, (1972).<br />

[6] C. D. Foy, A. L. Flem<strong>in</strong>g, J.W. Schwartz. “Opposite and alum<strong>in</strong>ium and manganese tolerance <strong>in</strong> two<br />

wheat varieties”, Agro. J. 65: 123-26, (1973).<br />

[7] A. D. M. Glass. Plant nutrition-An Introduction to Current Concepts, Jones and Bartlet Publishers, <strong>in</strong>c.<br />

234 p. (1989).<br />

[8] G. H<strong>in</strong>ga, F. N. Muchena, C. M. Njihia. <strong>Physical</strong> and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis, NAL-MoA,<br />

Kenya. (1980).<br />

[9] J. W. Huang, J.E. Shaff, D.L. Grunes, L.V. Kochian.. “Alum<strong>in</strong>ium effects on calcium fluxes at the root<br />

apex of alum<strong>in</strong>ium-sensitive wheat cultivars”, Plant Physiol., 98: 230-37, (1992b)<br />

[10] J. F. Ma, S. J. Zheng, X. F. Li, K. Takenda, H. Matsumoto. “A rapid hydroponic screen<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance <strong>in</strong> barley”, Plant and Soil. 191: 133-37, (1997a).<br />

[11] H. Marschner. M<strong>in</strong>eral Nutrition of higher plants, Inst. of plants Nutrition.Univ. Hohenheim,<br />

Germany. 889p., (1986).<br />

[12] E. N. Mugai, S. G Agong, H. Matsumoto. “Alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance mechanisms <strong>in</strong> Phaeolus vulgaris<br />

L.: Citrate synthase activity and TTC reduction are well correlated with citrate secretion”, Soil Sci. Plant<br />

Nutr., 46, 939-950, (2000).<br />

[13] R. D. Rhue, C. O. Grogan. “Screen<strong>in</strong>g corn for alum<strong>in</strong>ium tolerance”. Agron. J. 69,755 - 760, (1977).<br />

[14] W. G. Sombroek, H. M. H. Braun, B. J. A. van der Pouw. Exploratory Soil map<br />

and Agro-Climatic Zone Map of Kenya. Kenya Soil Survey. MoA. (1980)<br />

[15] G. J. Taylor. “Current views of the alum<strong>in</strong>ium stress response; the physiological basis of tolerance”.<br />

Curr. Top. Plant Biochem. Physiol., 10, 57-93, (1991).<br />

[16] S.M Wokabi. “The distribution, characterization and some management aspects of acid soils of<br />

Kenya”, Paper presented at IBSRAM’S 2 nd Regional Workshop <strong>in</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Development, Lusaka, Zambia.<br />

Kenya Soil Survey, (1987).<br />

116


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

EFFECT OF P FERTILISERS AND WEED CONTROL<br />

ON THE FATE OF P FERTILISERS APPLIED TO SOILS<br />

UNDER SECOND-ROTATION PINUS RADIATA<br />

A. A. Rivaie 1 , P. Loganathan 2 , and R. W. Tillman 2<br />

1 Indonesian Center for Estate Crops R & D, Jl. Tentara Pelajar No.1, Bogor, Indonesia<br />

(ariv<strong>in</strong>rivaie@yahoo.com). Telp/Fax: 62 0251 336194; 2 Soil Science, Massey University, Private Bag<br />

11222, Palmerston North, <strong>New</strong> Zealand (P.Loganathan@massey.ac.nz; R.Tillman@massey.ac.nz)<br />

Poster Extended Abstract<br />

Phosphorus is an important nutrient <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zealand forest plantations as most of the soils<br />

are P deficient or marg<strong>in</strong>ally deficient, and this element has been rout<strong>in</strong>ely applied s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

the 1960’s where appropriate. However, most of the <strong>in</strong>formation available on the P<br />

fertiliser requirements of radiata p<strong>in</strong>e was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from trials on first-rotation forests<br />

that were managed under silvicultural regimes which were quite different from today.<br />

The current silvicultural regimes of P<strong>in</strong>us radiata plantations with wider <strong>in</strong>itial tree<br />

spac<strong>in</strong>gs have created the potential for <strong>in</strong>creased growth of understorey vegetation. A<br />

consequence of this is that the response of P. radiata to P fertiliser is expected to be more<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenced by the <strong>in</strong>teraction between the P fertiliser, the tree and the understorey<br />

vegetation than was the case <strong>in</strong> the past.<br />

The objectives of this study were to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effect of application of different<br />

rates of two P fertilisers (Triple superphosphate (TSP) and Ben Guerir phosphate rock<br />

(BGPR)) and weed control, and their <strong>in</strong>teractions on P fractions and downward<br />

movement of P, <strong>in</strong> an Allophanic Soil (at the Kaweka forest) and a Pumice Soil (at the<br />

K<strong>in</strong>leith forest) under 4-5-year-old second-rotation P. radiata plantations.<br />

The results showed that P fraction conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the largest percentage of soil P was<br />

the 0.1 M NaOH extractable Po, <strong>in</strong> the surface soils (0-10 cm soil depth) at the two<br />

second-rotation forests. In the Allophanic Soil, NaOH-Po concentration was 196 µg P g -1<br />

soil, which was 41% of the total P, and <strong>in</strong> the Pumice Soil it was 253 µg P g -1 soil which<br />

was 64% of total P. Therefore, the long-term P supply<strong>in</strong>g power of the soil largely<br />

depends on the m<strong>in</strong>eralisation of this organic P.<br />

The NaOH-Pi and the H2SO4-Pi concentrations <strong>in</strong> the soils had <strong>in</strong>creased at both<br />

forests two years after P fertiliser application, whereas, the largest pool of P, NaOH-Po,<br />

and residual-P were unaffected by the P fertiliser application. Changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />

concentration of P fraction as a result of P fertiliser application depend on the P fertiliser<br />

type. When <strong>in</strong>creased rates of TSP were applied, the NaOH-Pi fraction (averaged over<br />

weed and weed-free treatments) <strong>in</strong>creased at a faster rate than the other P fractions and<br />

the rate of <strong>in</strong>crease was more marked at the Kaweka forest (an Allophanic Soil) than at<br />

the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest (a Pumice Soil). This suggested that the proportion of TSP applied to<br />

the soil that was adsorbed to allophane and Fe+Al oxides was more than that converted to<br />

any of the other P fractions. The higher rate of <strong>in</strong>crease of NaOH-Pi concentrations at the<br />

Kaweka forest than at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest is probably due to the higher P fixation capacity<br />

of the Kaweka soil compared to that of the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil.<br />

117


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

When <strong>in</strong>creased rates of BGPR were added, the H2SO4-Pi fraction (averaged over<br />

weed and weed-free treatments) <strong>in</strong>creased at a faster rate compared with the other P<br />

fractions and the rate of <strong>in</strong>crease was also more marked at the Kaweka forest than at the<br />

K<strong>in</strong>leith forest. This is due to the high concentration of undissolved PR (P associated<br />

with Ca) rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the soils, which was extracted by H2SO4. In comparison, the<br />

addition of TSP <strong>in</strong>creased the H2SO4-Pi concentrations only at 100 and 200 kg P ha -1 <strong>in</strong><br />

the Kaweka soil and at 200 kg P ha -1 <strong>in</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil. While, the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> H2SO4-Pi<br />

concentrations result<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> BGPR rates of application is due to an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> concentration of undissolved PR, the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> H2SO4-Pi with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

TSP rates is due to the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> concentrations of dicalcium phosphate result<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

the conversion of MCP <strong>in</strong> TSP to dicalcium phosphate.<br />

In general, the magnitude of the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> H2SO4-Pi concentrations per unit weight<br />

of BGPR addition at the Kaweka forest was greater than that at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest. This<br />

may be due to the higher rate of dissolution of BGPR <strong>in</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil than <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Kaweka soil, as the former was more acidic than the latter (pH 5.1 and pH 5.7,<br />

respectively). The supply of H + is a driv<strong>in</strong>g force for the dissolution of PR, along with the<br />

removal of the dissolution reaction products Ca 2+ , H2PO4 - and F - from the site of<br />

dissolution.<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>fall at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest dur<strong>in</strong>g the trial period was higher than at the Kaweka<br />

forest (annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall for 2001 at K<strong>in</strong>leith was 1491 mm and at Kaweka was 1285 mm;<br />

for 2002 they were 1702 and 1280 mm, respectively). It is possible that this would have<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> a higher soil moisture regime at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest to help further the<br />

dissolution of BGPR. But the Kaweka soil had lower exchangeable Ca and res<strong>in</strong>-Pi<br />

concentrations and higher P fix<strong>in</strong>g capacity compared to the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil, therefore,<br />

based on these properties PR dissolution would have been expected to be higher at<br />

Kaweka soil. The fact that the observed dissolution was lower <strong>in</strong> the Kaweka soil<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that the effect of the higher acidity and moisture content <strong>in</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil<br />

overrides the <strong>in</strong>fluences of P fix<strong>in</strong>g capacity, P concentration and exchangeable Ca <strong>in</strong> the<br />

soils <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g a higher rate of BGPR dissolution <strong>in</strong> the K<strong>in</strong>leith soil.<br />

The effect of weeds on plant-available soil P concentration (res<strong>in</strong>-Pi) depends on<br />

the type of weeds and the degree of P deficiency <strong>in</strong> the soil. The deeper root systems of<br />

the weeds (Himalayan honeysuckle, buddleia and some toetoe) at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest<br />

enhanced the plant-available P concentrations <strong>in</strong> soil surface probably by remov<strong>in</strong>g P<br />

from the subsoils and return<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> the form of litter to the soil surface (pump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mechanism). At the P-deficient Kaweka forest soils, however, the weeds (bracken fern<br />

and manuka) reduced res<strong>in</strong>-Pi concentration. This suggests that when plant-available P is<br />

very low, the weeds tend to compete with radiata for P.<br />

At both forests, the application of 200 kg P ha -1 as TSP and BGPR <strong>in</strong>creased Bray-<br />

2 P at the 0-10 cm soil depth. At the 10-20 cm soil depth, however, the application of any<br />

of the two P fertilisers at the rate of 200 kg P ha -1 had no effect on Bray-2 P concentration<br />

at the Kaweka forest, while at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest the two P fertilisers <strong>in</strong>creased Bray-2 P<br />

concentration. There was no fertiliser effect on Bray-2 P concentration at the 20-30 cm<br />

soil depth at both sites. This suggested that <strong>in</strong> the Pumice Soil at the K<strong>in</strong>leith forest, P<br />

from both TSP and BGPR has leached to the lower depth. In the less porous and higher P<br />

fix<strong>in</strong>g Allophanic Soil at the Kaweka forest it might have been difficult for the fertiliser P<br />

118


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

to have moved to below 10 cm depth. The movement of P <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>leith forest was higher<br />

for TSP than BGPR because of higher solubility of TSP.<br />

119


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Sub-theme : ORGANIC FARMING IN THE TROPICS<br />

PRESENT SITUATION, POSSIBILITIES AND CHALLENGES<br />

Current research at the research group of soil fertility and nutrient management<br />

Stefaan De Neve<br />

Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium<br />

The research group on Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management is part of the department<br />

of Soil Management and Soil Care, which does research on all aspects of applied soil<br />

science, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility, soil organic matter, soil physics, soil erosion and soil<br />

conservation, soil pollution and its remediation, and soil data process<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The research focus <strong>in</strong> the Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management group has<br />

gradually shifted from soil fertility related to maximis<strong>in</strong>g plant production towards<br />

environmental aspects related to fertilization and soil organic matter management. The<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> focus of the department is at present on the cycles of carbon and nitrogen <strong>in</strong> soil,<br />

and is reflected <strong>in</strong> a number of research topics that are briefly outl<strong>in</strong>ed below.<br />

Fundamental research is go<strong>in</strong>g on about soil organic carbon (SOC) along different<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es. A first l<strong>in</strong>e is the determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> soil of a passive SOC pool, i.e. a SOC pool that<br />

is by def<strong>in</strong>ition not affected by management but rema<strong>in</strong>s constant <strong>in</strong> size over centuries.<br />

This research uses a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of physical fractionation methods (size and density<br />

fractionation) and chemical fractionation, <strong>in</strong> order to isolate silt and clay associated SOC<br />

and further subdivide this <strong>in</strong> biochemically and non-biochemically resistant SOC. The<br />

fractionations are comb<strong>in</strong>ed with advanced mass spectrometrical analyses.<br />

A second l<strong>in</strong>e is the visualization of physically protected SOC with<strong>in</strong> microaggregates<br />

and the relationship between soil micro-architecture and SOC partition<strong>in</strong>g<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray computed nano tomography. This research should help to improve our<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of mechanisms of physical protection of SOC, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the improvement<br />

of exist<strong>in</strong>g SOC models.<br />

With regard to nitrogen, a more fundamental l<strong>in</strong>e of research is about the<br />

dynamics of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) <strong>in</strong> forest soils <strong>in</strong> Flanders. Over the last<br />

decades, research on DON has received <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g attention as a possible important loss<br />

mechanism for N and as a biologically active component <strong>in</strong> the N cycle. We are look<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at the importance of DON losses <strong>in</strong> forest soils <strong>in</strong> comparison to overall N leach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

losses, and will try to model DON dynamics <strong>in</strong> these soils, based on laboratory<br />

measurements of the m<strong>in</strong>eralization, sorption and desorption, chemical composition and<br />

transport <strong>in</strong> the vadose zone.<br />

Another research l<strong>in</strong>e is the <strong>in</strong>teraction between exogenous organic matter (EOM)<br />

that is applied to agricultural soil, the soil structure and soil physical properties, and soil<br />

foodweb dynamics, and how this <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong>fluences C and N cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> soil. To this<br />

end, a field experiment was started where different qualities of EOM are applied <strong>in</strong><br />

controlled quantities and where we monitor changes <strong>in</strong> soil physical properties/soil<br />

structure, changes <strong>in</strong> foodweb dynamics (notably microfauna, nematodes and<br />

earthworms) and associated C and N dynamics.<br />

120


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Applied l<strong>in</strong>es of research <strong>in</strong>cluded research on alternative agricultural production<br />

systems such as reduced tillage agriculture/conservation agriculture and organic farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Our research on reduced tillage is focussed on how this type of agriculture <strong>in</strong>fluences soil<br />

structure and soil physical properties, crop yields, and C and N dynamics from soil<br />

organic matter (SOM), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g C storage, C and N m<strong>in</strong>eralization, N2O emissions,<br />

nitrate leach<strong>in</strong>g and overall nitrogen use efficiency. Research is also go<strong>in</strong>g on about the<br />

dynamics of crop residues under reduced tillage agriculture, namely C and N<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralization, NH3 and N2O emission and soil quality parameters <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g enzyme<br />

activities, microbial biomass, earthworms, … The organic farm<strong>in</strong>g systems research <strong>in</strong><br />

our department until now has focussed on nutrient use efficiency compared to<br />

conventional agriculture, with emphasis on nitrate leach<strong>in</strong>g losses and phosphorus<br />

saturation. An important part of the research is focussed on field grown vegetable crops,<br />

because <strong>in</strong> that particular sector many problems of over-fertilization and excessive<br />

nutrient losses are concentrated.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, we are conduct<strong>in</strong>g research on nutrient balances and nutrient efficiencies<br />

of all k<strong>in</strong>ds of organic manures and wastes to provide scientific support for new<br />

legislation concern<strong>in</strong>g nutrient management <strong>in</strong> Flanders and <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Coleman D, Fu SL, Hendrix P & Crossley D. 2002. Soil foodwebs <strong>in</strong> agroecosystems: impacts of<br />

herbivory and tillage management. European Journal of Soil Biology 38, 21-28.<br />

[2] De Neve S., Pannier J. and Hofman G. 1996. Temperature effects on C and N m<strong>in</strong>eralization from<br />

vegetable crop residues. Plant and Soil, 181, 25-30.<br />

[3] Ferris H, Bongers T, de Goede RGM 2001. A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of<br />

the nematode faunal analysis concept. Applied Soil Ecology 18, 13-29.<br />

[4] D’Haene K., Moreels, E., De Neve S., Chaves Daguilar B., Boeckx P., Hofman G., Van Cleemput O.<br />

2003. Soil properties <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the denitrification potential of Flemish agricultural soils. Biology and<br />

Fertility of Soils, 38, 358-366.<br />

[5] Karlen, D.L., Mausbach, M.J., Doran, J.W., Cl<strong>in</strong>e, R.G., Harris, R.F. & Schuman, G.E. (1997). Soil<br />

quality: a concept, def<strong>in</strong>ition and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61, 4-<br />

10.<br />

[6] Lenz R & Eisenbeis G. 2000. Short-term effects of different tillage <strong>in</strong> a susta<strong>in</strong>able farm<strong>in</strong>g system on<br />

nematode community structure. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31, 237-244.<br />

[7] Nunan N, Ritz K, Rivers M, Feeney DS, Young IM 2006. Investigat<strong>in</strong>g microbial micro-habitat<br />

structure us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma 133, 398-407.<br />

[8] Schulten HR & Le<strong>in</strong>weber P (2000) <strong>New</strong> <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to organic-m<strong>in</strong>eral particles: composition,<br />

properties and models of molecular structure. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 399-432.<br />

[9] Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K 2002. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter:<br />

Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil 241, 155-176.<br />

[10] Sleutel S, De Neve S, S<strong>in</strong>gier B, Hofman G 2006. Organic C levels <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensively managed arable soils<br />

- long-term regional trends and characterization of fractions. Soil Use and Management 22, 188-196.<br />

[11] Sleutel S., De Neve S., Hofman G., Boeckx P., Beheydt D., Van Cleemput O., Mestdagh I., Lootens<br />

P., Carlier L., Van Camp N., Verbeeck H., Van De Walle I., Samson R., Lust N. & Lemeur R. 2003.<br />

Carbon stock changes and carbon sequestration potential of Flemish cropland soils. Global Change<br />

Biology, 9, 1193-1203.<br />

[12] Van Den Bossche A., De Neve S. & Hofman G. 2005. Soil phosphorus status of organic farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Flanders: an overview and a comparison with the conventional situation. Soil Use and Management, 21,<br />

415-421.<br />

[13] Young IM, Crawford JW 2005. Interactions and self-organization <strong>in</strong> the soil-microbe complex. Science<br />

304, 1634-1637.<br />

121


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

[14] Zelles L 1999. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides <strong>in</strong> the characterisation of<br />

microbial communities <strong>in</strong> soil: a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 29, 111-129.<br />

122


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

LOW INPUT APPROACHES FOR SOIL FERTILITY<br />

MANAGEMENT VERIFIED FOR SEMI-ARID AREAS OF<br />

EASTERN UGANDA<br />

Kayuki C.Kaizzi 1 , Byalebeka John 1 , Charles S. Wortmann 2 and Martha Mamo 2<br />

1 Kawanda Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO),<br />

Box 7065 Kampala, Uganda; kckaizzi@hotmail.com, 2 University of Nebraska L<strong>in</strong>coln, IANR, Department<br />

of Agronomy and Horticulture, 154 Keim Hall, L<strong>in</strong>coln, NE 68583-0915; cwortmann@unlnotes.unl.edu<br />

Abstract<br />

Gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moenich] is an important food crop <strong>in</strong> the semi-arid areas of Sub-<br />

Saharan Africa. Crop yields are generally low and decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g partly due to low soil fertility. In an attempt to<br />

address the problem, 148 on-farm trials were conducted at three sites over three years <strong>in</strong> the drought prone<br />

parts of eastern Uganda. The aim of this research was to evaluate, with farmer participation, alternative<br />

low-<strong>in</strong>put strategies for soil fertility improvement <strong>in</strong> sorghum based cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems. The strategies were:<br />

use of herbaceous legume (Mucuna pruriens) <strong>in</strong> improved fallow; a gra<strong>in</strong> legume (Vigna unguiculata) <strong>in</strong><br />

rotation with sorghum; use of cattle manure; application of low levels of N and P fertilizers. Mucuna<br />

(Mucuna pruriens) on average produced 7 t ha -1 of above ground dry matter conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 160 kg N ha -1<br />

across the three sites. There was an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> response to the alternative strategies.<br />

Application of 2.5 t ha -1 of kraal manure and the application of 30 kg N plus 10 kg P ha -1 both <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> yield by a mean of 1.15 t ha -1 . A comb<strong>in</strong>ation of 2.5 t ha -1 manure with 30 kg N ha -1 <strong>in</strong>creased gra<strong>in</strong><br />

yield by 1.40 tha -1 above the farmer practice (1.1 t ha -1 gra<strong>in</strong>). The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yields <strong>in</strong><br />

response to 30 kg N ha -1 alone, to a mucuna fallow, and to a rotation with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) was<br />

1.0, 1.4 and 0.7 t ha -1 , respectively. These alternative strategies were found to be cost-effective <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g sorghum yield <strong>in</strong> the predom<strong>in</strong>antly smallholder agriculture where <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer is not<br />

used. On-farm profitability and food security for sorghum production systems can be improved by use of<br />

<strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers, manure, mucuna fallow, and sorghum-cowpea rotation.<br />

Key words: cowpea, low <strong>in</strong>put, Mucuna pruriens, opportunity cost, resource poor, semi-arid, smallholder<br />

agriculture<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum is an important crop for smallholder farmers <strong>in</strong> the drier areas of sub-<br />

Saharan Africa (SSA) but crop yields are low, and decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some places [10, 22]. Low<br />

<strong>in</strong>herent soil N and P availability are major constra<strong>in</strong>ts [1] that are exacerbated by soil<br />

fertility depletion through nutrient removal <strong>in</strong> harvest and losses with runoff and soil<br />

erosion [21,30]. Many farmers are unable to compensate for these losses, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

negative nutrient balances at the national level for sub-Saharan Africa countries [26] and<br />

at the farm level <strong>in</strong> Eastern and Central Uganda [34]<br />

Nutrient availability can be improved through application of <strong>in</strong>organic or organic<br />

nutrient sources. The profitability of fertilizer use depends on agro-climatic and economic<br />

conditions at local and regional levels [31]. Infra structural and other market<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />

lack of agricultural subsidies, and high opportunity costs on available money makes the use<br />

of <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers very costly <strong>in</strong> SSA, and real costs to farmers are two to six times as<br />

123


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

much as <strong>in</strong> Europe [20]. Resource-poor farmers need large returns on the small <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />

that they can make, often require a 75% return with<strong>in</strong> a six to 12 month period to make an<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment competitive [32]<br />

Use of organic nutrient sources is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by labor availability for collect<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

apply<strong>in</strong>g the materials [19], limited quantities and variation <strong>in</strong> quality [17], and the demand<br />

for crop residues as fuel and fodder [16] Green manure production requires land that could<br />

often be used for food or cash crops [6]. Farmyard manure is available to many smallholder<br />

farmers but generally <strong>in</strong> small quantities [15]. Transfer of plant materials from field<br />

boundary areas, or near-by fallow or graz<strong>in</strong>g areas, often has potential <strong>in</strong> sub-humid areas<br />

but less potential <strong>in</strong> semi-arid areas [14,32].<br />

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) may contribute much N through better<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration of legumes <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g systems. Biologically fixed atmospheric nitrogen<br />

contributes to productivity both directly, when the fixed N is harvested <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> of gra<strong>in</strong><br />

or other food for human or animal consumption, or <strong>in</strong>directly by add<strong>in</strong>g N to the soil for<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance or enhancement of soil fertility [8]. Under favorable environmental<br />

conditions, BNF can meet the N requirements of tropical agriculture [6,7,18]. Economic<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts make BNF an attractive N source for resource-poor farmers <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan<br />

Africa [9,28].<br />

Several promis<strong>in</strong>g low <strong>in</strong>put approaches to soil fertility management for sorghum<br />

production <strong>in</strong> the drought-prone areas of eastern Uganda were evaluated to verify and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>e-tune them for the production systems <strong>in</strong> four related studies. The objectives of these<br />

studies were to determ<strong>in</strong>e sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield response to application of <strong>in</strong>organic and<br />

organic N and P sources, mucuna fallow, and cowpea rotation.<br />

Site characteristics<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Farmer-managed trials were conducted at Kadesok and Opwatetta parishes<br />

(approximately 33 45’ E and 1 12’N) <strong>in</strong> the Southern and Eastern Lake Kyoga Bas<strong>in</strong> of<br />

eastern Uganda and Kapol<strong>in</strong> parish <strong>in</strong> the Usuk Sandy Farm-Grasslands (34 0’ E and 1<br />

40’N) [33]. The altitude ranges from 1050 to 1150 m asl. The trials were part of a larger<br />

process of participatory research with these communities that began with participatory<br />

exercises <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g system characterization and diagnosis, identification of potential<br />

solutions to soil fertility problems, and development of research plans. The process lead<br />

to farmer participation <strong>in</strong> the dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of research results to other farmers.<br />

The ra<strong>in</strong>fall at the research sites allows for two cropp<strong>in</strong>g seasons per year with an<br />

annual mean of approximately 1150 mm for Kadesok and Opwatetta and 1000 mm for<br />

Kapol<strong>in</strong>. About 25-30% of the ra<strong>in</strong>fall falls outside the crop seasons and is used by<br />

naturally grow<strong>in</strong>g annual or perennial vegetation and unavailable to the planted crops.<br />

Soil samples for the 0- to 20-cm depth were collected for each trial site, air-dried, ground<br />

to pass through a 2-mm sieve, and analyzed accord<strong>in</strong>g to [6]. Extractable P, K and Ca<br />

were measured <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle ammonium lactate/acetic acid extract buffered at pH 3.8. Soil<br />

pH was measured us<strong>in</strong>g a soil to water ratio of 1:2.5. Soil organic matter was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

124


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Walkley – Black method, modified accord<strong>in</strong>g to [5]. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant soil<br />

types <strong>in</strong> the area are petric pl<strong>in</strong>thosols [3].<br />

Sets of trials<br />

Two sets of trials were conducted. Each farm was a replication to m<strong>in</strong>imize the<br />

probability of Type I error <strong>in</strong> extrapolat<strong>in</strong>g results throughout eastern Uganda. The plot<br />

size was 100 m 2 for all trials.<br />

Trial 1<br />

Use of the herbaceous legume (Mucuna pruriens), <strong>in</strong> improved fallow and cowpea<br />

(Vigna unguiculata) <strong>in</strong> rotation with sorghum were evaluated on 39 farms. The<br />

treatments were: cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum; sorghum follow<strong>in</strong>g cowpea which was produced<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the August to November short ra<strong>in</strong>s; cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum with 30 kg N ha -1<br />

applied to the second sorghum crop; and mucuna fallow dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong>s followed<br />

by sorghum. Sorghum, cowpeas and mucuna were planted <strong>in</strong> the respective plots dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the short ra<strong>in</strong>s. Sorghum was planted <strong>in</strong> all plots dur<strong>in</strong>g the subsequent long ra<strong>in</strong>s period.<br />

No nutrients were applied except for the +N treatment.<br />

Trial 2<br />

Sorghum response to applied <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers and manure was evaluated on 64 farms<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the long ra<strong>in</strong> season. The treatments were: no nutrients applied; 30 kg N ha -1 ; 30<br />

kg N plus 10 kg P ha -1 ; 2.5 t manure ha -1 ; and 30 kg N plus 2.5 t manure ha -1 . The manure<br />

was collected from open pens where farmers kept their cattle and goats at night. Cowpea<br />

was planted on all plots dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous short ra<strong>in</strong>s season.<br />

Crop management practices, application of manure and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers<br />

Manure and P fertilizers were applied at plant<strong>in</strong>g. Nitrogen was applied <strong>in</strong> two splits with<br />

5 kg N ha -1 at plant<strong>in</strong>g and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 25 kg N ha -1 six weeks later. Sorghum (cv.<br />

“Sekedo” and “Epurpur”) was planted at 60 x 20 cm dur<strong>in</strong>g the long ra<strong>in</strong>s of 2004<br />

(season 2004A) and 2005 (2005A). Mucuna was planted at a spac<strong>in</strong>g of 75 x 60 cm and<br />

cowpea at 45 x 20 cm dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong>s of 2003 (2003B) and 2004 (2004B). Inseason<br />

weed control was with hand hoes. Beta-cyfluthr<strong>in</strong> was applied 3 to 4 weeks after<br />

sorghum had germ<strong>in</strong>ated to prevent damage by stem borers and chloropyrifos 5% was<br />

applied for termite control.<br />

Sorghum and cowpea stover were left <strong>in</strong> the field. The mucuna that rema<strong>in</strong>ed after<br />

biomass measurements cont<strong>in</strong>ued to grow until the soil water was depleted. Some of the<br />

mucuna, as well as some of the stover of sorghum and cowpea, was grazed by livestock<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season as livestock generally graze freely <strong>in</strong> the fields after harvest of the<br />

crops. Mucuna seeds rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the field and germ<strong>in</strong>ated dur<strong>in</strong>g the subsequent long<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>s, the volunteer plants were controlled until the second weed<strong>in</strong>g after which emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mucuna was allowed to grow <strong>in</strong> competition with the sorghum crop.<br />

125


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Data collection and analysis<br />

Sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by harvest<strong>in</strong>g the whole plot at maturity. The gra<strong>in</strong><br />

was weighed after air-dry<strong>in</strong>g and thresh<strong>in</strong>g. Sub-samples were collected for moisture<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation and the gra<strong>in</strong> yield was adjusted to 14% water content.<br />

Mucuna biomass production was determ<strong>in</strong>ed at 22 weeks after plant<strong>in</strong>g by harvest<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

area equivalent to 3 m 2 us<strong>in</strong>g a 1 m 2 quadrant placed randomly at three different places<br />

with<strong>in</strong> a plot. All the materials with<strong>in</strong> the quadrant <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g litter were collected and<br />

weighed. A sub-sample was dried <strong>in</strong> an oven at 70˚C, ground to pass a 0.5 mm sieve and<br />

analyzed for total N, P and K by Kjeldahl digestion with concentrated sulphuric acid [1].<br />

P was determ<strong>in</strong>ed calorimetrically, and K by flame photometry.<br />

Cowpea gra<strong>in</strong> yield was determ<strong>in</strong>ed at physiological maturity by pick<strong>in</strong>g pods only,<br />

a common practice <strong>in</strong> the area. Harvested gra<strong>in</strong> was weighed after air-dry<strong>in</strong>g. Subsamples<br />

were collected for moisture determ<strong>in</strong>ation and the gra<strong>in</strong> yield was adjusted to<br />

14% water content.Analyses of variance were conducted by site and season for all sets of<br />

trials us<strong>in</strong>g Statistix V. 8.0 [25]. Differences were considered significant at the P ≤ 0.05<br />

level.<br />

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS<br />

The profitability of alternative practices was assessed. The analysis for fertilizer use was<br />

based on the follow<strong>in</strong>g assumptions [32]:<br />

1. Opportunity cost, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g risk allowance, was assumed to add 25, 50, and 75%<br />

to the cost of us<strong>in</strong>g fertilizer for the undef<strong>in</strong>ed categories of less poor, poor and very poor<br />

farmers, respectively;<br />

2. Farm gate crop prices were reduced by 10% to cover the cost of harvest<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g, and market<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

3. Fertilizer costs were <strong>in</strong>creased by 10% to cover transport and application costs;<br />

4. Plot yields were assumed to be high relative to yields that small-scale farmers<br />

can achieve at a farm-level and were reduced by 10% <strong>in</strong> the economic analysis.<br />

5. Prices <strong>in</strong> Uganda shill<strong>in</strong>gs (UgSh 1,800/- = US $1) were assumed to be 200/- and<br />

300/- kg -1 for sorghum and cowpea, respectively, at the farm-gate, and 40,000/- for 50-kg<br />

bags of urea and triple super phosphate.<br />

Soil characteristics<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the characterization and diagnosis process, farmers named different soils <strong>in</strong> the<br />

area and described these for their location on the landscape, associated problems, and<br />

soil-specific cop<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms. The major constra<strong>in</strong>ts mentioned by farmers <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

low soil fertility, low water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity for sandy soils, water logg<strong>in</strong>g for clayey<br />

soils, and weeds. Researchers and farmers discussed possible solutions to the problems<br />

and farmers then agreed to participate <strong>in</strong> their evaluation.<br />

126


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Soil texture class for the experimental sites ranged from sandy clay loam to sand<br />

with sand contents of 58 to 92% (Table 1). The pre-dom<strong>in</strong>ant texture classes were sandy<br />

loam and loamy sand, and of low water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity. The soils for most trial sites had<br />

chemical values below the critical low levels estimated for Uganda soils [5]. Soil organic<br />

matter varied widely but was often low. Available P was below the critical level <strong>in</strong> most<br />

fields. Extractable K and Ca levels were low <strong>in</strong> 24 – 33% and 10-16% of the fields,<br />

respectively. Depletion of soil K probably occurred partly due to past harvests of cassava<br />

and sweet potato. The soil test results were typical for the area [23].<br />

Soil property Kadesok Opwatetta Kapol<strong>in</strong> Critical<br />

127<br />

values a<br />

pH1:2.5<br />

6.1 (5.4 – 6.6) 6.0 (5.2 – 7.2) 6.1 (5.3 – 7.5) 5.2<br />

SOM (mg kg -1 ) 28 (19 – 42) 28 (26 – 41) 22 (17 – 35) 30<br />

Extractable P (mg kg -1 )<br />

1.3 (1 – 6) 1.3 (1 – 5) 2.80 (1 – 9) 5.0<br />

Extractable K (cmolc kg -1 ) 5.1 (2 – 10) 6.2 (3 – 10) 5.4 (2 – 10) 0.4<br />

Extractable Ca (cmolc kg -1 ) 41 (8 – 45) 36 (5 – 54) 31 (5 – 68) 0.9<br />

Sand (%) 71 (66 – 88) 76 (58 – 82) 84 (62 – 92) na<br />

Silt (%) 7 (2.6 – 13) 5 (1.3 – 15) 5. (3 - 11) na<br />

Clay (%) 2 (6.5 – 27) 19 (14 – 29) 11 (5 – 29) na<br />

a<br />

Below these values, soils are deficient or poor [5]; na = not applicable.<br />

Table 1: The median values and ranges for soil properties for the on-farm trial field<br />

<strong>in</strong> three communities<br />

Trial 1: Sorghum response to improved fallow and rotation with cowpea<br />

The mean above-ground dry matter production by mucuna across the three sites was 7 t<br />

ha -1 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 160 kg N ha -1 , 14 kg P ha -1 , and 94 kg K ha -1 This agrees with other<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the region where mean dry matter production was 7.3 t ha -1 , conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 180 kg<br />

N ha -1 with 103 kg N ha -1 derived from the atmosphere [11,13]. Farmers usually fallow<br />

their fields or grow cowpeas rather than sorghum dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong> season (season B)<br />

due to the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of the ra<strong>in</strong>s and heavy feed<strong>in</strong>g by birds. The mean cowpea gra<strong>in</strong><br />

yield dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong>s was 0.82 t ha -1 , and the mean sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield for the few<br />

farmers who harvested a short-season crop at Opwatetta and Kadesok was 1.05 t ha -1 ;<br />

these short season yields were used <strong>in</strong> the economic analysis.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Treatment Kadesok Opwatetta Kapol<strong>in</strong><br />

2004A 2005A 2004A 2004B 2005A 2004A 2005A<br />

Number of on-farm trials 5 8 5 3 7 6 5<br />

Previous sorghum 1.03 1.76 1.17 1.00 1.39 0.67 0.96<br />

Previous cowpea 1.84 3.19 1.61 2.00 2.17 1.43 1.18<br />

Previous sorghum,<br />

30 kg N ha -1<br />

2.30 3.49 1.65 2.50 2.43 2.05 1.36<br />

Previous mucuna 2.64 3.98 1.76 2.67 3.00 2.81 1.47<br />

LSD0.05 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.56 0.39 0.53 0.15<br />

Table 2 : Sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t ha -1 ) dur<strong>in</strong>g the long ra<strong>in</strong>s of 2004 and 2005 <strong>in</strong> three<br />

communities<br />

All treatments resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield at all sites <strong>in</strong> both years<br />

relative to cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum with no fertilizer applied (Table 2). The overall mean<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield due to the effect of rotation with cowpea as compared to<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum was 0.72 t ha -1 with a range of 0.2 to 1.4 t ha -1 for the means of sites<br />

and years. The effect of apply<strong>in</strong>g 30 kg N ha -1 to sorghum follow<strong>in</strong>g sorghum was an<br />

overall mean <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield of 1.03 tha -1 with a range 0.4 to 1.7 t ha -1 . The<br />

effect of mucuna grown dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous short ra<strong>in</strong> season was an overall mean<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield of 1.43 t ha -1 with a range 0.5 to 2.2 t ha -1 . Thus, <strong>in</strong>organic N<br />

fertilizer, cowpea rotation, and mucuna fallow served as effective N sources for sorghum<br />

at the three sites. The relatively greater <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield due to the<br />

improved fallow with mucuna is <strong>in</strong> agreement with results reported for maize<br />

[3,11,26,28]. The higher mean response for sorghum follow<strong>in</strong>g mucuna as compared to<br />

cowpea is expected as a large amount of fixed N was removed <strong>in</strong> the harvest of cowpea<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> while most mucuna biomass was left <strong>in</strong> the field.<br />

Treatment Gross returns<br />

(,000 UgSh ha -1 )<br />

Previous sorghum 371.2<br />

Previous cowpea 535.7<br />

Previous sorghum, 30 kg N ha -1 488.7 (25) b , 474.3 (50), 460.0 (75)<br />

Previous mucuna c 453.7<br />

b Values <strong>in</strong> parenthesis are opportunity costs<br />

Table 3: The gross returns, exclud<strong>in</strong>g fertilizer costs at 25, 50 & 75% opportunity costs, for<br />

sorghum produced <strong>in</strong> the long ra<strong>in</strong>y season follow<strong>in</strong>g either sorghum, cowpea or mucuna<br />

produced <strong>in</strong> the short ra<strong>in</strong>y season.<br />

The most economical cropp<strong>in</strong>g system was the cowpea-sorghum rotation followed<br />

by cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum with 30 kg N ha -1 fertilizer and the mucuna rotation (Table 3).<br />

Least profitable was the cont<strong>in</strong>uous sorghum without N. However, production costs were<br />

assumed to be similar for the previous crops while the cost of produc<strong>in</strong>g mucuna was<br />

undoubtedly less than for sorghum and cowpea due to easier plant<strong>in</strong>g, weed control and<br />

no harvest. The value of graz<strong>in</strong>g of the mucuna dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season was not estimated<br />

but was probably greater than the value of graz<strong>in</strong>g sorghum and cowpea stover. Accurate<br />

128


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

estimation of the true costs and benefits would improve the estimated profitability for the<br />

mucuna treatment to the extent that it may be the most profitable practice.<br />

Trial 2: Sorghum response to application of manure and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer<br />

All manure and fertilizer treatments resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield at all sites<br />

<strong>in</strong> all years relative to the control treatment with no nutrients applied (Table 4). The mean<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield, across sites and years, due to application of 30 kg N ha -<br />

1 and 2.5 t ha -1 manure was 1.3 and 1.2 t ha -1 , respectively. Application of 10 kg P ha -1 <strong>in</strong><br />

addition to the 30 kg N ha -1 resulted <strong>in</strong> a mean additional yield <strong>in</strong>crease of 0.27 t ha -1 with<br />

site-year mean <strong>in</strong>creases rang<strong>in</strong>g from


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Treatment Increase <strong>in</strong><br />

gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t<br />

ha -1 )<br />

Net returns to <strong>in</strong>put use<br />

(,000 UgSh ha -1 ) a<br />

130<br />

Benefit:cost ratio<br />

25% 50% 75% 25% 50% 75%<br />

30 kg N + 10 kg P ha -1 1.27 83.3 58.8 34.3 1.68 1.40 1.20<br />

30 kg N + 2.5 t manure ha -<br />

1 b<br />

1.40 54.4 29.9 5.4 1.32 1.15 1.02<br />

30 kg N ha -1 0.93 78.9 64.6 50.2 2.10 1.75 1.50<br />

2.5 t manure ha -1 1.02 115.2 115.2 115.2 3.30 3.30 3.30<br />

Table 5: Increase <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t ha -1 ) and net returns and benefit:cost ratios for<br />

opportunity costs of money of 25, 50, and 75%, averaged across all location/years<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The results presented <strong>in</strong> Tables 2, 4 and 5 show that sorghum yield is most constra<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

soil N. However, soil tests results show that the availability of P and other nutrients is<br />

often low. Crop yield may therefore be limited by deficiency of one or more of these<br />

nutrients if crop yields are <strong>in</strong>creased due to improved N availability. Application of a<br />

wide range of nutrients and organic matter with manure may contribute to the<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability of the higher yield levels. The nutrient content of the manure on a dry<br />

matter basis was <strong>in</strong> the range 0.7 – 1.8%, 0.1 - 0.2% and 0.8 - 2.4% for N, P and K,<br />

respectively. The manure was from open pens and a large proportion of the manure N<br />

was probably <strong>in</strong> organic rather than ammonium form. Much of the organic N was<br />

probably not m<strong>in</strong>eralized dur<strong>in</strong>g the season and may benefit subsequent crops.<br />

Manure use, however, is a process of transfer of nutrients from one part of the<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g system to another rather than a replacement of nutrients exported <strong>in</strong> marketed<br />

harvest result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a negative farm level nutrient balance <strong>in</strong> the long run. Eventually,<br />

there will be a need to br<strong>in</strong>g nutrients to the farm to susta<strong>in</strong> the higher levels of<br />

productivity and market<strong>in</strong>g of gra<strong>in</strong>. Also, there is <strong>in</strong>sufficient manure to apply 2.5 t ha -1<br />

yr -1 to most of the cropland although manure is currently an under-utilized resource.<br />

Includ<strong>in</strong>g legumes <strong>in</strong> the rotation apparently improved N availability. The cowpeasorghum<br />

rotation resulted <strong>in</strong> a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield while provid<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

cowpea gra<strong>in</strong> harvest the previous season. Us<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong> season to produce a<br />

mucuna fallow resulted <strong>in</strong> the greatest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield. This is <strong>in</strong> agreement<br />

with the results reported for maize <strong>in</strong> eastern and central Uganda [4,11,12,13].<br />

Furthermore, mucuna itself has some economic value as livestock grazed it dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

dry season when fodder was scarce. Application of N fertilizer resulted <strong>in</strong> a mean<br />

sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield that was <strong>in</strong>termediate relative to the yields follow<strong>in</strong>g the legumes.<br />

The use of N fertilizer means a cash expense to the farmer but allows more choice <strong>in</strong> land<br />

use dur<strong>in</strong>g the short ra<strong>in</strong> season. The results of the economic analysis show that fertilizer<br />

use is profitable for all the farmers but less so for the poorest farmers with the greatest<br />

opportunity cost.<br />

Several of the practices tested were verified as promis<strong>in</strong>g and a strategy is needed<br />

to achieve widespread adoption. Some of these practices had sufficient effect on crop<br />

performance that field demonstrations should be very effective if conducted throughout


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

the semi-arid sorghum production areas of eastern and northern Uganda. Farmer<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the full research process ensured that the practices are compatible with<br />

their farm<strong>in</strong>g systems. Also, the practices are easily testable by adopt<strong>in</strong>g farmers.<br />

Extension staff work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the target areas need to be enabled to conduct and<br />

effectively use demonstrations to <strong>in</strong>form farmers of the benefits of these practices. The<br />

participat<strong>in</strong>g farmers, who were <strong>in</strong>volved from the characterization and diagnosis<br />

exercises through the implementation of trials and assessment of the results, are a<br />

potential resource for an organized farmer to farmer dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of the <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Inorganic fertilizers, animal manure, N fertilizer comb<strong>in</strong>ed with manure, mucuna fallow<br />

and cowpea rotation enable profitable <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> sorghum yield on the sandy loam and<br />

loamy sand soils of eastern Uganda. Inadequate N availability is the most limit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nutrient <strong>in</strong> the traditional production systems <strong>in</strong> this area. Application of a small amount<br />

of P <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer or manure, <strong>in</strong> addition to N, is also profitable at three<br />

opportunity costs for money. The cowpea-sorghum rotation is a relatively profitable<br />

cropp<strong>in</strong>g system, especially if fertilizer N or manure is applied to the sorghum crop. The<br />

use of mucuna as a short ra<strong>in</strong> season fallow crop is a promis<strong>in</strong>g source of N and organic<br />

material, as well as dry season fodder, for the resource-poor smallholder farmers of<br />

eastern Uganda. Available manure needs to be used efficiently as it supplies some of all<br />

soil nutrients essential to crop growth, some of which are likely to become more limit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with <strong>in</strong>creased crop yields. Longer-term on-station research is needed to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability of these low <strong>in</strong>put approaches to soil fertility management.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors are grateful to the participat<strong>in</strong>g farmers and to Mr. Dennis Odelle, Mr. Bazil<br />

Kadiba, Mr. Patrick Odongo and Mr. William Acoda, the field assistants at the research<br />

sites. The research was made possible by the National Agricultural Research<br />

Organization (NARO), the International Sorghum/Millet Collaborative Research Support<br />

Program (INTSORMIL) and by fund<strong>in</strong>g from the U.S. Agency for International<br />

Development under the terms of Grant No. LAG-G-00-96-900009-00.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] J. M. Anderson, S. J. Ingram Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. CAB Int.<br />

Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, England. 221 p (1993).<br />

[2] M. A. Bekunda, A. Bationo, , H. Ssali. Soil Fertility Management <strong>in</strong> Africa. A review of selected<br />

research trials, pp 63 –79. In: Buresh, R.J., Sanchez, P.A., Calhoun, F. (eds) Replenish<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility <strong>in</strong><br />

Africa. SSSA spec. Publ. 51 SSA, Madison WI (1997).<br />

[3] FAO/ISRIC – ISSS. World Reference Base for Soil <strong>Resources</strong>. World Soil <strong>Resources</strong>. Report No. 84.<br />

Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome (1998).<br />

131


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

[4] M. Fischler, C. S. Wortmann. Green manures maize-bean systems <strong>in</strong> eastern Uganda: Agronomic<br />

performance and farmers’ perceptions. Agrofor. Syst., Volume 47, pp.123-138 (1999).<br />

[5]. H. L. Foster. Rapid rout<strong>in</strong>e soil and plant analysis without automatic equipment. I. Rout<strong>in</strong>e Soil<br />

analysis. E. Afric. Agric. For. J., Volume 37, pp. 160 – 170 (1971).<br />

[6] K.E. Giller, G. Cadisch, C. Ehakuitusm, E. Adams, W. D. Sakala, P.L. Mafongoya. Build<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />

nitrogen capital <strong>in</strong> Africa. In: R. J. Buresh, P. A. Sanchez, F. Calhoun, (eds.), Replenish<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility <strong>in</strong><br />

Africa. p 151-192. SSSA spec. Publ. 51 SSSA, Madison, EI (1997).<br />

[7] K. E. Giller, J. F. McDonagh, G. Cadisch. Can biological nitrogen fixation susta<strong>in</strong> agriculture <strong>in</strong> the<br />

tropics? p 173-191. In: J. K. Syers, D. L. Rimmer (eds.) Soil Science and susta<strong>in</strong>able land management <strong>in</strong><br />

the tropics. CAB Int., Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, England (1994).<br />

[8] K. E. Giller, G. Cadisch Future benefits from biological nitrogen fixation: An ecological approach to<br />

agriculture. Plant and Soil, Volume 174, pp.255-277 (1995).<br />

[9] K. E. Giller, K. J. Wilson. Nitrogen Fixation <strong>in</strong> Tropical Cropp<strong>in</strong>g Systems. CAB International,<br />

Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, 313p, (1991).<br />

[10] IBSRAM. IBSRAM position paper. In: D. J. Greenland, G. D. Bowen, H. Eswaran, R. Rhoades, C.<br />

Valent<strong>in</strong>, (eds). Soil, Water and Nutrient Management Research - A new Agenda. Bangkok, Thailand<br />

(1994).<br />

[11] C. K. Kaizzi. The potential benefit of green manures and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers <strong>in</strong> cereal production on<br />

contrast<strong>in</strong>g soils <strong>in</strong> eastern Uganda. Ecology and Development series No. 4. Cuviller Verlag Göttigen,<br />

German, 102p (2002).<br />

[12] C. K. Kaizzi, H. Ssali, P. L. G. Vlek. Differential use and benefits of Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens)<br />

and N fertilizers <strong>in</strong> maize production <strong>in</strong> contrast<strong>in</strong>g agro-ecological zones of E. Uganda. Agricultural<br />

Systems, Volume 88, pp. 44 – 60 (2006).<br />

[13] C. K. Kaizzi, H. Ssali, P. L. G. Vlek. The potential of Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) and N<br />

fertilizers <strong>in</strong> maize production on contrast<strong>in</strong>g soils and agro-ecological zones of East Uganda. Nutrient<br />

Cycl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Agro ecosystems,Volume 68 pp.59-73 (2004).<br />

[14] C. K. Kaizzi, C. S. Wortmann. Plant Materials for Soil Fertility Management <strong>in</strong> Subhumid Tropical<br />

Areas. Agron. J., Volume 93 pp.929-935 (2001).<br />

[15] J. K. Lekasi, J. C. Tanner, S. K. Kimani, P. J. C. Harris. Manag<strong>in</strong>g Manure to Susta<strong>in</strong> Smallholder<br />

Livelihoods <strong>in</strong> the East African Highlands. HDRA Publications, Coventry, UK. 32pp. (2001).<br />

[16] C. A. Palm. Contribution of Agro forestry trees to nutrient requirements of <strong>in</strong>tercropped plants.<br />

Agrofor. Syst., Volume 30, pp.105-124 (1995)[.<br />

[17] C. A. Palm, R. J. K. Myers, S. M. Nandwa. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed use of Organic and <strong>in</strong>organic nutrient sources<br />

for soil fertility ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and replenishment. In: R. J. Buresh, P. A. Sanchez, F. Calhoun, (eds.),<br />

Replenish<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility <strong>in</strong> Africa. pp 193 -217. SSSA spec. Publ. 51 SSSA, Madison, EI (1997).<br />

[18] M. B. Peoples, D. F. Herridge, J. K. Ladha. Biological nitrogen fixation: an efficient source of<br />

nitrogen for susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture? Plant and Soil, Volume 174, pp. 3-28 (1995).<br />

132


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

AMELIORATION OF ACID SULFATE SOIL INFERTILITY IN<br />

MALAYSIA FOR RICE CULTIVATION<br />

J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong><br />

Department of <strong>Land</strong> Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang,<br />

Selangor Malaysia<br />

Abstract<br />

Normally, acid sulfate soils are not suitable for crop production. Unless they are properly ameliorated us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

appropriate technology <strong>in</strong> agronomic practices, the soils are not put to agriculture production. The objective<br />

of this study was to ameliorate an acid sulfate soil <strong>in</strong> Malaysia us<strong>in</strong>g dolomitic limestone (GML) and an<br />

organic-based fertilizer for rice cultivation. The soils at the experimental plots belong to the Nipis-Bakri<br />

Associations (organic soils underla<strong>in</strong> by sulfidic materials with 50 cm depth), which can be classified as<br />

Typic Sulfosaprists. The rice (Oryza sativa) variety used <strong>in</strong> the trial was MR 219. The treatment <strong>in</strong>cluded a<br />

control (T1, no lime), 2 t GML/ha (T2), 4 t GML/ha (T3), 6 t GML/ha (T4), 8 t GML/ha (T5), 4 t GML/ha<br />

+ organic fertilizer (T6) and 4 t GML/ha + fused magnesium phosphate (T7). The result showed that the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial topsoil pH was low. At the depth of 45-60 cm, the pH values were lower than 3.5. The <strong>in</strong>itial topsoil<br />

exchangeable Ca ranged from 1.17 to 1.68 cmolc/kg soil, lower than the required level for rice of 2<br />

cmolc/kg soil. The <strong>in</strong>itial exchangeable Mg was only 0.50-0.53, but Mg requirement is 1 cmolc/kg soil. The<br />

highest rice yield for the 2 nd season was 7.5 t/ha obta<strong>in</strong>ed by T6. For this treatment, 4 t GML/ha were<br />

applied <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with the organic fertilizer. This yield is comparable to the yield of rice grown on<br />

good soils <strong>in</strong> the granary areas of the west coast of the Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia. The national average for<br />

Malaysia is 3.8 t/ha. It was observed that the yield obta<strong>in</strong>ed by T6 was not significantly different from that<br />

of T3, T4 and T5. This trial showed that apply<strong>in</strong>g 2 t GML/ha (T2) is not enough to ameliorate these soils<br />

for rice cultivation. For the T2, the pH was still low (3.99) and Al was very high (10.22 cmolc/kg soil). For<br />

T7, where 4 t GML/ha were applied <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with fused magnesium phosphate, the yield was not<br />

significantly different from that of T6. It means <strong>in</strong>stead of us<strong>in</strong>g organic fertilizer, farmers <strong>in</strong> that area can<br />

apply lime together with fused magnesium phosphate. The Malaysian government gives farmers <strong>in</strong> the area<br />

this phosphate fertilizer as a subsidy to <strong>in</strong>crease rice production.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Kemas<strong>in</strong>-Semerak Integrated Agriculture Development Project was launched by the<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture Malaysia <strong>in</strong> 1982. The project area is located <strong>in</strong> the Kelantan<br />

Pla<strong>in</strong>, an east coast state of Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia. The Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong> is <strong>in</strong> the tropical wet<br />

climatic zone, with a mean daily temperature of 32 o C and a mean annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall of<br />

2290-2540 mm [13]. The climate of the area is <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the South Ch<strong>in</strong>a Sea dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the Northeast Monsoon, which is from November to January.<br />

The Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong> consists of a mixture of river<strong>in</strong>e and mar<strong>in</strong>e alluvial soils,<br />

formed as a result of the rise and fall <strong>in</strong> sea level s<strong>in</strong>ce the Quaternary [4]. Peaty materials<br />

sometimes overla<strong>in</strong> by mixed clayey-sandy sediments occasionally with variable amounts<br />

of pyrite are scattered all over the pla<strong>in</strong>, especially along the coastl<strong>in</strong>e. This eventually<br />

gives rise to development of acid sulfate soil conditions, which are harmful to rice.<br />

About 80 % of the people <strong>in</strong> the area <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g activities, particularly<br />

rice production. Unfortunately, some of the soils <strong>in</strong> the rice farms are too acidic for rice<br />

cultivation, hav<strong>in</strong>g a pH value of less than 3.5. They are called acid sulfate soils. Under<br />

this condition, Al and Fe contents <strong>in</strong> the solutions are usually very high. Rice yield for<br />

133


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

these soils is very low (rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1.29 to 3.06 t/ha). Among the agronomic problems<br />

common to acid sulfate soils are toxicity due to the presence of Al, decrease on P<br />

availability, nutrient deficiency, Fe(II) toxicity and plant stress due to the presence of<br />

sulfuric horizon [3].<br />

The activities of Al 3+ <strong>in</strong> the soil solution are controlled by Al(OH)3 (gibbsite), but<br />

only at high pH. Thus, rais<strong>in</strong>g the pH would render the Al <strong>in</strong>active, as gibbsite is <strong>in</strong>ert. Al<br />

<strong>in</strong> soil solution at 1-2 mg/kg can be toxic to rice [5].<br />

With organic material, Fe(II) toxicity may occur due to reduction of Fe(III) under<br />

flooded soil conditions [20]. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Moore and Patrick [9], Fe(II) activities were<br />

seldom equilibrium with iron solid phases <strong>in</strong> acid sulfate soils. Ponnamperuma et al. [15]<br />

reported values of 5000 mg/kg Fe(II) with<strong>in</strong> 2 weeks of flood<strong>in</strong>g. Iron uptake by rice is<br />

correlated with Fe 2+ activities <strong>in</strong> soil solution [9]. Concentration above 500 mg/kg Fe(II)<br />

is considered toxic to rice plants planted on acid sulfate soils [12].<br />

Some areas of acid sulfate soils <strong>in</strong> Malaysia have been reclaimed for rice<br />

cultivation us<strong>in</strong>g ground magnesium limestone (GML). In the acid sulfate soils of the<br />

Muda Agricultural Development Authority (MADA) granary areas <strong>in</strong> Kedah-Perlis<br />

coastal pla<strong>in</strong>s (northwest coast of Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia), for <strong>in</strong>stance, rice yield improved<br />

significantly after apply<strong>in</strong>g 2.5 tonnes of ground magnesium limestone per ha [2]. In<br />

another area called Merbok Scheme (also <strong>in</strong> the Kedah-Perlis coastal pla<strong>in</strong>s), rice yield<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased from 1.4 t/ha (<strong>in</strong> 1974) to 4.5 t/ha (<strong>in</strong> 1990) after yearly application of 2 t<br />

GML/ha [19].<br />

Acid sulfate soils can also be ameliorated by application of organic materials [10].<br />

Application of organic matter <strong>in</strong> Al-toxic soils <strong>in</strong>creases yield by detoxification of Al<br />

through pH <strong>in</strong>crease and complexation of Al by organic matter [7]. The slight <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

soil pH can be due <strong>in</strong> part to release of NH3 dur<strong>in</strong>g decomposition of organic matter as<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g reported for green manure [6].<br />

The objective of this study was to ameliorate an acid sulfate soil us<strong>in</strong>g ground<br />

magnesium limestone and an organic-based fertilizer for rice cultivation.<br />

The soils<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The soils <strong>in</strong> the experimental plots belong to the Nipis-Bakri Associations (organic soils<br />

underla<strong>in</strong> by sulfidic materials with 50 cm depth), which can be classified as Typic<br />

Sulfosaprists. The peaty materials have been degraded as a result of a long history of rice<br />

cultivation. In the soil profile, the sulfuric layer occurs below the depth of 45 cm.<br />

Prior to treatment, soil samples were collected at 15 cm <strong>in</strong>terval to the depth of 75 cm at<br />

selected locations <strong>in</strong> the experimental plots (T1, T3, T5) <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

chemical properties of the soils. Further soil sampl<strong>in</strong>gs were carried out after every rice<br />

harvest for every treatment <strong>in</strong> the trial, but only for the topsoil.<br />

The crop tested<br />

The rice (Oryza sativa) variety used <strong>in</strong> the trial was MR 219. This is the most common<br />

rice variety planted by Malaysian rice growers <strong>in</strong> the Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong>. The past harvest<br />

134


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

showed that this rice variety yields about 2 t/ha us<strong>in</strong>g farmer’s practice, which is below<br />

the national average of 3.8 t/ha.<br />

Experimental<br />

The experiment was laid out <strong>in</strong> the field us<strong>in</strong>g Completely Randomized Design, with five<br />

replications. Each experimental plot size was 3X3 meters. There were altogether seven<br />

treatments. The treatment for the trial <strong>in</strong>cluded a control (no lime, T1); the rest of the<br />

treatments are given <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The amount of organic fertilizer applied was 0.25 t/ha.<br />

Symbol Treatment<br />

T1 Control (0 t GML/ha)<br />

T2 2 t GML + /ha<br />

T3 4 t GML/ha<br />

T4 6 t GML/ha<br />

T5 8 t GML/ha<br />

T6 4 t GML/ha + JITU*<br />

T7 4 t GML/ha + FMP #<br />

+ GML – Ground Magnesium Limestone<br />

* JITU – Sugar cane-based organic fertilizer (0.25 t/ha)<br />

# FMP – Fused Magnesium Phosphate<br />

Table 1: Treatment <strong>in</strong> the field<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> rice season <strong>in</strong> the Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong> is November-April, while the offseason<br />

is May-September. For this trial, two successive crops of rice were planted, dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> season. Ground magnesium limestone (GML) was applied once <strong>in</strong> mid-October<br />

2002 and the seed<strong>in</strong>g was done two weeks later, just before irrigation water was allowed<br />

to flow <strong>in</strong>to the experimental plots.<br />

Standard fertilizer rates were give to the grow<strong>in</strong>g rice plants <strong>in</strong> the field (90-120<br />

kg N/ha, 12-18 kg P/ha, 90-120 kg K/ha), us<strong>in</strong>g urea, NPK Blue (12:12:17+TE) and NPK<br />

Green (15:15:15+TE) as the sources of the nutrients. This rate was for optimal rice<br />

growth, which was slightly higher than that us<strong>in</strong>g farmer’s practice. The organic fertilizer<br />

used was sugar cane-based compost.<br />

Soil analysis<br />

The soil pH (1:2.5) was determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> water. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g NH4OAc, buffered at pH 7. Exchangeable Ca, Mg, and K <strong>in</strong> the<br />

NH4OAc extract were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).<br />

Exchangeable Al was extracted by I M KCl and determ<strong>in</strong>ed by AAS. The organic carbon<br />

was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the standard Walkley-Black method [21].<br />

135


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Iron <strong>in</strong> the soils was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by double acid method (henceforth referred to as<br />

acid-extractable Fe). It was extracted us<strong>in</strong>g 0.05 M HCl <strong>in</strong> 0.0125 M H2SO4. A five-gram<br />

sample of the soil was mixed with 25 mL of the extract<strong>in</strong>g solution and shaken for 15<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes. The solution was then filtered through Whatman filter paper number 42 before<br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Fe it conta<strong>in</strong>ed by AAS.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial soil chemical properties<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The chemical characteristics by depth of the soils at selected locations of the<br />

experimental plots <strong>in</strong> the trial before treatment are given <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The topsoil pH was<br />

low; the values were even lower at the depth below 50 cm. At the depth of 45-60 cm, the<br />

pH values were lower than 3.5 <strong>in</strong> all the three locations <strong>in</strong> the experimental plot (Table<br />

2). This low pH co<strong>in</strong>cid<strong>in</strong>g with the presence of jarositic mottles <strong>in</strong> the soils at that depth<br />

qualifies them to be classified as acid sulfate soils. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to a study conducted <strong>in</strong><br />

Vietnam, the depth of jarositic layer <strong>in</strong> an acid sulfate soil is not related with rice<br />

productivity [8]<br />

The low pH was consistent with the presence of high exchangeable Al, especially<br />

at depth below 45 cm, which were the sulfuric layers. But <strong>in</strong> the Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong>, the<br />

exchangeable Ca and Mg were very low [18]. Hence, lim<strong>in</strong>g is necessary to supplement<br />

the macronutrients.<br />

It was found that the peaty materials were completely decomposed. The CEC<br />

(data not shown) of less than 20 cmolc/kg soil further proves that the organic had broken<br />

down and completely mixed with m<strong>in</strong>eral sediments. The CEC of normal organic matter<br />

is very high, hav<strong>in</strong>g a value more than 200 cmolc/kg. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the soil taxonomy<br />

[17], these soils can be classified as Typic Sulfosaprists due to the presence of peaty<br />

materials and sulfuric horizon with<strong>in</strong> the depth of 50 cm.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial topsoil exchangeable Ca ranged from 1.17 to 1.68 cmolc/kg soil, lower<br />

than the required level for rice of 2 cmolc/kg soil [14]. The <strong>in</strong>itial exchangeable Mg was<br />

only 0.50-0.53, but Mg requirement is 1 cmolc/kg soil [5]. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these researchers<br />

also, Al concentration of 1-2 mg/kg <strong>in</strong> the soil solution would cause toxicity to the<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g rice plants. Potassium contents seemed to be moderately high and thus would be<br />

sufficient for rice growth.<br />

Based on the presence of deficient amounts of the two macronutrients (Ca and<br />

Mg), it is appropriate that the <strong>in</strong>fertility of the soils can <strong>in</strong> part be ameliorated by<br />

application of dolomitic limestone, which conta<strong>in</strong>s both elements.<br />

The effects of treatment on soils<br />

Flood occurred twice <strong>in</strong> late November 2002. It is not possible to estimate how much<br />

damage the flood had caused to the rice production. The soil analyses carried out on the<br />

soil samples after the first rice harvest (sampled <strong>in</strong> April 2003) showed unexpected<br />

results. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> T1, the topsoil pH, exchangeable Al, exchangeable Ca and<br />

136


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

T1 T3 T5<br />

Depth pH Al Ca Mg K O.C pH Al Ca Mg K O.C pH Al Ca Mg K O.C<br />

(cm) air-<br />

fresh --------------(cmolc/kg)-------------- %<br />

air- ------------(cmolc/kg)------------ % air- -----------(cmolc/kg)----------- %<br />

drieddrieddried<br />

1:2.5<br />

1:2.5<br />

1:2.5<br />

1:2.5<br />

0-15 4.1 4.7 4.46 0.36 0.18 1.21 10.4 4.2 3.35 0.27 0.13 0.88 21.5 4.4 2.72 0.46 0.18 2.20 25.6<br />

15-30 4.0 4.5 4.84 0.22 0.14 1.30 - 4.0 4.81 0.36 0.18 0.86 - 3.8 5.94 0.23 0.12 0.41 -<br />

30-45 3.6 4.4 8.29 0.20 0.52 1.81 - 3.7 8.74 0.32 0.47 1.23 - 3.5 8.82 0.16 0.39 1.32 -<br />

45-60 2.9 3.9 12.54 0.08 0.33 0.61 - 3.3 8.76 0.31 0.54 1.09 - 3.1 13.54 0.27 0.65 0.99 -<br />

60-75 2.5 4.1 15.10 0.05 0.15 0.13 - 2.5 32.43 0.07 0.37 0.76 - 2.5 26.73 0.25 0.68 0.75 -<br />

Table 2: Relevant chemical properties of the soil<br />

Treatment<br />

pH<br />

water<br />

1:2.5<br />

Al Ca Mg K<br />

----------------------(cmolc/kg)---------------------- T1 3.95 e 12.75 a 1.58 e 0.48 f 0.41 a<br />

T2 3.99 e 10.22 ab 1.99 de 0.57 e 0.24 bc<br />

T3 4.06 de 9.45 ab 2.22 cd 0.70 d 0.15 d<br />

T4 4.35 b 3.13 c 2.81 b 0.93 b 0.19 bcd<br />

T5 4.52 a 2.37 c 3.74 a 1.10 a 0.17 cd<br />

T6 4.21 bc 8.79 ab 2.57 bc 0.79 c 0.27 b<br />

T7 4.16 cd 7.46 bc 2.47 bc 0.78 cd 0.21 bcd<br />

LSD0.05 0.14 5.15 0.47 0.08 0.08<br />

Table 3: Topsoil pH and exchangeable cations after 2 nd harvest<br />

137


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

exchangeable Mg were 3.95, 5.83, 1.06 and 0.46 cmolc/kg soil, respectively (data not shown).<br />

In the T5, where 8 tonnes/ha of GML were applied, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g values were 4.38, 2.64,<br />

2.86 and 1.21 cmolc/kg soil. Ironically, the respective values for T7 were higher than those of<br />

the T5, where only 4 tonnes/ha of GML were applied. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g values for this<br />

treatment were 4.93, 0.12, 8.60, 3.37 cmolc/kg soil. All these would be seen <strong>in</strong> the response<br />

of the rice plants shown by the yield of rice <strong>in</strong> this trial <strong>in</strong> the 1 st season. However, the effect<br />

of this flood on rice yield was less remarkable <strong>in</strong> the 2 nd season.<br />

The results of the soil analyses for the second season (sampled on May 1, 2004) were<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to expectation. The lowest pH with a value of 3.95 was reported for the control.<br />

The highest pH, be<strong>in</strong>g 4.52, was reported for T5, where the most amount of GML was<br />

applied (Table 3). Consistent with the lowest pH, the control treatment had the highest value<br />

of exchangeable Al, with a value of 12.75 cmolc/kg soil. As a result of the GML application,<br />

soil pH slowly but surely <strong>in</strong>creased, culm<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the T5. In this treatment, the<br />

exchangeable Ca and Mg were the highest <strong>in</strong> the trials, hav<strong>in</strong>g values of 3.74 and 1.10<br />

cmolc/kg soil, respectively. The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> pH was concomitantly followed by the lower<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of exchangeable Al <strong>in</strong> the soil, the value of Al be<strong>in</strong>g 2.37 cmolc/kg soil. This was the lowest<br />

value of exchangeable recorded for this trial.<br />

Rice yield <strong>in</strong> the 1 st season<br />

The two floods of November of 2002 had affected the grow<strong>in</strong>g rice seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. After the<br />

floods, some plots needed to be reseeded (by transplant<strong>in</strong>g). There could also be removal of<br />

the some lim<strong>in</strong>g materials by the runn<strong>in</strong>g water dur<strong>in</strong>g the height of the flood period; each<br />

flood lasted for about a week. The effect of the flood is clearly seen <strong>in</strong> the erratic values of<br />

the rice yield (Table 4). There seemed to be no real difference <strong>in</strong> rice yield between<br />

treatments. Note that the highest yield was seen on T2, where 2 t GML/ha was applied. But<br />

this yield was not significantly different from the control. The result of the trial for the 2 nd<br />

would be presented later.<br />

Treatment<br />

First harvest<br />

April 26, 2003<br />

(t/ha)<br />

138<br />

Second harvest<br />

May 1, 2004<br />

(t/ha)<br />

T1 4.5 ab 5.1 bc<br />

T2 5.0 a 4.5 c<br />

T3 3.5 bc 6.3 abc<br />

T4 4.4 abc 6.6 ab<br />

T5 4.2 abc 7.2 a<br />

T6 3.7 bc 7.5 a<br />

T7 3.1 c 6.8 ab<br />

LSD0.05 1.4 2.0<br />

Table 4: The rice yield at the first and second harvest<br />

Seed<strong>in</strong>g of the 1 st plant<strong>in</strong>g season was done two weeks after lime treatment. This is<br />

considered a long enough time for the lime to react with soil, given the acid soil conditions at<br />

the site. The rice yield for the recommended rate (T6) was 3t/ha; this was lower than that of<br />

the control though it was not significantly different.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Rice yield <strong>in</strong> the 2 nd season<br />

The highest rice yield for the 2 nd season was 7.5 t/ha obta<strong>in</strong>ed by T6 (Table 4). For this<br />

treatment, 4 t GML/ha were applied <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with 0.25 t/ha sugarcane-based organic<br />

fertilizer (JITU). This yield is comparable to the yield of rice grown on good soils <strong>in</strong> the<br />

granary areas of the west coast of the pen<strong>in</strong>sula.<br />

It was observed that the yield obta<strong>in</strong>ed by T6 was not significantly different from that<br />

of the T3, T4 and T5. There was <strong>in</strong>dication that apply<strong>in</strong>g 2 t GML/ha (T2) is not enough to<br />

ameliorate the soil for rice cultivation. As Table 3 shows, for the T2, the pH was still low<br />

(3.99) and Al was very high (10.22 cmolc/kg soil). For T7, where 4 t GML/ha were applied <strong>in</strong><br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation with fused magnesium phosphate, the yield was not significantly different from<br />

that of the T6. It means that <strong>in</strong>stead of us<strong>in</strong>g organic fertilizer, farmers <strong>in</strong> that area can apply<br />

lime together with fused magnesium phosphate.<br />

General discussion<br />

Ca present <strong>in</strong> soils is good <strong>in</strong> itself. Ca is, to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent, able to reduce the toxic effect of<br />

Al [1,16]. This would happen from T3 right to T7 (Table 3). The amelioration of Al toxicity,<br />

should there be any, would be shown by the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> rice yield (Table 4). The presence of<br />

extra Mg could also contribute to alleviation of Al toxicity as had been shown by<br />

Shamshudd<strong>in</strong> et al. [16] for maize.<br />

Alum<strong>in</strong>um is toxic to plant. High exchangeable Al <strong>in</strong> soil is usually associated with<br />

low pH. This is clearly shown by the data given <strong>in</strong> Table 3; the lowest pH co<strong>in</strong>cides with the<br />

highest Al (T5). It shows the opposite <strong>in</strong> T1. As seen <strong>in</strong> Table 1, the <strong>in</strong>itial exchangeable Al<br />

was extremely high <strong>in</strong> some samples, reach<strong>in</strong>g a value of 32.43 cmolc/kg soil <strong>in</strong> the subsoil of<br />

T3. The lowest value was 2.72, <strong>in</strong> the topsoil of T5. In the water <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the<br />

experimental plots, Al would certa<strong>in</strong>ly exceed the critical value for rice production of 1-2<br />

mg/kg. This high Al <strong>in</strong> the solution can be reduced to an accepted level by apply<strong>in</strong>g GML at<br />

an appropriate rate. This study suggested that GML application at 4 t/ha would be<br />

appropriate.<br />

Fe toxicity is one of the most important problems fac<strong>in</strong>g production of rice on acid<br />

sulfate soils. In the abandoned rice fields, the water was reddish <strong>in</strong> color, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

presence of high amounts of soluble iron. In this study, acid-extractable Fe <strong>in</strong> the soils was<br />

slightly above the critical level, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.07 to 0.81 cmolc/kg soil (data not shown).<br />

Critical Fe concentration varies from 0.05 to 5.37 cmolc/kg soil [5] imply<strong>in</strong>g that Fe may not<br />

be the only source of soil toxicity that causes reduction <strong>in</strong> yield.<br />

A major problem of cultivated rice on acid sulfate soils is P-deficiency. This is caused<br />

by high P-fixation capacity of the soil due to the presence of high amounts of Al and/or Fe. P<br />

is unavailable to the rice and will rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> place where it is applied due to its<br />

immobilization. So, once soluble phosphate fertilizer is applied, it will revert to its less or<br />

<strong>in</strong>soluble form. Lack of P <strong>in</strong> the soil can be alleviated by apply<strong>in</strong>g fused magnesium<br />

phosphate (T7).<br />

P-deficiency <strong>in</strong> the soil would cause stunted growth, reduced tiller<strong>in</strong>g and reduction <strong>in</strong><br />

the number of panicles. In the 2 nd season, the available P was about 4 ppm (data not shown),<br />

and there was no significant difference between treatments. But the rice yield did not seem to<br />

be affected significantly by the possible lack of available P <strong>in</strong> the soils, as the yield <strong>in</strong> T6 and<br />

T7 had shown. The required soil available P for rice production is 7-20 ppm [5].<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g organic fertilizer <strong>in</strong>to a flooded acid sulfate soil would <strong>in</strong>tensify reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

condition, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> release of Fe 2+ , which is toxic to rice plants [20]. Putt<strong>in</strong>g organic<br />

fertilizer at the rate applied <strong>in</strong> the current study did not show any effect on rice yield.<br />

139


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Treatment T6 <strong>in</strong> which GML applied together with organic fertilizer gave the highest rice<br />

yield of 7.5 t/ha <strong>in</strong> 2 nd season (Table 4). On the contrary, high quality organic matter, like<br />

organic fertilizer used <strong>in</strong> the current study, would hasten reduction of Fe that result <strong>in</strong> pH<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease [11].<br />

The lime (GML) used <strong>in</strong> this study was dolomitic limestone [(Ca,Mg) (CO3)2 ].<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g this lime would <strong>in</strong>crease soil pH accord<strong>in</strong>gly, with concomitant addition of Ca and<br />

Mg <strong>in</strong>to the soil. For 2 nd season of the trial, soil pH <strong>in</strong>creased l<strong>in</strong>early with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exchangeable Ca (Figure 1A), with R 2 = 0.73. Likewise, pH <strong>in</strong>creased l<strong>in</strong>early with<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g exchangeable Mg (Figure 1B; R 2 = 0.78).<br />

pH<br />

4.80<br />

4.60<br />

4.40<br />

4.20<br />

4.00<br />

3.80<br />

3.60<br />

y = 0.26x + 3.54<br />

R 2 = 0.73<br />

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />

exchangeable Ca<br />

140<br />

pH<br />

4.80<br />

4.60<br />

4.40<br />

4.20<br />

4.00<br />

3.80<br />

3.60<br />

y = 0.26x + 3.54<br />

R 2 = 0.73<br />

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />

exchangeable Ca<br />

A B<br />

Figure 1. Relationship between pH and exchangeable Ca (A) and exchangeable Mg (B)<br />

GML ameliorated <strong>in</strong> the soil accord<strong>in</strong>g to the follow<strong>in</strong>g reactions:<br />

(Ca,Mg)(CO3)2 � Ca 2+ + Mg 2+ + CO3 2- (equation 1)<br />

CO3 2- + H2O � HCO3 - + OH - (equation 2)<br />

Al 3+ + 3OH - � Al(OH)3 (equation 3)<br />

The GML dissolved readily on apply<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to the acidic soil, releas<strong>in</strong>g Ca and Mg (equation<br />

1), and these macronutrients could be taken up the grow<strong>in</strong>g rice plants. Subsequently,<br />

hydrolysis of CO3 - (equation 2) would produce hydroxyls that neutralized Al by form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ert<br />

gibbsite (equation 3). Soil pH <strong>in</strong>creased significantly follow<strong>in</strong>g reduction of exchangeable Al<br />

(Figure 2A).


