Vatican Assassins

344
Vatican Assassins
“It seems to me that the privileges and immunities enumerated in these
[ten] amendments belong to every citizen of the United States. They
were universally so regarded prior to the adoption of the Fourteenth
Amendment. . . .I take it no one doubts that the great men who laid the
foundations of our government regarded the preservation of the
privileges and immunities specified in the first ten Amendments as vital
to the personal security of American citizens . . .
But, if I do not wholly misapprehend the scope and legal effect of the
present decision, the Constitution of the United States does not stand in
the way of any state striking down guaranties of life and liberty that
English-speaking people have for centuries regarded as vital to personal
security, and which the men of the revolutionary period universally
claimed as the birthright of freemen.” {11} [Emphasis added]
This same question was again before the Court in 1908. In Twining v. New
Jersey, 211 US 97, 105, 106 (1908), the majority opinion sealed forever the holding
of the Slaughterhouse Cases. Proceeding as if it were England’s King’s Bench or
the Pope’s Sacred Rota, it arrogantly declared:
“This view is based upon the contention which must now be examined,
that the safeguards of personal rights which are enumerated in the first
eight articles of amendment to the Federal Constitution, sometimes
called the Federal Bill of Rights though they were by those
Amendments originally secured only against national action, are among
the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, which this
th Am
clause of the 14 endment protects against state action. This view
has been, at different times, expressed by justices of this court . . . (Mr.
Justice Field . . . and Mr. Justice Harlan . . . ), and was undoubtedly that
entertained by some of those who framed the Amendment.
[The Court then gives its Jesuitical, absolutist, tyrannical decree, opening the door
for the Empire’s future fascist Roman Catholic, military dictatorship.]
It is, however, not profitable to examine the weighty arguments in its
favor, for the question is no longer open in the court.
The right of trial
by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7
right to bear arms, guaranteed by the 2 nd th
Amendment . . . and the
Amendment, have been
distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the
th
United States, guaranteed by the 14 Amendment
. . . the same decision
was made in respect of the guaranty against prosecution, except by
th
indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5 Amendment
. . . and in
The Jesuits – 1868 - 1872