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

pH<br />

4.80<br />

4.60<br />

4.40<br />

4.20<br />

4.00<br />

y = -0.23Ln(x) + 4.59<br />

R 2 3.80<br />

3.60<br />

= 0.59<br />

- 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00<br />

exchangeable Al<br />

141<br />

pH<br />

4.80<br />

4.60<br />

4.40<br />

4.20<br />

4.00<br />

3.80<br />

y = 0.19Ln(x) + 4.36<br />

R 2 = 0.71<br />

3.60<br />

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />

Ca/Al ratio<br />

A B<br />

Figure 2: Relationship between pH and Al(A) and Ca/Al ratio (B)<br />

Calcium is able to detoxify Al to certa<strong>in</strong> extent [1]. Hence, Ca/Al ratio can be used as<br />

an <strong>in</strong>dex of soil acidity [16]. Unfortunately, there was no correlation between rice and Ca/Al<br />

ratio <strong>in</strong> this study. Neither was there a correlation between relative yield and Ca/Al ratio.<br />

However, there was an excellent correlation between pH and Ca/Al ratio. This is shown by<br />

the equation <strong>in</strong> Figure 2B:<br />

pH = 0.19Ln(x) + 4.36 (R 2 = 0.71)<br />

Figure 3 depicts the relationship between yield and relative yield with either<br />

exchangeable Ca or Mg <strong>in</strong> the acid sulfate soil. The correlation between yield and<br />

exchangeable Ca was poor, with low R 2 value (Figure 3A). The Pearson Correlation<br />

Coefficient was 0.32 with probability of 0.058. Thus, the relationship between the two<br />

parameters was significant at 5 % level. The same is true for the correlation between relative<br />

yield and exchangeable Ca (Figure 3B). As the relationship is poor, it is unable to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the critical exchangeable Ca for rice cultivation on this particular acid sulfate soil. There is<br />

<strong>in</strong>dication that rice yield improves on GML application.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

Yield (t/ha)<br />

Relative Yield (%)<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

A<br />

y = 0.78x + 4.35<br />

-<br />

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />

exchangeable Ca<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

-<br />

B<br />

y = 7.86x + 43.84<br />

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00<br />

exchangeable Ca<br />

142<br />

Yield (t/ha)<br />

Relative Yield (%)<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

C<br />

y = 3.44x + 3.65<br />

-<br />

0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20<br />

exchangeable Mg<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

-<br />

D<br />

y = 34.65x + 36.84<br />

0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20<br />

exchangeable Mg<br />

Figure 3. Relationship between rice yield and exchangeable Ca (A), relative yield and exchangeable<br />

Ca (B), yield and exchangeable Mg (C) and relative yield with exchangeable Mg (D) for the second<br />

season. (R 2 < 0.01)<br />

Further <strong>in</strong>dication of the improvement of rice yield due to GML application is shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> Figure 3C and 3D, where yield and relative yield, respectively when exchangeable Mg was<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Ground magnesium limestone and organic fertilizer applied at appropriate rates on acid<br />

sulfate soils can produce rice yield comparable to that of the granary areas of Malaysia. The<br />

result of this study showed that rice yield could be as high as 7.5 t/ha us<strong>in</strong>g current<br />

technology, apply<strong>in</strong>g 4 t GML/ha <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with an organic fertilizer.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme B – Integrated soil fertility management<br />

ACKNOWLEDGENTS<br />

The authors would like to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia and the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Science,<br />

Technology and Innovation Malaysia for f<strong>in</strong>ancial and technical support.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] A.K. Alva, C.J. Asher, D.G. Edwards. The role of calcium <strong>in</strong> alleviat<strong>in</strong>g alum<strong>in</strong>um toxicity. Aust. J. Soil<br />

Res., 37, pp. 375-383, (1986).<br />

[2) X. Arulando, S.P. Kam. Management of acid sulfate soils <strong>in</strong> the Muda Irrigation Scheme, Kedah, Pen<strong>in</strong>sular<br />

Malaysia. In International Institute for <strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Improvement; Dosh, H., Breemenr N., Eds.; Publ.<br />

31, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The Netherlands, pp: 195-212, (1982).<br />

[3] D.L. Dent. Acid Sulfate Soil: A Basel<strong>in</strong>e for Research and Development; International Institute for <strong>Land</strong><br />

Reclamation and Improvement: Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The Netherlands, Publ. 39, (1986).<br />

[4] H.D. Djia. Geomorphology. In Geology of the Malay Pen<strong>in</strong>sula; Gobbet D.S., Hutchison, C.H., Eds.; John<br />

Wiley & Sons, <strong>New</strong> York, pp: 13-24, (1973).<br />

[5] A. Dobermann, T. Fairhurst. Rice: Nutrient Disorders and Nutrient Management; Phosphate Institute of<br />

Canada and International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, The Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, (2000).<br />

[6] P.B. Hoyt, R.C. Turner. Effects of organic materials added to very acid soil on pH, alum<strong>in</strong>um, exchangeable<br />

bases, ammonium, and crop yield. Soil Sci., 119, pp. 227-237, (1975).<br />

[7] N.V. Hue, I. Amien. Alum<strong>in</strong>um detoxification with green manures. Commun. Soil Sci. & Plant Anal., 20,<br />

pp. 1499-1511, (1989).<br />

[8] O. Husson, P.H. Verburg, Mai Thanh Phunh. Special variability of acid sulfate soils <strong>in</strong> the Pla<strong>in</strong> of Reeds,<br />

Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Geoderma, 97, pp.1-19, (2000).<br />

[9] P.A. Moore, W.H. Patrick. Metal availability and uptake by rice <strong>in</strong> acid sulfate soils. In International<br />

Institute for <strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Improvement; Dent, D.L, Mensvoort, M.E.F., Eds.; Publ. 53, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen,<br />

The Netherlands, pp: 205-224, (1993).<br />

[10] S. Muhrizal, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, I. Fauziah, M.H.A. Husni. Alleviation of alum<strong>in</strong>um toxicity <strong>in</strong> acid sulfate<br />

soils <strong>in</strong> Malaysia us<strong>in</strong>g organic materials. Commun. Soil Sci. & Plant Anal., 34, pp. 2999-3017, (2003).<br />

[11] S. Muhrizal, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, I. Fauziah, and M.H.A. Husni. Changes <strong>in</strong> an iron-poor acid sulfate soil upon<br />

submergence. Geoderma, 131, pp. 110-122, (2006).<br />

[12] M.M Nhung, F.N. Ponnamperuma. Effects of calcium carbonate, manganese dioxide, ferric hydroxide and<br />

prolonged flood<strong>in</strong>g and electrochemical changes and growth of rice on a flooded acid sulfate soil. Soil Sci., 102,<br />

pp. 29-41, (1966).<br />

[13] J.B. Ooi. <strong>Land</strong>, People and Economy of Malaya. Longmans; London, (1964).<br />

[14] M. Palhares. Recommendation for fertilizer application for soils via qualitative reason<strong>in</strong>g. J. Agric. Sys.,<br />

67, pp. 21-30, (2000).<br />

[15] F.N.Ponnaperuma, T. Attanandana, G. Beye. Amelioration of three acid sulfate soils for lowland rice. In<br />

International Institute for <strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Improvement; Dosh, H., Ed.; Publ.18, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The<br />

Netherlands, pp: 391-406, (1973).<br />

[16] J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, I. Che Fauziah, H.A.H. Sharifudd<strong>in</strong>. Effects of limestone and gypsum application to a<br />

Malaysian Ultisol on soil solution and yields of maize and groundnut. Plant and Soil, 137, pp. 45-52 (1991).<br />

]17] Soil Survey Staff. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic Soil Classification for Mak<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g Soil Surveys.<br />

USDA, Natural <strong>Resources</strong> Conservation Services, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, (1999).<br />

[18] S.W. Soo,. Semi-detailed Soil Survey of Kelantan Pla<strong>in</strong>. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture & Rural Development,<br />

Kuala Lumpur, (1975).<br />

[19] C.C. T<strong>in</strong>g, S. Rohani, W. S. Diemont, B.Y Am<strong>in</strong>udd<strong>in</strong>. The development of an acid sulfate soil <strong>in</strong> former<br />

mangroves <strong>in</strong> Merbok, Kedah, Malaysia. In International Institute for <strong>Land</strong> Reclamation and Improvement;<br />

Dent, D.L., Mensvoort, M.E.F., Eds.; Publ. 53, Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, The Netherlands, pp: 95-101, (1993).<br />

[20] K.T. Tran, T.G. Vo. Effects of mixed organic and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers on rice yield and soil chemistry of<br />

the 8 th crop on heavy acid sulfate soil (Hydraquentic Sulfaquepts) <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. A paper<br />

presented at the 6 th International Symposium on Plant-Soil at Low pH. August 1-5, 2004; Sendai: Japan, (2004).<br />

[21] A.Wakley, I.A. Black. An exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the Degtjrref Method for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g organic matter, and a<br />

proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37, pp. 29-38, (1934).<br />

143


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

WORKSHOP THEME C – LAND EVALUATION AND LAND<br />

DEGRADATION<br />

Sub-theme : <strong>Land</strong> evaluation for susta<strong>in</strong>able land management & policy<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

A. Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst<br />

Paper/poster : Oil palm and rubber production model for substitut<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rubber with oil palm and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g to establish oil palm <strong>in</strong>to Northeast<br />

Thailand – S. Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra, E. Van Ranst, H. Verplancke<br />

Paper/poster : Soil properties and biological diversity of undisturbed and<br />

disturbed forests <strong>in</strong> Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>gdan, Philip<strong>in</strong>es - Renato D. Boniao, Rosa<br />

Villa B. Estoista, Carmelita G. Hansel, Ron de Goede, Olga M. Nuneza,<br />

Brigida A. Roscom, Sam James, Rhea Amor C. Lumactud, Mae Yen O.<br />

Poblete, Nonillon Aspe<br />

Sub-theme : <strong>Land</strong> degradation : pressures, <strong>in</strong>dicators and responses<br />

W. Cornelis, D. Gabriels, H. Verplancke<br />

Paper/poster : Indicators and participatory methods for monitor<strong>in</strong>g land<br />

degradation. A case study <strong>in</strong> the Migori district of Kenya – V<strong>in</strong>cent de<br />

Paul Obade, Eva De Clercq<br />

Paper/poster : Proposed plan of action for research on desertification <strong>in</strong><br />

the Sudan : Gezira and Sennar States – Kamal Elfadil Fadul, Fawzi<br />

Mohamed Salih<br />

Paper/poster : Diagnostic of degradation processes of soils from Northern<br />

Togo (West Africa) as a tool for soil and water management – Rosa M.<br />

Poch, Josep M. Ubalde<br />

Conclusions<br />

144


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Sub-theme : LAND EVALUATION FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND<br />

MANAGEMENT & POLICY MAKING<br />

Overview of the latest research <strong>in</strong> land evaluation at the Laboratory of Soil Science<br />

A. Verdoodt & E. Van Ranst<br />

Laboratory for Soil Science, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<br />

<strong>New</strong> paradigms <strong>in</strong>terpret soil as a habitat for liv<strong>in</strong>g systems, deliver<strong>in</strong>g a wide range of<br />

hugely valuable ecosystem functions such as food security, clean air and water, biodiversity,<br />

and cultural heritage. Soil erosion, contam<strong>in</strong>ation, and organic matter decl<strong>in</strong>e, are only a few<br />

examples of threats that hypothecate soil function<strong>in</strong>g all over the world. Although there is<br />

good agreement on the importance that should be given to susta<strong>in</strong>able land management,<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g about how the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal drivers and configurations of the soil system differ<br />

between ‘land-use-soil-climate’ comb<strong>in</strong>ations is still <strong>in</strong>complete and hampers the<br />

development of scientifically sound land use policies. In response to these new demands, the<br />

research <strong>in</strong> land evaluation conducted at our laboratory focuses on three major aspects :<br />

(1) design of soil/land <strong>in</strong>formation systems provid<strong>in</strong>g georeferenced climate, landscape and<br />

soil data;<br />

(2) design of land evaluation tools for specific land uses, mak<strong>in</strong>g full use of the <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

availability of soil data; and<br />

(3) identification of soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators, basel<strong>in</strong>es and thresholds for monitor<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />

quality and design<strong>in</strong>g soil protection policies.<br />

In the first research aspect, land and soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems, together with the new<br />

techniques of data gather<strong>in</strong>g based on remote sens<strong>in</strong>g, have become <strong>in</strong>dispensable tools for<br />

the presentation and analysis of soil characteristics. Geographic <strong>in</strong>formation science and<br />

relational database software were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to capture the spatial as well as the numerical<br />

and descriptive data gathered dur<strong>in</strong>g the traditional soil surveys organised <strong>in</strong> Rwanda and the<br />

Democratic Republic of Congo. The soil <strong>in</strong>formation system of Rwanda, compris<strong>in</strong>g 43 soil<br />

maps and 43 digital terra<strong>in</strong> models at a scale of 1:50,000, was further extended with climatic<br />

records at monthly and daily temporal resolutions. Additionally, the generation of simplified<br />

soil maps at scale 1:250,000, revealed the diversity <strong>in</strong> land resources at national level. With<br />

the creation of a soil profile database, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1,834 described and analysed soil profiles,<br />

the soil <strong>in</strong>formation system is a powerful tool for agricultural and land use plann<strong>in</strong>g purposes<br />

<strong>in</strong> Rwanda. A similar soil <strong>in</strong>formation system is be<strong>in</strong>g created for the Democratic Republic of<br />

Congo. In addition, the detailed, semi-detailed and reconnaissance soil maps and the<br />

abundant morphological and analytical soil profile data gathered <strong>in</strong> Rwanda, Burundi and the<br />

DR of Congo, enabled us to develop a scientifically sound Great Lakes Area SOTER (Soil<br />

and Terra<strong>in</strong>) Database. SOTER mapp<strong>in</strong>g is similar to physiographic soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g but with<br />

stronger emphasis on the terra<strong>in</strong>-soil relationship. A SOTER unit represents a unique<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of terra<strong>in</strong> and soil characteristics. The methodology focuses on the identification<br />

of areas of land with a dist<strong>in</strong>ctive pattern of landform, lithology, surface form, slope, parent<br />

material and soil. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the design of the SOTER database of Central Africa, a<br />

physiographic map has been derived after analysis of SRTM satellite data of the region.<br />

Geological maps at different scales were translated <strong>in</strong>to lithological maps. These thematic<br />

maps were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to give the SOTER unit maps at scale 1:1M for Rwanda and Burundi<br />

145


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

and at scale 1:2M for the Democratic Republic of Congo. Much more additional <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

characteris<strong>in</strong>g the non-mappable terra<strong>in</strong> and soil components has been selected, harmonised<br />

and <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong> a large relational database conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a wealth of descriptive and analytical<br />

soil profile data.<br />

The second research aspect comprises the development of (1) a spatially and<br />

temporally explicit multi-scale decision support system that reveals the biophysical <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

affect<strong>in</strong>g land use choices of different stakeholders, and (2) a web-based land evaluation<br />

system to perform agricultural productivity assessments <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. The multiscale<br />

decision support system comprises three different environmental assessment tools,<br />

designed to run with data supplied by traditional soil surveys and organised <strong>in</strong>to a land<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation system. A qualitative land suitability classification procedure is adapted to<br />

translate the large-scale biophysical data, <strong>in</strong>to five suitability classes. At local scale, the<br />

productivity of the soil units is estimated us<strong>in</strong>g a three-level hierarchical crop productivity<br />

estimator. At the smallest spatial and temporal resolution, a daily water balance approach is<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ked to a crop growth model. The decision support system was applied and validated us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the land <strong>in</strong>formation system of Rwanda. It revealed the biophysical properties affect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

national crop regionalisation, regional crop productivity differences, and local <strong>in</strong>tensification<br />

options. The Web-based land evaluation system (WLES) is designed <strong>in</strong> such a way that the<br />

system operates either as a Web Application or as a Web Service via the Internet.<br />

Implemented on top of the .NET platform, the WLES has a loosely coupled multi-tier<br />

structure which seamlessly <strong>in</strong>tegrates the land evaluation knowledge eng<strong>in</strong>e and the spatial<br />

database. The WLES not only provides productivity assessment service <strong>in</strong> a user-friendly<br />

way to agricultural researchers, eng<strong>in</strong>eers, farm managers, policy makers and planners but<br />

also acts as a build<strong>in</strong>g block of a larger system such as that of land taxation, impact of climate<br />

change on agriculture, population carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity, and so forth.<br />

The third research aspect merely focuses on the assessment of the overall soil<br />

quality, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the capacity of the soil to function susta<strong>in</strong>ably. This encompasses the<br />

identification and selection of scientifically sound soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators to monitor the<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> the soil quality status. These changes are determ<strong>in</strong>ed relative to a basel<strong>in</strong>e value<br />

and are also compared to a threshold value, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a critical soil status limit<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g the susta<strong>in</strong>able function<strong>in</strong>g of the soil. The ongo<strong>in</strong>g ENVASSO (ENVironmental<br />

ASsessment for SOil monitor<strong>in</strong>g) project reviews and def<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicators that encompass the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> threats to soil degradation <strong>in</strong> Europe. Identification of the soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators for<br />

each threat is based on an extensive literature review with the reports of technical work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

groups with<strong>in</strong> the development of the EU Thematic Strategy on Soil Protection as ma<strong>in</strong><br />

source documents. Selection criteria for each <strong>in</strong>dicator are based on its significance,<br />

analytical soundness, measurability, policy relevance, geographical coverage, availability of<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>es and thresholds and its comprehensibility. Protocols and procedures for data<br />

collection, sampl<strong>in</strong>g, storage, manipulation, <strong>in</strong>terpretation and report<strong>in</strong>g will be developed.<br />

The project will report the current monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators, will identify gaps<br />

<strong>in</strong> the national and European wide monitor<strong>in</strong>g systems and will provide guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the<br />

development of a soil policy. Soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g and identification of sound soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

can also be realised through the <strong>in</strong>corporation of ethnopedological knowledge. In Mexico, a<br />

local soil classification scheme was formalised and compared to the <strong>in</strong>ternational USDA soil<br />

classification system. Both similarities and differences, reveal<strong>in</strong>g complementarities, were<br />

identified. Critical is the evaluation of the topsoil characteristics, as the monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

topsoil dynamics is fundamental to susta<strong>in</strong>able land management. In a study for susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

land management of mounta<strong>in</strong> karst areas <strong>in</strong> Vietnam, local <strong>in</strong>habitants are also participat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> the generation of soil maps and the identification and classification of local <strong>in</strong>dicators of<br />

soil quality. Laboratory results confirmed the validity of vernacular knowledge for<br />

146


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g and classify<strong>in</strong>g local <strong>in</strong>dicators of soil quality and soil fertility, compared to<br />

scientific standards applied <strong>in</strong> Vietnam and <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational community.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Research papers, Laboratory of Soil Science<br />

[15] N. Barrera-Bassols, J.A. Z<strong>in</strong>ck, E. Van Ranst. Symbolism, knowledge and management of soil and land<br />

resources <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous communities : ethnopedology at global, regional and local scales. Catena 65, pp. 118-<br />

137 (2006).<br />

[16] N. Barrera-Bassols, J.A. Z<strong>in</strong>ck, E. Van Ranst. Local soil classification and comparison of <strong>in</strong>digenous and<br />

technical soil maps <strong>in</strong> a Mesoamerican community us<strong>in</strong>g spatial analysis. Geoderma (<strong>in</strong> press, 2006).<br />

[17] B. M<strong>in</strong>tesenot, H. Verplancke, E. Van Ranst, H. Mitiku. Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g traditional irrigation methods, irrigation<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g and alternate furrows irrigation on Vertisols <strong>in</strong> Northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management<br />

64, pp. 17-27 (2004).<br />

[18] D. P. Shrestha, J. A. Z<strong>in</strong>ck, E. Van Ranst. Modell<strong>in</strong>g land degradation <strong>in</strong> the Nepalese Himalaya. Catena<br />

57, pp. 135-156 (2004).<br />

[19] H. Tang, E. Van Ranst. Is highly <strong>in</strong>tensive agriculture environmentally susta<strong>in</strong>able? A case study from<br />

Fugou county, Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Journal of Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agriculture 25 (3), pp. 91-102 (2005).<br />

[20] H. Tang, J. Qiu, E. Van Ranst, C. Li. Estimations of soil organic carbon storage <strong>in</strong> cropland of Ch<strong>in</strong>a based<br />

on DNDC model. Geoderma 134, pp. 200-206 (2006).<br />

[21] E. Van Ranst, F. O. Nachtergaele, A. Verdoodt. Evolution and availability of geographic databases. In :<br />

Innovative techniques <strong>in</strong> soil survey : “Develop<strong>in</strong>g the foundation for a new generation of soil resource<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventories and their utilisation”. H. Eswaran, P. Vijarnsorn, T. Vearasilp, E. Padmanabhan (eds.). <strong>Land</strong><br />

Development Department, Chattuchak, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 223-236 (2004).<br />

[22] Van Vosselen, H. Verplancke, E. Van Ranst. Assess<strong>in</strong>g water consumption of banana : traditional versus<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g approach. Agricultural Water Management 74, pp. 201-218 (2005).<br />

[23] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst, W. Van Averbeke. Modell<strong>in</strong>g crop production potentials for yield gap analysis<br />

under semi-arid conditions <strong>in</strong> Guquka, South Africa. Soil Use and Management 19, pp. 372-380 (2003).<br />

[24] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst, H. Verplancke. Integration of soil survey data, Geographic Information Science<br />

and land evaluation technology for land use optimisation <strong>in</strong> Rwanda. In : Innovative techniques <strong>in</strong> soil survey :<br />

“Develop<strong>in</strong>g the foundation for a new generation of soil resource <strong>in</strong>ventories and their utilisation”. H. Eswaran,<br />

P. Vijarnsorn, T. Vearasilp, E. Padmanabhan (eds.). <strong>Land</strong> Development Department, Chattuchak, Bangkok,<br />

Thailand, pp. 365-380 (2004).<br />

[25] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst, L. Ye. Daily simulation of potential dry matter production of annual field crops <strong>in</strong><br />

tropical environments. Agronomy Journal 96, pp. 1739-1753 (2004).<br />

[26] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst, L. Ye, H. Verplancke. A daily multi-layered water balance to predict water and<br />

oxygen availability <strong>in</strong> tropical cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems. Soil Use and Management 21, pp. 312-321 (2005).<br />

[27] Verdoodt, E. Van Ranst. Environmental assessment tools for multi-scale natural resources <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

systems. A case study of Rwanda. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114, pp. 170-184 (2006).<br />

[28] L. Ye, E. Van Ranst. Population carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity and susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural use of land resources <strong>in</strong><br />

Caoxian County (N. Ch<strong>in</strong>a). Journal of Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agriculture 19 (4), pp. 75-94 (2002).<br />

[29] L. Ye, E. Van Ranst, A. Verdoodt. Design and implementation of a Web-based land evaluation system and<br />

its application to land value tax assessment us<strong>in</strong>g .NET technology. In : Innovative techniques <strong>in</strong> soil survey :<br />

“Develop<strong>in</strong>g the foundation for a new generation of soil resource <strong>in</strong>ventories and their utilisation”. H. Eswaran,<br />

P. Vijarnsorn, T. Vearasilp, E. Padmanabhan (eds.). <strong>Land</strong> Development Department, Chattuchak, Bangkok,<br />

Thailand, pp. 183-196 (2004).<br />

[30] L. Ye, E. Van Ranst. Development of a Web-based land evaluation system and its application to population<br />

carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity assessment us<strong>in</strong>g .NET technology. In : Proc. of the AFITA/WCCA 2004 Jo<strong>in</strong>t Congress on<br />

IT <strong>in</strong> Agriculture. F. Zazueta, S. N<strong>in</strong>omiya, R. Chitradon (eds.). National Science and Technology Development<br />

Agency, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand, pp. 409-414.<br />

[31] J.A. Z<strong>in</strong>ck, J.L. Berroteran, A. Farshad, A. Moameni, S. Wokabi, E. Van Ranst. Approaches to assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture. Journal of Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agriculture 23, pp. 87-109 (2004).<br />

147


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Other <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g papers<br />

[32] S. S. Andrews, D. L. Karlen, C. A. Cambardella. The soil management assessment framework : a<br />

quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, pp. 1945-1962 (2004).<br />

[33] M.A. Arshad, S. Mart<strong>in</strong>. Identify<strong>in</strong>g critical limits for soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong> agro-ecosystems.<br />

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 88, pp. 153-160 (2002).<br />

[34] P. S. B<strong>in</strong>draban, J. J. Stoorvogel, D. M. Jansen, J. Vlam<strong>in</strong>g, J. J. R. Groot. <strong>Land</strong> quality <strong>in</strong>dicators for<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able land management : proposed method for yield gap and soil nutrient balance. Agriculture,<br />

Ecosystems and Environment 81 (2), pp. 103-112 (2000).<br />

[35] M. R. Carter. Soil quality for susta<strong>in</strong>able land management : organic matter and aggregation <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

that ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> soil functions. Agronomy Journal 94, pp. 38-47 (2002).<br />

[36] B. Govaerts, K. D. Sayre, J. Deckers. A m<strong>in</strong>imum data set for soil quality assessment of wheat and maize<br />

cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the highlands of Mexico. Soil and Tillage Research 87, pp. 163-174 (2006).<br />

[37] J. E. Herrick. Soil quality : an <strong>in</strong>dicator of susta<strong>in</strong>able land management? Applied Soil Ecology 15, pp. 75-<br />

83 (2000).<br />

[38] E. M. Hillyer, J. F. McDonagh, A. Verl<strong>in</strong>den. <strong>Land</strong>-use and legumes <strong>in</strong> northern Namibia – The value of a<br />

local classification system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment (<strong>in</strong> press, 2006).<br />

[39] M. Igué, T. Gaiser, K. Stahr. A soil and terra<strong>in</strong> digital database (SOTER) for improved land use plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Central Ben<strong>in</strong>. European Journal of Agronomy 21, pp. 41-52 (2004).<br />

[40] R. Mermut, H. Eswaran. Some major developments <strong>in</strong> soil science s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid-1960s. Geoderma 100, pp.<br />

403-426 (2001).<br />

[41] E. W. Murage, N. K. Karanja, P. C. Smithson, P.L. Woomer. Diagnostic <strong>in</strong>dicators of soil quality <strong>in</strong><br />

productive and non-productive smallholders’fields of Kenya’s Central Highlands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and<br />

Environment 79, pp. 1-8 (2000).<br />

[42] S. A. Rezaei, R. J. Gilkes, S. S. Andrews, H. Arzani. Soil quality assessment <strong>in</strong> semi-arid rangeland <strong>in</strong> Iran.<br />

Soil Use and Management 21, 402-409 (2005).<br />

[43] R. Ryder. Local soil knowledge and site suitability evaluation <strong>in</strong> the Dom<strong>in</strong>ican Republic. Geoderma 111,<br />

pp. 289-305 (2003).<br />

[44] D. Wu, Q. Yu, C. Lu, H. Hengsdijk. Quantify<strong>in</strong>g production potentials of w<strong>in</strong>ter wheat <strong>in</strong> the North Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Pla<strong>in</strong>. European Journal of Agronomy 24, pp. 226-235 (2006).<br />

148


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

OIL PALM AND RUBBER PRODUCTION MODEL FOR<br />

SUBSTITUING RUBBER WITH OIL PALM AND EVALUATING<br />

TO ESTABLISH OIL PALM INTO NORTHEAST THAILAND<br />

Abstract<br />

S. Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra 1 , E.Van Ranst 2 , H.Verplancke 2 , A. Verdoodt 2<br />

1 Department of Agriculture, Bangkok, Thailand. 2 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.<br />

Oil palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.) is a cash crop that can be exploited all the year round. However, up to now,<br />

oil palm production <strong>in</strong> Thailand has been very low because of some limit<strong>in</strong>g climatic, edaphic, crop-specific and<br />

management parameters. Especially the soil water deficit reported is restrict<strong>in</strong>g oil palm yields. The crop evapotranspiration<br />

<strong>in</strong> an immature state (1-7 years) was about 4.5-5.0 mm.d -1 , while the mature palm need more<br />

amount<strong>in</strong>g to about 5.0-5.5 mm.d -1 . These requirements further <strong>in</strong>crease from 6.5-7.5 mm.d -1 <strong>in</strong> drought period,<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g on soil texture and soil water content. An area of about 2.012 million rais (0.32 million hectare ) of<br />

oil palm plantation was identified from the LANDSAT 5 TM image data (date <strong>in</strong> 2004) and mapped us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ARCVIEW ver.3.2 a. <strong>Land</strong> evaluation techniques were designed to classify the plantations based on their<br />

production potential. They were grouped <strong>in</strong>to 4 potential production classes: (1) higher than 25 ton.ha -1 .yr -1<br />

(80,708 ha); (2) between 16-25 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 (113,956 ha); (3) between 10-16 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 (125,931 ha) and (4)<br />

lower than 10 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 be<strong>in</strong>g land classified as unsuitable for oil palm (68 ha). Rubber plantation occupy<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about 1.6 million ha <strong>in</strong> East and South Thailand were identified from the same satellite image data. In addition,<br />

the rubber plant<strong>in</strong>g areas were classified by us<strong>in</strong>g the Rubber Production Model. Comparison of the productivity<br />

of both cash crops resulted <strong>in</strong> the identification of areas with a rubber productivity less than 1,500 kg.ha - 1.yr -1<br />

that could be profitably substituted by oil palm, giv<strong>in</strong>g a production exceed<strong>in</strong>g 16 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 . F<strong>in</strong>ally, the oil<br />

palm production model was <strong>in</strong>tegrated with a soil water balance model and applied to evaluate the water-limited<br />

production potential <strong>in</strong> Thabor, Nongkai Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, where the annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall averaged less than 1,500 mm. One<br />

found that oil palm should be planted <strong>in</strong> an area about 20,000 ha and that expected yields are high enough for<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g-up the bio-diesel project.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Oil palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.) is one of an economic crop <strong>in</strong> the southern part of<br />

Thailand that can be exploited the whole year. However, the production <strong>in</strong> is limited by many<br />

parameters related to climate, soil fertility, oil palm variety and management technology. An<br />

optimized field management is required to cont<strong>in</strong>uously ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>imum bunch<br />

production, as oil palm production will be reduced when it is subjected to water stress<br />

[1,3,6,8,9,11,15]. The optimum average annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall for oil palm is about 2,000 mm with a<br />

monthly distribution of about 120 mm [5,6]. In Malaysia, the water requirement of oil palm<br />

were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g a lysimeter filled with soil of the Munchong Soil Series (Tropeptic<br />

Haplorthoxs). One found that the daily potential evapo-transpiration (ETp) dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

immature stage (1-7 year after plant<strong>in</strong>g (YAP)) is about 4.5-5.0 mm, and <strong>in</strong>creased to 5.0-5.5<br />

mm <strong>in</strong> a mature stage (more than 8 YAP). In the dry season, the daily ETP <strong>in</strong>creased up to<br />

6.5-7.5 mm, while it decreased <strong>in</strong> the ra<strong>in</strong>y season at about 3.0-3.5 mm [4, 12].<br />

The drought period affects the physiological process and stomatal resistance of oil<br />

palm, trigger<strong>in</strong>g the closure of the stomata. Consequently, the leaf temperature <strong>in</strong>creases,<br />

while the rate of photosynthesis was decreased [10]. Upon the decrease <strong>in</strong> photosynthetic<br />

assimilates, the rate of female <strong>in</strong>florescence abortion <strong>in</strong>creases, while the sex ratio decreases,<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g oil palm production [2]. Caliman found that the stomatal resistance of oil palm<br />

decreased when available soil water content. It mean that the stomatal resistant decreased<br />

when the soil moisture content decreased. Further research is required to identify the<br />

149


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

appropriate management techniques for oil palm plantation <strong>in</strong> stress area such as Northeast<br />

Thailand [1].<br />

In Thailand, oil palm plantation are extend<strong>in</strong>g very quickly, with an estimated area of<br />

320,000 that will be exploited at the end of 2006. Some of the new plantation areas face<br />

strong limitations due to low ra<strong>in</strong>fall and high water deficiencies. In these areas, the annual<br />

water deficit is about 208 to 675 mm with<strong>in</strong> a period of 2-6 months [7,16,17]. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

potential production and simulat<strong>in</strong>g soil water balance are important tools for guid<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

farmers <strong>in</strong> their management strategies, oriented to a ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of high yield.<br />

On the other hand, the Thai government policy has been assigned to control the<br />

rubber plantation at about 2 million ha <strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a balanced world demand and<br />

supply, and to stabilize the rubber price. Rubber production area, with a productivity less than<br />

1,500 kg.ha -1 , will therefore be converted to other economic crops such as oil palm.<br />

Materials<br />

This study objectives are;<br />

1. To locate the oil palm plantation and organize this <strong>in</strong>formation to GIS database;<br />

2. To evaluate and map the production potential of oil palm and rubber; and<br />

3. To determ<strong>in</strong>e the area of rubber that should be substituted with oil palm.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Digital Images Data and Image Analysis Module<br />

The Image Analysis is an extension module with<strong>in</strong> ARCVIEW GIS ver. 3.2a. This module is<br />

use to allocate and map the actual extension of rubber plantations and oil palm orchards from<br />

the false color composite image by us<strong>in</strong>g the visualized technique. The false color composite<br />

was formulated from 3 bands (5, 3, 2) of the follow<strong>in</strong>g LANDSAT 5 TM digital data:<br />

1. Path 127 Row 48, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 26 January, 2005.<br />

2. Path 127 Row 49, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 20 April, 2004.<br />

3. Path 127 Row 50, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 7 March, 2004.<br />

4. Path 128 Row 47, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 16 February, 2004.<br />

5. Path 128 Row 48, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 2 February, 2005.<br />

6. Path 128 Row 50, Digital Band 5 3 2, date 6 March, 2005.<br />

Climate Digital Database<br />

Climatic data reported dur<strong>in</strong>g the last twenty years (1986-2005) <strong>in</strong> the nearby meteorological<br />

stations were used to run the land suitability model for oil palm. Required <strong>in</strong>put data were<br />

maps of monthly ra<strong>in</strong>fall, temperature and evaporation.<br />

Soil survey and analytical data<br />

The prov<strong>in</strong>cial soil maps at a scale of 1:50,000 was used as a basal map for soil survey<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Soil sample <strong>in</strong> each depth were brought up by Edelman Auger and determ<strong>in</strong>ed moist soil<br />

color by us<strong>in</strong>g Monsel Soil Color Chart, texture by feel<strong>in</strong>g method, structure and clay coat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

by eye lens, pH with soil pH kit. Then, the soil series was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by compar<strong>in</strong>g the field<br />

characteristics with the typical soil profile characteristics. On the other hand, a composite<br />

150


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

sample of each soil horizon was prepared from 25 sampl<strong>in</strong>g pit and use for phisico-chemical<br />

analysis such as particle size, CEC, available P, %O.C etc. The analytical data of each soil<br />

were stored <strong>in</strong> the database.<br />

Methods<br />

The procedures <strong>in</strong> this study were applied from:<br />

1. The land evaluation technique [18]<br />

2. The yield gap analysis [19]<br />

3. The Rubber Production Model [13,14]<br />

4. The soil water balance [20, 21]<br />

The environmental crop requirements that need to considered to asses the suitability area for<br />

oil palm are related to climate and soil as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />

The steps of work<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 1) started from collect<strong>in</strong>g a climatic and soil data. The<br />

parametric approach , which mentioned <strong>in</strong> land evaluation technique, was used to calculate<br />

the land <strong>in</strong>dex by scor<strong>in</strong>g the parameter with the crop requirement table 1). Field survey<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was done for collect<strong>in</strong>g the field soil data and oil palm yield. Together with the field data and<br />

land <strong>in</strong>dex, the production potential model was classified to 4 classes, named as;<br />

1. L1 or very suitable (<strong>Land</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is higher than 76), the production potential is more<br />

than 25 ton.ha -1 .yr -1 .<br />

2. L2 or suitable (<strong>Land</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is 51-75), the production potential is between 13.1-25<br />

ton.ha -1 .yr -1 .<br />

3. L3 or marg<strong>in</strong>al area (<strong>Land</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is 26-50), the production potential is 9.5-13.0<br />

ton.ha -1 .yr -1 .<br />

4. L4 is not recommended (<strong>Land</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is lower than 25). The production potential is<br />

less than 9.5 ton.ha -1 .y -1 .<br />

The result of the model was projected <strong>in</strong> the map with the GIS work<strong>in</strong>g scheme (Fig.<br />

2).<br />

For rubber, plantations with a potential yield exceed<strong>in</strong>g 1,500 kg dry rubber.0ha -1 .yr -1<br />

were classified as suitable. All others with a lower production potential should be substituted<br />

with oil palm to get a better benefit.<br />

151


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Limitation classes and Indexes<br />

Characteristics<br />

Class<br />

Limitation<br />

S1<br />

0 1<br />

S2<br />

2<br />

S3<br />

3<br />

N<br />

4<br />

Index<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong>fall and Distribution<br />

100 95 85 60 40 25 0<br />

Average annual Ra<strong>in</strong>fall (mm) (p)<br />

2500<br />

3500<br />

2000<br />

3700<br />

1700<br />

4000<br />

1450<br />

5000<br />

1350<br />

5500<br />

1250<br />

6000<br />

600<br />

7000<br />

Drought period (months p20 20 18 16 14 12 10<br />

Annual mean temperature ( °C) >25 25 22 20 18 16 10<br />

Average annual w<strong>in</strong>d speed (m.s -1 )<br />

5<br />

8<br />

4<br />

9<br />

3<br />

10<br />

2<br />

12<br />

1<br />

15<br />

0<br />

20 25<br />

Sunsh<strong>in</strong>e radiation (MJ.m 2 )<br />

13<br />

15<br />

11<br />

16<br />

9<br />

17<br />

8<br />

19<br />

7<br />

21<br />

5<br />

23<br />

3<br />

25<br />

Sunsh<strong>in</strong>e ratio (n/N) >0.75 0.75 0.60 0.45<br />

Topology (%slope)<br />

Wetness (w)<br />

0 4 8 16 30 50 80<br />

Flood Duration<br />

F0<br />

F1 F2<br />

F3<br />

Dra<strong>in</strong>age classes<br />

Mod. Well s. poor Poor&aeric Poor v.poor,<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> Properties (s)<br />

Imp.<br />

but<br />

dra<strong>in</strong><br />

excess.<br />

Soil texture and structure C>60s SiCL, SCL, SiL, SL, fS Ls, Cm,<br />

C60v<br />

s,s,C<br />

C150 150 100 50 25 15 5<br />

CaCO 3 (%) 0 1 5 10 15 20 30<br />

Gypsum (%)<br />

Soil fertility (f)<br />

0 0.5 2 3 5 7 10<br />

Ex. CEC) (cmol (+) kg clay -1 ) >16 16 10 8 6 4 1<br />

pH 1:1 H2O 5.8<br />

6.0<br />

5.5<br />

6.5<br />

4.5<br />

7.0<br />

3.5<br />

7.5<br />

2.5<br />

8.0<br />

2.0<br />

9.0<br />

1.5<br />

O.M (%) >1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1<br />

ECe (dS m -1 ) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

After: [13, 18]<br />

Table 1 (Cont) : Soil characteristics requirement for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g for land suitability for oil palm<br />

152


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Climatic data<br />

- Ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />

- Temperature<br />

- Relative<br />

humidity<br />

Parametric Approach<br />

A1xA2xA3....<br />

An<br />

CI = 2n−<br />

2<br />

10<br />

A = <strong>in</strong>dex of parameters<br />

n = number of parameters<br />

<strong>Land</strong> suitability <strong>in</strong>dex (LI)<br />

CIxSI<br />

LI =<br />

2<br />

10<br />

Soil Characteristics<br />

WaixFaixPSaixPai<br />

SI =<br />

6<br />

10<br />

A = <strong>in</strong>dex of parameters<br />

n = number of parameters<br />

Figure 1 : Work<strong>in</strong>g scheme for <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation for Rubber and Oil Palm<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> data<br />

-Adm<strong>in</strong>istration Boundary<br />

- Climatic Database<br />

- Soil Database<br />

Map of Production Potential<br />

-Rubber<br />

- Oil palm<br />

Production Potential<br />

Y = a + b(LI)<br />

a = <strong>in</strong>tersect<br />

b = Slope<br />

Figure 2 : Work<strong>in</strong>g scheme for GIS<br />

153<br />

Crop Requirement Table<br />

- Climatic characteristics<br />

- Soil characteristics<br />

(Table 1)<br />

Symbols and Suitability Class<br />

CI = Climatic <strong>in</strong>dexes<br />

CI1 = Very suitable, <strong>in</strong>dex >75<br />

CI2 = Suitable, <strong>in</strong>dex 51-75<br />

CI3 = Marg<strong>in</strong>al, <strong>in</strong>dex 25-20<br />

CI4 = Non-suitable, <strong>in</strong>dex


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Production potential model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a pilot area<br />

The Thai government designed a policy that favors the bio-energy to substitute the petroleum<br />

energy. Oil palm is one of the oil crops that will be used to produce bio-diesel (B100). The<br />

target for new oil palm plant<strong>in</strong>gs is about 1 million ha. This means that the government needs<br />

to know which areas are most suitable to establish the new oil palm plantations.<br />

In Northeast Thailand, a pilot project for oil palm cultivation has been set up.<br />

However, this area is characterized by low ra<strong>in</strong>fall, high evaporation rates, and high light<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensities that are serious limitations for oil palm. Therefore, land evaluation models were<br />

designed and applied to analyse the problem. Soil water balances were studied. Based on that<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, the area of the Tharbor Irrigation Project was selected for the pilot project.<br />

The LANDSAT images were use to analyze land cover type and water system (Fig.<br />

4a). The flood<strong>in</strong>g areas were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by compar<strong>in</strong>g the GIS data with the image data. The<br />

ground control po<strong>in</strong>ts were located with the GPS GARMIN GPS 12 Model. A soil survey<br />

was performed around the area, and the soil texture was mapped. The irrigation canals were<br />

also drawn on the map. Fig 4b shows the spatial distribution of soil texture and the irrigation<br />

system.<br />

The soil water balance, based on Sys et al. [18] Verplancke [20], was then simulated<br />

to calculate the soil water deficit or water needs accord<strong>in</strong>g to soil texture. F<strong>in</strong>ally the<br />

production potential was mapped (Fig. 4C).<br />

Oil palm production potential<br />

RESULTS<br />

The first step of the land evaluation consisted of an analysis of the climatic data (Fig.3 A-E).<br />

The suitability classes of climate (Fig.3 F) show that the highly suitable areas are found <strong>in</strong> the<br />

South and some regions of East Thailand.<br />

Extension of Oil Palm Plantations<br />

The oil palm plantations identified from the LANDSAT images are located <strong>in</strong> the southern<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces occupy<strong>in</strong>g an area of 320,138 ha, and <strong>in</strong> the eastern prov<strong>in</strong>ces, occupy<strong>in</strong>g an area<br />

of 1,889 ha.<br />

The maps of the plantations were overlaid with the production potential maps by<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the Geoprocess<strong>in</strong>g Module <strong>in</strong> GIS ARCVIEW 3.2a. Then, the exist<strong>in</strong>g area of oil palm<br />

plantation were classified <strong>in</strong>to the 4 suitability classes (Table 2). The results have been shown<br />

<strong>in</strong>Table 2. About 70.0 ha of oilpalm plantations, almost entirely situated <strong>in</strong> the south were<br />

classified as “not recommendable”. Next, 124,912.2 ha <strong>in</strong> the southern and 1,019.5 ha <strong>in</strong> the<br />

eastern coast, were classified as marg<strong>in</strong>al for oil palm production. The suitable lands occupy<br />

113,086.4 ha <strong>in</strong> South and 869.4 ha <strong>in</strong> East. And f<strong>in</strong>ally, very suitable land was only found <strong>in</strong><br />

the south, with an extension of about 82,071.5 ha.<br />

154


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

A M<strong>in</strong>. Temperature <strong>in</strong>dex B Max. Temperature <strong>in</strong>dex C Mean temperature <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

D Ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>dex E Drought period <strong>in</strong>dex F Climatic <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

Figure 3 : The Result of Climate Classification for Oil Palm by us<strong>in</strong>g Parametric Approach<br />

Production Potential (ton.Ha -1 .year -1 Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Name<br />

25.0 Total<br />

Southern Prov<strong>in</strong>ces 68.8 124,912.2 113,086.4 82,071.5 320,138.7<br />

Chumporn - 22,694.9 33,346.9 2,090.1 58,131.7<br />

Krabi - 45,872.0 38,531.2 59,846.2 144,249.3<br />

Nakorn Srithammarat - 995.5 177.0 9.4 1,181.9<br />

Naratiwat 35.7 19.5 510.1 - 565.3<br />

Pang-nga - 5,450.7 2,522.2 1,759.4 9,732.3<br />

Pattalung 25.8 - - - 25.8<br />

Ranong - 1,696.6 - - 1,696.6<br />

Songkhla - 582.7 3,652.0 - 4,234.7<br />

Satun - 10,145.9 4,176.6 10,719.0 25,041.6<br />

Surat Thani - 34,249.9 27,073.8 3,539.2 64,863.0<br />

Trang - 3,204.3 3,096.8 4,108.2 10,409.1<br />

Yala 7.2 - - - 7.2<br />

East Prov<strong>in</strong>ces 0.2 1,019.5 869.4 - 1,889.0<br />

Chonburi - 424.6 814.7 - 1,239.4<br />

Rayong - 582.4 - - 582.4<br />

Trad 0.2 12.5 54.6 - 65.6<br />

Total Area 70.0 125,931.7 113,955.8 82,071.5 322,028.0<br />

Table 2 : The production potential classification for an exist<strong>in</strong>g oil palm plantation<br />

155


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Area of Rubber Plantation<br />

Analysis of the same LANDSAT images revealed that the total area of rubber is about 1.969<br />

million ha, ma<strong>in</strong>ly located <strong>in</strong> the south for more than 85% (Table 3).<br />

Unit : ha<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Name<br />

Low Production Potential<br />

Low land High land<br />

High Production Total<br />

Southern Prov<strong>in</strong>ces 278,102.6 422,726.2 998,552.0 1,699,381.0<br />

Chumporn 43,490.7 0.0 20,601.9 64,092.6<br />

Krabi 4,865.0 11,689.4 77,253.9 93,808.3<br />

Nakorn Srithammarat 13,415.8 47,092.8 145,306.1 205,814.7<br />

Naratiwat 15,845.9 234.9 140,748.0 156,828.8<br />

Pattani 6,990.7 13,181.3 24,377.4 44,549.4<br />

Pang-nga 32,302.9 39,542.6 30,449.8 102,295.2<br />

Pattalung 17,919.4 16,975.4 47,015.8 81,910.6<br />

Phukhet 216.8 8,559.7 8,817.9 17,594.4<br />

Ranong 457.6 8,819.4 7,793.9 17,070.9<br />

Songkhla 58,736.6 77,858.9 85,462.2 222,057.8<br />

Satun 5,671.7 6,859.5 30,101.1 42,632.3<br />

Surat Thani 31,421.4 29,519.4 219,858.6 280,799.4<br />

Trang 38,497.0 34,684.6 133,339.5 206,521.1<br />

Yala 8,271.2 127,708.5 27,425.8 163,405.4<br />

East Prov<strong>in</strong>ces 45,852.3 23,363.5 140,753.6 209,969.6<br />

Chanthaburi 14,303.0 5,110.2 33,265.1 52,678.4<br />

Chonburi 6,998.9 1,189.8 13,432.6 21,621.3<br />

Chachoengsao 3,591.5 11.4 8,705.8 12,308.6<br />

Rayong 8,941.9 15,624.2 65,098.2 89,664.3<br />

Trad 10,942.2 1,396.6 19,338.7 31,677.6<br />

Prach<strong>in</strong>buri 0.0 0.0 408.2 408.2<br />

Srakaew 1,074.9 31.4 505.0 1,611.2<br />

Total Area 323,954.9 446,089.9 1,139,305.8 1,909,350.6<br />

Establish<strong>in</strong>g oil palm <strong>in</strong> northeast Thailand<br />

Table 3 : An exist<strong>in</strong>g area of rubber plantation<br />

The area of Huimong Irrigation project is about 133,944 ha. An overview of the soils<br />

identified <strong>in</strong> the area has been giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Table 4, summaris<strong>in</strong>g the soil series together with<br />

their national and <strong>in</strong>ternational classification names.<br />

156


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Soil Series USDA-1975 National<br />

Borabu f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Aquic Pl<strong>in</strong>thustults Red-Yellow Podzolic Soils<br />

Korat f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, siliceous, Oxic Paleustults Gray Podzolic Soils<br />

Roiet f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, kaol<strong>in</strong>itic, Aeric Paleaquults Low Humic Grey Soils<br />

Renu f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Pl<strong>in</strong>thic Paleaquults Hydromorphic Gray Podzolic Soils<br />

Sanpaya f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Typic Ustifluevents AlluvialSoils<br />

Siton f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Aeric Tropaquepts Low Humic Grey Soils<br />

Satuk f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, kaol<strong>in</strong>itic, Typic Paleustults Red-Yellow Podzolic Soils<br />

Tatphanom f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, mixed, Ustic Haplustalfs Non Clacic Brown Soils<br />

War<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e loamy, siliceous, OxicPaleustults Red-Yellow Podzolic Soils<br />

Nakornpanom f<strong>in</strong>e clayey, mixed, Aeric Paleaquults Low Humic Grey Soils<br />

Pimai f<strong>in</strong>e clayey, mixed, Vertic Tropaquepts Hydromorphic Alluvial Soils<br />

Phen clayey skeletal, mixed, Typic Pl<strong>in</strong>thaquults Low Humic Grey Soils<br />

Phonpisai clayey skeletal, mixed, Typic Pl<strong>in</strong>thustults Red-Yellow Podzolic Soils<br />

Ratburi f<strong>in</strong>e clayey, mixed, Aeric Tropaquepts Hydromorphic Alluvial Soils<br />

Srisongkham f<strong>in</strong>e clayey, mixed, Vertic Tropaquepts Hydromorphic Alluvial Soils<br />

Table 4 : Soil Taxonomy <strong>in</strong> the Study area<br />

An area of about 30,169 ha has a clayey texture while the sandy soils cover about 96,420 ha.<br />

In sandy soil, the production potential is higher because these areas are located <strong>in</strong> the low<br />

terraces, which are flat and have a high level of ground water. An overview on the spatial<br />

distribution of these results has been shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4, while more detailed data are<br />

provided <strong>in</strong> Table 5.<br />

PPSHHH<br />

5<br />

IWVHHHH IWVHHHH<br />

5<br />

x�����—�—�<br />

€T<br />

8’ 5<br />

€U 8’<br />

5 8’ 8’<br />

€Q u�����—�� €S<br />

€������� 8’ €V<br />

8’<br />

€I<br />

€W<br />

8’<br />

8’ ���� ‚����—���<br />

x—�����<br />

€IH<br />

8’ 8’<br />

8’<br />

€R „�—˜��<br />

€ƒqIH<br />

5€���—<br />

5<br />

5 €��—�<br />

IWUSHHH 5<br />

IWUSHHH<br />

5<br />

5<br />

PQHHHH<br />

5<br />

u������<br />

PQSHHH<br />

IWVSHHH IWVSHHH<br />

f—����<br />

5<br />

5f—��—��<br />

f—���— 5<br />

f—�����<br />

157<br />

5<br />

f—����—�<br />

IWUHHHH IWUHHHH<br />

5x����—�<br />

IWTSHHH IWTSHHH<br />

PPSHHH<br />

PQHHHH<br />

PQSHHH<br />

PRHHHH<br />

PRSHHH<br />

PRHHHH<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Irrigation l<strong>in</strong>e Huimong Adm<strong>in</strong>istration Boundary<br />

Reservoir Flood<strong>in</strong>g area Sandy soil Clayey soil<br />

20.0 t ha -1 y -1<br />

PRSHHH<br />

PPSHHH<br />

5<br />

IWVHHHH IWVHHHH<br />

5<br />

x�����—�—�<br />

€T<br />

8’ 5<br />

€U 8’<br />

5 8’ 8’<br />

€Q<br />

€S u�����—��<br />

€������� 8’ €V<br />

8’<br />

€I<br />

€W<br />

8’<br />

8’ ���� ‚����—���<br />

x—�����<br />

€IH<br />

8’ 8’<br />

8’<br />

€R „�—˜��<br />

€ƒqIH<br />

5€���—<br />

5<br />

5 €��—�<br />

IWUSHHH 5<br />

IWUSHHH<br />

5<br />

5<br />

PQHHHH<br />

5<br />

u������<br />

PQSHHH<br />

IWVSHHH IWVSHHH<br />

f—����<br />

5<br />

f—����—�<br />

5<br />

5f—��—��<br />

f—���— 5<br />

f—�����<br />

IWUHHHH IWUHHHH<br />

5x����—�<br />

IWTSHHH IWTSHHH<br />

PPSHHH<br />

PQHHHH<br />

PQSHHH<br />

PRHHHH<br />

PRSHHH<br />

Figure 4 : The Result LANDSAT Image, Determ<strong>in</strong>e the Water Body, Irrigation system, and<br />

Production potential <strong>in</strong> the study area<br />

PRHHHH<br />

PRSHHH


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Soil Type Soil series Symbol Production Potential Area<br />

Clayey 30,169<br />

Alluvium complex AC 15.1-20.0 6,256<br />

Nakornpanom Nn 13.0-15.0 7,464<br />

Pimai Pm 15.1-20.0 2,870<br />

Phen Pn 13.0-15.0 4,871<br />

Phonpisai Pp 13.0-15.0 8,490<br />

Ratburi Rb 15.1-20.0 218<br />

Sandy 96,420<br />

Korat Kt >20.0 21,683<br />

Roiet Re 13.0-15.0 33,995<br />

Sanpaya Sa >20.0 10,307<br />

Srisongkham Ss 13.0-15.0 22,875<br />

Sithon St 13.0-15.0 5,490<br />

War<strong>in</strong> Wn >20.0 2,070<br />

Flood<strong>in</strong>g Area 7,355<br />

Total Area 133,944<br />

Table 5 : Area and production potential <strong>in</strong> Huimong Irrigation Project<br />

The soil water balance model runs revealed that the water deficit starts from the first decade<br />

of November <strong>in</strong> sandy soils, while it starts only <strong>in</strong> the second decade <strong>in</strong> clayey soils (Table<br />

6).<br />

Decade P ETc STL-1 ETa STL ST.d ETad Water Deficiency<br />

Jan1 1.52 33.85 2.19 2.2 1.2 3.40 2.19 29.3<br />

Jan2 1.57 35.86 1.21 1.7 0.8 2.47 1.65 30.3<br />

Jan3 1.92 23.29 0.82 1.2 1.2 2.35 1.20 30.4<br />

Feb1 1.67 35.58 1.15 1.7 0.8 2.49 1.65 30.2<br />

Feb2 3.28 37.14 0.84 2.4 1.1 3.46 2.35 29.3<br />

Feb3 5.85 21.93 1.11 2.8 3.0 5.79 2.82 26.9<br />

Mar1 11.72 46.49 2.97 9.4 3.0 12.34 9.36 20.4<br />

Mar2 14.46 48.40 2.98 11.2 3.3 14.56 11.24 18.2<br />

Mar3 16.42 32.36 3.32 10.3 6.1 16.45 10.34 16.3<br />

Apr1 9.03 46.06 6.11 10.1 3.3 13.34 10.08 19.4<br />

Apr2 15.82 44.42 3.26 11.8 4.1 15.92 11.82 16.8<br />

Apr3 28.24 28.74 4.10 15.6 11.1 26.69 15.59 6.0<br />

May1 58.86 39.76 11.10 37.1 21.1 34.31 13.22 0.00<br />

May2 73.10 36.84 21.09 36.8 42.8 42.77 - -<br />

May3 83.54 24.06 42.77 24.1 85.0 85.50 - -<br />

Table 6 : The example of some result of Soil Water Balance calculation<br />

In table 7, the calculation of the water needs of oil palm <strong>in</strong> every soil type show that the<br />

maximum requirements amount to about 438,000 m 3 .ha -1 <strong>in</strong> sandy soils and to 175,000<br />

m 3 .ha -1 <strong>in</strong> clayey soils.<br />

158


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Decade Ra<strong>in</strong>fall ETc S LS SL SCL LC CL C<br />

Jan1 2 36 34 33 30 27 21 13 3<br />

Jan2 2 38 36 35 34 32 28 22 16<br />

Jan3 2 25 22 21 20 19 16 12 6<br />

Feb1 2 37 36 35 34 33 31 28 24<br />

Feb2 3 39 35 35 34 33 32 30 27<br />

Feb3 6 23 16 14 13 12 11 9 7<br />

Mar1 12 49 36 34 32 31 29 28 26<br />

Mar2 14 51 36 33 30 29 27 26 24<br />

Mar3 16 34 15 12 8 6 4 2 0<br />

Apr1 9 48 39 36 33 31 29 27 26<br />

Apr2 16 47 30 27 23 22 19 17 16<br />

Apr3 28 30 - - - - - - -<br />

May1 59 42 - - - - - - -<br />

May2 73 39 - - - - - - -<br />

Oct33 9 20 - - - - - - -<br />

Nov1 6 31 21 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Nov2 2 31 28 17 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Nov3 0 20 19 13 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Dec1 2 32 30 26 14 4 0 0 0<br />

Dec2 2 30 27 25 17 11 1 0 0<br />

Dec3 2 22 19 17 12 7 0 0 0<br />

Total (1000 m 3 ha -1 ) 478 414 334 295 248 215 175<br />

Table 7 : The comparison of soil water balance <strong>in</strong> different texture<br />

PRESENTING AUTHOR<br />

Somjate Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra*, Senior Expert <strong>in</strong> Rubber, Department of Agriculture, M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />

Agriculture and Cooperative, Thailand, is an alumnus of Ghent University <strong>in</strong> 1994. He<br />

studied Master Degree <strong>in</strong> the program of Soil Survey and <strong>Land</strong> Use Plann<strong>in</strong>g. After that, he<br />

got the scholarship from ABOS and He f<strong>in</strong>ished Ph.D. <strong>in</strong> the Tw<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Program between<br />

Ghent University and Universiti Putra Malaysia <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>in</strong> <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Management.<br />

Email address: spratumm<strong>in</strong>@yahoo.com<br />

Prof. Dr. Eric .Van Ranst, Department of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of<br />

Science, Ghent University. He set the standard template for this work and gave an advisory <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Land</strong> Evaluation Technique and the Yield Gap Analysis.<br />

Email address: Eric.VanRanst@UGent.be<br />

Prof. Dr. Hubert .Verplancke, Department of Soil Management and Soil Care, Faculty<br />

of Bioscience Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. He set the template study <strong>in</strong> soil water balance and gave an<br />

advisory <strong>in</strong> Soil physics, and calculat<strong>in</strong>g on soil water flux and actual evapo-transpiration<br />

from Soil Water Balance Equations.<br />

Email address: Hubert.Verplancke@UGent.be<br />

Dr. Ann Verdoodt, Department of Geology and Soil Science, Faculty of Science,<br />

Ghent University. She works <strong>in</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation Technique and the Yield Gap Analysis.<br />

Email address: ann.verdoodt@UGent.be<br />

SUMMARY<br />

The GIS software such as ARCVIEW ver. 3.2 a and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g technique can be applied<br />

for mapp<strong>in</strong>g on an exist<strong>in</strong>g area of rubber and oil palm. <strong>Land</strong> evaluation technique together<br />

with GIS software could produce a map of production potential of oil palm and rubber. Then,<br />

159


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

the result from <strong>in</strong>tercept<strong>in</strong>g both two maps yielded the map of rubber plantation that should<br />

be substitutes with oil palm base on the crop production. It means that the rubber plantation,<br />

which a production was lower than 950 kg Ha -1 , should be substituted with oil palm that give<br />

the production higher than 16 ton FFB Ha -1 year -1 . At last, the same procedures such as<br />

parametric approach for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the land <strong>in</strong>dex of oil palm, a calculation of soil water<br />

balance were applied to study the area <strong>in</strong> Northeast Thailand. Then the yield gap analyses<br />

[20], especially the calculation of soil water balance, can predict a production of oil palm <strong>in</strong><br />

Northeast Thailand for establish<strong>in</strong>g oil palm <strong>in</strong> this area that will have a production higher<br />

than 16 ton FFB Ha -1 year -1 .<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Dr. Somchai Baimuang, Senior Expert,<br />

Department of Meteorology, who has consistently contributed <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g essential<br />

metrological data available. He also help me to convert each climate data to a digital map.<br />

Special thanks go to Department of <strong>Land</strong> Development, furthered contributed <strong>in</strong><br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g me all the digital LANDSAT TM 5, and help me to tra<strong>in</strong> my colleague for<br />

analyz<strong>in</strong>g a digital map of land use.<br />

Special thanks their respective <strong>in</strong>stitutions, the Chachoengsao Rubber Research<br />

Centre, Surat Thani Rubber Research Centre and Surat Thani Oil Palm Research Centre, for<br />

the generous support staff services dur<strong>in</strong>g the field survey <strong>in</strong> their responsibility area.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Caliman, J.P., 1992. Oil Palm and water deficit production adapted cropp<strong>in</strong>g techniques. Oleag<strong>in</strong>eux;<br />

47(5):205-216.<br />

[2] Corley, R.H.V. 1976. Inflorescence abortion and sex differentiation. In Oil Palm Research (ed. R.H.V.<br />

Corley, J.J. Hardon and B.J. Wood). Amsterdam Elsevier. pp. 37-54.<br />

[3] Corley, R.H.V. and T.K. Hong. 1982. Irrigation of oil palm <strong>in</strong> Malaysia. In The Oil Palm <strong>in</strong> Agriculture <strong>in</strong><br />

Eighties. E. Pushparajah and P.S.Chew (eds.) vol.2. pp. 343-356.<br />

[4] Cornaire, B.,C. Daniel, Y. Zuily-Fodil and E. Lamade. 1994. Oil palm performance under water stress.<br />

Background to the problem, first results and research approaches. Oleag<strong>in</strong>eux; 49(1):1-12.<br />

[5] Foong, S.F. 1991. Potential evapo-transpiration potential yield and leach<strong>in</strong>g losses of oil palm. PORIM Intl.<br />

Palm Oil Conf-Agriculture. p.105-118.<br />

[6] Foong, S.F. 1999. Impact of moisture on potential evapo-transpiration, growth and yield of oil palm. 1999<br />

PORIM Int. Palm Oil Congress. PORIM p.64-86.<br />

[7] Guha, M.M. 1986. Agro-climatic and soil factors <strong>in</strong> land use plann<strong>in</strong>g for oilpalm development <strong>in</strong> Thailand.<br />

Consultant Report to UNDP/FAO/THA/84/007. project.<br />

[8] Hartley, C.W.S. 1977. The Oil Palm. 2 nd Longmans , London. 706 pp.<br />

[9] Hartley, C.W.S. 1988. The Oil Palm. 2 nd Longmans, London. 706pp.<br />

[10]Hong, T.K. and R.H.V. Corley. 1976. Leaf temperature and photosynthesis of atropical C3 plant,<br />

Elaeisgu<strong>in</strong>eensis. MARDIRes. Bull.4 (1):16-20.<br />

[11]Kee, K.K. and P.S. Chew. 1991. Oil palm response to nitrogen and drip irrigation <strong>in</strong> a wet monsoonal<br />

climate <strong>in</strong> Pen<strong>in</strong>sular Malaysia. PORIM Int. Palm Oil Conf-Agriculture. pp. 321-339.<br />

[12]Ochs, R. and C. Daniel. 1976. Research on techniques adapted to dry regions. In Oil Palm Research (ed.<br />

R.H.V. Corley, J.J. Hardon and B.J. Wood) Amsterdam Elsevier. pp. 315-330.<br />

[13]Paramathan, S. 2003. <strong>Land</strong> Selection for Oil Palm. In Oil Palm: Management for Large and Susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

Yield (ed. Fairhurst, T. And Härdter, R. Potash&Phosphate Institute of Canada. pp:27-57.<br />

[14]Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra, S., Van Ranst, E., Verplancke, H., Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, J., Theeravatanasuk, K., and Kesawapituk<br />

P. 2002. Quantify<strong>in</strong>g Parameters for the Maximum Rubber Production Potential Model <strong>in</strong> East Thailand.<br />

The 17 th World Congress of Soil Science. 14-21 Septemper, Sirigit National Concerence Cemtre. Bangkok.<br />

160


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

[15]Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra, S., Verplancke, H., Van Ranst, E., Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, J., Zauyah, S., Yew, F.K. 2000. Maximum<br />

Production Potential Model for Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Land</strong> Suitability for Rubber <strong>in</strong> THAILAND. The International<br />

Symposium on Suitable <strong>Land</strong> management, 8-10 August 2000. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.<br />

[16]Prioux, J.,J. C. Jacquemard, H. de Franqueville and J.P. Caliman. 1992. Oil palm irrigation. Initial results<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed by PHCI (IvoryCoast). Oleag<strong>in</strong>eux. 47(8-9):497-509.<br />

[17]Sarakhun, N., S<strong>in</strong>thurahut, S. and Dansakoonphon, S. 1998.Analytical for Oil Palm Plantation <strong>in</strong> South<br />

Thailand. Department of Agriculture, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Agriculture and Cooporation. Thailand. 266 pp. (Thai<br />

Version)<br />

[18]Sys, C., Van Ranst, E. and Debaveye, J. and Beernaert, F. 1993. <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation Part I: Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong> <strong>Land</strong><br />

Evaluation and Crop Production Calculations. Agricultural Publication No. 7. General Adm<strong>in</strong>istration for<br />

Development Cooperation. Brussel. Belgium. 274 pp.<br />

[19]Vanranst, E. 1998. Estimation of Rubber Yields Us<strong>in</strong>g Readily Available Climatic Data and Soil<br />

Characteristics. University of Gent, Laboratory of Soil Science. Gent Belgium. pp 6.<br />

[20]Verdoodt, A. and Van Ranst, E. 2003. A Two Level Crop Growth Model for Annual Crop. Ghent<br />

University. Belgium. 258 pp.<br />

[21]Verplancke H. 1998. Applied Soil Physics. Department of Soil Management and Soil Care-Division Soil<br />

Physics. Faculty of Agriculture and Applied Biological Sciences. University of Gent. Gent, Belgium. 450<br />

pp.<br />

161


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

SOIL PROPERTIES AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF<br />

UNDISTURBED AND DISTURBED FORESTS IN MT.<br />

MALINDANG, PHILIPPINES<br />

Renato D. Boniao 1* , Rosa Villa B. Estoista 2 , Carmelita G. Hansel 2 , Ron de Goede 4 ,<br />

Olga M. Nuneza 3 , Brigida A. Roscom 3 , Sam James 5 , Rhea Amor C. Lumactud 1 ,<br />

Mae Yen O. Poblete 1 and Nonillon Aspe 3<br />

1 M<strong>in</strong>danao State University at Naawan, Naawan, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, 2 M<strong>in</strong>danao State University-Marawi, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

3 M<strong>in</strong>danao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, 4 Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen University,<br />

The Netherlands, 5 Kansas University, USA.<br />

Abstract<br />

Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang, a natural park <strong>in</strong> the southern Philipp<strong>in</strong>es faces serious problems of<br />

biodiversity loss and soil degradation. Scarce <strong>in</strong>formation on the drastic effects of forest<br />

cover loss and any form of disturbance keeps the forest denudation and soil loss unabated.<br />

Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the soil physicochemical and biological<br />

properties, and the change of such properties with disturbance <strong>in</strong> Mt Mal<strong>in</strong>dang. Undisturbed<br />

and disturbed forests and agro- and grassland ecosystems of the range, located at altitudes<br />

above and below the 1000 m asl contourl<strong>in</strong>e, were sampled. Results showed that <strong>in</strong> forest<br />

areas where human <strong>in</strong>trusion was less, highest amount of O.M. (20.2%), highest CEC (43 to<br />

57 cmolc kg -1 soil) and lowest bulk density (0.4 Mg m -3 ) were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. The soil was<br />

relatively fertile. There were also more earthworm species (at least four) <strong>in</strong> contrast to only<br />

one species (Pontoscolex corethrurus) <strong>in</strong> agricultural land and grassland. Activities of liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

organisms (soil respiration rate) <strong>in</strong> grassland were significantly lower than those of natural<br />

ecosystems. Root hair plant-feed<strong>in</strong>g nematodes are abundant <strong>in</strong> all sites except <strong>in</strong> arable corn<br />

and grassland below 1000 m asl where semi-endoparasitic species associated with crops<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ate. Thus, <strong>in</strong> any human-<strong>in</strong>duced forest disturbance, it is not only the forest cover that<br />

is lost, but the soil as well. Earthworms and nematodes species composition and a number of<br />

bio-physicochemical soil properties served well as <strong>in</strong>dicators of this disturbance.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Soil is an essential part of the biosphere and is vital for the cont<strong>in</strong>ued existence of life on<br />

Earth. It is a crucial component of terrestrial ecosystems and a determ<strong>in</strong>ant of their capacity<br />

to produce goods and services. Unfortunately, despite the role they played <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g our<br />

natural ecosystems, the soil and the soil communities and the vital functions they perform are<br />

still poorly understood. Lack of knowledge on the <strong>in</strong>credible complexity of soils and the<br />

organisms that made them their home is probably the s<strong>in</strong>gular reason that there is a seem<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued disregard of this vital component of the natural ecosystems. Such a disregard is<br />

true <strong>in</strong> the Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang range ecosystems, the research site.<br />

Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang range is one of the ecologically valuable areas <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>danao and is an<br />

important biodiversity refuge. Yet, the whole range with its varied ecosystems from the<br />

mossy forest (its highest po<strong>in</strong>t) down to the coastal areas is, <strong>in</strong> fact, ecologically threatened.<br />

The pressures come from many fronts: subsistence farmers liv<strong>in</strong>g and encroach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>side the<br />

Park [5] and farm<strong>in</strong>g on steep slopes; logg<strong>in</strong>g, either commercial or at small scale, denud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the formerly thickly forested lands; and political and economic power holders, and other<br />

162


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested groups (military or <strong>in</strong>surgent) [11] with<strong>in</strong> the range who would probably risk a<br />

fortune just to claim a stake on the land. All these pressures led to soil degradation, followed<br />

by loss of biodiversity, and the repercussion goes beyond local boundaries. Among people<br />

dependent on such resources, soil degradation is simply understood as depletion or loss of a<br />

natural productive resource. Biodiversity and its key function <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the stability of<br />

(soil) ecosystems are hardly understood [11].<br />

Studies, therefore, on soil properties and their relationship to soil biodiversity are expected to<br />

address the <strong>in</strong>adequacy of <strong>in</strong>formation for conservation needs and for truly susta<strong>in</strong>able land<br />

use plans that ultimately protect Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang and its natural ecosystems.<br />

Objectives<br />

Given the need to save Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang Natural Park from the <strong>in</strong>evitable degradation, the<br />

study was, therefore, conducted to assess the soil physicochemical and biological properties<br />

of the range, and to study the changes of such properties with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g ecosystem<br />

disturbance.<br />

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE<br />

Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang is located <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Misamis Occidental, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. It is a<br />

watershed and a catchment area. In 1971 it officially proclaimed as a National Park and<br />

Watershed Reserve through Republic Act 6266. In August 2002, through proclamation No.<br />

228, the range was proclaimed as Natural Park, which made it, at the same time, a protected<br />

area. With 78 rivers emerg<strong>in</strong>g from the mounta<strong>in</strong>'s rugged volcanic landscape [11] and with<br />

about 15 major catchment bas<strong>in</strong>s [5], the range is undeniably the lifeblood of the neighbor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Misamis Occidental, Zamboanga del Norte, and Zamboanga del Sur. DENR [5]<br />

noted that the range or particularly the park is an important biodiversity refuge. Diverse<br />

endemic faunal and floral species are found <strong>in</strong> the old-growth and mossy forests, several<br />

more other species have yet to be identified or discovered. Still others may already be<br />

threatened or endangered and some may no longer exist.<br />

The park occupies a total land area of 53,262 hectares, consist<strong>in</strong>g of 24,511 hectares<br />

forest land, 13,320 hectares shrub lands of open and denuded land and 14,297.25 hectares<br />

open and cultivated land. The soils are mostly undifferentiated except <strong>in</strong> the buffer zones and<br />

down to the lowlands.<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forest cover, approximately 23,000 ha, has been decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fast<br />

especially over the last decade, due to some logg<strong>in</strong>g and timber poach<strong>in</strong>g activities.<br />

Eventually, the lush forest is converted to agricultural land and human settlements. Such<br />

demand for the biological resources has, of course, resulted <strong>in</strong> high rates of biodiversity loss<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang as one of the “hotspots” <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es need<strong>in</strong>g high priority for<br />

protection and conservation [8].<br />

Earthworms, one of the groups of organisms studied, are considered as ecosystem<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers. Sensitive to low soil moisture and soil management practices such as soil tillage,<br />

application of organic matter, pesticides and <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer, the earthworm population<br />

density tends to <strong>in</strong>crease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g organic matter <strong>in</strong>puts and decrease with soil<br />

disturbance, e.g., tillage [3].<br />

Another group of organisms is the Nematodes. They are microscopic, unsegmented,<br />

threadlike worms that can be found <strong>in</strong> soils and sediments of all terrestrial and aquatic<br />

ecosystems. Nematodes, both free-liv<strong>in</strong>g and plant-parasitic, possess several attributes that<br />

make them useful ecological <strong>in</strong>dicators [6].<br />

163


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Participatory approach<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Series of consultation with the local communities, from the local government units and l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

agencies down to the barangay levels, were conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g the preparation of the proposed<br />

study and their participation and commitment to the study and to the eventual conservation<br />

and protection of the Park, was enlisted. Incorporated <strong>in</strong> some of these meet<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />

capacity-build<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs, particularly on field sampl<strong>in</strong>g, which resulted <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

number of ‘local researchers’. They also became an important source of <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

selection of sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites.<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites and soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Sixteen (16) sites (Fig.1) with<strong>in</strong> the Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang Protected Area, spread over 8 barangays<br />

<strong>in</strong> 4 municipalities, were selected for the study. These sites were grouped accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

elevation (above and below 1000 m asl) and <strong>in</strong>to four different ecosystems based on the<br />

degree of disturbance (Table 1).<br />

In each site at least three plots of 20 x 20 meters were established with<strong>in</strong> which<br />

composite soil samples were collected for chemical and physical analyses. A sub-sample of<br />

about 700 g was separated for nematode extraction. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil (for<br />

chemical/physical analyses) was air-dried and stored at room temperature. On the same plots,<br />

3 replicates of an undisturbed sample at 0-10 cm and at 20-30 cm depths, us<strong>in</strong>g a core<br />

sampler with known volume were collected for bulk density. Pits were dug, described and<br />

sampled for soil classification. The rout<strong>in</strong>e physicochemical analyses all follow the standard<br />

accepted laboratory procedures<br />

Earthworm sampl<strong>in</strong>g and identification<br />

With<strong>in</strong> each 20 x 20m plot, 10 subplots measur<strong>in</strong>g 50 cm x 50 cm and 30 cm deep were dug.<br />

The soil block was put on a plastic sheet and all earthworms present were collected by hand.<br />

The earthworms were killed <strong>in</strong> a 70-90% ethanol and stored <strong>in</strong> 10% formaldehyde and the<br />

total number and species composition were counted and identified by plot. Species new to<br />

science were stored for further taxonomic description.<br />

Soil respiration determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

In a randomly selected spots of each field plot, soil respiration was measured us<strong>in</strong>g the closed<br />

chamber–Draeger Tube-syr<strong>in</strong>ge method described by Park<strong>in</strong> and Doran [10]. Each<br />

measurement was replicated twice.<br />

Nematode analyses<br />

Nematodes were extracted from a 100 g fresh weight soil sample stored at 4 o C, us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Oostenbr<strong>in</strong>k elutriator technique [9]. Total numbers of nematodes were counted and then<br />

stored <strong>in</strong> 4% formaldehyde until identification. Nematodes were identified to family and<br />

genus level. Next, they were assigned to trophic groups accord<strong>in</strong>g to Yeates et al. [15].<br />

164


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Figure 1. Location of Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang Protected Area and the sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites with<strong>in</strong> four municipalities<br />

165


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Elevation Ecosystems<br />

Undisturbed<br />

(Primary)<br />

> 1000<br />

masl<br />

< 1000<br />

masl<br />

forest<br />

Mt.<br />

Gu<strong>in</strong>lajan<br />

(6)*<br />

North Peak<br />

(6)<br />

Disturbed Forest<br />

Small-scale timber extraction:<br />

a. Mt. Ulo sa Dapitan (6)<br />

b. Mt. Capole (6)<br />

c. Old Liboron (3)<br />

Logged-over- Pongol (3)<br />

Secondary Growth<br />

Forest - North Peak (1)<br />

Small-scale timber extraction:<br />

Mialen (3)<br />

Logged-over: Peniel (3)<br />

Agroforestry: Mamalad (3)<br />

166<br />

Agroecosystem<br />

1 st arable:<br />

a. Lake Gandawan/<br />

Cabbage (3)<br />

2 nd Arable:<br />

a. Lake Gandawan-<br />

Agro (3)<br />

b. Gandawan - Agro (3)<br />

Coco<br />

a. Mialen (3)<br />

Corn<br />

a. Bunga (3)<br />

b. Mamalad (3)<br />

Grassland<br />

Lake Dum<strong>in</strong>agat<br />

(1)<br />

b. Gandawan<br />

(2)<br />

a. Peniel (3)<br />

Table 1. Sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites at different ecosystems <strong>in</strong> Mt. *Mal<strong>in</strong>dang. Numbers <strong>in</strong> parenthesis are the<br />

total no. of sampl<strong>in</strong>g plots of the site specified<br />

Soil morphology and classification<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang soils were relatively young. Two soil orders, Inceptisols and Entisols<br />

were reported (Descriptions of 9 profiles not shown). The studied soils, except one Profile<br />

(Brgy. Peniel), may have andic properties as shown by the bulk density values (Table 2) and<br />

the nature of the parent material. Such soils have good physical properties and essentially are<br />

fertile when first cleared for cultivation. However, they deteriorate fast with cont<strong>in</strong>ued use<br />

over time, particularly because these soils were concentrated mostly on slop<strong>in</strong>g areas.<br />

Physico-chemical Properties<br />

Primary data on the chemical and physical properties of the soils were given <strong>in</strong> Tables 2 and<br />

3. It was shown that <strong>in</strong> a number of parameters, i.e. pH, available phosphorus (P), total<br />

nitrogen (N), exchangeable potassium (K) and texture, most of the ecosystems studied were<br />

similar, and if there were any seem<strong>in</strong>g dissimilarities, these were not statistically significant.<br />

There were, however, soil properties that reflected a higher soil quality <strong>in</strong> the<br />

undisturbed ecosystem than <strong>in</strong> the disturbed ecosystems, such as percent organic matter<br />

(%O.M.), CEC, and bulk density (Db).<br />

Organic matter (% O.M.)<br />

The organic matter contents ranged from 8.5 to 20.2 % (Table 2). These values were<br />

relatively higher than an ideal soil was supposed to conta<strong>in</strong> [1] and very much higher than<br />

most of the soils across the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es [2]. Comparison of the samples <strong>in</strong>dicated that the<br />

undisturbed (primary) forests were richer <strong>in</strong> O.M. than the other ecosystems studied.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

ECOSYSTEMS<br />

BD<br />

Mg m -3<br />

OM<br />

%<br />

pH<br />

1:1 H2O<br />

167<br />

Avail P<br />

ppm<br />

Total<br />

N %<br />

Exch K<br />

cmolc/kg<br />

soil<br />

CEC<br />

cmolc/kg<br />

soil<br />

Undisturbed Forest 0.4 a* 20.2 c 4.9 a 2.1 0.5 b 0.2 57.0 c<br />

Disturbed Forest 0.7 b 15.0 b 5.4 b 1.4 0.5 ab 0.5 40.1 b<br />

Agroecosystem 0.9 bc 10.3 ab 5.2 ab 1.3 0.4 ab 0.5 27.5 a<br />

Grassland 1.1 c 8.5 a 5.3 ab 1.0 0.3 a 0.3 23.6 a<br />

Table 2. Soil chemical properties of the different ecosystems. *Means with same letter are not<br />

significantly different at 5% level (Duncan) us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS<br />

Among disturbed ecosystems, the amount of O.M. went down with their degree or state of<br />

disturbance. Comparison by land use types (Table 3), reflect<strong>in</strong>g vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees of<br />

disturbance, confirmed that more O.M. is lost as disturbance progresses <strong>in</strong>to grassland<br />

(Peniel). Not even reforestation, as was the case of plantation forest <strong>in</strong> Peniel (6.6 %), can<br />

raise O.M. content approximately as high as the North Peak level (24.9 %), the undisturbed<br />

ecosystem. The consequential loss or decl<strong>in</strong>e of the natural levels of soil organic matter<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g cultivation is well established <strong>in</strong> literature. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Syers and Craswell [12]<br />

soils under agriculture <strong>in</strong>evitably show a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> organic matter because (1) tillage and<br />

other agricultural practices <strong>in</strong>crease the soil organic matter decomposition rate by mix<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

surface soil and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the number and <strong>in</strong>tensity of wett<strong>in</strong>g and dry<strong>in</strong>g cycles; and (2) the<br />

<strong>in</strong>puts of plant C are generally less <strong>in</strong> a disturbed or cultivated system than <strong>in</strong> natural<br />

environment. The reduction <strong>in</strong> return of organic residues to the soil is as much as ten-fold [7].<br />

<strong>Land</strong> Use Types<br />

OM<br />

(%)<br />

pH<br />

(1:1<br />

H2O)<br />

Total<br />

N%<br />

Avail P<br />

ppm<br />

Exch K<br />

cmolc/kg soil<br />

CEC<br />

cmolc/kg<br />

soil<br />

Small scale timber<br />

extraction 16.0 cd* 5.5 bc<br />

0.51 abc 1.6 ab 0.54 ab 43.16 d<br />

Logged-over 11.98 abcd 4.9 ab 0.45 abc 0.8 a 0.18 a 30.96 bcd<br />

Agroforestry 4.9 a 4.6 a 0.2 a<br />

0.5 a 0.20 a 20.48 ab<br />

First arable 14.8 bcd 5.4 bc 0.69 c<br />

1.9 ab 0.73 b 43.15 d<br />

Last arable 14.3 bcd 5.4 bc 0.57 bc<br />

2.6 b 0.28 a 29.77 ab<br />

Coco 10.6 abc 5.7 c 0.35 ab<br />

0.5 a 1.16 c 34.87 bc<br />

Corn 6.6 ab 4.8 ab 0.19 a<br />

0.5 a 0.30 a 17.14 a<br />

Grassland 8.5 abc 5.3 bc 0.29 a<br />

1.0 ab 0.38 a 23.58 abc<br />

Table 3. Soil chemical properties at different land use types. *Means with same letter are not<br />

significantly different at 5% level (Duncan) us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS<br />

Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC)<br />

The CEC values of the ecosystems regardless of elevation were given <strong>in</strong> Table 2. These<br />

values were all above the adequate level (20 cmolc kg -1 soil) for plant growth set by the<br />

BSWM [4]. The undisturbed forest was observed to have the highest CEC value (57.0 cmolc<br />

kg -1 soil). Grassland, on the other hand, had the lowest CEC (23.6 cmolc kg -1 soil), followed<br />

by the agricultural and the disturbed forest ecosystems. The CEC difference between<br />

undisturbed and disturbed forest was quite significant and both had CECs significantly higher<br />

than those of the agricultural and grassland ecosystems. Obviously, CEC decreases with<br />

ecosystem disturbance.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Incidentally, ecosystems with high CECs were the ecosystems with high O.M contents.<br />

Figure 2 shows the trend and the relationship hav<strong>in</strong>g a high R 2 value (R 2 =0.998). CEC<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g from humus (O.M.) seemed to play a prom<strong>in</strong>ent role. Thus, the importance of organic<br />

matter to the cation exchange capacity of the soils was once aga<strong>in</strong> demonstrated above. The<br />

organic matter content is <strong>in</strong> equilibrium with climate, vegetation and other environmental<br />

conditions. It depletes rapidly if this equilibrium is disturbed by <strong>in</strong>appropriate management<br />

practices [13]. It is, therefore, a must that the management of these soils is oriented <strong>in</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sufficient amounts of organic matter.<br />

CEC (cmolc/kg soil)<br />

Bulk Density (Db)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

168<br />

y = 2.8461x - 0.8821<br />

R 2 = 0.9987<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

% OM<br />

Figure 2. Relationship between OM and CEC of the different ecosystems<br />

The bulk densities of the studied soils <strong>in</strong> each ecosystem were presented <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The<br />

values were unusually low for m<strong>in</strong>eral soils, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.4 to 1.1 at 0-20 cm depth or 0.43<br />

– 1.03 Mg m -3 at 20-30 cm (not shown). However, aga<strong>in</strong>st the backdrop of high O.M. content<br />

of most soils, these Db values seemed plausible. M<strong>in</strong>eral particle densities (Dp) usually range<br />

from 2.5 to 2.8 Mg m -3 , while organic particles are usually less than 1.0 Mg m -3 . Thus, where<br />

O.M. was observed to be comparatively high, bulk density was also relatively low.<br />

Undisturbed forest, significantly had the lowest Db value. This was also the ecosystem with<br />

the highest O.M. Soils <strong>in</strong> the disturbed ecosystems, grassland and agro ecosystems <strong>in</strong><br />

particular, on the other hand, which may have lost much of their O.M. from human activities<br />

as presented earlier, had much higher bulk densities.<br />

Biological components<br />

Soil Respiration<br />

Soil respiration values were given <strong>in</strong> Table 4, all of which were less than the range of 40-72<br />

CO2-C ha -1 d -1 based on the soil respiration class rat<strong>in</strong>gs of Words End Research [14]. Tillage,<br />

which was known to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more oxygen to the soil and expose organic matter to<br />

organisms, had obviously contributed to the <strong>in</strong>crease of CO2 evolution from the soil.<br />

Comparatively, although the difference was not statistically significant, the undisturbed<br />

ecosystem had lower respiration rate than that of the disturbed or agro-ecosystem. The<br />

grassland ecosystem seemed to be an exception. It had the lowest respiration value among


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

ecosystems when, <strong>in</strong> fact, it was the most disturbed albeit quite recently. The reason, maybe,<br />

was the amount of organic matter available for decomposition. Grassland <strong>in</strong>cidentally (Tables<br />

2, 3) had the lowest O.M.<br />

As <strong>in</strong>dicator of biological activity, soil respiration is usually regarded as a positive<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicator of soil quality. A higher respiration rate results <strong>in</strong> more nutrients released from<br />

organic matter and improved soil structure, among others. In this perspective, the agroecosystem<br />

would have the highest quality soil. High respiration, however, does not always<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate good soil quality. It is understood that biological activity is also a direct reflection of<br />

the degradation of organic C compounds <strong>in</strong> soil [10]. It <strong>in</strong>dicates loss of carbon from the soil<br />

system. Viewed from this perspective, the agro-ecosystem <strong>in</strong> this study must have reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

less organic matter than the forest ecosystems. Indeed, based on the amount of organic matter<br />

present <strong>in</strong> these ecosystems (Table 2) the observation was true. All, except grassland, had<br />

high O.M. contents and the undisturbed ecosystem had more compared to other ecosystems.<br />

Earthworms<br />

Pontoscolex corethrurus, an exotic species <strong>in</strong>troduced from Brazil, was the earthworm type<br />

that <strong>in</strong>habited grassland and agro-ecosystems. It was the only species found <strong>in</strong> those<br />

ecosystems. In other ecosystems, varied species, possibly some would be new to science,<br />

were found. The undisturbed mossy forest had a notably higher number of species per unit<br />

area than the disturbed forest. Forest ecosystems, disturbed or not, had much more diverse<br />

species of worms than grasslands and agro-ecosystems (Table 4). In terms of the number of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals, however, the latter two gave the greater numbers at both elevations (below or<br />

above 1000 masl). The species presence, however, was limited to one, P. corethrurus. It was<br />

well to note that, <strong>in</strong> forests, particularly the undisturbed ecosystems, where bigger and more<br />

colorful species were found, organic matter and surface litters were abundant. This may<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> why the latter species of earthworms were mostly present.<br />

Type of<br />

ecosystem<br />

Earthworm<br />

(Ind. per 2.5 m 2 at<br />

0.30 m depth)<br />

Earthworm<br />

(No. of sp per<br />

2.5m 2 at 0.30 m<br />

depth)<br />

169<br />

Nematode<br />

(No. of Ind. per<br />

100 g soil)<br />

Soil respiration<br />

(CO2 -C kg ha -1 d -<br />

1 )<br />

Primary forest 9.5 a* 3.8 b 583.3 a 41.34 b<br />

Disturbed forest 74.6 ab 3.4 b 921.7 a 41.49 b<br />

Agroeco 113.8 b 1.0 a 910.7 a<br />

43.16 b<br />

Grassland 111.0 b 1.0 a 805.0 a 21.59 a<br />

Table 4. Soil nematode and earthworm abundance and soil respiration <strong>in</strong> different ecosystems.<br />

*Means with same letter are not significantly different at 5% level (Duncan) us<strong>in</strong>g SPSS.<br />

Nematodes<br />

Table 4 showed that the number of <strong>in</strong>dividual nematodes per 100 g soil was not<br />

significantly different among ecosystems and was rather low compared with soils <strong>in</strong> the<br />

temperate regions. But when grouped accord<strong>in</strong>g to feed<strong>in</strong>g habits, plant-feeders came out<br />

most abundant <strong>in</strong> all sites studied. And among this group, root-hair feeders dom<strong>in</strong>ate except<br />

<strong>in</strong> arable corn and grassland below 1000 m asl. In the grassland ecosystem, it was the semiendoparasitic<br />

group which was abundant <strong>in</strong> both elevation classes, while the ectoparasitic<br />

plant-feed<strong>in</strong>g nematodes were most abundant <strong>in</strong> forest ecosystems at more than 1000 m asl.<br />

When the relative abundance of nematodes were subjected to pr<strong>in</strong>cipal component analyses


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

(PCA) with some environmental parameters as passive variables, the result showed that the<br />

forest ecosystems, located <strong>in</strong> the upper part of the ord<strong>in</strong>ation plot (Fig. 3) and characterized<br />

by low bulk density, and high organic matter and CEC, have relatively high abundance of<br />

nematodes.<br />

Figure 3. PCA of nematodes show<strong>in</strong>g the position of the10 sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites (o) and some soil physical<br />

and chemical properties.<br />

Further ord<strong>in</strong>ation analyses (redundancy analysis, RDA) on the 10 sites with nematode data<br />

showed that 58% of the variation <strong>in</strong> the nematode population can be described by the<br />

environmental variables. In fact, all variables together can expla<strong>in</strong> 84% of the variation<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the nematode dataset (Table 5).<br />

Axes 1 2 3 4 Total<br />

variance<br />

Eigenvalues 0.305 0.185 0.112 0.072 1.000<br />

Species-environment correlations 0.993 0.997 0.959 0.929<br />

Cumulative percentage variance<br />

of species data 30.5 49.0 60.2 67.4<br />

of species-environment relation 36.4 58.4 71.7 80.3<br />

Sum of all eigenvalues 1.000<br />

Sum of all canonical eigenvalues 0.840<br />

Table 5. Results of a RDA on the 10 sites with nematode data. Total-N was not <strong>in</strong>cluded because data<br />

were miss<strong>in</strong>g for two sites; CEC and bulk density were excluded from the analyses because of strong<br />

autocorrelation with other parameters.<br />

PRESENTING AUTHOR<br />

*Renato D. Boniao, M<strong>in</strong>danao State University-Naawan, Naawan, Misamis Oriental,<br />

Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. E-mail: rdboniao@msu-naawan.net or natsupm@yahoo.com .<br />

170


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The soil characteristics, both physical and chemical properties, all po<strong>in</strong>ted out that they are at<br />

their optimum or best levels <strong>in</strong> ecosystems where human activities occurrence is almost<br />

absent or none at all. These ecosystems kept the organic matter values high, pH levels<br />

acceptable and reta<strong>in</strong>ed relatively good amounts of N or P <strong>in</strong> the soils. These are also the<br />

ecosystems that have loamy textural classes and low bulk densities, <strong>in</strong>dicative of good<br />

structural aggregation, presumably because of, but for one, the high amount of O.M. In<br />

contrast, forests converted <strong>in</strong>to agricultural lands and later abandoned <strong>in</strong>to grasslands have<br />

much poorer soil properties. As shown, a good quality of the soil is <strong>in</strong> part ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity of the forest cover, and forest or soil disturbance <strong>in</strong> any form without mitigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

measures, can ultimately compromise soil quality. As is the case <strong>in</strong> Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang, <strong>in</strong> time,<br />

grassland or waste land areas <strong>in</strong>crease while forestlands decrease correspond<strong>in</strong>gly.<br />

The best way to break the cycle of abandon<strong>in</strong>g old farms and open<strong>in</strong>g new ones is to<br />

select areas on which, by necessity and social consideration, a certa<strong>in</strong> degree of susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

cultivation is allowable.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

We wish to thank The Netherlands M<strong>in</strong>istry of Development (DGIS) for the research<br />

grant through SEAMEO-SEARCA for the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e-Netherlands Biodiversity Research<br />

for Development <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>danao: Focus on Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang (BRP)<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Brady, N.C and R. R. Weil. 1999. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 12 th Ed. Prentice Hall International,<br />

Inc.<br />

[2] Badayos, R. B. 1996. Soils and Agriculture <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. Sem<strong>in</strong>ar paper presented at Tsukuba, Ibaraki,<br />

Japan, October 1996<br />

[3] Blair, J.M., P.J. Bohlen and D.W. Freckman. 1996. Soil Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Quality. In: J.W.<br />

Doran & A.J. Jones (Eds.) Methods for Assess<strong>in</strong>g Soil Quality. SSSA special publication number 49, Madison,<br />

Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA: 273-287.<br />

[4] CARE-BSWM. 2002. Soil and <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> Evaluation. Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang National Park Buffer Zone,<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Misamis Occidental Vol. 1, The Bio-physical <strong>Resources</strong>. BSWM and CARE Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

[5] DENR, 1999. Management Strategy for Mt. Mal<strong>in</strong>dang. DENR, National Integrated Protected Areas<br />

Program. p. 22.<br />

[6] Freckman, D.W. 1988. Bacterivorous nematodes and organic –matter decomposition. Agriculture,<br />

Ecosystems and Environment 24:195-217.<br />

[7] Goh, K.M. 1980. Dynamics and Stability of Organic Matter. In: B.K. Theng, (ed), Soils with Variable<br />

Charge. <strong>New</strong> Zealand Society of Soil Science. pp 373-393.<br />

[8] Ong, P.S., L.E. Afuang, and R.G. Rose-Amball (eds). 2002. Philipp<strong>in</strong>e Bidiversity Conservation Priorities:<br />

A Second Iteration of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan. Department of Environment and<br />

Natural <strong>Resources</strong>-Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau, Conservation International Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, Biodiversity<br />

conservation program. UPCIDS and FPE, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

[9] Oostenbr<strong>in</strong>k, M. 1960. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g Nematode Populations by Some Selected Methods. In: Sasser J.N. &<br />

W.R. Jenk<strong>in</strong>s (Eds.) Nematology. Chapel Hill, Univ. N. Carol<strong>in</strong>a Press: 85-102.<br />

[10] Park<strong>in</strong>, T.B. & J.W. Doran. 1996. Field and Laboratory Tests of Soil Respiration. In: J.W. Doran & A.J.<br />

Jones (Eds.) Methods for assess<strong>in</strong>g soil quality. SSSA special publication number 49, Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>,<br />

USA: 231-246.<br />

[11] SEAMEO-SEARCA. 2002. Biodiversity Research Programme for Development <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>danao: Focus on Mt<br />

Mal<strong>in</strong>dang. SEAMEO-SEARCA, College, Los Banos, Laguna, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

171


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

[12] Syers, J.K. and E.T. Craswell. 1995. Role of Soil Organic Matter <strong>in</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agricultural Systems. In:<br />

R.D.B. Lefroy, G.J. Blair and E.T. Craswell (Eds.) Soil Organic Matter Management for Susta<strong>in</strong>able Agriculture<br />

A workshop held <strong>in</strong> Ubon, Thailand, 24-26 August 1994. ACIAR, Canberra.<br />

[13] Van Wambeke, A. 1992. Soils of the Tropics, Properties and Appraisal. McGraw-Hill, Inc. <strong>New</strong> York.<br />

343p.<br />

[14] Woods End Research. 1997. Guide to Solvita Test<strong>in</strong>g and Manag<strong>in</strong>g your Soil. Woods End Research<br />

Laboratory, Inc., Mt., ME.<br />

[15] Yeates G.W., T. Bongers, R.G.M. de Goede, D.W. Freckman & S.S. Georgieva, 1993. Feed<strong>in</strong>g Habits <strong>in</strong><br />

Soil Nematode Families and Genera – An Outl<strong>in</strong>e for Soil Ecologists. J. Nematology 25: 315-331.<br />

172


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Sub-theme : LAND DEGRADATION : PRESSURES, INDICATORS<br />

AND RESPONSES<br />

Various approaches for soil erosion risk assessment<br />

W. Cornelis, D. Gabriels, H. Verplancke<br />

Soil Physics and Soil Erosion Unit, Department Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent University, Gent,<br />

Belgium<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to GLASOD (Global Assessment of Degradation), erosion by water and w<strong>in</strong>d is,<br />

on a global scale, considered as the major cause of soil degradation. The detrimental effects<br />

of soil erosion are particularly manifest <strong>in</strong> many tropical rural areas, where farmers are highly<br />

dependent on the <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic land properties and are lack<strong>in</strong>g the means to improve the quality of<br />

their soils. There is, therefore, an urgent need for policy <strong>in</strong>terventions to arrest soil<br />

degradation, and erosion <strong>in</strong> particular, and rehabilitate degraded areas. Erosion risk<br />

assessment methods offer a vital tool <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g of such <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />

The early erosion models such as the widely adopted USLE (Universal Soil Loss<br />

Equation) or WEQ (W<strong>in</strong>d Erosion eQuation) consisted of relatively simple response<br />

functions that were calibrated to fit a limited number of (regional) observations. Despite our<br />

progress <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g soil erosion over the past years and the result<strong>in</strong>g attempts to<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduce physically-based determ<strong>in</strong>istic models of vary<strong>in</strong>g level of sophistication (e.g.<br />

WEPP, EUROSEM, WEPS), those ‘good old’ empirical models, though now improved and<br />

often <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to a Geographical Information System, are still very popular and most<br />

widely used. This was one of the outcomes of the International Symposium on ’25 Years of<br />

Assessment of Erosion’ held <strong>in</strong> September 2003 at Ghent University. The empirical models<br />

have generally a much simpler structure, require less <strong>in</strong>put parameters and show often similar<br />

performance <strong>in</strong> terms of prediction accuracy than determ<strong>in</strong>istic models when consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

yearly averages. Reduc<strong>in</strong>g model complexity will generally lead to a m<strong>in</strong>imization of the<br />

error propagation of erosion models, a topic that should be given much more attention than it<br />

has now <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />

Besides the model-based and strictly quantitative approach, more attention has been<br />

given <strong>in</strong> recent years to expert-based methods. These methods use qualitative (categorical) or<br />

quantitative (numerical) data, or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of both, be it <strong>in</strong> a parametric or nonparametric<br />

way. An example of a parametric approach is factorial scor<strong>in</strong>g. In this approach,<br />

scores are given to various <strong>in</strong>dicators of soil erosion and then multiplied giv<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

score that represents erosion risk. Non-parametric methods can be based on regression<br />

techniques such as e.g. kernel density regression or a classification tree. They have the<br />

advantage that they do not require any assumption about the functional relationships between<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent (e.g. erosion factor/<strong>in</strong>dicator) and dependent variables (e.g. erosion risk). This,<br />

however, also implies that the result<strong>in</strong>g regression is shaped accord<strong>in</strong>g to the data only, and<br />

not accord<strong>in</strong>g to theoretical functions. Expert-based methods <strong>in</strong> general are further rather<br />

subjective as they depend on judgment of erosion <strong>in</strong>dicators which can vary substantially<br />

among experts. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g these short-com<strong>in</strong>gs, expert-based methods have shown to<br />

be promis<strong>in</strong>g. They are very attractive <strong>in</strong> those tropical rural areas where numerical data are<br />

scarce, but where categorical data such as erosion <strong>in</strong>dicators can be relatively easily collected<br />

by scientists, extensionists or farmers. Integration of the broader scientific knowledge and<br />

experience of scientists and extensionists with the ‘grass-rooted’ local knowledge can<br />

become a key factor for successful <strong>in</strong>terventions, and can stimulate the participation of local<br />

farmers <strong>in</strong> conservation practices to arrest and combat land degradation.<br />

173


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

We f<strong>in</strong>ally believe that techniques enabl<strong>in</strong>g to identify computer models on the basis<br />

of expert knowledge of the process of soil erosion, such as e.g. fuzzy methods, should be<br />

further explored <strong>in</strong> the context of erosion risk assessment. Fuzzy-based model<strong>in</strong>g can also<br />

been applied to improve the empirical or determ<strong>in</strong>istic model-based methods.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[45] W.M. Cornelis, D. Gabriels (eds). “25 Years of Assessment of Erosion”. Catena Special Issue, 64, pp.139-<br />

364, (2005).<br />

[46] M. Grimm, R. Jones L. Montanarella. Soil Erosion Risk <strong>in</strong> Europe. European Soil Bureau. Institute for<br />

Environment & Susta<strong>in</strong>ability. JRC Ispra. 40 p. (2002).<br />

[47] V. Jetten, A. de Roo, D. Favis-Mortlock. “Evaluation of field-scale and catchment-scale soil erosion<br />

models”. Catena, 37, pp. 521-541, (1999).<br />

[48] G. Metternicht, S. Gonzalez. “FUERO: foundations of a fuzzy exploratory model for soil erosion hazard<br />

prediction”. Environmental Modell<strong>in</strong>g & Software, 20, pp. 715-728, (2005).<br />

[49] B.G.J.S. Sonneveld, M.Q. Keyzer, P.J. Albersen. “A non-parametric analysis of qualitative and quantitative<br />

data for erosion model<strong>in</strong>g: a case study for Ethiopia”. In: D.E. Stoot, R.H. Mohtar and G.C. Ste<strong>in</strong>hardt (eds.).<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Global Farm. Selected papers from the 10 th International Soil Conservation Organization<br />

Meet<strong>in</strong>g, May 24-29, 1999, Purdue University and USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory. pp.<br />

979-993. (2001).<br />

[50] L.T. Tran, M.A. Ridgley, M.A. Near<strong>in</strong>g, L. Duckste<strong>in</strong>, R. Sutherland. “Us<strong>in</strong>g fuzzy logic-based model<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to improve the performance of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation”. In: D.E. Stoot, R.H. Mohtar and G.C.<br />

Ste<strong>in</strong>hardt (eds.). Susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Global Farm. Selected papers from the 10 th International Soil Conservation<br />

Organization Meet<strong>in</strong>g, May 24-29, 1999, Purdue University and USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research<br />

Laboratory. pp. 979-993. (2001).<br />

[51] G. Verstraeten, J. Poesen, J. de Vente, X. Kon<strong>in</strong>ckx. “Sediment yield variability <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>: a quantitative and<br />

semiqualitative analysis us<strong>in</strong>g reservoir sedimentation rates”. Geomorphology, 50, pp. 327-348, (2003).<br />

[52] O. Vigiak, B.O. Okoba, G. Sterk, L. Stroosnijder. “Water erosion assessment us<strong>in</strong>g farmers’ <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong><br />

the West Usambara Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, Tanzania”. Catena, 64, pp. 307-320, (2005).<br />

174


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

INDICATORS AND PARTICIPATORY METHODS FOR<br />

MONITORING LAND DEGRADATION. A CASE STUDY IN THE<br />

MIGORI DISTRICT OF KENYA.<br />

Abstract<br />

V<strong>in</strong>cent de Paul Obade 1* , Eva De Clercq 2<br />

1* United States International University, Nairobi, Kenya, 2 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.<br />

"Knowledge is power" is a common term <strong>in</strong> development research. The two sides of the same co<strong>in</strong>, "shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

knowledge" and "power shar<strong>in</strong>g", however, lie at the root of problems like desertification and drought.<br />

Traditionally, farmers have used local knowledge to understand weather and climate patterns <strong>in</strong> order to make<br />

decisions about plant<strong>in</strong>g and harvest<strong>in</strong>g. This knowledge, which has been passed on from previous generations,<br />

is adapted to local conditions and has been ga<strong>in</strong>ed through many decades of experience. The potential of<br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g "grassroots (local) <strong>in</strong>dicators" offers possibilities to design new and more accurate<br />

approaches to <strong>in</strong>dicators selection, plann<strong>in</strong>g and monitor<strong>in</strong>g processes for development. This approach would<br />

also facilitate local control over the generation and use of knowledge. This paper gives an overview of localgrassroots<br />

and scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators of land degradation, which could be useful <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation oriented<br />

towards reduc<strong>in</strong>g poverty and combat<strong>in</strong>g desertification <strong>in</strong> Kenya. The study area is Migori district <strong>in</strong> Nyanza<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>habited mostly by the Luo community of Kenya.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Unpredictable ra<strong>in</strong>s and long periods without ra<strong>in</strong>s may result <strong>in</strong> crop failure and drought.<br />

Local people, <strong>in</strong> response to cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g poverty develop approaches to cope with unfavorable<br />

environmental conditions. These cop<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms can <strong>in</strong>clude career change, migrations,<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensive agriculture etc. To counter drought, the Luo are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly apply<strong>in</strong>g irrigation <strong>in</strong><br />

addition to us<strong>in</strong>g fertilizers and pesticides whenever possible to plant crops like vegetables,<br />

maize, and sugarcane. Furthermore, the lake region has had a rapid population growth, with a<br />

13% growth rate [10]. It is not uncommon for the Luo people to have large families of 3-4<br />

wives and 15-20 children <strong>in</strong> total. The comb<strong>in</strong>ations of all these factors are at the orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />

land degradation <strong>in</strong> Migori, Kenya.<br />

Desertification is "land degradation <strong>in</strong> arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid areas result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from various factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g climatic variations and human activities [8]." Degradation of<br />

soil, decreas<strong>in</strong>g water resources and changes <strong>in</strong> the climate are the three ma<strong>in</strong> obstacles to<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able agricultural development <strong>in</strong> Kenya [2, 6, and 7]. The current debate on<br />

desertification has tended to focus on alarm<strong>in</strong>g data and trends <strong>in</strong> climatology and ecological<br />

change, to the neglect of the <strong>in</strong>fluence of and impact on, social conditions [5].<br />

Participatory methods give outsiders a chance to learn how the local people live, what<br />

signs or signals they look for, and how they susta<strong>in</strong> their everyday lives. Before the advent of<br />

modern scientific methods, the local communities <strong>in</strong> Kenya must have realized that some<br />

animals, birds, <strong>in</strong>sects and plants had the capacity to monitor and detect the changes <strong>in</strong><br />

climatic conditions. However, research on these techniques cont<strong>in</strong>ues most commonly to be<br />

an isolated process. The question then is: if local people's knowledge is to be used for<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g natural resources, how can it be used and how useful and accurate is it for<br />

decision-makers, planners or implementers?<br />

175


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Objectives<br />

The objectives of this study are:<br />

1. Outl<strong>in</strong>e and briefly compare various <strong>in</strong>dicators (scientific and grassroots-traditional) and<br />

the participatory methodologies for monitor<strong>in</strong>g climate, land degradation and land cover<br />

changes and<br />

2. Identify <strong>in</strong>dicators perceived by rural communities as affect<strong>in</strong>g their Food Security (FS)<br />

and the changes (or <strong>in</strong>dicators of change) <strong>in</strong> the environment that are used by local<br />

communities to monitor the environmental resources and make decisions about the<br />

adequacy of their future food supply.<br />

INDICATORS<br />

Different approaches to understand<strong>in</strong>g land degradation suggest differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />

Scientists' explanations of degradation are derived from conclusions based on scientific data<br />

sets [2, 3 and 7]. Local perceptions-"grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators”, on the contrary, are mostly<br />

derived from the experience ga<strong>in</strong>ed by the local people from the observable changes on the<br />

environment over time. This article outl<strong>in</strong>es the factors considered when develop<strong>in</strong>g scientific<br />

and grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />

Scientific Indicators<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the extent of land degradation can be achieved through the use of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g [7 and 9]: topography, soil depth, dra<strong>in</strong>age, nutrient retention,<br />

vegetation, traffic, level of alum<strong>in</strong>ium toxicity and soil acidity, vertic properties, soil erosion<br />

potential, flood risk, calcium carbonate, soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity etc. Table 1 shows the types of <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

and specific factors considered <strong>in</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g land degradation [9, 11, and 12].<br />

Among the problems fac<strong>in</strong>g the development of scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators of land degradation <strong>in</strong><br />

Kenya are: the lack of coord<strong>in</strong>ated data systems between the various stakeholders, poor<br />

methodologies and <strong>in</strong>accuracies <strong>in</strong> data collection and analysis. As an example one can<br />

mention the heavy reliance on questionnaires to assess socio-economic conditions, or the<br />

conflicts <strong>in</strong> legislation, standards and specifications as given <strong>in</strong> the “Registration of Titles<br />

Act” (RTA) of 1919 (Cap. 281), the “Survey Act” of 1923 (Cap.299), and the “Registered<br />

<strong>Land</strong>s Act” (RLA) of 1963 (Cap 300) that are used for survey and mapp<strong>in</strong>g of land etc. In<br />

addition, scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators have the weakness of the giv<strong>in</strong>g less importance to the effects<br />

of plant diseases that are soil borne (or perceived to be), as well as pests that live <strong>in</strong> the soil or<br />

crop residue.<br />

176


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

<strong>Physical</strong><br />

Biological<br />

Type and subtype of <strong>in</strong>dicator Factors<br />

Socioeconomic<br />

Climatic a. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />

b. Temperature<br />

c. Ra<strong>in</strong> erosion potential (calculated)<br />

d. Sunlight duration<br />

e. Potential evapotranspiration — PET (calculated)<br />

Soils a. Texture<br />

b. Fertility (organic matter)<br />

c. Structure<br />

d. Permeability<br />

e. Erosion potential (calculated)<br />

f. Alkal<strong>in</strong>ization/Sal<strong>in</strong>ization<br />

Topography a. Slope<br />

Vegetation a. Canopy cover of herbaceous and woody plants (%)<br />

b. Plant composition and desirable or key species<br />

c. Potential herbaceous production (calculated)<br />

Animals a. Animal population estimates and distribution<br />

b. Herd composition<br />

c. Herbaceous consumption (calculated)<br />

<strong>Land</strong> and water use a. <strong>Land</strong> use<br />

b. Water availability and requirements<br />

Settlement patterns a. Settlements and <strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

Human biological<br />

parameters<br />

a. Population structure and growth rate<br />

b. Measures of nutritional status and Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />

Social process parameters a. Conflicts and Migration<br />

Table 1: shows the scientific parameters considered <strong>in</strong> land degradation [9, 11 and 12].<br />

Grassroots Indicators<br />

Traditional knowledge is generally def<strong>in</strong>ed as the “knowledge of the people of a<br />

particular area based on their <strong>in</strong>teractions and experiences with<strong>in</strong> that area, their traditions<br />

and economic systems”. There has been an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous knowledge <strong>in</strong> the<br />

science of climatology and agriculture [2]. Local climate can be predicted and <strong>in</strong>terpreted by<br />

locally observed variables and experiences; us<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ations of plant, animal, <strong>in</strong>sects and<br />

astronomical <strong>in</strong>dicators. Table 2 shows grassroots (local) <strong>in</strong>dicators of the people of Migori<br />

district. In design<strong>in</strong>g grassroots’ <strong>in</strong>dicators, one could ask the elders to expla<strong>in</strong> how they<br />

predict com<strong>in</strong>g events, ra<strong>in</strong>s, etc. What is it that they look for? What enables them to see<br />

trends? Future possibilities can also be probed by ask<strong>in</strong>g questions such as: What happens if<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g is done? Or if someth<strong>in</strong>g is done? The impact of this technique is that most of the<br />

outsiders and local community end up with some understand<strong>in</strong>g of their land resources, forest<br />

resources, village boundaries etc.<br />

177


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Issue Indicators Indicator Mean<strong>in</strong>g Expected action by community<br />

Start of<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Drought<br />

Soil types<br />

and changes<br />

Flower<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

shad<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

various<br />

species of<br />

plants<br />

When the Kayongo plant flowers, long ra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

are about to start. The onyiego plant shades<br />

its leaves and produces fresh buds just<br />

before the ra<strong>in</strong>. (March and April). The<br />

modhno plant produces fruit <strong>in</strong> September<br />

and turns reddish just before the short ra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>in</strong> October-December.<br />

Bird behaviour The osogo (weaver) birds make noises<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uously dur<strong>in</strong>g the day and night,<br />

Magungu, Ang’etho and Agak fly across the<br />

sky<br />

Insect<br />

behaviour<br />

Animal and<br />

human<br />

behaviour<br />

Stars,<br />

Lighten<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and<br />

Thunderstorms<br />

Plant and<br />

animal<br />

behaviour<br />

Stars<br />

Ong’<strong>in</strong>o, Onyoso and Ngwen <strong>in</strong>sects (ants<br />

/termites) jump up and down imitat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

way the women plant with a kwer (farm<br />

implement), Grasshoppers chirp<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />

Cows and goats jump about excitedly.<br />

Elders and ra<strong>in</strong>-makers (nganyi) determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the com<strong>in</strong>g of ra<strong>in</strong>s for example by<br />

appearance of ayila-plant and gwer-gwer<br />

birds. Frogs croak.<br />

Appearance of yugni mammon (the sisters)<br />

female constellation of stars <strong>in</strong>dicate wet<br />

season. Ra<strong>in</strong>s beg<strong>in</strong><br />

Flower<strong>in</strong>g of Otho tree, which usually never<br />

buds. Mab<strong>in</strong>ju, ochok, and ali plant flowers<br />

before any other plant. Strong easterly<br />

w<strong>in</strong>ds (Komadhi) marks dry spell. Ober and<br />

Saye plants shed off their leaves <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

drought. Deterioration of the health and<br />

productivity of crops.<br />

Appearance of numerous <strong>in</strong>sects which<br />

destroy crops. Absence of frogs. Snakes and<br />

other reptiles beg<strong>in</strong> stray<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to peoples<br />

houses search<strong>in</strong>g for food.<br />

Appearance of yugni-machwo (orion).-male<br />

constellation of stars <strong>in</strong>dicate dry season<br />

Fertile soils Soil red, heavy and sticky. Insects such as<br />

ants around anthills, earthworms, snakes<br />

and rats found here<br />

Infertile soils Formerly heavy, sticky soil becomes loose<br />

and coarse. Weeds such as akech, mab<strong>in</strong>ju,<br />

kayongo grow<br />

178<br />

Advanced stages of land preparation and<br />

manure application. Decisions and<br />

consultations with<strong>in</strong> households on what to<br />

plant and where to plant<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>ue land preparation. Preparation of<br />

seeds<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>ue land preparation.<br />

Farmers take risk <strong>in</strong> Plant<strong>in</strong>g suitable crops.<br />

Farmers Plant and Cultivate suitable crops.<br />

Start stor<strong>in</strong>g food. Migrate to empty<br />

government lands (lop serikal) or employ<br />

herdsmen, send them with cattle to these<br />

lands, and check on them frequently;<br />

(however, those who settle on these lands<br />

reta<strong>in</strong> previous homes)<br />

Unthatched rooftops for cattle feed. Sell cattle<br />

and farms to buy food<br />

Men migrate to seek employment elsewhere to<br />

feed families. Women engage more <strong>in</strong> fish<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess and feed on osuga, awayo, apoth,<br />

odielo etc Group formations <strong>in</strong>crease, k<strong>in</strong>ship<br />

affiliations and friendships are strengthened,<br />

as people grapple with problem of survival.<br />

Some men run away, leav<strong>in</strong>g wives and<br />

children beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

In kitchen gardens where debris and other<br />

rubbish are thrown away daily, Maize, beans<br />

and other legumes planted. Sorghum, pigeon<br />

peas, cowpeas, sweet potatoes and cassava<br />

planted.<br />

Manure is added as soil nutrient, crop rotation,<br />

grow drought resistant crops<br />

Table 2: Grassroots Indicators of land degradation for Migori district, Kenya.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

The weakness of the migori-luo grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators is that they are subjective <strong>in</strong> that<br />

they do not consider the effect of population change, landslides, soil erosion, texture,<br />

landform type and organic matter content. Furthermore, the appearance of ra<strong>in</strong>s is at times<br />

believed to be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by ra<strong>in</strong>-makers, lead<strong>in</strong>g to further uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty on the reliability of<br />

the luo <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />

HISTORICAL TRENDS<br />

Historical profiles and time trends are useful <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g important events or key<br />

changes between years. As such, they also help to focus on the future <strong>in</strong> terms of land use,<br />

climate change, soil erosion, population, tree cover and common property resources etc [1].<br />

PARTICIPATORY MAPPING<br />

Maps are important for communicat<strong>in</strong>g land use changes especially where monitor<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

evaluation are required. The people of the local community can do mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the landuse/change<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce they know most about the area under study. Maps are valuable for explor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

land-use patterns, changes <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g practices, constra<strong>in</strong>ts, depletion trends of forest cover,<br />

land deterioration, water, and crops [9]. The key <strong>in</strong>formants <strong>in</strong> this process will be the<br />

elderly, both men and women. The maps can be drawn on paper or on the ground i.e. “onground”<br />

digitiz<strong>in</strong>g whereby maps are sketched on the ground by people of various age<br />

groups. Secondary data and records can also be brought <strong>in</strong> for comparative <strong>in</strong>formation. As<br />

postulated by [4], satellite imagery and Global Position<strong>in</strong>g Systems (GPS) can also be used to<br />

validate the data.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

In order to improve land management and climate forecast<strong>in</strong>g, the gap between the<br />

local and scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators needs to be assessed and bridged for the benefit of the rural<br />

communities who form the largest percentage of the population <strong>in</strong> Kenya. Neither the<br />

scientist nor the local-farmer views consider all factors responsible for land degradation.<br />

There is need for further <strong>in</strong>vestigations on grassroots and scientific <strong>in</strong>dicators, to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the most useful soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators oriented towards susta<strong>in</strong>able land management. In<br />

addition, it is important to select <strong>in</strong>dicators that are easy and <strong>in</strong>expensive to measure or<br />

monitor. Identification of grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators is a complicated process, and there is a need<br />

for more exam<strong>in</strong>ation and documentation of this <strong>in</strong>formation. Most communities <strong>in</strong> Kenya<br />

have their own "grassroots <strong>in</strong>dicators" based on knowledge and practical experience ga<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

over time. The <strong>in</strong>dicators differ by area accord<strong>in</strong>g to environmental conditions and people's<br />

activities. However, the real challenge will be to evolve hybrid <strong>in</strong>dicator systems br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

together the different relevant traditional and scientific, historical and actual perspectives and<br />

knowledge systems.<br />

179


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

I wish to thank Dr-ir. Wim Cornelis and Dr. Ann Verdoodt of Ghent University <strong>in</strong> Belgium,<br />

Katsuji Nakamura and Professor Bob Kio Manuel both of the United States International<br />

University-Africa for their critical comments and contributions towards improv<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

article. I am also grateful to Professors Hubert Verplancke and Eric Van Ranst of Ghent<br />

University, Belgium for their advice.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Anthony, G.Y., Xia, L. Urban Growth management <strong>in</strong> the Pearl river delta: an <strong>in</strong>tegrated remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and GIS approach, ITC Journal 1996-1, pp. 77-86, 1996.<br />

[2] Copp<strong>in</strong>, N.J., Richards, I.G. Use of Vegetation <strong>in</strong> Civil Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. CIRIA/ Butterworths, London, 1990.<br />

[3] De jong, S.M., Paracch<strong>in</strong>i, M.L., Bertolo, F., Folv<strong>in</strong>g, S., Megier, J., De Roo, A.P.J. Regional Assessment of<br />

Soil Erosion us<strong>in</strong>g the distributed model SEMMED and remotely sensed data. Catena 37, 291-308, 1999.<br />

[4] Dymond, J.R., Bẻgue, A., Loseen, D. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Land</strong> at Regional and National Scales and the role of<br />

remote sens<strong>in</strong>g, ITC Journal 2001-2, pp. 162-175, 2001.<br />

[5] Evers, Y.D. Deal<strong>in</strong>g with risk and uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> Africa's dry lands: The social dimensions of desertification.<br />

International Institute of Environment and Development, Issue Paper No. 48, London, UK, 1994.<br />

[6] GoK (Government of Kenya). Royal Netherlands Government and United Nations Environment Programme.<br />

National <strong>Land</strong> Degradation and Mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Kenya. United Nations Office, Nairobi, 1997<br />

[7] Morgan, R.P.C. A Simple approach to soil loss prediction: a revised Morgan-Morgan-F<strong>in</strong>ley model. Catena<br />

44, 305-322, 2001.<br />

[8] UNEP. The United Nations Environmental Programme’s (UNEP) Millennium Report on the Environment.<br />

Global Environment Outlook 2000. Nairobi: UNEP, 1999.<br />

[9] Van Ranst, E., Verplancke, H. <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation. Lecture notes. Laboratory of Soil Science, Faculty of<br />

Science, Ghent University, Belgium, 2003.<br />

[10] http://www.cbs.go.ke/census1999.html, Accessed onl<strong>in</strong>e 12 th November 2005.<br />

[11] http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-30796-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html, Accessed onl<strong>in</strong>e 6 th July, 2006.<br />

[12] http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/lada/emailconf.stm, Accessed onl<strong>in</strong>e 6 th July, 2006.<br />

180


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Abstract<br />

PROPOSED PLAN OF ACTION FOR RESEARCH ON<br />

DESERTIFICATION IN THE SUDAN:<br />

GEZIRA AND SENNAR STATES<br />

Kamal Elfadil Fadul and Fawzi Mohamed Salih<br />

<strong>Land</strong> and Waterr Research Center, AgriculturalResearch Corporation, Wad Medani. Sudan<br />

The proposed plan of action for research on desertification <strong>in</strong> both Gezira and Sennar states <strong>in</strong>cludes an overall<br />

review of the previous and present activities <strong>in</strong>novated along his aspect. Both protective and preventive<br />

measures are required to combat desertification. Proper management of the cultivated lands, controlled use of<br />

the natural forests and rangelands, improvement of the standards of liv<strong>in</strong>g for the <strong>in</strong>habitants and the level of<br />

awareness perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to the problem are all factors of impact on the desertification <strong>in</strong> both states. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />

the proposed plan addresses two experimental sites, one <strong>in</strong> the natural vegetation zone and the other <strong>in</strong> the<br />

irrigated area. The former site <strong>in</strong>volves the cultivation of environmentally adapted plant species, where as the<br />

latter site caters for the management practices of the crops grown <strong>in</strong> the cultivated lands. Such a research<br />

program needs a multidispl<strong>in</strong>ary effort of the specialties concerned together with the provision of fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

estimated to implementation and follow up.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Desertification as a land degradational process is encountered <strong>in</strong> Sudan at vary<strong>in</strong>g levels of<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensity. It is mostly active <strong>in</strong> the northern and western regions. Nevertheless, Gezira and<br />

Sennar states, as parts of the central region, are susceptible to this phenomenon <strong>in</strong> the near<br />

future, especially <strong>in</strong> the northwestern parts of both states. The western part of Gezira state lies<br />

at he fr<strong>in</strong>ges of the degradated area of the northern and western regions, whereas the northwestern<br />

part of Sennar state borders the tongues of the lighter-textured soils of Managil ridge.<br />

To illustrate the danger of sand encroachment as a sign of desertification of the northwest<br />

part of Gezira state, an area of 34 km2 of alluvial clay pla<strong>in</strong> has been <strong>in</strong>vaded and covered by<br />

sands from the surround<strong>in</strong>g sand dunes (Fig1).<br />

However there is hardly any effective research done to monitor or combat the<br />

approach<strong>in</strong>g danger of desertification. The only effort implemented <strong>in</strong> this respect was the<br />

‘Green belt’ of Eucalyptus species grown north of Gezira state and more Mesquit trees east of<br />

the White Nile at Hashaba area. Previously “Forest” plots existed with<strong>in</strong> the Gezira irrigated<br />

scheme; also reclamation trials have been carried out <strong>in</strong> north Gezira salt-affected part<br />

(Mustafa,H.F., 1998).<br />

A plan of action has to be drawn for Gezira and Sennar states follow<strong>in</strong>g an overall<br />

study of the problem of desertification. Such mode of scientific <strong>in</strong>vestigation can be justified<br />

by threaten<strong>in</strong>g of the sand creep from the two border<strong>in</strong>g directions towards the northern and<br />

western regions. The <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly expected hazard of desertification <strong>in</strong>cludes even the<br />

irrigated tracts of lands, save the bare and seasonally ra<strong>in</strong>fed fields, where proper<br />

management of cultivated crops is envisaged. However this effort requires the collaboration<br />

of research units, universities, local government and land users as guided and supervised by<br />

the Desertification and Desert Cultivation Studies Institute <strong>in</strong> Khartoum University.<br />

181


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

11 .438250<br />

9 .438250<br />

7 .438250<br />

5 .438250<br />

3 .438250<br />

1 .438250<br />

-0 .561750<br />

0 .589750<br />

The legend<br />

desertification<br />

NAME<br />

Gezira Scheme<br />

Sand dune 1975<br />

Sand dune 1985<br />

Sand duue 1949<br />

0 .589750<br />

1 .589750<br />

1 .589750<br />

white Nile<br />

2 .589750<br />

2 .589750<br />

3 .589750<br />

M onitor<strong>in</strong>g of Sand Dune M ovement at North-West Gezira <strong>Land</strong>sat image for (1985,1975,1949)<br />

3 .589750<br />

4 .589750<br />

4 .589750<br />

182<br />

5 .589750<br />

Scale 1:400,000 ´<br />

Fig. 1 : Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of Sand Dune Movement at North-West Gezira <strong>Land</strong>sat image for (1985, 1975,<br />

1949)<br />

5 .589750<br />

6 .589750<br />

6 .589750<br />

7 .589750<br />

7 .589750<br />

8 .589750<br />

8 .589750<br />

11 .438250<br />

9 .438250<br />

7 .438250<br />

5 .438250<br />

3 .438250<br />

1 .438250<br />

-0 .561750


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Objectives<br />

PLAN OF WORK<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> objective of this proposed plan of action is to promote the process of combat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

desertification through feasible preventive and protective measures, where a comprehensive<br />

technological program will be established for the development and management of the agro<br />

forestry. Specific objectives for Gezira and Sennar states endorse the control measures of<br />

sand movement along their northwestern fr<strong>in</strong>ges by shelterbelts of environmentally adapted<br />

tree and grass species, the recommended management practices of the cultivated tracts and<br />

the reclamation of Gezira and low-fertility parts of northwest Sennar. Basic data for both<br />

states is to be acquired.<br />

Strategy<br />

This plan aims at the preservation of the natural ecosystem of Gezira and Sennar states<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the future projection of the grow<strong>in</strong>g population and the dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g returns of the<br />

environmental <strong>in</strong>puts (Purnell,M.F. and Venema,J.H., 1976).<br />

Priority research themes<br />

These themes may <strong>in</strong>volve the improvement of degraded cultivated lands (both irrigated and<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fed) and the conservation of the susceptible erodable lands (either by water, w<strong>in</strong>d or<br />

mismanagement). Although all parts of the two states are at stake, still the northwestern parts<br />

of the Gezira and Sennar states represent priority research areas due to their proximity to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>vad<strong>in</strong>g desert. In addition to these experimental sites, other susceptible parts to<br />

desertification could be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the overall plan i.e. Abu Guta, Butana, Tahamid, Rahad,<br />

Guneid, North-West Sennar and Kenana schemes.<br />

Research plan<br />

To set an actual plan of action fulfill<strong>in</strong>g the objectives of combat<strong>in</strong>g desertification <strong>in</strong> Gezira<br />

and Sennar states, a number of steps have to be considered:<br />

- Collection of data, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g maps of location, hydrology, vegetation, soils and land use.<br />

Also all relevant literature of research and control efforts is to be compiled as well.<br />

- Formation of a specialized cadre to review the prevail<strong>in</strong>g biophysical socio-economic and<br />

political conditions related to the two states.<br />

- Conduct<strong>in</strong>g a comparative study between the past and present situation of the forementioned<br />

aspects so as to evaluate the magnitude of the problem.<br />

- Selection of two experimental sites (e.g. north-west of the two states) for plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environmentally adapted species.<br />

- Follow-up of results of the experimental sites prior to the evaluation of the effects of<br />

control measures applied aga<strong>in</strong>st the hazard.<br />

- Monitor<strong>in</strong>g the trend of desertification through time by <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>formation system will<br />

be of high need (us<strong>in</strong>g landsat images and/or maps of similar landuse and crop yield<br />

potentials)(Imad,A.A., etal, 2000).<br />

- Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of all other aspects of land degradation (e.g. erosion sal<strong>in</strong>ization, pollution,<br />

etc.) for their potential impact on land utilization productivity both <strong>in</strong> irrigated and ra<strong>in</strong>fed<br />

areas i.e. by measur<strong>in</strong>g environmental stability <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />

183


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

- Undertak<strong>in</strong>g a feasibility study prior to the implementation of the research plan for<br />

provision of necessary funds. Thus a scheduled plan of action is proposed for each state.<br />

- Inclusion of land dune stabilization as <strong>in</strong>tegral activity of the overall research program<br />

(Table1).<br />

Activities Area feddans<br />

1<br />

1.1<br />

1.2<br />

2<br />

2.1<br />

3<br />

3.1<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Two plant<strong>in</strong>g (Irrigated & Ra<strong>in</strong>fed)<br />

Front rows (Laot, Kitir, Turfa, Tundub)<br />

Back rows (Eucalyptus, Seyal, Sidir, Sunut)<br />

Ranges:<br />

Grass-seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Dune stabilization<br />

Mesquite and/or Petro-chemicals<br />

Extension services (T.V, Radio, Leaflets, Sem<strong>in</strong>ars, etc)<br />

Alternative energy sources<br />

Ohers (Experimentation, Scholarships, Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, etc)<br />

184<br />

200,000<br />

200,000<br />

400,000<br />

200,000<br />

Table 1. A scheduled plan of action for each proposed research site <strong>in</strong> Gezira and Sennar states.<br />

PROPOSED RESEARCH PROGRAM<br />

This program aims at establish<strong>in</strong>g comprehensive technologies for the management and<br />

development of agroforestry.<br />

Natural vegetation zones<br />

Acacia seyal (Talh) belt<br />

This belt lies between 400 to 800 mm isohyets. Experimental sites are selected and reserved<br />

<strong>in</strong> agricultural schemes to:<br />

1. Study and monitor flower<strong>in</strong>g and seed<strong>in</strong>g of Acacia trees.<br />

2. Specify the critical moisture content necessary for growth (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g water conservational<br />

measures).<br />

3. Specify methods, rate and tim<strong>in</strong>g of plant<strong>in</strong>g seeds and young trees.<br />

4. Specify lateral position of tillers and the suitable time for cutt<strong>in</strong>g and activat<strong>in</strong>g the trees<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g natural or agronomic biofactors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g heir growth).<br />

5. Specify research site (size 625m 2 ) for data collection, i.e.:<br />

a) Survey of land use resources, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g type and density of vegetation (Van der kevie,W.,<br />

1976).<br />

b) Compar<strong>in</strong>g local sites with similar <strong>in</strong>ternational sites (IUFRO).<br />

c) Correlat<strong>in</strong>g product versus factors of production (climate, etc).<br />

d) Experiment<strong>in</strong>g on agronomic production factors.<br />

Acacia mellifera (Kitir) belt<br />

This belt is north of the Talh belt with less than 400 mm isohyets. Experimental sites are<br />

selected and reserved <strong>in</strong> agricultural schemes to:


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

1. Study and monitor flower<strong>in</strong>g and seed<strong>in</strong>g of Acacia trees.<br />

2. Specify the critical moisture content necessary for growth (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g water conservational<br />

measures).<br />

3. Specify methods, rate and time of plant<strong>in</strong>g seeds and young trees.<br />

4. Specify lateral position of tillers and the suitable time for cutt<strong>in</strong>g and activat<strong>in</strong>g the trees<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g natural or agronomic biofactors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g their growth).<br />

5. Specify research site (size 625 cm 2 ) for data collection, i.e.:<br />

a) Survey of land use resource, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g type and density of vegetation (Van der kevie,W.,<br />

1976).<br />

b) Compar<strong>in</strong>g local sites similar <strong>in</strong>ternational sites (IUFRO).<br />

c) Correlat<strong>in</strong>g product versus factors of production (climate, etc.).<br />

d) Experiment<strong>in</strong>g on agronomic production factors.<br />

Acacia nilotica (Sunut) belt<br />

This belt lies on both banks of Blue Nile, where, death of old trees due to silt<strong>in</strong>g-up <strong>in</strong> lowly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sites and difficulty of regenerat<strong>in</strong>g new trees occur. The foreseen activities aim at<br />

1. Study<strong>in</strong>g the factors affect<strong>in</strong>g silt<strong>in</strong>g up.<br />

2. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the amount of yearly silt<strong>in</strong>g up.<br />

3. Study<strong>in</strong>g the characteristics of soil deposits.<br />

4. Study<strong>in</strong>g the effect of silt<strong>in</strong>g up on establishment of tree roots.<br />

Irrigation zones<br />

Eucalyptus plantation<br />

The foreseen activities <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

1. Genetic improvement of eucalyptus species.<br />

2. Agronomic studies related to productivity.<br />

3. Ecological and silvicultural studies as related to productivity.<br />

Shelterbelts for agricultural schemes<br />

A shelterbelt model will be made for each scheme.<br />

Irrigation canals shelterbelts<br />

The foreseen activities <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

1. Selection of suitable species.<br />

2. Study of suitable technologies to grow these species.<br />

Other relevant <strong>in</strong>vestigations<br />

1. The mismanagement of the agricultural schemes (both ra<strong>in</strong>fed or irrigated) leads to<br />

deterioration of the cultivated lands as reflected by less productivity due to poor<br />

physiochemical properties of the soils. Such tracts of land may be deserted and hence become<br />

susceptible to desertification especially after their natural flora has been removed. Also some<br />

185


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

of these traces may undergo sal<strong>in</strong>ization and/or sodication (e.g. north Gezira, which requires<br />

reclamation to improve its productivity).<br />

2. Water harvest<strong>in</strong>g is an important practice <strong>in</strong> arid areas where the ra<strong>in</strong>water is collected<br />

and stored for use dur<strong>in</strong>g the critical time. Both climate and soils have an effective role <strong>in</strong> the<br />

system of water harvest<strong>in</strong>g (Amer,N.M., 1993). The role of climate is through precipitation<br />

and evapotranspiration (Farah,S.M., etal, 1996). Effective soil factors <strong>in</strong>clude texture, depth,<br />

<strong>in</strong>filtration rate, water availability, slope and sal<strong>in</strong>ity. The study of all these factors (climate<br />

and soil) will help <strong>in</strong> the establishment of pasture and forages thus reduc<strong>in</strong>g the hazard of<br />

desertification by vegetation cover and stabiliz<strong>in</strong>g the bare land surface.<br />

3. Some tree species are capable of N-fixation. Such trees may be identified so as to observe<br />

how much of this nutrient is added to the soil per grow<strong>in</strong>g season.<br />

4. Seed propagation and breed<strong>in</strong>g of selected tree species may be <strong>in</strong>corporated dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

research program.<br />

5. A socio-economic study of all the research program localities may be developed as<br />

related to the welfare of the people.<br />

Nevertheless, the implementation of this research plan of action is a multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary project<br />

<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g almost all the sectors of the society i.e. government, research centers, universities,<br />

specialized organizations and the users.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] N.M. Amer(1993). "Water harvest<strong>in</strong>g for supplementary irrigation. Regional Sem<strong>in</strong>ar on Cereal Production",<br />

Damascus, Syria, (1993).<br />

[2] S.M. Farah, I.A. Ali, S. Inanaga. "The role of climate and cultural practices on land degradation and<br />

desertification with reference to ra<strong>in</strong>-fed agriculture <strong>in</strong> Sudan". Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Fifth Int. Conference on<br />

Desert Development. Taxas Tch. University, USA, (1996).<br />

[3] A.A. Imad, M.F. Hassan, A.S. Ahmed. "Importance of <strong>in</strong>formation system for progress of research <strong>in</strong>to<br />

desertification and susta<strong>in</strong>able development of the natural resources", LWRC, ARC, Medani, Sudan, (2000).<br />

[4] H.F. Mustafa. "Forestry Research Program Dur<strong>in</strong>g (1998-2000)". Forestry Research Centre, ARC, Sudan,<br />

(1998).<br />

[5] M.F. Purnell, J.H. Venema. "Agricultural Potential Regions of Sudan". UNDP project work<strong>in</strong>g paper. Soil<br />

Survey Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, Medani, Sudan, (1976).<br />

[6] W. Van der Kevie. "Climatic Zones <strong>in</strong> the Sudan". Bullet<strong>in</strong> No. 27, SSA. Wad Medani, Sudan, (1973).<br />

186


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

DIAGNOSTIC OF DEGRADATION PROCESSES OF SOILS<br />

FROM NORTHERN TOGO (WEST AFRICA) AS A TOOL FOR<br />

SOIL AND WATER MANAGEMENT<br />

Abstract<br />

Rosa M Poch*, Josep M Ubalde<br />

Department of Environment and Soil Sciences, Universitat de Lleida, Catalonia, Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

In order to carry out a conservation project <strong>in</strong> Northern Togo, a survey was conducted to identify soil and water<br />

degradation processes. The model area occupies 100 ha and is representative of the Savannah Region of<br />

northern Togo (West Africa). This area belongs to the Centre de Formation Rurale de Tami, where several<br />

problems due to sheet and gully erosion, overgraz<strong>in</strong>g, waterlogg<strong>in</strong>g and trafficability were identified. Parent<br />

materials are Precambrian granites and gneisses with granodioritic composition. The soil moisture and<br />

temperature regime are ustic and isohyperthermic respectively (SSS 1999). The vegetation type is a woody<br />

savannah, with a marked agricultural <strong>in</strong>fluence. A soil survey of the model area at a scale 1:5000 (1 observation<br />

/ 10 ha) showed several mapp<strong>in</strong>g units classified as Geric Pl<strong>in</strong>thosol, Orthipl<strong>in</strong>thic and Arenic Acrisol, Arenic<br />

Gleysol, Stagnic, Endoeutric Pl<strong>in</strong>thosol (agricultural soils) and Pachic and Gleyic Phaeozem (natural soil) (FAO<br />

1998). <strong>Physical</strong>, hydrological, chemical and micromorphological analyses showed that the ma<strong>in</strong> problems<br />

related to the agricultural soils were waterlogg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> microdepressions due to saturated flow dur<strong>in</strong>g the wet<br />

season, shallowness due to sheet erosion, soil acidity, lack of nutrients and organic matter, and low water<br />

hold<strong>in</strong>g capacities. On the contrary, undisturbed forest soils show very favourable physical and chemical<br />

properties for root development. The results were used to design soil and water conservation works as dra<strong>in</strong>age<br />

ditches, zonation of crops and recommendation of management practices for each unit, as well as to assess the<br />

potential of the soils of the region to improve their quality with appropriate management. The practices are<br />

recommended not only to improve agricultural production, but also as mechanisms to use soils as carbon s<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

<strong>in</strong> the frame of global climatic change policies.<br />

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES<br />

Degradation of soils due to human activity, ma<strong>in</strong>ly as soil erosion, is one of the factors<br />

affect<strong>in</strong>g the future land use of the Savannah region <strong>in</strong> West Africa. In this region, an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease of the population (locally exceed<strong>in</strong>g 300 <strong>in</strong>habitants km -2 ) and a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the<br />

agricultural yield has already been recorded [1].<br />

The recovery or ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the soil quality requires a diagnostic of the degradation<br />

processes, and establish<strong>in</strong>g a hierarchy of the soils to manage and the measures to apply <strong>in</strong><br />

order to optimize the economical and human resources. The objectives of this research were<br />

to carry out the diagnosis of degradation processes through gather<strong>in</strong>g of soil morphological<br />

and analytical <strong>in</strong>formation that are easy to collect, and to assess the type and severity of soil<br />

degradation and recover<strong>in</strong>g possibilities.<br />

The physical environment<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

This work was carried out <strong>in</strong> a model area of 100 ha located <strong>in</strong> the Savannah Region of<br />

northern Togo (West Africa). This area belongs to the Centre de Formation Rurale de Tami,<br />

187


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

where peasants of the region are tra<strong>in</strong>ed on agriculture and husbandry dur<strong>in</strong>g two years. This<br />

centre is located 20 km east from Dapaong, the capital of the region.<br />

The climatic data was taken from a series of 19 years from the meteorological station of<br />

Dapaong. The climate is sudano-gu<strong>in</strong>ean, characterized by a dry season from October to<br />

April and a ra<strong>in</strong>y season from May to end of September. Dur<strong>in</strong>g January and February a<br />

strong dusty w<strong>in</strong>d from the NE (harmattan) re<strong>in</strong>forces the dryness of the season. Annual<br />

precipitation is 1001 mm, with a maximum <strong>in</strong> August (266 mm) and a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong> January<br />

(0 mm). Interannual variability is high: with<strong>in</strong> the studied series, annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall ranges from<br />

649 to 1370 mm. The maximum precipitation values <strong>in</strong> 24 h are 62, 86 and 107 mm for<br />

recurrence periods of 2, 10 and 100 years. Mean annual temperature is 28.1ºC, rang<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

25.2 ºC (August) to 31.8 ºC (May). The difference between the average of the maxima (33.6<br />

ºC) and the average of the m<strong>in</strong>ima (22.5 ºC) is higher than the annual variation of the monthly<br />

mean, characteristic of a iso-temperature regime. Potential evapotranspiration accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Thornthwaite is 2057 mm, with a maximum <strong>in</strong> April (280.8 mm) and a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong> August<br />

(106.7 mm). The soil moisture and temperature regime are ustic and isohyperthermic<br />

respectively [8].<br />

Geologically the region belongs to the sedimentary or epimetamorphic cover formations<br />

from the Voltaian. The study area is found on the birrimian (Precambrian) basement<br />

consist<strong>in</strong>g on granites and gneiss with granodioritic composition. The rock presents abundant<br />

large plagioclase crystals slightly oriented. Locally, quartz and pegmatite ve<strong>in</strong>s are found [2].<br />

The savannah region is characterised by a roll<strong>in</strong>g landscape consist<strong>in</strong>g of sequences of<br />

platforms, valleys and slopes without precise limits but with a great relevance <strong>in</strong> soil form<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and soil erosion processes. These units are found <strong>in</strong> the model area, at altitudes from 250 to<br />

270 m asl.<br />

The vegetation type is a woody savannah, with a marked agricultural <strong>in</strong>fluence. The<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant species are Parkia biglobosa and Butyrospermum parkii as trees and Acacia<br />

sieberiana as bush. Riparian and ruderal vegetation are also present. A small remnant of dry<br />

sudanian forest vegetation consist<strong>in</strong>g of Anogeissus leiocarpus, Butyrospermum parkii,<br />

Bauh<strong>in</strong>ia thonn<strong>in</strong>gii and Ziziphus mauritiaca as ma<strong>in</strong> species has been preserved as ‘sacred<br />

forest’ (fôret sacrée). The ma<strong>in</strong> land uses of the region are represented <strong>in</strong> the study area: 60%<br />

of the area is devoted to ra<strong>in</strong>fed crops, ma<strong>in</strong>ly for self consumption (peanuts, soja, corn,<br />

sorghum, millet, rice) but also cash crops as cotton, occupy<strong>in</strong>g 8% of the area. The rest are<br />

pastures (30%), forest or abandoned cropland. The crop yields are low due to low fertility of<br />

the soils and a lack of fertilisation: 1850 kg ha -1 for corn and 1500 kg ha -1 for rice.<br />

Methods<br />

The soils of the model area were surveyed at a scale 1:5000 (1 observation/10 ha). Profile<br />

description was carried out <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> geomorphological and vegetation units previously<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed. Chemical and physico-chemical characterisation was done <strong>in</strong> some of the profiles<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to Porta et al. [5].<br />

Tests of <strong>in</strong>filtration by a double-r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>filtrometer and permeability by the <strong>in</strong>verse<br />

Auger-hole method were performed <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> soil units of the study area.<br />

Three of the profiles were sampled for the micromorphological study. Ten th<strong>in</strong> sections<br />

were made accord<strong>in</strong>g to Guilloré [4] and described follow<strong>in</strong>g the guidel<strong>in</strong>es of Stoops [6].<br />

188


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

The soils: formation and characteristics<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The soils are developed either on saprolites of igneous rocks, on coarse colluvia of sands and<br />

petropl<strong>in</strong>thite gravels. Table 1 presents the ma<strong>in</strong> soils related with the geomorphological unit,<br />

the landuse/vegetation and the parent material. They classify as Ultisols, Vertisols and<br />

Mollisols, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the degree of stability and lack of soil erosion. The morphology and<br />

micromorphology of the representative soils are found <strong>in</strong> Table 2 and 3. The soil formation<br />

processes on the saprolite is fully displayed <strong>in</strong> Profile 9, who has the most complete sequence<br />

of horizons. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to this sequence, the alteration of the saprolite consists <strong>in</strong> the<br />

weather<strong>in</strong>g of the plagioclases to kaol<strong>in</strong>ite or 2:1 clays, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the dra<strong>in</strong>age class of<br />

the soils. Profile 9 and 7 correspond to a vertic horizon, with frequent slickensides and<br />

striated b-fabrics. The clay has later been dispersed and illuviated, as it is shown by the<br />

microlam<strong>in</strong>ated clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> these horizons and <strong>in</strong> the saprolite itself. Formation of<br />

pl<strong>in</strong>thic horizons would proceed from the more sandy horizons, with Fe-oxides accumulation,<br />

either absolute accumulation by direct release from m<strong>in</strong>eral weather<strong>in</strong>g, or residual<br />

accumulation after clay illuviation. This accumulation is strong enough for an <strong>in</strong>cipient<br />

cementation <strong>in</strong> the walls of Profile 9, and is generalized <strong>in</strong> the platform soils of the region.<br />

Position<br />

Tentative classification<br />

<strong>Land</strong>use / Parent material Modal<br />

FAO 1998 [3] SSS 1999 [8] vegetation<br />

profile<br />

Platforms Geric Haplic Pl<strong>in</strong>thustult cotton, corn, Saprolite of syenites and 1,3<br />

Pl<strong>in</strong>thosol<br />

peanuts gneiss<br />

Slopes Upslope Orthipl<strong>in</strong>thic Pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />

soja, corn, Saprolite of syenites and 8<br />

Acrisol or Kanhaplustult peanuts, gneiss<br />

Lixisol<br />

cotton,<br />

Footslope Arenic Acrisol Arenic<br />

millet, Colluvium of quartzitic sands 4<br />

or Lixisol Kanhaplustult sorghum, with petropl<strong>in</strong>thitic gravels<br />

Eroded slope Hypereutric Chromic Haplustert pastures Saprolite of syenites and 7<br />

Vertisol<br />

gneiss<br />

Valley Strong Arenic Gleysol Aquic<br />

Pastures, Colluvium of quartzitic sands 6<br />

bottoms accumulation<br />

Quartzipsamment rice with petropl<strong>in</strong>thitic gravels<br />

Pachic Pachic Vermustoll Sacred Saprolite of syenites and 5<br />

Phaeozem<br />

forest gneiss<br />

Slight Stagnic, Oxyaquic Argiustoll Pastures, Saprolite of gneiss and sandy 9,2<br />

accumulation Endoeutric (<strong>in</strong>c. Oxyaquic rice colluvium on top<br />

Pl<strong>in</strong>thosol (<strong>in</strong>c. Haplustoll)<br />

Gleyic<br />

Phaeozem)<br />

Table 1 : Classification, geomorphology and landuse of the soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g units <strong>in</strong> the study area<br />

The evolution from this model produces different soil patterns depend<strong>in</strong>g on the local<br />

conditions:<br />

- Soils on stable positions, not disturbed nor cultivated, under a dense vegetation cover<br />

(Profile 5) undergo an <strong>in</strong>tense OM accumulation. The relatively high base content of the<br />

saprolite allows even the formation and accumulation of calcite coat<strong>in</strong>gs and nodules, caused<br />

by root and microbial activity.<br />

- Soils with different degrees of erosion lack this organic-rich top horizon and have sandy<br />

surface horizons <strong>in</strong>stead, sometimes overly<strong>in</strong>g the pl<strong>in</strong>thic horizon (profiles 1,3). In the most<br />

severe cases, a slight acidification of the topsoil is proceed<strong>in</strong>g (Profile 1).<br />

- Redoximorphic features are generalized <strong>in</strong> the soils of the area, as Fe oxi-hydroxide<br />

accumulation as concentric nodules, hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs around pores and impregnative nodules,<br />

either orthic or anorthic. The high permeability of surface horizons <strong>in</strong> contrast to the<br />

189


Profile<br />

Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

impervious vertic or pl<strong>in</strong>thic horizons allows for subsurface saturated flow to occur, which is<br />

also the cause of erosion of the surface sands which are accumulated on the slopes (Profile 6)<br />

and <strong>in</strong> the valley bottoms (Profile 2)<br />

Horizon<br />

s<br />

1 Ap<br />

Bt1<br />

Bts2<br />

Bts3<br />

2 Apg1<br />

Ag2<br />

Bs<br />

2C<br />

3C<br />

3 Ap1<br />

Ap2<br />

Bw<br />

2Bts<br />

4 Ap1<br />

Ap2<br />

Ap3<br />

Bw<br />

Bts1<br />

Bts2<br />

5 Oa<br />

Oi<br />

A1<br />

Bw1<br />

Bw2<br />

Bwg3<br />

6 Ap<br />

Bg1<br />

Bg2<br />

Bs3<br />

7 Ap<br />

2Apg2<br />

2Bssg<br />

2Bt<br />

8 Ap<br />

Bw1<br />

Bt1<br />

Bt2<br />

9 Apg<br />

Bg1<br />

Bst2<br />

Bsm3<br />

Bssg4<br />

C<br />

Depth (cm) Colour<br />

(moist)<br />

0-20<br />

20-33<br />

33-55<br />

55->60<br />

0-10<br />

10-25<br />

25-63<br />

63-100<br />

>100<br />

0-10<br />

10-19/25<br />

19/25-40<br />

40->70<br />

0-10<br />

10-20<br />

20-26/43<br />

26/43-50<br />

50-68<br />

68->90<br />

-5 - -3<br />

-3-0<br />

0-16/19<br />

16/19-43<br />

43-75/85<br />

75/85->90<br />

0-15/21<br />

15/21-37<br />

37-65<br />

65->80<br />

0-2<br />

2-17<br />

17-35<br />

35->55<br />

0-18<br />

18-33<br />

33-53<br />

53->70<br />

0-20<br />

20-28<br />

28-60<br />

60-73<br />

73-150<br />

>150<br />

7.5YR4/4<br />

10YR6/3<br />

7.5YR5/6<br />

10R4/6<br />

10YR3/3<br />

10YR3/3<br />

10YR4/6<br />

7.5YR4/6<br />

-<br />

5YR2/3<br />

5YR2/3<br />

7.5YR4/6<br />

5YR3/6<br />

5YR4/6<br />

5YR4/8<br />

5YR3/6<br />

5YR3/6<br />

5YR4/6<br />

5YR4/6<br />

-<br />

7.5YR1.7/1<br />

7.5YR2/1<br />

10YR3/2<br />

10YR2/3<br />

10YR4/3<br />

10YR3/3<br />

10YR4/6<br />

10YR5/6<br />

10YR5/6<br />

10YR4/6<br />

2.5Y4/6<br />

2.5Y6/4<br />

2.5Y6/5<br />

7.5YR4/6<br />

7.5YR4/6<br />

7.5YR4/6<br />

10YR5/6<br />

10YR3/3<br />

10YR4/6<br />

10YR6/6<br />

10YR5/6<br />

2.5Y6/6<br />

2.5Y7/2<br />

Structure<br />

(primary,<br />

secondary)<br />

vw-sab-c<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

m-sab-m<br />

w-sab-m<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

vw-c-m<br />

vw-sab-c<br />

-<br />

-<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

vw-c-m,w-sab-m<br />

w-sab-c<br />

m-sab-m<br />

s-sab-m<br />

vw-sab-f<br />

vw-sab-m<br />

w-sab-m<br />

-<br />

abs<br />

m-sab-m<br />

s-sab-m<br />

-<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

w-sab-m<br />

vw-sab-m<br />

vw-sab-f<br />

abs<br />

vs-sab-f, m-p-c<br />

parent material<br />

Texture Coarse<br />

fragments<br />

LS<br />

SL<br />

SCL<br />

SCL<br />

LS<br />

LS<br />

CS<br />

CS<br />

-<br />

LS<br />

CL<br />

CS<br />

-<br />

mS<br />

mS<br />

mS<br />

mS<br />

CS<br />

CS<br />

-<br />

-<br />

CS<br />

CS<br />

CS<br />

CS<br />

LS<br />

SL<br />

CS<br />

CS<br />

S<br />

C<br />

C<br />

SC<br />

mS<br />

LS<br />

SC<br />

C<br />

S<br />

S<br />

LS<br />

–<br />

C<br />

-<br />

16-35% gr<br />

>70%gr<br />

>70%<br />

>70%<br />

abs<br />

fr-gr<br />

vfr-gr<br />

vfr-gr<br />

>70%<br />

fr-gr<br />

vfr-gr<br />

ab-gr<br />

ab-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

-<br />

-<br />

vf-gr<br />

vf-gr<br />

vf-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

abs<br />

f-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

>70% gr<br />

ab-gr<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

f-gr<br />

v-gr<br />

vf-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

fr-gr<br />

fr-gr<br />

fr-gr<br />

vfr-gr<br />

f-gr<br />

ab<br />

190<br />

Consiste<br />

nce<br />

l-vf<br />

c-fm<br />

vc<br />

vc<br />

vc-fm<br />

vc-fm<br />

c-vf<br />

s<br />

c<br />

l-s<br />

c-f<br />

c<br />

vc<br />

l<br />

c<br />

s<br />

s<br />

s<br />

l<br />

-<br />

-<br />

l-vf<br />

c-vf<br />

c-f<br />

c-fm<br />

l-vf<br />

l<br />

c-f<br />

vc<br />

l<br />

vc<br />

vc<br />

vc<br />

l<br />

c<br />

c<br />

vc<br />

l<br />

c<br />

c<br />

vc<br />

vc<br />

vc<br />

Roots Mottles Accumulations/surfaces Diagnosti<br />

c horizon<br />

[3]<br />

f<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

f<br />

f<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

f<br />

f<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

f<br />

f<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

-<br />

-<br />

ab<br />

ab<br />

ab<br />

fr<br />

f<br />

f<br />

vf<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

f<br />

f<br />

abs<br />

f<br />

f<br />

vf<br />

abs<br />

f<br />

f<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

fr-ox<br />

fr-ox<br />

ab-ox<br />

abs<br />

-<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

f-red<br />

-<br />

-<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

ab-red<br />

abs<br />

fr-ox<br />

ab-ox<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

fr-ox<br />

fr-ox<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

fr-ox<br />

fr-ox<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

fr-ox<br />

abs<br />

Abs<br />

silt cutans<br />

silt cutans, soft iron<br />

concretions<br />

silt cutans, soft iron matrix<br />

Abs<br />

abs<br />

iron coat<strong>in</strong>gs on coarse<br />

fragments<br />

abs<br />

Abs<br />

Abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

iron impregnations on soil<br />

mass<br />

Abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

few clay cutans<br />

few clay cutans<br />

-<br />

-<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

pressure faces<br />

abs<br />

few skeletans on root channels<br />

few skeletans on root channels<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

frequent slickensides<br />

frequent silt coat<strong>in</strong>gs on sands<br />

abs<br />

Fe-Mn nodules, soft<br />

id, silt coat<strong>in</strong>gs, vertical cracks<br />

Fe-Mn nodules<br />

abs<br />

abs<br />

few clay cutans, Fe-Mn<br />

nodules<br />

weak Fe cementation<br />

abundant slickensides<br />

few silt coat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

structure: s: strong, m: moderate, w: weak; sab: subangular blocky, g: granular; f: f<strong>in</strong>e, m: medium, c: coarse, vc: very coarse, abundance: abs:<br />

absent, c: common, fr: frequent, vfr: very frequent, ab: abundant, coarse fragments: gr: gravels, consistence: l: loose, vf: very friable, f: friable, fm:<br />

firm, s: soft, c: compact: vc: very compact, size f: f<strong>in</strong>e, c: coarse, vc: very coarse, roots: f: few, fr: frequent, ab: abundant, mottles: abs: absent, f: few,<br />

fr: frequent, ox: oxidation, red: reduction<br />

Table 2 : Field description of the modal profiles<br />

ochric<br />

argic<br />

pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />

pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />

mollic<br />

mollic<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

ochric<br />

ochric<br />

-<br />

pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />

ochric<br />

ochric<br />

-<br />

-<br />

argic<br />

argic<br />

-<br />

-<br />

mollic<br />

mollic<br />

mollic<br />

-<br />

ochric<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

ochric<br />

ochric<br />

vertic<br />

-<br />

ochric<br />

-<br />

argic<br />

argic<br />

mollic<br />

-<br />

argic<br />

pl<strong>in</strong>thic<br />

vertic<br />

-


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Microstructure and porosity Micromass Pedofeatures<br />

PROFILE 1 Bt1 25-35 cm<br />

Apedal, vughy, 30%, vughs,<br />

vesicles, biopores, planar.<br />

Bts2, 30-40 cm<br />

Pedal, subangular blocky, very<br />

coarse sand size. 25%, planar<br />

voids and vughs<br />

Bts3, 60-73 cm<br />

Apedal, vughy, 20%, vughs<br />

and planar voids<br />

PROFILE 5 A1, 0-15 cm<br />

Pedal, granular, coarse sand<br />

size, well developed. 40%,<br />

compound pack<strong>in</strong>g pores,<br />

biopores, accomodated planar<br />

voids<br />

Bw1, 20-30 cm<br />

Pedal; Primary: subangular<br />

blocky, 1 cm, well developed;<br />

Secondary: channel. 30%,<br />

planar pores, biopores.<br />

Bw1, 30-43 cm<br />

Pedal. Primary: subangular<br />

blocky, 3 cm, well developed;<br />

Secondary: channel. 35%,<br />

planar voids, biopores.<br />

Bw2, 50-60 cm<br />

Pedal, Primary: subangular<br />

blocky, 4 cm, moderately<br />

developed; Secondary:<br />

channel. 30%, planar voids and<br />

biopores<br />

PROFILE 9 Ap, 0-13 cm<br />

Apedal, vughy. 20%,<br />

vesicules, biopores<br />

Bst2, 33-43 cm<br />

Pedal. Primary: subangular<br />

blocky (3-4 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter),<br />

weakly developed; Secondary:<br />

vughy; 30%, planar voids,<br />

vesicles<br />

Bts2, 43-60 cm<br />

Pedal. Primary: subangular<br />

blocky (1-2 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter),<br />

moderately developed;<br />

Secondary: channel. 30%,<br />

planar voids, channels, vughs<br />

and vesicles.<br />

Bssg4, 80-85 cm<br />

Apedal, channel. 20%, vughs<br />

and vesicles<br />

Bssg4, 140-155 cm<br />

Pedal, subangular blocky, 1 cm<br />

<strong>in</strong> diameter, moderately<br />

developed, 20%, planar voids,<br />

vughs, biopores.<br />

Brownish mixture of clay and<br />

silt, mosaic and nodulostriated<br />

b-fabric<br />

fe-oxides.<br />

Intra-aggregate impregations of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, halo, very coarse sand size.<br />

Few silt and clay <strong>in</strong>tercalations around some vughs, moderately oriented, lam<strong>in</strong>ated, mottled.<br />

Few clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs, around fissure walls, limpid, microlam<strong>in</strong>ated, medium sand size, sta<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />

Nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, very coarse sand and gravel size, rounded, concentric, with<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusions of runiquartz, anorthic, with higher quartz content than the groundmass.<br />

Id before Nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, very coarse sand and gravel size, rounded, concentric, with<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusions of runiquartz, anorthic, with higher quartz content than the groundmass.<br />

General impregnation of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, with different degrees of <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />

Clay <strong>in</strong>tercalations along walls of planar voids, probably kaol<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

Id before Clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs around pores, occupy<strong>in</strong>g 30% of the soil.<br />

Nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, very coarse sand and gravel size, rounded, concentric, with<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusions of runiquartz, anorthic, with higher quartz content than the groundmass.<br />

Orthic nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides, aggregate, diffuse, halo, <strong>in</strong>tra-aggregate.<br />

Dark brown mixture of silt, clay<br />

and organic pigment, mosaic<br />

striated b-fabric<br />

Light brown mixture of silt, and<br />

clay, mottled; mosaic-, cross-<br />

and nodulostriated b-fabric<br />

Yellowish brown mixture of<br />

clay and silt, grano- and<br />

porostriated b-fabric<br />

Yellowish brown mixture of<br />

clay and silt, mosaic-<br />

granostriated and slightly cross<br />

striated b-fabric<br />

Brownish mixture of clay, silt<br />

and organic pigment,<br />

undifferenciated b-fabric,<br />

locally mosaic striated.<br />

Yellowish brow mixture of clay<br />

and silt, mottled, mosaic<br />

striated b-fabric, locally<br />

nodulostriated<br />

Passage features as <strong>in</strong>filled channels<br />

Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of acicular CaCO3 crystals <strong>in</strong> some biopores, apparently associated to organic rema<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Rounded nodules of Fe-oxi-hydroxides.<br />

Few micritic nodules of CaCO3, medium sand size.<br />

Concentric nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, very coarse sand and gravels, granostriated.<br />

Few diffuse nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnated, orthic, coarse and very coarse sand size.<br />

Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of acicular and microsparitic CaCO3 <strong>in</strong> some pores<br />

Passage features as <strong>in</strong>filled channels<br />

Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of acicular and microsparitic CaCO3 <strong>in</strong> some pores<br />

Kaol<strong>in</strong>ite coat<strong>in</strong>gs around a planar void and around anorthic nodules<br />

Nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnated, orthic (diffuse) and anorthic, very coarse sand size.<br />

Impregnations of Fe oxi-hydroxides <strong>in</strong>tra-aggregate, very coarse sand size<br />

Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of acicular CaCO3 <strong>in</strong> biopores, crystals 0.3 mm long and 0.1 mm thick.<br />

Impregnative hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs of microsparite <strong>in</strong> biopores, 0.25 to 0.5 mm <strong>in</strong> diameter<br />

Rounded nodules of microsparite, medium sand.<br />

Microsparite and needles of CaCO3 dispersed <strong>in</strong> the groundmass.<br />

Coat<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs of mottled clay, microlam<strong>in</strong>ated, colours of 1st and 2nd order, around<br />

channels, 0.1 to 0.25 mm thick.<br />

Frequent hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnative, around channels<br />

Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, medium sand, orthic and anorthic<br />

Frequent <strong>in</strong>tercalations of limpid clay, microlam<strong>in</strong>ated, 1st order colours, up ot 2 mm thick.<br />

Clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> channels, < 0.25 mm thick<br />

Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, with quartz <strong>in</strong>clusions, sharp boundary.<br />

Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnative, diffuse boundary.<br />

Impregnative Fe hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs along channels.<br />

Id before Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, with quartz <strong>in</strong>clusions, sharp boundary, very coarse sand,<br />

granostriated, porous.<br />

Rounded nodules of Fe oxi-hydroxides, impregnative, diffuse boundary.<br />

Impregnative Fe hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs along channels<br />

Clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>tercalations, limpid, microlam<strong>in</strong>ated, kaol<strong>in</strong>itic,


Profi<br />

le<br />

1 Ap<br />

Bt1<br />

Bts2<br />

Bts3<br />

2 Apg1<br />

Ag2<br />

Bs<br />

2C<br />

3C<br />

Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Degradation processes<br />

Soil erosion is one of the ma<strong>in</strong> problems, ma<strong>in</strong>ly as splash and sheet erosion. The most<br />

affected soils are those on the platforms and slopes. Soil erosion also occurs by concentrated<br />

runoff, as rills and gullies. Retreats of 2 m of the gully heads have been observed after a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle storm event.<br />

The erosion is due to <strong>in</strong>tense ra<strong>in</strong>falls dur<strong>in</strong>g the wet season, low structural stability,<br />

crops with low coverage and fields with an excessive length with low runoff control. In the<br />

case of the gullies, saturation flow <strong>in</strong> the sand colluvia runs along the slopes over the more<br />

clayey horizons and concentrates at the gully head. The low cohesion of the saturated sands at<br />

this po<strong>in</strong>t is the responsible of the collapse and retreat of the gully heads.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g the chemical and physical fertility (Table 4), the ma<strong>in</strong> problems are the low<br />

OM contents (600<br />

>600<br />

-<br />

86<br />

3 18<br />


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Modal profile Infiltration<br />

capacity (mm h -1 Bulk density of the<br />

) surface horizon (kg m -3 Permeability class Available water<br />

)<br />

capacity AWC (mm)<br />

1<br />

100<br />

1708<br />

-<br />

40<br />

3<br />

250<br />

1770<br />

-<br />

2<br />

75<br />

1418<br />

-<br />

48<br />

9<br />

60<br />

1480<br />

Moderate<br />

100<br />

6<br />

50<br />

1440<br />

Slow<br />

88<br />

5 100 1195 Moderate 200<br />

7 60<br />

1369<br />

Moderate<br />

110<br />

70<br />

1306<br />

-<br />

8<br />

170<br />

1612<br />

Moderate<br />

94<br />

4<br />

320<br />

1670<br />

-<br />

50<br />

50<br />

1560<br />

-<br />

Table 5 : Hydrological properties of the modal profiles<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The results show a very strong <strong>in</strong>fluence of human activity <strong>in</strong> soil formation and distribution.<br />

Erosion, either geological or human-driven (deforestation, fires) has acted <strong>in</strong> all soils except<br />

the undisturbed one under a permanent forest (Profile 5). Its properties show as well a high<br />

potential quality of the soils of the region, both regard<strong>in</strong>g agricultural yields and also as<br />

carbon s<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> the frame of global change policies.<br />

The fertility of the most degraded soils cannot be improved significantly unless large<br />

<strong>in</strong>puts of organic matter and strict conservation management practices are applied, which are<br />

not possible given the availability of organic residues and the socio-economical<br />

characteristics of the region [9]. Instead, the application of good management practices that<br />

can be adapted to the conventional agricultural systems <strong>in</strong> the moderately degraded soils -as<br />

the ultisols-, would optimize the resources, keep<strong>in</strong>g or improv<strong>in</strong>g soil quality and lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

higher yields.<br />

In this sense, the management recommendations have been the control of surface runoff<br />

by a new outl<strong>in</strong>e of the fields and a network of contour dra<strong>in</strong>age ditches, the control of gully<br />

erosion by permeable stone dams, and the management of organic matter: compost<strong>in</strong>g, crop<br />

residue management and bush fences. A new land use redistribution made from soil quality<br />

and soil erosion maps was also proposed [9].<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We acknowledge the <strong>in</strong>conditional help, willigness and enthusiasm of Felipe García (CTFC),<br />

and the fund<strong>in</strong>g of Diputació de Lleida, Proide and Centre de Cooperació Internacional -<br />

Universitat de Lleida.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] P. Brabant, S. Darracq, K Egue, V. Simonneaux. “Togo. État de degradation des terres resultant des activités<br />

huma<strong>in</strong>es. Notice explicative de la carte des <strong>in</strong>dices de degradation”, Éditions de l’ORSTOM, Paris, 57 pp.<br />

(1996)<br />

193


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

[2] J. Collart, I. Ouassane, J.P. Sylva<strong>in</strong>. “Notice explicative de la carte géologique à 1/200 000. Feuille<br />

Dapaong, 1e Édition” Mémoire n. 2. République Togolaise, M<strong>in</strong>istère de l’Équipement, des M<strong>in</strong>es et des Postes<br />

et Télécommunications, DG M<strong>in</strong>es, Géologie et du Bureau National des Recherches M<strong>in</strong>ières. (1985)<br />

[3] FAO. "World reference base for soil resources (WRB)", World Soil <strong>Resources</strong> Report No. 84 , FAO/<br />

ISSS/AISS/IBG/ISRIC, Rome, (1998).<br />

[4] P. Guilloré. “Méthode de fabrication mécanique et en série de lames m<strong>in</strong>ces”. CNRS and INA-Paris-<br />

Grignon. Dep. Sols. Thiverval.Grignon. 22p. (1980)<br />

[5] J. Porta, M. López-Acevedo, R. Rodríguez. “Laboratori d’Edafologia”. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.<br />

193 pp. (1993)<br />

[6] G. Stoops. “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for analysis and description of soil and regolith th<strong>in</strong> sections”, Soil Science Society<br />

of America, Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>. 184 pp. (2003)<br />

[7] R.M. Rochette. “Le Sahel en lutte contre la desertification: leçons d’expériences”. Weikersheim, Margraf.<br />

592 pp (1989).<br />

[8] SSS-Soil Survey Staff. "Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Classification for Mak<strong>in</strong>g and Interpret<strong>in</strong>g Soil<br />

Surveys ", USDA, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton. (1999).<br />

[9] J.M. Ubalde, R.M. Poch. “Projet de conservation des sols et des eaux dans la zone soudano-gu<strong>in</strong>éene au<br />

Centre de Formation Rurale de Tami (Togo)”, Bullet<strong>in</strong> du reséau erosion 20, pp 485-495, (2000)<br />

194


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme C – <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

WORKSHOP Theme: <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation and <strong>Land</strong> Degradation<br />

Convenors: A.; Verdoodt, W. Cornelis, E. Van Ranst, H. Verplancke, D. Gabriëls<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

This workshop focussed on two themes: «<strong>Land</strong> Evaluation» and «<strong>Land</strong> Degradation». The<br />

objectives were (1) to give an overview of the latest developments <strong>in</strong> both discipl<strong>in</strong>es, (2) to<br />

review the current activities of our alumni with<strong>in</strong> these fields of expertise and (3) to hold a<br />

round table discussion on the issues raised, on new research questions and chang<strong>in</strong>g needs.<br />

Although both themes were addressed separately, strik<strong>in</strong>g similarities and crosscutt<strong>in</strong>g issues<br />

could be identified throughout the workshop. Both sciences evolved from experimental<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g, over process-based modell<strong>in</strong>g, towards more participatory approaches, mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

full use of the local knowledge on land suitability and risks for land degradation. Recent<br />

research topics <strong>in</strong> both discipl<strong>in</strong>es focus on identify<strong>in</strong>g soil quality <strong>in</strong>dicators. The research<br />

topics presented by the 3 alumni illustrated these developments very well. Dr. Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra<br />

explored the possibilities for oil palm production <strong>in</strong> Thailand us<strong>in</strong>g land suitability<br />

classification and crop modell<strong>in</strong>g techniques. Dr. Boniao on the other hand, identified bio<strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

of soil degradation follow<strong>in</strong>g forest to agricultural land conversion <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Philipp<strong>in</strong>es; a presentation touch<strong>in</strong>g both land evaluation and land degradation issues. And<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ally, with<strong>in</strong> the «<strong>Land</strong> Degradation» theme, Dr. Poch illustrated how one combats soil<br />

degradation <strong>in</strong> Togo mak<strong>in</strong>g use of soil quality maps and local capacity build<strong>in</strong>g. Each<br />

presentation was followed by a short discussion with the alumni attend<strong>in</strong>g the workshop. The<br />

most important overall conclusion of the workshop was that current methodologies <strong>in</strong> both<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>tegrate – us<strong>in</strong>g a sound scientific approach - traditional models build<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

expert knowledge with more recent process-based models and strongly valuable grass-roots<br />

knowledge.<br />

195


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

WORKSHOP THEME D – SOIL SURVEY AND INVENTORY<br />

TECHNIQUES<br />

Sub-theme : Developments <strong>in</strong> soil (attribute) mapp<strong>in</strong>g with a application <strong>in</strong><br />

mapp<strong>in</strong>g groundwater depth<br />

P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke<br />

Paper/poster : Us<strong>in</strong>g geographic <strong>in</strong>formation systems and global<br />

position<strong>in</strong>g system to map soil characteristics for land evaluation – P.<br />

Wandahwa, J.A. Rota, D.O. Sigunga<br />

Sub-theme : Developments <strong>in</strong> GIS and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g with emphasis on<br />

high resolution imagery and 3-D presentation techniques<br />

R. Goossens<br />

Paper/poster : Geomorphology and classification of some pla<strong>in</strong>es and<br />

wadies adjacent to Gabel Elba, South East of Egypt – El-Badawi, M.,<br />

Abdel-Fattah, A.<br />

Paper/poster : High resolution terra<strong>in</strong> mapp<strong>in</strong>g and visualization of<br />

channel morphology us<strong>in</strong>g Lidar and Ifsar data – Sudhir Raj Shrestha, Dr.<br />

Scott N. Miller<br />

Sub-theme : Developments <strong>in</strong> soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and proximal sens<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

applications <strong>in</strong> precision agriculture<br />

M. Van Meirvenne, U.W.A. Vitharana, L. Cockx<br />

Paper/poster : Estimat<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cokrig<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Bahariya Oasis, Egypt – Kh. M. Darwish, M.M. Kotb, R. Ali<br />

Paper/poster : Spatial variability of dra<strong>in</strong>age and phosphate retention and<br />

their <strong>in</strong>ter relationship <strong>in</strong> soils of the South-Western region of the North<br />

Island, <strong>New</strong> Zealand – A. Senarath, A.S. Palmer, R.W. Tillman<br />

Conclusions<br />

196


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Abstract<br />

Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques :<br />

Modern soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques have been developed to meet requests for the updat<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems and to make primary soil <strong>in</strong>ventories <strong>in</strong> less accessible areas easier. The<br />

methods have <strong>in</strong> common that that a soil expectation map is produced by statistical <strong>in</strong>ference methods that<br />

replace part (not all!) of the field work. Another property is that an assessment of the quality of the soil<br />

expectation map is produced as well. The latter property is very useful for cost-quality optimization.<br />

Applications of these new methods are given <strong>in</strong> the fields of soil map updat<strong>in</strong>g and soil <strong>in</strong>ventories for precision<br />

agriculture. S<strong>in</strong>ce digital elevation models play an important role <strong>in</strong> these new mapp<strong>in</strong>g methods, new<br />

developments concern<strong>in</strong>g the acquisition, availability and presentation of elevation data are summarized.<br />

Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL (ATTRIBUTE) MAPPING<br />

WITH AN APPLICATION IN MAPING GROUNDWATER DEPTH<br />

P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke<br />

Lab. of Soil Science, Dept. of Geology & Soil Science, Krijgslaan 281, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium,<br />

Many years of soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g has resulted <strong>in</strong> a wide variety of soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems.<br />

Differences between and also <strong>in</strong>side countries are found, when the scale, the mapped objects<br />

and the soil parameters conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> different soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems (SIS) are evaluated<br />

with quality parameters such as completeness, currency and semantic quality.<br />

The completeness of a soil database is the degree to which the necessary data are<br />

present. Insufficient completeness can be of geographical nature (<strong>in</strong>complete coverage with<br />

data, <strong>in</strong>sufficient data density) and of thematic nature (<strong>in</strong>sufficiently sampled soil<br />

parameters). This <strong>in</strong>sufficiency comb<strong>in</strong>ed with an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g variety of applications of soil<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation has <strong>in</strong>voked new soil sampl<strong>in</strong>gs to upgrade SIS even <strong>in</strong> areas where the soil<br />

mapp<strong>in</strong>g had long been done [1,7].<br />

The currency of a soil database is the degree to which the soil map or the data <strong>in</strong> the SIS<br />

are still up-to-date. Thematic soil <strong>in</strong>formation that has been reported to loose currency with<strong>in</strong><br />

decades after the primary soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g are water table depths [3] and carbon contents [5], and<br />

as a consequence updat<strong>in</strong>g programs have been implemented [4].<br />

The need to improve the quality of SIS has stimulated the development of new soil<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g and soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g methods. In general, methods were needed that (1) reduce field<br />

work, (2) employ exist<strong>in</strong>g observational data as well as knowledge about soil formation and<br />

soil landscape relations. When used for primary soil (attribute) mapp<strong>in</strong>g, additionally these<br />

methods should (3) employ exist<strong>in</strong>g soil maps with partial coverage and (4) work <strong>in</strong> areas<br />

with scarce soil data. In [6] an overview is given of modern so-called "digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g"<br />

methods that meet these requirements. These methods have <strong>in</strong> common, that they produce a<br />

soil expectation map (like <strong>in</strong> the old reconnaissance survey, but now directly at the target map<br />

scale and map extent), that they use statistical <strong>in</strong>ference methods to replace part of field work,<br />

and that they <strong>in</strong> many cases can implicitly assess the quality of the soil expectation map. The<br />

latter property is very useful for cost-quality optimization.<br />

One recent example of digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g was the re-mapp<strong>in</strong>g of the water tables <strong>in</strong><br />

the Netherlands [4]. A high reduction of the field work relative to the traditional mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

approach was achieved by us<strong>in</strong>g a highly detailed DEM and exist<strong>in</strong>g thematic maps to<br />

formalize soil (water)-landscape relations us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of stratified multiple<br />

regression and krig<strong>in</strong>g to obta<strong>in</strong> maps of various aspects of water table dynamics. All<br />

197


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g maps are associated with maps of the quality (prediction error), which allows for<br />

targeted future improvement.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[53] C.L. Arnold, Jr., D.L. Civco, M.P. Prisloe, J.D. Hurd, J.W. Stocker. "Remote-sens<strong>in</strong>g-enhanced outreach<br />

education as a decision support system for local land-use officials", Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote<br />

Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (10), 1251-1260, (2000).<br />

[54] J. Bak, J. Jensen, M.M. Larsen, G. Pritzl, J. Scott-Fordsmand. A heavy metal monitor<strong>in</strong>g-program <strong>in</strong><br />

Denmark. The Science of the Total Environment 207: 179-186., (1997).<br />

[55] J.S. Bethel, J.S., J.Ch. McGlone, E.M. Mikhail. "Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry", John Wiley &<br />

Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, 477p, (2001).<br />

[56] D.L. Corw<strong>in</strong>., S.M. Lesch. “Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity<br />

I. Survey protocols”. Computers and Electronics <strong>in</strong> Agriculture, 46, pp. 103-133, (2005).<br />

[57] D. Devriendt, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, Y. Cornet, R. Goossens. "Accuracy assessment of an IKONOS derived DSM over<br />

urban and suburban area", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 2005 workshop EARSeL Special Interest Group “3D Remote<br />

Sens<strong>in</strong>g” - use of the third dimension for remote sens<strong>in</strong>g purposes.<br />

[58] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. Dewulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />

regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data – geometric aspects", High Resolution Mapp<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

Space (2003).<br />

[59] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. De Wulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />

regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data - geometrical aspects", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 24th<br />

EARSeL symposium : <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, /May 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 421-<br />

428, (2005).<br />

[60] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke. Updat<strong>in</strong>g groundwater table class maps 1:50,000 by statistical methods: an analysis of quality<br />

versus cost. Geoderma 97: 329-350, (2000).<br />

[61] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke, D.J. Brus, M.F.P. Bierkens, T. Hoogland, M. Knotters, F. de Vries. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g ground water<br />

dynamics us<strong>in</strong>g multiple sources of exhaustive high resolution data. Geoderma 123: 23-39, (2004).<br />

[62] K. Jacobsen. "Analysis of Digital Elevation Models based on space <strong>in</strong>formation", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for<br />

European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 439-451, (2005).<br />

[63] K. Jacobsen. "Orthoimages and DEMs by QuickBird and IKONOS", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Transition,<br />

Rotterdam, Millpress, 273-279, (2003).<br />

[64] P.J. Kuikman, W.J.M. de Groot, R.F.A. Hendriks, J. Verhagen, F. de Vries. Stocks of C <strong>in</strong> soils and<br />

emissions of CO2 from agricultural soils <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, Alterra-report 561. 41 pp.<br />

(http://www2.alterra.wur.nl/Webdocs/PDFFiles/Alterrarapporten/AlterraRapport561.pdf ), (2003).<br />

[65] A.B. McBratney, M.L. Mendonca Santos, B. M<strong>in</strong>asny. “On digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g” Geoderma, 117, pp. 3–<br />

52, (2003).<br />

[66] S.P. McGrath, P. Loveland. The Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. Blackie Academic and<br />

Professional, Glasgow, (1992).<br />

[67] K. Taillieu, R. Goossens, D. Devriendt, A. Dewulf, S. Van Coillie, T. Willems. "Generation of DEMs and<br />

orthoimages based on non-stereoscopical IKONOS images", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 453-460, (2005).<br />

[68] T. Vandevoorde, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, F. Canters, W. De Genst, N. Stephenne, E. Wolff. "Extraction of land use /<br />

land cover - related <strong>in</strong>formation from very high resolution data <strong>in</strong> urban and suburban areas", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Transition, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 237-245, (2003).<br />

[69] G. Zhou, R. Li. "Accuracy evaluation of ground po<strong>in</strong>ts from IKONOS high-resolution satellite imagery",<br />

Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (9), 1103-1112, (2000).<br />

198


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL<br />

POSITIONING SYSTEM TO MAP SOIL CHARACTERISTICS<br />

FOR LAND EVALUATION<br />

P. Wandahwa 1* J. A. Rota 1 , and D. O. Sigunga 2<br />

1 Egerton University, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, P. O. Box 536 Njoro, Kenya.<br />

2 Maseno University, Department of Horticulture, P. O. Private Bag, Maseno, Kenya<br />

*Present<strong>in</strong>g author: Tel: +254-733 26 94 60; Fax +254-51 62527; E-mail: wandahwa2002@yahoo.com<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>Land</strong> evaluation is traditionally based on conventional soil survey <strong>in</strong>formation i.e. the plan-view maps and<br />

written descriptions <strong>in</strong> soil reports. The maps consist of soil units that are characterized by a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

representative soil profile pit on which suitability evaluations are based. The soil unit has s<strong>in</strong>gle values for all<br />

soil characteristics analyzed for the profile and the same spatial boundary for these characteristics. These<br />

implies that soil variability encountered <strong>in</strong> the process of soil survey is not captured on the result<strong>in</strong>g soil maps<br />

and reports, yet analysis of these maps shows that there can be considerable variability <strong>in</strong> soil properties with<strong>in</strong><br />

soil units with consequent variability <strong>in</strong> land assessment results. In this study, cont<strong>in</strong>uous surface maps of<br />

organic carbon, soil pH, base saturation and soil depth hav<strong>in</strong>g a value at every location are generated from<br />

randomly sampled po<strong>in</strong>ts us<strong>in</strong>g geographic <strong>in</strong>formation systems and global position<strong>in</strong>g system. The maps are<br />

classified on the basis of suitability levels of a test crop, overlaid and the f<strong>in</strong>al evaluation results compared with<br />

those obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g soil units. The results show that a better distribution of suitability <strong>in</strong> accordance with the<br />

random sample po<strong>in</strong>ts is obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g these maps than soil units derived from conventional soil survey.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The data used for land evaluation have traditionally been derived from conventional soil<br />

survey maps and reports that range <strong>in</strong> degree of details from small to large scales. The basic<br />

premise <strong>in</strong> soil survey is that soils are predictable along landscape positions. Reliability of the<br />

predictions is a function of the soil scientists’ abilities to consistently <strong>in</strong>terpret and predict the<br />

relationship between soils and landscape. The soil scientist does not physically probe every<br />

acre <strong>in</strong> the survey area, or use random sampl<strong>in</strong>g techniques that allow each member of the<br />

soil population equal probability of be<strong>in</strong>g sampled [12].<br />

The maps produced dur<strong>in</strong>g soil survey are therefore characterized by a modal soil<br />

profile pit represent<strong>in</strong>g a soil unit on which suitability evaluations are based [13]. The soil<br />

units can be simple map units def<strong>in</strong>ed as del<strong>in</strong>eations conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a very low percentage of<br />

dissimilar soils and conform<strong>in</strong>g to the def<strong>in</strong>ition of a s<strong>in</strong>gle soil type or compound map units<br />

referr<strong>in</strong>g to del<strong>in</strong>eations with a higher percentage of dissimilar soils [19, 25]. Purity standards<br />

placed on soil map units are therefore a reflection of the expected (<strong>in</strong>terpretative) use of the<br />

maps and to a degree have misrepresented the true map unit composition. Focus on the soil<br />

map unit that has undoubtedly served well for the purposes of soil classification, does not<br />

however produce the best soil database for other applications, thereby weaken<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

between soil data and process models [14] and hence land evaluation for land use plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

An alternative procedure <strong>in</strong> soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g is to focus on po<strong>in</strong>t observations that allow<br />

each member of the soil population equal probability of be<strong>in</strong>g sampled and derive cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

surface <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristic or s<strong>in</strong>gle factor maps through <strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques. The<br />

procedure can be used to <strong>in</strong>ventory only soil characteristics required <strong>in</strong> land evaluation<br />

thereby reduc<strong>in</strong>g the time and costs normally <strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> conventional soil surveys. The<br />

199


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

boundaries of <strong>in</strong>dividual factor maps are <strong>in</strong>dependent of one another and a function of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques found <strong>in</strong> Geographic Information Systems (GIS) [27]; therefore free<br />

from the subjective <strong>in</strong>terpretative abilities of soil scientists.<br />

Po<strong>in</strong>ts for <strong>in</strong>terpolation must be geographically referenced us<strong>in</strong>g a Global Position<strong>in</strong>g<br />

System (GPS) as a prerequisite for management of the spatial <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> Geographic<br />

Information System. The purpose of this study was to generate <strong>in</strong>dividual soil characteristic<br />

maps from randomly sampled po<strong>in</strong>ts us<strong>in</strong>g GIS and GPS and explore their potential for land<br />

evaluation. Further <strong>in</strong>formation on the application of GIS to soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g and research can be<br />

found <strong>in</strong> publications by Burgess and Webster [4, 5]; Webster and Burgess [28]; Wild<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

Drees [31]; Trangmar et al. [26]; Webster [30] and Webster and Oliver [29] that represent<br />

some of the most acknowledged contributions on the subject.<br />

The Study Area<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The study was conducted <strong>in</strong> Kakamega District, western Kenya dur<strong>in</strong>g the month of April<br />

2001. The District lies between latitudes 0°15' and 1° N and longitudes 34°20' and 35° E <strong>in</strong><br />

the western part of Kenya. It covers approximately 1,486 km 2 . The altitude ranges from 1,250<br />

m above sea level (asl) <strong>in</strong> the southwest to 2,000 m asl <strong>in</strong> the east. Two dist<strong>in</strong>ct physiographic<br />

units evident are the southern hilly belt, and the slightly undulat<strong>in</strong>g penepla<strong>in</strong>, stretch<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

the north to the central and eastern parts. A prom<strong>in</strong>ent feature on the eastern border is the<br />

Nandi escarpment whose ma<strong>in</strong> scarp rises from a general elevation of 1,700 to 2,000 m asl<br />

with<strong>in</strong> one kilometer.<br />

Annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong> the District varies between 1,000 and 2,400 mm per annum and is<br />

received as heavy afternoon showers with occasional thunderstorms. About 500 to 1,100 mm<br />

is received dur<strong>in</strong>g the first ra<strong>in</strong>s (March through June) and 450 to 850 mm dur<strong>in</strong>g the second<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>s (August through November). M<strong>in</strong>imum, maximum and mean temperatures range from<br />

11to16, 24 to 31 and 17 to 23 °C, respectively [11].<br />

In this study, soybean was used as a test crop to explore the potential of the<br />

methodology for land evaluation. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the first ra<strong>in</strong>s, 78% of the land is very suitable for<br />

soybean cultivation because of adequate temperatures and ra<strong>in</strong>fall. Moderate and marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />

land is 20.6% and 1.4% due to mean temperature of the grow<strong>in</strong>g cycle below 20 and 18°C<br />

respectively. The low temperatures are associated with the high altitude of the Nandi<br />

escarpment. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the second ra<strong>in</strong>s, 9.4% of the land is very suitable while moderate and<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>al land is 90.5% and 0.1%, respectively. Farmers should therefore be encouraged to<br />

utilize the long ra<strong>in</strong>s season to <strong>in</strong>corporate soybean <strong>in</strong> their cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems [18].<br />

Soils and <strong>Land</strong>scape Data<br />

Figure 1 shows the soil map of the study area. The map was prepared by the Fertilizer Use<br />

Recommendation Project [11] us<strong>in</strong>g background <strong>in</strong>formation from the Reconnaissance Soil<br />

Map of the Lake Bas<strong>in</strong> Development Authority at scale 1: 250,000 [2] and the Exploratory<br />

Soil Map of Kenya at scale 1: 1,000,000 [20]. The soil units are physiographic and<br />

descriptive <strong>in</strong> nature without any soil characteristic data.<br />

200


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Soil characteristic<br />

Fig. 1: Map show<strong>in</strong>g soil units and sample po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the study area<br />

Suitability class and values<br />

High Moderate Marg<strong>in</strong>al Unsuitable<br />

Slope (%) 0-8 8-16 16-30 > 30<br />

Soil depth (cm) > 75 75-50 50-20 < 20<br />

Base saturation (%) > 35 35-20 < 20<br />

pH water 5.6-7.5 5.5-5.4 5.4-5.2<br />

7.5-7.8 7.8-8.2<br />

Organic carbon (%) > 1.2 1.2-0.8 < 0.8<br />

201<br />

< 5.2<br />

> 8.2<br />

Table 1: Soil and landscape requirements for soybean cultivation <strong>in</strong> Kakamega District (adapted from<br />

Sys et al., [23]<br />

Soil characteristic data were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from samples collected at 0 to 30 cm and 30 to 60 cm<br />

depths for 76 randomly selected sites shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1. The sites were geographically<br />

referenced us<strong>in</strong>g a portable Global Position<strong>in</strong>g System (GPS). Soil depth was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

augur<strong>in</strong>g to 100 cm or impervious layer. Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and flood<strong>in</strong>g conditions were recorded


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

at the sites. The collected soil samples were air-dried and the content of organic carbon<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to Okalebo et al. [15], cation exchange capacity (CEC) and basic<br />

cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na) as described <strong>in</strong> Sparks [21], and soil reaction (pH) accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Anderson and Ingram [1]. Base saturation was determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the sum of basic cations and<br />

cation exchange capacity. The values from the two depths sampled were averaged to provide<br />

the f<strong>in</strong>al value for evaluation [24].<br />

Soil unit<br />

code 1<br />

Unit names [10]<br />

No. of<br />

Sample<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

202<br />

OC 2<br />

%<br />

Soil<br />

Depth<br />

(cm)<br />

Soil<br />

pH<br />

BS 3<br />

%<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Slope<br />

(%)<br />

UhB3 Cambisol and Ferralsols 2 1.35 100 5.5 18 1434 5-16<br />

UhB5 Rhodic Ferralsols 1 2.95 100 5.7 41 2435 5-16<br />

UhD1 Orthic Acrisols 15 1.91 93 5.5 27 19991 5-16<br />

UhD2 Nito-rhodic Ferralsols 1 1.15 100 5.8 34 135 5-16<br />

UhDC Acrisols and Ferralsols 2 1.53 90 5.4 20 15225 5-16<br />

UhG2 Ferralo-humic Acrisols 4 1.24 51 5.9 27 5797 5-16<br />

UhG5 Humic Acrisols 6 1.74 74 5.6 38 5787 5-16<br />

UhI2 Luvic Phaeozems 5 2.36 100 5.7 35 6829 5-16<br />

UhV1 Dystro-mollic Nitisols 2 1.91 100 5.8 24 1845 5-16<br />

UmD2 Orthic Ferralsols 1 2.42 100 5.6 46 728 2-8<br />

UmD3 Rhodic Ferralsols 4 2.07 100 5.7 42 3011 2-8<br />

UmF1 Cambisols and Phaeozems 1 2.14 100 6.6 71 1042 2-8<br />

UmG2 Ferralo-orthic Acrisols 1 2.14 100 6.6 71 2246 2-8<br />

UmG3 Chromic Acrisols 13 1.63 97 6.3 54 17532 2-8<br />

UmG5 Humic Acrisols 16 1.14 82 5.8 30 28017 2-8<br />

UmG7 Rankers and Cambisols 8 1.18 66 5.6 67 9870 2-8<br />

UmU2 Ferralsols and Cambisols 1 2.14 100 6.6 71 920 2-8<br />

UlG3 Acrisols and Lithosols 1 1.92 55 6.1 21 1779 2-8<br />

UlGC1 Acrisols and Cambisols 4 1.11 63 6.1 26 7548 2-8<br />

UlX1 Rhodic Ferralsols 1 1.18 100 6.4 20 2878 2-8<br />

BXC2 Gleysols, planosols etc 1 - - - - 201 0-5<br />

FUC Ferralsols, Acrisols etc 1 - - - - 1334 2-16<br />

HGC Regosols, Rankers, etc 1 - - - - 456 16-30<br />

HU1 Humic Cambisols 1 - - - - 648 16-30<br />

MU2 Lithosols and Regosols - - - - - 2660 >30<br />

VXC Gleysols, Vertisols etc - - - - - 8232 -<br />

1<br />

The first soil unit letter represents physiographic position as follows: M: mounta<strong>in</strong>s and major scarps; H: hills<br />

and m<strong>in</strong>or scarps; F: footslopes; Uh: upland (upper middle level); Um: uplands (lower middle level); Ul:<br />

uplands (lower level); B: bottomlands; V: valleys.<br />

2<br />

Organic carbon.<br />

3<br />

Base saturation.<br />

Table 2: Soil units shown <strong>in</strong> Fig.1, number of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts per unit and their characteristics<br />

Data Analysis<br />

Data analysis comprised use of PC Arc / Info [16] followed by IDRISI32 [9] Geographic<br />

Information Systems. The soil map and sample po<strong>in</strong>ts were digitized along side other<br />

physical features <strong>in</strong> the study area us<strong>in</strong>g PC Arc / Info. Vector files for these features were<br />

created and exported as UNGEN files to IDRISI32. The files were imported and stored <strong>in</strong><br />

IDRISI32 as digital maps for further analysis. Sample po<strong>in</strong>ts were given numbers to identify<br />

them and the vector digital map converted to a raster digital map. For each soil characteristic<br />

(organic carbon, soil pH, base saturation and soil depth), a data file was prepared us<strong>in</strong>g the 76


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t identifiers and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g characteristic value. The values files were then<br />

assigned to the digital map hav<strong>in</strong>g the 76 po<strong>in</strong>t identifiers and surface analysis done to<br />

produce <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristic maps <strong>in</strong> a three step procedure.<br />

First, the maps were analyzed for spatial dependence <strong>in</strong> the spatial dependence modeler<br />

and semivariograms created. Models were then fitted to the semivariograms <strong>in</strong> the model-<br />

fitt<strong>in</strong>g module. F<strong>in</strong>ally, these models were used to produce cont<strong>in</strong>uous surfaces of the<br />

characteristics us<strong>in</strong>g the ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g method. Ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g is one of several optimal<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques useful <strong>in</strong> mapp<strong>in</strong>g soil resources [3]. The technique utilizes<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about the spatial autocorrelation <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of each sample po<strong>in</strong>t to provide<br />

optimal <strong>in</strong>terpolation between the <strong>in</strong>dividual po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong>to cont<strong>in</strong>uous surfaces [22].<br />

The cont<strong>in</strong>uous surfaces of the kriged maps were smoothed and reclassified based on<br />

suitability class values shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1 for soybean, a test crop. To evaluate the landscape,<br />

soil units <strong>in</strong> Figure 1 were assigned their respective slope values shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2 and<br />

reclassified accord<strong>in</strong>g to suitability slope classes of soybean shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The classified<br />

soil characteristic maps and the landscape map were overlaid to obta<strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al soils and<br />

landscape suitability map for soybean cultivation based on the most limit<strong>in</strong>g factor. This map<br />

was then overlaid with maps represent<strong>in</strong>g other physical features such as escarpments,<br />

forests, valleys, roads and towns and the land areas represent<strong>in</strong>g these features and different<br />

suitability levels for soybean cultivation determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Evaluation based on soil units was done by averag<strong>in</strong>g values of soil characteristics<br />

from a number of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts with<strong>in</strong> the soil units to obta<strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle value for the soil unit<br />

as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The total number of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts for all the soil units was more than 76<br />

because some fell on boundaries of two soil units and were therefore used for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g both<br />

units. The soil unit value was compared with the requirements for soybean cultivation shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> Table 1 and a suitability level assigned to the soil unit. The resultant map was also overlaid<br />

with maps represent<strong>in</strong>g other physical features and land areas represent<strong>in</strong>g these features and<br />

different suitability levels for soybean cultivation determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Random sampl<strong>in</strong>g of soil at po<strong>in</strong>ts geographically referenced us<strong>in</strong>g a GPS followed by<br />

krig<strong>in</strong>g of soil characteristic values <strong>in</strong> GIS resulted <strong>in</strong> spatial maps that can be classified for<br />

land evaluation. Classification of these maps <strong>in</strong>to suitability levels for soybean cultivation<br />

revealed a better distribution of soil characteristics for organic carbon, soil depth and soil pH<br />

but not base saturation as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. The distribution shown by base saturation could<br />

be an <strong>in</strong>dication that krig<strong>in</strong>g may not be the best statistical tool to use <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g spatial<br />

maps of this characteristic. On the other hand, it could be an <strong>in</strong>dication of a strong <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

of soil management practices on base saturation as opposed to the other characteristics.<br />

Despite the poor distribution exhibited for base saturation, a general <strong>in</strong>dication of soil<br />

characteristics across the district is directly observed and users of this <strong>in</strong>formation do not<br />

have to glean written descriptions <strong>in</strong> a separate location as <strong>in</strong> the case of conventional soil<br />

survey maps [8].<br />

A close look at the characteristic maps reveals that soils <strong>in</strong> the district are generally<br />

shallow and poor <strong>in</strong> fertility. Forty two percent of the district has soil pH equal to or less than<br />

5.5, while 54% has organic carbon equal to or less than 1.2%. Sixty two percent of the district<br />

has base saturation equal to or less than 35%, while 59% has soil depth equal to or less than<br />

0.75 m. The maps can be used to identify areas with soil problems that require to be<br />

addressed.<br />

203


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Organic carbon Soil depth<br />

pH Base saturation<br />

Suitability level<br />

Fig. 2: Maps show<strong>in</strong>g soil characteristics and their level of suitability to soybean cultivation<br />

204


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Table 3 shows results of the f<strong>in</strong>al evaluation based on soil characteristic maps and the<br />

soil unit map. In the study area, 17.6% of the district is accounted for by valleys, escarpments<br />

and forests. Evaluation based on soil characteristic maps reveal that very suitable soil is<br />

found <strong>in</strong> 3.5% of the district, while moderate and marg<strong>in</strong>al soil is found <strong>in</strong> 38.5% and 38.6%<br />

of the district, respectively. Unsuitable soil ow<strong>in</strong>g to low soil pH is found <strong>in</strong> 1.8% of the<br />

district. On the basis of soil units, highly suitable, moderate and marg<strong>in</strong>al soil is found <strong>in</strong><br />

5.8%, 72.7% and 3.9% of the district, respectively. There is no unsuitable land when soil<br />

units are used for evaluation yet sample po<strong>in</strong>t data shows sites that are classified as unsuitable<br />

due to low soil pH values.<br />

Soil characteristic maps Soil units<br />

Suitability level Area (ha) (%) Area (ha) (%)<br />

High 5131 3.5 8,609 5.8<br />

Moderate 57,266 38.5 108,024 72.7<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>al 57,341 38.6 5,830 3.9<br />

Unsuitable 2,725 1.8 0 0<br />

Valleys 8,232 5.5 8,232 5.5<br />

Escarpment 2,660 1.8 2,660 1.8<br />

Forests 15,225 10.3 15,225 10.3<br />

Total 148580 100 148,580 100<br />

Table 3: <strong>Land</strong> evaluation for soybean cultivation based upon soil characteristic and soil unit maps of<br />

Kakamega District<br />

When soil characteristic maps are used for evaluation of soil suitability, the amount of<br />

land del<strong>in</strong>eated as hav<strong>in</strong>g moderate soil (38.5%) is similar to that <strong>in</strong>dicated as hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>al soil (38.6%) to soybean cultivation. However, on the basis of soil units, the amount<br />

of land del<strong>in</strong>eated as hav<strong>in</strong>g moderate soil (72.7%) is by far more than that del<strong>in</strong>eated as<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>al soil (3.9%) to soybean cultivation. The reason is that large tracts of land are<br />

del<strong>in</strong>eated under s<strong>in</strong>gle soil units and evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g one value obta<strong>in</strong>ed by averag<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

number of sample po<strong>in</strong>t values as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2. This is the same way representative soil<br />

profiles from conventional soil survey maps are used to evaluate soil units.<br />

By randomly sampl<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts geo-referenced us<strong>in</strong>g a GPS and utiliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpolation<br />

techniques <strong>in</strong> GIS, it was possible to create cont<strong>in</strong>uous surface maps for <strong>in</strong>dividual soil<br />

characteristics and use them to produce soil evaluation maps for soybean production <strong>in</strong> the<br />

study area. Interpolation techniques have been used to create factor maps for evaluation of<br />

suitable areas for crops even when detailed soil survey <strong>in</strong>formation was available [6, 7]. This<br />

is an <strong>in</strong>dication that the procedures provide more <strong>in</strong>formation than is otherwise captured <strong>in</strong><br />

conventional soil survey maps and reports.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The present study successfully demonstrates the potential of us<strong>in</strong>g a GPS and GIS for land<br />

evaluation. Random soil characteristic data however respond differently when subjected to<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques dur<strong>in</strong>g the development of soil characteristic maps. There is need for<br />

further research on the type of <strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques suitable for mapp<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />

characteristics. Soil characteristic maps show spatial variations of these characteristics and<br />

are therefore useful <strong>in</strong> locat<strong>in</strong>g soil related problems. Soil variability not captured <strong>in</strong><br />

205


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

conventional soil survey maps is captured <strong>in</strong> soil characteristic maps developed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolation techniques. The maps can be used for spatial model<strong>in</strong>g of soil processes.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors acknowledge the f<strong>in</strong>ancial support for this study provided by the African Career<br />

Award (ACA) program of the Rockefeller Foundation.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] J.M. Anderson, J.S.I. Ingram. “Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods”. C. A. B.<br />

International, Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, U.K., pp. 221, (1993).<br />

[2] W. Andriesse, B.J.A. van der Pouw. “Reconnaissance soil map of the Lake Bas<strong>in</strong> Development authority<br />

area, West Kenya, scale 1:250,000”. Netherlands Soil Survey Institute (STIBOKA) <strong>in</strong> cooperation with Kenya<br />

Soil Survey, Nairobi, (1985).<br />

[3] A. Bekele, R.G. Downer, M.C. Wolcott, W.H. Hudnall, S.H. Moore. “Comparative evaluation of spatial<br />

prediction methods <strong>in</strong> a field experiment for mapp<strong>in</strong>g soil potassium”. Soil Science 168 (1), pp. 15-28, (2003).<br />

[4] T.M. Burgess, R. Webster. “Optimal <strong>in</strong>terpolation and isarithmic mapp<strong>in</strong>g of soil properties I. The<br />

semivariogram and punctual krig<strong>in</strong>g”. J. Soil Sci. 31, pp. 315-332, (1980).<br />

[5] T.M. Burgess, R. Webster. “Optimal <strong>in</strong>terpolation and isarithmic mapp<strong>in</strong>g of soil properties II. Block<br />

krig<strong>in</strong>g”. J. Soil Sci. 31, pp. 333-341, (1980).<br />

[6] A. Ceballos-Silva, J. Lopez-Blanco. “Del<strong>in</strong>eation of suitable areas for crops us<strong>in</strong>g a Multi-Criteria<br />

Evaluation approach and land use/cover mapp<strong>in</strong>g: a case study <strong>in</strong> Central Mexico”. Agricultural Systems 77, pp.<br />

117-136, (2003).<br />

[7] A. Ceballos-Silva, J. Lopez-Blanco. “Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g biophysical variables to identify suitable areas for oat <strong>in</strong><br />

Central Mexico: a multi-criteria and GIS approach. Agriculture”, Ecosystems and Environment 95, pp. 371-377,<br />

(2003).<br />

[8] A.W. Douglas, P.J. Schoeneberger, H.E. LaGarry. “Soil surveys: A w<strong>in</strong>dow to the subsurface”. Geoderma<br />

126, pp. 167-180, (2005).<br />

[9] J.R. Eastman. “IDRISI Release 32”. Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA,<br />

(2000).<br />

[10] FAO. “Soil map of the world. 1: 5,000,000, volume 1 legend”. FAO/UNESCO, pp. 59, (1974).<br />

[11] FURP. “Fertilizer use recommendation project: Kakamega District”. Vol. 7, KARI, Nairobi, Kenya, (1987).<br />

[12] S.L. Hartung, S.A. Sche<strong>in</strong>ost, R.J. Ahrens. “Scientific methodology of the National Cooperative Soil<br />

Survey”. In: Spatial variability of soils and landforms, M.J. Mausbach, L.P. Wild<strong>in</strong>g (eds). SSSA Special<br />

Publication Number 28. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA, pp. 39-48, (1991).<br />

[13] D.N. Kimaro, B.M. Msanya, G.G. Kimbi, M. Kilasara, J.A. Deckers, E.P. Kileo, S.B. Mwango.<br />

“Computer-captured expert knowledge for land evaluation of mounta<strong>in</strong>ous areas: A case study of Uluguru<br />

Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, Morogoro, Tanzania”. UNISWA Research Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology 6 (2), pp.<br />

120-127, (2003).<br />

[14] D. Lammers, M.G. Johnson. “Soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g concepts for environmental assessment”. In: Spatial variability<br />

of soils and landforms, M. J. Mausbach, P.L. Wild<strong>in</strong>g (eds). SSSA Special Publication Number 28. Soil Science<br />

Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA, pp. 149-160, (1991).<br />

[15] J.R. Okalebo, K.W. Gathua , P.L. Woomer. “Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

manual”. Soil Science Society of East Africa, Nairobi, pp. 128, (2002).<br />

[16] PC Arc / Info. “Users guide version 6.1”. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Inc.,<br />

Redlands, CA, USA, (1992).<br />

[18] J.A. Rota, P. Wandahwa, D.O. Sigunga. “<strong>Land</strong> evaluation for soybean (Glyc<strong>in</strong>e max L. Merrill) production<br />

based on krig<strong>in</strong>g soil and climate parameters for the Kakamega District, Kenya”. Journal of Agronomy, 5(1), pp.<br />

142-150, (2006).<br />

[19] W. Siderius. “Standards for soil surveys <strong>in</strong> Kenya”. National Agricultural Laboratories, Nairobi pp. 13,<br />

(1980).<br />

206


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

[20] W.G. Sombroek, H.M.H. Braun, B.J.A. van der Pauw. “Exploratory Soil Map and Agro-climatic Zone Map<br />

of Kenya, scale 1: 1,000,000”. Exploratory Soil Survey Report No. E1, Kenya Soil Survey, Nairobi, pp. 56,<br />

(1982).<br />

[21] D.L. Sparks. “Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3: Chemical Methods”. SSSA Book Series, 5. SSSA and<br />

ASA, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, U.S.A, pp. 1390, (1996).<br />

[22] A. Ste<strong>in</strong>, C. Ettema. “An overview of spatial sampl<strong>in</strong>g procedures and experimental design of spatial<br />

studies for ecosystem comparisons”. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 94, pp. 31- 47, (2003).<br />

[23] C. Sys, E van Ranst, J. Debaveye, F. Beernaert. “<strong>Land</strong> Evaluation part III: Crop requirements”.<br />

Agricultural publication No. 7. GADC, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 197, (1993).<br />

[24] C. Sys, E. van Ranst, J. Debaveye. “<strong>Land</strong> Evaluation part II: Methods <strong>in</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Evaluation. Agricultural<br />

publication No. 7. GADC, Brussels, Belgium pp: 274, (1991).<br />

[25] N.H. Taylor, I.J. Pohlen. “Soil survey method: a <strong>New</strong> Zealand handbook for the field study of soils”. <strong>New</strong><br />

Zealand Soil Bureau Bullet<strong>in</strong> 25, DSIR, Well<strong>in</strong>gton, (1970).<br />

[26] B.B. Trangmar, R.S. Yost, G. Uehara. “Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties”.<br />

Adv. Agron. 38, pp. 45-94, (1985).<br />

[27] D.R. Upchurch, W.J. Edmonds. “Statistical procedures for specific objectives”. In: Spatial variability of<br />

soils and landforms, M.J. Mausbach, L.P. Wild<strong>in</strong>g (eds). SSSA Special Publication Number 28. Soil Science<br />

Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA, pp. 49-71, (1991).<br />

[28] R. Webster, T.M. Burgess. “Optimal <strong>in</strong>terpolation and isarithmic mapp<strong>in</strong>g of soil properties III. Chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

drift and universal krig<strong>in</strong>g”. J. Soil Sci. 31, pp. 505-525, (1980).<br />

[29] R. Webster, M. Oliver. “Statistical methods <strong>in</strong> soil and land resource survey”. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford,<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, (1990).<br />

[30] R. Webster, “Quantitative spatial analysis of soil <strong>in</strong> the field”. In B. A. Steward (ed.), Advances <strong>in</strong> soil<br />

science 3. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger – Verlag, <strong>New</strong> York, pp. 1-70, (1985).<br />

[31] L.P. Wild<strong>in</strong>g, L.R. Drees. “Spatial variability and pedology”. In: L.P. Wild<strong>in</strong>g et al. (ed.). Pedogenesis and<br />

soil taxonomy I. Concepts and <strong>in</strong>teractions. Elsevier, <strong>New</strong> York, pp. 83-116, (1983).<br />

207


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN GIS AND REMOTE<br />

SENSING WITH EMPHASIS ON HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGERY<br />

AND 3-D PRESENTATION TECHNIQUES<br />

R. Goossens<br />

Dept. of Geography, Krijgslaan 281, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the year 2000 Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g is undergo<strong>in</strong>g a drastic change, offer<strong>in</strong>g much more<br />

possibilities than the decades before. These changes can be summarised as follow:<br />

- Very High Resolution imagery (VHR),<br />

- Stereo vision at different resolutions,<br />

- Digital photogrammetry,<br />

- Super to hyper spectral imagery.<br />

The VHR images are recorded ma<strong>in</strong>ly with the satellites IKONOS and Quick Bird.<br />

Both satellites are comparable concern<strong>in</strong>g the spectral characteristics, they are record<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

blue, green red and near <strong>in</strong>fra red light, allow<strong>in</strong>g image analysis <strong>in</strong> the visual as well as the<br />

<strong>in</strong>fra red light. True as well as false colour composites can be created, and image<br />

classification can be performed based upon 4 spectral bands. The ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics of<br />

these sensors are their ground resolution; IKONOS has a ground resolution of 4 meters <strong>in</strong> the<br />

multi spectral mode (XS) and 1 meter <strong>in</strong> the panchromatic (P) mode while Quick Bird has<br />

2.44 meter <strong>in</strong> the XS mode and 0.61 meter <strong>in</strong> the P-mode.<br />

Also other sensors provide stereo imagery at medium resolution. The ASTER sensor is<br />

an excellent tool for the creation of DEM, ortho-photo maps and contour maps. Where <strong>in</strong> the<br />

past topographical <strong>in</strong>formation at an appropriate scale was a problem, this problem can easily<br />

overcome with the ASTER sensor <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with GPS technology.<br />

Both new types of sensors came available on the moment that also photogrammetry<br />

became digital. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of both events makes it now possible that topographical<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation is easy to be created. With a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 6 ground control po<strong>in</strong>ts, areas of 60 by<br />

60 km can easily be mapped <strong>in</strong> an automated way. In the frame of soil survey, <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />

slope and aspect is crucial. It will be discussed how DEM are generated <strong>in</strong> an automated way.<br />

An other trend <strong>in</strong> remote sens<strong>in</strong>g is the shift from multi-spectral imagery towards super-<br />

and hyper-spectral imagery. The Aster sensor has 16 bands available <strong>in</strong> the visual, near<br />

<strong>in</strong>frared, short wave <strong>in</strong>frared and the thermal range. This allows a more detailed mapp<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the soil material. A Belgian satellite, called Chris-Proba, is taken super spectral images with<br />

32 bands, with the possibility of stereo view<strong>in</strong>g. This satellite and sensor summarize the<br />

possibilities of future remote sens<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Also more and more imagery is com<strong>in</strong>g available free of charge or at m<strong>in</strong>imum cost.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the sem<strong>in</strong>ar all possibilities of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g imagery will be discussed and listed.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[70] C.L. Arnold, Jr., D.L. Civco, M.P. Prisloe, J.D. Hurd, J.W. Stocker. "Remote-sens<strong>in</strong>g-enhanced outreach<br />

education as a decision support system for local land-use officials", Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote<br />

Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (10), 1251-1260, (2000).<br />

[71] J. Bak, J. Jensen, M.M. Larsen, G. Pritzl, J. Scott-Fordsmand. A heavy metal monitor<strong>in</strong>g-program <strong>in</strong><br />

Denmark. The Science of the Total Environment 207: 179-186., (1997).<br />

208


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

[72] J.S. Bethel, J.S., J.Ch. McGlone, E.M. Mikhail. "Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry", John Wiley &<br />

Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, 477p, (2001).<br />

[73] D.L. Corw<strong>in</strong>., S.M. Lesch. “Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity<br />

I. Survey protocols”. Computers and Electronics <strong>in</strong> Agriculture, 46, pp. 103-133, (2005).<br />

[74] D. Devriendt, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, Y. Cornet, R. Goossens. "Accuracy assessment of an IKONOS derived DSM over<br />

urban and suburban area", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 2005 workshop EARSeL Special Interest Group “3D Remote<br />

Sens<strong>in</strong>g” - use of the third dimension for remote sens<strong>in</strong>g purposes.<br />

[75] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. Dewulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />

regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data – geometric aspects", High Resolution Mapp<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

Space (2003).<br />

[76] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. De Wulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />

regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data - geometrical aspects", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 24th<br />

EARSeL symposium : <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, /May 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 421-<br />

428, (2005).<br />

[77] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke. Updat<strong>in</strong>g groundwater table class maps 1:50,000 by statistical methods: an analysis of quality<br />

versus cost. Geoderma 97: 329-350, (2000).<br />

[78] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke, D.J. Brus, M.F.P. Bierkens, T. Hoogland, M. Knotters, F. de Vries. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g ground water<br />

dynamics us<strong>in</strong>g multiple sources of exhaustive high resolution data. Geoderma 123: 23-39, (2004).<br />

[79] K. Jacobsen. "Analysis of Digital Elevation Models based on space <strong>in</strong>formation", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for<br />

European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 439-451, (2005).<br />

[80] K. Jacobsen. "Orthoimages and DEMs by QuickBird and IKONOS", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Transition,<br />

Rotterdam, Millpress, 273-279, (2003).<br />

[81] P.J. Kuikman, W.J.M. de Groot, R.F.A. Hendriks, J. Verhagen, F. de Vries. Stocks of C <strong>in</strong> soils and<br />

emissions of CO2 from agricultural soils <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, Alterra-report 561. 41 pp.<br />

(http://www2.alterra.wur.nl/Webdocs/PDFFiles/Alterrarapporten/AlterraRapport561.pdf ), (2003).<br />

[82] A.B. McBratney, M.L. Mendonca Santos, B. M<strong>in</strong>asny. “On digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g” Geoderma, 117, pp. 3–<br />

52, (2003).<br />

[83] S.P. McGrath, P. Loveland. The Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. Blackie Academic and<br />

Professional, Glasgow, (1992).<br />

[84] K. Taillieu, R. Goossens, D. Devriendt, A. Dewulf, S. Van Coillie, T. Willems. "Generation of DEMs and<br />

orthoimages based on non-stereoscopical IKONOS images", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 453-460, (2005).<br />

[85] T. Vandevoorde, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, F. Canters, W. De Genst, N. Stephenne, E. Wolff. "Extraction of land use /<br />

land cover - related <strong>in</strong>formation from very high resolution data <strong>in</strong> urban and suburban areas", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Transition, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 237-245, (2003).<br />

[86] G. Zhou, R. Li. "Accuracy evaluation of ground po<strong>in</strong>ts from IKONOS high-resolution satellite imagery",<br />

Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (9), 1103-1112, (2000).<br />

209


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

GEOMORPHOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION OF SOME<br />

PLAINES AND WADIES ADJACENT TO GABEL ELBA, SOUTH<br />

EAST OF EGYPT.<br />

Abstract<br />

El-Badawi, M. and Abdel-Fattah, A.<br />

National Research Center, Soil dept., Cairo, Egypt.<br />

The area under <strong>in</strong>vestigation is located <strong>in</strong> the southern eastern part of Egypt (Gabel Elba). It is considered as a<br />

promis<strong>in</strong>g part for the urban extension by establish<strong>in</strong>g new communities due to the abundance of the natural<br />

resources.<br />

The current work used the remote sens<strong>in</strong>g tools for prepar<strong>in</strong>g a geomorphological and soil maps based on the<br />

del<strong>in</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g of the photomorphic units (PMU`s) accord<strong>in</strong>g to the visual perception (visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation). The<br />

image classification is based upon the photomorphic elements, which can be easily dist<strong>in</strong>guished. Their values<br />

are comb<strong>in</strong>ed to def<strong>in</strong>e the PMU`s. Ten photomorphic units were recognized namely, Delta pla<strong>in</strong>, Alluvial pla<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Wadi, Sand dunes, Beach, Sabkhas, Costal pla<strong>in</strong>, Pla<strong>in</strong> with rock out crop, Denuded hill and Mounta<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy (1998), the data showed that the soils belong to Entisolos and Aridisolos<br />

orders. These orders could be classified <strong>in</strong>to six sub great groups: namely, Typic Torrifluvents, Typic<br />

Quartzpssaments, Typic Torripssaments, Typic Haplosalids, Typic Petrocalcids and Typic salorthids.<br />

The study has produced geomorphological and soil maps of scale 1:100000 based on remote sens<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>Land</strong>sat<br />

TM) accomplished with the field observation and laboratory analysis.<br />

Key words: soils, south east Egypt, remote sens<strong>in</strong>g, visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation, soil taxonomy.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The total area of Egypt is about one million square kilometers. It consists of about 94% desert<br />

and 6% as a traditional agricultural land of the Nile delta and valley. Therefor, there is a<br />

severe pressure and demand dictated by the grow<strong>in</strong>g population on this limited area of<br />

agricultural land.<br />

Rehabilitat<strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>g the south eastern part of Egypt are among the major<br />

aims of the government. Hence, this study may be regarded as a base for a better<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of the soil characteristics and soil classification of these areas.<br />

The current work has been performed by apply<strong>in</strong>g a false color composite landast TM<br />

image as suitable tools to def<strong>in</strong>e the ma<strong>in</strong> soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g units by the recognition of the<br />

geomorphological units and the field observation. Eventually, the geomorphological<br />

characteristics and the soil classification of the different features adjacent to Gabel Elba<br />

would be performed.<br />

PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES<br />

The area under <strong>in</strong>vestigation occupies the extreme south eastern part of Egypt. It is bounded<br />

by 36°00` and 36°30` east and 22°30` and 22°00` north fig(1).<br />

It has torric and hyperthermic moisture and temperature regimes. The mean annual<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall is 6.5 mm, ma<strong>in</strong>ly fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter and the mean maximum temperature is 29.71 °C<br />

210


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> summer. The area is exposed to north – eastern and south - western w<strong>in</strong>ds with a<br />

mean velocity of about >21 Knots.<br />

Egyptian Geological Survey and M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Authority Staff (1981)[6], Egyptian General<br />

Petroleum Cooperation Staff (1987) [5], Said (1990) [15] and El-Rakaiby et al. (1996) [13]<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that the surface of (Halaib-Shalat<strong>in</strong>) region is occupied by about fourteen rock<br />

formations belong to Precambrian, Cretaceous, Miocene and Quaternary ages<br />

Abu Al-Ezz, (1987) [13], Hammad (1994) [7], Desert research center (1994) [4] stated that<br />

two ma<strong>in</strong> geomorphic units are recognized;<br />

a) Basement ridges which occupy most of the surface area around 13000Km 2 ; (78% of the<br />

total area). It is formed by fractured hard igneous and metamorphic rocks, hav<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

elevation rang<strong>in</strong>g between 1000-1900 m a.s.l. the ridges are considered as the ma<strong>in</strong> watershed<br />

area. The surface is severely dissected by many wadis tributaries.<br />

b) The coastal pla<strong>in</strong>s represent a cont<strong>in</strong>uous strip of low lands bordered from north to south<br />

by the Red Sea, at altitude rarely exceed<strong>in</strong>g 100 m a.s.l. The width varies greatly (5-30 Km)<br />

and the largest width is found at Di`ib`s delta Fig (1). It occupies an area of about 3700 Km2,<br />

represents about 22% of the total area. It <strong>in</strong>cludes different landforms, namely; sabkha,<br />

alluvial fans, and shallow wadis mostly perpendicular to the coast.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g methods have been used:<br />

1- Visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

Fig 1: location of the study area<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

<strong>Land</strong>sat TM image acquired on path 72 and row 44/45 <strong>in</strong> 19-7-1995 was used. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation was done on a false color composite of bands 2, 4 and 7 at scale 1:100000 fig<br />

(2). The major landforms were identified by the physiognomic analysis, Bennema and<br />

Gelens, (1969) [10] .<br />

The landast image was carefully analyzed to demonstrate easily the dist<strong>in</strong>guishable<br />

physiographic features and land cover. Among the image characteristics, the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

elements have been used; shape, size, color tone, texture and pattern recognition.<br />

The image <strong>in</strong>terpretation was based on the follow<strong>in</strong>g criteria; soil surface, slope relief,<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age patterns, vegetation etc. V<strong>in</strong>k, (1963) [1] .<br />

211


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Geological map at scale 1:500000 and topographic map at scale 1:100000 were used to guide<br />

the image <strong>in</strong>terpretation.<br />

2- Field work and laboratory studies<br />

The field work was undertaken to verify the established soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g units, which were<br />

represented by ten soil profiles fig (3). A detailed morphological description was performed<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the guide l<strong>in</strong>es FAO (1970) [8] ,Table (3). Thirty soil samples were collected and<br />

subjected to the follow<strong>in</strong>g analysis:<br />

1- Particle size distribution was carried out by dry siev<strong>in</strong>g as described by Black (1985) [2] .<br />

2- Calcium Carbonate by the Coll<strong>in</strong>`s Calcimeter methods (Piper, 1950) [3] .<br />

3- Soluble salts <strong>in</strong> the saturated soil extract, soil reaction <strong>in</strong> the soil paste, cation exchange<br />

capacity and gypsum percentage were determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the standard methods by<br />

Richards (1964) [11] .<br />

4- Organic matter was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the method of Walkely and Black (Jackson, 1973) [12] .<br />

5- Soil classification was carried out accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy (1998) [16] .<br />

1. Visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The best color comb<strong>in</strong>ation for the recognition of soil and water bodies has been the<br />

enhanced FCC of bands, 2 (visible green) as blue, 4 (NIR) as green and 7 (MIR) as red. The<br />

FCC was projected on a transparent screen at scale of 1:100 000 for image <strong>in</strong>terpretation.<br />

Based on the <strong>in</strong>terpretation elements and the knowledge drawn from other sources (i.e.<br />

geological map, topographical map and the field work); eleven photomorphic units could be<br />

del<strong>in</strong>eated and discussed. fig (2) and table (1)<br />

Image characteristics<br />

Group Geomorphic unit<br />

color texture pattern<br />

Nature of<br />

the pattern<br />

1 Water Very dark blue F No X<br />

2 Delta pla<strong>in</strong> Mixed colors F to M P Y<br />

3 Alluvial pla<strong>in</strong> Light to dark G F P X<br />

4 Wadi W - Grey F to M L X<br />

5 Sand dunes W / Y M to F L X<br />

6 Beach Y (W) F No X<br />

7 Sabkhas<br />

Light to dark<br />

B(W)<br />

F to M P Y<br />

8 Costal pla<strong>in</strong> Very pale G F to M No Y<br />

9<br />

Pla<strong>in</strong> with rock out<br />

Mixed colors F to M No Y<br />

crop<br />

10 Denuded hill Dark G M to C Pol to P Y<br />

11 Mounta<strong>in</strong> Light to dark G C pol X<br />

Table 1: Image characteristics of the mapped pmu`s<br />

212


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Group 1<br />

This PMU was the easiest unit to be <strong>in</strong>terpreted, s<strong>in</strong>ce it shows nearly the same color of water<br />

bodies. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant and the only color of the PMU is very dark blue. The unit has a f<strong>in</strong>e<br />

homogenous texture and no pattern has been detected.<br />

The color characteristics of the PMU is co<strong>in</strong>cid<strong>in</strong>g with the water bodies i.e. the red sea<br />

and the water logged area.<br />

Group (2):<br />

This PMU appears <strong>in</strong> various color (light green, p<strong>in</strong>ky and dark green color) and refers to the<br />

out-wash of the mounta<strong>in</strong>, f<strong>in</strong>e to coarse <strong>in</strong> texture. S<strong>in</strong>ce the coarse materials precipitate first<br />

and the f<strong>in</strong>e materials come at the end of the precipitation, the unit takes a delta shape.<br />

Group (3):<br />

This PMU refers to the alluvial pla<strong>in</strong>s, founded <strong>in</strong> the out-wash area and hav<strong>in</strong>g a very f<strong>in</strong>e<br />

materials.<br />

Group (4):<br />

This PMU refers to the wadies hav<strong>in</strong>g many dra<strong>in</strong>age patterns.<br />

Group (5):<br />

This PMU exists <strong>in</strong> the north west of the study area, it displays as an accumulation area of<br />

w<strong>in</strong>d blown sand <strong>in</strong> longitud<strong>in</strong>al shape. The desert pavement and the gravelly corridors<br />

between the dunes appear <strong>in</strong> a pale p<strong>in</strong>k and greenish color.<br />

Group (6):<br />

The yellowish and the whitish colors <strong>in</strong>dicate a high reflection through out the wavelength<br />

range of the spectral bands; referr<strong>in</strong>g to the landscape features of f<strong>in</strong>e homogenous texture<br />

and the smoothness of the surface. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the color characteristics and the patterns; this<br />

PMU has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as beach.<br />

Group (7):<br />

This PMU has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as sabkhas and could be divided <strong>in</strong>to wet and dry. The blue<br />

color refers to the presence of water,<br />

Group (8):<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to image <strong>in</strong>terpretation and the field observation, the PMU has been referred to the<br />

costal pla<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Group (9):<br />

This PMU has mixed colors of light green, pale yellow and pale green with <strong>in</strong>clusion of<br />

white. It is covered by gravelly and stony materials transported by water stream. The PMU<br />

has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as pla<strong>in</strong> with rock out crop.<br />

213


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Group (10):<br />

The distribution of this unit <strong>in</strong>side the macro PMU, is homogenous. In few cases a relation<br />

was found with the hydrographic network. It refers to the strongly exposed rock out crop and<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpreted as denuded hill.<br />

Group (11):<br />

This PMU refers to Mounta<strong>in</strong><br />

2. Field trip<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the differences <strong>in</strong> the photomorphic unit (prelim<strong>in</strong>ary classification) the sample<br />

areas were chosen and ten soil profiles have been described and sampled, Fig (3).<br />

3. F<strong>in</strong>al classification map<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>al del<strong>in</strong>eation of the geomorphic units was based on the image characteristics and the<br />

field observation. Fig (2), table (2) Each geomorphic unit was described as follow<strong>in</strong>g:-<br />

1. Sabkhas<br />

The total area of this unit is about 8.6 Km2 (2064 feddan) and represented by profile 4. The<br />

soil surface slopes towards the sea. The soils are orig<strong>in</strong>ated from alluvial deposits mixed with<br />

mar<strong>in</strong>e deposits. The surface is covered with shells, some low hummocks and few scattered<br />

vegetation ma<strong>in</strong>ly from halophytes.<br />

The profile depth is varied from shallow to deep as far from the sea. The f<strong>in</strong>e texture is<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ated while the gravel content is varied from layer to another; it is 17.2% at the surface<br />

layer and 9.1 % <strong>in</strong> the lower one, as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> table (4).<br />

- The sal<strong>in</strong>ity is very high and <strong>in</strong>creased by depth. Table (5)<br />

- The soil pH was 7.5 which are due to the <strong>in</strong>crease of sal<strong>in</strong>ity.<br />

- The soil has low percentage of CaCO3 content.<br />

- The color is varied from yellow (10yr 7/6 dry) to (very pale brown 7/4dry) and from<br />

yellowish brown (10yr 5/6 moist) to yellowish brown (10 yr 5/4 moist). Table (3)<br />

- Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy 1998 the soils Typic Salorthids.<br />

2. Alluvial pla<strong>in</strong><br />

The total area of this unit is 662.3 Km 2 (158952 fedden) and geographically could be divided<br />

<strong>in</strong>to two parts from north to south as follows:<br />

a) From 22°30`N to Abu Ramad (22°20`N)<br />

b) From 22°20`N to Halaib (22°15`N)<br />

a) From 22°30`N to Abu Ramad (22°20`N)<br />

The total area of this unit is 245.7 Km2 (58968 fedden). It is represented by two profiles<br />

(profile 1 and profile 2) and characterized as follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

- the surface is almost flat, covered by desert pavement <strong>in</strong> some places.<br />

214


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

- In the upper layer the soil texture is commonly f<strong>in</strong>e sand, while <strong>in</strong> the subsurface it is<br />

commonly very gravelly coarse sand.<br />

- The soil surface is covered by some scattered young trees and some natural vegetation.<br />

- Generally the EC value of profile 1 is lower than 4 dS/m, while <strong>in</strong> profile 2 it is higher<br />

than 8 dS/m.<br />

- The mean CaCO3 content <strong>in</strong> profile 1 is lower than 2 %, and 4.5 %.<strong>in</strong> profile 2.<br />

- The soil taxonomy accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy 1998 is Typic Torrifluvents.<br />

215


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

<strong>Land</strong>scape<br />

Pla<strong>in</strong>, P<br />

Mounta<strong>in</strong>,<br />

M<br />

Relief<br />

Flat to gently<br />

undulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

P1<br />

Almost flat<br />

to Hilly<br />

P2<br />

Almost flat<br />

to<br />

Hilly<br />

P2<br />

Undulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to hilly<br />

P3<br />

Hill or Mounta<strong>in</strong><br />

M1<br />

Lithology<br />

Alluvial<br />

Deposit<br />

P11<br />

Aeolian<br />

deposit<br />

P21<br />

Mar<strong>in</strong>e deposit<br />

P22<br />

Colluvial<br />

deposit<br />

P31<br />

Rock<br />

M11<br />

<strong>Land</strong>form<br />

Delta pla<strong>in</strong><br />

Alluvial pla<strong>in</strong><br />

Wadi<br />

Sand dunes<br />

Beach<br />

Sabkhas<br />

Costal pla<strong>in</strong><br />

Pla<strong>in</strong> with Rock<br />

outcrop<br />

P311<br />

Denuded hill<br />

M111<br />

Mounta<strong>in</strong><br />

M112<br />

216<br />

Phase<br />

This soil covers most of the costal region and could be identified easily <strong>in</strong> the satellite image and<br />

classified as Typic Torrifluvents<br />

Flat, surface covered by desert pavement, vary<strong>in</strong>g texture from f<strong>in</strong>e sand to gravelly coarse sand, common<br />

to many calcium carbonate and salt contents, classified as Typic Torrifluvents, Typic Haplosalids, and<br />

Typic Petrocalcids<br />

Alluvial, sandy texture, covered by silty crust (<strong>in</strong> some areas). This soil could be classified as Typic<br />

Torrifluvents<br />

Undeveloped soils consist of sand accumulation of different altitudes, barchanoid and longitud<strong>in</strong>al form<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> dune types and could be classified as Typic Quartzpssaments<br />

Flat to undulat<strong>in</strong>g surface, some vegetation cover, loose, few to many calcium carbonate and salt<br />

contents. It could be classified as Typic Torripssaments<br />

Flat to undulat<strong>in</strong>g surface, sandy and strongly sal<strong>in</strong>e soils, shallow depth, highly sal<strong>in</strong>e gypsiferous orig<strong>in</strong>,<br />

motels of iron and manganese oxide also exist. The soil could be classified as Typic salorthids<br />

Coarse sandy soils <strong>in</strong>clude gravels, less vegetation covers, medium calcium carbonate and salt content.<br />

Could be classified as Typic Torrifluvents<br />

The soil surface is covered by stones <strong>in</strong> different size mixed with sand and gravels, shallow depth, could<br />

be classified as Typic quartzpssament<br />

Area covered with big rocks and stones of different size<br />

rocks<br />

Table 2: The f<strong>in</strong>al legend of the classified image, z<strong>in</strong>k, (1988) [9]<br />

Map.<br />

units<br />

P111<br />

P112<br />

P113<br />

P211<br />

P221<br />

P222<br />

P224<br />

P311<br />

M111<br />

M112<br />

Feddan<br />

(4200m 2 )<br />

320<br />

158952<br />

5832<br />

400<br />

1360<br />

2064<br />

3120<br />

49248<br />

49248<br />

189660


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Fig 2: Map of photomorphic units<br />

Fig 3: Location of the soil profile<br />

217


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

b) The alluvial pla<strong>in</strong> from 22°20` N to 22°15`N<br />

This area is very narrow pla<strong>in</strong> and has very small wadies namely; wadi Ashmahi, wadi Udar,<br />

wadi Ediab and wadi Cermatai. The total area is about 225 Km2 (54000 fedden) and is<br />

represented by profile 6, 9 and 10.<br />

The soil profiles are characterized as follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

- The topography is almost flat; some small sandy hills could be noticed <strong>in</strong> some places due<br />

to the w<strong>in</strong>d activity.<br />

- The texture is varied from f<strong>in</strong>e to very gravely coarse sand.<br />

- Most of the soil profiles have a mean EC value over 8 dS/m, while <strong>in</strong> profile 6 it is very<br />

obvious <strong>in</strong> the sublayer. The variations of the EC values are <strong>in</strong> relation to the distance<br />

from the sea.<br />

- The CaCO3 content of most profiles is lower 4 %. It is over 8% <strong>in</strong> profile 10 and reach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

45% <strong>in</strong> profile9.<br />

- Generally, the pH values are varied between 7 and 8.2. A reversible relationship between<br />

pH and EC values are obvious as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> profile 6 where the pH value is 8.1 and the<br />

EC value was 0.2 dS/m <strong>in</strong> the upper layer. While, <strong>in</strong> the lower layer the pH value was 7.4<br />

and the EC value was 11.2. This contradiction refers to the lowness of the buffer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capacity of the sandy soils and the dom<strong>in</strong>ant of NaCl salt.<br />

- The soil taxonomy of this unit accord<strong>in</strong>g to the USDA soil taxonomy 1998 is Typic<br />

Torrifluvents except for profile 9 is Typic Haplosalids and profile 10 is Typic<br />

Petrocalcides.<br />

3. Wadies<br />

This unit occupies a total area of about 24.3 Km (5832 feddens) could be divided <strong>in</strong>to two<br />

sub unit namely; ma<strong>in</strong> wadi and tributaries. It is represented by profiles no. (Profile 3, 5, 7<br />

and profile 8)<br />

- The soil surface is flat to undulat<strong>in</strong>g covered by gravels varied <strong>in</strong> size from small to<br />

coarse gravel and few scattered natural vegetation.<br />

- Geomorphologicaly the wadi could be divided <strong>in</strong>to three sub units namely; wadi bottom<br />

which is normally affected by water erosion, flood pla<strong>in</strong> and wadi terraces.<br />

- The EC mean value is lower 2 dS/m <strong>in</strong> profile 3, and 8.6 dS/m <strong>in</strong> profile 5 (wadi Oshipa),<br />

while <strong>in</strong> profile 7 (wadi Udar) and profile 8 (wadi Ediab) it reaches 18.6.<br />

- 50% of the pH values of the studied soil profiles are vary<strong>in</strong>g between 7 and 7.5, the rest<br />

are 7.6 to 8.2.<br />

- Most of the CaCO3 values of the profile are very low except for profile 7 and profile 12,<br />

it reaches to more than 8%<br />

- The soil texture is varied from f<strong>in</strong>e sand to very gravelly f<strong>in</strong>e sand and from coarse sand<br />

to gravelly coarse sand.<br />

- The soil classification accord<strong>in</strong>g to USDA soil taxonomy 1998 is Typic Torrifluvents.<br />

Table (3)<br />

4. Delta pla<strong>in</strong><br />

The total area of this unit is 320 fedden. This soils covers most of the costal region and can be<br />

identified <strong>in</strong> the satellite images. The soil can be classified as Typic Torrifluvents.<br />

218


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Pro<br />

f.<br />

no.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Locations<br />

Lg.: 22ُ 29`<br />

26.8" N<br />

Lt: 36ُ 5`<br />

12.6" E<br />

Lg. 22ُ 28`<br />

36.3" N<br />

Lt:36ُ 8` 00"<br />

E<br />

Lg. 22ُ 28`<br />

36.3"N<br />

Lt:36ُ 4`<br />

44.2" E<br />

Long. 22ُ 25`<br />

00' N<br />

Lat:36ُ 5`<br />

12.6" E<br />

Map.<br />

units<br />

vegetat<br />

ion<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>a<br />

ge<br />

P112 few well<br />

P112 common well<br />

P113 few well<br />

P216 few well<br />

Parent<br />

material<br />

Alluvial<br />

deposit<br />

Alluvial<br />

deposit<br />

Alluvial<br />

deposit<br />

Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

deposits<br />

classification<br />

Typic<br />

Torrifluvents<br />

Typic<br />

Haplosalids<br />

Typic<br />

Torrifluvents<br />

Typic<br />

Aquisalids<br />

219<br />

Depth<br />

Cm.<br />

0-15<br />

15-50<br />

50-100<br />

0-15<br />

15-35<br />

35-70<br />

0-25<br />

25-40<br />

40-60<br />

60-100<br />

0-15<br />

15-45<br />

45-100<br />

color<br />

dry moist<br />

10 YR<br />

7/3<br />

10 YR<br />

6/6<br />

10 YR<br />

7/3<br />

10YR 7/4<br />

10 YR<br />

7/8<br />

10 YR<br />

7/8<br />

10 YR<br />

7/2<br />

10 YR<br />

7/4<br />

10 YR<br />

7/6<br />

10 YR<br />

7/6<br />

10 YR<br />

7/6<br />

10 YR<br />

7/4<br />

10 YR<br />

7/4<br />

5/4<br />

5/6<br />

5/4<br />

6/3<br />

5/4<br />

6/4<br />

5/3<br />

5/3<br />

6/6<br />

6/8<br />

5/6<br />

5/6<br />

5/4<br />

text<br />

ure<br />

FS<br />

FS<br />

GCS<br />

GFS<br />

VGCS<br />

GCS<br />

GFS<br />

GFS<br />

CS<br />

GCS<br />

FS<br />

FS<br />

FS<br />

Struct<br />

ure<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

consis<br />

tence<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

effe<br />

rves<br />

cenc<br />

e<br />

s<br />

s<br />

st<br />

s<br />

v<br />

s<br />

vs<br />

st<br />

s<br />

s<br />

vs<br />

st<br />

st<br />

bounda<br />

ry<br />

d<br />

d<br />

-<br />

c<br />

cw<br />

cw<br />

d<br />

d<br />

d<br />

-<br />

cs<br />

cs<br />

-


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

Lg. 22ُ 23`<br />

36.32" N<br />

Lt:36ُ 19`<br />

31.6" E<br />

Lg. 22ُ22`00' N<br />

Lt:36ُ 25`00"E<br />

Long. 22ُ 20`<br />

00" N<br />

Lat:36ُ 25`<br />

42.6" E<br />

Long. 22ُ<br />

18`31.6" N<br />

Lat: 36ُ 25`<br />

25.3" E<br />

Lg. 22ُ 18` 00"<br />

N<br />

Lt:36ُ 26`<br />

23.7" E<br />

P112 few well<br />

P112 few well<br />

P113 few well<br />

P113 few well<br />

P311 common well<br />

10 Lg. 22ُ 18` 00" P112 Few well<br />

Alluvial<br />

deposits<br />

Alluvial<br />

deposits<br />

Alluvial<br />

deposits<br />

Alluvial<br />

deposits<br />

Colluvial<br />

deposits<br />

Typic<br />

Torrifluvents<br />

Typic<br />

Torrifluvents<br />

Typic<br />

Torrifluvents<br />

Typic<br />

Torrifluvents<br />

Typic<br />

Haplocalcids<br />

Alluvial Typic<br />

220<br />

0-15<br />

15-30<br />

30-100<br />

0-30<br />

30-60<br />

60-150<br />

0-25<br />

25-55<br />

55-100<br />

0-25<br />

25-80<br />

80-100<br />

0-25<br />

25-70<br />

0-15<br />

10 YR<br />

7/8<br />

10 YR<br />

7/4<br />

10 YR<br />

7/6<br />

10 YR<br />

7/3<br />

10 YR<br />

7/4<br />

10 YR<br />

7/4<br />

7.5 R<br />

6/6<br />

7.5 YR<br />

6/6<br />

7.5 YR<br />

7/6<br />

10 YR<br />

6/4<br />

10 YR<br />

6/6<br />

10 YR<br />

6/4<br />

10 YR<br />

7/6<br />

10 YR<br />

7/4<br />

10 YR<br />

6/6<br />

6/4<br />

5/6<br />

5/4<br />

5/6<br />

5/4<br />

5 YR 4/6<br />

7.5 YR<br />

4/4<br />

7.5 YR<br />

5/8<br />

5/4<br />

6/8<br />

5/4<br />

5/4<br />

6/3<br />

GFS<br />

GFS<br />

GCS<br />

GFS<br />

GCS<br />

GCS<br />

VGFS<br />

GCS<br />

VGCS<br />

FS<br />

GFS<br />

FS<br />

FS<br />

GFS<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

st<br />

s<br />

s<br />

s<br />

vs<br />

st<br />

st<br />

s<br />

vs<br />

st<br />

st<br />

st<br />

v<br />

v<br />

cs<br />

cs<br />

-<br />

d<br />

cs<br />

-<br />

d<br />

cs<br />

-<br />

d<br />

cs<br />

-<br />

d<br />

cs<br />

5/6 GFS Sg dL v c


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

N<br />

Lt:36ُ 24`<br />

39.5" E<br />

deposits petrocalcids 15-30<br />

Where: -Texture: FS= f<strong>in</strong>e sand, GFS= gravelly f<strong>in</strong>e sand, VGFS= very gravelly f<strong>in</strong>e Sand, GCS= gravelly coarse sand, VGCS= very gravelly<br />

coarse sand<br />

-Structure: Sg= s<strong>in</strong>gle gra<strong>in</strong> -Consistence: d=dry, L=loose - Boundary: c=clear, d= diffuse, s=smooth<br />

- effervescence with HCl: vs= very slight, s= slight, st= strong, v= violent<br />

221<br />

30-100<br />

7/4<br />

10 YR<br />

5/3<br />

10 YR<br />

7/2<br />

4/4<br />

7.5 YR<br />

4/4<br />

Table 3: Morphological description and classification of the studied soil profiles<br />

GFS<br />

VGFS<br />

Sg<br />

Sg<br />

dL<br />

dL<br />

v<br />

v<br />

d<br />

-


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

5. Beach<br />

The area of this unit is 1360 fedden. Almost flat to undulat<strong>in</strong>g, some vegetation cover, loose,<br />

few to many calcium carbonate and salt content could be classified as Typic Torripssament<br />

6. Sand dunes<br />

The total area of this unit is 400 fedden. Undeveloped soils consist of sand accumulation of<br />

different altitudes, barchanoid and longitud<strong>in</strong>al forms area the ma<strong>in</strong> dune type. Could be<br />

classified as Typic Quartzpssaments.<br />

7. Coastal pla<strong>in</strong><br />

The total area of this unit is 3120 fedden. the soil surface is slop<strong>in</strong>g towards the sea and the<br />

soil orig<strong>in</strong>ated from alluvial deposit mixed with mar<strong>in</strong>e deposit. Coarse sandy soils, <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

gravels, less vegetation covers, medium calcium carbonate and salt content, the surface<br />

covered with shells. It could be classified as Typic Torrifluvents.<br />

Profile<br />

nr.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Soil depth<br />

(cm)<br />

0-15<br />

15-50<br />

50-100<br />

0-15<br />

15-35<br />

35-70<br />

0-25<br />

25-40<br />

40-60<br />

60-100<br />

0-10<br />

10-45<br />

45-100<br />

0-15<br />

15-30<br />

30-100<br />

0-30<br />

30-60<br />

60-150<br />

0-25<br />

25-55<br />

55-100<br />

0-25<br />

25-80<br />

80-100<br />

0-20<br />

20-70<br />

0-15<br />

15-30<br />

Gravel<br />

>2mm<br />

%<br />

2.5<br />

3.4<br />

23.7<br />

35.7<br />

54.0<br />

47.1<br />

38.5<br />

40.4<br />

17.4<br />

50.0<br />

17.2<br />

3.1<br />

9.1<br />

38.8<br />

46.5<br />

42.9<br />

37.4<br />

31.4<br />

68.2<br />

54.9<br />

27.9<br />

34.1<br />

17.7<br />

42.3<br />

--<br />

14.7<br />

12.9<br />

42.4<br />

36.0<br />

2-1<br />

VCS<br />

9.5<br />

9.1<br />

29.8<br />

5.0<br />

29.0<br />

32.0<br />

9.1<br />

8.8<br />

30.1<br />

31.2<br />

7.9<br />

10.6<br />

10.1<br />

10.0<br />

8.1<br />

22.3<br />

6.4<br />

31.1<br />

20.1<br />

6.6<br />

27.0<br />

28.1<br />

7.9<br />

7.7<br />

8.6<br />

10.4<br />

12.9<br />

10.9<br />

10.7<br />

Percentage of separate particles (mm)<br />

1-0.5<br />

CS<br />

10.5<br />

10.1<br />

10.9<br />

12.0<br />

18.8<br />

17.3<br />

12.5<br />

12.3<br />

17.9<br />

16.3<br />

10.4<br />

9.8<br />

9.1<br />

7.7<br />

9.8<br />

20.9<br />

11.3<br />

18.7<br />

21.2<br />

8.1<br />

13.3<br />

12.1<br />

11.5<br />

13.4<br />

12.5<br />

10.4<br />

9.7<br />

11.9<br />

9.3<br />

0.5-<br />

0.25<br />

MS<br />

17.3<br />

19.2<br />

29.7<br />

18.1<br />

31.9<br />

27.4<br />

18.1<br />

17.7<br />

32.7<br />

28.5<br />

19.4<br />

12.2<br />

20.1<br />

21.7<br />

22.8<br />

30.0<br />

20.3<br />

23.8<br />

23.0<br />

19.6<br />

30.1<br />

30.2<br />

16.9<br />

16.3<br />

17.4<br />

16.0<br />

17.9<br />

16.5<br />

17.6<br />

222<br />

0.25-0.1<br />

FS<br />

43.8<br />

50.2<br />

18.5<br />

46.0<br />

14.4<br />

16.2<br />

44.4<br />

46.0<br />

12.4<br />

11.4<br />

50.0<br />

52.2<br />

46.5<br />

49.0<br />

44.5<br />

20.3<br />

43.3<br />

17.9<br />

27.9<br />

56.9<br />

23.8<br />

23.3<br />

41.5<br />

44.7<br />

43.6<br />

41.6<br />

41.4<br />

40.9<br />

40.3<br />

0.1-0.05<br />

VFS<br />

12.5<br />

8.4<br />

7.0<br />

10.9<br />

2.8<br />

5.4<br />

9.9<br />

9.0<br />

2.9<br />

4.0<br />

9.9<br />

11.1<br />

10.1<br />

8.8<br />

11.9<br />

5.0<br />

13.4<br />

4.8<br />

4.9<br />

4.9<br />

2.8<br />

3.2<br />

16.2<br />

13.3<br />

13.4<br />

13.2<br />

13.6<br />

13.7<br />

14.4<br />

Table 4: Gra<strong>in</strong> size distribution<br />


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

223<br />

Soluble cations me/L Soluble anion me/L<br />

Profil<br />

e nr.<br />

Depth <strong>in</strong>,<br />

Cm<br />

S.P.<br />

EC<br />

ds/m<br />

pH CaCO3 %<br />

OM<br />

% Na + K + Ca ++ Mg ++<br />

HCO3<br />

-<br />

Cl - CO3 -- SO4 ++<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

0-15<br />

15-50<br />

50-100<br />

0-15<br />

15-35<br />

35-70<br />

0-25<br />

25-40<br />

40-60<br />

60-100<br />

0-10<br />

10-45<br />

45-100<br />

0-15<br />

15-30<br />

30-100<br />

0-30<br />

30-60<br />

60-150<br />

0-25<br />

25-55<br />

55-100<br />

0-25<br />

25-80<br />

80-100<br />

0-20<br />

20-70<br />

0-15<br />

15-30<br />

30-70<br />

21.8<br />

19.1<br />

20<br />

23.1<br />

22<br />

19<br />

18<br />

18<br />

20<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

21<br />

21<br />

22<br />

22<br />

21<br />

18<br />

21<br />

19<br />

21<br />

22<br />

19<br />

22<br />

21<br />

22<br />

20<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

0.8<br />

0.36<br />

0.41<br />

11.45<br />

25.4<br />

16.4<br />

1.43<br />

0.5<br />

0.69<br />

3.58<br />

20.6<br />

26.9<br />

23.6<br />

1.92<br />

1<br />

5.4<br />

0.92<br />

2.9<br />

11.2<br />

14.53<br />

11.6<br />

4.99<br />

5.4<br />

8.9<br />

14.9<br />

23.9<br />

6.8<br />

12.1<br />

2.9<br />

5.9<br />

7.8<br />

7.9<br />

7.9<br />

8.2<br />

7.2<br />

7.2<br />

7.9<br />

8.2<br />

8<br />

7.9<br />

7.5<br />

7.6<br />

7.9<br />

8<br />

7.9<br />

8.2<br />

8.1<br />

8<br />

7.4<br />

7.6<br />

7.8<br />

7.8<br />

7.9<br />

8<br />

7.8<br />

8<br />

8<br />

8<br />

7.7<br />

8.2<br />

0.1<br />

1.3<br />

2<br />

1.6<br />

1.3<br />

3.6<br />

0.76<br />

4.9<br />

2.09<br />

0.83<br />

6.4<br />

5.4<br />

14.2<br />

8.1<br />

4.5<br />

9.8<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

7.1<br />

1.05<br />

0.09<br />

1.6<br />

9<br />

10.1<br />

3.93<br />

45<br />

12.8<br />

40.9<br />

28.5<br />

19.8<br />

0.36<br />

0.23<br />

0.29<br />

0.5<br />

0.23<br />

0.21<br />

0.01<br />

0.07<br />

0.07<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

0.5<br />

0.02<br />

0.02<br />

0.2<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

0.53<br />

0.02<br />

0.02<br />

0.2<br />

0.28<br />

0.14<br />

0.04<br />

0.01<br />

0.06<br />

0.01<br />

0.01<br />

0.8<br />

0.78<br />

0.7<br />

69.8<br />

163.9<br />

15.6<br />

0.14<br />

2.7<br />

0.19<br />

0.47<br />

34.4<br />

5.56<br />

15.5<br />

3.56<br />

6<br />

42.9<br />

0.12<br />

0.27<br />

.96<br />

54.35<br />

54.4<br />

0.53<br />

43<br />

60<br />

18.9<br />

210<br />

46<br />

0.24<br />

18<br />

46<br />

0.12<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

3<br />

0.55<br />

0.4<br />

0.01<br />

0.4<br />

0.01<br />

0.02<br />

0.09<br />

0.17<br />

0.09<br />

0.06<br />

0.4<br />

0.4<br />

0.01<br />

0.02<br />

0.05<br />

0.82<br />

1.7<br />

0.05<br />

1<br />

0.6<br />

0.16<br />

0.5<br />

2.2<br />

0.01<br />

0.6<br />

0.3<br />

1.05<br />

0.65<br />

0.54<br />

29.9<br />

41.51<br />

19.71<br />

0.14<br />

1<br />

0.08<br />

0.23<br />

6.93<br />

7.53<br />

9.61<br />

0.74<br />

2.7<br />

12.6<br />

0.02<br />

0.03<br />

0.2<br />

50.52<br />

46<br />

0.27<br />

11.4<br />

21.8<br />

4.29<br />

52.1<br />

24.2<br />

0.03<br />

7.4<br />

12.5<br />

0.22<br />

0.21<br />

0.1<br />

15.6<br />

36.9<br />

11.3<br />

0.05<br />

0.6<br />

0.12<br />

0.14<br />

6.38<br />

2.97<br />

5.8<br />

0.46<br />

1.1<br />

6.1<br />

0.0`4<br />

0.1<br />

0.78<br />

21.5<br />

5.6<br />

0.69<br />

7.8<br />

12.8<br />

3.57<br />

23.9<br />

7.6<br />

0.05<br />

5.4<br />

7.5<br />

0.52<br />

0.6<br />

0.61<br />

5.4<br />

4.1<br />

3.6<br />

0.17<br />

0.9<br />

0.15<br />

0.15<br />

0.72<br />

0.76<br />

0.45<br />

0.08<br />

0.9<br />

4.6<br />

0.04<br />

0.03<br />

0.42<br />

4.08<br />

4.29<br />

0.17<br />

5.3<br />

11.6<br />

0.39<br />

17.6<br />

9.3<br />

0.12<br />

3.8<br />

6.3<br />

1.01<br />

0.5<br />

0.5<br />

81.3<br />

200.1<br />

29.9<br />

0.12<br />

2.6<br />

0.16<br />

0.24<br />

10.2<br />

2.22<br />

2.05<br />

2.29<br />

5.3<br />

41.3<br />

0.14<br />

0.37<br />

0.96<br />

82.93<br />

72<br />

0.72<br />

47.5<br />

67.5<br />

15.03<br />

245<br />

50<br />

0.16<br />

23.5<br />

45.7<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.5<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.4<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.064<br />

0.62<br />

0.31<br />

31.4<br />

40.3<br />

13.5<br />

0.05<br />

0.7<br />

0.1<br />

0.77<br />

36.92<br />

13.25<br />

9.86<br />

2.25<br />

3.5<br />

16.1<br />

0.01<br />

0.02<br />

0.6<br />

40.19<br />

41.41<br />

0.65<br />

10.4<br />

15.7<br />

11.5<br />

23.9<br />

20.7<br />

0.05<br />

4.1<br />

14.3<br />

Table 5: Analysis of soil paste extract


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

8. Pla<strong>in</strong> with rock outcrop<br />

The soil surface is covered by stones <strong>in</strong> different size mixed with sand and gravels, shallow<br />

depth and it could be classified as Typic quartzpssament<br />

9. Denuded hills<br />

The total area of this unit is 49248 fedden. Area covered with big rocks and stones of<br />

different size<br />

10. Mounta<strong>in</strong><br />

The total area of this unit is 189660 fedden. Rocks.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] A.P.A., V<strong>in</strong>k "Aerial photographs and soil sciences". UNESCO report, Paris, (1963).<br />

[2] C. A., Black; D.D., Evans; L.E., Ensm<strong>in</strong>ger; J.L, White and F.E., Clark."Methods of soil analysis". Medison:<br />

American Society of Agronomy. IAC., Medison, Wiscons<strong>in</strong>, USA., (1985)<br />

[3] C. S., Piper "soil and plant analysis". Inter science Publishers, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, PP.59-75, (1950).<br />

[4] Desert Research Center (1994). Reconnaissance studies for natural and human resources <strong>in</strong> El-Shalate<strong>in</strong>-<br />

Halaib. Supervis<strong>in</strong>g committee on Technical studies and natural resources of El-Shalate<strong>in</strong>-Halaib region, D.R.C.<br />

Mataria, Cairo, Egypt (<strong>in</strong> Arabic).<br />

[5] Egyptian General Petroleum Cooperation Staff "Geological map of Egypt scale 1:500000". The Egyptian<br />

General Petroleum Cooperation, Cairo, Egypt, (1987).<br />

[6] Egyptian Geological Survey and M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Authority Staff "Geological map of Egypt, Scale 1:2000000".<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>in</strong>dustry and m<strong>in</strong>eral resources, Cairo, Egypt, (1981).<br />

[7] F. A., Hammad "Water situation <strong>in</strong> El-Shalatien- Halaib region susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture potentiality".<br />

International Egyptian center of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt. Report (<strong>in</strong> Arabic). (1994).<br />

[8] F.A.O. staff "Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for soil profile description". F.A.O. soil Bullet<strong>in</strong> 6, F.A.O, (1966).<br />

[9] J. A., Z<strong>in</strong>k "Geomorphology and soils", <strong>in</strong>ternal publ., I.T.C. Enschede, (1988).<br />

[10] J., Bennema and M. F., Gelons "Aerial photo <strong>in</strong>terpretation for soil survey". Lecture note, I.T.C. courses<br />

photo-<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong> soil survey I.T.C., Enschede, The Netherlands, (1969).<br />

[11] L. A., Richards "Diagnosis and improvement of sal<strong>in</strong>e and alkali soils". U. S. Dep. Of Agric. Hand Book,<br />

No. 60, pp. 102, (1954).<br />

[12] M. L., Jackson (1973). Soil chemical Analysis. Inter. Sci. pub. Inc., N.Y.<br />

[13] M. S., Abu Al-Ezz "<strong>Land</strong> form of Egypt'. Jojn Wiley and sons., Inc., <strong>New</strong> York. (1987).<br />

[14] M., El-Rakaiby; T., Ramadan; A., Morsy and M., Ashmawe "Geological and geomorphological studies of<br />

Halaib and Shalatien region and its relation to surface and subsurface water". NARSS, Cairo, Egypt, (1996).<br />

[15] R., Said (1990). "The geology of Egypt". A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Brookfield (1990).<br />

[16] USDA (1998) "key to soil taxonomy". SCC, SMSS Technical Monograph 19, USDA, USA., (1987).<br />

224


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

HIGH RESOLUTION TERRAIN MAPPING AND<br />

VISUALIZATION OF CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY USING LIDAR<br />

AND IFSAR DATA<br />

Sudhir Raj Shrestha 1* , Dr. Scott N. Miller 2<br />

1 Graduate Research Assistant, University of Wyom<strong>in</strong>g, Department of Renewable <strong>Resources</strong>, Laramie, WY<br />

82071, USA, Email: sudhir@uwyo.edu, Phone: 1-307-766-5305, Fax: 1-307-766-6403, 2 Professor<br />

Poster Extended Abstract<br />

Channel morphology characteristics play crucial roles <strong>in</strong> the understand<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

of the geomorphic and hydrologic characteristics of an area. Conventional techniques for<br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g channel width, depth and cross-section area is time consum<strong>in</strong>g and most of the<br />

time may not represent the spatial variability with<strong>in</strong> the watershed. This poster presents an<br />

overview of the methods for extract<strong>in</strong>g average channel morphology characteristics on a<br />

channel reach basis from a high resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of 1m and 2.5m<br />

respectively build from Light Detection and Rang<strong>in</strong>g (LiDAR) and Interferometric Aperture<br />

Radar (IFSAR) for 150 km 2 USDA-ARS Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed <strong>in</strong> Arizona.<br />

LiDAR is an active remote sens<strong>in</strong>g technology used on a satellite or airborne platform.<br />

By the use of laser light for reflection, high precision k<strong>in</strong>ematic DGPS (differential global<br />

position<strong>in</strong>g systems) for position <strong>in</strong>formation, and an IMU (<strong>in</strong>tertial measur<strong>in</strong>g unit, also<br />

know as <strong>in</strong>ertial navigation system, INS) for altitude calculations, this system can collect high<br />

density, highly accurate topographic and bathymetric data. Digital products delivered to the<br />

end user <strong>in</strong>clude a grid or irregular network of XYZ data po<strong>in</strong>ts with maximum vertical<br />

accuracy on the order of 15 cm and horizontal spac<strong>in</strong>g on the order of 1m, but under some<br />

circumstances as f<strong>in</strong>e as 30-60 cm. This technology holds the promise of produc<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>e<br />

resolution digital elevation model (DEM) for use <strong>in</strong> soil survey, subaqueous soil survey, and<br />

other related pedologic and geomorphological work.<br />

IFSAR is an active remote sens<strong>in</strong>g technology used on satellite or aircrafts. It<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>es complex images recorded by antennas at different locations or at different times. It<br />

is an alternative to conventional stereo photographic techniques for generat<strong>in</strong>g high<br />

resolution topographic maps.<br />

The primary objective of this project was to evaluate the accuracy of the LiDAR and<br />

IFSAR data <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g channel morphology and build an <strong>in</strong>put for Predictive Soil<br />

Mapp<strong>in</strong>g (PSM) project. An approach was developed <strong>in</strong> a geographic <strong>in</strong>formation system<br />

(GIS) to extract cross-section profiles on a stream system derived from the topographic<br />

models. Simultaneous to the acquisition of LIDAR data a field campaign was undertaken by<br />

to evaluate the accuracy of the LiDAR DEM; a total station was used to evaluate cross<br />

sections at 22 sites with<strong>in</strong> the study area. Manual <strong>in</strong>terpretation was required to identify the<br />

bank location from the profiles extracted from the GIS, after which average channel<br />

morphologic properties of width, depth and cross-section area were determ<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Results from both the LiDAR and IFSAR data were highly correlated with field<br />

observations, although the LiDAR data performed significantly better <strong>in</strong> terms of the ability<br />

to determ<strong>in</strong>e channel depth. These results illustrate the benefits of us<strong>in</strong>g high resolution data<br />

<strong>in</strong> hydrologic and geomorphic study, and show promise towards the development of a fully<br />

automated system for extract<strong>in</strong>g channel morphology from surface terra<strong>in</strong> models which can<br />

be used as one of the proxies of soil form<strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>in</strong> PSM.<br />

225


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL SAMPLING AND<br />

PROXIMAL SENSING WITH APPLICATIONS IN PRECISION<br />

AGRICULTURE<br />

M. van Meirvenne, U.W.A. Vitharana L. Cockx<br />

2 Research unit Soil Spatial Inventory Techniques, Dept. of Soil Management & Soil Care, Coupure 653, Ghent<br />

University, Gent, Belgium<br />

Detailed soil spatial <strong>in</strong>formation has become <strong>in</strong>dispensable for a variety of agronomic and<br />

environmental applications. Precision agriculture is one of the applications which refers to a<br />

crop management concept that allows for variable management practices with<strong>in</strong> a field<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to soil or site conditions. The economic and environmental benefits of precision<br />

agriculture have stimulated the research <strong>in</strong>terest and farmer adoption level <strong>in</strong> developed<br />

countries. Moreover, there are evidences for the potential applications of precision agriculture<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries with proper adjustments. Intensive soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

analysis is not a realistic alternative to explore the detailed soil spatial variation due to cost<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts. The advances <strong>in</strong> soil sens<strong>in</strong>g technology, global position<strong>in</strong>g systems (GPS) and<br />

spatial prediction techniques make it possible to acquire accurate high resolution soil<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> a cost effective manner. The user friendly geographical <strong>in</strong>formation systems<br />

have provided tremendous opportunities to analyze, display and <strong>in</strong>ventory soil <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

Consequently, new digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g techniques are aimed to produce soil <strong>in</strong>ventories with<br />

5 m resolution [6].<br />

Proximal soil sens<strong>in</strong>g is widely accepted as a suitable ancillary <strong>in</strong>formation source for<br />

detailed soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Currently, different types of proximal soil sensor techniques are<br />

available. These <strong>in</strong>clude electromagnetic <strong>in</strong>duction (EMI), magnetics, soil resistivity,<br />

spectrometry, ion selective field effect transistors, aerial digital photography and ground<br />

penetrat<strong>in</strong>g radar. In addition, comb<strong>in</strong>es mounted with crop yield sensors became<br />

commercially available <strong>in</strong> the last decade. These sensors are capable to reflect the spatial<br />

variability of different crop and soil properties, e.g. the EMI based EM38 sensor<br />

measurements reflect soil textural variation. Proximal sensors are coupled to a GPS receiver<br />

and a data logger to obta<strong>in</strong> large numbers of on-the-go georeferenced measurements. The<br />

spatial variation observed with sensor <strong>in</strong>formation can be used to design a targeted field soil<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g scheme consist<strong>in</strong>g of a limited number of samples [2]. The relationships identified<br />

between the proximal sensor <strong>in</strong>formation and soil properties are used to predict soil variation<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g appropriate prediction technique. The prediction approaches <strong>in</strong>clude techniques such as<br />

geostatistical methods, different forms of regression, neural networks and Bayesian<br />

maximum entropy. The cluster<strong>in</strong>g procedures like fuzzy k-means algorithm facilitate to<br />

identify with<strong>in</strong>-field zones characterized with a unique comb<strong>in</strong>ation of soil properties to<br />

manage crops at a with<strong>in</strong>-field scale.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[87] C.L. Arnold, Jr., D.L. Civco, M.P. Prisloe, J.D. Hurd, J.W. Stocker. "Remote-sens<strong>in</strong>g-enhanced outreach<br />

education as a decision support system for local land-use officials", Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote<br />

Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (10), 1251-1260, (2000).<br />

[88] J. Bak, J. Jensen, M.M. Larsen, G. Pritzl, J. Scott-Fordsmand. A heavy metal monitor<strong>in</strong>g-program <strong>in</strong><br />

Denmark. The Science of the Total Environment 207: 179-186., (1997).<br />

[89] J.S. Bethel, J.S., J.Ch. McGlone, E.M. Mikhail. "Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry", John Wiley &<br />

Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, 477p, (2001).<br />

226


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

[90] D.L. Corw<strong>in</strong>., S.M. Lesch. “Characteriz<strong>in</strong>g soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity<br />

I. Survey protocols”. Computers and Electronics <strong>in</strong> Agriculture, 46, pp. 103-133, (2005).<br />

[91] D. Devriendt, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, Y. Cornet, R. Goossens. "Accuracy assessment of an IKONOS derived DSM over<br />

urban and suburban area", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 2005 workshop EARSeL Special Interest Group “3D Remote<br />

Sens<strong>in</strong>g” - use of the third dimension for remote sens<strong>in</strong>g purposes.<br />

[92] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. Dewulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />

regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data – geometric aspects", High Resolution Mapp<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

Space (2003).<br />

[93] D. Devriendt, R. Goossens, A. De Wulf, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard. "Improv<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>in</strong>formation extraction for local and<br />

regional authorities us<strong>in</strong>g Very-High-Resolution data - geometrical aspects", In : Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 24th<br />

EARSeL symposium : <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, /May 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 421-<br />

428, (2005).<br />

[94] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke. Updat<strong>in</strong>g groundwater table class maps 1:50,000 by statistical methods: an analysis of quality<br />

versus cost. Geoderma 97: 329-350, (2000).<br />

[95] P.A. F<strong>in</strong>ke, D.J. Brus, M.F.P. Bierkens, T. Hoogland, M. Knotters, F. de Vries. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g ground water<br />

dynamics us<strong>in</strong>g multiple sources of exhaustive high resolution data. Geoderma 123: 23-39, (2004).<br />

[96] K. Jacobsen. "Analysis of Digital Elevation Models based on space <strong>in</strong>formation", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for<br />

European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 439-451, (2005).<br />

[97] K. Jacobsen. "Orthoimages and DEMs by QuickBird and IKONOS", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Transition,<br />

Rotterdam, Millpress, 273-279, (2003).<br />

[98] P.J. Kuikman, W.J.M. de Groot, R.F.A. Hendriks, J. Verhagen, F. de Vries. Stocks of C <strong>in</strong> soils and<br />

emissions of CO2 from agricultural soils <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, Alterra-report 561. 41 pp.<br />

(http://www2.alterra.wur.nl/Webdocs/PDFFiles/Alterrarapporten/AlterraRapport561.pdf ), (2003).<br />

[99] A.B. McBratney, M.L. Mendonca Santos, B. M<strong>in</strong>asny. “On digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g” Geoderma, 117, pp. 3–<br />

52, (2003).<br />

[100] S.P. McGrath, P. Loveland. The Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. Blackie Academic and<br />

Professional, Glasgow, (1992).<br />

[101] K. Taillieu, R. Goossens, D. Devriendt, A. Dewulf, S. Van Coillie, T. Willems. "Generation of DEMs<br />

and orthoimages based on non-stereoscopical IKONOS images", <strong>New</strong> Strategies for European Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 453-460, (2005).<br />

[102] T. Vandevoorde, M. B<strong>in</strong>ard, F. Canters, W. De Genst, N. Stephenne, E. Wolff. "Extraction of land use /<br />

land cover - related <strong>in</strong>formation from very high resolution data <strong>in</strong> urban and suburban areas", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Transition, Rotterdam : Millpress, pp 237-245, (2003).<br />

[103] G. Zhou, R. Li. "Accuracy evaluation of ground po<strong>in</strong>ts from IKONOS high-resolution satellite<br />

imagery", Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 66 (9), 1103-1112, (2000).<br />

227


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

ESTIMATING SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF SOIL SALINITY<br />

USING COKRIGING IN BAHARIYA OASIS, EGYPT<br />

Abstract<br />

Kh. M. Darwish*, M.M. Kotb and R. Ali<br />

Soils & Water Use Dept., National Research Centre (NRC), Cairo, Egypt.<br />

* kdarwish@hotmail.com<br />

The mapp<strong>in</strong>g of sal<strong>in</strong>e soils is the first task before any reclamation effort can be conducted.<br />

Soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity is determ<strong>in</strong>ed, traditionally, by soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and laboratory analysis. Recently, it<br />

became possible to complement these hard data with soft secondary data made available<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g field sensors like electrode probes or satellite images. Estimat<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability of<br />

soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity is an important issue <strong>in</strong> precision agriculture.<br />

In this study, geostatistical method of cokrig<strong>in</strong>g, were applied to estimate and identify the<br />

spatial variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity with ECe measurements <strong>in</strong> 200 km 2 agricultural fields <strong>in</strong> the<br />

north and south Bahariya oasis. In cokrig<strong>in</strong>g, more densely sampled secondary data from the<br />

ETM satellite image source were <strong>in</strong>corporated to improve the estimation of the electrical<br />

conductivity (ECe). The estimated spatial distributions of ECe us<strong>in</strong>g the geostatistical<br />

methods with various reduced data sets were compared with the extensive sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

measurements <strong>in</strong> the large field. The results suggest that sampl<strong>in</strong>g cost can be dramatically<br />

reduced and estimation can be significantly improved us<strong>in</strong>g cokrig<strong>in</strong>g. Compared with the<br />

krig<strong>in</strong>g results us<strong>in</strong>g only primary data set of ECe, cokrig<strong>in</strong>g with reduced data sets of ECe<br />

improves the estimations greatly by reduc<strong>in</strong>g mean squared error and krig<strong>in</strong>g variance up to<br />

70% and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g correlation of estimates and measurements about 25%. Relative<br />

improvements <strong>in</strong> map accuracy were highest (25% to 38%) <strong>in</strong> regression colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g<br />

approach, which also performed better than ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g method that utilized only one<br />

ancillary variable. The relative ga<strong>in</strong> from <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g remote sens<strong>in</strong>g secondary<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>creased with decreas<strong>in</strong>g sampl<strong>in</strong>g density. The results of these models allow to<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolate and classify sal<strong>in</strong>ity on a more realistic and cont<strong>in</strong>uous scale.<br />

Keywords: soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity - spatial variability - cokrig<strong>in</strong>g algorithm – colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Introduction<br />

Soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity limits food production <strong>in</strong> many countries of the world. There are ma<strong>in</strong>ly two<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ds of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity: naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g dryland sal<strong>in</strong>ity and human-<strong>in</strong>duced sal<strong>in</strong>ity caused<br />

by the low quality of water. In both cases the development of plants and soil organisms are<br />

limited lead<strong>in</strong>g to low yields. In Bahariya oasis, where more than 10% of the land is affected<br />

by salt, groundwater and <strong>in</strong>adequate dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions are the major causes of sal<strong>in</strong>ization.<br />

Generally, the classical soil survey methods of field sampl<strong>in</strong>g, laboratory analysis and<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolation of these field data for mapp<strong>in</strong>g, especially <strong>in</strong> large areas is relatively expensive<br />

and time consum<strong>in</strong>g. Remote sensed data might be a useful tool to overcome these<br />

problems. Dwivedi (1992) used <strong>Land</strong>sat MSS and TM data for more detailed mapp<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the salt affected soils <strong>in</strong> the frame of the reconnaissance soil map of India.<br />

Also, De Dapper and Goossens (1996) <strong>in</strong>dicated the development of GIS and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for monitor<strong>in</strong>g and predication of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> the Desert-Delta fr<strong>in</strong>ges of Egypt.<br />

Conventionally (Soil and Plant Analysis Council, 1992) soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

laboratory analysis (electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste extract ECe). This<br />

228


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

procedure is expensive and time-consum<strong>in</strong>g, and provides an <strong>in</strong>complete view of the extent<br />

of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity. An alternative to laboratory analysis is to assess soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> the field by<br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the apparent electrical conductivity (ECa). This can be done us<strong>in</strong>g sensors such<br />

as the four-electrode probes (Rhoades and van Schilfgaarde, 1976) or by electromagnetic<br />

<strong>in</strong>duction <strong>in</strong>struments (McNeil, 1980). This procedure is cheaper and less time-consum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and enabl<strong>in</strong>g a more <strong>in</strong>tensive survey of the study area. Creat<strong>in</strong>g maps typically <strong>in</strong>volves<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g, measur<strong>in</strong>g the variable of <strong>in</strong>terest, and estimat<strong>in</strong>g values at unsampled locations<br />

through some form of <strong>in</strong>terpolation, pla<strong>in</strong> regression, data aggregation, or other prediction<br />

techniques (McBratney et al., 2003).<br />

Geostatistics offers a collection of determ<strong>in</strong>istic and statistical tools aimed at<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g and model<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability. Hybrid geostatistical procedures that account<br />

for environmental correlation have become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly popular <strong>in</strong> recent years because they<br />

allow utiliz<strong>in</strong>g secondary <strong>in</strong>formation that is often available at f<strong>in</strong>er spatial resolution than the<br />

sampled values of a primary target variable. If the correlation between primary and secondary<br />

variables is significant, hybrid techniques generally result <strong>in</strong> more accurate local predictions<br />

than ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g or other univariate predictors (Goovaerts, 1999; McBratney et al., 2000;<br />

Odeh et al., 1994; Triantafilis et al., 2001).<br />

Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is the extension of krig<strong>in</strong>g to more than one variable. It is most likely to be<br />

beneficial where the primary variable (the one be estimated) is under sampled with respect to<br />

the secondary variable(s) that are assumed to be correlated with the primary variable. In some<br />

applications there are only a few measurements of the attribute of <strong>in</strong>terest; the resultant<br />

predicated maps have poor resolution and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty may be very large.<br />

In such situation it is critical to account for secondary, <strong>in</strong>direct <strong>in</strong>formation that may be more<br />

densely sampled (Goovaerts, 1997).<br />

In this way, colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is as reduced form of full cokrig<strong>in</strong>g. It requires only<br />

knowledge of the semivariogram of the primary variable and the cross-variogram between the<br />

primary and secondary variable (Curran & Atk<strong>in</strong>son, 1997). Furthermore, the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

geostatistics and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g techniques has been used before to study and assess the<br />

magnitude and extent of spatial variability <strong>in</strong> soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity (Lesch et al., 1995; Christakos &<br />

Li, 1998.; Darwish, 1998).<br />

This study aims to map soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> the northern and southern part of Bahariya oasis<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g geostatistical techniques, <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g a limited data set of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity measurements<br />

(ECe) as a primary variable with ETM satellite image as a secondary data source. The result<br />

of this methodology will be qualified us<strong>in</strong>g the cross validation method.<br />

Material and methods<br />

Study site description<br />

Bahariya depression is located nearly <strong>in</strong> the middle of the Western desert of Egypt and<br />

compris<strong>in</strong>g a total area of approximately 2250 km 2 (Fig.1). The area falls under the arid<br />

condition as the total ra<strong>in</strong>fall is (3-6) mm/year. Spr<strong>in</strong>gs and wells are the ma<strong>in</strong> two<br />

groundwater resources for irrigation and civic purposes (Salem, 1987). In Bahariya, it is<br />

found that the ma<strong>in</strong> unsuitability criteria elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g more extend of cultivation areas is the<br />

excess of salts. In this research, two study areas were selected. One is <strong>in</strong> the north of Bahariya<br />

cover<strong>in</strong>g an area of about 118.3km 2 and the second is cover<strong>in</strong>g partly the southern part of it<br />

with an area of 77.5km 2 (Fig.2).<br />

229


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Data description<br />

Based on the pre-field and <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed, 45 soil profiles and 71 soil augers were<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> different locations. Fig. 3a and 3b show the location of the observation sites<br />

where soil samples were taken. Four transects <strong>in</strong> area1 and two <strong>in</strong> the southern one. Electrical<br />

conductivity soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity measurements (ECe) dS/cm were determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the soil water<br />

extract out of the saturated soil paste. Total of six sample areas were selected and distributed<br />

over the study areas with a fixed wide of 1km for each. The exact locations of the soil<br />

profiles and auger po<strong>in</strong>ts were precisely def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the field by us<strong>in</strong>g the DGPS, and plotted<br />

on the maps.<br />

Figure 1 & 2. Location and the study areas <strong>in</strong> N and S Baharyia.<br />

Figure 3a. Location of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> study area-1 (North).<br />

230


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Figure 3b. Location of sample po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> study area-2 (South).Fig. 4a and 4b show the frequency<br />

distribution of ECe (dS/cm) values <strong>in</strong> study areas-1 and 2 respectively. The first one exhibit abnormal<br />

distribution, while the second is normally distributed, which does not deemed Ln transformation.<br />

Although the Ln transformation ECe semivariogram can give a better fitt<strong>in</strong>g, but the problem of back<br />

transformation through the estimation procedure is limit<strong>in</strong>g its usability.<br />

Frequency<br />

9,0<br />

6,8<br />

4,5<br />

2,3<br />

0,0<br />

0,96 59,97 118,99 178,00<br />

231<br />

"ECe"<br />

Figure 4a. Frequent distribution of ECe values <strong>in</strong> study area-1.<br />

Frequency<br />

Method of geostatistical analysis<br />

3<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0,86 44,57 88,29 132,00<br />

"ECe"<br />

Figure 4b. Frequent distribution of ECe values <strong>in</strong> study area-2<br />

The variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity represent<strong>in</strong>g horizontal distribution of salts <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

model was mapped. The study shows that it is possible to map soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity variability us<strong>in</strong>g


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

an appropriate <strong>in</strong>terpolation technique. The part of the study, as reported here, <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

reconstruct<strong>in</strong>g the spatial variability of sal<strong>in</strong>ity; and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the accuracy to predict<br />

electrical conductivity measurements.<br />

Geostatistical methods can be used to measure and model the spatial correlation of soil<br />

sal<strong>in</strong>ity measurements as a primary variable and the satellite image as a secondary data<br />

variable. The models of spatial correlation are then used along with Krig<strong>in</strong>g and the new<br />

geostatistical technique of Collocated Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g to develop large scale maps show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

spatial pattern of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity status <strong>in</strong> the selected study area.<br />

Colocated Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g<br />

As mentioned before, Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is the extension of Krig<strong>in</strong>g to more than one variable.<br />

Colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is as reduced form of full cokrig<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g Z (the primary variable) = 1 and Y (The secondary variable) = 2<br />

Then, colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g with Markov-type approximation of attribute Z at location X<br />

is given by:<br />

Z*cok (u) = n i=1∑ λ1i (u) Z (ui) + λ2 (u) [Y (u) + mz - my] (1)<br />

Where:<br />

Z*cok (u): cokrig<strong>in</strong>g estimator of Z(u)<br />

λ1i (u): cokrig<strong>in</strong>g weight associated to neighbor<strong>in</strong>g datum Z(u) for estimation at location u.<br />

λ2 (u): cokrig<strong>in</strong>g weight associated to collocated secondary datum Y(u).<br />

mz: mean of the primary variable (ECe measurements).<br />

my: Mean of the secondary variable (Satellite data).<br />

In this study, colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g was applied to map soil ECe values, from available<br />

ECe data as primary data and ETM Satellite image as densely sampled secondary data<br />

source. When the collocated secondary variable Y (u) is known everywhere and varies<br />

smoothly across the study area (e.g., satellite data & surface reflectance) there is little loss <strong>in</strong><br />

reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the cokrig<strong>in</strong>g system, provided that it is available at each location u be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

estimated (Xu et al., 1992; Goovaerts, 1998b). This is clear the case <strong>in</strong> remote sens<strong>in</strong>g where<br />

the secondary variable is provided by remotely sensed imagery data, which often completely<br />

covers the area of <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

Selection of the imagery<br />

Two smaller w<strong>in</strong>dows of a complete <strong>Land</strong>sat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) satellite<br />

image of Bahariya Oasis dated <strong>in</strong> 21-04-2002 were chosen to be used <strong>in</strong> this study (Fig.2).<br />

The False Color Composite (FCC) of these image w<strong>in</strong>dows is cover<strong>in</strong>g area-1 as shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Fig. 3a and area-2 <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3b. The first image w<strong>in</strong>dow is with<strong>in</strong> the Northern part of Bahariya<br />

depression, which is cover<strong>in</strong>g most of the villages located there. The second one is cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

partly the southern part of Bahariya.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g geo-morphological features are covered by image one from north to<br />

south:<br />

1- Maysera Plateau, escarpment and plateau footslope.<br />

2- Mandisha Hill, hilland and footslope.<br />

3- Penepla<strong>in</strong> sand sheet and rock out crop.<br />

4- Pla<strong>in</strong> sand sheet, sand flat and playa.<br />

On the other hand, the follow<strong>in</strong>g geo-morphological features can be recognized <strong>in</strong> image two:<br />

1 Pla<strong>in</strong> sand sheet, sand flat, playa and isolated conical hills.<br />

232


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

2 Plateau footslope and escarpment.<br />

Exploratory data analysis<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Some statistics about the hard data (ECe) for areas-1 &-2 are reported <strong>in</strong> Table 1. It was<br />

noted the presence of a strong spatial variability. For example <strong>in</strong> areas 1 & 2, there is a big<br />

difference between the extreme values (m<strong>in</strong>imum and maximum). In addition, to improve<br />

estimation accuracy, the correlation between the primary and secondary variables should be<br />

as high as possible. Therefore, the Pearson correlation coefficient was applied on the ECe<br />

values that were available and the colocated reflectance measurements provided by the eight<br />

spectral bands of the ETM image. It is found, that the highest correlation (r≅0.3) of the ETM<br />

bands with the EC observations is signed for the ETM low ga<strong>in</strong> band 6 (Fig. 5). At study<br />

areas 1 and 2, the relationship between EC and surface reflectance REF was probably masked<br />

by the sand sheet and flat layer on the soil surface, which had accumulated as a result of<br />

geological history and greatly affected surface reflectance shown <strong>in</strong> the satellite image, but<br />

not ma<strong>in</strong>ly EC. The oldest rocks exposed with<strong>in</strong> Bahariya depression are sandstone, siltstone<br />

and clay of Cenomanian age that cover the floor of the depression and crop out along the base<br />

of the escarpment (Parsons, 1962).<br />

In this way, the secondary variable could be determ<strong>in</strong>ed for every pixel covered by the image.<br />

Items Mean Standard Deviation Sample variance M<strong>in</strong>. Max.<br />

Area 1 (N) 37.27 46.51 2163.06 0.96 178.0<br />

Area 2 (S) 51.26 39.41 1552.79 0.86 132.0<br />

Correlation Coefficient<br />

Table 1. Statistical summary of ECe (dS/cm) data.<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

0<br />

-0.05<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

ETM spectral bands<br />

Figure 5. The Correlation Coefficient statistical analysis among primary and secondary variables.<br />

(All correlations were significant at P < 0.001 level).<br />

On the other hand, the frequent distribution of the colocated reflectance measurements<br />

of ETM low ga<strong>in</strong> band 6 for area 1 and 2 is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 6a & 6b.<br />

233


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Frequency<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

NonTransformed<br />

0<br />

148.0 169.0 190.0 211.0<br />

ETM LG band 6<br />

Figure 6a. Frequent distribution of ETM low<br />

ga<strong>in</strong> band 6 for area-1.<br />

234<br />

Frequency<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

NonTransformed<br />

0<br />

161.0 177.0 193.0 209.0<br />

ETM LG band 6<br />

Figure 6b. Frequent distribution of ETM low<br />

ga<strong>in</strong> band 6 for area-2.<br />

The reflectance values of ETM LG band 6 were standardized to zero mean and unit variance<br />

for each study area and re-comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>to one dataset of standardized the field surface<br />

reflectance (REF) for whole study area. The confirmed Regression Coefficient of (ETM LG<br />

band 6) with the EC observations for study areas 1 and 2 is <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g relatively higher<br />

correlation for area-1 than area-2 (Fig. 7a & 7b).<br />

Primary ("EC")<br />

178.00<br />

133.74<br />

89.48<br />

45.22<br />

0.96<br />

148.00 169.00 190.00 211.00<br />

Covariate ("ETM LG 6")<br />

Regression coefficient = 0.9 (SE = 0.6, r2 =0.065, y <strong>in</strong>tercept = -126.705, n = 31)<br />

Figure 7a. The Regression Coefficient among<br />

variables (Z & Y) <strong>in</strong> area-1<br />

Structure analysis<br />

Primary (EC)<br />

132.00<br />

99.22<br />

66.43<br />

33.65<br />

0.86<br />

161.0 177.0 193.0 209.0<br />

Covariate (ETM LG band 6)<br />

Regression coefficient = 0,6 (SE = 0,8, r2 =0,047, y <strong>in</strong>tercept = -72,154, n = 14<br />

Figure 7b. The Regression Coefficient among<br />

variables (Z & Y) <strong>in</strong> area-2.<br />

It is necessary to analyze the spatial variability of the data above by semivariance function.<br />

Fig. 8a and 8b illustrate the semivariance value of primary variable (ECe) of study areas 1 &<br />

2. The sill of EC <strong>in</strong> areas 1 & 2 are 2620.0m and 1845.0m and their correlation lag range<br />

3710.0m and 1120.0m respectively


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Semivariance<br />

5805<br />

4353<br />

2902<br />

1451<br />

0<br />

0.0 2596.0 5192.0 7788.0<br />

Separation Distance (h) m<br />

Figure 8a. Isotropic variogram (spherical model)<br />

of ECe (dS/cm) <strong>in</strong> area-1.<br />

235<br />

Semivariance<br />

3482<br />

2611<br />

1741<br />

870<br />

0<br />

0.0 2257.7 4515.3 6773.0<br />

Separation Distance (h) m<br />

Figure 8b. Isotropic variogram (spherical model)<br />

of ECe (dS/cm) <strong>in</strong> area-2.<br />

The variogram shows a relative nugget effect of 11.7% for study area-1 and 10.0% for area-2,<br />

which cloud be calculated through this ratio [(C /(C + C)) x 100] between nugget variance<br />

0 0<br />

and sill. The nugget effect looks more significant <strong>in</strong> study area-2 than area-1, which causes<br />

by random factors.<br />

On the other hand, as Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g is a multivariate extension of krig<strong>in</strong>g, when the<br />

secondary variable is known everywhere and varies smoothly across the study area (e.g.,<br />

colocated reflectance measurements provided by ETM low ga<strong>in</strong> band 6) there is little loss <strong>in</strong><br />

reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the cokrig<strong>in</strong>g system. The secondary variable provides <strong>in</strong>formation only about<br />

the primary trend at location u.<br />

In order to apply a colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g method a cross-semivariance analysis must be<br />

performed prior to cokrig<strong>in</strong>g, where CZY(ui - u) is the cross covariance between primary and<br />

secondary variables at locations ui and u, respectively. Aga<strong>in</strong>, the common practice consists<br />

of estimat<strong>in</strong>g and model<strong>in</strong>g the (cross) semivariogram, then retriev<strong>in</strong>g the (cross) covariance.<br />

Fig. 9a and 9b show the experimental semivariogram of the secondary variable ETM LG<br />

band6 and cross semivariogram with the primary one (ECe po<strong>in</strong>t observations) for study<br />

area-1, computed as:<br />

(2)


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Semivariance<br />

394.7<br />

263.1<br />

131.6<br />

"ETM LG 6": Isotropic Variogram<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 2596.0 5192.0 7788.0<br />

Separation Distance (h) m<br />

Figure 9a. The semivariogram of secondary<br />

variable for study area-1<br />

236<br />

Semivariance<br />

"EC" x "ETM LG 6": Isotropic Cross Variogram<br />

2163.<br />

1431.<br />

698.<br />

-34.<br />

0.0 2596.0 5192.0 7788.0<br />

Separation Distance (h) m<br />

Figure 9b. The cross-variogram of primary and<br />

secondary variables for area-1.<br />

The sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed based on the semivariograms. In Fig. 9a & 9b, an<br />

exponential model of isotropic variogram was fitted for the secondary variable (ETM LG 6)<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g an iterative procedure developed by Goulard (1989). The cross-variogram between the<br />

primary and secondary data sets is modeled (here a small nugget effect 11.6m and a spherical<br />

model with sill 232.2m and range 3400.0m), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the <strong>in</strong>tensive sampl<strong>in</strong>g scheme<br />

used resolved most of the spatial variation<br />

Nevertheless, Fig. 10a & 10b illustrate the experimental semivariograms of the<br />

secondary variable (ETM LG 6) and the cross-variogram <strong>in</strong> study area-2. At area-2, the<br />

isotropic varigram of (ETM LG 6) shows a spherical model with a sill of 164.7m and a fitted<br />

range of 1150.0m, which probably reflected gradual differences <strong>in</strong> EC due to elevation. The<br />

cross-variogram between the primary and secondary data sets <strong>in</strong> area-2 modeled l<strong>in</strong>early with<br />

sill of 0.1m and range of 0.75m. Although <strong>in</strong> study area-2, EC was less significantly<br />

correlated with the secondary variable compare with area-1, only a small portion of the<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> EC can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by variation <strong>in</strong> elevation.<br />

Generally, cross-variograms largely confirmed the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the simple correlation analysis,<br />

show<strong>in</strong>g (i) more spatial correlation between EC and ETM LG 6 at area-1, and (ii) decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

spatial correlation between EC and ETM LG 6 at area-2 (Fig. 10b). This proves the existence<br />

of correlation between spatial variability of the soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity data, which belongs to nugget<br />

effect.<br />

Semivariance<br />

450.0<br />

300.0<br />

150.0<br />

"ETM LG 6" Isotropic Variogram<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 2257.7 4515.3 6773.0<br />

Separation Distance (h) m<br />

Figure 10a. The semivariogram of secondary<br />

variable for study area-2.<br />

Semivariance<br />

"EC" x "ETM LG 6" : Isotropic Cross Variogram<br />

1552.79<br />

851.66<br />

150.52<br />

-550.61<br />

-1251.75<br />

0.00 2257.67 4515.33 6773.00<br />

Separation Distance (h) m<br />

Figure 10b. The cross-variogram of primary and<br />

secondary variables for area-2.


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Colocated Cokrig<strong>in</strong>g of EC po<strong>in</strong>t observations with ETM as secondary data source<br />

The colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpolated maps cover study areas 1 and 2 is shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 11a &<br />

12a. The ord<strong>in</strong>ary cokrig<strong>in</strong>g algorithm was applied to <strong>in</strong>terpolate the EC data us<strong>in</strong>g GS +<br />

program.<br />

As a result of us<strong>in</strong>g search neighborhood area as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> the cross-variograms of<br />

area-1 and area-2, quite lots of areas were closed to the primary observation po<strong>in</strong>ts and this<br />

give high effect of the secondary data. Closer to primary observation po<strong>in</strong>ts this effect is<br />

more screened by the available primary data and this significantly improved the accuracy of<br />

colocated EC maps.<br />

However, the visual <strong>in</strong>terpretation of the EC colocated map of area-1 <strong>in</strong> relation to the<br />

DEM (digital Elevation Model) grid image of each area give a good impression that the<br />

estimation of sal<strong>in</strong>ity values is logical, taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration the location from the salt<br />

effected soils (playa), the relatively lower elevation units (depressions) and the position <strong>in</strong><br />

landscape <strong>in</strong> the oasis (Fig. 11b).<br />

"m north"<br />

3142286<br />

3138434<br />

3134583<br />

35679444 35687159<br />

"m east"<br />

35694874<br />

Figure 11a. Interpolate-colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g map of EC (dS/cm) of the study area-1 (North of<br />

Bahariya).<br />

On the other hand, the relatively high ECe (dS/cm) values that are pronounced and<br />

presented as connected counter l<strong>in</strong>es are express<strong>in</strong>g the areas where low elevation and much<br />

sal<strong>in</strong>ity features are available. This is clear presented for area-2 <strong>in</strong> Fig. 12b. This quite<br />

validat<strong>in</strong>g the estimated <strong>in</strong>terpolated cokriged maps obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Obviously, there is a visually<br />

better resolution of spatial detail <strong>in</strong> the EC colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpolated maps.<br />

237<br />

"EC"<br />

> 164<br />

> 151<br />

> 139<br />

> 126<br />

> 114<br />

> 102<br />

> 89<br />

> 77<br />

> 64<br />

> 52<br />

> 39<br />

> 27<br />

> 15<br />

> 2<br />

> -10


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

3142000<br />

3140000<br />

3138000<br />

3136000<br />

"m north"<br />

35680000 35684000 35688000 35692000<br />

3103869<br />

3100634<br />

Playa<br />

238<br />

Playa<br />

Depression<br />

Figure 11b. The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) map of area-1.<br />

3097399<br />

35657997 35663986<br />

"m east"<br />

35669976<br />

"EC south area"<br />

Figure 12a. Interpolate-colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g map of EC (dS/cm) of the study area-2 (South of<br />

Bahariya).<br />

3102000<br />

3100000<br />

3098000<br />

35658000 35661000 35664000 35667000<br />

Playa<br />

Figure 12b. The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) map of area-2<br />

142<br />

138<br />

134<br />

130<br />

126<br />

122<br />

118<br />

114<br />

110<br />

106<br />

102<br />

98<br />

94<br />

144<br />

140<br />

136<br />

132<br />

128<br />

124<br />

120<br />

116<br />

112<br />

108<br />

104<br />

100<br />

96<br />

92<br />

> 119<br />

> 110<br />

> 102<br />

> 93<br />

> 85<br />

> 77<br />

> 68<br />

> 60<br />

> 51<br />

> 43<br />

> 34<br />

> 26<br />

> 18<br />

> 9<br />

> 1


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Perform cross validation analysis<br />

To assess the accuracy of the colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g estimated maps, there is a cross validation<br />

analysis for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g effective parameters for cokrig<strong>in</strong>g. In cross-validation analysis a graph<br />

can be constructed of the estimated vs. actual values for each sample location <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong>.<br />

The cross validation analysis of study areas 1 and 2 are presented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 13a & 13b. Each<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t on the graph represents a location <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>put data set for which an actual and estimated<br />

value are available.<br />

Actual "EC"<br />

178.00<br />

133.74<br />

89.48<br />

45.22<br />

0.96<br />

0.96 59.97 118.99 178.00<br />

Estimated "EC"<br />

Regression coefficient = 0.321 (SE = 0.363 , r2 =0.026,<br />

y <strong>in</strong>tercept = 26.72, SE Prediction = 45.893)<br />

Figure 13a. Cross Validation (CoKrig<strong>in</strong>g) of<br />

study area-1.<br />

239<br />

Actual<br />

132.00<br />

99.22<br />

66.43<br />

33.65<br />

0.86<br />

0.86 44.57 88.29 132.00<br />

Estimated<br />

Regression coefficient = -0.455 (SE = 0.390 , r2 =0.102,<br />

y <strong>in</strong>tercept = 75.99, SE Prediction = 37.344)<br />

Figure 13b. Cross Validation (CoKrig<strong>in</strong>g) of<br />

study area-2.<br />

The regression coefficient, which is describ<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>in</strong>ear regression equation is for<br />

(area-1) = 0.3 and for (area-2) = -0.4. The standard error of the regression coefficient (SE =<br />

0.36, 0.39 for area-1 & 2 respectively). The r 2 value is the proportion of variation expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by the best-fit l<strong>in</strong>e (<strong>in</strong> case of (area-1) = 2.6% and 10.2% for (area-2)); and the y-<strong>in</strong>tercept of<br />

the best-fit l<strong>in</strong>e is also provided. The SE Prediction term is def<strong>in</strong>ed as SD x (1 - r 2 )0.5, where<br />

SD = standard deviation of the actual data (45.9 and 37.3 for areas-1 & 2 respectively).<br />

Generally, the method of colokated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g significantly improved the accuracy of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolated cokriged EC maps, as shown by a reasonable acceptable regression coefficient<br />

values <strong>in</strong> both study areas. For cokriged EC, patterns <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpolated EC maps closely<br />

resembled those of the DEM maps, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that this method is also more vulnerable to<br />

potential artifacts <strong>in</strong> ancillary variables. In study areas 1 & 2, both the primary variate (ECe<br />

measurements) and secondary one (surface reflectance derived from ETM satellite image)<br />

contributed significantly to predict<strong>in</strong>g the local means of ECe.<br />

However, it is clear that the spatial variability of area-2 is comparatively less than that<br />

<strong>in</strong> area-1. The ma<strong>in</strong> reason for this weakness of spatial variability <strong>in</strong> area-2 could be referred<br />

to the lack of EC sampl<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts available and still to the high <strong>in</strong>fluence of the ECe (dS/cm)<br />

extreme values on neighbor<strong>in</strong>g locations.<br />

Although two sites were used <strong>in</strong> our study, the range <strong>in</strong> soil types and terra<strong>in</strong> conditions<br />

was limited. Clearly, more work needs to be done, to develop a flexible, more generic<br />

framework for soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity mapp<strong>in</strong>g at different scales and <strong>in</strong> different environments. Of<br />

particular <strong>in</strong>terest is what secondary data source (e.g. surface reflectance derived from<br />

satellite images) are most suitable for EC mapp<strong>in</strong>g across larger regions, for which detailed<br />

on-the-go mapp<strong>in</strong>g of EC or similar properties is not feasible. Our study <strong>in</strong>dicates great<br />

potential for reduc<strong>in</strong>g sampl<strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>in</strong> digital soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity mapp<strong>in</strong>g when a cokrig<strong>in</strong>g<br />

approach is used. However, the reduction of sample size tested here (Fig. 13a & 13b) was<br />

somewhat arbitrary. Better procedures are needed for optimiz<strong>in</strong>g sampl<strong>in</strong>g with regard to


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

cover<strong>in</strong>g the variation <strong>in</strong> primary and secondary variables <strong>in</strong> both feature and geographic<br />

spaces, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g situations where little prior <strong>in</strong>formation about the target variable is<br />

available.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The spatial distribution maps drawn based on cokrig<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terpolation method expla<strong>in</strong> clearly<br />

the spatial variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> north and south study areas of Bahariya oasis.<br />

Geostatistical method of colocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g that utilized spatially correlated secondary<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>creased the quality of maps of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity (ECe measurements) as compared to<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g method. Apparent EC cokriged with surface reflectance derived from<br />

satellite images performed best <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g map accuracy. In this method, relative<br />

improvements <strong>in</strong> map accuracy over ord<strong>in</strong>ary krig<strong>in</strong>g method ranged from 19% to 38% at the<br />

two study areas and there was little loss of accuracy when sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity was reduced by<br />

half as shown <strong>in</strong> area-2. The ETM LG band 6 secondary data source is considered valuable<br />

one for detailed mapp<strong>in</strong>g of EC at the field scale, whereas the relative value of terra<strong>in</strong><br />

attributes varied geographically.<br />

Indeed, there are different orig<strong>in</strong>al factors have <strong>in</strong>fluenced the f<strong>in</strong>al output of the<br />

cokrig<strong>in</strong>g logarithm technique. Those factors can be related to the issues of sampl<strong>in</strong>g, the<br />

spatial distribution of the soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity measurements <strong>in</strong> the space, the total number of the<br />

observation po<strong>in</strong>ts and the variability of the ECe data set obta<strong>in</strong>ed. In addition, most<br />

secondary <strong>in</strong>formation (i.e. satellite image data) conta<strong>in</strong>s uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties that may mask<br />

relationships with EC values, or other soil properties of <strong>in</strong>terest. Furthermore, rely<strong>in</strong>g on a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle secondary attribute is risky because (i) the variable chosen may not be related to the<br />

primary variable of <strong>in</strong>terest and (ii) field artifacts or errors <strong>in</strong> the secondary <strong>in</strong>formation could<br />

cause significant errors <strong>in</strong> the EC prediction.<br />

Improv<strong>in</strong>g those factors especially <strong>in</strong> the south study area-2, would play an important<br />

role for receiv<strong>in</strong>g more accurate results out of this <strong>in</strong>terpolation method.<br />

At the end of the whole procedure, it is still manage successfully to use the obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolated EC sal<strong>in</strong>ity maps. To reduce uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, we recommend us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

measured, multivariate secondary <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity<br />

approach.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[104] A.B. McBratney, I.O.A. Odeh, T.F.A. Bishop, M.S. Dunbar and T.M. Shatar. "An overview of<br />

pedometric techniques for use <strong>in</strong> soil survey". Geoderma 97, 293– 327, (2000).<br />

[105] A.B. McBratney, M. L. Mendonca Santos and B. M<strong>in</strong>asny. "On digital soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g". Geoderma 117,<br />

3– 52, (2003).<br />

[106] G. Christakos, X. Li. "Bayesian maximum entropy analysis and mapp<strong>in</strong>g: a farewell to krig<strong>in</strong>g<br />

estimators". Mathematical Geology 30, 435–462, (1998).<br />

[107] I.O.A Odeh, A.B McBratney and D.J. Chittleborough. "Spatial prediction of soil properties from<br />

landform attributes derived from a digital elevation model". Geoderma 63, 197–214, (1994).<br />

[108] J. D. McNeil. "Electromagnetic Terra<strong>in</strong> Conductivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers:<br />

Technical Note TN-6". GEONICS Limited, Ontario, Canada (15 pp.), (1980).<br />

[109] J.D. Rhoades and J. Van Schilfgaarde. "An electrical conductivity probe for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity".<br />

Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 647– 651, (1976).<br />

[110] J. Triantafilis, A.I. Huckel and I.O.A Odeh. "Comparison of statistical prediction methods for<br />

estimat<strong>in</strong>g field-scale clay content us<strong>in</strong>g different comb<strong>in</strong>ations of ancillary variables". Soil Sci. 166, 415–427,<br />

(2001).<br />

240


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

[111] Kh. M. Darwish. "Integrat<strong>in</strong>g soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity data with satellite image us<strong>in</strong>g geostatistics". M.Sc. Thesis,<br />

Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Gent University, Gent, Belgium, (1998).<br />

[112] M. De Dapper, R. Goossens. "Model<strong>in</strong>g and monitor<strong>in</strong>g of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity and water logg<strong>in</strong>g hazards <strong>in</strong><br />

the Desert-Delta fr<strong>in</strong>ges of Egypt based on Geomorphology", Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g and GIS, (1996).<br />

[113] M. Goulard. "Inference <strong>in</strong> a coregionalization model". In: M. Armstrong, Ed. Geostatistics, Kluwer,<br />

Dordrecht, pp. 397-408, (1989).<br />

[114] M. Z. Salem. "Pedological characteristics of Bahariya Oasis soils". Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. of Agric. A<strong>in</strong><br />

Shams, Univ., Egypt, (1987).<br />

[115] P. Goovaerts. "Geostatistics for Natural <strong>Resources</strong> Evaluation", Oxford University Press, London,<br />

(1997).<br />

[116] P. Goovaerts. "Ord<strong>in</strong>ary cokrig<strong>in</strong>g revisited", Math. Geol., 30(1), pp. 21-42, (1998b).<br />

[117] P. Goovaerts. "Geostatistics <strong>in</strong> soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives". Geoderma 89, 1 –45,<br />

(1999).<br />

[118] P.M. Atk<strong>in</strong>son and P.J. Curran. “Choos<strong>in</strong>g an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigations”. Photogrammetric Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 63, 1345-1351, (1997).<br />

[119] R. M. Parsons. "Bahariya and Farafra areas (<strong>New</strong> Valley Project, Western Desert of Egypt)", F<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Report. Egyptian General Desert Development Organization, U.A.R, (1962).<br />

[120] R. S. Dwivedi. "Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and the study of the effect of image scale on del<strong>in</strong>eation of salt affected<br />

soils <strong>in</strong> the Indo-Gangentic pla<strong>in</strong>s". Intern. Journal of Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g, 13: 1527-1536, (1992).<br />

[121] S. M. Lesch, D. J. Strauss and J. D. Rhoades. "Spatial predication of soil sal<strong>in</strong>ity us<strong>in</strong>g electromagnetic<br />

<strong>in</strong>duction techniques. 1. Statistical predication models: A comparison of multiple l<strong>in</strong>ear regression and<br />

cokrig<strong>in</strong>g". Water Resour. Res. 31, 373-386, (1995). Soil and Plant Analysis Council. "Handbook on Reference<br />

Methods for Soil Analysis". Georgia University Station, Athens, Georgia, (1992).<br />

[122] W. Xu, T.T. Tran, R.M. Srivastava and A.G. Journel. "Integrat<strong>in</strong>g seismic data <strong>in</strong> reservoir model<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

the collocated cokrig<strong>in</strong>g alternative", Society of Petroleum Eng<strong>in</strong>eers, paper no. 24,742, (1992).<br />

241


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF DRAINAGE AND PHOSPHATE<br />

RETENTION AND THEIR INTER RELATIONSHIP IN SOILS OF<br />

THE SOUTH-WESTERN REGION OF THE NORTH ISLAND,<br />

NEW ZEALAND<br />

A.Senarath*, A.S.Palmer and R.W.Tillman<br />

Soil & Earth Sciences, Institute of Natural <strong>Resources</strong>, Massey University, Palmerston North, <strong>New</strong> Zealand<br />

Abstract<br />

Spatial variability of dra<strong>in</strong>age, phosphate retention and their <strong>in</strong>ter-relationship was<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> soils developed from mixed quartzo-feldspathic and tephric parent material on<br />

river terraces <strong>in</strong> the south western region of the North Island . A series of dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps<br />

at 1:25,000, 1:10,000 and 1:5000 scales were produced for selected w<strong>in</strong>dow areas. The<br />

optimal soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale for captur<strong>in</strong>g soil dra<strong>in</strong>age variability and the usefulness of the<br />

soil maps for identify<strong>in</strong>g spatial variability of phosphate-retention was <strong>in</strong>vestigated. Soil<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age varies from well dra<strong>in</strong>ed through moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed to imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

and poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> a paddock scale (2-3 ha). In this study, soil dra<strong>in</strong>age had no<br />

topographic control which makes soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g extremely difficult. The reason for the short<br />

distance variability <strong>in</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>age is attributed to slight textural variations of the orig<strong>in</strong>al alluvial<br />

parent material. This gives rise to the formation of different soil structures, which <strong>in</strong> turn<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluences the hydraulic conductivity of the soil and results <strong>in</strong> variable dra<strong>in</strong>age properties<br />

which <strong>in</strong>fluence the clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy. There is a close relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age, Pretention<br />

and clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy. Well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have high P-retention and the clay fraction<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s 12-13% allophane. Poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have low P-retention and the clay fraction<br />

has no allophane and conta<strong>in</strong>s ma<strong>in</strong>ly kandite. The relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and Pretention<br />

can be used to identify different P-retention areas on soil maps. In addition,<br />

1:10,000 is the most suitable soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale for practical farm plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Region.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

A detailed soil survey carried out at 1:25,000 scale <strong>in</strong> an area cover<strong>in</strong>g 2000 ha of terraced<br />

land near Kiwitea village <strong>in</strong> south western region of the North Island reveals that the soil<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age varies over the landscape at paddock scale (2-3 ha.) hav<strong>in</strong>g no topographic control<br />

[15]. Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age dictates suitability for cropp<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>tensive graz<strong>in</strong>g and sensitivity of<br />

land to a number of management practices so, soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps will be helpful <strong>in</strong> land<br />

use plann<strong>in</strong>g and management practices. Furthermore previous studies have shown that<br />

phosphate retention (P-retention) is related to soil dra<strong>in</strong>age; and <strong>in</strong> particular Parfitt et all[10]<br />

have shown that soil dra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>in</strong>fluences clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy and hence P-retention. Phosphate<br />

retention is an important soil attribute determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the amount of P needed to be applied for<br />

plant production. Soil maps are therefore valuable tools. Small scale exist<strong>in</strong>g soil maps<br />

published for the area at 1:250,000 [9] and at 1:63,360 [8] are clearly <strong>in</strong>capable of show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age variability on soil maps [15].<br />

The aim of this study is to <strong>in</strong>vestigate variability of soil dra<strong>in</strong>age status over the<br />

landscape, the best scale to map soil dra<strong>in</strong>age classes to aid land management decisions,<br />

242


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

ability of soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps to predict P-retention values and the reasons for short<br />

distance soil dra<strong>in</strong>age variability <strong>in</strong> the region..<br />

OVER VIEW OF THE STUDY AREA<br />

The study area, 2000 ha <strong>in</strong> extent, is located near Kiwitea village <strong>in</strong> the northern Manawatu<br />

district which is situated towards the south-western part of the North Island. The landform of<br />

the area is characterized by suites of river terraces at different elevations. Three major<br />

terraces can be identified with<strong>in</strong> the area; the river flats (180 m above msl) covered with<br />

recent alluvium (1000-2000 years BP) hav<strong>in</strong>g flat to gently slop<strong>in</strong>g topography, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate terrace (200-240 m above msl) covered with a mixture of old alluvium,<br />

colluvium, loess and tephra (


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

core sampler and were comb<strong>in</strong>ed to form a composite sample to determ<strong>in</strong>e P-retention. This<br />

is the methodology used <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zealand as part of a fertiliser recommendation for pastures.<br />

P-retention of soils was determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the method given by Saunders [13]<br />

and the results are expressed as percentage values. Eight quality control samples with known<br />

P-retention values were <strong>in</strong>corporated with<strong>in</strong> each 100-sample batch to monitor the possible<br />

variations that might arise among different batches. The same P-retention solution and<br />

vanado-molybdate solutions were used throughout the analysis of the samples for a fair<br />

comparison of results.<br />

Preparation of maps<br />

Dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps were generated by the “Surfer” programme (version 5.0) based on the<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t dra<strong>in</strong>age class data. The dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps (Figure 3A, 3B and 3C) are contour maps<br />

generated by the “Surfer” programme based on the po<strong>in</strong>t dra<strong>in</strong>age data. The programme<br />

generates values between the po<strong>in</strong>ts automatically by krig<strong>in</strong>g [14]. To generate maps,<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age classes were given numerical values of 100, 90, 60 and 30 for well dra<strong>in</strong>ed,<br />

moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed and poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed dra<strong>in</strong>age classes<br />

respectively [6]. When generat<strong>in</strong>g the contour pattern, the programme always generates a<br />

sequential dra<strong>in</strong>age pattern accord<strong>in</strong>g to this order. That is if a well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soil was found by<br />

auger<strong>in</strong>g to occur adjacent to a poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soil, the programme automatically <strong>in</strong>terpolates<br />

moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed and imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soil units between the two.A series of soil<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps were produced at 1:25,000 (observations on a 250 m grid), 1:10,000<br />

(observations on a 100 m grid) and 1:5000 (observations on a 50 m grid) scales<br />

Bulk density<br />

Bulk density measurements were made on core samples (with known volume) taken from<br />

each soil horizon. Soil samples were oven dried at 105° C until the weight became constant.<br />

Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat)<br />

Saturated hydraulic conductivity measurements were made for undisturbed soil samples taken<br />

from each soil horizon, us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tact cores (150 mm height and 74 mm diameter) accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the method of Klute [5].<br />

M<strong>in</strong>eralogical analysis<br />

M<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of soil samples were determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to methods described by<br />

Whitton and Churchman [18]. Allophane present <strong>in</strong> soils was determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

method of Parfitt [11] and Parfitt and Wilson [12]. Acid-oxalate extractable Si was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the method of Blakemore et.al..[1].<br />

Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age variability<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The 1:250,000 scale soil map [9], of the study area portrays the 2000 m by 300 m w<strong>in</strong>dow<br />

area as well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Kawhatau silt loam (Table 1). A subsequent land resource map at<br />

1:63,360 scale [8] shows the area to be well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Kiwitea loam. Senarath [15] has<br />

244


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed why neither series name is appropriate for the soils on the Intermediate terrace, and<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced new series. When the authors mapped the area at 1:25,000 scale it appears to<br />

encompass three different soil dra<strong>in</strong>age classes (Figure 1a); well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Coulter silt loam,<br />

moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Horoeka silt loam and imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed, Barrow silt loam (Figure<br />

Figure: 1a Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class map for the 2000 m by 300 m w<strong>in</strong>dow area (60 ha) when mapped at<br />

1:25,000 scale.<br />

Figure: 1b Grid sampl<strong>in</strong>g design (50 m by 50 m) with<strong>in</strong> blocks A, B and C established with<strong>in</strong> the 2000<br />

m by 300 m large w<strong>in</strong>dow area on imperfect, moderately well and well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soil units respectively<br />

mapped at 1:25,000 scale.<br />

Figure: 1c .Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps for the 300m by 250m w<strong>in</strong>dow (7.5 ha) areas when mapped at<br />

1:10,000 scale.<br />

Figure: 1d Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps for the 300 m by 250m blocks (7.5 ha) when mapped at 1:5,000<br />

scale.<br />

245


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Soil type <strong>New</strong> Zealand Classification<br />

USDA Soil Taxonomy<br />

[4]<br />

[16]<br />

Kawhatau silt loam Acidic Allophanic Brown Soil Andic Eutrudepts<br />

Kiwitea loam Typic Orthic Melanic Soil Eutrudepts<br />

Coulter silt loam Typic Orthic Allophanic Soil Dystrudepts<br />

Horoeka silt loam Typic Orthic Melanic Soil Andic Eutrudepts<br />

Barrow silt loam Mottled Immature Pallic Soil Aqualfs<br />

Table 1:Classification of soil types accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>New</strong> Zealand soil classification system and the<br />

USDA Soil Taxonomy.<br />

1a). When selected w<strong>in</strong>dow areas (blocks A, B and C) are mapped at 1:10,000 scale it<br />

becomes apparent that the relatively simple soil dra<strong>in</strong>age pattern represented <strong>in</strong> the 1:25,000<br />

scale map (Figure 1a) is much more complex (Figure 1cA, 1cB, and 1cC). Instead of a<br />

gradation of dra<strong>in</strong>age status from well dra<strong>in</strong>ed to imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils (Figure 1a), there<br />

is a mixture of well, moderately well and imperfectly or poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils present <strong>in</strong> each<br />

block with<strong>in</strong> close proximity. At least three different soil dra<strong>in</strong>age classes are identified <strong>in</strong><br />

each of the 300 m by 250 m blocks when mapped at 1:10,000 scale. Each of these blocks<br />

comprises only one soil dra<strong>in</strong>age class when mapped at 1:25,000 scale.<br />

When blocks A, B and C are mapped at 1:5000 scale, no new dra<strong>in</strong>age classes are found<br />

<strong>in</strong> any areas except for block B (Figure 1d B), but the dra<strong>in</strong>age class boundaries could be<br />

shown more accurately and it is apparent that the distribution of dra<strong>in</strong>age classes is more<br />

complex even than that revealed at 1:10,000 scale (Figure, 1d A, 1d B and 1d C). It is evident<br />

that when ground observation <strong>in</strong>tensity is <strong>in</strong>creased a more and more variable soil dra<strong>in</strong>age<br />

pattern can be observed.<br />

Soil-landscape relationship<br />

The problem associated with mapp<strong>in</strong>g of dra<strong>in</strong>age classes (soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>in</strong> this area is that it<br />

is difficult to establish an obvious relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and the topography of<br />

the land [15]. The land is essentially flat to gently undulat<strong>in</strong>g, with a gentle tilt to the west.<br />

There are some <strong>in</strong>stances where soils <strong>in</strong> local depressions, areas close to water bodies or<br />

streams are imperfectly or poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed, but that cannot be accepted as a general rule for<br />

the entire area.<br />

Phosphate retention (P-retention)<br />

The relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and P-retention was <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> detail us<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>in</strong>formation collected from blocks A, B and C on a 50 m <strong>in</strong>terval grid (Figure 1b).<br />

The comparison between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and the P-retention at each observation po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />

that 100% of the poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils <strong>in</strong> the study area have low P-retention, whereas 100%<br />

of the well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have high P-retention. P-retention <strong>in</strong> imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils ranges<br />

from low through medium to high, but 69% of the observations have medium P-retention.<br />

Twenty two percent show high values and only 8% show low values. A majority of the<br />

moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have high P-retention (85%), whereas only 15% of the<br />

observations have medium P-retention values (Table 2).<br />

246


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Dra<strong>in</strong>age class<br />

Blocks A+B+C<br />

Total number of observations<br />

247<br />

Blocks A+B+C<br />

Percentage number of observations<br />

LP-ret MP-ret HP-ret LP-ret MP-ret HP-ret<br />

0 - 30% 31 – 60% 61 – 100% 0 -30% 31 – 60% 61 – 100%<br />

Poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed 9 0 0 100 0 0<br />

Imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed 4 34 11 82 69.4 22.4<br />

Moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed 0 5 29 0 14.7 85.3<br />

Well dra<strong>in</strong>ed 0 0 34 0 0 100<br />

Table 2:The relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age classes and P-retention classes.<br />

LP-ret = low P-retention; MP-ret = medium P-retention; HP-ret = high P-retention.<br />

From these observations it is evident that poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have low P-retention,<br />

imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have medium P-retention and moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed and well<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils have high P-retention. Therefore, the variability <strong>in</strong> P-retention with<strong>in</strong> paddocks<br />

can be attributed to the variability of soil dra<strong>in</strong>age. The relationship has been suspected but<br />

never before demonstrated for <strong>New</strong> Zealand soils.<br />

Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age, phosphate retention and clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy<br />

The sand fractions of both the well dra<strong>in</strong>ed and imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils on the <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />

terrace conta<strong>in</strong> volcanic glass (Table 3). But the clay fraction of the well-dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s allophane whereas the clay fraction of the imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils conta<strong>in</strong>s no<br />

allophane. The P-retention also varies accord<strong>in</strong>gly (Table 3).<br />

Soil Type<br />

Sand fraction Clay fraction<br />

Quartz Feldspar Volcanic.glassKandite<br />

Allophane P-<br />

% % %<br />

% % Ret.%<br />

Coulter silt Well dra<strong>in</strong>ed 41 32 13<br />

loam<br />

16 10 86<br />

Barrow silt Imperfectly 54 29 8<br />

loam dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

31 0 50<br />

Table 3.The relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age, P-retention and clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy of the topsoil of two<br />

of the soils (Senarath, 2003).<br />

As mentioned <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>troduction, Parfitt et al. [10] showed that clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy is<br />

related to soil dra<strong>in</strong>age. It is well known <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zealand that topsoils dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />

allophane have high P-retention while those dom<strong>in</strong>ated by kandite have low P-retention.<br />

These results show that the average P-retention of the topsoil is also <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age of the whole profile.<br />

Soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale and variability of P-retention<br />

The P-retention values of the topsoil samples collected from the study area range from 15%<br />

to 86% [15]. These values <strong>in</strong>dicate that there is considerable variability <strong>in</strong> P-retention with<strong>in</strong><br />

the soils, rang<strong>in</strong>g from low to high [13]. When the area is mapped at 1:25,000 scale, the<br />

ranges of P-retention with<strong>in</strong> the imperfectly, moderately well and well dra<strong>in</strong>ed map units, are<br />

15-72%, 23-86% and 34-86% respectively (Table 4). These figures show that the variability


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

with<strong>in</strong> each map unit at this scale has not reduced significantly compared to the total range of<br />

P-retention (15 – 86%).<br />

Map unit<br />

Mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale 1:25,000<br />

Phosphate Retention<br />

Range Mean STD CV%<br />

Ohakea silt loam (PD) No mapp<strong>in</strong>g unit at 1:25,000 scale<br />

Barrow silt loam (ImD) 15 - 72 44.1 14.4 32.6<br />

Horoeka silt loam (MWD) 23 - 86 65.1 14.2 21.8<br />

Coulter silt loam (WD) 34 - 86 71 12.4 17.4<br />

Mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale 1:10,000<br />

Ohakea silt loam 22 - 44 28 6.7 23.9<br />

Barrow silt loam 15 - 73 46.2 13.5 29.2<br />

Horoeka silt loam 23 - 86 64.8 13.8 21.2<br />

Coulter silt loam 54 - 86 75.9 6.1 8<br />

Mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale 1:5,000<br />

Ohakea silt loam 16 - 52 27.5 8.3 22.3<br />

Barrow silt loam 15 - 78 48.5 14 28.8<br />

Horoeka silt loam 32 - 85 67.9 10.4 15.3<br />

Coulter silt loam 54 - 86 76.7 5.9 7.6<br />

Table 4:The variability of P-retention with<strong>in</strong> the soil map units when mapped at three different scales.<br />

(Senarath, 2003).<br />

STD = standard deviation; CV% = coefficient of variation; PD = poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed; ImD = imperfectly<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>ed; MWD = moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed; WD = well dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

When the mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale is <strong>in</strong>creased from 1:25,000 to 1:10,000 a new poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

map unit (Ohakea silt loam) with less variable P-retention values (22 – 44%) is added to the<br />

soil map (Table 4). The range of P-retention values <strong>in</strong> the Barrow (15 – 73%) and Horoeka<br />

(23 – 86%) map units changed only slightly. However, there is a considerable change of<br />

range <strong>in</strong> P-retention with<strong>in</strong> the Coulter map unit (from 34 – 86% to 54 – 86%). The coefficient<br />

of variation (CV) <strong>in</strong>dicates that Barrow and Horoeka map units mapped at 1:10,000<br />

scale are slightly less variable compared to that of 1:25,000 scale. CV of P-retention slightly<br />

reduced <strong>in</strong> Barrow (from 32.6 to 29.2%) and Horoeka (from 21.8 to 21.2%) silt loams<br />

whereas CV considerably reduced <strong>in</strong> Coulter silt loams (from 17.4% to 8%) (Table 4).<br />

When the mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale <strong>in</strong>creased from 1:10,000 to 1:5,000, the variability of Pretention<br />

very slightly decreased <strong>in</strong> Ohakea , Barrow, Horoeka and Coulter silt loam map<br />

units (Table 4).<br />

Therefore map units at all scales have a considerable range <strong>in</strong> P-retention, but their<br />

mean P-retention values <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> an orderly manner with improv<strong>in</strong>g dra<strong>in</strong>age.<br />

Soil maps at 1:25,000 scale are of little use <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g different areas of P-retention<br />

<strong>in</strong> the field. Dra<strong>in</strong>age class maps at 1:10,000 scale can be used to identify low and high Pretention<br />

areas successfully, but always some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty exists with<strong>in</strong> moderately well and<br />

imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed areas. Although 1:5000 scale maps are more precise and less variable,<br />

there is no advantage <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong>stead of 1:10,000 maps when the added cost of<br />

produc<strong>in</strong>g the maps at the larger scale is taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />

248


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Genesis of soil dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions<br />

Soil texture is a property that is <strong>in</strong>itially <strong>in</strong>herited from its parent material, so variations <strong>in</strong><br />

soil texture are presumed to reflect variations <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial deposition overpr<strong>in</strong>ted by changes due<br />

to weather<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The slight textural variations <strong>in</strong> the parent material probably effected slight variations<br />

<strong>in</strong> soil structural development. In the soils of the study area, silt loam soil textures are<br />

associated with nutty structure while silty clay loam; clay loam or clay soil textures are<br />

associated with blocky structures (Table 5 and 6).<br />

Horizon Depth (cm) Field -texture Structure Macro-<br />

Porosity (%)<br />

249<br />

Ksat<br />

(mm hr –1 )<br />

Ap 0-20 silt loam moderate f<strong>in</strong>e to medium nutty 6 to 7 8<br />

Bw1 20-65 silt loam moderate f<strong>in</strong>e to medium nutty 11 8<br />

Bw2 65-95 silt loam moderate f<strong>in</strong>e to medium nutty<br />

and moderate medium blocky<br />

2Ab 95-125 clay loam moderate medium to coarse<br />

blocky<br />

8 4.3<br />

5 4.6<br />

Table 5:The physical properties of a representative profile of well dra<strong>in</strong>ed Coulter silt loam related to<br />

water movement <strong>in</strong> soil (Senarath, 2003).<br />

Horizon Field-texture Structure Macro- Ksat<br />

depth (cm)<br />

porosity (%) (mm hr –1 )<br />

Ap 0-21 silt loam Strong f<strong>in</strong>e to medium nutty 4 to 8 6.4 to 14<br />

Bg1 21-34 silty clay loam strong very f<strong>in</strong>e, f<strong>in</strong>e and medium<br />

nutty and moderate medium blocky<br />

Bg2 34-65 f<strong>in</strong>e sandy clay loam strong medium to coarse<br />

nutty<br />

Bg3 65-82 clay loam moderate medium to coarse<br />

blocky<br />

12 0.9<br />

9 7.6<br />

3 0.8<br />

Table 6:The physical properties of a representative profile of imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed Barrow silt loam<br />

related to water movement <strong>in</strong> soil (Senarath, 2003).<br />

It is hypothesised that the differences <strong>in</strong> soil structure largely caused the differences <strong>in</strong><br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age status. The hydraulic conductivity of a soil is directly related to its porosity, more<br />

importantly the macro porosity. The shape and the size of the soil structural units has a<br />

noticeable affect on the space between them [2,3] Blocky structure is more closely fitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

than nutty structure hence water can move more readily along structural faces of soils hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nutty structure.<br />

Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) values <strong>in</strong> the Bg1 and Bg3 horizons (0.9 and<br />

0.8 mm/hr) are very slow <strong>in</strong> the imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed Barrow soils (Table 6). This impedes<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>in</strong> the whole profile. K sat values for the other two horizons are approximately same<br />

as that of the Coulter soil (Table 5). Ksat values range from moderately slow to very slow <strong>in</strong><br />

soils hav<strong>in</strong>g blocky structures [3] Although macro porosity is more or less similar to that of<br />

Coulter soils (Table 5), they may not be <strong>in</strong>terconnected with<strong>in</strong> soil aggregates, because


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

blocky structure is rather compact compared to nutty structure [3]. Therefore, water moves<br />

very slowly with<strong>in</strong> Barrow soils, creat<strong>in</strong>g imperfect dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions.<br />

The soil textures of Coulter soils are silt loam and the structures are nutty. The<br />

structural units are not closely packed as expla<strong>in</strong>ed above. Therefore, water can move<br />

through soils more rapidly and hence soils are well dra<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

From these observations it is possible that the dra<strong>in</strong>age variability of soils with<strong>in</strong> short<br />

distances on the <strong>in</strong>termediate terrace may be associated with the slight textural variations of<br />

the orig<strong>in</strong>al alluvial parent materials from which the soils are formed, and the result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

development of contrast<strong>in</strong>g soil structure. These subtle changes <strong>in</strong> texture have been<br />

subsequently masked by weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g clay formation and changes <strong>in</strong> clay<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogy.<br />

Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions <strong>in</strong>fluence clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Parfitt et al. [10]<br />

weather<strong>in</strong>g of rhyolitic tephra is controlled by Si <strong>in</strong> soil solution. When Si concentration <strong>in</strong><br />

the soil solution is low (possibly < 10 µg cm -3 ), due to leach<strong>in</strong>g, allophane is formed from<br />

volcanic glass whereas if Si concentration is high (possibly >10 µg cm -3 ), <strong>in</strong> the soil solution<br />

due to impeded dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions, halloysite is formed. The presence of allophane <strong>in</strong> the<br />

clay fraction of Coulter silt loam can be attributed to weather<strong>in</strong>g of volcanic glass under welldra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

conditions. Under well-dra<strong>in</strong>ed conditions Si is leached from the profile and<br />

allophane forms. Imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed Barrow silt loam conta<strong>in</strong>s no allophane <strong>in</strong> the clay<br />

fraction due to Si not be<strong>in</strong>g leached from the profile, and kandite m<strong>in</strong>erals (kaol<strong>in</strong>ite +<br />

halloysite) form <strong>in</strong>stead.<br />

The variability <strong>in</strong> P-retention with<strong>in</strong> a paddock should have a significant <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />

the amount of phosphate fertilizer applied by farmers. If fertilised at a rate suited to the low<br />

P-retention soil, then the high P-retention soils <strong>in</strong> the paddock will be deficient <strong>in</strong> P and will<br />

have suboptimal productivity. If land is fertilised accord<strong>in</strong>g to the high P-retention soil, then<br />

surplus P will be applied to the low P-retention soil which is uneconomic and may <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

the rate of loss of P to waterways. Thus it is clear from both an economic and an<br />

environmental po<strong>in</strong>t of view that soils with<strong>in</strong> different P-retention classes should be treated<br />

differently. Therefore, identification of low, medium and high P-retention areas <strong>in</strong> the<br />

landscape and manag<strong>in</strong>g them accord<strong>in</strong>gly is important. Variable rate of application of<br />

phosphate fertiliser through precision agriculture is an obvious solution, if the areas of low,<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate and high P-retention <strong>in</strong> a paddock can be identified. This is most cheaply and<br />

efficiently achieved by soil survey recognis<strong>in</strong>g dra<strong>in</strong>age classes.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

• Soil dra<strong>in</strong>age properties <strong>in</strong> the study area vary from well dra<strong>in</strong>ed through moderately well<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>ed to imperfectly dra<strong>in</strong>ed and poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>in</strong> the paddock scale.<br />

• The poor relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and the topography of the landscape poses<br />

difficulties for conventional soil survey.<br />

• There is a strong relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age, phosphate retention and clay<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogy <strong>in</strong> soils developed from tephra mixed parent materials. Well dra<strong>in</strong>ed soils<br />

have high P-retention and the clay fraction conta<strong>in</strong>s allophane whereas poorly dra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

soils have low P-retention and the clay fraction conta<strong>in</strong>s no allophane but ma<strong>in</strong>ly kandite.<br />

• The positive relationship between soil dra<strong>in</strong>age and P-retention can be used to identify<br />

different P-retention areas on soil maps.<br />

• 1:10,000 is the optimal soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g scale for practical farm plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this area.<br />

250


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

• Short distance dra<strong>in</strong>age variability has a relationship to the textural variations of the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al alluvial parent material which gives rise to the formation of different soil<br />

structures and different pathways of weather<strong>in</strong>g. This <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>in</strong>fluences the hydraulic<br />

conductivity of the soil and results <strong>in</strong> variable dra<strong>in</strong>age conditions and different Pretention<br />

values.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] L.C.Blakemore, P.L.Searle, B.K.Daly. Methods for chemical analysis of soils, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau<br />

Scientific Report no.80, .<strong>New</strong> Zealand Society of Soil Science, Lower Hutt, <strong>New</strong> Zealand, (1987).<br />

[2] E.Griffiths, T.H.Webb, J.P.C.Watt, P.L.S<strong>in</strong>gleton. “Development of soil morphological descriptors to<br />

improve field estimation of hydraulic conductivity”, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 37, PP. 971-982,<br />

(1999).<br />

[3] E.Griffiths. Interpretation of soil morphology for assess<strong>in</strong>g moisture movement and storage, <strong>New</strong> Zealand<br />

Soil Bureau Scientific Report, 74, (1985).<br />

[4] A.E.Hewitt. <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Classification, DSIR, <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> Scientific Report No.19,(1992).<br />

[5] A.Klute. Methods of soil analysis part 1, American Society of Agronomy Inc., Soil Science Society of<br />

America, Inc., PP. 694-696, (1986).<br />

[6] J.D.G Milne, B.Clayden, P.L.S<strong>in</strong>gleton, A.D.Wilson. Soil Description Handbook, L<strong>in</strong>coln, Canterbury,<br />

<strong>New</strong> Zealand, (1995).<br />

[7] <strong>New</strong> Zealand Meteorological Service. Summaries of climatological observations to 1980, <strong>New</strong> Zealand<br />

Meteorological Service Miscellaneous Publication 177, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport, (1983).<br />

[8] <strong>New</strong> Zealand <strong>Land</strong> Resource Inventory Work sheet, Feild<strong>in</strong>g N.144. The National Water and Soil<br />

Conservation Organization, Water and Soil Division, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Works and Development, (1979).<br />

[9] <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau General survey of the soils of North Island, <strong>New</strong> Zealand, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil<br />

Bureau Bullet<strong>in</strong> 5, (1954).<br />

[10] R.L.Parfitt, M.Saigusa, D.N.Eden. “Soil development processes <strong>in</strong> an Aqualf-Ochrept sequence from loess<br />

with admixtures of tephra”, <strong>New</strong> Zealand .Journal of Soil Science, 35, PP. 625-640,.(1984).<br />

[11] R.L.Parfitt. Towards understand<strong>in</strong>g soil m<strong>in</strong>eralogy III, Notes on allophane. <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau<br />

Laboratory Report CM 10, (1986).<br />

[12] R.L.Parfitt, A.D.Wilson. Estimation of allophane and halloysite <strong>in</strong> three sequences of volcanic soils, <strong>New</strong><br />

Zealand, Catena Supplement 7, PP. 1-8, (1985).<br />

[13] W.M.H.Saunders. “Phosphate retention by <strong>New</strong> Zealand soils and its relationship to free sesquioxides,<br />

organic matter and other soil properties”, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, PP. 30-57, (1965).<br />

[14] A.Senarath, G.Arnold, A.S.Palmer, R.W.Tillman, M.P.Tuohy. Use of geostatistics <strong>in</strong> soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

precision agricultural management, In precision tools for improv<strong>in</strong>g land management (Eds LD Currie and P<br />

Loganathan).Occasional report No.14.Fertiliser and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston<br />

North, PP. 161-171, (2001).<br />

[15] A.Senarath. Soil spatial variability <strong>in</strong> northern Manawatu, <strong>New</strong> Zealand, Unpublished PhD thesis, Massey<br />

University, Palmerston North, <strong>New</strong> Zealand, (2003).<br />

[16] Soil Survey Staff Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Mak<strong>in</strong>g and Interpret<strong>in</strong>g Soil<br />

Surveys., United State Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook Number 436, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton D.C.,<br />

(1999).<br />

[17] N.H.Taylor, I.Pohlen. Classification of <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soils, In Soils of <strong>New</strong> Zealand, Part 1 (Ed Jean Luke)<br />

PP. 15-46, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau Bullet<strong>in</strong>. 26(1), (1968).<br />

[18] J.S.Whitton, G.J.Churchman. Standard methods for m<strong>in</strong>eral analysis of soil survey samples for<br />

characterization and classification <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> Zealand, <strong>New</strong> Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific Report 79, (1987).<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors are grateful to the technical staff of the Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre,<br />

Massey University, Palmerston North particularly Ian Furkert, Bob Toes, James Hanly and<br />

Lance Currie for help <strong>in</strong> the field and laboratory experiments and farmers of the Kiwitea<br />

study area for their co-operation dur<strong>in</strong>g the soil survey and field experiments.<br />

251


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

WORKSHOP Theme: Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

Convenors: P. F<strong>in</strong>ke, M. Van Meirvenne, R. Goossens<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

This workshop focused on current and develop<strong>in</strong>g techniques for soil and terra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ventory to<br />

meet requests for the construction, updat<strong>in</strong>g and upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of soil <strong>in</strong>formation systems. The<br />

papers were grouped <strong>in</strong>to three perspectives:<br />

1. Soil (attribute) mapp<strong>in</strong>g at regional and national scales<br />

The keynote by F<strong>in</strong>ke addressed the quantitative soil mapp<strong>in</strong>g methods co<strong>in</strong>ed as digital soil<br />

mapp<strong>in</strong>g methods. Based on the overview it was concluded that these methods have a great<br />

potential for mapp<strong>in</strong>g soil types and soil attributes <strong>in</strong> scarcely visited areas if ancillary data<br />

like DTM and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g images are available. As these methods give an <strong>in</strong>dication of<br />

the precision of their output, they allow for a motivated choice on the position<strong>in</strong>g of future<br />

field work. Because of their complexity, applucation of these methods require an expert. It<br />

was stressed that the result<strong>in</strong>g maps and data bases are as reliable as the (amount and quality)<br />

of the data used as <strong>in</strong>put.<br />

The paper by Wandahwa et al. treated the issue of how to obta<strong>in</strong> soil characteristics for land<br />

evaluation <strong>in</strong> a case study from Kenyia. A comparison was made between the approaches<br />

“calculate first, <strong>in</strong>terpolate later” and its opposite. It was found that soil characteristics<br />

respond differently when subjected to <strong>in</strong>terpolation. Conclusion was, that a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

landscape and soil characteristic maps derived from <strong>in</strong>terpolation gave better distribution of<br />

suitability classes than the approach based directly on soil units. The study successfully<br />

demonstrates the potential of us<strong>in</strong>g GPS and GIS for land evaluation.<br />

2. Gis and remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The keynote by Goossens highlighted a number of important developments <strong>in</strong> remote sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for data users worldwide. It was concluded that <strong>in</strong> the near future, 3-D visualisation of remote<br />

sens<strong>in</strong>g images will become accessible s<strong>in</strong>ce data and techniques are available and costs are<br />

low (e.g. the Corona images at $18 / 14*188 km). Another trend is that ground resolutions are<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly f<strong>in</strong>er (± 1.2-1.8 m to near the physical threshold of 30 cm). Thirdly,<br />

the emergence of hyperspectral imagery (from the Chris-Proba satellite) was mentioned.<br />

The paper by El-Badawi on mapp<strong>in</strong>g soils <strong>in</strong> southeastern Egypt <strong>in</strong> difficult field<br />

circumstances demonstrated that aerial photo <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with remote<br />

sens<strong>in</strong>g is a powerful method to make a physiographic soil map.<br />

252


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme D – Soil survey and <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

3. Soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g at field scale<br />

The keynote by Van Meivenne addressed some developments <strong>in</strong> soil sampl<strong>in</strong>g and proximal<br />

sens<strong>in</strong>g with applications <strong>in</strong> precision agriculture. The measurement precision of position (by<br />

GPS) and crop yield has greatly improved over recent years, is operational and commercially<br />

available. One bottleneck is the characterization of the with<strong>in</strong> field variability of crop<br />

controll<strong>in</strong>g variables, especially soil. Usage of soil sensors based on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of<br />

electromagnetic <strong>in</strong>duction (EMI) offers a promis<strong>in</strong>g alternative to detailed soil map<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensive sampl<strong>in</strong>g schemes. In the context of precision agriculture, it was concluded, that the<br />

with<strong>in</strong>-field soil variability is often underestimated, especially of deeper soil horizons. There<br />

is a potential for improved crop management with a reduced environmental pressure.<br />

253


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

WORKSHOP THEME E – SOIL PROCESSES AND ANALYTICAL<br />

TECHNIQUES<br />

Sub-theme : Development <strong>in</strong> soil genesis and m<strong>in</strong>eralogy<br />

Van Ranst E., Mees F.<br />

Paper/poster : Impact of acid deposition on cation leach<strong>in</strong>g from Mt. Talang<br />

airfall ash – D. Fiantis, Nelson, E. Van Ranst, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong><br />

Paper/poster : Stone l<strong>in</strong>es and weather<strong>in</strong>g profiles of ferrallitic soils <strong>in</strong><br />

Northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a – Morrás H., Moretti L., Piccolo G., Zech, W.<br />

Paper/poster : Pedogenesis along a hillslope traverse <strong>in</strong> the upper Afram<br />

bas<strong>in</strong>, Ghana – T. Adjei-Gyapong, E. Boateng, C. Dela Dedzoe, W.R.<br />

Effland, M.D. Mays, J.K. Seneya<br />

Paper/poster : Influence of titanomagnetite on dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate<br />

(DCB) and oxalate extractions <strong>in</strong> weathered dolerite – C.G. Algoe, E. Van<br />

Ranst, G. Stoops<br />

Sub-theme : Developments <strong>in</strong> soil micromorphology<br />

G. Stoops, V. Marcel<strong>in</strong>o, F. Mees<br />

Paper/poster : Spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g of dolerite <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame : evidence from<br />

physical, chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical data – C.G. Algoe, E. Van Ranst, G.<br />

Stoops<br />

Paper/poster : Micromorphological characteristics of andisols <strong>in</strong> West Java,<br />

Indonesia – Mahfud Arif<strong>in</strong>, R<strong>in</strong>a Devnita<br />

Paper/poster : Micromorphological features of some soils <strong>in</strong> the Afram<br />

pla<strong>in</strong>s (Ghana, West Africa) – M.D. Mays, W.R. Effland, T. Adjei-Gyapong,<br />

C.D. Dedzoe, E. Boateng<br />

Conclusions<br />

254


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL GENESIS AND<br />

MINERALOGY<br />

Overview of latest research <strong>in</strong> soil genesis and soil m<strong>in</strong>eralogy conducted at the<br />

Department of Geology and Soil Science<br />

Van Ranst E. & Mees F.<br />

Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<br />

The research related to m<strong>in</strong>eral weather<strong>in</strong>g/formation and soil processes is concentrated with<strong>in</strong><br />

three big research programs that are still go<strong>in</strong>g on:<br />

(1) Interaction between atmospheric deposition, soil acidification, and m<strong>in</strong>eral weather<strong>in</strong>g, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

soil solution analyses, laboratory and field experiments;<br />

(2) M<strong>in</strong>eralogy and chemistry of variable charge soils to determ<strong>in</strong>e their constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

management options; and<br />

(3) Formation of authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> atmospheric conditions, studied by means of an analysis<br />

of regional variations.<br />

In the first research programme a fortnightly monitor<strong>in</strong>g of the chemical composition of the<br />

bulk precipitation, throughfall, humus water and soil water at three depths <strong>in</strong> 6 forest ecosystems<br />

<strong>in</strong> Flanders (N-Belgium) is carried out from 1993 onwards. The selected forest plots, with soils<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g from sand to silt of Pleistocene orig<strong>in</strong>, belong to the forest condition monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

programme that started <strong>in</strong> Flanders <strong>in</strong> 1987, as part of the ‘International Co-operative<br />

Programme (ICP) on the Assessment and Monitor<strong>in</strong>g of Air Pollution Effects on Forests’ under<br />

the Convention of Long-range transboundary Air pollution (UN/ECE) and the European Scheme<br />

on the Protection of Forests aga<strong>in</strong>st Atmospheric Pollution. Based on chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical<br />

analyses a methodology to assess the total acid-neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g capacity (ANC) of forest soils has<br />

been developed and applied on the forest floor and the m<strong>in</strong>eral topsoil <strong>in</strong> the 6 forest ecosystems.<br />

As the total ANC is clearly related to the soil texture class, the exist<strong>in</strong>g soil maps are ideal<br />

documents to assess the sensitivity of the soils for acidic pollution. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the average acid<br />

loads on the plots a danger for further alum<strong>in</strong>ization of the organic complexes would be real.<br />

Although s<strong>in</strong>ce these analyses did not consider the neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g effect occurr<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g turn-over<br />

of organic matter, the actual outlook is probably less dramatic. The chemical analyses of the<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g programme proved that previous and present weather<strong>in</strong>g is predom<strong>in</strong>antly due to<br />

synthesis of HNO3 out of organic rema<strong>in</strong>s and subsequent reaction with silicates with release of<br />

Al 3+ and acidity. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of the synthesis of HNO3 on the nutrient replenishment <strong>in</strong> these<br />

forest soils has been studied as well. The weather<strong>in</strong>g of soil m<strong>in</strong>erals was studied further <strong>in</strong> detail<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g different approaches(batch-, column and field experiments). The laboratory experiments,<br />

performed under different conditions (acid type and strength, temperature, solid:liquid ratio, etc.)<br />

served to better understand the ability and mechanisms of different m<strong>in</strong>erals (hectorite, biotite,<br />

vermiculite, etc.) to neutralize acidity. The field experiments, based on the test m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

technique, were set up under the hypothesis that a residence of the m<strong>in</strong>erals (trioctahedral<br />

vermiculite and glauconite) <strong>in</strong> the soil dur<strong>in</strong>g 4 years, would result <strong>in</strong> the extraction of quantiable<br />

amounts of structural elements, render<strong>in</strong>g it possible to deduct the <strong>in</strong> situ weather<strong>in</strong>g rates. The<br />

255


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

test-m<strong>in</strong>eral(vermiculite) technique was used to dist<strong>in</strong>guish simple acidolysis from acidocomplexolysis<br />

<strong>in</strong> a Podzol profile.<br />

In the second research programme a great deal of time and effort is spent to study the<br />

chemical behaviour of variable charge m<strong>in</strong>erals and soils, ma<strong>in</strong>ly highly weathered soils (Oxisols<br />

and Ultisols) of the tropics and volcanic ash soils (Andisols), to elucidate different aspects of<br />

their behaviour. Variable charge soils (VCS) are heterogenous charge systems. The coexistence<br />

and <strong>in</strong>teractions of soil particles and colloids with net opposite surface charges confer a quite<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g, and much more complex pattern with respect to soil physical and chemical behaviour<br />

compared to homogeneously charged soil systems of temperate regions. Different methods<br />

(NH4OAc, Charge F<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t, Compulsive Exchange) to determ<strong>in</strong>e the electrochemical<br />

properties, <strong>in</strong> particular ion exchange capacities, have been tested to assess variation <strong>in</strong><br />

exchange capacity with respect to the composition of the colloid fraction. The application of Casilicate<br />

slags and calc-alkal<strong>in</strong>e pyroclastic materials has been used to <strong>in</strong>crease the cation<br />

exchange capacity (CEC) of highly weathered VCS. Research us<strong>in</strong>g other natural amendments<br />

on sandy soils is go<strong>in</strong>g on at moment. Special emphasis is given to the study of Andisols on<br />

volcanic ash, ma<strong>in</strong>ly from the Indonesian islands, Java and Sumatra. The physico-chemical and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of ash soils along the Sunda arc were characterized <strong>in</strong> order to assess<br />

the <strong>in</strong>fluence of the change of parent material on differ<strong>in</strong>g soil characteristics and on surface<br />

reactivity with emphasis on short-range-order m<strong>in</strong>eral constituents and active Al and Fe<br />

compounds on fluoride and phosphate sorption. This study provided a scientific basis for (1)<br />

localiz<strong>in</strong>g the soils which are less likely to be deficient <strong>in</strong> Ca and Mg under yearly application of<br />

acidify<strong>in</strong>g nitrogenous fertilizers and (2) propos<strong>in</strong>g separate regions <strong>in</strong> terms of P-fertilizer<br />

strategy for susta<strong>in</strong>able crop production.<br />

The aim of the third research programme is to contribute to a fundamental understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the factors and mechanisms that control the formation of authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals at earth-surface<br />

conditions. Specific objectives are (i) an evaluation of the conditions of formation of authigenic<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals for <strong>in</strong>dividual lake bas<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> selected study areas, and (ii) the creation of a regional<br />

synthesis for each study area, relat<strong>in</strong>g variations <strong>in</strong> the nature and mode of occurrence of<br />

authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals to regional patterns and factors. One of both regions selected for this research<br />

project is a zone with temporary and dry salt lakes <strong>in</strong> a karst area of the Ebro Bas<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> northern<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> (Los Monegros), with e.g. abundant gypsum, magnesite, halite and Mg-bear<strong>in</strong>g sulfates.<br />

The second study area is a region with dry lake bas<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the southwestern Kalahari, Namibia,<br />

which conta<strong>in</strong> smectite, sepiolite, dolomite, thenardite and various other authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> two<br />

previously studied bas<strong>in</strong>s. The lakes <strong>in</strong> both regions represent a series of ma<strong>in</strong>ly groundwater-fed<br />

flow-through bas<strong>in</strong>s. Both study areas conta<strong>in</strong> a group of about 20 isolated lake bas<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

characterised by (i) the presence of authigenic m<strong>in</strong>erals belong<strong>in</strong>g to different m<strong>in</strong>eral groups, (ii)<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral associations between the bas<strong>in</strong>s, and (iii) important variations with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual bas<strong>in</strong>s, which represent a set of characterstics that renders the study areas ideally suited<br />

for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the conditions of authigenic m<strong>in</strong>eral formation. These conditions will <strong>in</strong>itially be<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed for each <strong>in</strong>dividual lake bas<strong>in</strong>s, consider<strong>in</strong>g various modes of m<strong>in</strong>eral formation<br />

(synsedimentary vs pedogenic, direct precipitation vs transformation) and the processes and factors<br />

that control m<strong>in</strong>eral distribution patterns (e.g. lateral and vertical groundwater movement, flood<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

groundwater composition, groundmass characteristics, porosity, lithological discont<strong>in</strong>uities).<br />

Subsequently, a regional synthesis for each study area will be made, allow<strong>in</strong>g the development of a<br />

model for authigenic m<strong>in</strong>eral formation, <strong>in</strong> relation to the evolution of groundwater composition<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the region, modified by local factors. Samples were collected <strong>in</strong> both study areas <strong>in</strong> the<br />

256


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

course of 2005. Analysis of the available samples is <strong>in</strong> progress, us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray diffraction methods,<br />

th<strong>in</strong> section observations and chemical analyses.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[123] D. Fiantis, E. Van Ranst, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>, I. Fauziah, S. Zauyah. "Effect of calcium silicate and<br />

superphosphate application on surface charge properties of volcanic soils from west Sumatra, Indonesia". Comm.<br />

Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 33: 1887-1900, (2002).<br />

[124] P. Kanyankogote, E. Van Ranst, A. Verdoodt, G. Baert. "Effet de la lave trachybasaltique broyée sur les<br />

propriétés chimiques de sols de climat tropical humide", Etude et Gestion des Sols, 12(4):301-311, (2005).<br />

[125] O.T. Mandir<strong>in</strong>gana, P.N.S. Mnkeni, Z. Mkile, W. Van Averbeke, E. Van Ranst, H. Verplancke.<br />

"M<strong>in</strong>eralogy and fertility status of selected soils of the Eastern Cape Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, South Africa". Comm. In : Soil<br />

Science and Plant Analysis, 36:2431-2446, (2005).<br />

[126] F. Mees. “Salt m<strong>in</strong>eral distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> soils of the Otjomongwa pan, Namibia”. Catena, 54:425-<br />

437, (2003).<br />

[127] F. Mees, M. De Dapper. “Vertical variations <strong>in</strong> bassanite distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> near-surface sediments,<br />

southern Egypt”. Sedimentary Geology, 181:225-229, (2005).<br />

[128] F. Mees, A. S<strong>in</strong>ger. “Surface crusts on soils/sediments of the southern Aral Sea bas<strong>in</strong>, Uzbekistan”.<br />

Geoderma, <strong>in</strong> press.<br />

[129] F. Mees, G. Stoops, E. Van Ranst, R. Paepe, E. Van Overloop. "The nature of zeolite occurrences <strong>in</strong><br />

deposits of the Olduvai Bas<strong>in</strong>, northern Tanzania", Clays and Clay M<strong>in</strong>erals, 53(6) : 659-673, (2005).<br />

[130] J. Neirynck, E. Van Ranst, P. Roskams, N. Lust. "Impact of decreas<strong>in</strong>g throughfall depositions on soil<br />

solution chemistry at coniferous monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites <strong>in</strong> northern Belgium", Forest Ecology & Management, 160:127-<br />

142, (2002).<br />

[131] N.P. Qafoku, E. Van Ranst, A.Noble, G. Baert. "M<strong>in</strong>eralogy and chemistry of variable charge soils. In :<br />

The Encyclopedia of Soil Science (Ed. : R. Lal), M. Dekker, Inc. (ISBN:0-8247-0846-6)", Onl<strong>in</strong>e Published:1-8,<br />

(2003).<br />

[132] N.P. Qafoku, E. Van Ranst, A.Noble, G. Baert. "Variable charge soils : their m<strong>in</strong>eralogy, chemistry and<br />

management", Advances <strong>in</strong> Agronomy, 84:159-215, (2004).<br />

[133] G. Stoops, E.Van Ranst, K. Verbeek. "Pedology of soils with<strong>in</strong> the spray zone of the Victoria Falls<br />

(Zimbabwe)", Catena, 46:63-83, (2001).<br />

[134] E. Van Ranst, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck. "Evaluation of ferrolysis <strong>in</strong> soil formation", European Journal of Soil<br />

Science, 53:513-519, (2002).<br />

[135] E. Van Ranst, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck. "Synthesis of HNO3 out of organic matter and its <strong>in</strong>fluence on weather<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />

: Soil Science : Confront<strong>in</strong>g <strong>New</strong> Realities <strong>in</strong> the 21 st Century", Transactions 17 e World Congress of Soil Science<br />

(CD-Rom), Bangkok, Thailand : 285, 1-10, (2002).<br />

[136] E. Van Ranst, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck, K. Van Rompaey. "Synthesis of HNO3 from organic matter and its <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

on nutrient replenishment <strong>in</strong> forest soils", Environmental Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Assessment, 98:409-420, (2004).<br />

[137] Van Ranst, E., De Con<strong>in</strong>ck, F., Roskams, P., V<strong>in</strong>devogel, N. "Acid-neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g capacity of forest floor and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral topsoil <strong>in</strong> Flemish forests (North Belgium)", Forest Ecology and Management, 166:45-53, (2002).<br />

[138] E. Van Ranst, S.R. Utami, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>. "Andisols on volcanic ash from Java Island, Indonesia :<br />

Physico-chemical properties and classification", Soil Science, 167:68-79, (2002).<br />

[139] E. Van Ranst, S.R. Utami, J. Vanderdeelen, J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong>. "Surface reactivity of Andisols on volcanic<br />

ash along the Sunda arc cross<strong>in</strong>g Java Island, Indonesia", Geoderma, 123:193-203, (2004).<br />

[140] K. Van Rompaey, E. Van Ranst, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck, N. V<strong>in</strong>devogel. "Dissolution characteristics of hectorite <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>organic acids". Applied Clay Science, 21 : 241-256, (2002).<br />

[141] K. Van Rompaey, E. Van Ranst, A. Verdoodt, F. De Con<strong>in</strong>ck, 2006. Use of the test-m<strong>in</strong>eral technique to<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish simple acidolysis from acido-complexolysis <strong>in</strong> a Podzol profile. Geoderma (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />

257


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

IMPACT OF ACID DEPOSITION ON CATION LEACHING FROM<br />

MT. TALANG AIRFALL ASH<br />

Fiantis, D., Nelson 1 , E. Van Ranst 2 and J. Shamshudd<strong>in</strong> 3<br />

Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture University of Andala, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, Padang<br />

25163, Indonesia; 1 Department of Crop Estate, Polytechnic of Agriculture University of Andalas, Kampus Politani<br />

Tanjung Pati, 50 Kota, Sumbar, Indonesia; 2 Department of Geology and Soil Science, Laboratory of Soil Science,<br />

Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S1, B- 9000 Gent, Belgium; 3 Department of <strong>Land</strong> Management, Faculty of<br />

Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400 Selangor, Malaysia<br />

Abstract<br />

An evaluation of the response of airfall ash from Mt. Talang on acid deposition and weather<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rates was studied by us<strong>in</strong>g a controlled laboratory leach<strong>in</strong>g experiment. Airfall ash from Mt.<br />

Talang was collected a few days after it was blown up by a phreatic eruption at the upper NE<br />

side of the volcano. The ash samples were leached with de-ionized water and nitric acid 0.05 M<br />

(pH 2) for seven weeks. Solutions leachates were collected after 2 and 48 hours, and after 7, 14,<br />

21, 28, 35 and 42 days for chemical analyses. Measured cations were Ca and Fe. Two sets of<br />

sample conta<strong>in</strong>ers were constructed, namely (1) successive <strong>in</strong>cubation and (2) separated<br />

<strong>in</strong>cubation. The successive <strong>in</strong>cubation set up consisted of the addition of new solutions to the<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ers after each collection of leachate to simulate the leach<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong> the field. The<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ers for separate <strong>in</strong>cubation were set up accord<strong>in</strong>g to the respective time and discharge<br />

afterward.<br />

Acidic <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong>creased iron leach<strong>in</strong>g; Fe was <strong>in</strong>creased by 1.75-folds <strong>in</strong> successive <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />

and 47 times <strong>in</strong> separated <strong>in</strong>cubation, while Ca was elevated 1.5 times <strong>in</strong> successive mode and 4folds<br />

<strong>in</strong> separate set. The Fe release was <strong>in</strong>creased sharply after 3 weeks and started to level off<br />

after 6 weeks. Meanwhile, Ca was released sharply after 1 week and started to level off after 2<br />

weeks. In total, 0.08 to 0.13 % of iron was released after addition of de-ionized water <strong>in</strong><br />

successive mode and 0.05 – 0.08% <strong>in</strong> separate mode. Treat<strong>in</strong>g the airfall ash with nitric acid<br />

yielded more Fe, <strong>in</strong> the range of 0.34 – 0.37% and 1.41 to 2.42 %, <strong>in</strong> successive and separate<br />

modes respectively. Addition of de-ionized water resulted <strong>in</strong> higher concentration of Ca <strong>in</strong><br />

contrast to addition of nitric acid. The value of Ca between 2.54 to 6.64 % was obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

reconstructed field condition and between 6.04 – 6.84 % <strong>in</strong> separated sets. The total<br />

concentration of calcium after apply<strong>in</strong>g nitric acid was between 2.06 – 3.03 %, and 5.10 – 5.91<br />

%.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Ow<strong>in</strong>g to its position <strong>in</strong> the mid-western part of the Barisan Mounta<strong>in</strong> Range of Sumatra, to its<br />

shape and size and to its activity, Mt. Talang is one of the most important and active volcano <strong>in</strong><br />

Sumatra. Mt. Talang is a strato volcano, formed of lava flows alternat<strong>in</strong>g with pyroclastic<br />

materials, emitted from various eruptive cases over the centuries. Summit elevation of Mt.<br />

Talang reaches 2896 m above sea level and located at 100° 40' 41.9304" E and 0° 58' 40.8072" S<br />

258


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

and the distance from the city of Padang to Talang is about 35 km. (Figure 1). Historical<br />

eruptions from Talang volcano have occurred many times from flank vents and most of the<br />

eruptions are moderate <strong>in</strong> size. On April 12 th , 2005 an explosion was heard 25 km from Talang<br />

and grayish ash was emitted to the sky. Ash fell to the south and eastern-northern slope of Mt.<br />

Talang.<br />

Volcanic ash, the smallest tephra fragments, is highly disruptive to economic activity<br />

because it covers just about everyth<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>filtrates most open<strong>in</strong>gs, and is highly abrasive. On the<br />

other hand, from these ashes of devastation arise some of the most productive soils <strong>in</strong> the world<br />

with the capacity to susta<strong>in</strong> high human population densities.<br />

Figure 1. Satellite image of Mt. Talang and surround<strong>in</strong>g area<br />

Airfall volcanic ash has f<strong>in</strong>e particle size, vesicular nature with high surface area, high<br />

porosity and permeability enhance weather<strong>in</strong>g rates [4]. Rapid weather<strong>in</strong>g of the ash liberated<br />

cations through surface exchange with aqueous hydrogen ions [13]. Volcanic ash is believed to<br />

release elements faster than other primary or secondary crystall<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>erals [11]. The primary<br />

proton donors <strong>in</strong> the weather<strong>in</strong>g of airfall ash are both acidic aerosols, carbonic and organic acids<br />

[3]. Proton donors or acids affect weather<strong>in</strong>g by provid<strong>in</strong>g H + which may attack rocks or<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals [12] The acidic aerosols, such as sulfuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl),<br />

fluoric acid (HF) and nitric acid (HNO3), which come from eruption plume dur<strong>in</strong>g the eruption<br />

while the carbonic and organic acids derived from biota [3].<br />

Both m<strong>in</strong>eral and organic acids play an important role <strong>in</strong> soil environments and provided<br />

evidence that weather<strong>in</strong>g of rocks and m<strong>in</strong>erals are facilitated by these acids through<br />

259


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

organometallic complex formation or through metal chelation process [9]. Furthermore, [7]<br />

found out that the ratio between anion or cation released over protons-added from organic acids<br />

are greater than those from m<strong>in</strong>eral acids. The ability of organic acids to complex metals is more<br />

important than the strength of m<strong>in</strong>eral acids that have lower dissociation constant (pK1). M<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

acids are considered as strong noncomplex form<strong>in</strong>g acids [12].<br />

Solutions leached from the tephra layer <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>in</strong>congruent dissolution result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

formation of a cation-depleted, silica-rich leached layer on glass and m<strong>in</strong>eral surfaces [4] As<br />

reported by [1] the <strong>in</strong>itial lechates from the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens composed primarily<br />

of base cations (Ca 2+ > Na + >> Mg 2+ > K + ) and strong acid anions (SO4 2- >> Cl - > F - >> NO 3- ).<br />

The rate of alum<strong>in</strong>um release from colored volcanic glass <strong>in</strong> order of 10 -12 mol g -1 s -1 at pH 4.00.<br />

Colored volcanic glass release cations 1.5 times greater than non-colored glass, reflect<strong>in</strong>g its<br />

lower stability [11]. As weather<strong>in</strong>g progresses, dissolution rates are controlled by surface<br />

dissolution with concurrent diffusion of cations through the leached layer near the glass surface.<br />

A shift from <strong>in</strong>congruent to congruent dissolution presumably occurs when the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

diffusion length equals the rate of retreat of the solution-solid <strong>in</strong>terface [14].<br />

The primary objective of this study was to provide a direct measurement of acid<br />

dissolution from unweathered airfall ash deposits <strong>in</strong> a warm, humid climate regime. The<br />

questions addressed <strong>in</strong> this research concern<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial stages of volcanic ash weather<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: (1) what are the <strong>in</strong>itial cations releases from fresh volcanic ash; (2) does the volcanic<br />

ash dissolve stoichiometrically or <strong>in</strong>congruently?<br />

To answer these questions fresh airfall ash of Mt. Talang were subjected <strong>in</strong>to laboratory<br />

dissolution experiment for 7 weeks with nitric acid, which is considered as strong m<strong>in</strong>eral acid,<br />

de-ionized water as weak noncomplex acid and acetic acid of the organic acid. Lechates from ash<br />

deposits were collected weekly for chemical analysis and are used to calculate elemental fluxes<br />

and weather<strong>in</strong>g rates of airfall ash.<br />

2.1. Study area<br />

2. MATERALS AND METHODS<br />

Mt. Talang is considered as type-A volcano and has been <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous eruption for decades<br />

either from flank vent, radial fissures or summit of volcano. The area affected by volcanic<br />

activity covers at about 42103.6 ha and mostly from Quaternary age. The recent eruption of<br />

April 12, 2005, blew away airfall ash tephra over portions of Solok District of West Sumatra,<br />

Indonesia. The maximum thickness of ash was 5 cm <strong>in</strong> the upper NE slope of Mt. Talang and<br />

the m<strong>in</strong>imum thickness of 1 mm blanketed the area <strong>in</strong> the foot slope.<br />

2.2. Collection and Analysis of Ash Lechates<br />

Airfall ash was collected from the affected areas of tea-plantation shortly after the April 12 th<br />

2005 eruption. The ash was collected prior to any ra<strong>in</strong>fall and sealed <strong>in</strong> watertight conta<strong>in</strong>ers<br />

until it was used for m<strong>in</strong>eralogical and chemical analysis as well as applied it for the dissolution<br />

experiments. The airfall ash fractions were analyzed <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> mounts with a polariz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

microscope. Elemental analyses of airfall ash were done by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry<br />

after ignition at 1100 0 C.<br />

260


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

The dissolution experiment was carried out as follows. One gram of airfall ash was<br />

placed <strong>in</strong> each 250 ml plastic conta<strong>in</strong>er with a stopper, and 200 ml of de-ionized water and nitric<br />

acid 0.05 M (pH 2) for seven weeks at room temperature. Mix<strong>in</strong>g of the solution was made by<br />

shak<strong>in</strong>g the conta<strong>in</strong>ers once a day for 60 m<strong>in</strong>utes dur<strong>in</strong>g the dissolution. The solution was<br />

separated after 1 hour, 24 hours, and after 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days. Chemical analysis of<br />

lechates were conducted to determ<strong>in</strong>e the pH, cations (Ca and Fe) were measured by AAS.<br />

Two sets of sample conta<strong>in</strong>ers were constructed, namely (1) successive <strong>in</strong>cubation and<br />

(2) separated <strong>in</strong>cubation. The successive <strong>in</strong>cubation set up consisted of the addition of new<br />

solutions to the conta<strong>in</strong>ers after each collection of lechates to simulate the leach<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong><br />

the field. The conta<strong>in</strong>ers for separate <strong>in</strong>cubation was set up accord<strong>in</strong>g to the respective time and<br />

discharge afterward. All values represent the mean of duplicate analyses.<br />

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

3.1. M<strong>in</strong>eralogical Characteristics of Mt. Talang Airfall Ash<br />

The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of the ash consisted of noncrystall<strong>in</strong>e and crystall<strong>in</strong>e<br />

components. The noncrystall<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>eral is volcanic glass (30%) and the rest are crystall<strong>in</strong>e<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals. The glassy materials of volcanic glass appear optically isotropic under crossed<br />

polarizer microscope and usually present as clusters of small particles with vesicular<br />

morphology. Volcanic glass, as it was believed [2], is the most weatherable components as a<br />

result of its amorphous nature <strong>in</strong> volcanic deposits. Weather<strong>in</strong>g of volcanic glass can be<br />

described <strong>in</strong> term of a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of parabolic and l<strong>in</strong>ear k<strong>in</strong>etics, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the hydration of<br />

glass and the formation of secondary clay m<strong>in</strong>erals. Furthermore they stated that the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of volcanic ash varies widely as a function of particle-size and that<br />

volcanic glass <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> relative proportion to plagioclase as the particle size decreases.<br />

The crystall<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong>clude andes<strong>in</strong>e (1%), quartz ( 32 mm). As it is, the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of volcanic ash varies accord<strong>in</strong>g to rock types. Ash of rhyolite, dacite<br />

or andesite composition is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by noncolored volcanic glass with lesser amounts of<br />

plagioclase, pyroxenes, and ferromagnesian m<strong>in</strong>erals. On the other hand, volcanic ash hav<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

composition of basalt and basaltic andesite composition is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by colored volcanic glass<br />

accompanied by plagioclase, oliv<strong>in</strong>e, pyroxenes and ferromagnesian m<strong>in</strong>erals [2].<br />

261


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

3.2. Elemental Composition of Mt. Talang Airfall Ash<br />

Air fall ash, as a parent material of soils, controls soil formation more than any other parent<br />

materials. The behavior of chemical elements <strong>in</strong> airfall ash can be <strong>in</strong>ferred by compar<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

total elemental analysis. The elemental composition of the airfall ash is depicted <strong>in</strong> Tables 1.<br />

Each element is expressed <strong>in</strong> oxide percentage on the basis of an oven-dried weight (105 0 C).<br />

Based on the silica content of 54%, the airfall ash of Mt. Talang can be considered as basalticandesitic<br />

type. A classification of volcanic ash was proposed by [10] <strong>in</strong>to five groups based on<br />

the silica (SiO2) content: rhyolite (100-70%); dacite (70-62%); andesite (62-58%); basaltic<br />

andesitic (58-53.5%) and basalt (53.5-45%). The result of this study is different with the report<br />

of [5] that volcanic ash of Mt. Marapi, located 140 km north of Mt. Talang, are considered as<br />

andesitic type s<strong>in</strong>ce the silica contents was higher 15%. Japanese soil scientists stated that silica<br />

content of volcanic ash from Japan <strong>in</strong> the range of 48 – 73% and exists strong correlation<br />

between silica content and most of chemical elements except for K [15]. Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />

also reported for volcanic ash orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>New</strong> Zealand [8]. SiO2 is regarded as one of the<br />

immobile element found <strong>in</strong> tephra as well as Al2O3 and Fe2O3 [2].<br />

Element<br />

Composition (%)<br />

Fresh Oxalate-treated<br />

SiO2 54.37 64.36<br />

Al2O3 18.33 15.00<br />

Fe2O3 4.82 5.95<br />

CaO 4.19 4.25<br />

MgO 1.33 1.42<br />

K2O 1.15 1.49<br />

Na2O 0.61 0.67<br />

LOI 4.2 4.88<br />

Table 1: Contents of major elements <strong>in</strong> fresh and oxalate-treated<br />

airfall ash of Mt. Talang<br />

The molar ratio between SiO2/Al2O3 is 6.14 <strong>in</strong> fresh volcanic ash and decrease <strong>in</strong>to 4.29<br />

<strong>in</strong> oxalate-treated ash of Mt. Talang. The down shift value of the molar ratio is assumed to be<br />

largely due to presence of the amorphous and noncrystall<strong>in</strong>e components of volcanic materials.<br />

This is <strong>in</strong> accordance with the report else where <strong>in</strong> Japan [15]. Meanwhile the SiO2, Al2O3 and<br />

Fe2O3 are orig<strong>in</strong>ated from both volcanic glass and plagioclase while Fe2O3 can be found also <strong>in</strong><br />

mafic m<strong>in</strong>erals [10].<br />

The alkal<strong>in</strong>e earth elements (CaO and MgO) found <strong>in</strong> the studied ash are higher then the<br />

alkal<strong>in</strong>e elements (K2O and Na2O). The higher contents of CaO and MgO because the samples<br />

are very new and is not subjected to any weather<strong>in</strong>g process yet. These data are <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with<br />

those obta<strong>in</strong>ed by [10] that CaO and Na2O are orig<strong>in</strong>ated from volcanic glass and plagioclase,<br />

MgO is from mafic m<strong>in</strong>eral and K2O ma<strong>in</strong>ly occurs <strong>in</strong> volcanic glass. They added that<br />

proportion of CaO, Na2O and MgO were decreased as weather<strong>in</strong>gs proceed contrary to K2O<br />

content. Both CaO and Na2O have high solubility and easily lost by leach<strong>in</strong>g. The mobility<br />

sequence found <strong>in</strong> volcanic ash parent materials are <strong>in</strong> order: CaO, Na2O >SiO2 >MgO > Al2O3,<br />

Fe2O3, K2O [7, 10, 2].<br />

262


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Removal of the amorphous constituents by us<strong>in</strong>g oxalate <strong>in</strong>creased the concentration of<br />

all elements except for the alum<strong>in</strong>um oxide concentration, which is down from 18% to 15%.<br />

Although SiO2 concentration is exceed<strong>in</strong>g the requirement for basaltic andesitic, it is our belief<br />

that treated the samples with chemical solutions does not necessary change the rock type of the<br />

airfall ash from basaltic andesitic <strong>in</strong>to dacitic. The ammonium oxalate acid dissolution is<br />

<strong>in</strong>tended to remove the amorphous fraction that is coat<strong>in</strong>g some of the crystall<strong>in</strong>e particles.<br />

Unfortunately, we do not have any value of dissolved cations from the lechates to be reported<br />

and compared with the concentration of cations from ash-residue or solid components after<br />

ignition to 1100 0 C.<br />

3.3. Dissolution Rate of Calcium<br />

The solubility of solid-phase of calcium upon leach<strong>in</strong>g with different acids <strong>in</strong> successive and<br />

separate mode <strong>in</strong>cubation is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2 and 3. Different results obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the two<br />

mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation. Ca obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the successive mode, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the leach<strong>in</strong>g conditions <strong>in</strong><br />

the field, are lower than the separated <strong>in</strong>cubation mode. Comparable results were also reported<br />

by [3] maximum solute concentrations <strong>in</strong> solutions dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from tephra layer dur<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>y<br />

season dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial weather<strong>in</strong>g study (12 months) and there was a dist<strong>in</strong>ct decrease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

annual concentrations of several solutes such as calcium, sodium, silicon and bicarbonate after 4<br />

years of study.<br />

Location<br />

Bukit Sileh<br />

1.300 m a.s.l<br />

Aie Batumbuk<br />

1.100 m a.s.l<br />

Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates (g/kg)<br />

Treatments<br />

After 2 h After 24 hAfter 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w After 6 w<br />

H2O 13.83 18.82 102.47 57.40 13.18 31.89 15.56 0.39<br />

Acetic acid 19.72 20.48 229.17 85.46 28.49 25.09 39.86 0.52<br />

HNO2 17.38 13.35 161.99 30.19 4.68 15.73 16.25 0.27<br />

NH4 OACe 14.02 14.78 339.71 161.14 60.80 23.38 65.56 0.61<br />

H2O 18.05 20.08 451.96 92.26 31.04 31.04 19.72 0.34<br />

Acetic acid 20.41 19.02 503.83 296.34 45.49 18.28 32.22 1.06<br />

HNO2 20.27 19.02 192.60 46.34 6.38 2.98 14.86 0.31<br />

NH4 OACe 19.04 21.01 416.24 304.00 86.31 26.79 32.92 0.76<br />

Table 2: Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates as a function of residence time and type of acids <strong>in</strong> successive<br />

mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />

263


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Location<br />

Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates (g/kg)<br />

Treatments<br />

After 2 h After 24 hAfter 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w After 6 w<br />

Bukit Sileh<br />

H2O Acetic acid<br />

13.83<br />

19.72<br />

18.82<br />

20.48<br />

158.59<br />

130.53<br />

117.77<br />

122.02<br />

105.02<br />

99.06<br />

96.51<br />

109.27<br />

90.56<br />

88.47<br />

3.24<br />

2.36<br />

1.300 m a.s.l<br />

HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />

17.38<br />

14.02<br />

13.35<br />

14.78<br />

117.77<br />

140.73<br />

94.81<br />

123.72<br />

105.87<br />

67.60<br />

81.21<br />

102.47<br />

78.06<br />

105.83<br />

2.02<br />

3.60<br />

Aie Batumbuk<br />

1.100 m a.s.l<br />

H 2O 18.05 20.08 144.13 141.58 109.27 138.18 109.31 2.92<br />

Acetic acid 20.41 19.02 157.74 134.78 126.28 123.72 107.22 2.77<br />

HNO 2 20.27 19.02 120.32 108.42 107.57 111.82 100.97 2.53<br />

NH 4 OACe 19.04 21.01 149.23 139.88 80.36 168.79 138.47 4.48<br />

Table 3: Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates as a function of residence time and type of acids <strong>in</strong> separate<br />

mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />

Compar<strong>in</strong>g the source of proton donors used to age the airfall ash of Mt. Talang, acetic<br />

acid released cations more than deionized water, nitric acid and sulfuric acid as well as<br />

ammonium acetate. Acetic acid is one of the organic acids, nitric acid is considered as strong<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral acid, deionized water is a weak acid while ammonium acetate is an alkal<strong>in</strong>e solution<br />

with pH value of 7. Organic acids, as expla<strong>in</strong>ed by [12], are capable of dissolv<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

complex<strong>in</strong>g the cations from the surface layer of colloid or clay particles. Deionized water as a<br />

weak acid, is a source of protons <strong>in</strong> soil. It can be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> hydrolytic reactions lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

partial dissolution (<strong>in</strong>congruent) and total dissolution (congruent) of m<strong>in</strong>erals as time progresses.<br />

Furthermore, they discussed that strong acid, like nitric acid with a pKa of -1, capable of<br />

lower<strong>in</strong>g the pH and to dissolve cations congruently, leav<strong>in</strong>g no residue <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>eral surfaces.<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> leachates chemistry of progressive weathered of ash dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cubation are<br />

illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 and Figure 3. As <strong>in</strong>dicated, the amount of Ca <strong>in</strong> leachates <strong>in</strong>creases with<br />

time, especially after 24 hours of contact time between the ash and the proton donor of each<br />

respective solution and started to level off after 5 weeks. Similar trend was also observed by<br />

[14] both <strong>in</strong> field and laboratory experiments of the Mt. St. Helens ash fall. They expla<strong>in</strong>ed that<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g of the cations (ca and Mg) from field study reflect<strong>in</strong>g retention of the cations <strong>in</strong> the<br />

soils after 2 years. Meanwhile higher amount of cations <strong>in</strong> lechates obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the leach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

experiments as surface layer of the ash become cations-depleted. The same author presumed that<br />

rapid weather<strong>in</strong>g of the ash liberated cations through surface exchange with aqueous hydrogen<br />

ions.<br />

264


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Ca dissolution (%)<br />

8.000<br />

7.000<br />

6.000<br />

5.000<br />

4.000<br />

3.000<br />

2.000<br />

1.000<br />

0.000<br />

Bukit Sileh (Successive <strong>in</strong>cubation mode)<br />

After 2 h After 24 h After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w<br />

265<br />

Times<br />

H2O H Acetat HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />

Figure 2: Concentration of Ca after leached with different acids for 5 weeks<br />

Ca Dissolution (%)<br />

7.000<br />

6.000<br />

5.000<br />

4.000<br />

3.000<br />

2.000<br />

1.000<br />

0.000<br />

Bukit Sileh (separate <strong>in</strong>cubation mode)<br />

After 2 h After 24 h After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w<br />

Times<br />

H2O H Acetat HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />

Figure 3: Concentration of Ca after leached with different acids for 5 weeks<br />

3.4. Dissolution Rate of Iron<br />

The solubility of solid-phase of iron upon leach<strong>in</strong>g with different acids <strong>in</strong> successive<br />

mode <strong>in</strong>cubation is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4 and Figure 4, whereas the result of the separated mode<br />

<strong>in</strong>cubation is displayed <strong>in</strong> Table 5 and Figure 5. Fe concentrations are much lower compared to<br />

concentration of Ca. Aqueous concentration of iron is low because of the low solubility of the<br />

iron dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial period of weather<strong>in</strong>g. As expla<strong>in</strong>ed by [3] that Fe display low solubility<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the first two years of experiments and <strong>in</strong>crease slightly dur<strong>in</strong>g the last two stages of their<br />

study. The dissolution of iron by soluble organic acids <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g complexation process for quite<br />

long period of time [12].


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Location Treatments<br />

After 2 h After 24 h<br />

Fe concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates (g/kg)<br />

After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w After 6 w<br />

Bukit Sileh<br />

H2O Acetic acid<br />

0.45<br />

1.91<br />

0.97<br />

2.08<br />

0.01<br />

1.66<br />

2.00<br />

3.57<br />

8.27<br />

2.29<br />

0.43<br />

1.74<br />

0.24<br />

2.18<br />

0.15<br />

1.30<br />

1.300 m a.s.l<br />

HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />

5.35<br />

0.05<br />

6.25<br />

0.06<br />

2.46<br />

0.26<br />

6.27<br />

0.42<br />

3.56<br />

0.50<br />

4.15<br />

0.43<br />

4.48<br />

0.52<br />

1.89<br />

0.39<br />

Aie Batumbuk<br />

1.100 m a.s.l<br />

H2O 0.09 0.13 0.01 2.22 4.44 0.14 0.94 0.37<br />

Acetic acid 1.93 1.49 1.41 4.54 2.36 2.20 2.33 1.38<br />

HNO2 5.10 6.13 1.66 6.76 4.24 5.72 5.12 2.75<br />

NH4 OACe 0.00 0.05 0.30 0.45 0.16 0.40 1.15 0.37<br />

Table 4: Fe concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates as a function of residence time and type of acids <strong>in</strong> successive<br />

mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />

Location<br />

Bukit Sileh<br />

1.300 m a.s.l<br />

Aie Batumbuk<br />

1.100 m a.s.l<br />

Treatments<br />

After 2 h After 24 h<br />

Fe concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates (g/kg)<br />

After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w After 6 w<br />

H2O 0.45 0.97 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.00<br />

Acetic acid 1.91 2.08 0.72 0.72 7.93 10.09 10.81 0.29<br />

HNO2 5.35 6.25 58.36 7.20 48.27 54.76 61.96 0.29<br />

NH4 OACe 0.05 0.06 2.88 4.32 4.32 3.60 8.65 0.24<br />

H2O 0.09 0.13 0.72 2.88 2.16 0.72 0.72 0.11<br />

Acetic acid 1.93 1.49 2.88 6.48 6.48 4.32 7.93 0.26<br />

HNO2 5.10 6.13 3.60 17.29 36.02 36.02 36.74 0.17<br />

NH4 OACe 0.00 0.05 0.72 4.32 0.72 0.72 5.76 0.09<br />

Table 5: Ca concentration <strong>in</strong> the lechates as a function of residence time and type of acids <strong>in</strong> separate<br />

mode of <strong>in</strong>cubation<br />

Fe dissolution (%)<br />

0.400<br />

0.350<br />

0.300<br />

0.250<br />

0.200<br />

0.150<br />

0.100<br />

0.050<br />

0.000<br />

Aie Batumbuk (successive <strong>in</strong>cubation mode)<br />

After 2 h After 24 h After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w<br />

266<br />

Times<br />

H2O H Acetat HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />

Figure 4: Concentration of Fe after leached with different acids for 5 weeks


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Fe dissolution (%)<br />

0.800<br />

0.600<br />

0.400<br />

0.200<br />

0.000<br />

Aie Batumbuk (Separate <strong>in</strong>cubation mode)<br />

After 2 h After 24<br />

h<br />

After 1 w After 2 w After 3 w After 4 w After 5 w<br />

267<br />

Times<br />

H2O H Acetat HNO2 NH4 OACe<br />

Figure 4: Concentration of Fe after leached with different acids for 5 weeks<br />

4. CONCLUSIONS<br />

The preced<strong>in</strong>g data and discussion <strong>in</strong>dicate that the recent airfall ash of Mt. Talang considered as<br />

basaltic andesitic rock type with higher amount of volcanic glass and plagioclase. Other primary<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals exists are hypersthene, augite, hornblende, opaque or ferromagnesian m<strong>in</strong>erals. The<br />

elemental composition of the ash reaches the value of 55% for silica, with lesser amount of<br />

calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium oxides. The calcium concentration detected <strong>in</strong> the<br />

leachates <strong>in</strong>creased sharply up to 4 weeks and started to level off after 5 weeks. Among the<br />

proton donors, acetic acid is capable to dissolve more cations from air fall ash compared to other<br />

source proton donors such as deionized water, nitric acid and ammonium acetate. Concentration<br />

of Ca is higher thru the experimental study compared to Fe concentration.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This work is supported by Directorate of Higher Education Department of National Education of<br />

Republic of Indonesia under Fundamental Research Grant no: 005/SP3/PP/DP2M/II/2006,<br />

granted to the first author. Total elemental analyses with XRF Spectrophotometer were<br />

performed at the Laboratory of Research and Development of PT. Semen Padang, Indonesia.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[142] Dahlgren, R. A. and F. C. Ugol<strong>in</strong>i. Effects of Tephra Addition on Soil Processes <strong>in</strong> Spodosols <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Cascade Range, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, U.S.A. Geoderma, 45:331-355. (1989).<br />

[143] Dahlgren, R., S. Shoji and M. Nanzyo. M<strong>in</strong>eralogical characteristics of volcanic ash soils. In: S. Shoji, M.<br />

Nanzyo and R. Dahlgren (eds.). Volcanic Ash Soil-genesis, properties, and utilization. Developments <strong>in</strong> Soil<br />

Science 21, Elsevier, Amsterdam. 101-144. (1993).


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

[144] Dahlgren, R. A., F. C. Ugol<strong>in</strong>i and W. H. Casey. Field weather<strong>in</strong>g rates of Mt. St. Helens tephra.<br />

Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 63, 587-598. (1999).<br />

[145] Dahlgren, R. A., M. Saigusa and F. C. Ugol<strong>in</strong>i. The Nature, Properties and Management of Volcanic<br />

Soils. Advances <strong>in</strong> Agronomy, Academic Press. Vol. 82:113-182. (2004).<br />

[146] Fiantis, D. Colloid-Surface Characteristics and Amelioration Problems of some volcanic soils <strong>in</strong> West<br />

Sumatra, Indonesia. Ph. D. Thesis. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. 315 p. (2000).<br />

[147] Kpomblekou-A, K. and M. A. Tabatabai. Effect of Organic Acids on Release of Phosphorus from<br />

Phosphate Rocks. Soil Sci. Vol 156, No.6:442-453. (1994).<br />

[148] Kurashima, K., S. Shoji and I. Yamada. Mobilities and related factors of chemical elements <strong>in</strong> the toposoils<br />

of Andosols <strong>in</strong> Tohoku, Japan: 1. Mobility sequence of major chemical elements. Soil Sci. 132:300-307. (1981).<br />

[149] Lowe, D. J. Controls on the rates of weather<strong>in</strong>g and clay m<strong>in</strong>eral genesis <strong>in</strong> airfall tephras: a review and<br />

<strong>New</strong> Zealand case study. In: S. M. Colman and D. P. Dethier (eds.), Rates of Chemical Weather<strong>in</strong>g of Rocks and<br />

M<strong>in</strong>erals. Academic Press, Inc. Orlando. 265-330 pp. (1986).<br />

[150] Robert, M. and J. Berthel<strong>in</strong>. Role of Biological and Biochemical factors <strong>in</strong> Soil M<strong>in</strong>eral Weather<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />

Interactions of Soil M<strong>in</strong>erals with Natural Organics and Microbes. P. M. Huang and M. Schnitzer (eds). Soil Sci.<br />

Soc. Am. Spec. Publ. 17. Madison, WI, pp.453-495. (1986).<br />

[151] Shoji, S., I. Yamada and K. Kurashima. Mobilities and related factors of chemical elements <strong>in</strong> the toposoils<br />

of Andosols <strong>in</strong> Tohoku, Japan: 2. Chemical. and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical compositions of size fractions and factors<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the mobilities of major chemical elements. Soil Sci. 132:331-346. (1981).<br />

[152] Shoji, S., M. Nanzyo and R. A. Dahlgren. Volcanic Ash Soils – Genesis, Properties and Utilization.<br />

Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 288 p. (1993).<br />

[153] Ugol<strong>in</strong>i, F. C. and R. S. Sletten. The Role of Proton Donors <strong>in</strong> Pedogenesis as Revealed by Soil Solution<br />

Studies. Soil Sci. Vol. 151, No. 1:61-75. (1991).<br />

[154] White, A. F. Surface chemistry and dissolution k<strong>in</strong>etics of glassy rocks at 25°C. Geochim. Cosmochim.<br />

Acta. 47, 805-815. (1983).<br />

[155] White, A. F., L. V. Benson and A. Yee. Chemical Weather<strong>in</strong>g of the May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helen Ash<br />

Fall and the Effect on the Iron Creek Watershed, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton. In “Rates of Chemical Weather<strong>in</strong>g of Rocks and<br />

M<strong>in</strong>erals”. Colman, S. M. and D. P. Deither (Eds.). pp.351-375. Academic Press, Orlando. (1986).<br />

[156] Yamada, I., S. Shoji, S. Kobayashi and J. Masui. Chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical studies of volcanic ashes.<br />

II. Relationship between rock types and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical properties of volcanic ashes. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 24:75-89.<br />

(1975).<br />

268


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

STONE LINES AND WEATHERING PROFILES OF FERRALLITIC<br />

SOILS IN NORTHEASTERN ARGENTINA<br />

Morrás, H. 1* , Moretti, L. 1 , Píccolo, G. 2 , Zech,W. 3<br />

1INTA-CIRN, Instituto de Suelos, 1712 Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argent<strong>in</strong>a, 2 INTA-EEA Cerro Azul, 3313 Cerro<br />

Azul, Misiones, Argent<strong>in</strong>a, 3 Institute of Soil Science, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany<br />

Abstract<br />

A ferrallitic pedological mantle with Ultisols and a lower proportion of Oxisols, is found <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of<br />

Misiones, <strong>in</strong> northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a. This ferrallitic material usually has a depth of 3 to 7 m above the weathered<br />

basalt, and frequently a “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”, many times ly<strong>in</strong>g on a th<strong>in</strong> structured layer, appears <strong>in</strong> its lower part, close to<br />

the limit with the saprolite.<br />

The autochthonous or allochthonous orig<strong>in</strong> of materials compos<strong>in</strong>g this type of profile, frequent <strong>in</strong> tropical and<br />

subtropical environments, is controversially discussed <strong>in</strong> the literature. Referr<strong>in</strong>g specifically to the area of Misiones<br />

and to neighbour<strong>in</strong>g regions <strong>in</strong> Brazil and Paraguay, Iriondo and Kröhl<strong>in</strong>g [5] postulated that the material that covers<br />

the basaltic rock and <strong>in</strong> which the red soils have developed is an eolian sediment (a “tropical loess”) of upper<br />

Pleistocene age, deflated from the alluvial pla<strong>in</strong>s of the Paraná and Uruguay rivers.<br />

The work we have carried out <strong>in</strong> this region, allows us to dist<strong>in</strong>guish two basic types of “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”: the first one is<br />

a “nodular l<strong>in</strong>e”, more typical for the southern part of Misiones, composed by goethitic nodules of gravel size, and<br />

appear<strong>in</strong>g to derive from differential weather<strong>in</strong>g of more resistant basaltic layers. The second one is a “siliceous”<br />

layer of quarzitic nature, characteriz<strong>in</strong>g profiles <strong>in</strong> central Misiones: these silica concentrations <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>stances are<br />

<strong>in</strong> situ relicts of former quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the basalt, and <strong>in</strong> other cases the “l<strong>in</strong>e” may be def<strong>in</strong>ed as a “silcrete”; a<br />

secondary accumulation of quartz on relictic quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s seems to happen <strong>in</strong> other cases. Concern<strong>in</strong>g the blocky<br />

structured subsurface levels below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”, the results lead to conclude that they are not paleosols, and that<br />

they can not be considered as an evidence of paleosurfaces.<br />

Consequently, accord<strong>in</strong>g to our field observations and to our laboratory results (clay and sand m<strong>in</strong>eralogy, magnetic<br />

susceptibility, geochemical data, granulometry, micromorphology and stable carbon isotope analysis), we consider<br />

that the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” as well as the surface ferrallitic soil materials <strong>in</strong> Misiones have an autochthonous orig<strong>in</strong>,<br />

deriv<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong> situ weather<strong>in</strong>g of basaltic rock.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

A ferrallitic pedological mantle with Ultisols and a lower proportion of Oxisols, covers most part<br />

of the landscape <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Misiones, <strong>in</strong> northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a. This ferrallitic material<br />

usually has a depth of 3 to 7 m above the weathered basalt, and frequently a “stone l<strong>in</strong>e’, many<br />

times ly<strong>in</strong>g on a th<strong>in</strong> structured layer, appears <strong>in</strong> its lower part, close to the limit with the<br />

saprolite.<br />

The nomenclature of different layers and the autochthonous or allochthonous orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />

materials compos<strong>in</strong>g this type of complex profile, frequent <strong>in</strong> tropical and subtropical<br />

environments, is a controversial matter that has deserved numerous <strong>in</strong>terpretations and proposals<br />

[19, 20]. The presence of the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” suggests the existence of an unconformity and this<br />

feature has been generally considered to be of sedimentological rather than of pedological orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Thus, most part of diverse hypotheses proposed considers processes of generation, movement<br />

and accumulation of pebbles, though differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of their genesis and that of the<br />

overly<strong>in</strong>g material.<br />

269


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Segalen [19] the different <strong>in</strong>terpretations currently admitted concern<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong> of the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” can be grouped <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way: 1) processes of pediplanation<br />

related to climatic changes, produc<strong>in</strong>g the erosion of laterites and quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s followed by the<br />

transport of their fragments; 2) colluvial processes <strong>in</strong> steep slopes, produc<strong>in</strong>g the erosion and<br />

transport of hardened horizons and ve<strong>in</strong>s; 3) autochthony or <strong>in</strong> situ s<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of hardened laterites<br />

previously fragmented by chemical weather<strong>in</strong>g. The activity of the soil fauna has also been<br />

proposed to be responsible for the downward movement of the pebbles with<strong>in</strong> the profiles, and<br />

for cover<strong>in</strong>g them with f<strong>in</strong>e textured materials.<br />

For the orig<strong>in</strong> of surface material above the stone l<strong>in</strong>es different <strong>in</strong>terpretations have also<br />

been suggested. A two stages process made up by a first one of deflation and exposure of pebbles<br />

and a second one of cover<strong>in</strong>g due to a later sedimentation is among the older explanations; this<br />

would be eventually possible at certa<strong>in</strong> localities but it is considered unacceptable as a general<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation [3, 19, 20]. At present, two explanations of general application about the orig<strong>in</strong> of<br />

the f<strong>in</strong>e textured surface materials are a colluvial deposition and an upward vertical transport of<br />

f<strong>in</strong>e material by termites from the saprolite [19, 20]. Segalen [19] also mentions that several<br />

authors have presented <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the simultaneous effect of different processes <strong>in</strong><br />

the development of these soil profiles. Recently, Johnson [7, 8] proposed a general explanation<br />

comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g different theories and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of geomorphology, pedology and hydrology that he<br />

named “the dynamic denudation theory”, and <strong>in</strong> which the dynamic processes and conditions are<br />

driven by gravity, water and biotic agents.<br />

With regard to Misiones <strong>in</strong> Argent<strong>in</strong>a, the red soils were traditionally considered to be the<br />

result of <strong>in</strong> situ weather<strong>in</strong>g of the tholeiitic basalt of the Serra Geral Formation [18]. On the<br />

contrary, Iriondo and Kröhl<strong>in</strong>g [5] referr<strong>in</strong>g to Misiones as well as to neighbour<strong>in</strong>g regions <strong>in</strong><br />

Brazil and Paraguay, postulated that the material cover<strong>in</strong>g the basaltic rock and <strong>in</strong> which the red<br />

soils have developed is an eolian sediment of upper Pleistocene age, deflated from the alluvial<br />

pla<strong>in</strong>s of the Paraná and the Uruguay rivers. The authors consider this surface material to be a<br />

“tropical loess” and have formally named it “Oberá Formation”, identify<strong>in</strong>g an “Upper member”<br />

and a “Lower member” separated by the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”. Besides some analytical data, the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

arguments are the presence of a “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” described as platy-gravel sized silica and, less<br />

frequently, the presence of a buried soil (classified as Ultisol) represented by a moderately<br />

structured B horizon below the ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ and therefore regarded as an evidence of a<br />

paleosurface.<br />

Similarly, Lichte y Behl<strong>in</strong>g [10] referr<strong>in</strong>g to the Quaternary landscape evolution <strong>in</strong><br />

southeastern Brazil, also consider that the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” have developed on a now fossil surface<br />

that was subsequently covered by an eolian sediment. For these authors the quartz pebbles derive<br />

from quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Precambrian crystall<strong>in</strong>e rocks, which were distributed by heavy<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>s along the slopes, and later on covered by f<strong>in</strong>e eolian sediments deriv<strong>in</strong>g at least partly from<br />

the lateritic cover of the Sudamericana pla<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Consequently, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the diversity of hypotheses concern<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong> of this<br />

type of ferrallitic soils with “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”, and due to the role they play with respect to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation of landscape evolution, we focus s<strong>in</strong>ce some years on this phenomena <strong>in</strong> Misiones<br />

[13, 14, 15, 16]. In the follow<strong>in</strong>g our results will be summarized.<br />

270


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The Prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Misiones is located <strong>in</strong> northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a, around 28º S and 54º W (Fig. 1).<br />

The climate is subtropical humid without dry season; the mean annual temperature is around<br />

20°C and the mean annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>creases from 1750 mm <strong>in</strong> the south to 1950 mm <strong>in</strong> the north.<br />

The present vegetation is a subtropical forest, except a narrow strip along the southern border<br />

with a savanna type vegetation.<br />

The field work for the study of ferrallitic soils was for the most part done on exposed<br />

profiles along the ma<strong>in</strong> roads <strong>in</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The sites observed and described up to the present<br />

are more than sixty, and several of the profiles <strong>in</strong> different sectors of the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce have been<br />

selected and sampled for detailed studies. Some soil profiles <strong>in</strong> concave topographic positions<br />

have also been sampled and analyzed. The samples were characterized by conventional analysis;<br />

<strong>in</strong> addition clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy (DRX and TEM), sand m<strong>in</strong>eralogy (optical microscopy and SEM),<br />

magnetic m<strong>in</strong>eralogy (magnetic susceptibility), micromorphology, geochemistry (macro- and<br />

micro-elements), and stable carbon isotopes analysis were taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration.<br />

Figure 1: Map of the Misiones Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, and location of some of the surveyed sites.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g that the genesis of ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>es¨ and associated ¨structured horizons¨ is unclear, we<br />

have focused our study on these features. The work we have carried out <strong>in</strong> this region, allowed<br />

us to dist<strong>in</strong>guish several morphological types of ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>es¨, from which two basic<br />

compositional types were identified.<br />

271


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

a) The ¨nodular l<strong>in</strong>es¨<br />

The first type of “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” we named “nodular l<strong>in</strong>e” (Fig. 5-A), typical for the southern part<br />

but also observed <strong>in</strong> other sectors of Misiones, is composed by ferrug<strong>in</strong>ous nodules of gravel<br />

size, usually with a mean size of around 15 mm. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to their m<strong>in</strong>eralogy and morphology<br />

three groups were dist<strong>in</strong>guished: the first one consists of hematitic nodules, dark red <strong>in</strong> colour<br />

and bright, and be<strong>in</strong>g the smallest <strong>in</strong> size; the second group is composed by goethitic nodules,<br />

reddish yellow <strong>in</strong> colour, opaque, and the bigger <strong>in</strong> size; the third group is composed by nodules<br />

of <strong>in</strong>termediate aspect and composition. The hematitic nodules occur <strong>in</strong> low proportion along the<br />

profile, as well above as below of the ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ with a slight maximum at that level; the<br />

goethitic nodules are <strong>in</strong> a high proportion with<strong>in</strong> the ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ and appear only <strong>in</strong> this layer,<br />

while the <strong>in</strong>termediate nodules are <strong>in</strong> low proportion above and below the ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

there a sharp quantitative <strong>in</strong>crement though the <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> size is progressive (Fig. 2).<br />

Though the nodules are more abundant at a particular level thus def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨, the<br />

fact that those ¨iron gravels¨ are not restricted to that level, together with their verticals variation<br />

<strong>in</strong> quantity, size and composition, suggest that they are not the result of a sedimentary process of<br />

accumulation. Secondly, the goethitic nature of gravels appear<strong>in</strong>g exclusively at the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”<br />

level, would not be compatible with their residence at a surface under an arid climate.<br />

Moreover, transitional vertical or horizontal steps of rock weather<strong>in</strong>g observed <strong>in</strong> several<br />

profiles have furnished the evidence of the <strong>in</strong> situ formation of this type of “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”: thus for<br />

example, it was observed the transition from homogeneous saprolite bodies to levels with an<br />

<strong>in</strong>cipient <strong>in</strong>dividualisation of soft rounded and more yellowish nodules, <strong>in</strong> turn pass<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

rounded hardened fragments <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>dividualised and sparsed, giv<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ally rise to a k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

of relictic ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨ (Figs. 5-C, 5-E, 5-F). Microscopic analysis of the nodules form<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

“stone l<strong>in</strong>e” shows an <strong>in</strong>ternal porphyric texture with weathered phenocrysts, partially filled with<br />

goethitic iron, thus reveal<strong>in</strong>g its relationship with the basaltic rock.<br />

b) The ¨siliceous l<strong>in</strong>es¨<br />

The second type of ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>e¨, ma<strong>in</strong>ly observed <strong>in</strong> the central part of the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, is a<br />

“siliceous” level of quartzitic nature (Fig. 5-B). In this type of ¨l<strong>in</strong>e¨ the silica appears as<br />

horizontal levels of variable thickness, from a few millimeters (<strong>in</strong> this case usually fractured and<br />

with the appearance of lam<strong>in</strong>ar fragments) up to 30 cm or more.<br />

In some <strong>in</strong>stances these silica concentrations are clearly <strong>in</strong> situ relicts of former quartz<br />

ve<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the basalt. Lateral as well as vertical transitions from weathered basalt levels <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s to pedogenized red materials <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g quartz ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ have been observed (Figs. 5-E,<br />

5-F). In some cases these siliceous levels <strong>in</strong>to the pedogenized material seem to result from a<br />

secondary crystallisation of quartz, thus develop<strong>in</strong>g as ¨silcretes¨. Besides, <strong>in</strong> several <strong>in</strong>stances, a<br />

secondary crystallisation of quartz seems to happen on relictic quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s; the upper face of<br />

these levels shows an irregular morphology that could be the result of dissolution as well as<br />

crystallization of silica.<br />

In every case it is clear that the siliceous levels are basically massive and cont<strong>in</strong>uous, i.e.<br />

they are not constituted by pebbles or fragments that were submitted to transport. Some<br />

fragmentation of thick siliceous ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ observed <strong>in</strong> some cases on vertical walls is the artificial<br />

result of the excavation, which is not observed when the ¨levels¨ are carefully exposed remov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

272


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

the cover<strong>in</strong>g material. Th<strong>in</strong> ve<strong>in</strong>s may be naturally fragmented, but the fragments appear<br />

perfectly accommodated as the pieces of a floor (Fig. 5-D), this be<strong>in</strong>g the result of <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

movements and eventually from processes of dissolution, dur<strong>in</strong>g the processes of rock<br />

weather<strong>in</strong>g and soil formation.<br />

273


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

In these profiles, the ferrug<strong>in</strong>ous nodules are scarce and its vertical distribution is different to<br />

the profiles with ¨nodular l<strong>in</strong>es¨. In some cases levels show<strong>in</strong>g a relatively higher<br />

concentration of iron nodules, dark red and hematitic, and appear<strong>in</strong>g regularly with depth,<br />

co<strong>in</strong>cides with a higher concentration of quartz gravels (Fig. 3). The last may be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as<br />

fragments of presently dissolved th<strong>in</strong> relictic quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s; it may be hypothesized that those<br />

former ve<strong>in</strong>s have slow<strong>in</strong>g down the process of lixiviation thus contribut<strong>in</strong>g to an<br />

accumulation of iron and promot<strong>in</strong>g the development of iron nodules.<br />

c) The ¨structured horizons¨<br />

Concern<strong>in</strong>g the blocky structured subsurface levels below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” (Figs. 5-A, 5-F),<br />

field and analytical results lead to the conclusion that they are not buried paleosols and that<br />

they can not be considered as an evidence of paleosurfaces. Two processes may be<br />

responsible for the formation of these structured layers: 1) The first one is similar to the<br />

“stone l<strong>in</strong>e” development described above, to which sometimes they are associated: <strong>in</strong> this<br />

case a lateral sequence of weather<strong>in</strong>g, from the weathered rock to a structured and f<strong>in</strong>e<br />

textured material, can be observed (Figs. 5-E, 5-F). 2) In a second one, nodular or siliceous<br />

layers derived from the above mentioned processes, may exert a “protection” effect on the<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>e textured materials aga<strong>in</strong>st the weather<strong>in</strong>g front, thus allow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

development or conservation of structural blocky units. As a consequence, places are found <strong>in</strong><br />

which a well def<strong>in</strong>ed “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” covers a cont<strong>in</strong>uous structured horizon, as well as places<br />

where short discont<strong>in</strong>uous ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ or even isolated gravels preserve structured micro-horizons,<br />

surrounded by a differently organized material.<br />

Besides the profiles show<strong>in</strong>g one of the above mentioned two types of ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>es¨,<br />

other situations have been also observed: profiles with several superimposed ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ of the<br />

same type; profiles with different types of ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨ superimposed at different depths; ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨<br />

with dark and bright gravels of lam<strong>in</strong>ar morphology; profiles without ¨l<strong>in</strong>es¨; ¨stone l<strong>in</strong>es¨<br />

appear<strong>in</strong>g above, below as well as <strong>in</strong>side of structured layers, thus do not hav<strong>in</strong>g a fixed<br />

positional relation with structured horizons, and “l<strong>in</strong>es” ly<strong>in</strong>g directly on or with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

saprolite. It is also to be mentioned that besides the horizontal facies, many times “stone<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es” and structured layers show sub-horizontal directions and bifurcations or branch<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

(Fig. 5-A). ¨L<strong>in</strong>es¨ with an undulated morphology, sometimes described as ¨funnel-like¨ [20],<br />

are also common.<br />

d) Clay m<strong>in</strong>eralogy.<br />

The XR-diffractometry of the clay fraction from different profiles, those hav<strong>in</strong>g a nodular<br />

“stone l<strong>in</strong>e” as well as those with a siliceous l<strong>in</strong>e, shows a similar composition and gradual<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogical variation from the saprolite up to the soil surface (Fig. 4). The more abundant<br />

components of the fraction are kaol<strong>in</strong>itic m<strong>in</strong>erals, i.e ma<strong>in</strong>ly kaol<strong>in</strong>ite and some halloysite,<br />

the last evidenced clearly by TEM; the content of these phyllosilicates decrease progressively<br />

from the saprolite up to the surface. At the same time, a cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>crease of chloritic<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals is observed from the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” up to the surface, where they comprise around the<br />

15% of the clay fraction. These last m<strong>in</strong>erals known under different names, v.g. pseudochlorites,<br />

alum<strong>in</strong>ous chlorite, alum<strong>in</strong>ous vermiculites, develop <strong>in</strong> pedogenic environments.<br />

This m<strong>in</strong>eralogical vertical variation suggests that these profiles are the result of <strong>in</strong> situ<br />

weather<strong>in</strong>g of the basalt rock. Besides, it can be observed that the m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition<br />

of structured levels below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”, which have been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as paleosols, have a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition similar to that of the saprolite and thus differ<strong>in</strong>g from that of the<br />

upper B soil horizons.<br />

274


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

e) Sand m<strong>in</strong>eralogy and quartz exoscopy<br />

The sand fraction of the ferrallitic soils <strong>in</strong> Misiones is almost exclusively composed by quartz<br />

and magnetite, the first be<strong>in</strong>g more abundant <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>er fractions while the second is more<br />

abundant <strong>in</strong> the coarser ones. Variable proportions of pseudosand gra<strong>in</strong>s and small iron<br />

nodules are also observed by microscopy. Other stable m<strong>in</strong>erals as ilmenite, anatase and rutile<br />

have been detected by XRD [2, 12]. The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of sands is thus typical<br />

for highly weathered materials.<br />

On the other hand, the morphological study of quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s by optical microscopy and<br />

by SEM, record<strong>in</strong>g their general morphology and the features on their surfaces, provides<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about their history, i.e. processes of transport and chemical environment that have<br />

affected the materials where the gra<strong>in</strong>s are <strong>in</strong>cluded [4, 9].<br />

Microscopic analysis of the sand fraction from soils of Misiones reveals that a<br />

considerable part of quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s have experienced a high degree of weather<strong>in</strong>g, characterised<br />

by deep and <strong>in</strong>terconnected pits of dissolution (Fig. 5-G). On the other hand, many of the<br />

gra<strong>in</strong>s are clearly the result of secondary crystallisation of quartz. This secondary quartz can<br />

be observed as <strong>in</strong>dividualized s<strong>in</strong>gle gra<strong>in</strong>s, or as a secondary crystallisation on the surface of<br />

other quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s act<strong>in</strong>g as a nucleus or template for silica deposition (Fig. 5-G). Some of<br />

the gra<strong>in</strong>s appear rounded under optical microscopy, but under the SEM these gra<strong>in</strong>s show<br />

sharp and well developed crystal faces (Fig. 5-H). Besides, these gra<strong>in</strong>s show on their surface<br />

typical marks of dissolution with an <strong>in</strong>verted trigonal symmetry [12]<br />

The exoscopy performed on sand gra<strong>in</strong>s from different horizons of ferrallitic soils from<br />

Misiones, do not show evidences of eolian transport. On the contrary clear traces of quartz<br />

crystallisation and of chemical dissolution appear. Very <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g are those gra<strong>in</strong>s show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

both processes, a first one of quartz crystallisation, with silica supposedly ma<strong>in</strong>ly com<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from more weatherable m<strong>in</strong>erals, followed by the dissolution of that secondary quartz (Fig. 5-<br />

275


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

H). Thus, morphology and surface textures of quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s are consistent with a <strong>in</strong> situ<br />

development of these ferrallitic soils.<br />

f) Magnetic susceptibility<br />

Magnetic susceptibility was measured <strong>in</strong> the field and <strong>in</strong> the laboratory, <strong>in</strong> this case at high<br />

and low frequency. Results obta<strong>in</strong>ed show high values, fitt<strong>in</strong>g the concept of “magnetic” soils,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g progressively from the saprolite up to the soil surface. The difference between high<br />

and low MS –the frequency dependent MS– is low <strong>in</strong> the saprolite, shows a rapid <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

from the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” to lower B horizons, and then keeps similar differences up to the surface<br />

(Figs. 2, 3).<br />

The gradual <strong>in</strong>crease of MS from the saprolite towards the surface can be related to a<br />

gradual <strong>in</strong>crement <strong>in</strong> the magnetite content, a highly resistant m<strong>in</strong>eral found <strong>in</strong> the basalt rock<br />

[2]. In turn, the high value of the frequency dependent MS above the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”, is an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dication of the existence of superparamagnetic magnetite, which is of pedogenic orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Thus, both results suggest that these soil profiles are developed through <strong>in</strong> situ ferrallitic<br />

processes of weather<strong>in</strong>g from the basalt. Besides, data from the structured horizons below the<br />

stone l<strong>in</strong>e differ from the soil horizons above it, thus be<strong>in</strong>g an additional <strong>in</strong>dication that they<br />

are not paleosols.<br />

g) Granulometry<br />

The granulometric data show a gradual <strong>in</strong>crease of clay and silt fractions from the surface to<br />

the middle part of the B horizons, and then a progressive decrease towards the base of the<br />

saprolite (Figs. 2, 3). The maximum of f<strong>in</strong>e materials observed <strong>in</strong> the B horizon would be the<br />

result of a twofold process, <strong>in</strong> a one hand the result of the process of illuviation typical for<br />

Ultisols, and <strong>in</strong> the other hand a process of argilogenesis due to rock weather<strong>in</strong>g and soil<br />

development. Particularly, the progressive <strong>in</strong>crease of f<strong>in</strong>e fractions from the saprolite<br />

towards the middle part of B horizons suggests that the materials are <strong>in</strong> situ. Besides, the<br />

content of f<strong>in</strong>e fractions <strong>in</strong> the structured horizons below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” are quite different<br />

from the B horizons, and do not seem to correspond to a paleo Ultisol as has been proposed.<br />

h) Geochemistry<br />

Total amounts of selected chemical elements and their ratios generally show cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

transitions from the saprolite up to the soil surface, evidenc<strong>in</strong>g the weather<strong>in</strong>g process and the<br />

neoformation of m<strong>in</strong>erals that have occurred <strong>in</strong> these soils. Total content of silica <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

rapidly above the saprolite, due to the neoformation of clay m<strong>in</strong>erals as well as quartz<br />

crystallisation. The Si/Al ratio <strong>in</strong>creases progressively towards the surface, runn<strong>in</strong>g parallel<br />

with the <strong>in</strong>crease of chloritic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> the same direction (Fig. 3). A stable element as Zr<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases progressively towards the surface, which would reflect the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity of<br />

weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the same direction. Weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dices such as the one of Parker and<br />

homogeneity <strong>in</strong>dices such as Ti/Zr do not show discordances (Fig. 3). But the same elements<br />

and certa<strong>in</strong> ratios shift significantly below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”. These results <strong>in</strong>dicate that the<br />

reddish materials and the “structured horizons” below the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” do not correspond to a<br />

paleosol and to a lower member of a sedimentary formation as has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted [5], but to<br />

slightly pedogenized transitional levels between the saprolite and the B horizons of the soils.<br />

276


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

i) Stable Carbon Isotopes<br />

The stable carbon isotope composition of plants differs accord<strong>in</strong>g to their photosynthetic<br />

pathway (C3, C4, and CAM). δ 13 C values of C3 plants like trees and almost all the plants <strong>in</strong><br />

temperate and cold regions, range from approximately –32‰ to –20‰ PDB, with a mean of –<br />

27‰. In contrast δ 13 C values of C4 plants, adapted to conditions of higher hydric stress, range<br />

from –17‰ to –9‰, with a mean of –13‰ [11, 17]. Isotopic fractionation depends not only<br />

on the type of vegetation but also on the plant environment, the CO2 atmospheric<br />

concentration, the temperature and on the humidity level. Dur<strong>in</strong>g litter decomposition and<br />

humification the isotopic signal of plants is transferred <strong>in</strong>to the soil organic matter (SOM).<br />

Thus, the analysis of carbon isotopic composition of SOM may allow to deduce <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

about the environments and climatic conditions under which plants have grown <strong>in</strong> former<br />

times.<br />

Results obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Misiones [16] show that surface soil horizons (0-50 cm) have δ 13 C<br />

values around –25‰ <strong>in</strong> accordance with the present humid climate and a C3 vegetation cover.<br />

At around one meter depth the isotopic signature shows a significant enrichment <strong>in</strong> δ 13 C of up<br />

to –15‰ (Figs. 2, 3).This result <strong>in</strong>dicates that the SOM has derived from a vegetation<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ated by C4 plants developed under conditions of hydric stress <strong>in</strong> a savanna<br />

environment. Such conditions have probably existed <strong>in</strong> Misiones dur<strong>in</strong>g the Last Glacial<br />

Maximum and the first half of the Holocene, as it is reported by several authors <strong>in</strong> southern<br />

Brazil [6, 17].<br />

In the lower part of the profiles, the measurement of δ 13 C gives <strong>in</strong>termediate values<br />

(around -21‰) that are more difficult to be expla<strong>in</strong>ed. Anyway, and <strong>in</strong> accordance with the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretations made for similar situations, it is considered that these δ 13 C values result from a<br />

vegetation dom<strong>in</strong>ated by C3 plants <strong>in</strong> an open forest and under <strong>in</strong>termediate climatic<br />

conditions. Consequently, <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” there are no evidences of arid to<br />

semiarid environmental conditions suitable for a denudation, accumulation of gravels on a<br />

paleosurface, and a later eolian sedimentation several meters thick dur<strong>in</strong>g the LGM as has<br />

been proposed by Iriondo and Kröhl<strong>in</strong>g [5].<br />

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to our field and laboratory results, it is possible to attribute an autochthonous<br />

orig<strong>in</strong> to the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the red soils of Misiones.<br />

In the case of the “nodular l<strong>in</strong>es”, the rounded goethitic gravels seem to derive from a<br />

differential weather<strong>in</strong>g of relatively more resistant basaltic layers. Transitional situations<br />

between the weathered basalt and the well def<strong>in</strong>ed “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” clearly show the orig<strong>in</strong> and<br />

the process of <strong>in</strong>dividualisation and accumulation of s<strong>in</strong>gle nodules. Besides, the ferrug<strong>in</strong>ous<br />

nodules are not restricted to the “stone l<strong>in</strong>es”. The hematitic ones as well as those with a<br />

partial cover<strong>in</strong>g of hematite at their surfaces, both appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g proportion with<br />

depth down to the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e”, may also be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as relictic fragments of the basaltic<br />

saprolite, i.e. formed similarly to the ones <strong>in</strong> the “stone l<strong>in</strong>e” but that has been progressively<br />

weathered, sparsed and covered by hematite as the result of soil development.<br />

In the case of the “siliceous l<strong>in</strong>es” several evidences <strong>in</strong>dicate that they are also<br />

autochthonous, and derived from pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> the basalt. Here also<br />

transitional situations between the weathered basalt <strong>in</strong>truded by quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s, and silica<br />

accumulations <strong>in</strong>to pedogenized materials have been observed. Besides it has clearly appeared<br />

that platy siliceous gravels are not transported and that they result from <strong>in</strong> situ fragmentation<br />

of quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s. Some additional complexity <strong>in</strong> the evolution and morphology of these<br />

277


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

“siliceous l<strong>in</strong>es” is given by the frequently evident secondary accumulation of quartz on the<br />

relictic ve<strong>in</strong>s, which <strong>in</strong> cases make difficult to dist<strong>in</strong>guish relictic features from newly formed<br />

levels that would better fit with the concept of “silcretes”.<br />

Concern<strong>in</strong>g the “structured horizons” below the “stonel<strong>in</strong>es”, field and analytical data<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate that they are not paleosols. Though the process of structuration is not so clear, it also<br />

seems to be associated to the existence of the relatively more resistant layers with<strong>in</strong> the basalt.<br />

In the case of profiles with “nodular l<strong>in</strong>es”, it seems that dur<strong>in</strong>g the process of nodules<br />

development, the material <strong>in</strong> between and immediately below gets a polyhedric structure. In<br />

this process of aggregates development, the “l<strong>in</strong>es” seem to play as a sort of “protection”<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st the weather<strong>in</strong>g front. This “protective” effect would be the orig<strong>in</strong> of structuration <strong>in</strong><br />

the case of “siliceous l<strong>in</strong>es”. Several field evidences seem to support these <strong>in</strong>terpretations: <strong>in</strong><br />

many cases the “structured horizons” conserve many morphological features from the<br />

saprolite. In the cases where the “nodular” or “siliceous” l<strong>in</strong>es have subhorizontal directions<br />

or when they bifurcate, “structured horizons” follow the orientation of those gravelly “l<strong>in</strong>es”.<br />

Moreover, <strong>in</strong> the cases where the horizontal gravelly “l<strong>in</strong>es” are <strong>in</strong>terrupted, a feature that<br />

may be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as the result of weather<strong>in</strong>g proceed<strong>in</strong>g through pockets <strong>in</strong>to the parent<br />

rock, the “structured horizons” also disappear.<br />

Thus, both types of gravelly ”l<strong>in</strong>es” identified <strong>in</strong> the ferrallitic soils of Misiones as well<br />

as the “structured horizons” are consider<strong>in</strong>g to be <strong>in</strong> situ relictic features deriv<strong>in</strong>g from the<br />

ferrallitic weather<strong>in</strong>g of two types of basaltic flows appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the area. The soils show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

both types of “stone l<strong>in</strong>es” superposed with<strong>in</strong> the same profile, the “nodular” one above the<br />

“siliceous” one -as was consistently observed up to the moment- <strong>in</strong> agreement with the usual<br />

ly<strong>in</strong>g of both types of basalt layers at the surface, are additional evidences of its<br />

autochthonous orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

The authors thank the ¨Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación Científica y<br />

Técnica¨ –ANPCyT- of Argent<strong>in</strong>a, for support<strong>in</strong>g a great part of this research through the<br />

Project PICT 07-08879.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] H. Behl<strong>in</strong>g, M, Lichte, A., Miklós. Evidence of a forest free landscape under dry and cold climate conditions<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the Last Glacial Maximun <strong>in</strong> the Botocatu region (Sao Paulo State), Southeastern Brazil. Quaternary of<br />

South America and Antartic Pen<strong>in</strong>sula, 11, 99-110, (1998).<br />

[2] H. Causevic, H. Morrás, A. Mijovilovich, C. Saragovi. Evidences of the stability of magnetite on a soil from<br />

Northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a by Mössbauer spectroscopy and magnetization measurementes. Physica B: Physics of<br />

Condensed Matter, 354 (1-4): 373-376, (2004)<br />

[3] Y. Chatel<strong>in</strong>, Influence des conceptions géomorphologiques et paléoclimatiques sur l´<strong>in</strong>terpretation de la<br />

genèse et la classification des sols ferrallitiques d´Afrique Centrale et Australe. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Pédol.,<br />

V(3): 243-255, (1967)<br />

[4] H. Eswaran, G. Stoops. Surface textures of quartz <strong>in</strong> tropical soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal.<br />

43(2):420-424, (1979).<br />

[5] M. Iriondo, D. Kröhl<strong>in</strong>g. The tropical loess. Proc. 30 th International Geological Congress, (An Zhisheng et<br />

al., Eds.), Vol. 21, p. 61-77, (1997).<br />

[6] T. Desjard<strong>in</strong>s, F. Andreux, B. Volkoff., C. Cerri, Distribution de l’ isotope 13 C dans des sols ferrallitiques du<br />

Brésil. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Pédol., XXVI (4): 343-348, (1991).<br />

[7] D. Johnson. Dynamic denudation evolution of tropical, subtropical and temperate landscapes with three<br />

tiered soils: toward a general theory of landscape evolution. Quaternary International, 17: 67-78, (1993).<br />

278


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

[8] D. Johnson, J. Domier, D.N. Johnson. Animat<strong>in</strong>g the biodynamics of soil thickness us<strong>in</strong>g process vector<br />

analysis: a dynamic denudation approach to soil formation. Geomorphology, 67, 23-46, (2005).<br />

[9] L. Le Ribault. L´exoscopie des quartz. Masson, Paris, 150 p, (1977)<br />

[10] M. Lichte, H. Behl<strong>in</strong>g, Dry and cold climatic conditions <strong>in</strong> the formation of the present landscape <strong>in</strong><br />

Southeastern Brazil. Z. Geomorph. N.F., 43(3):341-358, (1999).<br />

[11] A. Mariotti. Le carbone 13 en abondance naturelle, traceur de la dynamique de la matière organique des sols<br />

et de l’évolution des paléoenvironments cont<strong>in</strong>entaux. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Pédol., XXVI (4): 299-313, (1991).<br />

[12] A. Mijovilovich, H. Morrás, C. Saragovi, G. Santana, J. Fabris. Magnetic fraction of an Ultisol from<br />

Misiones, Argent<strong>in</strong>a. Hyperf<strong>in</strong>e Interactions, C, 3: 332-335, (1998)<br />

[13] H. Morrás, L. Moretti, G. Píccolo, W. Zech. Algunas observaciones sobre la composición y el origen del<br />

material edafizado y las líneas de piedra sobreyacentes a los basaltos de Misiones. Actas X Reunión Argent<strong>in</strong>a de<br />

Sedimentología, San Luis, pp. 106-108, (2004)<br />

[14] H. Morrás, L. Moretti, G. Píccolo, W. Zech. <strong>New</strong> hypotheses and results about the orig<strong>in</strong> of stonel<strong>in</strong>es and<br />

subsurface structured horizons <strong>in</strong> ferrallitic soils of Misiones, Argent<strong>in</strong>a. 2 nd Assembly of the European<br />

Geosciences Union, Vienna, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 7, 05522, (2005).<br />

[15] H. Morrás, L. Moretti, B. Glaser, G. Píccolo, W. Zech. Eolian transport vs. <strong>in</strong> situ weather<strong>in</strong>g: evidences for<br />

support<strong>in</strong>g an autochthonous orig<strong>in</strong> of ferrallitic soil parent materials <strong>in</strong> subtropical norhteastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

Abstracts, INQUA International Workshop, Lower Latitudes Loess - Dust transport. Past and Present,<br />

Lanzarote, Canary Islands, (2006)<br />

[16] H. Morrás, L. Moretti, B. Glaser, G. Píccolo, C. Hatté, W. Zech. Paleoenvironments <strong>in</strong> the subtropical<br />

northeastern Argent<strong>in</strong>a as deduced from stable Carbon isotopes composition of ferrallitic soils. V South<br />

American Symposium on Isotope Geology. Punta del Este, Uruguay, pp. 267-271, (2006)<br />

[17] L. Pessenda, S. Gouveia, R. Aravena, R. Boulet, E. Valencia. Holocene fire and vegetation changes <strong>in</strong><br />

southeastern Brazil as deduced from fossil charcoal and soil carbon isotopes. Quaternary International, 114, 35–<br />

43, (2004).<br />

[18] G. Sanesi. I souli di Misiones. Academia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, 343 p., (1965).<br />

[19] P. Ségalen. Les sols ferrallitiques et leur répartition géographique. Orstom Éditions, Paris, Tome 1, 198 p.,<br />

(1994).<br />

[20] G. Stoops. Le profil d´alteration au Bas-Congo (K<strong>in</strong>shasa). Sa description et sa genèse. Pédologie, XVII (1):<br />

60-105, (1967).<br />

279


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Figure 5. A: soil profile with a ¨nodular l<strong>in</strong>e¨ (profile M0 <strong>in</strong> the locality of Leandro N. Alem); see the<br />

complex morphology of the ¨l<strong>in</strong>e¨. B: a profile with a ¨siliceous l<strong>in</strong>e¨ (M10, <strong>in</strong> the locality of<br />

Aristóbulo del Valle). C: goethitic nodules develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the saprolite, and giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to a ¨nodular<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e¨. D: vertical view of a ¨siliceous l<strong>in</strong>e¨ deriv<strong>in</strong>g from a quartz ve<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>to the basalt; E: at left, two<br />

superposed weathered basalt layers; the lower layer <strong>in</strong>cludes quartz ve<strong>in</strong>s; at right, the same profile <strong>in</strong><br />

a more advanced step of weather<strong>in</strong>g. F: the same sequence of basalt layers showed <strong>in</strong> figure E,<br />

already pedogenized; remark the superposition of a ¨nodular l<strong>in</strong>e¨ above a ¨siliceous l<strong>in</strong>e¨, each one<br />

with its own ¨structured horizon¨ G: sand fraction from a Bt horizon, composed by magnetite, quartz<br />

and pseudosands (optical microscopy); remark the presence of very weathered quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s together<br />

with secondary quartz. H: a gra<strong>in</strong> of secondary quartz from the sand fraction; remark the dissolution<br />

pits.<br />

280


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

PEDOGENESIS ALONG A HILLSLOPE TRAVERSE IN THE<br />

UPPER AFRAM BASIN, GHANA<br />

T. Adjei-Gyapong, 1 E. Boateng, 1 * C. Dela Dedzoe, 1 W.R. Effland, 2 M.D. Mays 2 and J.K.<br />

Seneya 1<br />

Poster Extended Abstract<br />

1 Ghana Soil Research Institute and 2 USDA/NRCS Soil Survey Division<br />

E-mail: soilri@ncs.com.gh, Tel: 23321778226, Fax: 23321778219<br />

In March 2004, six pedons were sampled dur<strong>in</strong>g a collaborative Ghana-U.S. <strong>in</strong>ter-laboratory<br />

soil characterization project. This poster presents results from three pedons located along a<br />

hillslope traverse. The objectives of this research are: (1) to compare the morphology of the<br />

soils; (2) to exam<strong>in</strong>e the chemical, physical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of each soil; and<br />

(3) to understand the genesis and variation of soil properties along the hillslope.<br />

Three locations were selected to represent soil variation along a hillslope traverse with<br />

consistent parent materials, climate, and native vegetation. Standard soil characterization<br />

analyses were conducted at the USDA/NRCS National Soil Survey Laboratory <strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>coln,<br />

NE (Soil Survey Staff, 1996),and the Soil Research Institute , Ghana. Analytical results for<br />

particle size distribution, pH, clay and sand m<strong>in</strong>eralogy, and citrate-dithionite extractable<br />

“free” Fe are discussed. Th<strong>in</strong> sections were prepared from oriented clods<br />

The soils are developed over relatively similar parent materials (f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed Voltaian<br />

sandstones) and <strong>in</strong> similar macro-climates. Occurr<strong>in</strong>g at the forest-savannah transition, they<br />

display contrast<strong>in</strong>g morphological properties, which affect their soil classification, land use<br />

and management. The Techiman series (Typic Rhodustalfs) on the summit to shoulder is well<br />

to excessively dra<strong>in</strong>ed, moderately deep (80-100 cm), grayish brown, loamy f<strong>in</strong>e sand with<br />

many (35%) ironstone concretions and nodules over a reddish brown, dom<strong>in</strong>antly ironstoneconcretionary<br />

(65%) sandy clay loam subsoil. On the l<strong>in</strong>ear (middle) back slopes, the<br />

Amant<strong>in</strong> series (Typic Kandiustalfs) is moderately well dra<strong>in</strong>ed, very deep (> 190 cm),<br />

grayish brown, loamy f<strong>in</strong>e sand over yellowish brown sandy clay loam free of coarse<br />

fragments. The Denteso series (Oxyaquic Dystrudept) on the foot (lower) slope is poorly<br />

dra<strong>in</strong>ed, grayish brown, loamy f<strong>in</strong>e sand over structureless, s<strong>in</strong>gle-gra<strong>in</strong>ed p<strong>in</strong>kish gray sand.<br />

Iron concretions and ironpans occur with<strong>in</strong>, and <strong>in</strong> some cases beneath, the soils<br />

studied along the hillslope <strong>in</strong> the Upper Afram Bas<strong>in</strong>. The genesis of ironpans <strong>in</strong>volves cycles<br />

of Fe mobilization, redistribution and concentration with<strong>in</strong> the landscape. The higher Fe<br />

content results from element release through m<strong>in</strong>eral weather<strong>in</strong>g from overly<strong>in</strong>g horizons and<br />

neighbor<strong>in</strong>g upslope soils.<br />

Further research is planned with an evaluation of terra<strong>in</strong> data on elevation, slope<br />

classes, slope aspect and other derivatives for the Afram Bas<strong>in</strong> study area.<br />

Current environmental conditions (elevation, slope classes, aspect) with<strong>in</strong> the Afram<br />

Bas<strong>in</strong> study area are displayed with derivatives from a 200 ft resolution digital elevation<br />

model (DEM).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[157] S.V. Adu, J. A. Mensah-Ansah. "Soils of the Afram Bas<strong>in</strong>, Ashantiand Eastern Regions, Ghana",<br />

CSIR-Soil Research Institute, Memoir No. 12. Kwadaso-Kumasi, Ghana. 90pp., (1995).<br />

281


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

[158] T.W. Awadzi, R.D. Asiamah. "Soil Survey of Ghana", Soil Survey Horizon. 43 (2): 44-52, (2002).<br />

[159] E. Boateng, TR. E. Chidley, D. J. Savory, J. Elgy. "Soil Information System Development and <strong>Land</strong><br />

Suitability Mapp<strong>in</strong>g at the Ghana Soil Research Institute", Poster Presentation at 16 th World Congress of Soil<br />

Science, Montpellier, France. August 20-26, (1998).<br />

[160] Soil Survey Staff. "Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual". USDA/NRCS Soil Survey<br />

Investigations Report No. 42, January, (1996).<br />

282


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

INFLUENCE OF TITANOMAGNETITE ON DITHIONITE-<br />

CITRATE-BICARBONATE (DCB) AND OXALATE<br />

EXTRACTIONS IN WEATHERED DOLERITE<br />

C. G. Algoe 1* , E. Van Ranst 2 , G. Stoops 3<br />

1* Anton de Kom Universiteit van Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Faculteit der Technologische Wetenschappen, POB 9212,<br />

Paramaribo, Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Tel: +597 465558 ext. 413, Fax: +597 495005, Email: c.algoe@uvs.edu<br />

2 Laboratorium voor Bodemkunde, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Gent, Belgium<br />

3 Laboratorium voor M<strong>in</strong>eralogie, Petrologie en Micropedologie, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, S8 B-9000<br />

Gent, Belgium<br />

Abstract<br />

Four dolerite boulders were collected <strong>in</strong> weathered profiles <strong>in</strong> the Precambrian Guiana Shield<br />

occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame. These spheroidally weathered boulders were sub-sampled <strong>in</strong> the<br />

laboratory to obta<strong>in</strong> shells of different weather<strong>in</strong>g grades, which were analysed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical techniques. The high amount of ammonium-oxalate extractable<br />

iron as compared to the dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB) extractable iron and the presence<br />

of titanomagnetite <strong>in</strong> the fresh rock questions the <strong>in</strong>fluence of (titano)magnetite on either type<br />

of extraction technique. Highly magnetic fractions were separated from the fresh rock and<br />

studied us<strong>in</strong>g microprobe analyses, oxalate and DCB extractions. Oxalate and DCB<br />

extractions were also carried out on th<strong>in</strong> sections. The results confirm the <strong>in</strong>fluence of<br />

titanomagnetite on the extractable iron content.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Two techniques are most commonly used to extract pedogenic iron from soil and regolith<br />

samples: the ammonium-oxalate method (Ox) and the dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB)<br />

method. The oxalate extraction is presumed to remove X-ray amorphous and organic bound<br />

iron oxides, whereas the dithionite extraction is supposed to remove <strong>in</strong> addition the f<strong>in</strong>ely<br />

crystall<strong>in</strong>e iron oxides [9, 10, 21]. The amount of iron released by the dithionite extraction<br />

should therefore be equal to or greater than the amount of iron released by the oxalate<br />

extraction method [21].<br />

In order to study the spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g of dolerite, four boulders were collected <strong>in</strong><br />

a weathered profile with<strong>in</strong> the Precambrian Guiana Shield occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame. These<br />

boulders were sub-sampled <strong>in</strong> the laboratory, to obta<strong>in</strong> shells of vary<strong>in</strong>g weather<strong>in</strong>g grade,<br />

which were analyzed with various chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical techniques, among which the<br />

oxalate and DCB extractions. The amount of iron extracted by the ammonium-oxalate method<br />

was unexpectedly higher than the amount of Fe extracted by the DCB method carried out on<br />

fresh rock (Table 1). One of the possible explanations for this result could be the presence of<br />

magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> the samples, <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the extraction methods. This study aims at<br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>fluence of magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals on the ammonium oxalate extractable and<br />

DCB extractable iron. Analyses are made on bulk samples as well as th<strong>in</strong> sections of the fresh<br />

rock.<br />

A number of studies have been dedicated to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the <strong>in</strong>fluence of magnetite on<br />

both the dithionite and oxalate extraction methods. The results are sometimes however a bit<br />

contradictory. It has been demonstrated that oxalate extraction dissolves magnetite and that<br />

283


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

dithionite extraction does not attack primary magnetite [10] but does attack hematite <strong>in</strong> or on<br />

the magnetic gra<strong>in</strong>s [19, 20, 21]. Other studies however reveal that the presence of magnetite<br />

or maghemite does <strong>in</strong>fluence the DCB extraction method [4, 5, 6, 7, 8].<br />

DCB extraction depends on the extraction temperature, as well as on the concentration<br />

of the magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals [18]. Athough some dist<strong>in</strong>ction between f<strong>in</strong>e gra<strong>in</strong>ed maghemite and<br />

magnetite could be made the DCB extraction treatment alone was proven not to be suitable<br />

for dist<strong>in</strong>ction between f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed magnetic iron oxides [18].<br />

It was stated [18] that the results of reported DCB extraction studies varied<br />

considerably. In some cases the DCB method was reported to dissolve only the pedogenic<br />

maghemite [5, 16, 17] while <strong>in</strong> other cases the f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed magnetite was dissolved as well<br />

[8]. The results of different studies were found difficult to compare, because the extraction<br />

procedure of each study was not always clearly specified. Factors such as amount of sample,<br />

type of sample, amount of dithionite and extraction temperature varied with each study.<br />

The reductive dissolution of iron oxides is a k<strong>in</strong>etic process and factors such as pH,<br />

crystall<strong>in</strong>ity and temperature have a major effect on the dissolution rate [11, 13, 22].<br />

Therefore, results of extraction studies with differences <strong>in</strong> extraction procedures do not<br />

necessarily reflect the same dissolution behaviour. The sample type (natural or synthetic) also<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>es the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed by DCB extraction.<br />

Chemical extractants, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g acid ammonium oxalate and DCB, have also been<br />

used for study<strong>in</strong>g the spatial distribution of iron and other oxides <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections of<br />

undisturbed soil [1, 2, 3], prov<strong>in</strong>g the usefulness for these techniques for extractions carried<br />

out on th<strong>in</strong> sections.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The material selected for this study consisted of dolerite samples obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Central-North area of Sur<strong>in</strong>ame <strong>in</strong> a village called Berg en Dal (Figure 1). The dolerite<br />

boulders show<strong>in</strong>g spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g patterns were collected <strong>in</strong> the field and shells were<br />

sub-sampled <strong>in</strong> the laboratory. For this study samples of the unweathered dolerite were<br />

selected for analyses. Ammonium-oxalate extractions and DCB extractions were carried out<br />

on bulk samples, their highly magnetic fraction, and on th<strong>in</strong> sections. The highly magnetic<br />

fraction was separated from the bulk sample by pass<strong>in</strong>g a hand magnet over the sample at a<br />

distance of 1 cm. The highly magnetic fraction was studied us<strong>in</strong>g microprobe analyses,<br />

ammonium-oxalate extractions, DCB extractions, and X-Ray analyses. The extracts were<br />

measured us<strong>in</strong>g atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS).<br />

The ammonium oxalate extraction is based on solubilisation of the amorphous<br />

sesquioxides after reduction reactions with ammonium oxalate <strong>in</strong> the dark. The method<br />

followed was retested by Schwertmann [14, 15] who found out that <strong>in</strong> the darkness the<br />

ammonium-oxalate extraction only dissolved X-ray amorphous oxides [9]. Fe, Al, Si and Mn<br />

are measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). A 0.2M ammonium oxalate<br />

solution and a 0.2M oxalic acid solution were prepared and mixed to obta<strong>in</strong> an ammonium<br />

oxalate-and oxalic acid mixture with pH = 3. The sample (250 mg) was weighed <strong>in</strong> a plastic<br />

centrifuge tube to which 50 ml ammonium oxalate mixture was added. This mixture was<br />

stirred <strong>in</strong> the dark for 4 hours and centrifuged dur<strong>in</strong>g 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes at 2000 rpm. The supernatant<br />

clear solution was decanted to a volumetric flask of 50 ml and the volume was made up with<br />

the oxalate mixture. This solution was used for the measurement of Fe, Al, Si and Mn. The<br />

same procedure was followed for extraction of th<strong>in</strong> sections, vary<strong>in</strong>g the extraction time from<br />

4 to 6, and f<strong>in</strong>ally 12 hours [1, 2, 3].<br />

284


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Figure 1: Location of the study area Berg en Dal <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame (Modified after [12])<br />

285


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g the DCB extractions, amorphous coat<strong>in</strong>gs and crystals of free iron oxides and<br />

other sesquioxides are removed us<strong>in</strong>g sodiumdithionite as reduc<strong>in</strong>g agent. The removal of free<br />

iron oxides aids <strong>in</strong> dispersion of the silicate proportion [11]. The DCB extractions were<br />

carried out follow<strong>in</strong>g the procedure outl<strong>in</strong>ed by Mehra and Jackson [11]. The concentration of<br />

Fe, Al, Si and Mn are determ<strong>in</strong>ed from a solution <strong>in</strong> which the solubilized cations are kept <strong>in</strong><br />

solution by complexation with Na citrate. A Na citrate bicarbonate buffer is added to the<br />

sample, which is placed <strong>in</strong> a waterbath, for 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes after which sodium dithionite powder<br />

(0.75 gram) is added, while stirr<strong>in</strong>g and the solution is aga<strong>in</strong> left for 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes. After<br />

cool<strong>in</strong>g, the mixture is centrifuged at 3000 rpm, decanted, washed, aga<strong>in</strong> centrifuged and<br />

decanted. The collected extraction solution is used for determ<strong>in</strong>ation of Fe, Al, Si and Mn<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g AAS. The same procedure was followed for DCB extraction on th<strong>in</strong> sections. In some<br />

cases multiple DCB extractions were carried out on the same th<strong>in</strong> section. The total values for<br />

Fe, Al, Si and Mn were measured for the fresh rock us<strong>in</strong>g AAS.<br />

The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of the opaque m<strong>in</strong>erals was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by wavelength<br />

dispersive spectrometry (WDS) microprobe analyses on uncovered th<strong>in</strong> sections and Energy<br />

dispersive spectrometry (EDS) microprobe analyses on magnetic gra<strong>in</strong>s, as well as X-Ray<br />

Diffraction analyses on the highly magnetic fraction. The XRD patterns were collected with a<br />

Phillips X’PERT system with a PW 3710 based diffractometer (Laboratory of Soil Science,<br />

Ghent University), equipped with a Cu tube anode, a secondary graphite beam<br />

monochromator, a proportional xenon-filled detector, and a 35-position multiple sample<br />

changer. The <strong>in</strong>cident beam was automatically collimated. The irradiated length was 12 mm.<br />

The secondary beam side comprised a 0.1 mm receiv<strong>in</strong>g slit, a soller slit, and a 1° anti-scatter<br />

slit. The tube was operated at 40 kV and 30 mA, and the XRD data were collected <strong>in</strong> a θ/2θ<br />

geometry from 3° 2θ onwards, with a step of 0.02° 2-theta and a count time of 1 second per<br />

step. The highly magnetic samples were analysed us<strong>in</strong>g unoriented powder samples (3° to 60°<br />

2θ) that were placed on a glass plate us<strong>in</strong>g collodium solution.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

M<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition - Microprobe analyses<br />

In order to determ<strong>in</strong>e the composition of the opaque m<strong>in</strong>erals, 12 WDS microprobe analyses<br />

were carried out <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections. All analysed gra<strong>in</strong>s are Fe-Ti oxides. Three analyses gave<br />

Fe/Ti ratios equal to 1, po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to an ilmenite composition (FeTiO3). For the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

analyses, the Fe/Ti ratio was close to 2, which is compatible with an ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el composition<br />

(Fe2TiO4). Investigation of the opaque gra<strong>in</strong>s at a magnification of 400 times shows the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tergrowth of ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el <strong>in</strong> a mass of ilmenite. EDS microprobe analyses of the highly<br />

magnetic fraction give similar results, and po<strong>in</strong>t to an ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el composition.<br />

M<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition – X-Ray Diffraction<br />

The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical composition of the highly magnetic fraction was determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g X-ray<br />

diffraction. The X-Ray diffraction pattern obta<strong>in</strong>ed is presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. The peaks<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate the presence of sp<strong>in</strong>el, magnetite and/or (titanian) maghemite. The peaks do not<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate the presence of ilmenite.<br />

286


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Oxalate and DCB extraction on samples<br />

Table 1 shows the results of the extractions carried out on the samples. The higher amounts of<br />

oxalate extractable iron <strong>in</strong> the bulk samples as apposed to the amounts of DCB extractable<br />

iron are clear. The same can be stated for Al2O3. In order to <strong>in</strong>fer whether the difference can<br />

be attributed to the presence of magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> the fresh rock, the analyses were<br />

repeated on magnetic fractions.<br />

Intensity<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0.483 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />

0.374 Mgt<br />

0.336 Mgt<br />

0.322 u<br />

0.318 u<br />

0.296 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />

0.275 Ilm/Mgt<br />

0.252 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />

15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60<br />

287<br />

0.242 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />

2θ<br />

0.223 Mgt<br />

0.214 u<br />

0.209 Sp/Mt/Mgt<br />

Figure 2: XRD Diffraction pattern for highly magnetic samples , Sp: Sp<strong>in</strong>el, Mt: Magnetite, Mgt:<br />

maghemite, U: Unidentified<br />

DB1-C: Bulk Sample DB1-C: highly magnetic sample<br />

Wt %<br />

Fe2O3DCB 1.73 4.64<br />

Fe2O3OX 3.91 12.42<br />

Fe2O3-total 15.60 -<br />

Al2O3DCB 0.18 0.14<br />

Al2O3OX 0.52 0.31<br />

Al2O3-total 12.80 -<br />

MnO2DCB 0.01 0.01<br />

MnO2OX 0.01 0.02<br />

MnO2-total 0.23 -<br />

SiO2DCB 0.90 0.32<br />

SiO2Ox 0.49 0.27<br />

SiO2-total 48.90 -<br />

Table 1: Total oxide values, ammonium-oxalate and DCB extractable oxides <strong>in</strong> bulk and magnetic<br />

samples<br />

0.187 u<br />

0.172 Sp/Mt<br />

0.161 Sp/Mgt


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Figure 3: Image of untreated section (A), ammonium-oxalate treated section (B) and DCB treated<br />

section (C)<br />

The results <strong>in</strong>dicate that the oxalate extractable Fe and to some extend Al are much higher<br />

than the DCB extractable ones.<br />

Oxalate and DCB extractions on th<strong>in</strong> sections<br />

After treatment of the th<strong>in</strong> sections digital photographs were taken <strong>in</strong> order to visually detect<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>erals present. Figure 3 gives three photomicrographs of the fresh rock, one<br />

before treatment (A), one after 4 hours of oxalate treatment (B) and one after DCB treatment<br />

(C), each taken <strong>in</strong> pla<strong>in</strong> polarised light.<br />

The fresh rock is composed of predom<strong>in</strong>antly lathshaped plagioclases which are<br />

colourless and bright <strong>in</strong> the pictures. The second most abundant are the pyroxenes, which are<br />

also colourless but have higher relief as compared to the plagioclases. The treatments were<br />

focused on the black opaque gra<strong>in</strong>s of either ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el or ilmenite composition.<br />

After the ammonium-oxalate treatment the th<strong>in</strong> section appears brighter. The opaque<br />

gra<strong>in</strong>s show no visible changes. There is however the appearance of a black spot (outl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with an ellipse) that was not present <strong>in</strong> the untreated sample. After DCB treatment the section<br />

is far less bright, the black spot is no longer present and no changes have been noticed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

opaque gra<strong>in</strong>s. The DCB and oxalate extractions on th<strong>in</strong> sections of fresh rock material did<br />

not show any sign of m<strong>in</strong>eral dissolution. For this reason the oxalate extraction period was<br />

extended to 6, 8 and 12 hours, however still without signs of apparent dissolution.<br />

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION<br />

This study demonstrates that the amount of oxalate extractable Fe was much greater than the<br />

DCB extractable Fe. These differences are even more pronounced <strong>in</strong> the magnetic fraction<br />

288


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence from the magnetic fraction. The XRD pattern of the magnetic fraction<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t to the presence of magnetite, sp<strong>in</strong>el or maghemite. The percentage of the magnetic<br />

fraction was however not determ<strong>in</strong>ed. The data presented does suggest attack of the magnetic<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral (ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el) by the oxalate solution. The higher values for DCB extractable iron<br />

measured <strong>in</strong> the magnetic fraction, also po<strong>in</strong>t to attack of the magnetic gra<strong>in</strong>s by the DCB<br />

extraction technique. This means that Fe values obta<strong>in</strong>ed from samples conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a magnetic<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral (magnetite or ulvosp<strong>in</strong>el) can be overestimated. The XRD pattern of the magnetic<br />

fraction did not po<strong>in</strong>t to the presence of ilmenite, and consequently the <strong>in</strong>fluence of ilmenite<br />

was not <strong>in</strong>vestigated. Although this is apparent <strong>in</strong> the chemical data the extractions on the th<strong>in</strong><br />

sections do not reveal attack or dissolution of the opaque (and possibly magnetic) m<strong>in</strong>eral. A<br />

possible dissolution of the opaque gra<strong>in</strong>s should be confirmed by study<strong>in</strong>g the th<strong>in</strong> sections<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy and microprobe analyses before and after treatment. This<br />

would also <strong>in</strong>vestigate the <strong>in</strong>fluence of ilmenite on the extraction techniques.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] J.M. Arocena, G. De Geyter, C. <strong>Land</strong>uyt and U. Schwertmann. “Dissolution of soil iron oxides with<br />

ammoniumoxalate: comparison between bulk samples and th<strong>in</strong> sections”. Pedologie, 29, pp. 275-297, (1989)<br />

[2] J.M. Arocena, G. De Geyter, C. <strong>Land</strong>uyt and G. Stoops. “A Study on the Distribution and Extraction of Iron<br />

and Manganese <strong>in</strong> soil th<strong>in</strong> sections”. In: Douglas L.A (ed.). Soil Micromorphology: A Basic and Applied<br />

Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 621-626, (1990)<br />

[3] P. Bullock, P.J. Loveland and C.P. Murphy. “A technique for selective solution of iron oxides <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections<br />

of soil”. Journal of Soil Science, 26: 247-248, (1975).<br />

[4] P. F<strong>in</strong>e, and M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger. “Pedogenic factors affect<strong>in</strong>g magnetic susceptibility of northern California soils”,<br />

Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53, pp. 1119-1127, (1989).<br />

[5] P. F<strong>in</strong>e, M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger, R. La Ven, K.L. Verosub and R.J. Southard. “Role of pedogenesis <strong>in</strong> distribution of<br />

magnetic susceptibility <strong>in</strong> two California chronosequences”, Geoderma, 44, pp. 287-306, (1989).<br />

[6] P. F<strong>in</strong>e,. M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger and K.L. Verosub. “Use of magnetic susceptibility measurement <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />

uniformity <strong>in</strong> chronosequence studies”, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56, pp. 1195-1199, (1992).<br />

[7] P. F<strong>in</strong>e, M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger, K.L. Verosub and J. TenPas. “<strong>New</strong> evidence for the orig<strong>in</strong> of ferrimagnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong><br />

loess from Ch<strong>in</strong>a”, Soil Science Society of America Journa, 57, pp. 1537-1542, (1993).<br />

[8] C.P. Hunt, M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger, G. Kletetschka, J. TenPas and K.L. Verosub. “Effect of citrate–bicarbonate–<br />

dithionite treatment on f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed magnetite and maghemite”, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 130, pp.<br />

87–94, (1995).<br />

[9] J.A. McKeague, and J. H. Day. “Dithionite and oxalate extractable Fe and Al as aids <strong>in</strong> differentiat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

various classes of soils”, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 46, pp. 13-22, (1966).<br />

[10] J.A. McKeague, J.E. Brydon and N.M. Miles. “Differentiation of forms of extractable iron and alum<strong>in</strong>ium<br />

<strong>in</strong> soils”, Soil Science Society of America Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 35, pp. 33-38, (1971).<br />

[11] O.P. Mehra, and M.L. Jackson. “Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite–citrate system<br />

buffered with sodium bicarbonate”, Clays and Clay M<strong>in</strong>erals., 7, pp. 317–327, (1960).<br />

[12] Narena-Celos. Sur<strong>in</strong>ame kaarten collectie, 1p., (2004).<br />

[13] D. Postma. “The reactivity of iron oxides <strong>in</strong> sediments: a k<strong>in</strong>etic approach” Geochimica Cosmochimica<br />

Acta, 57, pp. 5027–5034, (1993).<br />

[14] U. Schwertmann. “Differenzierung der Eisenoxide des Bodens durch photochemische Extraktion mit saurer<br />

Ammoniumoxalat-Lösung”. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Düng., Bodenkunde, 105, pp. 194-202, (1964).<br />

[15] U. Schwertmann. “Use of oxalate for Fe extraction from soils”. Canadian Journal of Soil Science., 53: pp.<br />

244-246, (1973)<br />

[16] M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger and P. F<strong>in</strong>e. “Pedogenic factors affect<strong>in</strong>g magnetic susceptibility of Northern California soils”,<br />

Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53, pp. 1119–1127, (1989).<br />

[17] M.J. S<strong>in</strong>ger, L.H. Bowen, K.L. Verosub, P. F<strong>in</strong>e and J. TenPas. “Mössbauer spectroscopic evidence for<br />

citrate–bicarbonate–dithionite extraction of maghemite from soils”, Clays and Clay M<strong>in</strong>erals, 43, pp. 1-7,<br />

(1995).<br />

[18] I.H.M. van Oorschot, and M.J.Dekkers. “Dissolution behaviour of f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed magnetite and maghemite <strong>in</strong><br />

the citrate–bicarbonate–dithionite extraction method”, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 167, pp. 283–295,<br />

(1999).<br />

289


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

[19] I.H.M. van Oorschot and Mark J. Dekkers. “Selective dissolution of magnetic iron oxides <strong>in</strong> the acid–<br />

ammonium oxalate/ferrous iron extraction method—I. Synthetic samples, Geophysical Journal International,<br />

145, pp. 740–748, (2001).<br />

[20] I.H.M. van Oorschot, M. J. Dekkers and P. Havlicek,. Selective dissolution of magnetic iron oxides with the<br />

acid-ammonium-oxalate/ferrous-iron extraction technique—II. Natural loess and palaeosol samples .<br />

Geophyisical Journal International, 149, pp. 106–117, (2002).<br />

[21] A.L. Walker. “The effects of magnetite on oxalate and dithionite extractable iron”, Soil Science Society of<br />

America Journal, 47, pp. 1022-1026, (1983).<br />

[22] B. Z<strong>in</strong>der, G. Furrer and W. Stumm. “The coord<strong>in</strong>ation chemistry of weather<strong>in</strong>g, II. Dissolution of Fe(III)<br />

oxides”, Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, 50, pp. 1861–1869, (1986).<br />

290


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Sub-theme : DEVELOPMENTS IN SOIL MICROMORPHOLOGY<br />

Abstract<br />

Stoops, G., Marcel<strong>in</strong>o, V., Mees, F.<br />

Department of Geology and Soil Science, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium<br />

This contribution br<strong>in</strong>gs an overview of latest research <strong>in</strong> soil micromorphology conducted at<br />

the Department of Geology and Soil Science of the Ghent University, and a short <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

to two important current themes <strong>in</strong> this field.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Although soil microscopy has been totally excluded from the new curriculum of “<strong>Physical</strong><br />

<strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>” studies <strong>in</strong> Ghent, research <strong>in</strong> this field is still be<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued.<br />

Apart from applications of micromorphological techniques to soil genesis and<br />

development [1-23] and to archaeology (the latter especially by Prof. R. Langohr and coworkers),<br />

attention has also been paid to the development and/or critical evaluation of special<br />

methodologies such as image analysis and X-ray-tomography, and observation and<br />

description techniques. A book on genetic <strong>in</strong>terpretation of micromorphological data is <strong>in</strong><br />

progress (Stoops et al.).<br />

APPLICATIONS IN SOIL GENESIS AND DEVELOPMENT<br />

Amongst the applications <strong>in</strong> soil genesis and development the follow<strong>in</strong>g will be summarised:<br />

1° circumgranalar bassanite formation around quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> a natural gypsum crust.<br />

Heat<strong>in</strong>g experiments suggest that differences <strong>in</strong> heat capacity between the components can<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> the observed patterns, but <strong>in</strong> the natural crust they were found to be related to the<br />

availability of space around the enclosed detrital m<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s. Coat<strong>in</strong>gs of the studied type,<br />

or derived relict features, are potential palaeosurface <strong>in</strong>dicators [9].<br />

2° zeolite neoformation <strong>in</strong> the Olduvai (Tanzania) stratigraphic sequence of lacustr<strong>in</strong>e and<br />

fluvial sediments, related to the <strong>in</strong>teraction of volcanic material with sal<strong>in</strong>e alkal<strong>in</strong>e lake water<br />

or groundwater [10]. The conditions formation of the various zeolite m<strong>in</strong>erals were<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated (analcime, chabazite, phillipsite, erionite, cl<strong>in</strong>optilolite), based on their mode of<br />

occurrence, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g their relationship with other pedogenic materials.<br />

3° differentiation of pedogenic and geogenic calcite <strong>in</strong> soils from Iran, us<strong>in</strong>g UV and blue<br />

light fluorescence techniques comb<strong>in</strong>ed with cathodolum<strong>in</strong>escence [7].<br />

4° impact of land use (forest, afforested pasture and crop land) and seasonal freez<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

(micro)morphological properties of silty Norwegian soils [20]: platy and lenticular<br />

microstructures due to frost are present <strong>in</strong> the upper part of all soils studied but occur at<br />

shallowest depth (35 cm) under forest than <strong>in</strong> the other soils (50 cm); planar voids associated<br />

with these structures are not or partially accommodat<strong>in</strong>g, mean<strong>in</strong>g that when the soil is wet<br />

they do not completely close and water can still move parallel to the soil surface. Dusty clay<br />

coat<strong>in</strong>gs (agricutans) and <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs and compound layered <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs are observed immediately<br />

below the plough layer <strong>in</strong> the cropland but not at the same depth <strong>in</strong> the other soils. They thus<br />

reflect the <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>ternal soil erosion associated with cultivation.<br />

291


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

5° soil evolution on volcanic ash <strong>in</strong> Europe [19, 22]: as a first step coat<strong>in</strong>gs of f<strong>in</strong>e material<br />

develop around the coarse particles (chitonic c/f related distribution pattern), or form hypocoat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong> the case of pumice; with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g amount of f<strong>in</strong>e material an enaulic c/f r.d.p. is<br />

formed, that gradually grades <strong>in</strong>to a f<strong>in</strong>e granular microstructure. The latter is preserved as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>trapedal microstructure <strong>in</strong> the more clayey Bw horizons where a (sub)angular blocky<br />

microstructure prevails. In the case of Icelandic soils a lenticular microstructure developed,<br />

related to freeze-thaw cycles [21] and a microstratification, often with organic layers, is<br />

throughout preserved, po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to the quasi absence of biological activity, <strong>in</strong> contrast to what<br />

happens <strong>in</strong> temperate and tropical areas [1]. The transformation of volcanic glass to<br />

alteromorphs of allophane, with a palagonite like appearance, is discussed [2]. Throughout the<br />

profiles an undifferentiated b-fabric is noticed <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>e mass of the European soils on<br />

volcanic ash. Alteration products of volcanic ash <strong>in</strong> Mexico give rise to specific opal<strong>in</strong>e<br />

features [3, 4].<br />

6° research on micromorphological concepts and term<strong>in</strong>ology lead to the publication of a new<br />

manual [19], <strong>in</strong> order to replace the standard work of Bullock et al. (1985) out of pr<strong>in</strong>t s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

many years.<br />

IMAGE ANALYSIS<br />

Presently, low-cost software-based image analysis systems make automated analysis of soil<br />

pore space and other features very attractive. Large amounts of data on feature characteristics<br />

can be easily generated. Although it is currently possible to use 3D image analysis associated<br />

with non-destructive tools such as X-ray CT to observe and quantify soil porosity, 2D image<br />

analysis procedures are still commonly applied because of their lower cost and easier<br />

accessibility. With the aim of <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g whether different sorts of images analysed with<br />

different methods produce comparable results, three widely used sample preparation and<br />

image acquisition procedures and three 2D-image analysis methods with different levels of<br />

manual <strong>in</strong>tervention were compared. The quality of the image, determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the image<br />

acquisition and sample preparation method used, affects average porosity measurements<br />

significantly: fluorescent images compared with BSE-images clearly underestimate porosity.<br />

On the other hand, different <strong>in</strong>terventions and methods used to <strong>in</strong>crease image quality and to<br />

segment images also affect porosity measurements significantly. Moreover, <strong>in</strong> the particular<br />

case of manual threshold<strong>in</strong>g, porosity values obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the same observer are more<br />

reproducible than those from different observers. These results stress the need for<br />

standardization of image analysis protocols and warn of the dangers of compar<strong>in</strong>g soil<br />

porosity measurements performed on different types of images.<br />

X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY<br />

X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) is a non-destructive imag<strong>in</strong>g technique that provides<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about the <strong>in</strong>ternal structure of objects. X-ray CT images are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

record<strong>in</strong>g radiographs for successive positions dur<strong>in</strong>g step-wise rotation of a sample relative<br />

to an X-ray source and a detector. These radiographs are then used to create images show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

variations <strong>in</strong> X-ray attenuation values, determ<strong>in</strong>ed by density and element composition, for<br />

cross-sections perpendicular to the axis of rotation. One of the advantages of X-ray CT is the<br />

292


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

possibility of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a large number of parallel cross-sections, which can be used for 3D<br />

imag<strong>in</strong>g and analysis.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce its development as a medical technique, X-ray CT has been applied <strong>in</strong> various<br />

other fields of research, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g earth sciences and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. [28]). In soil science, it<br />

has ma<strong>in</strong>ly been used for the study of pore characteristics. Aspects of soil porosity that have<br />

been <strong>in</strong>vestigated with X-ray CT <strong>in</strong>clude the effects of faunal activity (e.g. [24]), soil<br />

compaction (e.g. [27]), erosion control measures (e.g. [31]), and tillage practices (e.g. [30]).<br />

Examples of other applications are the study of root development (e.g. [26]), water movement<br />

(e.g. [25]), and soil surface morphology (e.g. [25]).<br />

Ghent University has X-ray CT facilities for material research, operated by the<br />

Department of Geology and Soil Science and the Department of Subatomic and Radiation<br />

Physics. The available scanners can handle a wide range of sample types, for studies<br />

requir<strong>in</strong>g CT images with specific requirements regard<strong>in</strong>g spatial resolution and material<br />

contrasts.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Most important micromorphological contributions from the Department of Geology and Soil<br />

Science over the last five years<br />

[1] Fauzi, A.I., Stoops, G. Influence of Krakatau ash fall on pedogenesis <strong>in</strong> West Java. Example of a<br />

toposequence <strong>in</strong> the Honje Mounta<strong>in</strong>s, Ujung Kulon Pen<strong>in</strong>sula, Catena, 56, 45-66, (2004).<br />

[2] Gérard, M., Caqu<strong>in</strong>eau, S., P<strong>in</strong>heiro, J., G. Stoops. Weather<strong>in</strong>g and allophane neoformation <strong>in</strong> soils on<br />

volcanic ash from the Azores, Europ. J. Soil Sci.(<strong>in</strong> press).<br />

[3] Gutierrez Castorena, M.d.C., Stoops, G., Ortiz Solorio, C.A., Lopez Avila, G. Amorphous silica materials <strong>in</strong><br />

soils and sediments of the Ex-Lago de Texcoco, Mexico. An explanation of its subsidence, Catena, 60, 205-226,<br />

(2005).<br />

[4] Gutierrez Castorena, M.d.C., Stoops, G., Ortiz Solorio, C.A., Sanchez-Guzman, P. Micromorphology of<br />

opal<strong>in</strong>e features <strong>in</strong> soils on the sediments of the Ex-Lago de Texcoco, Mexico, Geoderma, 132, 89-104, (2005).<br />

[5] Heidari, A., Mahmoodi, Sh., Stoops, G., Mees, F. Micromorphological characteristics of Vertisols <strong>in</strong> Iran,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g non-smectitic soils, Arid <strong>Land</strong> Research and Management, 19, 29-46, (2005).<br />

[6] Khormali, F., Abtahi, A., Mahmoodi, S., Stoops, G. Argillic horizon development <strong>in</strong> calcareous soils of arid<br />

and semi-arid regions of southern Iran, Catena, 53, 273-301, (2003).<br />

[7] Khormali, F., Abtahi, A., Stoops, G.. Micromorphology of calcitic features <strong>in</strong> highly calcareous soils of Fars<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, Southern Iran, Geoderma, 132, 31-46, (2006).<br />

[8] Marcel<strong>in</strong>o V., Cnudde V., Vansteelandt S., Carò F.. An evaluation of 2D-image analysis techniques for<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g soil microporosity, European Journal of Soil Science (<strong>in</strong> press). (2006).<br />

[9] Mees, F., Stoops, G. Circumgranular bassanite <strong>in</strong> a gypsum crust from eastern Algeria - a potential<br />

palaeosurface <strong>in</strong>dicator, Sedimentology, 50, 1139-1145, (2003).<br />

[10] Mees, F., Stoops, G., Van Ranst, E., Paepe, R., Van Overloop, E. The nature of zeolite occurrences <strong>in</strong><br />

deposits of the Olduvai Bas<strong>in</strong>, northern Tanzania, Clays and Clay M<strong>in</strong>erals, 53,659-673,. (2005).<br />

[11] Mees, F., De Dapper, M. Vertical variations <strong>in</strong> bassanite distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> near-surface sediments,<br />

southern Egypt, Sedimentary Geology, 181, 225-229, (2005).<br />

[12] Mees, F. Salt m<strong>in</strong>eral distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> soils of the Otjomongwa pan, Namibia, Catena, 54, 425-437,<br />

(2003).<br />

[13] Mees, F., S<strong>in</strong>ger, A. Surface crusts on soils/sediments of the southern Aral Sea bas<strong>in</strong>, Uzbekistan,<br />

Geoderma, (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />

[14] Mulyanto, B., Stoops, G.. M<strong>in</strong>eral neoformation <strong>in</strong> pore spaces dur<strong>in</strong>g alteration and weather<strong>in</strong>g of andesitic<br />

rocks <strong>in</strong> humid tropical Indonesia, Catena, 54, 385-392, (2003).<br />

[15] Oleschko, K., Parrot, J-F., Ronquillo, G., Shoba, S., Stoops,, G. Marcel<strong>in</strong>o, V. Weather<strong>in</strong>g: towards a fractal<br />

quantify<strong>in</strong>g,. Mathematical Geology,. 51: 607-627, (2004).<br />

[16] Stoops, G., Van Ranst, E., Verbeek, K. Pedology of soils with<strong>in</strong> the spray zone of the Victoria Falls<br />

(Zimbabwe), Catena, 46, 63-83, (2001).<br />

[17] Stoops, G.,. Achievements <strong>in</strong> micromorphology,. Catena, 54, 317-319, (2003).<br />

293


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

[18] Stoops, G. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the Analysis and Description of Soil and Regolith Th<strong>in</strong> Sections. SSSA. Madison,<br />

WI., 184pp + CD. ISBN 0-89118-842-8, (2003).<br />

[19] Stoops, G., Gérard, M., Micromorphology. In: Arnalds, O., Bartoli, F., Buurman, P., Garcia-Rodeja, E.,<br />

Oskarsson, H., Stoops, G. (eds), Soils of Volcanic Regions of Europe, (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />

[20] Stoops, G., D. Dedecker. Microscopy on undisturbed sediments as a help <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g dredg<strong>in</strong>g operations.<br />

A case study from Thailand. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs International Conference Pnom Penh, KAOW. (<strong>in</strong> press).<br />

[21] Stoops, G., Gérard, M., Arnalds, O. A micromorphological study of andosol genesis <strong>in</strong> Iceland, Geoderma,<br />

(accepted).<br />

[22] Stoops.G. Micromorphology of soils on volcanic ash <strong>in</strong> Europe. A review and synthesis. Europ. J.Soil<br />

Science, (accepted).<br />

[23] Sveistrup T. E., Haraldsen T.K., Langohr R., Marcel<strong>in</strong>o V., Kværner J.. <strong>Land</strong> use impact on seasonally<br />

frozen silty soils <strong>in</strong> South Eastern Norway, Soil and Tillage Research, 81: 39-56, (2005).<br />

Cited papers – X-ray tomography<br />

[161] Bastardie, F., Capowiez, Y., Cluzeau, D. 3D characterisation of earthworm burrow systems <strong>in</strong> natural<br />

soil cores collected from a 12-year-old pasture. Applied Soil Ecology 30, 34-46, (2005).<br />

[162] Fohrer, N., Berkenhagen, J., Hecker, J.M., Rudolph, A. Chang<strong>in</strong>g soil and surface conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall - S<strong>in</strong>gle ra<strong>in</strong>storm/subsequent ra<strong>in</strong>storms, Catena, 37, 355-375, (1999).<br />

[163] Gregory, P.J., Hutchison, D.J., Read, D.B., Jenneson, P.M., Gilboy, W.B., Morton, E.J. Non-<strong>in</strong>vasive<br />

imag<strong>in</strong>g of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography, Plant and Soil, 255, 351-359, (2003).<br />

[164] Langmaack, M., Schrader, S. & Rapp-Bernhardt, U., Kotzke, K. Soil structure rehabilitation of arable<br />

soil degraded by compaction, Geoderma, 105, 141-152, (2002).<br />

[165] Mees, F., Swennen, R., Van Geet, M., Jacobs, P. (eds). Applications of X-ray Computed Tomography<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Geosciences. Geological Society Special Publication 215, 328 pp. Geological Society Publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

House, Bath, United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. (2003).<br />

[166] Mooney, S.J. Three-dimensional visualization and quantification of soil macroporosity and water flow<br />

patterns us<strong>in</strong>g computed tomography, Soil Use and Management, 18, 142-151, (2002).<br />

[167] Pedrotti, A., Pauletto, E.A., Crestana, S., Holanda, F.S.R., Cruv<strong>in</strong>el, P.E., Vaz, C.M.P. Evaluation of<br />

bulk density of Albaqualf soil under different tillage systems us<strong>in</strong>g the volumetric r<strong>in</strong>g and computerized<br />

tomography methods, Soil & Tillage Research, 80, 115-123, (2005).<br />

[168] Rachman, A., Anderson, S.H., Gantzer, C.J., Computed-tomographic measurement of soil<br />

macroporosity parameters as affected by stiff-stemmed grass hedges, Soil Science Society of America<br />

Journa, 69, 1609-1616, (2005).<br />

Some new publications on micromorphology<br />

[169] Eswaran, H., Drees, R. Soil under the Microscope: Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g Soil <strong>in</strong> Another Dimension. CD. Soil<br />

Micromorphology Committee of the Soil Science Society of America.<br />

[170] FitzPatrick, E.A., Soil Microscopy and Micromorphology. CD. Interactive Soil Science, 76 Burns Road,<br />

Aberdeen, AB15 4NS, UK, (2006)<br />

[171] Kapur, S., Mermut, A., Stoops, G., (Eds.), Special Issue of Geoderma (papers presented dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

International Work<strong>in</strong>g Meet<strong>in</strong>g on Soil Micromorphology, 2004, Adana, Turkey) (<strong>in</strong> preparation<br />

[172] Stoops, G. (Ed.), Achievements <strong>in</strong> Micromorphology. Special Issue of Catena, Vol. 54, Issue , pp 317-<br />

678 (papers presented dur<strong>in</strong>g the International Work<strong>in</strong>g Meet<strong>in</strong>g on Soil Micromorphology, 2001, Gent,<br />

Belgium) (2003)<br />

294


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

SPHEROIDAL WEATHERING OF DOLERITE IN SURINAME:<br />

EVIDENCE FROM PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND<br />

MINERALOGICAL DATA<br />

C. G. Algoe 1* , E. Van Ranst 2 , G. Stoops 3<br />

1* Anton de Kom Universiteit van Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Faculteit der Technologische Wetenschappen, POB 9212,<br />

Paramaribo, Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Tel: +597 465558 ext. 413, Fax: +597 495005, Email: c.algoe@uvs.edu<br />

2 Laboratorium voor Bodemkunde, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, S8, B-9000 Gent, Belgium<br />

3 Laboratorium voor M<strong>in</strong>eralogie, Petrologie en Micropedologie, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, S8 B-9000<br />

Gent, Belgium<br />

Poster Extended Abstract<br />

Sur<strong>in</strong>ame consists geologically for about 80 % of a Precambrian basement, the Guiana shield.<br />

At numerous places this shield is <strong>in</strong>tersected by Permo-Triassic NS strik<strong>in</strong>g dolerite dike<br />

suites. In the regolith they appear as spheroidally weathered boulders with an “onion-sk<strong>in</strong>”<br />

fabric.<br />

Four weathered boulders were collected <strong>in</strong> profiles near the locality Berg en Dal and<br />

shells of different weather<strong>in</strong>g grades sub-sampled <strong>in</strong> the laboratory. These shell-samples were<br />

analysed us<strong>in</strong>g physical, chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical methods <strong>in</strong> order to characterize the<br />

spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g process and the result<strong>in</strong>g weather<strong>in</strong>g products. The chemical analyses<br />

comprise total elemental contents, oxalate and dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extractions,<br />

cation exchange capacities and pH values. The m<strong>in</strong>eralogical data is obta<strong>in</strong>ed from th<strong>in</strong><br />

section studies, WDS microprobe analyses, X ray diffraction data, and scann<strong>in</strong>g electron<br />

microscopy.<br />

The bulk densities show a vast decrease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g weather<strong>in</strong>g grade. The total<br />

elemental data show a progressive and complete loss of the alkal<strong>in</strong>e and earth alkal<strong>in</strong>e<br />

elements <strong>in</strong> course of the weather<strong>in</strong>g process. These data also allow the calculation of a<br />

number of weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dices, used to def<strong>in</strong>e the behaviour of elements dur<strong>in</strong>g the weather<strong>in</strong>g<br />

process. The total elemental data and bulk densities are used to calculate the isovolumetric<br />

weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the boulders. Special attention is given to the behaviour of both free and<br />

amorphous Fe as revealed from the oxalate and dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extractions.<br />

The unweathered parent material consists predom<strong>in</strong>antly of lath-shaped plagioclases<br />

(andesite and labradorite), pyroxenes (augite and pigeonite), chlorites, opaque m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

(ilmenite and titanomagnetite), granophyric <strong>in</strong>tergrowths of quartz, feldspars, apatite and<br />

ilmenite. In addition amphiboles and apatite occur <strong>in</strong> small amounts. All m<strong>in</strong>eral data of the<br />

weathered samples po<strong>in</strong>t to an end system with residual weather<strong>in</strong>g products consist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly of clay m<strong>in</strong>erals (kaol<strong>in</strong>ite and chlorite) and Fe- and Al-hydroxides (goethite and<br />

gibbsite). Weather<strong>in</strong>g of m<strong>in</strong>erals takes place abruptly, and although the orig<strong>in</strong>al m<strong>in</strong>erals are<br />

completely altered, their alteromorphs can still be recognised <strong>in</strong> the th<strong>in</strong> sections upto the<br />

latest weather<strong>in</strong>g stages.<br />

The isovolumetric condition of spheroidal weather<strong>in</strong>g and the mobility of Al and Ti <strong>in</strong><br />

the weather<strong>in</strong>g system are discussed as well as the <strong>in</strong> situ character of the boulders based on<br />

the sharp contrasts <strong>in</strong> data between weathered dolerite samples and the residual soil. Another<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t of discussion is the <strong>in</strong>fluence of magnetic m<strong>in</strong>erals on the oxalate and DCB extractable<br />

components.<br />

295


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

MICROMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ANDISOLS<br />

IN WEST JAVA, INDONESIA<br />

Abstract<br />

Mahfud Arif<strong>in</strong> * , R<strong>in</strong>a Devnita<br />

Dept. of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia<br />

mahfud_arif<strong>in</strong>s@yahoo.com<br />

Tel. ++62-22/779.63.16 Fax. ++62-22/779.63.16; ++62-22/779.72.00<br />

Micromorphological characteristics have been studied for six pedons of Andisols developed<br />

<strong>in</strong> volcanic materials <strong>in</strong> West java, Indonesia. The pedons represent deposits of different<br />

volcanoes (Mt.Tangkuban Perahu A and C, Mt. Patuha, Mt. Kendeng, Mt. Papandayan, Mt.<br />

Guntur), with different ages (Pleistocene, Holocene) and different types of volcanism<br />

(andesitic, basaltic), <strong>in</strong> three agroclimatic zones (A, B1, B2). Undisturbed soil samples for<br />

th<strong>in</strong> section preparation were taken from every identifiable horizon (49 samples <strong>in</strong> total).<br />

Observations were made with a magnify<strong>in</strong>g lens, b<strong>in</strong>ocular stereomicroscope, polarization<br />

microscope, and scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope. The results demonstrate that the study of<br />

micromorphological characteristics is very useful to identify pedogenetic processes <strong>in</strong><br />

Andisols.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Soil micromorphology is a method to study undisturbed soil samples us<strong>in</strong>g microscopic and<br />

submicroscopic techniques to identify soil components and establish their spatial, temporal,<br />

genetic and functional relationships [3, 13].<br />

Historically, micromorphological <strong>in</strong>vestigations have ma<strong>in</strong>ly been used for soil<br />

genesis studies, but they also have wider applications, e.g. <strong>in</strong> soil physics, biology and<br />

chemistry [3]. Two basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of micropedology are the use of undisturbed (oriented)<br />

samples and the concept of functional research whereby all observations are directed towards<br />

reach<strong>in</strong>g as an understand<strong>in</strong>g of the function of soil components and the relationship between<br />

one another.<br />

Micropedology covers all microscopic analyses of undisturbed soil samples [14],<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the study of soil th<strong>in</strong> sections, microchemical and microphysical methods, and<br />

submicroscopic techniques. The most advanced analysis is the study of the entire soil fabric<br />

(soil micromorphology) and its quantitative aspects (soil micromorphometry).<br />

Many soil micromorphology studies have been conducted and published, especially on<br />

Ultisols, Oxisols, Spodosols and Paleosols [3]. However, research on Andisols is still rare,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> Indonesia. Therefore, there is only a few <strong>in</strong>formation concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

micromorphological features of Andisols <strong>in</strong> Indonesia, particularly the Andisols develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on different parent materials and <strong>in</strong> different agroclimatic zones.<br />

For this study, research has been done on the micromorphological characteristics of<br />

Andisols <strong>in</strong> six pedons <strong>in</strong> the tea plantation area of West Java, Indonesia. The studied soils<br />

represent six different volcanic eruptions, ages, and parent materials, <strong>in</strong> three agroclimatic<br />

zones [11].<br />

296


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Pedon CTR-A2 (Acrudoxic Durudan) represents eruption C (middle Holocene) of Mt.<br />

Tangkuban Perahu (Ciater District, andesitic, agroclimatic zone A), and pedon CTR-B4<br />

(Acrudoxic Thaptic Hydrudand) represents eruption A (early Holocene) of Mt. Tangkuban<br />

Perahu (Ciater District, andesitic, agroclimatic zone A), both located <strong>in</strong> Subang Regency.<br />

Pedon SNR-A2 (Acrudoxic Hydrudand) at Mt. Kendeng (S<strong>in</strong>umbra District, Pleistocene,<br />

andesitic, agroclimatic zone B1), pedon SNR-B5 (Lithic Hapludand) at Mt. Patuha (S<strong>in</strong>umbra<br />

District, Holocene, basaltic, B1), pedon SDP-A3 (Typic Hapludand) at Mt. Guntur Cs (Sedep<br />

District, Pleistocene, basaltic, agroclimatic zone B2), and pedon SDP-B5 (Hydric Thaptic<br />

Hapludand) at Mt. Papandayan (Sedep District, Holocene, basaltic, agroclimatic zone B2) are<br />

all located <strong>in</strong> Bandung Regency.<br />

Undisturbed soil samples for the preparation of soil th<strong>in</strong> sections were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for<br />

every identifiable horizon <strong>in</strong> all profiles. The total number of samples was 49.<br />

Preparation of the soil th<strong>in</strong> sections <strong>in</strong>volved harden<strong>in</strong>g of the samples by impregnation.<br />

Observations of the undisturbed samples were made with the naked eye, a magnifier lens,<br />

b<strong>in</strong>ocular stereomicroscope, polarization microscope and scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope. The<br />

term<strong>in</strong>ology and concepts of the Handbook for Soil Th<strong>in</strong> Section Description [3] were used,<br />

with a few modifications.<br />

Micromass Colour<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The colour of the micromass as observed <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections partly depends on thickness, light<br />

source properties and magnification.<br />

In this study, only small variations <strong>in</strong> colour were observed. Horizon A/Bw has a<br />

brown to dark brown colour. Horizon BC generally has a lighter colour compared to the other<br />

genetic horizons. Surface horizons and buried A horizons have the darkest colour. In<br />

general, the horizons of pedons CTR-A2, SNR-A2, SNR-B5 and SDP-A3 have a brown<br />

colour, except pedon SDP-A3, which was lighter. Pedon CTR-B4 and SDP-B5 have a dark<br />

brown colour.<br />

The micromass colour <strong>in</strong> the th<strong>in</strong> sections was generally more brownish than the field soil<br />

capacity colour. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall, age and parent material appear to have no significant effect on<br />

micromass colour. However, <strong>in</strong> Ciater District pedon CTR-A2 generally has a lighter colour<br />

than CTR-B4, <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>umbra District pedon SNR-A2 has a lighter colour than SNR-B5, and <strong>in</strong><br />

Sedep District SDP-A3 is lighter than SDP-B5. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the older parent<br />

materials have a lighter colour than the younger parent materials.<br />

Microstructure<br />

Microstructure refers to the shape, size and arrangement of soil aggregates and pores,<br />

generally observed at rather low magnification.<br />

Pedality<br />

The complete results of observation of the microstructure are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Some<br />

examples of soil microstructure features are presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. The microstructure of the<br />

Andisols ranges from granular to massive. The surface horizon generally has crumb and<br />

297


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

granular microstructures (Fig. 1.a and 1.b), whereas the subsurface horizon has a blocky to<br />

subangular blocky microstructure.<br />

The surface horizons (Ap) of soils developed <strong>in</strong> areas with high ra<strong>in</strong>fall (e.g. Ciater)<br />

have a more strongly developed pedality (and darker colour) than those developed <strong>in</strong><br />

relatively drier areas (S<strong>in</strong>umbra and Sedep), which generally also have a lighter colour and<br />

tend to show rounded and subangular peds. This suggests a relationship between organic<br />

matter content and pedality. Besides, the granular peds <strong>in</strong> the Ap horizon of soils develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on older parent materials are generally larger and have a denser groundmass than the younger<br />

soils. Chemical analysis <strong>in</strong>dicates that the Ap horizon has a high organic carbon content and<br />

also conta<strong>in</strong> Al- and Fe-bear<strong>in</strong>g organic complexes. Those materials are predicted to play a<br />

role <strong>in</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g a stable granular microstructure.<br />

In all horizons, the size of the peds shows a rather wide range (0.02-11.00 mm). The degree<br />

of accommodation ranges from well accommodated to unaccommodated, and is generally<br />

partly accommodated (Fig. 1.f).<br />

Types of voids<br />

In surface horizons, compound pack<strong>in</strong>g voids are observed (Fig. 1.a and 1.b). The voids are<br />

equant to elongate, <strong>in</strong>terconnected, occurr<strong>in</strong>g between granular, crumb and angular blocky<br />

peds, which are unaccommodated. Other void types that are recognized are planar voids,<br />

chambers and vughs (Fig. 1.a, 1.b, 1.f)<br />

Subsurface horizons, which show crumb, granular or angular blocky microstructures,<br />

with or without pores, generally have planar voids, or planar voids with compound pack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

voids (Fig. 1.f). In a subsurface horizon (A’’, Bw) developed on old parent material (e.g.<br />

pedon SNR-A2 and SDP-A3), planar voids, vughs, channels, chambers and vesicles are<br />

recognized.<br />

a<br />

c<br />

b<br />

d<br />

298


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

e<br />

g<br />

Figure 1. Photomicrograph of th<strong>in</strong> section with plane polarized light. Hor. Ap, CTR-A2 (a); Hor. Ap,<br />

SNR-B5 (b); Hor B’wb, SDP-A3 (c); Hor. 2Ab SNR-A2 (d); Hor. 3Ab, CTR-A2 (e); Hor. Ap, SNR-A2<br />

(f); Hor. A’b2, SDP-A3 (g); Hor. Bw SDP-A3 (h)<br />

f<br />

h<br />

Planar voids <strong>in</strong> the surface horizon (Ap) generally developed along roots residues or<br />

microfauna rema<strong>in</strong>s. In the subsurface horizon, planar void ma<strong>in</strong>ly formed by development<br />

of cracks <strong>in</strong> dense groundmass material.<br />

Abundance of voids<br />

The abundance of voids <strong>in</strong> the th<strong>in</strong> sections was determ<strong>in</strong>ed, expressed as percentage of the<br />

total area of the th<strong>in</strong> section [5]. The results show that surface horizons have a higher<br />

porosity than the subsurface horizons. Hence, the percentage of voids decreases with depth.<br />

This can be clearly seen <strong>in</strong> old pedons such as SNR-A2 and SDP-A3. This was predicted<br />

referr<strong>in</strong>g to processes of <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>g of voids by illuvial material derived from the groundmass by<br />

299


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

percolation of water, gravity, and biological activity, tak<strong>in</strong>g place dur<strong>in</strong>g a long period.<br />

Therefore several pores have been closed by material derived from upper horizons.<br />

Related Distribution Patterns<br />

Horizons <strong>in</strong> Andisols have porphyric and enaulic c/f related distribution patterns, i.e. they are<br />

composed of coarse material embedded <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>er material (porphyric) or they have a skeleton<br />

of larger fabric units with aggregates of f<strong>in</strong>e material <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terstitial spaces (enaulic) [1,8].<br />

In the latter, the aggregates do not completely fill the <strong>in</strong>terstitial spaces, and the larger units<br />

support each other.<br />

Surface horizon generally have enaulic c/f related distribution patterns (Fig. 1.a and<br />

1.b), especially <strong>in</strong> Andisols developed on young parent materials. Andisols developed from<br />

old parent material have porphyric c/f related distribution patterns <strong>in</strong> their surface horizon.<br />

The granular or crumb structure <strong>in</strong> the surface horizon could be related to high biological<br />

activity (e.g. termites, ants), and the <strong>in</strong>tensive growth of roots. The allophane content <strong>in</strong> the<br />

surface horizon is generally lower than <strong>in</strong> subsurface horizons due to the strong accumulation<br />

of organic matter <strong>in</strong> the surface horizon, prevent<strong>in</strong>g the formation of allophanes because of<br />

the formation of Al-humus complexes [9].<br />

The subsurface horizons have porphyric c/f related distribution patterns. These<br />

horizons have a high total density, with porous and non porous parts. Pores <strong>in</strong> the porous parts<br />

can be filled with material derived from upper horizons. With time, they can develop <strong>in</strong>to<br />

non-porous materials <strong>in</strong> this way.<br />

Pedons SNR-A2 and SDP-A3 have porphyric c/f related distribution patterns (Fig. 1.c<br />

and 1.d). Both pedons represents the older parent materials. The partly short range-order<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals have been weathered to crystall<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>erals like halloysite, metahalloysite and<br />

gibbsite. The change <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral composition was predicted to be accompanied by a change <strong>in</strong><br />

c/f related distribution pattern from enaulic to porphyric.<br />

The subsurface horizons of pedon CTR-B4 still have enaulic c/f related distribution<br />

patterns, although the age of this pedon is older than that of CTR-A2, which shows porphyric<br />

c/f related distribution patterns. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the accumulation process <strong>in</strong> the subsurface<br />

horizons (pedon CTR-A2) was <strong>in</strong>tensive due to the presence of impervious layers that prevent<br />

transportation of material to the lower horizons.<br />

Pedon/ Depth Shape Size Pedality Acc. Proportion<br />

Hor. (cm)<br />

(mm)<br />

(%)<br />

Pedon CTR-A2<br />

Ap 0-17 gr 0.042-0.2 s no 80<br />

ab 0.4-4.0 w pr 20<br />

Bw 17-31 gr 0.04-0.4 m-w no 45<br />

sab 0.4-1.6 w pr 55<br />

BC 31-43 ab-sab 1.6-2,8 w pr 30<br />

gr 0.4-0.8 w no 30<br />

gr 0.04-0.12 w no 40<br />

2Ab 43-60 gr < 0.08 w-m pr 20<br />

gr 0.4-0.8 w-m pr 40<br />

gr 1.6-2.4 w no 40<br />

2Bw 60-70 cr-gr 0.04-0.2 m-s pr 40<br />

ab 0.08-4.4 m-s pr 60<br />

2BC 70-94 mv - - - 90<br />

ab - m no 10<br />

300


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

3Ab 94-110 sab 0.4-0.8 m pr 40<br />

cr 0.04-1.2 w no 60<br />

3Bw 110-128 ab 4.8 s-m pr 80<br />

gr 0.08-0.4 s-m no 20<br />

Pedon CTR-B4<br />

Ap 0-15 gr 0.04-0.2 m no 60<br />

gr 0.2-0.4 m no 20<br />

gr 0.4-3.2 m no 20<br />

Bw 15-30 cr 0.04-11.0 m no 70<br />

ab 2.0-5.0 m no 30<br />

BC 30-38 mv - - - 100<br />

2Ab 38-52 cr 0.02-0.04 m no 80<br />

ab 0.4-1.0 m pr 20<br />

2BCb1 52-65 gr 0.02-0.2 m no 60<br />

ab 0.7-2.0 m pr 40<br />

2BCb2 65-90 ab 5.0 m pr 100<br />

2A’b1 90-105 ab 0.04-0.4 m pr 50<br />

ab 1.0-7.0 m pr 50<br />

2A’b2 105-120 ab 1.0-8.0 m pr 85<br />

gr 0.04-0.8 m no 15<br />

Pedon SNR-A2<br />

Ap 0-10 gr 2.0-3.0 m no 100<br />

Bw1 10-23 ab 2.0-5.0 s no 50<br />

sab 5.0-5.9 s no 50<br />

Bw2 23-40 ab 3.0-5.0 s gd 100<br />

Bw3 40-54 sab 1.0-10.0 s pr 70<br />

BC 54-73 sab 5.0-10.0 m pr 70<br />

2Ab 73-84 ab,sab 5.0-7.0 m pr 80<br />

2BCb 84-98 ab 2.0-7.0 m pr 100<br />

2A’b -120/130 ab 2.0-3.0 m pr 80<br />

2BC’b -142/148 sab,ab 1.0-2.5 m pr 100<br />

Pedon SNR-B5<br />

Ap 0-10 ab,sab 0.04-4.0 m pr 70;30<br />

Bw 10-19 ab,gr 0.04-3.6 m pr 70;30<br />

A’b 19-44 ab,gr 0.2-1.2 m pr 70;30<br />

Bcb 44-60 ab,sab 0.5-5.0 m pr<br />

Pedon SDP-A3<br />

Ap 0-14 ab 1.0-5.0 m pr 100<br />

A2 14-24 ab,gr 1.0-4.0 m no 50:50<br />

Bw 24-35 ab 0.05-5.0 m pr 60<br />

gr 0.12-0.24 m pr 40<br />

A’b1 35-46 ab 1.0-10.0 m gd 100<br />

A’b2 46-65 ab 0.1-5.0 m pr 100<br />

B’wb 65-81 ab 0.4-10.0 m gd 100<br />

A”b 81-95 ab 1.0-5.0 m pr 100<br />

B”wb 95-105 ab 0.4-2.8 m pr 100<br />

BCb 105-130 ab,mv - w pr<br />

Pedon SDP-B5<br />

301


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Ap 0-11 sab 1.0-8.0 m pr 100<br />

Bw 11-30 gr,sab - m pr 25:75<br />

A’b 30-45 sab,gr - m pr 70:30<br />

B’wb 45-54 sab 0.2-2.4 m pr 70<br />

gr 0.08-2.4 m pr 30<br />

A”b1 54-72 sab - s pr 100<br />

A”b2 72-94 sab 0.2-1.0 m pr 70<br />

gr 0.02-0.04 m pr 30<br />

B”wb 94-115 sab 7.0-8.0 m pr 100<br />

BCb 115-135 sab 0.4-4.00 m pr 100<br />

A”’b 135-152 sab 0.4-2.4 s pr 100<br />

Table 1. Shape and size of aggregates, degree of pedality and accommodation of the studied profiles.<br />

ab; angular blocky;sab subangular blocky; gr granular; cr crumb; mv massive; w weak; m medium; s<br />

strong; pr part; gd good; no non<br />

Pedofeatures and weather<strong>in</strong>g features<br />

The types of pedofeatures that have been recognized are textural, amorphous and<br />

cryptocrystall<strong>in</strong>e, fabric and excrement pedofeatures [3,4]. Weather<strong>in</strong>g of primary m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

gra<strong>in</strong>s is also considered <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Table 2 gives a detailed overview of the<br />

pedofeatures observed <strong>in</strong> every studied horizon.<br />

The features most commonly found <strong>in</strong> Andisols are the weather<strong>in</strong>g of primary m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

and the illuviation and accumulation of material derived from upper horizons, as found by<br />

Goenadi and Tan [6, 7]. Illuvial material can be material derived from the groundmass, or<br />

f<strong>in</strong>e organic material mixed with silt to very f<strong>in</strong>e sand (Fig. 1.c and 1.d). In addition, humic<br />

substances quite often penetrate the groundmass. These pedofeatures are generally found <strong>in</strong><br />

the site with young parent material and high ra<strong>in</strong>fall (Ciater), or <strong>in</strong> the horizon directly<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g the buried A horizon (thaptic) (Fig. 1.e).<br />

The other features generally found were the strong alteration of primary m<strong>in</strong>eral, e.g.<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals susceptible to physical and chemical weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> A, B, and BC horizons. <strong>Physical</strong><br />

weather<strong>in</strong>g can be <strong>in</strong> the form of fragmentation. Chemical weather<strong>in</strong>g can be recognized by<br />

the change of form or colour of the m<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

M<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> pedons orig<strong>in</strong>ated from old parent material generally have anhedral shapes<br />

(and low c/f2µ ratios), whereas gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> younger pedons usually have subhedral to euhedral<br />

shape (and higher c/f2µ ratios). Iron nodules are found <strong>in</strong> old pedon like SDP-A3 <strong>in</strong> Sedep<br />

(Fig. 1.g). The nodules were formed by residual accumulation of iron compounds, related to<br />

weather<strong>in</strong>g of primary m<strong>in</strong>erals. Gibbsite coat<strong>in</strong>gs (Fig. 2.a) are found <strong>in</strong> Acrudoxic<br />

Hapludand.<br />

Weak <strong>in</strong>dications for clay illuviation are only recognized for the B’wb horizon <strong>in</strong><br />

pedon SDP-A3, orig<strong>in</strong>ated from old parent material, and <strong>in</strong> horizon 2BCb of pedon SNR-A2<br />

(Fig. 2.b). These horizons do not fulfill the prerequisite of an argillic horizon <strong>in</strong> Soil<br />

Taxonomy [12] due to the small total volume of illuvial clay (< 1 %) and the low degree of<br />

orientation with<strong>in</strong> the clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs. Maeda et al [10] also reported a few coat<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />

Andisols. Mohr et al [11] proposed that Andisols often <strong>in</strong>clude a horizon with clay<br />

accumulation.<br />

302


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

Pedon/horizon Pedofeatures and weather<strong>in</strong>g features (and plant rema<strong>in</strong>s)<br />

CTR-A2<br />

Ap Partly weathered primary m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

Bw Voids of root residue filled by granular groundmass material [??]<br />

Fragment of altered root, coloured brown-black at the edge<br />

BC Planar voids filled by isotropic clay mixed with very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

2 Ab Fragment of yellowish weathered rock<br />

2Bw -<br />

2BC Plagioclase covered by opaque material<br />

3Ab Planar void filled by a mixture of clay and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

3Bw Planar voids filled by clay<br />

Root residue, with black soil material at the edge<br />

CTR-B4<br />

Ap Voids of root residue, brownish, 20 %<br />

Bw Voids of root residue, 15 %<br />

BC Planar voids filled by a mixture of clay and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

Brownish red organic fragments, 10 %<br />

2Ab -<br />

2BCb1 Voids of root residue and organic fragments, 10 %<br />

2BCb2 Planar void filled by granular clay aggregates and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

Fragment of reddish weathered rocks with volcanic glass<br />

2A’b1 Tuff with volcanic glass and yellowish brown clay m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

2A’b2 Voids filled by very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

2B’wb Voids filled by very f<strong>in</strong>e sand and groundmass material<br />

SNR-A2<br />

Ap Voids of tea plant’s root residue, reddish brown wall<br />

Bw1 Voids filled by gibbsite<br />

Bw2 Partly altered root fragments<br />

Bw3 -<br />

BC Voids of rounded root residue filled by granular groundmass material<br />

2Ab Planar void filled by clay and gibbsite<br />

2BCb Planar void filled by clay<br />

Root fragments, 7 % [or phytoliths ??] non crystall<strong>in</strong>e !!<br />

2A”B Void of weathered m<strong>in</strong>eral residue<br />

Planar void filled by clay and gibbsite<br />

2BC’b Planar voids and vughs filled by granular groundmass material<br />

SNR-B5<br />

Ap Opaque root fragments<br />

Bw Opaque root fragments<br />

A’b Opaque root fragments<br />

BC’b Voids of root residue, partly filled with groundmass material<br />

Typic nodules<br />

SDP-A3<br />

Ap Opaque and reddish brown root fragments<br />

Voids of root residue, partly filled with granular groundmass material<br />

A2 Typic and nucleic nodules<br />

Root fragments [or phytoliths ??] non crystall<strong>in</strong>e !!<br />

Bw Typic and nucleic nodules<br />

303


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

BC Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

A’b1 Hypocoat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the planar voids<br />

Typic nodules<br />

Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

A’b2 Typic nodules<br />

Voids of root residue, reddish brown wall, partly coated by groundmass<br />

material<br />

B’wb Typic nodules<br />

Voids of root residue (Chamber), filled with groundmass material<br />

Typic hypocoat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> planar voids<br />

Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

A”b Planar voids coated by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand (Typic)<br />

[type ?]<br />

B”wb Typic coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> planar voids<br />

Planar voids filled by groundmass material<br />

BC”b Coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> planar voids (Typic)<br />

Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

Typic nodules<br />

SDP-B5<br />

Ap Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

Bw -<br />

A’b Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

Voids of weathered root residue, rounded, reddish brown wall<br />

B’wb Planar voids and compound pack<strong>in</strong>g voids filled by groundmass<br />

material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

A”b1 Planar voids filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e sand<br />

A”b2 -<br />

B”wb Chamber filled by micropeds<br />

BCb -<br />

A”’b Planar voids and vesicles!! filled by groundmass material and very f<strong>in</strong>e<br />

sand [vesicles ?]<br />

Table 2. Pedofeatures of every identifiable horizon <strong>in</strong> the studied soils.<br />

304


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

A<br />

C<br />

e<br />

b<br />

d<br />

Fig.2 . Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope images (a and e) and th<strong>in</strong> section photographs. Gibbsite<br />

coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hor. 2BCb, SNR-A2 (a); clay coat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hor. B’wb-SDP-A3, XPL (b); coat<strong>in</strong>gs of organic<br />

material <strong>in</strong> hor. B’wb, SDP-A3, PPL (c); pores with <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hor. 2BCb, SNR-A2, XPL (d); clay<br />

coat<strong>in</strong>g on sand gra<strong>in</strong>s, hor. Bw, SNR-B5 (e)<br />

305


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

(1) Pedofeatures observed <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections are very useful to reveal pedogenetic processes.<br />

The pedon developed after the eruption of Mt. Guntur has clay coat<strong>in</strong>gs and nodules. The<br />

pedon developed at Mt. Kendeng has gibbsite coat<strong>in</strong>gs, and pedons developed at Mt.<br />

Papandayan and Mt. Tangkuban Perahu (eruption A and C) had coat<strong>in</strong>gs of organic material.<br />

(2) Micromorphological characteristics of Andisols developed from old parent material<br />

were different from those of soils developed from young parent material. The former have<br />

porphyric c/f related distribution patterns, low c/f2µ ratios, poor sort<strong>in</strong>g, common <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />

coat<strong>in</strong>gs of voids, a few clay and gibbsite coat<strong>in</strong>gs, anhedral primary m<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s, planar<br />

voids, a blocky to angular blocky microstructure, well-developed pedality and good<br />

accommodation. The soils on young parent materials have enaulic c/f related distribution<br />

patterns, high c/f2µ ratios, poor sort<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>gs composed of groundmass material, silt and<br />

organic material, subhedral to euhedral primary m<strong>in</strong>eral gra<strong>in</strong>s, a granular microstructure, a<br />

crumb to blocky microstructure with medium pedality, partly accommodated peds and<br />

compound pack<strong>in</strong>g voids.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Brewer, R. “Fabric and M<strong>in</strong>eral Analysis Soils”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., <strong>New</strong> York, (1964).<br />

[2] Brewer, R. “Fabric and M<strong>in</strong>eral Analysis Soils”, Robert E. Krieger Publ. Co., <strong>New</strong> York, (1976).<br />

[3] Bullock, P. L., Federoff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G. and T. Turs<strong>in</strong>a, “Handbook for Soil Th<strong>in</strong> Section<br />

Description”, Wa<strong>in</strong>e Research Publ, 152 p (1985).<br />

[4] Bullock, P. L. “The Role of Micromorphology <strong>in</strong> the Study of Quaternary Soil Process. Soil and Quaternary<br />

<strong>Land</strong>scape Evolution”, J. Boardman (ed), John Wiley & Sons Lt, (1985).<br />

[5] FitzPatrick, E. A. “Micromorphology of Soils”, Chapman and Hall, London, (1984).<br />

[6] Goenadi, D. H. and Tan, K. H. “M<strong>in</strong>eralogy and micromorphology of soils from volcanic tuffs <strong>in</strong> the humid<br />

tropics”, SSSAJR, 53(6):1907-1911 (1989).<br />

[7] Goenadi, D. H. and Tan, K. H. “Relationship of soil fabric and particle-size distribution <strong>in</strong> Davidson soil”,<br />

Soil Sci. 147:264-269 (1989).<br />

[8] Goenadi, D.H and Tan, K. H. “Micromorphology and x-ray microanalysis of an Ultisols <strong>in</strong> the tropic”, Indon.<br />

J. Trop. Agric, 1:12-16 (1989).<br />

[9] Maeda, T., H. Takenaka and B.P Warkent<strong>in</strong>. “<strong>Physical</strong> properties of allophane soils”, Advances Agronomy,<br />

29:229-264 (1977).<br />

[10] Mohr, E.J.C., F.A van Baren and I. van Schuylenborg. ”Tropical Soils, A Comprehensive Study of Their<br />

Genesis”, The Hague-Paris-Djakarta, (1972).<br />

[11] Oldeman, L. R. “An Agroclimatic Map of Java Central Research”, Institute of Agricultur, Bogor, (1975).<br />

[12] Soil Survey Staff. “Keys to Soil Taxonomy, SMSS, Technical Monograph No.19, Fifth Edition”,<br />

Pocahontas Press. Inc, Blacksburg. Virg<strong>in</strong>ia, (1992).<br />

[13] Stoops, G and A. Jongerius. “Proposal for micromorphological classification <strong>in</strong> soil materials, I. A<br />

classification of the related distribution of coarse and f<strong>in</strong>e particles”, Geoderma, 13: 189-200 (1975).<br />

[14] Stoops, G and H. Eswaran. “Soil Micromorphology”, Van Nostrand Re<strong>in</strong>hold, <strong>New</strong> York (1986).<br />

306


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

MICROMORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF SOME SOILS IN THE<br />

AFRAM PLAINS (GHANA, WEST AFRICA)<br />

M.D. Mays 1 , W.R. Effland 2 , T. Adjei-Gyapong 3 , C.D. Dedzoe 3 and E. Boateng 4 *<br />

1 National Soil Survey Centre, USDA-NRCS, L<strong>in</strong>coln NE; 2 USDA-NRCS, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C.;<br />

3 CSIR-SRI, Kumasi (Ghana); 4 CSIR/SRI, Accra (Ghana)<br />

E-mail: soilri@ncs.com.gh, Tel: 233-21-778226, Fax: 233-21-778219<br />

Poster Extended Abstract<br />

An eight-member sampl<strong>in</strong>g team from Ghana’s Council for Scientific and Industrial Research<br />

(CSIR) / Soil Research Institute (SRI) and from the USDA-National <strong>Resources</strong> Conservation<br />

Service (NRCS) sampled soils <strong>in</strong> the Upper Afram Bas<strong>in</strong> as part of a co-operative project that<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded provid<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> modern soil survey methodologies.<br />

The field portion of the project <strong>in</strong>cluded sampl<strong>in</strong>g six soil pedons that represent a<br />

variety of soil types for complete analyses. These soils are developed <strong>in</strong> Paleozoic f<strong>in</strong>e- and<br />

coarse-gra<strong>in</strong>ed Voltaian sandstone and shale. The objective is to relate clay and optical<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogy f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs to micromorphological properties of the studied soils. As <strong>in</strong> many<br />

tropical soils, they did not reflect strong pedofeatures, except for clay illuviation, which may<br />

be masked <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections by illuvial iron and manganese that coats peds and gra<strong>in</strong>s. The<br />

illuvial iron/ferri-argillans mask the cation exchange capacity of the soil and other clay<br />

expressions such as x-ray diffractions. It also fixes phosphorous and produces the red colour<br />

exhibited <strong>in</strong> these soils.<br />

X-ray diffraction analysis showed that quartz is the dom<strong>in</strong>ant m<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>in</strong> the clay<br />

fraction. Faunal activity, e.g. by termites and earthworms, and vegetation differences are<br />

important soil developmental factors observed <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections. Also, iron and clay illuviation<br />

was dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> soils on mature landscapes. Quartz gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong> sections <strong>in</strong> these soils are<br />

highly weathered with rounded edges and striated marks <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong>s surfaces. These features<br />

are evidence of the long and cont<strong>in</strong>uous weather<strong>in</strong>g that has taken place <strong>in</strong> these soils or<br />

parent materials over time. Remnants of termite and worm activity <strong>in</strong>clude vermiform features<br />

composed of kaol<strong>in</strong>itic clays that have been <strong>in</strong>gested and are plastered along the walls of<br />

channel. The soils <strong>in</strong> this study record a large variation <strong>in</strong> animal activities. There was a larger<br />

variety of activities <strong>in</strong> the surface layer of forested areas than <strong>in</strong> cultivated fields. However,<br />

termites were active <strong>in</strong> both forested and cultivated areas.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[173] S.V. Adu, J. A. Mensah-Ansah. "Soils of the Afram Bas<strong>in</strong>, Ashantiand Eastern Regions, Ghana",<br />

CSIR-Soil Research Institute, Memoir No. 12. Kwadaso-Kumasi, Ghana. 90pp, (1995).<br />

[174] D.A. Bates. Geology. P51-61. In J. Brian Wills (ed). "Agriculture and land use <strong>in</strong> Ghana", Oxford<br />

University Press, London, (1962).<br />

[175] R. Brewer. "Fabric and M<strong>in</strong>eral Analysis of Soils", John Wiley & Sons, Inc. <strong>New</strong> York. 304pp., (1964).<br />

[176] E.A. FitzPatrick. "Soil Microscopy and Micromorphology", John Wiley & Sons, Inc. <strong>New</strong> York.<br />

304pp., (1993).<br />

[177] Soil Survey Staff. "Keys to Soil Taxnomy", N<strong>in</strong>th Edition. United States Department of Agriculture<br />

and Natural <strong>Resources</strong> Conservation Service. 332pp., (2003).<br />

[178] G. Stoops. "Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Analysis and Description of Soil and Regolith Th<strong>in</strong> Sections", Soil Science<br />

Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI, 184pp, (2003).<br />

307


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

WORKSHOP Theme: Soil Processes and analytical techniques<br />

Convenors: E. Van Ranst, G. Stoops, F. Mees, V. Marcel<strong>in</strong>o<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

About 15 participants attended the session for this workshop theme. They were ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

alumni of the former “Soil Science” and “Soil Science and Eremology” programmes, <strong>in</strong><br />

which more attention was given to the understand<strong>in</strong>g of soil genesis and dynamics (e.g. us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogical and micromorphological methods) compared to the curriculum of the present<br />

“<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>” programme. A majority of the participants is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at university level, which implies that the total impact of the session will be important, due to<br />

the multiplication effect of deal<strong>in</strong>g with teach<strong>in</strong>g staff.<br />

The first part of the session was concentrated ma<strong>in</strong>ly on soil m<strong>in</strong>eralogy. E. Van Ranst<br />

(UGent), chair<strong>in</strong>g that part, illustrated the importance of physico-chemical and m<strong>in</strong>eralogical<br />

studies of the clay fraction for understand<strong>in</strong>g soil dynamics, followed by a presentation of an<br />

ongo<strong>in</strong>g research project about authigenic m<strong>in</strong>eral formation (F. Mees, UGent). Lectures by<br />

Fiantis et al. and Morras et al. illustrated the use of various techniques for the m<strong>in</strong>eralogical<br />

study of soils.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the coffee break, attention was focussed on the presentation of posters by<br />

participants of this workshop theme session.<br />

The second part started with an <strong>in</strong>troduction by G. Stoops (UGent), describ<strong>in</strong>g recent<br />

advances <strong>in</strong> soil micromorphology and the present research <strong>in</strong> this field with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

Department, followed by more detailed discussions on the problem of compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

micromorphometric data obta<strong>in</strong>ed by different techniques (V. Marcel<strong>in</strong>o, UGent) and on the<br />

application of X-ray tomography <strong>in</strong> soil micromorphology (F. Mees, UGent). Two alumni<br />

presented papers on their current research <strong>in</strong> Sur<strong>in</strong>ame and Indonesia, us<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eralogical and micromorphological techniques to disentangle complex pedogenic<br />

processes.<br />

All presentations, dur<strong>in</strong>g both parts of the session, were followed by a discussion with<br />

the audience.<br />

308


Workshop IC-PLR 2006 – Theme E – Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

309


Clos<strong>in</strong>g Word<br />

CLOSING WORD<br />

Clos<strong>in</strong>g Address by Prof. E. Van Ranst, Chairman Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong><br />

<strong>Resources</strong> and Promotor of the Master Programme (UGent)<br />

310


Clos<strong>in</strong>g Word<br />

Clos<strong>in</strong>g Address by Prof. E. Van Ranst, Chairman Steer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Committee <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> and Promotor of the Master<br />

Programme (UGent)<br />

Given at the occasion of the fifth refresher course for alumni of the Master of Science Programmes <strong>in</strong><br />

Soil Science (UGent), Eremology (UGent) and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> (UGent-VUB)<br />

Dear Alumni,<br />

Dear Colleagues,<br />

Esteemed Guests,<br />

9 September 2006<br />

On behalf of the Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee and the Staff of our programme <strong>in</strong> PLR, I first want to<br />

congratulate all of you, alumni and staff who attended this 5 th refresher course, for your<br />

contributions and active participation <strong>in</strong> the discussions. I am proud to be able to announce<br />

that this refresher course was attended by 40 alumni com<strong>in</strong>g from 22 countries spread over<br />

different cont<strong>in</strong>ents. As I said already dur<strong>in</strong>g my open<strong>in</strong>g speech, our major objective was to<br />

come to an overall exchange of knowledge and <strong>in</strong>formation from alumni to staff and vice<br />

versa, as well as amongst alumni. I hope we have succeeded <strong>in</strong> this objective? I hope that all<br />

of you enjoyed the sessions, that you could establish cooperative l<strong>in</strong>kages, upgrade your<br />

knowledge with the latest developments <strong>in</strong> the field of soil science and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g geology,<br />

and that you were able to collect valuable <strong>in</strong>formation about the wide range of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g opportunities provided by VLIR or offered by other <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> Belgium that are<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> development cooperation.<br />

I th<strong>in</strong>k that the <strong>in</strong>formation session we had on Monday afternoon on possibilities for cooperation,<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial support, project plann<strong>in</strong>g, etc.. with presentations of VLIR, BTC, the<br />

Department of Research Affairs from the Ghent University and the Department for<br />

Development Cooperation of the Free University of Brussels was very <strong>in</strong>formative to<br />

strengthen your academic cooperation <strong>in</strong> the near future or to help younger colleagues or<br />

scientists of your <strong>in</strong>stitute <strong>in</strong> their further tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or career development.<br />

The flash presentations proved to be an ideal communication tool, <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g us to explore the<br />

differences and similarities <strong>in</strong> the problems you, the alumni, face while develop<strong>in</strong>g your<br />

scientific career. It stressed the importance of fund<strong>in</strong>g – through projects with professors from<br />

Ghent University and the Free university of Brussels - but it also highlighted opportunities for<br />

co-operation among the alumni themselves.<br />

The most important limitation experienced by the majority of the speakers is the lack of funds<br />

and consequently, there’s a high necessity for cooperation with other <strong>in</strong>stitutes through<br />

projects. The funds raised as such are necessary to buy basic equipment for laboratories or<br />

field experiments, or to buy data such as climatic records or satellite imagery. The<br />

collaboration with European universities also opens opportunities for knowledge exchange,<br />

through guest lectures or short tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs. The <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong> current lead<strong>in</strong>g research topics is<br />

broadened as the alumni get access to e-papers.<br />

311


Clos<strong>in</strong>g Word<br />

However, a project starts with writ<strong>in</strong>g a well-prepared project proposal, and this <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

proposal writ<strong>in</strong>g is not as evident as it seems if there’s no access to basic computer<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure, <strong>in</strong>ternet services or e-subscriptions to journals that allow the alumni to keep<br />

pace with the latest developments <strong>in</strong> their field of expertise.<br />

Once the project f<strong>in</strong>ishes, often, there are no funds anymore that can be used to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>,<br />

repair or order spare parts of the laboratory equipment acquired. This opened the discussion<br />

with respect to the frequent demand of alumni for more sophisticated <strong>in</strong>struments. In reality,<br />

they more urgently need good basic <strong>in</strong>frastructure that is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed correctly. This<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance not only requires funds, but also a good management with cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

supervision.<br />

All speakers are also will<strong>in</strong>g to exchange MSc and PhD students. These foreign students br<strong>in</strong>g<br />

along with them their knowledge of tools, theories, and new advances <strong>in</strong> soil science. On the<br />

other hand, several alumni highlighted the lack of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> soil science shown by the local<br />

students. Often, these students don’t choose for soil science because they don’t have any idea<br />

of the potential future jobs. They also need to be conv<strong>in</strong>ced of the persist<strong>in</strong>g (or even<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g) importance of soil science <strong>in</strong> our modern communities.<br />

Upon the demand for more « upgraded » local staff, the problem of bra<strong>in</strong>-dra<strong>in</strong> is raised,<br />

faced by many develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. However, there are also positive, encourag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

statements. Fac<strong>in</strong>g all the problems, mak<strong>in</strong>g it difficult (at might take several years) to get a<br />

project proposal launched, some of the speakers already successfully got <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> national<br />

and <strong>in</strong>ternational projects. Cooperation among the alumni of different universities or research<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutes with<strong>in</strong> a country or with<strong>in</strong> neighbour<strong>in</strong>g countries, is often a way of gett<strong>in</strong>g access<br />

to papers, to data, or to specific laboratory <strong>in</strong>struments.<br />

Also our newsletter “PEDON” can play a major role <strong>in</strong> all this, as I mentioned already <strong>in</strong> the<br />

editorial of Pedon nr. 16 (2005). I wish to rem<strong>in</strong>d everyone of you that Pedon is not meant as<br />

a one-way channel of <strong>in</strong>formation from our centre towards alumni. Pedon also makes room<br />

for your contributions, reactions, call for research partners, important events <strong>in</strong> your research<br />

groups, as well as activities and projects organised <strong>in</strong> the frame of the soil science – and<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g geology – community <strong>in</strong> your country and, perhaps, by associations of alumni.<br />

In 1992, a local Alumni Association was set up <strong>in</strong> Malaysia. We have about 70 alumni from<br />

Malaysia, and they were one of the most prom<strong>in</strong>ent countries represented here dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

seventies and eighties. At present, other nationalities surface <strong>in</strong> our <strong>in</strong>ternational student<br />

community. Ethiopia is certa<strong>in</strong>ly tak<strong>in</strong>g the lead. In 1996, an association of Ethiopian alumni<br />

from Belgian universities was founded. Although this association groups alumni from<br />

different programs <strong>in</strong> Belgium, it does provide a channel through which our alumni can meet<br />

and (we hope) keep contact. Associations like these can facilitate network<strong>in</strong>g and set up of<br />

research activities with<strong>in</strong> and across borders.<br />

Please send us <strong>in</strong>formation to be published <strong>in</strong> PEDON!<br />

312


Clos<strong>in</strong>g Word<br />

Before end<strong>in</strong>g this speech, I once aga<strong>in</strong> would like to thank the VLIR for co-f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

event; the Ghent University for host<strong>in</strong>g this workshop, and especially the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative staff<br />

of the secretariat of the PLR for the hard work done over the past weeks mak<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

organization of this refresher course possible.<br />

Thanks, let’s keep <strong>in</strong> touch, and have a safe journey back home.<br />

313<br />

Prof. E. Van Ranst


Agenda<br />

Workshop for Alumni of the M.Sc. programmes <strong>in</strong> Soil Science, Eremology<br />

and <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Sunday September 3, 2006 :<br />

NEW WAVES IN PHYSICAL LAND RESOURCES<br />

3-9 September 2006<br />

AGENDA<br />

04.00–06.00 pm : Registration and reception of participants, Faculty of Bioscience<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, 9000 Gent (FBE, UGent), Bldg. E<br />

Monday September 4, 2006 :<br />

Place: Faculty of Bioscience Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, 9000 Gent (FBE, UGent),<br />

Bldg. E, room E009<br />

09.00-09.30 am : Registration<br />

09.30-10.00 am : Welcome of the participants by<br />

. course promoter(s)<br />

. Rector UGent<br />

. Director VLIR-UOS (K. Verbrugghen)<br />

10.00-11.30 am : Open<strong>in</strong>g lectures by alumni<br />

. Prof. Dr. Mitiku Haile, Rector, Mekelle University College,<br />

Ethiopia<br />

. Prof. Dr. Tang Hua-Jun, Director General, National Institute of<br />

Agricultural <strong>Resources</strong> and Regional Plann<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Academy<br />

of Agricultural Science (CAAS), Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

. Prof. Dr. Erpul Gunay, Ankara University, Turkey<br />

11.30-02.00 pm : Reception - Lunch<br />

02.00-05.30 pm : Informative session on possibilities for co-operation, f<strong>in</strong>ancial support,<br />

project plann<strong>in</strong>g etc.<br />

. UGent, Dept. Research Affairs (Dr. D. De Craemer)<br />

. VUB, Dept. Devt. Cooperation (J. Couder)<br />

. BTC (C. Michiels)<br />

. VLIR (F. Vermeulen)<br />

. DGOS (D. Molderez, A. Van Malderghem)<br />

314


Agenda<br />

Tuesday September 5, 2006 :<br />

Place: FBE (UGent), Bldg. E, room E009<br />

09.00–11.00 am : Flash presentations by alumni on background, current work, needs,<br />

demands for co-operation<br />

11.00–11.30 am : Break<br />

11.30-12.30 am : Discussion<br />

02.00–04.00 pm : Flash presentations by alumni on background, current work, needs,<br />

demands for co-operation (cont’d)<br />

04.00-04.30 pm : Break<br />

04.30-05.30 pm : Discussion<br />

6.00 pm : reception at the town hall and guided city walk<br />

Wednesday September 6, 2006 :<br />

Full day excursion:<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g time and meet<strong>in</strong>g place:<br />

7.30 am: Monasterium Poortackere, Oude Houtlei 56, 9000 Gent<br />

8.00 am: <strong>in</strong> front of the entrance hall of the build<strong>in</strong>g S8, De Sterre, Krijgslaan 281, 9000<br />

Gent<br />

Expected time of return: It is expected to leave from Brussels around 4.00 pm.<br />

Morn<strong>in</strong>g : Visit to the labs of ICP staff at the VUB (Brussels)<br />

Afternoon : Visit to the Royal Museum of Central Africa, Tervuren, dept.<br />

Teledetection<br />

Thursday September 7, 2006 :<br />

Visit to the labs of ICP-staff (UGent):<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g time: 15 m<strong>in</strong>utes before start of each tour (08.45 am and 01.45 pm respectively)<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g place: entrance hall of the build<strong>in</strong>g concerned (S8, Sterre and Bldg. B, FBE<br />

respectively)<br />

Note: a bus will pick up participants at the Monasterium at 8.30 am, with dest<strong>in</strong>ation the<br />

Sterre. A bus will take the participants at 12.00 am to the FBE for lunch and cont<strong>in</strong>uation of<br />

the visit there.<br />

315


Agenda<br />

place time nr. lab/dept.<br />

De Sterre, S8 09.00 – 12.00<br />

am<br />

(3 groups)<br />

FBE, bldg B 02.00 – 05.30<br />

pm<br />

(4 groups)<br />

FBE, bldg A By appo<strong>in</strong>tment 8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Friday September 8, 2006 :<br />

Place: FBE (UGent), Bldg. E<br />

09.00 – 12.30<br />

am<br />

break: 10.30-11.00 am<br />

02.00 – 05.30<br />

pm<br />

break: 03.30-04.00 pm<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

Lab. Soil Science<br />

Lab. Applied Geology & Hydrogeology<br />

Center for Remote Sens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Lab. Applied <strong>Physical</strong> Chemistry<br />

Lab. Analytical Chemistry & Applied Ecochemistry<br />

Lab. Soil Physics<br />

Lab. Soil Fertility & Data Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Lab. Hydrology & Water Management<br />

Dept. Applied Ecologie & Environmental Biology<br />

Dept. Applied Mathematics, Biometry & Process<br />

Regulation<br />

: Parallel theme-workshops based on papers and posters:<br />

� Theme A : Soil and groundwater pollution and<br />

remediation<br />

� Theme C : <strong>Land</strong> evaluation and land degradation<br />

: Parallel theme-workshops based on papers and posters :<br />

� Theme B : Integrated soil fertility management<br />

� Theme D : Soil survey and soil <strong>in</strong>ventory techniques<br />

� Theme E : Soil processes and analytical techniques<br />

7.30 pm : Workshop D<strong>in</strong>ner at Monasterium Poortackere, Oude Houtlei 56<br />

Saturday September 9, 2006 :<br />

Place: FBE (UGent), Bldg. E, room E010<br />

09.00 - 10.00<br />

am<br />

10.00 – 10.30<br />

am<br />

10.30 – 11.30<br />

am<br />

:<br />

:<br />

:<br />

Time for mak<strong>in</strong>g reports of the workshops<br />

Coffee break<br />

Report<strong>in</strong>g on theme workshops, conclusions<br />

11.30 am : Clos<strong>in</strong>g of the meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

316<br />

Room<br />

E010<br />

E009<br />

Room<br />

E009<br />

E010<br />

E015


Agenda<br />

317


List of Participants<br />

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS<br />

Dr. Héctor Morrás<br />

Instituto Nacional de Tecnolgia Agropecuaria (INTA), Centro de Investigación de Recursos<br />

Naturales (CIRn) - Instituto de Suelos<br />

Las Cabañas y Los Reseros, 1712 Castelar, Argent<strong>in</strong>a<br />

tel.: 54-1146211448 fax: 54-114811688 e-mail: hmorras@cirn.<strong>in</strong>ta.gov.ar<br />

Promotion: 1972, Soil Science<br />

Ms. Kather<strong>in</strong>e Verbeek<br />

Goed<strong>in</strong>genstraat 20, 9051 Afsnee, Belgium<br />

tel.: 0473/522513 fax: e-mail: kverbeek@skynet.be<br />

Promotion: 1982, Soil Science<br />

Prof. Boon Goh Tee<br />

University of Manitoba, Dept. Of Soil Science<br />

R3T 2NZ W<strong>in</strong>nipeg, Canada<br />

tel.: 204-4746046 fax: 204-4747642 e-mail: gohtb@ms.umanitoba.ca<br />

Promotion: 1978, Soil Science<br />

Dr. Youqi Chen<br />

National Institute of Natural <strong>Resources</strong> and Soil Science, CAAS,<br />

12 Zhong Guan Cun South Avenue, 100081 Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

tel.: 0086-10-68919638 fax: 0086-10-68976016<br />

e-mail: <br />

Promotion:<br />

Dr. J<strong>in</strong> Ke<br />

Soil and Fertilizers Institute,<br />

Baishiqiao 30, 100081 Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

tel.: 0086-10-68918672 fax: e-mail: ke-j<strong>in</strong>@hotmail.com<br />

Promotion: 2002? <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Prof. Dr. Tang Huajun<br />

National Institute of Natural <strong>Resources</strong> and Soil Science, CAAS,<br />

12 Zhong Guan South Ave., 100081 Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

tel.: 86-10-68919638 fax: 86-10-68976016<br />

e-mail: <br />

Promotion: 1993, Soil Science<br />

Prof. Dr., Dean Luhembwe Ngongo<br />

University of Lubumbashi,<br />

825 Lubumbashi, D.R. Congo<br />

tel.: 243-997027140 fax: e-mail: ngongoluhembwe@unilu.ac.cd<br />

Promotion: 1986, Soil Science<br />

318


List of Participants<br />

Prof. Jorge Valarezo<br />

Universidad Nacional de Loja-Ecuador,<br />

Ciudad Universitaria, La Argelia, 1101 Loja, Ecuador<br />

tel.: 593-72546671 fax: 593-72545054 e-mail: jivg1@yahoo.es<br />

Promotion: 1977, Soil Science<br />

Ing. M.Sc. Carlos Valarezo<br />

Universidad Nacional de Loja-Ecuador,<br />

Ciudad Universitaria "Guillermo Falconi" - La Argelia, 1101 Loja, Ecuador<br />

tel.: 93-72545054 fax: 593-72584802 e-mail: cvalarezo@softhome.net<br />

Promotion: 1978, Soil Science<br />

Dr. Ahmed Taalab<br />

National Research Centre,<br />

Tahrrer St., 12622 Dokki, Cairo, Egypt<br />

tel.: 123991830 fax: 2023371362 e-mail: astaalab@hotmail.com<br />

Promotion:<br />

Prof. Dr. Mohamed El-Badawi<br />

National Research Centre, Soil Dept.<br />

El-Bohouse St., 123 Dokki, Cairo, Egypt<br />

tel.: 20123707177 fax: 20123370931 e-mail: badawi2712@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1986, Ph.D. Soil Science<br />

Dr. Ageeb Gamil Waheeb<br />

National Research Centre,<br />

Al Bohos St., 12622 Dokki, Cairo, Egypt<br />

tel.: 202-0106833629 fax: 202-3370931 e-mail: gamilageeb@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1994, Soil Science<br />

Prof. Dr., President Mitiku Haile<br />

Mekelle University,<br />

P.O. Box 231, 231 Mekelle, Ethiopia<br />

tel.: 251-344402264 fax: 251-344409304 e-mail: gualmitiku@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1987, Soil Science<br />

Drs. Meklit Tariku<br />

Ugent, Dept. Soil Mant. & Soil Care<br />

Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, B 9000 Gent, Belgium<br />

tel.: fax: e-mail: Meklit.TarikuChernet@UGent.be<br />

Promotion: 2004, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Mr. Enoch Boateng<br />

CSIR-Soil Research Institute,<br />

P.O. Box 1132, Accra, Ghana<br />

tel.: 233-244732410 fax: 233-21778219 e-mail: soilri@ncs.com.gh<br />

Promotion: 1990, Soil Science<br />

319


List of Participants<br />

Mr. Ebenezer Abuaku<br />

University of Cape Coast, Dept. of Soil Science, School of Agriculture<br />

23342 Cape Coast, Ghana<br />

tel.: 233-244736051 fax: 233-21-774313 e-mail: ebentje@yahoo.co.uk<br />

Promotion: 2002, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Prof. Dr. Arif<strong>in</strong> Mahfud<br />

Padjadjaran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Soil Science<br />

Jl. Raya Sumedang km 21 Jat<strong>in</strong>angor, 46000 Bandung, Indonesia<br />

tel.: 062-22-7797200 fax: 062-22-7796316 e-mail: mahfud_arif<strong>in</strong>s@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion:<br />

ir. M.Sc. R<strong>in</strong>a Devnita<br />

Padjadjaran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Soil Science<br />

Jl. Raya Sumedang km 21 Jat<strong>in</strong>angor, 46000 Bandung, Indonesia<br />

tel.: 062-22-7797200 fax: e-mail: r<strong>in</strong>abursi@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1993, Soil Science<br />

Dr. Dian Fiantis<br />

University of Andalas, Dept. Of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture<br />

Kampus Unand Limau Manis, 25163 Padang, Indonesia<br />

tel.: 62-75128136 fax: 62-75172702 e-mail: dianfiantis@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1995, Soil Science<br />

Dr. A. Ariv<strong>in</strong> Rivaie<br />

Indonesian Centre for Estate Crops Research & Development,<br />

Jl. Tentara Pelajar n° 1, 16111 Bogor, Indonesia<br />

tel.: 62-251313083 fax: 62-251336194 e-mail: ariv<strong>in</strong>rivaie@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1998, Soil Science and Eremology<br />

Dr. Mugai Njue<br />

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Horticulture Department<br />

P.O. Box 62000, Nairobi, Kenya<br />

tel.: 722-337605 fax: e-mail: nmugai@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1982, Soil Science<br />

Dr. Philip Wandahwa<br />

Egerton University, Dept. Of Soil Science<br />

P.O. Box 536, Njoro, Kenya<br />

tel.: 254-733269460 fax: 254-5162527 e-mail: wandahwa2002@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1992, Soil Science<br />

Mr. Peter Njoroge Kamande<br />

University of Nairobi,<br />

P.O. Box 29053, Nairobi, Kenya<br />

tel.: 254-726378491 fax: e-mail: pnkamande2002@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 2005, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

320


List of Participants<br />

Prof. B<strong>in</strong> Jusop Shamshudd<strong>in</strong><br />

Universiti Putra Malaysia, Department of <strong>Land</strong> Management, Faculty of Agriculture<br />

43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia<br />

tel.: 603-89466985 fax: 603-89434419 e-mail: samsud<strong>in</strong>@agri.upm.edu.my<br />

Promotion: 1981, Soil Science<br />

Dr. Abdul Razzaq<br />

University of Agriculture, Dept. of Soil Science<br />

Faisalabad, Pakistan<br />

tel.: fax: e-mail:<br />

Promotion: 1969, Soil Science<br />

Dr. Renato Boniao<br />

MSU-NAAWAN,<br />

Naawan, Misamis Oriental, 9023 Naawan, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<br />

tel.: H/P # 063 63 9164958669 fax: e-mail: natsupm@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1996, Soil Science<br />

Prof. Rosa Poch<br />

Universitat de Lleida, Departament de Medi Ambient i Ciències del Sòl<br />

Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

tel.: 34973702621 fax: 34973702613 e-mail: rosa.poch@macs.udl.es<br />

Promotion: 1989, Soil Science<br />

Drs. Udayakantha Vitharana<br />

Ugent, Dept. Soil Mant. & Soil Care<br />

Coupure L<strong>in</strong>ks 653, B-9000 Gent, Belgium<br />

tel.: fax: e-mail: U.Vitharana@UGent.be<br />

Promotion: 2004, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

M.Sc. Chandra G. Algoe<br />

Anton de Kom Universiteit van Sur<strong>in</strong>ame, Faculteit der Technologische Wetenschappen<br />

Universiteitscomplex, Leysweg, POB 9212, Paramaribo, Sur<strong>in</strong>ame<br />

tel.: 465558 ext. 413 fax: 495005 e-mail: c.algoe@uvs.edu<br />

Promotion: 1999, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Dr. Somjate Pratumm<strong>in</strong>tra<br />

Department of Agriculture,<br />

Chatuchak, 10900 Bangkok, Thailand<br />

tel.: 66-2-5790574 fax: 66-2-9405472 e-mail: spratumm<strong>in</strong>@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 1996, Soil Science<br />

Dr. Gunay Erpul<br />

Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture, Soil Science Department<br />

06110 Ankara, Turkey<br />

tel.: 90-312/5961796 fax: 90-312/5171917 e-mail: Gunay.Erpul@agri.anakara.edu.tr<br />

Promotion: 1996, Eremology<br />

321


List of Participants<br />

Dr. Hasan Öztürk<br />

Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Soil Science<br />

06110 Diskapi, Ankara, Turkey<br />

tel.: 90-312-5961757 fax: 90-312-3178465 e-mail: hozturk@agri.ankara.edu.tr<br />

Promotion: 1997, Eremology<br />

Dr. Crammer Kayuki Kaizzi<br />

Kawanda Agricultural Research Institute (KARI),<br />

P.O. Box 7065, Kampala, Uganda<br />

tel.: 256-41567649696 fax: 256-41567649 e-mail: kckaizzi@hotmail.com<br />

Promotion: 1994, Soil Science<br />

M.Sc. Tran Thi Le Ha<br />

Hanoi Agricultural University, Faculty of <strong>Land</strong> and Environment, Department of Soil Science<br />

22A Duong S., Trau Quy, Gia Lam, 10700 Hanoi, Vietnam<br />

tel.: 84-912554602 fax: 84-48276554 e-mail: faithanoi@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 2000, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Mr. Dai Trung Nguyen<br />

Research Institute of Geology and M<strong>in</strong>eral <strong>Resources</strong>, Soil and <strong>Land</strong>use Dvision<br />

Nguyen Trai Road, km 9 + 200 Chien Thang Street, Thanh Xuan, 0084 Hanoi, Vietnam<br />

tel.: 84-4/8543107 fax: 84-4/8542125 e-mail: trung_nd@yahoo.com<br />

Promotion: 2001, <strong>Physical</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Sr. Lecturer, Director Khoa Le Van<br />

Can Tho University,<br />

3/2 Street, N<strong>in</strong>h Kieu District, Cantho City, Vietnam<br />

tel.: 84-71-832971 fax: 84-71-838474 e-mail: LVKhoa@ctu.edu.vn<br />

Promotion: 2002, Ph.D.<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!